Even with the very few bugs that may pop up, Firefox 3 beta 5 was still much better than firefox 2. that's why it was included in Ubuntu, at least, that's my assumption.
Small swarming insects are not more adaptive just from being small and swarming.
In fact right now the honeybee is quickly going from high population to endangered, and there's still no explanation why. That is only compounded by a significant number of new threats to their species.
When a "small swarming animal" like that can go from obscene levels of population to nearly nothing so fast it's very clear that they are NOT more adaptive. rather, they have simply filled a niche by nature, and are no longer there (or will be soon) since the niche is gone.
The problem with your "problem" is that it isn't a problem.
It's the same fallacy that dictates that the rabbit will never beat the turtle in a race if the turtle gets a head start, because by the time the rabbit catches up to where the turtle was, the turtle has since moved forward, even if he's moving slower. and ad infinitum, you can argue this case until the universe has collapsed in on itself, never actually passing the point at which the turtle gets passed by.
As long as you view things from only one perspective it is impossible to be sure of anything. Your argument isn't any less circular than theirs.
This is because companies put people in charge of finances who only care about minimizing costs. Eventually they'll realize that this is a horrible idea, but it's a mistake they have to learn not to make.
the downside from deregulation came from the fact that people's wages were artificially high from barriers to trade. when those barriers were removed they thought that they'd still be earning the same amount of money because people would naturally want to buy higher priced goods believing them to be higher quality.
Turns out that reputations for quality have to be built, and tend to be significantly more important in smaller economic communities, and are significantly weaker in global markets. Cost matters more when there are no barriers to trade. Naturally many people have issues with this, but it does eventually work out for the better.
I think they recognize that getting the information was as easy as walking through a door, and so they don't trust any security measures other than physical security.
Slashdot Mirror
Even with the very few bugs that may pop up, Firefox 3 beta 5 was still much better than firefox 2. that's why it was included in Ubuntu, at least, that's my assumption.
Admit it. If tequila is a virus, you don't want to be virus free.
Chad is INNOCENT!
Okay I have to stop you there.
Small swarming insects are not more adaptive just from being small and swarming.
In fact right now the honeybee is quickly going from high population to endangered, and there's still no explanation why. That is only compounded by a significant number of new threats to their species.
When a "small swarming animal" like that can go from obscene levels of population to nearly nothing so fast it's very clear that they are NOT more adaptive. rather, they have simply filled a niche by nature, and are no longer there (or will be soon) since the niche is gone.
At least they wiil appeal the ruling.
You could make that argument for most weapons that have killed people.
The problem with your "problem" is that it isn't a problem.
It's the same fallacy that dictates that the rabbit will never beat the turtle in a race if the turtle gets a head start, because by the time the rabbit catches up to where the turtle was, the turtle has since moved forward, even if he's moving slower. and ad infinitum, you can argue this case until the universe has collapsed in on itself, never actually passing the point at which the turtle gets passed by.
As long as you view things from only one perspective it is impossible to be sure of anything. Your argument isn't any less circular than theirs.
Younger than America, that's actually really impressive.
I didn't catch that. What kind of lawyer did you say he was?
I couldn't hear over all the people laughing.
oh, oh crap. When you posted that, my whole web page got ruined. thanks a bunch.
But where would you get a bridge in a place like that?
Hmm, perhaps someone should try to get a bill passed that would create one.
No good can come of this.
A botnet is like a disease. Not a bomb. Deliberately infecting your own computers is a horrible idea.
DNA.
This is because companies put people in charge of finances who only care about minimizing costs. Eventually they'll realize that this is a horrible idea, but it's a mistake they have to learn not to make.
I was worried I'd have to pirate it.
On the contrary, It's people like NewYorkCountryLawyer who are ruining the perfectly good reputation of lawyers by giving people hope.
I KNEW IT!
I totally knew they were pirates all along!
How about showing you the history of it, and the good and bad that's come of it?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/
the downside from deregulation came from the fact that people's wages were artificially high from barriers to trade. when those barriers were removed they thought that they'd still be earning the same amount of money because people would naturally want to buy higher priced goods believing them to be higher quality.
Turns out that reputations for quality have to be built, and tend to be significantly more important in smaller economic communities, and are significantly weaker in global markets. Cost matters more when there are no barriers to trade. Naturally many people have issues with this, but it does eventually work out for the better.
"Data Mining In Law Enforcement"
I'll take "How do you round up the most possible innocent people and make false charges against them" for $500, Alex...
In the demo for Alien Vs Predator 2, there's a part where the floor falls out from under you.
Keep in mind that there hasn't been a single alien in the game prior to this point.
I unloaded a full clip of ammo and several grenades into the walls.
That wasn't scared?
...So why not study the air pollution in a place where there's more of it?
You have plenty of options.
Well, there can be only one.
I don't think that's it.
I think they recognize that getting the information was as easy as walking through a door, and so they don't trust any security measures other than physical security.
Et tu, Jerry?
So who wrote that summary?
Richard Simmons, or the Oxy Clean guy?
new tag: toomanyexclamations.
seriously, it's a real turn off.