1) The story only claims that he was arrested, which is still correct, and is not inconsistent with being released.
2) "This person's situation has been totally resolved" is categorically false. Spending three days in jail for no reason doesn't get resolved when the victim is released, just as an assault isn't resolved because the perp stops attacking someone.
It's actually closer to the far-infrared, but one of the interesting things about the technology is that it bridges a gap in the electromagnetic spectrum between regions traditionally thought to be completely different - electronics and antennas at low frequencies and optics at high frequencies. It's only recently that the technology has opened up the region, so it isn't entirely obvious what to call the radiation.
Only because the general population uses the term "imply" in a different context to mathematicians/statisticians/logicians.
The original objection to "correlation does not imply causation" is as flawed as objecting to "an astronaut will weigh less on the moon" because one can confuse mass and weight. The definition intended is clear from the context, and the statement is 100% correct. It isn't pedantry to object to the phrase, it's ignorance.
Slashdot Mirror
Want an example: ever had sex without being married?
You do realise who you are asking, don't you?
So they've compressed it to 11. I'd say that's a step forward.
Me too. My limit was $502402000000.
Except for two things:
1) The story only claims that he was arrested, which is still correct, and is not inconsistent with being released.
2) "This person's situation has been totally resolved" is categorically false. Spending three days in jail for no reason doesn't get resolved when the victim is released, just as an assault isn't resolved because the perp stops attacking someone.
Fuel consummation?
I don't think I want to know what that means.
I'm... grrrrh.... ugh... receiving... argh... a fax.
Correction: "Blue-shifted microwaves"
Perhaps TFA should have mentioned that.
Wait... 100% redundant what?
It's actually closer to the far-infrared, but one of the interesting things about the technology is that it bridges a gap in the electromagnetic spectrum between regions traditionally thought to be completely different - electronics and antennas at low frequencies and optics at high frequencies. It's only recently that the technology has opened up the region, so it isn't entirely obvious what to call the radiation.
This is why they call them "Smart" sunglasses - it's relative to their wearers.
Ewe shore a boot fat?
More importantly, Slashdotters may now be able to reproduce.
That could be of Biblical proportions.
Well there used to be Jews in Germany. I wonder what happened to them.
You have selected Allow. Cancel or Allow?
Not to mention a paicent. I think they're ninjas or something.
Only because the general population uses the term "imply" in a different context to mathematicians/statisticians/logicians.
The original objection to "correlation does not imply causation" is as flawed as objecting to "an astronaut will weigh less on the moon" because one can confuse mass and weight. The definition intended is clear from the context, and the statement is 100% correct. It isn't pedantry to object to the phrase, it's ignorance.
I sure hope so. They have better music down there.
We did not get pubic lice from other hominids. We got them from the ancestors of gorillas." Just.... Dude.
NASA has fired astronauts before, people. Apollo 1, Challenger, Columbia... all "fired" for various reasons. /...17 in the ashtray
I think you'll find they're made in the U.S. Expect W. to declare a War on Chimps some time soon. Er, wait a minute...