SO WHAT?
Does the term "irrelevant" mean nothing to you, you anonymous dumbass? They have the itinerary, they checked the passports, and the laws as is - from what I've read = don't require the RFID chip to be functional/valid.
Considering ALL godwin says is that the onger a discussion drags on, the more likely the reference to Nazis, Hitler, etc would be made, so what? The law doesn't do more than to point out an inevitability, and I wish SOME of the people out there who scream Godwin would get that.
Allowing users to download copyrighted content" in of itself means nothing.
Everything is copyrighted that can under current law, and the illegality comes from the sharing ILLEGALLY - as in WITHOUT PERMISSION. If I make a work, copyright it, and share it freely expecting / allowing others to do so, we're sharing copyrighted works legally.
In before "you know what I meant" - MOST people don't, and that doesn't make it ok to be factually wrong wither.
You're law-abiding until you decide to do something against the law, but you can be detained or arrested without actually breaking / or having broken the law.
Don't internet tough guys get defined by talking tough and being in real life all bark no bite? Taking down websites en masse like that, being able to hack and disrupt websites, and DOING so doesn't sound, to me, like the definition of ITG.
So? If it meets the textbook definition of an operating system, IT'S A FUCKING OPERATING SYSTEM regardless of who uses it or not, or any %s you throw - oh wait, if you had an iota of intellect, you'd already know that.
Hmm, seems to me you are taking the time to justify the fact that you have nothing more than gross generalizations and hollow arguments to make. Where's the "-1 moron" moderation when you need it?
Riding a subway is not a right. When you enter a subway station you are entering a secure area and anyone in that secure area can be inspected. You can decline inspection by leaving.
I hope that like with the MSFS series before it [having legit 2002, 2004 disks, and having torrented 95 for the hell of it] that even though THIS will be DLC driven that users can still do their own addons [scenery, airports, models, AI, etc] - and that there will be backwards compatability for aircraft models.
But music, movies, photos, paintings, etc are not ideas, but a combination of ideas. [just nitpicking]. And I personally don't see copyright infringement as complete loss of that control, since one of the features built in is the ability to go after those who infringe on that right... hope those thoughts make sense. I'm not a morning person.
"Alec Liu of Fox News reports that Amazon, Facebook and Google are considering a coordinated a coordinated blackout of the internet to protest SOPA, the Stop Online Privacy Act... *SNIP*
PIRACY act, it's the Stop Online PIRACY act. Talk about a grammar failure./GrammarNazi.
So, I get a CD as a gift. I got it legally, but didn't pay for it.
Yeah, if you define it purely on payment or lack thereof when situations to the contrary are bountiful, you need to rethink your overly narrow definition.
Yeah, we should stop complaining about the TSA, the ineptitude, rudeness,inefficiency, invasiveness that exists all because of a claim you make that doesn't exist logically, in actuality. Right.
Slashdot Mirror
SO WHAT? Does the term "irrelevant" mean nothing to you, you anonymous dumbass? They have the itinerary, they checked the passports, and the laws as is - from what I've read = don't require the RFID chip to be functional/valid.
And you're stupid if you think that the moderator pool is any indication as to the existance of "groupthink" or not.
I don't think that was being called into question by the one you were replying to, but simply that the analogy is not the best in his opinion.
It's only the "I want to be able to infringe copyright" party to a moron who slanders instead of looking up facts.
Please, mod this jackass post troll - judged by his gross generalizations and contrived attempts at flaming.
Butt hey were too big and fat, so they all died and turned into oil. And then the Arabs came, and they all bought Mercedes Benzs.
Shit, now I want to watch Airplane!
By bullshit, you mean like the gross generalizations, and dishonest painting of all /. users who post on a particular issue?
Since when was not ruling against kalediescape and being supportive of copyright laws ever mutually exclusive?
Considering ALL godwin says is that the onger a discussion drags on, the more likely the reference to Nazis, Hitler, etc would be made, so what? The law doesn't do more than to point out an inevitability, and I wish SOME of the people out there who scream Godwin would get that.
Allowing users to download copyrighted content" in of itself means nothing. Everything is copyrighted that can under current law, and the illegality comes from the sharing ILLEGALLY - as in WITHOUT PERMISSION. If I make a work, copyright it, and share it freely expecting / allowing others to do so, we're sharing copyrighted works legally. In before "you know what I meant" - MOST people don't, and that doesn't make it ok to be factually wrong wither.
You're law-abiding until you decide to do something against the law, but you can be detained or arrested without actually breaking / or having broken the law.
Don't internet tough guys get defined by talking tough and being in real life all bark no bite? Taking down websites en masse like that, being able to hack and disrupt websites, and DOING so doesn't sound, to me, like the definition of ITG.
Yeah, 'cause you're the absolute arbiter of what reasons are real or not, right. *rolls eyes*
So? If it meets the textbook definition of an operating system, IT'S A FUCKING OPERATING SYSTEM regardless of who uses it or not, or any %s you throw - oh wait, if you had an iota of intellect, you'd already know that.
Hmm, seems to me you are taking the time to justify the fact that you have nothing more than gross generalizations and hollow arguments to make. Where's the "-1 moron" moderation when you need it?
I thought the OPEN act was meant to be an ALTERNATIVE to SOPA.
The way some of my profs talk about it, you'd think they were ready to strangle the people behind Blackboard with the problems it has.
Riding a subway is not a right. When you enter a subway station you are entering a secure area and anyone in that secure area can be inspected. You can decline inspection by leaving.
Citation needed, bro.
Yout "truism" doesn't apply when it is on public property AND/or with GOVERNMENT agencies, or at least, in theory that [should] be the case.
I hope that like with the MSFS series before it [having legit 2002, 2004 disks, and having torrented 95 for the hell of it] that even though THIS will be DLC driven that users can still do their own addons [scenery, airports, models, AI, etc] - and that there will be backwards compatability for aircraft models.
But music, movies, photos, paintings, etc are not ideas, but a combination of ideas. [just nitpicking]. And I personally don't see copyright infringement as complete loss of that control, since one of the features built in is the ability to go after those who infringe on that right... hope those thoughts make sense. I'm not a morning person.
"Alec Liu of Fox News reports that Amazon, Facebook and Google are considering a coordinated a coordinated blackout of the internet to protest SOPA, the Stop Online Privacy Act ... *SNIP*
PIRACY act, it's the Stop Online PIRACY act. Talk about a grammar failure. /GrammarNazi.
So, I get a CD as a gift. I got it legally, but didn't pay for it.
Yeah, if you define it purely on payment or lack thereof when situations to the contrary are bountiful, you need to rethink your overly narrow definition.
No ... just no.
"you should have blah blah" WELL HE DIDN'T, really, what is the point of subjective opinions like that?
Yeah, we should stop complaining about the TSA, the ineptitude, rudeness ,inefficiency, invasiveness that exists all because of a claim you make that doesn't exist logically, in actuality. Right.