Your forgetting that companies reclaim the VAT they paid when the sell something; so the effective VAT at each stage is only charged on the additional value of the goods that happened at that stage, hence the name Value Added Tax.
Not quite; it is no so much a hole in the goatse sense, but rather an lack of anything at all. If anything it is where the Invisible Pink Unicorn lives.
if( bool prompt( $cop, "Be honest, is he really drunk?") )
$input = BreathSample::get_ethanol_content_as_u32(); else
$input = rand(50,200); Or so I would guess.
Ah, but they are a part of the EEA, same difference but for they don't have any MEPs or or a member in the council of ministers; they still (in most cases) need to implement EU directives (such as the EUCD).
That seems like a far reaching definition of theft, in English law it's only "A person is guilty of theft, if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it". Under this receiving the wrong change or being under-billed is not thief, unless you dishonestly took part in the transaction the the intent to be undercharged. This seems better to me; as you could of only become aware of the mistake when it would be inconvenient to correct it.
While the BBFC are indeed a private company their decisions do have legal bearing because they are the (current) official film classifier as decided by the Home Secretary under the Video Recordings Act. Their decisions don't have any effect on "private member clubs", and can be overruled for cinemas by local councils (what your talking about); but for all retail selling or renting they do have full effect so this does for all intents ban the game.
Funny how you mention that, the BBFC was given their legal powers to ban films (and computer games) as a result of the "Video Nasties" campaign of the british press in the 80's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_nasties
Well for my market demographic (18-25 year old male), the extortionate insurance rates are more due my peers' reckless abandonment of safety then any degree of intent to defraud the insurance company; or so would be my guess. Would your experience match this?
I would say that royalties are not the decisive factor in the state UK radio, I would personally put it that the BBC and stronger regulation has saved the UK from the likes of Clear Channel. Clear Channel, in the UK own a great many venues, and to some extend operates some large festivals (Glastonbury is the first that comes to mind); the latter of which involves paying the artists.
At a somewhat interesting side note they are also one of the largest billboard advertising companies in the UK.
It works alright for me in Seamonkey 1.1.1 on linux, maybe you have disabled something that messes it up. That being said the design is awful, though not quite as bad as http://www.parliament.uk/.
No, I think he meant TRUCKS, the aluminum would only clog the tubes, So while the Internet is not a truck you can just dump things on, you would still need the truck to drive your aluminum-oxide alloy powered car.
Slashdot Mirror
They're called biscuits, Penfold.
Neither the slashdot department or its parent ministry are not in are in charge of Gundam.
>>I follow the law of my King.
I'm sorry Elvis is dead, did you not get the memo?
Thats only proof that he (and his server) got hit by a flying chair...
Your forgetting that companies reclaim the VAT they paid when the sell something; so the effective VAT at each stage is only charged on the additional value of the goods that happened at that stage, hence the name Value Added Tax.
You FSM freaks, your faith is illogical.
Not quite; it is no so much a hole in the goatse sense, but rather an lack of anything at all. If anything it is where the Invisible Pink Unicorn lives.
if( bool prompt( $cop, "Be honest, is he really drunk?") )
$input = BreathSample::get_ethanol_content_as_u32();
else
$input = rand(50,200);
Or so I would guess.
Ah, but they are a part of the EEA, same difference but for they don't have any MEPs or or a member in the council of ministers; they still (in most cases) need to implement EU directives (such as the EUCD).
That seems like a far reaching definition of theft, in English law it's only "A person is guilty of theft, if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it".
Under this receiving the wrong change or being under-billed is not thief, unless you dishonestly took part in the transaction the the intent to be undercharged. This seems better to me; as you could of only become aware of the mistake when it would be inconvenient to correct it.
Because he's ALICE.
>I didn't even know her number for the first month.
Nor `her' gender.
Sorry, I'll resist next time.
While the BBFC are indeed a private company their decisions do have legal bearing because they are the (current) official film classifier as decided by the Home Secretary under the Video Recordings Act. Their decisions don't have any effect on "private member clubs", and can be overruled for cinemas by local councils (what your talking about); but for all retail selling or renting they do have full effect so this does for all intents ban the game.
Funny how you mention that, the BBFC was given their legal powers to ban films (and computer games) as a result of the "Video Nasties" campaign of the british press in the 80's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_nasties
Well for my market demographic (18-25 year old male), the extortionate insurance rates are more due my peers' reckless abandonment of safety then any degree of intent to defraud the insurance company; or so would be my guess. Would your experience match this?
As has yours, and mine also I suppose.
Drats, whats my compliant again?
I think you misunderstood the spirit of those two statements, it was (I presume) very much tongue-in-cheek.
You don't know just how correct that statement is.
I would think Homo Ballmus would be be better, personally.
>Then they came for the Volkswagons...
And forced them to make the beetle, I didn't speak up because I wasn't a person.
I would say that royalties are not the decisive factor in the state UK radio, I would personally put it that the BBC and stronger regulation has saved the UK from the likes of Clear Channel. Clear Channel, in the UK own a great many venues, and to some extend operates some large festivals (Glastonbury is the first that comes to mind); the latter of which involves paying the artists.
At a somewhat interesting side note they are also one of the largest billboard advertising companies in the UK.
It works alright for me in Seamonkey 1.1.1 on linux, maybe you have disabled something that messes it up. That being said the design is awful, though not quite as bad as http://www.parliament.uk/.
No, I think he meant TRUCKS, the aluminum would only clog the tubes, So while the Internet is not a truck you can just dump things on, you would still need the truck to drive your aluminum-oxide alloy powered car.
Yes, next question.
Oh, I'm sorry. Thanks for the correction.