The vaccine is only 97% effective and herd immunity requires about 93...95% immunity. There are people that cannot be vaccinated due to no fault of their own, in particular children too young. They will get sick though and have a real risk of permanent problems or long-term problems and a small risk of death. Want to restate your question?
Actually, not that clever. Productivity with this schedule is massively lower than with a 40h work-week and costs are massively higher. Unless the actual benefits outweigh that...
To be fair, it was not really difficult to trick Trump. Because it was indeed obvious from the start and Trump either does not even have the minimal business-savvy to see that or he simply did not care. (Never attribute to maliciousness what can be adequately explained by stupidity, but Trump has both in spades...)
It is even worse: The productivity you get this way is wayyyy lower than with a 40h week. I can only think it is some idea that the underclass has to be tortured and a tiny number of those that take the torture without complaining and ask for more can be lifted up.
It is even worse than that: Preaching hard work will get _him_ less money, because individual productivity peaks at around 40h/week and drops above that. This guy mast have gotten really lucky, because he does not even understand the basics of work. Not that different from the average CEO, though.
Indeed. This stupidity constantly amazes me. The 40h work week goes back to Henry Ford, as far as I know, and he was certainly not under any suspicion of wanting to do anything nice for his workers. The plain unadorned fact is that at 40h/week work, productivity peaks for manual workers and it is even lower for mental workers. Work more, be _less_ productive and less valuable to your employer.
There are some very old studied done by Henry Ford and others. They wanted to optimize worker efficiency. They found that the best outcome is at 8h per day, 5 days a week for manual work and 6h per day, 5 days a week for mental work. Work more and your productivity drops due to mistakes, sick-days (even if uncompensated, you are still not working) and other effects.
Of course, the US has forgotten that and China has probably never found out. In both cases, the mistaken thinking is that the more you exploit your workers, the better the profits. That is patently untrue, but requires dropping greed and the superiority complex of the average capitalist and rationally looking at facts instead. Few people with money or a deep desire for money are capable of that.
True, it is the peace of the grave and of people too exhausted to even think about what kind of country they live in and how that is pretty bad, but it certainly works. Exhausted workers start no riots.
This is just one of the effects. Of course, Foxconn has no intentions doing an economically demented move. But tricking the, ahem, "stable genius" in the white house, why not? It is the job of politics to keep companies like Foxconn under control and if politics proves incapable, everybody suffers.
Oh, decidedly not Orwellian yet. But the direction and the eventual use of this data is clear, even if it still will take a while. The economy going to hell in a totalitarian state is also clear. This universally happens, unless there is a lot of riches to sell, e.g. as the Saudis have. But look at Venezuela, which has a lot of oil too and people now have trouble getting enough to eat. Also, what happens to the Saudis when the oil runs out or becomes worthless is also pretty clear. They do not produce anything, they just sell a finite resource that is already there.
Slashdot Mirror
The vaccine is only 97% effective and herd immunity requires about 93...95% immunity. There are people that cannot be vaccinated due to no fault of their own, in particular children too young. They will get sick though and have a real risk of permanent problems or long-term problems and a small risk of death. Want to restate your question?
Anyways, I have stopped caring since Episode 1.
Because in any sane legal system, it is.
Nah. For the high performers, the extra hours will be productive
They are not. This myth is pervasive though.
Don't think that is possible. This is based on electronic records.
Actually, not that clever. Productivity with this schedule is massively lower than with a 40h work-week and costs are massively higher. Unless the actual benefits outweigh that...
He did not care for anything but maximizing his profits.
Here is some starting-point with lots of references for you if you really find yourself google-challenged: https://www.askspoke.com/blog/...
Get help, urgently.
To be fair, it was not really difficult to trick Trump. Because it was indeed obvious from the start and Trump either does not even have the minimal business-savvy to see that or he simply did not care. (Never attribute to maliciousness what can be adequately explained by stupidity, but Trump has both in spades...)
It is even worse: The productivity you get this way is wayyyy lower than with a 40h week. I can only think it is some idea that the underclass has to be tortured and a tiny number of those that take the torture without complaining and ask for more can be lifted up.
It is even worse than that: Preaching hard work will get _him_ less money, because individual productivity peaks at around 40h/week and drops above that. This guy mast have gotten really lucky, because he does not even understand the basics of work. Not that different from the average CEO, though.
Indeed. And not everybody has so little to offer as a person that they need "success" to be able to feel they are somebody.
Indeed. This stupidity constantly amazes me. The 40h work week goes back to Henry Ford, as far as I know, and he was certainly not under any suspicion of wanting to do anything nice for his workers. The plain unadorned fact is that at 40h/week work, productivity peaks for manual workers and it is even lower for mental workers. Work more, be _less_ productive and less valuable to your employer.
If you put all your energy into work, you are not living, plain and simple. Any imagined "success" you work towards is meaningless.
There are some very old studied done by Henry Ford and others. They wanted to optimize worker efficiency. They found that the best outcome is at 8h per day, 5 days a week for manual work and 6h per day, 5 days a week for mental work. Work more and your productivity drops due to mistakes, sick-days (even if uncompensated, you are still not working) and other effects.
Of course, the US has forgotten that and China has probably never found out. In both cases, the mistaken thinking is that the more you exploit your workers, the better the profits. That is patently untrue, but requires dropping greed and the superiority complex of the average capitalist and rationally looking at facts instead. Few people with money or a deep desire for money are capable of that.
True, it is the peace of the grave and of people too exhausted to even think about what kind of country they live in and how that is pretty bad, but it certainly works. Exhausted workers start no riots.
This is just one of the effects. Of course, Foxconn has no intentions doing an economically demented move. But tricking the, ahem, "stable genius" in the white house, why not? It is the job of politics to keep companies like Foxconn under control and if politics proves incapable, everybody suffers.
Ah, so even more worthless...
Oh, decidedly not Orwellian yet. But the direction and the eventual use of this data is clear, even if it still will take a while. The economy going to hell in a totalitarian state is also clear. This universally happens, unless there is a lot of riches to sell, e.g. as the Saudis have. But look at Venezuela, which has a lot of oil too and people now have trouble getting enough to eat. Also, what happens to the Saudis when the oil runs out or becomes worthless is also pretty clear. They do not produce anything, they just sell a finite resource that is already there.
Make sense. Reactive protocol design is pretty much an assured failure.
No? Then it is not a security guide or rather one that is worthless...
(I assume it does not. In good /. tradition, I have not looked at the documents...)
Well, you started it. I doubt you are smart enough to see it though.
Learn some history. Get some perspective.
Instead I will just not listen to idiots like you.
I mean, how obvious does it have to get?
No. And since this is an IT problem, even less so.