You just agreed. Those posts confirm that it is irrelevant to java software, unless apple was so committed to both to add an entire new api to their java that no one else would have yet, that no software would use yet.
Sure, these things are possible, if only we *completely* change the way we do things. We'd have to do much more labor-intensive farming, we'd have to reverse our trend *away* from density to this amazing density proposed in the link.
Uh, wrong. There's an extensive set of standards within a variety of jurisdictions which are legally enforced.
It might not be as clear as you'd like, nationally, or worldwide, and it's under lobbying attack over time, but it's clear enough to the required inspectors.
Your parent post is correct. Methodology is either the study of methods or a system or organized approach or set of methods. A few methods does not make a methodology at all.
It's pretty easily shown that Pol Pot and company had their own breed of dogma which occupied exactly the same kind of mental slot that religion has had for many other "justified" horror shows.
This both agrees and disagrees with your premise. No, religion doesn't have an exclusive lock on this sort of crap. Yes, it does participate frequently.
Braid had a pleasant look, but I found it a *terrible* game. I have no idea at all why people fawn over its so.
Re:I finally could tell my friend to go to hell
on
Windows 95 Turns 15
·
· Score: 1
OS/2 crashed any time I copied more than 10 files at once.
I'm sure that was driver stability, but that's the point. I had the most common Adaptec SCSI card at the time. Maybe Adaptec are idiots, but it worked great in win95.
Sure, but governements pretty much always have mechanisms to guarantee sufficient food production. Most countries use a fixed pricing structure which is adjusted to work, while the US uses a more problematic fixed subsidy-per-creation model.
In other words, food production is not really a problem in need of an economic solution. That one is well-explored.
As for spending per capita, city dwellers are not subsidised.
If you switched for ZFS without carefully considering whether it would meaningfully help for your particular use cases, you probably spent a lot of money and effort for no gain.
For most people, ZFS is a cpu-sink that offers slightly more convenient volume management, at a high price for hardware overhead and latency.
But you have to use it on solaris, because their UFS infrastructure is so out of date, you can't support a reasonable number of spindles (without investing even MORE money in moving that problem off the box entirely).
It has some neat whizzy bits, but those whizzy bits are not at all free, and things most people seem to not need.
I pretty much avoid or minimize the multiplayer component of any multiplayer game. Games designed entirely around multiplayer I simply do not purchase at all.
My reasons are:
* Other people online are jerks. I have no time for jerks in any part of my life, especially recreation.
* Multiplayer games are invariably about very confrontational competition (I win, you lose.) I am not big on competition, but I'm fine with it if it's not too confrontational, if it doesn't involve limiting the actions of the loser. Board games have found their way out of those holes, but computer/video games have yet to figure it out.
* Cooperative games expect long play sessions, and involve too much scheduling which is tedious, and requires everyone to purchase the same game.
* Multiplayer games have no opportunity for personal experience with the story, place, setting, etc. Multiplayer, even when grouped with friends, has severe pacing issues, which are difficult to overcome.
People have different abilities to mental gymnastics, and apparently your ability to view a situation from multiple angles at once is not very developed. Becoming aware of this is a big advantage.
Paypal seizes funds and then suggests for you to beg for them back. Many people have never received their funds back from paypal.
Even if they are 'following regulations' or whatever, I don't care. I don't give my money to people who are thieves, or who have some piece of paper that says that they have to be thieves. It doesn't much matter to me WHY you can't be trusted with money. It's sufficient to know that you can't be trusted.
Slashdot Mirror
But you phrase it in a self-defeating way. Apparently the value of the game, for you, is that other people can't win.
I don't think that's what you really mean.
You just agreed. Those posts confirm that it is irrelevant to java software, unless apple was so committed to both to add an entire new api to their java that no one else would have yet, that no software would use yet.
Sure, these things are possible, if only we *completely* change the way we do things. We'd have to do much more labor-intensive farming, we'd have to reverse our trend *away* from density to this amazing density proposed in the link.
The problem is we are not doing these things.
Only because we have cheap power sources. We'll see how that plays out.
Yeah, why not just put all western domains under .latin. (uhhh....)
Uh, wrong. There's an extensive set of standards within a variety of jurisdictions which are legally enforced.
It might not be as clear as you'd like, nationally, or worldwide, and it's under lobbying attack over time, but it's clear enough to the required inspectors.
Bizarre. I have never ever heard this sentiment in my entire life. I wonder what is different about our scenarios.
dstat provides _per process_ per disk io usage data in relatively fine grained sampling windows?
That's what iotop provides, mind you.
Your parent post is correct. Methodology is either the study of methods or a system or organized approach or set of methods. A few methods does not make a methodology at all.
It's pretty easily shown that Pol Pot and company had their own breed of dogma which occupied exactly the same kind of mental slot that religion has had for many other "justified" horror shows.
This both agrees and disagrees with your premise. No, religion doesn't have an exclusive lock on this sort of crap. Yes, it does participate frequently.
Braid had a pleasant look, but I found it a *terrible* game. I have no idea at all why people fawn over its so.
OS/2 crashed any time I copied more than 10 files at once.
I'm sure that was driver stability, but that's the point. I had the most common Adaptec SCSI card at the time. Maybe Adaptec are idiots, but it worked great in win95.
Must everything be partisan?
Sure, but governements pretty much always have mechanisms to guarantee sufficient food production. Most countries use a fixed pricing structure which is adjusted to work, while the US uses a more problematic fixed subsidy-per-creation model.
In other words, food production is not really a problem in need of an economic solution. That one is well-explored.
As for spending per capita, city dwellers are not subsidised.
Duh, it depends upon:
- your contract
- the laws in your jurisdiction
If you switched for ZFS without carefully considering whether it would meaningfully help for your particular use cases, you probably spent a lot of money and effort for no gain.
For most people, ZFS is a cpu-sink that offers slightly more convenient volume management, at a high price for hardware overhead and latency.
But you have to use it on solaris, because their UFS infrastructure is so out of date, you can't support a reasonable number of spindles (without investing even MORE money in moving that problem off the box entirely).
It has some neat whizzy bits, but those whizzy bits are not at all free, and things most people seem to not need.
I pretty much avoid or minimize the multiplayer component of any multiplayer game. Games designed entirely around multiplayer I simply do not purchase at all.
My reasons are:
* Other people online are jerks. I have no time for jerks in any part of my life, especially recreation.
* Multiplayer games are invariably about very confrontational competition (I win, you lose.) I am not big on competition, but I'm fine with it if it's not too confrontational, if it doesn't involve limiting the actions of the loser. Board games have found their way out of those holes, but computer/video games have yet to figure it out.
* Cooperative games expect long play sessions, and involve too much scheduling which is tedious, and requires everyone to purchase the same game.
* Multiplayer games have no opportunity for personal experience with the story, place, setting, etc. Multiplayer, even when grouped with friends, has severe pacing issues, which are difficult to overcome.
This article confirms my limited experience.
Of course, gay men also score higher in all these categories.
I think this probably implies a wide variety of things, and from my *many* experiences, I think they're probably all partially true.
Part of it is funny, and part of it is bad.
People have different abilities to mental gymnastics, and apparently your ability to view a situation from multiple angles at once is not very developed. Becoming aware of this is a big advantage.
If that were true, there would be no issues with distributing and selling patented software, only running it.
Imagine instead: people driving less.
It's only socialist if your idea of socialism is "government controls money", which is not anything close to an accurate understanding.
Paypal seizes funds and then suggests for you to beg for them back.
Many people have never received their funds back from paypal.
Even if they are 'following regulations' or whatever, I don't care. I don't give my money to people who are thieves, or who have some piece of paper that says that they have to be thieves. It doesn't much matter to me WHY you can't be trusted with money. It's sufficient to know that you can't be trusted.
The point is if you actually select a relevant timeframe, you'll find the right answer.
If only you understood the things you took such trouble to comment on.
Your complaint is that the WGII contains non-peer reviewed non-scientific materiel. That is its goal and its charter.
Sky blue today. Film at 11.