This is a gross misrepresentation of relationship of free speech and violence.
You forgot abot common sense, rationality and science that should precede as factors even before any consideration of whether thia will violate free speech or not.
One of the largest post WW2 genocides occurred in Central Africa, and it was fueled by unchecked radio hate speech.
>Naziism isn't really an ideology -- not like socialism, communism, or capitalism for that matter. It is too profoundly anti-intellectual to be one
Nicely formulated. I would add: the anti-intellectuallity of it stems from the pure animal nature of xenophobia which is foundation of Nazism. People who sincerely believe in Nazi ideology are literally animals, devoid of humanity.
Now the other part you said is true as well: intellectuals join this movement as well for different reasons: power, insanity of not recognizing the obvious, etc.
True human ideology has none of this: quite often leaders sincerely believe in it as well.
Any human ideology is strikingly defiantly anti-animalistic: it negates animal nature in humans.
All of them involve the essential notion of self-sacrifice for the common good, 100% human feature. The foundation of ideology have nothing to do with humanity and involve some ideal concept (God, equality, abstract moral concepts).
I, the benevolent lord of/., impose an obligatory minimum Youtube tax on every eclipse watcher. If you do not make a nice video of this, you are just worthless waster of my oxygen.
Suppression of males have been a common thing in the 70s in Soviet Russia. I would say significantly more than now in Western world. The results were devastating: substance abuse was widespread among young males. It's not a liberal phenomenon. It's a phenomenon in oppressive society. The good thing is that these society never lived long enough to worry and the thing that happened to commies worldwide will happen to all those who forgot the lessons of history.
I think this reflects the nature of the language. It's not that language eventually and spectacularly became what Orwell has predicted in 1948, it just it became that so quickly. Not only the words mean the opposite nowadays, they are quickly switching the meaning.
Even the pronouns. Apparently, "they" has now "singular they", "marriage" is no longer a organized sex between men and women, "spokesman" is an offensive word.
Once you start allowing language losing it's stability, the very basic ground of rational communication disappears.
And that is the main problem nowadays: defiantly anti-science attitude. Not from "flat-earthers", not from "climate" deniers, but from the establishment which on the words claims to be defending science, but in reality attacks scientific reasoning on everyday basis.
Take Google Manifesto, for example. The man expressed offensive scientific statistical observation and got fired for that. Take James Watson. The man expressed offensive scientific statistical observation and got fired for that.
People in Austria jailed for mere questioning the official history.
This is in turn a result of further objective devaluation of science as meaningful human activity. Basic science, physics, is almost over.
I know, I sound like Lord Kelvin, but listen to the reason why he said this hilariously mistaken observation. There is the end, there is the end to everything, and that includes our objective knowledge about basic things.
And we reached it. But scientists are still there, so they increasingly do unscientific things presenting it as science: technology, politicking, manipulating data, making careers, cranking up grants.
That's why we are here, talking language we can't understand, doing things that nobody needs.
Thr whole Western system is about hypocrisy, which often nowadays went to absurd levels.
Gay marriage aloud, polygamy is a crime.
Going butt naked is aloud, but putting on a headscarf is a crime.
Mere extrapolation of the level of scientific understanding millions of years into the past is a law, but if you state obvious biological differences between races or genders, you are a bigoted Nobel laureate or Harvard PhD.
Slashdot Mirror
>. If you don't know who Harry (not Henry, derp) Anslinger is, I highly suggest you read up.
Why don't you go and shove your stupid poison up your ass, legalizer imbecile?
>The answer to hate speech has always been more free speech
No. You are worshiping free speech, which is just another stupid flying spaghetti model of liberals.
You are stupid.
Not until I trust anti-malware support on Android at least as much I trust anti-malware support on Windows.
>They're all scum to me.
And you are scum to me.
> Cartoons and animations about faith need to be tracked too?
Cartoons are already properly dealt with in the only right way.
Nice choice of examples, piece of shit Nazi.
... just gather all young straight white males into some kind of concentration camp and just gas the bastards?
This is a gross misrepresentation of relationship of free speech and violence.
You forgot abot common sense, rationality and science that should precede as factors even before any consideration of whether thia will violate free speech or not.
One of the largest post WW2 genocides occurred in Central Africa, and it was fueled by unchecked radio hate speech.
>Naziism isn't really an ideology -- not like socialism, communism, or capitalism for that matter. It is too profoundly anti-intellectual to be one
Nicely formulated. I would add: the anti-intellectuallity of it stems from the pure animal nature of xenophobia which is foundation of Nazism. People who sincerely believe in Nazi ideology are literally animals, devoid of humanity.
Now the other part you said is true as well: intellectuals join this movement as well for different reasons: power, insanity of not recognizing the obvious, etc.
True human ideology has none of this: quite often leaders sincerely believe in it as well.
Any human ideology is strikingly defiantly anti-animalistic: it negates animal nature in humans.
All of them involve the essential notion of self-sacrifice for the common good, 100% human feature. The foundation of ideology have nothing to do with humanity and involve some ideal concept (God, equality, abstract moral concepts).
Nazism of course is nothing like that.
As long as it does not become "too big to fail"
I, the benevolent lord of /., impose an obligatory minimum Youtube tax on every eclipse watcher. If you do not make a nice video of this, you are just worthless waster of my oxygen.
>Stay home and watch movies on your TV. Nobody likes you anyway :-)
Trump is like pinata. With crap instead of candy. Everyone knows that you need to hit it hard to win, but nobody wants to deal with the flying shit.
I am afraid if Netflix will throw in free popcorn for extra $10 a month, public health advocate groups will be really pissed.
>Go to theaters that serve alcohol.
I do not want to go to such theaters.
Suppression of males have been a common thing in the 70s in Soviet Russia. I would say significantly more than now in Western world. The results were devastating: substance abuse was widespread among young males. It's not a liberal phenomenon. It's a phenomenon in oppressive society. The good thing is that these society never lived long enough to worry and the thing that happened to commies worldwide will happen to all those who forgot the lessons of history.
>find out no one cares now
>nationalism
I wish
> family unity
A lot of people care
>They don't want to destroy the statue of Robert E. Lee
I do. I want to destroy all statues.
>but I really think G would be better off letting Apple default to using Bing for a year
Shots fired.
Uh-oh. I missed the hype. Again.
... to kick out all teenagers and people with small kids?
>TODAY, the Antifa are a facist violent group
I think this reflects the nature of the language. It's not that language eventually and spectacularly became what Orwell has predicted in 1948, it just it became that so quickly. Not only the words mean the opposite nowadays, they are quickly switching the meaning.
Even the pronouns. Apparently, "they" has now "singular they", "marriage" is no longer a organized sex between men and women, "spokesman" is an offensive word.
Once you start allowing language losing it's stability, the very basic ground of rational communication disappears.
And that is the main problem nowadays: defiantly anti-science attitude. Not from "flat-earthers", not from "climate" deniers, but from the establishment which on the words claims to be defending science, but in reality attacks scientific reasoning on everyday basis.
Take Google Manifesto, for example. The man expressed offensive scientific statistical observation and got fired for that. Take James Watson. The man expressed offensive scientific statistical observation and got fired for that.
People in Austria jailed for mere questioning the official history.
This is in turn a result of further objective devaluation of science as meaningful human activity. Basic science, physics, is almost over.
I know, I sound like Lord Kelvin, but listen to the reason why he said this hilariously mistaken observation. There is the end, there is the end to everything, and that includes our objective knowledge about basic things.
And we reached it. But scientists are still there, so they increasingly do unscientific things presenting it as science: technology, politicking, manipulating data, making careers, cranking up grants.
That's why we are here, talking language we can't understand, doing things that nobody needs.
Thr whole Western system is about hypocrisy, which often nowadays went to absurd levels.
Gay marriage aloud, polygamy is a crime.
Going butt naked is aloud, but putting on a headscarf is a crime.
Mere extrapolation of the level of scientific understanding millions of years into the past is a law, but if you state obvious biological differences between races or genders, you are a bigoted Nobel laureate or Harvard PhD.
Star Wars was a shit movie. Devoid of any artistic merit, marketed very well.
That piece of shit "actor" Charlie Hannam must go. I want to never hear a peep about this shitface piece of shit evere again