Slashdot Mirror


Discord Bans Servers That Promote Nazi Ideology (theverge.com)

A popular video game chat service with over 25 million users announced today that it had shut down "a number of accounts" following violence instigated by white supremacists over the weekend. Discord, the service "which lets users chat with voice and text, was being used by proponents of Nazi ideology both before and after the attacks in Charlottesville, Virginia," reports The Verge. "We will continue to take action against Nazi ideology, and all forms of hate," the company said in a tweet. From the report: Discord declined to state how many servers had been affected, but said it included a mix of old accounts and accounts that were created over the weekend. Among the affected servers was one used by AltRight.com, a white nationalist news site. The site's homepage includes a prominent link to a Discord chat which is now broken. The company said it does not read private messages exchanged on its servers. Members of those groups reported messages in the chats for violating Discord's terms of service, the company said, and it took action. "When hatred like this violates our community standards we act swiftly to take servers down and ban individual users," the company said in a statement. "The public server linked to AltRight.com that violated those terms was shut down along with several other public groups and accounts fostering bad actors on Discord. We will continue to be aggressive to ensure that Discord exists for the community we set out to support -- gamers."

456 comments

  1. Pulled the plug too soon? by A10Mechanic · · Score: 2

    They should have checked with some three-letter agencies first. They might have appreciated leaving them up a few days.

    1. Re:Pulled the plug too soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      _________
      _ _ _ _ _| . . But khow can I feel Safe?
      =================
      666g ____)
      /,6g <_o)__
      l 6g . . . \
      l_/6g . (o__) Everytime you type words
      :: 6g .__l_
      :. 6g / ___) feels like another Kholocaust
      l . . |(___
      l . : l____)

    2. Re:Pulled the plug too soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would be naive to believe that 'deleting the account' means 'deleting the record of the account's existence and activities'.

      The internet is a series of fiefdoms. Even, perhaps especially, the chons.

    3. Re:Pulled the plug too soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it won't matter. They use TLSv1.0 and 3DES/EDE for session encryption -- although all this is fronted by CloudFlare. Either way, Discord isn't the best for security. Not sure why companies care about the content of their users outside of what is legally permitted. Either you're there to make money, or you're there to be moral police and make money. AirBNB, meet Discord.

    4. Re: Pulled the plug too soon? by Millennium · · Score: 1

      Not sure why companies care about the content of their users outside of what is legally permitted. Either you're there to make money, or you're there to be moral police and make money.

      And by and large, companies don't care, not even AirBNB, Discord, and Google. Plenty of bad stuff still goes down under the auspices of these businesses, and this will likely continue for a very, very long time.

      But there are degrees. Sometimes people just go so far over the line that even entities not normally concerned with morality feel compelled to stand up and say "Dude, that's just wrong". And that's all that is happening here. You're that bad, and your opponents simply are not. You don't operate according to some mystical cosmic balance; you're just evil. And you're getting a very, very small taste of what you deserve.

    5. Re:Pulled the plug too soon? by SandWyrm · · Score: 1

      Aren't something like 1/4 of all the KKK's (and similar groups) membership FBI informants? I can't remember his name, but there was one particularly vile internet NAZI, who got arrested right after Obama took office. His was the literal definition of hate speech, and was gaining more traction than most (I had black students of mine asking about whether they should be scared after reading his stuff). It later came out in court that he was on the FBI's payroll. Presumably to inform on those who contacted him.

      So to fight the NAZIs, the FBI was paying someone to be the MOST extreme possible NAZI? (faceplam)

  2. No safe spaces for Nazis by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Texas A&M University just canceled the scheduled "Unite the Right" rally that was set for 9/11 and now Discord is closing down Nazi accounts on a game chat service.

    It's hard out there for "white male discontent".

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's frustrating seeing racist assholes of any color using race to breed violence and hate.

      It should be this: people who stand against bigotry vs. all bigots, no matter which group an individual bigot is blaming for their failure at life.

      Tired of useless bigots blaming their problems on "politically acceptable targets".

    2. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah.

      Thankfully some very good peaceful freedom loving men from the middle-east have a list full of ideas what to do in a situation like ours.

    3. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      "white male discontent".

      I thought the politically correct phrase was "economic anxiety"? ;-)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yey, the fucking psy-OP worked. And of course the "response" to "the violence" is spontaneous, even though it seems largely the same: de-platform. What nonsense. I guess discord is another piece of shit tech company that was overrun by cult of PC.

    5. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Be very careful about censoring speech and shutting off outlets for people to vent legally and peacefully. JFK might have said it best:

      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

    6. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, because when I think of peaceful revolutions, I think of the Nazis. It's not like they silenced dissent when they were in power, or that their entire ideology is based on the genocide of anyone deemed genetically inferior?

      Does it still count as a peaceful revolution if you plan to commit terrible violence after you're in power?

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    7. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Well you can't ask Chavez so maybe send a telegram to Maduro. See what he has to say.

    8. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As opposed to what? the non white non male discontent of blm and antifa that's allowed to get away with violence?

    9. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ask them if they are Nazis. See if they all say yes.

    10. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really understand how white males are being crucified for both taking all the money / jobs - and also being crucified for economic anxiety ?

      Can we start to be more specific which white males we're referring to instead of just "all white males " ?

    11. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by meglon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then the worthless fucking neo-nazi pieces of shit should be loving it.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    12. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see either BLM or the right's public enemy du jour Antifa running over their opponents now do we? Some rock throwing and glass breaking but no one was ran over.

      (captcha, the right's true public enemy: 'diabetes')

    13. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not sure I understand your point? There are other dictators who aren't Nazi's therefore...? Profit?

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    14. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You go ask BLM if they're SJWs and see if they all say yes.

    15. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Clever white males take all the money and jobs. Stupid white males blame it on the blacks, Mexicans, Asians, Muslims, women, transsexuals, etc, basically anyone but the real cause. Some clever white males have taken on the job of stirring up the stupid white males for their own ends.

    16. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see either BLM or the right's public enemy du jour Antifa running over their opponents now do we? Some rock throwing and glass breaking but no one was ran over.

      (captcha, the right's true public enemy: 'diabetes')

      No, your type likes to shoot up baseball practices and slaughter 5 police officers.

    17. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

      Yeah, because when I think of peaceful revolutions, I think of the Nazis.

      I'm glad to see you agree with me that by censoring these Nazis, we make violent Nazi-powered revolution inevitable.

    18. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Do you have some evidence that the shooter was involved with Antifa or BLM? You know, perhaps a video of him marching with them in their uniform?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    19. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Throwing acid in faces and permanently blinding a guy is ok with you then?

    20. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      The Nazi's rose to power in large part because the German people were disenfranchised and, yes, oppressed, by the Allied powers following WWI. Suppression doesn't eliminate hatred, it fosters and nurtures it. It's not that I think this ideology should be broadcast to the world, but all these kinds of bans do is fuel the narrative that these Nazi's aren't really evil, and are simply being misrepresented and prevented from speaking their piece. This is outright censorship, government enforced or not (and members of the government did try to enforce it), and censorship never works, and never has, and never will.

      Yeah, because when I think of peaceful revolutions, I think of the Nazis.

      Well, they did rise to power peacefully, and might even have remained so had they not been so focused on the whole "genocide" thing. That's in sharp contrast to something like Communism, which is openly endorses (and, often, requires) violence, yet strangely is still widely accepted, or at least tolerated... I suspect in large part because it was so strongly suppressed in the US (and many other western countries) that most people never came to understand what it really stands for.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    21. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by execthis · · Score: 1

      Wow, if you're going to go off against "racist assholes" you might really want to attack countries like Japan, China, Indonesia, India - wait... - most countries of the world in fact which are ethnically homogeneous (and want to remain that way).

    22. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, if you're going to go off against "racist assholes" you might really want to attack countries like Japan, China, Indonesia, India - wait... - most countries of the world in fact which are ethnically homogeneous (and want to remain that way).

      Ethnically homogeneous nations simply don't have the infighting and problems that multi-cultural nations do. In fact not one multi-cultural nation has lasted very long compared with those which did not embrace it. The pattern is always the same: the native culture that built the nation and made so much progress gets taken over and the whole thing collapses.

    23. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, if you think that Hitler's rise to power was peaceful, you need to seriously take a refresher in history. Ever heard of the brown shirts? Or the burning of the Reichstag?

      Also, Communism is 'widely' accepted and tolerated? Where? Even in China they're Communist in name only.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    24. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      I want to add to my other comment that I am not detracting from your point about post WWI and the Treaty of Versailles, which absolutely gave Hitler a fertile ground to fuel his rhetoric.

      Woodrow Wilson did predict exactly what happened, and it's why the US never joined the League of Nations.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    25. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by zugmeister · · Score: 2

      It's hard out there for "white male discontent".

      I'd say free speech is taking quite a beating.

    26. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard out there for "white male discontent".

      Look everyone, another racist!

    27. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I'd say free speech is taking quite a beating.

      No. Free speech is fine. It's Nazis that are taking a beating.

      https://68.media.tumblr.com/84...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    28. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      It's not like they silenced dissent when they were in power, or that their entire ideology is based on the genocide of anyone deemed genetically inferior?

      Does it still count as a peaceful revolution if you plan to commit terrible violence after you're in power?

      If we are basing this on violence done in the name of revolutions , the communists and socialists have everyone else beat hands down. So using your logic they need to be shut down, their groups outlawed and demonstrations broken up.

      You willing to call for outlawing socialists and communists ?

    29. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      You willing to call for outlawing socialists and communists ?

      I wasn't aware that Discord wrote the laws. This changes everything!

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    30. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Crashmarik · · Score: 0

      You willing to call for outlawing socialists and communists ?

      I wasn't aware that Discord wrote the laws. This changes everything!

      Oh let me pinch your cheek. Here I thought I was talking to an adult not a cute precocious child.

    31. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      Ah! Clearly I misunderstood!
      I was under the impression that people were saying things they wanted to say (free speech) and other people were stifling that speech by removing / hiding / disappearing it.
      So you're saying that free speech isn't being stifled and something is being done to the Nazis themselves?
      Strange how I missed that part.

    32. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, that's not fair. Never once did I mention that I support Communists, Socialists, or a law banning either them or Nazis. And yet, because I point out that the Nazi's did not rise to power peacefully, you accuse me of exactly that.

      I'm sorry, but if you're going to paint my position in an extreme light with absolutely no basis, then I am not going to take you seriously.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    33. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by sg_oneill · · Score: 0

      Wow, if you're going to go off against "racist assholes" you might really want to attack countries like Japan, China, Indonesia, India - wait... - most countries of the world in fact which are ethnically homogeneous (and want to remain that way).

      Nice theory. But completely wrong.

      Neither China, Indonesia, nor India are ethnically homogenous at all. Both China and Indonesia have very large numbers of sub ethnicities within them (Compare for instance Mongols and Han chinese, straight up different races of people. Or to be even more extreme, compare the Javanese to the Papuans or Timorese.), India is exceptionally diverse, possibly even more so than Indonesia which is really a whole lot of different countries mashed together.

      Japan is somewhat Homogenous, more comparable to european countries, than the ethnically diverse Indonesians or Indianss, but its a multicultural country like most other stable first world countries and has been so since the war.

      But anyway, what the hell has any of this got to do with the the topic, or are you just squirting out ink to flee the argument?

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    34. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, that's not fair. Never once did I mention that I support Communists, Socialists, or a law banning either them or Nazis

      Pardon weren't you the one who took the position it was OK to silence the NAZIs because of perceived potential danger ?

      Be very careful about censoring speech and shutting off outlets for people to vent legally and peacefully. JFK might have said it best:

      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

      Yeah, because when I think of peaceful revolutions, I think of the Nazis. It's not like they silenced dissent when they were in power, or that their entire ideology is based on the genocide of anyone deemed genetically inferior?

      Does it still count as a peaceful revolution if you plan to commit terrible violence after you're in power?

      I mean that was you.

      Now you want to argue that DISCORD is a business and can enforce its TOS anyway it sees fit, I am really fine with that. But you need to realize that cuts both ways and if it doesn't cut both ways people will support whoever promises to give them the knife.

    35. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so you are perfectly fine with speech and ideologies you disagree with being attacked and censored. You know, as long as "your" people get rights, it's perfectly fine to stomp on the rights of others.
      And you wonder why white people are beginning to get sick of your kind.

    36. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Pardon weren't you the one who took the position it was OK to silence the NAZIs because of perceived potential danger ?

      No, and that isn't what I said in what you quoted. I guess if you squinted your eyes a bunch you could infer that, but then your inference is wrong.

      My point was really that if someone supports the Nazi ideology, then they cannot claim to want a peaceful revolution, by definition. Part of the Nazi ideology is to inflict violence and terror on those deemed inferior, whether by forced deportation or outright genocide.

      I also absolutely did not mention Communists or Socialists, or say anything in support of either. Yet conveniently your latest reply ignored that detail, which you completely pulled out of your ass in order to, again, paint me in an extremist light that was not warranted.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    37. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 2

      Tolerance is a peace treaty, it only works when all sides accept a live-and-let-live attitude. NAZIs literally define themselves by their unwillingness to let others live (here). They won't abide by the treaty, so they don't get protection under it.
      And since, historically, their tactics have been murderous - punching them in the face is a very restrained response.

      When somebody wants you dead and you ONLY punch him in the face, I admire your peaceloving nature.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    38. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      shame you got modded down on that as its correct

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    39. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you assume I don't?

      Every person who gets interested in Asian culture eventually has to face the fact that as a foreigner you'll never be accepted as part of it.

      Hell, in India, there's still traces of the caste society -- bigotry against people of another ethnicity is almost quaint next to the idea of your next door neighbor of a thousand years being lesser than you.

      But the whole discussion is likely a diversionary tactic on your part. "Pay no attention to the bigots in your back yard -- there's bigots elsewhere that need tending to!"

      To hell with all bigots. It's an ugly practice that history shows us tends to end badly for everyone involved.

    40. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice trick if you can manage it -- redefine the argument so most people are on your side.

      Too bad you fail at it. Millions of "white" people fought the Nazis and died, or survived to never be the same people again. Nobody but the Nazis had much appetite for another great war, but grudgingly stood up to defend freedom regardless.

    41. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 1

      And since, historically, their tactics have been murderous - punching them in the face is a very restrained response.

      Well, historically members of my clan waged war on the English. Punching me in the face is not a restrained fucking response.

      How about you learn how to manage a difference of opinion without initiating violence.

    42. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 0

      Right because history that ended centuries ago is the same as history that repeated itself just last weekend. Could you sound more stupid if you tried?

      Adopting an ethno nationalist ideology is a lot like stepping into a boxing ring. By doing so you have voluntarily forfeited the right not to have the shit beaten out of you.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    43. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Well, they did rise to power peacefully, and might even have remained so had they not been so focused on the whole "genocide" thing.

      Yep, except for a never ending string of violent rallies, attacks on the government, special powers introduced to defend pro-nazi functions from dissidence, and the arson attack on parliament with a few people sentenced to death here and there. Other than those *minor* details the nazis were perfectly lovely people until they gassed Jews.

      Take a history lesson and also apply a bit of logic. When in history has a disenfranchised nation peacefully handed over absolute power to a government.

    44. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The acts of last weekend have the same relevance as those of 1642: if someone didn't physically attack you then you have no legal or moral grounds to assault them.

      That's called civilisation, consider giving it a go.

      Instead you throw around labels then insist that violence is acceptable based on those labels. Hope nobody labels you.

    45. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 2

      I'm not labeling people. I'm labeling an idea. People choose to adopt an idea and can choose to abandon it again.
      But they cannot choose the things that idea labels them on. They cannot choose their color or their country of birth.

      That makes using such labels evil by default with no possible redeeming value. But labeling ideas is inherently good and fighting evil ideas is called heroism.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    46. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Those who wear the flags of genocide and treason are busy threatening your life personally and inciting others to harm you as well.
      Any action against anybody wearing those flags is self defense because the flags themselves are a declaration of war upon you

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    47. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assaulting people because they have different ideas to you is an evil idea.

      Be a hero, punch yourself, you bigoted ignorant twat.

    48. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by KGIII · · Score: 2

      You can't win a debate with the willfully ignorant. I do wish you luck, however.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    49. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Consider this scenario. You are sitting quietly in a pub minding your own business. Suddenly a big burly drunkard gets up, starts approaching you declaring loudly his intention to beat you to death.

      It's clear he means it. But thanks to his drunkenness you see a moment where you can get a first swing in. Do you take that opportunity?
      Or do you wait for him to throw the first punch not knowing if you will still be able to fight back after it connects?
      Me - I throw that first punch and I do not stop until he doesn't get up.
      And no judge or jury would convict me because I defended myself against a credible threat.

      This is no different. Wearing the swastika or the fasces or the KKK cloak is a credible announcement of your intention to murder me. By making that announcement you give me the right to pre-emptive lyrics defend myself. And there is no other credible meaning I should be expected to infer from it beyond your announcing your intention to murder me.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    50. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Good luck with the inevitable court hearing.

    51. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      The guy who punched Richard Spencer in January has not been charged. Not a single counterprotestor or antifa was charged on Saturday. Only the NAZI terrorist who killed someone was charged. The cops won't even arrest me because they know no jury would ever convict me.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    52. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Well, there is that. Deny justice to a large and well armed group, good luck recovering in hospital.

    53. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      They are not denied justice. They are the guilty party.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    54. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 1

      ..and we're back to blind hatred and bigotry.

    55. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Right... But wearing a fucking swastika is not, in your book, evidence of hate? You are a profoundly disturbed individual.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    56. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 1

      In and of itself? No.
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/417...

      I may or may not be profoundly disturbed. I'm also aware of the meaning of justice, and prejudging someone's guilt and imposing a penalty based purely on their clothing is not justice.

    57. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 2

      A bunch of angry people with fasces and swastikas shouting "blood and soil" oh and killing people and I'm supposed to, what, assume they are there for a fucking kumbaya singing and a drum circle?

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    58. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the "but mommy, he's doing it" defence.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    59. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, if you're going to go off against "racist assholes" you might really want to attack countries like Japan, China, Indonesia, India - wait... - most countries of the world in fact which are ethnically homogeneous (and want to remain that way).

      Really? You call ethnic because in your mind you see only white, black, and yellow? Nevertheless, ethnically homogeneous doesn't prevent racism within its own ethnic. Yes, there are racist in Asia countries as well. Period.

    60. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very rational indeed. Especially considering the national social and the russki and Chi commies....

    61. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      https://newrepublic.com/articl...

      Look who you are defending. You seriously think those guys give a fuck about anybody else's rights? Do you see any reason to doubt their violent intentions? Because I do not. This is not a bad taste outfit at a fancy dress party. This is a bunch of rampaging white supremacists on a warpath.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    62. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antifa are proud commies in the pay of the corporations.

    63. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nazis were taught by uljanov and tshershinsky. And Robespierre.

    64. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Strange, you seem to think I'm defending someone. I'm not. I'm pointing out how irrational, illogical, illegal and immoral your stance is.

    65. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Take a history lesson and also apply a bit of logic. When in history has a disenfranchised nation peacefully handed over absolute power to a government.

      Here is the only example of how Thailand abolished slavery peacefully by the King Rama V back in 19th century (read the section "Abolition of corvée and slavery"). Not to disagree with what you said about Nazis. This is just to show you the only example I knew that there exists a way to do things the right way but would take a long time.

    66. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      My stance is that punching those guys was a perfectly acceptable, indeed heroic, thing to do.
      I applaud the people who stood up to those bullies.

      That is the whole of my stance. And I think it's the only conceivably moral stance there can be in this situation.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    67. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like the 200 antifa in DC who are facing 10 years for punching trash cans?

    68. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Go set up your own discord and host the nazis there. Whinge while you do it.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    69. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Maritz · · Score: 1

      You willing to call for outlawing socialists and communists ?

      Are Nazis outlawed in the US? I thought this was about a private company exercising their right to control what is on their platform. Man, you know your argument is weak when this shit is the best you can come up with.

      It's legal to spout nazi shit in the US. It's legal for a company to decide they don't want it on their platform. Grow the fuck up and deal with it.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    70. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, you mean besides him literally saying that he was a member of antifa?

      You are the dumbest motherfucker on Slashdot..

    71. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      the dallas shooter flat out said he did it because of BLM

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    72. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      ALL americans get rights, even the wackjobs like the nazis or the wack jobs like the SJWs or the wackjobs like (insert whatever wackjob you wish here)

      you cant just assault people for having differing views

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    73. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We AntiFA won't be touched. If they try we'll torch whole cities and they know it. In Europe we rule.

    74. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by sethstorm · · Score: 0

      So leftist approved racism is OK?

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    75. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      So all we have to do to remove rights from groups of people is stick them with arbitrary labels?

      Neat. I can see no possible downside.

      How about you, Mr. Neimoller?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    76. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by execthis · · Score: 1

      too retarded to comprehend the argument ergo it must not be valid defense. sorry.

    77. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 1
      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    78. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      ALL americans get rights, even the wackjobs like the nazis or the wack jobs like the SJWs or the wackjobs like (insert whatever wackjob you wish here)

      Not Nazis. They only get provisional rights if they happen to be famous rocket scientists, and there are no rocket scientist alt-right nazis.

      We settled this in the 1940s.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    79. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      So all we have to do to remove rights from groups of people is stick them with arbitrary labels?

      It's not an "arbitrary label" if you call yourself a Nazi, carry a Nazi flag, wear Nazi armbands and give the Nazi salute. It then becomes a very specific label, and a voluntary one.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    80. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that coming out with firearms against the violent protesters in Berkely would have been excusable?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    81. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Nobody's being crucified for economic anxiety. The media is being crucified for pretending a bunch of racists voted for Trump because they weren't really racist, nah, they just had "economic anxiety".

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    82. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      No. I defended punching them. Not killing them.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    83. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no, we didnt. and that attitude of yours is doing nothing but breeding contempt from a large number of people who may not be nazis but see nothing but you people saying its ok to assault others if they disagree

      you are causing more violence with your statements than they are

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    84. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      you are causing more violence with your statements than they are

      You triggered bro? Does your anger have something to do with Daily Stormer going off the air today?

      What's more American than violence against Nazis, anyway? Aren't you a patriot?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    85. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      The Chinese and Japanese have a seething hatred for each other that even a klan member would have a hard time understanding.

    86. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with you people? When did I mention Communists at all? Are you dyslexic or something? Seriously what the fuck? Is it just deflection so that you can defend Nazism without appearing to defend it directly?

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    87. Re: No safe spaces for Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called employment and yes I'm proud I have employment. You might wish to try it some time.

    88. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      And Japs get nuked, too, eh? We settled that at that same time you know.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    89. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      And Japs get nuked, too, eh? We settled that at that same time you know.

      The Japanese aren't still trying to create a white entho-state in 2017.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    90. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      No they are not, but that doesn't mean shit based on your conjecture that we settled something with a war last century.

      What I am pointing to is that your approach is beneath you. Yes, NAZIS are fucking scum. Yes, it is self evident to all but the most stunted and malformed of us. You can do better than that. There are much better terms and much more universal principles to base this off of besides who won some war.

      For instance, if war results are the basis for argumentation you will need to lay off of Israel, and I am sure you don't want to do that. Do better.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    91. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Nothing to say? That's what I thought.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    92. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      For instance, if war results are the basis for argumentation

      I agree with you, of course. But you do know that the entire purported reason for the alt-Right/Nazi march last weekend was to argue war results, right? The Civil War, no less.

      Do you have any moral corrections left for the people who would march to preserve the Confederate "heritage"?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    93. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      What's more American than violence against Nazis, anyway?

      I'd definitely put freedom of speech WAY higher in importance than violence against Nazis.
      Putting aside for a moment that freedom of speech is a defining characteristic of America to be proud of, I would say the removal of the freedom of speech would present a far greater threat to our country than Nazis.
      Do they really frighten you that much?

      Aren't you a patriot?

      Absolutely. Why aren't you?

    94. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      So all we have to do to remove rights from groups of people is stick them with arbitrary labels?

      It's not an "arbitrary label" if you call yourself a Nazi, carry a Nazi flag, wear Nazi armbands and give the Nazi salute. It then becomes a very specific label, and a voluntary one.

      OK, fine, but they still have rights, whether you like it or not. The exact same rights, as a matter of fact, as you, me, and every other person within the borders of the United States.

      "We fought a war over this"

      No, our grandparents fought a war over something with a similar name but different ideologies. Conflating the two only gives the bastards power.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    95. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      No, our grandparents fought a war over something with a similar name but different ideologies.

      It's exactly the same ideology: Blood and Soil, White ethnostate, "get in the ovens", etc etc.

      Nazis gonna nazi. And no, they don't get rights because as Churchill said, "Nazi got no humanity".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    96. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      I have corrections for them, but not the kind I gave you. I wanted to see you make a better argument, not a worse one. I was not trying to undermine you, I was trying to goad you into making a better argument for the same end. For those that would march to preserve the Confederate "heritage" I would take an entirely different tack. I would try to convince them they are misguided at the very least.

      Don't just tear these statues down. Relocate them. Create a museum dedicated to the folly of mankind. A testament to how people can feel right about things and still get them completely wrong. Something that could engender humility and reflection, rather than outrage.

      The past needs to be put in the proper context, not erased. To that end, the places where these statues were located should be changed to reflect better values than leadership in war. A shrine to the values of the constitution and specifically the 13-15th amendments would be appropriate. There are other ideas that would work as well.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    97. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Don't just tear these statues down. Relocate them. Create a museum dedicated to the folly of mankind.

      When the Declaration of Independence was written, mobs of American patriots tore down every statue of King George. Every single one.

      But I'm nothing if not a conciliatory and reasonable gentleman. I will agree that we should relocate all of the Confederate statues to a landfill, and call it a "museum dedicated to the folly of mankind". We can even put up a big sign calling it, "The Donald Trump Museum of the Folly of Mankind and Presidential Library". That fulfills your need for putting the past in a proper context.

      Satisfied?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    98. Re:No safe spaces for Nazis by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      not at all, i find it funny when the far left and far right fight each other. 2 groups of morons taking each other out is good for the rest of us americans.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  3. What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's a private company so they can do whatever they want with a service, but it always burns me how you'll see these companies bend over backwards to appease leftist sensibilities but ignore the left-wing extremists. The protests in Charlottesville were over attempts to rewrite history. They were peaceful until left-wing agitators showed up and started causing violence. You can tell by the police response - the police generally left the Unite the Right protestors alone and only had to deal with the violent so-called "antifa" fascists who were there to cause trouble.

    Yet are we seeing antifa websites taken down and Black Lives Matter servers shut down? No. No we are not. Everyone is focusing on the people who were the victims of violence and ignoring things like the two police officers who the violent left got killed.

    So, fine, you've made your choice, Discord. And I now know never to use your service, because you care more about virtue signaling that shutting down violent extremists.

    1. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      So, fine, you've made your choice, Discord. And I now know never to use your service,

      Didn't you read the article? They already closed your account.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from what I found out, it's removing a statue of a general from the LOSING side of a war.

    3. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by IonOtter · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      [End Of Line]
    4. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet are we seeing antifa websites taken down and Black Lives Matter servers shut down? No. No we are not.

      We aren't seeing any right wings servers being shut down either, that is the benefit of running your own server.
      If they don't like Discords service they are free to take their business elsewhere. If you don't like it you can move to China or Russia where there government decides what private entities should do.

      Everyone is focusing on the people who were the victims of violence

      They are flying the flag of the enemy of U.S. and are supporting genocide.
      I'm surprised they didn't get shot.

    5. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by naubol · · Score: 1

      Calling every association choice by a private company "virtue signalling" demeans the meaning of the phrase. Virtue signalling goes to intent, and claims about intent should be carefully made.

      It strains credulity to think that you made an argument that white nationalists are not violent. If your claim is that the guy who ran a car into people was an outlier, nevermind that it was well documented that other marchers were violent, then where is your nuance when considering left-leaning protesters?

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    6. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by aliquis · · Score: 2

      that you made an argument that white nationalists are not violent

      An insane majority of us aren't.

      If we aren't supposed to threat Muslims like genocidal terrorists then white nationalists definitely aren't either.

      Now go fuck yourself.

    7. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, yes, we get it. Everyone who disagrees with your viewpoint is a nazi. Now go play with your toys and let the rest of us discuss the issues rationally.

    8. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by naubol · · Score: 1

      An insane majority of us aren't.

      Sure, an insane majority of you aren't. Plenty of you are, by implication. The post I was responding to, in case you may have missed it, was implying the white nationalists were not violent and the leftists were. I was asking, where's the nuance. I think you also demonstrated that you can't appreciate the nuance. In essence, you implied agreement with me while misunderstanding what I was saying.

      Now go fuck yourself.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    9. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I now know never to use your service, because you care more about virtue signaling that shutting down violent extremists.

      Is "virtue signaling" synonymous with stating the obvious? Because I always thought saying "Nazis are bad, mmmkay?" fell into that category.

    10. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Everyone is focusing on the people who were the victims of violence and ignoring things like the two police officers who the violent left got killed.

      So you claim. Anything to back that up? How were they killed by the left?

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    11. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that you made an argument that white nationalists are not violent

      An insane majority of us aren't.

      Why are the insane majority of you not repudiating the violence, then?

    12. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Much in the same way the Taliban destroyed statues if the Buddha, destruction of history should always be opposed, or should we tear down mt Rushmore?

    13. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that BLM member that killed 5 Dallas cops stands for peace and love.

    14. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      You can tell by the police response - the police generally left the Unite the Right protestors alone and only had to deal with the violent so-called "antifa" fascists who were there to cause trouble.

      Yet are we seeing antifa websites taken down and Black Lives Matter servers shut down? No. No we are not.

      You would see them taken down if members started driving cars into crowds of people.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    15. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Informative

      Much in the same way the Taliban destroyed statues if the Buddha, destruction of history should always be opposed, or should we tear down mt Rushmore?

      No, not like that at all. They don't want to destroy the statue of Robert E. Lee, they just want to put it somewhere else, e.g., in a museum.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    16. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An insane majority of us aren't.

      So you condemn the violence that occurred, right? Because that's the problem in the Muslim world (I'm an ex-Muslim atheist, FYI).

      Even reasonable, or secular, Muslims are often apologist towards violence or terrorism because a part of them feels it's justified by historical events (Western foreign policy, propping up dictators, toppling legitimate democratic governments, etc.). I have often told my Muslim friends that it was predominantly white Christians who fought and died to defeat the Nazi's, and so it must be Muslims who must unite to defeat Islamic Terrorism. The problem is internal to the group, so the group must fix it.

      Muslim terrorists are terrorists. White nationalist terrorists are terrorists. Can we agree on that?

      You describe yourself as a "white nationalist", and I'm not going to read into that in any way, it's just a label. All I'm asking is that if you are truly not violent, then don't turn a blind eye to those on "your side" who are.

      Like with Islam, you may quickly find that if this minority becomes large enough (which can still be very small) it will usurp your movement, and you will find it very difficult to separate yourself from them. Similar to the secular/moderate Muslims, you may find your legitimate concerns or grievances being constantly overshadowed, and you will be unable to gain any real traction in achieving the change you want.

      And, again paralleling Islamic Radicalization, you may find that you are their first target. The people who primarily suffer from Islamic Terrorism are other Muslims. I guarantee ISIS hates me more than they hate you, because I am an apostate. The first thing radicals do is eliminate the moderates within their own group.

      Tread carefully, my fellow American. I mean that in all sincerity.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    17. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by iggymanz · · Score: 0

      Hilarious, it is left wing racists that have murdered far more people in the last 40 years, destroyed property, glorify living like a savage.

      Are we going to ban rap music for all the caucasian and police maiming/ killing so many of its songs advocate?

    18. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False Equivalence, the pseudo-intellectual's variation on 'I am not a hypocrite because REASONS'

    19. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, Nazi sympathizer

    20. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'anti fascists' who act like them. protesting nazis (who are also socialists)

      The left eating the left. I am getting the popcorn out.

    21. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Except they kinda are.
      On the left you have a fringe group that want to actually exterminate all whites and a bigger group that cheers for "the whites not being a majority anymore" and do things to speed up the process.
      While on the right, you have a fringe group that want to exterminate the blacks and jews and a bigger group that cheer for expelling the immigrants etc..

    22. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by epyT-R · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure you'd be singing a different tune if a service dropped a BLM or antifa channel.

    23. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously PopeRatso, did you have a stroke or something? Please get yourself checked because you are not who you used to be.

    24. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 2

      Hilarious, it is left wing racists that have murdered far more people in the last 40 years, destroyed property, glorify living like a savage.

      Do you just have a feeling that should be true because it fits neatly into your world view or do you have any type of evidence?

    25. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's completely different. We're whites who hate blacks. They're blacks who hate whites. Clearly, completely different.

    26. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by DogDude · · Score: 0

      Oh, poor AC. So delicate. Fuck off. I doubt that they are reeling from the impact of dozens of ignorant rednecks on welfare who no longer pay for their services.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    27. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      It is virtue signaling. If corporate execs cared about the bottom line, they'd be as a-political as possible. The public line would be "We love people who love our products."

      Irrational belief often leads to violence, especially when other expression is suppressed. White nationalists/KKK are no different than BLM or antifa. They each have self-interested, identity driven agendas and try to claim the moral high ground, the former based on a claim of supremacy, the latter under the guise of equality. Idiocy all around.

    28. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The protests in Charlottesville were over attempts to rewrite history. "

      You mean the illegal right wing protest there? Wasn't it downtown too, unpermitted?

      "The protests in Charlottesville were over attempts to rewrite history."

      I see no history being rewritten. A statue celebrating a guy who wanted to overthrow the government, tired to, and lost was being lawfully removed. You wanted to violate permitting and property rights for political ends.

      "They were peaceful until left-wing agitators showed up and started causing violence."

      Well, your track record sucks rocks given the string of lone wolf killings across the country, showing up on "liberal" campuses to throw down anyone that stood in your way, the multiple stabbings and murders in Oregon, and the dog whistle politics of the current POTUS.

      The likes of you were told not to show up. You did anyways. They had 2 permitted groups in the area as counter protests. You broke the law first by showing up anyway. They didn't.

      And it doesn't freaking explain one of you jackasses driving a car into a group of pedestrians.

      "You can tell by the police response"

      Police usually go toward the weaker group or the group they can manage the most. Regardless, you still threw down because you wanted to and was waiting to.

      But hey, you are pissed there are non-white people in the country and want to throw them out of their homes, cause them to lose their citizenship, and steal their property and holdings and jobs as "opportunity" for whites. I'd be pretty pissed at you too. I'm sorry you don't understand this most basic understanding of civility. I mean, really, how would you like to be told you should be dragged out of your home and dumped in central Russia in a refugee camp because that's where Caucasians belong?

      "Yet are we seeing antifa websites taken down and Black Lives Matter servers shut down? No. No we are not"

      Well, at least your admit you are fascist shitholes. That's a start.

      Much of the other stuff being taken down is because of the spreading of flat out lies, which broke contractual agreements. Maybe you should learn not fuck with contracts versus trying to tie it to political ends. Again, law, contracts--your word doesn't seem to add up to much when you are a white nationalist apologist, now does it.

      "ignoring things like the two police officers who the violent left got killed."

      Fuck you. Really. Their helicopter crashed. It's called an accident. It was part of their job.

      Your member drove a car into a crowd, committed domestic terrorism, killed a woman, and ran over others injuring them.

      One was an accident involving professionals. The other a clear crime involving civilians, where your group was organized into and called militia groups and what not. And you still managed to ignore the crime and focus on the accident because...it suits your political and ideological ends. That's how freaking fubar'd your sense is.

      But if you want to play that game, Mr. Law and Order, you were not permitted. The "left" probably still was. You were told to move from downtown to a park, you refused. You were told not to show up. You refused. The copter was probably in the air because of the foreseen conflict, which you deliberately ignored lawful orders not to be there days beforehand.

      "And I now know never to use your service, because you care more about virtue signaling that shutting down violent extremists."

      Your. Member. Drove. A. Car. Into. A. Crowd. Of. Civilians.

      That's your virtue signaling. Loud and clear.

      Yeah, yeah, I know. I'm a snowflake. And it's the fault of fake news. And it's all because we're all so politically correct, and you're just calling it like you see it. And you grew up white. So yes, I feel sorry for you. Really, I sincerely do...

    29. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be the top comment.

    30. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are flying the flag of the enemy of U.S. and are supporting genocide. I'm surprised they didn't get shot.

      Flags of enemies that got themselves a well deserved beatdown. We fought the slave-owning south, We fought the Nazi's. We beat both of them.

      And if we must, we shall administer the very same sort of beatdown to the neoNazi's.

    31. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read "Days of Rage" about left-wing violence in America from a former FBI agent. And check the list of dead piling up under such leftist ideologies as communism and so forth. I can't help you if you're stupid, but I can if you're ignorant. :)

      You're welcome.

    32. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by meglon · · Score: 1, Troll

      Hate to tell you this, dipshit, but ISIS is as conservative as they come.... probably even more-so than the evangelicals here in the US. It's not religion that's the problem so much as it's the fucking authoritarian bent conservatives who take charge of it.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    33. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you're funny, you're blind to what is going on right under your nose on in the news.

    34. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by meglon · · Score: 1

      Ahh, you're one of the stupid cunts who thinks fascism and socialism are the same. Does it hurt to go through life so fucking stupid?

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    35. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by meglon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you agree with the NAZI propaganda, like you obviously do, YOU are a fucking NAZI.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    36. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am not arguing that there was no left wing terrorism, but in the modern context your statement is either vacuous or incorrect. The violence you are talking about was a generation ago, entirely different groups with different causes in a different political landscape. If you want to count 40 years back, we could include Timothy McVeigh on the right-wing side and he alone would outweigh all the deaths on the left. But I don't because, again, that was a different political climate.

      Today, you are just being ignorant or stubborn if you honestly believe that there is more violence from the left than the right. I am not saying there is no violence, so don't throw that straw man at me, but to claim that the left is equal to the right (let alone vastly outweighs as you say) is just wrong.

    37. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by meglon · · Score: 1

      People like you, who lie apparently at every chance they get, are part of the problem. Muslims routinely condemn the violence done in their name, it's just doesn't show up on the likes of fauxnews and drudge because it doesn't fit the stupider-than-fuck narrative that you've posted here. It's fringe groups that commit the violence, just as with groups here in the US. The problem here is, the rightwing has been radicalized the past 30+ years so that those fringe groups now feel that they're acceptable enough to come out in the open. Look around, pull your head out of your ass if need be... but quit being a lying little parrot.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    38. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by fuzznutz · · Score: 2

      Much in the same way the Taliban destroyed statues if the Buddha, destruction of history should always be opposed, or should we tear down mt Rushmore?

      No, not like that at all. They don't want to destroy the statue of Robert E. Lee, they just want to put it somewhere else, e.g., in a museum.

      Really? I guess that's why they broke off a chunk of it and spray painted it red?

    39. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is authoritarians on all "sides," not "conservatives." It doesn't matter if you're leftist, centrist, right-ist, or shoot-Khan's-ship-in-a-nebula-ist. Authoritarianism is the true cancer. The left/right dichotomy is nothing more than a distraction to give everyone an Emmanuel Goldstein to hate.

    40. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more than a few similarities economically. Heck the fasces itself is a roman symbol of collective power.

    41. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.google.com/amp/amp.timeinc.net/time/4501670/bombings-of-america-burrough/

      In the seventies there were numerous leftist bombing. The FBI recorded over 2,500 in 18 months.

    42. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But who wants to bring that crap here and denies that it exists? Not the American right. They have many problems, but wanting to Rotherham the US in the name of meaningless cultural diversity is not one of them.

    43. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only got to this stage because those who wanted to keep it there resorted to rabid frothing at the mouth during town meetings and legitimate death threats. Had the wonderfully masterful debaters actually had decent arguments it might have gone a different route.

    44. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virginia actually has a law on the books to prevent jurisdictions from removing these statues.

      https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/local/a-virginia-city-votes-to-remove-a-confederate-statue-but-doing-so-may-prove-difficult/2017/02/08/519042da-ee3e-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html

      Several other jurisdictions have tried to remove statues but came to the conclusion they could not do so.

    45. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://vacode.org/2016/15.2/II/18/3/15.2-1812/

    46. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is condemnation, for sure. And sometimes the media is not quick enough to report on it. And I am also happy to have seen more and more Muslims taking direct action recently. It pains me very much to watch my culture and my history be maligned and vilified, and I do not take this position lightly.

      I am not lying, there are many secular/moderate Muslims who are the way I describe. Some are within my own family, who are highly educated (often in Western countries), and highly secular. They call themselves Muslims, they participate in Ramadan (generally), but they drink alcohol, don't pray 5 times a day (or even at all), and generally are like most Christians in the west. Like me, if they actually thought about it, they would probably become atheists.

      Often they will make arguments along the lines of "The US invasion of Iraq was an act of terrorism, and that was much worse than ." Again, very similar to the right pointing the finger at BLM or whoever in response to what happened in Charlotte. It's not that they are right or wrong, but rather that it doesn't matter. You can't deflect from your problems by pointing out others' problems.

      The War in Iraq was wrong. 9/11 was wrong. What happened in Charlotte was wrong. Period. Moderates on all sides must condemn violence in all forms, without hesitation and without caveat.

      Many people are familiar with the Bill Maher/Ben Affleck/Richard Dawkins argument on radical Islam. After that episode aired, I showed it to my very devout (but completely OK with my apostasy :D) friend, Mohamed. He is like a brother to me. At the end of the argument, the comparison was made between fundamentalist Christianity and Islam. Bill Maher said (paraphrasing) "One is herpes, and the other is cancer." That is a very strong statement, and my initial reaction was to take offense, even as an atheist.

      After that, Mo and I discussed the issue at length. It was very heated, although we weren't arguing against each other, per-se. At the end, he looked at me, his eyes misty, and said "I'm mad. But I'm mad because they are right."

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    47. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not religion that's the problem

      You're either being willfully ignorant, or you're just ignorant.
      You should actually check out what that religion not only preaches, but the followers believe and practice.

    48. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1, Troll

      Here, let me help you with this. It's called False Equivalence: a logical fallacy in which two opposing arguments appear to be logically equivalent when in fact they are not.

      For those of us above the left-right divide, the equivalence isn't remotely false. The "antifa" idiots have done far more damage than right-wingers in the last 7 months. Take a look at Berkeley when Milo was going to speak, for instance. Did anyone talk about taking down their servers because of violence?

      I hate fascists - whether they're on the right or "antifa". When there's a boot on your neck you don't really care who it's attached to.

    49. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      I am aware. Are you aware that those bombings were almost entirely without casualties? One right-wing terrorist, Timothy McVeigh, killed 20x more people than all those bombings combined. Having said that, what do the 1970s have to do with what is happening here, today? This is a whole different generation, with different groups and different motivations.

    50. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Really? I guess that's why they broke off a chunk of it and spray painted it red?

      Sorry, are you saying the Charlottesville city council did that? That would be a huge story if true.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    51. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, yes, we get it. Everyone who disagrees with your viewpoint is a nazi.

      https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DD...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    52. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think that conservatives would be more receptive to taking in refugees fleeing Muslim extremists. But no.

    53. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Am I? I saw the news when Jeremy Joseph Christian stabbed two people on a train saying he was a patriot. I saw when Alexandre Bissonnette killed six people in a mosque. And when Dylann Roof killed nine people in a church while they were praying. When James Harris Jackson killed a black man on the street because he was afraid that interracial relationships were destroying the white race. When Adam Purinton killed two Indian men in a bar because he mistook them for Iranians. Just fuck right off if you really think that violence is all on the side of the left.

    54. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      On the left you have a fringe group that want to actually exterminate all whites [...]

      Not saying you're wrong, there's plenty of nutcase to go around, but which group is that? I don't believe I've heard of it.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    55. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lies, damned lies and whatever the hell you just posted. A left wing nut shot up a republican softball practice, another one in PA shot a Trump supporter in the head in front of his wife. Antifa has been rioting, showing up armed to events and starting fights- while police are told to stand down. It is absolutely a false equivalence to compare the two because in the last 6 months the violence has been overwhelmingly coming from the left.

    56. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... they had a permit, it got pulled then a federal judge over-ruled pulling the permit. To get around it the governor declared a state of emergency.

    57. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      The "antifa" idiots have done far more damage than right-wingers in the last 7 months. Take a look at Berkeley when Milo was going to speak, for instance. Did anyone talk about taking down their servers because of violence?

      How many people have antifa killed? And how many have right-wing terrorists killed? Okay, now tell me more about servers and cancelled lectures.

    58. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      What does "BLM member" mean in this context? Did he go to any meetings? Attend any rallies?

      I honestly don't know, that's why I'm asking.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    59. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      What was lies exactly? Here I will copy paste right-wing terrorist attacks from the last year that I wrote on another comment:

      I saw the news when Jeremy Joseph Christian stabbed two people on a train saying he was a patriot. I saw when Alexandre Bissonnette killed six people in a mosque. And when Dylann Roof killed nine people in a church while they were praying. When James Harris Jackson killed a black man on the street because he was afraid that interracial relationships were destroying the white race. When Adam Purinton killed two Indian men in a bar because he mistook them for Iranians. Just fuck right off if you really think that violence is all on the side of the left.

    60. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The number one ideology of terrorist attackers in the United States has been Environmentalism - the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front have performed hundreds of attacks, killing dozens, just by themselves.
      45% of all US terrorist groups are Extreme Left Wing, while just 20% are Extreme Right Wing - and that's just political affiliation.
      There's also the Puerto Rico separatist movements that performed a few dozen attacks, killing more than 20 people.

      Puerto Rico Revolution, Symbionese Liberation Army, Animal Liberation Front, Omega-7, May 19th Communists... the list of left-wing groups goes on and on.

      Source: US Government

    61. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Ok and Timothy McVeigh killed 170, injured 700. What do you have the compares to that? I don't even give a flying shit about numbers anyway, I am not defending any of the groups you listed. If they committed violence then I denounce them. I am just fucking flabbergasted that you, and so many other people here, are defending literal nazis. I am not afraid to denounce left-wing terrorists, but you apparently cannot denounce actual, self-proclaimed nazis. What the fuck is wrong with you?

    62. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by murdocj · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe it's more like not putting up a statue of Erwin Rommel in a Jewish neighborhood? You know, Lee didn't just fight on the losing side, he fought to enslave the ancestors of people who walk past that statue every day.

    63. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by murdocj · · Score: 2

      You mean after the Nazis ran protestors over, the remaining people who were still alive were a little pissed? My goodness.

      Maybe you ought to work on your analogies.

    64. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stalin and Mao's body count last century beats Hitler's hands-down. Not arguable as fact.

      Evidence: Google anything about it.

      That is, of course, further granting that one should classify National Socialism as "right-wing".

    65. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      I don't give a fuuuuuuck because I am not defending Stalin or Mao. You are defending nazis, which is the whole point here.

    66. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry are we talking about Christianity or Islam here?

    67. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cite where exactly I am "defending Nazis".

      That false dichotomy is your game.

      I'm a small government, individual rights, Constitutionalist.

      "Left wing" or "right wing", as soon as you give a politician group some principle, whether "for the volk", "for the proletariat", "for the poor we pretend to want to help", "climate change"... that overrides individual rights, prepare for the body count. The worst will rise to the top.

    68. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      The difference is, supporters of neo-Nazi groups are really few, while a good part of leftist public figures (politicians like Sanders, CEOs like Zuckerberg, etc) support BLM.

      Thus, this time it's the left that's the bigger problem in the US. I dread the next time the pendulum swings...

      In the meanwhile, Poland, Hungary, Turkey have far-right in power.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    69. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Z80a · · Score: 1

      It's not an organized group exactly, but part of the BLM etc..

    70. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by meglon · · Score: 2

      That's the point the radical conservatives in this country don't get. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all came from the same religion to start with, and share a very large portion of their beliefs and teachings. Christianity and Islam have the addition of having their messiah return already, as apparently the Jewish messiah ain't quite got here yet. Thing is, the beliefs of conservative evangelicals in the US are more strongly based in the old testament than the new, and in many of the evangelical churches a lot of what they teach is exactly opposite of what Jesus taught.

      I would have modded you up if i had the chance, because your question hits at the crux of many of the problems we're facing.... but you knew that already.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    71. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by meglon · · Score: 1
      And there's the difference, and distinction, that needs to be made. There are many churches in each religion that teach things that are NOT taught by their "prophets," and it's those who claim to be or those religions who are most easily led astray that cause the damage. Those people tend to be those more gulible and more prone to be "led" by false prophets.

      The parable of the sheep and the goat is the epitome of Christianity:

      ‘Come, blessed of my Father, inherit the Kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry, and you gave me food to eat. I was thirsty, and you gave me drink. I was a stranger, and you took me in. I was naked, and you clothed me. I was sick, and you visited me. I was in prison, and you came to me.’

      “Then the righteous will answer him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry, and feed you; or thirsty, and give you a drink? When did we see you as a stranger, and take you in; or naked, and clothe you? When did we see you sick, or in prison, and come to you?’

      “The King will answer them, ‘Most certainly I tell you, because you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’

      And what do we get from conservative churches here in the states: homosexuality is bad, abortion is murder.

      And lets be clear about that.... the bible calls homosexuality an abomination.... along with idolatry (you know, that cross you see people wearing, or the image of Mohamed), eating seafood that lacks fins or scales (oysters, clams, scallops, lobsert... which i'm ok with lobster being called an abomination, i can't stand it myself), or eating insects, or eating birds of prey (the bald eagles thank you, by the way), dishonesty (i'm all for that, but it seems to be an abomination that a LOT of people embrace), eating unclean food (like...bacon.....), adultery (you know, like getting a divorce and remarrying.... like over half the people in this country, with a higher percentage of divorces occurring in states that vote conservative....), oppressing the poor and needy (check out the republican political platform), a sower of discord (.... seriously, Proverbs 6:19), justifying the wicked, touching pig leather (there goes my fucking billfold).... and the list goes on and on.

      Now, as for abortion, you'll notice one thing that DIDN'T make the abomination list; abortion doesn't show up in there, and abortion (through chemicals... herbal) was a known thing back then, and the only time it's mentioned in the Bible is when it is specifically said it MUST be carried out whenever the father demands it. In Jesus's time, in the land where Jesus would have been born, grew up, and one would have to think, learn a few things..... the Roman Empire was law of the land. And guess what they did..... lots of herbal abortions. It was such a common practice that they LITERALLY drove the herb they used into extinction. Yet, let me quote what Jesus had to say about the practice:

      .....

      But, those are the two things conservative churches teach... anti-homosexual, and anti-abortion..... not anything that Jesus actually taught (they do give lip service to some of them, but then they turn to their false prophets to pack the house, apparently). So there are things within religions that are good and moral, but once hatred and fear take over, it pretty much turns to shit.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    72. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the herpes line, because neo Nazis just never go away for good. Good stuff.

    73. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I would be reconsidering my affiliation with "white national"ism if I had a problem with what happened. You don't protest dressed up as Nazis (or the president while chanting Nazi slogans!) If you're peaceful. At a minimum, the ideas of Nazi Germany and how it ended up at the Holocaust and WW2 are a very clear warning.

      It is not a peaceful movement.

    74. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Xac · · Score: 0

      Well what good is condemning it after the fact when they knowingly harbor them until they nail people to walls at concerts? Unless they're willing to outcast and report those people before someone dies, they don't belong in our civilization.

    75. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by bongey · · Score: 1

      Definitely more left wing political violence in the last 2 years that are directly tied to left wing political organizations.

    76. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by MattKeith · · Score: 2

      I think I would be reconsidering my affiliation with "white national"ism if I had a problem with what happened. You don't protest dressed up as Nazis (or the president while chanting Nazi slogans!) If you're peaceful. At a minimum, the ideas of Nazi Germany and how it ended up at the Holocaust and WW2 are a very clear warning. It is not a peaceful movement. Only now there is no longer any pretence

    77. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter where you are on the political spectrum, people with the same beliefs as you will have done something violent somewhere. But that doesn't make you a violent person. So what's the point in saying x position has enacted violence politically? Let's be against violence no matter who did it.

    78. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is wrong with you?

      If there were nazis that marched but didn't actually commit any violence, should they be denounced? Because it seems that's where you stand. You'll denounce only specific people on the left, but if they're on the right, they're all guilty.

    79. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      We have been trying to warn you about the actual Nazis who are in your midst, but you keep having little fits of rage like that one.

      It's in your own interest to acknowledge this problem and try to deal with it. This rally and the violence from the literal Nazis who where there has damaged both the alt-right and Trump. Is that what you want?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    80. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      I agree. I am simply responding to the poster who tried to deflect from the original point by saying that violence all comes from the left.

    81. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If there were nazis that marched but didn't actually commit any violence, should they be denounced?

      Yes. Because they are FUCKING NAZIS.

    82. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      He shouted, "that's what liberalism gets you" as he stabbed a guy in the neck.

    83. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      First off, I don't know who the fuck you are because you post AC, so I can't separate your comments from the dozens of other cowards on here. I'm just going to respond in general. If your first thought in this discussion, as many have posted here and what started this whole thread, is, "yeah but what about left-wing extremists?" you are deflecting from the discussion. This article is not about left-wing extremists. If you are deflecting away from the discussion of these nazi extremists, then you are defending them. If you are not defending them then just stfu for a bit.

    84. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only link between works of art and violence is violence from people who are offended by the art. For example; the Charlie Hedbo terrorist attack.

    85. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please remember that most if not all of the Civil War statues in towns were erected in the 50's and 60's in response to the Civil Rights movement. They are meant to be a FU to people wanting to end segregation. There is nothing noble about having the statue of a traitor to the nation in a town. Unless, of course, you support slavery or a way of life that promotes slavery then you would be just wrong.

    86. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Hilarious, it is left wing racists that have murdered far more people in the last 40 years, destroyed property, glorify living like a savage.

      Seriously? You are trying to justify your own political point of view with amount of violence of the opposite political point of view people did? Violence is NOT OKAY regardless the perpetrators' political point of view. There should never be a comparison which side did what. All of those who commit violence are wrong. Period.

    87. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      There haven't been many deaths, yet. (And, no, right wing terrorists haven't committed more attacks than Islamic nutjobs since 9/11 - that's been thoroughly debunked everywhere)

      We do know that an "antifa" idiot was whacking people over the head with a bicycle lock at one violent event. We know that a left-wing kook shot and tried to kill Republican congressmen a couple of months ago. We know that one used the SPLC's map to find the family research council and go in looking to kill people. The left-wing violence in Charlottesville was over the top - the white supremacists were forced by the police to walk through the crowd of left-wingers, who then attacked them.

    88. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Just saw this:

      http://legalinsurrection.com/2...

      Again, they're escalating their attacks.

    89. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      you mean after the person hit dudes car with a bat freaking him out? you did see that video right???

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    90. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      berkely? furgason? NYC? LA? all left wing violence (that they justify on the grounds of...but nazis!!!)

      no, the left wing violence in america today dwarfs the right wing violence. walking down the street with a torch isnt violent. suckerpunching and pepperspraying people walking with a torch is

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    91. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you try and equate BLM to fucking white supremacists then yeah I am going to guess your either a fucking Nazi or at least their ally. Either way nothing you stand for has any place in a civilized society.

    92. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      jeremy was all about bernie and jill stein.... stop flat out lying

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    93. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh is it? that sounds so real with out any supporting evidence.

    94. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no one is defending nazis right to be violent. however we are defending americans right to PEACEFULLY assemble without the fear of being sucker punched and pepper sprayed regardless of how stupid their beliefs are

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    95. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      moving the goal posts. we are talking about violence not murder

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    96. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Oh man kind of exactly like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    97. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      He literally yelled, "this is what liberalism gets you" when he stabbed a guy in the throat. He is on video saying that. Is that fake news?

    98. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Why are you trying so hard to find some way of tallying up violence so that you can put nazis on the "right" side? Think about your life for a second.

    99. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      well yeah, hes a liberal.... it was a rally call

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    100. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Ok that was actually funny lol

    101. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      thats not the intent of this post im not defending "nazis" im defending "americans" and in american we have to defend the rights afforded to us, even to the worst kinds of people. most violence over the past year (i said violence) has been done by antifa and other far left groups. this isnt even debatable. if nazis wanna walk down a street, they should not have to worry about getting sucker punched by some violence scumbag unless they themselves are in fact being violent. otherwise you open up a whole can of worms.

      do the rest of the country get to attack BLM supporters and other people who agree with antifa unprovoked simply because they support them???? of course not!

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    102. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I watched a good portion of the events live. What I saw were 2 groups of people doing their best to prove the negative stereotypes about themselves.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    103. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      thats what i saw as well. at first i totally condemned the driver however after seeing his car getting smashed with a bat right before he hit the gas. i can understand the reaction

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    104. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      The irony, is that one of the funders of leftist violence is also a Nazi supporter - George Soros.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    105. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might be taken more seriously if you actually did something about the warnings of the violent left.

    106. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      They were peaceful until left-wing agitators showed up and started causing violence.

      Sure. That's why they peacefully showed up with peaceful guns and peaceful shields.

    107. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have always appreciate your stance on political and social matters, but lately you started slipping towards strident, callous extremism. Are you becoming senile? Really, check for once posts to wrote years ago with the stupid drivel of today. Then wake up.

    108. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Just referring to BLM (not going to talk about Antifa), that doesn't seem to be a fair comparison. The IDEALS of their "organizations" aren't similar. Yes, you can find examples of calls for violence and actual violence within the BLM community but their message certainly is not "get rid of everyone that isn't black".

      Specifically to your point: If BLM was actively promoting the elimination of whites, as a member of that race you can bet your ass I'd be singing the same tune.

    109. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Well what good is condemning it after the fact when they knowingly harbor them until they nail people to walls at concerts? Unless they're willing to outcast and report those people before someone dies, they don't belong in our civilization

      Are you referring to neo-nazi terrorists or muslim terrorists?

    110. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't have skipped the Civil War unit in class, ignorant clown! Your comments about Robert E. Lee how utterly ignorant you are regarding the history of your own country. No one who foames at the mouth about a statue is a rational being, yourself included.

      BTW, I see no one lining up to tear down George Washington's statue or rename the cities/states named after him. After all he was the owner of one of the largest (if not *the* largest) slave population owners in the entire history of the Colonies+US

    111. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >They don't want to destroy the statue of Robert E. Lee

      I do. I want to destroy all statues.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    112. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      So you condemn the violence that occurred, right?

      No, and in classical also Muslim inspiration "why would I have to do that? It's not my responsibility ('as a neo-Nazi to do that!')"

      That's a completely fine argument for the sand-people so I guess it's ok for us from the forests too. Or? Maybe different rules for different people?

      Because that's the problem in the Muslim world (I'm an ex-Muslim atheist

      What's the problem? The lack of condemnation? Right.

      Western foreign policy, propping up dictators, toppling legitimate democratic governments,

      If the first is enforced by the west then I agree.
      As for the dictators if the dictators are the one they had in Iran for instance then I don't know if the west is really to blame for his existence (first half of the 20th century?) I guess for Saud one could kinda blame the west.
      As for any democratic ones I'm not for democracy at all but rather for freedom. Muslim democracy often seem to lead to Islamism anyway and western democracy at-least here in Europe lead to socialism and neither is free and both suck so no thanks to democracy. Democracy is bad. Freedom is good.

      I have often told my Muslim friends that it was predominantly white Christians who fought and died to defeat the Nazi's, and so it must be Muslims who must unite to defeat Islamic Terrorism. The problem is internal to the group, so the group must fix it.

      Yeah our idiotic government who drench Sweden in Muslims seem to think that's just fine because we've decide freedom of religion is fine because religion is fine and hence any amount of Muslims and any amount of Muslim behavior is fine because religion is fine ..

      Pretty stupid.

      And then they likely think that they can change the mind of Muslims, which they likely can if just a few come here, but if you let enough of them come then they can group up and keep their ways and then there will be less of that. And it's unlikely Muslims whatever in the middle-east or here in Sweden will really want to change because someone from outside tell them too.

      Muslims simply shouldn't be welcomed here to preserve our people and freedom and then we could encourage progress and help develop the Muslim world instead. Insane amounts of money are used up on a few Afghani immigrants in Sweden rather than what could had been accomplished for such amounts abroad.

      White nationalist terrorists are terrorists.

      Any terrorist is a terrorist. But terrorist is just a word on something using violence for political means without being a legitimate state power. As is Europe is being invaded by Muslims defended by our own police, courts, politicians, military and media. As you know the USA is no stranger of using violence for its political ideas. Neither is Saudi-Arabia. So what's the difference when some other group do it? The only difference is that they made up the law that it would be a difference. Erdogan calls the Kurds terrorists while bombing them in Syria. Of course there's no difference to Kurds bombing Turks. Terrorist is a bullshit word. We should rather just call it warrior I guess. Warrior for different purposes. If the terrorists was a white nationalist when it was a warrior for his people, whereas an IS terrorist may have been one for his, or for your ideas. Whatever. The state which try to prevent that and kill them they are also warriors for their ideas and authority. No difference whatsoever. It's as useless as an argument as "racism."

      Also since in Europe in kinda no country we've got freedom of speech and hence can't say what we feel about this and the politicians clearly haven't listened and prevent it we haven't had any democratic means and influence to affect it. So what's left? You can't blame us for not accepting the result when it never was our choice! Sweden isn't a democracy, it's a socialist & capitalist democrature.

    113. Re: What about left-wing extremists? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I think I would be reconsidering my affiliation with "white national"ism if I had a problem with what happened.

      That would be insanely stupid.

      It would be like saying "I'm not a Muslim!" because some other Muslim blew himself up. Why would you do that? Something tell me you're not a white nationalist at all and hence don't really give a shit / want people to not claim they are because that marginalize and destroy them even more so.

      Muslims would simply say loud and proud that they are Muslims anyway. And that whatever some other Muslim did isn't their problem.

      You don't protest dressed up as Nazis

      No why the fuck would I? I think the NSDAP gear and symbols should be just fine to wear here. It's not because the idiots consider that persecution of people groups which I find completely retarded because the preservation of my own people haven't got shit to do with the destruction of other peoples. They are different things.

      If you're peaceful

      Of course you can wear nationalsocialist gear to show your opinion and yet be peaceful. This is complete bullshit of yours.

      At a minimum, the ideas of Nazi Germany and how it ended up at the Holocaust and WW2 are a very clear warning.

      Yeah. It's a warning about how America and socialism fuck things up alright. Nothing really new there. America is the world leader in destroying other societies and socialist ass-hats want their shit everywhere too.

      It is not a peaceful movement.

      It is. But by now we've kinda got no other means to reach our goals than to fight.

    114. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      But, not for beating on passing cars with bats, or tossing bottles full of fireworks into crowds.
      Gotcha.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    115. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's more like not putting up a statue of Erwin Rommel in a Jewish neighborhood? You know, Lee didn't just fight on the losing side, he fought to enslave the ancestors of people who walk past that statue every day.

      The irony is, Lee opposed any statues of himself whilst he was alive.

      Most of the Confederate statues were erected decades after the war, the 1920's was very popular for it (far right extremism was just popular then).

      Lee wanted the US to heal after the war, which is why he didn't want anyone glorifying his actions.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    116. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If there were nazis that marched but didn't actually commit any violence, should they be denounced?

      Yes. Because they are FUCKING NAZIS.

      Almost.

      If your political philosophy cannot withstand a little valid criticism, then your philosophy is wrong and needs to be strongly denounced if not willingly given up.

      That's what happens with James Alex Fields Jr, he couldn't handle people protesting against his philosophy. He couldn't meet them with rational discussion and wouldn't ignore them, so he drove a car into them.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    117. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      If your political philosophy cannot withstand a little valid criticism

      You just said that nazis have valid criticisms.

    118. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im amazed how no matter who the subject is, the jews suddenly appear and out-victim everyone in the conversation.

    119. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by Xac · · Score: 0

      Muslims killed over 300 people this year alone with cars. the right wing, or "neo-nazis's" as you like to put it, has not killed anyone with a vehicle. James Fields feared for his life and defended it. It makes sense too, everyone sees us as nazis no matter what we do, and you all want to "bash the fash". He'll walk, thanks to your violent rhetoric.

    120. Re:What about left-wing extremists? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      yes you're hilarious citing cases of a few deaths when I am talking about hundreds of murders per year.

  4. why don't they just use irc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why are nazi's so shit at tech

    1. Re:why don't they just use irc by ponraul · · Score: 1

      https://twitter.com/FuxNet/sta... They get banned there too.

    2. Re: why don't they just use irc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the only solution to their ideas is to burn their books, we are pretty fucked in the information age.

  5. seems like a clear message by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    White nationalists: we have a clear message of nationalism and family unity.
    Internet: nobody cared 70 years ago, and you're about to find out no one cares now.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:seems like a clear message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If nobody cared these various companies wouldn't need to ban them. It seems that people care quite a bit, they just don't want to hear it.

    2. Re:seems like a clear message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White nationalists: we have a clear message of nationalism and family unity.

      Internet: nobody cared 70 years ago, and you're about to find out no one cares now.

      By "Internet" you mean, "Me and other Leftists".

      I hate to break it to you, but you're going to care eventually. I don't know how it will play out, but it's obviously going to be quite violent, unfortunately.

    3. Re:seems like a clear message by Yosho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whites are tired of being destroyed by the other races.

      The majority of the population of the USA is still white. The vast majority of political positions are held by Christian, white males. The ones that don't are usually held by Christian black males. Everybody else is a tiny minority.

      You are not being destroyed, and -- at least within the USA -- you never have been and aren't even in danger. You are being asked to share.

      That's not to say that there is never any discrimination against or hatred for white males, but if your response to that is to support an ideology and symbolism that were literally dedicated to the genocide of an entire race, then fuck you. You can go die, the rest of the white males who are decent people can stay. They'll be just fine, and everybody else will be better off for it.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    4. Re:seems like a clear message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your civilization was created in Iraq, you dumbass.

    5. Re:seems like a clear message by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Race is bullshit anyway. It's just an arbitrary division based on a fairly random selection of traits. That's one reason why the ratio of non-white people is increasing - people who were white are now considered something else as the definition of race shifts.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:seems like a clear message by r0kk3rz · · Score: 1

      Race is bullshit anyway. It's just an arbitrary division based on a fairly random selection of traits. That's one reason why the ratio of non-white people is increasing - people who were white are now considered something else as the definition of race shifts.

      Indeed. The various races were created out of isolation and time, and as a species we are a whole lot less isolated from each other now than we used to be. Inevitably we will merge into a singular race unless you want to arbitrarily restrict peoples freedoms to preserve 'racial purity' whatever that means.

    7. Re:seems like a clear message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that leftists don't even know what constitutes whites or basic history.
      I'm a Slav with white skin, Caucasian would be a more apt term also including mixed whites that constitute the majority of the Mediterranean and Eastern Europe which happens to include Germanic/Nordic genes only on a relative basis; yet feminist and blacks and other ignorant groups hate me as much as Hitler hated my people, just because they see my skin but don't know shit about the history or ethnicity. I don't expect feminists and the alt-left of today to even know what constitutes the Caucasus region in terms of ethnicity and blood and history and which cultures overlay it.
      On any account they try to argue white privilege against a Slav, you only need to refer to history, whether Mongol expansion which saw the 2nd highest loss of life following WW2 (with almost equal numbers), or Ottoman enslavement, or Communist oppression and destruction, or Nazis trying to erase us, history speaks for itself;
      yet some dumbass uneducated ignorant social justice baby (in most cases western white female or stupid looking western emasculated white male) wants to shit about privilege and guilt to me on a daily basis without giving me any peace, like some god damn religious preacher telling me about original sins and trying to police how i should live?
      Get the fuck out.
      The only liberals i respect are those who practiced tolerance and peace during the 60's and such, who didn't try to shame anyone for having white skin or black skin or whatever skin, nor did they have guilt tripping schemes like this privilege meme these days. But those seem to have been suppressed and substituted by radical militant idiots who think social justice itself is an excuse for intolerance, or rather than tolerance should be pursued through sanctioned intolerance.
      Reads like a shitty religious absolutism these days.

      You know what's the worst? Let's theorize i was a western white with ancestors who did crazy shit (everyone's ancestors on this planet did to survive).
      Whatever my ancestors did, it contributed to me being alive today. 1 microsecond (even this is overstating it) is the difference between me being born and some other sperm making it instead, and that exact timing that contributed to me experiencing this life wouldn't happen if a single breath or movement of my ancestors was different.
      Leftist would have me be ashamed not only for my ancestors having the foresight and intelligence to survive with whatever means (ergo i am alive today), they would have me discredit my own life by discrediting the acts of my ancestors that lead to me materializing into this world.
      This is the stupidest, most moronic, most short-sighted, most insulting logic that the radical alt-left practices today; and you can bet your ass
      that anyone with a spine who values this, possibly 1 and only 1 life, wouldn't reciprocate for this insult.
      Compared to this idiocy of trying to guilt me into hating myself for existing, right leaning idiots are more tolerable since their fight isn't a mental one but one of pure and simple honest conflict of exchanging fists, a you or me logic.

    8. Re:seems like a clear message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everybody else is a tiny minority."

      'It’s official: Minority babies are the majority among the nation’s infants, but only just'
      http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/23/its-official-minority-babies-are-the-majority-among-the-nations-infants-but-only-just/

      Why are they calling a majority a 'minority'? Because they think white people are stupid enough to carry on allowing endless immigration into our countries, until it's too late. MOST white people don't want to live in a multiracial society, when did we ask for it?

    9. Re:seems like a clear message by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >find out no one cares now

      >nationalism

      I wish

      > family unity

      A lot of people care

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    10. Re:seems like a clear message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet feminist and blacks and other ignorant groups hate me as much as Hitler hated my people, just because they see my skin

      Do you think perhaps that some other reason might be responsible, hmmm?

    11. Re:seems like a clear message by Reziac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Worldwide, whites are 12-14% of the population, and shrinking fast. (Projected to be around 8% in another couple generations.)

      So... whites are being asked to share America and Europe. Okay, how about whites ask Africa and Asia to share too??

      What? That's colonization??!

      So why is it not colonization when whites are "asked to share" America and Europe??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:seems like a clear message by mjwx · · Score: 1

      White nationalists: we have a clear message of nationalism and family unity... and a hidden message of hate, outdated ideas, censorship of our opposition and control over your lives to ensure our unpopular and destructive dogma is followed without question.
      Internet: nobody cared 70 years ago, and you're about to find out no one cares now.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    13. Re:seems like a clear message by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Worldwide, whites are 12-14% of the population, and shrinking fast. (Projected to be around 8% in another couple generations.)

      So what? Was anybody here talking about worldwide racial distributions at all?

      So... whites are being asked to share America and Europe. Okay, how about whites ask Africa and Asia to share too??

      Ok. If you're being discriminated against in a country in which you're the minority, that sounds reasonable.

      What? That's colonization??!

      No, it's not. That's immigration.

      So why is it not colonization when whites are "asked to share" America and Europe??

      Because your entire premise is wrong, and even if it wasn't wrong, sometimes things are decided on a case-by-case basis rather than sweeping generalizations.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    14. Re:seems like a clear message by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "Ok. If you're being discriminated against in a country in which you're the minority, that sounds reasonable."

      One should perhaps take note of what's happening in South Africa.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  6. Was this just to ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

    ... make me aware of a chat site I never knew existed?

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:Was this just to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably. Discord is another one of those startups like Twitter - they've exploded in popularity among a certain set (namely the annoying gamer types) but make no money and are surviving solely on venture capital. They have no plans for turning a profit or making money at all and their long-term plan appears to be getting bought out.

    2. Re:Was this just to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously do not do any online gaming, Discord is well known in certain sectors.

    3. Re:Was this just to ... by Phydeaux314 · · Score: 1

      Eh, they have a premium service that charges a few bucks a month but most people don't use it since it doesn't really offer much in terms of extra features.

      I happen to enjoy it because it brings my VOIP and chat (which is just IRC with some extra front-end features) into one app. If it goes away, I can always go back to the mumble/IRC combo that I used before.

      --
      Never underestimate the stupidity inherent in all human beings.
  7. Censorship is not the answer by sheph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm no fan of these idiots, but any time we start stifling free expression I think we're on dangerous ground. I know Discord is a private company and it's their right to do it. However, I think there's value in letting it go. Let these fools demonstrate what fools they are. At least everyone will know who they are and what they're all about. Censoring them doesn't change their mind it just forces them underground.

    --
    I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
    1. Re: Censorship is not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      hello 20 year old me. i spent the last fifteen years working with people who censor themselves so they wont lose their jobs and health insurance for their families and their housing. and it is always white males who they are afraid of firing them. so in the real world censorship is an economic reality. in fantasy land its a principle that says its ok for nazis to burn flags. but nobody can say they were groped by the boss, name their rapist, disagree with unfair policies , complain about unsafe working conditions, incompetence, corruption, etc. that is where actual censorship exists in 2017.

    2. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, underground, where it's more difficult for the easily influenced to find them.

    3. Re:Censorship is not the answer by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Fuck Discord.

      Not really relevant.

      The larger problem is Facebook and Google since they basically dominate communication now and as such they should in my view be enforced to NOT block anyone out of their services since they have become so important.

      Of course with shit-governments like the German, Iranian, Turkish, North Korean, Chinese and likely our Swedish one too they would rather want to demand the opposite.

      But Discord is shit anyway. It's easy to use but why do it have to be a fucking web-browser with permanent webpages as chats filled of animations, videos, images and shit?

    4. Re:Censorship is not the answer by naubol · · Score: 2

      Does this argument apply to ISIS? Is there no cultural group so terrible that we can't all agree it's not bad for a private company to refuse service to? Are you sure refusing them service doesn't hurt their ability to spread and reinforce their ideas?

      This isn't a college de-platforming some people. This is a company choosing not to host Nazis. I think we can still have a nice market of ideas without encouraging companies to platform Nazis.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    5. Re:Censorship is not the answer by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

      I am no fan of racist's either but problem with censoring people is the problem is who decides what is what. Anyone with common sense that have seen things lately people have different views on what is racist. Sadly that line of racism will moved based upon who says it and their views. So one person that is liberal is given way more lee way on the matter where as a conservative is pretty much outright racist without even saying a word. I don't like censoring either side and 1st protects even hate speech even though people don't like it does for very reason I just said.

    6. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Pseudonym · · Score: 0

      Of course censorship isn't the answer. Anyone should be allowed to hold a peaceful rally on equal and non-discriminatory terms.

      Social censureship may be part of an answer though. Governments and societies are not required to be ideologically neutral. No private individual or private organisation is required to play along.

      If you don't like this, start your own nazi chat service or be a good national socialist and nationalise the chat industry.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    7. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The disenfranchised will always seek out the like minded, no matter where you lock them up.

    8. Re:Censorship is not the answer by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Yeah yeah, slippery slope, blah blah, but what you don't seem to get is that there is no slippery slope here. No one is saying censor anything that is racist. They are saying censor these particular nazis. It is illegal to be a nazi, express nazi views or use nazi iconography in Germany and they seem to be doing fucking fantastic with that policy. It is really okay to not give nazis a platform, I promise.

    9. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more value in not getting sued when these fools get caught having committed violence planned on Discourse.

    10. Re:Censorship is not the answer by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      However, I think there's value in letting it go

      Oh? What's the value in letting hate speech pollute an online gaming chat system? This isn't general chat we're talking about.

    11. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Discord is shit anyway. It's easy to use but why do it have to be a fucking web-browser with permanent webpages as chats filled of animations, videos, images and shit?

      Well to address your issues:

      (1) It being a "web-browser" (i.e. built using Electron) means it's easy to deploy for Windows, OS X and even Linux, the shittiest of the desktop operating systems. Everyone here wants more apps on Linux, well Electron's here to serve.

      (2) Users WANT all the GIFs, Videos, images and so on. Discord is basically an IRC for the modern age, where all these elements can be integrated inside the chat. It means you can have servers/channels specifically for memes, wallpapers and so on. There's a definite audience for such things.

      So shut the fuck up cunt, you don't know what you're talking about.

    12. Re:Censorship is not the answer by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      Did I say that we should believe accusations without evidence? Pretty sure I never fucking said that and the whole idea is completely orthogonal to what we are talking about. I am so tired of nonsense AC strawman arguments.

    13. Re: Censorship is not the answer by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      but nobody can say they were groped by the boss, name their rapist

      Bullshit.

    14. Re:Censorship is not the answer by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then let them have to work harder. It was far better when being a Neo-Nazi meant a lot of "wink wink nudge nudge" and secret meetings in basements, and having a subscription to racist literature produced via cheap mimeograph and sent in a plain brown envelope.

      The problem now is that the "dispossessed" can find extremist literature far too easily; whether that be young Muslim men finding ISIS propaganda, or young white men being able to find Storm Front, and once they're there, the speed at which they can be radicalized is truly astonishing.

      So yes, I think hosting companies at the very least making sure they're not the ones helping radicalize is a good thing.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    15. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I don't think those resources can properly be suppressed. China has been trying that approach for a decade.

      It would be rather nicer to understand why people feel or become "dispossessed" and address those issues.

      When you're told you're racist because you speak out against immigration, having seen its impact on jobs and wages, having seen preferential provision of services to immigrants.. you're not going to be scared of listening to a group that empathises with you just because they're also vilified as racists.

      I think Islamic radicalisation has other roots but again, when you're told your beliefs are wrong, when you're demonised as a terrorist or a paedophile, you're going to seek comfort.

      So do counter the extremist measures but people also need to start listening and accepting other views. Otherwise you get.. well, Brexit, or Trump, or a reciprocal escalation of violence in Charlottesville.

    16. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the answer is to fucking hang them.

      You see, the problem is that most people today have forgotten or never really experienced first hand what (real) Nazis are like. I suggest you open a history book sometime and look up what it took to deal with them the last time, and how it was done. Let me tell you, the last thing that was done was to give them a pedestal to speak from, at least without a priest and a noose around their neck to complete the arrangement.

    17. Re:Censorship is not the answer by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      That's a false equivalency. Being a critic of immigration doesn't make you a nazi, being a nazi makes you a nazi.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    18. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Cederic · · Score: 1

      But both net you an accusation of racism. Don't tell me it's a false equivalency, tell the people liberally throwing around labels and trying to shut down conversations.

    19. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISIS actually calls for direct violence against myriad peoples. AFAIK the Alt-Right hasn't made any real credible threats of violence, they're just a bunch of buffoons.

    20. Re:Censorship is not the answer by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I think there are some anti-immigrant types who are out and out racists. I think there are some who have legitimate concerns. I think most have been convinced immigration is some sort of great evil. In other words, the Nazis are only a small subset of anti-immigrant types.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    21. Re:Censorship is not the answer by aliquis · · Score: 1

      1) I had no clue what it was built on. But since it did so many things I assumed it used some web engine.
      2) Since I have a shit PC I don't. Some people likely want it but it's overloaded with crap.

      So shut the fuck up cunt, you don't know what you're talking about.

      I thought the point was pretty clear in that I didn't wanted it at-least ..

    22. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      How is that nonsense, when there is recent historical proof to show it works exactly like that. Please run the terms "red scare" through google.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    23. Re:Censorship is not the answer by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      As I already said, there is an even closer example of Germany where it is illegal to be a nazi or use nazi iconography and they seem to be doing just fine. Nobody over there accusing people of being nazis left and right.

    24. Re:Censorship is not the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a college de-platforming some people. This is a company choosing not to host Nazis.

      nice De-humanisation you've got going on there

      nazi's might not be 'nice people', but they're still people

  8. Good riddance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Boy does BeauHD come up a lot in these whiny propaganda heavy threads.

    1. Re: Good riddance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're the ones that get the page hits and the revenue. Never mind that Slashdot has become Whitepowerdot in the process by attracting the extremists, personally I wouldn't want my ad revenue associated with such a shitshow.

  9. So. What shall I use instead? by aliquis · · Score: 2

    https://tox.chat/
    Seem like a good option.

    https://wiki.mumble.info/wiki/...
    Likely safe from "we know better than you" trash-people.

    https://wire.com/en/
    Maybe?

    https://about.riot.im/
    Maybe?

    http://www.teamspeak.com/en/te...
    Guess running your own server removes the issues.

    https://ring.cx/
    Seem like it could work.

    https://www.evolvehq.com/welco...
    That's the stuff which came with AMD drivers before? Likely not safe for your freedoms.

    https://app.twitch.tv/
    Curse was direct competitor to Discord before. But Twitch .. Anything owned by a company like that I guess want to act like the anti-white globalists and their followers in idiocy want so .. likely not a good option? Unless one already use it and they haven't fucked around yet.

    1. Re:So. What shall I use instead? by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Are you a Nazi? If so, maybe you should rethink your position and then you can use any service you want!

    2. Re:So. What shall I use instead? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Are you a Nazi? If so, maybe you should rethink your position and then you can use any service you want!

      I'm a Swede.

      In Europe anyone who don't want to destroy their own people and culture is called a Nazi. So yes.

    3. Re:So. What shall I use instead? by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      They aren't called that, but you could try not being a Nazi and then you'd be able to use Discord

    4. Re:So. What shall I use instead? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      They aren't called that

      The stigma is about the same.

      The left has been free to make any decisions and associations they want for decades. It's not like it's important.

      Here in Sweden all immigrants to Europe was called refugees the whole fucking time. Now they are sometimes called migrants which are correct but by now they have changed how people perceive them anyway so it's not really important any longer for their message. It's important in that refugees was always wrong though.
      Our "Daily News" magazine still call even those who sit demonstrating because they don't live up to either of the refugee convention or the more generous EU laws for asylum-seekers refugees though. When clearly they are not. If they were they wouldn't have a problem and get to stay because that's how the stupid law work.

      but you could try not being a Nazi

      I've never really considered myself a Nazi and definitely not for authority. I read some text piece which suggested they really wasn't much of socialists then again that's what a red would say. Still to authoritarian for me I guess. Maybe ok during a cleanse. So yeah. Never really been a problem. Then again being one if that was how I felt wouldn't be a problem either .. I'm fine being one.

      and then you'd be able to use Discord

      I'm totally ABLE to use Discord. The question is rather whatever I want to use that piece of shit when they do shit like this.

  10. Re:Nazis are people too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wonderful volk who just happen to not have any problems loading people into ovens...

  11. Re:Nazis are people too. by naubol · · Score: 2

    Have you ever met a real Nazi? I have. And they aren't like in the movies. They are by and large likable people who love their country. I would never be a Nazi myself. For one thing, I'm not a joiner. But it is unfair to demonize them. They are just every day work-a-day Joes. Leave them alone.

    Yes, they're people. We don't have to hate them to hold them accountable for what they support. We don't have to give them protection from being removed from a private company's service, either.

    --
    Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
  12. Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This move is virtue signalling for Discord. It's the same nonsense that drove the Merck CEO resigning from the American Manufacturing Council.

    The more important problem is how to take care of both the extreme right wing morons (neo Nazis / KKK, who are not the alt-right that the mainstream/social media is attempting to associate the extremists with), as well as the extreme left wing idiots like Antifa and BLM. The issue is who is funding this rabble-rousing on all sides. Follow that money trail and prosecute them by any means to shut them down.

    The goal of all of this nonsense is to create FUD in the populace and divide the nation to take away everyone's rights. Recognize this for what it is and we'll actually bring this crap to and end and move forward as a nation.

    1. Re:Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf is this "virtue signalling"? The notion that Being A Good Person(TM) is some sort of manipulative, attention-seeking charade is not only a sad projection, but a full-on alt-right delusion that ought not be paid any attention. Fuck off, troll.

      What a lot of babies.

    2. Re:Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      ...says the person desperately trying to equate antifa and BLM.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    3. Re:Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This move is virtue signalling for Discord.

      Is that what the kids are calling being against Nazis these days?

    4. Re: Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virtue signalling is when you do something pointless just to try to signal to your in group that you are afherent to their principles. Ex: The carbon output of a single car is trivial, but you buy an electric car to indicate that you hold yourself to a standard, despite not actually helping the environment in any meaningful way.

    5. Re:Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by DogDude · · Score: 1

      "The goal of all of this nonsense is to create FUD in the populace and divide the nation"

      Says the fucking Russian troll. Fuck off.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    6. Re:Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a well-reasoned level-headed response. Your mom must be proud of that mouth of yours. Now explain why s/he's wrong.

    7. Re:Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      virtue signaling is when someone is trying to make sure his comrades know he doesn't agree with the politically incorrect position. He's not necessarily interested in actually making a point one way or the other or achieving anything relevant.

    8. Re: Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      Virtue signalling is when you are JK Rowling or George Clooney, and say that people and governments need to do more to help refugees. This becomes virtue signalling when you do absolutely nothing to help any single refugee personally - especially when you have multiple residences and ample resources that could easily house a good number of refugees - but you choose not to.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    9. Re:Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both are the exact same type of overreaction to a manufactured situation.

          In the Antifa case, it's about being against people who support Trump or conservative ideas conflated with actual fascism, yet with none of them have lived under a fascist dictatorship such as Mussolini's Italy or Franco's Spain to understand what that term means.

      In the BLM case, it's choosing the wrong cases to go against for the movement (e.g. Michael Brown, who was an armed robber attempting to take a gun from a cop after his robbery vs. Eric Garner who was literally murdered by the NYPD for selling fucking illegal cigarettes), and ignoring the elephant in the room that black-on-black violence is by far the biggest cause of murders of black men.

      In both cases, the level of reaction against people who were complete supporters of them is completely inappropriate (e.g. when BLM took over Bernie Sanders' speech in WA state, even though the guy marched with MLK for fuck's sake). The root cause is someone funding them. Find that source and terminate it.

    10. Re:Virtue Signalling - Follow the Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      virtue signaling is when someone is trying to make sure his comrades know he doesn't agree with the politically incorrect position. He's not necessarily interested in actually making a point one way or the other or achieving anything relevant.

      Uh... I think that stating that you are against white supremacist Nazis kind of makes the point that white supremacism and Nazis are a Bad Thing(tm). Normally, this should be obvious, but it's pretty clear that these days, a lot of people need to be hit with that clue-by-four.

  13. Net Neutrality and the 1st Amendment by david.emery · · Score: 1

    If you believe in Net Neutrality, should this also include 1st Amendment protections for content that is legal but offensive?

    I'm not sure if we want to add ISPs to the (relatively small) list of entities where the First Amendment is explicitly applied. On the other hand, I'm afraid of the consequences if internet companies have unlimited rights (subject to other existing laws) to decide what content is and is not made available on the internet.

    (Do Telephone Companies have to right to refuse telephone service, and utilities the right to refuse power, water, etc? I don't know!)

    1. Re:Net Neutrality and the 1st Amendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1st Amendment merely prevents the government from shutting you up. It does not mean anyone is required to listen to you or provide a forum for you to speak in. It also does not shield you from criticism or consequences. If you're yelled at, boycotted, or banned from an internet community your free speech rights aren't being violated. It just means people think you're an asshole and they're showing you the door.

    2. Re:Net Neutrality and the 1st Amendment by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Net neutrality does indeed mean that if someone wants to create a NaziChat service the ISPs and backbone providers should not be able to shut them off.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  14. Discord: IRC, but shittier. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1, Informative

    It takes a few brain cells and an apt-get install to get an IRC server up and running.

    Or just use one of the dozens already out there.

    1. Re:Discord: IRC, but shittier. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Discord is Slack, but shittier. And I mean that in pretty much every way, it's basically a chat client like Slack that supports a strict subset of the features Slack offers. Just like Slack, the "desktop" version of the app is literally Chrome but with a static HTML app it loads. If you've ever been forced to use Slack and wonder WTF for, all the same problems apply to Discord. Including the ridiculous overhead for a chat app due to embedding a complete browser.

    2. Re: Discord: IRC, but shittier. by j-turkey · · Score: 1

      It's been some time since I've used IRC. Has the protocol been updated to include group VoIP? Discord is quite good in this regard (although I find TeamSpeak's client better for gaming for several reasons).

      --

      -Turkey

    3. Re: Discord: IRC, but shittier. by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      No IRC works like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    4. Re: Discord: IRC, but shittier. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha there are voice plugins and there are even voice audio chat servers .....
      open source

      all this does is shove people away form the eyes that WERE watching easy and now might get tipped off better.....

    5. Re:Discord: IRC, but shittier. by tepples · · Score: 1

      It takes a few brain cells and an apt-get install to get an IRC server up and running.

      And an ISP that allows servers.

    6. Re:Discord: IRC, but shittier. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital Ocean. $5/month for more CPU, RAM and Disk than any IRC server I used growinp up.

    7. Re: Discord: IRC, but shittier. by j-turkey · · Score: 1

      Hah!

      --

      -Turkey

  15. Re: Nazis are people too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck off

  16. Virtue signaling by HBI · · Score: 1

    More important than doing the right thing, which is to ignore them.

    What's wrong with the world today, in a nutshell.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Virtue signaling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Virtue signaling: such an overused term. The latest armchair sociologist's go-to term.

    2. Re:Virtue signaling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given how the leading cause of atrocities in histories came from religion or ideology sanctioning them under the excuse of virtue,
      or under the cover of virtue, or that most injustices go unpunished because the oppressing party used virtue to excuse themselves
      as a smokescreen; i'd say you absentmindedly underestimate the meaning of the word. It's purpose is precisely to be overused
      as the phenomena it fights is precisely one that tries to hide its evil under a righteous outer appearance. Skepticism is universal and
      doesn't only apply to evil people, but also evil people who appear good or who are too deluded to recognize their own evil.

  17. The elephant in the room by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's an elephant in the room that no one's talking about.

    "Unite the right" was not afforded the protection of law during their rally.

    Furthermore, law enforcement purposely directed the rally-goers into the antifa crowd, putting them in significant danger.

    The Antifa crowd was flinging urine, poop, and one ralley-goer suffered permanent eye damage from having acid (!) thrown at him. The police were widely observed as doing nothing to stop the fighting.

    Think about this for a minute: The government withdrew the protection of law from a group based on their political ideals. The state governor and the mayor simply decided not to enforce the law for an ideology they don't like.

    This is a profoundly scary thought - that a political faction within the government can simply decide not to enforce the law in order to promote their narrative.

    I'm going to have to side with the ACLU on this one. Hate speech is protected speech, and UniteTheRight should have been allowed to peaceably assemble.

    1. Re:The elephant in the room by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      If only they'd managed to not have one of their "side" commit murder on video they might have been able to have managed to spin the event to their side. But they couldn't so as you would expect the spin goes with the message of the side who were on the receiving end of the murder. I admit I would expect the media to spin it against them anyway, but you can't really complain given what actually happened.

      I agree they have the right to their speech and if that involves waving Nazi flags that is their choice. I would imagine it would be highly offensive to those who remember the American who paid the ultimate price to free Europe from that flag and were in fact killed by those serving under that flag - but being offensive is part of that freedom of speech thing and the very thing those Americans died defending.

    2. Re: The elephant in the room by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Someone should tell the alt-righters that it's hard to argue you planned for a peaceful protest when many of your members wore helmets, carried riot shields, and had knives or clubs.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:The elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, Nazi sympathizer. Nothing about the alt-right's assembly was peaceful nor intended to be peaceful. You are simply an apologist.

    4. Re:The elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you have a source that is a reputable news organization for that?

    5. Re: The elephant in the room by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      Antifa always counter protests with the utmost courtesy and leaves all their weapons at home when hunting for Nazi scalps.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    6. Re:The elephant in the room by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 0, Troll

      do you have a source that is a reputable news organization for that?

      Here's a direct quote from a Finnish man on vacation who observed the situation:

      I was expecting to enter a peaceful protest to protect this monument and part of United States history from utter and total rewriting. I entered with people from the United States who were aware there were going to be counter-protesters. They promised to keep me safe, which they did. But what happened was, the police force, which should have kept the protesting parties separate, in fact funneled the right-wing protesters, the people defending the monument, right into Antifa, [making them run] a gauntlet of Antifa to the monument Then – I don’t know the details of it – on dubious legal grounds, [the police] declared the gathering of right-wing protesters unlawful. We were forced to leave the venue and run another gauntlet.

      Call me jaded, but I don't think we'll find accurate reporting on *anything* about this incident from the MSM.

    7. Re: The elephant in the room by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      You know why that happened don't you? Because the police refused them protection. Remember what happened at berkeley? People on the right showed up and people got the shit kicked out of them, and maced. The second time there, known as the "battle for berkeley" was when the right showed up willing to defend themselves, and the little antifa and bamn shits learned what happens when you can't disappear into a crowd when you're assaulting people with bottles, bricks, sticks, steel bars, and bike locks.

      Now we see what's happened this weekend, when people on the right. Irregardless of what you think of their views show up and expect violence because the police will not separate the crowd or do their jobs because they were ordered not to. Just like at Berkeley...twice. But look at Seattle, where both sides ended up being separated by police, oh and the police seized multiple weapons from antfa.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:The elephant in the room by bongey · · Score: 1

      ACLU in Virginia reported that police were told to stand down . "Claire Guthrie Gastañaga, Executive Director of the ACLU of Virginia, told NPR Monday that she was present at the rally and “law enforcement was standing passively by, waiting for violence to take place, so that they would have grounds to declare an emergency, declare an ‘unlawful assembly’ and clear the area.”
      Oh I don't believe for one second the police chiefs saying there wasn't a stand down order. More than one police officer told people that they were told to stand down.

    9. Re:The elephant in the room by ArylAkamov · · Score: 3, Informative

      Couldn't agree more. It was obvious if you were watching what went down live, it was perfectly peaceful until the police started herding the protesters into the violent counter-protesters.
      It was nice to see Seattle handle it well, even with the counter protesters calling for violence and chanting "HOW DO YOU SPELL NAZI? SPD!" (Seattle Police Department).
      Not to mention one group had the proper permits to be there, and fought in court to get them.
      It's only going to get more violent from here on out though. As you said, same shit happened in Berkley. It's only a matter of time until the protesters start showing up armed and waiting to be attacked, since the police won't do shit to protect them.

    10. Re:The elephant in the room by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The court case for that death could get very interesting. If you're in fear of your life, you've already been attacked, you've seen someone injured by acid.. it could well fail on a murder charge.

      I'd hope for justice but can't see that happening. The prosecution will be beholden to public outrage and the defense will be ludicrously well funded, so minimal chances of the actual truth being discussed.

    11. Re:The elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your referencing fucking breitbart, I have a fucking bridge you might want to buy

    12. Re:The elephant in the room by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      That's true, and the leaving the scene charge should be easy enough to beat because of that. The problem for the defense is that he easily drove away back the way he came, speeding towards the crowd of people is hard to explain as fleeing the crowd of the people. But as you say a US court case is very much not a truth finding exercise.

    13. Re: The elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that certainly sounds like someone planning for a peaceful event.

      Listen snowflake. Bringing a whole heap of weapons "just in case", isn't how you conduct peaceful events. It is the classic fascist tactic though. Come armed to the teeth, and blame "the others" when the violence starts. Why, if you listen to the old nazis, packing women and children into the gas-chambers was all about "self defence" and "protecting" themselves and their nation.

    14. Re:The elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Finnish man, on vacation to an extreme right wing rally in the US? That's not a Finnish man, it's a fucking European neo-nazi meeting up with his brethren. Your "direct quote" - found on breitbart of all places - isn't worth the bits you wasted on it.

      You're a complete idiot, no surprises there.

    15. Re: The elephant in the room by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      The assemblers came prepared to be attacked. They can argue that the thread of violence was both obvious and eminent, yet the authorities chose to do nothing.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    16. Re: The elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Imminent", dummy.

  18. Discord bans servers?? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    A service named Discord is banning people who are causing discord? They need to rename their service.

  19. Mob justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Mob justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All justice is "mob" justice. If you're going to march in public, this shit can happen. It happened to antifa, so I guess no one is willing to learn?

    2. Re:Mob justice by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      If you don't want to be outed as a Nazi, don't march with Nazis. At least the KKK had enough wits to wear hoods. Not that they often had to worry, since in many places the local government was either sympathetic or out and out members.

      Still, if you're a proud White Supremacist, how could you possibly have a problem with your family, your neighbors, your boss and coworkers knowing that you espouse those views? I mean, aren't you on the right side of history believing that America is white and working to get rid of all those brown skinned people who are perverting your precious bodily fluids? Why on earth would you have a problem with people identifying you?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Mob justice by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And some more attempts at moral equivalency
       

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Mob justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One day they won't have a problem with being identified.

      On that day you are in trouble.

    5. Re:Mob justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's first ask a more neutral question. Why are all those proud atheists hiding their non-believe in Afghanistan? Because Afghan society is hostile against atheists.
      So in essence, it is a rather simple question to answer. You hide, because society is hostile towards your ideology, believe or whatever.

      Of course in Afghanistan you die and here you get a bit ridiculed for being a naz and perhaps have to search for different worki, but the principle is the same.

    6. Re:Mob justice by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Good. Name and shame every last one of these pieces of garbage.

    7. Re:Mob justice by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Still, if you're a proud White Supremacist, how could you possibly have a problem with your family, your neighbors, your boss and coworkers knowing that you espouse those views? I mean, aren't you on the right side of history believing that America is white and working to get rid of all those brown skinned people who are perverting your precious bodily fluids? Why on earth would you have a problem with people identifying you?

      Disclaimer: I am pretty far on the left ideologically, and I hate racist Nazis.

      With that said, I think most of them have no problem with their friends, family, and even coworkers knowing who they are. The reason they hide their identities is because the authoritarian left loves to doxx people and then use any means necessary to ruin their lives. As soon as the incidents in Charlottesville happened, my social media feeds were covered with people posting zoomed-in individual pictures of protesters on the white nationalist side, and mobs of people were doing their best to identify them, post their personal information, and then contact and harass their friends, family, and workplace. You don't have to be ashamed of your opinions to not want hundreds of complete strangers to call your parents and scream at them or hack into their Facebook pages.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    8. Re:Mob justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think they actually believe any of the absolute brain-rotted shite they post, or is it just a knowing sneer to get the rise they love? After all, before they achieved power the brownshirts would just... hang around. Not attacking anyone per se, just kind of imposing themselves, getting in peoples faces and waiting for the trouble the sweet-innocent-little-mes didn't start, honest. With the rise of internet and troll culture, it seems like a direct shoe-in.

  20. What do we get with all this censorship? by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

    Battle Royal... Nazis vs. Fascists... Which ones are the good guys?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:What do we get with all this censorship? by meglon · · Score: 1

      Those are the same thing, and they're all worthless pieces of shit.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    2. Re:What do we get with all this censorship? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Just lump them under 'authoritarian' and leave it at that.

    3. Re:What do we get with all this censorship? by Yosho · · Score: 2

      Are you really trying to imply that a private company that chooses not to allow people they don't like to use their servers is in any way like fascism? Really?

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    4. Re:What do we get with all this censorship? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1
      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  21. Verge? by dicobalt · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't trust a word from that SJW corporatist site.

    1. Re:Verge? by pseudofrog · · Score: 1

      Why, you don't think Discord banned the Nazis? I'm pretty sure they banned the Nazis.

    2. Re:Verge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, you don't think Discord banned the Nazis? I'm pretty sure they banned the Nazis.

      Actually, my only real question is whether they banned Nazis, or called someone Nazis and then banned them.

      There's a huge difference there, as it seems that lately both sides (left and right) are calling each other Nazis. In many cases, both sides are acting like Nazis.

  22. Re:Nazis are people too. by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

    You know those aren't just movies, right?

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  23. I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that not all of those were NAZI sites...

  24. How many websites were shutdown for Scalise? by Jarwulf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't approve of either the Scalise shooter's ideological faction or the Charlotteville driver's faction but I don't remember this guilt by association purge being enacted all the times leftwing violence was committed.

    1. Re:How many websites were shutdown for Scalise? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's not retaliation for the actions of those at the protest, it's enforcement of the ToS covering incitement.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:How many websites were shutdown for Scalise? by luther349 · · Score: 1

      yet did they ban any of the blm channels.

    3. Re:How many websites were shutdown for Scalise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charlotteville driver was mentally ill and there's evidence his car was damaged before his erratic behavior, besides which the left was only there to prevent the right from exercising the freedoms of speech and assembly - I'd say they got off easy with only 1 death.

    4. Re:How many websites were shutdown for Scalise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you.

    5. Re:How many websites were shutdown for Scalise? by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'd say you're a gutless Nazi apologist that's a festering pustule on the arse of humanity.

  25. Fucking hillarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fucking hilarious how the right-wingers here are running around with swastikas saluting Hitler, then they go crying about nazis being socialists and leftists when reminded about how we fought a war with the motherfuckers.

    1. Re:Fucking hillarious by luther349 · · Score: 0

      quit watching the fake news there probably was like 10 white power types there to pose for the cameras. it was the blm and the white meth heads attacking the rite side. throwing piss tear gas and acids jumping the lines and pepper spraying people. and they where protected and no reports by big fake media on what they where doing. then 1 guy loses his shit and runs the terrest over its huge ass news. if they guy was part of blm i bet they would have burred that to. its simply a setup to thow race into everything so they can get there way and thats deleting your history.

    2. Re:Fucking hillarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is a damning indictment of the US education system, certainly.

  26. Which part? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1, Troll

    do you have a source that is a reputable news organization for that?

    Which part? The ACLU just confirmed that the police were told to stand down, and the permanent eye damage thing comes directly from the victim.

  27. "Nazi ideology"? by execthis · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Nazi ideology"? Use of that term is a joke.

    The AltRight is not about Nazi ideology. Spencer has addressed the topic at length for anyone who actually cares, which clearly most don't since they just want to spew shit against any movement that unites the interests of native European peoples.

    Basically anyone who doesn't support open borders, unlimited immigration, and ethnic replacement = Nazi.

    This thread only proves many of the AltRight's basic points.

    1. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by meglon · · Score: 2

      No, it proves you can make a strawman argument, and stick by it for a hundred words or so.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    2. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually blaming a group for all a societies ills works great to reintegrate that group back into society and form a more cohesive integrated tribe. I know that is exactly what happened with the European pogroms against the Jews. Oh that's right that is exactly the opposite of what happened. Well maybe the alt right will finally be chased off the continent and they will form their own nation state in Liberia or someplace they can form their own identity and chase off the folks already living there.

      There is no difference between the hate of the Jews in Nazi Germany, and the hatred of the alt right in the USA. It is all just people forming tribes. It's what people do

    3. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys need to look long and hard at your movement and figure out what's the matter with it.
      it's easy to blame the antifa for the violence that happened, but did nobody on your side see this coming? Did you expect police protection? You guys marched into a city with a jewish mayor, with all of those idiots waving nazi flags and facist symbols, and what did you expect? You guys talk a lot about how the leftist are the useful idiots, but I think you guys are.

    4. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it proves you can make a strawman argument, and stick by it for a hundred words or so.

      > "You're Using a Strawman Argument"

      > "Literally everyone to the right of Stalin is a Nazi."

      Well ok.

    5. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly enough, there's compelling evidence that one of the people that organized this was doing so to set them up. Basically, a honeypot. People are looking into his background and he has work history with the media, was a Hillary supporter, did the whole Occupy Wallstreet thing... basically all extremely leftist stuff.

    6. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Erm yes, that's literally the definition of NAZISM - it was also the exact same arguments Shitler made.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    7. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the Nazi! I mean...AltReich.

    8. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      A problem for the AltRight movement is that it's been infiltrated by actual Neo-Nazis. I think it's similar to the problem GamerGate had, in which their message got mixed in with sexist and harassing behavior of women who posted their feminist-slanted treaties on videogames and culture. Those treaties were, in my opinion, at best pondered as an interesting discussion point, and at worst simply ignored. Whatever sort of "ethics in journalism" message GamerGate had was far overshadowed by those who used the GG moniker to commit sexist acts.

      The left *tried* to poison the image of the Tea Party movement, but only partially succeeded, because the movement was more about tax reform than overly ideological (hence, the name), and most of the members were reasonably well behaved. So, "Tea Party" is really only vilified by the left - but then again, so are normal conservatives and Republicans in general, I suppose. But here, we have actual, avowed white supremacists associating with and endorsing the movement. I don't see how anyone can view that movement as anything but fatally poisoned.

      BTW, I self-identify as a generally right-leaning, conservative Republican with a sprinkling of liberal or libertarian views on some topics. So, I hope you don't dismiss this as someone who actually disagrees with many of your core concerns. But I'll be damned if I ever get anywhere near the "AltRight" moniker myself.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    9. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Nazis in the 1930s claimed not to be about Nazi ideology, just defending their people and opposing immigration and all that stuff that Spencer is now saying. That's how they work, pretending to be socialist until they get into power.

      Don't fall for it. Again.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by execthis · · Score: 1

      So basically what you're saying is that because there happen to be some people - not mainstream people nor leaders - who call themselves AltRight and are neo-nazis, that irrevocably invalidates the AltRight?

      In any grouping of people there will always be things like that to occur. That doesn't invalidate the group and it doesn't invalidate what prominent members/leaders of the group state.

      The Wikipedia page of Richard Spencer and others is almost a complete lie, based on extensive direct statements he has made many times.

      The bottom line is the AltRight is being deliberately maligned.

    11. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by execthis · · Score: 0

      So "not being about Nazi ideology" = being a Nazi

      Looks like you've got it neatly tied up. Can't argue with you on that.

      Now you can freely call anyone you want a Nazi and not have to worry about it :-)

    12. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by KeensMustard · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it would help if the alt right were to clearly condemn and denounce the violence perpetrated by actual Nazis?

      To be honest, I never suspected that the alt-right were as extreme as they have demonstrated themselves to be. Cowardly, whining arseholes, yes. But the number of posts from alt right I've read over the last few days, justifying the murder of someone whose only crime was to stand up to Nazis (a stance that we used to be PROUD of) has made me change my mind.

    13. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by Barsteward · · Score: 0

      "There is no difference between the hate of the Jews in Nazi Germany, and the hatred of the alt right in the USA." - of course there is, Jews are a race of people, Alt-right are not born bigots, they are a groomed group of ignorant bigots.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    14. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      AltReich is great replacement for alt-right as they seem to support Hitler and his flag

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    15. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      It's an issue of perception among the general population. Whether it's spread by misinformation is completely irrelevant. What people actually believe is, and we've provided beautiful ammunition for that. Sorry if that smacks of realpolick rather than ideological purity.

      Think of the swastika symbol as an example, which is ironically appropo, given the circumstances. The swastika was a symbol of peace and good fortune for thousands of years before the Nazis appropriated it. Do you think that any amount of effort could transform it back into it's original meaning, at least in western / European countries? There have been a few who have tried, like a company that tried to rebrand it in its original intent. All efforts have been shut down due to public pressure. Even the Japanese government, in preparation for the upcoming Olympics, has decreed that swastikas shouldn't appear on maps printed for the benefit of tourists (they typically depict Buddhist temples, I believe). They recognize the reality of our entrenched perception of that symbol as a mark of hatred, bigotry, and evil.

      To me, it's a matter of choosing your battles appropriately and wisely. After the past few days, I think the battle of AltRight's public perception has seen a tipping point, and I'm just not sure there's any coming back from it. The "truth", as you claim, is fine and good, but the point of politics is to effect change. You won't do that if the majority of the country believes that AltRight is associated with the white supremacist movement, as you won't get them to listen beyond their initial pre-conceptions. Conservatives have a hard enough time courting minorities to our side without an infusing of KKK members.

      The movement doesn't have to die - at least the non-racist parts of it. But I think it's probably ripe for a re-branding. I just don't believe the "AltRight" brand is worth as much as it appears to be costing us.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    16. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by KGIII · · Score: 0

      Bigot is our natural state. Tolerance is learned, not innate. There have been numerous studies on prejudice. It's pretty much what we do, and probably a holdover from our tribal days. You are born with an automated distrust of different.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    17. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by Millennium · · Score: 1

      "Nazi ideology"? Use of that term is a joke.

      If only.

      The AltRight is not about Nazi ideology.

      Yes, it is.

      Spencer has addressed the topic at length for anyone who actually cares, which clearly most don't since they just want to spew shit against any movement that unites the interests of native European peoples.

      His arguments are bullshit, a transparent attempt at thinly disguising Nazi ideology among people who have not already bought into it, as you have.

      Basically anyone who doesn't support open borders, unlimited immigration, and ethnic replacement = Nazi.

      If you buy into the ridiculous conspiracy theory that anyone is "replacing" your ethnicity, then yes, you're on the path to Nazi ideology. All else is window dressing and implementation detail, because they've already caught you in the Big Lie. If you aren't a monster yet, you're a dupe. Turn back.

    18. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spencer has said a lot of racist bullshit and if you think any of it is even remotely defensible, you are racist too and you should get the fuck out of the USA.

    19. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to Wikipedia, the word "Sawastika" is supposed to referred to a different symbol (clock-wised drawing), and its meaning is on the good side. However, the one that Nazis used (counter-clock-wised) is called "Sauvastika" which is the bad side of "Sawastka". However, people kept calling the bad symbol as "Sawastika" all along, so now the word is referring to a bad meaning regardless how it is being drawn...

    20. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by TRRosen · · Score: 1

      Or it could be all the Nazi flags and Hitler salutes. Just saying.

    21. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      I like a nice conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but Hillary! supporters aren't exactly the core of the hard Left.

    22. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by ElKry · · Score: 0

      Gamergate LITERALLY started with harassing a woman.

    23. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That woman is LITERALLY an abuser. If she were a man you'd be cheering for it, and everyone knows this.

    24. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by meglon · · Score: 1

      > "Literally everyone to the right of Stalin is a Nazi."

      Clearly you just need to clean the shit out from between your ears, because that's the stupidest thing i've read all morning... although with the number of neo-nazi appeasers and wannabe's on this site, i'm sure there will be much more stupid to come.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    25. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bwahahahaha, oh dear, yet another example of the alt-right being a bunch of kooks and paranoid delusional conspiracy theorists. Absolutely no loyalty between their members at all, the second one of them fucks up or is publically shamed, they're disowned. What utter trash.

    26. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by execthis · · Score: 1

      Just like you're blaming whites, attacking them for collectively advocating for their self-interests, calling us Nazis and supremacists, etc.

      Right.

      All your convoluted rhetoric is is nothing more than anti-white hatred.

    27. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by execthis · · Score: 1

      Loving your self and your race/people is not bigotry. It's natural.

      Also, loving yourself doesn't mean hating others, unless you're a stupid anti-white, hateful Antifa retard.

    28. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by execthis · · Score: 1

      Found the white hater.

    29. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by execthis · · Score: 1

      This topic came up after last year's NPI conference and Spencer did a lengthy video about it (on RedIce). The way mainstream media dealt with the very few Roman salutes which occurred was a deliberate deception (Watch Henryk's lengthy analysis of it on RedIce TV).

      In the end, because it is recognized AltRight are invariably going to be called Nazis regardless of what reality is, we chose to laugh it off as a joke, as an easy way to trigger idiots who are either intent on deliberately maligning us or else are too stupid to realize the truth.

      After what the media did yes people were literally referring to others as Nazi as a joke because that's how absurd the situation was.

    30. Re: "Nazi ideology"? by execthis · · Score: 1

      You know what? I bet most AltRighters actually know more about the actual history of the mid-20th century, the second Great War, and the politics that surrounded it than the vast majority of people screaming the word Nazi at us.

      At this point, constantly throwing out the term Nazi clearly indicates that you're capable of nothing more than ad hominem attacks since your argument is completely vacuous.

    31. Re:"Nazi ideology"? by KeensMustard · · Score: 1

      Is there a particular reason for anybody to believe anything that that guy says? let alone the fact you included yet another conspiracy theory, withotu any evidence other than the insane rantings of a right wing extremist.

  28. Of course you'd disdain it - it's true by HBI · · Score: 1

    No one would even know Discord was being used in such a way unless they opened their mouths like this.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  29. Authoritarians want to eat the people's authority by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hard fascism and hard socialism are not the same, but both are authoritarian. This puts them in the lower part of a Nolan chart, the upper part of a Pace News chart, or the right side of a Pournelle chart.

  30. RAM used by one background app by tepples · · Score: 1

    I happen to enjoy it because it brings my VOIP and chat (which is just IRC with some extra front-end features) into one app.

    But how much RAM does this "one app" use while running in the background, compared to an IRC client like HexChat? Some PCs are still being sold with only 2 GB, particularly compact laptops. As I understand it, Discord is like recent versions of Skype: an Electron app that uses over 300 MB because it's running inside a copy of Chromium.

    1. Re:RAM used by one background app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how much RAM does this "one app" use while running in the background, compared to an IRC client like HexChat?

      Discord is popular among gamers to coordinate while playing, or to chat when not playing. Gamers usually have ample RAM to run apps in the background.

      As Phydeaux314 points out, it's basically IRC with a voice component. As such, it has utility that exceeds any drawback based solely on RAM consumption.

    2. Re:RAM used by one background app by tepples · · Score: 1

      Gamers usually have ample RAM to run apps in the background.

      How, when a PC game itself takes so much RAM? Or are they playing older or emulated games, which require less RAM, or console games, which use the RAM of a different device? Besides, once you have some groups in Discord, other groups in Skype, and still others in a third app, the RAM cost keeping yourself contactable starts to add up.

  31. and you wan tot remove your history of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do you want to remove the history of that ?

    IT IS WHAT IT IS AND WHAT HAPPENED....
    and they are free to walk past it right?
    They also are free not too..?
    BUT ALL SHOULD REMEMBER THERE PAST OR ThEY ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT

  32. Red Herring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neo-nazi blah blah blah....I'm out raged! Right this! Left that! Ideology! Concern concern! Bad words! Focus on the 6" screens! Meanwhile, while you idiots are distracted, worse things are happening. They only need the red herring to last a week or two.

  33. Sub ethnicities = one ethnicity by execthis · · Score: 1

    "Sub ethnicities" = variations within one ethnic group = same primary ethnic group

    You didn't invalidate my point.

    1. Re:Sub ethnicities = one ethnicity by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      There are bigots everywhere in the world but you can't class the whole of Japan, China or India as bigots, but you can class the extremes of the groups within those states as bigots.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Being part of the same ethic group does not mean there isn't bigotry between groups, people are bigoted about skin colour, religion, left or right and you usually find the bigots sitting at the left or right extremes of those groups.
      If you go back far enough in time, we are all Africans at the end of the day, we are all a sub-ethnicity of some sort.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    2. Re:Sub ethnicities = one ethnicity by Maritz · · Score: 1

      You didn't invalidate my point.

      He did.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    3. Re:Sub ethnicities = one ethnicity by execthis · · Score: 1

      ethnicity != race type of food you eat or language you speak doesn't define your race

    4. Re:Sub ethnicities = one ethnicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you're a retard

    5. Re:Sub ethnicities = one ethnicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I've heard the Italians are exactly like the Germans who are pretty much the same as the English. Because Europe.

      Lol..

      You idiots don't even understand what you're saying.

    6. Re:Sub ethnicities = one ethnicity by execthis · · Score: 1

      Being nationalistic and in favor of your people/culture doesn't make you a bigot.

  34. beginning to get scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do these website banning the alt right accounts not realize that no one has been convicted, yet? US has now had a long history of neo nazi and clan marches with nothing more than elevated rhetoric. Yet when ANTIFA shows up, violence ensues. Do they not understand that banning these groups could constitute defamation? The only person charged, so far, might win a self-defense case. The police did refuse (not fail, but refuse) to protect the alt right rally from the ANTIFA. If this guy can prove that he felt the people he came to rally with were under threat of physical violence because police actively looked the other way, it's gonna be hard to convict him for murder or anything else. The police was already there and they didn't even separate the 2 opposing sides.

  35. Then most countries are Nazi by execthis · · Score: 1, Informative

    So Japan must really be off the scale Nazi then? What about China? What about Indonesia or in fact most other countries in the world which are ethnically monolithic and wish to remain that way?

    1. Re: Then most countries are Nazi by silentcoder · · Score: 0

      You do know that Japan actually fought on Hitler's side yes?
      And China is not ethno nationalist in the least. In fact its a more diverse country than the USA.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    2. Re: Then most countries are Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha... You actually believe that?

      Quick research project, dipshit: What is the largest three ethnic groups worldwide, and where does the largest live?

      (Hint: None of them are Caucasian)

    3. Re: Then most countries are Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the brainwashed Han Chinese!

  36. Nazi is as Nazi does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    So we have established that it is OK, acceptable, and legal for a political movement to silence its foes? I bet the Nazis are laughing - once times change, and they always do, they will do the same to you!

  37. Re: Nazis are people too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave Nazis alone! They're humans!

    Humans responsible for a world war, but who is counting?

  38. It doesn't matter if you do not like what they say by Zemran · · Score: 1

    It is still censorship if you stop them from saying it. I do not support right wing nut jobs but I totally support free speech. Just as I am free to say that they are morons they are free to say all the moronic crap they like.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  39. Re:Authoritarians want to eat the people's authori by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Well, that's gone and educated me a little. Although I instinctively reject charts that try and label politics as left or right because individuals invariably get stereotyped by a crude placement on the chart, disregarding their actual views or behaviour towards any specific policy or issue.

    The Pournelle chart at least avoids that left/right divide but will suffer the same stereotype issues. I think the rationality axis could be better named too; while it offers an interesting mechanism to differentiate political creeds, describing some as rational and others as irrational works against objective evaluation and exploration.

    In particular writing off extremist views as irrational is a barrier to understanding and countering those views.

    But all three charts only work at the macro level. Individual communists still have a sense of personal ownership of belongings, anarchists form power structures, white supremacists can believe in the welfare state. Where is the chart that acknowledges this individuality and supports exploration of the issues and not the identities?

  40. *shrug* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm saying nothing. I'm not a Nazi.

  41. Discord sucks anyway by syril · · Score: 1

    I don't disagree with what they did, but Discord is a bad product either way, it's has an awful UI and it's filled with cringeworthy memes, plus they probably sell your data. Use teamspeak or mumble.

  42. Take that you leftwing bastards! Socialism SUCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its finally time to get rid of all these left wing sites! Good riddance!

  43. Then they will ban BLM/Antifa by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    They have identical ideologies.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Then they will ban BLM/Antifa by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      They should, but most liberals would rather take someone else's word for those groups being "Peecee" and therefore OK, because they are far too lazy and have far too much of a short attention span to ever bother with doing their own research. Thats why they are liberals in the first place.

  44. You mispelled BLM and Antifa by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    The BLM and Antifa are racist and bigoted individuals that have no place in this country.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  45. Berkeley. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Apparently you haven't seen the thuggery by the left, aided by cops - whether it is racist left of Berkeley or their fellow travellers in Charlottesville.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  46. Are you white? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you white and tired of multiculturalism? You're a Nazi as far as Slashdot is concerned. Loving yourself is just as bad as gassing every Jew in Europe. You will be removed from the internet until you believe what a certain group wants you to believe and they will erase as much of your history as it takes to help cure you of this vile racism.

  47. Go to Germany. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    This isn't really about Nazis, but about smearing conservatives with the label to silence them.

    If you want political correctness, go to Germany.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  48. Actually, youre wrong. by sethstorm · · Score: 2

    It started with a woman that harassed a man, with the help of many in the media.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  49. They both have massacred people. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    So I take it that you're a leftist, which means that you support the murder of 50 million people.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  50. So violent leftism is OK by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    So you support ideologies that have an equal thirst for blood - if they don't obey leftist narratives?

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  51. Re:Nazis are people too. by Yunzil · · Score: 1

    Leave them alone.

    No.

  52. Re:"violence instigated by white supremacists" - L by Yunzil · · Score: 1

    Funny how the video doesn't show any of that. Is this some vision you conjured up in your fevered imagination?

  53. I'm Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if there were a list of questions that the head of every political group had to answer (or be researched for). They would be questions like: 1) Is your government model like a a) Republic b) Democracy c) Monarchy d) oligarchy e) dictatorship, etc. . . . 2) What civil rights would it have? 1) Freedom of Speech 2) keep and bear arms . . .

    Comparing the answers to these and other questions, we get a detailed look at what each group really wants -> not just what they say before election or in front of a camera. . Then, compare them. I wonder (curious) just how different some of these other popular groups would really be from the one with the unpopular swastika. Some I think would be much closer than they will admit.

  54. This is like poor management skills... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    ...You have so much on your plate that you can't remember all there is to do. Only the things that make the most noise, hit your desk the most, etc, get focus and everything else is forgotten until it makes noise again. Just sayin'.

    White supremacy and remarks about Hitler were just ignored and/or not a big deal until something happens, now punishing the people that are involved in any way will completely stop it, right? Uh, telling people they can't do something makes them want to do it much more. See: drugs, see: alcohol, see: anything people are told they aren't allowed to do.

    "Donny, don't stick your finger in that light socket, you'll get shocked."
    - 1 minute later -
    "DONNY! Why did you do that????? You're so stupid for not listening to me!"

  55. since we're doing Nazis, maybe do Socialists too? by cptawesome · · Score: 1

    Socialists/Communists ideology killed hundreds of millions (5x more than Nazism alone) in the name of their ideology. We fought Wars with them and they have explicit goals of tearing down Government to implant their own. I think we should ban everything Communist/Socialist too.

  56. never let a tragedy go to waste by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

    'all forms of hate' is now a euphemism for all political speech they disagree with. It's the same bullshit excuse that youtube is using to shut down independent journalists by demonetizing and quarantining their videos, under the banner of 'fighting extremism.'

    Ironically enough, the very definition of fascism includes social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. I hope those celebrating this move enjoy having their speech dictated to by a corporate controlled media, because once censorship is the norm, eventually they'll get a turn at being silenced or excommunicated because the goal posts are always being moved.

    1. Re:never let a tragedy go to waste by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Totally agree.
      I might disagree with someone's alternative opinion/philosophy, but I will very much defend their right to have and express one.

  57. Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't they communicate by yelling at each other?

  58. Re: No safe spaces for Communists by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    BLM, Antifa, and other anti-Trump groups are aligned with Communists.

    Besides, your eagerness to smear is a deflection in itself.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  59. So you do approve of leftist racism. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    N/T

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  60. Re: No safe spaces for Communists by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

    So what? When did I say I was a part of or supported those groups or even that I was anti-Trump? Also, smear the Nazis? I'm pretty sure their reputation speaks for itself.

    Unless of course you were also "smearing" the Communists?

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  61. The retina is 2D by tepples · · Score: 1

    Individual communists still have a sense of personal ownership of belongings, anarchists form power structures

    Which is why anarchism, communism, and anarcho-communism don't touch the edge of a Nolan chart. They come close but aren't quite to the extreme.

    white supremacists can believe in the welfare state

    Hence the "socialist" in "National Socialist German Labor Party" (NSDAP). To capture where different ideologies fall relative to the National Socialists and their successors, you might need a different chart with economic regulation and ethnic discrimination as its axes.

    Where is the chart that acknowledges this individuality and supports exploration of the issues and not the identities?

    These charts improve on the left/right divide by adding an additional axis. But a chart really can't summarize more than two orthogonal aspects of a political position for one practical reason: An image on a piece of paper or computer monitor has two dimensions, as does the human retina.

    1. Re:The retina is 2D by Cederic · · Score: 1

      These charts improve on the left/right divide by adding an additional axis. But a chart really can't summarize more than two orthogonal aspects of a political position

      This though is my problem with them. Use of these charts may be valid and helpful at a population but too many idiots use those population characteristics to assign identities to individuals, then act on those identities.

      As an example, "Punch a nazi" became farcical the moment it became a meme because everybody's now a nazi. Display a single trait associated with particular defunct German political movement and you're labelled with everything that's bad about them and treated accordingly.

      That's ludicrous, and these charts don't really help.

  62. Re: No safe spaces for Communists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and Sethstorm is Kim Jong-un's boy toy.
    And his mother was a hamster and his father smelt of elderberries!

    What? You're the one who started with the absurdities, I'm just playing along.

    BLM has nothing to do with communism. And this isn't 1947 and Joe McCarthy is long dead. Take a Valium or something.

  63. first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first post