it just doesn't make sense that a civilization advanced enough to cross interstellar space would crash in New Mexico
why? Is it REALLY possible to prevent the consequences of "human" error with just technology? would it be really possible to prevent all failure possibilities, specially if you are visiting some new planet that who knows what might have? Or what about a hostile world that may throw them missiles at the very moment they are trying to land and thus cannot avoid the hazard?
And the chances of aliens being humanoid in appearance are close to zero.
heck 22 days? How dare them take so much time? Oh no!
Now seriously, let them use their legal department let them take some time to do what they are supposed to do, 22 days is not a lot of time, now, if the legal department says they shouldn't release the sourcecode that's when you are supposed to bombard SWSoft with blames of not complying with the GPL and blah blah blah
Yes, this has enlightened me! I should so obviously spend the n*100$us I could spend in getting a new computer with double the power of my current box ON a PHONE! Yeess! Steve Jobs is a pioneer!
Hello my friend, I saw all your candidates and I must say that I doubt the outcome of choosing ANY of them would really affect "Social Security", or the "matters of privacy" the result seems to be the same in that case for whatever guy wins, thus it is pretty logical to use more worthless reasons to choose them,
I think that a better solution is to promote the usage of the "OSI approved License" logo on webpages and projects that got an actual open source license. Since the words "Open Source" are pretty ambiguous, some people make the mistake of thinking that being able to read the source code makes it "open" and some people even dare to say that it is the standard/popular definition, which doesn't make any logical sense but that is.
I just think the logo is a much more efficient way of letting people know what software is truly open, otherwise when I am looking for libraries I just stick to sourceforge for this reason, too much non open source stuff pretend to be open lately...
First of all I am not sure if OSI was so against owning stuff, most OSI approved licenses got the word "copyright" on them, did you notice?
I didn't think it was all about giving everything for free and letting anyone do what they want
Thus I am unable to see the Irony, did you have issues understanding what is the actual problem here? Proprietary software disguising itself as open source, it is something the Open Source community is forced to handle thus your last line doesn't make any sense either.
You failed terribly when putting that up, your paragraph just sounds lame and confusing instead of delivering the impacting statement you wanted to deliver. The part about the tag barely makes the sarcasm noticeable, please try harder next time.
I am an ubuntu user and whatnot, but is Ubuntu supposed to be a business distro? I've heard of Ubuntu, Ubuntu server, Edubuntu and Ubuntu studio, No "Ubunsiness" (oh my gawd!) , Ubuntu does seem to be focused for home and no "work".
Ahahhhaha! 25% market share! Not even firefox or Opera are dreaming to get that, yeah got karma to spare so I don't mind getting modded down, but seriously 25%! Somebody at apple is having issues with reality .
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, cause any negative news story about apple is obviously a lie.
Wow bro, is MS using apple's brain wash pills? I hope that when I run vista I won't get this crazy.
The asshole giving this an Insightful needs to be shot. Repeatedly.
Now seriously, let them use their legal department let them take some time to do what they are supposed to do, 22 days is not a lot of time, now, if the legal department says they shouldn't release the sourcecode that's when you are supposed to bombard SWSoft with blames of not complying with the GPL and blah blah blah
Oh no I like cheetos and soda! Noez this offends me too much! how dare you call me normal!
Wow bro, they washed your brain.
Yes, this has enlightened me! I should so obviously spend the n*100$us I could spend in getting a new computer with double the power of my current box ON a PHONE! Yeess! Steve Jobs is a pioneer!
Mod parent UP!, then mod grandparent DOWN! and then Give me the -1 off-topic this post deserves.
I didn't mean Bolivarian computers were any good or better, but Cuba is certainly going to go there, and yes, to support Chavez.
hope that it happens or that it doesn't happen? I wouldn't like any Linux distro to become a defacto standard...
OLPC worse and worse everyday
Don't worry about Cuba, I am seeing a bunch of "Bolivarian computers" in their future...
Linux was ready for the desktop years ago, although there are still people that think "ready for the desktop" means "complete windows clone"
Hello my friend, I saw all your candidates and I must say that I doubt the outcome of choosing ANY of them would really affect "Social Security", or the "matters of privacy" the result seems to be the same in that case for whatever guy wins, thus it is pretty logical to use more worthless reasons to choose them,
So I guess what's "news" is that apparently some people were not expecting it to happen?
I think that a better solution is to promote the usage of the "OSI approved License" logo on webpages and projects that got an actual open source license. Since the words "Open Source" are pretty ambiguous, some people make the mistake of thinking that being able to read the source code makes it "open" and some people even dare to say that it is the standard/popular definition, which doesn't make any logical sense but that is.
I just think the logo is a much more efficient way of letting people know what software is truly open, otherwise when I am looking for libraries I just stick to sourceforge for this reason, too much non open source stuff pretend to be open lately...
Quite an over statement.
First of all I am not sure if OSI was so against owning stuff, most OSI approved licenses got the word "copyright" on them, did you notice?
I didn't think it was all about giving everything for free and letting anyone do what they want
Thus I am unable to see the Irony, did you have issues understanding what is the actual problem here? Proprietary software disguising itself as open source, it is something the Open Source community is forced to handle thus your last line doesn't make any sense either.
You failed terribly when putting that up, your paragraph just sounds lame and confusing instead of delivering the impacting statement you wanted to deliver. The part about the tag barely makes the sarcasm noticeable, please try harder next time.
I am an ubuntu user and whatnot, but is Ubuntu supposed to be a business distro? I've heard of Ubuntu, Ubuntu server, Edubuntu and Ubuntu studio, No "Ubunsiness" (oh my gawd!) , Ubuntu does seem to be focused for home and no "work".
Is this a copy/paste troll?
err.. this is rather embarrassing, I wanted to install Linux but I installed genuine windows! fuck.
what makes you think that those bunkers actually stopped Russia? I thought what kept the war cold was the fact US had nukes as wel..
Ahahhhaha! 25% market share! Not even firefox or Opera are dreaming to get that, yeah got karma to spare so I don't mind getting modded down, but seriously 25%! Somebody at apple is having issues with reality .
wtf? I call humbug, doing those wouldn't help as much as denying evolution and global warming.