Slashdot Mirror


Activation Problems in iPhone Paradise

Thomas Hawk writes "Unfortunately it appears that some activations of Apple's new iPhone have gone badly. After waiting in line 36 hours I'm still unable to activate my phone. I'm documenting the AT&T circus call by call on my blog. I've had my hold calls dropped, been patched into other users unable to activate their phone instead of AT&T customer service reps, been told that my wife must get a new phone and that the family plan can't work for me. I've been told that the problem is that I'm not putting a new chip into my iPhone in the slot on the left side of my phone when no slot there exists. PR Blogger Steve Rubel has also been documenting his problems on his Twitterstream. According to an unscientific poll being conducted by Engadget about half of the people who bought iPhones have had activation trouble with about 38% of problems still unresolved." Even the folks at MacWorld weren't immune to these issues.

434 comments

  1. Never saw it coming! by Renraku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Activation problems? With the iPhone being hyped for a year?

    Never saw it coming.

    Especially since AT&T, a company known for shitty service, was given launch rights.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Never saw it coming! by terrymr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think all the mobile phone providers are known for shitty service.

    2. Re:Never saw it coming! by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read the other person's problem thingy, it states quite clearly that this is not AT&T's problem, but it is a problem with iTunes and the iPhone.

    3. Re:Never saw it coming! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Especially since AT&T, a company known for shitty service, was given launch rights.

      But, but but!

      Apple's going to fix the entire cell phone industry with the iPhone! Surely they wouldn't have chosen the worst servicing, most predatory monopolist of the cell phone industry to be their partner?

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:Never saw it coming! by KiahZero · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, they did choose the most predatory monopolist of the cell phone industry, but Verizon said no.

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
    5. Re:Never saw it coming! by pinchhazard · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. Exactly what I thought when I read the parent.

      --
      Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
    6. Re:Never saw it coming! by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      Schadenfreude, nuff said

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    7. Re:Never saw it coming! by geddes · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think all the mobile phone providers are known for shitty service. I have to disagree. I have had nothing but excellent service from T-Mobile, and I mean truly excellent. Their phone reps are not only friendly and helpful, but WELL TRAINED. They understand the different models, the plans, SIM cards, unlocking, and will help you with anything. I even called T-Mobile once lost in Salt Lake City, looking for a wi-fi hotspot. I read them the name of the street I was on and the rep gave me step-by-step directions, and stayed with me on the phone. It was awesome. I really want an iPhone, but I am loathe to leave T-Mobile for this reason. Hearing stories like this makes me even more reluctant to buy an iPhone. Good customer service is so rare these days. Why didn't apple go with T-Mobile? Or rather, why did they have an exclusive deal with anyone the great thing about gsm is that it is interoperable. AT&T isn't subsidizing the price, or so I hear, so what possible advantage does apple get from the relationship? "Innovative Network features like visual voicemail." Fine, I would be happier with an iPhone without visual voicemail that I could put my T-Mobile SIM into.
    8. Re:Never saw it coming! by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Its a GSM phone, why the hell do you need to activate it? Every other phone in the world just needs a your old sim card inserted and a full battery charge.

    9. Re:Never saw it coming! by Palpitations · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked for Cingular for quite a while before they merged with AT&T - and for a while afterwards. My jobs ranged from fraud prevention to customer service. My position in fraud prevention was the most interesting, as a large part of the fraud we saw was from cell phone dealers themselves. They'd steal credit card information from one customer, tell the rest of their customers that they could come pay their bills at the store with cash (when they weren't authorized to do that), pocket the cash, and then use the stolen card to pay the bills. When you see 100+ accounts paid with the same credit card, you know something is up. That said, before AT&T moved in, my job was basically to help people. I was in a position where I called people who were using a lot more minutes than their plan offered, and instead of charging them the insane amount they would have paid for going over, I offered to switch them to a plan that would cover their usage. The most extreme example that comes to mind is someone who had used so many minutes over their plan that their next bill would have been well over $2,000 - they were flagged, I called them, and convinced them to switch from the lowest priced plan to the highest priced one, because that meant they would save about $1,800 a month. How's that for customer service? Sure, we could have just stuck that guy with a $2,000 bill, and put his nuts in a vice. But we did the right thing - we looked for customers who would be hurt and spent our time, money, and resources to help them out. Guess what one of the first programs that got cut was when AT&T took over?

    10. Re:Never saw it coming! by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      Whats better than starting a revolution?

      Shattering one and keeping people happy with what they have of course :D

    11. Re:Never saw it coming! by theturtle32 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My 8gb iPhone activated no problem but then the speaker didn't work ... No rings no music without headphones, no speakerphone. So I took it back to the apple store at the grove in los angeles and they replaced it with a new one on the spot, even though they were supposedly out of them. They had enough foresight to keep a bunch on hand to be able to offer replacements for people who had problems. That's good customer service. They switched the sim card from my broken phone to the new one so that when i went to re activate it (yes I had to take it home and plug it back in to iTunes to get the new one to work) it wouldnt start charging me for two iphone plans. I am a very happy iPhone customer. Its not perfect but its better than anything else on the market. Its what I'm typing this message on now.

    12. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have been with T-Mobile for years, and have had nothing but the best service and help on the few times I've called the reps. After knowing all the horror stories from other providers, I'm grateful that I'm with them.

    13. Re:Never saw it coming! by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Oh boy, you just opened up a can of worms.

      Expect 10 replies of personal experiences on how each service does suck and 10 replies of personal experiences on how each service just rocks. Plus a couple of "me and all my friends have had sucky/great experience".

      Every time cell phone networks come up, this is what happens, sadly.

      For me Cingular/ATT/Bob's Cell isn't too bad :P

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    14. Re:Never saw it coming! by sokoban · · Score: 2, Funny

      Verizon does have pretty good coverage.

      It reaches all the way to their headquarters in Malebolge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malebolge)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    15. Re:Never saw it coming! by loganrapp · · Score: 0
      Probably because AT&T is shitty - which means they need the money, which means they're willing to let Apple do whatever they wanted.


      Verizon/T-Mobile/et. al may have wanted a little more control on what the iPhone could or could not do. At least that's how I'm reading between the lines of Apple's PR stuff. It's very possible I'm wrong.

    16. Re:Never saw it coming! by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Their customer and tech support is great, but I've had nothing but nightmares with their rebate department. I tried for 3 months to get them to process the rebate. Every time the guy on the other end said it looked to be in order, reprocessed it, and about a week later I would get a letter in the mail saying that my rebate had been denied.

      Also, am I the only person who doesn't see it as unfortunate that people are having problems with the iphone? Really, problems with apple products not working properly would be more like "expected" wouldn't it?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    17. Re:Never saw it coming! by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I never understood this either. Assuming an iPhone costs $600, why not just sell them in the Apple store and let customers sort their own phone plan out. Yes it might mean some inconvenience setting up stuff like WAP / SMS etc. which are provider specific, but nothing I'm sure some setup software couldn't have sorted. Most GSM phone providers will sell SIM kits, and most really couldn't care what phone you use on their network just so long as you use their network.

      All Apple have done by their move is ensure that anyone buying their phone package is locked into a contract that with the phone costs anywhere upwards of $2000 for two years. That represents absolutely terrible value for money. You really would have to be blinded by the hype to buy an iPhone on those terms. It's an utter waste of money especially considering other technical deficiencies such as lack of 3G. Perhaps a firmware update will fix that issue because there's going to be some severe buyers remorse if an updated model appears with that feature.

    18. Re:Never saw it coming! by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with this as well--except when I was forced to switch to a Cingular corporate account. Despite making it clear that it was not my decision to leave T-Mobile and that I loved the service I'd received from my years with them, I was given a Verizon-worthy runaround trying to cancel the service. My contract was mere weeks from expiring, and I was more than happy to pay it out. I ended up paying for a month of service BEYOND my contract (with zero airtime, but over $70 for the service) before I was finally permitted to cancel. I very nearly had to threaten legal action to get it done.

      But up until that 7-week debacle (I was literally on the phone with them at least four days of every week and logged over 30 hours of talk [mostly hold] time, just getting them to close the account), it was a remarkably pleasant experience. Accurate billing, friendly service, lots of "extra" help beyond the bare minimum, and none of that random "network busy" crap that Cingular pulls all too often (fewest dropped calls AND as a bonus, fewest connected calls!). I still use T-Mobile branded hardware, even on Cingular/AT&T, in fact.

    19. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed.

    20. Re:Never saw it coming! by arth1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They may be helpful if you talk to them, but T-Mobile's web site is about the worst mess I've ever had the misfortune of using. Every single time I visit "My T-Mobile", I have to explain to the web site that I don't have any of the phones listed. And because of that, half the site is not available. Including support -- you have to choose a phone model before you can look up support information for something that's NOT device related!
      And half the time I try to pay my bill, the system is "temporarily" unavailable, and won't let me.

      As for the iPhone -- have anyone bought an unfettered iPhone yet, which /wasn't/ bundled with a plan? (Not "unlocked", but one that never was locked in the first place.) If so, what's the experience in getting it activated with an already existing SIM card?

    21. Re:Never saw it coming! by tacocat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How many GSM providers are nationwide in the USA? AT&T, T-Mobile, anyone else?

      They couldnt' set up a service with Verizon Wireless (an example) because they just don't do GSM technology.

      It's unfortunate that AT&T is so clueless on this coming out of the gate. I think the iPhone has mind numbing potential. GSM is the right choice if you consider a world wide market, but not for US market, because GSM is more widely used globally. Economy of scale in units manufactured dictate that they go with GSM for a global market.

      If you look at the techcentric nations of the world, the United States is not the leading country. We don't have the digital high speed cellular networks or internet broad band speeds of other nations. I just don't think you can safely market a product of this type to only the USA when we have a global market to consider.

    22. Re:Never saw it coming! by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      All Apple have done by their move is ensure that anyone buying their phone package is locked into a contract that with the phone costs anywhere upwards of $2000 for two years. That represents absolutely terrible value for money.

      I'm really sick of this weak argument against the iPhone when there are SO many valid things it is really lacking compared to "free" cell phones providers are giving away with 2 years of service (speed dial, changing ring tones, Bluetooth object transfer, voice dial, swappable batteries, MMS, Bluetooth tethering, etc.). All the people that are buying an iPhone would've had a wireless plan for the next two years regardless of whether or not the iPhone came out so factoring in the cost of service is ridiculous. The real price is $600 + the contract termination fee of $175 since you can escape your contract at any time for $175.

      The BIG problem is that I bet a LOT of those people buying iPhones are going to be extremely disappointed with the basic features missing that they're used to in cheap phones and are going to try to return them only to find they get fucked in the ass with a 10% "restocking" fee... or as I like to call it, Apple's little way of making it too painful to return products you bought on impulse. That's the little hook they get in to you.
    23. Re:Never saw it coming! by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      Several GSM phones are sold for prepaid usage, and are "locked" to the SIM card. To put in another SIM card, you have to "unlock" the phone. This means paying a fee to the provider that you bought the prepaid phone from (from a contract point of view, though, as I'm sure you could hack it).

      So yes, a GSM phone can be made to lock out your old SIM card. All other manufacturers already sell phones that do this.

    24. Re:Never saw it coming! by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      I always heard T-Mobile has the worst coverage though. I was considering getting one of their prepaid phones, since it works out to something like $6/month if you buy the card that lasts 365 days. It sounds like a good deal as I don't make many calls.

    25. Re:Never saw it coming! by Wookietim · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I guess this is what you get when you are one of those people that line up in front of a door in order to have a lump of plastic before everyone else....

      --
      http://timcol6.freehostia.com/
    26. Re:Never saw it coming! by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      http://www.thinksecret.com/archives/iphonetakeapar t/

      I wouldn't do it with a brand new $600 piece of hardware.

    27. Re:Never saw it coming! by DrXym · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm really sick of this weak argument against the iPhone when there are SO many valid things it is really lacking compared to "free" cell phones providers are giving away with 2 years of service (speed dial, changing ring tones, Bluetooth object transfer, voice dial, swappable batteries, MMS, Bluetooth tethering, etc.).

      Perhaps you can escape the plan, but does that include an unlock code? Can you even unlock your iPhone?

      Perhaps I'm spoilt from living in Europe. Most ~ $60 price plans would get you any phone for nothing or a small fee. That includes models like the Palm Treo 750, Blackberry models etc. We'll have to wait and see what happens when the iPhone appears in Europe. It wouldn't surprise me if Vodafone, O2 etc. engage in a little rape of their own if there are people dumb enough pay for one and sign up for a high contract.

    28. Re:Never saw it coming! by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      We didn't get T-Mobile service at our house (despite there being a cell phone tower belonging to someone in view) and despite their advertised 90-day return policy they still made my dad pay over $70 in early termination fees that a plan that didn't work.

      Yeah, lovely service there.

    29. Re:Never saw it coming! by paulpach · · Score: 1

      I agree, T-Mobile really has a superb service.

      So much they even UNLOCKED my cell phone. So long I bought the cell phone from T-Mobile, and I have been with them for a few months. They will be extremely polite while doing so. They are the "don't be evil" carrier of the bunch.

    30. Re:Never saw it coming! by jkabbe · · Score: 3, Informative

      why not just sell them in the Apple store and let customers sort their own phone plan out

      Because visual voice mail apparently required changes to AT&T's network. I doubt AT&T would've made that commitment if Apple were selling iPhones that could be used on T-moble as well (and vice-versa for T-mobile).

    31. Re:Never saw it coming! by RESPAWN · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, I happened to be in an AT&T store this weekend* and overheard a couple of people complaining to the store reps that they couldn't activate their iPhone. Their problem actually lied in being unable to install XP SP2 on their computer, but like most non-technologically inclined consumers they didn't understand that this was a PC/Microsoft problem. They were pissed and the poor Cingular/AT&T/name-of-the-day reps had no idea how to help the customers. And who can blame the customers either? They just spent $500-$600 on a new "superphone" and can't even use the thing.

      I played with the iPhone and it is a very cool phone. Just like the iPod, the iPhone interface is extremely intuitive. My only complaint was that I found the onscreen keyboard hard to use. Without any sort of tactile feedback, such as what I get with my current QWERTY keyed phone, I found that I had a lot of mistyped letters on the screen. That would probably be a deal breaker for me, personally.

      I really want the iPhone to succeed because it is a cool product with a lot of cool new ideas. The more the iPhone succeeds the better the market on the whole will get, as more and more competitors start including many of the iPhone's features. But I just can't help but wonder if the iPhone will ever be able to live up to its own hype.

      *Note: while I refuse to give Cingular any more of my money after the way they treated me before, like a good little geek I did have to play with the demo phones in the store. If the next version of the iPhone is released on a cross-carrier basis and it's a little more reasonably priced, I would probably consider it.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    32. Re:Never saw it coming! by MoxFulder · · Score: 1

      iGuess iPhone isJust iNother cool product squandered by being totally locked in to one vendor.

      Oh wait, it's actually locked in to *two* vendors. Yikes!

    33. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what...the phone can be used on T-Mobile if you can find one without selling your soul. Pop in a SIM card and bam, you should be off and running. (Besides, a lot of T-Mobile's roaming networks are AT&T operated.)

      GSM is a marvelous thing. I actually think the real reason Verizon and Sprint did not support it was because of lock-in. They basically can sell you whatever phones they want, and it is really impossible to switch networks without having to change phones, which is really a pain in the ass for most people.

      I love T-Mobile, because they didn't castrate my new phone like Verizon is so fond of doing.

    34. Re:Never saw it coming! by ari_j · · Score: 4, Informative

      How many GSM providers are national in the USA? ZERO. Not one of them has a network with "home" service where I live or with ANY service in most of the places I spend time other than home and the office. You may find it surprising, but that vast middle part of the country is part of the nation, and it is by and large CDMA-only. It sucks, too. And here's AT&T, whose shitty service doesn't surprise me given that they lie about having the largest digital voice and data network in the country, given that only a CDMA provider with lots of good partnering agreements.

    35. Re:Never saw it coming! by radl33t · · Score: 1

      AT&T took over? I thought Cingular bought at&t wireless and some years later decided to use their name. I was satisfied with my at&t service until I was switched to cingular account (early 05 I think) after the acquisition/merger (murders & executions). Service was a nightmare. Even after receiving credits & phones from their funny office of the president support, I bailed permanently.

    36. Re:Never saw it coming! by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      No, despite being GSM and with a sim card, it doesn't accept T-Mobile SIM cards or any others besides AT&T. Do you really think people wouldn't have noticed this?

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    37. Re:Never saw it coming! by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      I've had 2 issues with T-Mobile in the past 3 yrs. After 18 months, my boss was selling the company, but I wanted to keep my phone and transfer it into my name. I also wanted to get a different phone since the battery on mine was going bad. Their script said that I was not eligible for a phone upgrade since I was a "new" customer. However, if I'd have killed the acct (not under contract, so no cancellation fees) and signed up for a new one, they'd jump thru hoops throwing offers at me. They ended up offering me an upgrade, but I wasn't able to do it through the first line rep. I wanted to change plans over to the My Favs - but was told I couldn't because my Razor (less than 1 yr old) wasn't compatible. But if I bought a new Razr, it would be. My Favs is a flippin' billing issue, not a phone issue. If you're wanting to move phones, then say so. Why does it seem that cell phone companies only offer incentives to new customers? There seem to be no retention incentives at all. Why not offer better plans when you've been with them for X years?

    38. Re:Never saw it coming! by klaun · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably because AT&T is shitty - which means they need the money

      I have trouble understanding why you were moderated insightful, since publicly available information disproves the second part of your hypothesis.

      Total revenue for AT&T first quarter of this year was $28 million compared to $22 million for Verizon and much smaller numbers for others... Leader in market share for wireless at 27.1%

      I think the more likely explanation is AT&T is much, much larger than any other GSM provider in the U.S. (As in more than twice as large... subscriber-wise). By far has the most GSM network infrastructure and bandwidth. I think the desperate hurting for money thesis is totally ludicrous.

      I'm really interested in more info on what the nature of the activation issue is, so I'm disappointed that all the articles I read on it seem to be Apple fanboys saying "it definitely can't be Apple's fault, must be AT&T." But they don't provide any details... Most GSM phones don't need to be "activated" at all... put a(n appropriate) SIM card in and it works. What happens during activation? And before launch I heard that you'd be able to activate via iTunes at home... What happened to that?

    39. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We didn't get T-Mobile service at our house (despite there being a cell phone tower belonging to someone in view) Proving you know nothing of cell phones, if this tower was not a GSM provider then there was no way in hell your phone was going to connect to it.

      dad pay over $70 in early termination fees that a plan that didn't work. How much of this was for services used? Please, most people will charge you the $175 (or more) fee and tell you to like it. I wanted to end my Verizon account early but they wanted to charge me $175, even though I owed them less money then the term fee.
    40. Re:Never saw it coming! by sogoodsofarsowhat · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well i live in the heartland in a town/county of under 30,000....we have excellent GSM coverage by ATT. Granted compared to the iPhone ATT service sucks. But ALL USA based cell providers SUCK!! I have activated 3 iPhones so far without a single glitch. My friend had a problem but let me explain...he had a business package same as i did..but tried at first to activate to that account....THATS A NONO!!! See I read the literature....and COMPREHENDED that ATT said no business accounts. So i just got a new number/account. Then had ATT shut off the old phone and move the number (not the account to my iPhone) the other 2 iphones i activated were new accounts tied in a family package to my new iphone account with old #. No issues. A lot of individuals had packages with just them on it...but were business packages to get the data pack they needed...they didnt realize this and thus the problem. Anyways...who didnt expect the cell company to be the worst part of this whole thing....i mean cell companies, like phone companies are THE DEVIL!!!

      --
      . I love the sound of burning women and screaming rubber....
    41. Re:Never saw it coming! by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 2, Informative

      One word: Visual Voice Mail
      Or maybe three if you don't hyphenate it or something =)

      I recall a big deal about how Cingular had to make changes on their backend systems to be able to support this feature. The iPhone won't fully work on any system that doesn't have this functionality, and if it's not done exactly the same way, then there will have to be code changes and exceptions for each and every one.

      Why exclusive? Call providers like that... it was probably the only way Apple could get one to carry it... the only way to guarantee enough revenue to make supporting this weird phone worthwhile /tis only my guess

    42. Re:Never saw it coming! by ari_j · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mind if I ask which town and/or county that is? I am in a city of 80,000 on an interstate corridor and Apple says no way, AT&T says partner service only (and even that is dubious), etc.

    43. Re:Never saw it coming! by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Most likely, they didn't set out to make an exclusive deal with someone. However, none of the carriers really wanted the iPhone. Now, they wouldn't mind the iPhone so much if Apple agreed to cripple it in all the ways each carrier asked, put the individual carrier's branding all over the thing, have the iPhone run the carrier's software, etc. However, Apple was insisting on doing things their own way, and that represents a threat to the carrier's control.

      So exclusivity was probably one of the few bargaining chips Apple had to offer to get at&t to agree.

    44. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's just old-fashioned envy.

    45. Re:Never saw it coming! by ahoehn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if this round of problems were due to ATT's customer service, the buck still stops at Apple because they chose to go exclusively with ATT, which makes it all Apple's problem.

      Certainly, they also chose to go with CMDA, which basically limits them to ATT or T-Mobile, but just about every other phone in the US market seems to be able to produce both a GSM and CMDA version, so why couldn't the iPhone? Producing a couple models of the iPhone that could were sold contract-independent, were sold in the Apple store and would work with all the major US carriers would have been a step towards revolutionizing the cellphone industry. As it is now, Apple's just produced more of the same with a pretty and intuitive UI.

      Nifty, not revolutionary.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    46. Re:Never saw it coming! by narf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The iTunes activation process is what reads the SIM card ID# and links it to your new (or old) AT&T account. For some reason I'm not privvy to, your old sim card cannot be used. You get told to put the new one back in if you try using your old sim. And unlike any other phone I've used, there really is an activation process on the iPhone. Until the phone is activated by AT&T, it's completely unusable apart from emergency calls. No iPod, no camera, no nothin'.

      The real problem is that nobody at AT&T or Apple seem to really know whats going on during the process, and because both companies are involved, it's easy for their reps to blame each other. For example, my activation process took about 14 hours. About 13 hours into the process I called AT&T and was told that there was a problem with the porting of my old number (wrong acct # given by me) ... but that it shouldn't affect the activation of my phone. Yet, 5 minutes after getting an e-mail saying the port was sucessful, the phone activated. In the grand scheme of things, 14 hours isn't a big deal, it's just fustrating to have the device in your hands, totally unusable.

      I think most people are blaming AT&T because Apple is usually fanatical about the 'customer experience' and most phone companies act like they'd really prefer you just died.

    47. Re:Never saw it coming! by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      My experience with T-Mobile is that reception in any major US cities and along all freeway corridors has been perfect. Only times I've had problems have been in rural areas. Caveat: I have not traveled all around the country.

      I bought 1000 minutes for $100, and they don't expire until the end of next February. It's been over four months and I still have over 300 minutes left. So that's worked out to less than $20 a month. Your price will depend on how much you use it, though. But I knew I wasn't getting my money's worth out of my $50 a month plan.

    48. Re:Never saw it coming! by JDevers · · Score: 1

      http://www.wireless.att.com/coverageviewer/ disagrees. The majority of the country in terms of shear area IS GSM and the overwhelming majority of the country as far as population is GSM. Now, their 3G service coverage sucks, pretty much 800K+ pop metros and very select other places.

    49. Re:Never saw it coming! by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Try zooming in. It's also disingenuous to say the "largest voice and data network" when you won't sell a smartphone to people living in much of the country, including vast areas that CDMA Blackberries work fine in. Also, your use of the phrase "is GSM" is misleading, because CDMA covers more area as well as all of the GSM-covered area. See, e.g., http://www.alltel.com/personal/wireless/plans/nf_c overage_map.html.

    50. Re:Never saw it coming! by bluemonq · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correction. They couldn't set up a service with Verizon Wireless because Verizon wouldn't kowtow to Apple's demands. Apple went to Verizon first.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/30/verizon_tu rned_down_iphone/

    51. Re:Never saw it coming! by petehead · · Score: 1

      Assuming an iPhone costs $600, why not just sell them in the Apple store and let customers sort their own phone plan out... All Apple have done by their move is ensure that anyone buying their phone package is locked into a contract that with the phone costs anywhere upwards of $2000 for two years.

      You do realize that Apple gets a cut of that $2000 (beyond what is paid for the phone) right? AT&T agreed to let Apple have a piece of the service fees which is likely why they have the exclusivity. You have to sign up for 2-year contract which means that Apple will still be reaping the benefits of each iphone purchase for 24 months after the initial transaction. I bet they are going to make more money off of the service agreement than they do off of the phones.
    52. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that my T-Mobile reception is often very poor or just non-existent in many areas. Their coverage seems to be inadequate compared to their competition.

    53. Re:Never saw it coming! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Please note that most of the midwest is listed as 'partner'. IE it's not AT&T towers, might not even be GSM. Take that out and you have a vast gulf for most of the midwest.

      Here's Alltel's plan. I'd argue it has MUCH better coverage.

      Sure, AT&T might have 'most' of the USA covered, but alltel/verizon have much better coverages.

      Heck, in my local area my choices are Alltel, Verizon, and SRT(local phone coop). AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile don't even want to talk to me where I'm at.

      Even if I wanted an IPhone, I wouldn't be getting one because I wouldn't be able to get service. That alone makes me think that the IPhone will be a relative flop compared to the IPod. They've limited their customer base right off the bat to people AT&T is willing to do business with and who are willing to deal with AT&T.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    54. Re:Never saw it coming! by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Just as an aside, I talked to a T-mobile rep who was very helpful just yesterday in getting my phone unlocked so I can use a local SIM while traveling in Europe (pay local rates for local calls, instead of international roaming charges).

      I mentioned the iPhone, and he hinted that it might be coming to their network way sooner than the 5 year exclusive lock we keep hearing about with AT&T/Cingular. Yeah, agents don't always know, and sometimes just spread misinformation but, that would be wonderful.

      I've had nothing but good experiences with T-mobile, and I hope they can get it soon. Maybe the exclusive deal was for the first X units, or the rev-1 hardware, and T-mobile can get the Rev-2 hardware "exclusively" :P

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    55. Re:Never saw it coming! by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      Anybody ever heard of "anecdotal evidence"?

      T-Mobile's network does not extend as far as the AT&T leviathan. As I understand it, the 3G chips are very power-draining.

      It would be good if all phones could be interchangeable with all networks by just putting in a different SIM card, or if all networks had to operate like the Internet: free access for everybody of whatever service who is near a wireless tower of whatever company. Free passthrough.

      But it would take an act of Congress to do that, not an act by one phone manufacturer.

    56. Re:Never saw it coming! by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      The iPhone is GSM, not CDMA. Also, the reason they went with this specific hardware platform was to reduce power consumption and size and weight, and because certain of the features (e.g., visual voice mail) required network upgrades that only AT&T was willing to do.

    57. Re:Never saw it coming! by vigmeister · · Score: 1

      Why does it seem that cell phone companies only offer incentives to new customers? There seem to be no retention incentives at all. Why not offer better plans when you've been with them for X years? I agree that this is the stupidest nonsense I have ever observed. Every time my contract with someone expires, I have to switch carriers just so that I can get a cool new phone through some online place. When you fulfill a contract, you can't cancel and sign up for a new contract (which has the best deals) without waiting 90 days. You are considered a retained user who gets shitty deals from the company website where the deals are already bad to begin with.

      Also makes me wonder why the cell companies do not have the best deals. It is always cheaper to get your phone through wirefly or some other place. Looks like these phone companies are missing a trick.

      Cheers!
      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    58. Re:Never saw it coming! by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      The cell phone tower thing is mostly just a general frustration - I need to find out who actually does use it.

      But the point was they told him that his house was covered, told him that he could just return everything if it didn't work. He didn't make a single call on it (because he couldn't get service) and then they charged him and told him to like it when he returned it. I'm sure some of the others are pretty nasty, too, but I haven't seen them acting as the "nice" company at all.

    59. Re:Never saw it coming! by powerlord · · Score: 1

      QFT. A few months ago I was going to be traveling overseas. The operator Heck the service rep even helped me check what the foreign carriers were for the area I'd be traveling (although policy prevented him from recommending one of them).

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    60. Re:Never saw it coming! by jasonmicron · · Score: 1

      I've been on hold for over 2 hours with AT&T - and I'm just trying to get home phone service & DSL turned on in my new apartment. Oh, and I've marked down 17 times I've been transferred & had to hold again.

      I'm inclined to agree with GP that AT&T is high on the shit list for service.

    61. Re:Never saw it coming! by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I'm just crossing my fingers that someone makes a CDMA OpenMoko device in the next year or so. :)

    62. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding your generous upgrade in plans, saving the customer $1800: Tell me again, *why* there are different plans at all? Oh yeah, it's a marketing gimmick to take more money from people...

      A fair service would either be fixed price or per usage. The plans are designed to make you pay more than you're going to use, or to rape you when you "go over". The fact that you opted not to rape some kid in an extreme case doesn't mean the plans aren't a sleezy scam.

    63. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Bell South took over Cingular (who took over a different company called "AT&T Wireless" earlier) Then Bell South changed there name to AT&T.

      Confused yet? Just look at it this way, "The New AT&T" is 5/7th "The Old AT&T" That was broken up by the justice department for being a evil monopoly in the early 80's.

    64. Re:Never saw it coming! by Casual+Maritime · · Score: 1

      I've got news for you buddy. AT&T was bought out by Cingular, not the other way around.

      Basically, the bad-guy in this story is SBC. Cingular was formed as a joint partnership between SBC and Bell South (something like a 60-40 split respectively). SBC had Cingular buy out AT&T Wireless. Later, SBC bought out Bell South. After another period of time, SBC bought out AT&T itself but decided to go with the AT&T name for greater recognition. Any changes that might have coincided with an AT&T absorption have less to do with AT&T and more with SBC feeling emboldened by the lack of competition.

    65. Re:Never saw it coming! by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      The activation process is what is used to enforce the 2 year contract. Existing AT&T customers COULD have simply used their existing SIM and gotten service just like with any other unlocked GSM phone. Special activation isn't a technical requirement, it's a business one. No way to re-obligate you without it.

      Of course, Apple couldn't sell iPhones with new service without having a means of estabishing that service. Activating through iTunes is a clever way of doing that without training their sales staff and making the purchase experience agonizingly slow like it is with every other cellphone purchase.

      It's very annoying that Apple locks the phone to AT&T without any apparent subsidy coming in to them. Yes, I've tried my Tmobile SIM in one and it doesn't work. After activation everything else appears to.

      "The real problem is that nobody at AT&T or Apple seem to really know whats going on during the process, and because both companies are involved, it's easy for their reps to blame each other."

      Oh yes they do, just not the ones you are talking to.

      Interesting story, one of my friends went to activate his iPhone using an existing iTunes account. That account had a 5 letter password and the minimum is 6 letters. As a result, he could log into iTS but but not activate. He tried to change the password but was unable to. Instead, he created an entirely new account for activation and it worked fine.

      My experience with AT&T is that they know absolutely nothing about the activation process and what it requires.

    66. Re:Never saw it coming! by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Actually they chose to go with a GSM version, not a CDMA version. The advantage is that the exact same version, with no revisions, can also be sold throughout Europe, once a european cell phone company modifies its backend to work with Visual Voicemail.

      This alone is a huge reason to have gone with GSM for a "first shot out of the gate".

      If it sells enough to support development, then they can worry about a CDMA version ... maybe.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    67. Re:Never saw it coming! by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      I too agree about T-Mo... I've had numerous problems with my phones (not with T-Mo's service), and they have always been very helpful and resolved them.

      • "Lost" my phone once on a construction site (dropped it while on a ladder, climbed in the house and came down and the neighbor already stole it)... called T-Mobile, they deactivated the account instantly and were ready to set me up with a replacement. The neighbor returned the phone he "found" the next morning (after trying to make a bunch of calls, and I am guessing failing). T-Mo reactivated the account shortly after I called them to let them know. Before I realized it was stolen, they (offered to and then) stayed on the phone with me while I searched the yard and street and kept ringing the phone to try to help me find it. I was using someone else's phone, had already tried that - but didnt realize the phone was already taken by the neighbor, and didnt want to wait the couple days for a replacement... so I tried again with their help while they stayed on the phone.
      • Switched from the standard, generic free phone of the time to a Treo600 unlocked (and "unsupported" by T-Mo at that time)... couldnt get Internet working and didnt know how to set up the rest of the features. Called them, and received by far, the best support ever from a phone company - on a phone they don't officially support!
      • Same deal with issues with my Treo 650 when I called them (an unlocked Cingular version)
      • Again same deal with any billing issue - which was twice when payments went lost (yes, they were sent). Unlike AT&T, they didnt hold the account hostage while things were resolved... they let everything proceed as normal while they investigated it. The payments were eventually found, processed and fees reversed... all the while my phone service kept working.
      • They've politely, intelligently and competently stayed on the phone with me for various issues; called back numerous times while I was working with them to get my Internet working on the Treo 600 and Treo 650 (required changing certain settings, and resetting the phone), and then ensured all was well afterwards - all for phones that at the time they didnt officially support.

      They may not (yet) have the fastest Internet (but it is cheap), but I like the (customer) service so well, that I am sticking with them for a while yet.

      -R

    68. Re:Never saw it coming! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Linked above.../a.
      This article would suggest that your suspicions are incorrect, although I (and the article) could be wrong.

    69. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the iPhone has mind numbing potential.
      I'm certainly finding the constant coverage mind-numbingly boring, if that's any help.
    70. Re:Never saw it coming! by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 1

      I don't even have T-Mobile (I'm with AT&T, although not getting an iPhone just yet) but I have to imagine there's some kind of "get out early" clause in that agreement - if Apple ends up able to make more money by breaking the deal and offering additional carriers than they would by sticking with AT&T I'd assume it's likely they would.

      And just to throw in my $.02, I've had pretty a good experience with AT&T coverage so far, and surprisingly a very good customer service experience with them.

      --
      Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
    71. Re:Never saw it coming! by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      The other AC is partially right. Cingular was a joint venture of SBC and Bellsouth which bought AT&T Wireless, begun to phase out the AT&T Wireless brand, and then reversed this decision to instead phase out the Cingular brand after SBC bought AT&T, renamed itself to AT&T, and gobbled up Bellsouth too. The Wikipedia article is pretty accurate from what I remember.

      Stephen Colbert has a funnier take on it, though.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    72. Re:Never saw it coming! by cyphercell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the grand scheme of things, 14 hours isn't a big deal, it's just fustrating to have the device in your hands, totally unusable.

      You're a f*cking lunatic. A six hundred dollar brick you have to haggle over for 14 hours, before it will do anything? That's insane. I'm sorry, but I'd attach the receipt to the damn thing and throw it back through a store window, but that's just me.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    73. Re:Never saw it coming! by Palpitations · · Score: 1

      That may be true - I was in a low level position and not really paying attention to the specifics of the "merger" (as everyone in my office spoke of it). I was simply speaking to the changes in policy that I saw when that happened. Sorry for the mix up.

    74. Re:Never saw it coming! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Basically, the bad-guy in this story is SBC.

      Has the Southern Bastards Club ever been the good guy in a story?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    75. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you nuts? Believe me, the iPhone costs more than $600. You're only paying that because you sign a 2+ year agreement with AT&T to be on their crappy network which in turn earns them well over the extra $200-300 they paid ontop of the $600 you paid for the phone.

      Oh, I don't like either AT&T or Apple so... It's both of their faults. Apple for releasing a product before it was ready for market. Helloooooo iPod anyone? Forget the first 4 years of that??? And AT&T for having overseas (read non-engrish speaking) and poorly trained support staff. I won't go into their poorly managed infrastructure.

      Any of you fanboys getting on AT&T's network just be have an iPhone. You deserve what you're going to get. OOOOOH, fyi, I'm an AT&T partner so believe me, I know what you're about to go through.

      And /. fix your captcha. It's so bad humans can't read them but I'm sure PCs still can.

    76. Re:Never saw it coming! by tacocat · · Score: 1

      Verizon is not in a position where they feel a need to bargain with anyone. Unfortunately, their coverage or service has declined considerable over the past few years. But what can you do?

    77. Re:Never saw it coming! by raga · · Score: 1

      RTFpost...he gave the wrong account #...it was his mistake, and by doing it, he got bumped off the automated (and quick) activation queue and got on a slower pile (probably requiring human intervention)...and you want him to brick apple's store for that?

      Umm...and who's the f*cking lunatic?

    78. Re:Never saw it coming! by RivieraKid · · Score: 1

      Oh yes they do, just not the ones you are allowed to talk to.
      There, fixed it for you...
      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    79. Re:Never saw it coming! by bullnotbear · · Score: 1

      Apple made AT&T(T)the exclusive provider for 5 years because they (APPL) receive $10/mos per subscriber from T + all ringtone rights (read this avg's $60+/yr per subscriber, although I find that a wee bit high). So think about that revenue stream.....just in 3 days = 500K * $10 = 5 million (free cash) to AAPL per month (not including the 9.5M units they are projecting to be sold by June 30,2008)! Why would T agree to a contract like this?? T has $0 cost to acquire new customers v. the industry average of $135 and I presume they still make profit on the monthly sub. fee (less $10).

    80. Re:Never saw it coming! by Edoko · · Score: 1
      I saw it coming, but it didn't come.


      The entire process of activation, including number transfer from T-Mobile took about 5 minutes.


      Flawless.


      Can't imagine what people are talking about.


      We had prepared for the worst, so my wife took her old T-Mobile to work, because after reading the horror stories, I assumed the activation would be delayed.


      But it wasn't.


      Not even near that.


      Only "problem" was that SMS did not switch over until the older T-Mobile phone is switched off.


      Best activation experience ever.


      Absolutely tops.

    81. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sentiment's exactly. It is NOT AT&T's fault that this whole iPhone thing is a total nightmare. In my 9 years as a customer of BellSouth Mobility / Cingular / AT&T, the process for activating new service AND upgrading has been: Pick out your phone, the REP activates it IN THE STORE using THEIR computers (which are PCs, I might add) and YOU WALK OUT WITH A WORKING PHONE. With the iPhone, Apple demanded FULL CONTROL over the activation process, and the contract between AT&T and Apple clearly states that the device MUST be activated with iTunes, NOT using AT&T's internal system. iTunes' servers WERE NOT designed to handle hundreds of thousands of users logging in, all trying to do the same thing at the same time. A friend of mine who has a master's degree in computer science (specializing in programming and networking) told me that he knew without a doubt that iTunes wouldn't be able to handle the work load. (He uses iTunes and said he has experienced terrible lag-times during the holidays when everyone jumps online to use their iTunes gift cards) So, it is NOT AT&T's fault. AT&T wanted to activate the phones in-store as they normally do. APPLE SAID "NO! IT IS OUR PRODUCT, SO WE WILL DECIDE HOW TO ACTIVATE IT. CUSTOMERS WILL BE USING iTUNES, END OF DISCUSSION!" So stop using AT&T as the scapegoat for your frustrations just because you are so deluded that you think there is no way that Apple could make a mistake. Trust me, with their choice of the iPhone activation method, THEY DID. If you contact AT&T to make sure the account is correctly provisioned, and let's say it is all correct, then if your phone still won't activate, THAT MEANS IT'S AN iTUNES ISSUE, thereby making it the fault of APPLE and their network. The E-mail that Apple is sending out saying that "AT&T needs more time to set up your account..." is completely bullshit. They should be saying, "iTunes is bogged down all to hell right now, and it's totally Apple's fault that we made product that can only be activated via our servers that have failed to withstand this amount of workload." The short of it: AT&T was ready for the onslaught, Apple and their not-so-wonderful iTunes was not. Apple failed you, not AT&T.

    82. Re:Never saw it coming! by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Are you nuts? Believe me, the iPhone costs more than $600. You're only paying that because you sign a 2+ year agreement with AT&T to be on their crappy network which in turn earns them well over the extra $200-300 they paid ontop of the $600 you paid for the phone.

      It is highly unlikely that the iPhone costs Apple anywhere remotely close to $600 to manufacture. And even if it did, there is no reason at those ridiculous contracts that AT&T couldn't have have slashed the retail price down to $300.

      Look how much Vodafone in the UK charges you for a Treo 750v (the v meaning gimped Vodafone version) on an Anytime 500 package which costs roughly $70 pm. NOTHING. That's right you pay nothing for a phone which costs $600 according to Palm. Another example - I can buy the incredibly lovely looking Toshiba G900 for £117 ($235) on the same Anytime 500 package. On a 12 month contract too. The G900 has less memory than the iPhone but is far superior in most other respects including screen resolution and even has a popout keyboard.

      So the point is that Apple could have sold the iPhone retail for $600 and probably made a profit. Why they did this is a mystery but I suspect that they thought there was no point in an iPhone if no service provider had a package including unlimited data and other things it needs to be in any way impressive. That's where AT&T come in and probably both Apple and AT&T concluded that their customers were ripe for a raping and neither made any concessions to price or relied on the other for subsidy.

      It sucks for people stupid enough to buy into a 2 year contract for iPhone 1.0 but there you are. That's the power of hype for you. After reading reviews on Engadget & elsewhere, it is hard to come away thinking the phone is anything but meh. I'm sure iPhone 2.0 will be a lot better, especially if it gets 3G and the glaring faults in some of its apps are sorted out.

    83. Re:Never saw it coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone activation problems I am working with truly have been horrendous. Please note, that only after two days of phone calls to AT&T phone support using both: 877-800-3701 and the "higher support number" 877-777-4192 - was I told that ALL addresses had to match during the activation process.
      My problem was that I have an iTunes account and my wife has an iTunes account. The new iPhone belongs to my wife who will be added to My AT&T Family plan.
      Her phone number was set to propagate from Verizon to my AT&T account (still not complete).
      During the activation process and when asked for the iTunes account to be associated with my wifes iPhone, I used her iTunes account, which has a different billing address - 1st problem.
      AT&T told me that she would have to have the same iTunes account which was associated with my AT&T phone billing address.
      This forced me to change her information within iTunes and now the process appears to be stalled. I have yet to speak with a support person knowledgeable enough to make this process work. When I tried asking Apple's technical support, they told me to contact AT&T.
      My last conversation with a senior iPhone support person at AT&T lead me to waiting another 24 hours - "just incase the system is bogged down".
      HELP!

  2. Apple - because things just work! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Eventually)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Apple - because things just work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Activation problems? It's Steam: Apple Edition!

  3. A bit of perspective. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Keep in mind that AT&T is turning on more cell phone accounts at once than anyone has ever done in the history of the cell phone industry. iPhone sales have either hit a million units already, or they will by the end of the coming week. If they perform at 99.9%, that's still going to be a thousand people running into problems.

    Everyone I know who's gotten one so far had it activated in a couple of minutes. The real story here is how smoothly it's going overall.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real story here is how smoothly it's going overall.

      Being able to use what you paid for is the real story? My, what high standards you have.

    2. Re:A bit of perspective. by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      "cell phone accounts at once than anyone has ever done in the history of the cell phone industry"

      right so you'd think they would have tested this activation thing and gotten it right BEFORE launch. no excuses, it's just piss poor.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone sales have either hit a million units already

      Link Please.

      Pity Apple didn't foresee the iPhone's popularity & choose a more capable partner.

    4. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It isn't like they are a new company or haven't done this before.

      When other new huge phones launch, there is often a flurry of activations, and I do believe AT&T has been in the phone business a while.

      Let's be honest here. The problem is that this is new in how they're handling activation. Because Apple has a such a large say in this whole process, it suddenly becomes less clear who is responsible for what. You introduce new policies, procedures and hardware at once, you're going to get SNAFUs.

      This isn't being a hater, but simply being objective. Apple has done some things rather well, and others not so well. For a company that does claim to have things "just work", they made the activation process more complicated than it needs to be.

      Just activate in-store like any other cell phone.

      That is having it "just work".

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    5. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it!

      The Apple loonies are already is damage control mode after shitting all over the Net for the past year with the tiresome iPhone hype and how Apple was going to save the phone industry from themselves and how we all hate our cellphones even if we don't realize it.

      And what is the result of all the idiotic fanboy hype:

      * Pathetic sales to no one but the hardcore, more money than brains Apple fanboy demo
      * Scathing reviews comparing the iPhone to better and cheaper phones
      * Buggy and poorly written iPhone software
      * And all the people crying over activation problems after Apple claimed they were going to make cellphone 'easy to use for everyone'

      Jobs now has his very own Newton to be remembered by.

    6. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Two other things.

      1 - You seem to suggest the iPhone is selling out like mad. Funny, countless reports show the phone is still in stock everywhere, not just at the usual AT&T stores, but in Apple stores, and available on the web. For the most hyped-product of the year, it didn't sell out right away. Let's say 20% of the country has AT&T Cingular (which may be generous). Of those, how many are eligible for new phones this minute? Of that group, how many absolutely had to have the iPhone on launch day? Of that group, how many of them had the money to actually purchase it?

      I'm not sure they sold 1 million units.

      2 - You suggested they could be operating at 99.9% effectiveness with activation. Perhaps you didn't RTFA let alone the paragraph summary. It was an unscientific poll, but the results still showed half of iPhone owners reported problems.

      50% > 0.1%

      Those figures aren't remotely in the same ballpark. After you brush up a bit on your reading skills and math, I'll start giving you a bit more credit.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    7. Re:A bit of perspective. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1, Insightful

      iPhone sales have either hit a million units already

      Link Please.
      He has no link, he's pulling numbers out of his ass. The telltale sign is the second half of the sentence you quote, "or they will by the end of the coming week". What he's saying, basically, is "They've either sold a million in a day, or are going to sell a million in six days. He's stating a time span that's variable by half an order of magnitude. He doesn't have numbers. He just knows that a lot of people waited in line to buy. How many phones this means, he has no clue. QED, the one million number is sourced from his rectum.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be expected coming from the local Apple Shill.

      There is no evidence that there were many long lines other than at a few big city stores.

      The iPhone has all the signs of marketplace flop. I can't think of another product that has generated as much hate.

    9. Re:A bit of perspective. by ronin510 · · Score: 1
      Here's a link to an MSNBC article. It does talk about how some people are having activation problems, but at the bottom section it does state that:

      "But in a sign of strong initial demand, AT&T said it had sold almost all its phones within hours of the device going on sale at its 1,800 stores.

      As for web availability, people are being quoted 2-4 weeks.

      AT&T has stated that pre launch, 40% of the inquiries they received about the iPhone came from people currently on other service providers. Of course, that isn't very scientific, but it does give you an idea of who potential iPhone consumers are.

    10. Re:A bit of perspective. by cyber-dragon.net · · Score: 1

      how about he reads when you do. iPhone is still in stock because they are being re-stocked daily. They have to my knowledge sold out daily. Why they did it that way who knows, screw ebayers? If so bravo.

    11. Re:A bit of perspective. by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What are you in such a snit about? Pissed off because you didn't buy AAPL shares?

      I based my estimate on the reports that Apple had made three million units for the launch, the fact that AT&T ran out of them, that several of the Apple stores did as well, and that those stores are getting restocked daily. I was at the Valley Fair store in Santa Clara on Friday, and I saw a much bigger line than I ever saw for a previous event. Friends of mine who went by that same store today and yesterday have told me that the store looked like the post-thanksgiving rush.

      My POINT is that AT&T is turning on more accounts at once than anyone has before, and they're doing a very good job of it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    12. Re:A bit of perspective. by cuzco · · Score: 1

      Wow. You've had some bad luck!

      I've had the opposite experience. I bought my first Mac in 1999, a first gen 350 MHZ G4 which I sold to a friend last year (who still uses it for web surfing and email).

      My second Apple purchase was a first gen TiBook in 2000 which traveled with me on a six month trip in Mexico. That puppy took a beating travelling in "chicken buses" "combis" and getting irreverently tossed into a beat up backpack. I still use it for development. The only things wrong with it are a few cracked keys that are held together with tape and the firewire port gave up the ghost about a year ago.

      My third Apple computer was a MacBook Pro I picked up a year ago and so far it's worked flawlessly.

      The fourth and final Apple product I own is a 2003 iPod which I still use all the time.

      The only problems I've ever had are batteries that loose their charge after about 1.5 to 2 years and one trip to the shop to get my MacBook Pro cleaned after spilling half a can of Pepsi on the keyboard. Nothing shorted out it's just that the pepsi goop under the keys made them stick in the down position and it got rather annoying. After the cleaning though, it was good as new.

      That's it.

    13. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      My wife and I checked earlier today because we heard how people were selling them for $900 on eBay. There were several auctions with 5 minutes left that were still at $200 for a brand new iPhone. You know what. I still wouldn't buy one. I have a Samsung SGH-D807 that I got not only for free, but for -$15 thanks to an instant in-store rebate. I have a gig memory card that I got for $9, and I love it. It plays my music, has a pretty screen, visualizations, I can download games to it, download full TV episodes, etc. And having owned a PDA, I'd rather operate my phone easily with one hand than pull out a stylus. Honestly, I'd try one if it was free, but I still wouldn't jump at a $200 price tag let alone a $600 tag.

      Generally a product of this hype sells out, which it has not. If you can show me articles showing that it is selling out everywhere everyday, I'd love to read them. But I've seen about ten that have stated quite clearly they are sitting on store shelves.

      Vendors generally don't have the logistics to restock daily. That's just absurd. I take it you've never worked retail. Why ship daily? People don't want to make orders daily, do inventory daily, or receive daily. If Apple produced X phones, and you have demand for X phones for the week or month, that's what you order. You don't order enough only to last the day, especially with the hype. You order as many as Apple will give you.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    14. Re:A bit of perspective. by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      "and they're doing a very good job of it"

      based on what? all the horror stories we are seeing?

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    15. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The few friends I know who bought them, walked into stores and didn't fight lines. They were readily available on the shelves. And I checked AT&T's website myself. It is listed as being in stock.

      Kevin Smith talked about buying one. He didn't wait in line either. Again, he just walked down to the Apple store, walked in, and walked out with one.

      If they sold out on launch-day specifically, it was due to an artificially created limited number for that day.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    16. Re:A bit of perspective. by jcr · · Score: 1

      all the horror stories we are seeing?

      No, the remarkably small number of those stories. Do the math.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    17. Re:A bit of perspective. by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      They did quite a bit of testing, actually. That's why we're not getting reports of tens of thousands of people having problems.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    18. Re:A bit of perspective. by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Took seven hours for my phone to go from "slide for emergency" to actually being able to do anything. I'm still not getting incoming calls forty-odd hours later.

      Also, reports that Edge is slow appear to be exaggerated. In reality it is worthless.

      The thing is awesome on Wi-Fi, though.

      -Peter

    19. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather trust Reuters than Engadgets: 2% activation problems

      Learning how to read is important, but distinguishing credible sources is just as vital.

    20. Re:A bit of perspective. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      They are in fact shipping daily. AT&T stores don't have enough storage room to store a week's worth of iPhones. I got in line at an AT&T store on friday and 10 minutes after I got in line they told everyone they were sold out. They only had like maybe 60 phones in stock.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    21. Re:A bit of perspective. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some of the problems arise from the owner living outside the area code of the original line.

      I really don't think that it helps that maybe several hundred thousand transfers and activations are happening at the same time, basically 6pm ET to 7pm PT. I don't think it happens very often.

      Having it done in iTunes on the whole, probably improved the experience for 95%+ of the buyers, otherwise the lines would have taken maybe two or three times longer to finish.

    22. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It improved the experience for 95% of the buyers?

      Then why did 50% of them report problems?

      Something doesn't add up right. Anytime I've purchased a phone, it worked when I left the store. I didn't need to do anything else.

      Last time I checked, Microsoft got hit with a fine over half a BILLION dollars for bundling their media player. If I want to watch something with the Quicktime codec, Apple bundles iTunes into the Quicktime download, and forces people to download iTunes if you want to activate their phone. And apparently, if you have a 64-bit OS, you need to change your OS as well.

      How exactly is that an improvement?

      What was the number? Some 38% are still unresolved. Clearly this is a huge improvement over walking out of the store with a working phone.

      I will never understand this site. People blast Microsoft all day long for forcing people to do things in proprietary ways, and then give Apple a free pass for the same tactics.

      Objective, reasonable human beings should be able to call out what they see.

      Activation of the iPhone is unnecessarily proprietary, and a hassle. And quite frankly I run Win x64, and Gentoo x64 at home. If an Apple representative told me I needed to format my computer and install another OS for their phone, I'd be flat-out irate. But again, this is a huge improvement in your eyes.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    23. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can't think of another product that has generated as much hate."

      Ummmmm... MS Vista?

    24. Re:A bit of perspective. by greg_barton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When other new huge phones launch, there is often a flurry of activations, and I do believe AT&T has been in the phone business a while.

      Yeah, but this was a phone launch like no other. I'm not just being the fanboi here. I've never seen a line outside a cellular phone store for anything. (Well, to get tech support at lunch time, maybe...) Cell providers just aren't prepared to handle this kind of burst buying.

      Case in point, I got my iPhone at an AT&T store. For each person who bought a phone they sat us down, asked us a few questions, got our payment info, etc. Took about 10 minutes, and they had maybe five sales guys processing customers. From when the line started moving (I was #34 in line) it took about an hour before I was driving away. For contrast, my friends who bought at an Apple store were out in half the time, and there were more customers there than at the AT&T store I went to.

      Bottom line, Apple knows how to handle hype generated high volume sales. (They know how to create hype, natch...) The public's never gotten so excited about a cell phone before, so cell providers are unaccustomed to the phenomena. Hopefully they'll learn...
    25. Re:A bit of perspective. by ronin510 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Before I comment on Apple's availability, it's interesting you say AT&T's website states that the iPhone is in stock, when there seems to be no way to check an AT&T retail store's personal stock (aside from AT&T putting out a news blurb that their retail stores are sold out). Buying from AT&T's website isn't a possibility, since they tell you to go to Apple.com, which is this link: http://www.apple.com/iphone/buy/ , which states you can only buy the iPhone at Apple's online store, Apple's retail stores, and AT&T's retail stores. Apple's stores still list ship times of 2-4 weeks. I'll just take it as a simple error on your part.

      I don't doubt that you'll find Apple stores that aren't sold out. Analysts are showing figures of up to 1,000 iPhones per Apple retail store. With 168 retail stores, they have sold an estimated 128,000 units (not including AT&T store sales) on launch day. 168 stores times an estimated 1,000 units each gives about 168,000. source:Bloomberg Piper Jaffray has said sales of 200,000 units at launch (AT&T and Apple) were expected and met. Also, most of the sold-out Apple retail stores are in California, where if you were to separate the state from the rest of United States, it would still have the 5th largest economy in the world. I'm sure Apple's smart enough to realize this and place more stock in the California stores.

      For first weekend figures, I must say that's pretty good, especially for a $499/$599 phone on a non-holiday shopping season. That's over $100 million in revenue in a couple days. Apple retail stores that are currently out of stock have stated that they should be receiving shipments in constant intervals. Instead of an artificial shortage, Apple seems to actually be prepared for demand.

    26. Re:A bit of perspective. by jcr · · Score: 1

      What I'd be interested to know is out of that 2%, how many had the phones working in an hour, how many had to wait a day, etc.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    27. Re:A bit of perspective. by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      I will never understand this site. People blast Microsoft all day long for forcing people to do things in proprietary ways, and then give Apple a free pass for the same tactics.

      I will never understand how your post got modded down to -1 and the grandparent got modded up to +3. Must be the reality distortion field.

      Oh, before I forget, I'm going to click No Karma Bonus so the zealots can only knock me down two points rather than three.
      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    28. Re:A bit of perspective. by shmlco · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Just activate in-store like any other cell phone."

      You think people are having problems now? A Piper Jay analyst said Apple has probably sold a half-million phones this weekend. I waited in line, then once inside the store, paid and had my phone in two minutes. Went to an WiFi-enabled restaurant nearby and was activated in three more, while I had some coffee.

      So given that, the Apple store I went to processed an entire line of 200 people in an hour and a half, and I'd saw a quarter of those at least bought two phones.

      Now. Picture a half-million people standing in line and having store employees REQUIRED to do all activations, transfers, credit checks, purchases, and all the other garbage usually associated with buying a phone, and now taking 10, 15, or even 20-minutes with each one. Now THAT would have been a disaster.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    29. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      iPhone sales have either hit a million units already, or they will by the end of the coming week. If they perform at 99.9%, that's still going to be a thousand people running into problems.

      Half a million idiots, who knew... Well enjoy $2000-6000 your phone and contract will cost you. I'm sure it will be no coincidence that by the time your contract is up, so too will your phone. You may as well toss it in the bin because the irreplaceable battery will be fucked. And enjoy the molasses like web performance due to the lack of 3G. No streaming for you!

      Smarter minds would discover that a top of the line iPod, plus a Mac mini and a regular phone on any other contract would have cost far less than an iPhone. Hats off to Apple for discovering such a large market of chumps.

    30. Re:A bit of perspective. by ronin510 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, that was 200,000 units sold on the FIRST DAY. That makes the units sold, revenue generated, and likelihood of sold out stores during the weekend even greater.

    31. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe because it's full of untrue garbage?

      -50% of users didn't report problems. 50% of poll respondents did. They're definitely not the same group in this poll. Reuters, a *reputable* news source not relying on an open poll, pegs the number at 2%.
      -Off topic rant about proprietary software. There's no such thing as an "open" phone activation system, and presumably people want to use this as an iPod as well (which out of the box requires iTunes, too--alternatives for the iPhone post-activation can't be far off). Microsoft's fine wasn't for bundling. It was for bundling after being convicted of an illegal monopoly (key word: ILLEGAL, not just a simple monopoly, which Apple doesn't have in the first place).
      - In store activations would have made lines move slower than molasses in January. Since 38% didn't actually have problems, it's a moot point, but assuming for a moment they did, 38% of activation problems is better than 100% having 5x the wait.
      -"Activation of the iPhone is unnecessarily proprietary" just about sums up the ludicrous comment. Letting you do it yourself, on your own computer, is a time saver. Buying it to use on an unsupported platform is a pretty stupid thing to do, no matter how much you want the stupid thing. For 95% of computer owners, it poses no problem. It wasn't designed to work for the other 5%, so complaining that it's a hassle is kind of a "duh" moment.

    32. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just activate in-store like any other cell phone. That is having it "just work".

      No - let me buy the phone, pick it up and make a call, with the phone being already activated and automatically picking the cheapest network for each individual call, so that I don't ever have to even think about it again. *That* is having it "just work".

      I'm not saying that this is feasible or likely to happen - just pointing out how much room for improvement there is in the user-friendliness of such technologies.

    33. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The magnitude of your ignorance on this issue is demonstrated by your line, "having owned a PDA, I'd rather operate my phone easily with one hand than pull out a stylus."

      The iPhone has no stylus, will not work with a stylus, and can be operated with one hand. What else are you wrong about? These are basic, basic facts, not side issues, since half the point of the iPhone is that Apple has made the best interface yet in any handheld device.

    34. Re:A bit of perspective. by Thrudheim · · Score: 1

      The parent poster is making a good point. It seems practically impossible to a test run that represents anything close to the volume of activiations that the iPhone brought. There are many different pieces to the puzzle, moreover, such as the fact that many people have to wait for another carrier to release the number, which is just out of AT&T's control.

      Think about it this way. In the typical process for buying a cell phone, a person would go to the store and sit there and wait while somebody activated the phone for them. When I've done this in the past, it's taken close to an hour. If the iPhone were being sold this way, there lines would have moved like molasses. People who got in line Friday would still be there today, waiting for their turn. Instead, everybody got their phones pretty quickly and all went home to activate them at the same time. It's really not that surprising the system got overwhelmed. That volume of activations happening simultaneously has to be unprecedented.

      AT&T is not blameless, of course, but I really doubt that any of the other carriers would have handled it without hiccups.

    35. Re:A bit of perspective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There's no such thing as an "open" phone activation system

      The system the iPhone uses is web-based. I know because I saw the error messages. They just don't allow you to use it with a standard web browser. If they had done that and given you a code to type into the phone then many of the problems would have been avoided. Of course you still have AT&T lack of coverage to deal with, but there's nothing Apple can do about AT&T's horrific network.

    36. Re:A bit of perspective. by abaddononion · · Score: 1

      I will never understand this site. People blast Microsoft all day long for forcing people to do things in proprietary ways, and then give Apple a free pass for the same tactics.
      I scanned this entire article's comments looking for a post like this. It feels good to see, because this whole thing has made me feel like everyone is completely insane.

      Seriously, if this entire endeavor had gone the EXACT same way, except that it was the "Microsoft xPhone", all of these Apple fanboys would just be constantly tearing into what an evil, monopolistic company Microsoft is, and how they were trying to control every nuance of their customers, and strip them of all freedom to use the product as they see fit, yadda yadda. Not to mention NO ONE would be defending the AT&T merger, like Ive seen a lot of here. And dont get me wrong, Im not a Microsoft fan, I hate them. But how can ANYONE hate Microsoft and not see how balls-to-the-walls evil Apple has been in this whole endeavor? They could have done so many things SO differently. It's not like they were FORCED to use this locked-down and controlling of an approach. they chose to. They WANTED to.

      I just... I dont understand. I feel like Im living in a madhouse. Ive been debating buying a laptop for a while now. And now that this Apple iPhone has come out, and people are paying $2000 a year for it (people who complain that the PS3 costs way too much), I think Im gonna go out and invest me some money in a nice cool 800 dollar laptop. Wait til you see all the features you get on one of those badboys! And you dont even have to pay 60 dollars a month! but will it run linux? HELL YES IT WILL.
    37. Re:A bit of perspective. by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      Took us 23h, about 8 hours on phone with Apple and AT&T both sides blaming the other and saying I'd just have to wait. Finally the magic 3701 number worked for me (was not in any FAQ or e-mail, found it on the forum). That rep was about to transfer us out again, but after explaining it, perhaps a little forcefully, got an activation in a minute or two.

      I think you're being a tad optimistic with your 99.9% - even if enGadget's estimate might be a little pessimistic.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    38. Re:A bit of perspective. by the1rob · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's 300,000 - 500,000 sold between Friday and Sat, according to most estimates. JP Morgan is saying 300k, and PiperJaffray is saying 500k. So it's somewhere in the middle.

      http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?s toryID=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20070702:MTFH48869_2 007-07-02_14-36-39_N02339932&type=comktNews&rpc=44

    39. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I just did something crazy. Everyone is telling me how incredible every Apple product is, so I just installed iTunes again to give it another whirl.

      It wants to covert my music files before it will play them, the browser interface is poor, and it wants my credit card information to display album art.

      That was a big waste. I hate 90% of Microsoft products out there, and I openly advocate Amarok for all Linux users, but on Microsoft boxes, I have to go with WMP.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    40. Re:A bit of perspective. by slamb · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that AT&T is turning on more cell phone accounts at once than anyone has ever done in the history of the cell phone industry. iPhone sales have either hit a million units already, or they will by the end of the coming week. If they perform at 99.9%, that's still going to be a thousand people running into problems.

      How is that possible? They are only selling in the US, correct? The population of the US is 300 million. Of that, I'm going to say only the 20- to 64-year-old group is at all likely to buy an iPhone. That's 180 million people, according to Wikipedia. Are one out of 180 working-aged Americans really standing in line to buy an iPhone in the first week?

    41. Re:A bit of perspective. by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      I just did something crazy. Everyone is telling me how incredible every Apple product is, so I just installed iTunes again to give it another whirl.

      It wants to covert my music files before it will play them

      Bullshit.

      the browser interface is poor

      Opinion, but still kinda bullshit

      and it wants my credit card information to display album art.

      COMPLETE bullshit. You have to have an iTunes Store account to DOWNLOAD album art from the iTS. If the artwork is already in your files it displays properly.

      You have a great future living under a bridge and charging tolls.
      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    42. Re:A bit of perspective. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      right so you'd think they would have tested this activation thing and gotten it right BEFORE launch. no excuses, it's just piss poor.

      None of the activation problems have anything to do with the method. It's ATT not being able to be flexible. They, like all phone companies, are so used to screwing over their customers that it's built into the fabric. Now that they have these new rules the system simply can't handle it 100% smoothly.

    43. Re:A bit of perspective. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Vendors generally don't have the logistics to restock daily. That's just absurd.

      I've seen stores that do it. For something like the iPhone, it'd be easy: figure 12x12x6" for the box. Stuff a 3 foot cube full of those boxes(54 phones), mail Fedex/UPS nextday.

      If four employees can't get those out to the ~1600 stores I've seen quoted elsewhere, they're doing something wrong. Fedex/UPS will be more than happy to send up the required number of trucks to pick it all up.

      Add a fifth employee to keep track how many or how fast stores are selling out and don't send a box to a store that still has them in stock while sending multiple boxes out to the high-traffic stores.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    44. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Convert my files - I ripped my entire CD collection I own into WMP. iTunes won't touch any of those songs or play them because they are WMA's with DRM. Other players will play them just fine. Our two MP3 players play them just fine. iTunes is demanding that I convert 20 gigs of music to suit its whims. That is bullshit, but rather a cold-hard fact. So much for "it just works" when it fails to serve the primary purpose, playing my music.

      As for the browser interface, again that is subjective. The first time I open iTunes it doesn't ask me where my music is, it scans my entire computer, taking forever, and loads all kinds of small crappy sound effects into the library. It however, completely misses that I have a mapped drive to my file server with my music collection. Those files are thrown into one huge playlist (of junk sound effects). I don't immediately see a good way to pull up certain media, not that it matters, because it won't put my music into the library.

      Looking through the menu I then see an option to display the browser, where I get three little menus to select genre, artist, etc. WMP has a quick dropdown in the top right at all times, in addition to the big tree-view on the left. Within the tree view I can pull up dynamic playlists, artists, albums, genres, etc. The tree provides a logical structure to organize my collection. And Amarok blows both completely out of the water. Check out the Amarok 2 playlist and see what a real media player looks like.

      And as far as album art, I have THOUSANDS of songs, and various media players had no problem picking up the album art jpgs in the folders are the album art. Various media players automatically pull album art and metadata from the web. iTunes was going to force me to manually associate pictures with all my music by hand, or force me to enter my credit card to download the media from their store.

      Complete bullshit?

      Again, a simple fact. This is simply how the software operates. We keep hearing "it just works" but I can't get basic functionality out of it. Both WMP and Amarok also have CD burning built in. If iTunes has this feature, it was not readily apparent.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    45. Re:A bit of perspective. by Sheepless · · Score: 1

      I'll grant you that some large number of activations go through just fine. Mine didn't. I was a new account (no porting issues), and I called Customer Service (and the so-called "Resolution Team") over 10 times. At NO time were the following questions answered:

      1) How long will my phone take to activate?

      I mean, really, how hard is it to say "Well, people in your situation who began activation at a particular time are activating after 36 hours."

      2) (In response to "You just have to wait...") How long should I wait until I call back because there is a problem?

      Again, how hard is this to answer? You know (or should know) where I am in the process and how long each step takes. Someone actually told me to call back at midnight. When I did, I got the SAME STORY "Just wait."

      In addition, I can't count the number of times I was told "I can't help you until you have a mobile number." To which, I queried, "Can you give me a mobile number?" The answer, in short, was "No!"

      Considering that their failure rate is LESS THAN what they expected, at least according to one account from the contractor who actually performed the activations, the customer service aspect of this is abysmal.

      --
      Social media and technology thoughts: http://jasonkinner.wordpress.com
    46. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      My original post in this thread repeated that it was an unscientific poll, but many Apple fanboys are using numbers like "99.9%" or "95%", which quite frankly are ridiculous to assume given this article.

      A similiar thing is happening with the XBox 360's. Microsoft keeps saying that is a very small minority that has any problems, and then you hear how certain service centers are getting 2,500 360's in every day. How some users a year later on are their 11th and 12 boxes. Who do you believe? The countless users who report the problems, or the company who insists the problems don't exist.

      In both these cases, both with Microsoft and Apple, they have deleted postings about problems and attempting to obfuscate facts in that matter. Thusly I am less likely to trust them. At the same time, people will problems are often more likely to be vocal than those who had no problems. So their data is likely skewed.

      A rational human being will assume that the numbers lie somewhere between the 50% and 95-99.5% numbers. Regardless, I wrote that the simple fact is that there wasn't a need to alter the activation process and make things proprietary. This kind of tactic would be blasted by the entire community if Microsoft did it. I guarantee it. Apple claims their products "just work", and perhaps that is the case with some of their products, but not all of them.

      I work in IT for a large newspaper. We have all kinds of platforms here from Solaris, Unix, Linux, Windows, AS400, and yes Macs. I don't use them, don't care for them, but I do have to support them. People do have problems with them. It isn't like the Mac commercials are true. People act like they are immune to crashing or glitches. The Linux community will tell you the same about their software. In reality, everyone has imperfect products. The disadvantage Microsoft has is that a driver will cause the entire system to crash, but otherwise, everyone is subject to malfunctions.

      When people gloss over flaws and pretend a product is inherently superior, when in reality it has comparable flaws to other products, that is inane. When people blindly worship a company and swear it can do no wrong, that is fanaticism. Am I saying Apple is evil and horrible? No. In this particular instance, I think they made a mistake.

      As for the Microsoft fine, it was for bundling. The EU demanded that Microsoft release a version of Windows without the media player. Netscape's big fight was how Windows bundled IE by default. Google is upset that Microsoft puts in a default search engine. Bundling, bundling, bundling. Everyone is upset about bundling, but again, Apple gets a free pass. Am I accusing Apple of being as evil as Microsoft? Again, no. But in this one case, they are using the same tactic that is otherwise deemed to be evil.

      I love how you deem it is more important that you don't have to wait, than the next guy receiving a working product. Let's apply this axiom to any other industry. Let's say doctors rushed through surgery so families didn't have to wait. 38% of surgeries have extra complications, but everyone has quicker surgeries. 100 is bigger than 38, so clearly this is an advantage. IF you think speed trumps a working product, then quite frankly I'm just going to dismiss you here and now.

      Again, you pull out a number of 95% and are confident about it. Where do you get that number? You say the poll can be completely dismissed as unscientific, but nothing is more unscientific than just making up data out of thin air and claiming it is fact.

      Please return when you have an interest in responding with logic and objectivity.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    47. Re:A bit of perspective. by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Convert my files - I ripped my entire CD collection I own into WMP. iTunes won't touch any of those songs or play them because they are WMA's with DRM. Other players will play them just fine. Our two MP3 players play them just fine. iTunes is demanding that I convert 20 gigs of music to suit its whims. That is bullshit, but rather a cold-hard fact. So much for "it just works" when it fails to serve the primary purpose, playing my music.


      Waitasec, you ripped your CDs int oa format with DRM? Sorry, I didn't realize you were so, well, stupid. (Sorry, but it had to be said.) Do yourself a favor and rerip it in any format you can without DRM. Since you have two mp3 player, I would suggest mp3.

      Now, as to iTunes going through your computer and gathering up your music: don't blame iTunes. It asked if you wanted it to scan your computer for music, and you said yes. Irrelevant anyway, since you ripped it all in WMA. With DRM! Jeezus, do you even READ Slashdot?

      And just to assuage your fears, yes iTUnes has CD burning built in. That is assuming you aren't stupid enough to rip in WMA WITH FUCKING DRM. Christ on a cracker, man.

      And before you ask, iTunes does NOT rip CDs in a format with DRM. The only tracks in an iTunes library with DRM are the ones you buy in the iTunes Store. Which I would suggest that you never do, because you're the type of person who RIPS HIS OWN CDS WITH DRM. Just, and i mean with this with all of the sympathy in the world, but FUCK, MAN. Just, just...FUCK!
      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    48. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize at the time by ripping my music into WMP that it was placing restrictions on the music.

      Other players play the files just fine. I have multiple computers in the house, I share the music across a file server, and I play the music across Linux and Windows. I have iRiver mp3 players which play the music just fine.

      But iTunes won't play them.

      Since then, I've been converting my entire library regardless into DRM-free mp3's with CDex. However it is a slow process. Regardles, iTunes is the first thing I found that wouldn't play my legally owned music. So much for "it just works".

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    49. Re:A bit of perspective. by jcr · · Score: 1

      I ripped my entire CD collection I own into WMP

      Sucker.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    50. Re:A bit of perspective. by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Honestly I regret it now, but having tried all the various media players on the Windows platform, WMP was my favorite, and I still stand by that.

      Of course no media comes close to Amarok, and I can't wait until I can use it on both Windows and Linux.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  4. I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by adam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am aware of the activation problems, especially after seeing this looooong thread on Apple's own forums. However, with regard to the engadget poll, I would be wary of its results-- there are many people who are "haters" of the Apple products, of the iPhone, etc, and I suspect many people who don't own iPhones are responding anyway saying they have activation problems, to skew the poll. My experience has been generally good.. bought 4 phones (I discussed yesterday), and three of them activated almost immediately. My primary phone, our biz dev guy's phone, our operations director.. no problem. The fourth, got the notorious "we need more time to complete this activation" (I was porting a second line, after porting my primary line from t-mobile). After about 12 hours, it started receiving texts, and within 24hrs it was ringing at the correct number. I called t-mobile tonight to cancel my service (40hr mark, or so) and they told me the second number has yet to fully release and to call back tomorrow to confirm it released and my service was fully cancelled.

    I admit not to have much technical knowhow with respec to the inner workings of this process, but I don't imagine it's entirely any one aspect.. AT&T, Apple, etc. It's probably due to the slowness of every vendor involved (those releasing numbers, etc) and the sheer volume of registrations over the last 72hrs.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by heinousjay · · Score: 0, Troll

      I would be wary of its results-- there are many people who are "haters" of the Apple products, of the iPhone, etc

      Are you seriously trying to shift blame to a vast PC-user conspiracy?

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Informative

      actually he is just stating a fact, that a unscientific poll does not = everyone having issues. Everyone I know who has gotten one has all had not one issue with it except one, who had a pre-existing ATT account which many people who have issues, ALSO have had.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    3. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by BlueTrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple should force users to enter some iPhoneID to be able to post in the technical problems section to avoid spams and false information.

      But did you consider also the fact that not all the people who have problems will log on to Apple forums to post or vote in the poll ?

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    4. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha. I love these Apple "lovers". Ready to accept and argue anything for Apple. But this is taking it to extreme. But then you should be after spending exorbitant money for almost any Apple preoduct.

    5. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by dattaway · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I love these Apple "lovers".

      Wait until the descendants of Johnny Appleseed goes on the Crusades and start wiping out non-apples. You'll see nothing but red apples on the zion horizon.

    6. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Holmwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      there are many people who are "haters" of the Apple products, of the iPhone, etc, and I suspect many people who don't own iPhones are responding anyway saying they have activation problems, to skew the poll.


      I really don't buy that 'haters' are skewing the poll significantly. It's possible, sure, but... it really comes off as sounding unlikely to me.

      That said, there's no way that 33% or more of iPhone customers are having serious activation problems. That would be many, many hundreds of thousands of people. If that were the case, there'd be news stories galore, all over CNN etc. We'd all (not just a few of us) know people who were suffering activation problems.

      The OP is certainly correct in this -- it's an unscientific poll that doesn't mean much. Any online poll like that will suffer from selection bias. That bias could be 'haters', but it's much more likely that people having troubles activating are out actively searching for information, and, more likely to find such a poll and, in turn, much more likely to respond to such a poll than people who have the phone perfectly activated and are relaxing and enjoying their phones.

      (To the OP, I wanted to see the results and cheerfully answered -- lying -- that I'd had no problems activating my non-existent iPhone. So at least I biased it the other way!)

      I'm biased btw, I think the iPhone is nice, but ludicrously overhyped, and anyone who waited a long time in line for it is out to lunch.

      But I suspect the OP's experience (2 of 4 phones activating perfectly, one almost perfectly, and the fourth within 24 hours) is par for the course. And, frankly, considering what a mess AT&T's systems are, I think that's an impressive achievement for Apple.

      If we took a WAG (wild-assed guess), there are almost certainly thousands of people with serious activation problems. There might even be tens of thousands. A hundred thousand? I doubt it, but perhaps possible. Even at the 100k mark, that'd be one in 15 customers. 6.7%. Considering it's mobiles and AT&T involved, that actually sounds very good to me, though painful for those with problems.

      Granted, if there are still many thousands of people with serious problems in several days time, that'd be quite bad.

      As someone who isn't an iPhone fan, it looks like a pretty decent launch. Though I still shake my head at those waiting in line.
    7. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Vincman · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's one big unscientific aspect about that poll, at least when I tried to vote on it. You can only see the results if you voted. So how many people do you think just clicked any option to see the results?

      A couple of people, including me, mentioned it in the comments and Engadget should've changed it right away. Just another reason to question blogs as an authentic media source.

    8. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

      So, you say the empiric evidence is false, throwing in suspicions and your anecdotal evidence.

    9. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but since I have seen even CNN do this, Its not a shock, and I would say its just blogs emulating what the real media does themselves... make news so they have something to report between real newsworthy stories.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    10. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I really don't buy that 'haters' are skewing the poll significantly. It's possible, sure, but... it really comes off as sounding unlikely to me

      Only an apple hater would say that!

    11. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by bjourne · · Score: 1

      But I suspect the OP's experience (2 of 4 phones activating perfectly, one almost perfectly, and the fourth within 24 hours) is par for the course. And, frankly, considering what a mess AT&T's systems are, I think that's an impressive achievement for Apple.

      That's quite apologist and on par for the rest of the "iPhone has problems" articles comments. If another vendor, say Microsoft, had the same problems activating Vista licenses would you have cut them the same amount of slack? Or if another carrier failed to active their customers new subscription plans? Ofcourse you wouldn't, you'd be real pissed. Fact is that Apple and AT&T's performance so far has been real amateurish. Granted, this is the first version of Apple's first mobile phone and their inexperience shows. But still, crap is crap even if it is new crap.

    12. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by m0nstr42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If that were the case, there'd be news stories galore, all over CNN etc.


      http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/ptech/07/02/iphone.ap /index.html#cnnSTCText

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19539747/

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,287638,00.html

      All linked off their main pages.
    13. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      I voted as having problems, because I was getting sick of engadget's incessant blathering about the I-Phone. I could care less if it was Apple, Nokia, Microsoft, or Wang Chung selling those. The amount of hype one non-apple site was doing was insane.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    14. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't buy that 'haters' are skewing the poll significantly. It's possible, sure, but... it really comes off as sounding unlikely to me.

      Then you simply aren't familiar with the site. 50% negative comments for an iPhone article - pre-launch - would be a light day.
    15. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Holmwood · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Mod the parent up for funny!

      Seriously, I'm a mild Apple "hater" in that I dislike the hype. But I think they produce some aesthetically lovely, at times overpriced technology. Haven't regularly used a mac since the early 90's. I still can't imagine buying a desktop mac as they don't offer anything both expandable and affordable (Xeon based machines, whether from Dell or Apple aren't cost-effective for the average non-workstation user).

      But my next laptop? Probably a mac. I won't care that it's not expandable, and on high-end machines their prices track Dells within a few hundred dollars. Sometimes a few hundred dollars better.

    16. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Holmwood · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft, within the first 48-72 hours of launch of Vista were having the same problems with activations?

      If Vista were unusable in those 72 hours? No. I wouldn't cut them remotely the same slack. Why? Activation is necessary for mobiles. International agreements specify the payment of vast sums of money based on international call traffic between national carriers. Even fairly large carriers are on the hook for 976 payments for calls that their customers make. And phones are frequently highly subsidized by ongoing payments.

      Allowing people free and unrestricted access to untraceable phones means that carriers could be on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars.

      There's a genuine need to ensure that someone using your network for long distance, 976 and the like, and calls between carriers, is actually a paying customer.

      It isn't the same with Vista. Microsoft can cheerfully let someone use Vista for 10 days -- or even 30, as they do -- without completing activation, and without incurring losses. As they do. No harm, no foul.

      Next, Vista is purely under the control of Microsoft. The iPhone sadly isn't. One has to look at the world as it is not as we would wish it to be.

      In the ideal world, we'd all be using incredibly reliable custom-built computers as cheap as the cheapest parts with all the mail-in-rebates working, running something with the aesthetics of OS X that cost us what Linux costs and had all the compatibility and game playing capability of Windows, and all the security of FreeBSD, OpenBSD or NetBSD.

      I find it amusing that I'm both an Apple apologist and an Apple hater for the same post. I suppose I must be in the middle!

      Coming back to your question? Given that Vista is usable for 30 days prior to activation, I wouldn't have a serious issue with 48-72 hours of problems for up to 7 percent of those activating. I wouldn't like it; I'd think it bungled given that it's entirely under their control, but I wouldn't conclude that it's a doomed launch.

      In Apple's case, knowing what I know of AT&T and the merger mess, I think it's reasonable. (You've a stronger case if you criticize Apple for going with AT&T. Much stronger).

    17. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Holmwood · · Score: 1
      OK:

      Nearly all customers have been able to activate their phones within five to eight minutes, he said.

      The story cites a single customer complaining he took 48 hours. And "simmering blog posts". Sorry, proves my case.

      (Yes, the AT&T spokesman could be lying, but in the age of Sarbannes-Oxley, publicly-traded companies lying just got a lot more expensive in jail time for senior executives).

      Yes, the phone was over-hyped. Yes, it's got some teething troubles. Yes, I think Apple chose a carrier that... well I have no clue why they chose AT&T. No, there is no way I'll buy an iPhone unless they cut the required monthly contract in half while still offering the same features. And switch to a better carrier, and have something better than the godawfully slow EDGE service which even Steve Jobs condemns. Even then, I doubt it, because I think the iPhone is too low res, and too closed an architecture.

      For me, the iPhone has a lot of problems, but they're all at the service/design level rather than the implementation layer. The presence of three identical stories sourced from AP that quote "almost all customers" activating within minutes... nope, doesn't prove your argument, sorry.
    18. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Holmwood · · Score: 1

      I'm familiar with Engadget. Look, you're posting as AC. I don't know why. I wish you weren't. But read this and tell me if you think I'm an iPhone hater: The phone was brilliantly overhyped and I think it's got some serious design/service shortcomings. - The lack of openness in architecture. - The expensive service plan ($60+) with one of the weaker (service-wise) providers. - Relatively low resolution (an 800x480 screen would have been feasible in roughly that form factor), - a non-user-serviceable battery thereby mandating product destruction within 3-4 years, (Yes, I use a 4-year-old MP3 player with a replaceable battery) - lack of a physical keyboard. - Horrible (IMO) service partnership with AT&T, one of the weaker and more disorganized mobile carriers. All of these service/design flaws render it unacceptable to me. So am I an iPhone hater? I also think it's a fantastic, nifty product with an elegant user interface. I think it will, and should, do very well. Whether it'll reinvent the phone? Probably not, especially given that they've partnered with AT&T. But it's raised the bar for everyone, and I as a consumer am very happy about that. It's possible to dislike a bunch of things about the iPhone -- strongly so, even, and like a bunch of things about it. And decide that it's not for me. And not be a hater. I trust. Best, Holmwood

    19. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by m0nstr42 · · Score: 1

      The presence of three identical stories sourced from AP that quote "almost all customers" activating within minutes... nope, doesn't prove your argument, sorry.
      *shrugs*

      I didn't even read the stories, and I'm not really trying to make an argument. I just thought I'd call you on making a sweeping statement that was untrue. It caught my eye because it was all over the television this morning, so I figured it must also be all over the news sites.

      Personally, I think both the phone and the ensuing problems are over-hyped (don't get me wrong, it's a pretty cool device). How else does the media operate but by sensationalizing things, though? It's a direct consequence of their social function.
    20. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by Holmwood · · Score: 1
      I appreciate you responding. Kudos. (Slashdot doesn't have ENOUGH dialog). I think you're mistaken on a major point though.

      Remember I said stories "galore, all over CNN".

      I just thought I'd call you on making a sweeping statement that was untrue.

      I think we differ on what "untrue" means.

      I think your comment that I made an untrue statement is unfair. And, well, uh... incorrect. You don't have to accuse someone of being a liar, just say you think they were mistaken. And I don't believe I was.

      Again, I said stories news stories "galore, all over CNN". Not 'one lonely wire service story quoting a single user'.

      I pointed out that you cited three identical stories from AP that simply spoke of "simmering blogs", and a SINGLE user with problems. You should have read the stories. You looked a little ridiculous citing three identical stories (in my respectful opinion). Fair enough, you didn't read them, but that's part of the problem. I think we all suffer from a lack of reading on Slashdot.

      Again, as I said, there'd be stories "all over" CNN. They wouldn't be quoting ONE user from a Friday news wire. They'd be quoting hundreds, thousands.

      I've looked at CNN right now, and there's nothing on the iPhone off the main page. Not even the wire story you reference. When I clicked through to Tech, I did find the same exact story you reference about blogs simmering as a minor headline. Unupdated for me. (In fairness, I may be getting a different geographic CNN feed than you; I'm in central Asia, but surfing via an IP that registers as Canadian). It may be that CNN is playing this up a lot more in the US; I can't tell, but I don't think so.

      Personally, I think both the phone and the ensuing problems are over-hyped (don't get me wrong, it's a pretty cool device). How else does the media operate but by sensationalizing things, though? It's a direct consequence of their social function.

      Now here I get you 5x5. Yeah. The media needs conflict and controversy to survive (or so they feel). Personally, I think the best thing about the iPhone is it will drive competition. Good, because I'd rather not buy one given its significant limitations (to me).

      Holmwood
    21. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by m0nstr42 · · Score: 1

      Hey dude, no problem. No personal harm meant. I'm just trying to be a smartass. You got me.

      Purely in the name of dialog, though, the number of news stories on a given topic is not necessarily indicative of its scope or importance. Compare: Number of stories and/or blog posts (at least in the US) on Paris Hilton's prison release vs. the weekend's terrorist activity in Britain.

      For me, at the top of cnn.com is a "Hot topics" bar, which includes an "iPhone" link that brings up 75 stories (not all about said problems, just about the phone in general). It comes up if you search the page for "iphone". Maybe this is determined from cookies or something.

    22. Re:I would emphasize the "unscientific" aspect by bgspence · · Score: 1

      I agree with the poster. I don't have an iPhone. So, I voted #3, no problem to see the poll results.

      Maybe there needs to be another poll to see who voted with/without an iPhone.

  5. Apple Hype by syousef · · Score: 0, Troll

    I don't get it. What's so damned special about the iPhone? Any other company puts out a device like this and I guarantee you there'd be very few people taking it up, and they'd be labelled suckers by the rest of us. However Apple does it and suddenly its cool. Honestly I have had crap luck with Apple products - even my Ipod and my fiancee's - the only personal Apple gear I've bought in 2 decades have been trouble. Her's had a scratched screen, mine has a temperamental click wheel. Without those flaws they'd be good but not spectacular for what they are.

    I set up an eMac for work a few years back and in a month it was off back to the Apple shop because the mother board had just suddenly died cold. This was a rarely used but usually left on and idle developers test machine. I saw enough to tell you I hate the interface and sadly my new Vista laptop looks just like a damned Mac.

    I've come to the conclusion that Apple is good at one thing: Hype that creates a fanatical following.

    Mod as you will. This being /. I don't expect much.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Apple Hype by Necroman · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you've had some bad luck with the products... and you know what, that happens sometimes. I know a lot of people with Apple products in their homes and I hear only good things about them. I've got a Powerbook that I've had for almost 2 years now and it's still functioning fairly well. I've got an iPod Nano that has treated me very well.

      Apple doesn't create a lot of hype for most of their products. The iPhone is one of the first products (in a long while) from them where they did a full advertising campaign before a product release. Much of the "hype" that you hear are other Mac/Apple users talking about their computers/toys.

      --
      Its not what it is, its something else.
    2. Re:Apple Hype by dmarcoot · · Score: 1, Interesting

      try the phone. i have.
      and your wrong.
      there is a lot special, namely the UI.
      but if that doesn't float your boat, find me a phone anywhere that has 1 gb of memory, never mind the 8 gb iphone has.

      or the video play back with a 160 ppi screen, or a better internet experience, because there is none.
      io dont even think it is best phone, but it certainly is best hand held internet device with perhaps the nicest UI ever made.

        i have used apple gear for 15 years, with not a single hardware problem, not one.
      your entitled to your opinion based on your singular experience, but the vast repeat customers apple has, Consumer reposts highest customer satisfaction rating for years. all speak to another experience with their products entirely.

        i wonder why your wasting your tim reading and posting here on a product your made up your mind on without even trying. people like you are more annoying than so called "apple zealots"

    3. Re:Apple Hype by kubevubin · · Score: 1

      Storing a lot of data within a phone is reckless. Plenty of phones offer removable storage options, which I feel is a far more intelligent approach.

    4. Re:Apple Hype by hxnwix · · Score: 1

      While everything you say is true, I wonder whether you've used an iPhone.

    5. Re:Apple Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Hardware problems? How's the shift key working?

    6. Re:Apple Hype by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      You don't get it because by definition of being a Slashdot regular you are a geek and geeks don't put much value in easy to use interfaces. If there isn't a REASON to tinker, it doesn't attract you. Likewise this is exactly why Apple DOES have a cult following.

      You just aren't the target market.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    7. Re:Apple Hype by L7_ · · Score: 1

      the thing is, you're not actually storing the data on the phone. its just temp flash memory for files that are stored on your computer. its just like an ipod: the iphone will never be the only place you store information, because they realize that information on your phone is volatile. you could lose your phone at any time, all pertinent information is always stored and kept on a more robust desktop/laptop system.

    8. Re:Apple Hype by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      store what?
        8 gb of text messages? or perhaps media you might actually use, which you never will use and cant on any other device. The iphone has a phone, but it has a screen and memory that you can watch a movie on it, and dont need 3 devices in your pocket.
      the phone has mp4 decoder on the chip-set.

      that is intelligent.

      find me another phone hand held device on market that does

      your solution is yesterdays. Apple has opened a whole new playing field the devices you find intelligent cant compete on, but whose manufactures are shitting themselves wishing they could, even if you dont see it.

    9. Re:Apple Hype by dwater · · Score: 1

      > find me a phone anywhere that has 1 gb of memory

      Pretty much any Nokia...with a 1GB card

      Actually, even with a smaller card, depending on how much they have on board.

      For example, my Nokia 3250 can take a 2GB card. That's been available for a long time now.

      A lot of phones have a slot where you can *add* memory - and the cards are getting bigger all the time. How long before they are 8GB or over? Assuming the phone can actually support those larger sizes, they can just add the bigger ones. The N95, for example, can have a 2GB card, if you feel you need it - it's a choice you make, not one they force on you. That's also been available for several months.

      Also, I wonder just how much of that 4/8GB is used by the OS. At least all (well, most) of a card's capacity is for you to use.

      --
      Max.
    10. Re:Apple Hype by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So you have bought the hype. Fantastic. There are PLENTY of phones out there that have more than 1GB of memory. 160ppi screen? That doesn't mean a lot when what you're limited to using it how the manufacturer has deemed you want to, instead of using it how you want to. Better internet experience? You mean, like faster over 3G? Yup - look to other phones for that. GPS? That too. And flash. And java.

      I don't need to try out a shoe/car/cat/bowl-of-chili to see if it makes a great phone - I can tell from its specs it's not up to scratch. It doesn't matter how nice the packaging is, my glee in owning an iPhone doesn't instantly give it GPS, 3G, a decent camera, and stereo bluetooth audio.

      Fanboy much?

    11. Re:Apple Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is exactly it. Apple produces innovative products but so do many companies. The difference is that Apple has built up a following that borders on zealotry and to criticize one of their products is to risk moderation.

      Even stating the obvious such as how expensive their products, or to point out long history of faults with new launches is to risk moderation and angry replies. It's no wonder they're so fond of sealing in batteries and other tactics that reduce the life of their products. Clearly they make so much cash from repeat business that it doesn't make sense for them to make products that are too reliable, or last more than a few years.

    12. Re:Apple Hype by biscon · · Score: 1

      and that makes me wonder. Why are there so many fans here? thought most of slashdot would prefer something they could tinker with.
      I have no special love or hate relationship with Apple and the iPhone does look like a nice product, but personally im going
      for a symbian phone so I can tinker with and write C++ programs.

      you can even get open source on symbian.

      I don't see that much geek appeal in the iphone being so locked down.
      anyway its their first phone, perhaps the next version.

    13. Re:Apple Hype by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 1

      I have a Palm Treo 700p, which I bought about 3 months ago. It takes an SD card, and right now I have a 4gb card in there, but you can get as big as 8gb. I can play videos, read email, surf the web, play games, listen to mp3s, user AOL Instant Messenger, run Google Maps (with traffic!) and, with my $60 bluetooth GPS, I use TomTom Navigator for in-car driving directions.

      It runs PalmOS, so I can download any Palm application and run it on my phone. There's and SDK for palm, and it even runs Java so I can write my own apps if I so desire.

      I also paid $200 for the unit (with various rebates).

      Understand this: the Apple iPhone doesn't allow you to do anything that Treo users (and probably other PDA phones) haven't been able to do for years! What you're paying for is a slick UI, period. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure the iPhone's interface is VERY slick, but is it $600 slick?

      --
      "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
    14. Re:Apple Hype by acalthu · · Score: 1

      Nokia N91 8GB edition.. sonyericsson W960.. pretty much any new nokia or sonyericsson can _easily_ be upgraded to 1GB via the addition of a memory card of the same capacity, often vendors will throw this in free if the card is not already part of the bundle as it already is with the newer Sonyericsson walkman phones. The iPhone is mediocre at it's best, my dopod 818 has the exact same features as this.. i really don't count rubbing one's fingers over the screen to make it do things a "feature", and i've had it for a year now already.. so yes.. mediocre.. at best.. with plenty of gimmicks. not flamebait, just a mobile user outside the states ^_^

    15. Re:Apple Hype by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      There's a 4GB card that works with the N95. And of course, they're swappable (if you want lots of videos, 4GB isn't going to give you a lot). And of course, the N95 does TV out.

      I heard it loses 750mb for the OS. Which really makes a 4GB iPhone more like a 3GB iPhone.

      (yes, I'm hoping that some sheeple dump their N95s when the iPhone arrives in the UK).

    16. Re:Apple Hype by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      The OS takes about 700MB. You get to use the rest.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    17. Re:Apple Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that Apple has built up a following that borders on zealotry and to criticize one of their products is to risk moderation.

      And open-source hasn't?

    18. Re:Apple Hype by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Because, no matter how hopeless Slashdot may seem in this regard, there are still a lot of people who don't have an obsessive need to tinker with every single thing they own, and who actually value good design.

    19. Re:Apple Hype by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me - Sentences begin with capital letters. I, when referring to yourself, is always capitalized.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    20. Re:Apple Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      160ppi screen? That doesn't mean a lot when what you're limited to using it how the manufacturer has deemed you want to, instead of using it how you want to.

      Please do tell... is there another use for a 160 ppi screen other than displaying visual information, such as pictures, text, and video? Would you perhaps prefer it if the iPhone's 160 ppi screen could be used as a casserole dish, as well as a shoehorn?

      Of all the things to bitch about being "locked down" on the iPhone, "160 ppi screen" seems to be an odd target.
    21. Re:Apple Hype by syousef · · Score: 1

      That's quite simply rubbish.

      find me a phone anywhere that has 1 gb of memory
      I have a Nokia N70 which is last year's model:
      It has 1 Gig of memory. (Yes that's in the form of an expansion card, but it's still a gig).
      It plays music and video. Can't quote screen res but it works well.
      It actually runs several emulators. I can even run the doom demo.

      The UI I have to admit isn't spectacular. However I wouldn't rate my IPods UI as spectacular either.

      Honestly this is what I get from mac zealots who are oblivious to what else is out there all the time.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    22. Re:Apple Hype by syousef · · Score: 1

      Nope I haven't used an iPhone. I haven't jumped off a cliff either, but I don't need to do so to have an opinion that doing such a thing would be stupid.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    23. Re:Apple Hype by hxnwix · · Score: 1

      Right, I'm glad you set that cliff thing straight.

      Now, about the rush to judgement on the iPhone: until you've used one, why would anyone care to hear what you think of it?

    24. Re:Apple Hype by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm not bitching about the 160ppi screen - quite the contrary. It's analogous to having a fantastic Ferrari with no wheels. You have the equipment to do something fantastic (the screen), but some other idea (locked OS, no custom apps) means its usefulness has been rather massively limited.

  6. Well, I'm happy by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not because I hate Apple or AT&T ... but because I just went through the process of upgrading a seven-year-old phone (Sprint). And it was a pain in the ass. I went through customer support hell, inconsistent stories, runarounds, transfers ... I was thinking the whole time, "holy shit, people upgrade phones all the time, why the hell does this have to happen to me?"

    Well, as of this weekend, I completed the month-long process of upgrading ... and I'm just glad to know I'm not the only one who has to go through a stressful activation process :-)

    1. Re:Well, I'm happy by tftp · · Score: 1

      I'm also on Sprint, and when I upgraded I just bought the phone from their Web site, and it was either activated out of the box, or I just had to do something like power it up... I clearly remember that I had no need to call anyone at Sprint, and now that I heard about AT&T I also know that I will stay with Sprint for a while :-)

  7. Check your zip codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at&t seem to be quite out of it with regards to how their own systems work, to the point where they have to make things up (or make wild guesses) when they don't understand why it isn't working. So far there is at least one solution to work around at&t's incompetence, but there's no telling if it applies to your situation.

  8. The Engadget Poll by Necroman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Poll that Engadget had about the service problems was fairly badly put together. The only way to be able to see results is to vote first. For for all the people that don't even have iPhones, they had to choose 1 of the 3 options before they could see the results. Since there was no "I Don't have an iPhone" options, it severally screwed with the results.

    --
    Its not what it is, its something else.
    1. Re:The Engadget Poll by mr_matticus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only that, but the respondents are self-selecting (why would the "happy middle," who have no stake in spreading their tales of joy, even respond to the poll? While a higher percentage of early adopters probably read Engadget, it's still a small minority of the market. How about the benefit of iPhone haters claiming problems just to stir the pot?) and don't have to "prove" that they even have an iPhone. It's basically the same as asking, "what's your opinion about Windows Vista after purchase?" without taking any further steps.

      Are we really willing to believe that 13,000 iPhone customers responded to a poll on a tech-nerd website like Engadget? If that's even remotely accurate, that should indicate the high sales rate of the iPhone. But then again, it's similar to the response rate of every other Engadget poll, so it's probably total crap.

      For the record, I don't care either way whether or not 38% of customers had activation trouble or not. I don't care whether 100,000 iPhones sold or 2 million did. It's a neat gadget, but my life isn't riding on it.

    2. Re:The Engadget Poll by n3tcat · · Score: 1

      Damn fanboys! And next, I'll guess you're going to say it should have been written on a Mac, and then we wouldn't have these problems?

  9. And? by adona1 · · Score: 1

    Maybe some perspective is needed. Half of Slashdot sees the hand of God in the iPhone, and the other half wants it to fail miserably. But at the end of the day, it's still just a phone. If it makes calls and texts, then it's fine. Anything else is just window dressing (which admittedly is the main selling point for it).

    I'd be more interested in hearing reviews/complaints after people have actually had the phone for a few weeks, as first impressions tend to be coloured by the owner's predisposition towards it.

    --
    Between the falling angel and the rising ape
    1. Re:And? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      Half of Slashdot sees the hand of God in the iPhone, and the other half wants it to fail miserably.

      ...and the third half doesn't care much either way, but is just interested in tech generally.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      "If it makes calls and texts, then it's fine"

      no it's not, for $499 it'd want to suck my fat cock 3 times a day

    3. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer: I live in Kentucky and our local cell phone company, Bluegrass Cellular, is simply awesome.

      My sort-of friend, David, who has FAR too much money for doing absolutely nothing, just got an iPhone. He had the activation problem too. He paid an outrageous sum for the thing. I paid $59 for my phone. I didn't even to sign a contract to get it -- I prefer to prepay, as it's only $56 a month. Like most cell phones, mine was activated in the store; I was calling my best friend (not David) as soon as I stepped out of the door with it. So what is the deal with the iPhone? I genuinely don't get it. Even taking into consideration that in many places there's no cell phone company as good as Bluegrass Cellular, I still don't understand why people are forking out mega-dollars for the iPhone in the first place. I'm not trying to troll or flame, I really just don't get it. For that much money, I'd want to be able to do something more, and that something more should something pretty damn good.

    4. Re:And? by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like jewelry - a status symbol. People buy jewelry not because they are doing optics experiments or need a portable glass-cutting tool. iPhone has a potential to be eventually usable for making calls, but given that the battery in it is not replaceable (now we know for sure!) it is clear that iPhone is designed as a toy, to be a toy, and it is sold at a price of an intricate toy as well. In other words, it is not a businessman's strong and solid weapon of communication - it's a gentle, flimsy and feminine fashion apparel.

    5. Re:And? by Confuzzled · · Score: 1
      So the parent believes that because "[since the] battery in it is not replaceable it is clear the the iPhone is designed as a toy". And that was modded +5 insightful? What is wrong with moderators today?

      yes yes, i must be new here...

      t's a gentle, flimsy and feminine fashion apparel.
      Check out PC World, they dropped it, tried to scratch it with a key, etc. Good troll though.
    6. Re:And? by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 1

      And yet another person who has bought into the countercultural critique of consumerism. I guess it's nice for you think you are so smart and apart from the unwashed sheeple. But the truth is that you are the one with the problem. Every time something popular is released, there will always be people who oppose it simply because they want to be different (just like those daft people who abandon their favourite band when they become popular). So what's happening is that you are subject to the same disease that the people you are criticising are. Being cool is about wanting to stand out and be different. You just want to stand out as an "individual" by resisting the iPhone "groupthink". In essence, you are no different from the people you are criticizing.

      The only thing that's funnier and more pathetic than people who buy iPods to be "cool" are people who refuse to buy iPods to be "cool".

      The truth is that the whole thing is a fantasy. Of course there are some people who buy iPhones and iPods as a fashion statement, but for iPods, that ship sailed a long time ago, since they are so widespread. Hell, old people have them, and that is usually the killer for the fashion obsessed.

      The truth is that the iPhone and iPod are selling well because they are simple, well designed products that have been aimed at the ordinary user. That's the truth of the market. If you make something that is good, people will line up to buy it. The idea that the masses are brainwashed by advertisers and hype is simply a conspiracy theory.

      So please stop accusing Apple customers of wanting to be cool, when you are doing the exact same thing.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    7. Re:And? by tftp · · Score: 1
      You just want to stand out as an "individual" by resisting the iPhone "groupthink". In essence, you are no different from the people you are criticizing.

      That is true only if someone goes against the groupthink automatically and without an independent thought. You haven't proven your case here, though, because I do not hate iPods - though I don't own one. I just don't need any, I am not a music addict and I work best in silence.

      iPods are indeed a decent purchase in terms of quality of hardware, and with generally good UI. Geeks may want something fancier, with [more] buttons and such, but most of the people are happy with iPods. Good for them, though they still pay a premium for all that, and for the brand name. But I guess they have the cash to burn. Fashion-wise, you probably can't surprise anyone by owning an iPod, so it's not that important these days. It was, though, when the iPod line was launched.

      In any case, the major difference between iPod and iPhone is that iPod created a new function where none were before. It was a first truly pocket-sized music player which could hold all your music (or at least a sizable part of it.) Then it became a first music player that played video. Then it became a first music player in a tiny size. Then it became a first super-thin music player. And so on - iPod was offering to the user something that the user did not have before.

      Now turn to the iPhone. What exactly does it add to the wealth of free phones that the market is flooded with?

      • Large display. That is good but has only a limited value. Most phones have adequate displays already. It may be useful if you browse the Web on the phone; I don't. Besides, my PDA has a 640x480 LCD so the iPhone would be a downgrade for me.
      • Functions as an iPod. Many phones play music already, so this is not exactly new.
      • Has a touch interface. This is new, but not necessarily good. Many people dial by touch, and I personally like buttons (but won't hate touch buttons nevertheless.)
      • Is tied to probably the worst cellular provider in the country. That is priceless.
      • Has no programmability beyond what the Web browser offers.
      • Not a clamshell (this is a personal complaint, disregard if you disagree.)
      • Battery is not replaceable. This is a killer, IMO. Li-Ion batteries die after a couple of years, faster if you use them. (the total number of charge cycles is about 500.) Why to throw a perfectly good, expensive phone away if you only need a $50 battery? What is the plan, doc? The phone is not a micro-power iPod, the phone draws some decent power when talking. Does Apple expect everyone to dump their $500 iPhones in two years?
      • Super-expensive. Most people get their phones for free.

      Did I miss something? Let's check Apple's Web site:

      iPhone is a revolutionary new mobile phone that allows you to make a call by simply tapping a name or number in your address book, a favorites list, or a call log.

      Fancy that, I have this function in my old phone already, and I doubt that anyone else lacks it. You just press a button instead of tapping, how hard is that? Besides, I'd hate to touch a wrong entry and dial a wrong number. Hard buttons have their advantages.

      It also automatically syncs all your contacts from a PC, Mac, or Internet service.

      So does my phone (Sanyo PM-8200) - I have a USB cable for it and the software. Works great and allows me to move camera photos from the phone (or onto it) without using any wireless function, in complete privacy and with excellent speed. I back up my phone's contacts this way.

      And it lets you select and listen to voicemail messages in whatever order you want -- just like email.

      May be convenient and an innovation, but has nothing to do with the iPhone. This is in cellular provider's department. I guess Apple just coded the thing while Verizon and others were busy turning phones' features off.

      That's why I think that the iPho

    8. Re:And? by tftp · · Score: 1
      As I mentioned elsewhere, Li-Ion batteries have a limited number of charge cycles, and once they are used up the battery doesn't take charge any more. I guess we know that well enough with our notebook batteries, isn't it so? Replacement batteries for notebooks are bought all the time, and I purchased a few myself. A battery for a $1,000 notebook may cost a $100 but the owner (a road warrior) needs his computer to work on the go.

      The iPhone was opened, as you probably saw a few days ago, and it is obvious that not even a geek would be able to open the case without some custom tools. The replacement battery is also not going to be on the market because it is against the law in this configuration (the Li-Ion battery may be sold only as a user-replaceable part, like notebook batteries, but not as a solderable part.)

      Without a replaceable battery the user can only hope that he is not using too many charge cycles of his new and shiny iPhone before the battery dies. That may be difficult, though, because the phone has WiFi and EDGE connectivity and if you actively use them they may bite some chunk of power from the battery. Apple specifies only 6 hours of Internet use until the battery is empty - but that's not that much, and you never want to run your phone's battery dry - someone may need to call you about something important! The audio playback, however, does not impact the battery much, so Apple learned from early iPod battery debacle. Let's see if they learned enough to pick the right battery for a more power-hungry device.

    9. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know which is less likely -- that you have $499, or that you have a fat cock.

      Oh wait, yes I do...

    10. Re:And? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      With LiIon, a charge of 50% only uses 50% of a charge cycle. Because of the complex circuitry in a LiIon battery, it does not suffer from memory effects.

      Of course, using WiFI, Edge, Music, et cetera, will drain the battery more than just keeping a phone on standby. So the battery will probably wear out faster from having to be recharged more often.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  10. Badly chosen launch date by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lesson: do not launch product that requires extensive customer service at the beginning of a weekend.

    The general observation seems to be that activation from a cold start works OK, but anything that requires "number portability" from a previous account may be troublesome. That's no surprise; number portability is usually a mess, because the carriers don't want you to use that Government-mandated feature.

    It's still not clear why activation should require a separate computer. Activation via iTunes might be a nice option if you already use iTunes, but it shouldn't be the main route. After all, the iPhone has its very own Internet connection.

    1. Re:Badly chosen launch date by chumpboy · · Score: 1

      Lesson: do not launch product that requires extensive customer service at the beginning of a weekend.

      Killing my mod points for this discussion, but the statement needs to be said:

      It was the last business day of Apple's (and most likely AT&T's) financial quarter.

      Don't launch a MAJOR tech product until a week with a national holiday right in the middle of it? The week after end-of-quarter? Doesn't sound like any corporation I have ever heard of - or have had the pleasure of working for.

      --
      I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
    2. Re:Badly chosen launch date by voisine · · Score: 1

      After all, the iPhone has its very own Internet connection. Not until it's activated it doesn't.
    3. Re:Badly chosen launch date by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Why iTunes? They probably want more people to download iTunes and try it out.

      My reading of this was: if you don't have the ability to buy music from Apple, they don't want you as a phone customer either.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    4. Re:Badly chosen launch date by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Probably just trying to punch up their quarterly numbers, for whatever inane reason. Plus, trying to get it out to people for the 4th so new iPhone users will brandy about their new phone to everyone at the picnic, getting more hype for -more- new buyers.

      Still badly executed; Apple and ATT should have set up clear and distinct boundries as to which problems each company handled and methods to fix expected problems. Also, Apple should have put up some kiosks in their and ATT's stores where you could activate your phone on-site, rather than have to go home to do it. They had 6 months to figure out some way to do this.

      Of course, hindsight is 20/20 and no one has rolled out a phone this way before. Hopefully they learn for iPhone 2.0.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    5. Re:Badly chosen launch date by DoctorDyna · · Score: 1

      They could have done it the way newer versions of Windows do once the activation runs out, where you are allowed to log on, however the only thing the PC does is allow you to go to Microsoft and purchase a license.

      --
      Windows has more viruses because linux has more virus coders.
    6. Re:Badly chosen launch date by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Use iPod to push people to iTunes
      Use iPhone to push people to iTunes
      Make UI of next OS release identical to iTunes
      ???
      Profit!

  11. gadgets by wall0159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The iPhone looks like a great piece of tech, and I might get one someday. But...

    It seems like Slashdot has a greater and greater proportion of articles that relate to gadgets (stuff to buy), and fewer and fewer that are about tech developments, science, etc. I'm not bitching about Slashdot, but is it really the case that nerds have become merely watered-down gear-freaks, and no longer employ their mind in the pursuit of knowledge?

    Please, oh true nerds, answer my rallying cry!

    1. Re:gadgets by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Interesting

      iPhone, and Apple articles in general, attract fans (and anti-fans), rather than nerds/geeks. The difference between tech-fans and geeks is the difference between religionists and mystics. Fandom is, at the end of the day, a dependent relationship of admiration and respect for the cultural authority of some producer or another. That's antithetical to the nerd distance from the "marketed product" and the interest on how it could work and what could be done with it.

      I'll admit it: I think fannishness of any stripe is a kind of cultural servitude.

    2. Re:gadgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rally call???

      MOO!

      Let the Bovine madness begin.

    3. Re:gadgets by swb · · Score: 1

      I think its multifaceted. To the extent its about money and advertising, controversial topics about Apple, etc bring in eyeballs, and gadget stuff brings in searchers.

      I also think technology is so deep anymore in any particular direction, that the "old" Slashdot circa 1999 has a hard time covering 2007's technology. You could (and somebody probably does!) an entire site devoted to web development languages, whereas 10 years ago you had much fewer choices making it more possible to cover them in a generic technology site.

      I also think that the editors are probably less programming-type tech oriented than they used to, and I think thats the case for a lot of tech type blogs. They've been "taken over" or their operators have evolved from hard-core developers to more technology "generalists" and gadgets are an easier focus.

    4. Re:gadgets by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      It seems like Slashdot has a greater and greater proportion of articles that relate to gadgets (stuff to buy), and fewer and fewer that are about tech developments, science, etc

      Technology is merely applied science. Technology articles are more interesting than science because its easier to digest; technology is science for a specific purpose. Gadgets are even more specific; they're a technology refined into an affordable, mass produced item that people can actually use. Gadgets are most emphasized because it is science made available to everyone, that can benefit everyone. Having an iPhone that can shave minutes off my day by being able to read email wirelessly, etc may save 1 million people 5 minutes. It doesn't sound all that impressive, but it impacts people's lives much more significantly than the abstract cosmology that NASA or others puts out; or the latest refinement of TFT displays or something. I'm not saying we can't appreciate things at the higher level, I'm just saying that sometimes you want to just experience the effects in a gadget. I think that's why they're so popular.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    5. Re:gadgets by abaddononion · · Score: 1

      I like this post. I wish I had modpoints for ya... sorry bro.

  12. Thanks for letting us know. by Meor · · Score: 0

    Maybe you shouldn't have hinged so much time an effort on a piece of hardware you could have easily gotten 1 week later. It's people like you that cause the problem, who do you think you are to complain about it?

  13. no problem for me by greg_barton · · Score: 1

    Activation was a snap. Took about 3 minutes. Posting fromm iPhone. :)

    1. Re:no problem for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Posting fromm iPhone. "

      Wait, you actually BOUGHT an iPhone???

      Points at Greg and laughs...

    2. Re:no problem for me by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 4, Funny

      Posting fromm iPhone. :)

      how's that lack of tactile feedback workin' out for ya?

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    3. Re:no problem for me by greg_barton · · Score: 5, Funny

      how's that lack of tactile feedback workin' out for ya?

      It's ffffffuckin' aaawesommmmme!1!
    4. Re:no problem for me by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 1

      Same here. Took a very short time to do the activation, and I had zero troubles. My old Sprint phone quit working just a few minutes after I finished the iPhone activation. I was able to make calls from the iPhone pretty much immediately. (Now, getting a decent signal from inside my townhouse... heh.)

      I bought my phone the same time as two friends. One had trouble - he was moving from T-Mobile. He had trouble simply getting his iPhone activated - it took a few hours before he was able to use it. Another day before he was getting incoming calls (his incoming calls were still hitting his T-Mobile phone). My other friend, who was already an AT&T customer, activated and started using his phone pretty much without issue. Fun thing was, he's a Georgia resident and was visiting me in Colorado at the time. Being outside his normal calling area when activating was a complete non-issue.

      Only major issue I've personally heard of was from this one fellow who was in line Friday right behind me - literally, the next guy down. I bumped into him and his g/f at the Apple store this afternoon, while my friend and I were in checking out phone cases/etc. He'd bought two units - one for each of them - and the g/f's unit was having touchscreen issues, so they were back at the store to sort that out. The fellow himself, however, had had having some major activation issues and I think had largely worked things out by that time.

      Aside from the whole "can't do a 'delete all' emails" thing that I'm sure everyone and their brother has mentioned, I've had zero problems with my new toy. I love it so far.

      --

      "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
    5. Re:no problem for me by pgillan · · Score: 1

      I'll also take a stand stand for the silent and (apparently) narrow majority. I bought an iPhone Friday afternoon and activated it from iTunes in about 10 minutes. This included moving my number from Verizon.

    6. Re:no problem for me by XaXXon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      both mine activated fine at about 7pm pacific.

      As far as the keyboard, it's one of my favorite parts. Not having used any type of small-form-factor keyboard extensively, after 5 minutes, I was typing far faster than I ever had on a blackberry-style device (which I've played with for similar short periods of time).

    7. Re:no problem for me by davechen · · Score: 1

      Me too. I bought two iPhones and activated them around 7:30 EDT. It took about 10 minutes each, no muss, no fuss. That included transferring phone numbers over from Sprint. I think I got in before AT&T's systems started to really get hammered.

    8. Re:no problem for me by profplump · · Score: 1

      He never suggested that his old phone was better, just that cellular reception was poor in is home. It's possible that the AT&T GSM signal is worse, but his post didn't tell us that. Maybe you should explore posts before insulting people.

  14. iPhone questions by evildogeye · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this has been explained elsewhere, but here seems as good a place as any for me to ask the question: How is Cingular/AT&T not being to be a disaster for Apple. Everyone I know who has had Cingular has been unhappy with their service. The majority end up switching to Verizon and become fairly satisfied.
     
    I always felt Cingular made cell phone virtually unuseable. Has AT&T/Cingular massively improved their network in the past year? Is everyone going to end up thinking the iPhone is awful simply because their service is so bad? Am I missing something?

    Thank you.

    1. Re:iPhone questions by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps this has been explained elsewhere, but here seems as good a place as any for me to ask the question: How is Cingular/AT&T not being to be a disaster for Apple. Everyone I know who has had Cingular has been unhappy with their service. The majority end up switching to Verizon and become fairly satisfied.

      I always felt Cingular made cell phone virtually unuseable. Has AT&T/Cingular massively improved their network in the past year? Is everyone going to end up thinking the iPhone is awful simply because their service is so bad? Am I missing something?"

      Yes it has, I don't know, I don't think so, I doubt it, surely.

    2. Re:iPhone questions by kencurry · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this has been explained elsewhere, but here seems as good a place as any for me to ask the question: How is Cingular/AT&T not being to be a disaster for Apple. Everyone I know who has had Cingular has been unhappy with their service. The majority end up switching to Verizon and become fairly satisfied.

      I always felt Cingular made cell phone virtually unuseable. Has AT&T/Cingular massively improved their network in the past year? Is everyone going to end up thinking the iPhone is awful simply because their service is so bad? Am I missing something?

      Thank you. I'm a current verizon customer and I can't stand them: here's why - I had a RAZR with 1st gen firmware, phone worked well, and I was able to use bluetooth to sync to my powerbook, transfer pix, and transfer mp3 ringtones. I had battery problem and brought the phone into verizon last Oct. they told me they would replace battery (was about $50) and that they would "upgrade" the firmware to improve battery life. Later, I found that bluetooth wouldn't work. I did some googling, and found out that the new firmware disabled bluetooth! I took back the phone, and I was told that they couldn't downgrade restore bluetooth. So there is verizon for you. Is AT&T worse? maybe, but I'll chance it.

      --
      sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    3. Re:iPhone questions by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      I've been with Cingular for a real long time now. I've not had many significant problem. The problems I have had were usually fixed in less then 15 minutes.

      I just upgraded to a BB Curve and while talking to the person the phone call dropped (on a land line) and she actually called me back to complete the upgrade and when I asked her for the unlock code she found it for me in less than 10 minutes. I was really very impressed.

      Incidentally Verizon uses CDMA (or whatever) so their phones work in only a few countries. A GSM phone on the other hand can be used with a pre-pay card saving large amounts of money when you travel.

      ]{

    4. Re:iPhone questions by L7_ · · Score: 1

      i think it is because the antenna on the iphone is not cheap, and is waay better than ones that come with any free mobile phone nowadays.

      good antenna = no dropped calls, better service, everything.

    5. Re:iPhone questions by jcr · · Score: 1

      Well, turning off bluetooth would certainly improve battery life.

      I'm curious: did you leave it at that, or demand that they repair or replace the phone they'd damaged?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:iPhone questions by Kankraka · · Score: 1
      Worked in cellular sales for a few years now, remember the same issue with poor battery life on our Telus V3's when they launched, so many customers. Ugh.

      Just visit motomodders.net, find yourself your previous firmware and downgrade it yourself; as far as I know the first gen firmware in the CDMA phones in Canada (Telus/Bell) were in the same boat. The issue was caused mostly by backlight time out settings being set -way- too high (twenty minutes for display time out) in the settings pane. Changing those settings, and replacing the -very- strained battery should have been the logical fix for Verizon, assuming the issue is akin to the one that was present in Canada.

      Now, downgrading isn't -easy-, but it is possible. Just find yourself the required software (read: visit your favorite torrent site), follow the instructions on http://www.motomodders.net/ and you should have your bluetooth capabilities back. The primary reason I'm with Rogers up in Canada, even though they -used- to be partnered with AT&T, is because they are far less prone to locking features of the phone out. I find CDMA providers to be the worst for doing stupid things like that.

    7. Re:iPhone questions by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1
      The funny thing is that at least in the part of NJ I'm in, I know a lot of people who are using AT&T because they were shafted by Verizon, or had service problems. The GSM carriers seem to get better signals inside of buildings than the CDMA carriers, at least in this area. And, by the way, if you're a government or educational customer, AT&T/Cingular has much better support for your end users - you can call at night for help, and you can actually go to a Cingular store for support, etc. For gov't/edu, Verizon won't do 24 hour, won't do weekends, and they don't want to see you in a Verizon store. If you're providing Blackberry service, the execs with them expect to get help no matter where they are.


      Also, GSM data roams - CDMA doesn't, as far as I know. And it's not just internationally - if the local CDMA carrier isn't Verizon, you're be out of luck. However, there are places with non-Cingular GSM coverage, and GSM data (EDGE or GPRS) just works. I'm still not sure why they didn't include HDPSA support in the device, unless supporting that and EDGE wouldn't have fit in the form factor.. There's a rumor that there will be a 3G iPhone in Europe by October. Guess everyone in the US will shell out another $500 next year :).

    8. Re:iPhone questions by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      CDMA can roam but it depends on the intercarrier agreements. All the carriers I have heard of with roaming data are the smaller rural carriers partnered with Sprint and other rural carriers.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  15. First generation thingy. What did you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Early adopters hurt. Haven't you learned that by now?

  16. i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by adam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not trying to shift blame at all. I said myself that 25% of the phones I purchased had activation problems. But I don't posit that as evidence that 25% of *ALL* iphones have had activation problems. Look at the replied to my last three comments (which all got modded +5, btw), and you'll find the exact people i'm talking about who may have clicked "my phone is still unactivated!" when they don't even own one. (for the lazy, comments: here | here | here)

    Replied to those comments, you'll see people who said they would laugh at me/whomever they saw on the street using an iPhone, people calling me stupid/dumb, calling those in lines "emo retards," calling those in line "suckers," etc. Now, most people who choose not to buy an iPhone just do so out of logical choice, and that's the extent of their involvement.. but there most definitely is a vocal minority that feels slighted by Apple.. I really don't know exactly why, but I can say for sure that when I spent $600 a piece on my unlocked Treos (as did many others a few years ago), I don't recall a sizable portion of people calling me retarded/dumb/etc. The fact is a lot of people online have some sort of irrational distaste for the iPhone, and for those that buy it. And I don't believe that 40% of the people who bought the phone so far are still without service (as noted in the poll). I suspect it's in the single digit percentile, which still sucks if you're in that group, but 40% it isn't. I even posted a link to the Apple discussion page that has hundreds if not thousands of relies from people with activation problems.. but Apple is quickly approaching the "million iPhones sold" mark, and I don't imagine that of those million there will be several hundred thousand that take 48+hrs to navigate an activation quagmire. But hey, maybe I'm just lucky in my experiences. Engadget even noted themselves that they've activated 6 iphones without any problems.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by mr_matticus · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't have to care about Apple at all to know that 38% of people aren't having problems with activation. Just ask Reuters. They say 2%, and I trust their sources infinitely more than an Engadget poll with roughly the same number of responses as every other Engadget poll and absolutely no mechanism to restrict responses--two clicks to a vote is an easy target.

    2. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by TrekkieGod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't know exactly why, but I can say for sure that when I spent $600 a piece on my unlocked Treos (as did many others a few years ago), I don't recall a sizable portion of people calling me retarded/dumb/etc. The fact is a lot of people online have some sort of irrational distaste for the iPhone, and for those that buy it.

      It's the publicity. The iPhone was hyped up a lot more than treos. Heck, most people have never heard of the treo, but everyone seems to know about the iPhone. The end result is that more people end up wanting them, but since they have decided not to get it for one reason or another, they're mad at you for getting one. See, in their mind, you're ensuring that they will never get one. Since you're helping the iPhone to be successful by buying it, Apple has no motivation to change the iPhone to cater to their wishes (lower price, different network, dev kit). Since you didn't hold out like they did for the same reasons, they feel like you're retarded/dumb/etc, when in reality you just don't care about the same things they do.

      I hate to admit that the reason why I understand that motivation so well is because I've suffered from it. I don't particularly care about the iPhone but there have been plenty of products that I *really* wanted to fail because they were really good but contained a serious deal-breaker for me. I voted with my wallet and got really frustrated when others didn't. Or rather, they did, but they didn't care about the issue that was important to me. Now, I was smart enough to understand what it was that I was feeling and why, and thus I didn't lash out at those people, but the irrational anger was there.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    3. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, just wow. You believe lies told to a journalist by a paid spokesmoron from AT&T over actual user experience?

      I've attempted to get six of the things working so far for friends and coworkers without any luck. Yesterday I was in downtown Columbia, SC, and AT&T doesn't offer service in that part of town so while I think the activation worked, I couldn't confirm it. Today I'm in downtown Spartanburg, SC, and AT&T only offers very limited service in this area. My Verizon phone works fine, my Sprint phone goes into roaming, and the two iPhones I've tried here at work this morning don't have service. With the other two, the web site wouldn't accept the AT&T credit check #. That's zero of six so far, and the owner of the company I work for just bought four more for his family so I'll probably be zero for ten before the end of the day because AT&T doesn't offer service at either of our offices or at the owner's house. Despite being a 20 year owner of Apple stock and a 25 year owner of Apple computers, I won't buy one. What does that say about this fiasco?

      PS: I'm still laughing at your gullibility.

    4. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by v_1matst · · Score: 1

      The fact is a lot of people online have some sort of irrational distaste for the iPhone, and for those that buy it. Yup... it's called jealousy.
    5. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Now, I was smart enough to understand what it was that I was feeling and why, and thus I didn't lash out at those people, but the irrational anger was there. Is it really "irrational"? I mean, isn't it true that the people who're willing to spend $600 on an iPhone (when it still requires a 2-year contract, doesn't support 3G or development, etc.) are, to some extent, preventing those deal-breakers from getting fixed? Just like the people who pay $2 for a ringtone are keeping ringtone prices ridiculously high, and the people who buy Avril Lavigne CDs are keeping the music industry focused on easily marketable crap.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    6. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      There's just about zero chance that 13,000 iPhone users responded to an Engadget poll. There's also just about zero chance of a near 50% failure rate in activations. Engadget has no real relationship with "actual user experience" and your post is, further, pretty much BS.

    7. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear that there isn't good cell service out in the sticks, but I can't really say I'm surprised.

      I live on long island and bought an iPhone for myself and another for my daughter. Activation was quick and easy. Most or the cases I've heard about where people had problems with activation are either people with no coverage and/or people with lousy credit.

      If you don't pay your bills can you really blame AT&T for not extending credit to you?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    8. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1

      Is it really "irrational"? I mean, isn't it true that the people who're willing to spend $600 on an iPhone (when it still requires a 2-year contract, doesn't support 3G or development, etc.) are, to some extent, preventing those deal-breakers from getting fixed? Just like the people who pay $2 for a ringtone are keeping ringtone prices ridiculously high...

      The reasoning that these buyers are messing us up is perfectly rational. The irrational part is expecting others to care about the same things we do. If there are enough people who think $600 is fair for an iPhone, who are we to tell them it's not? And if there are enough people who are willing to pay for ringtones instead of demanding unlocked phones that can use any mp3 I own (I'm not willing to pay for a ringtone at all, I pay for my music once), who are we to tell them they shouldn't?

      Yeah, people define the market and take it in a direction some of us think is completely unacceptable, but what it boils down to is that I don't want anybody else telling me what I should buy and what I shouldn't. By extension, I shouldn't tell them how to spend their money. Voting with your wallet is like any other type of voting and sometimes the candidate you don't approve of wins. You can't really get mad at that...

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    9. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by doxology · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IMO, the main reason so many people hate Apple is because of their incessantly annoying fanboys.

      --
      sigfault. core dumped.
    10. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      What kills me is every apple hater i have ever met has NEVER USED A MAC or anything APPLE.
      I've used Apples from the IIe days. I don't care for hype. Doesn't matter who's spewing it. Remember, Marketing's job is to take a poop sandwich and convince you it's filet mignon. My tendency is to wait and let OTHER people sample that sandwich first.
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    11. Re:i don't think "vast" is the right adjective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Sorry to hear that there isn't good cell service out in the sticks

      Yes, because 1.2 million people in the metro-area is the sticks. We had great analog service here over 15 years ago.

      > If you don't pay your bills can you really blame AT&T for not extending credit to you?

      Hey moron, the credit check # is given to you after AT&T approves your credit. Thanks for proving you're a troll and don't actually have the phone. You Apple fanboys are pitiful.

      You trolls are getting more and more ridiculous.

  17. Re:Maybe they should have waited by MightyMartian · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Thank you for describing the mental state of your average techno-addict. They're a pathetic lot; picking their noses, popping their zits, repeating Aquateen Hunger Force episodes verbatim and going around spending big bucks on pointless, over-hyped hardware that in a normal world would be paid about as much attention as a big-busted whore in a gay bar. But hey, where would the almost as pathetic investors be without these antisocial losers.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  18. I blame Apple and the customers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did customers expect? Fool me once... It's both the customer's and Apple's fault for this one. Customers (including my girlfriend) has consistent bad service and customer service from Cingular (now ATT). It's confirmed in so many news articles. It must be some pretty big kickbacks from ATT that convinced Apple to work with them despite Apple knowing about impending customer service problems. Do you think a company that big (Apple) wouldn't research that beforehand and decide to look away, distance themselves from their carrier while going after the bigger margin? Duh..that's how business works. By buying this phone we are voting with our dollar saying...yeah we want more of this...subscribe and support this lousy service more! http://blogs.mercurynews.com/consumeractionline/20 05/06/worst_cell_phon.html http://www.epinions.com/content_277319683716

  19. Cingular and AT&T network probably by JimboFBX · · Score: 0

    When I got a regular old cell phone on the day that Cingular's network merged with AT&T, it took two days to get my phone up and running, and I had to get 3 new phone numbers. Then I was billed for changing phone numbers. They happily got rid of the charges, but thats just the way Cingular / AT&T are. Honestly, I'd avoid them like the plague except my girlfriend has cingular so we get free mobile to mobile. Oh yeah, the reception aint that great even at 5 bars. In another incident, a cingular rep. flat out lied about a plan that my girlfriend was signing up for, claiming it would be about 70 a month, and it ended up being over 400 a month. Again, with some calling that got straightened around.

    So people new to at&t / cingular, now you know what your getting into.

  20. what helped me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.tuaw.com/2007/07/01/two-possible-fixes- for-iphone-activation-problems/

    After waiting for activation since Friday night, I came across this article, followed fix #2, and had an activated iphone 1/2 hour later.

  21. Friend Returning His Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only person I know how bought an iPhone is already returning his. He finally did get the thing turned on and was dumbfounded at what a clunker it was. Outside of the usual pretty Apple icons the phone has all signs of being designed by people who have never used a cell before. The thing just doesn't feel right carrying around or talking on.

    The only positive result was it allowed me to make fun of him for falling for the stupid iPhone hype.

  22. We dont care!! by stox · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're the phone company, we don't have to.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:We dont care!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, one more thing ... we're Apple. See that twinkle twinkle orbiting around in the sky? Don't worry about it for now.

      Ummm ... "you don't have to."

    2. Re:We dont care!! by jaysones · · Score: 1

      What does this even mean? Apple has an evil satellite?

  23. Link to resolution of problem by scooter.higher · · Score: 5, Informative
    The summary fails to mention one of the (I believe) more informational parts of the story...

    http://thomashawk.com/2007/07/hot-donkey-after-36- hours-we-just.html

    Hallelujah, Hallelujah, Hallelujah, Hallelujah, Haaaalllleeeeejuuuuuahhhhh!

    We just did it. After probably 20 or so phone calls to numerous departments all over Apple and AT&T we finally found the *right* department who can actually activate iPhones with you online, on the spot.

    The magic number, and you will want to write this one down, is 877-800-3701. A special shout out and thanks to Scott Francis who left us a comment with the key to getting this whole mess solved. Apparently this is the one place at AT&T where they can actually activate your iPhone with you online. It was about a 20 minute hold and about a 10 minute process but the iPhone is now activated.

    Thanks to everyone who spent the last day plus with us on ZooomrTV while we got it activated. It's been a fun ride. Now time to play with the phone and figure it out.
    --
    Ramen
    1. Re:Link to resolution of problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The summary fails to mention one of the (I believe) more informational parts of the story...

      Oops, you quoted the wrong part, from the comments:

      you are an idiot. i saw several ppl trying to help you in the zooomr chat and you ignored their suggestions, choosing instead to milk the story. how funny that the solution you eventually was the same as the one they suggested. if you had spent more time trying to solve the problem and less time on a broadcasting ego-trip then maybe you wouldn't have wasted so much of your weekend on hold and could have spent it with the children instead.
    2. Re:Link to resolution of problem by doctorisham · · Score: 1

      I'm really glad someone noticed that beyond me! MOD PARENT UP!!!!!

    3. Re:Link to resolution of problem by scooter.higher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't feel I need to apologize for skipping that. I tend to give less attention to anonymous posters, whether on /. or elsewhere.

      ACs tend to be more inflammatory and abrasive than is necessary, which they probably would not had they put their name (or pseudonym as the case may be) behind what they say.

      I will add, and others have caught this as well, that the "magic number" he mentioned is the same number he was given in an e-mail when a problem was first identified.

      --
      Ramen
    4. Re:Link to resolution of problem by doctorisham · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure whether you are applauding the AC on posting the captions, or attempting to flame me, but at any rate I don't recall accusing you of anything. So why would an apology even be implied? It seems the submitter is the one we should be upset with, as he had the "holier than thou" attitude that caused his 2 day horror. Especially considering the answer laid right in front of him, and he chose to ignore it.

    5. Re:Link to resolution of problem by conigs · · Score: 1

      Thomas Hawk is one of the only bloggers I know by name. I heard about him after that whole PriceRite Photo thing. It seems that "exposing" companies with bad/terrible customer service became his thing. Now when I see his name attached to anything like this, I take it with a grain of salt. (Seriously, this guy either has really bad luck, or he's just looking for a fight.)

      --
      Slashdot: where repeating an article in a post is "+5 Insightful"
    6. Re:Link to resolution of problem by scooter.higher · · Score: 1

      No flame here. I meant exactly what I said, and did not mix words in any way. I didn't take the comment on the author's page into account because it was posted by "Anonymous" and abrasive. Your comment was accusing me of not including the AC's comment.

      I'm not sure why you think we should be upset with the submitter/author, as he seemed to be trying to give an account of the issues he was dealing with. On the first day he did call the "magic number" he posted, but the person was not able to help him properly, delaying the resolution of the problem. That's not ignoring it.

      Point-by-point rebuttal, not a flame.

      --
      Ramen
    7. Re:Link to resolution of problem by doctorisham · · Score: 1

      Just because something is abrasive does not make it any less true. By that ideology, President G.W. Bush is the greatest ever, period. Not exactly an idea I would want to stand by. The article gives off that nasty "i need attention" feeling, and your post including the phone number will prove useful, to those who did not RTFA.
      I'm not quite sure if you think I was the one who posted the AC comment at the top of our little thread, but maybe thats why you are discussing this with me. Regardless, talk to the AC, if he dares speak. I only support his idea that the submitter is an idiot.

    8. Re:Link to resolution of problem by doctorisham · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree. He seems to be picking a fight, almost like Mikey Moore :)

    9. Re:Link to resolution of problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Mr. Higher,

      I would have posted a witty retort, but the Lameness Filter intervened. Suffice it to say that it involved a comical amount of capitalised letters, truncated profanity, and cliché phrases attempting to delude your intelligence and undermine your true intent. Please accept my begrudgingly succinct replacement retort as a consolation:

      ur n ass hat

      I humbly thank you for your thoroughly wasted time.

      Sincerely,

      A. Coward

    10. Re:Link to resolution of problem by scooter.higher · · Score: 1

      I agree, just because it is abrasive does not make it less true.

      I guess I have a different opinion of how to present myself in public forums and discussions, which is why I don't have to hide as an AC. The same points that were made could have been made without the inflammatory attitude that came with the comment.

      The intention of my original post was to show that the problem had been resolved (which was not in the summary).

      I was not trying to get into any kind of flame war with you, and I don't know why you seem to be taking this so personally.

      --
      Ramen
  24. Go AT&T by strangeattraction · · Score: 1

    AT&T only spends money to get new customers not to service the ones they have. The greatest threat to iPhone success will be that Apple depends on AT&T to provide service that people like. The iPhone can fail simply because AT&T sucks.

  25. Re:Maybe they should have waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read your own comment again to figure out who the real antisocial loser is. So people want to buy a toy - why the hell should that matter to you?

    If it makes you feel better, I just wrote this from my new toy - so far it's been really intuitive to flame assholes like you...

  26. here's your link by adam · · Score: 1

    Bloomberg quotes the number at 200k units for the first day.. 1800 stores at just under (averaging) 1000 units each, with another 72,000 units moved by AT&T stores. If you check the stock online right now on Apple's site, you'll see that around half of the stores are currently out of stock (90% of CA sold out). I can't say how many stores were restocked nationwide, by I know most California stores were restocked on Saturday for sure, and perhaps Sunday (i'm just guessing here, though). I don't think it's particularly unfair to assume 200k units for day one, 100k for day two, 50k for day three. At this point, as you said, I'm now pulling numbers out of my ass, but you don't have to develop a complex algorithm to see that there is still a lot of demand, and (if Apple has the stock) they can easily move 300k units this next week. JCR is even on my "enemies" list (apparently he's said some stuff before that I really didn't care for, haha, since I don't move many people to enemy status), but what he said here is perfectly fair IMO.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:here's your link by pgillan · · Score: 1

      Am I a moron, or do those numbers add up to almost two million, not two hundred thousand?
      (1,800 * 1,000) + 72,000 = 1,872,000

    2. Re:here's your link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California is full of fags. No wonder the iphone has sold out there first.

    3. Re:here's your link by Budenny · · Score: 1

      You have to ask what sort of numbers it would take to justify the hype expressed in the share price.

      Right now the price/sales ratio is 5 (Morningstar, based on 2006 full year numbers). Revenues were around 19 billion to generate that ratio. So lets say they sell (round numbers) a million phones at 600 each, which would be 600 million in dollars. Lets say that the price/sales ratio is headed back to the historical norm for Apple of below 3. Let alone they fall to more reasonable numbers.

      Question: how many would they have to sell for revenues to rise to levels where the ratio would be 'normal'?

      Well, assume the price stays the same and revenues double. That would do it comfortably - and maybe leave a little room for growth in the share price. That would imply, if it all came from phones, around 30 million phones. There is no need to be more precise - its the general scale of the thing we are interested in.

      So you see that selling a million is not really cutting it in terms of the expectation built into the price at the moment. What they needed to justify the price was lines around the block for a week. Not for an evening.

      We can now expect to move to phase two of the bubble, during which the Apple folks tell us (a) sales are in fact higher than they look (b) they are going to pick up very soon (c) market share doesn't matter (d) market share is higher than it looks....

      The stock price action will however tell the real story. If it goes up for the next month, we know its working. If not....watch out below.

    4. Re:here's your link by jcr · · Score: 1

      You have to ask what sort of numbers it would take to justify the hype expressed in the share price.

      You've barely seen the effect that the phone will have on Apple's share price. Look at Nokia's market cap: that's what the phone can add to Apple's valuation.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:here's your link by jcr · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't have 1800 stores, they have around 180.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:here's your link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a surprise? You haven't looked at Apple's customer base lately have you?

  27. my experience by venicebeach · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Posting this from my iPhone. I had trouble activating at first too. After waiting 10 hours I figured out that the problem was with transfering my old verizon phone number. I asked them to cancel the activation and started again with a new number -- went through immediately.

    You cant do anything with the phone until its activated, no ipod, photos, nothing except calling 911. So the wait can be frustrating, and its very hard to get info out of ATT.

    1. Re:my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and its very hard to get info out of ATT.
      Better get used to it. You're stuck with them for 728 more days.
  28. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by jcr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The iPhone has really fallen off the radar for everyone but Apple fans.

    Wishing won't make it so, Mr. Ballmer.

    It sounds like Apple is already starting to pawn off the marketplace thud of the iPhone

    By "thud", do you mean the sound of the most successful consumer electronics product launch of all time? The iPhone's already set that record, even if they never sold another unit.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  29. How is it Apple or AT&T's fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The activation problems are related to switching from competing services over the weekend.

    The competition are dragging their heels in an attempt to dull the luster of the iPhone and retain customers as long as possible (it's the weekend).

    1. Re:How is it Apple or AT&T's fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he's 100% right. You need to RTFA.

  30. "haha, awesome" by posterlogo · · Score: 1

    talk about abuse of the tagging system. you guys are like 10 year olds.

    1. Re:"haha, awesome" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh noes! Large numbers of slashdot readers don't like the iPhone and think it is an over-hyped piece of crap! Call them children! Question their intelligence! Anything to rationalize blowing $600 on a cell phone!

  31. Be patient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to wait about 20 hours before mine was activated, and then another 12 hours or so before my number got ported over and incoming calls would go to the iPhone. No big deal. I thought the whole thing would take about 30 minutes, but it was really no big deal to wait a day and a half.

    Well worth it. I'm a happy iPhone user. EDGE is bearable. Not great, but bearable.

  32. I still don't get it why people want this iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean it doesn't have anything special or new that you can't find on any cell phone been out on the last 3 years. My 2nd cell phone is 3 years old and has camera, MP3 player, Internet, etc. Touch-screen phone also been around 2 years ago.

    So what so special about this stupid phone anyway?
    I guess that it's like the iPod which is the worse MP3 player ever been released but there're some stupid people that buying it.

  33. Enough by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 0, Troll

    Enough
    I honestly dont give a fuck about the fucking iPhone anymore.
    This endless blathering on has gone on quite long enough.
    I dont care what some douche has to say on his twitchstream.
    I dont care what an engadget unscientific poll has to say about it.
    I dont care what MacWorld has to say about it.
    I just fucking dont care anymore.

    I'm sorry to troll, i really am, but this fucking circus is worse than any other hypefest we've had recently here.
    Fucking knock it off.

    --
    Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
    1. Re:Enough by Icarus1919 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's why I came to this thread to post about it!

    2. Re:Enough by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      then dont read the fucking story. its that fucking simple.

    3. Re:Enough by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I really hate reading about the PS3. So you know what I do (this is a secret, so don't let anyone else hear about it), I stop reading after I come across the word PS3. Most articles about the PS3 include it in the heading. I have installed this special widget in firefox called a scroll bar (you can probably download it from somewhere), and I scroll past the story.

      I used to click on every PS3 story and complain about it, but then I realised that I was just being a complete wanker, and stopped.

      So, how the fuck do you get moderated up, how many stupid people really hate iphone stories, but still feel the need to click on the link, and read all the comments to the end. What a bunch of retards.

    4. Re:Enough by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      It takes more work to actually access the story then it does to just scroll right past. I would say 75% of /. story headlines don't mean a thing to me. Maybe you can pretend you don't know what an iPhone is, and not care, kinda like I do with any Linux article?

    5. Re:Enough by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      It's not about hating iPhones. The iPhone is an inanimate piece of tech gear. It's about hating the ultra hype and all of the fanbois/apologists.

    6. Re:Enough by east+coast · · Score: 1

      then dont read the fucking story. its that fucking simple.

      This is Slashdot. No one actually reads the story.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    7. Re:Enough by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

      well, you're still being a complete wanker. One may link to a story from an rss feed because from the title it seems as though there may be a *gasp* substantive article/discussion. Yet upon reaching the story it becomes apparent that its just another vapid iPhone hype/negahype. This story may then become the straw that broke the camels back. A reply may then be chosen from the header of the discussion without reading any comments whatsoever. And then 25 seconds later, the surfing of the tubes may recommence as normal.

      My post got modded troll because it was explicitly so. I even pointed it out and apologized for it. Not sure what you're complaining about, when your antitroll troll gets modded insightful. The best part of these little spats is that the "Well if you dont like (topic of discussion) you can just guuheeht out!" trolls. thank you for making my morning.

      Does your special scroll bar widget do anything superspecial that the regular ones dont? maybe they make you super clever and witty. Gosh, i should really try to find that widget so i can be as super cool and non-retarded as you all the time. *crush*

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
  34. The #1 reason I won't buy an iPhone by pavera · · Score: 1

    I absolutely hate AT&T. I have tmobile, and honestly of all the phone companies I've ever had land line or cell, they have been the best. I know people have had problems with them, they aren't perfect. But I don't know ANYONE who has had AT&T service and not had problems. I even called tmobile once because a certain strech of highway I drive on suddenly didn't have service anymore, they looked it up, found the problem and said they'd send techs out to fix it. Something had happened with some antennas in a snow storm, and it was kinda remote, but I drove past there at least 2-3 times a week, and I would drop my call right there and not have service for ~5 miles all of a sudden. 2 days after I called, back up and working. I called back and they were open and explained everything that had happened, and thanks for calling to report the problem cause they might not have found it without my call... It was nice. AT&T's response would be something like "FU, pay your bill, we never said it would work there"

    I don't know why Apple chose AT&t for this thing, that is the stupidest move they could have made. It'd be like taking a Ferarri out to baja. (IE, really fast car, completely unsuitable roads). AT&T has the worst of everything, crappy slow non-3g network, crappy customer service, horrible attitude towards customers.

    They at least could have partnered with someone with a decent network (verizon) or decent customer service (tmobile). This whole 5 years exclusive deal with AT&T is (for me) and should be (for everyone) the death of the iPhone.

    1. Re:The #1 reason I won't buy an iPhone by BondGamer · · Score: 1

      Apple did try to partner with Verizon first. But Verizon and other phone companies wouldn't let Apple do what they wanted. Releaing the iPhone with Verizon would probably have meant no free internet, no free google maps, paying extra for visual voicemail, and lots of other stuff.

      AT&T are the good guys here for finally letting a phone come out where they don't dictate what features it can have and what you have to pay extra for.

    2. Re:The #1 reason I won't buy an iPhone by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Releaing the iPhone with Verizon would probably have meant no free internet, no free google maps, paying extra for visual voicemail, and lots of other stuff.


      The internet isn't free.. unlimited data is just a required purchase... unless you think $60/mo for 450 minutes is reasonable.

      Aside from visual voicemail, there's nothing the iPhone does that other phones don't already do. So I don't see where the conflict is with Verizon or T-mobile. T-mobile's sidekick plans are cheaper than the iPhone's plans and they include unlimited sms.
    3. Re:The #1 reason I won't buy an iPhone by BondGamer · · Score: 1

      Aside from visual voicemail, there's nothing the iPhone does that other phones don't already do. So I don't see where the conflict is with Verizon or T-mobile.

      Well then go ask Verizon and T-Mobile why they turned down Apple. It is because cell phone companies have a stranglehold on the market and have a strict dictation on what a phone can and can not do.

  35. No porblmes at all by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm ptsonig tihs form my iPnhoe, and I'm gald to say taht I've had no porblmes wsoeavrthr!

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    1. Re:No porblmes at all by cuzco · · Score: 1

      Snotr! Thret Rucks! Coiffe alovr the scren! :)

    2. Re:No porblmes at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to see that tiny touch screen keyboard is working out for you!

  36. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by pavera · · Score: 1

    sure, my phone has mp3, internet and camera on it...
    The number 1 thing I would like about the iphone is the full internet browser. I can't stand the stupid "mobile" versions of websites that I get on my phone, they are impossible to navigate, and 99% of the time don't even have 10% of the content of the real site.

    It's a complete pain. Hence my phone browsing is limited to a) stock quotes, b) movie times, c) sports scores

    Anything more than that, and my phone is useless.

    Also, my phone has 128MB of storage for MP3's and pictures combined.... that's about 10-15 songs and maybe 20-30 pictures... as a "media" device it is useless. And there isn't a single phone out there that you can store and play back an entire movie except the iPhone.

    So there are 2 brand new things:
    1) Full complete internet browser
    2) storage and playback of complete movies

  37. Slashdot Hater FUD. Reuters reports 2% by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

    With engaget reporting 38%, reuters is reporting 2% are having problems..

    http://www.macrumors.com/c.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fnews .yahoo.com%2Fs%2Fnm%2F20070702%2Ftc_nm%2Fapple_dc_ 1&t=1183358102

    with tags like "Haha" and "Awesome" on this story,
    It's not hard to see where the bias is.

    1. Re:Slashdot Hater FUD. Reuters reports 2% by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      But wait, where is all the obligatory slashdot anecdotal evidence? I don't believe any stats until somebody on slashdot tells us they know at least 3 people who have had problems with their iPhone.

  38. haha... by Yamagami · · Score: 1

    when you stand in line for 36 hours for a 1st gen hype machine - don't be surprised it doesn't work. sounds like total apple-blackmail that story with at&t exclusivity.....

  39. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    By "thud", do you mean the sound of the most successful consumer electronics product launch of all time? The iPhone's already set that record, even if they never sold another unit.

    You, jcr, are fantastic at making up the most fantastic statements with utterly zero evidence to support your point. You admitted yourself you have NO IDEA how many units have been sold ("they've sold a million units already. or they will have in a week." huh?!?), but you've decided they've set a record for the most product sold.

    Wow. If you weren't busy telling everyone that you work(ed) for Apple, it wouldn't be at all hard to guess.

  40. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by jcr · · Score: 1

    utterly zero evidence

    I look forward to you eating your words in a day or so, when Apple announces the millionth sale of an iPhone.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  41. Simple answer by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps this has been explained elsewhere, but here seems as good a place as any for me to ask the question: How is Cingular/AT&T not being to be a disaster for Apple.

    Because we hate all cell carriers. We expect to hate the cell carrier.

    After activation is complete though, we don't really have to talk to the cell-phone carrier. Then we just have the phone experience, which is great. That's when cell service may start to arise as an issue, but we've also been trained to accept that as a fact of life.

    One thing Apple did well right off the bat is to not have to have us activate at the store, already a better expereince for most people despite the problems some are having. I myself am porting a T-Mobile number - while the number itself is not yet ported (and may take days more as T-Mobile apparently ports pay-as-you-go numbers by hand) the actual activation of my phone worked just fine, and I was abe to make calls and otherwise use the device almost instantly - it's only incoming calls and SMS I can't get just yet.

    Frankly I expect a lot of issues to vanish Monday, when the regular people get to work instead of the poor weekend shift.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Simple answer by abaddononion · · Score: 1
      Dont take this as offensive, because I may be wrong, but:

      After activation is complete though, we don't really have to talk to the cell-phone carrier.
      It seems to me that the notion that post-activation we dont have to deal with the cell-phone carrier is the notion of someone with WAY too much american-style dollar. Personally, that little bill I get in the mail once a month is a PRETTY big dialog from the cell-phone carrier that I take very seriously. And again, maybe Im wrong, but last I heard these iPhone dont come with any "unlimited minutes" plans. So I think the original post of "everyone I know who has cingular hates them" will also be true. I saw your point about "We expect to hate our provider"... but that's just not true! I know plenty of people who when they hated their provider, you know what they did? They SWITCHED! And then again, and again, until they found someone they were happy with. And not ONCE has that final company been AT&T/Cingular. In fact, they're usually the first one. The company everyone starts with and realizes "this is shit." And the people who dont realize it just seem to either A. Have too much money B. Have someone else paying their cell bill or C. just dont pay that much attention (probably a corollary to A. or B.)
  42. person who moded me- i love you! by dmarcoot · · Score: 1


    thats the bait...

      fuck you.

    now thats a flame.
    not a single point made was in my original post was without merit or in fits definition of a flame bait, if anything, i i defused the bait i replied to.

  43. Have you tried them? And T-Mobile, not so hot. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I think it's unfair to say what AT&T would have done, when you never actually called them.

    I have had a T-Mobile pay-as-you-go account for about a year now. Service quality is OK, but not great. However your support experience does not extend to my dealings with them - when I first got the phone I was trying to make a call to T-Mobile to buy the initial minutes for my phone, and they kept dropping me - the most frustrating experience I have ever had via phone. On the tail end, I'm trying to port my phone number from T-Mobile to the iPhone. I called T-Mobile support to find my account number and password (having no monthly bill, I had no easy way to find my account number which turned out just to be my phone number). T-Mobile was able to give me my account number (though they were more icy when I said I needed it for a transfer) and said I had no password on my account. WRONG! In fact the number port failed for that reason. Now AT&T has the correct password for the account, but says that T-Mobile may take up to four days(!) to port the number as they port pay-as-you-go phones by hand. Sure enough, days later incoming calls go to my old phone (though I can happily use the iPhone for outbound calls and all other features, better than some people have been able to do). I found the AT&T tech I taked to about the port to be very kind, and she also made sure my phone actually activated which was nice since I hadn't even asked about that. And it wasn't someone in India either, it was some nice southern woman.

    I personally wouldn't go lauding any phone company, since al of them can be horrible to use from time to time. But neither would I assume the worst about any company since it's almost always more about an individual you talk to than the company itself.

    On top of that all all the people wth problems today are working through the second-string guys that have to work the weekend. Let's see how AT&T fares when Monday rolls around and everyone is back in to help.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  44. 500,000 iPhones sold over the weekend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A financial analyst at Piper Jaffray published this morning an estimate quoted on cNet: 500,000 iPhones sold by close of business on Sunday. If this estimate is even close to the actual number, then it is amazing that my new iPhone and many others have activated and worked without a hitch. EDGE network has been running well. I am very satisfied with both the Apple hardware and AT&T service so far.

  45. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by gunny01 · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up.

    The killer app of the iPhone is undoubtedly the proper browser. That is the only reason I'd buy one.

    --
    kill all the fucking niggers
  46. Dumbasses! by superbus1929 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Anyone that waited 36 hours in line without doing a modicum of research to find out that most Apple products tend to have a grace period in terms of being glitchy as all get out - and that Apple doesn't give a fuck about your problems, they have your money already - and basically doing it to be the cool kid on their block... they deserve what they got, and I hope the fuckers never work.

    --
    Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
    1. Re:Dumbasses! by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Even sadder - anyone who waited 36 hours in line for a product that still hasn't sold out 3 days later needs to stop whining about waiting in line for 36 hours.

  47. More about the weekend by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The software is just a front-end on a very old, and established process - which you find if you have to make support calls because you run into issues.

    I'd say problems are a lot more about launching just before a weekend, than anything else - Apple should have launched Monday. If you want to fault Apple, fault them for just having to make that June deadline.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  48. Materialism by residents_parking · · Score: 1

    I've noticed this too over the last 5 years or so in the UK. People are starting to call themselves geeks, when they're really just gadget addicts with plenty of spare cash (or as we say here "more money than sense"). And you know what? Like any other addict, they're not satisfied. They're buying multiple phones, multiple cameras, multiple GPSs, multiple PDAs, PER YEAR.

    It's not normal. But it's OK. What ISN'T OK is the gross assumption that anyone / everyone with a clue about technology will automatically follow the herd. We are - if anything - individuals. And what has happened with the iPhone and the Apple Religion in general cuts across that: like most religions, it has polarized society. So it becomes difficult to remain objective because all the time you've got these True Believers shoving things at you and going "WORSHIP MY NEW SHINY TOY". It's called materialism, and it used to be considered shallow. I still do, and I suspect I'm not alone.

    1. Re:Materialism by fbjon · · Score: 1

      We are - if anything - individuals Thanks for the confidence-inspiring reassurance.

      But you're quite right, gadget-itis is a common affliction among geeks, I'm infected too. As I get older I've tried to take a step back though, I don't constantly upgrade my computer, I think three times before buying anything remotely expensive (and usually arrive at the conclusion that I don't actually need it). Perhaps it's a passing phase in geekdom, or wannabe geekdom.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  49. Re:Blow AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The iPhone can fail simply because AT&T sucks."
    But then again, The Personal Computer didn't fail because Windows sucks. People are stupid, and they'll no doubt buy an iPhone no matter how badly AT&T screws them over.

  50. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
    But you said they'd already sold a million units. But now you're saying it's "a day or so". And before, it was "within a week". Keep going, you'll cover every possibility.

    Reuters had estimated slightly shy of 200,000 units as of Sunday. Now, of course, you've got the connections inside Apple. They're a news agency making estimates, but I'm sure they have their contacts too, if not at Apple, with AT&T.

    So, we'll see.

    But if they've sold a million units - then I'll say I'm wrong.

    Because you're still not actually providing evidence for your claims, you're just saying "You'll see".

  51. Mod parent up! by Otis_INF · · Score: 0, Troll

    I completely agree. This morning I opened my usual morning batch of sites, among them CNet, and what do I see? 50% of the articles are about this freaking iPhone. :-/

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  52. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by Andyvan · · Score: 1

    I believe you're mistaken in one respect. I can store and play back an entire movie on my Treo. It has an SD slot, and you can get SD cards in capacities as large as 8 GB.

    -- Andyvan

  53. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by jcr · · Score: 1

    But you said they'd already sold a million units

    Look back in the thread. I said they may have done so already, and if not then that they'd hit that mark by the end of the week.

    But now you're saying it's "a day or so".

    A day or so until the announcement. Try reading before you flame.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  54. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    A day or so until the announcement. Try reading before you flame.

    So they'd sit on the announcement for a couple of days? For what possible reason? The iPhone is very well hyped and a big subject in the mainstream media. If they'd already sold a million units (or near, whatever), they'd know well in advance, and that press release would be out that moment, if not before, embargoed til the estimated time. They're not going to hit that mark and then sit on that release for any time at all, there's no sense in doing so.

  55. He's up and running now... by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

    TFA says it took 36 hours, but he's all sorted out.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  56. ZOMG! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Brand new product fails to have flawless launch. Film at eleven on The No Fucking Kidding News Network.

  57. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by Layth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you think full internet browsing on mobile devices is a brand new thing, you need to need your head out of your ass and take a better look around.

  58. I am iRate - 48+ hours and counting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am having activation problems. The incompetent fools at AT&T screwed up my profile for a 27+ hours, about 13 hours after I signed up for iTunes. I've spent hours on the phone with them and I've finally reached an impasse. My phone number starts with area code 914 because I lived in Westchester County when I first got a cell phone 7 years ago. Westchester is about 20 miles N of Manhattan. I live in Brooklyn now. AT&T is telling me that porting is going to be impossible unless I set my "home" address to something in Westchester. Of course, I don't know anyone up there any more. My other alternative is to get a brand new number, forward my calls until this is resolved, and then port my number whenever things clear up. Either way, AT&T's advice is "we can help you get this working by subverting our billing system". (!) My motivation for not taking this route is simple: cell providers can't handle the simplest of details without completely screwing them up, what confidence do I have that I'll even be able to fix my address or port my number in any reasonable amount of time? I can't imagine how many years I'd be dealing with the aftermath of playing games with their billing system _this_ weekend.

    I went to the Apple store on 5th ave this evening to bitch, which was cathartic. The person who I spoke to couldn't actually FIX the problem (and I frankly wasn't expecting them to), but was able to sympathize and he vigorously agreed with my frustrations and added a bunch of his own. He told me that their VP of Retail was actually on their store floor at 5 in the morning Sunday and that Apple were very, very aware of how much of a debacle this has been. I enjoy Apple products and have been eagerly awaiting a cell phone that isn't entirely awful, but this whole experience has been quite a bitter pill to swallow.

  59. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

    "And there isn't a single phone out there that you can store and play back an entire movie except the iPhone."

    Except for every single pocket pc phone ever made. I have 2 gigs of storage, which is on the low end. 8gb cards are coming out next year, 4gb cards are already out.

    I agree on the browser though. I hope someone ports safari to wm6.

  60. 36 hours in line??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What planet is someone on that they are silly enough to wait in line for 36 hours???? For a phone!! Didn't they have a phone already? Or am I getting too old to appreciate neat new gadgets? All I can think is Get. A. Life.

  61. Re:iPhone = gayPhone by Kokuyo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The asshole giving this an Insightful needs to be shot. Repeatedly.

  62. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by radmarshallb · · Score: 1

    And you need to use an iPhone.

  63. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by jcr · · Score: 1

    Jesus, are you just going to jump down my throat for everything I say? Take a fucking pill and chill out.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  64. I wonder why... by sokoban · · Score: 1

    You know, sometimes I wonder why so many people who are looking at a page about having problems with iPhone activation report having problems.

    But then I remember how inaccurate non-randomly sampled surveys can be.

    And I see real gems like this one in the comments section:
    "Well, I sent in a fake vote to see what the percentages were (and since there wasn't a place for "AT&T store sold out before I got inside" I chose still having problems and pissed...of course the store only got about 30 iPhones total)"

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
  65. Mod Parent Up (was: Re:ZOMG!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the above post isn't an example of efficient, "economic" use of language, I don't know what is.

    Clear, concise, and strikes to the heart of the matter. This is a 5 post if I ever saw one (unlike the multi-page psychobabble that usually gets modded up)

  66. Not Surprising by ghoul · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know about shitty but it is kind of expected that all the wireless providers will have the same level of service as 95% of US providers (by customer base) use the same software to run their systems - Amdocs Ensemble. So it all works the same way. The only difference is in marketing and how big a smile you get at their stores. Even the CRM runs on AMDOCS Clarify so all the call center reps are working from the same script.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  67. Easy fix by usv · · Score: 1

    There's an easy fix for this, just buy Nokia N95 and enjoy. HTH.

    1. Re:Easy fix by stewbacca · · Score: 1
      Nice bait. I won't take it. Plus, you save $75 buying an iPhone over an N95, and you don't get a Phugly Phone....(oops, see I can troll too).

      The "Easy Fix" is to just wait a weekend before buying an iPhone. The real story here is all the idiots who stood in line--just desserts, if you ask me.

    2. Re:Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you save $75 buying an iPhone over an N95 Looks like you're comparing with the price of an unlocked N95. No contract, no discount.
  68. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Nokia N70 has a full browser...

    But unfortunately the Opera variant on said model is a PITA to use. Pages (such as /. frontpage) sometimes render correctly, sometimes incorrectly; images may suddenly start loading when configured not to; drop-down menus sometimes work and sometimes not, so you end up selecting again; it's overall terribly slow; you can't change/disable the uppermost numpad shortcuts (1, 2, 3) where you accidentally hit them the most; focus doesn't correctly follow textbox cursor, so you start typing blindly if you go correct a word; et cetera. I know it's upgradable, though, just haven't got around to checking about that.

    Somehow I'm ready to believe from past Apple experience that I wouldn't have these kind of inconveniences with the iPhone.

  69. Re:iPhone = gayPhone by Nullav · · Score: 1, Troll

    The iPhone is the AIDS of gay sex.

    Wait. Gay people get free phones? I need to get in on this!
    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  70. Geek Generation Gap by DrYak · · Score: 1

    It just that most of the geek that were around in the past have grown up, got jobs, earned money. Some of them even... gasp... married.

    Their interests have shifted, and today they have less time to spend on some things that kept the up the whole night before. Buying gadgets instead of building them is the "geekness" of 40 years-olds. They're still outside the norm compared to their peers - who all think "why does he spend so much time and money on... toys ?". But It has nothing to do anymore with the usual homebrew spirit of the typical younger geek.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Geek Generation Gap by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      "...outside the norm"...? I disagree. Material consumption is the most powerful ideology in our culture -- we're trained to believe in it more than we are to believe in democracy, liberty, or social justice. So-called "geeks" who participate in gadget-consumption aren't out of the norm, they are a very boring EXAMPLE of it. Not really a whit different, IMO, than tweens gobbling up Paris Hilton branded fashion accessories.

  71. The "happy middle" fallacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they don't want to enter a poll about it, that's not the problem of the poll or the people who are having problems, is it? And how many tech nerds will buy the apple iPhone ($600 is enough to buy a computer ferchrissakes)? I suggest that tech-nerds are the number-1 market segment.

  72. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by dwater · · Score: 1

    > My Nokia N70 has a full browser...

    I don't think you can call the N70's browser a full browser. It's not bad, but it ain't good either.

    However, all S60 3rd Edition phones have a full browser (either pre-installed or via download), and it's based off the same code as Safari. 3rd edition phones have been available for over a year, I'd guess.

    --
    Max.
  73. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by dwater · · Score: 1

    Try any S60 3rd edition phone. They have a full browser too - it's even based off the same code as Safari.

    The only reasons I can see for getting an iPhone are the UI and style - not to say that those aren't good reasons.
    I guess some might value the voice mail thing too, but I haven't heard anything about that yet. ..oh, and 8GB and 4GB is pretty decent sized memory too, though some other devices that can take sizable flash cards too (and removable is an advantage, IMO). ..but no, web browsers are old new to most of the world. I've been using a decent one on my Nokia 3250 for several months.

    --
    Max.
  74. Re:iPhone = gayPhone by ultrafunkula · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    sack a duck? I don't get it.

  75. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by dwater · · Score: 1

    > Except for every single pocket pc phone ever made.

    I wonder if the h/w will support it though. I say this because most Nokia phones have SD slots, and so can theoretically take the bigger SD cards, but Nokia still list them as 'up to 2GB'. Have you tried a card bigger than 2GB?

    > I agree on the browser though.

    Well, Nokia S60 3rd edition devices have a decent browser (based on Web Kit too), so the iPhone isn't special in that respect (either?).

    --
    Max.
  76. So no stories about iPhone failures? by hattig · · Score: 1

    Given that Apple have sold a million iPhones (give or take), and that the typical failure rate within warranty for your average consumer electronics is 5%, and that the vast majority of these failures occurs within the first few days according to the bathtub model (where the other vast majority of failures will occur after the warranty has expired), we should have seen 20,000 - 40,000 dead iPhones by now. Never mind having activation issues that seem to stem from number portability implementation issues in many cases.

    Not a peep.

    So either Apple's hardware reliability is good with a failure rate more like 1%, or they're covering it up well, or it's just not quite old enough yet to get statistics for failure (give it a few weeks). Or it will be a product that bucks the bathtub model, like the XBox360 where failures start occurring some time into the product's lifespan (but these types of failures are usually stress or environmental (heat) in nature than component, I imagine).

  77. hahaha.. lap it up.. by sqldr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From this article..

    "I can't think of another product launch that has been like this. When we went into the store I was almost moved to tears, it just made you feel really special."

    "Nothing matches this - it's like going to a rock concert. As I went down the stairs in the store I was thinking 'this is what Sting feels'."

    "It feels great, oh my God, overwhelming. I never thought this day would come - and now it finally has, it's mind-blowing,"

    "I'm going to run home and ring people just to say 'Guess what, I've got an iPhone, bye!"

    You SAD, SAD, HORRIBLE, PATHETIC people..

    It's just a phone!!

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  78. translation by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1
    The iPhone is the Paris Hilton of the gadget world.

    *prints this /. article out and puts it through the shredder*

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  79. its not that hard people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought one...

    seriously only a dumb monkey couldnt register it
    Download new itunes
    plug phone into dock
    wait for apple servers to register phone( i think this is where most people are having problems)
    done...

    real friggin hard....

    No cards to mess with
    the family plan works...I did it...its broken down all barney style
    do you have an existing family plan? yes or no?
    do you want to use it still? yes or no?
    then add this unlimited data plan and your good...confirm or deny
    done...

  80. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by acalthu · · Score: 1

    N70 does have a full browser if you count the latest offerings by Opera, which basically work on an S60 platform including my N-Gage.. yes I own an N-Gage.. nothing like it will ever come again... most probably like the iPhone if they don't improve the product with the European release.

  81. Somebody lost theirs..... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Two days after the iPhone went on sale somebody lost
    theirs in the local K-Mart parking lot. One of the
    K-mart employees turned one in to the manager after he
    found it lying on the pavement in the parking lot.
    Must be one real upset dude out there!

  82. Revenue sharing helps Apple by Cato · · Score: 1

    http://www.macrumors.com/2007/05/07/atandt-brandin g-iphone-and-revenue-sharing/ talks about a rumour that Apple demanded a share of monthly AT&T revenues from iPhone subscribers, and is getting this - apparently Verizon refused this.

    Not too surprising then that the iPhone is locked to AT&T, despite it being sold without subsidy - possibly the only GSM phone ever sold at full price while remaining locked, which is a nice earner for Apple but really doesn't help customers. Anyone who travels outside the US will soon realise the pain of not being able to swap in a cheaper GSM SIM card (just a few dollars for prepaid accounts in most countries) to make cheaper calls outside the US...

  83. d00d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just so you know, moron. no one gives a damn about you and your expensive fashion statement. it serves you right to suffer.

  84. No surprise by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised. Not saying this because I anticipated a lot of problems, just that with any product there will always be problems be it software, hardware or that the widget just doesn't work.

    As a student, I've worked in Customer Service before for a big carrier/media company (not AT&T) and know others who have worked similar roles for other companies (again not AT&T). With the companies that my friends and I are familiar with, the general emphasis has always been on providing great service. Its not that the CSRs aren't trying to do a good job but of the ones who do a really bad job (like you'd write an article about) they tend to be the real sticklers for company policy (on the *excessive* side) which I don't think any manager would support or frankly, they aren't all that smart. Most of these companies pay out fairly hefty bonuses or commissions so that there's a real incentive to keep customers and provide great service. I was making close to $50k with bonuses in under a year - full time. (Yeah, this might explain the service charges!).

  85. Troll-la-la-la by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YES! The NGage, 700w, and Neo1973 are all appropriately drab examples of chesthairy mobile phones for the true man's man every anti-pansy yearns to be, while the pinko iPhone is but a mere trinket from the plastic bubbles of the 25 cent dispensers we remember from childhood. Gentle, flimsy, and feminine fashion apparel serving as a status symbol of your flaming homosexuality. If you aren't gay but are looking to prove your manhood to a /. poster, then a true geek would seek out the most rugged and emotionless piece of (preferably, Microsoft Vista Mobile-gilded) hardware they could find in the back alleys of south central Los Angeles where the men are men and the sheep daintily clasp iPhones.

  86. Nelson said it best.. by s31523 · · Score: 1

    Haha!

  87. Re:iPhone = gayPhone by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait. Gay people get free phones? I need to get in on this!

    Switching can be difficult, but not nearly as bad as getting out of a cell phone contract!

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  88. It's called FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  89. the hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone explain to me what the hype is all about? As far as I understand this is a phone with the functionality mostly equal to any other phone on the market, the main difference being the input interface; a comparably large touchscreen. While I could see its appeal for certain people (the usual suspects) I can't quite grasp what the actual hype is all about. Was it the amount of advertising?

  90. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

    I think it will take longer. There will have been a rush on Friday and then lots of sales on Saturday. Huge numbers of people buy phones on Saturdays, less on weekdays.

  91. Or buy a cheap GSM off ebay for internat. travel by Blahbooboo3 · · Score: 1

    Just buy a cheap GSM off eBay for travel internationally. That's what I did. No problem...

  92. Funny Stuff by RawGutts · · Score: 1

    What I think is funny, and I am sure that someone has said it already.

    Verizon and Sprint had a shot at the Iphone first. They were just greedy and wanted more profit from the sales of it. Not really surprising.

    1. Re:Funny Stuff by CompMD · · Score: 1

      And what I think is funny is that Verizon and Sprint offer better quality devices with more capabilities, on faster networks, on larger networks, that they can't brick at their discretion for less money than an iPhone.

  93. You need to wait on Apple stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I generally wait on getting Apple stuff until the first $100 service pack. It's generally not ready for prime time until then.

  94. Suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so happy when people who buy over-hyped products have this kind of trouble. Eat it! How do you like your stupid phone now, you gullible, acquisitive, shallow, pathetic trend-slaves?

  95. Sounds exactly like the Sidekick launch... by HalfOfOne · · Score: 1

    A bunch of years ago, T-Mobile and Danger launched the Sidekick. A friend from college had worked for Danger for awhile, and had gotten our circle of geeks really hyped about it. So I ponied up the cash and got one, even though I really only needed a phone.

    It was a cool gadget. It was awful as a phone, both in terms of reception and in form factor. Holding the equivalent of a bar of soap to your head was bad enough, but then there were all the dropped or missed calls. It got bad enough that I called T-Moblie service.

    There were no options for the Sidekick in their routing tree for customer service, and every agent I'd gotten connected to kept transferring me, as they had never heard of the Sidekick or had heard of it but didn't know what to do with it. They were totally unprepared, and this was more than a month after the launch. Eventually the answer was "yeah, we're working on that".

    A year or two later, I fell for it again and bought a color sidekick, having been told that the guts of the xmit/recv phone parts had been totally replaced. They might have been, but they still sucked. This was in Chicago, where I'd expect their coverage to be top-notch. Still no help from T-Mo service. They at least knew what the Sidekick was, but the response on the phone was "oh, you have one of THOSE, okay..." Eventually the thing died, unable to read it's SIM or a new one. I found out it died a week after the warranty expired, T-Mo wanted $150 to replace it with a refurb.

    Lesson learned: No more T-Mobile and no more sidekicks. May they wither into Newton-ness.

  96. That's what you get... by NIN1385 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That is what you get for rushing out to buy one like it's your new kidney dialysis machine. Everyone knows that it's not a good idea to buy electronics immediately after they are released, but for some reason people still do it. I will think about getting one when all the problems are fixed and they come out with a better model.

    --

    If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
  97. Re:iPhone = gayPhone by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    The asshole giving this an Insightful needs to be shot. Repeatedly.

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  98. yeah, right ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Thomas Hawk and company,

    Are you sure you don't have a short position in AAPL, or have some other interest in spreading FUD around? Associated Press and Reuters are reporting that only about 2% of iPhone activations went "less than perfect":

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070702/tc_nm/apple_dc _1
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070702/ap_on_hi_te/ap ple_iphone_90;_ylt=ArycuuFKJIhY5imH9_VUUxhU.3QA

    Why should anyone believe your story is significant or represents more than one of unlucky 2%? 500,000 phones were probably sold. It's reasonable to say that 2% "less than perfect" experiences on anything on such a huge consumer demand scale would be considered rather successful. Let's put this in perspective.

  99. They created the line! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They closed the stores for 4 friggin' hours, and made people line up for it. If they had started selling the phones at start of business Friday, there would have been some small overnight lines from the insane people, but there would have been almost no lineups at all. They (Apple and AT&T) 'manufactured' the lines to increase the hype.

  100. Competition by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness the FCC has ensured that there is plenty of competition in the industry!

  101. Not true by avdp · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's not true for this GSM phone, or any other GSM phone sold in the US. Unlike in Europe, where such practice is illegal, the US cell phone carrier lock their phones to their SIMS. You can't used a AT&T GSM phone on the T-Mobile network, or vice versa UNLESS you manage to convince the provider to unlock your phone (or in the alternative, find a way to unlock it, usually for a fee, from the internet). The justification for this practice is that phones are heavily subsidized by the carrier in the US (you pay a small fraction of the actual cost of the phone). The justification for the iPhone (for which you pay FULL price) is that Apple is too greedy?

    The other thing the SIM thing is good for in the US is to switch phone within the same company. i.e. my wife and I are both with T-Mobile, and we decide to switch phone (and keep our respective numbers).

    1. Re:Not true by powerlord · · Score: 1

      I've been using T-mobile for the past 6 or 7 years. Their coverage may be a little spotty in some places, but the service has always been excellent.

      They were even very amenable in unlocking my phone so I can use it with local SIMs when we travel internationally, and yeah, being able to just pull the SIM and swap it into a new phone is loads easier than what I hear Verizon users go through (not to mention I can keep my old phone as a "ready back up" just in case my current one gets run over ... yeah its happened).

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    2. Re:Not true by avdp · · Score: 1

      Good to know. I am with T-Mobile as well. I do plan to ask before going to Europe (end of the year or so) because the roaming charges are outrageous. Much cheaper to rent a SIM from the airport...

  102. Re:iPhone = gayPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it was "sock a deck" - though that's gonna hurt your hand.

  103. Re:iPhone = gayPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm supposed to get an iPhone for that? sweet.

  104. So the real stupidity was the timing? by argent · · Score: 1

    Frankly I expect a lot of issues to vanish Monday, when the regular people get to work instead of the poor weekend shift.

    So they would have done better, back when they announced Jun 29th, to say "Well, we can't quite make June, we'll release on July 2nd" instead of having the release after normal working hours on a Friday?

  105. Sweet by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    There's nothing like the smell of first-wave fansumers' shattered hope in the morning..

  106. Why the long wait?? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    After waiting in line 36 hours..

    I don't understand the people who waited in line for so long to get the iPhone. On Saturday, the day after the launch, I went to my local Apple Store to buy something for my Mac. The store was busy, but not more than usual. While I was getting rung up, I noticed the huuuuuuuuge stack of iPhones on the desk behind the counter. I asked if those were iPhones that people had reserved, or could you just buy one.

    He said these were iPhones that you could buy, and did I want to buy an iPhone today?

    So why did you wait in line for 36 hours, when you could have gone to an Apple Store (mine is in Roseville, MN) and picked one up the following day? I just don't get the people who waited in line for this.

    1. Re:Why the long wait?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why did you wait in line for 36 hours, when you could have gone to an Apple Store (mine is in Roseville, MN) and picked one up the following day? I just don't get the people who waited in line for this.
      It's like these wackjobs I live with, AKA "the citizens of San Francisco". They do that for the "community experience." Anti-war rally, cell phone sale, it's all the same thing. We really are depraved, aren't we? But I suppose it's all relative.
  107. This is what happens... by bynary · · Score: 1

    when you hand the reins for your product's service over to the number one, shittiest cell service provider in North America. I won't regale you with my AT&T/Cingular horror stories here, but suffice it to say that I will NEVER directly do business with them ever again. Verizon has been flawless in both customer service and cellular service execution. It sucks when my favorite company ties the knot with quite possibly my least favorite company. No iPhone for me until other providers sign up with Apple.

    --
    http://www.bynarystudio.com
  108. iPhone activation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got my phone on Sunday and took it home to activate. I got the dreaded "Your phone requires more time to activate". That sucked! I waited about 3 hours and still nothing. The worst part of it all is that it immediately stopped service on my old phone (I was an existing AT&T customer) so I had no phone at that time.

    After reading about people waiting 24+ hours I got nervous so I called the AT&T iPhone Activation Hotline, selected the option "Check Status on your activation". I was on hold about 20 minutes, a very nice man answered and immediately proceeded to activate my phone. I asked him what the problem was, he told me since I was originally a Cingular customer (who is now merged with AT&T) my account had to be manually activated and since I called he did it right then instead of waiting god knows how long.

    Anyway, I think if you call make sure you call the iPhone number at AT&T, the regular AT&T customer service has absolutely no idea what do to. I think that is major problem a lot of people are having when calling AT&T.

  109. It's only affecting those without enough faith by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    The people who REALLY believe in the power of Steve are having no problems with activation. So, if you're having a problem, you have only yourself to blame. Maybe you need to look deep inside yourself and reaffirm your dedication to Steve.

    Steve needs faithful followers, truly dedicated to Apple's world-changing mission. He doesn't need fair-weathered followers, who criticize him or his wonderful products.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  110. More like 2% apparently by An+Anonymous+Hero · · Score: 1
    "a source familiar with the situation said that just less than 2 percent of the buyers had problems activating their service with AT&T Wireless"

    (Form cnn, "Estimate puts iPhone sales at 500,000 in opening weekend".)

  111. What are the chances... by plowboylifestyle · · Score: 1

    What are the chances that you could someday have your iPhone, and buy from some carrier just an unlimited data plan, no voice. And then use a voice-over-ip service such as Skype as your primary voice provider. How much hacking would this take, and does any carrier provide data service without voice. What are you up against if you are sick of minutes, text message plans and this is your goal?

  112. Re:hahaha.. lap it up.. by cowscows · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it sure is upsetting to see people enjoying themselves. The ability to find fun in everyday things, that's the sure sign of a loser. From now on, I'll just reserve all of my excitement until I win the lottery, is that something exciting enough that you'll approve me being happy about it?

    --

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  113. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

    I would add Visual Voicemail to that list. It's one of those things I'm amazed hasn't been done already, to be honest.

  114. Exactly by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Yes, that is my thinking. I'm sure AT&T kept extra staff around the weekend, but it's just not the same as a fully staffed work day.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  115. statistics by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    Your misuse of your anecdotal experience is a logical fallacy. It's unfortunate for you that you've had problems activating a few iPhone. However, every single report of experiences with iPhone activation that I can personally verify had no trouble at all, or minimal trouble which was easily overcome. You see, my anecdotal evidence simply doesn't match yours. Perhaps you are an outlier case. The sample does not include random reports posted to Slashdot by Anonymous Cowards, who, for all I know might well be paid by someone (Verizon? Microsoft?) or otherwise motivated to trash talk iPhone (a deep seated loathing for Steve Jobs because he once fired you?) or to pollute discussion forums when iPhone is the topic (stuck using a Motorola RAZR with hobbled bluetooth on a Verizon contract for another year?) or to preach the controversy to generate traffic and revenue (Engadget? Slashdot?). No serious problems *at all* were observed in the sample that I can verify. That suggests to me that perhaps the journalist isn't just parroting lies and the problem rate is actually relatively low.

    "OMG! Somebody had trouble registering their iPhone!!!" is only one of many examples at Slashdot where it is clear that the participants in the discussion could benefit from an improved understanding of basic logic and basic statistics.

    You might enjoy watching this short video clip of Michael Shermer @ TED where he says, "In science, we have to keep track of the misses, not just the hits." He has a marvelous example here of priming our audio circuits, playing part of Stairway to Heaven backwards.

    You might also enjoy the book Why Flip a Coin: The Art and Science of Good Decisions .

    P.S. I'm not laughing at your ignorance. I suspect you are merely frustrated and venting. Please do take about 10% of the time you spend reading slashdot, and use that time to hone your logical reasoning skills and understanding of statistics. It can be fun!

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the AC you replied to. BTW, I'm an AC since Oct 98 when I heard about /. at the Linux ALE. I'm a believer in the anonymous part of the Internet, and I refuse to register.

      > Your misuse of your anecdotal experience [wikipedia.org] is a logical fallacy.

      I wasted much of a weekend and part of a weekday morning so it's hard not to vent, but it is not a logical fallacy. When you test a set of seven (just attempted to setup another and have no service w/ AT&T), and zero of the seven work then you have a pretty good sample size. How is observing a set of seven experiments that are repeatable a problem? This is a stretch, but I also have a control set. My two Verizon and Sprint phones that I carry work reliably about 10% of the time versus 0% for the AT&T ones. Where's the logical fallacy?

    2. Re:statistics by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

      There are several ways that you can fall into an anecdotal experience fallacy with this case. Perhaps you tried to activate all seven phones with the same broken iTunes installation on the same broken PC, for example. The fact that my sample size is much larger than yours, and includes no major problems whatsoever is another clue that perhaps you cannot extrapolate your experience into a validation of the obviously skewed survey that started this discussion thread.

      Although I agree that anonymity has a certain value, you are missing out on building a reputation. If you are a technology professional, you might want to reassess your position. A lot has changed since the early days of the net.

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  116. Ebay! by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    If you look on ebay, you will see that there are a large number of iPhones listed there. If Apple runs short of the phones, just wait until these auctions fail, just like with the PS3, and there will be a lot of them returned to the stores.

    Too many people believe that a device being produced in a high volume, and easily available in almost every city, will sell for twice what they paid for it on ebay.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  117. So when do we get to see ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when do we get to see the latest in the series of "Hi I'm a Mac and I'm a PC" television ads?

    You know, the one where the Mac guy just stands there, in a catatonic state, because he hasn't been activated yet?

  118. Not communication though by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Personally, that little bill I get in the mail once a month is a PRETTY big dialog from the cell-phone carrier that I take very seriously.

    That doesn't really involve having to have AT&T DO anything though, which is the real problem with any carrier - the point at which something has to be changed, is the point of frustration in regards to cell phones.

    Bills you receive, you pay, there is not really any pain except perhaps when you need to pay your billing address - but there again, that is a change and not the normal course of operations for a bill.

    This incidentally is exactly why I would never sign up for automatic bill pay, because the likleyhood of my needing to eventually change that form of payment (CC lost, dropping service) is too high and I don't trust many companies with enough details to extract money from me directly.

    And again, maybe Im wrong, but last I heard these iPhone dont come with any "unlimited minutes" plans.

    I also cannot talk an unlimited amount of time. But actually, you are partly wrong - the $80 and $100 plans come with unlimited nights & weekends. I personally will not need more than a few hundred minutes a month anyway, so the $60 plan was perfect.

    I know plenty of people who when they hated their provider, you know what they did? They SWITCHED! And then again, and again, until they found someone they were happy with.

    Yes, I switched and switched and settled - once I realized they were all the same. And now I've switched again.

    And not ONCE has that final company been AT&T/Cingular.

    I know people that had cingular before. Heck, this wole article is about people with cingular (AT&T) accounts having trouble migrating to the iPhone. So it would seem a number of people were already happy with AT&T to have been using them before... remember they ARE the largest cell carrier, and that means they have the largest number of customers. By your own logic that would technically make them the "best" since after rounds of switching that's where people ended up.

    And the people who dont realize it just seem to either A. Have too much money B.

    I don't particularly care for your financial pissing contest. I'll bet I paid less for my last phone + service than you do for yours (pay as you go, $15 every three months). $60 a month is not much compared to what a LOT of people are paying for cell service, and I get something very valuable to me in return by way of features. I don't like spending a lot of money on a cell phone or a plan but if there is real value, I am happy to do so.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not communication though by abaddononion · · Score: 1

      Bills you receive, you pay, there is not really any pain except perhaps when you need to pay your billing address

      This is still a ridiculous statement. Most people I know with cell phone plans have PLENTY of problems with their bill. Either they run up minutes, they wind up paying for RECEIVING text messages... somewhere or another, they have problems with their bill. It gets run up to 300+ dollars for a single month. Im not saying that's not that person's fault. But saying "cellphone bills arent a problem" just seems outright stupid to me.

      I also cannot talk an unlimited amount of time. But actually, you are partly wrong - the $80 and $100 plans come with unlimited nights & weekends. I personally will not need more than a few hundred minutes a month anyway, so the $60 plan was perfect.

      Unlimited nights and weekends is NOT unlimited minutes. Just because you're on an unlimited nights and weekends plan does not mean your bill cannot still get driven up.

      I don't particularly care for your financial pissing contest.

      I dont care much for any of your post, as you seem to have completely ignored the point of my post, which was simply a response to your original post of "cell phone companies bad but it's not their fault!".

      I'll bet I paid less for my last phone + service than you do for yours

      You would lose that bet, as I got tired of cell companies a couple of years ago and have switched to vonage. Feel free to try again.

    2. Re:Not communication though by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      This is still a ridiculous statement. Most people I know with cell phone plans have PLENTY of problems with their bill.

      Possibly, but every month? I cannot recall a single person I know having an issue. I know I never have, even back when I had regular monthly plans.

      Unlimited nights and weekends is NOT unlimited minutes.

      It is if you talk on nights and weekends.

      "cell phone companies bad but it's not their fault!".

      Not at all what I was saying, so I guess basically you can't understand me either.

      You would lose that bet, as I got tired of cell companies a couple of years ago and have switched to vonage. Feel free to try again.

      Just because you stopped playing doesn't mean you won the game. It means you aren't a player. Or at least, are irrelevent like a guy who sits on the bench the whole game. I pretty much figured you didn't have much actual experience with cell phones from the nonsense you are spouting about how bills are always going wrong.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Not communication though by abaddononion · · Score: 1

      Just because you stopped playing doesn't mean you won the game. It means you aren't a player. Or at least, are irrelevent like a guy who sits on the bench the whole game. I pretty much figured you didn't have much actual experience with cell phones from the nonsense you are spouting about how bills are always going wrong.

      Dear lord, you sure are GREAT at reading things that arent there, huh? This will be once again that you've done it. If you had paid attention to my previous post, you could easily read "as I got tired of cell companies a couple of years ago and have switched to vonage". Which part of that implies "little cell phone experience?" That's like saying Ive never used Windows because I got sick of Windows years ago and moved to Linux. Sure, you can say I dont have any RECENT cellphone experience, but you cant say I dont have none, and you cant even say I dont have a LOT, 5+ years.

      And you say that Im "spouting nonsense" about people's cell phone bills always going wrong... Well, I guess THAT is why so many cellphone commercials are targeted towards people who are tired of outrageous cellphone bills. Gee, I think it's amazing how some nonsense I totally made up is totally driving the advertising firms at all of the majority telecommunications companies. That's awesome!

      As to your "I stopped playing the game" bluff, you clearly didnt stop playing the game, or you wouldnt still be trying to make an argument. On the flip side, I AM going to stop playing the game, because... well, your points are very weak, and I have other places to be. Since I, unfortunately, dont own an iPhone, I cant be posting on /. on the go. So sad for me, I guess. If you wish to make the last post and therefore "win", have at.

    4. Re:Not communication though by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Which part of that implies "little cell phone experience?"

      The part where you haven't used them for a few years, while I and others have.

      Well, I guess THAT is why so many cellphone commercials are targeted towards people who are tired of outrageous cellphone bills.

      They are targeted at people who end up paying a lot for a cell phone. That is not the *bill* going wrong, that's the user accidentally doing something like sending a billion text messages. The resulting bill, while shocking, is quite accurate. It seems ou aren't even paying attention to cell-phone commercials or you'd notice that's a big trend.

      you clearly didnt stop playing the game,

      Exactly, which is why I have relevant experience to talk about the things while you have only conjecture based on old memories.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  119. Who cares? You should know better by crivens · · Score: 1

    Who cares? You should know better - a new tech product is bound to have issues. It's not worth waiting in line for. Wait until it's been out a while; by then they've sorted out the glitches, maybe even upgraded the specs ever so slightly. Oh, you want to be able to wank over the fact you bought an iPhone on the day it was released for $600!? Sucker!

  120. Cingular is just bad.... by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

    When I opted out of my contract, they billed me the cancellation fee - once for each phone, on each account, that turned into just under $1800 for cancelling 3 phones. In 3 months all I ever heard was "yes it looks like something is wrong, but if you'll just pay your bill we'll refund you when we figure it out."

    I still get the occasional call from them & I still tell them I'll pay after they figure it out.

  121. Re:hahaha.. lap it up.. by sqldr · · Score: 1

    Fill your boots mate, although, if you can be "moved to tears" by the purchase of a trendy gadget, then you've possibly lost all sense of perspective. Usually, I usually reserve those kind of emotions for more powerful things, like a loved one recovering from cancer, or the birth of a child. Each to their own, I guess.

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    That was silly.. you could've got fifty quid for it.

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  122. Re:you are welcome to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It means you and the current phone companies are clueless about the meaning of "good" products and "good" services. You are welcome to remain a dumbass, while Apple does something about it.

  123. Re:you are welcome to ... by jaysones · · Score: 1

    Huh? What's with the ad hominem? And what does this have to do with a shiny object in the sky?

  124. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by i_like_spam · · Score: 1

    It may take longer than a day...

    Both Apple and AT&T shares are down.

    According to Bill Shope, an analyst at JP Morgan, "we believe initial demand may have been disappointing, but it's still early."

  125. Ok, can I do it now? by e2d2 · · Score: 1

    As the wise man Nelson once said: Ha ha!

    I have no pity whatsoever. So your foolish ideals about the IPhone clashed with reality? Imagine that.

    Now for the less smug post:

    I've never had a "great" experience with any cell phone provider, and given the information I've gathered from others I have yet to know anyone that has. It's not surprising at all that the hype didn't match the reality. Quite disappointing considering what people paid for them.

  126. Unplanned dependencies by Pointy_Hair · · Score: 1

    There are two things that have been mentioned that I am not too surprised about:

    1. The enrollment process for new iPhones was probably pretty streamlined for those that were activating new service or doing a simple transfer (new device, same contract). Looks like the trouble starts with more complex changes where people are changing service plans or changing providers at the same time.

    2. The impact of this product release is impacting all the other carriers where people are changing or cancelling service, along with the expected hassle of number portability.

    No big newsflash here, move along...

  127. GSM coverage in the vast majority of the U.S. by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 2, Informative

    GSM coverage is definitely not excellent in the central U.S. plains or the Rocky Mountains. There is coverage now on interstate highways and in cities and larger towns, but smaller towns and highway routes have spotty coverage or none at all. There were a handful of small telephone companies that sprung up to fill the void in the past few years. Two of the largest such have been recently acquired.

    Western Wireless was acquired by Alltel.

    AT&T recently acquired Dobson Communications (which was the largest vendor licensing the Cellular One brand). I think that the "new AT&T" realizes that Verizon will kick their ass if they don't start competing on the coverage front. Nobody can touch Verizon in the U.S. for actually getting a wireless signal in more places.

    The AT&T coverage map is, ahem, optimistic, regarding its coverage in the plains states. The Dobson/Cellular One acquisition helps with this, but not with the rocky mountain states.

    Here is a relatively honest assessment of GSM coverage in the western US: Cellular One coverage map (includes the Dobson network and all the other mom-and-pop licensees of the Cellular One brand).

    The Alltel coverage map is also a little deceptive, because it mixes their GSM network in with their other network, but they provide much better GSM coverage in the west than anybody else, thanks to their acquisition of Western Wireless. Both T-Mobile and AT&T were asleep at the wheel and either should have acquired Western Wireless. It will be more difficult for AT&T to assemble a network which can rival Alltel or Verizon in the west. Fortunately, they are able to lease time on the Alltel network for their customers, as does T-Mobil. Oddly enough, Alltel does not provide GSM service to its own customers.

    It's not clear that AT&T can fix this problem via acquisitions. Alltel already bought the company that AT&T should have acquired. What's left now is a whole bunch of relatively small players. AT&T will need to go on a major buying and building spree if they are really serious about providing nationwide cellular GSM coverage. They have been cherry picking the best (highest population density) markets for years, but they'll need to get serious about providing coverage to the rest of the country if they don't want the "I can't get an iPhone because AT&T doesn't offer service in my area" blogger chorus to drown out their efforts to promote the iPhone beyond the initial product launch. The stock valuations of AT&T and Alltel are interesting, too. AT&T has brand recognition, but they are themselves possibly an acquisition candidate.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:GSM coverage in the vast majority of the U.S. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that GSM map. It is indeed about right. However - my Cellular One experience was not GSM. Were they that mixed? I was in the northern Great Plains when I had them, and I know that at least the portion of their network I was on is now owned by Alltel.

    2. Re:GSM coverage in the vast majority of the U.S. by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

      Yes. Cellular One is ironically named. It's not one cell phone company, but quite literally dozens. They just licensed the Cellular One brand. I didn't realize some were not GSM vendors, but I'm not really surprised.

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  128. How unfortunate. . . by tekshogun · · Score: 1

    It is too bad all these people waited around so long for such an expensive item. After all the hype, fooling around with, Cisco over trademarks, diving head-first into unfamiliar markets. . . you would hope this stuff would at least work 95% of the time. But it seems like they are more into the 85% to 70% success range which is really bad for such a major launch. This is just horrible. People are shelling out $500 and $600 for crap. What the fact that there were too many early adopters trying to hit the activation systems at once or does the product just suck? We'll see.

  129. Trouble was to be expected by jrfezziwig · · Score: 1

    AT&T and Apple both knew that the iPhone would be immensely popular, but neither company apparently realized how big initial demand would be. The Chicago Tribune reports today that "before the phone's debut analysts expected Apple to sell 50,000 to 200,000 units" during the rollout, but initial reports are that 500,000 units were in customer hands within the first few hours. (see http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-070702i phone,0,1339325.story?coll=chi-business-hed) One problem was that both companies were not only introducing a new product, but a new activation method -- take it home and activate it yourself using iTunes. Store employees were not allowed to open the box or even break the shrink-wrap; it was all up to customers -- all of whom were obviously untrained in the process, and some of whom were probably less technically qualified than others. To make matters even more complicated, at least half of the iPhone first-day buyers were coming from other cell phone providers (see http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/02/500-000-iphones -sold-so-far-but-can-apple-keep-up/), the AT&T activation server was swamped. According to a friend who works for the company, all half-a-million buyers wanted to activate at the same time. Under those circumstances, what could anyone expect but difficulty? One reason I'm waiting until Christmas to get mine ...

  130. no MP3 without service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey I'm curious... you say you cannot use anything on the unit, not even the MP3 player unless you activate it?

    What about if you end your subscription service? Say you run out of cash for the overpriced service plan or you wait out your 2 year contract.... does the phone stop working even as an MP3 player?

    If so, that's pretty much genius on Apple's part, right? I mean, if iPods are popular, imagine iPhones that you have to keep subscribing to in order to even listen to the music you stored on it.

  131. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by SoulRider · · Score: 1

    Reuters, digg and engadget are all claiming 500,000 units sold in the first 3 days. Probably not the most successful rollout but a pretty respectable showing.

    I dont have time to link to all of the articles.

  132. Ever looked in the mirror. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Apple loonies"

    Indeed!

  133. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by Skreems · · Score: 1

    And there isn't a single phone out there that you can store and play back an entire movie except the iPhone.
    That isn't even close to true. There's plenty of phones out there that take an SD or miniSD expansion card, which gives you at least a 2GB space to play with. You can easily fit a DVD-res avi in that, and probably several at once if you downsize them to 320x240 or whatever your phone is natively.
    --
    Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
    The Urban Hippie
  134. Re:I still don't get it why people want this iPhon by qlayer2 · · Score: 1

    I have an LG fusic with sprint service. It has a micro sd slot, which currently houses a 2gb card. It also has a built in radio transmitter, to wirelessly beam my mp3's onto any car stereo tuned to the right frequency.

    I have never had the desire to watch full length movies on my phone, and the "limited" mobile web features are about all I'd ever think to use it for- I've looked up addresses and phone numbers, got directions, checked movie times and sports scores, and checked my gmail.

    The iphone looks like a cool toy, I just don't need the extra features, or have the desire to spend extra money to switch providers and everything else. P.S.- 90%+ of the "media" phones out there have the same micro (or mini) sd slot mine does, thus making the amount of memory a moot point. I could put a movie on my 2gb card, I've just never seen a reason to.

  135. They don't use Amdocs for the iPhone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, AT&T's GSM service uses two in-house systems called Telegence and CARE for account management and billing, depending on the part of the country you're in. CARE is the old Bellsouth wireless billing system, and Telegence is the old SBC wireless billing system.

    The old AT&T Wireless TDMA service may have been run on Amdocs, but I can't remember. I do remember that there was an effort to transition away from the old AT&T Wireless's billing system in all CARE & Telegence markets, and I know for a fact that they wouldn't be using it for any new service.

    (Disclosure: I used to work in support for part of CARE. Incidentally, they do use a product called Clarify for managing trouble-tickets originated by customers, but I'm pretty sure it's by Clarify, Inc. and not by Amdocs. Could be wrong; since I no longer work there, I can't verify.)

  136. Re:Maybe they should have waited by Danny_Freak · · Score: 1

    I just wrote this from my new toy - so far it's been really intuitive to flame assholes like you... Quality.
    iPwned.
  137. Re:iPhone = gayPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gay and I hate the iPhone.

  138. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by jcr · · Score: 1

    and the following day, Apple jumped nearly six dollars.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  139. Re:iPhone Already Fading Into Irrelevance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, look, it seems they "only" managed to sell 700,000 opening weekend.

    I'm not an iPhone hater, but you do your cause no service by quoting inaccurate statistics.