... than GoDaddy. It just goes to show if you're not running a website that shows all people in a light and happy and cheery manner, don't use GoDaddy hosting or GoDaddy DNS registration services. They've interfered with other sites as well, if they cannot shutdown your website, they'll just turn off the DNS resolution for your IP address like they did with Seclists.Org http://seclists.org/nmap-hackers/2007/0000.html
GoDaddy is the Self-Proclaimed Internet Police and just because they have the ability to interfere with certain websites they think it's OK. Of course they'll argue Terms of Service, but no company should be able to interfere with one's First Amendment rights. Also why should they want to disable websites in this manner anyway? All the negative press must affect their profit margin.
I think GM saw Toyota passing Ford and catching up in US sales and realized they needed to change in order to stay on top of the American automobile market.
Proprietary code? Trade secrets? After reading the excerpts from the "Base One report," would any self respecting programmer take credit for that drivel?
Now that the cat's out of the bag, so to speak, they'll be editing wiki entries from home and coffee shops and anywhere there is a truly anonymous internet connection.
I can't believe it took so long for investors to bail out. With such flagrant and desperate acts of legalese I can't imagine anyone would believe the stock would suddenly skyrocket if they won. (Which was looking less and less likely as the years passed.) I suppose those who still owned stock were hoping for that very miracle, because they had too much money tied up in the organization.
If you're paying for software which is supposed to be designed to make your computer more productive, the software should not be delivering unproductive advertising let alone reading your email or private documents. TV is free because we're forced to view advertising. I paid for my computer and my internet service so I shouldn't have to view ads.
If they want to run ads on my computer, they should be paying me. (Although, they couldn't pay me enough to run windows.
Is it just me or is Microsoft seeking alternative means of profit since Vista was released? This looks like something the RIAA/MPAA or SCO would do, not a highly respectable corporation like Microsoft. Seriously, suing people trying to make a buck on the coattails of giants? That can't be a crime. IHMO
GNU, which stands for Gnu's Not Unix, is the FSF's attempt to create a nonproprietary clone of Unix. Right now, that effort is based on the Linux kernel. But Solaris is another possibility for the core part of the GNU operating system.
Slashdot Mirror
etc.
That's because they're busy trying to reconquer the Warsaw Pact.
... begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th.
IANAL, but if filesharing really were illegal, would not the police and the FBI be going after the lawbreakers?
'fraid not http://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1067689&cid=26168727
Insider trading isn't allowed if you're not in the insider trading club.
google.co.uk and google.ca appear to be unaffected as noted in the summary...
Maybe after a few HUNDRED beers.
It totally makes sense! Jerry is a comedian and Vista is a joke!
Invites for sale! $25USD
... than GoDaddy. It just goes to show if you're not running a website that shows all people in a light and happy and cheery manner, don't use GoDaddy hosting or GoDaddy DNS registration services. They've interfered with other sites as well, if they cannot shutdown your website, they'll just turn off the DNS resolution for your IP address like they did with Seclists.Org http://seclists.org/nmap-hackers/2007/0000.html
GoDaddy is the Self-Proclaimed Internet Police and just because they have the ability to interfere with certain websites they think it's OK. Of course they'll argue Terms of Service, but no company should be able to interfere with one's First Amendment rights. Also why should they want to disable websites in this manner anyway? All the negative press must affect their profit margin.
I think GM saw Toyota passing Ford and catching up in US sales and realized they needed to change in order to stay on top of the American automobile market.
http://www.torproject.org/
To arms! Viva la Revolucion!
--
-1 Troll/Flamebait
Proprietary code? Trade secrets? After reading the excerpts from the "Base One report," would any self respecting programmer take credit for that drivel?
Now that the cat's out of the bag, so to speak, they'll be editing wiki entries from home and coffee shops and anywhere there is a truly anonymous internet connection.
I can't believe it took so long for investors to bail out. With such flagrant and desperate acts of legalese I can't imagine anyone would believe the stock would suddenly skyrocket if they won. (Which was looking less and less likely as the years passed.) I suppose those who still owned stock were hoping for that very miracle, because they had too much money tied up in the organization.
I for one do NOT welcome our new plate scanning overlords.
If you're paying for software which is supposed to be designed to make your computer more productive, the software should not be delivering unproductive advertising let alone reading your email or private documents. TV is free because we're forced to view advertising. I paid for my computer and my internet service so I shouldn't have to view ads.
If they want to run ads on my computer, they should be paying me. (Although, they couldn't pay me enough to run windows.
... my disks are encrypted
'dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda' FTW
Damn, +5 just isn't enough.
Where are the mod points when you need them?
Is it just me or is Microsoft seeking alternative means of profit since Vista was released? This looks like something the RIAA/MPAA or SCO would do, not a highly respectable corporation like Microsoft. Seriously, suing people trying to make a buck on the coattails of giants? That can't be a crime. IHMO
Am I missing something?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_Operating_Sy
Where was the DMCA when the plans for the cotton gin were leaked?