A simple group of ~20 VMs could handle this egregious type of error. Who cares if AV X marks some specialty software with a false positive? It should at least not detect itself! Load the new sigs to the test VMs, and if they don't commit suicide after a full scan, upload the sigs to the prod download servers. At most, this costs a company ~$5,000/year for equipment and ~$40,000/year for labor. That's pocket change compared to how much the company can lose over a screw up like this.
What's impressive is that this got out of Sophos' testing lab and into production. I guess they must not test signatures in house at all. Congratulations, Sophos customers, you've been promoted to alpha testers.
Ergo, they will have more BPA in their systems. Maybe fat stores BPA better too. Doesn't mean boa makes you fat (which is the angle tv news is taking).
Education does need any [more] technology. It needs good teachers. Find ways for your money to supplement worthy teachers' incomes, or increase all teachers' incomes. Make news geeks through proper education, not by shoveling technology at kids.
Would be nice if you cockfuckers would learn to pull your head out of your ass and read the fdman title. Let me help : "MS Office 2013 Pushing HOME USERS Toward Subscriptions 110". That's not bujsiness u8 sutpdi ignrosnt anoanmosu tylotlerle shti. Burn inhell.
Dmajn fuckignndiptioc pierfed sof mchsit. Why are theere so many stupdi people in this world that cna;t even REAd a fucikjigntitled? Being stupdi ashoudl quzluitfy people for sterilziation, so they can't mspreaed their suptid gejhnes ot other peopel.
D,an fuckignidiktopci opeice so shfit shirt.\
FTI: somepeople inbteract wuith businedsdses from hone. Espexiakkly withresumes. Senfing an Open/LibreOffice Dog to an HR drone using MS Office csnresult infickinh loojin likethus.
Is "Dearer Than Makes Sense" a British colloquialism? I've never heard it before, and it does not make sense to my American brain. Or I'm suffering from a stroke.
It's still an assumption. If the universe is infinite, then this observation says nothing about the non-observable universe. Any statements about the non-observable portions are purely assumptions.
By the same standard, to be a decent parent as a Christian is to be a bad Christian, because the Bible says (for example) "If anyone curses his father or mother, he must be put to death." (Leviticus 20:9)
Your argument stems from a misunderstanding of what Christians believe regarding the laws in Leviticus. They were laws for the Israelites. Fin. When Paul pointed out that Gentiles didn't have to become Jews before becoming Christians, it opened the floodgates to the spirit of the law, not the letter (Love God above all, and love your neighbor as yourself). Now this might mean that to be a good Christian (loving others), one must be a bad Jew (not executing your children), but that's what grace is for.
They could be both: shills trying to get us so angry that we get in Balmer's face, yelling at the top of our lungs, then we suddenly snap from one heated emotion to another. I've seen it a million times on TV.
As someone who has hired over 50 programmers in his career I don't need a theory to tell me it doesn't work, experince tells me it does work. If you're not smart enough to get past the HR filter, why the hell would I want to interview you?
The problem the GP mentioned is that HR never understands what tech managers are looking for, so they sometimes throw the baby out and keep the bathwater (let in the idiots who say they have 25 years of Java experience, but exclude others with perfect actual experience).
I thought, the way DMCA was supposed to work is:
1. Claim filed.
2. Content taken down.
3. Counterclaim filed.
4. Content restored until a court order is received to take it down permanently.
Why does it so often seem to end at step 3?
Because step four is voluntary since keeping the content up is usually voluntary to begin with (even contracts are usually written such that they can be ended by either party on a whim). If step four were not voluntary, then a sneaky party could force a company to host material it objected to (a photoshopped image of its board of directors eating kittens) by having a friend claim a "mistaken" DMCA notice, then until the court order is obtained (never), the company would be forced to keep the objectionable material up. Instead, the company still retains its rights to tell its customer "find another host", and they usually invoke that right since the customer "caused" trouble.
Yeah, I SSHed into a server that was experiencing uber-load and restarted the offending service. Then I went back to reading/.. I'd say reading/. is serious.
Why would a third hand quote from some tradesman from 2000 years ago matter in the slightest? You don't think some technological and scientific advances in the meantime might have changed the game a little? That advances in philopsophy and economic theory and ethics might make a difference?
Nope. I just posted this to another comment, but it seems to fit even better here:
Even in America today, where people with air conditioning, Xboxes, and cell phones are considered poor, we still have actual poor people who don't have homes. It's usually because they're mentally ill or don't want to take advantage of private and public assistance, but they are around, and they're what anyone except early hunter-gatherers would consider poor (today's actual-poor are essentially hunter-gatherers with comparatively nice clothing, environments, and equipment).
In 33AD, the poor were those who couldn't/wouldn't even work as a farmhand; the disabled or the lazy. Today, they're those who can't/won't work or those who can't/won't work the system (even without a job, you can survive). Maybe future advances will finally fix all disabilities, but you can't cure lazy with cybernetics.
Slashdot Mirror
A simple group of ~20 VMs could handle this egregious type of error. Who cares if AV X marks some specialty software with a false positive? It should at least not detect itself! Load the new sigs to the test VMs, and if they don't commit suicide after a full scan, upload the sigs to the prod download servers. At most, this costs a company ~$5,000/year for equipment and ~$40,000/year for labor. That's pocket change compared to how much the company can lose over a screw up like this.
What will those people [Windows XP lovers] do when Microsoft ends support in less than 2 years.
Be smugly satisfied that they eeked every ounce of use from their software while simultaneously feeling dirty for having to buy Windows 9.
What's impressive is that this got out of Sophos' testing lab and into production. I guess they must not test signatures in house at all. Congratulations, Sophos customers, you've been promoted to alpha testers.
Or get Congress to force you to buy one. They can do that now according to the Supremes (assuming you're American).
Ergo, they will have more BPA in their systems. Maybe fat stores BPA better too. Doesn't mean boa makes you fat (which is the angle tv news is taking).
Just in time for Oktoberfest!
Err, education does not need etc.
Education does need any [more] technology. It needs good teachers. Find ways for your money to supplement worthy teachers' incomes, or increase all teachers' incomes. Make news geeks through proper education, not by shoveling technology at kids.
Would be nice if you cockfuckers would learn to pull your head out of your ass and read the fdman title. Let me help : "MS Office 2013 Pushing HOME USERS Toward Subscriptions 110". That's not bujsiness u8 sutpdi ignrosnt anoanmosu tylotlerle shti. Burn inhell. Dmajn fuckignndiptioc pierfed sof mchsit. Why are theere so many stupdi people in this world that cna;t even REAd a fucikjigntitled? Being stupdi ashoudl quzluitfy people for sterilziation, so they can't mspreaed their suptid gejhnes ot other peopel. D,an fuckignidiktopci opeice so shfit shirt.\
FTI: somepeople inbteract wuith businedsdses from hone. Espexiakkly withresumes. Senfing an Open/LibreOffice Dog to an HR drone using MS Office csnresult infickinh loojin likethus.
Is "Dearer Than Makes Sense" a British colloquialism? I've never heard it before, and it does not make sense to my American brain. Or I'm suffering from a stroke.
It's still an assumption. If the universe is infinite, then this observation says nothing about the non-observable universe. Any statements about the non-observable portions are purely assumptions.
I have a Hexxen box that says Linux on it. Maybe this is a new definition of "finally".
They're made of neurons. There's no wiring involved.
By the same standard, to be a decent parent as a Christian is to be a bad Christian, because the Bible says (for example) "If anyone curses his father or mother, he must be put to death." (Leviticus 20:9)
Your argument stems from a misunderstanding of what Christians believe regarding the laws in Leviticus. They were laws for the Israelites. Fin. When Paul pointed out that Gentiles didn't have to become Jews before becoming Christians, it opened the floodgates to the spirit of the law, not the letter (Love God above all, and love your neighbor as yourself). Now this might mean that to be a good Christian (loving others), one must be a bad Jew (not executing your children), but that's what grace is for.
They could be both: shills trying to get us so angry that we get in Balmer's face, yelling at the top of our lungs, then we suddenly snap from one heated emotion to another. I've seen it a million times on TV.
No one uses unity anyway.
As someone who has hired over 50 programmers in his career I don't need a theory to tell me it doesn't work, experince tells me it does work. If you're not smart enough to get past the HR filter, why the hell would I want to interview you?
The problem the GP mentioned is that HR never understands what tech managers are looking for, so they sometimes throw the baby out and keep the bathwater (let in the idiots who say they have 25 years of Java experience, but exclude others with perfect actual experience).
Must be a godaddy site.
I thought, the way DMCA was supposed to work is:
1. Claim filed.
2. Content taken down.
3. Counterclaim filed.
4. Content restored until a court order is received to take it down permanently.
Why does it so often seem to end at step 3?
Because step four is voluntary since keeping the content up is usually voluntary to begin with (even contracts are usually written such that they can be ended by either party on a whim). If step four were not voluntary, then a sneaky party could force a company to host material it objected to (a photoshopped image of its board of directors eating kittens) by having a friend claim a "mistaken" DMCA notice, then until the court order is obtained (never), the company would be forced to keep the objectionable material up. Instead, the company still retains its rights to tell its customer "find another host", and they usually invoke that right since the customer "caused" trouble.
If they're solar, donate them to some third world schools.
No, he meant pasties. http://www.pasty.com/ Get them sans turnip/rutabaga, you'll thank me.
Means we can buy their cities for half price. Engage the diplomat unis!
Yeah, I SSHed into a server that was experiencing uber-load and restarted the offending service. Then I went back to reading /.. I'd say reading /. is serious.
dryeo is smart. He will make us go.
Why would a third hand quote from some tradesman from 2000 years ago matter in the slightest? You don't think some technological and scientific advances in the meantime might have changed the game a little? That advances in philopsophy and economic theory and ethics might make a difference?
Nope. I just posted this to another comment, but it seems to fit even better here:
Even in America today, where people with air conditioning, Xboxes, and cell phones are considered poor, we still have actual poor people who don't have homes. It's usually because they're mentally ill or don't want to take advantage of private and public assistance, but they are around, and they're what anyone except early hunter-gatherers would consider poor (today's actual-poor are essentially hunter-gatherers with comparatively nice clothing, environments, and equipment).
In 33AD, the poor were those who couldn't/wouldn't even work as a farmhand; the disabled or the lazy. Today, they're those who can't/won't work or those who can't/won't work the system (even without a job, you can survive). Maybe future advances will finally fix all disabilities, but you can't cure lazy with cybernetics.