The summary implies they are using debit cards to get cash.
The summary says that they are "draining accounts". I know of know way to access cash with a debit card without a PIN. Presumably, the actors are using the debit cards/chips to make purchases processed as credit, which requires (typically) no PIN.
Don't you think the terms of a settlement of this nature would preclude any further civil action on behalf of either party related to this incident? Are you seriously suggesting that Uber would cut them a check then go after them for the damage to the vehicle?
I realize that "terrorist" is the new trendy label, but while hate crimes are often related to terrorism they are not the same thing. This despite the fact that hate crimes are often intended to generate terror.
In it's simplest form, "terrorist" can be defined as "a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."
While we may not have seen the video associated with this case and we do not fully understand this individual's motivations, it is not unreasonable to theorize that those motivations were political on some level, and therefore not unreasonable to refer to this jackass as a domestic terrorist (or simply terrorist) until such time as evidence of his true motives is presented.
Problem with Facebook is we post a new job or school or city because we want friends to know how we are doing. It's not for Facebook to take that information and sell it...
No, "we" do not. Speak for yourself. I don't post jack shit to Facebook. My friends? I talk to them. They know how I am doing because I speak to them. My new job is not fodder for my so-called "friends" to stare mindlessly into their phones.
As for that last bit, you may want to review this before your next visit back to Facebook. It's obvious you've never read it.
You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings. In addition:
For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (IP content), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it.
Yes, your personal writings and announcements of new jobs and schools are covered by IP. And that last part "others" is not clearly defined, now is it? Here, go read the rest... it's good shit!
In a conference room at my office is an entire cork board wall with a projector screen in the middle. Someone, naturally, took a picture of the cork board, made it the room PC's wallpaper, and I guess set a Group Policy prohibiting the wallpaper from being changed. They INSIST on whimsy. I thought inspirational photos like something from Southeast Alaska would be better... sorry, but no.
Can't they just move all that stuff Google is trying to hide into cookies and/or form fields instead so the URLs are kept vaguely human readable and not crazily long?
So Apple's billions in the bank is because their customers are a bunch of dolts who take it straight up the ass and not because their product(s) might be useful to (or god forbid, preferred by) millions upon millions of customers?
Gee whiz!
Apple's recent gaffs have been stupendous, that's for sure. But really, other than a handful of geeks on the Internet, nobody really gives a shit.
Slashdot Mirror
I wonder if they use an AI to come up with their excuses.
No need. Bullshit excuses are as old as time itself.
So is his mouth-breathing constituency.
Er... huh?
don't worry, they can put together quite a nice profile of you from all of your friends and family that still use it.
I don't have any friends or family, you insensitive clod!
Fucked up the quote tags and know/no mistake. I'm tired... sorry. :(
Preview is a hell of a drug.
The summary implies they are using debit cards to get cash.
The summary says that they are "draining accounts". I know of know way to access cash with a debit card without a PIN. Presumably, the actors are using the debit cards/chips to make purchases processed as credit, which requires (typically) no PIN.
Indeed, the article makes no mention of cash.
ABC 7 San Francisco's parent company is Disney.
Can you create paragraphs on your Linux MacPro desktop? Sure doesn't seem like it.
Seriously?
Don't you think the terms of a settlement of this nature would preclude any further civil action on behalf of either party related to this incident? Are you seriously suggesting that Uber would cut them a check then go after them for the damage to the vehicle?
Get real.
In it's simplest form, "terrorist" can be defined as "a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims."
While we may not have seen the video associated with this case and we do not fully understand this individual's motivations, it is not unreasonable to theorize that those motivations were political on some level, and therefore not unreasonable to refer to this jackass as a domestic terrorist (or simply terrorist) until such time as evidence of his true motives is presented.
Give GP a brake. It's a doggy dog world out there.
Well fuck.
Trafficking... ..is the new "terrorism" which replaced "think of the children"
Neither of those have been replaced. Both are in full swing.
No, "we" do not. Speak for yourself. I don't post jack shit to Facebook. My friends? I talk to them. They know how I am doing because I speak to them. My new job is not fodder for my so-called "friends" to stare mindlessly into their phones. As for that last bit, you may want to review this before your next visit back to Facebook. It's obvious you've never read it.
You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings. In addition:
For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (IP content), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it.
Yes, your personal writings and announcements of new jobs and schools are covered by IP. And that last part "others" is not clearly defined, now is it? Here, go read the rest... it's good shit!
https://www.facebook.com/terms...
In a conference room at my office is an entire cork board wall with a projector screen in the middle. Someone, naturally, took a picture of the cork board, made it the room PC's wallpaper, and I guess set a Group Policy prohibiting the wallpaper from being changed. They INSIST on whimsy. I thought inspirational photos like something from Southeast Alaska would be better... sorry, but no.
That's amazing!
"I don't use Facebook, but let me list all the ways I use Facebook..."
Your grammar and phrasing is atrocious, which makes your thoughts difficult to parse.
You seem smart. Improve.
You mean like a Google URL?
h++ps://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=63iLWqKmJMKmjwPMqouwBA&q=pineapples&oq=pineapples&gs_l=psy-ab.3...0.0.0.6378.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0....0...1c..64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.n3CzS30gTZ0
We have to ask Lee King Snatch...
Click on thumbnail, right click image, Open Image in New Tab / Window...
Problem solved, 1 extra click.
How long, did that, take you?
So Apple's billions in the bank is because their customers are a bunch of dolts who take it straight up the ass and not because their product(s) might be useful to (or god forbid, preferred by) millions upon millions of customers?
Gee whiz!
Apple's recent gaffs have been stupendous, that's for sure. But really, other than a handful of geeks on the Internet, nobody really gives a shit.
--Android User
Violence.
The perfect response to a non-violent protest.
Yes, but this isn't about the end-user and the device in their home. This is about not clobbering Amazon's servers.