Slashdot Mirror


User: JockTroll

JockTroll's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,507
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,507

  1. Re:PWnard on New Litigation Targets 20,000 BitTorrent-Using Downloaders · · Score: -1

    If you want to fax, fax a black continuous page so it will waste some toner/ink and possibly damage their faxes. But you should really send a letter-bomb, make some corporate drone lose their fingers or the whole hand. Just for starters.

  2. Re:The difference is... on Warner Brothers Hiring Undercover Anti-Pirates · · Score: -1, Troll

    Since oz is a shithole of censorship and government-mandated internet censorship, I wouldn't follow any example made by them. Evidently aussies are not intelligent or mature enough for freedom, and they should surrender sovereignty to more advanced nations.

  3. Re:First rebellion on Obama Backs MPAA, RIAA, and ACTA · · Score: -1

    Start by executing the corporate overlords who have bought your legislators. They can't buy their way out of the grave.

  4. Re:Reality on EU Parliament Rejects ACTA In a 663 To 13 Vote · · Score: -1

    Exactly so: you WERE suckers. If you don't like genocides, Rwanda is a better place to start looking. The US had its own reasons to intervene, and that was to diminish the Russian power sphere while showing some goodwill towards the EU (it was not so long before that a US plane had killed 20 people in Italy, see "Cermin accident", with all the US military personnel getting away with it) and reaffirming NATO's central role in European defence at a time many voices called for an independent EU military force.

    Of course, the political climate is more than a little different from then. As for the generation growing up in bomb shelters, you may have not noticed but it's going out.

    Instead of masturbating furiously to theoretical arguments, come and live here for a while. Say, couple of years. You'll learn something. Maybe.

  5. Re:Reality on EU Parliament Rejects ACTA In a 663 To 13 Vote · · Score: -1

    As before, you miss the point: should the EU take a stance that would cause economic harm to the US, and should the US have any advantage in crippling the EU, then the EU would stand no chance. As for Serbia, it shit on the EU's face for some 7 years by ignoring their huffing and puffing, and no wannabe superpower can stand for that. They simply managed to have NATO (and primarily the US) do the dirty work for them.

    What I said, and I stand by it, is that in a direct confrontation the EU has NO CHANCE. Europeans are not Iraqis or Afghanis, or Serbians used to hardships. One day without electrical power and they'll have no option but to cave in. Since I spend a LOT of my time in Europe, I know what I'm saying. Euros act like they'd love for the US (and much of the rest of the world) to just disappear, but they don't tolerate less-than-optimal bath water temperature.

  6. Re:i'm sick of this meme on EU Parliament Rejects ACTA In a 663 To 13 Vote · · Score: -1

    There's nowhere you can move. If you don't stand your ground, soon the whole world will be one happy, corporate, business-friendly, IP-protecting place.

    So, the soap box didn't work because Big Money has bigger boxes. The mail box didn't work either, because trash cans are so convenient when it comes to throw away that useless protest letters from some poor schmuck whose vote doesn't matter anyway. The ballot box will not avail anybody, because the industry has EVERYBODY in its pockets. Forget the jury box, the laws have been bought and paid for.

    All that remains is the ammo box. Are you ready to use it? Are you prepared to kill in the name of digital freedom? Can you look a man in the eye and tell him "I'm sorry, but I must end your life in order to keep the Internet free"?

    If you can't, stay home and learn to love your masters.

    If you can, join the growing numbers.

  7. Re:Reality on EU Parliament Rejects ACTA In a 663 To 13 Vote · · Score: -1, Troll

    Shame that the military power of the EU is non-existant, so unless they ally themselves with Russia or China, the US can dictate its whims to them with a rather large stick. It takes only some Tomahawk missiles to turn the EU into pauperland.
    Of course, I believe that ACTA must die, along with all of its supporters, but don't think for a moment the EU can stand up to the US on its own strength and survive the encounter.

  8. Re:Idiot. Seriously. on Whatever Happened To Programming? · · Score: -1

    "Any moron can pick up a firearm and pull the trigger for effect."

    Care to bet your life on it, loserboy? There are plenty of good reasons firearms training is mandatory for law enforcement and military personnel, and anyone who has to rely on their firearm skills to survive. With your moronic gangsta "skillz" you'd be mozambiqued before I ever needed to say "Yo homie, that my briefcase?"

  9. Re:Internet to Powerful, for governments on US Gov't. Ending Its Hands-Off-the-Internet Stance · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The internet is not "powerful" because in order to connect to it you need ISPs, which being private enterprises can be bullied by government and bigger business easily enough.
    They'll soon be taking complete control of the root, and after that it will be a done deal: they will own the internet. Game over.
    Now, we tried the soap box, and they ignored us. We tried the mail box, and they didn't answer or reminded us of the need to protect "teh children" and especially IP ownership. We tried the ballot box, and each and every major party is either pro-control or too pro-business to care, and the Pirate Parties are too small to make any difference. We tried the jury box, and the judges are either pro-corporate or the new laws comples them to be.
    All that's left is the ammo box, but loserboys do not want to fight.

  10. Re:If so, it's time to adopt plan B on The Awful Anti-Pirate System That Will Probably Work · · Score: -1

    Even if you boycott, Ubisoft won't feel it. Not enough people will do it, and even if the game were to fail because of gamers refusing to buy it, Ubisoft would blame it on piracy.

    Want to fight DRM? Find out who are the programmers responsible for its implementation and assassinate them.

  11. Re:apt quote on Leak Shows US Lead Opponent of ACTA Transparency · · Score: -1, Troll

    Then, loserboy, roll over and die. But that's why you're loserboys: you're already defeated to begin with. You know that no matter what, you'll end up beaten, bloodied and shat upon.

  12. Re:the gun on How Packing a Gun Protects Valuables From Airline Theft · · Score: -1

    It looks like a Mateba Unica autorevolver.

  13. Re:Too many schizophrenic-narcissist's with Guns ! on Switzerland Pursues Violent Games Ban · · Score: -1

    It does make sense according to some loserboy psychologists who couldn't get laid because they were limp-dicked and now need to take their frustration out on those who had more success.

    I say, shit on their faces.

  14. Re:Part of a general pattern on Switzerland Pursues Violent Games Ban · · Score: -1

    Then, loserboy nerd, it's your fucking duty to see to it that they don't get titles meant for ADULTS. As an adult myself, I'm glad if no piece-of-shit kid can buy stuff that is meant for my age group, but this assraping law would make it impossible for adults to buy adult-themed games for the sake of the piece-of-shit kids. Fuck, in Switzerland you cannot buy liquor if you're under 18, do the same for games. Otherwise, ban all liquor in Switzerland and see how long their shitty government lasts.

  15. Re:Losing the war.. on Did We Lose the Privacy War? · · Score: -1

    That's because the loserboy nerds didn't want to fight. Too late for words: throw away your worthless computer, grab a gun, knife or pipe and kill someone.

  16. You're all a bunch of whiny loserboy nerds on Studies Reveal Why Kids Get Bullied and Rejected · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You don't get it, do you? Do you need research to find out why bullies exist and why they behave the way they do?

    It's actually quite simple: humans are pack animals and in any pack there's an alpha male who leads, and some wannabe who gets beaten into submission or killed. Mankind however has unwisely decided to skip the beating and killing, so the wannabes keep being wannabes.

    And what does a wannabe alpha do? Lacking the skills to lead, it clings to the shreds of self-esteem it can keep and in order to maintain them, it has to reaffirm it by picking on defenceless victims and surrounding itself by lackeys who are even inferior to it in abilities and self-esteem. Of course, in order to keep the respect of those lowlives, it has to keep reasserting its make-believe superiority by picking on the aforementioned victims.

    So, make no mistake: there's no way to keep a bully from being what it is. You cannot talk to them, you cannot bargain with them, you cannot reason with them. They won't stop being bullies, even when grown up. They will use different means, but that's what they are.

    The only way to defeat a bully is by bursting its self-esteem bubble and causing it to lose its respect. That can only be achieved by the calculated and unrestrained use of violence on the part of the target or targets, violence that must be both physical and psychological and is to be exercised in the presence of its lackeys, which have been observed to not intervene when their leader is in obvious difficulty.

    The bully must be hit, harshly, and with intent to cause harm. Bullies in the vast majority of the cases do not attack with the intention of causing lasting damage, only minor incapacitation and humiliation, but such limits must not be observed when dealing with them. The first blows must be aimed to stun and/or reduce its mobility and ability to fight back, the rest to subdue it in the fastest way possible. Ganging up is possible, because the objective is not a fair fight, but to cause the bully to lose any respect.

    The attack should not take place on school grounds because misguided, feel-good policies have severely curtailed the natural tendence of human nature to self-balance via the old and effective ways of ultraviolence. Public soil is acceptable. Dark alleys or places out of the public's eye should be preferred. Normally it only takes one session to neutralize the bully, if more are needed then the second one should be way harsher and further humiliation should be contemplated. Forcing the target to run home without his pants is an option. Shitting on his face would be a bonus.

    In any case, remember that bullies are like nerds: they're inferior specimen, losers. The difference is that the nerd is a loser who wants to be a loser, while the bully is a loser who wants to be a winner. Have no mercy with neither, they're not human and should not be treated as such.

  17. Re:So... on The Upside of the NASA Budget · · Score: -1

    Screw the future generations. What have they ever done for us, huh?

  18. Re:Act of God on Smartphones Receive Holy Blessing · · Score: -1, Troll

    Typical loserboy nerd. Boo-hoo, they nuked Caprica, sob sob sigh sigh, those bad Cylons with their God. Get over it, dammit. It was only the fucking human race.

  19. Re:Agree with you, CT on NASA’s Contest To Design the Last Shuttle Patch · · Score: -1

    Loserboy nerd, think of the energies needed to attain orbit and then read your drivel again. How the fuck can you go from Mach .84 (the 747 cruising speed) at about 10000 meters to Mach 25 at 200000 meters without some serious delta-v? Huh? Knock knock, is there anyone in that thick skull of yours? Are you planning to put the damn LOX/LH2 tank on the 747 as well? In that case, good luck taking off.
    The only reason to mate an orbiter to a 747 is to ferry it around or test its gliding capabilities. You know nothing about rocket science. Typical loserboy nerd.

  20. Re:Well Duh! on IT Job Satisfaction Plummets To All-Time Low · · Score: -1

    "Being passed over for the newly hired suit"
    Life's a bitch, get over it.

    "you will have to train him, then he will be your boss"
    Life's a superbitch, get over it or suicide.

    "being reguarded as a janitor or member of the custodial staff instead of a professional"
    Because that's exactly the case.

    "being shoehorned into a role instead of being allowed to advance"
    Why should they allow you to advance? Where's the gain in this?

    "watching your co-workers get outsourced"
    Good for the shareholders.

    "being forced to fix other peoples stupid mistakes over and over"
    It's your job.

    "not given power to prevent them from making those mistakes"
    It's not your job.

    "bitched out because you are having to fix their messes all the time"
    That's what you're there for. Work, slave.

    "overtime without compensation"
    As above.

    "and having your work regarded as spurious to the company"
    Either you do it or we'll find someone cheaper to do it.

    "also being forced to accept as full team members people from other departments who can do more damage in 1 day than even the boss can in 1 week"
    Are you the CEO? No? Then don't bitch about stuff that's above your pay rank.

    "watch them do nothing but chat with their old co-workers about how its so slack and easy"
    Rank privilege.

    "have the boss bitch because 'you have all this extra help and its not going faster'"
    He's right. Work, slave.

    "their borken system stays borken"
    You're in the wrong field. I heard the IKEA cafeteria is hiring. Bork bork bork.

  21. Re:Video games? on PhD Candidate Talks About the Physics of Space Battles · · Score: -1

    Wrong, loserboy nerd. The DGIII, IV and XR-series have damage models and the next iteration will probably have it as standard. There are already simple combat add-ons, guided missile models and ICBMs complete with simulated damage. Dr M. Schweiger, PhD, as a true athlete of science, has absolutely no problems with weapon-handling code, just check out the BombMFD.
    Of course, as a loserboy nerd you have no idea what you're blabbering about. Wait until my ShitOnYourFaceMFD is ready.

  22. Re:Video games? on PhD Candidate Talks About the Physics of Space Battles · · Score: -1

    Ain't no one. But if you're not a loserboy nerd, I mean if you're a real jock, an athletic mentally and physically superior specimen, a true quarterback of the Cosmos, you could try the freeware space simulator Orbiter which is based on real, meaty, harsh physics. The stuff nerds cannot understand with their laughable trekkie obsessions.
    Of course, space combat is not really a feature there but a work in progress. But as a real jock who can command programming, you should be able to write your own space-fighter add-on.

  23. I'm a fuel atheist on Lotus Teases With a Fuel-Agnostic Two-Stroke Engine · · Score: -1

    I don't believe in fuel and I have no need for it. Our engines would be better off abandoning those superstitious beliefs they need any of this "fuel" to do anything.

  24. Re:I'm writing this comment from 2017 on LHC Knocked Out By Another Power Failure · · Score: -1

    You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation.

  25. Re:And what happens.. on Air Cannon Ties Pirates In Knots · · Score: -1

    It happens that, like with all weapons, the better and faster shot wins. So, arm yourself because no one else here with save you.