Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Domains

Domain: 64.233.167.104

Stories and comments across the archive that link to 64.233.167.104.

Comments · 495

  1. "I'm being censored!!" -battle cry of a wikinutter by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Interesting · on WikiPedia Founder Wales Speaks About Wikinews

    I feel I should chime in here, as the person who originally removed the geocities links from the article.

    I removed the link because; number one - wikipedia does not publish original research, two -Jim Baldrson has been a known trollish crazy on Kuro5hin for years and a troll on Usenet for over a DECADE landing himself on a kook-of-the-month list way back in 1994, three -The ideas expressed on his geocities site (which is down now but I'll link anyway, maybe it'll be back up) are just plain insane. Here's a real gem: "Immigration Causes Autism" a lovely little racist tract (also, racist extremists endorse his views), fourth -he started editing wikipedia articles in suspicious anti-semitic and racist ways (see here, though these are merely revivals of his MANY earlier anti-Jewish ramblings) though his changes were reverted by other users fairly quickly, fifth -he seems to go "underground" when he's noticed by others as a problem and then starts posting changes to articles using only his IP. So in conclusion I think its quite clear that neither he nor his ideas or motives are trustworthy. He is closely watched on wikipedia right now and I doubt he will get away with too much shenanigans.

    One hilarious bit of irony I can't help but relish is that he came here to cry a river about how he was being "censored" on wikipedia and then had four +5 comments posted below him agreeing with his opposition after recognizing him for the kook he is. Wow, congrats Jim!

  2. Re:Only 25 years? by Flower · · Score: 1 · on Laser Painting Could Lead to 25-Year Prison Term

    One cite from Google cache. I won't invest the time to recover the other one I read about on CNN which I recall citing the Patriot Act directly. Not for an abusive AC.

  3. Google Cache by jasonmantey · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    Page 1 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:0MMZI6RZ4OIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html+&hl=en&client=fi refox-a Page 2 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 3 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 4 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 5 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 6 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 7 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 8 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 9 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 10 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en&client=firef ox-a

  4. Google Cache by jasonmantey · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    Page 1 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:0MMZI6RZ4OIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html+&hl=en&client=fi refox-a Page 2 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 3 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 4 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 5 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 6 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 7 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 8 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 9 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 10 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en&client=firef ox-a

  5. Google Cache by jasonmantey · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    Page 1 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:0MMZI6RZ4OIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html+&hl=en&client=fi refox-a Page 2 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 3 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 4 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 5 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 6 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 7 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 8 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 9 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 10 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en&client=firef ox-a

  6. Google Cache by jasonmantey · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    Page 1 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:0MMZI6RZ4OIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html+&hl=en&client=fi refox-a Page 2 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 3 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 4 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 5 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 6 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 7 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 8 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 9 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 10 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en&client=firef ox-a

  7. Google Cache by jasonmantey · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    Page 1 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:0MMZI6RZ4OIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html+&hl=en&client=fi refox-a Page 2 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 3 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 4 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 5 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 6 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 7 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 8 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 9 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 10 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en&client=firef ox-a

  8. Google Cache by jasonmantey · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    Page 1 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:0MMZI6RZ4OIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html+&hl=en&client=fi refox-a Page 2 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 3 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 4 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 5 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 6 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 7 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 8 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 9 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 10 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en&client=firef ox-a

  9. Google Cache by jasonmantey · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    Page 1 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:0MMZI6RZ4OIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html+&hl=en&client=fi refox-a Page 2 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 3 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 4 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 5 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 6 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 7 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 8 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 9 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 10 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en&client=firef ox-a

  10. Google Cache by jasonmantey · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    Page 1 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:0MMZI6RZ4OIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html+&hl=en&client=fi refox-a Page 2 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 3 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 4 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 5 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 6 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 7 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 8 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 9 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 10 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en&client=firef ox-a

  11. Google Cache by jasonmantey · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    Page 1 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:0MMZI6RZ4OIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html+&hl=en&client=fi refox-a Page 2 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 3 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 4 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 5 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 6 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 7 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 8 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 9 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 10 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en&client=firef ox-a

  12. Google Cache by jasonmantey · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    Page 1 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:0MMZI6RZ4OIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html+&hl=en&client=fi refox-a Page 2 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 3 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 4 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 5 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 6 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 7 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 8 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 9 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en&client=firefo x-a Page 10 http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en&client=firef ox-a

  13. Google Cache: by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:YJVHxs5VtxQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:6l-VIcR0iMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8KIDC55vCFMJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ICkFqS3PwFsJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:tf3yqAiAm1MJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ontDTq5hoMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:LjrgtRXHr7gJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en

  14. Google Cache: by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:YJVHxs5VtxQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:6l-VIcR0iMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8KIDC55vCFMJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ICkFqS3PwFsJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:tf3yqAiAm1MJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ontDTq5hoMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:LjrgtRXHr7gJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en

  15. Google Cache: by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:YJVHxs5VtxQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:6l-VIcR0iMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8KIDC55vCFMJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ICkFqS3PwFsJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:tf3yqAiAm1MJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ontDTq5hoMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:LjrgtRXHr7gJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en

  16. Google Cache: by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:YJVHxs5VtxQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:6l-VIcR0iMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8KIDC55vCFMJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ICkFqS3PwFsJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:tf3yqAiAm1MJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ontDTq5hoMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:LjrgtRXHr7gJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en

  17. Google Cache: by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:YJVHxs5VtxQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:6l-VIcR0iMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8KIDC55vCFMJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ICkFqS3PwFsJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:tf3yqAiAm1MJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ontDTq5hoMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:LjrgtRXHr7gJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en

  18. Google Cache: by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:YJVHxs5VtxQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:6l-VIcR0iMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8KIDC55vCFMJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ICkFqS3PwFsJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:tf3yqAiAm1MJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ontDTq5hoMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:LjrgtRXHr7gJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en

  19. Google Cache: by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:YJVHxs5VtxQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:6l-VIcR0iMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8KIDC55vCFMJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ICkFqS3PwFsJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:tf3yqAiAm1MJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ontDTq5hoMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:LjrgtRXHr7gJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en

  20. Google Cache: by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:YJVHxs5VtxQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:6l-VIcR0iMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8KIDC55vCFMJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ICkFqS3PwFsJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:tf3yqAiAm1MJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ontDTq5hoMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:LjrgtRXHr7gJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en

  21. Google Cache: by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Informative · on What Do You Believe Even If You Can't Prove It?

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:_mP4gzFI0u8J: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_2.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ftSUFD3pHfIJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_3.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:YJVHxs5VtxQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_4.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:6l-VIcR0iMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_5.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:8KIDC55vCFMJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_6.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ICkFqS3PwFsJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_7.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:tf3yqAiAm1MJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_8.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ontDTq5hoMQJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_9.html+&hl=en http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:LjrgtRXHr7gJ: www.edge.org/q2005/q05_10.html+&hl=en

  22. Re:Freedom by cshark · · Score: 2, Informative · on RIAA Loses DMCA Subpoena Case Against Charter

    Why? The Judicial branch is mostly the only form of government that is not corrupted. They don't take bribes like Senators and the Executive branches do. This allows them to speak sense without restriction. This is a rare example of how the United States is supposed to function; it is a little glimpse into our great paste. Savor in this moment people, for it is rare.

    You're generally right, except for judges in states where they need to be elected. There is growing concern in the judicial community that this practice hinders the judge's ability to be impartial because they have to fund raise like any other politician. Interestingly enough, Missouri has both systems in place.

    According to this:

    In Missouri , judges are selected by one of two methods: election; and the so-called " Missouri system." Most counties elect trial court judges . The rest of the judges , including the judges of the three courts of appeals and the justices of the supreme court, are appointed by the Governor. The trial court judges selected in this way are mainly in urban areas where election fraud, etc., was a problem in the time of the political machines.

    However, the Governor does not have every lawyer in the state from whom to choose. Rather, nominees must be screened by a judicial selection commission composed of lawyers from the jurisdiction who themselves have been by all lawyers in the area. The commission presents the Governor with a panel of three names from which to choose. The Governor may either choose one, or reject the entire panel, whereupon the entire process begins anew.

    In this case, it sounds like we're looking at an appointed judge, which explains why he was so literal with the law (in this case, it's a good thing ). I think it might be an interesting exercise to look at the verdicts passed in favor of the entertainment industry, and then cross reference that with the method by which judges are appointed/elected, and weather or not any of them took money from the entertainment industry in the form of campaign contributions in the case of elected judges.

    I wonder if anyone else has done any research like that. I imagine Groklaw has probably played with the idea.

  23. Darknet (the book) vs. the Wired article? by mah! · · Score: 1 · on Inside the Shadow Internet
    Hpw does the Wired article relate to the book Darknet and for example this chapter?

    some parts seem to be copied almost verbatim...

  24. Well so much for the PDF... by yuriismaster · · Score: 4, Informative · on Safecracking for the Computer Scientist

    Cmon, you expected a 2.5 mb file to last...

    Here's Google's HTML-ification of the pdf (sans said 'pretty pictures')

  25. Re:Laser as a Weapon. by shadowbearer · · Score: 1 · on Green Security Clearance Laser Pistol Available
    The Geneva convention disallows the use of the M2 as a weapon against personnel, only equipment.



    Not according to this guy



    Not like the incoming munitions wouldn't be finishing him off any moment anyway.

    Yup, if you're in the beam cone it's prolly time to grab yer ankles :D

    SB

  26. Re:What about Brazil? by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 1 · on The Coming Atlantic Mega-Tsunami

    Uhh, not so fast. Maybe you should check your facts.

  27. Re:Stingy Americans? Here's One... by stupidfoo · · Score: 1 · on Quake Changes Earth's Rotation, Moves Islands

    Here is a rather good article on ODA by country. You'll see USA has the stingiest "1st world" government offering with only 0.14% of GDP.

    And, once again, that figure only counts money/aid given. It does not count military humanitarian expenditures, of which the US does a ton of, and most importantly it does not cover private donations, most of which are not in the form of large donations from Gates (which gain the most headlines), but in small, individual donations, which carry no crazy conspiratorial connections.

    The fact is, with private donations which total over 200% of what the government gives, the US is extremely charitable. We are the most charitable per capita in private donations. It's a fact. If you want to get hung up over the low public funding, that's fine, and there would be a problem with it if there wasn't the massive amount of private giving that takes place.

    The European total absolutely dwarfs the USA total and is a fairer comparison for populations.

    European population: 729,966,641
    Even if you take out Russia you're still at about 600,000,000, roughly twice that of the US. With that taken into account Europe puts out roughly $42 billion in public funding, the US puts out roughly $16 billion (or 38% of Europe's total, with 48% of the population - and this is with Russia removed). Now, if you compare the European public funding with American private funding, some other numbers appear. American private funding is roughly $28-$30 billion which is about 70% of the European funding with the US again only have about 48% of the population.

    American's, on average, donate 2% of their income to charity (both domestic and international), or roughly ~$800 per person. The figures for 2003 are at roughly $236 billion.

    Some EU examples:
    UK: ~$150 per person
    Germany: $50 per person
    Netherlands: $251 per person

    So, take those numbers, add them to the number for per capita giving by their respective governments, and the US is clearly on top. By a large amount. I would like to be able to split all of the above data into international and domestic giving per capita, but I don't have the data for the UK, Germany, or the Netherlands. For the US it would be ~$150 a person, or a little under 20%.

    based on: Private Donations for International Development and Europe Population

    If you want to continue harping on low public funding, you can, but then we might as well just be done.

  28. Re:cable co by PitaBred · · Score: 1 · on Windows Media Center Edition vs. The World

    Read this and come back again. Thanks for playing.

  29. anti? by Quixote · · Score: 1 · on Paint.NET: The Anti-GIMP?
    The Anti-GIMP?

    Why should the existence of a free paint program be "anti-Gimp" ? It's not like there's room for only 1 free paint app! The more, the merrier I say!

    What is interesting is that Microsoft supported this. And the license is BSD-like; which is good.

    First MSI. And now this. Could it be that Microsoft is inching towards opening up to OSS ideas?

  30. google cache by k3v0 · · Score: 4, Informative · on Paint.NET: The Anti-GIMP?

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:M2DW9zE1bnIJ: www.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/+&hl=en/

  31. Security is an illusion ... by Gopal.V · · Score: 4, Interesting · on WEP And PPTP Password Crackers Released
    To be truthful, nothing is secure ... It can only be "Secure Enough". If the cost of breaking something is more than the benifit - that is security in one sense.

    Any encryption can be broken - given enough resources ... The trick is to make it so difficult that nobody finds out unless they are prepared to invest more than what you did (time, computing power, money, technology).

    Interestingly in India, according to Department of Telecom website - security means something different :).
    23. Individuals/Groups/Organisations are permitted to use encryption upto 40 bit key length in the RSA algorithms or its equivalent in other algorithms without having to obtain permission from the Telecom Authority. However, if encryption equipments higher than this limit are to be deployed, individuals/groups/organisations shall do so with the prior written permission of the Telecom Authority and deposit the decryption key, split into two parts, with the Telecom Authority.
    We have to keep our private keys in ESCROW to use >40 bit encryption ... Talk about stupid laws (of course which no-one enforces or obeys).
  32. Bzzzt...wrong by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Informative · on High School Dropout, Self-Taught Chip Designer

    It appears that it's properly licensed.

    Commodore isn't exactly the big juggernaut it was 20 years ago...I'd venture to say that the owner of the brand is not exactly "well lawyered". Rather than aim to shut her down, I think they gladly paid her for the idea in hopes of finally making money off the brand for the first time in ages.

    Of all the big names of the past I'd say Commodore is the safest bet on the emulation scene. The other big players 20 years ago? Apple, Atari, IBM, perhaps you could include Tandy and TI in there as well. There are still big companies behind all those brands, and in some cases they have demonstrated a willingness to defend their rights to those brands even if they no longer support those old products.

    Jeri's a sharp cookie, she has gotten in on the leading edge of a craze. Those retro joysticks (a lot of them pirate NES knockoffs) are all over the malls this Christmas...it's quite possible they will be a real craze next year. Whether they'll remain popular in the long haul I'm not sure. In any case, the original NY Times article is right, Jeri has all the hallmarks of becoming another Woz or Burell or Dr. Roberts. I'd ventrue to say there'll be more neat stuff to come from here in the future.

  33. Re:Coral Cache by modifried · · Score: 1 · on Build Your Own Teleprompter

    Also, Google Cache.

  34. Re:On the rocks, please. by KarMann · · Score: 1 · on Saturn's Rings Could be Disappearing

    Hmm, there was supposed to be a link for that first sentence. If the link doesn't work right here, and this Google search doesn't link right either, go Google yourself for "Mars water Dasani site:.theonion.com", follow the only link that comes up, you'll see what I mean.

  35. Disagreement based on gross errors by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 1 · on Liquid Oxygen from Lunar Rocks
    I started to check some of your figures and found gross errors starting with your atmospheric densities. My CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (55th ed.) lists density values almost an order of magnitude lower than your calculator does for the lower altitudes:

    100 km 8.0e-7 kg/m^3
    120 km 5.0e-8 kg/m^3
    150 km 3.0e-9 kg/m^3

    Et cetera. I found this a bit odd, so I decided to confirm with the Standard Atmosphere table in the CRC Handbook of Tables for Engineering Science, 2nd ed. This book yielded these figures from table 7-3:

    100 km 5.0e-7 kg/m^3
    200 km 3.3e-10 kg/m^3
    400 km 6.5e-12 kg/m^3

    Table 7-5 lists temperatures, molecular weights and pressures rather than densities, but we can calculate density from rho = mw*P/RT. I get similar figures for the 600K exospheric temperature table (calculated using oocalc):

    120 km 380.0 K 26.77 g/mol 2.30E-005 mb 1.95E-008 kg/m^3
    140 km 483.9 K 25.40 g/mol 5.92E-006 mb 3.74E-009 kg/m^3
    160 km 535.0 K 23.90 g/mol 2.00E-006 mb 1.07E-009 kg/m^3
    180 km 561.1 K 22.32 g/mol 7.80E-007 mb 3.73E-010 kg/m^3
    200 km 574.1 K 20.79 g/mol 3.36E-007 mb 1.46E-010 kg/m^3
    250 km 593.7 K 17.85 g/mol 5.53E-008 mb 2.00E-011 kg/m^3
    300 km 598.4 K 16.06 g/mol 1.19E-008 mb 3.84E-012 kg/m^3
    400 km 599.9 K 11.30 g/mol 9.91E-010 mb 2.25E-013 kg/m^3

    Second, you assume that the skyhook would go down to 100 km. I did not say this, I said 120 km (roughly the altitude that SS1 actually reached); this knocks 1.5 orders of magnitude off the maximum air density as well as cutting the speed of the segment below 400 km. If this remains a problem, the pickup could be moved up to 150 km and knock another 1.2 orders of magnitude off the density and another good fraction of the airspeed.

    Third, you assumed a very large width for the skyhook. The tensile strength of both standard grade carbon fiber and Spectra is about 3.5 gigapascals, and a 3.3 ton vehicle accelerating at 3 G would weigh roughly 100 kN; at a 100% safety factor the cross-sectional area required would be only 0.57 cm^2, or a circular cross-section about 0.85 cm across. There's another half order of magnitude for you, assuming that you don't elongate the cross-section and align it with the direction of motion to cut drag further.

    Fourth, the skyhook only dips into the atmosphere for a small part of each rotation, and only when it is at perigee while it goes through vertical alignment. Keeping it in an elliptical orbit and avoiding the atmosphere when not required would further reduce the average drag.

    In conclusion, you should revisit your calculations using better data and more realistic assumptions.

  36. Re:WOW by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1 · on Lego Logic Gates

    Wrong.

    Show me how to build an AND or OR gate in CMOS with less than 4 transistors. I will happily show you how to build a 4 transistor NAND gate. (roughly halfway down the page.)

  37. Mandrake Charts Available by tashanna · · Score: 2, Informative · on Boot Process Visualization

    If you search around in the Google Cache, you can find a link to a Mandrake Wiki that has several bootchart images.

    - Tash

  38. Mirror by kmmatthews · · Score: 1 · on Boot Process Visualization

    To reply to my own post, http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:A3PMVcmM0kIJ: www.klika.si/ziga/bootchart/+&hl=en, a google cache. Err, not very useful, no graphics and only a minor explanation, but..

  39. Duh ! ... It's an exe + bootstrap for JIT by Gopal.V · · Score: 3, Informative · on A .Net CPU
    .NET is a JIT engine , it's designed explicitly for JIT'ing ... It does produce a .exe file which has a main which calls the Mscoree.dll with the current file and starts up the VM using the bytecode data. The EXE part is just bootstrap code , the rest is JIT'd .

    Read this paper about how many hoops you have to go through to get a decent interpreter for .NET. And it blatantly ignores the _Main() x86 native code that's in the .exe files.

  40. Re:Great styling. by demachina · · Score: 1 · on Reliving The Glory Days of SGI

    Here is a pretty good link(from google cache) on ILM's Linux transition.

    Bottomline the thing gained in dumping SGI was a 5X performance improvement at a much lower cost which shows you how far behind the power curve SGI's workstations are. IA32, Nvidia and ATI have been making giant leaps while SGI has been taking baby steps for years.

    I should note a key factor in this saga, as memory serves, was Intel cut an NDA with DEC to evaluate the Alpha architecture for future inclusion in their product line, Alpha being the reigning performance king at the time. As memory serves Intel just stole all the performance jewels out of their documents, incorporated them in Pentium Pro and beyond and told DEC to go to hell. DEC did win a judgement against them over this blatant theft by Intel, but by then the damage was done to RISC, Intel achieved performance parity at a much lower cost and higher volume and the RISC workstation market was doomed.

    I should also note one area SGI might still be able to compete at big studios is in storage and networks. They do still have a good story on IO, disk farms and high speed networking. This is crucial to most studios since they store and move tons of images, textures, scenes, etc to workstations, rendering and compositing farms. They do still have a story for specialized hardware intensive applications like Discrete's high end applications. But SGI simply has no story for workstations or rendering farms in today's studio's and hasn't had one for years.

  41. Google cache by Joey+Patterson · · Score: -1 · on How Sony's HD Audio Player Falls Short

    Google cache

  42. Blocklists, Teergrubes, Bandwidth Suckers by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative · on De-spamming Your Inbox The Hard Way
    Active cracker DDOSing is mean and nasty and you shouldn't do it. But there are better-behaved ways to use group efforts to stop spammers.
    • Blocklists are of course a critical tool - identify the spammers or the relays/proxies/zombies they exploit, publish their addresses so that people can reject mail from them.
    • Sugarplums and other spam poisoners generate web pages full of bogus trap addresses for spammer address harvesters, so that they can DDOS themselves. Infinite-loop web pages, bogus email addresses, email addresses of other spammers, email addresses of teergrubes, spambait addresses on your machines that tell you to block anything from that IP address. Imagine if everybody set your 404-not-found page to include a few bogus addresses for spammers to email to...
    • Teergruben are modified tarpit mail servers that answer SMTP v...errrrryyyyyyyy... sssssssllllloooooooowwwwwwwlllllllly, and can keep SMTP senders that talk to them tied up for minutes or hours. If you're running real SMTP on the same machine, you can configure the tarpit function to only happen for recognized spammer IP addresses, or else you can run a dedicated server (e.g. if you're not running your own SMTP on your DSL or cable modem.) One of these doesn't make much difference. Lots of teergrubes can tie up lots of spammers.
    • Bandwidth Suckers like Artists Against 419 repeatedly download images from spammer websites to tie up their bandwidth. Because many web sites and ISPs charge for bandwidth on a 95th percentile basis, two days of heavy downloads can totally jack their bandwidth bill for a month, and small sites (e.g. free web pages) that have quotas can be taken out for the month by aggressive downloads (1GB is about 6 hours at 384kbps, so you can blow out a small quota overnight.)
  43. Get yer fuckin' cache right here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1 · on Science in Antarctica

    bitches.

  44. In related news... by Sheepdot · · Score: 1 · on Search Engines for Handwritten Documents

    such as the 140,000 [handwritten] pages that make up George Washington's personal papers in the Library of Congress.

    In related news, the family of Tobias Lear, George Washington's personal secretary, who took his own life (arguably due to the horrible pain in his wrists), has filed suit.

  45. In related news... by Sheepdot · · Score: 1 · on Search Engines for Handwritten Documents

    such as the 140,000 [handwritten] pages that make up George Washington's personal papers in the Library of Congress.

    In related news, the family of Tobias Lear, George Washington's personal secretary, who took his own life (arguably due to the horrible pain in his wrists), has filed suit.

  46. Re:Dow-chem chairman Warren Anderson by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative · on Bhopal Disaster Revisited [updated]
    ...the current state of criminal law doesn't really recognize something as "reckless neglect". There is recklessness and there is neglect.

    Quite correct. The technical term I was grasping for--but couldn't quite reach, this morning--was "depraved indifference". Deaths as a consequence of depraved indifference qualify as second-degree murder in New York state; in other jurisdictions your mileage may vary. (Here's the PDF of the standard directions to a New York jury for a depraved indifference second degree murder charge; also available the Google HTMLified version.)

    Obviously, such a criminal finding might be challenging to come by. You'd have to prove that specific individuals at Union Carbide knew that their facility was unsafe, and that a fatal accident was a reasonably foreseeable outcome, and that they failed to take reasonable steps to protect the public. It is indeed a high bar to clear.

  47. its not as hard as it sounds.... by draos · · Score: 1 · on Live to be 1000 Years Old?

    If we can extend the life of 60 year old to 100 and in that 40 years learn to extend his life to 150 and in that 50 years extend it another 50 then we'll stay ahead of the game and extend life indefinately. We don't need to cure aging today , just take the first step before I die :) This link [google cache] shows how its planned out.

  48. BBN DEVLOPED this YEARS AGO, patent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0 · on Gunshot Tracking Cameras to be Deployed in LA

    BBN TECHNOLOGIES out of Cambridge mass. Developed an acoustically system that can pinpoint a bullet form the soundwave created by the bullet cutting through the air, it was deployed in a form in iraq. It can even tell you the type of arm that fired the bullet.

    Google cache: here

  49. Re:Media Portal by sp00 · · Score: 2, Informative · on Open Source Multimedia Center For Windows

    Ummm.... yeah... Linky!

  50. Found it! by celerityfm · · Score: 1 · on China Blocking Access to Google News Site
    Regarding the land bridge and animals becoming infected with chemical and biological weapons by crossing over to the island in the Caspian Sea:

    CNN wrote about it. Look near the bottom for the juicy stuff:

    "This island is definitely a potential time bomb, because the shrinking of the sea and the likely emergence within a few years of a land bridge to the mainland and the possibility that insects and rodents, carrying deadly diseases, could cross over and infect the local population," Tucker said.

    The article is a little over 5 years old.. so uhm. Be on the lookout :(