Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Teleprompter

bigt_littleodd writes "Ever been in the situation where a certain expensive piece of equipment would be ideal to do the job at hand, but you would probably never ever need it to use it again, thus making the purchase/rental of equipment prohibitive? Here's a guy that had such a need and built a teleprompter with easy-to-find materials, a camcorder and a laptop."

218 comments

  1. Rental prohibitive? by 31415926535897 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Ever been in the situation where a certain expensive piece of equipment would be ideal to do the job at hand, but you would probably never ever need it to use it again, thus making the purchase/rental of equipment prohibitive?"

    If it's expensive (i.e. specialized), and you only have to use it once, then wouldn't rental be ideal? I would rather rent an expensive piece of equipment once, than roll my own and hope that it works (half as well as the real thing).

    I guess it comes down to what your time is worth, but personally, I would want to rent in a situation like this.

    1. Re:Rental prohibitive? by nbert · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I agree that it wasn't a good choice to mention renting as a choice in the article.

      But I completely agree that it often makes more sense to build some device out of old parts instead of buying expensive gear. Most of the time such things are expensive because:

      *There is just a small market and/or
      *it's too hard for Joe Sixpack to build it

      It's nowadays possible to build just about anything with cheap components or even stuff which is considered trash. So if you have time and imagination at hand it's a good idea to think of building stuff on your own.
      Especially if the money you saved is lower than the income you would have had if you spend the same time at work :)

    2. Re:Rental prohibitive? by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Seems to me it could be much faster to drill the info into one's head by rote, than it would be to build such a device for just one use.

    3. Re:Rental prohibitive? by Coach+Mike · · Score: 1

      The guy was out in the boondocks and made such a rental impractical. There's ideal, and there's real. Oh, but you'd have to RTFA once to know.

    4. Re:Rental prohibitive? by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sometimes it is a matter of opportunity costs. There may be limited funds, and if those funds are spent on project A, say a TelePrompter, then funds will not be available for project B, say buying dinner for clients after the presentation. Since dinner must be bought, the TelePrompter must be homemade. And while your time is worth something, the time spent in building the TelePrompter will be billed as an investment in acquiring clients and building the business.

      This is really why windows was used so much in the 90's. The computer were relatively cheap. The software was easy to acquire for little cash. The stability compared to other platforms was irrelevant because software for other platforms was harder to get. Money spent on software was not seen an investment to build the business.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Rental prohibitive? by dubiousmike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      for a video professional, time is money. If he has the time to build a telepromter instead of just buying one that uses a PDA and comes with appropriate PDA software, he can't be that good at producing video.

      They are so cheap, his time SHOULD be worth more than the hours to build one.

      That said, he was industrious. Though he built one that is prohibitive to shooting on location. That thing is huge.

    6. Re:Rental prohibitive? by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1

      Why rent when you can build? It's more fun, and chances are you'll learn af ew things in the process. Do it the geek way - build it from scratch! :)

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    7. Re:Rental prohibitive? by RipTides9x · · Score: 1

      After making an informational video for a high school project one time, let me tell you, it's more difficult than you can imagine. Anything that requires a good speil of dialogue all at once, can be intimidating, difficult, and required many many many takes. We spent the whole week after school as the TFA says of trying various cue cards, card placments and cards with just key words. But on viewing the video, it ended up being totally fucked up when a person would pause, look away camera then continue or just looking off camera the whole entire time. So back to doing it as you say "by rote" and spent the rest of an entire weekend getting everyones bit recorded just right and edited into place. If we had had anything like this back 14 years ago now that could have been easily made, on the net, etc.. would have made the whole ordeal much better.

    8. Re:Rental prohibitive? by Feanturi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I used to have to do a verbal presentation once a month in school, and I did all my prep at the last minute, the night before. I wouldn't even write it until that final evening. It would take a couple hours tops, so that's where I got the impression it wasn't much of a deal to do. Practice makes perfect, don't roll the camera until the words are coming naturally. But I guess when there are other people involved and having to have their shit together at the same time, it would be a hassle after all.

    9. Re:Rental prohibitive? by iocat · · Score: 1

      How long were your takes? Anything longer than a minute or two of you staring at the camera tends to be super-dull to watch. Even newscasts change the camera angle every minute or so, although you may not pay that much attention to it.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    10. Re:Rental prohibitive? by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      1)He was too far away to make it practical
      2)It wasn't in his budget

      I can relate to #2 - I work for one of the TV networks -a "real" prompter is NOT cheap to rent, but they DO a LOT more than what his laptop does, and he admits that. A "real" prompter has default scroll rates for different readers, the rate can be adjusted on the fly, and the up coming text can be change up to the last second (it's usually set to lock out text changes once they are displayed. Remember, your average show is made up of many segments, and you have associated cues that tell people OTHER than the reader what to do, but you may have a box on the set that is scrolling those, which is linked to the prompter

      Of course, we could start discussing how a prompter gets hooked into a newsroom type system, but then you'd have to hire me :)

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    11. Re:Rental prohibitive? by Baricom · · Score: 1

      I can second that. As someone who has spent quite a lot of time in front of a camera and prompter, I can say that the two most important factors are scroll quality and speed.

      Despite the FP's comment, you do not want to use PowerPoint for prompting. Talent is most comfortable with words that scroll continuously and smoothly, like the paper rolls that were cranked before the computerized prompter was developed. For that reason, I also have a feeling that paging through a PDF document is not the best way to accomplish this.

      You also want an attentive, knowledgable operator running the prompter - somebody who can hold a hand control and set the speed to precisely match your pace (and does nothing but that during a program). It's ideal to keep the current text around the second line, so the talent has plenty of look-ahead and a line or two in case your speed doesn't exactly match up.

      Since 99% of the shows I did went out live, I understand my situation is a little different than Lawler's, but I still can't help but cringe thinking about using my toes to click a mouse hooked up to the prompter. *shudder*

    12. Re:Rental prohibitive? by pstapley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seriously I need your guys' money. I don't have a laptop or a camcorder lying around. I have never been able to afford either. $%#@$(^!

    13. Re:Rental prohibitive? by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be good to rent certain software such as partition magic? I mean if I forked out the money for a full version of partition magic and then only used it once or twice I would feel ripped. $5 for a weeks usage would sit just right for me though. However untill something like that becomes available its suprnova for me.

    14. Re:Rental prohibitive? by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      for a video professional, time is money. If he has the time to build a telepromter instead of just buying one that uses a PDA and comes with appropriate PDA software, he can't be that good at producing video. They are so cheap, his time SHOULD be worth more than the hours to build one.

      May be the guy isn't a professional. He certainly doesn't claim to be one.

    15. Re:Rental prohibitive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's really not such a bad idea

    16. Re:Rental prohibitive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teleprompter Rentals can cost from $600 to $1200 a day.

  2. Cool Idea by mrbcs · · Score: 0

    Not that I'd ever have need for one, but I think it's a very cool idea.

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
  3. teleporter? by Leers · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was I the only one who read that as "build your own teleporter?"

    Too much Si Fi....

    1. Re: teleporter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The alphabet dancing in front of your eyes... time to get some sleep, dude.

    2. Re:teleporter? by bigberk · · Score: 1
      Hey kids, build your own teleporter this holiday! You'll need:
      • A couple laser pointers
      • Mirrors and beam splitters
      • Tin foil
      • Liquid helium
      • A ruler
      • One large table compensated for zero micron vibrations
      We rummaged through the dumpster behind CERN to find our phase splitters, but you can also make your own using cellophane and spraypaint.
    3. Re:teleporter? by Almond+Paste · · Score: 0

      I also read teleporter and thought to myself: Finally, they've made it!!!

    4. Re:teleporter? by CyberVenom · · Score: 1

      Actually that's exactly what I read too. It sounded interesting. Then I realized it was only a teleprompter. That's old news. Been there, built that. ;) I built a teleprompter from an old pentium laptop, a floppy disk, a parellel cable, 3 Roland DP-12 foot pedals, and some assembly code. Works great. My friend Johnny used it when he toured with Axel Rudi Pell in europe early this year. It runs right from the bootloader off a floppy; no OS or hard drive needed. I wrote my own variable-width bitmap font engine, so I can use pretty much any size bitmap font on the screen for easy readability. As far as user-interface, there are two modes: title mode, and lyric mode. The center foot pedal flips between the two modes. When in lyric mode, the lyrics for a particular title are displayed on the screen one page at a time, and the left and right pedals flip through pages. When in title mode, one title is displayed on the screen at a time (along with any notes about the title), and left and right pedals flip through titles.

    5. Re:teleporter? by mandolin · · Score: 1
      Yeah. I thought the next part was leading to some kind of l33t equipment-sharing scheme.

      "Ever been in the situation where a certain expensive piece of equipment would be ideal to do the job at hand, but you would probably never ever need it to use it again, thus making the purchase/rental of equipment prohibitive? Here's a guy that had such a need and built a teleporter with easy-to-find materials, a camcorder and a laptop. When he's done with the equipment he releases it into the para-dimensional ether, ready for random nerds in need to retrieve it."

    6. Re:teleporter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it GPL'd? Where can I download the source?

    7. Re:teleporter? by sinner0423 · · Score: 1

      "Was I the only one who read that as "build your own teleporter?"

      No, No you weren't. I actually got disappointed when I re-read it.

    8. Re:teleporter? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      No. You're not. I was thinking. "OK, This Star Trek crap has gone far enough!"

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    9. Re:teleporter? by domc · · Score: 1

      You forgot duct tape...

      Dom

    10. Re:teleporter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omfg domo is that you? didn't you have a QM exam tonight?

    11. Re:teleporter? by Performaman · · Score: 0

      Hey, you're not the one who's brother came home yesterday complaining that he got in trouble for "beaming" (using IrDA) on his school's AlphaSmart.
      He had to write an essay on it, and I sarcastically told him to say that beaming was dangerous because it could create evil twins.

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
    12. Re:teleporter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually built one. Give me your living room lat and lng. I will tell you how I did it. Let me know what time is good for you. I have to warn you, I've already been partying tonight though....

    13. Re:teleporter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could filter out "I read this as ..." posts

    14. Re:teleporter? by glazed · · Score: 1

      No, I saw it the same way with my own bleary eyes.

    15. Re:teleporter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now where am I gonna get a ruler?

    16. Re:teleporter? by ankhank · · Score: 1

      Well, no.

      But you're the only one who got that version of the project, built it, and is still there on that planet.

      The rest of them built the teleporter and arrived here, with us.

      The reciprocal interdimensional slip has confused the heck out of those of us who got the alternate version -- what are we supposed to be doing this this "teleprompter" thing? It does NOT seem to get us anywhere, faster ....

  4. What? by Guillermito · · Score: 2, Interesting
    would be ideal to do the job at hand, but you would probably never ever need it to use it again, thus making the purchase/ RENTAL of equipment prohibitive?
    I would rather say this is exactly the kind of situation in which renting the equipment makes sense.
    1. Re:What? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Its really a bad blurb; more like the lack of units available for rental in the local vicinity (the closest one he could find was a couple hundred miles out).

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teleprompter was the solution, but there are no teleprompters in our area, and renting one from Los Angeles or San Francisco - both hundreds of miles away - was impractical and beyond my budget.

      I would rather say this is exactly the kind of situation where you need to READ THE FUCKIN ARTICLE BEFORE POSTING YOUR IDIOTIC OPINIONS THAT ARE ALREADY COVERED IN THE FUCKIN ARTICLE.

      The 7th circle of hell is being saved for telemarketers, employees of Micro$0ft, and idiots who post without reading the article.

    3. Re:What? by Guillermito · · Score: 1

      I wasn't commenting on the article, but rather on the post, which is plain illogical.
      You don't have to read the article to realize that, because saying that it is prohibitive to rent something because you are using it just once is a contradiction in itself.
      The excerpt you cited doesn't cover that, it just says something different.

  5. Generic term plz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TelePrompTer is a registered trademark, nu? Like Rollerblades, Kleenex and Xerox.

    1. Re:Generic term plz by Socrates+Demise · · Score: 1

      What? In Front of Camera Word Displayer?

      --
      I hate stupid rules... Rules that make sense I don't mind... But the stupid ones just really bug me!
    2. Re:Generic term plz by wastingtape · · Score: 1

      Displayer? Most people i work with would probably have gone with "In Front of Camera Word Thingy"

  6. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by jm92956n · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know it's quite uncool to read the article and all. . .

    But even with sophisticated presentation software, there's still a basic problem: when you're reading a screen, you're not looking directly at the camera. And that's bad. Which is why this guy's teleprompter is directly in front of the camera, and he can maintain proper eye contact throughout.

    --
    An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
  7. ProPrompter by Mechnoch · · Score: 1

    I know the guy who developed the ProPrompter, and GoPrompter. Much more mobile than the setup in TFA. http://www.proprompter.com/

    --
    .mechnoch
    1. Re:ProPrompter by Mechnoch · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I heard about this bug with certain shopping cart systems. I'll have to let the man know that this could be a potential liability... Thanks!

      --
      .mechnoch
    2. Re:ProPrompter by jci · · Score: 1

      But I am pretty confident that the teleprompter in the article cost much much less than $1695 when counting the laptop as existing equipment.

    3. Re:ProPrompter by o0m · · Score: 1

      I used one on a dvcam and it worked well. Just wish I had time to get smother software the speed control has a little more to be desired. But the rig was solid and clean. I would much rather us the www.prompterpeople.com then a home build wooden rig. But I have to give him props for seeing a need and solving it on a low budget.

    4. Re:ProPrompter by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      In the meantime.... I'll take 3 of them!

    5. Re:ProPrompter by o0m · · Score: 1

      opps i was think of the www.prompterpeople.com never used a propromter.

  8. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by ttldkns · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when you RTFA you see that he tried to put a laptop just under the camera but it still looked stupid once it was on tape as he was looking down. With a teleprompter there is a sheet of glass placed infront of the camera at an angle, the camera sees through this just fine. There is then a source of light placed underneath and because of total internal reflection the light (or screen of text) gets reflected into your eyes. you can then read the word and look into the camera at the same time.

    --
    How many computers are too many?
  9. Coral Cache by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Coral Cache, Site going down quick.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Coral Cache by modifried · · Score: 1

      Also, Google Cache.

    2. Re:Coral Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it appears to be handling it just fine, right now.

      solaris, oracle, apache, java.

  10. something about those photos ... by timothy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I keep squinting and saying "Huh, is that a photo? Or a rendered graphic? No ... it's a photo! But hmmm ... it looks like a cool rendering."

    I'd be curious about how the photos were taken.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:something about those photos ... by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      My guess is that, being big into video, he happened to have a large white backdrop to shoot in front of. A lot of shots where you really shouldn't notice the background at all are shot in front of a white (or black, depending) wall / sheet / drape sort of thing.

      If you slowly curve it, and are good with the lighting, there are no evident lines (ie, where the wall meets the floor).

      He IS a videographer, so this type of stuff probably is part of what he does routinely.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:something about those photos ... by prockcore · · Score: 1


      I'd be curious about how the photos were taken.


      He's in a white room with diffuse lights. The result is very even lighting that looks very unnatural. It's the same look 3d artists get with skybox lighting and radiosity. Which is why it looks 3D.

    3. Re:something about those photos ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

      The uber-suckass-jpeg artifacts don't help much either.

  11. RTFA by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    teleprompter was the solution, but there are no teleprompters in our area, and renting one from Los Angeles or San Francisco - both hundreds of miles away - was impractical and beyond my budget.

    Renting is no good when you have to drive 200 miles round trip to rent+haul it.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:RTFA by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      Shipping wasn't an option? Yes, I realize that the mirror and LCD panel would need to be carefully packed but it's more than possible. If you can ship a few hundred thousands of dollars worth of (one) camera lens (they just did where I work) I'm sure a telepompter is nothing.

    2. Re:RTFA by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      Oh, by the way, I'm not knocking what he did in any way; it was cool and pretty smart and yes, renting still does cost money...this way he has one forever. My point was simply that renting is probably more of an option than most people would think. I'm in the middle of nowhere, the closest rental house is about an hour away, but I can think of two or three studios or commercial production houses that might rent out their prompters under the right circumstances.

  12. Well, Spank my ass and call me a slashdot whore. by Spackler · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bit by Bit: Forget Cue Cards, Make a Teleprompter!
    Creative problem solving is a trait many creative professionals share, but perhaps no one possesses that skill more than Brian P. Lawler. See how he made a teleprompter with a laptop, Adobe InDesign, and some scrap wood. Ingenious.

    (creativepro.com)
    By Brian P. Lawler, creativepro.com contributing editor
    Thursday, December 16, 2004

    It was Thursday evening and I needed a teleprompter.
    I was making a video about panoramic photography, and for the scenes where I speak directly into the camera I looked like a cross-eyed newscaster. While trying to read cue cards on a stand in front of the camera, my eyes were cast downward, and that looked odd.

    To overcome this problem, I decided to read from the screen of my PowerBook instead. I figured that I could put the PowerBook display closer to the lens, and thus not appear to be looking down when looking at the camera.

    But even with the text on the PowerBook screen, I still looked slightly downward when I wanted to look directly into the lens of the camera. A teleprompter was the solution, but there are no teleprompters in our area, and renting one from Los Angeles or San Francisco - both hundreds of miles away - was impractical and beyond my budget. I decided to build one.

    Discipline Makes Successful Video
    I am careful when making video productions to enforce a moviemaker's discipline upon myself and my hired crew and helpers. This is a skill learned from experience. When one is making a video, attention to detail, continuity, and story are critical. I find that I can't go back -- ever -- to shoot a fill-in scene; something will have changed, someone won't be available, the light will be different -- something will prevent success. Instead, I work to get it right the first time!

    In the back of my sketchbook I keep a cardboard template with four windows cut to the proportion of a television screen. I use this to draw frames for my storyboards, and then I sketch ideas and stories into the frames. My sketchbook thus becomes the foundation of many of my projects. I had been working on the storyboard for this video for several months, and the story and scene ideas covered many pages of the book (see Figure 1).

    From Sketchbook to Database
    After deciding to use a teleprompter, I wanted to convert the sketches in my book to visual elements of a script database. I scanned the pages of the sketchbook, and then cropped the individual frame drawings into small photos that I stored in a folder. I then built a FileMaker template, and imported all the images into that database. FileMaker is very accommodating in this respect -- it imported my entire folder of numbered images into the database automatically.

    Once the sketches were imported, I added descriptions, scene and shot numbers (used to sort the story into chapters), and the narration text. This method allowed me to develop the text that I would read into the camera using the teleprompter. Using FileMaker's sorting functions, I then generated a story that was in logical order with a narration that flows smoothly and which I could read easily. After sorting the script, I exported the script records into text, and then placed the resulting file in Adobe InDesign for my teleprompter needs.

    Construction of the teleprompter
    Having seen a number of commercial teleprompters over the years in television studios and at trade shows, I understood the concept. A teleprompter is a made of a sheet of glass suspended in front of the camera lens at a 45-degree angle. The glass reflects the image of a TV screen without affecting the light entering the lens. In the most sophisticated units, there is a controller -- and an operator -- to set the pace of the text scrolling on the screen. Mine is more primitive.

    My prompter is nothing more than a sheet of window glass supported in a plywood frame in front of the camera at the correct angle (see Figure 3). I probably spent three hours cutting and building. Once

  13. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're fucking stupid. RTFA and then get a clue.

  14. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good idea. If you read the article, he uses powerpoint...

  15. Basement Project by foistboinder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ruper Pupkin probably has one of these in his basement.

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. Re:Well, Spank my ass and call me a slashdot whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *spank*
    /. whore!

  18. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by omega_cubed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The part that actually requires construction is the part where he projects the text on a slab of glass that is placed between him and the video recorder.

    The whole point of the teleprompter, rather than a fancy-schmancy projected PowerPoint display, is that the person reading the teleprompter stares directly into the video camera: from his point of view the text is directly in front of the camera. The slab of glass at 45 degree angle means that the text on the prompter will not be reflected into the camera.

    Of course, the reflection means that the texts all apper mirrored, compared to the laptop screen. Personally, I don't understand why he needed to export the document in postscript and mirror flip it. Wouldn't it be alright if he just add another mirror?

    --
    Engineers also speak PDE, only in a different dialect.
  19. Free, easy, powerful way by tomocoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just open a text file in quicktime... It shows each line sequentially.

  20. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is parent modded down? grad-parent *was* being fucking stupid... id 56 and all

  21. Bush's Back Pack - Nifty Newfangled Teleprompter by QTeela · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe the little rectangular object that protruded from President Bush's backside during the debates was really a wireless teleprompter that transmitted wirelessly to an implant in the visual cortex of his brain. Better to rent than buy, though, unless it is upgradable.

  22. X + xrandr can mirror text by po8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The image on my home-built teleprompter was -- of course -- backward. I tried to find a way to reverse the entire screen, but that was fruitless.

    Note that with a modern version of the X server supporting Keith Packard's "Resize and Rotate" extension and utility, this could be easy. Just say "xrandr -x" to mirror the display left-to-right. (Unfortunately, this doesn't appear to work for all servers supporting the extension yet.)

    1. Re:X + xrandr can mirror text by bigberk · · Score: 2, Funny

      ???lamron ot kcab ti teg I od woh ,uoy nmad

    2. Re:X + xrandr can mirror text by reality-bytes · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've already been using this and it works a treat (for mirror augmented display).

      Dead simple, pixel for pixel quality and no hassle.

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  23. Prompter People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There's a company called Prompter People http://www.prompterpeople.com/that offers a solid professional teleprompting solution. They offer systems that can easily be moved from camera to camera, and it's a much better value than anything else out there (800 bucks for a professional quality setup). They have a website with a really informative video in both quicktime and windows media that basically says the same thing as the article without any of the reading. It's worth a watch if you want to learn more about how these work.

    1. Re:Prompter People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, go watch a video, because reading that short article is really, really difficult.

  24. Re:Ummmm,,, cue cards? by Skater · · Score: 1

    He did try that.

    I won't spoil the ending, though. You'll have to RTFA to see why he didn't use cue cards.

    --RJ

  25. make your own teleporter??? by master_p · · Score: 1

    Gee, technology has progressed really far. ...hmmm wait a minute...

  26. Re:Ummmm,,, cue cards? by Hungry+Student · · Score: 1

    Because cue cards don't solve the problem.

    The problem is that he wanted to look into the camera while reading his lines. Precisely the setting the teleprompter was designed for. Ergo, he made a teleprompter, as cue cards wouldn't do what he needed them to.

    Jeez, with this many cynics and naysayers around, its amazing anything gets made these days, "why think outside the box, just do a crappy substitute and make do".

  27. Teleporter by peeledback · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read this as "build your own teleporter".. been looking at the screen for too long !!

  28. better solution??? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    It sounds like this was a one time thing, so why not just memorize it or at least the main points? I taught public speaking for a year and saw dozens of students give 5-10 minute speeches with minimal notes. Seems like an easier solution to me.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    1. Re:better solution??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another good tip is to have a nip of alcohol before you get in front of the audience. I'm not joking here. Psychologists have found that alcohol suppresses self consciousness / self awareness, calming you down in social situations and letting you focus more on the task at hand - your speech. Tackling public speeches and getting good at them is quite the exhilirating experience, and I suggest giving it a go.

  29. Bunch of pussies by scenestar · · Score: 1, Funny

    there another cheap DIY method, its called: MEMORISING your fucking speech

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:Bunch of pussies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that was Kinda funny.. Really, can you remember 60 to a 100 pages of tech dialog?

    2. Re:Bunch of pussies by scenestar · · Score: 0

      just minor details

      --
      perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    3. Re:Bunch of pussies by wastingtape · · Score: 1

      it's hard to do that when you don't write them yourself. :P

  30. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by dirty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow, what an insightful comment! Everyone starts out somewhere bucko. What if your show is only ok? By your logic cheap high quality digital camcorders should have no reason to exist. After all, if your show is excellent you can afford a proper film camera.

    Sheesh, some people just can't appreciate creativity.

    --

    -matt
  31. He should've used a fresnel lens... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    If I'm not mistaken, if he could have used a fresnel lens and a backlight, he might have been able to get the magnification and the "reverse" image that he was seeking.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:He should've used a fresnel lens... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you put the lense on right. Otherwise, the person reading the prompt may lose his or her eyes and other facial parts.

    2. Re:He should've used a fresnel lens... by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      And if done in full day-time sun, gives a very cool special effect- flaming narriator!

    3. Re:He should've used a fresnel lens... by ColGraff · · Score: 1

      The article points out that a narrower image was desirable, in order to prevent conspicuous "reading" eye movements.

      --
      I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    4. Re:He should've used a fresnel lens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why didn't he just turn the laptop around?

    5. Re:He should've used a fresnel lens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess he's not good at reading upside-down either? ;)

  32. Does is smooth scroll at different speeds? by YCrCb · · Score: 1

    I could use one the does those things.

    Michael

  33. WTF! That wasn't the point at all! by macz · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I realize that with all the pressure to post first people don't always read the articles, but it is amazing to me that this and several preceding comments are making the same, misinformed statement... Why not tell him to memorize his lines... cause "That's better than a USB thumb drive!"

    The point, and he did have one, was that using powerpoint, or perhaps it's analog equivalent, cue cards, were not good enough for him. He was always looking off to the side or down and not right at the camera.

    I will 'splain: Unless you can afford a studio with long camera angles, there is a thing called parallax that will make you look like every dumb asshole who tries, and fails to do a home documentary... staring off into space, uncomfortably over the viewer's right shoulder or worse, their crotch.

    We have all seen these on public access channels that have small studios or too few lenses to get sufficiently far enough away that a person holding a cue card can make the person on camera look natural without completely obstructing the view of the camera.

    I could understand it if someone said "What about a piece of poster board with a hole cut in the middle and the text written around the lens" because that would at least show some understanding of the problem, if not actually hitting on an acceptable solution. (Hint: Unless you have only a single cue card, bad idea.)

    Think about it, WHY ARE TELEPROMPTERS SO EXPENSIVE AND USEFUL IN THE FIRST PLACE? It is because, Occam's razor hasn't eliminated them in the places where they are most useful. Yes, Letterman and Conan can get away with cue cards, but that is because they have larger studios, more cameras to cut up the view so that people don't get uncomfortable with a walleyed announcer, and they can move around during spots that depend heavily on cue cards like the short monologue of 5-8, 30 second jokes. Not 60 second news storys where they have to pronounce words like Slobodan Milosevich or Hafith al-Barghuth

    Give the guy a little credit, he said he tried other, less complicated analog and digital methods and in true /. fashion, copied the IP of the Teleprompter and released it open source. Compare his solution, some 2x4's and a piece of glass with a commercial equivalent

    --
    ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
  34. Re:Ummmm,,, cue cards? by Soulfarmer · · Score: 1

    just have someone to flip those cue cards in place of the powerbook. Still one would be able to look at the lens. Much cheaper. Altho, if you already have that powerbook...

    nice idea.

    --
    -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
  35. MAC USERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another example of the creativity of MAC users.

    1. Re:MAC USERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, fucking idiot wasted hours to make this when he could have spent a few seconds memorizing his lines. Unless, that is, he is a complete moron.

    2. Re:MAC USERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah he had to justify paying $3000 for a notebook that the PC equiviliant would only run $800 somehow.

  36. Oops by wfs2mail.com · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I thought you said Teleporter!

    1. Re:Oops by puppetman · · Score: 1

      I thought so too. What concerned me most was no mention of the Heisenberg compensators. I know it's a Do-It-Yourself project, but if you're going to do something, do it right.

  37. CmdrTaco would say... by Garabito · · Score: 1

    Lame.

    1. Re:CmdrTaco would say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as lame as you

  38. Memorization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the love of God, are people so poor at memorizing a few lines that they would rather spend hours developing a temporary teleprompter!?

    The author is so worried about how his eyes look while reading on camera, well, guess what, I bet he still looks like he is reading with his teleprompter.

    My advice: memorize a few lines and recite them directly into the camera. This guy claims to be a movie director/producer/etc. and if his movies are worth a damn, he won't have a scene of himself talking directly into the camera continuously for more than 15-30 seconds. Can he not memorize that amount of material at a time?

    1. Re:Memorization? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Great, if you have the hours. But if you're on camera and some soldier has just asked you why the hell he doesn't have any armor, and one of your flunkies is typing your excuse in real time, this setup could come in pretty handy.

      rj

  39. Well, if the goal is to make things difficult... by papaskunk · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There are no mirrors. Adding a mirror to the construction would be a lot of physical work, not to mention: where would you put the mirror? InDesign is AppleScriptible (which, when combined with watched folders, allows the process to be completely automated), but in any case checking one box when you're saving the file, which takes all of about half a second, seems like a lot less work than adding mirrors to a wooden frame to me.

  40. Commodore 64 by tekrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most of the small studios I have worked in used the venerable Commodore 64 as a teleprompter (to this day, many are still in use).

    Using teleprompter software that was developed for the system, the C=64 had the advantage to being able to output to any NTSC screen, making it a cheap and reliable method of putting text on the screen.

    You simply typed in your script, and ran the software, which would display the text one line at a time and you could go fowards, backwards, etc. The monitor was then bounced into the glass in front of the camera, so the person speaking could look directly into the camera and see the text reflected.

    Pretty simple and very very reliable.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  41. I had the same problem! by Syre · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I had the same problem once, but I came up with another solution.

    It's called "memorize the cue cards".

    I bet I did that in a lot less time than he took to build a teleprompter.

    1. Re:I had the same problem! by drawfour · · Score: 1

      After some number of presentations, the total amount of time needed to memorize for all presentations will be greater than the amount of time it took to build the teleprompter. Assuming, of course, that the teleprompter is used repeatedly and repairing any breaks do not require a large amount of time. Regardless, if you only need the teleprompter a few times, it's probably not worth your time. If you need it more often than that, it's probably cheaper time-wise to build one yourself. If you need it much more than that, you're probably better of buying one that's already made, especially since there will likely be some service plan or warrantee.

  42. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could just use a web browser and some MARQUEE tags.

  43. Paperclip by LittleBigScript · · Score: 1

    What? No paperclip?

    All DIY projects require at least one paperclip. It is some kind of understood rule.

  44. This guy's my professor... by papaskunk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I know this is off-topic, but you'll thank me...

    This guy is one of my professors. This teleprompter is for a presentation on panoramic photos, of which he is an amazing photographer. He's actually creating a coffee-table book from these panoramics, and some are for sale through PayPal.

    Worth at least a look, especially the ones of the Brooklyn Bridge. He'll also sell you huge prints if you email him.

  45. just dont by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    do what THIS guy did

  46. Re:WTF! That wasn't the point at all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen!

    This guys my professor. Knowing him, this didn't take long at all.

  47. BOO by iamzack · · Score: 0

    I was excited when I thought that said "Build your own teleporter"!

    1. Re:BOO by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      Yeah I thought the same to :)

  48. Re:MAC USERS/pc loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you really remember 60 to 100 pages of tech Dialog? And can all the people you hire do this...I bet not.

    Go out and shoot some video and see how well you do. I will bet you real money, you will want to build on of these or at least kill a few actors :)

  49. Videocue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though it doesn't involve powertools, we're using Videocue to make videos at our school.

  50. Re:Have a nice night, nerds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm off to get laid.
    heh, no you're not. you wish you were, but instead you're just going to go play some counterstrike.
  51. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by wastingtape · · Score: 1

    I was wondering about the converting to PS then flipping as well. A 2nd monitor seems a bit extravegant (if you're on a limited budget that is). At work, my workstation's driver supports image flipping (it's an nvidia version i believe).

    I've never actually used it for anything serious. Most of the time it's just to play office jokes by flipping the screen upside down then acting like i'm working. I suppose in this context it would actually benifit.

  52. mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's the guy who bought his acct on ebay

  53. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by netsharc · · Score: 1

    Actually the new Nvidia Windows drivers allow you to rotate and flip the output image (I think, not running Windows right now so I can't check).. dunno if they have it for their Linux drivers as well, in any case, he was using a Mac.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  54. Re:Bush's Back Pack - Nifty Newfangled Teleprompte by Matt+Moyer · · Score: 1

    Pshhh, that would involve Bush reading and talking at the same time. Reading is hard. :-)

  55. You can do this with monitors, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is more fun if you do it with an actual black-and-white television monitor -- just reverse the connections on the horizontal deflection coil.

  56. Re:Bush's Back Pack - Nifty Newfangled Teleprompte by Hobadee · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, Bush didn't rent that, he bought it, and it was a good investment seeing as how often he probably uses it.

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  57. Re:Well, if the goal is to make things difficult.. by WarPresident · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are no mirrors. Adding a mirror to the construction would be a lot of physical work, not to mention: where would you put the mirror?

    How would this be any more difficult than mounting a sheet of plate glass at a 45 degree angle? You would have a mirror mounted below and parallel to the plate glass. The laptop would then be oriented upright and pushed back on the platform closer to the camera. It's really quite simple. See ascii below for obfuscation.

    Observer \ glass Camera
    ..mirror \ _| laptop

    --
    Here come da fudge!
  58. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by Boricle · · Score: 1

    I suspect that the reason for the "driver image flipping" is for use with projectors. Some projectors don't support flipping for rear-projection, or for "upside down roof mounted" situations. Or in some cases, its easier to change your own laptop, than to mess around with someone elses projector (assuming you even have access to the controls on it). Cheers, Boris.

  59. Looking shifty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As people recite memorized information, they glance about. It seems to be attached to recall quite deeply... people glance upward when remembering numbers.

    When talking to an audience this is a good thing. Glancing to the side for one person is glancing directly at another, as you well know, since you teach the subject.

    It doesn't work on camera, though. There everyone who looks at the tv has the feeling that straight at the camera is straight at them. If you're glancing about, you look shifty, either with dishonesty or discomfort.

    The whole point of the teleprompter is to not memorize the information so that you can retain that all important eye contact. That's why news reporters use it. They could memorize the news and use cue card style brief notes, but they'd be less able to control their gaze.

  60. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if you're not doing a show, and just want to use a teleprompter for practice/school?

    I, for one, am scared to pieces by cameras. You might see me going to lowes to get some parts to use with an old laptop, but you ain't going to find me buying a several thousand dollar pos that is totally unjustified for my purposes.

  61. Teleprompter software by rdarden · · Score: 1

    Apparently he's not the first to do something like this with a Mac, as variety of software is designed to make it easy

    One tip: put some sort of shroud around the glass and the camera to keep the background dark, making the text easier to read. The teleprompters I've seen all have this, and it also makes a nice matte box for the camera.

  62. Re:Ummmm,,, cue cards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get some paper and a sharpie. Write down all the stuff you want to say, and have the camera man flip the pages. They're called cue cards, and they used them way back in the day....

    Except for the problem of looking weird on camera rather than being able to look at the camera (and therefore your audience), that would be a solution. Now all you have to do is carry your idea forward a bit and you'll get the original solution to this problem.

    Earlier telepromters use a roll of paper. You wrote your text on the roll of paper and and scrolled the paper in front of a camera. The camera sent the image to a TV monitor sitting where the laptop sits in this version. Of course, the glass/mirror reflected everything backwards so you had to be a bit dyslexic to use it. Later versions use another mirror at the camera end to flip the text before it was sent to the monitor.

  63. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by TreeHead · · Score: 1

    ;no, no, no it's called bash .

    ;treehead

    --

    "If any part Linux was stolen, then Windows was the biggest heist in history."

  64. Don't make light -- teleprompter control is hard by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Before anyone makes fun of this guy for not just using PowerPoint or something else, just think about what a teleprompter is being used for. Someone is reading a script that they've either not had in their possession long enough to read it or contains content that's new enough to NOT allow for memorization (i.e. breaking news).

    A friend of mine shot a documentary last December whose narrator was none other than Ben Jones, former US congressman and, more famously, Cooter, the mechanic from The Dukes of Hazzard. Mr. Jones had only had the script for a few days, and he wanted to make minor changes as he went along to facilitate his own personal style.

    I was asked to be a production assistant. I ended up, for the most part, being responsible for a low-end teleprompter we were using for the documentary script. In order to keep up or slow down depending on Mr. Jones' reading speed, a thumbwheel type control was used off camera to move the script up and down at variable speeds. Mr. Jones finally asked me to do it since, after trying it once, he found that I kept up with his rate of speech much better than the other production assistant.

    Sure enough, documentary narration that was requiring retakes and retakes suddenly wrapped up a helluva lot more quickly. We would end up taking so much time in earlier takes because the precision required for the thumbwheel control was just not there. And we couldn't give the control to Mr. Jones, since he had to walk in and out of shots for the various narration scenes. The cord to the teleprompter was NOT long enough for him to be on the other side of a room and walk in.

    I think the worst part about the whole experience was trying to do takes in the middle of a small town courthouse square in the middle of 15F temperatures, freezing rain, and wind. The teleprompter was pretty damned useless then because the glass kept fogging up due to the temperature changes.

    My 2 cents.

    IronChefMorimoto

  65. Oh, just great... by d474 · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can just see Osama bin Laden in his next terror tape...
    "...oh and I want to give a shout out to Slashdot which showed me how to make this bitchin' DIY teleprompter so I can look more professional while I scare the shit out of western civilization on camera...jihad thanks you as well..."
    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  66. this kind of thing is needed for video chats! by Lon · · Score: 1

    One of the most awkward things about video ichats is that you never really make true eye contact with the other party. either you are looking at the camera (and not seeing their image) or looking at the other's image - to them you are looking down (or away from eye contact). I don't think video chat will ever really "catch fire" until this gets corrected -- humans crave eye contact in visual communication!

    Even the video phones I've seen get this wrong with the camera located some distance above the incoming image display.

    1. Re:this kind of thing is needed for video chats! by Kenardy · · Score: 1

      Mount your camera between you and the monitor. Problem solved.

    2. Re:this kind of thing is needed for video chats! by Lon · · Score: 1
      Mount your camera between you and the monitor. Problem solved.

      :) OK, however this will obscure the display of the other person's face defeating the point (that is, both parties get eye contact). I suppose you could blow up display window and position the camera between the other's eye's (supposing they don't move).

      I think what I am hoping for is something better -- given what is known about human communication and UI design.

  67. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's This! Mirrors reflecting mirrors!? Sorcery I say!

  68. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by paranoidgeek · · Score: 1

    Wouldnt there be a problem with the loss of light by reflecting the image twice ? Even when it has been mirrored once it still doesnt look very bright,

    --
    Lima India November Uniform X-ray
  69. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by kesuki · · Score: 1

    'new' nvidia drivers? *scoffs* try 2 year old nvidia drivers have had image rotate... As far as 'flip' goes, now thats a whole different ball of wax... I'm not sure that they even have that...
    My only system with an nvidia gpu is my former laptop, so I can only check my ati drivers, which have rotate but not flip... But I'm assuming that if nvidia's drivers had flip, that ATI would feel the need to 'add' flip capablility, so as not to be left behind.
    Someone suggested adding a mirror, which is quite feasible, simply mount it above the laptop's keyboard, and have the laptop laying normally on it's bottom instead of on it's screen!

  70. I want a Teleporter too. And a Replicator! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    Nope. Clearly a lot of us hopeful geeks read it that way.

    Man, I'm sooooo ready for my own personal teleporter. I want to wake up at 7:00AM (instead of the usual 5:30AM), get ready and eat breakfast, then start my morning commute at around 8:00AM (instead of the usual 6:30AM), arriving at my desk at something like 8:00AM (as opposed to the usual 8:15AM).

    I want to come home for lunch too but still get my whole hour.

    I want to buy a car that's price doesn't reflect the cost of shipping it to the dealership, or the parts that made it to the factory where it was built. I want to....well, you get the idea.

    A Replicator would be nice too so if you're feeling generous Santa come on down!

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:I want a Teleporter too. And a Replicator! by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1
      people would have no use for cars, so car companies and their workers would go out of business. roads wouldnt need maintinance so all road builders would be out of jobs. there would be no point in air ports, pilots, air planes, plane repair people, oil tankers, harbors, trains, travel agents. think about all the jobs that would be "displaced", and when I say displaced, i really mean lost because a garbage truck driver isnt all the sudden going to become a teleporter repair man. if teleporters were ever invented it would make a huge impact on the world economy, not to mention terrorism and lord knows what else. i could see the governments of the world trying to regulate it, making teleports, like airports but only for rich people and governments and military, but who knows how long that would last before it gets into the hand of the people and all hell breaks loose. people teleporting into brick walls, the overpopulation of hawaii, bank robery. I'm kinda glad we dont live in a world with teleporters, i cant see it being as cool as on star trek, the human race is way too volitile right now, maybe in a few hundred years when we settle down the vulcans will come down and teach us. :)

      </ramble>
      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    2. Re:I want a Teleporter too. And a Replicator! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "i really mean lost because a garbage truck driver isnt all the sudden going to become a teleporter repair man."

      That may be true, but if the other engineer on my team says "he would rather be a garbage man" one more time... I will kill him... I guess there must me something about that job....

    3. Re:I want a Teleporter too. And a Replicator! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1


      Yeah, we're probably not ready for it just yet but there's positives from a Teleporter/Replicator world too. The cost of just about everything decreases for starters. With no more costs involved in transporting anything instantly you would be looking at cheaper merchandise across the board. Just because people could teleport that wouldn't stop them from wanting a new iPod or set of DVD's. We would still make things and those things would become cheaper.

      Sure there would still be cars but the people would be driving them because they wanted to, not because they had to. Same with airplanes but of course you're right about the demise of airlines. Frankly (and maybe it's a bit cold of me) I don't anticipate missing them much. Boats would still be around too. Like everything else involved in transportation boats would become leisure items.

      Add a Replicator into the mix and you're really talking about things costing nothing. Instead of having to buy most things you'd pay for the "pattern" so your replicator could make that. Then you'd get all messed up with DRM and people would be downloading Rolex patterns off of P2P networks. Companies all over the world would be fighting an unwinnable war against every kind of pirate you can think of.

      But then of course someone creates a pattern of a nuke and madcap terrorist antics ensue.

      Bad Idea, nevermind I don't want a teleporter or a replicator.

      I could however like an iPod and a Rolex.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    4. Re:I want a Teleporter too. And a Replicator! by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      With no more costs involved in transporting anything instantly you would be looking at cheaper merchandise across the board.
      That's arguable. In the UK, I've observed a very intereting trend that applies directly to this theory. When fuel prices go up, the price of goods goes up to match the increase in transport costs. When the price of fuel goes down, the goods stay the same price, the difference now forming an extra profit for the hauliers or the retailers. Price reductions across the board when fuel prices decrease is unheard of.

      Add a Replicator into the mix and you're really talking about things costing nothing.
      Only if the ownership of replicators is universal. Consider what would happen if governments heavily regulated their production and ownership and corporations made them so expensive only a handful of places could afford them (and they would do, because they'd know that replicators would be the end of them: any company dealing in material products as opposed to IP would cease to exist overnight while the monetary basis of governments around the world would collapse - something those in charge would do everything possible to avoid)

    5. Re:I want a Teleporter too. And a Replicator! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so just replicate all the major parts of a replicator and slap it together for more. start the underground ecomony and wait for the revolution

    6. Re:I want a Teleporter too. And a Replicator! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've noticed the same thing here in the US when fuel prices go up. When they drop the price of fuel (which also never seems to return to it's former price completely) the prices almost never drops back to it's former level.

      But what about when transportation prices don't just go down? What would happen if transportation prices vanished entirely?

      Replicators being tightly regulated by governments and/or corporations would probably be the norm. Universal ownership would have some seriously cool ramifications but at the same time it could turn into a huge mess very quickly.

      Playing pretend though and assuming that a replicator is something that takes the world by storm and that it doesn't result in someone teleporting a nuke into the oval office, I think companies wouldn't cease to exist so much as cease to be companies that make things. They'd all become IP companies instantly.

      This of course leads to most everyone involved in making anything suddenly being without a job as was already mentioned. On the other hand if they all had replicators they certainly wouldn't go hungry (Computer, Tea, Earl Gray, Hot, and a Corn Dog please, no Mustard).

      Also in many instances it seems only reasonable that certain items might be freely replicated. Food for instance would be free at this point. If everyone could use the copying function of a replicator then most of us would be buying our last tube of toothpaste for some time as well as many other everyday items. That may or may not come to an end once toothpaste sales started heading towards zero. The fight between companies that make things and consumers who bought one and then copied it forever would be a real mess to try and sort out. I'd like to think that a whole lot of the everyday things might enter the "public domain" as a result of this. Can you imagine a replicator users bill of rights ensuring that citizens can legally replicate basic items they need unrestrained?

      Companies that used to make stereo equipment would suddenly be in the business of designing and making a handful of a particular model which they would then throw into the replicator to transform into a pattern. They'd never again have to produce their products on a large scale. They'd only need to produce one perfect one and then sell the pattern. What do people with no jobs buy it with though?

      The economic upheaval would be pretty massive. It would be a total economic reboot.

      Imagine open source replicator patterns popping up. Anybody who wanted to make something cool could create it, turn it into a pattern, and give it away if they wanted to.

      Strange stuff. I don't think I can completely get my head around what the world would be like, which is probably another good indication that man ain't ready for this kind of stuff yet.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    7. Re:I want a Teleporter too. And a Replicator! by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      not sure if anyone is still interested in this thread, but..

      You right, were not ready for this stuff, and the ramifications of the teleporter and replicator are so large its almost imposible to think of them all. terrorism aside it would be good for man kind, in a way. then again think about it this way, if teleporters and replicators came out next year we would be stuck with 2005 toothpaste flavors for forseeable future, unless some inspired individual decides to make his own toothpaste flavor just for the intrinsic reward. its open source on a physical and global level. in one sense it would fix hunger and many other thing, but it would also hault progress in many other fields. why go to work after you've got a replicator and teleporter? dont have one, get a friend to replicate you one. the only thing left thats not replicatable (i would assume) is land, and its not like people have been fighting for that stuff since the begining of time. what a beautiful fucked up mess it would be. personally i would hope that enough people would realize after a while that hanging out in a hot tub all day and never working would get boring and start going back to work for the better of humanity.

      then again, throw hollodecks into the mix and you can just forget it, I'm in the hot tub with 3 blondes and theres nothing you can say to get me out.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  71. Re:Have a nice night, nerds! by TheCrawlingShadow · · Score: 1

    for the first time ever!!! not bad for being 27

  72. Thank God... by tdhillman · · Score: 1

    You know, I cannot count the number of times in a year a need to find a teleprompter fast. And now, lo and behold- I can make one myself!

    Holy cats! My webcam sermonettes will never be the same.

    --
    befuddled (noun) 1. Unable to create a pithy sig
  73. does apple pay all the bills? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    what is with the apple articles? who the heck has an apple powerbook for this project?

    how do I relate?

  74. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    teleprompter = hardware
    PowerPoint/Impress = software

    hardware != software

    Q.E.D. PowerPoint/Impress != teleprompter

    RTFA.

  75. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least not as stupid as your comments!
    again, RTFA!

  76. Re:Well, if the goal is to make things difficult.. by databyss · · Score: 0

    Actually, to get everything accurate and to compensate for the dissipation of the signal, you should use something like this:

    / \\\/\/
    /\/\/ O> 0O> \\

    That should just about handle it...

    --
    Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
  77. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by iocat · · Score: 1
    Curious: Are you from America? Typically, Americans are all about pluck and doing it yourself, while I tend to find that non-Americans are much more receptive to your attitude -- if you don't have access to a teleprompter, you don't need access to a teleprompter.

    Which is all well and good if you want and expect people to stay in their places; for me I'll take creativity and social mobility.

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  78. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by snooo53 · · Score: 1
    Thanks for a good summary.

    It seems like this idea could also be used for Webcams or Video-phone calls. Use a tilted piece of glass setup so that someone could look directly into the camera instead of away from the lens. I really think that's one of the big reasons why video conferencing hasn't caught on... the fact that everyone is always looking away from the camera.

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  79. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's a newbie. He bought his UID off of ebay. He's been posting all of a month.

  80. Re:Well, if the goal is to make things difficult.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, to get everything accurate and to compensate for the dissipation of the signal, you should use something like this:

    / \\\/\/ /\/\/ O> 0O> \\

    That should just about handle it...


    I understand most of this, except why you're attaching electrodes to your testicles.

  81. usage nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "rote" does not mean "repetition" or "memorization". "rote" refers to the mechanical aspect of repetition for memorization, mechanical to the extent that one does not necessarily get the point of the lesson. so, "rote" would not be the appropriate word to use here.

    1. Re:usage nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From www.m-w.com:

      the use of memory usually with little intelligence (learn by rote)

      Seems like the perfect word to use here. What struck you as wrong? Was it the fact that he said "drill it into your head by rote" instead of "learn by rote"? His still fits.

  82. No Total Internal Reflection by skoda · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your explanation is close enough, but I'll make a minor optics nit-pick: TIR (Total Internal Reflection) is not involved. Bare glass reflects about 4% of the incident light. As the author indicates, that's enough to read high-contrast text. The other 96% of the light is transmitted up through the glass to the room ceiling. There would be light which is reflected from the top glass surface, then reflected again from the lower surface which makes it to the camera. So less than 0.2% (96%*4%*4%*96%) of the light reaches the camera, which is likely not detected.

    1. Re:No Total Internal Reflection by Long-EZ · · Score: 1

      Brief additional information is here.

      This article was well timed for me. I've been contemplating a teleprompter for a low budget product demo video I want to shoot. I was planning on putting my notebook PC as close to the camera lens as possible and reading my Impress (PowerPoint if you don't use OpenOffice) presentation. I was hoping Impress would scroll all the text continuously. Probably not. Oh well, page flipping won't be too bad. It'd be nice if someone wrote an open source teleprompter application. Bonus points for image reversing.

      I simulated my side-by-side teleprompter by putting my digital camera to the immediate left of the notebook LCD and set the timer so it snapped a picture as I was five feet away, looking at the center of the laptop LCD. In the resulting image, I appeared to be looking into the camera. The image was framed about the way it would be on the video, so I don't think the differences in lenses would make much difference.

      It will also help to place the camera as far away as possible and zoom in to frame the shot. This will minimize the angle between the camera lens and the display off to the side. It'll also help to have the camera trained on the product I want to demo so I'm to the side of the shot. When looking diagonally into the camera, the viewer's brain will probably perceive me looking at them. It'd be more obvious that I'm not if I was using a straight-on shot.

      My simulation may be crap. It may be easier to detect that I'm looking to the side with the visual cues in a video as opposed to a still image. If so, I'll build a cheap teleprompter. I'm dyslexic enough that I can read backwards about as well as forwards, especially capital letters when I'm familiar with the text, so I probably won't bother to reverse the reflected mirror image.

      --
      >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  83. What's old is new again. by ah802 · · Score: 1

    Humm.. the old Amiga computer had software teleprompting years ago... smooth scrolling large text and mirrored any which way.

  84. sounds over-engineered to me... by rnd() · · Score: 1
    <marquee>In today's news... Here's my home made teleprompter...</marquee>
    --

    Amazing magic tricks

  85. And Duct Tape by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a project that uses all of the things that "must" go into a Do-it-yourself project, and nothing else. Perhaps as a contest of some sort.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:And Duct Tape by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      Yep the duct tape is round the edges of the glass.

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
  86. Addendum to nitpic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Light travels in both directions. If there were total internal reflection allowing him to see the words, there would necessarily be total internal reflection allowing the words to see him, making the camera somewhat useless.

  87. Build your own teleporter by wasudeo · · Score: 1
    Ever been in the situation where a certain expensive piece of equipment would be ideal to do the job at hand, but you would probably never ever need it to use it again, thus making the purchase/rental of equipment prohibitive?

    Then he outsourced the design to India and the Star Trek crew got bangalored...

  88. glass at a 45 degree angle towards the speaker by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    On the flip side of the glass, Doesn't that 45 degree angled cause sunlight to then be beamed directly into the camera lens? A crispyfried CCD, great. So we have a perfect monologue, with a nice lens flare halo blocking the shot. Hmm, I guess he won't need AfterEffects.

    I think I'd spend the 800 on those mini lcd versions with the black case rather than build my own. Look at the size of that thing. He's got a jumboprompt. After doing 2 or 3 productions with that thing, odds are he'll get tired of carrying it and chuck it into a ravine.

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  89. That's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but the guy who says you can do it in bash doesn't actually tell you how to do it in bash.

    I had a professor once who did that sort of thing. We'd have trouble prototyping circuits and ask for some help, he'd come over and look at a couple of seconds and say, "I see your problem" and walk away.

  90. Re:Well, DON'T Spank my ass and call me a slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *spank*
    /. whore!

  91. Flipping Images by EvilMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

    ... why he needed to export the document in postscript and mirror flip it Had he used a CRT, a ridiculously simple method of flipping the images would be to simply reverse the monitor's internal connection to the horizontal deflection coil. (the wires go down to a connector on the mainboard; just remove, reverse, and reinstall the pins in the connector housing). Do the same for the vertical coil if you need the image flipped upside-down. Also makes for an excellent prank against co-workers, or a way to score a perfectly good monitor from that annoying, non-tech-saavy roommate.

  92. Re:Bush's Back Pack - Nifty Newfangled Teleprompte by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    nah... that's the back mounted ratbrain autopilot...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  93. How about a bluetooth mouse? by Xenna · · Score: 1

    On the off chance that the guy's actually going to read this I'd suggest using a bluetooth mouse for setting the pace. Maybe even with a scroll wheel if the PB can handle that.

    X.

  94. Missing feature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you drape a black cloth over the area between the camera and the glass it makes the reflection much easier to read.

  95. Re:Where do you get these stories anyway? by netsharc · · Score: 1

    Actually I looked through the settings using the latest NVidia driver just now and couldn't find any flip options... oops, one more piece of disinformation..

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  96. Two words by sahonen · · Score: 1

    Cue cards. And being familiar with your copy.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  97. Re:Well, Spank my ass and call me a slashdot whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really... the article is still as fast as a motherfucker. The text is really unneeded.


    oh, and also...

    *spank*

    /. whore

  98. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm having trouble understanding why this is on slashdot - I mean, it's a piece of angled glass and an upside down laptop. It's not terribly innovative, since anyone who's ever looked at a prompter would probably say to themselves that, yes, if they had a piece of glass and nothing better to do with their time, then they, too, could make one. His solution isn't even a very good one, since it lacks the one essential feature of any prompter: namely smooth, variable speed scrolling. Without that, the reader's eyes will be moving down the page as they go, and the result will look very amateurish. Watch any newscast and realize that the anchors are reading off a prompter all the time, yet it's usually hard to tell, since they know their job, as does the prompter operator. Also, the bit about reflections only being a problem outdoors is ridiculous, since there are presumably lights in the studio, and any reflections at all will look terrible - sure you can minimize them by careful light placement, or you could just put a freaking shroud around the thing and save setup time.

    Anyway, since most people in the business of making videos would be in a position to either rent one or buy one cheap, the whole thing just seems like a waste of time and bandwidth. Not unlike posting long rants on slashdot that nobody cares about... um...

  99. Simple improvement by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    Grab some black construction paper, cut up from the bottom, then cut a hole the size of the videocamera's lense. Then place the black construction paper on the camera. It should be possible to get it to stay on it's own, if not some tape should hold it in place.

    This will make the teleprompter much easier to read even against bright backgrounds; there would be a more or less single colour background over the entire viewable area of the teleprompter instead of the vastly different background colours in the current one; in the sample photo you can only really read the text that is in front of the black camera.

  100. Who needs a teleprompter by aarku · · Score: 1

    Just get your video footage of your actor moving his/her mouth and emoting, then dub over the voice later in editing. Everyone loves dubs!

  101. I read that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read that as "Build your own Teleporter"

    Wow, slashdot is ahead of the times

  102. Funny: slashdot lives in cave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so funny when geeks think they've
    discovered something new, and the reality
    is just that there's a whole world beyond
    their cubicle that they're not aware of.

    There's like a bazillion bits of teleprompter
    software available for download. full version
    demo copies, shareware etc. Why reinvent
    the wheel and brag about it?

    I just downloaded TeleScreen-32 Pro ( from drs-digitrax)
    (one of many available) ..
    it has reverse imaging, scrolling, all sorts
    of features.

    I'm an idiot, and I had scrolling reverse image
    text on the one of my dual monitors on my PC,
    within 30 seconds after reading this article.

    The glass really isn't needed. With large scrolling text,
    you can just place the lcd screen facing you,
    next to the camera (above or side) and
    read it just fine...

    Let me tell you about my invention. I call it "fire".
    My buddy is working on something he
    calls "toilet paper".

  103. Use Flash to render flipped text on the fly by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    It's all in the headline. With a little flash programm you could easyly render actuall text-data mirrored. You could even build a mirrord mini GUI for the prompter. ...
    Coming to think of it, that's actually a cool little OSS project there.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  104. It isn't as unreasonable at $435 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet this guy wouln't have went through this much trouble if he knew that he could purchase a real teleprompter for $435 from http://www.teleprompters.org/ in the Bargains section.

  105. Easier by Major+Hazard · · Score: 1

    Easier is to open a .txt file with line breaks inbetween paragraphs in QuickTime.

    --
    Intel Inside. Idiot Outside.
  106. I clicked on the Read More link because.... by WizardRahl · · Score: 1

    I thought it said, "Build your own teleporter".

  107. Can I suggest an improvement? by drigz · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone else has said/thought this, but if he drapes a black sheet over the camera and stand (like school photographers do) then he will see the reflection better - unless he wants to see the camera.

  108. What an imbecile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has he not heard of blu-tac? Getting somebody to hold up his damn cue cards? What an idiot.

  109. This is one of those cases where... by jolyonr · · Score: 1

    If this is a one-off event - why not just memorize the damn script!

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  110. Expensive maybe, but not ridiculously so... by dickens · · Score: 1

    I get this catalogue for some reason and happened to remember reading this.

  111. needs beamsplitter glass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using plain glass it'll be real hard to read. Beamsplitter glass is what's needed, even paying the $300 for the 60/40 glass is a lot cheaper than buying a teleprompter.

  112. The right tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I learned a long time ago that it is often better to go and buy or rent a specific tool and I can get the job done immediately.
    For example there is a serpentine belt on my car. If I don't have the special tool then it could take an hour to put on the belt. With the tool the belt goes on in less than thirty seconds.

    Same thing with computers. I want to transfer my cassette tapes to CD. I have rangled with Linux sound (my Windows partitions don't boot anymore). but no matter what it couldn't be easier then to have a device that I can put the cassette on one side and a CD-RW on the other, and push a button. Minutes later I have a useful CD recorded from the tape! This device (from TASCAM) costs about $800 but would let me be very productive in this way.

    But the price is high. So is it better for me to just use my Linux install and an old tape deck?

    For music recording I could use a MAC or a Linux box say running the planet CCRMAA extensions.
    And then I would have an audio workstation. OR I could get a hard-drive recorder.

    I am leaning towards the hard-drive recorder because they have solved all of the problems of sync and noise. The devices are of a comparable price to buy a fullup computer. But with that I wouldn't need to rangle over sound cards and noise from the computer fans and hum from bad grounding, or the sound of the TCP/IP bleeding through to the sound input. Or I won't have to worry about every time the kernel is upgraded that the sound drivers don't work any more.

    And then in a few years if Linux sound is better, then I can do that.

    So, to be productive in music it would be good to get the hard-drive recorder. And then I could also get a LINUX box to load the CCRMA extensions. And while I am musical I can make music and when I am being a techie then I can work on getting the Linux music work-station stuff working. Or I could go buy an IMAC. . .

    In any case it is always best to get the tool that does the job.

    Another thing: having the right tool means you are productive and getting things done.

    Part of the equation with computers is that the venders can not be trusted. They will break the tool if they think it will make you upgrade. (OK, I am being a little bit paranoid and irrational)

    That is why it is still important to be part of the Linux movement. It makes the venders behave in a more honest way.

    As far as Linux sound goes, it has a lot of issues. My sound didn't work for recording. And as this was something that I hadn't done much of I was trying to get the drivers for the card I have. But they didn't work (kernel 2.4 is broken for some sound that used to work). The solution:

    get an older sound card that only does 16 bit sound.

    $30 verses hours of work. I paid the coin and got the sound card that worked.

    And so my conclusion: There is no easy answer to these problem of buying verses building tools. You have to do a little of each. Your time is very valuble.

    If you solve a problem you solve it for everyone, so if you do make your own tools you then become a source of help to others. I get off on helping others.

    I think I have gone on long enough.

  113. Nvidia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he used a pc with a nvidia gpu, he could have just used any word processor, and in the video driver invert/flip/rotate the screen and would not have to worry about going through the extra process. Heck he could have someone type the script in real time!

  114. Re:Don't make light -- teleprompter control is har by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    ok how about making fun of him for reinventing that which indie film makers and small studios have been doing for 20 years???

    we built our own teleprompter in 1986 for t he school production class. it was a VIC 20 modified by me to reverse the video and then use a ATARI pong paddle to control the speed and direction of the propter scrolling.

    pretty much the same way except we used plexi that was very slightly mirrored on one side that we found in the junkpile at school. contrast was great and with some black felt from the back to drape over the camera we only had a 1/4 F stop light reduction.

    What is next? we going to get a story about someone who discovered how to build your own desk? or maybe a chair?

    3 seconds of googling would have produced 20 similar wesites, most over 5 years old.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  115. All your crossbar are belong to us by davidwr · · Score: 1

    All your crossbar telephone switches are belong to us.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  116. More expensive and less practical than the real by NeedleSurfer · · Score: 1

    As it turns out, teleprompter aren't special super expensive machines only holywood has. I know I set some up pretty often and they basically are cheaper more practical versions than the one he made. Kudos for the imagination but here is the cheaper way to do it, which as it turns out is the real thing:

    1-Use a microphone stand, it is telescopic, cost less than the amount of wood seen in the article, is faster and easier to set up and can be transported more easily, no need for the big mic stand with boom and all, the simplest telescopic stand will do.

    2- Place a glass instead of a mirror at the top of the mic stand, for that you will need to buy a clip that can be screwed on a mic stand or built it yourself using a microphone clip and a glass fixed to a wood pole about the size of a mic which will fit in the mic clip. Again very inexpensive, less than what you see there, glass (or plastic glass (plexiglass is even better)) is less expensive than a mirror and let the person who reads the telepromter look at the set, the crowd or whatever he needs to be looking at without looking away from the teleprompter.

    3-Use the same laptop with filemaker database, or whatever other database, he is using to generate text and or images. Be aware that there are teleprompter software on the web to do exactly what I describe here, cheap sotware that let you type anything and autoscroll it to provide a live teleprompting feed.

    4-Place laptop under glass and push brightness to a max, use dark backgound (usually black but the surrounding will actually dictate what is apropriate) and bright text (on black use bright rich yellow, it's more obvious than white), OR, for a feel of luxury ( ;) ), feed the output of your laptop to a tv screen (if your laptop has such facility) use a big size font and feed the text to the tv from afar, which let you control the prompting without having to be close to the person reading it or without having this person to switch it itself making the speech more natural and continuous, plus a tv screen is way brighter than a laptop screen so the letters (or images) will be more visible trough the glass.

    TV studios and movie studios use electronic teleprompter because the let you totaly free the speaker surrounding of any prompting gear by placing the prompter beside the cam it also helps the speaker to look at the camera without much conscious effort, but for most other situation what I described here is what you will see.

  117. Real Tele-Prompt-Ters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Yeah, that's the trademark name, btw.) Anyway, they have a black shroud surrounding the front of the camera an connecting to the reflector. It keeps glare from bouncing into the lens from the back side and it makes the text so that it's actually readable. You don't want any light coming from behind that reflector, and his design egregiously allows for it.

  118. For Channel 4 News, I'm Veronica Corningstone by lowrydr310 · · Score: 2, Funny
    "And I'm Ron Burgundy. Go f**k yourself, San Diego."

    Oh, the fun you can have with a teleprompter.

  119. Re:Don't make light -- teleprompter control is har by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

    Before anyone makes fun of this guy for not just using PowerPoint or something else

    If I were going to make fun of this guy, it sure wouldn't be for not using PowerPoint. It'd be for being so damn full of himself. Basically, this guy builds a little platform to hold a sheet of glass and a PowerBook and calls it a teleprompter. Big deal. Give me a tripod, two square feet of MDF, a sheet of glass, and a couple hinges, and big piece of black felt and I'll build you a version of this guy's teleprompter that fits in your laptop bag, is easier to read, and doesn't reflect light from above into the camera.

    You're right that controlling the scrolling rate of a teleprompter can be a delicate matter. Thirty seconds on Google would find half a dozen Mac-compatible apps which are for the most part pretty inexpensive and which do exactly the sorts of things you need from a teleprompter. They'll give you big white letters on a dark background, reverse the text, scroll manually or automatically, and so on. Instead, Mr. Lawler uses some PDF tricks to come up with a manual-only, page-by-page scrolling system. Creative maybe, but it sounds less than effective.

    I'd say that TFA is more about Brian P. Lawler and his lackluster screen reflector than about building an effective teleprompter. And that's too bad, because it wouldn't have taken any more effort to design a more useful device incorporating off-the-shelf software.

  120. put my thang down flip it and reverse it by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 2, Informative

    (sorry about the subject, couldn't resist)

    This guy (and most teleprompter designs I've seen) both require that the image displayed on the screen is mirrored so that the reflected image is not mirrored.

    Simple fix: have the point outward toward the subject and put a REAL mirror to reflect the image upwards in front of the display. Then put your beamsplitter glass in front of the lense. Think like it's a periscope.

    --
    This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  121. Re:Bush's Back Pack - Nifty Newfangled Teleprompte by QTeela · · Score: 1

    But has it been tested? What if it is vulnerable to interception? He utters 'My Fellow Americans' and says 'My Fellow Investors'? If there was adequate quality-control, the urgency for upgrades would decrease.

  122. That's usually the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but, from what I've found, renting for just a few days is often a high percentage of the cost of buying outright. Like a tile cutter. Or similar. Don't get it back within two days? Need it for an extra day for a few extra tiles you didn't calculate correctly? Didn't make it in time to return it by the closing time?

    Sometimes even in rental situations, it turns out better to buy than to rent.

    Hair Trap Hair Salon New York