Slashdot Mirror

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O use

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

http://www.businessinsider.com...

Tell me again about how you find that beautiful.

BTW are you still enjoying the favors of 7 year old girls ?

> Google just delivers the source code and the telephone/tablet manufactures are responsible to adapt to their system.

Except when Google violates patents and uses its monopoly power to prevent the use of non-Google based services. They got caught at this by Skyhook Wireless a few years back, and the company has never really recovered from the abuse, even though Google settled for roughly $90 million.

                    http://www.gpsbusinessnews.com...

                    http://www.businessinsider.com...

Google hasn't taken on the raw business evil that Oracle has.

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

But Shadow Brokers isn't an agent of a nation with a lot to lose like the NSA is.

Read this. Shadow Brokers ARE the Russians. A lone, non-state-sponsored hacker did NOT break into an NSA server and then keep it secret for over three years.

legal immigrants he has no problem with

Depending on their religion.

I'm trying to think of the last leader of a first-world nation that had a problem with a particular religion, and singled them out for "extreme vetting". Nobody comes to mind.

http://static4.businessinsider...

As of January 2016, unemployment is 4.9% UE3 and 5.6% UE4 (UE4 includes people who CAN take a job if you give it to them, WANT to take a job, but believe there is no job, so have given up). This seems to have improved since.

You're conflating labor force participation rate with unemployment. We are in a long-standing labor force bubble, and have not yet recovered to the pre-1960s stable level of 58%-60%. Other countries are better off, with lower rates of labor participation, allowing more leisure time and home life among the population.

The labor force participation rate argument assumes that every able-bodied man and woman must have a job, whether they need the income or not. Rather than staying home to raise a child, you would pay someone else to raise your child. This increases expenses; it does, however, concentrate child-raising (4 people raising 40 kids, rather than 40 mothers raising 20 kids), and allow for more production, thus total wealth.

You are basically being judgmental against people who chose to have single-income households rather than work. Families with $100,000/year incomes from a single earner, with one or two children, living in relatively-high luxury have no need for a second income; your assertion that the labor force participation rate is not fully-employed is an assertion that these people are lazy, irresponsible assholes and should get to work instead of staying home to tend house and maintain community social connections.

Let's deconstruct more of your deception.

The US has a population of 319 million, and only 151 million are employed

The United States has 319 million INCLUDING RETIREES AND MINORS. It has a civilian non-institutional population of 254 million, and a labor force of 159 million.

That's less than half the work force

The United States has a labor force of 159 million, 62.8% of its non-institutional population--more than half. It has 152 million employed in that labor force, or 95.1%.

Again: you demand every man and woman capable of doing anything go out and get a job. Wage slavery under a communist regime is the order of the day, I see.

http://www.businessinsider.com...

HP is doing what is done by companies which have amassed more wealth than they know what to do with, and in which the spark of innovation has long since died: They'll pay any amount (because money is "cheap" to them) for anything to anyone. Fiorina is long gone, but we should invent a verb for this practice in honor of her. http://fortune.com/2015/09/17/... http://www.businessinsider.com... http://fortune.com/2011/08/21/...

They keep doing it because it's a great tactic to prime the stock price: shareholders only see the short term gain, and by the time the company splutters the instigators are drifting to the ground in their golden parachutes.

Snopes is as trustworthy as Politico after their chief investigative reporter sends their clinton articles to the DNC for revision. They can't even get basic things correct, and when it's something to the contrary to their viewpoint they still label it as fake. Even when their own links prove otherwise.

The family welcomes any and all information that could lead to the identification of the individuals responsible, and certainly welcomes contributions that could lead to new avenues of investigation. That said, some are attempting to politicize this horrible tragedy, and in their attempts to do so, are actually causing more harm than good and impeding on the ability for law enforcement to properly do their job. For the sake of finding Seth's killer, and for the sake of giving the family the space they need at this terrible time, they are asking for the public to refrain from pushing unproven and harmful theories about Seth's murder.

Good luck with that. The sister of ambassador Chris Stevens has also been asking these people to please STFU already, so naturally she's getting slimed as delusional and complicit.

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Dude, we've already paid for the shit that goes over-budget on F-35.

We're into production, and costs go down during the production run. According to the latest info from the Air Force's accountants, each new F-35 costs less then any opther American fighter currently on sale. Altho we could conceivably save $16 million a pop if we got the Swedish Grippen.

Technically knowledgeable people have been having nightmares about Windows. I've collected some of them here:

In the future, Windows will force your computer to be a dumb terminal. You will pay monthly.

All your data will be examined by Microsoft. Can it be sold to secret U.S. government agencies? Can it be sold to advertisers?

It will be revealed that Bill Gates has always been CEO of Microsoft. Former CEO Steve Ballmer, called Monkey Boy by BusinessWeek Magazine, was just a fake leader. So is CEO Satya Nadella.

There will be fights between secret U.S. government agencies. Microsoft will spy on one, against another. Microsoft will do the most spying for the U.S. secret agency that pays the most.

To use Windows, you will be forced to agree to a contract, as now. The future contract will include even more complicated language that only lawyers can understand. That future contract will say that Microsoft employees can go to your refrigerator and take anything they see. That will be an important clause in the contract because Microsoft employees won't be paid enough to buy their own food. They will still have to work 12 hours each day, except when there are special needs, then 15 hours. But there will always be special needs.

The rich will get richer, the poor will be made poorer, much worse than this: "The rich control everything in Seattle. Bill Gates ... wants obedient little workers that never, ever, EVER ask questions." Books will be published: Microsoft Is Filled With Abusive Managers And Overworked Employees, Says Tell-All Book (May 23, 2012) However, since the rich control everything, no protests will have any effect.

The nightmare will get worse, as IT gets worse:

The dumb terminals will be forced to have 360 degree cameras. Everything you do will be supervised by a Microsoft slave.

Eventually, most people won't be allowed to have money. Only billionaires and trillionaires will have money.

Trillionaires will own nuclear facilities. They will get into nuclear wars over who will have ALL of the money.

The nuclear wars will destroy all life on planet Earth.

All because of Windows 10. Abuse, if not stopped, tends to get worse.

Technically knowledgeable people have been having nightmares about Windows. I've collected some of them here:

In the future, Windows will force your computer to be a dumb terminal. You will pay monthly.

All your data will be examined by Microsoft. Can it be sold to secret U.S. government agencies? Can it be sold to advertisers?

It will be revealed that Bill Gates has always been CEO of Microsoft. Former CEO Steve Ballmer, called Monkey Boy by BusinessWeek Magazine, was just a fake leader. So is CEO Satya Nadella.

There will be fights between secret U.S. government agencies. Microsoft will spy on one, against another. Microsoft will do the most spying for the U.S. secret agency that pays the most.

To use Windows, you will be forced to agree to a contract, as now. The future contract will include even more complicated language that only lawyers can understand. That future contract will say that Microsoft employees can go to your refrigerator and take anything they see. That will be an important clause in the contract because Microsoft employees won't be paid enough to buy their own food. They will still have to work 12 hours each day, except when there are special needs, then 15 hours. But there will always be special needs.

The rich will get richer, the poor will be made poorer, much worse than this: "The rich control everything in Seattle. Bill Gates ... wants obedient little workers that never, ever, EVER ask questions." Books will be published: Microsoft Is Filled With Abusive Managers And Overworked Employees, Says Tell-All Book (May 23, 2012) However, since the rich control everything, no protests will have any effect.

The nightmare will get worse, as IT gets worse:

The dumb terminals will be forced to have 360 degree cameras. Everything you do will be supervised by a Microsoft slave.

Eventually, most people won't be allowed to have money. Only billionaires and trillionaires will have money.

Trillionaires will own nuclear facilities. They will get into nuclear wars over who will have ALL of the money.

The nuclear wars will destroy all life on planet Earth.

All because of Windows 10. Abuse, if not stopped, tends to get worse.

Steve Wozniak (co-founder of Apple) spent the night in jail when he was high school for doing this kind of thing, and didn't get to meet the president:

http://www.businessinsider.com...

Firefox turned against Firefox. It is slow borderline unusable for any pages that stream video or use scripting heavily. When Firefox's own ex-CEO decided to use Chromium for his new project it certifies that there are deep issues under the hood. I only keep it because of bookmarks, it will be purged from my new OS installs.

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO"

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO"

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Have you actually read the article you cite? I quote:

"...three Russian aircraft approaching the Baltic skies..."

How vague is it possible to get, in what purports to be a news item? I defy anyone to know, from those words, whether the Russian aircraft encroached on any other nation's air space or not. Circumstantial evidence, however, makes it obvious they did not: because, if they had, the article would have said so in ringing tones. Even the headline says only that "Typhoon jets intercept Russian planes that committed 'act of aggression'". The quotation marks around "act of aggression" show that even the Guardian's sub-editors did not consider there to have been a definite act of aggression.

The article explains that, as the Russian aircraft "approached the Baltic skies", they had their IFF switched off. That was the "act of aggression". Presumably the aggression lay in the possibility that, without IFF, they might not be detected. Yet they were detected, and fighters scrambled to "intercept" them (as if that were necessary). Try this article for size:

http://uk.businessinsider.com/...

"Reuters Apr. 30, 2016, 12:22 PM 1,978 MOSCOW - The Russian Defence Ministry said on Saturday it had sent a fighter plane on Friday to intercept a U.S. aircraft approaching its border over the Baltic Sea because the American plane had turned off its transponder, which is needed for identification".

So?

And the first person who sends a cute "I'm going to shoot you with my (water-gun emojii) tomorrow!" gets arrested for making a threat because the receiver doesn't have an iOS device will get to sue Apple for creating an incompatible standard which lead to legal issues.

If that were to actually happen then obviously the problem is with US society. Let's not even get into the fact that Apple is not creating a standard here, nor is it incompatible or even debating the merit of the representation, I could set my font to wingdings and that would likely cause me to misinterpret everything anybody sends me. But the point here is that your society is so shitscared that sending or tweeting ::gun:: ::bomb:: ::knife:: can get you arrested. You could get away with that in China or Russia...if North Korean's could tweet they could probably get away with it for fuck sake. The problem is that terrorism has gotten the US so scared that that sort of oppression has been normalized and you are demonstrably more worried about the possibility of accidentally tweeting that and getting arrested for it than you are about the fact that being arrested for that is completely fucked up.

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO"

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

You mean tablet sales which are showing explosive growth, right?

http://www.businessinsider.com...

http://betanews.com/2016/03/08...

The poor people of Rio are paying for those games with their health and their lives. Sociopath is too strong a word but be honest: how they suffer doesn't bother you or anyone else living it up at the Olympic party at public expense. http://money.cnn.com/gallery/n... http://www.businessinsider.com... https://www.theguardian.com/sp... http://www.theatlantic.com/bus... http://www.economist.com/blogs...

The word he is looking for is Narcissism: the pursuit of gratification from vanity or egotistic admiration of one's own attributes. Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is a long term pattern of abnormal behavior characterized by exaggerated feelings of self-importance, an excessive need for admiration, and a lack of understanding of others' feelings.

What sucks is how so many people accepted Microsoft spying on everything they do. Most didn't even put up a fight and now we're all lumped with it. http://www.extremetech.com/com...

Corporate media shills told us to swallow and smile http://www.businessinsider.com... http://www.windowscentral.com/... Ed Bott his face covered in Microsoft semen told us it doesn't make you any less a man to be willingfully violated.

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO"

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO"

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO"

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

It's also the media characterization of Trump's statement as 'asking the Russians' anything.

The sarcasm was dripping off of the last line, the one rarely included in the quote.

What virtually all the media reports:

"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," Trump said at a press conference. "I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press."

What was actually said, as one statement, from one site:

"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," Trump said at a press conference. "I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press. Let's see if that happens. That'll be nice."

Let's unpack this:

- Trump says "Russia, if you're listening,". Sure, they listen. Is Trump actually addressing the Russians?

- Next, "I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,". This is where so many burrow in and wonder if Trump realizes the servers are gone, the emails are no longer 'out there' according to conventional wisdom, so what is he actually saying here? Maybe this is the first line of sarcasm? For those of you at home, yes, this is your signal that Trump is on a roll here, playing all of you and sticking his thumb in the Democrats' eye.

- And then, "I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press". And here, if you're even marginally paying attention over the approximately 51 years or so, you are immediately thinking 'oh, yeah, like THAT's gonna happen'. Unless you're a lickspittle Lefty, and you're thinking absolutely nothing. Vacant stare.

- And Trump, as he does so often, delivers the punch line we, mostly, already know is coming: "Let's see if that happens. That'll be nice.". This cannot be reported by the media, for they cannot bring further attention to their abject failure. As we now know, they lie by commission and omission.

And frankly. I hope you still do not get it. We are at the beginning of the post-postpolitical era, where consensus politics that has led to a concerted challenge to capitalism, rise of the Liberal State, emergence of newly reconstituted tyrannies such as, but not limited to, Russia, China, and ISIS/ISIL, and the assertion of political power as the defining, organizing, and exclusive means of social organization. Trump is the anti-politician, who speaks plainly, the way his core constituents/prime audience/fan base do, and they understand him completely. He speaks as a man of action, which a man of business must be, not as a policy wonk or apparatchnik, which most of his opponents are, and not as a thoroughly compromised/complicit globalist politician, who are his enemy and adversaries.

Keep mistaking this campaign for anything approaching conventional. Please.

it would be fun to watch the CIA fund the opposition in russia to weaken the position of putin.

There is evidence that Russia has been doing something similar in the USA:

In his research from St. Petersburg, Chen discovered that Russian internet trolls — paid by the Kremlin to spread false information on the internet — have been behind a number of "highly coordinated campaigns" to deceive the American public.

"I created this list of Russian trolls when I was researching. And I check on it once in a while, still. And a lot of them have turned into conservative accounts, like fake conservatives. I don't know what's going on, but they're all tweeting about Donald Trump and stuff,"

"I created this list of Russian trolls when I was researching. And I check on it once in a while, still. And a lot of them have turned into conservative accounts, like fake conservatives. I don't know what's going on, but they're all tweeting about Donald Trump and stuff," he said.

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO"

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Adblock can't do (or do as well) 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO"

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ or @ ALL

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

It's now reported that the FBI warned team Hillary back in March and they refused to cooperate with the FBI.

Sorta like their earlier year-long refusal to cooperate with the feds on the investigation of her server, while she ran around telling the public she was eager and fully cooperating and that her server was approved, which her own State Department denies. There's a good reason why she has held not a single actual press conference in all of 2016 (you know, those things where politicians take questions from a hostile press corps (worse given that in her case the press is actually in the tank for her party and not even tough)).

Former CBS news journalist Sharyl Attkisson has a nice, concise timeline on the whole Hillary server flap for those interested.

Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ or @ ALL

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Why Social Mobility In The United States Is A Total Myth
http://www.businessinsider.com...

Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ or @ ALL

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Management at Microsoft seems wildly incompetent. It wasn't only Slashdot comment posters who called former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer Monkey Boy.

Quote from an article in Forbes Magazine about Steve Ballmer: "Without a doubt, Mr. Ballmer is the worst CEO of a large publicly traded American company today."

Exactly. So kill the indenture part, then they will work at about market price. Suddenly, hiring H1-Bs becomes way less economical, since you can't pay them artificially low wages.

I'm sure you believe that, but it simply isn't the case. You are talking about companies with a seemingly suicidal PC tact. You really have to take a step back when seeing something like that and ask yourself "if this greedy megacorp is out for every dollar why would they take such a massively racist stance when it hurts their profit?"

The answer is actually pretty straightforward, as Warren Buffet said: "There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning."

They don't want middle-class people raising more upper-middle-class people because ultimately people don't go from rags to riches, financial security is made incrementally over generations and there isn't enough room at the top for everyone in a resource-constrained economy. More people who are well-off means more people who want more than what they have on a level that would lead to competition for the upper class. The simplest way for them to avoid this issue is to push the narrative that white males are bad because most of their potential competition are white males.

They love helping the poor, the immigrants and so on - because people are very grateful to go from poor to middle class while being oblivious to the nature of wealth. That isn't to say the children of those poor-to-middle-class people won't suffer the same fate as the current middle class, they will if left unchecked.

TL;DR: the elite keep the poor and middle classes in a state of perpetual reflux to avoid competition, the only way to avoid it from where we are is to cut down on immigration because it's ultimately a balancing act of how many resources there are vs how many people want them.

She's gleefully in favor of infringing on constitutionally protected rights,

Taking your guns away once again, I assume?

supports nationally self-destructive immigration policies,

Are you referring to the couple thousand Syrian women and children fleeing the aftermath of your stupid war? Or the 12 million Mexicans he wants to load onto rail cars and dump into the desert, south of the 2000 mile wall you think he's actually going to build?

and wants to see the government involved in wildly more private sector activities, at both the business and personal level.

Does she want to dictate where iPhones can be manufactured? Or does she have a history of abusing eminent domain to seize people's property?

So you think destabilization of international affairs, particularly against the larger more powerful competitor nations

Well we already screwed the pooch on that in 2007 when we put Anti-Ballistic Missiles in Poland (over Russia's protestations), and we've been doing our damnedest to threaten China's maritime resource lifeline using the SCS "freedom of navigation" excuse. Newsflash: ~85% of SCS shipping goes to/from China....

I'm not sure why you think Trump would make these relationships worse. I would describe the Trump-Putin relationship as "cordial" ( http://www.businessinsider.com... ) ( http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07... ), which is more than I can say for Obama-Putin or Bush Jr. - Putin.

I recently watched a video of Trump interviews over the years, and in one he talks about how the Chinese are ruthless business people who are taking us to the cleaners. He's willing to do business and engage with them, as long as we make sure we aren't getting ripped off. Seems a more honest assessment of how we should handle China than the Clinton approach that we saw in the 90's.

along with unnerving long-standing and even newer allies

The vast majority of which owe their national security to the US. Security which we are not properly compensated for. Trump will force our lazier "allies" to get their houses in order and shoulder more of the burden for protecting themselves.

lied, claiming it was NOT blocking?

Is this the same Facebook that's associated with Zuckerberg's Americans fora Conservative Direction which, like its partner phoney org "Council for American Job Growth" is actually a deceptive subsidiary of Zuckerberg's FWD.us and is designed to trick Republicans into supporting open borders, amnesty and foreign worker visas? THAT Facebook?

Why do people keep falling for this garbage? Facebook convinces people that their personal info and all the info on their friends and families is worthless, and they convince people to give it all to Facebook in exchange for "free" web page. Facebook then makes BILLIONS of dollars selling that info to the highest bidder and, along with their "partners", trying to manipulate people with the very information they gave to Facebook for free.

It's all the super-rich gaming the system. Remember: the huge boost in income inequality has come during the Obama years, and Wall Street has been pouring cash into Hillary for years and wants her for President. All those Hillary supporting Silicon Valley tech billionaires signed a letter opposing Trump, who has argued against their use of cheap foreign workers over American workers.

..Certainly Yahoo's problems were well in place before Mayer ever showed up.

True, but she didn't exactly help..
as to the sale, I was expecting it to be sold to Bobbie, for a nickel..

I am so disappointed.

Can adblock+ do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security & reliability:

1.) Protect vs. bad sites (past ads)
2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnet C&C servers
3.) Protect vs. dynamic dns botnet C&C servers
4.) Protect vs. DGA botnet C&C servers
5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (reliability)
6.) Protect vs. DNS redirect poisoned/downed dns
7.) Protect vs. trackers
8.) Protect vs. spam payloads
9.) Protect vs. phish payloads
10.) Protect vs. caps
11.) Get past dns blocks
12.) Keep off dns request logs
13.) Speed up 2 ways (adblocks & hardcodes)
14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
15.) Ez data edit
16.) Block ads more efficiently in cpu/ram/I-O us

* ANSWER ="NO" on ab+ or @ ALL

APK

P.S.=> Ab+ does less vs. hosts less efficiently (a 128-151mb memory hog http://cdn.ghacks.net/wp-conte...)

ClarityRay defeats it

Ab+'s bribed not to work by default http://www.businessinsider.com...

AdBlock's SLOWER: http://superuser.com/questions...

Money laundering is obscuring where money came from. If you walk into a bank with $3M in cash, its going to be noticed. However, if you sell a ton of $Drug for $3M cash, and own a cash-heavy / inventory-light business such as a strip-club or casino, you inject the cash into that business over time with fake transactions and treat it as ordinary income. You pay taxes on it and to everyone it looks like you are operating a particularly successful business, and you have legit cash in the bank.

In this way you've obscured that the money came from an illicit deal and made it appear legitimate. Any business that can do a lot of turnover without a lot of inventory (as someone might notice if your bar is doing a ton of business but never buying inventory) is a candidate.

For larger non-cash sums you can do things with offshore fake businesses; make a 'startup' offshore, then sell it to another offshore entity and bank the cash / declare it on your taxes. The fact that it didn't really exist is hard for on-shore regulators to notice, and now you've got a bunch of legit taxes-paid cash in your wallet.

http://www.businessinsider.com... describes some more schemes.

Yes, it's paywalled, so why use that link? Do you really think I'm going to subscribe to the WSJ just to see an article? There are plenty of other sources:

http://www.businessinsider.com...

http://adage.com/article/agenc...

I thought the idea of audio ads was interesting. I haven't had speakers turned on for years, except when I do something like running a youtube video. I don't like being surprised by irrelevant sounds when I'm trying to concentrate. So if someone out there is yelling at me right now about the best laundry soap then I'm unaware of it.

The problem is that your dataset is both flawed and too small. The real data set is worldwide devices sold. Android has about 84% in Q1 2016. There is no reliable data set on users who used both.

I agree the dataset is not a statistically significant sample-size. But the relative marketshare percentages don't mean squat, either, because that doesn't measure "switchers" (in either direction).

In looking for that number, I found several interesting articles in this search, which is at least a step in the right direction. But this graph makes it look like, quite frankly, both platforms are equally healthy.