Slashdot Mirror

Just to clarify the how gmail ignores dots and does not let people set up accounts where only the dots differ:

"If the sender added or removed dots from your email address, the message will still go to your inbox. Your email address is unique; people can't set up an identical account even with a different number or placement of dots." Gmail help

This is what Boomarks are for : keeping a list of frequently visited sites.

And if you are a tabs hoarder, The Great Suspender extension is your best friend on Chrome : https://chrome.google.com/webs...

On Firefox, you can use Suspend Tab or UnloadTab extensions I think.

See subject: I often say fools on /. have NO BALLS but YOU? You, in particular (lmao), are NO exception https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22frankenfurter%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/ Everyday is halloween for you (freak).

* You know, out of PITY (for your obvious mental issues, no questions asked) I was CIVIL w/ you (you "TrAnSteStiCuLar" monstrosity) - not anymore though, you disgusting degenerate weirdo.

APK

P.S.=> I see you STILL talk behind my back butthurt "FrAnK" but all I ever have to say to a BLOWHARD bullshitter windbag like you? Is this (answer it "FrAnK", you disgusting fucking whacko) https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10894385&cid=54855909/ & a LYING disgusting loon like you will HAVE to RUN ("Forrest")... apk

https://www.google.com/search?...

f you own private property, you have property rights from the center of the earth to outer space.

Nope, at least not according to the Supreme Court. Check out US v. Causby. You have rights to the first 365-500 feet. Spoiler:

The airspace, apart from the immediate reaches above the land, is part of the public domain.

I guess it depends on your definition of "alongside." Here's an example of the Conotton Creek Trail. https://www.google.com/maps/pl... The Northeast corridor is part of that subsidy. Take it away and we'll have to either let Amtrak stop operating or make up the lost profits in additional subsidies.

See subject: Everyone gains e.g. pointing out known 'bad actors' (in a variety of scenarios) to avoid or shutdown.

* IF the info. turns up 'unreliable' or not useful you figure it out pretty fast & just don't use it!

(Information = power (to protect yourself with)).

APK

P.S.=> It's pretty much how the program I created others here like & use (which the highly esteemed folks from Malwarebytes even host + recommend) works - consolidating information from ~10 reputable reliable sites that produce hosts file data APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/ ... apk

I can't see how anything could possibly keep an idea like this from working.

Exactly the first thing to come to my mind.

They'll probably have to put spikes on the roof, similar to pigeon spikes:

https://www.google.com/search?...

From MS - SMB Ports 445/139 (TCP) & 137/138 (UDP) protection via:

Disable SMBv1 on the SERVER, configure the following registry key:

Registry subkey: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters Registry entry: SMB1

REG_DWORD: 0 = Disabled
REG_DWORD: 1 = Enabled

Default: 1 = Enabled

Enable SMBv2 on the SERVER, configure the following registry key:

Registry subkey:HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters Registry entry: SMB2

REG_DWORD: 0 = Disabled
REG_DWORD: 1 = Enabled

Default: 1 = Enabled

---

Disable SMBv1 on the CLIENT, run the following commands:

sc.exe config lanmanworkstation depend= bowser/mrxsmb20/nsi

sc.exe config mrxsmb10 start= disabled

Enable SMBv2 & SMBv3 on the CLIENT, run the following commands:

sc.exe config lanmanworkstation depend= bowser/mrxsmb10/mrxsmb20/nsi

sc.exe config mrxsmb20 start= auto

---

* The above is per https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2696547/how-to-enable-and-disable-smbv1,-smbv2,-and-smbv3-in-windows-vista,-windows-server-2008,-windows-7,-windows-server-2008-r2,-windows-8,-and-windows-server-2012/

(THIS HAS BEEN PATCHED but you can protect this way too & it works...)

Not sure if this works in a "mixed-mode" network though (check MS link) using older Windows (e.g. XP/2000 etc.).

APK

P.S.=> For a SINGLE 'standalone' non-networked PC (no home network/LAN but TCP/IP connected online) turn off Server & Workstation services.

That shuts off any "handles" (port 445) this thing propogates thru + turn off NetBIOS over TCP/IP in your internet connection & uncheck/disable Client for Microsoft Networks + File and Print Sharing. Port 139 & 445 always pop up issues over time. It also makes your packet trains smaller (no encapsulation of LanMan)

I covered all this 11++ yrs. ago in a security guide I wrote for users with a single system & apparently, its advice STILL STANDS THE "TEST OF TIME" https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22HOW+TO+SECURE+Windows+2000%2FXP%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/ vs. even today's threats like this one.

* This effectively makes this threat a non-issue + saves you CPU cycles/RAM & other I/O wasted on services you don't NEED as a single PC user only... & you don't. They're just wastes with a single PC really. Many services are (covered in guide above based on CIS Tool guidance (who took fixes to their ware from "yours truly" too, no less)) & again, no more encapsulated packet bulk... apk

I can't see how anything could possibly keep an idea like this from working.

Google recently implemented a verification process for Projects using certain features and scopes, in response to phishing attacks. However, they have also created a method to bypass the verification process when using Projects for personal use.

You will need to join the ‘Allow Risky Access Permissions By Unreviewed Apps’ Google group to bypass the verification. After authenticating, you can then leave this group.

The left wing in various contexts throughout history can censor things, yes, but here in the US at the moment? The right wing is the one that is in any power. ...

Riiiight.

It's those conservative right-wingers that use violence as a heckler's veto to chase "progressive" speakers off of college campuses.

Oh, wait, I was wrong.

It's self-styled "PROGRESSIVES" that go around actually engaging in political violence by "punching Nazis". (Well, they try to - the candy-ass metrosexual wimps usually get their asses kicked - just Google "moldylocks gets punched". Oh, wait, I did it for you! BWAA HAAA HAAAA!!!!)

It's "PROGRESSIVES" who go around shutting down speakers they don't agree with for the simple act of daring to say things they don't agree with.

It's "PROGRESSIVES" who glorify political violence - any pay homage to fanatic Islam - by severing the head of President Trump.

So we can conclude that, just like most hard-left idiocy, "progress" involves not just censorship but actual political violence.

You mean like on Chrome?

https://chrome.google.com/webs...

From MS - SMB Ports 445/139 (TCP) & 137/138 (UDP) protection via:

Disable SMBv1 on the SERVER, configure the following registry key:

Registry subkey: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters Registry entry: SMB1

REG_DWORD: 0 = Disabled
REG_DWORD: 1 = Enabled

Default: 1 = Enabled

Enable SMBv2 on the SERVER, configure the following registry key:

Registry subkey:HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters Registry entry: SMB2

REG_DWORD: 0 = Disabled
REG_DWORD: 1 = Enabled

Default: 1 = Enabled

---

Disable SMBv1 on the CLIENT, run the following commands:

sc.exe config lanmanworkstation depend= bowser/mrxsmb20/nsi

sc.exe config mrxsmb10 start= disabled

Enable SMBv2 & SMBv3 on the CLIENT, run the following commands:

sc.exe config lanmanworkstation depend= bowser/mrxsmb10/mrxsmb20/nsi

sc.exe config mrxsmb20 start= auto

---

* The above is per https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2696547/how-to-enable-and-disable-smbv1,-smbv2,-and-smbv3-in-windows-vista,-windows-server-2008,-windows-7,-windows-server-2008-r2,-windows-8,-and-windows-server-2012/

(THIS HAS BEEN PATCHED but you can protect this way too & it works...)

Not sure if this works in a "mixed-mode" network though (check MS link) using older Windows (e.g. XP/2000 etc.).

APK

P.S.=> For a SINGLE 'standalone' non-networked PC (no home network/LAN but TCP/IP connected online) turn off Server & Workstation services.

That shuts off any "handles" (port 445) this thing propogates thru + turn off NetBIOS over TCP/IP in your internet connection & uncheck/disable Client for Microsoft Networks + File and Print Sharing. Port 139 & 445 always pop up issues over time. It also makes your packet trains smaller (no encapsulation of LanMan)

I covered all this 11++ yrs. ago in a security guide I wrote for users with a single system & apparently, its advice STILL STANDS THE "TEST OF TIME" https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22HOW+TO+SECURE+Windows+2000%2FXP%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/ vs. even today's threats like this one.

This effectively makes this threat a non-issue + saves you CPU cycles/RAM & other I/O wasted on services you don't NEED as a single PC user only... & you don't. They're just wastes with a single PC really. Many services are (covered in guide above based on CIS Tool guidance (who took fixes to their ware from "yours truly" too, no less)) & again, no more encapsulated packet bulk... apk

Your post is a textbook example of "lies, damned lies, and statistics". Now lets break down why.

You claim that the number of civilians killed by cops is 4x the number of cops killed by civilians.

A quick google shows that there are around 1.1 million cops in the US. Another quick google shows that the population of the US is about 321.4 million. But that number is from 2015 while the cop number is from 2008. Eyeballing the chart on the second google, it looks like we can safely use a nice round 300 million for 2008, so that is what I will use.

298.9 million (300 - 1.1) is two-hundred and seventy-one point seven three times LARGER than 1.1 million, making it common-fucking-sense that more civilians will have been killed by cops, than cops killed by civilians.

Next time, try thinking before posting. You're just causing yourself to lose credibility otherwise.

Your post is a textbook example of "lies, damned lies, and statistics". Now lets break down why.

You claim that the number of civilians killed by cops is 4x the number of cops killed by civilians.

A quick google shows that there are around 1.1 million cops in the US. Another quick google shows that the population of the US is about 321.4 million. But that number is from 2015 while the cop number is from 2008. Eyeballing the chart on the second google, it looks like we can safely use a nice round 300 million for 2008, so that is what I will use.

298.9 million (300 - 1.1) is two-hundred and seventy-one point seven three times LARGER than 1.1 million, making it common-fucking-sense that more civilians will have been killed by cops, than cops killed by civilians.

Next time, try thinking before posting. You're just causing yourself to lose credibility otherwise.

I've never noted TThread.Synchronize on /. but I created a multithreaded program using it which invalidates your lie APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

* Jealous I can SHOW I know how to use that & you can't? Yes...

APK

P.S.=> People like & use my work (as well as host + recommend it), not yours https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10845337&cid=54788831/ lol... apk

Some good beginner computer architecture books:

Code by Charles Petzold
Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
Machine Language for Beginners by Richard Mansfield

And an online course:
NAND to Tetris

Some good beginner computer architecture books:

Code by Charles Petzold
Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
Machine Language for Beginners by Richard Mansfield

And an online course:
NAND to Tetris

I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

APK your posts on this and the hosts file posts, and more, have never been in error and/or bad advice by BlueStrat

* My code's recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

APK

P.S.=> See subject, /. peers quoted above & APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

They're targeting a different market. The AtGames portable has the emulator market tied up. I'll bet they're taking an early swipe at the NES Classic but with an online market. The guts of the machine will most likely be AllWinner Android box with modified version Android 6. So you can also get streaming services and use prebuilt dev tools and games already on the Play Store. Version 2 or 3 is where they'll go after the the Switch market once that shakes out.

People who advocate for UBI don't math.

Actually, a universal social security would stabilize the social security OASDI system permanently by providing a basis; reduce total income tax burden on all income earners (the rough, unadjusted model cuts the top tax bracket from 39.6% to 35%); reduce payroll taxes by 0.9%; and reduce corporate income taxes by 2.5%.

Try actually doing the math once.

Math tallying government budgets and universal social security projections. Also math about impacts on take-home wages.

I also did further math on the handling of childcare welfare and naturalized American households, which came out (in 2013) to cost ~1.4% more of all AGI on top of this. This system shifts OASDI from payroll to income taxes and redistributes it into a universal benefit, then restores OASDI's full benefit to OASDI recipients by restoring the OASDI payroll tax at 5.3%, hence why it's only a 0.9% reduction in payroll taxes and not a 6.2% reduction.

Note that this is a rough model, and needs adjustment by the CBO. The tax brackets actually peak at the middle-income level, then fall back down again. Even without adjusting to smooth tax brackets, the low point is at $200,000, where a single earner takes home $2,700 more spendable income than he does today, and a two-adult household (joint filer) takes home around $11,000 more. Everyone with more or less income than this is more-advantaged by this system.

That middle-class peak tax bracket, by the way, comes from the Social Security OASDI tax being currently capped at $121k ($118k in 2016). There's an extra 6.2% paycheck + 6.2% payroll tax (or 12.4% FICA, for the self-employed) on top of the Federal tax brackets. Once you break out of the Social Security Wage Base, your tax burden drops.

Do any of you people bother doing the math before you talk about whether the math works out?

People who advocate for UBI don't math.

Actually, a universal social security would stabilize the social security OASDI system permanently by providing a basis; reduce total income tax burden on all income earners (the rough, unadjusted model cuts the top tax bracket from 39.6% to 35%); reduce payroll taxes by 0.9%; and reduce corporate income taxes by 2.5%.

Try actually doing the math once.

Math tallying government budgets and universal social security projections. Also math about impacts on take-home wages.

I also did further math on the handling of childcare welfare and naturalized American households, which came out (in 2013) to cost ~1.4% more of all AGI on top of this. This system shifts OASDI from payroll to income taxes and redistributes it into a universal benefit, then restores OASDI's full benefit to OASDI recipients by restoring the OASDI payroll tax at 5.3%, hence why it's only a 0.9% reduction in payroll taxes and not a 6.2% reduction.

Note that this is a rough model, and needs adjustment by the CBO. The tax brackets actually peak at the middle-income level, then fall back down again. Even without adjusting to smooth tax brackets, the low point is at $200,000, where a single earner takes home $2,700 more spendable income than he does today, and a two-adult household (joint filer) takes home around $11,000 more. Everyone with more or less income than this is more-advantaged by this system.

That middle-class peak tax bracket, by the way, comes from the Social Security OASDI tax being currently capped at $121k ($118k in 2016). There's an extra 6.2% paycheck + 6.2% payroll tax (or 12.4% FICA, for the self-employed) on top of the Federal tax brackets. Once you break out of the Social Security Wage Base, your tax burden drops.

Do any of you people bother doing the math before you talk about whether the math works out?

I understand how this might confuse people as I had the same misunderstanding of heat pumps myself.

I have no confusion about heat pumps. The standard for cold weather with a reversible heat pump is to combine it with resistive heating. Preferably high voltage resistive heating with PTC heating elements. Heat scavenging from the drivetrain further improves performance.

No, you don't. The batteries need to be protected from being frozen.

A cruising li-ion EV on the highway is putting 300-400W into its battery pack, a couple hundred into wiring, and perhaps 800W into each of the motor and inverter. You can take power from the latter three at will. The former you can take at a rate slower than it enters, assuming that it's preheated and that said rate is positive; if it's cold enough and poorly insulated enough, then heat loss is greater than incoming heat and you have to use resistive heating and/or scavenged heat from the drivetrain.

Not all EVs make good use of heat scavenging, but at least the Model S does a good job scavenging it. Which is why heating doesn't cut as much of the range as you'd expect. For example, at 120kph / -20C the 75's range drops from 328km to 293km by using the heater - 11% for nearly three hours of heating at a quite cold external temperature.

Into that mix come early automobiles, little more than glorified carriages with primitive gas engines or electric motors. It’s not surprising that despite the manifold annoyances of dealing with horses, they were viewed with suspicion. And our faithful saddle pals had been good enough for thousands of years, right? Remember what they yelled at early motorists? “Get a horse!” (source)

The Evolution from Horse to Automobile: A Comparative International Study.

Others are smarter than you. You also might want to bear in mind that you can continue to have remote logging, etc. It isn't a replacement, but additional security.

You are a moron.

Good luck getting a clue!

fascism
faSHizm/
noun
an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
synonyms:
authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy;


Hmmm

fascism
faSHizm/
noun
an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More (in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.

Here are more links:
Fascism /fæzm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism,[1][2] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and control of industry and commerce,[3] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. The first fascist movements emerged in Italy during World War I, before it spread to other European countries. Opposed to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism, fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[4][5]
Then we have the implication of your posting that NAZIs were left-wing, which is as far from the truth as your calling W or trump liberals.
National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism (/ntszm, næ-/[1]), is the ideology and set of practices associated with the 20th-century German Nazi Party, Nazi Germany, and other far-right groups. Usually characterised as a form of fascism that incorporates scientific racism and antisemitism, Nazism's development was influenced by German nationalism, Pan-Germanism, the Völkisch movement and the anti-communist Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged during the Weimar Republic after Germany's defeat in World War I.
Nazis were strongly opposed to the far left, but added minor elements of it, to appease ppl. The real fist in the nazis was PURE RIGHT WING, just like Trump today is. NAZIs HATED the far left which is why they invaded USSR as soon as they thought they could. Perhaps the ONLY element of the left that they accepted was the lefts love of science. Sadly, the NAZIs perverted science, just like today's GOP does

Here is how the ORIGINAL socialist party was perveted in under a year, by hitler and his far right cronies.
The small number of party members were quickly won over to Hitler's political beliefs. He organized their biggest meeting yet of 2,000 people, for February 24, 1920 in the Staatliches Hofbräuhaus in München. Further in an attempt to make the party more broadly appealing to larger segments of the population, the DAP was renamed the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) on February 24.[12][13] Such was the significance of Hitler's particular move in publicity that Karl Harrer resigned from the party in disagreement.[14] The new name was borrowed from a different Austrian party active at the time (Deutsche Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei, German National Socialist Workers' Party), although Hitler earlier suggested the party to be renamed the "Social Revolutionary Party"; it was Rudolf Jung who persuaded Hitler to follow the NSDAP naming.[15]

That is history. What you are writing is nothing more than a total re-writing of history in hopes that the idiots will follow your line of thinking .

From MS - SMB Ports 445/139 (TCP) & 137/138 (UDP) protection via:

Disable SMBv1 on the SERVER, configure the following registry key:

Registry subkey: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters Registry entry: SMB1

REG_DWORD: 0 = Disabled
REG_DWORD: 1 = Enabled

Default: 1 = Enabled

Enable SMBv2 on the SERVER, configure the following registry key:

Registry subkey:HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters Registry entry: SMB2

REG_DWORD: 0 = Disabled
REG_DWORD: 1 = Enabled

Default: 1 = Enabled

---

Disable SMBv1 on the CLIENT, run the following commands:

sc.exe config lanmanworkstation depend= bowser/mrxsmb20/nsi

sc.exe config mrxsmb10 start= disabled

Enable SMBv2 & SMBv3 on the CLIENT, run the following commands:

sc.exe config lanmanworkstation depend= bowser/mrxsmb10/mrxsmb20/nsi

sc.exe config mrxsmb20 start= auto

---

* The above is per https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2696547/how-to-enable-and-disable-smbv1,-smbv2,-and-smbv3-in-windows-vista,-windows-server-2008,-windows-7,-windows-server-2008-r2,-windows-8,-and-windows-server-2012/

(IMPORTANT: Finally, THIS HAS BEEN PATCHED by MS but you can protect this way too & it works...)

APK

P.S.=> For a SINGLE 'standalone' non-networked PC (no home network/LAN but TCP/IP connected online) turn off Server & Workstation services.

That shuts off any "handles" (port 445) this thing propogates thru + turn off NetBIOS over TCP/IP in your internet connection & uncheck/disable Client for Microsoft Networks + File and Print Sharing. Port 139 & 445 always pop up issues over time. It also makes your packet trains smaller (no encapsulation of LanMan)

I covered all this 11++ yrs. ago in a security guide I wrote for users with a single system & apparently, its advice STILL STANDS THE "TEST OF TIME" https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22HOW+TO+SECURE+Windows+2000%2FXP%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/ vs. even today's threats like this one.

* This effectively makes this threat a non-issue + saves you CPU cycles/RAM & other I/O wasted on services you don't NEED as a single PC user only... & you don't. They're just wastes with a single PC really. Many services are (covered in guide above based on CIS Tool guidance (who took fixes to their ware from "yours truly" too, no less)) & again, no more encapsulated packet bulk.

AND?

Don't be STUPID & click on attachments in bogus malicious emails this thing propogates thru also (Chrome/Opera/Webkit users - BEWARE of the ShellControlFile issue that just popped up (.scf file) noted here-> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/17/chrome_on_windows_has_credential_theft_bug/ ) ... apk

I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

APK your posts on this and the hosts file posts, and more, have never been in error and/or bad advice by BlueStrat

* My code's recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

APK

P.S.=> See subject, /. peers quoted above & APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/ imo you're not capable of it skills-wise... apk

I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised by mmell

his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

APK is kinda right. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

APK your posts on this and the hosts file posts, and more, have never been in error and/or bad advice by BlueStrat

* My code's recommended & hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

APK

P.S.=> See subject, /. peers quoted above & APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

See subject & you're welcome to do better than APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

Ads/script & malware rob speed/security/privacy

Hosts add speed (via hardcodes/adblocks), security (vs. bad sites/malware/poisoned dns), reliability (vs. dns down), & anonymity (vs. dns requestlogs/trackers).

Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity & faster vs. addons/routers/remote dns!

Avoids DNSChangers in routers/IP settings & dns redirects (99.999% of ISP DNS != patched vs. it) + lightens DNS load & resolves faster from local system RAM!

* Via what u NATIVELY have in the IP stack in FASTER kernelmode!

APK

P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e01211ca36aa02e923f20adee0a3c4f5d5187dc65bdf1c997b3da3c2b0745425/analysis/1433430542/

There are J2ME versions of Google's Authenticator app, if that is your thing. Do yourself a favor and enable 2FA, without the insecure SMS messaging channel before your account is hacked.

My understanding is that they don't occupy a vital niche in the food-chain or otherwise in the ecosystem.

Google is your friend. I knew the answer to this already, but was surprised by how readily available source material was to support my response.

A few notable items:

http://www.nature.com/news/201... http://io9.gizmodo.com/what-if... http://science.howstuffworks.c... https://www.theguardian.com/gl...

Etc.

You were surprised? Yeah, I was too, particularly as to the data you provided, since I believe the point you were trying to make is mosquitoes are necessary and vital to our ecosystem.

Some of your articles hint that eradication would not create an ecological impact. Some also stated that eradication efforts are "not worth it unless there was a very serious public health emergency."

Perhaps the true question is how many humans will have to become infected or die until the latter statement rings true?

Perhaps we look at history to answer that. The mosquito has long been known as the deadliest animal on the planet. They have killed countless humans through the ages. It carries over a dozen diseases, including malaria, which still kills over a million people every year. Now Zika has been added to that infamous list.

Sad when you consider the innocent victims of Zika are babies suffering from microcephaly. The fear of that affliction alone is a form of terrorism when it comes to people wanting to start a family. Imagine the other impacts of areas known to be Zika-prone. Think your home value would not plummet if they found a 300% increase of Zika cases in your zip code? Impact local business that rely on humans being outside but now aren't due to increased fear of infection? I'm willing to bet it would. Much like the global concerns surrounding the Ebola outbreaks a few years ago, humans can get rather panicky when it comes to increased chances of being exposed to a life-threatening disease. Perhaps rightly so.

It would appear that we are doing something now to counter the threat, likely because enough revenue is at risk. Efforts have to be financially justified when it comes to preventing harm or death these days. If we do nothing in response to increased risk, then the mosquito will simply stand as yet another form of population control.

My understanding is that they don't occupy a vital niche in the food-chain or otherwise in the ecosystem.

Google is your friend. I knew the answer to this already, but was surprised by how readily available source material was to support my response.

A few notable items:

http://www.nature.com/news/201...
http://io9.gizmodo.com/what-if...
http://science.howstuffworks.c...
https://www.theguardian.com/gl...

Etc.

Look at https://myactivity.google.com/... if given a user name does not look like it is hard for google to display what you did.

No, but Google won't provide that data without a search warrant or subpoena, properly issued by a court. In a criminal case like this, they'd have to have probable cause to think there's evidence in his search history before the court would issue the warrant needed to get it from Google.

It's more likely they got a warrant to search his computer, and found the searches in the browser history.

Not in Sweden. Here it is common even for bankoffices to be cash less.
I usually have less than a dollar on me.

Close to 530 out of 780 offices lack cash

See subject: Everyone benefits by sharing it. It's exactly how programs like mine work APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/ using valid information from reputable & reliable security sources & yes, it works well (even per /.ers who like & use it) ala https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10839329&cid=54777645/

* Sharing "cyber-security" information here would be to EVERYONE's advantage involved, e.g. - KNOWN sources of threats would be one such example (& blocking them, just as my program above does, keeps you PROOFED vs. touching them & thus being infected by them...)

APK

P.S.=> You can quickly + EASILY figure out when it's invalid/bogus (so if a source consistently provides bad or invalid information/misinformation, you simply stop using them)... apk

Look at https://myactivity.google.com/... if given a user name does not look like it is hard for google to display what you did.

Most thieves work as teams.
Robbery is one of the crimes most likely to have a group of perpetrators, but even so the majority of robberies (55-60%) are committed by solo individuals.

https://books.google.com/books...

I did when it was first released and not sure if this pdf is the same one https://www.google.com/url?sa=...

But a large majority of it covers cell phones.

Why use Delaware? It's less taxing than other states!

(add your own rimshot noise)

https://www.google.com/#q=things+i%27ve+seen+students+doing+in+class

How about some data to put these arguments into context?

Its less fashionable neighbor, Queens, outearns Brooklyn at $54,373 per year. New York City's most suburban borough, Staten Island, is also its richest, with a median household income of $70,295, while the suburban counties surrounding New York are all richer than any of the boroughs.Jan 9, 2014
https://www.google.com/url?sa=...

The ACS 1-year data shows the median family income for San Francisco was $103,237 in 2015. Compared to the median California family income, San Francisco median family income is $29,656 higher. As with the median household income data, 2016 family income data for San Francisco will be released in September of 2017.
http://www.deptofnumbers.com/i...

Based on those numbers, a "family" composed of 2 earners would be making 5x the median income for a familly in San Fran and 6x that in Staten Island. I'd say that definitely qualifies as rich. Now whether that affords one a "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" type of living, would be a different question. No doubt though that $250K is a lot even on the wealthy coasts. That housing costs are outrageous is a whole other issue.

This took me 2.5 seconds to google and I don't even give a crap about the issue.

Could people stop being so damn lazy when the information is easy to verify?

https://www.google.com/search?...

New York Taxable Income Rate
$25,000 - $50,000 3.591%
$50,000 - $500,000 3.648%
$500,000+ 3.876%

https://www.thebalance.com/cit...

Alabama: Birmingham levies an income tax of 1%
Arkansas: Seven Arkansas school districts assess an income tax surcharge equal to 10% of state income tax before tax credits. They are Berryville, Green Forest, Westside, Hope, Huntsville, Waldron, and Marshall.
Colorado: Three cities impose flat taxes on compensation. Aurora charges $2 per month on compensation over $250, Denver charges $5.75 per month on compensation over $500, and Greenwood Village charges $4 per month on compensation over $250.
District of Columbia: D.C. has a bracketed income tax system. The rates are 4% for the first $10,000 of income, 6% for $10,000 to $40,000 of income, and 8.5% for income over $40,000.
Delaware: Wilmington has a flat 1.25% tax on income.
Iowa: 666 school districts impose an income tax surcharge ranging from 1% to 20% of state income tax owed.
Indiana: All 92 counties in Indiana have an individual income tax. Tax rates are in the process of being changed and will be announced on the Indiana Department of Revenueâ(TM)s website once they are finalized.

Kentucky: Eight cities in Kentucky levy income taxes on residents and non-residents. They are: Bowling Green (1.85%), Covington (2.5%), Florence (2%), Lexington-Fayette (2.25%), Louisville (2.20% for residents and 1.45% for non-residents), Owensboro (1.33%), Paducah (2%), and Richmond (2%). Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government and Louisville - Jefferson County also impose taxes on businesses.

Maryland: All 24 Maryland counties levy income taxes on residents and non-residents. Tax rates range from 1.25% to 3.20%. Baltimore also has an income tax of 3.05%.
Michigan: Several Michigan cities impose income taxes with rates ranging from 0.50% to 2.50%. Detroitâ(TM)s income tax rate is 2.50% for residents and 1.25% for non-residents.
Missouri: Both Kansas City and St. Louis have an income tax of 1%.
New York: Yonkers and New York City both have individual income taxes. New York City's income tax rates range from 2.907% to 3.648%. Yonker's income tax rate is equal to 10% of your net (after credits) state income tax.
Ohio: 235 cities and 331 villages in Ohio have an income tax, including Columbus, Toledo, Cincinnati, and Cleveland. Ohio law requires a flat rate that cannot exceed 1% unless it is approved by the voters. Ohio local income tax rates range from 0.40% in Indian Hill to 3% in Parma Heights.
Oregon: The Tri-Met Transit District (includes Portland) assesses an income tax of 0.6318% and the Lane County Transit District (includes Eugene) assesses an income tax of 0.60%. Multnomah County (Portland) also assesses a 1.45% business income tax.
Pennsylvania: Most municipalities in Pennsylvania assess a tax on wages, known as the Earned Income Tax. This tax is usually split between the municipality and the local school district. The local Earned Income Tax is only assessed on earned income, like wages. Unearned income like interest and dividends are not taxed. Pennsylvania state law limits the Earned Income Tax to a maximum flat rate

There are list of Chinese proxy servers on line. One is http://cn-proxy.com/ You can get it in English by using Google Translate https://translate.google.com/t...

It is satanic brain-washing, and I want my child to have no part in it. Teaching a gifted student "the dumbass way" of doing addition is tantamount to
torture.