Domain: rense.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to rense.com.
Comments · 512
-
Re:Witnesses Stories Don't Matchhow about a combination? there are 40 witnesses saw a plane (but not the same plane, two different sorts of jumbo and some swore it was a bizjet, semi-explainable, they were in shock and memory is not always 100%):My take, there was a plane of some sort, and it looked at least reasonably like a passenger jet
Next we have a witness who saw a millitary helicopter, from the far side of the building, and it went towards the helipad near the crash site just before the fireball. Only one witness (as far as I know) but its not like you could confuse a plane with a helicopter all that easily and it was coming from the far (hidden from freeway) side. Relevance? unsure. possibility given later
Next we have millitary trained personal claiming to have smelled cordite (explosives), witnesses who claimed the airoplane blew up before impact, witnesses who saw a missile, and a damage pattern more consistant with a combination missile/explosives strike than a plane crash. We also have a video showing:
- no recognizable airplane: the one frame that shows a small white thing doesnt look like a jumbo jet to me (but could be...maybe): wrong size/shape/thickness but its hard to tell. It looks like a missile to me though.
- Fireball is COMPLETELY wrong for a jet crash... isn't it? am I the only one noticing this? a jet traveling at 500 miles per hour flies smack into a building and the resulting fireball looks perfectly symetrical around a vertical center line? not splayed out as I would expect? can someone explain this cos I cant see it
- some people have raised doubts about its authenticity: to do with shadows, lighting, what looks like editing of the colours in one frame (talking about older release here). Me- I think its probably mostly real, but question what it shows, and REALLY would like to know if there is no conspiracy, then why has the other footage not been released, and why did this take so long?My theory? there was a plane (remote controlled, maybe the original, maybe not) and it was somehow exploded before impact (perhaps the helicopter shot missiles at it? I doubt they would be powerful enough but dont know, or it already had explosives on board, or the anti arcraft missile battery actuallly worked but they havent told us). or maybe overflew the building and kept out of view (Im doubtful of this one, but otheriwse where is all the wreckage?) I think there was a missile involved (either in blowing up the plane before impact or causing some of the damage- wintesses saw it) I'm a bit thrown off by the fireball. It doesnt fit with what I imagine should have happened in a pure plane crash (why symmetrical?) but also cordite is almost smokeless and flashless and so couldnt have caused it. there is the strangely almost perfect edge of the hole supposedly knocked out by part of the airplane (it seems looking at that website that that may have just been a mistake and it was really an access hole made for emergency workers: makes more sense)
ok so what are we left with? confusion. And I think thats likely one of the main purposes of the attack at the pentagon: confusion and misdirection. Get conspiracy theorists confused and making up wild speculation, including the speculation that there wasn't a plane, and most people will just assume they are nuts, cos 40 people saw the plane. maybe the people involved werent sure they could count on the plane not getting shot down at the last minute (eg by the aa missiles), so set up explosives just in case? this particular conspiracy is generally thought NOT to have deeply involved the military in the planning and execution, with the bush administration, CIA and others involved probably relying on confusion due to the wargames and key personel who were in on it to dupe the millitary into letting it happen, which also explains flight 93 getting shot down (not everyone went along with it...)
-
Do you have a right to know what's in your food?
Just as the subject is written, do you?
Your concern to genetically-modified (and patented) varieties of crop is a legitimate concern -- intellectual property can travel by wind and "taint" a neighbors substrate, causing a tournament for the forced subjection to a foreign private law. Recently as of February of 2006, CONGRESS was receiving a Bill from that HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES as H.R. 4167, the "National Uniformity for Food Act." Despite the misleading title of the Bill, among the content was that whomever bought any food were not allowed to know of certain ingredients or qualities on its nature.
How this all sets is, as of recently, it is a known fact that "Aspartame" causes cancer; its an artificial sweetener in many beverages, mostly in them branded as diet drinks. Another recent discovery is at microwave-popcorn factories, where everyone working among the "artificial butter flavoring" had all caught severe allergies and atrocious lung cancers. It was such a dangerous cancer that the remedy for one worker was a lung transplant! The chemical that caused the damage is "Diacetyl" and also is used in various brew of beer and who knows what else.
That Bill would allow those corporations to simply use any ingredient, method, or application of artifice to provide an incomplete and misleading report to the Contents of all packages lading the product assembled of them. It's no different than postal fraud, when someone intentionally mis-presents the contents of a parcel, where harm can be incurred by the worker that moves said parcel (even from grocery store to their domicile and house). I don't drink diet beverages, but I know some people that do. Nearby me is a box of microwave-popcorn, where on the Contents is no list for the ingredients of the artificial "light butter"; there is information on oiled popcorn kernels, but nothing on the butte flavoring -- into the trash it will all go.
If there ever was false advertising for a product, the above Bill would only try to seal someone's prior and future effort at fraud; brought from the end of genetically-engineered and patent crap and into the lives of people.
References are...
thomas.log.gov (Four versions of 4167 to this hour)
MSDS for butanedione
DRAYMANS.COM on Diacetyl
Ambulance-chasing lawyers
RENSE.COM on the Bill(a conspiracy theorist/fact never hurt anyone to prove)
oh no! I found this PrionPlanet.com article, therefore there shouldn't be anything to worry about this Bill or aritificial butter flavouring. Keep grazing the grocery aisles, and take your monthly shots (money-pill/vaccine shots) -
Re:damn you, Scuttlemonkey!!!!
Look, the crap you are spewing out has been answered a million times.
Odd, then, that you failed to sufficiently answer them in your response. All we get from you is more distortions and evasions.
Repeating lies won't make them true.
Then why do you persist?
This is really a waste of time, except that you may convince some gullible idiot that you are telling the truth.
Exactly why I'm taking the time to debunk your nonsense now.
As you point out, they were built to withstand smaller planes.
The 707 and 757 are virtually identical in weight, and actually have the same fuselage diameter.
Meanwhile, the WTCs were overdesigned by 600%
Still want to argue that the 757 is sufficiently different from the 707 to invalidate my point?
And then the top part fell down on the floors below because of the plane, and the building went to the ground.
Setting aside for just a moment that you're presenting the conclusion of your argument as if it was a defense, if the collapse had occured as you suggest, then there would have been a necessary slowdown as the 'top part' impacted the rest of the building, overcame the resistance of the steel structure, and caused the collapse. Video evidence contradicts this, however, instead showing the towers collapsing at free-fall speeds. No stutters or pauses of any type, just a smooth acceleration all the way down.
Again, it doesn't have to melt. It weakens at significantly lower temperatures.
Again, the temperatures of the kerosene fires were far too low to cause the weakening you speak of. Again, the steel in question is ASTM E119 certified. Apparently, you didn't check the link I provided, in which Kevin R. Ryan,
Site Manager of the Environmental Health Laboratories, South Bend, Indiana (A division of Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.), states:We know that the steel components were certified to ASTM E119. The time temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be exposed to temperatures around 2000F for several hours. And as we all agree, the steel applied met those specifications. Additionally, I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all.
The results of your recently published metallurgical tests seem to clear things up (3), and support your team's August 2003 update as detailed by the Associated Press (4), in which you were ready to "rule out weak steel as a contributing factor in the collapse". The evaluation of paint deformation and spheroidization seem very straightforward, and you noted that the samples available were adequate for the investigation. Your comments suggest that the steel was probably exposed to temperatures of only about 500F (250C), which is what one might expect from a thermodynamic analysis of the situation.
However the summary of the new NIST report seems to ignore your findings, as it suggests that these low temperatures caused exposed bits of the building's steel core to "soften and buckle"(5). Additionally this summary states that the perimeter columns softened, yet your findings make clear that "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperature above 250C". To soften steel for the purposes of forging, normally temperatures need to be above 1100C (6). However, this new summary report suggests that much lower temperatures were be able to not only soften the steel in a matter of minutes, but lead to rapid structural collapse.
This story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did soften or melt, I?m sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans. Alternatively, the contention that this st -
Re:damn you, Scuttlemonkey!!!!
Your post is the one containing lies, deception, manipulation and general nonsense and unfounded claims, hkmwbz.
Let's go over them one at a time, shall we?
No steel/concrete skyscraper has ever had huge planes smash into them.
Ignoring for just a moment that that statement is patently untrue, the fact is that the WTC towers were specifically designed to be able to withstand a strike from an airliner. The airliner cited is a 707, the largest airliner of the day, and only slightly smaller than the 757s that did strike. At any rate, the towers did in fact weather the strike just fine, only swaying back and forth a few feet.
Straw man. The steel didn't melt. It was hot enough to significantly weaken it (ask a blacksmith), but not to melt it.
Wrong. The steel in question was rated ASTM E119. The time temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be exposed to temperatures around 2000F (1100C) for several hours. There is simply no way that a kerosene fire could raise the temperature of the steel that high. And yet, WTC1 collapsed in only 102 minutes, while WTC 2 collapsed in only 56 minutes.
No steel/concrete building has had the top part partly separated from the rest of the building, only to give in and fall down on the floors below.
Wrong again. During the Madrid skyscraper fire (which burned far hotter and far longer than the either WTC tower), the steel warped enough to send the top ten floors crashing down upon the rest of the structure. However, the building did not collapse, and even managed to continue supporting a massive construction crane on the roof.
Yes. It was severely damaged by falling debris from the other buildings.
Wrong a third time. Check this map to see the relative placement of the buildings. Building 7 was never hit with more than incidental debris, yet, it collapsed sudddenly and completely into its own footprint, precisely like the twin towers. Perhaps you're thinking of WTC 6, which stood right next to the north tower, and was severely damaged by falling debris (two gigantic holes punched down enitrely through the structure). Problem is...despite this horrrendous damage, WTC 6 continued to stand until it was demolished during the cleanup.
If you are implying that "explosions" == "bombs", then you are, frankly, a fucking moron. Many things can cause explosions.
I call bullshit. List your candidates.
If you think that "looks like" == "actually is", then you are, frankly, a fucking moron.
Perhaps you'd like to give your explanation of what the firefighters witnessed, then.
When a building collapses, there is lots of air which suddenly finds itself in a lot less space, so it finds its ways out, resulting in what people observed - puffs of smoke, or puffs of dust, debris, etc.
First of all, you're talking about a different point than the parent. Since both points are important, I'll address them both (yours first).
I assume you're referring to the jets of gas and dust that were observed appearing at regular locations down the side of the building during the collapse. Here's where your explanation falls flat:- If the jets were nothing more than escaping air, how is it that they were filled with dust and smoke, despite the inconvenient fact that there was no damage whatsoever on those lower floors? Where could that smoke and dust have come from?
- How is it that the jets were so regular in appearance, some even visible from two sides of the tower simultaneously? If this was just pressurized gas finding a way out, as you assert, once it had blown one window, the pressure would decrease, pr
-
Re:Speaking of which...
Well, I guess that's my cue.
Since I was on an on-site call for much of yesterday, this is the first opportunity I've had to post here. Sorry for the delay.
Well, I've looked very carefully at the newly released video (as I'm sure everyone else in the nation has by now), and like most others, I'm rather disappointed. I was really hoping for some sort of conclusive evidence (one way or another) so we might finally put one of the 9/11 controversies to bed.
Unfortunately, the newly released video shows nothing conclusive...quite the contrary. There is only one frame that contains new information...the alleged 'nose cone'. However, this nose cone certainly does not look like it belongs to a 757, although it is understandable that at the speeds this object was travelling (450-500 mph), there will be a certain amount of blurring.
It's a real shame that the only frame in video 1 that seems to show any of the aircraft has the aircraft hidden behind that yellow column, while the only frame in video 2 that seems to show any of the aircraft shows only a tiny bit of the nose. I realize that these are CCTV cameras whose framerate is not high, but while it's unfortunate that video 1 contains no useful information about the aircraft, the fact that video 2 has no useful info either can only be described as unfortunate squared. How unlucky can you get?
From the BBC article:"Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77," president Tom Fitton said.
Exactly how is a blurry, indistinct shot of a nose cone that doesn't seem to belong to a 757 going to 'put to rest' the conspiracy theories? All this video can do is fan the flames.
This video was not released to attempt to put the conspiracy theories to rest...it was released for one purpose only...to forcefully remind the general public of 9/11. Bush' numbers at the polls are abyssmal, and beating his breast over 9/11 hs been proven to help them. After all, the link to the video on Fox News is titled 'Timely reminder of a clear and present danger'. Timely, indeed.
If the government was truly interested in ending the controversy, why not release the several other videos that were shot that day? Neil Cavuto of Fox News said that 'the other videos didn't pan out', but if that's the case, why does the government need to deny access to them at all? Why can't we see them? It's not like the don't exist.
Another quote from Fox News' Neil Cavuto:"It is odd that this image hits our senses as the debate over our freedoms hits the headlines."
No, Neil, it's not 'odd' at all. It's what we've come to expect from a President who shamelessly uses the horror of 9/11 to further his own political ends. -
Re:Remember the constitution?
Yes, we agree on many points. And I'm glad we managed to keep this civil. The points we disagree on are rather big though:
I do not believe that the death of tens of thousands of civilians can be justified by claiming to be bringing democracy.
I do not believe that you can force democracy on a country. All you can achive that way is a pseudo colony with a pseudo democracy. The kind of situation leading to the current state of Africa.
I do not believe that Bush believed there were WMDs in Iraq, nor that Iraq was closely tied to Al Quaeda, nor that Iraq was any kind of threat to the US.
I do believe that the "intelligence failures" were 100% intentional.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-15936 07,00.html
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/sp ecial_packages/iraq/intelligence/11901380.htm
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/sp ecial_packages/iraq/intelligence/12995512.htm
I do not believe that Bush invaded Iraq for humanitarian reasons.
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
This count is most likely closer to the truth:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11 674.htm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/ne ws/2006/05/12/wirq12.xml
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2162249, 00.html
http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,1 186519,00.html
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArti cle.asp?articleID=8218
The list is endless but I'll stop here.
I believe that Bush does and will continue to do exactly whatever he feels will benefit him, with no concern what so ever for how many dies for his gain. Not that you actually need anything but his actions and his statements to prove this, but here are more links:
http://downingstreetmemo.com/archive/2004-10-31-Ho ustonChron-Herskowitz/
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12 885.htm
I believe that Bush is now planning his next war of aggression.
http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&trh=20 060511&hn=33036
http://www.rense.com/general71/tdarg.htm
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2006/05/ us-feverishly-works-to-frame-iran_13.html
http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/839133.sh tml
http://english.people.com.cn/200605/13/eng20060513 _265252.html
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Condoleeza_Rice_ admits_she_responded_to_0509.html -
Re:Buckle Up
There were dozens upon dozens of eyewitness reports who say that a commercial jetliner was what crashed into the Pentagon.
This statement is misleading in the extreme. Most of these eyewitnesses were not in the proper position to actually witness the aircraft striking the Pentagon. Also, there are several witnesses who claimed to see a missile...as well as several eyewitnesses who claim to have seen a commuter plane. These differences in testimony are not at all surprising, given the historic unreliability of eyewitness testimony, as well as the simple fact that the object was travelling at approximately 500 miles per hour.
What is telling, however, is what your eyewitnesses didn't report...namely, the terrific blast of turbulence that would have necessarily accompanied a 757 travelling 500 miles per hour mere feet above the ground.
At any rate, physical evidence trumps eyewitness evidence any day of the week, so if we really want to get to the bottom of this, we ought to consider the ample physical evidence present at the site.
All of the "conspiracy" reports talk about how "no wreckage" was found at the scene. That is patently false.
And this is a patent Straw man argument. Certainly, there is wreckage...there are even airplane parts visible within said wreckage. There are other sites that examine those pieces in detail and present compelling arguments that these pieces did not, and could not, come from a Boeing 757, but I'll let you research those in your own time. The assertion that I was making, however, was that there simply is not enough wreckage to acount for the mass of the 757.
There was TONS of Boeing 757 wreckage recovered, in total, from the Pentagon.
I call bullshit. Link, please.
The ONLY place I've EVER seen any claims about supposed video from the Sheraton, gas stations, etc., is in the internet flash video. I have seen no reference or proof ANYWHERE else, from ANY source, that videos have supposedly been confiscated "minutes" later by the FBI.
Ask, and ye shall receive.
Funny how I was able to find it...took me all of 30 seconds, too.
Also, stop and think about this: where was the (visible) "wreckage" from the WTC towers? Is the only reason we even believe that commercial planes crashed into the towers is because we were able to see it with our own eyes?
Two things:- This is an utterly ridiculous comparison to make. The impact on the WTC towers happened some 70 stories up, while the Pentagon impact allegedly occured while the aircraft was mere inches from the Pentagon lawn. I'd direct you to sort through the WTC rubble for the aircraft pieces, but there's two problems with that:
- The cleanup was done in record time, denying investigators a chance to examine the debris (itself a federal crime).
and - Virtually all the steel was sectioned into 30-foot lengths, while all the concrete was completely pulverized into fine dust. It's doubtful the aircraft debris could have survived such total destruction (let's ignore, for just a moment, that steel from buildings involved in accidental collapes does not magically seperate into 30-foot lengths, and that the total kinetic energy generated by the WTC collapse was nowhere near the energy required to pulverize the concrete).
- The cleanup was done in record time, denying investigators a chance to examine the debris (itself a federal crime).
- But, if you still insist on drawing this ridiculous parallel, all one needs to do is look at pictures of the WTC impacts. In each impact, the silhouette of the impacting aircraft is obvious, from the fuselage to the wingtips. Remember that these were steel columns that these 'fragile' wingtips sliced through like so much butter. Such is the power of kinetic energy.
However, when we return to the Pentagon, we are now asked to believe that the wings of the impacting 757 magically 'folded up' along the fuselage, to allow the e
- This is an utterly ridiculous comparison to make. The impact on the WTC towers happened some 70 stories up, while the Pentagon impact allegedly occured while the aircraft was mere inches from the Pentagon lawn. I'd direct you to sort through the WTC rubble for the aircraft pieces, but there's two problems with that:
-
Re:Assumptions which also explain other odd facts.
That's easy. The Madrid building didn't have the fireproofing insulation blown off of ten floors worth of steel supports.
The ASTM E119 certified steel comprising the structure of the WTC twin towers was able to take temperatures of 1100 degrees Celsius for several hours while maintaining structural integrity, without the benefit of 'fireproofing insulation'...at least, that's the U.L's opinion...and I'm inclined to trust them.
The jet fuel burning in the WTC could not have even come close to softening or annealing the structural steel of the WTC, let alone in as little time as 85 minutes. Please look here for an excellent mathmatical proof of this.
One plane hit near the center of the tower, the other farther off center. The offset was of little ultimate consequence given the load-bearing nature of the open floor plan.
Sorry, but I'm not buying that. It's farfetched enough to believe an airliner crash (which the towers were specifically designed to withstand) plus weak kerosene fires burning in an oxygen-poor environment could somehow make every load-bearing member fail simultaneously, but expecting another airliner crash in a different part of the other tower could somehow yield the same perfectly symmetrical collapse is beyond incredulity.
It seems obvious that it was a less robust design
Really? 'Seems obvious'?
If you've done any research into WTC 7 you would know that due to it a) being built straddling an existing electrical substation, and b) being Mayor Guiliani's doomsday bunker (a $15 million project), a command post from which to operate in case of a total infrastructure breakdown, it was one of the most (if not the most) overdesigned structures on the planet.
that was hit with about 50 stories of debris from the neighboring tower's collapse; have you been to ground zero? Building 7 and Building 6 were both heavily damaged by debris from the north tower.
Apparently you haven't...try checking out this map:
You'll see that WTC 7 is significantly farther away from the nortrh tower than WTC 6. In fact, WTC 6 stands directly between the north tower and WTC 7.
So how exactly could '50 stories of debris' jump out from the north tower, over WTC 6, and strike WTC 7?
The answer is: it couldn't, and it didn't. There are no reports of more than incidental debris from the north tower striking WTC 7. In contrast, WTC 6 had two huge holes punched straight through it from top to bottom, but remained standing until it was demolished during the site cleanup.
I don't know where you got your '50 stories of debris' information, but we'd really like to see a link. This assertion runs contrary to all other observations of the event.
I vehemently disagree with your theories on several grounds, the most obvious being that no conclusive evidence has emerged to show any government involvement in this matter
What we have here is conclusive evidence that the incidents surrounding 9/11 did not occur in the fashion described by the official version of events. Since that version was researched, verified, and published by our government, they are, by definition, involved in the matter. QED.
your theories are the ravings of a crackpot
That's hardly helpful. I could call your theories the ravings of a self-deluded Polyanna, but that wouldn't be helpful, either.
What is helpful is stimulating intelligent, informed, honest, and rational debate of the subject. I was once like you....I believed the 'official version of events' unquestioningly. When I was introduced to this information by a friend, I was overwhelmingly skeptical, so I decided to go about debunking the CT claims in favor of the official version.
However, the -
Re:Assumptions which also explain other odd facts.
What an amazing application of circular logic.
Steel reinforced concrete construction is not similar to the WTC's construction.
Are you seriously maintaining that steel-reinforced concrete structures are more fire-resistant than steel-framed structures?
There are also many examples of buildings similar to the building in Madrid collapsing due to a fire.
Apparently not. What was your point again?
(BTW, I call bullshit on this FUD. Please give examples of steel-framed buildings that have collapsed due to fire, or admit they don't exist.)
You are basically stating that it impossible for a steel framed building to collapse from a fire. Perhaps you should inform the regulatory bodies who write fire codes and design specifications and inform them that their work is pointless.
Umm, the reason that it is impossible for a steel-framed building to collapse from fire is precisely because of the work done by the regulatory bodies who write fire codes and design specifications. Your contention that steel-framed buildings can collapse due to fire is the contention that would render their work pointless.
By the way, speaking of regulatory agencies, you might want to read this communication from Kevin R. Ryan shortly after the 'collapse by fire' theories began flying.
Conspiracy or not, however, it seems more logical to me that a building which is known to be collapsible by fire did collapse by fire
You can't be serious. The only reason that the buildings were 'known to be collapsable by fire' is because the 'official account of events' maintains that they indeed collapsed from fire, despite the inconvinent fact that this explanation flies violently in the face of all accepted knowledge of architecture, chemistrry, metallurgy, physics, and just plain common sense.
rather than a massive plot requiring shaped charges with fireproof wireless explosive blasting caps in shaped charges placed directly against every support column in 3 buildings.
Several floors in WTC 1, 2, and 7 were closed in the preceeding week due to "security concerns". Bomb-sniffing dogs were also removed during this period.
Modern demolition explosive is fireproof, and wireless triggers are commonplace.
Yes, it may seem "far-fetched" to someone who hasn't looked critically at the facts, but the longer you look, the more you are forced to conclude that the 'official account of events' does not add up. -
The hair on the back of my neck is standing up
Being a paranoid type, I tend to overreact to things, but consider the following-
Given the US Governments current plans to consolidate all the data they hold about you into ginormous centralized multi-agency databases-
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/c-6-9-ioi.html
They then intend to secure this data with biometric-containing RFID equipped tokens-
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/b-1-information .html#is
But they intend to use Microsoft MIIS as the security engine-
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetmag/issues /2005/11/PostMortem/default.aspx
And to save cost they are going to let BANKS issue the RFIDs (the same places that routinely send pre-approved credit cards to your dog)
http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/cc/20040420a1.asp
http://www.thriftyfun.com/tf209806.tip.html
Put all this together and it becomes frighteningly plausible that the government has little interest in securing citizen data, and a lot of interest in assembling data it can use to control its citizens.
http://www.rense.com/general15/happy.htm
But nobody will complain, becuase totalitarian control of our lives will be, like having a chip implanted, *just so convenient*.
However, for those who are still conscientious, it is possible to comment on the government's plans. But please be restrained and responsible in doing so, ranting and raving will just discredit opposing viewpoints.
http://www.estrategy.gov/lineofbusiness/docs/ioi_r fi.doc -
Re:Lost my respect with 9/11 article
So being that the all of the Arabs on board the flight all did brief "flight training" is all a coincidence? This is all documented.
Except that of the 19 people the FBI said hijacked the planes, 7 have since been found to be alive.
Until the investigators can sort out who *actually* hijacked the planes, saying whether this or that theory is right or paranoid is kind of pointless, don't you think?
-
Re:Are you crazy???
-
Re:These people dont have sense of proportion
Kill a man, you get 20 years in jail. 'Steal' 20 bucks worth of software, you get 10.
And if you do it again after you get out, you get 20 new years.
Tell me again how the U.S. is not a fascist regime? -
Sarcasm Aside...I'm worried. Wait, no, that's an understatement. I'm scared badly of what is going on. I remember what things were like in 1983 with the USSR and this is much, much more frightening. Here we have a situation where a man is honestly considering the use of nuclear weapons on another nation that has, to date, not attacked anyone directly on United States soil. If he decides to nuke Iran, then all hell will break loose. I believe that this article does an excellent job of painting the picture of what the first day of the war with Iran will be like.
I'm even worried that the administration would deliberately sabotage something to cause another 9/11 type even in the near future. One hypothesis I overheard was that a boat with a low-yield nuke would be detonated off of the coast of Los Angeles, San Francisco, or Miami, with claims that Iran caused it. I will be taking a cruise towards the beginning of June and don't like even contemplating that idea.
Sorry, just had to get this off my chest anonymously...
-
More precise definitions of fascism
From writer Umbertbo Eco:
http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_blackshirt.ht ml
From the partisan but informed Dr. Lawrence Britt:
http://www.rense.com/general37/char.htm -
Re:More evidence of corruption?
You are also not supposed to notice the complete lack of airplane parts in and around the pentagon.
really? And why do you think that there should be large pieces of debris all around the place, when there shouldn't be any in the first place? Take a look at this and this.
Why do I get the feeling that even though you have now been presented with plenty of pictures of airplane-parts in and around Pentagon, and with pictures that show that usually no large pieces of debris remain after such a crahs, you will simply decide to ingore them, and you will keep on believing that "there were no airplane-parts inside or around Pentagon!".? If you do change your mind, I would like you to say it aloud here. A simple "I was wrong" will do. If you don't reply, then I'll just assume that you didn't change your mind, and that would make you a moron. -
Ancient story, it happened years ago
-
Words have meanings
Sending out a CD with inadequate privacy notifications is not Fascism
-
Australia did it a while ago
I don't know if its redundant but I was reading this some time ago and thought it was interesting then. Check this out if your interested.
-
That would take zillions of very big bombs
Water is a pretty good shock buffer, and there's a lot of energy in a tidal wave. You'd be better off putting a few big bombs in a hole somewhere else.
-
Re:And the other half?
-
Re:Star Trek IVAnd, once we whip around a star, we can go back in time to save the whales and invent transparent aluminum (which, of course, my physics professor showed us was impossible to create).
Oh really? What about this or this? Granted, this is transparent Alumina, which is aluminum oxide - Al2-O3 but it's close enough in my book.
-
Call For A Red Synthetic Terror Alert
http://www.rense.com/general69/redsynth.htm
Call For A Red Synthetic Terror Alert
By Webster Griffin Tarpley
2-5-6
The intense international intelligence warfare pattern mandates a move to red alert -- the highest vigilance -- for the upcoming superbowl Sunday in the USA and the Turin winter Olympics, and perhaps all the way to the March 20 opening of the Iranian oil bourse, which spells the beginning of the end for six decades of world dollar hegemony.
The Iranian oil bourse opens March 20 -- this is the strategic key. The Cheneyacs want war to stop the bourse from deflating the sick US dollar. The crumbling of European resistance has given new strength to Condi's nuclear lynch mob against Iran, with that country about to be hauled before the UN Security Council. At that point, a wider Middle East war will be immediately in sight.
The Mohammed cartoons are a transparent provocation by NATO intelligence through a Danish right wing newspaper of limited circulation. This classic US-UK provocation has had an enormous effect. Islamic circles need to realize that this is a cynical ploy designed to lead to an attack on Iran and thence to general war, and treat it that way.
We had the latest British terror bombing in Achwaz, Iran last week (Jan. 24), killing several people. The trial of British-backed terrorists in Iran starts in about 2 weeks. The situation of the British invaders in southern Iraq is becoming critical. Afghanistan is about to boil over. The US and North Korea are trading nuclear war threats across the 38th parallel. Russia has accused the British of flagrant spying, and there is every reason to believe this charge. Venezuela has expelled a US military attache as an obvious agent provocateur; now the US expels top Venezuelan diplomat. Now the fake provocation of an alleged IED bomb near a school in Gaiithersburg, Maryland in the Washington DC suburbs, impacting the personnel of the Bush administration and the federal government in general; many top officials live within a few miles of this school.
There was real hysteria in the corridors of the US government this afternoon. A new Sudden Response terror drill is taking place at Charleston. South Carolina. Will this drill go live in the way other drills went live in London last July 7? The latest leaked Downing Street memorandum reveals Bush as proposing to send US U-2 spy planes disguised in UN colors to be shot down over Iraq to secure a pretext for the illegal aggression there. This reveals Bush in the Operation Northwoods tradition, ready to commit acts of war in the form of impeachable offenses.
Detroit is a burned-out auto city, expendable in the eyes of the finance oligarchs. Turin, Italy, home of FIAT, is another expendable burned out ex-industrial city. An action in Turin would push the Europeans to join the US in the attack on Iran. The sinking of the Egptian ferry in the Red Sea may well fit into this pattern, but this is not clear. The Patriot Act has not been renewed. Top neocons face indictment and jail sentences.This is the classic moment when the neocons and their rogue network backers go back to Leo Strauss's nihilist revolution, capable of throwing humanity back into the Stone Age.
Webster Griffin Tarpley Washington DC
February 4, 2006 -
Re:So they know they were African...
The sole basis for that is that the earliest human remains we've found so far are African. The evidence is scarce to say the least and is now disputed China seems to be a candidate and with more evidence to back it than the African claim.
-
Re:Not illegal.
The president was granted this power by congress and congress knew all along about it.
Nonsense. Congress knew nothing about it. The wiretaps were "authorized" by the Office of Legal Council, an arm of the Justice Department full of appointed judges, appointed by. . .Guess who?
Nor was there a lot of agreement within the OLC about the legality of the wiretaps:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11079547/site/newsweek /print/1/displaymode/1098/
These are the same people who said that just because we signed the Geneva Convention doesn't mean we're bound by it, but can still bitch about anyone else not obeying it, because it's the law.
I've not seen that anywhere.
Really?
http://www.rense.com/general69/legit.htm
Well, now you have.
KFG -
Indeed, a liberal company
First, there's that guy, Bill Clinton, who allowed sensitive information to be leaked to China while forbidding security agencies to investigate and helping CIA to be almost destroyed.
http://www.discoverthenetwork.com/individualProfil e.asp?indid=644
After that, there's this other nice guy, George Soros, who thinks the treason par... I mean, the democratic party is so nice he must purchase it by both financing every kind of subversive liberal cause in existence as well as financing its elections, what the party heads of course love. A man who, of course, also loves China:
http://www.discoverthenetwork.com/individualProfil e.asp?indid=977
http://www.rense.com/general61/thecaseofgeorgesoro s.htm
And now, Google, a major contributor to the treas... sorry, to the *democratic* party, also explicitly enters the gang.
Oh, this was "such" a surprise. As if liberals weren't like that... -
Re:Cold War junk code?
According to this guy http://www.rense.com/general3/coca.htm Coca-Cola has been working with the CIA to spy on several foreign governments for years, so I guess that it is not that far fetched that the CIA would use Microsoft as well.
-
Re:First Anonymous Post
President Bush sucksIf only it were true. He seems to be able to lie us into a war, shred the constitution, hand out important government jobs like stocking stuffers to incompetent nitwits, give aid and comfort to our enemies in time of war, suppress political descent, and run up enormous debt in our name to enrich his backers, and there doesn't seem to be anything the hand wringing "opposition" party can do to stop him.
If only he sucked , he's be out of there so fast his head would spin.
--MarkusQ
-
Re:BREAKING NEWS!
Actually, below are some pictures of Marfa lights and if anyone still thinks these are car lights then he has his own problems
:)
http://www.whattofix.com/blog/archives/2005/07/giv e_up_trying.php
http://www.rense.com/general45/excel.htm
http://taskboy.com/lectures/UFOlogy/02_Pre-1946/sl ide_03.html
Also am I the only one who read the pdf? I didn't see anything about any lasers. All they did was pure statistics; # of lights appeared at given time vs # of cars that drove on the 67th highway. This could be pure coninsidence. -
A light in the darkness.
It's rather wryly amusing that the event that might have tipped the scales against the renewal of the Patriot Act was Dubya authorizing the unlawful surveillance of American citizens.
Honestly, we can't expect any better conduct from Bush, a president who has been quoted as saying the Constitution is'just a goddamned piece of paper'. Apparently he's forgotten all about that oath he took twice to uphold said 'piece of paper'. Fortunately, it looks like most of the Senate (including a few noteworthy Republicans who crossed the aisle on this one) have a slightly higher regard for the Constitution of the Unites States.
Excellent quote from TFA:"I don't want to hear again from the attorney general or anyone on this floor that this government has shown it can be trusted to use the power we give it with restraint and care,"
Senator Russ Feingold D-Wisconson, and the only senator to vote against the Patriot Act in 2001.
-
Re:I don't think it'll be cheapmeh. kitty may go out and come back in, but it is also the only domesticated pet that can KILL a pregnant woman and the unborn faetus just from the fumes coming outta that nasty sand-shitter-urine-catcher next to your toilet.
I've always thought that cat-owners were a bit loony, and one of the citations at the end of the above-linked wikipedia entry seems to support that notion, at least the lower IQ portion of it
;) -
*Christ, What Balls!*
Likewise, please consider the case of Mexicans and Blacks. Mexicans are infamous for killing their girlfriends when they get in disputes. Blacks are famous for carjackings. But if you read what they think of as their holy book (The Holy Bible), it is clear that stealing and killing girlfriends (or just premarital sex) are forbidden. And if a black or Mexican were to do those things, he'd have to do a great deal of penance.
Wow. Just wow. Have you any idea what you've just said? I am at a loss for words. Truely breathtaking ignorence. I mean, have you ever even met a black or hispanic person in your entire life? I tell you; you've got to get up early in the morning to be this ignorent. No really. It takes effort. You might not like this guy's comments, but you have to admire his dogged determination to be as big an asshole as he can possibly be.
However, as you may or may not know, Hasidim have different standards for cheating Jews vs. cheating gentiles. It is part of their religion. A hasid published a book on this recently, and it is a big deal, because he lays it all out: http://www.rense.com/general48/newbook.htm -- where Orthodox Jews recommend to other Orthodox that the gentiles are evil and a different species. And that a Jew should deceive them about their true feelings -- e.g. don't tell the gentiles that you think they are evil, and of a different species.
Yeah, maybe this guy did write such a book, and maybe he does think its OK to rip people off because they're not a member of [insert clique here]. If he does, then he's an asshole. If anyone does things like that then they're an asshole too. I have no doubt that there's at least one Hasidist out there who rips people off; because Hasidists are human beings, and there are rotten apples in every batch. But on the main, I know that Hasidist are by and large OK guys. I know this because statistics tell me so. And statistics is mathematically and scientifically verifiable. Which is of course, something you're opinions can never be.
You need to get out more and visit your local bazzar. That or read Roots or something. -
Re:Run By Hasidim?
About 90% of these stores in New York and New Jersey are owned by hasidic Jews. The cheating methods they use are standard practice.
I'm just talking about peoples' experiences, not what you've read.
E.g. Hasidim are infamous for cheating people -- including other non-hasidim who consider themselves Jews. Ask any Israeli -- it causes a lot of conflict.
Likewise, please consider the case of Mexicans and Blacks. Mexicans are infamous for killing their girlfriends when they get in disputes. Blacks are famous for carjackings. But if you read what they think of as their holy book (The Holy Bible), it is clear that stealing and killing girlfriends (or just premarital sex) are forbidden. And if a black or Mexican were to do those things, he'd have to do a great deal of penance.
However, as you may or may not know, Hasidim have different standards for cheating Jews vs. cheating gentiles. It is part of their religion. A hasid published a book on this recently, and it is a big deal, because he lays it all out: http://www.rense.com/general48/newbook.htm -- where Orthodox Jews recommend to other Orthodox that the gentiles are evil and a different species. And that a Jew should deceive them about their true feelings -- e.g. don't tell the gentiles that you think they are evil, and of a different species. -
Re:Sensationalist Journalism?
See http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/101805_w orld_stories.shtml#5 for an interesting take on the whole situation...
Ok you want to get really paranoid?
http://www.rense.com/general20/mic.htm -
what about Aluminum oxide?
Granted, it sounds like this new stuff may actually be transparent, but please don't take the title away from Aluminum oxide ceramics, which were written about over 3 years ago.
http://www.rense.com/general20/transparentalum.htm -
Re:The article is disappointing
Ask and ye shall receive. And apparently the oldest dupe yet.
-
Picture of
-
Re:The Asian Centurydood,
From the October 10th issue: "$1 Million Reward Offered to Prove No Explosives Used in WTC Collapse".Entrants must prove, and support with detailed drawings for all significant events, how the twin towers collapsed in 8.5 seconds, as the video and seismic records show, without explosives. Contestants must show exactly whow the concrete was pulverized and ejected hundreds of feet with detailed drawings."
If it's really just "wacko paranoia", I'm sure it'll be an easy million bucks. You should enter. http://www.reopen911.org/
sincerely yours,
wacko paranoid conspiracy theorist.Yet while you're reading this on your computer screen, safe at home or work, thousands of people all over this country must silently wrestle with their thoughts: What if those wacko conspiracy theorists on the Internet are RIGHT?
http://www.rense.com/general68/jumbo.htm -
Its not really 'new' esp if it uses...
Look up Rife http://www.holman.net/rifetechnology/ (Read the history section) and it has been shown to work currntly. http://www.rt66.com/~rifetech/ is another link http://www.rense.com/general31/rife.htm http://www.renewedlife.com/article/?id=28
What got me interesting in this is reading Clarks book the cure for all diseases , I built the zapper and it works well, while not plasma based.
Makes you really wonder why this is all supressed. Take back a History of the AMA journal and the needs of advertising revenue to pay for it.
While at it might as well check out Moray another vein but http://www.nuenergy.org/alt/archive.htm link 1. Free Electricity Generated from the Radiant Cosmos (esp page 3 where the pantent examiner wouldn't allow the patent cause he couldn't concieve of the idea.) -
Re:Erosion of intelligence in general
Actually, I've studied them at great length. Tell me exactly how the current regime
in the US is _not_ a prototypical Facist movement?
My thought also.
Fourteen Defining Characteristics Of Fascism
http://www.rense.com/general37/char.htm
Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each:
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread
domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.
6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
7. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.
9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
10. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist -
Please oppose hate bill 2662
URGENT: PLEASE CONTACT YOUR SENATOR IMMEDIATELY TO OPPOSE AMDT.2662
On Sept 14, the Orwellian federal "anti-hate" bill, AMDT.2662 (The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005), was passed by the House of Representatives. It will establish a "hate crimes" bureaucracy in America, just like Canada's, ending free speech.
AMDT.2662 is designed by the ADL and is exactly the type of legislation that has ruined Canada.
Here is a summary of what the bill would make law:
Although AMDT.2662 ostensibly empowers the government to assist states in prosecution of violent hate crimes, its actual effect will be much more far-reaching. AMDT.2662 will lead to enforcement of the working definitions of "hate" and "hate crimes" which are enforced by the many "anti-hate" bureaucracies in countries throughout the western industrialized world. In such countries, it is now a "hate crime" to criticize members of federally protected groups such as Jews and homosexuals. Utilizing such definitions, "hate crime" indictments have been made or are currently being pursued by Canada, England, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Australia and New Zealand. AMDT.2662 builds a foundation for a "hate crimes" bureaucracy in America, also ending free speech.
Here are some of the specially protected groups which AMDT.2662 defends:
Homosexuals. Any public criticism of homosexuals will soon be considered a hate crime, just as it was for 11 Christians under the Pennsylvania hate crime law on Oct. 10, 2004. These Christians were arrested as "hate criminals" for preaching during a huge "gay pride" rally and faced 47 years in prison and $80,000 fines each.
Women. A woman who claims her boyfriend used a sexist word against her and raped her the last time they had sex, can press charges for a "hate crime" of rape. Punishment will triple the usual penalty, about 30 years in prison.
Jews. Already the Dept. of Global Anti-semitism, being established in the US State Dept., makes it "anti-semitic" to express "strong anti-Israel sentiment" against Israel or its leaders. It also says upholding the New Testament charge that Jews killed Christ is "anti-semitic." Under "anti-hate" laws in Canada and Europe, such statements are "hate crimes" punishable by harsh fines and imprisonment.
AMDT.2662 will hasten such anti-Christianity in America as well.
ENDING FREE SPEECH RADIO
If this amendment is approved, FCC restrictions will soon descend on American talk show hosts, with lists of banned topics. Hosts will be fined or imprisoned and stations will lose their broadcast licenses, just as in Canada, if they violate these restrictions.
Don't let this happen to the USA. Don't let them tear up your God-given Constitution.
http://www.hatelawsexposed.org/
http://truthtellers.org/
http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/adl_hate_bill_ talk_radio_death_knell.htm
http://www.rense.com/general67/hatm.htm
http://www.rense.com/general67/speech.htm
http://www.rense.com/general66/adl.htm
CONTACT YOUR SENATOR NOW!!!!
Go to http://www.hatelawsexposed.org/ -
Please oppose hate bill 2662
URGENT: PLEASE CONTACT YOUR SENATOR IMMEDIATELY TO OPPOSE AMDT.2662
On Sept 14, the Orwellian federal "anti-hate" bill, AMDT.2662 (The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005), was passed by the House of Representatives. It will establish a "hate crimes" bureaucracy in America, just like Canada's, ending free speech.
AMDT.2662 is designed by the ADL and is exactly the type of legislation that has ruined Canada.
Here is a summary of what the bill would make law:
Although AMDT.2662 ostensibly empowers the government to assist states in prosecution of violent hate crimes, its actual effect will be much more far-reaching. AMDT.2662 will lead to enforcement of the working definitions of "hate" and "hate crimes" which are enforced by the many "anti-hate" bureaucracies in countries throughout the western industrialized world. In such countries, it is now a "hate crime" to criticize members of federally protected groups such as Jews and homosexuals. Utilizing such definitions, "hate crime" indictments have been made or are currently being pursued by Canada, England, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Australia and New Zealand. AMDT.2662 builds a foundation for a "hate crimes" bureaucracy in America, also ending free speech.
Here are some of the specially protected groups which AMDT.2662 defends:
Homosexuals. Any public criticism of homosexuals will soon be considered a hate crime, just as it was for 11 Christians under the Pennsylvania hate crime law on Oct. 10, 2004. These Christians were arrested as "hate criminals" for preaching during a huge "gay pride" rally and faced 47 years in prison and $80,000 fines each.
Women. A woman who claims her boyfriend used a sexist word against her and raped her the last time they had sex, can press charges for a "hate crime" of rape. Punishment will triple the usual penalty, about 30 years in prison.
Jews. Already the Dept. of Global Anti-semitism, being established in the US State Dept., makes it "anti-semitic" to express "strong anti-Israel sentiment" against Israel or its leaders. It also says upholding the New Testament charge that Jews killed Christ is "anti-semitic." Under "anti-hate" laws in Canada and Europe, such statements are "hate crimes" punishable by harsh fines and imprisonment.
AMDT.2662 will hasten such anti-Christianity in America as well.
ENDING FREE SPEECH RADIO
If this amendment is approved, FCC restrictions will soon descend on American talk show hosts, with lists of banned topics. Hosts will be fined or imprisoned and stations will lose their broadcast licenses, just as in Canada, if they violate these restrictions.
Don't let this happen to the USA. Don't let them tear up your God-given Constitution.
http://www.hatelawsexposed.org/
http://truthtellers.org/
http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/adl_hate_bill_ talk_radio_death_knell.htm
http://www.rense.com/general67/hatm.htm
http://www.rense.com/general67/speech.htm
http://www.rense.com/general66/adl.htm
CONTACT YOUR SENATOR NOW!!!!
Go to http://www.hatelawsexposed.org/ -
Please oppose hate bill 2662
URGENT: PLEASE CONTACT YOUR SENATOR IMMEDIATELY TO OPPOSE AMDT.2662
On Sept 14, the Orwellian federal "anti-hate" bill, AMDT.2662 (The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005), was passed by the House of Representatives. It will establish a "hate crimes" bureaucracy in America, just like Canada's, ending free speech.
AMDT.2662 is designed by the ADL and is exactly the type of legislation that has ruined Canada.
Here is a summary of what the bill would make law:
Although AMDT.2662 ostensibly empowers the government to assist states in prosecution of violent hate crimes, its actual effect will be much more far-reaching. AMDT.2662 will lead to enforcement of the working definitions of "hate" and "hate crimes" which are enforced by the many "anti-hate" bureaucracies in countries throughout the western industrialized world. In such countries, it is now a "hate crime" to criticize members of federally protected groups such as Jews and homosexuals. Utilizing such definitions, "hate crime" indictments have been made or are currently being pursued by Canada, England, Sweden, Germany, Italy, Australia and New Zealand. AMDT.2662 builds a foundation for a "hate crimes" bureaucracy in America, also ending free speech.
Here are some of the specially protected groups which AMDT.2662 defends:
Homosexuals. Any public criticism of homosexuals will soon be considered a hate crime, just as it was for 11 Christians under the Pennsylvania hate crime law on Oct. 10, 2004. These Christians were arrested as "hate criminals" for preaching during a huge "gay pride" rally and faced 47 years in prison and $80,000 fines each.
Women. A woman who claims her boyfriend used a sexist word against her and raped her the last time they had sex, can press charges for a "hate crime" of rape. Punishment will triple the usual penalty, about 30 years in prison.
Jews. Already the Dept. of Global Anti-semitism, being established in the US State Dept., makes it "anti-semitic" to express "strong anti-Israel sentiment" against Israel or its leaders. It also says upholding the New Testament charge that Jews killed Christ is "anti-semitic." Under "anti-hate" laws in Canada and Europe, such statements are "hate crimes" punishable by harsh fines and imprisonment.
AMDT.2662 will hasten such anti-Christianity in America as well.
ENDING FREE SPEECH RADIO
If this amendment is approved, FCC restrictions will soon descend on American talk show hosts, with lists of banned topics. Hosts will be fined or imprisoned and stations will lose their broadcast licenses, just as in Canada, if they violate these restrictions.
Don't let this happen to the USA. Don't let them tear up your God-given Constitution.
http://www.hatelawsexposed.org/
http://truthtellers.org/
http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/adl_hate_bill_ talk_radio_death_knell.htm
http://www.rense.com/general67/hatm.htm
http://www.rense.com/general67/speech.htm
http://www.rense.com/general66/adl.htm
CONTACT YOUR SENATOR NOW!!!!
Go to http://www.hatelawsexposed.org/ -
Not enough documentation for you?
Try these sites:
http://www.newsmakingnews.com/sexandcapitol7,18,01 .htm#article2
(full text of many news articles)
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a388cd49f5ce8.ht m#article19
(Sex, Lies, Videotape, Teenagers, Drugs, Blackmail, and Death)
To see the entire "Conspiracy of Silence" documentary:
http://www.rense.com/general61/appallingconspiracy of.htm -
Re:The proverbial canary.
Look at the ties the Bush family has to that dirty Nazi money also. Maybe the corporations are just following the lead set by the Presidential family.
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/randy/swas5.h tm
http://www.rense.com/general26/dutch.htm
http://www.john-loftus.com/bush_nazi_scandal.asp
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article32 55.htm
technoid_ -
Re:Volcano machine?
These people might:
http://www.rense.com/earthchanges/emfmind.htm
Google search for HAARP and weather modification.
Never mind that if we had that kind of power available to us, we wouldn't have an energy crisis. :) -
Re:Mad Cow and CFD is a hype - it is safe.
Just about everything you posted in wrong. For example if contacting CJD requires a genetic defect then how do you explain the cluster of CJD found in southern Idaho recently (please no hillbilly jokes). European cows and sheep where effected in huge numbers because of feeding practices and not inbreeding.
Also Kuru a prion disease found in tribes in New Guinea was found to be caused by a tradition of eating dead relatives as a religious practice. -
...but it was written in Italian
...in Olinto de Pretto's handwriting. Or maybe David Hilbert's. Either way, the "original" probably is second-generation from something else.
-
14 simple signs.
http://www.rense.com/general37/char.htm
Now, how far away do you think it is? -
Just another "coincidence"
It stops being a conspiracy theory when all you have are facts.
http://rense.com/Datapages/londonbmb.htm
Patriot Act coming up for revote
England losing support to stay in Iraq
New need to fuel the fight against 'those terrorists'
London just got the olympic bid
The g8 summit.
The orwellian "we can't define the enemy, so we can't define the victory, so we'll just keep an ongoing war against a mythical enemy" syndrome
The list goes on
posted anonymously, because my karma can't take any more hits from those that censor anything that would shatter their world view.