Slashdot Mirror


China Going Up and Coming Down

SoCalChris writes "The BBC writes that China has just completed the world's highest railroad, climbing to 16,640 feet (5,072 meters) above sea level. The cars will be sealed to help passengers cope with the pressure changes from the altitude. The line is expected to begin carrying passengers next year." This news comes at the same time that their Chinese taikonauts return from their spaceflight after just 115 hours in orbit.

400 comments

  1. First Prime Factorization Post by 2*2*3*75011 · · Score: 4, Funny

    SoCalChris writes "The BBC writes that China has just completed the world's highest railroad, climbing to 2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*5*13 feet (2*2*2*2*317 meters) above sea level. The cars will be sealed to help passengers cope with the pressure changes from the altitude. The line is expected to begin carrying passengers next year." This news comes at the same time that their Chinese taikonauts return from their spaceflight after just 5*23 hours in orbit.

    1. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you going to do when we come up with a story about cracking some new cryptographic scheme and it requires factoring the product of two huge prime numbers? :)

  2. Safety? by mfh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude. Then what?

    I remember riding a train that had colided with a truck a few years back. This wouldn't likely happen at that altitude, but what could happen would be wildlife and environmental blockage.

    It seems like a challenge to me.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Safety? by QuasiEvil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would assume that, like other rail systems that operate in harsh climates, there are backup systems. Figure when BC Rail built their all-electric Tumbler Ridge line, they included a small diesel engine in each locomotive in case the overhead power failed so that the crew wouldn't freeze to death (winters in the Tumbler Ridge area are absolutely brutally cold). While the Qinghai-Tibet Rwy isn't electrified, there just have to be backups for such things. In this case, supplemental heat and bottled oxygen would be the two I'd worry about. Based on what I've read, the average elevation of the line is something like 13,000 feet, which is still perfectly breathable, especially to those accustomed to thin air. (I live at about 7,000, and spend weeks during the summer above 10000-11000.) It's only going to be on the high passes that you have issues with air. I'm guessing that it's not built to Western-type standards of redundancy (because, after all, this still is *China*, who was still running mainline steam locomotives until this year), but I'm sure they have something in case of failures. Figure each coach probably has its own systems, so if one fails, you pile everybody into the working coaches. My guess is that they'll probably get away from the Chinese way of one locomotive per train as well - anything running in those nasty conditions, I'd want at least two units in case one died somewhere en route.

      Add yet another railway to my list of lines I have to go photograph at least once in my life...

    2. Re:Safety? by mikael · · Score: 1

      It's probably no difference from the danger of travelling in either a British train in Summer or on the London underground on the hottest day of Summer (8th June 2001).
      Temperature was around 40 degrees centigrade, and they were serving free bottles of water for people coming out of the train.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:Safety? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      (reads article)

      Around 800 passengers, packed into an eight-carriage train, were stranded below ground in temperatures that soared over 30C.

      "Soared over 30C?" Dear God , those poor, poor Brits.

      Tim Jones, 37, a marketing manager .... said, "....The temperature must have got to 120f, so it was starting to get a bit scary. "

      Sounds like a bit of heresay there - did he have a thermometer handy?
      It's the third week of spring here where I live and we've already had a few 39C days. Suck it up, you Brits. Remember - what doesn't kill you, prepares you for global warming in the 21st century. Enjoy :-)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    4. Re:Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude. Then what?

      Then what? No different than what they do right now. Drive a jeep. C'mon, 5,000meters is high, it causes altitude sickness, and COULD be fatal, for some people. However, the pressurization of the cars is for COMFORT, not safety. Right now the only way to get up to Tibet is to either fly, or take a jeep/bus combo over the same 5,000meters. And no, those jeeps are not pressurized. The floors are, however, littered like crazy with empty aspirin packages...

      Get real. People live up there. When I read about this train, the oxygen was the least on my mind. The first thing I thought of was how the Tibetans have been fighting this railroad, without much success (a few people have disappeared, a monk was sentenced to death and then later reduced to life in prison after Amnesty International went ape shit) since it's another permanent infrastructure put in place which makes the Chinese occupation of Tibet more and more permanent.

      Free Tibet!

    5. Re:Safety? by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Going through a heat wave above ground in a ventilated or open area is quite different to being trapped in an enclosed space in 30+ degree heat.

      This is why kids trapped in a car can die from heat exhaustion even though the heat outside is quite bearable.

    6. Re:Safety? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      First the average person is just fine at 16,500. Yeah, they will be a bit light headed, but nothing too bad (will not be good on heart condition, pregnancy, etc). Obviously, they will not be working.

      Secondly, they will probably not have O2, but just a compressor, no different than what you find in a jet.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:Safety? by smvp6459 · · Score: 2, Funny

      [U.S.-centric ignorance]30 degree heat? Wouldn't those poor people be hypothermic and not hot?[/U.S.-centric ignorance]

    8. Re:Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they'll just leave them up there. Screw em, no? Think, man. God gave you a brain.

    9. Re:Safety? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      I know. I work 1200m underground in a hot, wet, stinky lead mine.

      But I still reserve the right to poke fun at the brits, the sooks (poke).

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    10. Re:Safety? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Funny
      [U.S.-centric ignorance]30 degree heat? Wouldn't those poor people be hypothermic and not hot?[/U.S.-centric ignorance]
      You have to remember that the British measure their temperatures in centipedes, not fairyheights like sensible people.
      So you have to convert from centipedes to fairyheights.
      Let's see, 30 centipedes, multiply by 666, dance naked around the altar, carry the one, sacrifice the virgin, run the units program, type "30C<CR>F<CR>", and you get, uh, "conformability error", which is pretty damn hot I guess.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    11. Re:Safety? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude. Then what?
      How do you feel about transoceanic flight? What if the plane stops working over the middle of the Atlantic, then what?
    12. Re:Safety? by Palal · · Score: 1

      I guess the Engineers on BC Rail are lucky, cause in Siberia they have no such things on their VL's.

      --
      -Palal
    13. Re:Safety? by seweso · · Score: 0

      If something happened they just have to call for the Thunderbirds!

    14. Re:Safety? by csrster · · Score: 1

      Actually federal aviation regulations require that all civilian aircraft have a redundant subsystem that automatically returns them to low altitude in the event of a total engine failure.

    15. Re:Safety? by rongten · · Score: 1

      You start dancing with the sharks and *AA agents.

      --
      Zed: Nothing is ever easy
    16. Re:Safety? by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Then a few people might die, it would be in the news, they'd repair whatever broke, and go on. Just like with every other means of transport on the entire planet and in the entire history of humankind. Sh1t happens. Get over it. We're not going to stop creating new transport infrastructure until someone finall invents some 100% safe means of transport.

    17. Re:Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I visited Tibet in April this year. We stayed mainly in Lhasa and Tsetang, but on an excursion one day we hired a 4x4 and (with our rather too close-watching guide) drove 5 hours to a sacred lake. Interestingly most of the journey was on a road that followed the tracks of the new railway (although there wasn't much actual track laid when we visited).

      The lake was the highest point of our journey, at (IIRC) 5,100 metres (the same height as Everest base camp, higher than any part of the railway). We had no trouble breathing at rest, but pounding headaches were our reward for any kind of exercise (jogging up a hill to get a good photo etc). The Chinese are more susceptable to altitude sickness (our Chinese friend who travelled the silk-road part of our China trip with us refused to come to Tibet for that reason), which may explain the worker's need for oxygen (especially as they were probably doing a LOT of heavy lifting and labouring).
      I don't think getting stuck at that altitude at rest for a day without cabin pressure would cause anyone any serious problems.

      The main problem would be in rescuing passengers and clearing the line after a crash. 30 minutes outside Lhasa on our drive to the lake we came to a long traffic jam (very unusual in Tibet!). Two trucks had collided on the narrow road, both drivers dead, what was left of their vehicles strewn across the road. We were able to get around the mess by some insane 4x4 driving (thank God we paid for the upgrade from minibus!). When we returned nine hours later (after our visit to the lake) the jam was still there, just about being cleared with help from one of the railway cranes and about 50 military trucks that had mysteriously appeared from nowhere. This was just 30 minutes outside of Lhasa, what if a train crashed on one of the more remote parts of the line?

      But yes, the real REAL issue is the affect this will have on Tibetan people and wildlife. The railway line runs within metres of many villages, and will make them completely uninhabitable. And it runs the full length of many valleys, how will this impact the migration of grazing animals? (Much of the line is on raised embankment, and so entirely separates one side of a valley from another.) Tibet is a beautiful country with a wonderfully diverse range of people and cultures. But already Chinese-led tourism is ruining the most famous areas, and the increased number of visitors from the railway will only exacerbate the problem.

    18. Re:Safety? by balloonpup · · Score: 2, Funny
      Actually federal aviation regulations require that all civilian aircraft have a redundant subsystem that automatically returns them to low altitude in the event of a total engine failure.


      Remember, kids, 9.8 m/s^2 isn't just a good idea, it's the law!
      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    19. Re:Safety? by maken · · Score: 1

      yah Its called gravity!!! hehe

    20. Re:Safety? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      Based on what I've read, the average elevation of the line is something like 13,000 feet, which is still perfectly breathable, especially to those accustomed to thin air. (I live at about 7,000, and spend weeks during the summer above 10000-11000.) It's only going to be on the high passes that you have issues with air. I don't know if a Diesel backup would be very effective at 13,000 feet unless they had a big turbocharger. Power output on a naturally aspirated Diesel engine drops 3% for every 1000 ft. above 3000 ft. altitude.

    21. Re:Safety? by ZvlvLord · · Score: 1

      Oh dear, you're worried about trains getting stuck at "16,640 feet (5,072 meters)" ? I bet you never take the plane. Forget about the plane getting stuck, it just falls down...

    22. Re:Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact I really think the monks are really for their own political agenda than the benefit of Tibetan people. A railroad WILL help people there to improve their life. However, it will reduce the theocracy and the previlige the monks enjoy now. People will know more and will be less inclined to be brainwashed by their crap. That's the REAL reason they object to it. In my minds, a FREE TIBET means a Tibet that people can enjoy not only religious freedom but economic freedom as well.

    23. Re:Safety? by mikael · · Score: 1

      It's more than possible. Trains have regularly been delayed due to the wrong kind of heat.

      Trains on the surface and underground tend to be overcrowded at rush hour, with each carriage containing at least 150 passengers (not including those standing). And "air-conditioning" only consists of an extractor fan activated when the carriage is in motion. On some trains, there are scrolling LED displays that give the time, temperature, final and next destination.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    24. Re:Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm assuming you have talked to the Tibetan people and heard of this first hand. Until you've done so, you're assumptions hold no more truth than the Chinese gov't propaganda machine saying that the railroad is good for the Tibetan people.

      FYI, I've been to Tibet, and seen first hand how the police will beat the local people for simply being friendly and trying to communicate with westerners. The Chinese immigrants and local Tibetans don't exactly enjoy the same benefits of this "invasion", and it's rather obvious who has the true benefit.

      Do a bit of research before you take sides with the Chinese gov't. They have a MUCH cleaner image than they did 20 years ago, but they're still communist, and worse yet, in serious human rights violations. A bit of cosmetics applied to the surface doesn't change this.

    25. Re:Safety? by microgametophyte · · Score: 1

      On what fucking planet do you live on? Of course, in everybody's mind a FREE TiBET means a Tibet that people can ...enjoy not only religious freedom but economic freedom as well... Except maybe the Chinese. So yes of course some benefits might come out of this train for the Tibetans. But what is the main goal of building this railway? Helping the Tibetans enjoy economic freedom? Wow. Think man think. Don't be scared, it wont hurt you on the contrary... Sorry man but what is so difficult to understand about the fact that the Tibetans are/where a sovereign nation with its own written language, its own culture, its own religion and so forth and that they have been BRUTALLY invaded by the Chinese. They are outnumbered by the Chinese and are second order citizens in their own land. And this is what this train will do to Tibet. Make it more and ever more Chinese. I don't know how you can come up with such an idiotic point of view but let me tell you that it should be to the Tibetans alone to decide whether they want to have a train running on their land or if they want to be Buddhist or Taoist or communist or whatever. Tibetans want to live free on their land with a democratically elected, non-religious government. But the Chinese have a very different agenda and they are holding very, very tight to it. FREE TIBET!

    26. Re:Safety? by edinjapan · · Score: 1

      Let the Chinese build all the infrastructure they want. This will only benefit the Tibetans in the longrun. When the Chinese bubble crashes and they have to face an unhappy mainstream Han populace in the lower provinces the Tibets will be able to replace the Chinese in the local government and take over all the improvements for themselves.

      --
      Fish....More than just sushi
    27. Re:Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me that anyone who really cared about Tibet would learn Chinese in order to actually do something about it. Imagine if a bunch of illiterate people tried to abuse Americans for slavery era reparatations and Europeans for not integrating their cities like Chicago, New York and Los Angeles are integrated. It just wouldn't make sense. You can't really post here on Slashdot if you don't know English and you can't really get in touch with the Tibet situation if you don't know Chinese. It really irritates those of us who do. Talk about newbies! Duh! Free Tibet! Ziyoude Xizang!

    28. Re:Safety? by Oscarshs · · Score: 1

      I have been Hawaii for several times. What I can see is that americans are building purely american-style supermarkets, parks, hotels, roads (with totally the same traffic signs) on which americans driven cars are run... All americanized. Should we free hawainians too? Leave them along! your arrogant americans! free Hawaii (and alaska...)

    29. Re:Safety? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I have been Hawaii for several times. What I can see is that americans are building purely american-style supermarkets, parks, hotels, roads (with totally the same traffic signs) on which americans driven cars are run... All americanized. Should we free hawainians too? Leave them along! your arrogant americans! free Hawaii (and alaska...)

      Nice troll. Of course you overlooked the minor little fact that the people of Hawaii were actually allowed to vote on becoming a State in the United States. They approved it by a margin of 17 to 1. Do you think that if the PRC allowed Tibetans to vote they would approve their enslavement by that margin?

      I doubt it.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  3. Big Week for China by mordors9 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    With these two accomplishments added to the Slashdot article about them having pasta first makes for a very big week for the Chimese. I have seen some speculation that some of the xinhua photos may have been fakes. They do look impressive. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-10/17/conte nt_3623214.htm

    1. Re:Big Week for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Your slashdot geek membership is revoked.

      You missed the link to the chicks http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-10/15/conte nt_3618725.htm at the bottom of the page.

    2. Re:Big Week for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ooops, the last 4 pictures are really fakes, but the Chineses are too lazy to remove the word 'mo2ni3', which meanings "simulated photoes", from these pictures' titles. otherwise, some stupid slashdot readers may think these pictures are for real.

      **grin**

    3. Re:Big Week for China by moosesocks · · Score: 0
      wow. if those are real, I definitely would not like to be in one of those.

      Let's overview here:

      It looks like one of those aluminum motor homes from the 50s

      It looks like it can barely support its own weight. Granted, gravity is very weak in orbit, blah blah blah, but doesn't this thing get strapped to the top of a rocket?

      It's got burn marks all over it

      And no apparent heat shielding

      The parachute detaches before it hits the ground!?

      It's got all sorts of crap hanging off of it. A loose piece of tile created enough drag to incinerate the space shuttle. This thing looks like it's got a freaking' sewer pipe coming out of it

      All in all, I'd say that this thing looks a lot less safe than the early nasa capsules.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    4. Re:Big Week for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow.

      >You've said that it looks like an "aluminium motor home from..."
      Do you know if it works ok for the job it was designed for? How do the looks matter here?

      >It looks like it can barely support its own weight. Granted, gravity is very weak in orbit, blah blah blah, but doesn't this thing get strapped to the top of a rocket?

      Ignorance is bliss. For things you have no clue about, its best to remain silent or do your own research.

      >It's got burn marks all over it
      >And no apparent heat shielding

      You are speculating. You obvisously have heard the word "heat shielding" and thats about what you know about it.
      "Its got burn marks all over it" - must be the funniest sentence
      I've heard.

      I could continue to post all your trash but I guess we aren;t contributing in a meaningful way on this.

    5. Re:Big Week for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't really see anything wrong here (note: I used to be a rocket scientist).

      > It looks like one of those aluminum motor homes from the 50s

      Well, I'm sure they're mortified that you don't find it attractive :).

      > It looks like it can barely support its own weight.
      > Granted, gravity is very weak in orbit, blah blah blah,
      > but doesn't this thing get strapped to the top of a
      > rocket?

      And I'm sure you've done all the studies to make sure it's too weak? And how strong does it have to be? The top isn't going to be subjected to much aerodynamic drag (assuming it's covered on liftoff). It just has to withstand several Gs on liftoff (and the lighter it is, the less that is).

      > It's got burn marks all over it

      Umm, that's kind of normal.

      > And no apparent heat shielding

      Except for the fairly obvious looking heat shield, you're quite right.

      > The parachute detaches before it hits the ground!?

      I can't see anything wrong with that. The pictures show that they use retros for the final descent. We (the USA) had some plans to do that (I had a friend working on it at McDonnell Douglas), but we stopped funding that sort of research.

      > It's got all sorts of crap hanging off of it. A loose
      > piece of tile created enough drag to incinerate the space
      > shuttle. This thing looks like it's got a freaking' sewer
      > pipe coming out of it

      Again, nothing wrong with this as long as they've got the aerodynamics right.

      > All in all, I'd say that this thing looks a lot less safe
      > than the early nasa capsules.

      Just at a guess, with the advances in technology their system should be much safer than the Apollo's. If it isn't they screwed up.

      Steve

    6. Re:Big Week for China by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      disclaimer: relatives worked for NASA contractors during the 70s, 80s and 90s.

      It looks like one of those aluminum motor homes from the 50s

      I thought it looked more like one of those fancy terra cotta flower pots you can buy along the highway in Mexican border towns for a couple bucks a piece.

      It looks like it can barely support its own weight. Granted, gravity is very weak in orbit, blah blah blah, but doesn't this thing get strapped to the top of a rocket?

      Forgot 8th grade science? It's a dome, the strongest known shape.

      It's got burn marks all over it

      Compare to Apollo landings and the space shuttle. They're not exactly having to paint those tiles black, you know.

      And no apparent heat shielding

      Probably because it's sitting on it. You don't see the heat shield on the Apollo capsules except from below.

      The parachute detaches before it hits the ground!?

      Finally, you name something a little bit hairy...

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    7. Re:Big Week for China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think think the fake looking ones are supposed to be photographs, but rather artistic renderings of the capsule. How else would they get pictures from those angles? Then again, I can't understand those funny little symbols above the pictures, so maybe they are being presented as actual photographs.

      Does anyone else read "takeoutnaut" whenever they see "taikonaut"? Oh, so it's just me then?

    8. Re:Big Week for China by DeMorgon · · Score: 1

      The parachute detaches before it hits the ground!? Finally, you name something a little bit hairy... If you have retro rockets for the terminal stage of the landing then it is prudent to jetison the parachutes before engaging the rockets. You dont want the parachute to cover up the escape hatch or catch fire and impede egress. In windy conditions the chute could end up draging you all over the place. IIRC, the same proceedure was used for the old mars missions. Atmospheric braking to deorbit -> heatsheild jettisoned and chutes deployed at altitude -> parachute detached and retro rockets fired a few hundred feet up -> retro rockets doused and free fall for the last few feet.

  4. Great by nihilogos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well that seals the cultural genocide of the Tibetan people.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This definitely will help Tibet develop whether you think Tibet should be independent or not.

    2. Re:Great by nastyphil · · Score: 1

      Tibet wasn't exactly a democracy before either; People seem to forget that. I do not condone the actions of the PRC, but a feudal theocracy ain't what I would call Shangri-la.

      --
      Dialectician. Archology.
    3. Re:Great by ghoul · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So ? I dont see native Americans running the American continent so why should native Tibetans run Tibet. Dont worry enough casino jobs will be available for the Tibetans. If the Tibetans are too lazy to run their own country they deserve to be second class citizens. We have been hosting the Dalai Lama in India and all that has done is sour our relationship with the Chinese. The Tibetans dont have the guts to fight back and get their country back so why should other people be bothered?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    4. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, Every day I see stories of those poor Native Americans, fleeing over freezing cold mountians, risking being shot at only to end out living in miserable refugee camps.

      The chinese are just so nice, kind and want to help the Tibetians NOT

      If you believe they are the same, may I interest you in some cheap scrap iron, You dismantle - currently in Paris

    5. Re:Great by c_woolley · · Score: 0

      First off, Buddhists do not fight back...The time it would take to fully describe how ignorant you just made yourself sound just is not available. Second, there has never been an issue with "Lazy" Tibetans. The Chinese government took over the country by force (just in case you haven't seen a history book). For those about to mention the Native Americans again, yes, the European settlers and early Americans did horrible things to the Native Americans, and they are not treated nearly as good as they should be, even to this day. It still does not justify Chinese taking over Tibet.

    6. Re:Great by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      the European settlers and early Americans did horrible things to the Native Americans

      "horrible"? It was quite possibly the second biggest genocide in human history. Only Stalin has it beat.

    7. Re:Great by c_woolley · · Score: 0

      Yep. You got it. Good job on knowing about "history." Now...about those Tibetans....

    8. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..., but a feudal theocracy ain't what I would call Shangri-la.

      Oh, for a +1 Irony mod option!

  5. Mixed feelings by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, goody for them. Having a third player in space is probably a good thing even if they are the communist Chinese since they probably won't remain communist a lot longer. On the other hand it is just another doomed government 'prestige' program that won't actually acomplish much before being abandoned the second the cost exceeds the publicity value and that always happens long before anything longterm good can happen.

    Nope, the only hope of our species getting off this rock is private enterprise.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Mixed feelings by Damer+Face · · Score: 1

      Three and a half players. Don't forget us Europeans.

    2. Re:Mixed feelings by hotsauce · · Score: 1

      The Chinese haven't been communist in a long time. Just old, self-serving dictators hiding behind a flag. Happens in a lot of places.

      Whether or not the average /. libertarian sensibility likes it or not, governments have done many important things that private enterprise would never have done, from major medical research, to the internet, to all spaceflight to date.

    3. Re:Mixed feelings by jmorris42 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > governments have done many important things that private enterprise would never have done,
      > from major medical research, to the internet, to all spaceflight to date.

      Exactly. The US went to the moon more than thirty five years ago and the net result is so close to zero it gets lost in the rounding error. A couple hundred rolls of film decomposing away in a climate controlled vault and a couple hundred pounds of rocks. Some would even argue it had a net negative effect since after going to the moon puttering about in orbit was widely seen as an anti-climax. But of course low orbit and establishing a permanent presence was what should have been the priority if the goal was a longterm presence instead of a publicity stunt.

      Give it to the Reds, they at least tried to do the right thing goal wise, but still couldn't really do anything worthwhile before their whole evil empire came crashing down around their ears, leaving their rocket geeks to depend on Western handouts and a supporting role in our boondoggles.

      Yes, government operations have done some fairly important ground work, collected useful information on basic biological processes in space and how to survive there, sent some good 'voyages of exploration' out ahead of the colonists to follow. But the government alone in space would be like Columbus making his voyage of discovery and not being followed up by the hundreds of voyages, mostly private ventures, that followed his path.

      But governments aren't the ones who can do the heavy lifting in space, they can't make a profit and at the current tech level there isn't much of a military use for manned spaceflight. So that leaves private industry. As tech progress marches on it will eventually be practical (read profitable) to get into space and it will be the 'evil' capitalists who will get us there, looking to strip mine the moon or an asteroid probably.

      But lets bring this back more on topic and allow me to burn off some excess karma. The significance of todays event is minimal. Perhaps the Chinese will eventually do something that advances the state of the art in spaceflight but today certainly didn't. A modified Soyuz capsule? Ok, they have to learn to walk before they can run but walking isn't exactly newsworthy.

      Oh but is the second Chinese manned flight. Big whoop. Personally I'm a bit tired of these qualified successes in general. First woman to ___, First Black to ___, First Gay Paraplegic to ___. And this is the SECOND Chinese spaceflight, double boring. Russia got the first guy into orbit before most of the engineers who built this clone were probably born, about as much glory in that as crossing the Atlantic sitting First Class in a British Airways jumbojet. History barely remembers #2, let alone a tortise showing up at #3 when #1 would be* tottering off to the nursing home. Most people can't name the second man on the moon, and only the truly hardcore trivia buffs remember #3.

      * Would be, except Yuri Gagarin died an untimely death in 1968. Everybody else is just following in his footsteps.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    4. Re:Mixed feelings by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > Three and a half players. Don't forget us Europeans.

      If shooting unmanned bottle rockets into space makes you a half player there are a few more to put on the list. But it don't. The name of the game is the conquest of space and unmanned just doesn't get it done.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    5. Re:Mixed feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Most people can't name the second man on the moon

      Oh , I don't know how true that is, after he decked a guy half his age for getting in his face claiming that the Moon landings were faked.

      Yeah, "Buzz" Aldrin was #2.
      #3? Pluto Nash.

    6. Re:Mixed feelings by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1
      Having a third player in space...

      Oh, give it some time. When you're least expecting it, Canada starts throwing Cosmonauts and Astronauts into the sun with the CanadArm.

      --
      Help us build a better map!
    7. Re:Mixed feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is, china does really not have a dictator. They have some sort of different instances where thousands of communist leaders votes to select leaders in different positions, etc. Its really not one-man-has-all-the-power dictatorship as we are used to; but some sort of democracy for everyone that has the right ideology, which really is more about china than communism..

    8. Re:Mixed feelings by Damer+Face · · Score: 2, Funny

      >The name of the game is the conquest of space and unmanned just doesn't get it done.

      Yeah you're right, we need big burly space marines to beat all that vacuum into submission.

    9. Re:Mixed feelings by smithmc · · Score: 1

        Yeah you're right, we need big burly space marines to beat all that vacuum into submission.

      "C'mon, you apes! Do you wanna live forever?!?"

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    10. Re:Mixed feelings by smithmc · · Score: 1

        Whether or not the average /. libertarian sensibility likes it or not, governments have done many important things that private enterprise would never have done, from major medical research, to the internet, to all spaceflight to date.

      True. The Chinese government, however, has done a few other things - like the imprisonment of thousands of political prisoners, the slaughter of millions during its formative years, the continued suppression and denial of basic human rights, continued support for an insane nuclear dictatorship that stands ready to wipe out Seoul at a moment's notice, etc. And few other governments in the world have clean hands, either. So maybe you'll forgive us libertarians for not jumping up and singing along with the rest of you about how great and wonderful government is, mmm-kay?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  6. YYYYEEEEAAAARRRGHH!!! by soapdog · · Score: 5, Funny

    World biggest roller coaster?

    --
    -- Por mais que eu ande no vale das trevas e da morte, meu PowerMac G4 Não Travará!!!
    1. Re:YYYYEEEEAAAARRRGHH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Howard Dean ? Is that you?

  7. Re:Oh Really? by vmcto · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    At first I was thinking this sounds awfully xenophobic...

    And then I thought "He who underestimates the chinese is a fool"...

    But then I realized, I agree. Their track record at honest reporting of events isn't so good.

  8. Good stuff by alucinor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm glad China's having good progress (in many respects). I do hope their government loosens up (maybe money'll soften them like it did ours) so they allow freedom (since it means more money) to speech and internet and whatnot. Just tell them that!

    Now, I really really do hope China doesn't make giant killer robot, and I'll be fine with them for good.

    --
    random underscore blankspace at ya know hoo dot comedy.
    1. Re:Good stuff by Pneuma+ROCKS · · Score: 0

      Damn chinese spy trolls.

      --
      Favorite quote: &quot;
    2. Re:Good stuff by JediLow · · Score: 2, Informative
      I was there this summer, and actually China's government has opened up a ton (I wasn't there as a tourist... and I spent quite a bit of time in Qinghai Province with their college students). While it doesn't have nearly any of the freedoms that we have to the extent we do, its not the closed country that it was 30 years ago... or even 10 years ago. The opening up of China in the 70's and the second opening up in '96 really has changed the political scape of the country - and with the Olympics comming to Beijing in '08 China's opening up even more.

      It'd be great to see real freedom being given there, but the Communist party has come a long way.

    3. Re:Good stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do hope their government loosens up (maybe money'll soften them like it did ours) so they allow freedom

      Wha? If anything, money's influence on the USA government* has reduced freedom.

      * I assume you mean "the USA" when you say "ours" because people outside of the USA usually realise they are communicating internationally.

    4. Re:Good stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I do hope their government loosens up (maybe money'll soften them like it did ours)"

      Oh, yeah, our government has really softened up lately, :rolleyes:

      Oh, maybe you aren't from the USA. If so, then my apologies.

    5. Re:Good stuff by bm_luethke · · Score: 2

      One of the great things about this type of progress is that it always leads to removal of repressive govts (the bad news is that it has pretty much always been bloody and long).

      Essentially they require an uneducated, uninformed populace for control. They need an educated informed populace to move forward. They are trying the impossible right now - to have them educated and informed about 85% of the world and totally ingorant of the rest. It doesn't work - you notice when you aren't allowed to talk about things and an educated populace can very accuratly guess what they are being censored from.

      China, as is, is something of a threat to the free world. It has the man power to be a real bitch if they wanted too - enough that if they felt like WWIII they could do so (and if the govt sees it as that with a chance to win or definatly die they could even try it).

      A fairly free china will be great for the world - lots of manpower and resources coming to market. Just imagine a free prosperous China, US, britain, and EU working together (really together, not just lip service) in space exploration or heck, pretty much anything. There are basically four great regions - the US, Europe, Old russia, and china (to be a "great region" you need both population and resources - places like South America lack the manpower and Africa lacks much of the resources - though that could change over time) - between them you have the vast majority of manpower and resources. If they could ever all be free, educated, and pretty much on the same page it's hard to imagine what we could do. I don't know if that is possible in my lifetime, but the current chinese govt falling and them and old russia rebuilding is pretty much what is needed.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    6. Re:Good stuff by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      britain, and EU

      Britain AND the EU? Wow, that _would_ be impressive. Nearly as good as what could be done if we could get California and the USA to cooperate...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    7. Re:Good stuff by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      its not the closed country that it was 30 years ago... or even 10 years ago.

      I visited just over 10 years ago. Even then you could tell things were changing. The fact I got a visa for no real reason other than sightseeing was pretty telling!!

      I was able to talk to anyone, and had complete freedom of movement. Never spoke to an official or police officer once other than customs. Passing thru USA immigration the previous month was far more stringent! Never got any reaction from the locals, except curiosity (many Chinese tourists coming to e.g. Bejing for their own holidays and I was the first westerner they'd ever seen). Highly recommended, though apparently "it's getting too touristy now"... ;-)

    8. Re:Good stuff by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Essentially they require an uneducated, uninformed populace for control. They need an educated informed populace to move forward. They are trying the impossible right now - to have them educated and informed about 85% of the world and totally ingorant of the rest.

      Sounds exactly how the war on Iraq was started then. Witness this level of ignorance. People believe that Saddam was involved in 9-11, and that terrorists "hate freedom".

      Personally, I believe that if half your country can't point it out on a map, then you should not be allowed to conquor it. ;-)

      Just imagine a free prosperous China, US, britain, and EU working together

      Where's the profit in that to those who are in the position to make it happen?

    9. Re:Good stuff by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      I've been in and out of Hong Kong and China all my life, and the treatment i get from visiting/leaving the states is by far always the worse off. Government officials in China give you an awful lot of freedom provided that it doesn't "annoy" them. Yea, so none of that "we can have guns and can hug Falun Gong" stuff, but if you're being outrageous they really don't care.

      At least when I visit China I don't get body searched and the locks on my luggage don't get intentionally destroyed and it doesn't take hours and I don't get barked at and asked sharp questions.

      this train thing sounds like it will be an awesome opportunity for tourism in China, and the fact that they are willing to spend so much money and 4 years on this, while they still have the Space program and the Three Gorges Dam and whatnot.

      Kudos!

  9. Re:Oh Really? by Kagura · · Score: 1

    Um, I think if they were faked, it would be all over western news. Kind of like how if the Apollo landings were faked, every other country in the world (which includes the Soviet Union) would have reported that the US faked them.

  10. simulation pictures by pikine · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case if someone doesn't realize, the lower four pictures are simulated artwork, which is what the blue heading indicates in Chinese. Please don't shout "they're fake."

    --
    I once had a signature.
    1. Re:simulation pictures by mordors9 · · Score: 1

      And I certainly did not say they were fakes. I merely stated that I had seen some speculation to that effect. I believe I even saw some statements along that line already here on Slashdot.

    2. Re:simulation pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, thanks, I would have never guessed that myself! ;)

      Seriously, do you really think any nation on Earth with sufficient technology did NOT track that space flight? And if it had been fake, they wouldn't have been shy about publicizing that. So calling their images fake is really pretty ridiculous.

  11. How much did it cost? by clockwise_music · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year.

    1. Re:How much did it cost? by Manchot · · Score: 1

      How accurate can that figure really be? China has over a billion people, so 800,000 people is .08% of the population. I don't know of any studies which are that accurate.

    2. Re:How much did it cost? by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lets put that in perspective.

      America

      China

      These are both about a year ago. Which country has done better in the last year?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:How much did it cost? by 2Bits · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why don't you turn a little bit of your viewing angle, and think maybe, the whole point of building infrastructure is to help less developed areas to catch up, and hence, reduce the poverty level as a whole?

      Why does everything have to be negative? This is not like building a Liberty statute which serves nothing but for display. This is a modern railway to a remote area which is almost cut off from the world. This might be a catalyst for more economic development, along the line of that railway, from Qinghai all the way to Tibet.

      No one seeems to scream bloody when the US built their railway system link the east and the west over 100 years ago, which had an amazing effect on the development of the country, in terms of economic, social, cultural, etc. No one screamed bloody when the US built the national highways and other infrastructures, in the 1930s amid the biggest economic crisis when people were lining up for soup.

    4. Re:How much did it cost? by hode · · Score: 1

      Interesting. If I had mod points I'd use them here.

    5. Re:How much did it cost? by InsideTheAsylum · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the people residing in povery in america, for the most part, have a TV, cable, and food stamps. Comparing america's "poor" to the chinese poor is like comparing bananas and banana peels.

    6. Re:How much did it cost? by RRRussian · · Score: 1

      Not making any particular point, but the US railway system was built mostly by the Chinese immigrants for next to nothing (if they were lucky), and the highway system was build in part by post-Depression workers "employed" by the PWA (the poor, previously unemployed blue-collar workers). And the Statue of Liberty, a gift from the French. And more to the point, she is supposed to be a symbol of independence and freedom, not just a pretty piece of art. You should really go see it in person, it's quite magnificent.

    7. Re:How much did it cost? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year.

      Put that in proportion for me, though. How much did the number of Chinese people total rise last year?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:How much did it cost? by vinlud · · Score: 1

      Sources?

      --
      Repeat after me: We are all individuals
    9. Re:How much did it cost? by dustmite · · Score: 1

      The number of people in the US living in poverty (over 37,000,000) rose last year in both absolute terms (by 1,100,000) and as a percentage of the population (over 12%). Are you suggesting that funding for organisations like NASA should also be terminated until that poverty problem is solved? What level of poverty is an "acceptable level" before you can justify prestige projects? Don't you think prestige projects might play a role in lowering long-term poverty, by altering how a nation perceives itself and its capabilities/confidence, while also promoting interest in science/engineering? You can't uplift a nation by only focusing on the lowest-level problems. E.g. a nation with many starving people might need food as a first priority, but how can you ever uplift them from that situation without spending money on seemingly less important things like roads and education? It's called "investment".

    10. Re:How much did it cost? by Nept · · Score: 1

      this has nothing to do with reducing the poverty of Tibet. If the Chinese government was truly interested in reducing impoverishment, they would focus on their own country. The railway line is just another effort to hasten the integration of Tibet with the rest of Mainland China. The government has already encouraged the re-settlement of over 100,000 Han Chinese into Tibet, and this railway line will strengthen the economnic ties between Tibet and China, making relocation more desirable and permanently removing the description "remote" from the Tibetan geography. I read about a year ago that a highway was also in the works.

      This strategy of integration has been used in the past: Israel moved settlers into Palestinian territory; and further back the English enticing the Scottish into Northern Ireland.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    11. Re:How much did it cost? by CagedBear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one seeems to scream bloody when the US built their railway system link the east and the west over 100 years ago

      Noone except the natives who had been inhabiting this region for a few thousand years. And we all know what happened to their way of life.

    12. Re:How much did it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done, thats the best analogy yet.
      Did anyone ask the native americans if they wanted the railway? I don't think so
      Was the railway built to improve the lives of the native americans? er no
      Were the native americans marginalised as richer and politically more suitable people took over the land ? yep
      Were they masacered ruthlessly if they got in the - shit yeah
      Native American 100 years ago = Tibetian today

      Could the life of a native ameriacan be better today? yes
      Could it be worse - hell yes

    13. Re:How much did it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Which country has done better in the last year?

      America.

    14. Re:How much did it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one seeems to scream bloody when the US built their railway system link the east and the west over 100 years ago

      Because they were all dying of smallpox.

    15. Re:How much did it cost? by RKenshin1 · · Score: 0

      America's definition of poverty is much different than China's. America's poverty threshold for 1 person is at about $10,000.

      I'm sure that China's definition of poverty is quite different.

    16. Re:How much did it cost? by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

      China. At least they are doing something about their poverty.

      --
      ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
    17. Re:How much did it cost? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Economically, China is growing at about 8-10%/year, and that was without any funny games.

      They have no defict (trade or gov.) and as soon as we balance our federal deficit, we instantly take it back to the red.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    18. Re:How much did it cost? by Gryphn · · Score: 1

      Which country is deliberately pushing more people toward the poverty level?

      --
      Fantasy and superstition should be used for entertainment purposes only.
    19. Re:How much did it cost? by Oscarshs · · Score: 1

      How about Hawaii? You are still doing the same thing in Hawaii.

  12. The Asian Century by JymBrittain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While we [the /. crowd] bitch and moan about Microsoft and while the great herd worry more about Britney's spawn than credible science, more about the latest American Idol than engineering and while China and India graduate more scientists and engineers than the US...you can expect many, many more reports like this. The 21st century just may be when the Sino-Communist brand of capitalism eclipses lAmerican power and influence.

    1. Re:The Asian Century by Microlith · · Score: 0, Troll

      I assume we'll also get Chinese style freedoms to go along with it, right?

      Oh that's right, no freedom.

    2. Re:The Asian Century by e2d2 · · Score: 2

      The 21st century just may be when the Sino-Communist brand of capitalism eclipses lAmerican power and influence.

      I for one don't really care. My life goals do not include "maintain America as the premier super-power". I would like to think most Americans think the generally the same.

      Besides, the world is now joined at the hip when it comes to economic and social prosperity. There isn't gonna be a powerful China without the US, and vice versa. We are all in this together, the sooner everyone realizes this the better.

    3. Re:The Asian Century by weighn · · Score: 1
      The 21st century just may be when the Sino-Communist brand of capitalism eclipses lAmerican power and influence.

      Well, we could always live in hope. (Whilst, of course, continuing to vote for our favorite Idol).

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    4. Re:The Asian Century by nido · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Besides, the world is now joined at the hip when it comes to economic and social prosperity.

      By "joined at the hip" you're refering to, of course, the present condition where the rest of the world manufactures stuff and sells it to Americans.

      Chinese factories produce widgets. Americans buy them. Americans don't produce anything the Chinese can't make themselves for less, so the ships are filled up with raw materials (including, ironically, cardboard for recycling from all the boxes they just sold us), which the Chinese turn into fancy tech gadgets to sell to Americans.

      China takes all the dollars they earn in trade and buy U.S. Treasury bonds. Georgy Boy uses the money China lends him to pay for his stupid "war" (real wars are declared by an act of congress), and all the other pork-barrel programs politicians pass to get re-elected.

      Trade is only a good thing when it's a two way street.

      The future I 'see' leaves America on the sidelines.

      I buy 'american' when I can, but even so, that's more a symbolic gesture than anything else.

      there's more, but not tonight. Subscribe to America's Last Real Newspaper (American Free Press) for the news you won't get anywhere else.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    5. Re:The Asian Century by digitect · · Score: 1
      Subscribe to America's Last Real Newspaper (American Free Press) for the news you won't get anywhere else.

      Seriously? Here's the first headline I saw: Bush Insider Claims WTC Collapse Bogus, Demolition More Likely.

      That is some of the most wacko assembly of unscientific paranoia I have ever witnessed. Statements like "fire had never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse, nor has fire collapsed any steel high rise since 9-11" are so flat wrong, it astounds the mind to think they were offered as anything other than some sort of sick satire.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    6. Re:The Asian Century by nido · · Score: 1
      dood,

      From the October 10th issue: "$1 Million Reward Offered to Prove No Explosives Used in WTC Collapse".
      Entrants must prove, and support with detailed drawings for all significant events, how the twin towers collapsed in 8.5 seconds, as the video and seismic records show, without explosives. Contestants must show exactly whow the concrete was pulverized and ejected hundreds of feet with detailed drawings."
      If it's really just "wacko paranoia", I'm sure it'll be an easy million bucks. You should enter. http://www.reopen911.org/

      sincerely yours,
      wacko paranoid conspiracy theorist.
      Yet while you're reading this on your computer screen, safe at home or work, thousands of people all over this country must silently wrestle with their thoughts: What if those wacko conspiracy theorists on the Internet are RIGHT?

      http://www.rense.com/general68/jumbo.htm
      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    7. Re:The Asian Century by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      In China you might get in trouble for wanting to overthrow the government, but in America you can't even copy a DVD you own to your computer.

    8. Re:The Asian Century by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      That website really is wacko paranoia. In their article about the how the London Tube Bombings were faked they have a huge headline saying "Impossible To Leave Luton at 7:22 and arrive in London at 8:26" and then directly underneath they have published the actual times trains departed and arrived that day from the Thames Link Database. There is a train leaving at 7:24 and arriving at 8:25.

      I don't know why you people choose to believe all this nonsense when in all cases the facts clearly prove you are wrong.

    9. Re:The Asian Century by blue.strider · · Score: 1
      Chinese factories produce widgets. Americans buy them. Americans don't produce anything the Chinese can't make themselves for less.

      Right. First consequence: fully robotized plants. That make widgets for even less than any slave wage in China.

      Second consequence: hourly wages as main economic way for people to gain their subsistence don't work anymore. The owners class finally does not need any pesky workers to get whatever they desire. Only a small number of engineers/designers. That's when the fun really begins.

    10. Re:The Asian Century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to know not everyone has gone completely crazy. Some of the posts on here warrant a strait jacket at the very least.

    11. Re:The Asian Century by digitect · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: IIAA (I am an architect).

      Proving no explosives were used is like proving that UFOs don't exist. It's backwards, the hypothesis suggests the course of research rather than following the line of reasoning suggested by the facts.

      What I do know is that burning jet full would weaken the structural integrety of any building steel (which is only about 450 degrees F). Steel does not have to reach melting point (3,300F+/- IIRC) to weaken structurally. This is why very basic structures are usually 1hr rated. It doesn't mean the steel will withstand 1 hr of heat, only that there is this much quantified protection assigned to it (as opposed to 2hr or 4hr). In the case of WTC, nothing short of a non-existant 8hr rating would have protected it, and it is abundantly clear that the crash removed considerable quantities of these protections on initial impact. What is amazing is that neither building collapsed in the first 10 minutes.

      Denying that a 400mph 767 can take down an enormous 1970's skyscraper is nothing short of ignorant, ignorance at a 6th grade level of education at that.

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    12. Re:The Asian Century by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Besides, the world is now joined at the hip when it comes to economic and social prosperity. There isn't gonna be a powerful China without the US, and vice versa. We are all in this together, the sooner everyone realizes this the better."

      They said something very similar in 1913.

  13. Rising temperature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The National Climate Centre said in June that rising temperatures would affect operation of the railway by 2050. I don't understand. How would rising temperatures affect a railroad at 16,640 feet, much less affect any railroad?

    1. Re:Rising temperature? by hama · · Score: 1

      The permafrost on which the railroad is built may thaw in the rising temperature.

    2. Re:Rising temperature? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't understand. How would rising temperatures affect a railroad at 16,640 feet, much less affect any railroad?

      Metal expands when heated. Here's what can happen: http://www.charmec.chalmers.se/railtech/suncurves. html

  14. Real shame... by katharsis83 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah too bad they'll now suffer terribly with expanded access to new goods and services, educational opportunities, and contact with the outside world besides 1-2 hollywood stars visiting ever 2 years. I just hope the Chinese government doesn't do anything terrible like build more hospitals or expand access to electricity... Damn them for having spent $3 billion in local Tibetan communities on this project and creating thousands of jobs...

    Real shame that the standard of living in Tibet has risen steadily from the subsistence level ever since the CCP took control, huh?

    1. Re:Real shame... by nihilogos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      with expanded access to new goods and services, educational opportunities, and contact with the outside world

      All of the above could have been accomplished without destroying a millenium of scholastic and artistic works. Not to speak of the execution and incarceration of its living representatives.

      Real shame that the standard of living in Tibet has risen steadily from the subsistence level ever since the CCP took control, huh?

      For the Chinese immigrants. The native population are treated as second class citizens. Hundreds of thousands died of starvation when collectivism was first introduced, and most survivors suffer from various disabilities caused by malnutrition.

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:Real shame... by knappz · · Score: 1, Informative

      Real shame? How about this: A country that was free at one point, was completely taken over by a monsterously large other country. Their government has been replaced, they have destroyed the geographical heart of Buddhism itself, by burning monestaries, taking prisoners, and executing the innocent. A region so rich in culture is now strangled by China for it's economic and natural resources. Sorry if this is a troll, but I think had Tibet been free from the beginning, they would have done what's right for their own country rather than have China handle everything, treat their people as lower lifeforms, and ruin what took millenia to create. Thank Mao.

    3. Re:Real shame... by Angry+Toad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Real shame that the standard of living in Tibet has risen steadily from the subsistence level ever since the CCP took control, huh?

      If I could trust a totalitarian government to do anything other than lie, maybe so. As it is they may as well be claiming that Tibetans are made of cheese for all the validity it has.

      Anyway the song that "we're doing it all to raise the natives" has been the standard line of the conqueror all through history, and the natives always get the shaft in the end.

    4. Re:Real shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Tibet before the Chinese invasion was one of the most tyrannical, oppressive theocracies in history. Whilst the Chinese haven't improved the situation much, those who contend that Tibet used to be a peaceful mountain kingdom inhabited by gentle mystics are deluded woo-woos.

    5. Re:Real shame... by Damer+Face · · Score: 1

      > Tibet before the Chinese invasion was one of the most tyrannical, oppressive
      > theocracies in history. Whilst the Chinese haven't improved the situation
      > much, those who contend that Tibet used to be a peaceful mountain kingdom
      > inhabited by gentle mystics are deluded woo-woos.

      Yeah that's probably true to a large extent. Buddhists are really good at fighting each other (they're doing it at the moment, over who is the true lama of something), and they were running a feudal country with appaling treatment meted out to the serfs.

      But china hasn't done much better on the peace and freedom front, and they did burn a shed load of monasteries. Not that you get many of those in a shed.

      So you're all right and you're all wrong and I'm just pointlessly wibbling into my keyboard.

    6. Re:Real shame... by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Well, more often than not the natives do get civilized in the end.
      Europe wouldn't be the same without the Roman empire, Russian
      empire would not have happened had they not been conquered by the
      Mongols. India owes its unity to being conquered first by Mongols then
      Brits (the latter also screwed India in the very end by splitting
      out what became Pakistan and Bangladesh, and getting out of
      Afganistan which could have also been Indian). Let's not forget the
      Chinese who had at least one dinasty of emperors from conquering
      nation (Manchuria I believe, also Mongols for a while). And the whole
      imperative to develop an effective state came from the horror of being
      conquered by the Japanese.
      Did I mention Britain which got conquered by Saxons and
      became the definition of civilized nation. I could go on...
      What it comes to is that conquerors need unity to rule effectively.
      Sure they often wipe out or change local culture, but they create
      a more monolithic state with better technology (realpolitik meets
      darwinism). The natives often get something out of it in the end
      provided they do not get mostly wiped out like what happened in
      America.

    7. Re:Real shame... by p2sam · · Score: 2

      s/Chinese/Americans/g
      s/Tibetan/Native Americans/g

      good day sir.

    8. Re:Real shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that makes it all better you relativistic fuck.

    9. Re:Real shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It does, you hypocrite.

    10. Re:Real shame... by nido · · Score: 1

      Anyway the song that "we're doing it all to raise the natives" has been the standard line of the conqueror all through history, and the natives always get the shaft in the end.

      Most the time "the natives" are perfectly happy living as they are. Couple hours of 'work' a day to provide for their needs, and the rest of their time is free to live and to be. Satisfying life, if you ask me.

      Today people work 40+ hours a week, plus commute time. And they do that so they can spend the rest of their free time watching flashing lights on a "television". Most of us can't even read anymore (I couldn't even read Harry Potter), not really anyways (slashdot comments don't count).

      It's a very shallow life that most westerners get to live. We've just been 'hypnotized' to believe that it's greater than it really is.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    11. Re:Real shame... by icydog · · Score: 1

      I don't know if hundreds of thousands of Tibetans actually died or not (seems like there's not many of them to begin with), but don't forget that something like forty million ethnic Chinese died as a result of the collectivism stuff too.

    12. Re:Real shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Anyway the song that "we're doing it all to raise the natives" has been the standard line of the conqueror all through history, and the natives always get the shaft in the end.

      Funny, that's exactly what most USians are saying about the invasion of Iraq.

    13. Re:Real shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      strangled by China for it's economic and natural resources

      "its".

    14. Re:Real shame... by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      apart from the local mobs that would hack off your limbs for going against their beliefs, to what extent did Tibet have a viable government?

    15. Re:Real shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thats what the chinese say, strangely enough the chinese aren't prepared to ask the Tibetians if they would prefer a tyrannical, oppressive theocracy over them.

    16. Re:Real shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real shame that the standard of living in Iraq has risen steadily from the subsistence level ever since the USA took control, huh?

      If I could trust a totalitarian government to do anything other than lie, maybe so. As it is they may as well be claiming that Iraqis are made of cheese for all the validity it has.

      Anyway the song that "we're doing it all to raise the natives" has been the standard line of the conqueror all through history, and the natives always get the shaft in the end.

    17. Re:Real shame... by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      Real shame that the standard of living in Tibet has risen steadily from the subsistence level ever since the CCP took control, huh?

      Similarly the median standard of living in, say, Norway is higher than in the US. Therefore if Norway invades the US and starts providing free healthcare for all, generous benefits, high standards of education (in Norwegian) and top-notch public services, you will certainly be very satisfied with it and, for one, welcome your new Scandinavian overlords. Even if they indulge in small things such as crushing dissent, brutally suppressing rebellions and colonising the country with hordes of Norwegian settlers to such an extent that Americans end up being a minority in their country.

      Purely rethorical question of course. After all, it's not like you'll have a choice.

      Thomas-

    18. Re:Real shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Life was much better when disease limited the average lifespan to 40 years. When a pathogen could kill millions. When sanitation consisted of sewage running outside your front door.

      You can keep the simple life.

    19. Re:Real shame... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Warning: poster 'nido' lives in an alternate reality.

      Most the time "the natives" are perfectly happy living as they are. Couple hours of 'work' a day to provide for their needs, and the rest of their time is free to live and to be. Satisfying life, if you ask me.

      A couple of hours, plus 100 hours working the fields and mines. Not to mention starvation, disease, non-stop tribal warfare, high child mortality, and a life expectancy in the 20s. That's when they're not being sacrificed at the altar or forced into marriage to the local chief. They barely made enough money to live in a hovel and eat stale bread and drink filthy water.

      Today people work 40+ hours a week, plus commute time. And they do that so they can spend the rest of their free time watching flashing lights on a "television". Most of us can't even read anymore (I couldn't even read Harry Potter), not really anyways (slashdot comments don't count).

      Today people hardly work any hours at all compared to the past, usually as low as 40 hours. They have great working conditions, with laws protecting them. They have easy jobs, often at desks rather than constant back-breaking labour. They work in clean offices rather than dust-filled mills or dust and gas filled mines.

      When they get home, rather than going straight to bed in order to be up at 5am for the next day's hard labour, they get to relax, watch TV, sit in the pub, play sports, read, anything they want.

      They eat decent food, all sorts of vegetables, meats, milk, imported spices, herbs and cheeses. It's all clean as well. They have so much money they can live in luxurious houses with running water, toilets, electricity, heating, air-conditioning and rooves that aren't made of straw. They have several bedrooms rather than eight kids in one bed. They have luxurious matresses and quilts rather than filthy blankets on the floor full of lice and rats. They have baths and showers, rather than bathing in the river.

      Literacy is much higher today than it used to be. There is free education for all children. The 'natives' probably didn't have education for anyone other than elite, and that's assuming they had much written language at all. There's no time for learning when you're working every waking hour so the local chief can have a bigger palace.

      You're looking at the world through rose-tinted specs. Probably been watching too much of 'seven years in tibet'.

    20. Re:Real shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tibeans never asked Chine to invade them. Tibetans today want nothing more than for the Chinese to leave.

      No amount of your party line claptrap bullshit will change this fact.

      Tibetans. Don't. Want. China. There.

      Keep reading that over and over, slowly, until it sinks into your thick skull.

    21. Re:Real shame... by smithmc · · Score: 1

        I don't know if hundreds of thousands of Tibetans actually died or not (seems like there's not many of them to begin with), but don't forget that something like forty million ethnic Chinese died as a result of the collectivism stuff too.

      Oh, well, I guess that makes it all right then.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  15. Boy am I pissed by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I actually rode on the Central Rail Line in Peru which was the former highest. Now I am going to have to go to China to ride this thing.

    DAMN.

    I will say the Peruvian one seems still a bit more challenging - no wussy sealed cars. You get to experience altitude sickness in all its glory.

    1. Re:Boy am I pissed by stontu · · Score: 1

      he's right, i'm from peru

    2. Re:Boy am I pissed by garcia · · Score: 1

      I got to experience some altitude sickness at around 10k feet when I went to Maui on my honeymoon. I wasn't a pussy like you in your sealed train! I was out in the open riding a bike down the volcano!

      Going from sea level to 10k feet in such a short time sucked *and* I paid a shitload to do it too!

    3. Re:Boy am I pissed by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      You must admit though that the view and the scenery is great! Being able to enjoy Maui like that is well worth getting altitude sickness! :D

  16. Must be light-weight trains by Got+Laid,+Can't+Code · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are they talking about funicular trolleys or actual heavy rail? Because heavy rail generally sees a 4% grade as a maximum due to, well, physics. Since I'm not aware of any fantastic engineering innovations, this must be some sort of light rail--or at least lighter than standard heavy rail.

    --
    Asparagus has many and excellent powers.
    1. Re:Must be light-weight trains by corngrower · · Score: 1
      this must be some sort of light rail--or at least lighter than standard heavy rail.

      I'm guessing you're correct about this being lighter than standard heavy rail. I'm wondering how the high altitudes affect the performance of the engines that will be pulling these trains. At those altitudes the atmosphere is like half as dense as at sea level.

      They remarked that the passenger cars on the line would be pressurized. The atmosphere even at 16,000 feet would not be thin enough to be fatal for most healthy people should pressurization be lost. Some would develop high altitude pulmonary endima, however, and would need to be evacuated to lower elevations within a few hours. A supply of bottled oxygen on board the train would be a good idea.

      I'm also wondering how warming temperatures would affect the operation of the train. Would it cause some of the permafrost to melt and destabilize the tracks? Would the atmosphere become still less dense making operation of the locomotives at the altitude very difficult?

    2. Re:Must be light-weight trains by mnemonic_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Grade is a measure of terrain slope. The story says that the trains go to high elevations, but not necessarily at steep grades.

    3. Re:Must be light-weight trains by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      Even if the cars are pressurized, it surely must somehow adjust slowly to match that of the outside pressure... otherwise there will be a big surprise for the passengers when they finally arrive and exit the cars. Unless there are no stops at that altitude, the train is simply passing through.

    4. Re:Must be light-weight trains by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      Are they talking about funicular trolleys or actual heavy rail? Because heavy rail generally sees a 4% grade as a maximum due to, well, physics.

      What about cog railways, like this one [1]?

      Such a railway wouldn't be compatible with the standard, but it could easily be made to work.

      [1] I now unfortunately have a burning desire to travel to Switzerland and ride the damn thing...

    5. Re:Must be light-weight trains by Got+Laid,+Can't+Code · · Score: 1
      Oh, yeah.

      (If I had RTFA'd, I guess we wouldn't be having this discussion.)

      --
      Asparagus has many and excellent powers.
    6. Re:Must be light-weight trains by jkmartin · · Score: 1

      The steepest mainline grades to survive into modern times in the U.S. were about 5% (Saluda in North Carolina). Granted the Appalachians are not the Himalayas. The only photos I've been able to find of the Tibet line show diesel-electric locomotives. These engines are supercharged so the altitude will not be a big issue. If altitude were an issue I imagine they'd use electric locomotives. Using a cog railroad would severely limit the amount of traffic.

      The additional articles have all made mention about how sensitive the Chinese have been towards the environment, remarking that 1/2 of the line will be layed on frozen ground. It's hard to know how much of this is propoganda though.

    7. Re:Must be light-weight trains by Schaffner · · Score: 1

      This is actual heavy rail, not a light rail trolley system. It will carry big freight trains and passenger trains using diesel locomotives over long distances. It is not a cog railway, just normal adhesion. I'm not sure what the max. grade is, but last November I visited the JiTong railway in Inner Mongolia and over the Jingpeng pass it's about a 3% grade. The design of the viaducts is very similar on both railways. Of course, the JiTong was still using steam locomotives over the pass at that time, they replaced them with diesels just a few months later.

  17. But what of the landing rocket engines? by mbaciarello · · Score: 1

    Ok but, why would they simulate those landing rockets, if not for increased awe? Or do you think they actually were there?

    I'd like to know what a rocket scientist would think of landing rockets on the bottom of the capsule, blasting off (presumably) after the parachutes have detached. That picture smells like propagandistic hype to me, but IANRS.

    1. Re:But what of the landing rocket engines? by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      Are people really this clueless about even the simplest facts of human spaceflight in the 21st. century? HELLO!?? They're called retro-rockets people.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    2. Re:But what of the landing rocket engines? by pikine · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's an uncommon practice. NASA has released a number of artist rendition of various space missions, including Deep Impact of July 4 this year and Mars Rovers. Do you think that sort of increase in awe has casted any doubt on credibility of NASA's missions?

      --
      I once had a signature.
    3. Re:But what of the landing rocket engines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is quite established that the decent module HAS rockets to break the fall. The propagandic hype I saw was the capsule and astronaut beds in the module was redesigned from shenzhou 5 so that they would provide for more safety for the astronauts in case the retro rockets did not fire.

    4. Re:But what of the landing rocket engines? by Schaffner · · Score: 1

      >I'd like to know what a rocket scientist would think of landing rockets on the bottom of the capsule, blasting off (presumably) after the parachutes have detached. That picture smells like propagandistic hype to me, but IANRS.

      This is also the way the Russian Soyuz capsule lands. Since the Soyuz (and the Shenzhou which is based on the Soyuz design) are capsules that land on solid ground instead of water, there needed to be some way to cushion the landing, since the parachutes don't slow it down enough for the final impact with the earth. So, they jettison the 'chutes and fire some landing rockets to slow the descent for the final few seconds.

  18. not the highest by slizz · · Score: 0

    from the first paragraph of the article: "one of the world's highest train routes."

  19. I'm not a transportation engineer... by ThaFooz · · Score: 2, Informative

    but what advantage does the railroad have over trucks/busses or planes? I was under the impression that they're rather dangerous and costly in comparison. I mean, here in the US Amtrak is struggling because of the derailings and the fact that it just isn't cost efficent... am I missing something?

    1. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we care about pollution and human life.

    2. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by KiranWolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      I would hardly call Amtrak representative of rail transportation as a whole. Amtrak is a joke, both to Americans and to the rest of the world and, outside of the Northeast Corridor between D.C. and Boston, and maybe somewhere out on the west coast, is useless.

      Meanwhile, rail forms the backbone of most developed nations, including France, Germany, and Japan. In case you weren't paying attention, a train also now links England and France via the Channel Tunnel. Bluntly put, America is the exception, not the rule.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is, then realize that half of 'em are stupider than that!" - George Carlin.
    3. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by spitzak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trucks and busses are only cheaper if there is already a highway going where you want. Highways are not free, even though a lot of Americans seem to think they are a natural feature of the landscape.

    4. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by FredGray · · Score: 4, Informative

      Railroads generally use a whole lot less energy (i.e. fuel) per passenger or unit of cargo than a truck/bus (not to mention a plane). There are economies of scale in running one large engine (or electric motor) relative to lots of smaller ones, and with a metal wheel you don't dissipate energy into the tires. Amtrak's problems come from several sources: (a) they don't own the tracks, but have to lease them from private owners on very poor terms; (b) the management isn't exactly clever; (c) the labor costs are extremely high; (d) they operate under an immense set of regulations. It's nothing fundamental about railroad technology, just that we aren't willing to run one sensibly in the US.

    5. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      Train systems, like mass transit in general, exhibits its benefit when its USED, like a turbine engine. Sure, a single passenger in a buss is more polluting than a car. In the US, Amtrak is ... all most people have and it isn't that great. One of the Few things i admire about Europe is their mass use of train systems, they are very reliable, fast, efficient, and overall a good solution to mass transit problems.

      --
      I am Spartacus
    6. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by ThaFooz · · Score: 1

      Very true. But I'm well aware of (and have traveled on) the European rail systems and the commuter rails/subways of Boston/DC/NYC/San Francisco.

      I guess I should have been more specific. Why do you suppose it is that the rail system doesn't see more use in the US, outside of subways/short commuter rails? The initial thought is probably population density, but the US Northeast is quite densly packed.

      The reason I don't take the train from home (Greater Boston) to NYC (a 3 1/2 hour train or bus ride) is simply cost. The train is USD $99, wheras the same bus is $30, and driving to a Metro North commuter rail stop in CT $20 in gas, $5 in train fare, and $8 in overnight parking.

      Anways, I was wondering if the US rail system is just horribly mismanaged, or if its a function of population/geography, and what the Chinese/Tibetan border is like in comparison...

    7. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by CommieOverlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US system is horribly mismananged I would guess.

      Up here, I can make a round trip Ottawa-Kingston via train for $45. The same by car would run $40-50 at current gas prices. Not to mention, saving 400km in wear and tear on the car, which would be another $100-$120 or so in hidden costs.

    8. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by slazar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amtrak is struggling because trains take so damn log to get from place to place. Airplanes are much faster.

      A trip from San Jose, CA to Atlanta, GA on Amtrak costs $344 and takes about 4.2 days.

      The same trip on Delta costs between $260-$326 and takes 4-7 hours.

      Cost is a little bit more for the train, both types of travel have accidents...

      This was leaving December 19th.

    9. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by jgc7 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yes. Trains are neither dangerous or costly.

      This is way off-topic, but a little backgroung on the realative merits of different modes of transportation.

      In the US and the UK deaths per passenger mile are approximately 1 order of magnitude lower on trains than by trucks/buses.

      Trains cost 1 order of magnitude less to operate than an autos. There are numerous reasons why Amtrak is not viable in the US that don't necessarily apply to this case. Amtrak has to compete with the autos whose owners benefit from free roads. In areas with user fess for the roads, trains and other modes of public transportation are viable enterprises. Also, the rail and public transit network is not extensive enough to allow people to opt out of buying a vehicle. In Western Europe, it is possible in most places to have a high standard of living and not own a car. With the exception of NYC, Boston, Chicago, DC, and a few other cities in the US, a car is practically a necessity in the States.

      Furthermore, in the case of China which is desperate to secure its necessary energy needs, fuel efficiency is important. Planes get roughly 40 miles per passenger gallon, trains get roughly 80, and cars vary from 15-120 based on the vehicle and number of passengers. So unless everyone travels 4 deep into a Honda CRX, trains aren't so bad when it comes to efficiency.

      --
      70% of statistics are made up.
    10. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      you forgot E) they have discovered a business plan that does not actually require that they make a profit. The shortfall is made up by begging off the american taxpayer.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    11. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Informative
      As I understand it, passenger rail service in the US has almost never been profitable since day one. The only reason the railroads offered passenger service at all was because they were required to do so as a condition of their original free government handouts of right-of-way. When the government offered to take up responsibility passenger rail service with Amtrack, the railroads were more than happy to unload it and focus on their profitable freight business.

      My guess is that passenger rail is no more profitable in most other countries, but government subsidies make up the difference. Here in the US, the people don't seem to like the idea of government subsidies for passenger rail for some reason; they only want subsidies for roads and airports. Thus, those modes of transport can make a profit with relatively cheap fares. In the mean time, the rail service languishes with such low volume due to stingy government subsidies (relative to other transportation modes) that it lacks economies of scale, and the ticket price stays high.

    12. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by LeadfootCA · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your missing freight. As the above posters have said, the U.S. passenger rail system sucks. However, we have the best freight rail system in the world, hands down. Trains here are rarely less than a mile in length, transport huge amounts of cargo, and do it all at a profit. Our freight railroads are private industries, after all. Oh, and the biggest growth area in the railroad industry right now? Intermodal, i.e: truck trailers and shipping containers. Railroads here compete with trucks, and they're winning. Take a look at BNSF Railway's stock price, if your sceptical.

      Now as for China, they're probably going to use this rail line for shipping out mineral ores and other raw materials. I doubt that the native people will see any benefit from this rail line.

    13. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      In America, they are a natural feature of the landscape. Just sayin'.

    14. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hold on there. Even the Super Economy advanced-purchase heavy-change-penalty adult return fare Ottawa-Kingston is $60. Economy is normally $95.

      Meanwhile, a car that takes $40-50 in gas for that trip has a hole in the gas tank. I do the trip in a mid-size car on 18L, or $18.

      Only when we look at total operating cost does VIA start to look good. Using 40cents/km (easily attainable by non-idiots), the 330km round-trip costs $132. That isn't a lot more than $95, and if you already own the vehicle, the incremental or cash cost is considerably less. Then there's the convenience - even when VIA is running on time it's slower than the car.

      Of course, instead of driving your own car, if it's a same-day return trip, renting a car is the cheapest way to go, as little as $50 all-in.

      I like VIA, really I do, but if you already own a car, it rarely makes sense. And the $450M subsidy last year we paid VIA through our taxes is ridiculous.

    15. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by jfmiller · · Score: 1

      I am daily commuter on three different rail systems: Sacramento RT, Amtrak Capitol Corridor, and the Bay Area Rapid Transit. All 3 are safer by any metric then driving, and while the suc.. er um pavement bound commuters may arrive 45 minutes sooner they still have to park, and I don't ever want to see one trying to study for classes while driving.

      The problem, as many have pointed out, with Amtrak's cross country routes is that theres always an Intermodal in the way and their always late. More compact countries can easily build rial systems that have a high enough capacity to keep the trains on time. But imagine a 3 track mainline running say from Sacramento to Chicago. There's a whole lot of nothing out there and some big Mountains.

      In California, however we ought to be able to support a high speed rail system. It would be profitable and well used. There are lots of people wanting to go up and down the coast. Even one tenth of the air traffic between LAX and SFO would cover the cost of rail service. Now all we have to do is build the Darn thing, and that means negotiating with places like the Peoples republics of Berkeley and San Jose who feel they must defend themselves from the evils of high speed efficient transportation in their municipalities.

      JFMILLER

      --
      Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
    16. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by FredGray · · Score: 1
      you forgot E) they have discovered a business plan that does not actually require that they make a profit. The shortfall is made up by begging off the american taxpayer.

      True, but we subsidize all forms of transportation in the US, not just Amtrak. Your state highway department doesn't make a profit either.

    17. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

      I'm taking Amtrak later this week from Eugene, OR (2 hours south of Portland) to Los Angeles. It's scheduled to take about 25 hours. However the route is a very heavy freight route, and they really, really hate Amtrak (which is understandable I suppose) so I expect my travel time to be in excess of 30 hours. My ticket however is less than half what airfare would cost, and it's a great way to see the country. I took Amtrak from Eugene to St. Paul for Christmas once and got to see parts of Montana and North Dakota that I'd otherwise never seen. The train stopped at every single station, even at some places where the station was boarded up and there were just a few pickups waiting for travelers comming home for the holidays. But that's vacation travel. Amtrak's completely impractical for anything else here, unless maybe in the high population areas it might work. I'm thinking Tacoma to Seattle or the equivalent in southern California.

    18. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "now links"

      Mate, you're a decade behind!

    19. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And there you go, that's the two major parts of the joke that is N. American railways. The trains can't even keep to the schedule, to the point that you're expecting it to take 20% longer. And secondly the trains are so bloody slow. Eugene to LA is between 800 and 900 miles, which at 60 mph would take 15 hours. You're talking about them averaging 30 mph!!! Most modern countries have their intercity trains running at over 100 mph. The London to Edinburgh trains in the UK top out at 140, and the London to Paris even more on the French side. The UK doesn't have the fastest rail networks either. Your journey by rail should be taking well under 10 hours. At least you will get to enjoy the view, which is very nice in that area.

    20. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Malc · · Score: 1

      What most car drivers tend to forget to figure in to their calculations is insurance, wear-and-tear (e.g. maintenance) and depreciation. Then of course there's time - time spent driving rather than sleeping or reading; time spent working on the car (cleaning, maintaining, etc). And there's stress - being on the roads!!!, worrying about getting it fixed when there's a problem. Anybody who's lived as an adult any length of time without a car can appreciate these last points, which is one of the reasons I choose to live where I do (downtown Toronto). I pay more for home, but it's more than balanced by a life-style revolving around cycling and walking rather than the car.

    21. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      Why do I never have mod points at times like this?

    22. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      In the US, buses, trucks, and cars have an advantage because of the billions of dollars spent by the government on infrastructure each year.

      Imagine if every road had to pay for itself via tolls -- pretty soon, trains would look pretty efficient.

      Or, imagine if the government spent as much on mass transit infrastructure as they did on roadways. The aut industry is heavily subsidized by government through roadbuilding and road maintenance.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    23. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Ok. I'm willing to subisdize the rails and switches in a highways & airports model. I'm not willing to subsidize a specific company and at the same time support their monopoly. Why does a train ticket from say.. florida to new england cost more than an airline ticket to same? I submit that the reason is the subsidies: they don't need passengers to stay in business. (the other possible reason, that it's actually more expensive to oparate trains than planes also leads to the conclusion that rail subsidy should be ended.) BTW, shame on the big airlines for taking a lesson from AMTRAK instead of Southwest.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    24. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Malc · · Score: 1

      You're right about the Via Rail price. But I take issue with your car number.

      It's a 400 km round-trip via 401 and 416. With my lead foot driving at over 140, I get about 7.5-8.5 litres per 100 km, so say 50l for the round trip. If I drive conservatively I can get it down 7l/100km or just below on long journeys. That's $50 (actually make that $55 as I have to use premium fuel). I have a 1.8l engine (VW Passat).

      A couple of years back when prices were lower, I used to be able to do a weekend from Toronto to the family cottage near Grand Bend for just over $35 (430 km round-tip, and with long sections with 80kph zones), so your issue with a car doing it for $40-50 is miss-placed.

      Now add in wear-and-tear, etc. Insurance for people in Toronto is $5 - $6 / day and upwards for people don't use the car to commute, although probably at least half that in Kingston.

    25. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Malc · · Score: 1

      So you're getting 4.5 l/100km. So which of Honda Insight, Toyota Prius or Smart Twofour do you have? None of those are your average "mid-size" car. Even the VW's with the TDI engines aren't that efficient.

      Efficiency numbers here:
      http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/transportation/personal/buy ing/compare.cfm?attr=8

    26. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, you neglected to put a value on your life. Which you would have to do for a valid comparison, since rail has significantly lower chance of death per mile than car. That's without taking into consideration the long-term health effects from increased risk of thrombosis & stress. Than there's the fact that on a train you can get up & move around whenever you want, and you can meet people. I meet a new attractive woman on about 40% of the inter-city train rides I take.

      But hey, if your life & enjoyment of it are worthless to you, stick to your car. It's cheaper.

    27. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new German ICE's run at 165 (archaic arrogant length units per hour) & can go up to 185 to make up time when needed.

      The downside is they don't run beside the Rhine anymore so you don't get to see all the cool castles & vineyards.

    28. Re:I'm not a transportation engineer... by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      Even the Super Economy advanced-purchase heavy-change-penalty adult return fare Ottawa-Kingston is $60

      Okay, admittedly that's using an ISIC student card. $60 still isn't too bad.

      The gas really does cost that much though. It's about a tank of gas in either the Cavalier or Elantra I do it in frequently.

  20. Re:Congratulations China! by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and the US space program has advanced from that point in leaps and bounds hasn't it?

    I mean, it seems like only yesterday that we planned to send people to Mars, and look where we are today.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  21. You idiot, Matt Drudge is not a reporter by michaeltoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The images on Xinhua are meant to demonstrate the capsule landing. They're not pretending to be actual photos. You should know better than to trust headlines with a question mark at the end of them.

    1. Re:You idiot, Matt Drudge is not a reporter by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I dunno, the pictures I've linked to seem rather dubious. Just look around the edges of the heat shilding and the bottom. It's made of metal? Also, where are the re-entry streaks on the edges? It seams as though someone just airbrushed one side of it and even then it's not very uniform.

      Just my observation. And to be fair, I am NOT a rocket scientist. However, I have been the NASA center Texas and looked at photos and such our capsules.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:You idiot, Matt Drudge is not a reporter by DigiShaman · · Score: 1
      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  22. in my day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This news comes at the same time that their Chinese taikonauts return from their spaceflight after just 115 hours in orbit.

    Yeah I mean, the chinese have it easy. 115 hours? In my day we stayed in space for at least a year so that at least it was worth it. Hell, we had to communicate down to Houston once in a while to make sure they didn't forget about us. And the trip wasn't easy. We had to endure a hell of G force. Both ways. And we like it!

  23. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well...I guess the legend of the Mongolian Butt Picker is true! You can pick your friends, you can pick your butt...but you cannot pick your friend's butt! Mookie da Wookie is a Mongolian Butt Picker!

  24. Chinese "American" Idol by katharsis83 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Haha maybe this'll cheer you up:

    http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-05/2 7/content_446335.htm

    "The name may not roll off the tongue quite like American Idol does, but that hasn't kept the Mongolian Cow Sour Yogurt Super Girl contest from sweeping China. Zhao Jingyi, 17, the "schoolgirl" candidate won the Changsha competition.

    Like Idol, which named its winner Wednesday night, China's Super Girl gives aspiring singing stars a shot at televised fame and fortune."

    Looks like American culture has spread far and wide...

    1. Re:Chinese "American" Idol by FRiC · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Idol type programs are far more popular China than America since cellular phones and Internet are much more common in China than anywhere else, it's common to vote for your favorite idol by using SMS or online.

      Here's one where a friend's friend entered, go vote!
      http://topidol.netandtv.com/showdj.aspx?ContentID= 10&VoteID=10

    2. Re:Chinese "American" Idol by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      It's not just China, when I was in Poland a couple years ago, they had a "Polish Idol" show on TV.

    3. Re:Chinese "American" Idol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Haha maybe this'll cheer you up:

      Who said he needs cheering up? He could be Chinese...

    4. Re:Chinese "American" Idol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't American Idol originally "Pop Idol" in the UK? OK, it is a very American concept, I'll grant that...

  25. Re:TIBET by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So, the Beastie Boys posting on /. Awesome! C'mon, for old time's sake...What's the time? Time to get ill! Say it! Say it!

    --
    blah blah blah
  26. Now you can... by elzurawka · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...join the mile high club without ever leaving the ground!

    --
    -EL
    1. Re:Now you can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked, a pre-requisite for the mile high club is getting laid. Remember, you ARE talking to the /. crowd here.

    2. Re:Now you can... by ExoticMandibles · · Score: 1

      I guess you've never been to Denver.

  27. Mod Parent Down by michaeltoe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This guy is just a sucker who reads more into the headlines on DrudgeReport than he does actual articles anywhere else. There are no 'faked pictures', there are merely CG images meant to demonstrate the landing, very similar to how NASA demonstrated the landing of the mars rovers, where no one was there to photograph it.

    This type of thing goes on all the time in western media, and there was no attempt to pass off the images as actual photographs. It's just a misconception put forth by xenophobic conspiracy nuts.

    1. Re:Mod Parent Down by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      People are afraid of an avowedly totalitarian communist government that is rapidly gaining power. This does not make them "xenophobic." Perhaps sino-communist-o-phoboic. The Chinese government wants everyone to confuse its interests and wishes with those of the Chinese people. Do not fall into that trap. The Chinese government is a malignant force that oppresses them and endagers us. Chinese and Western people should be united in their opposition to it.

  28. Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Reading comments here saddens me.

    The sheer arrogance emitted from some posts are really not worthy of slashdot, and/or its readers/posters.

    What China has done, - in terms of the Qinhai-Tibet rail-line, or its spacecraft, - is not better, nor worse, than those from other countries.

    Do we see any comments like the

    " Some of the images of the spacecraft look fake"

    and

    "and the ones that don't look fake show damage on the spacecraft"

    and

    "This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude?"

    and

    "Well that seals the cultural genocide of the Tibetan people"

    and

    "Wow, you are finally almost to the point where the USA's space program was over 40 years ago. That is impressive"

    and

    "It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year"

    ad nauseum

    if the spacecraft or railway is from the United States of America or Russia ?

    This development of sheer arrogance, is not checked, might even venture into the territory of racism.

    I'm an /. old-timer, and I'm really sad to see /. goes to the dog because of these type of postings.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by michaeltoe · · Score: 1

      As someone probably not qualified to call themselves an "old-timer", I can at least appreciate your concern. A lot of these comments are unabashedly moronic and xenophobic.

    2. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by AlthalusUK · · Score: 1

      Weird, I both agree with you and disagree with you...

      some comments were way over the top, some were fair..

      it _IS_ wrong that their spending billions on developing a space program with the amount of poverty there...
      it _IS_ wrong what they have done, and continue to do to the tibetan people, etc...

      but it's also wrong to be racist.

    3. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by tgbrittai · · Score: 1

      We're just trying to keep China's arrogance in check (: Get over yourself...

    4. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      You are right. It doesn't have to take a /. old-timer to be nauseated by those postings.

      Unfortunately, these type of postings keep occuring in /. This is supposed to be a place for those interesting in tech and style, to educate and to be educated, to share with each others what one knows .... and so on.

      Have been with /. ever since it started, and I'd have to say that I have no idea what /. would be like 10 years from now, if these type of postings keep on drowning out other meaningful messages.

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    5. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1
      We're just trying to keep China's arrogance in check (: Get over yourself..

      Gee ...

      Does one has to be arrogant in order to keep other's arrogance in check ?!

      Gee ... again !

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    6. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      hey i like how you mentioned Tibet but just skirted over it in your reply. smooth.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    7. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      I've been around since the start too, and there have always been these types of posts. As long as the ratio of good posts is kept up everything will be just fine (at least as fine as Slashdot can get).

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    8. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 2

      I don't really see your point. Are you saying that 800,000 people living in extreme poverty and the cultural annihilation of Tibet AREN'T bad things? Or perhaps that these are minor issues compared to the glory that is a high-altitude railway system?

      Just as you see a bunch of posts related to the US government every time there's a NASA article, you're gonna see the same for the Chinese space agency. I can't imagine anything fairer.

      And just FYI, disliking the Chinese government is in no way "racist." As far as I can tell (and in the posts you quoted), nobody even mentions race or ethnicity (except in reference to the Tibetan culture being exterminated). I guess your idea is that since China has Asian people in it, a criticism of that government is an implied criticism of the Asian race? Would you say I'm prejudiced against Anglo-Saxons if I criticized England's foreign policy? If there's anything "disappointing" about Slashdot, it's that idiotic assertions like that will get you an Insightful rating.

    9. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by hunterx11 · · Score: 1
      Uhm, people complain about the U.S. all the time here; in fact it usually comes up in the comments of every YRO article about China. And there are even a few tinfoil types who don't think the U.S. went to the moon.

      I'm not saying that there aren't a lot of arrogant and/or stupid /. posters, but you seem to be choosing which ones to focus on selectively.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    10. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by EvanED · · Score: 1

      "This just seems unsafe to me. Imagine something goes wrong and the train is stuck up at that altitude?"

      "It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year"

      These comments at least aren't reserved for China. Look at many NASA stories, and most about the shuttle. The debate if space travel is worth it, both for safety and economic issues, shows up quite a bit.

    11. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by p2sam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Same can be said of the United Stated of America.

      it _IS_ wrong that their spending billions on developing a space program with the amount of poverty there...
      it _IS_ wrong what they have done, and continue to do to the iraqi people, etc...

      FUCK YEAH!!!

    12. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why, you can always make insightful -5 in your preferences.

    13. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first Tibetan Lama was supported and established by the force of the Imperial Chinese army, yet when the true barbarity of the monarchs was finally overthrown and the necessary government put into place in the mainland it is suddenly "hands-off" for Tibet, where the monks had established a totalitarian government with strict slavery and punishments of amputation and enforced rape? Investigate beginning with http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles9/Parenti_Ti bet.htm

    14. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ratio of "good" posts to the junk/racist/xenophobic posts by mostly young, tech-savvy, "modern" Americans is not that high and that speaks for the quality of a certain class of people who see a bleak future for themselves, can't deal with the advancement of other people in other parts of the world, and their own rapid decay into irrelevance. Just wait for the next article on out-sourcing to India/China and we will see. BTW, how many tech folks in the computer industry in the Silicon Valley are white American males? Its a dying creed that refuses to give credit to those (Indians and Chinese) who are more capable and are beating them at their own game in their own country. May the winners live long and the losers perish.

    15. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took me a long time to realize how you got modded anything but troll. Then I figured it out. It was the fancy bold and italic font formatting.

      Seriously man, it is our place to be critical of their achievements given what has transpired to achieve them.

    16. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously. Our war on drugs/terror/Iraq has killed far more people than anything China has done recently, and the Bush administration has openly admitted to lying/presenting falsified data to the U.N. and to the public on more than one account to proceed with our own imperialistic foreign policy. Right now, least of all, Americans should not be criticizing other governments when we should be focusing on keeping our own "democracy" on the right track.

      China announces that they've succeeded in putting a man in space, and our first reaction is that they're lying. But when Bush tries to claim a connection between 9/11 or Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein, the only secular ruler in the Arab world--one which Bin Laden had offer to assassinate for the U.S. when we were allied with his militants, we believe it unquestioningly against the face of all logic.

      I think America's arrogance and ethnocentrism has reached an all time high since the 80's with the post 9/11 surge of blind nationalism. It's sad how caught up our society is in all the superficial displays of patriotism that we blindly following our government leaders into war yet relinquish our democratic perogative to think critically about the actions of our government. It's no wonder that a nation so arrogant and self-righteous faces the problem of intellectual stagnation and is quickly losing its competitive edge in academic and intellectual spheres to other cultures.

    17. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by oddfox · · Score: 0, Troll

      First off, spell it right, it's the United States of America. There's a preview button, use it.

      Secondly, the points you make here as well as in another post of yours comparing the wrongdoings of the American government to the wrongdoings of the Chinese government are valid but two wrongs do not make a right, and you ignore the simple logic that hey, just because one is a citizen of a specific place, doesn't necessarily mean they agree with the leaders! Far out concept, I know, but once you grasp it, you'll find a lot less people think you come off as a complete jackass who's flaming for the sake of flaming, or playing devil's advocate with no supporting statements. That is, unless you consider "FUCK YEAH!!!" a supporting statement.

      Besides, the dude you replied to has the handle AlthalusUK (901826). Notice that UK there? It means he's probably not from America, especially when UK also appears on his userpage. Get a fscking clue.

      And for the record, I'm an American who despises most every aspect of the government, and has for a while. Does it make sense to belittle the concern for the plight of the Tibetan people and the poor of China by saying "Well America did this...!" when nobody said anything like "Hey it was awesome when we performed genocide on the Native American population but really, China, it's just not cool when you pseudo-commies do it." Don't expect to make any logical sense to anyone but your circle-jerk buddies who don't seem to think any intervention should occur with regards to what's going on, what the government of China continues to do. Hell, I don't even care if anyone directly intervenes, the least we could do is stop having them as our #1 trading partner while at the same time seemingly begging for more caring about basic human rights (And if you would argue there are no such things, well, sucks to be you with an outlook like that I guess).

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    18. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tibet? Ask an American how they got Hawaii see if they know the answer.

      As for poverty, it has raised in the US while it has dropped by by huge numbers (and I mean huge, not the piddling 800k).

      Face it, USA days are over as the major player you get to join the ranks of France, UK, etc.

    19. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll see the very same "arrogance" when the topic is about the USA, of course but it's moderated higher on /. As long as it's valid criticism that doesn't mean it's xenophobic, or what have you. We're just pointing out ways to improve the human condition, and in China there certainly is much to improve on.
      I'd say your post is nearing the "Much Ado About Nothing" so I won't go any further.

    20. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1
      Huh?

      But when Bush tries to claim a connection between 9/11 or Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein, the only secular ruler in the Arab world


      Can you name an Arab state that doesn't have a secular ruler?

      Or did you mean secularist? Have you forgotten Syria, Egypt?
      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    21. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by Cally · · Score: 1
      Well, up to a point Lord Copper.

      I agree with you that there are a lot of sad comments posted on stories that touch even indirectly on the topic of "USA vs The World" - that includes stories such as this, which mention another nation achieving something. This is pathetic (as it reveals the deeply unattractive mixture of ignorance, arrogance, and insecurity that infests part of the Slashdot community. And yes, I agree that for some of those comments, the line between ignorance and racism is crossed.

      On the other hand, China IS a profoundly unfree society, and I personally regret that so many western corporations are so willing to pinch their noses and trade with a regieme that's still shooting people for expressing the wrong opinions (or disappearing them into prisons.) And yes, Tibet is being occupied and it's culture systematically eradicated, which may not be genocide but certainly counts as a war crime in _my_ book. Yes, western societies aren't perfect. Yes, we should engage constructively with unpleasant states in order to encourage them towards greater freedom and openness... but yes, when you wear a pair of cheap made-in-China jeans (or use a C-M-i-C wifi card, or whatever) you are profiting directly from other people's misery and oppression.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    22. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      it _IS_ wrong that their spending billions on developing a space program with the amount of poverty there...

      That's the point!! China has LESS poverty than most western nations. In theory, Communism is supposed to look after the poor. We have space programs etc...

      it _IS_ wrong what they have done, and continue to do to the tibetan people, etc...

      And the west occupies several countries for it's own gain. In fact, I believe that we have killed more Iraqi civilians in the last two years than China ever has in Tibet. The grandparent poster is complaining about the complete and utter ignorance and hypocracy present on ANY threat that involves China. Or France. It's pathetic and I completely agree with him.

    23. Re:Sad to see all the sheer arrogance at /. by caixj · · Score: 1

      I strong agree with u. US will decline certainly if they keep being so arrogant and self-righteous.

  29. Har har. by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You had me until the 'capitalist' part. Chinese have so few freedoms, and businesses are no exception. I researched them for a human right project last year and, while there are many successful businesses in China, it happens falsely most of the time with heavy government interference. Without it much of their economy would crumble. Most of the big names in Chinese business are at least partially government owned or run. While they are not entirely 1984, i wouldn't go so far as to call them capitalism either, I'd rather not soil that name.

    --
    I am Spartacus
    1. Re:Har har. by Subotai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obviously someone doing a research project from afar is an expert. From living in China, let me tell you. This is the most free wheeling economy you will ever see. And while human rights may not be in the forefront of people's thoughts, making money is, with or without government help. They will truly bury the US.

      --
      "The only way to catch tiger cubs is to go into the tiger's den."
    2. Re:Har har. by Stonehand · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He may have a valid point, however, about the government playing a large and not necessarily fair role. Capitalism to a large degree depends on even-handed enforcement of certain rules, such as prohibitions on outright fraud and sanctions for breaches of contract. In addition, the greater the government is directly involved as a buyer or seller and the more unified it is, the less you might trust its ability to objectively investigate possible malfeasances when you consider conflicts of interest and assorted entanglements.

      Beijing tacitly acknowledges this through the occasional high-profile crackdown, and the occasional extreme severity such as sentencing a former governor to death.

      http://www.transparency.org/cpi/2004/cpi2004.en.ht ml#cpi2004
      http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1471412.htm
      http://english.people.com.cn/200509/09/eng20050909 _207609.html
      http://www.carnegieendowment.org/events/index.cfm? fa=eventDetail&id=284

      It's a reasonable concern if you're thinking about a large capital investment that you can't simply take with you if local officials decide to squeeze you after you're committed -- perhaps demanding direct bribes, or using governmental powers against you if you don't throw business to somebody, or so forth. Granted, it's probably not nearly as foolhardy as trying to run a high-profile independent media network in Putin's Russia...

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  30. Re:Mod Child Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the Parent say it was fake- NO. It merely said some were speculating they were fakes. Perhaps you should learn to read something other than nuts putting forth xenophobic conspiracy ramblings.

  31. OT[Re:First Prime Factorization Post] by zobier · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Just curious, did you create the throwaway account 2roll4life7 (900131) before creating 2*2*3*75011 (900132)?, Couldn't you just peek for the latest ID (923669 at time of writing)?

    BTW: why don't they use some kind of limit clause on those queries? It seems they load the entire table and then loop forward to the starteth row!?

    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  32. way to go slashdot! by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am really starting to hate the China apologists on /. Way to go! you mention the railroad but you dont mention WHERE the railroad was made. If you read up on it you see that it was made to link China to TIBET where the local population is being wiped out by the chinese communists. Of course they are going to invest in somthing that provides more places for an over crowded china to move people to.

    No, I am not a stoned "free tibet hippie", i happen to come from that part of the world.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:way to go slashdot! by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 1

      Despite the general dislike of "yeah me too" posts on Slashdot I will say I COULD NOT AGREE MORE.

      This railroad is nothing but bad news for people that have been sh** on more than many. [unhappy sarcasm]Now the Chinese can move troops and settlers more easily into an area that could really use them![/unhappy sarcasm]

      I am also neither a hippie nor a member of the "free tibet" movement. I am simply a person that values individual rights and freedom. So the less the Chinese government is involved in any area the happier I am.

    2. Re:way to go slashdot! by ZuggZugg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The original reclamation of Tibet was brutal. But what the Chinese did to the Tibetans is no more brutal than what the "Americans", "Canadians", "Mexicans", "Peruvians", "Bolivians",...etc did to the natives in the Americas. If anything the Tibeting history is more complex and less brutal.

      Humans seem to me to be territorial and prone to violence. I'm not really condoning it, but why else would you explain the sordid history of humanity killing each other over the same piece of dirt over and over again.

      I not sure I would say that I'm as hard on the Chinese communists as you are. I think the Chinese people in power woke up about 20 years ago and realized that communism and a state run economy were not going to work. They are quickly opening up their economy and they are gradually making the political transformation into something less brutal than what it was 40 years ago...will they fully eliminate communism...time will tell. Maybe they'll succeed with a new hybrid style of government where others have failed?

    3. Re:way to go slashdot! by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i like how you move from ethnic cleansing to politics. I will ignore that for now. Consider what happened in the americas was over a hundred years ago in most cases. What is happening in Tibet is right now. Just becasue something happened somewhere else some time back does not make it ok to do now. I find it amazing that there are people around here defnending the systematic destruction of a religion, race and culture.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    4. Re:way to go slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All modern governments are hybrids.
      Some elements of socialism "nanny" state stronger in some.
      Some democracy.
      Some republic principles.
      Hell, even more than a tinge of fascism and state worship.

      And that fact that what China has done has been repeated in history hardly excuses it.
      Just because the end result of a group of U.S. businessmen deciding to overthrow a constitutional monarchy and install a puppet state government of Hawaii was pretty much ok - does that make it right?

      Certainly the chinese government doesn't even have close to that kind of moral credibility that america pretends to have.

    5. Re:way to go slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Over crowded China"? How can you say that? Most of China (as in the USA) is close to empty. The vast majority of the population live in very small parts of it.

      (BTW, it says on their home page that they've had 61,462,759 hits in 227 locations and a daily hit average of 78,400 - in case anyone wants to measure the /. effect).

    6. Re:way to go slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strong cultures compete with and often destroy weak ones.
      This is normal cultural natural selection.

    7. Re:way to go slashdot! by Mr_Icon · · Score: 1

      I will note that the US I-40 goes through the (formerly) Cherokee-owned lands. ...

      What was that about the apologists?

      --
      If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
    8. Re:way to go slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you voted for Mr. Bush...

      spending money in space is way better than killing people in iraq!

    9. Re:way to go slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ye, after chinese communists wiped out local population for last fifty or so year, the native population is double before communists take over. I wonder what rabbit hole those native came out of?

      stop spread that "free tibet hippie" ( aka MI6 of England, or CIA) BS.

    10. Re:way to go slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's compromise: We can spend money to kill people in space.

    11. Re:way to go slashdot! by wheany · · Score: 1

      The Slashdot effect is caused by links in a front page article, not links on the third page of comments of a first page article.

    12. Re:way to go slashdot! by ZuggZugg · · Score: 1

      I don't feel like I'm defending the Chinese anymore than I would defend the Lion for eating a gazelle. Life sucks and can be incredibly unfair...

    13. Re:way to go slashdot! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 0, Troll

      We have killed more Iraqi's in the last two years than China has killed in Tibet. Oh, and the previous Tibetan government weren't angels, in fact they were pretty evil. Someone should mention the words "regime change" to the Chinese PR people.

    14. Re:way to go slashdot! by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 1

      And better yet to do both my anonymous friend

  33. Mod Parent Eats Alien Fetuses for Breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually, if you read what I posted, I never said he said that the images were fake. I merely called him a sucker for reading DrudgeReport, which is where these rumors are being perpetuated. And yes, the rumors are the product of xenophobic conspiracy nuts. They're too stupid to even translate the chinese captions embedded in the very images in question. Lot of in depth investigation there...

    Besides, it's really obvious that they're CG. Only an idiot would try to fake images like that.

    1. Re:Mod Parent Eats Alien Fetuses for Breakfast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I merely called him a sucker for reading DrudgeReport, which is where these rumors are being perpetuated.
      Well they're being perpetrated here too (and not by the person you wrongly accused), so that makes you a sucker too. With brass knobs on.
  34. Re:Congratulations China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up you cracka ass cracka

  35. 5000 m is just not that high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe any workers would require oxygen at that level. Any workers, that is, in good health.

    Ordinary people (i.e., like me) go from low altitudes to the top of Mont Blanc (4807 m) without acclimatization. A worker who actually lived up at 5000 m would rapidly adjust to the altitude. Without pressurization passengers in ordinary health would have some ear discomfort and would puff a good bit when moving around. Pressurized carriages would perhaps make sense for those in poor health.

    Someone is confusing this with serious altitude, like 7000-8000 m...

    1. Re:5000 m is just not that high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people use the oxygen mainly in their brains. Even at 4000 m. there are efects. Maybe your brain don't user oxygen?.

    2. Re:5000 m is just not that high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they hope wealthy foreign retirees will pay for a ride.

  36. Re:Must be light-weight trains or maybe COG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    or maybe Cog rail, like the one to pikes peak

  37. Re:Congratulations China! by ngsayjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Never forget Egyptians built the first Great Pyramids 5000 years ago, and now they have tumbled to the point of technological weaklings. And this tells me that even tough US is the technology leader now, but things can change over time. I'll just sit back and see how China will take over the world (in terms of technological advancement). With over 1 billion smart people, this will only happen sooner or later.

  38. Re:Oh Really? by tgbrittai · · Score: 1

    Actually, I would rather see the story verified rather than falsified. But China is clearly trying to cast itself as a world superpower so they are going to have to get used to constant critisism about everything they do. It's how the big players are treated.

  39. The Paper Tiger Express by Quirk · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Historically China has demonstrated some of the large characteristics of state building. The ancient kingdoms of China constructed effective waterways that linked the various areas of what we know as mainland China. The Great Wall of China is another example of state implemented grand scale construction. Of course the The Three Gorges Dam is another example. Having noted these examples I can't see China succeeding as an industrialized state. I see it as a paper tiger destined to burn up. It will be another collapse like that of the USSR.

    I've undertaken to read John Kay's book Culture and Prosperity. The book has become almost mandatory reading, and, other than finding his narrative construction grating, so far I can see why it's become such a widely read and hearlded book. I strongly recommend it to Open Source advocates who want a more lucid framework within which to understand and foster the Open Source business model.

    Pertainent to this thread he lists characteristics common to the most enduring successful market economies versus the perennial failures. As follows successful modern states...

    are cooler by climate

    democracy

    relatively high environmental standards

    freedom of expression

    gender equality

    health

    height (go figure)

    honesty

    egalitariansim

    literacy

    openness

    materialism (most poor country's citizens wish for money above all else)

    population growth (slower in wealthy countries)

    propery rights

    religion (protestant christian countries show better)

    tolerance

    China fails many of these tests and I don't believe their broadcasted slow but sure movement toward more open egalitarian government.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
    1. Re:The Paper Tiger Express by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      Japan also fails many of these tests... and yet they're one of the biggest economies.

    2. Re:The Paper Tiger Express by Quirk · · Score: 1
      Japan also fails many of these tests... and yet they're one of the biggest economies.

      I've studied Japanese history, both as to culture and economics. I've also done considerable business with Japan and as a consequence had the opportunity to travel in Japan. Having the above to go on I can give only a loose analogy in answer to your post.

      First I think it's instructional to come to know Tokugawa Japan, and, as an added bonus, Tokugawa Ieyasu is an intriguing character. At first glance it might seem Tokugawa Japan would suggest by way of it's hierarchical, caste rigidity to lend weight in favour of your post, but I'd like to draw an analogy between the warring factions that predate the Tokugawa Shogunate. Japan, I think, has much in common with the preindustrial tribal factions of western europe, and, by way of a long reach, with Protestanism.

      The Roman Empire failed, for many reasons, to dominate northern Europe, with the exception of Britain. I think it was the strifeful nature of warrior culture where the idea of a king was more akin to an agreed upon battle leader whose 'kingship' lasted only as long as the war. This allowed the northern european tribes to withstand Rome's onslaught. This same reluctance to bow to one kingly overlord is exemplified in Protestant refusal to bow to the Roman Catholic Church and, by way of M Luther to see it as the right of each individual to read from the Bible their own truth.

      Generally, I suspect there's an underlying like current in Japan's culture to allow for pluralism. It's useful to remember that the Emperor worship of Japan as an ancient practise is in large part a fiction. I don't want to go any further afield so, as it stands, this is my best short reply to your post.

      now back to my book

      cheers

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
    3. Re:The Paper Tiger Express by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would strongly suggest you go back to study logic again:

      those factors (democracy, healthy..) ==> successful modern states

      Or more likely:

      uccessful modern states --> those results (democracy, healthy...)?

    4. Re:The Paper Tiger Express by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan:

      are cooler by climate (fail)

      democracy (pass)

      relatively high environmental standards (pass)

      freedom of expression (sorta pass)

      gender equality (sorta pass, but not really. While women are accepted in the workplace, they're around 1970's america)

      health (pass, the Japanese as a whole are very healthy. Much moreso than Americans. They have the highest life expectancy in the world - 85 years for women, and 78 years for men)

      height (go figure) (fail, the average male height in Japan is 5'5", female is 5'0")

      honesty (pass with flying colors)

      egalitariansim (pass)

      literacy (pass)

      openness (how do you mean this? open-minded? open to trade? open to foreign workers? pass, pass, fail.)

      materialism (most poor country's citizens wish for money above all else) (pass)

      population growth (slower in wealthy countries) (fail. Population growth in Japan may well come to a halt in 2007)

      propery rights (property rights, I assume. Pass.)

      religion (protestant christian countries show better) (Japan is largely buddhist and athiest. Christianity only represents a very small section of Japan. Their culture, however, is very independant and loyal - a factor that is more important than what diety the country bows to.)

      tolerance (I suppose they pass - caucasians are looked upon with curiosity, while chinese and koreans are often looked down upon. They are much more tolerant of alternate sexualities than western countries.)

      That's only a 10/16 passing grade, mate, and right now they've got a more stable economy than the US. Many of these things (such as religion/culture, health) are what is keeping the US back in terms of economy and scientific achievements.

    5. Re:The Paper Tiger Express by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like one of those 'we're right because we're right' kind of books, like 'Guns, germs and steel'. Makes you feel all warm on the inside when you're a Westerner. Kind of like confirms what you've been suspecting all along - kind of like Batman when he answered Robin's question 'why do you think we always win, Batman ?', 'I tend to think it is because we have the right on our side, Robin'. Ugh. Forget about China having a superior culture sixthousand years old. Forget about Egypt, the Mayas; currently we're on top, therefore we've always been right. We've always been at war with Eurasia. Here's a nickel, son, go buy yourself a brain.

  40. Space is great. Tibet is Tibet. by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If there is any payoff to the destruction of US industrial might by moving it to China, their greater space activity is it. They are to be congratulated for a positive application of their growth and I hope they put the US to shame for the failure of its pioneer heritage. But the railroad, for all of its engineering prowess, is just another nail in the coffin of Tibetan self-determination. There are things more important than economic development.

  41. Re:Congratulations China! by e2d2 · · Score: 1

    They have 1 billion smart people? Uhm, how are we defining _smart_?

  42. Only a cynic would suggest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...this is all part of China's ongoing policy of populating Tibet with its own citizens to water down dissent, right?

  43. Why pressurize? by cryptor3 · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder why they pressurize? I mean, they are taking people from lower altitudes to higher altitudes right? This seems different from a plane, where people go up to a high altitude, come down to a lower altitude, then get off.

    Some people ought to be getting off in tibet, so what happens when they open the doors? Do they get the bends or does their head explode? or just get altitude sickness all at once?

    1. Re:Why pressurize? by yppiz · · Score: 1

      It makes sense if the line's maximum altitude is greater than the altitude at the destination.

      --Pat

    2. Re:Why pressurize? by chaos99 · · Score: 1

      Think Arnold in Total Recall, helmetless on Mars.

    3. Re:Why pressurize? by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with the starting or ending altitudes. In order for people to live longer than minutes, you need a partial pressure of O2 of at least 12 kPa. Sea level O2 pressure is (typically) about 20 kPa. As your altitude increases, the partial pressure drops, to about 16 kPa at 6,000 feet (where the first symptoms of hypoxia become evident for sensitive individuals, such as smokers - usually night vision is one of the first things to go with increased altitude), to about 14 kPa at 10,000 feet, and down to 12 kPa at about 15,000 feet. IIRC, the train is supposed to go up to above 17,000 feet about sea level, so either the oxygen content of the cabin has to be enriched above 20% (can you say, Fire Hazard?), oxygen masks have to be provided, or the cabin has to be pressurized.

      This link describes a bit more about the hazards of altitude:

      http://www.high-altitude-medicine.com/AMS.html

    4. Re:Why pressurize? by Timbotronic · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the highest point of the journey isn't where people are getting off, so in that regard it's just like going up and down in a pressurised plane and makes sense.

      As far as altitude sickness goes, the faster the pressure changes, the higher the likelyhood of problems. So if, say, the train depressurised at it's highest point you'd have a lot of trouble without supplimental oxygen. Over several days most fit people can adjust to breathing at 17,000 feet unassisted. It's a sobering thought that base camp for climbing Everest is about this high. You then have to climb another 10,000ft. Read "Into Thin Air" by Jon Krakauer for the full horror show. Amazing book.

      As far as the bends go, I don't think you can get them ascending from sea level. But you definately could if you'd been diving for even a short time before going up there.

      --

      One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

    5. Re:Why pressurize? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Nice theory. Except it doesn't explain how people manage to lives for
      days , even weeks above that altitude. Ever heard of sherpas? Sure , they
      have more red blood cells but if O2 partial pressure is all that mattered
      they'd die just as fast as the rest of us would. And don't forget , people
      have *climbed* - never mind just sat still - up to the top of everest
      at 29000 feet with no breathing equipment whatsoever.

    6. Re:Why pressurize? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Yes but they don't climb it very quickly and tend to have rests inbetween moving each foot forward.

    7. Re:Why pressurize? by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

      Hypoxia is a "nice theory" to the same extent as gravity and evolution are "nice theories". This is a very well researched area, which you don't appear to know much about, so here are some links:

      Maximum altitude of human habitation:
      http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2005/MoniqueAnthony .shtml

      Maximum altitude of human survival:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_zone

      On the one in a billion who can make it to the top of Mt. Everest without supplimental oxygen:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherpa_Ang_Rita

      I'd like to remind you that these numbers are for extremely fit, trained individuals. For your AVERAGE human being, like the ones who are presumably going to ride in this thing, the numbers are far less. But don't take my word for it, take the FAA's (Federal Aviation Administration) when they decided what minimum levels of oxygen should be supplied to air passengers, not to mention pilots:

      For private flying:
      http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_ Library/rgFAR.nsf/0/BA9AFBF96DBC56F0852566CF006798 F9?OpenDocument

      For Part 121 Airline flying:
      http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_ Library/rgFAR.nsf/0/38EA18D996EDBCEC86256F3C0069EB 60?OpenDocument

      So, while it is possible, briefly, for extremely fit, acclimated individuals to survive at 15,000 foot plus altitudes, it is not something that you would want to go through just to ride on a bloody train. If you really want to learn more about Hypoxia, go to a local Air Force base, and they may give you a complementary ride in an altitude chamber. This is done with all military (and most civilian) pilots, so that they can learn what their personal symptoms of hypoxia are. They even videotape it - it's very entertaining to watch yourself drool and not remember it, and to see how a sentence you were to write at each 1000' pressure bump turns from neat penmanship into a seismograph.

    8. Re:Why pressurize? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget , people have *climbed* - never mind just sat still - up to the top of everest at 29000 feet with no breathing equipment whatsoever.

      Yes, and it is quite important that they climb rather than sitting still, because they have to go up and then get the hell out of there. Without breathing equipment, no human can survive for a whole day at 29000 feet altitude.

    9. Re:Why pressurize? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Well done , you can use Google and you're probably even a Real Hero (tm) as
      you've been in real altitude chamber and drooled. Have a dog biscuit.
      However , its not just "extremely fit" people who "survive" at 15000 feet,
      entire families *live* at that altitude. Yes , that means little children.
      So while you can probably impress you mates by waffling on about your near
      death experience for 2 minutes in a chamber , theres some 3 year old scurrying
      about right now in similar conditions.

    10. Re:Why pressurize? by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

      Actually I went in such a chamber because my airline requires it within your first year of employment as a pilot. They do it not to create heroes, but to make plain how a) individual your symptoms are, and b) how insidious and dangerous hypoxia is. It still is a small but persistent cause of airplane crashes. You see, there is this little concept called "responsibility" that seems to escape you, which pilots have for the conduct of their flights. For similar reasons, we also practice a variety of other emergency situations on a regular basis, not just so armchair masters like you can talk about hero bullcrap. Oh, and since you are so obviously an expert, I won't bother providing the links. And I'm sorry I bothered making a suggestion that might enlighten you as to what an AVERAGE person would experience at that altitude, since you are so plainly nowhere near average. And, if you had bothered to read any of the sources I had provided, ACCLIMATED people (like Sherpas) can survive somewhat higher; and that acclimatization can take WEEKS or MONTHS, and for many people doesn't occur at all. Great stuff for someone who just wants to RIDE ON A FRIGGIN' TRAIN.

      So, for 99% of the people who would ride this thing (oh wait! All those sherpas want to go sightseeing in the rest of China! It will only be 98%!), the minimum pressure factor I mentioned is the PRIMARY consideration. Wrap your non-average brain around that concept.

    11. Re:Why pressurize? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Ooooh , you're a pilot too! Wow , you really are Mr Amazing. Any other
      facts you want to casually drop in? Perhaps you're training to be an
      astronaut in your spare time?

      I don't give a shit who you are or what you do. My original point if your
      lonely braincell could have figured it out (god help your passengers if this
      is your level of intellect) is that O2 partial pressure is NOT the whole
      story since if it was people couldn't live full time at these altitudes.
      Now go off to your plane airborn bus driver , and leave the thinking to the
      rest of us.

    12. Re:Why pressurize? by Marco+Rossi · · Score: 1

      Why did you make me (CmderTaco) a foe? Don't you realize it's hard for me to live like that? Especially when the CmderTaco account is banned for no reason..... :~(

      --
      - Marco
  44. Re:Congratulations China! by mesach · · Score: 1

    Just because they are in a different country, the old addage still applies.

    Remember, 1/2 of the population has an I.Q. UNDER 100

    --
    moo.
  45. PR Spin? by bleckywelcky · · Score: 0


    China says the line will promote the development of impoverished Tibet.

    That, or help enslave Tibet?

    1. Re:PR Spin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Know who helped to build the first trans-continental railroad in North America to help enslaving native Indian?

    2. Re:PR Spin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Sure. Bringing the richness of Chinese cultural across the broad land.

      Except Chinese workers replace Tibetan workers, meaning the only way for Tibetans to earn a living is to be completely co-opted into Chinese society. And that means no more Tibetan culture and Tibetan religion strictly on Chinese terms. Tibetans become a minority in their own lands and the culture disappears.

      NEVER forget that part of Chinese "progress" is heavy duty state control. Do not impose western assumptions of freedom onto China - on the surface they may be advancing, but underneath it is a pretty nasty place.

      Tibetan cultural genocide is the right term.

    3. Re:PR Spin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :Tibetan cultural genocide is the right term.

      Right term of what? What part of their culture is being wiped so far?

      Or you yourself have got brainwashed somehow to belive this?

  46. Re:Congratulations China! by yotto · · Score: 1

    We also had a (roughly) 40-year head start on the Japanese in car-building, so don't get all high-and-mighty just yet.

  47. Re:Congratulations China! by Starker_Kull · · Score: 1

    Dude, it's not the place, it's the PACE. And they are moving along pretty quickly as of late.

  48. High, but not THAT high! by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    Anyone see the icons used for this story? "Space" and "Technology" :)

    Maybe we need an "Engineering Achievement" icon or something? Maybe a construction hat with a set of spanners orthe like...IANAA (I am not an artist), but I'm sure others will be able to come out with a suitable icon for these types of stories.

    They definitely are of interest to the average geek, so they deserve to be on Slashdot. I think that engineering feats like these deserve their own icon too.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  49. Can US launch someone into space this year? by dreadlord76 · · Score: 1

    I mean, Wow, we can't even feed the people on the ISS without the Russians.

  50. Re:Congratulations China! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I hate to point this out, but we do not even have that capability at this moment. Do you really wish to be rude to them?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  51. cost cutting measures... by weighn · · Score: 0
    It also comes at the same time that the number of Chinese people living in extreme poverty rose by 800,000 last year.

    See those pillars?
    To reduce cost they gathered together 500,000 of their most poverty stricken people and walled them in them there pillars. To further reduce costs, Buddhists and yak farmers were retrained in steel smelting and put to work on making the rails for nix. Sweet, eh?.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    1. Re:cost cutting measures... by metricmusic · · Score: 1

      link to the story about those pillar pls.

      --
      http://www.livejournal.com/users/metricmusic
  52. Historical Retrospective by rlp · · Score: 4, Funny

    I understand that in the early 1940's Germany had a pretty good rail system and was making remarkable progress with rocketry. Can't wait for the Slashdot retrospective on that.

    Oh! Excuse me, have I triggered Godwin's Law?

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Historical Retrospective by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Yeah well in the early 1930's the Nazis were being funded from New York and London so as to prevent a communist revolution in Germany. And anti-semitism was rife in Russia,US and Britain. In fact historically Germany was where Jews were treated the best besides in Muslim Turkey. Which is why it was surprising that Nazis arose in Germany. I would have thought the Nazis were much more likely to get power in the US or UK. Also how ironic that the Jews are now fighting the Muslims who had sheltered them for centuries while the Christians were out on their pogroms and now it is the self same Christians who claim to be the defenders of Judaism. Do note also that Christians dont want Jews to live within their countries hence they promoted the idea of Zionism ergadtz all the Jews will leave their countries and go live in the middle of the Muslim heartland thus solving 2 problems- getting the Jews out of their own country and keeping the Muslims busy fighting so they dont come whoop ass in Europe. The tragedy is the Jews are being played like a banjo by the Christian right and they believe the Christians actually have their interests at heart. Also sometimes I wonder given the tactics adopted by Generals from the Holocaust generation in Israel. Are these really guys from the concentration camps or nazi camp guards who took on the identities of the Jews they had murdered in order to escape prosecution. I mean Sharon has all the characteristics of a camp guard. I am sure had he been in the camps he would have been a collaborator helping to keep the weaker jews in line. These collaborator jews are also something else which sticks in my craw. The weak, the sick and the old jews died in disproportionate numbers. Amongst the survivors a disproportionate number were these collaborators who got better rations and treatment and immunity from gas chambers in return for helping to police the ghettos and camps internally. Yet every survivor of the camps is honored equally. If it was up to me I would treat these collaborators at the same level as the nazis but instead these are the guys who became generals of the IDF as they had some military experience (policing the camps)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  53. Genocide by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 0

    The chinese are attempting to wipe out all the Tibetan people and culture. They have been trying to do so for a long time.

    It would appear that their usual method of 'send in the army, kill all of the men except children and elderly, rape all of the woman and watch the next generation grow up as chinese' is taking too long.

    This is far faster. With this railroad they can ship thousands of people into Tibet. They can also ship thousands of people out.

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
  54. Re:Oh Really? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    And what's with the "after just 115 hours in orbit?". Sounds like a little bit of disdain there.

    "just 115 hours." Well, have you done any better, Scuttlemonkey? Do tell.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  55. This place really sucks by xs650 · · Score: 4, Funny

    When the conductor opened the pressurized train car door for the first time in Tibet, the pasengers were heard to exclaim, "This place really sucks!" as they blew out the door.

    1. Re:This place really sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and that train totally blows!

  56. Re:Oh Really? by Silicon_Knight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They look fake because the little caption on top, in Chinese, says "Simulated Rendering".

      The rest of the images, they must have filmed in the same sound stage that faked the Apollo moon landings.

    -=- Terence

  57. Re:Oh Really? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.


    You are eaten by a jobs.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  58. 5000 Meters isn't that high by spinfire · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been to nearly 5900 meters while climbing Kilimanjaro, and I can tell you the air is pretty thin up there. We obviously spent a fair amount of time adjusting, but not the timeframe on Kili is rushed and you definitely feel it. On the final day we climb at a rate of several seconds per step breathing like we were running a marathon. Very exhilarating :)

    The article makes it sound like oxygen/pressurized cabin is neccessary at this altitude. It isn't. We spent our final night higher than this altitude and I never even had a headache. I assume the reason why the workers received oxygen was to assist with the heavy labor they had to do.

    The pressurized cabin on the train is merely a matter of comfort for most people, although that altitude is high enough to cause problems for some people susceptible to Acute Mountain Sickness or AMS. Since the purpose of the railroad is to reach those high altitudes, I'd assume most people are somewhat accustomed to it.

    Here is a picture from the crater rim of Kilimanjaro's larger peak Kibo at sunrise. The smaller peak you see is Mawenzi, and the view is towards Kenya. I would love to visit Tibet some day.

    1. Re:5000 Meters isn't that high by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "everal seconds per step breathing like we were running a marathon. Very exhilarating :)"

      And what do you do for normal recreation, visit Madam Whiplash and get
      her to beat you for an hour?

    2. Re:5000 Meters isn't that high by David+Off · · Score: 1

      > I assume the reason why the workers received oxygen was to assist with the heavy labor they had to do.

      more likely they are all smoking 100 day unfiltered cigarettes supplied by BAT industries

  59. Real purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A friend of mine returned from China and Tibet two years ago and mentioned the train and how many Chinese made no bones about the fact the train would be used to move many Chinese into Tibet to shift the demographics and help dillute/destroy Tibet as an independent culture.

    1. Re:Real purpose by 2Bits · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine returned from the USA and California 100 years ago and mentioned the train and how many white people made no bone about the fact the train would be used to move many white people into the midwest nd west to shift the demographics and help dilute/destroy Amerindians as an independent culture.

    2. Re:Real purpose by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine recently returned from Spain a couple of hundred years ago and mentioned the boat and how many white people made no bones about the fact the boat would be used to move many white people into South America to shift the demographics and help dilute/destroy South Americans as an independant culture.

    3. Re:Real purpose by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine recently returned from the A5 and mentioned the road and how many Welsh people made no bones about the fact the road would be used to move many Welsh people into England and shift the demographics and help dilute/destroy the English as an independant culture.

  60. s/Tibet/Iraq/g by p2sam · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For all comments, I substitute Tibet with Iraq, and China with US to INFINITY!! haha, I win!!

    PS: also s/falun gong/terroism/g

  61. Re:Congratulations China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, I know you're sore that China is going to beat the US by landing the first man on the Moon and all, but do try and be a gracious loser :)

  62. None of the above by bluGill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The US rail system is well managed, with one exception: Amtrak. The US railroads have realized that freight does not care too much about how fast it is going, sitting still waiting for another train to pass, and not taking the shortest route point to point.

    So the US rails have decided to focus on freight where they hold nearly 2/3rds of all traffic (compare to less than 1/3rd for Europe's rails). That is good management: do what you can do well, and let someone else deal with what you cannot do well. I would argue that Europe's rails are mismanaged, spending all their energy on moving people when it is much easier to move freight.

  63. Not surprising at all, really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just ask any Asian American.

    Many, many Americans (white, black, latino, whatever) are racist against Asians. It's just the way they were raised.

  64. People moving in? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although not quite innocuous, I fail to get overexcited about people moving in.

    When people from Northern California (where I live now) bitch about people moving in from elsewhere, I don't exactly sympathize with them. So I don't automatically sympathize here.

    Should I go and bury I-80 at Donner Lake because it just makes it easier for people to come over the (formerly protective) Sierra Nevada mountains and settle here?

    Or should I go and pry out the "golden spike" in Promentory Point, Utah, because rails made it easy 100 years ago?

    Of course China is investing in infrastructure to move people. We do it too.

    Now, that being said, I'm not in favor of ethnic cleansing or killing of any sort. But just people settling? Well, there's a lot of people on this planet now. Everyone has to make a little room for closer neighbors.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  65. pressurized? by coyote4til7 · · Score: 1

    Pressurized... I thought we'd become soft. While I haven't been to 16k+, I have been to 14k+ (Pikes Peak) and at that altitude, there's no need for assistance. And the cog railway up is supposed to be a hoot. Of course, a sealed cabin has the advantage that you'll reach the other end with all your kids no matter how pissed they get at each other. At least most people consider that an advantage ;-)

    --

    the clock on the wall says 4 til 7
  66. Railroad straight to occupied Tibet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the line that goes straight to the Dali Lama's monastary that he can no longer occupy? Or is it the one that will carry the 5 year old, kidnapped Panchen Lama (2nd in command to the Dali Lama) back to his homeland. China is communist people -- they invade other lands (at least the US isn't communist). Free Tibet!

  67. not sure about that... by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First the average person is just fine at 16,500. Yeah, they will be a bit light headed, but nothing too bad...

    I don't know about that. When I climbed Longs Peak in Colorado, about 14,000', I was sick as a dog and couldn't really think straight. And that's after living two months in Boulder (5150'). I recall recently climbing Mt. San Gorgonio in Southern California (11,500') with someone else, and we had to turn back at about 10,000' because she got seriously disoriented and out of breath, the first signs of altitude sickness.

    Now, it could be I don't know any average people, but my personal experience says that 16,000' would be pretty serious without acclimatization, especially if, like me, you're no longer that young. I would certainly hesitate to try it without knowing I had oxygen standing by.

    For one thing, the *first* thing that goes wrong when you have altitude sickness is your judgment. You start to make dumbass decisions, and lose track of time, and wander in your thoughts. Indeed, this mental dullness is suspected by some people for the climbing disaster on Everest in 1996 described by Jon Krakauer in his absorbing book, Into Thin Air.

    1. Re:not sure about that... by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      What i'm curious about is what you did on your climb of Long's and how long it took...but based on what you wrote, sorry, it sounds like you just didn't drink enough water.  Assuming you are a healthy person (excercise 3 x a week or whatever, don't smoke, drink in excess) you can do Long's Peak in about 8 hours at a relatively slow pace without altitude sickness if they drink at least 2 liters of water.  Now I'm assuming you're relatively healthy, but if you're not, then you'd need more water and probably more time, or to do more cardio work than 'hiking'.

      I know this from my time living in Blue River, Colorado, elev. 10,000(next to Mt. Quandry, elev. 14,285), Breckenridge, elev. 9200, Cooke city MT, elev. 7400, Boulder, elev. 5000, and Indiana, elev. 20.  And from my experience teaching snowboarding and dealing with tourists from all over getting on a snowboard for the first time on a mountain for the first time.  I've seen way too much altitude sickness (damn you texas!)...so yeah IAAMC, and this altitude thing is bogus

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    2. Re:not sure about that... by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      I don't want to give the wrong impression...I did succeed in climbing Longs, don't get me wrong. I just felt like crap at the top, and if I'd stayed any real time at all, I think my decisions would have started declining in quality. But, yeah, I did it right. I lived in Boulder for about a month. I climbed a few lower peaks in RMNP first. I started at the base about 5 AM and made it to the top about noon, as I recall. And I do know about water, yes, and I drank plenty. Longs was not my first peak, although it was -- and remains -- my highest.

      Nor was it a question of training. I was in great shape. I'd run the San Francisco Marathon in 3:25 the year before. I was running 6-10 miles a day, and swimming 3 miles a weak. I ran several 10Ks that year in the Denver area, including the Elbert Reflections up around 7000-8000'.

      I think it's just I'm not particularly good at altitude. Plenty of people can do it without my problems. But, on the other hand -- and this is my point -- I also know plenty of people are worse at altitude than me, like the person I went up Gorgonio with last year. And, indeed, on Longs there was no shortage of people turning around before that last scramble up to the peak, looking sick and feeling awful.

      It seems to me -- although I'm no physician -- that a substantial amount of how you do at altitude on any given day is your genetic make-up and some weird imponderables that are hard to predict, and harder to affect by training, eating right, et cetera. There's a certain random factor that seems to come into play, and for some people on some days it's fine, and for others on other days it's a disaster.

      Anyway, all I'm saying is 16,000' is nothing to be taken lightly by ordinary people. Indeed, it's my impression that people in general take altitude sickness far less seriously than they should.

    3. Re:not sure about that... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      Whats the deal with having to drink lots of water at those heights ?

    4. Re:not sure about that... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I was in Peru a few years ago at various altitudes between 3000M - 5000M and the best thing to stop the headaches, illness etc is coca leaves either eaten or infused in hot water to make tea.

      I don't think 5000M is an especially dangerous altitude but it would definitely be uncomfortable should the train get stuck and the pressurization fail. Maybe with a more rapid exposure to this altitude it could be more serious than if you had acclimatised gradually.

    5. Re:not sure about that... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, some ppl can not handle it well. But the truth is, you lived. Even at 16K, you would still live. Remember the situation is that you are in a train, sitting, and awaiting rescue. Not too taxing on the system. So it is not like when you walked up Longs.

      BTW, I am assuming that you walked up Longs and did not climb the face. All of the Colorado 14ers here have nice walks that you can do. They also have a face that you can climb. Big Difference. I also walked Longs as well as a few other here.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:not sure about that... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Much of the later altitude sickness is simply dehydration. One of the issues is that as you go up, the air is dryer. Most ppl seem to drink based on a schedule, rather than when they need to drink.

      Whenever I bring family/friends (most are east, and all are less than 1K feet elevation) out here to go skiing/camping/etc., I make sure that they drink lots. I will see that they have a water jug and will watch exactly what they drink. If not enough, then I tell them that to prevent a headache they need to drink. It works for most.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:not sure about that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was up at 12,000 and 14,000 in Colorado this past summer - Pike's Peak to be specific - formerly once the world's highest RR.

            yes, I did get altitude sickenss. yes, I did drink water like crazy. My family and I probally drank enough bottled water to supply the drinking needs of half of Africa while we were in Colorado.

          However, a couple of points. First off, you can be healthy, but still get altitude sickness if you have ever had any kind of lung or breathing problems.

            secondly, I used to be a pilot, and the law was over 10,000 feet, you go on oxygen.

              Third, you may think you are not affected, but quite often you are. even at 5,000 to 6,000 feet., People living in Boulder, Denver, Aspen, etc, adapt over time, but visitor can be affected but not think you are.

          Kinda like having just one or two drinks, not enough to put you over the limit for impared driving, but in critical situations, your reaction speeds & judgement are not as good as they should or can be.

          So don't downplay or dimisss the effects of altitude sickness, even in minor form, it something serious, and you have ot consioulsy look out for the effects of it.

    8. Re:not sure about that... by The+Salamander · · Score: 1

      I think people just react differently to altitude.

      My anecdotal experience is that after living my whole life at sea level, I pretty much ran all the way to the top of Long's Peak, hung out for a while, and then ran down with no negative effects whatsoever.

      Although perhaps the speed of the ascent/descent helped? Although my other times above 14k have been pretty pleasant as well.

      I did make sure to hydrate well, though.

    9. Re:not sure about that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "PPL" is not a word, you fucking moron. I think you intended to say PEOPLE.

  68. Re:Congratulations China! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Oh, come now. Surely you know that all of us Asians are good at math.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  69. Damn you're an IDIOT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THE ABDUCTION OF MODERNITY
    Part 1: The race toward barbarism
    By Henry C K Liu

    The United States defines its global "war on terrorism" as a defensive effort to protect its way of life, beyond attacks from enemies with alien cultural and religious motives, to attacks from those who reject modernity itself. This definition is derived from the views of historian Bernard Lewis, a scholar of Islamic culture at Princeton University, who traces Islamic opposition to the West beyond hostility to specific interests or actions or policies or even countries, to rejection of Western civilization for what it is. To Lewis, Western civilization stands for modernity. This anti-modernity attitude, he warns, is what lends support to the ready use of terror by Islamic fundamentalists.

    Samuel Huntington in his The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order argues that the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War will bring neither peace nor worldwide acceptance of liberal democracy. Huntington rejects Francis Fukuyama's prematurely optimistic "end of history" theme that the collapse of communism means Western civilization is destined to spread as people elsewhere seek the benefits of technology, wealth, and personal freedom it offers. Instead, because technology has been reserved for exploitation, wealth obscenely maldistributed, and freedom selectively denied to the powerless, narrow ideological conflict will transform into conflicts among people with different religions, values, ethnicities, and historical memories. These cultural factors define civilizations. Nations will increasingly base alliances on common civilization rather than common ideology; and wars will tend to occur along the fault lines between major civilizations.

    Huntington points out that embracing materialist science, industrial production, technical education, rootless urbanization, and capitalistic trade does not mean the rest of the world will embrace the culture of the West. On the contrary, he argues that economic growth is likely to increase the aspiration for cultural sovereignty, breeding a new commitment to the values, customs, traditions, and religions of native cultures. The struggle is not capitalism against communism, but backward civilization against modern civilization.

    The fault in both these views is the assumption that modernity is an exclusive characteristic of the West. On the surface, such views appear self-evident, since science and technology have been the enabling factors behind Western ascendance and dominance. But the "modern world" can be viewed as a brief aberration on the long path of human destiny, a brief period of a few centuries when narcissistic Western thinkers mistake technological development as moral progress in human civilization. Many barbaric notions, racism being the most obvious, appear under the label of modernity, rationalized by a barbaric doctrine of pseudo-science. The West takes advantage of the overwhelming power it has derived from its barbaric values to set itself up as a superior civilization. The West views its technical prowess as a predatory license for intolerance of the values and traditions of other advanced cultures.

    Chinese civilization has weathered successive occupation by barbaric invaders, all of whom as rulers saw fit to adopt Chinese civilization for their own benefit and contributed to the further development of the culture they had invaded and subsequently adopted. The history of the West's interaction with the rest of the world has been culturally evangelistic, to suppress and encroach on unfamiliar cultures Westerners arbitrarily deem inferior, often based on self-satisfied ignorance. Until confronted by Western imperialism, China might have faced military conquests, but Chinese civilization had never been under attack. Barbaric invaders came to gain access to Chinese culture, not to destroy it. The West is unique in its destructive ethnocentricity. Under the domination of the West, Chinese or other non-Western intellectuals who do no

  70. Oh, yeah? by Hershmire · · Score: 1

    It doesn't compare with the world's highest bus.

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  71. Please learn English. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having to figure out that your "Unless there are no stops at that altitude, the train is simply passing through" is not a logical contradiction but rather a run-on sentence is a waste of everybody's time.

  72. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  73. PLEASE MOD PARENT DOWN by RedBear · · Score: 1

    Parent's post is pointless. It has nothing to do with "racism".

    It has a lot more to do with the fact that a certain country building a railroad into another country is a lot less important to most of /. than the fact that said country has been spending the last several decades oppressing the country it just built a railroad to. The country that built the railroad has been killing, starving and imprisoning a large portion of the population of that other country, and doing its best to completely annihilate the culture of that country. If the oppressive railroad-building country was the United States we would be seeing the same comments. Who they are does not matter. The fact that they have built an impressive railroad does not outweigh the evil they have done and continue to do to this very day. If the US were doing the same thing to the people of British Columbia (Canada), you would be seeing the same sort of comments overshadowing the US building a technologically advanced railroad into B.C., even though most of the posters here come from the US. Would that be "racist" as well?

    But we do apologize for not saying "Oooh, shiny!" and then going on about our business without bringing up the fact that there is evil afoot in that part of the world that's a hell of a lot more important than some technological advancement.

    1. Re:PLEASE MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information, mostly previously posted content, second post deemed necessary as parent demonstrates such lack of attention and lack of depth in investigations that the content may not otherwise be seen by the parent.

      The first Tibetan Lama was supported and established by the force of the Imperial Chinese army, yet when the true barbarity of the monarchs was finally overthrown and the necessary government put into place in the mainland it is suddenly "hands-off" for Tibet, where the monks had established a totalitarian government with strict slavery and punishments of amputation and enforced rape? Read http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles9/Parenti_Ti bet.htm [dissidentvoice.org] and follow each of its sources to become educated about the reality of Tibet and Tibetans prior to our liberation from the monstrous monks.

  74. Space is great. Tibet is over. by hotsauce · · Score: 1

    I hate to break it to you, but the only country that cared about self-determination for Tibet was India. A couple of years ago, when India gave that up in exchage for a border and trade deal, Tibet was officially done.

    Until, perhaps, China splits up.

  75. Cheap gasoline by Goonie · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Fuel is much more expensive in Europe than the United States, so your $20 in gas is probably closer to the equivalent of $40 in much of Europe (though Europeans generally drive smaller, more fuel-efficient cars to compensate).

    The second thing to keep in mind is that because the public transport systems within cities are so much better (New York is a bit of an exception, as the subway on Manhattan is very good), a lot of Europeans simply don't own a car even if they can afford it. Therefore, even if the train is a bit dearer in terms of variable cost, the money saved by not owning, garaging and servicing a car more than makes up for it.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  76. Re:Oh Really? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1, Troll

    You know, you're probably right. I mean, they are communists after all. America being superior to the rest of the world in all ways, if our democratic nation's own space agency is having such a hard time safely putting man in space, how can those godless communists possibly manage to do it?

    I think the Russians were lying about their space exploration feats as well--They were communists too under the Soviet government. Nothing good has ever come out of a country that is ideologically opposed to the U.S.!

    Meanwhile, I know I can perfectly trust our democratic government to be completely honest, just as American mainstream media sources are always 100% accurate. I mean, c'mon it's not like CNN has army psy-ops personnel watching over their operations. And our president would never lie to us about anything.

  77. Re:Free Tibet? by nihilogos · · Score: 1

    as well as some pretty good history of China.

    It sounds like you read the history of China that refers to the "Tiananmen Square Riots." You should try reading a history of Tibet too.

    --
    :wq
  78. Re:Congratulations China! by ngsayjoe · · Score: 1

    But then, there's still 500 million smart people, which is larger than the population of US and Japan combined :)

  79. Only 115 hours in orbit? by spamster · · Score: 1

    Pussies!

  80. Re:Oh Really? by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

    But then I realized, I agree. Their track record at honest reporting of events isn't so good.

    And America's is?

  81. This brings back the Soviet-era joke by Palal · · Score: 1

    This brings back the Soviet-era joke.... Someone knocks on the door of the Russian Space Station. -Who is it? -Its se Chinese. -How did you get here? -Person on person, person on person.

    --
    -Palal
    1. Re:This brings back the Soviet-era joke by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Errr , sorry , you're going to have to explain that punchline. Don't get it.

  82. Fuel by Palal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't forget that Europe uses electricity when we use Diseasel. That also plays a part in speeds and in costs.

    --
    -Palal
  83. If they need some labor... by areadan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe U.S. manufacturing workers who have been canned because their factories were outsourced can be a source of cheap labor for building the railroad. They can settle in China and become a vibrant minority, opening up 'american' restaurants on every corner. I can see it now: General Franks' Chicken.

    --
    http://www.areadan.com
    1. Re:If they need some labor... by Schaffner · · Score: 1

      Well, the railroad to Tibet is about finished, so you're a little too late with this idea. Also, many major cities in China have quite a few American restaurants. In one picture I shot looking down Nanjing Road in Shanghai you can see 4 McDonald's and 3 KFC's. Shanghai also has a Taco Bell. To compete with KFC they also have CFC, Chinese Fried Chicken. It has a similar menu and the logo also looks similar, the difference is that the man in the logo is Chinese!

  84. MOD PARENT UP by Ray+Alloc · · Score: 0

    This is not flamebait, this is truth.

  85. Re:Free Tibet? by Baldrson · · Score: 1

    When the Chinese come in and start appointing reincarnations of Tibentan religious authorities, it is pretty obvious they are treating the Tibetans worse than the Inuit are being treated by the US authorities.

  86. Re:Congratulations China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's quite some advice coming from a mental midget like yerself, Spanky :)

  87. Please elaborate by fliptout · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering, since you are from the area, if you can share some of your first-hand experiences there. I'm an American living in Beijing: when I was in America, I dismissed the "free tibet" cause as liberal arts majors not having enough homework. Now that I am here, all I see are images of chinese on CCTV gushing about how interesting Tibetan culture is.. Perhaps you can provide me and some other people something I can take at face value?

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  88. Re:Congratulations China! by galven · · Score: 1

    You might want to look at how US students fare against students from countries like Japan, Singapore and China. Do consider, too, how Asian culture flourished during the middle ages when the rest of Europe was a slump. Things change, and change back.

  89. Never mind safety, toilet usage..? by Falcon040 · · Score: 1

    Never mind safety, what about using the conventional train toilet (ie. A hole in the floor, or a conventional curved pipe toilet holding some water to stop direct air flow)... Has no one yet imagined? I wouldn't like to sit on that kind of toilet with the estimated pressure difference. It could be dangerous for my health. (I expect constipated me be advised to ride this train in the future)

    1. Re:Never mind safety, toilet usage..? by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      hmmmm they can always have "porta-potty" type things. =P basically a box for all your shit*. If the cabin is presurrized, then the box can be a sealed unit that's pressurized about the same. Stuff goes in, stuff gets locked up until everything gets back to normal pressure, and then stuff gets thrown away.

      At least I'd LIKE for that to be in place rather than literally hole in the ground. Those things are scary >..>

      (....erh, t'was not intended, sorry)

    2. Re:Never mind safety, toilet usage..? by Falcon040 · · Score: 1

      I have experience of train toilets...
      The toilets on the new Virgin Trains between Glasgow and London are particularly frightening. It was maybe a 10 or 12 carriage train, of which 5 toilets failed completely with 1 hour of the journey, then to top it off, shit started overflowing from one of the toilets and was rolling down the corridor.
      This is typical of Virgin Train technology. However the staff kept smiling... Their training must be impressive.

    3. Re:Never mind safety, toilet usage..? by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      EW.....
      so that must be that "Stiff Upper Lip" I keep hearing about

  90. Chinese Propaganda v's Earthquake Reports by bearave · · Score: 1
    Did anybody notice that the railway is not yet complete ? Sure, the Chinese held a ceremony on Saturday to mark the track completion, with no less than the Vice Premier Huang Ju in attendance (see http://en.chinabroadcast.cn/725/2005/10/16/202@249 98.htm

    The report is a "pre-announcement" of the railway, and has all the credibility of undiluted Chinese Propaganda. See ChinaView.CN's article http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-10/15/conte nt_3620072.htm for the unadulterated Chinese-English report of the ceremony - the government newsagency report is worth reading for the payout to the projects opponents.

    The railway could be a wonderful feat of engineering - but you can't tell from these kind of reports. The railway traverses very inhospitable earthquake prone territory. How many slashdotters were aware that the day before the 8th October Pakistan Earthquake there was a large 5.0 richter scale earthquake with epicentre just 6 km from a mountain pass traversed by the railway http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/neic_dxbv.html ?

    For a google earth placemark of the location see http://bbs.keyhole.com/ubb/showflat.php/Cat/0/Numb er/139349/an//page//vc/1 ?

    I couldn't find any media reports of the earthquake - and certainly no mention of any impacts or lack of impacts on the railway.

    If the railway survived this unscathed, it would be a great credit to it. So why no report from the Chinese or Western media ?

    The Chinese might be good at building monuments, and certainly can spin wonderful propaganda. But until they've built a hint of democracy, can you really give any credit to their claims ?

    --
    plurality should not be posited without necessity. - William of Occam
    1. Re:Chinese Propaganda v's Earthquake Reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xinhuanet.com is the internet arm of the Chinese government's propoganda. Everything you read there will obviously be filtered for best representation of China.

      If you want to find the real stories about what is happening in China, do NOT read any website that has its home/server in China. All content published in China is censored/filtered - you will read _nothing_ critical of the Chinese government (or its achievements) on any web site in China or run by someone in China - punishment is arrest for disrupting the public harmony or similar bullshit.

      In China, if you watch the English language TV channel there (CCTV4?), you will see countless reports of diplomatic meetings where "one nation policy" is mentioned, etc. You have to take what you see there with a grain of salt. So too xinhuanet.com. It's garbage news.

    2. Re:Chinese Propaganda v's Earthquake Reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Chinese Propaganda v's Earthquake Reports by bearave · · Score: 1

      Good link especially for Mac people etc without google earth. If you have access to it, google earth has a roads layer which shows the Qinghai-Tibet highway route location. The railway follows that closely. Google Earth is also a bit more useful in looking at the 3D elevation - so you can appreciate the likelihood of landslides etc.,. Although not obvious, it's also possible to punch in coordinates like this in Google Earth's search textbox - that's the easiest way to find a known coordinate; the placemark lets you add text and "zoom" level etc.,.

      --
      plurality should not be posited without necessity. - William of Occam
  91. Re:Congratulations China! by cruachan · · Score: 1

    To be pedantic, the ancient Egyptians and current day Egyptians are not the same people. The nearest living relatives to the ancient Egyptions are probably the Copts, but most modern day Egytions are Arabs

  92. Re:They beat him until he was lifeless by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2, Informative
    Funny how he's still alive though.

    Seeing and believing in China



    The initial report containing what were quickly exposed as gross errors and exaggerations was written by the Guardian's newly appointed Shanghai correspondent, Benjamin Joffe-Walt...


    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  93. Thats OK then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All witnesses agree that Mr Lu was severely beaten, and Mr Lu has confirmed that that was the case.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1593599 ,00.html

  94. A few facts about China and its people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Chinese communism has a capitalistic hue about it. Look at the billions of dollars pumped into china by american companies.

    2) Chinese put honour before anything else.

    3)Chinese people have each year named to animals. Like year of the goat, year of the tiger and so on.

    4) There is a popular belief that chinese eat anything that moves - except perhaps other human beings.

  95. Lower pressure means easier evaporation. by ambrosen · · Score: 1

    More water gets sweated out as it evaporates more easily.

  96. Over 1 billion died building the Railroad by digitaldc · · Score: 0

    It is a great achievement, even if they sacrificed many souls to build it.

    China says the line will promote the development of impoverished Tibet.

    Who says Tibet wanted China to 'develop' it? Maybe the Tibetans are happier without sweatshops and slave labor factories. Maybe it is better to just be impoverished and be in touch with nature, rather than be impoverished in some polluted, run-down pre-fab neighborhood.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Over 1 billion died building the Railroad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who says Tibet wanted China to 'develop' it?"

      Who says Iraqis wanted USA to invade Iraq?

      Cry americans... cry

    2. Re:Over 1 billion died building the Railroad by Oscarshs · · Score: 1

      Who said Iraq wanted US to "free" it? Maybe the Iraqi are happier withouer bombs and american skewed contractors.

  97. Re:Free Tibet? by emh0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which history books have you been reading? For most of recent history (prior to 1950) Tibet was in effect an independent state. It certainly wasn't considered part of China when Britain invaded Tibet in 1903! Britain then gave it to China because all they wanted was a secure trade route through it. The Tibetans then overthrew the Chinese and by 1906 had regained effective independence. China then descended in to civil war and Europe in to WWI and so everybody lost interest in Tibet until China had become communist and invaded in 1949-50.

    Most of China's historical claim to Tibet is based on the fact that from the 1300s Tibet was ruled by Beijing, which is technically true - but it was not ruled by the Chinese! The Mongols (Ghengis Khan, et. al) invaded China, Tibet, Korea and most of the rest of South East Asia and ruled the whole area from Beijing. That hardly gives China a legitamate claim, and it gives them no more of a claim to Tibet than it to Korea.

    Since the invasion in 1950 vast numbers of Chinese people have been moved in whilst similarly vast numbers of Tibetans have died of starvation or fled to India, Nepal and Bhutan. The Chinese government has systematically sought to destroy the Tibetan culture, religion, and identity, to the point where Tibetans are now outnumbered by Chinese in their own land. This railroad will only accellerate that process.

  98. No Blow-Job Jokes Yet? by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    This story's been up almost twelve hours, and no one's said anything about "going down" and "coming up"? What's wrong with you people?

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
  99. More perspective by amightywind · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, the only direction China can go is up considering the damage done in the 1960's and 1970's by the madman Mao.

    Give 100 poor people from anywhere in the 3rd world a choice: A Visa to China or the United States. My guess is 99% will take growing poverty in the USA.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  100. Impressive, but... by spreer · · Score: 2, Informative

    It beats the previous holder of the record, a railroad in Peru that passes over 4843m, by only a couple of hundred meters, taking away a record it held since it was completed in 1912, almost a hundred years ago.

    The fact is, not many places have much use for a railroad that high. Both the current and the former holders of the record would pass over the highest point in Europe or the lower 48 states.

  101. Whaddaya' mean JUST? by swelke · · Score: 1

    What do you mean just 115 hours? How long have you been in space, wise guy?

    --
    Have you ever wondered How to Take Over
  102. a disaster not to Tibet only by wakako · · Score: 1

    This might be a good news to Beijin; yet obsolutely a bad one to Tibet, Tibet's independence, human culture/civilization, human rights, and human environmental protection.

    1. Re:a disaster not to Tibet only by caixj · · Score: 1

      Why don't US or other developed contries destory their railroad to keep their culture? It's a stupid idea. How many Tibetans do u really knows? I don't think it's reasonable to keep their culture by isolating them.

  103. HOw dare you!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is one country. Tibet is a province of that country. It has been a part of China since long before your country has existed. How do you like it if I talk of Evil because of Americans building highway system to Florida. It was a country too, until it was betrayed and slaughtered by YOUR president Andrew Jackson.

    And if you are English, then you can just bloody yourself. You imperialits raped China and pushed drugs such as opium on us and cut off pieces of our country until we were too weak to stop the bastard Japanese murders from coming too. Canadians are arrogant too, but just have no power.

    Time's different now. Now China is strong. Your lies don't Change any of it. China is strong and western hegemons and imperialists cannot push us again. Ever. Make your own spaceship and stop your own uneducated barbaric lazy people from killing each other instead of trying to say Chinese accomplishments aren't good. China is rising.

    1. Re:HOw dare you!!!! by Non-Newtonian+Fluid · · Score: 1

      Okay....

    2. Re:HOw dare you!!!! by Non-Newtonian+Fluid · · Score: 1

      Don't let your nationalism blind you to your country's imperialism. Or is imperialism okay as long it's China being imperialist? (And I don't think my Tibetan friends would agree with you about Tibet either.)

  104. In a train, you're sitting by freeweed · · Score: 1

    I've done some high altitude work as well in the Rockies. Not quite 14,000', but still very noticable.

    The difference is, you're CLIMBING. Exerting yourself. Using up a hell of a lot more oxygen than normal. Altitude hits you very hard when you're doing any sort of exercise. Sitting in a train and experiencing low air pressure is much like being on an airplane - you don't even notice it, because you're barely moving.

    I've never taken a barometric altimeter on a commercialized flight, but I do know this: while they are pressurized, they're nowhere close to sea level air pressure (anyone know what the equivalent altitude would be, btw?). I've seen people get dizzy after one too many trips to the bathroom, but generally no one notices as you're sitting down and hardly moving at all.

    People who live close to sea level can get dizzy and out of breath simply walking at 5,000'. Let them sit down for a while, and they're fine. I've done 10-11,000' many times with people who are otherwise unused to it, and while they may stuggle a lot going up, they're almost always fine once they reach the top and have a chance to relax.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:In a train, you're sitting by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Commercial airliners are typically pressurised to 8000ft or so.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
  105. I'll add thrree more by pavon · · Score: 1

    f) In America cars can go anywhere, while public transportation is limited especially compared to Europe.
    Therefore most people already have cars and it is usually more convienient to use them for medium length trips (don't have to plan around train schedule, have something to get around town when they get to their destination).

    g) America is more spread-out that europe.
    Therefore it is harder to support frequent routes to where people need to go. This creates a harsher trade off between convinience and price.

    h) Americans have less vacation time than europe.
    Therefore, Americans put a larger value on fast tranportation for long trips, and thus choose planes.

    All of these decrease train usage which drives up the overhead price for the remaining customers. I like Amtrack, but it really doesn't have much place in the transportation system here in the US. Until the rest of the system changes, continental rail will be a fundamentally bad solution, because the economies of scale just aren't there.

  106. Free Tibet! by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

    Free Tibet!

    Sweet! I'll take two!

  107. Re:Free Tibet? by vertinox · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that Tibet (the people and the land) is as much a part of China as the Inuit areas of Alaska are a part of the USA

    Well then, the PRC better hurry up and hand over Tibet to Taiwan.

    The Republic of China (Taiwan) is technically still the original government of China before the Communists came along.

    Many of the outer regions (you need to play Hearts of Iron 2 and you can see why it was banned by PRC) and you'll realize that most of China was divided by several groups all vying for power. Communist China assimalated all of them and then kicked the RoC forces out. The only reason China doesn't claim Mongolia was because Stalin made Mao drop the claims. We don't see China clammering for Mongolia to be back now do we?

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  108. two-mile-high club? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    I grew up in Leadville, Colorado. Their airport is at 9950 feet elevation. I would've had to dig quite a hole to join the Mile High Club.
    (For some reason, oh maybe it was the sucky performance of airplanes at that altitude, I've never used my pilot certificate in Leadville.)

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  109. Height by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think height is a function of nutrition to some extent. So might be considered more of an effect than a cause.

  110. Perhaps by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    Yes, I lived. I wasn't even seriously ill. But, on the other hand, I was only on the top for 30 minutes or so, and the weather was fine, and I was in my mid-20s.

    If, on the other hand, a Chinese train broke down at 16,000', the weather might well be bad, the people on board might be in their 50s or 60s, and rescue might not come for three or four days -- since, of course, they put the train in because getting up there is difficult.

    I certainly agree most people could probably go to 16,000' air pressure for a short time without serious ill effect, and many people could go longer. But I also think it's not unlikely that quite a number of normal not-fit non-acclimatized people, middle-aged or older, would if left at 16,000' feet at -15 C for two or three days, without much water and food, be quite seriously affected. That's all I'm saying.

    Yes, I walked up Longs. For some reason, I'm not comfortable with technical climbing and I've never really done any, although I've tried it out a little in parks. There's just some "unnaturalness" to it that I feel, so that even when I can do it, it isn't fun. It's just work. Don't flame me -- I'm not saying people who do it are nuts -- I think it's just a matter of taste, and it so happens that technical climbing doesn't suit mine. I realize that means I'm never going up Denali or Everest, but that's OK, I'm happy enough noodling around on lower peaks, and I'm a bit old for that kind of stuff anyway.

  111. Native Tibetans have been dreading this ... by coherentlight · · Score: 3, Informative

    China's policy over the last few years has been one of population dilution. By trucking in native Chinese, they were diluting native Tibetan population. With this new railroad that process will accelerate dramatically. I spent a month in Lhasa last year and spoke with some of the Tibetans (technically you are supposed to have a Chinese guide present at all times, but since there were no other tourists there .. none .. the guide just took off to a bar), and they were very depressed about the finish of the railroad. Their culture is being coopted by China and western influence. So very sad. -coherentlight

  112. Population Transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This railway will ensure that China's "final solution" for the Tibet issue will be successful. Through population transfer of Han Chinese migrants into the region (assisted by Government incentives), the Tibetan population will become increasingly marginal and their collective voice a minority. According to Tibetans, there are 3 Chinese migrants for every native Tibetan currently in Tibet (especially Lhasa and bordering areas). According to the Chinese Government, the Han Chinese population is only 5%. I have friends who are currently travelling in Tibet and they assure me that the CPC's figure is quite off.

  113. Tibetan can have the second child in China by jameszhou2000 · · Score: 1

    There no conflict of common interests between Tibetan and the general Chinese. China has been messed up by communism for nearly 50 years. Tibetan did not suffer more than the general Chinese did in other areas.

    In fact, nowadays, Tibetan, regarded as a minority of Chinese in China, have the right to have the second child, on which Han Chinese are very jealous.

  114. Soiling capitalism is best left to capitalists! by Tungbo · · Score: 2, Insightful


    They've done a fine job too: Bhopal, US tobacco industry, Pinkertons, South Africa, Love Canal...

    It's most ironic that you were researching for a human rights project.
    Do read some Upton Sinclair and Dickens. Without other moderating
    cultural influences, capitalism have run rough shod over human rights for centuries. The benefit of capitalism is economical, not the promotion of a more humane society.
    Historically, corporate interests attempt to use governmental influences to gain benefits for themselves as often as they want to be left alone. Look at trade tariffs, agricultural subsidies, the East India Company (Is that a company or an arm of the government?) !

    There has never been pure lassiz faire capitalism and there probably never will be. If it comes to be, it's not obvious that you would want to live there.

  115. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  116. Re:Free Tibet? by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    You need to read your history a bit more carefully. The last emperors of China were Manchurians who have largely assimilated within the Han culture. They stationed permanent imperial officlas in Lhasa. They also got involved in selection of reincarnations when there had been competing claims.
    When Tibet had de facto independence was from roughly 1911-1049 although they achived no international recognition. This is not insignificant, but certainly not overwhelming.

    Britain were not interested in trading as much as their 'Great Game' of geopolitics against Russia.

    I disapprove of the harsh methods the PRC government has deployed to suppress dissent and religions. However, there was never any systematic pogram to attack Tibetans as in Croatia. I find the term 'cultural genocide' more polemical than meaningful.
    You weaken your arguments when you based them on inaccuracies or spins.

  117. Re:TIBET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another guy brainwashed by the western media. In fact Tibet has been a part of China for A THOUSAND YEARS.

  118. Reservations and population by Baldrson · · Score: 0, Troll
    First of all, the population of north Amerindians is the same as it was at the introduction of smallpox by the Spanish. They recovered their numbers because:

    1. The Protestant settlers increased the carrying capacity of the land through agricultural techniques.
    2. The system of reservations allows the portions of their population that would otherwise have lost their identity to retain their identity.

    Sure, Tibet is an entire country but the real question is:

    1. Do Tibetans have any territory set aside exclusively for them the way the US set aside reservations?
    2. Is the increase in carrying capacity being shared in a way that keeps the number of Tibetans from dwindling along with their identity?
    1. Re:Reservations and population by Baldrson · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've been on reservations and indeed once visited Chief Dan Evanheema, the Hopi elder, when he was near death. I did so precisely because he was a living link to the authentic heritage of the Hopi made possible by the reservation system. You yourself point out, entirely ignoring my point about the value of reservations, that the problem isn't "loss of land" but "rather the assimilation with regular Chinese". That's my entire point. The US system of reservations, for all their inadequacies as a refuge from outside influences, has provided far better protections than are being afforded the Tibetans in Tibet. The main thing that is protecting Tibetans in diaspora is the social status afforded them, which allows the young people to be proud of their identity and respect those who most embody its living traditions but that is only good so long as the Tibetan cause is a popular cause. They need and are entitled to as a basic human right -- their own territory.

  119. Define "poverty". by smithmc · · Score: 1

    How is poverty defined in China, vs. the US? As Bill Maher said, "America is the only country with poor fat people". What we call "poverty" would be considered pretty good living in much of the world.

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  120. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  121. Re:Free Tibet? by jnana · · Score: 1
    I agree with you completely, as long as you ignore certain inconvenient facts like that the PRC systematically destroyed almost all of Tibet's 6000 or so monasteries (and the monasteries were the center of the culture, sort of a cross between library-university-museum-monastery) expressly because they were the centerpoints of Tibetan culture, or that 10-20% of the population was killed in the during the so-called 'invited peaceful liberation,. or that things like rape and torture of nuns in prison were and are extremely widespread and implicitly sanctioned, or that very many monks, nuns, and laypeople were shot without trial for no other reason than that they were Tibetan and perceived to be -- or possibly, perhaps, could sort of be -- troublemakers, the families of the victims often forced to pay for the bullets that were used to kill them, or even that Tibetans are now a minority in their capital city, and those that remain are second-class citizens.

    Apart from minor quibbles like these, I agree that China has really been a poster-child for what we might call 'compassionate imperialism.'

    You might have a different perception of their policies if you had spoken to as many former political prisoners who were raped by prison guards using electric cattle prods as I have. And no, these things are not only from the distant past. They are still occurring now, and if you go to Dharamsala, India, you can meet the newcomers who are arriving from Tibet, and hang out at the support organizations for former political prisoners (e.g., Gu Chu Sum) and see that these brutalities are not a thing of the past.