Slashdot Mirror

tco? fooey. pay "protection" money to some FraUDuleNT payper liesense peddling softwar gangsters? no way? not you J.? say it isn't so. be LIEk giving gotti money to keep those garmentiers "in line". those .convicted slimebawls are plotting to take india hostage as we don't speak. wake up j., yOUR fuderal gov't. has forsaken yOUR rights, to up the suckage, from yOUR fine&shill systern.

without our tco of software being near $0.00, thanks to the good gnus, we'd likely never be listed as one of "Top 10 Companies of 2002"(tm) , on fuddle's search thingy.

almost everything's gnu now. wait, there's more...

beat DOWn from trying to be a billyunheir/keeping your job? you may want to try some nice ktea . it's not snake oil, but it's still good for you.

without our tco of software being near $0.00, thanks to the good gnus, we'd likely never would be listed as one of "Top 10 Companies of 2002"(tm) , on fuddle's search thingy.

almost everything's gnu now. wait, there's more...

beat DOWn from trying to be a billyunheir/keeping your job? you may want to try some nice ktea . it's not snake oil, but it's still good for you.

meanwhile, as always, we're ?thrilled? about being listed as one of the "Top 10 Companies of 2002"(tm) [msn.com], on fuddle's search thingy.

almost everything's gnu now. talk about easy fashion [easyfashion.com]? ecomability [ecomability.com]? there's more...

beat DOWn from trying to be a billyunheir/keeping your job? you may want to try some nice ktea [kombucha.org]. it's not snake oil, but it's still good for you.

meanwhile, we're nearly speechless over having been found to be one of the "Top 10 Companies of 2002"(tm) , on fuddle's search thingy.

long live the hobbyist whiners et AL.

Viva La Revolucione(tm)

wrong. IT's ALL about money for these ill eagle corepirate slimebawls.

dastardly lowrating aside, we notice the "?field leveling?" beginning to take effect already, with our being found to be one of the
"Top 10 Companies of 2002"(tm) , on fuddle's search thingy.

you may see this as just more ineptness on the part of the kingdumb, or annoying shameless promotion on our part. we see IT as some notion that FraUDuleNT Godless sloth may not be abull to keep the good gnus DOWn, with a little help.

no matter, we're ?thrilled? just being listed as one of the "Top 10 Companies of 2002"(tm) on fuddle's search thingy. more good gnus....

something we see they did get right, was listing us as one of the "Top 10 Companies for 2002"(tm) , on billy's search thingy. guess you just can't hide from the good gnus, know?

back to the os thing, if you had written the greatest 6D apps in the wwuniverse, they would look fuddy when run on some shoddily engineered, bug/spy wear, from the naykid furor's kingdumb. carry on.

you just can't keep the good gnus DOWn i guess.

see also: FraUDuleNT EyeCon

annoying (telling the truth about) fuddles couldn't be any worse than say, peacing off, john gotti, now that they're dead. you can bulleave me or knot. probably just best to keep yOUR heads buried in the sillysand.

don't worry about if we're BiG enough to handle IT. since we we're found to be one of the Top 10 Companies of 2002(tm) on fuddle's search thingy, our hugeness is unquestionable.

even better yet, if you want to, you can LET the feds peruse your boxes, with ONLY you & them knowing all about IT (eliminating the need for "secret" payper liesense hostage ransom stock markup scamsters). call us.

maybe they need to stew in their phony payper liesense stock markup hostage ransom scam, for another year or two?

anyway, we're ?thrilled? beyond exclamation about being found to be one of the "Top 10 Companies for 2002(tm)" by fuddles search thingy. what a break for us?

I guess there's just no escaping the good gnus.

yikes, no wonder the rest of the world is laughing/crying in sympathy at/for US.

ucann also bet your dog, that IT's NO coincidence that the forums of the NYT weNT DOWn friday p.m. (we'd like to know if it is working with IE?) & have yet to return.

megasloth.con is N0T the leased byte iNTerestdead in what J. really thinks/knows.

gimme a b.......

yikes, no wonder the rest of the world is laughing/crying in sympathy at/for US.

ucann also bet your dog, that IT's NO coincidence that the forums of the NYT weNT DOWn friday p.m. (we'd like to know if it is working with IE?) & have yet to return.

megasloth.con is N0T the leased byte iNTerestdead in what J. really thinks/knows.

gimme a b.......

congratulations J., on your acquisition of your free pass into the brave gnu wwworld of open/honest communications/commerce. what!!??, you haveN'T gotten won yet? gadzuks!

Start Here(tm)

you're welcome.

Drink Swahilli(tm)

Because IE is full of bugs and holes. It's probably the most insecure piece of software on the planet. And since MS were dumb enough to tie IE in with the OS, an IE hole can threaten your whole system. Use it at your own risk...

just whois the real .commIEs? fud is dead?

this ill eagle payper liesense hostage ransom scam report just in, from the Billyum De FUDgeville Institute, indicates that folks are just thrilled with the kingdumb's bugwear, & that there is no knead to look for alternatives.

whoever tolled you that evile deceptive ?pr? FUDgePacking is dead, must be from the future.

YIKES!@#$%

maybe some prayer.

beware the REAL .commIEs.

The FBI's new securities fraud (pumper/dumper club) hotline also seems to be producing good tips. Barely a day after the phone line was set up (at (800) 207-7676 or http://sanfrancisco.fbi.gov), more than 20 calls and e-mails had been received. "Some of the tips we've gotten are very promising and even corroborate ongoing investigations," Black said.

beware billonlyUS FUDgePeddlers spewing kode blew payper liesense, hostage ransom, stock markup FraUD scams

Somebody beat me to it! :-)

"The Palladium was a famous theater in London and another in Hollywood, and the name choice makes more and more sense to me as the story develops about Microsoft's computer security initiative of the same name. It certainly felt like theater, for example, when I received this week a very careful message on the subject from inside Microsoft. It's rare that I hear from any of the troops in Redmond, and the writer's message is an interesting one that made me think a lot -- not just about Palladium, but about the whole power structure behind the protection of intellectual property rights and just where Microsoft fits in. Frankly, I think we're being played for fools. The message follows (with my addition of capital letters where needed).

As a long time reader and watcher, I've always respected your insight. But you should know that you're pretty far off the mark with your recent Palladium commentary. It's basically content creator (be that ISV or copyright holder) driven only, and Microsoft only provides the infrastructure to let that happen. Obviously, I cannot comment on internal issues, but this public interview sums it up pretty accurately [cites a URL that you'll find is the first "I Like It!" entry this week]. Especially the following (an interview with Palladium product manager Mario Juarez published in Digital ID World):......

But hey, this is just Microsoft you say. Microsoft doesn't envision anything so diabolical. And I agree with that statement simply because I don't see Microsoft as a company having much vision at all. That's why it is possible for Palladium to be devised exactly as Mr. Juarez says, from the bottom up for purely altruistic reasons. In fact, I am sure that is how it happened. But then one day somebody near the top of Microsoft realized that what they had was a way of taxing the world, and suddenly, Palladium became strategic for Microsoft.

Now maybe I am a crackpot. And if I am, then you'll be able to take apart everything I have just written, point by point, showing how crazy it is. Please do. I'm waiting.

And I'm still waiting.

As a footnote here, I did a Google search on my writer from Microsoft, and found that he had submitted comments to the Department of Justice asking that Microsoft be dealt with leniently in the penalty phase of the current anti-trust trial. While the writer described himself to the DOJ as an "entrepreneur," he did not identify himself as a Microsoft employee. How entrepreneurial of him! I wonder how many of the positive comments received by the DOJ came from such closeted Microsoft people?

Now back to Palladium. One aspect of this story that really amazes me is the role of the recording, broadcasting, and film industries, which are accorded far more prestige than I think they deserve or that they would receive from Microsoft on a normal day. This is a company, remember, that is consistently acused of stealing intellectual property and has been found guilty of doing so. There is no respect for intellectual property rights that I can see there. Beyond Bill Gates's extensive video collection of Audrey Hepburn movies, I don't think the movie business makes much difference to Microsoft. It's all about the money."

see also: The horrors of becoming involved in some phony payper stock markup bookFUDging FraUDs, & ill eagle hostage ransom liesense scams perpetrated buy the ill eagle KingDumb

"The Palladium was a famous theater in London and another in Hollywood, and the name choice makes more and more sense to me as the story develops about Microsoft's computer security initiative of the same name. It certainly felt like theater, for example, when I received this week a very careful message on the subject from inside Microsoft. It's rare that I hear from any of the troops in Redmond, and the writer's message is an interesting one that made me think a lot -- not just about Palladium, but about the whole power structure behind the protection of intellectual property rights and just where Microsoft fits in. Frankly, I think we're being played for fools. The message follows (with my addition of capital letters where needed).

As a long time reader and watcher, I've always respected your insight. But you should know that you're pretty far off the mark with your recent Palladium commentary. It's basically content creator (be that ISV or copyright holder) driven only, and Microsoft only provides the infrastructure to let that happen. Obviously, I cannot comment on internal issues, but this public interview sums it up pretty accurately [cites a URL that you'll find is the first "I Like It!" entry this week]. Especially the following (an interview with Palladium product manager Mario Juarez published in Digital ID World):......

But hey, this is just Microsoft you say. Microsoft doesn't envision anything so diabolical. And I agree with that statement simply because I don't see Microsoft as a company having much vision at all. That's why it is possible for Palladium to be devised exactly as Mr. Juarez says, from the bottom up for purely altruistic reasons. In fact, I am sure that is how it happened. But then one day somebody near the top of Microsoft realized that what they had was a way of taxing the world, and suddenly, Palladium became strategic for Microsoft.

Now maybe I am a crackpot. And if I am, then you'll be able to take apart everything I have just written, point by point, showing how crazy it is. Please do. I'm waiting.

And I'm still waiting.

As a footnote here, I did a Google search on my writer from Microsoft, and found that he had submitted comments to the Department of Justice asking that Microsoft be dealt with leniently in the penalty phase of the current anti-trust trial. While the writer described himself to the DOJ as an "entrepreneur," he did not identify himself as a Microsoft employee. How entrepreneurial of him! I wonder how many of the positive comments received by the DOJ came from such closeted Microsoft people?

Now back to Palladium. One aspect of this story that really amazes me is the role of the recording, broadcasting, and film industries, which are accorded far more prestige than I think they deserve or that they would receive from Microsoft on a normal day. This is a company, remember, that is consistently acused of stealing intellectual property and has been found guilty of doing so. There is no respect for intellectual property rights that I can see there. Beyond Bill Gates's extensive video collection of Audrey Hepburn movies, I don't think the movie business makes much difference to Microsoft. It's all about the money."

see also: the horrors of becoming involved in some phony payper stock markup bookFUDging FraUDs, & ill eagle hostage ransom liesense scams

see also: VA Lairy et AL

"The Palladium was a famous theater in London and another in Hollywood, and the name choice makes more and more sense to me as the story develops about Microsoft's computer security initiative of the same name. It certainly felt like theater, for example, when I received this week a very careful message on the subject from inside Microsoft. It's rare that I hear from any of the troops in Redmond, and the writer's message is an interesting one that made me think a lot -- not just about Palladium, but about the whole power structure behind the protection of intellectual property rights and just where Microsoft fits in. Frankly, I think we're being played for fools. The message follows (with my addition of capital letters where needed).

As a long time reader and watcher, I've always respected your insight. But you should know that you're pretty far off the mark with your recent Palladium commentary. It's basically content creator (be that ISV or copyright holder) driven only, and Microsoft only provides the infrastructure to let that happen. Obviously, I cannot comment on internal issues, but this public interview sums it up pretty accurately [cites a URL that you'll find is the first "I Like It!" entry this week]. Especially the following (an interview with Palladium product manager Mario Juarez published in Digital ID World):......

But hey, this is just Microsoft you say. Microsoft doesn't envision anything so diabolical. And I agree with that statement simply because I don't see Microsoft as a company having much vision at all. That's why it is possible for Palladium to be devised exactly as Mr. Juarez says, from the bottom up for purely altruistic reasons. In fact, I am sure that is how it happened. But then one day somebody near the top of Microsoft realized that what they had was a way of taxing the world, and suddenly, Palladium became strategic for Microsoft.

Now maybe I am a crackpot. And if I am, then you'll be able to take apart everything I have just written, point by point, showing how crazy it is. Please do. I'm waiting.

And I'm still waiting.

As a footnote here, I did a Google search on my writer from Microsoft, and found that he had submitted comments to the Department of Justice asking that Microsoft be dealt with leniently in the penalty phase of the current anti-trust trial. While the writer described himself to the DOJ as an "entrepreneur," he did not identify himself as a Microsoft employee. How entrepreneurial of him! I wonder how many of the positive comments received by the DOJ came from such closeted Microsoft people?

Now back to Palladium. One aspect of this story that really amazes me is the role of the recording, broadcasting, and film industries, which are accorded far more prestige than I think they deserve or that they would receive from Microsoft on a normal day. This is a company, remember, that is consistently acused of stealing intellectual property and has been found guilty of doing so. There is no respect for intellectual property rights that I can see there. Beyond Bill Gates's extensive video collection of Audrey Hepburn movies, I don't think the movie business makes much difference to Microsoft. It's all about the money."

see also: the horrors of becoming involved in some phony payper stock markup bookFUDging FraUDs, & ill eagle hostage ransom liesense scams

see also: VA Lairy et AL

"The Palladium was a famous theater in London and another in Hollywood, and the name choice makes more and more sense to me as the story develops about Microsoft's computer security initiative of the same name. It certainly felt like theater, for example, when I received this week a very careful message on the subject from inside Microsoft. It's rare that I hear from any of the troops in Redmond, and the writer's message is an interesting one that made me think a lot -- not just about Palladium, but about the whole power structure behind the protection of intellectual property rights and just where Microsoft fits in. Frankly, I think we're being played for fools. The message follows (with my addition of capital letters where needed).

As a long time reader and watcher, I've always respected your insight. But you should know that you're pretty far off the mark with your recent Palladium commentary. It's basically content creator (be that ISV or copyright holder) driven only, and Microsoft only provides the infrastructure to let that happen. Obviously, I cannot comment on internal issues, but this public interview sums it up pretty accurately [cites a URL that you'll find is the first "I Like It!" entry this week]. Especially the following (an interview with Palladium product manager Mario Juarez published in Digital ID World):......

But hey, this is just Microsoft you say. Microsoft doesn't envision anything so diabolical. And I agree with that statement simply because I don't see Microsoft as a company having much vision at all. That's why it is possible for Palladium to be devised exactly as Mr. Juarez says, from the bottom up for purely altruistic reasons. In fact, I am sure that is how it happened. But then one day somebody near the top of Microsoft realized that what they had was a way of taxing the world, and suddenly, Palladium became strategic for Microsoft.

Now maybe I am a crackpot. And if I am, then you'll be able to take apart everything I have just written, point by point, showing how crazy it is. Please do. I'm waiting.

And I'm still waiting.

As a footnote here, I did a Google search on my writer from Microsoft, and found that he had submitted comments to the Department of Justice asking that Microsoft be dealt with leniently in the penalty phase of the current anti-trust trial. While the writer described himself to the DOJ as an "entrepreneur," he did not identify himself as a Microsoft employee. How entrepreneurial of him! I wonder how many of the positive comments received by the DOJ came from such closeted Microsoft people?

Now back to Palladium. One aspect of this story that really amazes me is the role of the recording, broadcasting, and film industries, which are accorded far more prestige than I think they deserve or that they would receive from Microsoft on a normal day. This is a company, remember, that is consistently acused of stealing intellectual property and has been found guilty of doing so. There is no respect for intellectual property rights that I can see there. Beyond Bill Gates's extensive video collection of Audrey Hepburn movies, I don't think the movie business makes much difference to Microsoft. It's all about the money."

see also: the horrors of becoming involved in phony payper stock markup bookFUDging FraUDs, & ill eagle hostage ransom liesense scams

The Harken Tale: Harken Energy purchased Bushboy's worthless oil company Spectrum7 for $2 million (bailing Bushboy out of big debts) in the late 80s and put Bushboy on their board and paid him a $120,000/year "consulting fee." Harken then lent Bushboy $180,000 so he could buy Harken stock. Bushboy was on their Board and was a member of their 3 man "Audit group" which was privy to the companies financial woes in 1990. After being briefed about Harken's cash flow problems in April, 1990, Bushboy sells his stock in June, 1990, when some mystery investor pays him $848,000 based on a "cold call" made by some stock broker (this is what the Bushboy people really say). In August, 1990 the poor financial condition of Harken becomes known and the stock drops like a rock to 1/4 its value when Bushboy sold it. Bushboy fails to report the sale of the stock by the 10th day of the month following the sale as required by law. He doesn't file the necessary SEC documents until 36 weeks later! The SEC head was appointed by Bushdaddy who is now president. Although the head of the SEC, Mr. Doty, was Bushboy's personal attorney, he doesn't recuse himself from any judgement of Bushboy and although the SEC refuses to exonerate Bushboy's criminal conduct it chooses not to investigate or prosecute (surprise!). The whole Bushboy/Harken deal stinks to high heaven and makes Whitewater seem like the jaywalking that it was in comparison, but Bushboy and the GOPers will block any attempt to investigate and hire a Special Prosecutor as they were so quick to do in Whitewater. Harken will be Whitewashed, as is everything else in Bushboy's sleazy past.

see also: komanduh tahoe's NEXT employer

The Harken Tale: Harken Energy purchased Bushboy's worthless oil company Spectrum7 for $2 million (bailing Bushboy out of big debts) in the late 80s and put Bushboy on their board and paid him a $120,000/year "consulting fee." Harken then lent Bushboy $180,000 so he could buy Harken stock. Bushboy was on their Board and was a member of their 3 man "Audit group" which was privy to the companies financial woes in 1990. After being briefed about Harken's cash flow problems in April, 1990, Bushboy sells his stock in June, 1990, when some mystery investor pays him $848,000 based on a "cold call" made by some stock broker (this is what the Bushboy people really say). In August, 1990 the poor financial condition of Harken becomes known and the stock drops like a rock to 1/4 its value when Bushboy sold it. Bushboy fails to report the sale of the stock by the 10th day of the month following the sale as required by law. He doesn't file the necessary SEC documents until 36 weeks later! The SEC head was appointed by Bushdaddy who is now president. Although the head of the SEC, Mr. Doty, was Bushboy's personal attorney, he doesn't recuse himself from any judgement of Bushboy and although the SEC refuses to exonerate Bushboy's criminal conduct it chooses not to investigate or prosecute (surprise!). The whole Bushboy/Harken deal stinks to high heaven and makes Whitewater seem like the jaywalking that it was in comparison, but Bushboy and the GOPers will block any attempt to investigate and hire a Special Prosecutor as they were so quick to do in Whitewater. Harken will be Whitewashed, as is everything else in Bushboy's sleazy past.

see also: sum other BiG FraUDs

IT's easy to know. just read this report buy the Furor de FUDgeville Institute, on the horrors of becoming involved in sum FraUDuleNT payper liesensing, &/or stock markup bookFUDging scams.

don't forget to read this report from the Marquis de FUDgeville on the horrors of becoming involved in sum payper liesense hostage ransom, &/or stock markup FraUD schemes.

some LIEforms (never a more appropriate/accurate domain name) just doN'T/will NEVER get IT.

although i'm sure the folks over at fud.con.troll would love for you to bulleave you have some moral leeway in the question of what to do when your IIS machine is pilfered, butt there is not.

if your cc inf. was stolen of sum billybox somewhere, would you FEEl asp dough you had the write to know? would you FEEl asp dough the inept fuddite apologists had the right to fail to, or MiSinform you, about the situation? m$0k.

be sure to read this report , just re-leased buy the billonlyUS de FUDgeville Institute, on sum of the "other" horrors of becoming involved in the ill eagle kingdumb's FraUDuleNT infactdead payper liesense hostage ransom scams.

just read this report suppLIEd buy the Institute de FUDgeville. IT .coNTains ALL the answerves any hopeful wannabe could hope for, including how to become an apologist for payper lisense hostage ransom schems.

can a scruffly beard be far behind? will it help with the BiG ?pr? poosh?

talk about FraUDuleNT stock markup scamsters? sheesh, phewww.

no matter, fud IS dead. doN'T be hauled to the bottom with those payper liesense crooks, no matter what the cut of the pengwin suite they're wearin'.

on the dangers of not giving all of your security billyuns to the kingdumb. just look what happened to gotti.

meanwhile, the justin de Linusville Institute has re-leased diss report, which would leave one's head spinning as to why even the corrupt lamo fuderal gov't. would spend one more dime of J. Public's money on the notoriously infactdead m$ payper liesense bugwear blight.

if HomePage security is outlawed, only crooks will have homepages. eye gas that's IT then for US.

on the whoreabull dangers of pcds withOUT fuddle's payper liesense bugwear.

meanwhile, the gooed folks over at the TUX de Linusville Institute have issued a rebuttal/repriNT/payper of sum facts about the FraUDuleNT KingDumb's ill eagle liesense peddling scams.

stand buy.

meanwhile, check out this report , re-leased buy your friends over at the Tux de Linuxville institute for GNU reporting.

tawlk about desperados, whois the bIEgger won, billy or k0mandeer tahoe?

see ALL the details (eXcePt anything about this massive stock markup FraUD) tonite on the blather at 6.5 b.m..

if you knead proof, just read the report . that's write, & we're sticking to IT, we're NOT taking IT DOWn when sumbuddy w(h)ines about IT.

if you knead proof, just read the report. that's write, & we're sticking to IT, we're NOT taking IT DOWn when sumbuddy w(h)ines about IT.

taking lessons from the head FUDgePackers eye gas? time to call in WayGoner & FUDstorm. all the wwworld's a stage/fright.

well, not exactly. does any1 know how many cc #s have been filched doo to M$ IIS security "enhancemeNTs"? know? does any1 know why ecommerce is practically dead in the wwwater? IEaaaggghhh.ofInvasion

just when we thought PayPer LieSense FUDgePacking was dead.

Propally mentioned before but this site is still up. Go to www.trustworthycomputing.com and you get redirected to a google search results listing the thousands of articles on Microsft's history of security breaches.

Mean while, Microsoft has started a public marketing campagn and even plans to have .net set to secure by default but it will be an uphill battle for them. Today at the same time as secure by default came out there was another story about another vulnerability in Outlook Express

I was going to do exactly what this fellow did, but he beat me to it. Clever. Let's hope this URL gets around: http://www.trustworthycomputing.com