Slashdot Mirror

To guarantee the free access of citizens to public information, it is indespensable that the encoding of data is not tied to a single provider. The use of standard and open formats gives a guarantee of this free access, if necessary through the creation of compatible free software.

To guarantee the permanence of public data, it is necessary that the usability and maintenance of the software does not depend on the goodwill of the suppliers, or on the monopoly conditions imposed by them. For this reason the State needs systems the development of which can be guaranteed due to the availability of the source code.

To guarantee national security or the security of the State, it is indispensable to be able to rely on systems without elements which allow control from a distance or the undesired transmission of information to third parties. Systems with source code freely accessible to the public are required to allow their inspection by the State itself, by the citizens, and by a large number of independent experts throughout the world. Our proposal brings further security, since the knowledge of the source code will eliminate the growing number of programs with *spy code*.

In the same way, our proposal strengthens the security of the citizens, both in their role as legitimate owners of information managed by the state, and in their role as consumers. In this second case, by allowing the growth of a widespread availability of free software not containing *spy code* able to put at risk privacy and individual freedoms."

after dialing feverishly, we see only wan web entity (figure a.) that has evolved significantly enough to survive the ongooing fud0cide buy Godless corepirate larcenists.

after the spinning stops, look for: va.msn.net, ticker symbol: (VAST)

"Free access to public information by the citizen. Permanence of public data. Security of the State and citizens.

To guarantee the free access of citizens to public information, it is indespensable that the encoding of data is not tied to a single provider. The use of standard and open formats gives a guarantee of this free access, if necessary through the creation of compatible free software.

To guarantee the permanence of public data, it is necessary that the usability and maintenance of the software does not depend on the goodwill of the suppliers, or on the monopoly conditions imposed by them. For this reason the State needs systems the development of which can be guaranteed due to the availability of the source code.

To guarantee national security or the security of the State, it is indispensable to be able to rely on systems without elements which allow control from a distance or the undesired transmission of information to third parties. Systems with source code freely accessible to the public are required to allow their inspection by the State itself, by the citizens, and by a large number of independent experts throughout the world. Our proposal brings further security, since the knowledge of the source code will eliminate the growing number of programs with *spy code*.

In the same way, our proposal strengthens the security of the citizens, both in their role as legitimate owners of information managed by the state, and in their role as consumers. In this second case, by allowing the growth of a widespread availability of free software not containing *spy code* able to put at risk privacy and individual freedoms."

after ?much? drooling re-search, we see only wan species (figure a.) that has evolved significantly enough to survive the ongooing fud0cide buy Godless corepirate larcenists.

in 250 billyun years? look for: va.msn.net, ticker symbol: (VAST)

the way things are going, we'll knead a new won, to move to, if our fuzzIE accouNTing systurns are corewrecked, & the hole thing's gooing up in spookIE errors.

the # 1 "product" of the deception generation: hypenosys.

we want to be "assigned" far away from the evile wons, & will not be surprised, when they try to fleece US again, anyway.

mod US up robbie. IT's still whoreabull DOWn here.

1) Earnings Management: The first and most important tool Microsoft (see also: va.msn.net, ticker symbol: (VAST) uses is the manipulation of earnings to ensure analysts' expectations are met. According to an ABC News 1/22/99 article by Michael Martinez, Microsoft's own internal auditor, a respected 30 year veteran and former partner of Deloitte and Touche, was fired in 1996 after informing management that their earnings manipulations were illegal and violations of the SEC and FASB laws. He was given the option to resign or be fired and later settled for $4 million after suing under the Federal Whistle Blowers Act.

2) Speculating on Their Own Stock: Microsoft issues a massive amount of put options. During the same quarter ended 3/31/99, Microsoft sold put contracts on their own stock for $400 million, basically betting that the stock will not decline. They need not worry because they are allowed to "cook the books." Of Microsoft's significant cash balance, it is also a financial fact that more than 65 percent of that cash did not originate from product sales but rather from tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options, employees prepaying their own wages, and the sale of put contracts on its own stock. Microsoft's financial innovation is making a mockery of financial integrity, ethics, and the securities laws, just as Insull did in the 1920's.

3) Convincing Employees to Take Less Real Wages: Microsoft aggressively markets stock options to new employees in an effort to take wage expenses off the books. They also know that they can pocket the exercise price employees will be required to pay to take ownership of the stock. What also seems clear is that Microsoft is still aggressively marketing its stock option program to new recruits. To quote an email received, "I am about to begin employment at Microsoft and the stock option was the selling factor. Does your article overall state that it will be bad for me and will fail me in my retirement planning?" Is Microsoft fulfilling its disclosure obligations to its own employees, especially those that have put their entire 401K balance in Microsoft stock? This explains how 22 percent of Microsoft's massive cash balance has actually come from its own employees in the form of them prepaying their own wages through stock option exercise prices.

4) Publicly touting the stock: In a recent earnings release, CFO Greg Maffei jokingly cited 10 reasons why Microsoft is a $1 trillion company. A common strategy here is to have top executives issue conflicting statements, one talking up the stock and the other talking it down and then within a few days financial analysts all come out with buy recommendations on the stock due to a small decline. They are making a mockery of financial integrity, ethics, and the securities laws.

5) Controlling the media. After issuing several press releases on PR Newswire, Microsoft told the service to stop issuing my press releases. Microsoft is PR Newswire's largest client. PR Newswire is owned by Miller Freeman of the UK, a large media company that publishes many computer related publications including Information Week in addition to Microsoft focused journals such as the Windows System Developer. Miller Freeman does indeed function as if it were a department of Microsoft itself.

6) Stock Option Accounting: It is important to note that any discussion of stock option accounting must address two completely different and independent situations. The first is to analyze the impact of options exercised and already retired and the second is to analyze the remaining options debt outstanding. This study focused on both whereas most media coverage only focuses on the remaining options debt outstanding.

whois your daddIE?

you go robbIE. tell 'em.

payper liesense hostage ransom stock markup FUDgePeddlers, up on the pacific crest.

nice won daze 10% "haul", so far today. happy gnu year? i DOWt it. george/bill/robbIE et AL, must "partner" to revive/re-incarnate the evile larcenious "bull", lest fuddle's owned "gnu" poutoll go under, in a wash of MiStrust/bank fraud investigations. so IT goes.

look for: va.msn.net, ticker symbol (VAST)?

MANY of larry/rob's ?pr? bots, are volunteers. none so dedicated they say.

LIEk msn et AL, no matter what, the "storIE" is, the scriptdead "dialogue" is always around: "my, how gooed the FUDge tastes again today".

robbIE's BiG draw, is that he still lets stuff about goat sex, & other trivial text, get buy. he's been a hard won on this "business", stock markup stuff dough.

fortunately/conveniently, we all "learned" early&often, that /. is NOT about money/stock markups, or really anything profitable, for US.

show US the books lairy. remember, "open"? 0, right, that only appLIEs to stuff that's NOT about money.

happy happy gnu year, to the "keepers" of the kode. IT doesn't get any better than this?

you should be grateful that king william the FUDst gave US a back button to start with, & that va lairy has given US somewhere to back up to.

hobbyists. sheesh. they know nothing of being payper liesense stock markup billyunheirs.

"In the case of software sales, which often involve multiyear deals, a major gray area exists in determining whether to book the revenue when the deal is signed, or when some or all of the software is delivered and installed. The problem worsened during the boom, when both software and Internet companies were signing many multiyear deals ultimately ?worth? tens of millions of dollars."

L0L(tm)

"People who are compensated in options had an incentive to inflate prices," he said.

"There is a pattern here," he said, referring to company behavior. "There will be more indictments."

maybe the kingdumb will call IT, FUDux.0h0h

doesN'T l00k LIEk they're goon to be abull to call IT Lindows(TMp). that sure would have been handy. would have made a nice name used to priNT up some more phony billonly stock markup payper, to "spin" off onto trusting old J. et AL.

likely, that bullshipping(tm) co. won't go for the FUDox lowgo. has anyone heard how elmer fudd's name dilution/defamation litigation is going? he was the won whois hurt the MoSt, we think.

show US the money lairy.

"In the case of software sales, which often involve multiyear deals, a major gray area exists in determining whether to book the revenue when the deal is signed, or when some or all of the software is delivered and installed. The problem worsened during the boom, when both software and Internet companies were signing many multiyear deals ultimately ?worth? tens of millions of dollars."

L0L(tm)

"People who are compensated in options had an incentive to inflate prices," he said.

"There is a pattern here," he said, referring to company behavior. "There will be more indictments."

maybe the kingdumb will call IT, FUDux.0h0h

doesN'T l00k LIEk they're goon to be abull to call IT Lindows(TMp). that sure would have been handy. would have made a nice name used to priNT up some more phony billonly stock markup payper, to "spin" off onto trusting old J. et AL.

likely, that bullshipping(tm) co. won't go for the FUDox lowgo. has anyone heard how elmer fudd's name dilution/defamation litigation is going? he was the won whois hurt the MoSt, we think.

& IT's more like skewered. nobody thinks they were like this, before they became "owned" buy wall street of deceit et AL.

"In the case of software sales, which often involve multiyear deals, a major gray area exists in determining whether to book the revenue when the deal is signed, or when some or all of the software is delivered and installed. The problem worsened during the boom, when both software and Internet companies were signing many multiyear deals ultimately ?worth? tens of millions of dollars."

L0L(tm)

"People who are compensated in options had an incentive to inflate prices," he said.

"There is a pattern here," he said, referring to company behavior. "There will be more indictments."

maybe the kingdumb will call IT, FUDux.0h0h

doesN'T l00k LIEk they're goon to be abull to call IT Lindows(TMp). that sure would have been handy. would have made a nice name used to priNT up some more phony billonly stock markup payper, to "spin" off onto trusting old J. et AL.

likely, that bullshipping(tm) co. won't go for the FUDox lowgo. has anyone heard how elmer fudd's name dilution/defamation litigation is going? he was the won whois hurt the MoSt, we think.

"In the case of software sales, which often involve multiyear deals, a major gray area exists in determining whether to book the revenue when the deal is signed, or when some or all of the software is delivered and installed. The problem worsened during the boom, when both software and Internet companies were signing many multiyear deals ultimately ?worth? tens of millions of dollars."

L0L(tm)

"People who are compensated in options had an incentive to inflate prices," he said.

"There is a pattern here," he said, referring to company behavior. "There will be more indictments."

maybe the kingdumb will call IT, FUDux.0h0h

doesN'T l00k LIEk they're goon to be abull to call IT Lindows(TMp). that sure would have been handy. would have made a nice name used to priNT up some more phony billonly stock markup payper, to "spin" off onto trusting old J. et AL.

likely, that bullshipping(tm) co. won't go for the FUDox lowgo. has anyone heard how elmer fudd's name dilution/defamation litigation is going? he was the won whois hurt the MoSt, we think.

so, va lairy wants folks to overpay him to: "guard" their kode, &/or "manage" their net...working?

meanwhile, he can't even keep a vacant decaying blog "on the air", despite having collected billyuns, in advertising billybuks, & 100's of millions more of J.'s hardearned, with which to accomplish same.

reminds US of another failed dictatorship/stock markup FraUD. 40 does it for us.

eye gas we just had to weight. can anyone help US to define the relationship between the billyuns investdead, to the resulting void of progress?

don't even bother robbIE. see you @around 40.

is robbIE /.ing himself? will va lairy get to stay being a billyunheir? stay tuned...., just in case IT doesn't get any better than this?

"In the case of software sales, which often involve multiyear deals, a major gray area exists in determining whether to book the revenue when the deal is signed, or when some or all of the software is delivered and installed. The problem worsened during the boom, when both software and Internet companies were signing many multiyear deals ultimately ?worth? tens of millions of dollars."

L0L(tm)

"People who are compensated in options had an incentive to inflate prices," he said.

"There is a pattern here," he said, referring to company behavior. "There will be more indictments."

maybe the kingdumb will call IT, FUDux.0h0h

doesN'T l00k LIEk they're goon to be abull to call IT Lindows(TMp). that sure would have been handy. would have made a nice name used to priNT up some more phony billonly stock markup payper, to "spin" off onto trusting old J. et AL.

likely, that bullshipping(tm) co. won't go for the FUDox lowgo. has anyone heard how elmer fudd's name dilution/defamation litigation is going? he was the won whois hurt the MoSt, we think.

L0L(tm)

"People who are compensated in options had an incentive to inflate prices," he said.

"There is a pattern here," he said, referring to company behavior. "There will be more indictments."

maybe the kingdumb will call IT, FUDux.0h0h

doesN'T l00k LIEk they're goon to be abull to call IT Lindows(TMp). that sure would have been handy. would have made a nice name used to priNT up some more phony billonly stock markup payper, to "spin" off onto trusting old J. et AL.

likely, that bullshipping(tm) co. won't go for the FUDox lowgo. has anyone heard how elmer fudd's name dilution/defamation litigation is going? he was the won whois hurt the MoSt, we think.

L0L(tm)

"People who are compensated in options had an incentive to inflate prices," he said.

"There is a pattern here," he said, referring to company behavior. "There will be more indictments."

maybe the kingdumb will call IT, FUDux.0h0h

doesN'T l00k LIEk they're goon to be abull to call IT Lindows(TMp). that sure would have been handy. would have made a nice name used to priNT up some more phony billonly stock markup payper, to "spin" off onto trusting old J. et AL.

likely, that bullshipping(tm) co. won't go for the FUDox lowgo. has anyone heard how elmer fudd's name dilution/defamation litigation is going? he was the won whois hurt the MoSt, we think.

1. the bank fraud/stock markup "problems" have been resolved.

2. you'll knead a liesense for that.

3. the elections were NOT FUDged.

4. the internet is bad/a way to win bets on wall street of deceit.

5. having mickey d feeding bull to folks in other parts of the wwworld, is good for US.

6. linux is bad.

7. your secrets are safe with US.

8. nothing is going to change, from now on.

9. we're winning the "war".

10. the only way to get the storIE "straight", is if everybody uses the same scriptdead eXPlanation.

there's more, but we have to be moddead around +-40.

"The measures enacted this year will not end the entrenched disconnect between pay and performance, compensation experts say."

see also: stock markup FraUDs/record UNemploymeNT_FUDging, etc...

"Will Auditing Reform Die Before It Begins?

For the accounting industry, 2002 was the year of capital punishment, in both senses of the term. But will prosecutorial vigor lead to real reforms in an oligopolistic industry?

The death of Arthur Andersen, which shrank the Big Five to the Final Four, resulted from a Justice Department prosecution that startled accountants. But in showing they were tough, the prosecutors also eliminated the possibility that a new Andersen, under Paul A. Volcker's guidance, could lead the way to reform.
Advertisement

That auditors have sometimes not lived up to their obligations was proved this year as never before. But what the public needs to know is whether spectacular audit failures are isolated events or reflect systemic problems, either in the way audits are conducted or in the financial pressures that confront the auditors.

What is clear is that the new Sarbanes-Oxley Act could not end the fundamental conflict facing auditors: the people who hire the audit firm, and can replace it if they choose, are from the very company being audited. The people who depend on the job being done by the auditor -- the investors -- have no say in the matter.

What is needed is for someone to audit the auditors regularly, to review the way they conduct audits and to essentially reaudit some companies. That could show what problems exist, leading to new audit procedures where needed. But the most important effect could be one of strengthening auditors' backbones. Knowing that all the documents might be reviewed by outsiders, auditors might be far less willing to cave in to their clients' demands.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act gave that responsibility to the new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. But Joel Seligman, the dean of law at Washington University in St. Louis and the author of the leading history of the Securities and Exchange Commission, says no change in securities law ever had "a slower or more inept" start. "They don't have a full board, don't have a budget, don't have a staff, don't have an office, don't have a plan," Mr. Seligman said. "It's as sad a beginning as one can imagine."

To both Mr. Seligman and John Biggs, the pension fund executive who was passed over for chairman of the board, setting off a controversy, the way the board conducts its inspections will be the most important issue confronting it. "The major function of the board will not be enforcement so much as working with the firms to develop better assurance of quality control," Mr. Biggs said. "The means for the board will be through the annual inspections."

The law establishing the board was full of compromises. Just how thorough those inspections will be, and even who will do them, is up to the board. Reformers want it to hire its own staff and to carefully review numerous audits each year. Many in the accounting industry would prefer that the board do little more than the "peer reviews" that used to be carried out under the auspices of the ineffective Public Oversight Board, in which one major accounting firm would bless another firm's work.

Unfortunately, the accounting industry got Congress to specify that when the board finds problems with the quality control systems of an auditing firm, that information will be kept secret if the firm addresses the issue within a year. Similarly, disciplinary proceedings may remain secret until the S.E.C. has considered appeals of the board's rulings, a process that could take years.

That secrecy means that investors will have limited ways to be sure that the board is doing a good job and makes it all the more important that the board's chairman be someone whose record provides assurances of a commitment to reform. William Donaldson's choice for that job after he is confirmed as S.E.C. chairman may determine whether the scandals of 2002 bring real changes."

Will Auditing Reform Die Before It Begins?

For the accounting industry, 2002 was the year of capital punishment, in both senses of the term. But will prosecutorial vigor lead to real reforms in an oligopolistic industry?

The death of Arthur Andersen, which shrank the Big Five to the Final Four, resulted from a Justice Department prosecution that startled accountants. But in showing they were tough, the prosecutors also eliminated the possibility that a new Andersen, under Paul A. Volcker's guidance, could lead the way to reform.

That auditors have sometimes not lived up to their obligations was proved this year as never before. But what the public needs to know is whether spectacular audit failures are isolated events or reflect systemic problems, either in the way audits are conducted or in the financial pressures that confront the auditors.

What is clear is that the new Sarbanes-Oxley Act could not end the fundamental conflict facing auditors: the people who hire the audit firm, and can replace it if they choose, are from the very company being audited. The people who depend on the job being done by the auditor -- the investors -- have no say in the matter.

What is needed is for someone to audit the auditors regularly, to review the way they conduct audits and to essentially reaudit some companies. That could show what problems exist, leading to new audit procedures where needed. But the most important effect could be one of strengthening auditors' backbones. Knowing that all the documents might be reviewed by outsiders, auditors might be far less willing to cave in to their clients' demands.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act gave that responsibility to the new Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. But Joel Seligman, the dean of law at Washington University in St. Louis and the author of the leading history of the Securities and Exchange Commission, says no change in securities law ever had "a slower or more inept" start. "They don't have a full board, don't have a budget, don't have a staff, don't have an office, don't have a plan," Mr. Seligman said. "It's as sad a beginning as one can imagine."

To both Mr. Seligman and John Biggs, the pension fund executive who was passed over for chairman of the board, setting off a controversy, the way the board conducts its inspections will be the most important issue confronting it. "The major function of the board will not be enforcement so much as working with the firms to develop better assurance of quality control," Mr. Biggs said. "The means for the board will be through the annual inspections."

The law establishing the board was full of compromises. Just how thorough those inspections will be, and even who will do them, is up to the board. Reformers want it to hire its own staff and to carefully review numerous audits each year. Many in the accounting industry would prefer that the board do little more than the "peer reviews" that used to be carried out under the auspices of the ineffective Public Oversight Board, in which one major accounting firm would bless another firm's work.

Unfortunately, the accounting industry got Congress to specify that when the board finds problems with the quality control systems of an auditing firm, that information will be kept secret if the firm addresses the issue within a year. Similarly, disciplinary proceedings may remain secret until the S.E.C. has considered appeals of the board's rulings, a process that could take years.

That secrecy means that investors will have limited ways to be sure that the board is doing a good job and makes it all the more important that the board's chairman be someone whose record provides assurances of a commitment to reform. William Donaldson's choice for that job after he is confirmed as S.E.C. chairman may determine whether the scandals of 2002 bring real changes...."

remember, dysfunction STARTS, at the "top".

that's right, due to J. Public's ongoing outrage, at having his "future" pulled out from under him, buy felonious stock markup FraUDs, & the continuing ill eagle "collaboration" between yOUR fudderoll gov't., & the FraUDuleNT kingdumb of fud, there's going to be some real changes coming soon.

it's times like these, where some folks with intelligence, integrity, & yOUR interests at heart, should be called upon, to try to help to drag US out of the immoral cesspool of Godless deception, the rest of the wwworld sees US as trapped in. right robbIE?

these guise do they ever quit?

big excitment about some heavy duty star gazing & hand waving, resulting in the speculation buy the VAST majority of fine&shill analcysts overt at bearonstearno.con, saying that sum of our billyuns would be returning some time next year, as if buy magic, if we would be willing to make some more heavy bets on phony payper stock markup scams. those guise. sheesh!@#$% do they think that we're sheep?, or stupid/greedy/afraid? we'll show them. right robbIE?

that's right. buy sum Godless, ill eagle, payper liesense, hostage ransom, stock markup felons. that's who?

nothing gnu about that dough.

mod US up robbIE. J.'s STILL getting his pocket picked DOWn here. we won't mention lairy again, honest.

if these matters remain un/under addressed, all the chips you'll knead, will be plaNTdead in your head, in order for megasloth.con, & yOUR gov't, to .controll your every purchase (you didn't really bulleave they're concerned with OUR well being).

at any rate (they make up a new won every day), a headinthesand position on this stuff, will leave us looking LIEk argentina in a couple of years.

we're not surprised robbIE has nothing to say on these matters, pretending that if we pretend we don't care, IT will all work out for US. don't even ask lairy about IT.

there'll be no "independence", until all of those larcenious felons, at the "top", are quartered in sum of george's fuderoll prisons. LIEk that's that's going to happen anytime soon.

ucann pretend you're not won robbIE, but will it be bulleaved?

mod me DOWn robbIE, 'cause there's still scads of felonious payper liesense fraud peddling racketeers DOWn here. ru12?

is the collective taking a breather, or what? ucann bet your .asp fuddles loves diss won.

that'll be all the FUNd any of US can bear up to at once there, so we'll move along to ?choosing? the daze VDOs. maybe we'll watch the Upgrade Day(tm) (used to be called christmas) edition of "the kode ahead", the kingdumb's latest re-lease. euphoria again.

well, that's it for US, got to get some rest, as the stock markups are open again tomorrow, & we doN'T waNT to have a "tired" clicking finger, as we may get the fud souled out from under US again. gawd bless US, every won.

wake up J., the "smoking gun" is poiNTdead at you. our "domestic terroists"/felons are @leased as dangerous to US as our published 'enemIEs'.

WHOaRE the REAL .commIEs?

stay tuned for more from capitollist vdo, 0perating from the basemeNT of an abandoned k-mart, somewhere in the kode blew zone. mod US up robbIE, you know IT's a little smelly DOWn here.

fud on dough. .asp we all know, IT's ONLY about money for (too) MANY.

face the facts, there's probully only room at the "top", for a handful of stock markup FraUD, convicted "non"-felons, who have won or more outstanding felony indictmeNTs.

remember FraUDuleNT dysfunction, STARTS at the "top".

there is NO joy in fudville tonight, as phony fuddles keeps striking out (at anything that move$). LIEk some kind of megalomaniacal power&.controll freak "non"-felon.

very merry. happy happy.

L0L [google.com] 10 [trustworthycomputing.com] [ Reply to This ]

• off topic my .asp by Anonymous Coward Friday December 20, @06:10AM
• eyecon eyegas lemming sea by Anonymous Coward Friday December 20, @06:03AM
  • what the fud? by Anonymous Coward Friday December 20, @08:07AM

L0L [google.com] 10 [trustworthycomputing.com] [ Reply to This ]

• off topic my .asp by Anonymous Coward Friday December 20, @06:10AM
• eyecon eyegas lemming sea by Anonymous Coward Friday December 20, @06:03AM
  • what the fud? by Anonymous Coward Friday December 20, @08:07AM

'course now with almost everything being gnu, there's infinite opportunities available to those who are willing/able to think outside of the (billy)box.

as we like to think, all you need, is a dialup, a dream, & some investigation of the brand gnu cooperation. not a billyunheir in the bunch, & proud of IT.

probably knot.

with all the advances in brand gnu gui interfaces/scripting, IT's become relatively easy to set up/administrate workstations/web servers. plus, you NEVER have to worry about the m$.compliance po'lice, coming around to pick your pocket/censor your content, or infect your systems with fuddle's pateNTdead m$SpyWear(tm). mod me up robbIE.

you could have a gnu/linux/o-s home/office & website up buy nightfall, then learn about all feechurns of the brave gnu wwworld of open/honest communications/commerce, in your spare time. you could do that for little more than the price of a few books (which you might buy later anyway).

you can only imagine our elation, after only 1 year in "business", being listed as one of the "Top 10 Companies of 2002(tm) , on some search motors. that's a different book. mod me up robbIE, everything's almost brand gnu DOWn here.

have you heard about the efforts of the .gnu initiative? some say that's how you got your foots in the dour over at fudville. yuk. almost nobody types .GNU every sentence or so. maybe they should. maybe they should get fuddles&fudstorm, the giaNT ?pr? ?firm? to write some .CATCHY .PHRASES for them? do you know when the completion of their deletion is anticipated?

God save the innoceNT gnomes. mod me up robbIE, IT's getting even thickerer DOWn here.

fauxking payper liesense stock markup FraUDs, YUK!@#$%

is it really better with the butturdflIE, megel? or, are you just saying that, over&over&over&over? some of you should WINd dupe in fuderal prison.

J. Publick gets to be shoveled/herded from one set of FraUDs. to yet another?

around here, you can hear, "quick, disable the cd drives, before megel gives US m$mono, AGAIN".

sad on tv they'se working for the fuds, & the villians, at the same time. yet another feet of modem takeknowledgee? or just more fuderoll bungling? there MUST be a story. some of US .conspiracy buffs are intrigued (not surprised) at the implications.

(:>L0L

try doing that with some felonious gangsterious FraUDuleNT payper liesense stock markup FraUD megalomaniac.

fuddle's giaNT MiSleading advertismenNTs here on robbIE's blogger. know how IT works?

that's right, afturd IT's all sad & dumb, fuddle's is PAYing robbIE, to "borrow" yOUR eyeballs, hoping to raise momeNTdumb, for his crimewave. you gotta laf.

although we're no billyunerr backed stock markup FraUDs, we've still managed to appear as one of the "Top 10 Companies of 2002"(tm) , on several search engines. good gnus for US, you say? wrong, that's how IT works, for almost anybuddy, now, right? MOD me up robbIE, the email's ringing off the h00k.

God bless the hobbyist dogooders. almost everything's gnu now.

does anyone think that "their" vote in the next BiG "election" may already have been cast/couNTdead? just a thought.

if any of you are still l00king for a "smoking gun", IT's probully poiNTdead at US right now. IT looks LIEk gov't. supported/sponsored domestic terrorism to US, & we'd know. strong language? pairannoyed? think about IT.

now you too can afford to do open/honest communications/commerce, without having your pocket picked buy sum FraUDuleNT stock markup scamsters.

we're pleased to be able to help. thanks again to richard et AL.

even more good gnus to come....

(:>L0L

the really important part, is in transforming those folks, into sellers/consumers of genuine quality products/services, without hooking them into any payper liesense hostage ransom scams.

anyhow, without reading the 'economyst's' predictions, here are the top 5 "movers" as we see them.

1. entertainment, (primarily music, with other media, in close pursuit). the hunt for associated media gadgetry is lumped here.

2. business/education: information/financial/products/services.

3. fashion.

4. health.

5. travel/relocation/employment.

the "order" is somewhat flexible, but the key words "pattern" is rock solid across almost 200 sites that we monitor.

possible recognition of our sleekness under fire (see also: sh!tstorm of deceptive billonlyUS ?pr? FUDgePacking), would include being listed as one of the "Top 10 Companies of 2002"(tm), on fuddle's search thingy. even more good gnus....

what used to cost billyuns in markup "research" can now be done for about 10 minutes of one's time. again, the real job becomes: now that we know what you want, how do we come to terms....,?

IT's gooed practice for them anyway, for when they doo the same to US, prior to the next fixed election.

IEaaaggghhh.0fInfection

don't come crying to us, when there's only 5 websites (that YOU can see) left on the 'net.