Slashdot Mirror

Typical Vox article, where "pro-Trump" = "racist". Continuing to deny even the remotest possibility that Hillary! was just too corrupt for many people to swallow, and that she is indicative of the political elite orchestrating the presidential election.

Bernie was never meant to be a real threat to Hillary! but the D constituents are just as fed up with the 1% as anyone else. Even without those carefully crafted primary rules, Bernie almost got out of control. The R side of the equation didn't have those rules in place, so Jeb did get displaced. That left Trump-the-outsider running against Hillary!-the-corrupt, and that's why he won.

It seems to me that even progressive publications like Vox would see through what's going on here. It's no longer (only) progressive vs. conservative. This is a different battle, orthogonal to the first one: it's the political elite pulling the levers behind the scenes, vs. actually having control of your own government.

You may personally support (or not support) Trump for other reasons, but he was definitely race-baiting.

Race-baiting has been a serious problem in American politics for a very long time. Slinging "leftist" at those that point it out hurts our ability to talk about it and try to deal with it.

And here is the other major arc of democracy, if that book doesn't depress you enough.

Why? Because Konami is Konami. And Konami is the worst.

But we're gonna get that...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I know I linked to a conspiracy site video. But conspiracy sites aren't always wrong. In this case. I think the "Pedo Gate" theory almost works out. I don't know if you have ever been to prison, but unfortunately I used to be a fuck up. I have grown out of that phase of life. That being said. I would be suspect of this guy. Would definitely want to "Check his Papers".

I ask this question every time someone tries to say there was a shift. Exactly WHEN did this shift take place, where the KKK became part of the Republicans. I'll bet, you can't actually point to when.

Oh my, Archangel Michael seems to think he can create a false standard by requiring a particular and exact moment, as if anybody would be inane enough to be fooled by such a requirement. Sorry, but all you accomplished was to demonstrate, as you often do, how biased, flawed, and partisan your argumentation is. It's similar to the one Zeno used to point out sophistry, thus you are way too obvious.

So thanks, once again, you show us yourself, for the wretched fraud of a human being you are.

But I'd say that the Republican party turned its backs on blacks no later than 1876. Possibly sooner, depends on how you count NOT prosecuting the traitors in the South. Or Lincoln's willingness to talk peace.

Hell even the revered FDR was a fucking Racist pig segregationist.

Facts speak otherwise

And lets not forget Johnson's "Ni**er" comments.

You mean the one that's made-up?

If you can do that, why not make up quotes about anybody?

Hell I'll even say the Modern Democrat party is filled with the real kind of Racism with their "Blacks can't help themselves, we have to help them" attitude.

You say a lot of things, most of them fallacious, so what? You seem to think that nobody remembers the bullshit you say, but you shovel it enough that people catch on.

You can see examples in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here's a nice video for you or this one or this or this one.

Maybe you should get a license before you exercise your First Amendment rights. Or at least attend a training course. You might not shoot your mouth off so easily.

I ask this question every time someone tries to say there was a shift. Exactly WHEN did this shift take place, where the KKK became part of the Republicans. I'll bet, you can't actually point to when.

Oh my, Archangel Michael seems to think he can create a false standard by requiring a particular and exact moment, as if anybody would be inane enough to be fooled by such a requirement. Sorry, but all you accomplished was to demonstrate, as you often do, how biased, flawed, and partisan your argumentation is. It's similar to the one Zeno used to point out sophistry, thus you are way too obvious.

So thanks, once again, you show us yourself, for the wretched fraud of a human being you are.

But I'd say that the Republican party turned its backs on blacks no later than 1876. Possibly sooner, depends on how you count NOT prosecuting the traitors in the South. Or Lincoln's willingness to talk peace.

Hell even the revered FDR was a fucking Racist pig segregationist.

Facts speak otherwise

And lets not forget Johnson's "Ni**er" comments.

You mean the one that's made-up?

If you can do that, why not make up quotes about anybody?

Hell I'll even say the Modern Democrat party is filled with the real kind of Racism with their "Blacks can't help themselves, we have to help them" attitude.

You say a lot of things, most of them fallacious, so what? You seem to think that nobody remembers the bullshit you say, but you shovel it enough that people catch on.

You can see examples in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here's a nice video for you or this one or this or this one.

Maybe you should get a license before you exercise your First Amendment rights. Or at least attend a training course. You might not shoot your mouth off so easily.

I ask this question every time someone tries to say there was a shift. Exactly WHEN did this shift take place, where the KKK became part of the Republicans. I'll bet, you can't actually point to when.

Oh my, Archangel Michael seems to think he can create a false standard by requiring a particular and exact moment, as if anybody would be inane enough to be fooled by such a requirement. Sorry, but all you accomplished was to demonstrate, as you often do, how biased, flawed, and partisan your argumentation is. It's similar to the one Zeno used to point out sophistry, thus you are way too obvious.

So thanks, once again, you show us yourself, for the wretched fraud of a human being you are.

But I'd say that the Republican party turned its backs on blacks no later than 1876. Possibly sooner, depends on how you count NOT prosecuting the traitors in the South. Or Lincoln's willingness to talk peace.

Hell even the revered FDR was a fucking Racist pig segregationist.

Facts speak otherwise

And lets not forget Johnson's "Ni**er" comments.

You mean the one that's made-up?

If you can do that, why not make up quotes about anybody?

Hell I'll even say the Modern Democrat party is filled with the real kind of Racism with their "Blacks can't help themselves, we have to help them" attitude.

You say a lot of things, most of them fallacious, so what? You seem to think that nobody remembers the bullshit you say, but you shovel it enough that people catch on.

You can see examples in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here's a nice video for you or this one or this or this one.

Maybe you should get a license before you exercise your First Amendment rights. Or at least attend a training course. You might not shoot your mouth off so easily.

I ask this question every time someone tries to say there was a shift. Exactly WHEN did this shift take place, where the KKK became part of the Republicans. I'll bet, you can't actually point to when.

Oh my, Archangel Michael seems to think he can create a false standard by requiring a particular and exact moment, as if anybody would be inane enough to be fooled by such a requirement. Sorry, but all you accomplished was to demonstrate, as you often do, how biased, flawed, and partisan your argumentation is. It's similar to the one Zeno used to point out sophistry, thus you are way too obvious.

So thanks, once again, you show us yourself, for the wretched fraud of a human being you are.

But I'd say that the Republican party turned its backs on blacks no later than 1876. Possibly sooner, depends on how you count NOT prosecuting the traitors in the South. Or Lincoln's willingness to talk peace.

Hell even the revered FDR was a fucking Racist pig segregationist.

Facts speak otherwise

And lets not forget Johnson's "Ni**er" comments.

You mean the one that's made-up?

If you can do that, why not make up quotes about anybody?

Hell I'll even say the Modern Democrat party is filled with the real kind of Racism with their "Blacks can't help themselves, we have to help them" attitude.

You say a lot of things, most of them fallacious, so what? You seem to think that nobody remembers the bullshit you say, but you shovel it enough that people catch on.

You can see examples in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here's a nice video for you or this one or this or this one.

Maybe you should get a license before you exercise your First Amendment rights. Or at least attend a training course. You might not shoot your mouth off so easily.

I ask this question every time someone tries to say there was a shift. Exactly WHEN did this shift take place, where the KKK became part of the Republicans. I'll bet, you can't actually point to when.

Oh my, Archangel Michael seems to think he can create a false standard by requiring a particular and exact moment, as if anybody would be inane enough to be fooled by such a requirement. Sorry, but all you accomplished was to demonstrate, as you often do, how biased, flawed, and partisan your argumentation is. It's similar to the one Zeno used to point out sophistry, thus you are way too obvious.

So thanks, once again, you show us yourself, for the wretched fraud of a human being you are.

But I'd say that the Republican party turned its backs on blacks no later than 1876. Possibly sooner, depends on how you count NOT prosecuting the traitors in the South. Or Lincoln's willingness to talk peace.

Hell even the revered FDR was a fucking Racist pig segregationist.

Facts speak otherwise

And lets not forget Johnson's "Ni**er" comments.

You mean the one that's made-up?

If you can do that, why not make up quotes about anybody?

Hell I'll even say the Modern Democrat party is filled with the real kind of Racism with their "Blacks can't help themselves, we have to help them" attitude.

You say a lot of things, most of them fallacious, so what? You seem to think that nobody remembers the bullshit you say, but you shovel it enough that people catch on.

You can see examples in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Here's a nice video for you or this one or this or this one.

Maybe you should get a license before you exercise your First Amendment rights. Or at least attend a training course. You might not shoot your mouth off so easily.

Here is an interesting commentary from Forbes about how to find non-fake journalism. The number one item in his list of criteria for how to tell whether a site is legitimate news source: "If a reporter gets facts in a story wrong, will the news outlet investigate a complaint and publish a correction?"

After youtube played the clip you posted, the very next clip loaded was the apology from CNN and the correction. A google search for "Carol Costello Apologizes On Air for CNN Lying About Milwaukee Riot Situation" gives me 95,200 hits.

So, to the contrary. I will cite this next time I am asked for an example of how CNN is NOT fake news.

Search Results
Carol Costello Apologizes On Air for CNN Lying About Milwaukee Riot ... Video for Carol Costello Apologizes On Air for CNN Lying About Milwaukee Riot Situation 16:25 https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Carol Costello of CNN apologized on air for her network lying about the Milwaukee situation via a quick on ... WATCH: CNN Apologizes For Lying About Milwaukee Riots (VIDEO ... https://www.conservativeoutfit... News
Aug 18, 2016 - CNN just apologized on air for not showing the full clip of the ... CNN's Carol Costello said she "regrets the second part of the statement was not included" in the report. .@CarolCNN apologizes for not airing full clip of Milwaukee victim's sister calling .... Put yourself in her situation, your house just got shot at. CNN anchor offers apology for shortening of Milwaukee clip – CNN ... https://cnncommentary.com/.../......
Aug 17, 2016 - On Wednesday morning, CNN Newsroom anchor Carol Costello offered ... shot by an officer on Saturday afternoon, which triggered riots in the city. ... On-air, Costello apologized, “I want to take a moment to clarify something from Monday. ... CNN is a lying piece of crap network that is not a good place to get ... www.topbuzzapp.com/article/i6320193922531639812?app_id=1106
CNN Sorry For Editing Clip Of Milwaukee Victim's Sister Calling For ... https://www.buzzfeed.com/.../c...
Aug 17, 2016 - CNN Sorry For Editing Clip Of Milwaukee Victim's Sister Calling For Violence ... an officer on Saturday afternoon, triggering destructive riots in the city. ... On Wednesday, anchor Carol Costello issued a rare on-air apology .... You're one of the few people I've spoken with, who sees both sides of the situation. Costello Apologizes For Deceptive Report About Milwaukee | The ... dailycaller.com/.../cnn-anchor-grovels-to-audience-after-allowing-deceptive-report-ab...
Aug 17, 2016 - CNN anchor Carol Costello apologized on Wednesday for allowing a deceptive report about the violence in Milwaukee to air that characterized ... Carol Costello Apologizes On Air for CNN Lying About ... - Pinterest https://www.pinterest.com/pin/...
Carol Costello Apologizes On Air for CNN Lying About Milwau

Good call. Let's watch Nelson Mandela sing a rousing song of "Kill the Bhulu". Bhulu means whites. Many of the people standing next to him are real-live Communists. Blatant historical example indeed.

An example of this is I was having problems with a device deployment getting bad packet loss after we just installed new cabling for these devices. The group hypothesis was that the people who installed the cabling did a bad job.

You didn't do acceptance testing of the wiring before hooking up the MTGPing? Come on - surely you did? And your cabling contractor bloody well should have done so too, before handing it over.

I knew a Sysadmin years ago who had a Power Over Ethernet cable which she used to threaten cabling contractors (and friends) with. A 240V plug at one end, and an RJ-45 plug and socket at the other end. Alternating wires connected to live and neutral. One wave, and the cabling contractor would hand over their signed check sheets.

I'd say it's that you don't understand the ability of protests to change public opinion. It's become a cargo cult. It wasn't the marching that made people come around to Dr. King's side in the Civil Rights Movement. It was the pictures of respectable looking black people in suits and dresses having dogs and fire hoses turned on them for the simple act of marching.

Among the things that brought people around to Trump's side was the pictures of average looking American voters being beaten in the streets by violent leftists and pictures of illegal Mexicans stomping on cop cars.

At what point do the look at the leftists holding the bloody faux-severed heads of your political opponents, mock stabbing them in Central Park plays, see the nut jobs shooting Congressmen on the baseball field, put two and two together and ask, "Oh...we're the baddies?"

I ask this question every time someone tries to say there was a shift. Exactly WHEN did this shift take place, where the KKK became part of the Republicans. I'll bet, you can't actually point to when. Hell even the revered FDR was a fucking Racist pig segregationist. And lets not forget Johnson's "Ni**er" comments.

Hell I'll even say the Modern Democrat party is filled with the real kind of Racism with their "Blacks can't help themselves, we have to help them" attitude. You can see examples in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Except when it works, and it often works much better than you appear to think.

Sure. It works pretty much like a methodology to win the lottery or, more graphically, in the same way than Charlie's mom thinks that what she does keeps him alive. LOL.

devout Catholic is of the Trinity

??!! What was that?! Projection? Extreme irony? The most inoffensive, naive and pointless attack ever?! Don't you get it? Here you have a clearer version:
- Person 1 thinks that a deeper (expert) knowledge about the given conditions is a basic requisite to ever reach a good enough understanding about any situation.
- Person 2 blindly defends approaches on the lines of "things will work out anyway, not sure how, but they will certainly work out".
- Person 2 defines (tries to attack?) person 1's behaviour as (fanatic-)religious-like?!

Can you seriously read this comment (+ all the previous ones and confirm its accuracy) and continue with this discussion? And/or talking to me at all? In that case, congrats. I will not continue with this nonsense.

They do this kind of shit all the time. If you're watching CNN for some other reason than to see what they're lying and spinning this time to suit their agenda then bless your little heart.

Video of CNN cameraman man "protesting". Anchor wasn't told they were faking it and outed the cameraman as a CNN employee that is normally on the other side of the camera.

Pretty damn funny. They aren't even pretending they are doing real news now.

Meh, I don't know what to do with this sort of simplistic statement. This is a fairly good discussion of Mel Brooks and why his humour is usually considered edgey but not actually a problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Addendum to pevious post

Manufacturing consent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwU56Rv0OXM

https://vimeo.com/39566117

" back before crony-capitalism passed the tipping-point and jumped the shark"

Ahh yes "That's not really real free market capitalism" argument. Sorry to tell you there crony capitalism doesn't exist because that's the way capitalism has always worked, the historical evidence is overwhelming. That rule of law can not exist within capitalism. Everytime copyright came up for review to protect the publics right it was expanded over 200 years long before you were even born.

Our brains are much worse at reality and thinking than thought. See the manufacturing consent videos when you get the time.

Science on reasoning:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYmi0DLzBdQ

Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHj2GaPuEhY#t=349

Testing theories of representative government

https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf

Education as ignorance

Energy subsidies

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2015/NEW070215A.htm

Interference in other states when the rich/corporations dont get their way

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mxp_wgFWQo&feature=youtu.be&list=PLKR2GeygdHomOZeVKx3P0fqH58T3VghOj&t=724

" back before crony-capitalism passed the tipping-point and jumped the shark"

Ahh yes "That's not really real free market capitalism" argument. Sorry to tell you there crony capitalism doesn't exist because that's the way capitalism has always worked, the historical evidence is overwhelming. That rule of law can not exist within capitalism. Everytime copyright came up for review to protect the publics right it was expanded over 200 years long before you were even born.

Our brains are much worse at reality and thinking than thought. See the manufacturing consent videos when you get the time.

Science on reasoning:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYmi0DLzBdQ

Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHj2GaPuEhY#t=349

Testing theories of representative government

https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf

Education as ignorance

Energy subsidies

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2015/NEW070215A.htm

Interference in other states when the rich/corporations dont get their way

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mxp_wgFWQo&feature=youtu.be&list=PLKR2GeygdHomOZeVKx3P0fqH58T3VghOj&t=724

" back before crony-capitalism passed the tipping-point and jumped the shark"

Ahh yes "That's not really real free market capitalism" argument. Sorry to tell you there crony capitalism doesn't exist because that's the way capitalism has always worked, the historical evidence is overwhelming. That rule of law can not exist within capitalism. Everytime copyright came up for review to protect the publics right it was expanded over 200 years long before you were even born.

Our brains are much worse at reality and thinking than thought. See the manufacturing consent videos when you get the time.

Science on reasoning:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYmi0DLzBdQ

Protectionism for the rich and big business by state intervention, radical market interference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHj2GaPuEhY#t=349

Testing theories of representative government

https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf

Education as ignorance

Energy subsidies

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2015/NEW070215A.htm

Interference in other states when the rich/corporations dont get their way

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mxp_wgFWQo&feature=youtu.be&list=PLKR2GeygdHomOZeVKx3P0fqH58T3VghOj&t=724

Something is definitely funky - other browsers run at 10-15% when playing the same stream.
In the past I've regularly seen it run at 100% (i.e. flatlining a core) when doing much of anything, but especially while receiving data. Been trimming ad-ons in the past to figure out if any of them is messing with it.

The stream in question was/is the E3 2017 livestream from YT : https://gaming.youtube.com/e3

First, you have to obtain a copy of G.A.Y N1GGERS FROM OUTER SPACE THE MOVIE and watch it.

You can watch G.A.Y N1GGERS FROM OUTER SPACE on Youtube.

Second, you need to succeed in posting a G_N_A_A "first post" on slashdot.org , a popular "news for trolls" website

Third, you need to join the official G_N_A_A irc channel #G_N_A_A on EFNet, and apply for membership.
Talk to one of the ops or any of the other members in the channel to sign up today!

If you are having trouble locating #G_N_A_A, the official G.A.Y N1GGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA irc channel, you might be on a wrong irc network. The correct network is EFNet, and you can connect to irc.secsup.org or irc.easynews.com as one of the EFNet servers.
If you do not have an IRC client handy, you are free to use the G_N_A_A Java IRC client by clicking here.

If you have mod points and would like to support G_N_A_A, please moderate this post up.

This post brought to you by Penisbird , a proud member of the G_N_A_A

G_____________________________________naann_______ ________G
N_____________________________nnnaa__nanaaa_______ ________A
A____________________aanana__nannaa_nna_an________ ________Y
A_____________annna_nnnnnan_aan_aa__na__aa________ ________*
G____________nnaana_nnn__nn_aa__nn__na_anaann_MERI CA______N
N___________ana__nn_an___an_aa_anaaannnanaa_______ ________I
A___________aa__ana_nn___nn_nnnnaa___ana__________ ________G
A__________nna__an__na___nn__nnn___SSOCIATION_of__ ________G
G__________ana_naa__an___nnn______________________ ________E
N__________ananan___nn___aan_IGGER________________ ________R
A__________nnna____naa____________________________ ________S
A________nnaa_____anan____________________________ ________*
G________anaannana________________________________ ________A
N________ananaannn_AY_____________________________ ________S
A________ana____nn_________IRC-EFNET-#G_N_A_A________ ________S
A_______nn_____na_________________________________ ________O
*_______aaaan_____________________________________ ________C
Gary Niger gary_niger@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A Corporate Headquarters 143 Rolloffle Avenue Tarzana, California 91356
Enid Al-Punjabi enid_al_punjabi@G_N_A_A.us G_N_A_A World Headquarters No.33 Kyutei Bld. 2F, Shinjuku 2-11-7, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan ????????2??11-6
Copyright (c) 2003-2015 G.A.Y N1GGER Association of America

Ich Bindawalross (London) - G_N_A_A (NYSE:

The basic problem is that the Left doesn't like the American people. Instead of lifting us up with hope, they crap on us because it makes them feel better about themselves.

You think Americans don't pick up on this? We got the message, loud and clear. We don't think we're bad people and we won't vote for anyone who tells us so, no matter how clearly it is explained on TV.

Liberalism explained: "You think America's good? We've found something that's going to make you not believe that any longer."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDb3sTwD_vA&t=9m15s

It's racist and sexist not to vote Democrat. That's why the Democrats tend to murder or try to impeach presidents when they lose their elections; they're trying to save the country.

You think I'm kidding, but I remember a song by spoken word artist Shane Koyczan. He said: "Strange in a George W. Bush hasn't been assassinated yet kind of way".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Hear the crowd laugh and applause. Those are the people who see themselves as the "tolerant" side.

I wonder what he has to say about Trump.

None of what you wrote you is correct. The most glaring ones.

It has a the Tesla has a lower top speed and worse handling.
Has the industry's worst autonomous system.
Has the industry's worst reliability meaning you spend a shit ton of money getting it repaired.

The "greatest love story ever told" is really just a sub-plot of the most terrifying horror story ever told.

That's true. When considered objectively, at least it does make for some great comic material. RIP, Carlin, you will be missed.

"TTF" (tumor treating fields) are varying electrical fields that disrupt cell reproduction by interfering with gene segregation during mitosis.

They can be produced, in turn, by varying magnetic fields. This allows treatments to be done with magnetic coils, rather than electrodes.

While they are used for cancer treatment, they work by killing ALL cells that attempt division while exposed to the fields.

This is very handy for treating, say, glioblastoma (an aggressive brain tumor), because cells that are NOT trying to divide are apparently unaffected, and non-cancer cell division in the brain is very rare.

(This might be why epidemiological studies of cellphone use versus brain cancer incidence has indicated a slight REDUCTION in brain cancer risk.)

In other tissues (like the hand, for instance), I'd expect such fields to be more problematic. If they kill off, say, the stem cells needed for wound repair, there might be substantial damage or eventual destruction of the hand - but nothing would be noticeable for perhaps years.

Did you even watch the Youtube video he linked to?

Video footage of that particular incident, from multiple sources, is plentiful.

Not only that, but the attacker that is being exposed has been charged for it.

If you want to criticize Breitbart, or talk about how a single Youtube video from a single person does not make for a credible source and thereby encourage people to check sources and dig deeper to make sure they're getting all the facts ... great. I'm with you. But wait, that's not what you've done. You used the fact that you take issues with those sources to dismiss what the person has to say outright, instead of doing your own due diligence by checking those sources to see if they're correct or not. And in this case, turns out they were correct. So way to go, you've actually undermined the very argument that people should be careful to check and verify sources for accuracy.

Posting AC for mods (Hussman32).

There are a few things that stand out to me:

• Uber is a superior product and they changed the world from relying on a government-subsidized monopoly (with horrific service) to actually allowing people to be able to count on non-personal transportation.
• Attaining that product was done by setting up a highly competitive environment that bypassed all niceties...they hired the best, the best people worked there wanted to work there because of the challenge, and they changed the world.
• They also clearly broke a lot of laws and rules and screwed with people's privacy.
• What I can't figure out is how many of the recent 'scandals' are real (you can't tell your subordinate that she needs to have sex with you), and how much of it is people trying to use diversity as a weapon.

I don't know. I would hope Kalanick gets a severe dose of shakubuku and comes back a better, wiser leader, because he did change the world. Otherwise, we'll probably watch the slow death spiral of Uber.

Linus from Linus Tech Tips isn't too happy with this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Linus did this already: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

You're telling me we should quit trying to demand abortion rights and try to get everyone on the same page first about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? .. The pro-life crowd must be opposed with legislative force, screw their beliefs.

I'm not saying you shouldn't fight; I'm saying you should begin to fight to win, instead of continuing the futile, losing strategy, which BTW, looks like it was copied from the other team's playbook. Are you sure they don't know something about the battleground that you don't? It looks like you're accepting their invitation to fight on their terms.

This matter will be settled either when a critical mass of pro-lifers die out

I think that's an unreasonably optimistic view. From what I've seen, pro-life isn't an old-people thing. Religion is taught and people are still doing it, today. Their ranks are constantly replenished, and if your idea of a good fight is in the legislature rather than in peoples' heads, then it means you are doing nothing to counter their advantage.

Look at climate change. .. uninformed voters root for their "team" and point to the charlatans, they have way too much political power

Now, c'mon, I can tell you know exactly how to fight that one; you gave it away with the word "uninformed." You know what to do, and you probably already know that you're eventually going to win. You can try the same strategy with abortion. It's harder because it's about values instead of facts, but values can be taught too. What is a person?

BTW, the ruling party in the US is the voters, really. We're just very easily manipulated, thanks to our intellectual apathy and cowardice. Arguing is exactly what is needed, so that people start voting better. Maybe you've just been arguing badly? I noticed your compelling "Bullshit, you're either being lazy or disingenuous" argument and .. if I'm going to practice what I'm trying to preach in this very paragraph .. let's just say that it revealed certain aspects of your personality which suggest you might be out-classed by most pro-lifers. But I don't think that means you shouldn't try! Practice makes perfect, after all.

No.
It is however clear that the Plastic Doll didn't order Russia to hack herself. Not so clear about the Orange Wig. After all, the wig did state he would welcome criminal acts like that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

DISCLAIMER: I hate this bill and think it is really short-sighted and un-American.

Yeah, this bill isn't targeted at math class, and I see no reason why it would be a conservative student pulling this any more than a liberal (to use your labels). There are now whole majors teaching a pseudoscientific dogma as truth (*COUGH*gender studies*COUGH*). I think that students of either side of the isle should be loudly asking for the scientific proof for this shit, particularly if they are being taught as fact and truth in a classically liberal university.

Inside a fridge? No that will no work they are closed systems meant for cooling items that do not produce heat. However there are phase cooling systems out there that work on the same principle as the fridge. LD-Cooling provides a pretty good phase change case. However phase change provide extreme cooling and has the same issue other posters have pointed out, condensation. Where you have a large change in temperature you will have condenstation. Linus Tech Tips actually did a pretty good build guide on this as well.

Here's how that might look.

Right now the radical right is the ones doing the screaming

Sorry that's the left in berkely. Same with the bike lock attacker Nice collection of weapons pulled off antifa members who were looking to attack people at pro-trump/free speech rally. And I can really keep going, because there's not only dozens of cases like this but hundreds in the last 2 years.

Antifa are leftists of marxist/mao kind. BAMN are of the same kind, you also need to toss in their little cult camps. And people on the right didn't start responding until the left started going "OH NO, they're not us." We don't condone anything, while letting them slip back into the crows and cover them. Professor bikelock is the most recent and famous example of this. Now what I want you to do is freeze it within the first 3 seconds. You see all those masked people happily moving within that group of unmasked leftists?

Find any video where people are filming antifa and you'll see: Antifa slip into the crowd or part of the crowd, attack someone/attack in a group/crowd of unmasked leftists cover for them and let them slip back in.

It was a thing at the time to blame the riots on secret right-wingers who came to campus to make Berkeley look bad. LOL no. It as another thing to say that the students didn't support the riots. LOL no. Here's a bunch of op eds in the school newspaper from students condoning the Berkeley violence. They call it "self-defense". A direct quote: "Your free speech is raping and killing us."

I won't apologize to a nazi sympathizer either

Yeah, I bet you see those EVERYWHERE, happens to correlate nicely with people who don't agree with your nonsense.

What happens if you put a computer inside a fridge? It gets hacked, of course:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I'm sick of these lefties fresh mouths.

Dunno what you're talking about, Anonymous Strawman. Nothing in this bill would prevent left-wingers from holding a corresponding, competing speech in response to a right-wing speaking event they don't like.

But you and I (and BeauHD) all know that we're really talking about the leftists' "fresh" fists, flagpoles, credit-card knives and bike locks. From TFS:

There have been some well-publicized incidents in which student groups or other protesters have interfered with scheduled appearances by right-wing speakers at U.S. universities.

That's a hell of a way to sugarcoat left-wing hooded mobs setting fires on campus and beating the attendees. Sam Harris did a decent job summarizing the horror of Social Justice run amok:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Oh boo hoo hoo, milo yogurt and ann coulter couldn't speak on a college campus because of protests. A republican student murdered another student for being black. If you're upset about liberals shutting down free speech but not the massive rise in right-wing hate crimes across the country, are you even fooling yourself? You hate liberals, you don't have a fucking reason other than they're not like you.

During the Milo riots, leftist rioters beat Milo attendees with flagpoles and fists. [MMA fighter] Jake Shields pulled a victim from a crowd of beaters and protected him from harm. When asked, the victim had no idea why he was being beaten. Some of the rioters had simply started calling him [the victim] a nazi, for apparently no reason, and the beatings began from there.

This is why the left keeps saying things about the right that aren't true. They say it because once you've established that someone is a nazi, or islamaphobe, or racist, or so on... once you've established that they are despicable then it's OK to attempt to murder them.

I suppose it's a form of virtue signalling, in the manner of "she's a witch! Burn her!" You are such a good and virtuous person that you actively stamp out evil. It starts by labelling the other person as something despicable.

I've *never* seen the right do that to the extent that the left has done, in the last several months. Apparently holding the bloody, severed head of the president is OK, knifing him to death as part of "Shakespeare in the park" is OK, and putting up disgusting nude statues of him in cities across the nation is considered OK.

The left says a lot of things about the right that simply aren't true, for a reason: it's to justify breaking laws and trampling rights. They want to get their way in any manner possible, and the ends justify any means.

The left says a lot of things about the right that simply aren't true.

Don't believe them.

As seen here. Megyn Kelly, LOL. Ivanka Trump is a KGB agent. Donald TRUMP will declare war against progress.

There are DYIs and commerical ones out there, Here is the first one I found. Computer Liquid Cooling (Submersion)

If you do DYI just besure to get it right ;)

11 comments and nothing but complaints and grousing. Where's the apps guy, to accuse you all of being Luddites?

I've been using a cordless keyboard and mouse since 2001, Logitech's very first model with a USB antenna. They're a marvelous invention. The antenna is a brick as big as the mouse with a four foot cable coming out of it with two separate USB connectors on the end. Still works beautifully, even though it looks like something from the last century. Admittedly it didn't cost $200-$250, even though I bought it when it was a brand new product, so I'm not impressed with the price point of this product, but the concept is immensely appealing. Not having to pop the batteries out of the mouse every few weeks and muck around with the battery charger is just the sort of tiny little convenience my lazy ass desires. (Why do I have sometimes have to rotate the batteries with my thumb after I plug in the charger before the charge light will come on?)

In the immortal words of Arnold Schwarzenegger, stop whining!

Instead, let's speculate about why Logitech is lying about their inability to use Qi. The Wireless Power Consortium has published a paper about how to use multiple cooperative flux generators to provide charging over an arbitrarily large surface, while not wasting power energizing coils that aren't underneath a receiver. Considering the size of the receiver puck in the picture of the Logitech product, it's obvious they're using precisely this technique in the mouse pad. Qi could have been used just fine, especially since the part that makes Qi what it is is the communications protocol between the receiver and the transmitter. Qi uses backscatter modulation from the receiver to tell the transmitter to give it power. When there's no receiver present, the Qi transmitter uses only 70 mW. With a receiver present and the protocol negotiated successfully, the transmitter ramps up to the power level requested by the receiver, up to 7.5W in the v1.2 standard.

I assume Logitech doesn't want to submit to any standards verification and doesn't want people to be able to use their mousepad to charge their Qi-enabled phones because Logitech hates their customers and wants them to die. I invite other opinions...

It mainly consists of eating niblets.

Actually it's Harry Caray