Slashdot Mirror
Free (Ad-Supported) DSL ISP Debuts
The first catch - and one that I read with horror - is that in order to get a free DSL modem (they aren't cheap) a subscriber must refer at least 10 other subscribers to Broadband Digital Group. Sure, they're going to come up with some sort of sanctimonious anti-spam policy, but I will bet this policy causes as much spam as a horror called AllAdvantage.com, which claims to have a strong anti-spam policy, but at the same time offers big incentives to members who refer "friends" to its service. (The hypocrisy behind these "wink,wink, we're not spamming, just asking people to tell friends about us" policies is truly vomit-inducing, but it is illegal to do what I'd like to do to the people who came up with this horror, so they're safe from me. For the moment.)
I'm tired of all the All-Advantage "friends" I suddenly have who I've never met before. I get spam from them every day. Now I'm sure I - along with many others - will suddenly have many Broadband Digital Group "friends" trying to rope us into this new scheme. I spotted nothing on the company's Web site about simply buying a DSL modem. I'm sure this is an oversight that will be rectified shortly. It would be horrible to think that this company would only open its service to spammers, no matter what kind of market-speak they use to cover up the fact that their referral program is nothing but an inducement to spam.
But even if Broadband Digital Group can figure out a way to justify its spam-creating marketing plan or drops it in favor of something nicer, you will still be forced to use software from Broadband Digital Group's business partner Winfire to access the service. This software requires "Windows 95, 98 (or higher), or Windows NT." No Mac, no Linux, no *nix. Without this software you won't see the ads, and Broadband Digital Group won't be able to gather info on what sites you visit, so you must have their chosen software to connect to their service.
You can see the company's point; their service is ad-supported, so if they can't give all kinds of info about you to advertisers, there's no way they can give you - free - a service that currently retails for $40 - $60 per month in most areas. There is no such thing as a free lunch. The ads pay the freight. If you are going to use the service, you must put up with the ads. And you can't even complain about being forced to use Windows as part of the deal. No one is forcing you to sign up for free broadband Internet service. By definition, wherever you will be able to get this service, you will also be able to sign up for DSL service through other providers that will charge you money - but won't require special software or send you an ad barrage.
Will this work? Is this going to be a viable business? It's going to be interesting to watch. There are obvious flaws in the company's business plan, but there are good things about it, too. Please don't take my word for it either way; I urge you to read the C|Net story and check the company's Web site before coming up with an opinion. If nothing else, assuming Broadband Digital Group can grow as rapidly as its owners and investors hope it can, the availability of "free" broadband service will force other high speed Internet access providers - like cable companies - to provide either more reliable service or lower prices (or both!) than they do now if they want to have any subscribers left in a few years.
if you don't want to make the trade they are asking, don't do it. doesn't seem like a problem to me.
Have you seen Ironstayn vs Supergovernment yet?
- VMWare......1 pcs....$299
- Windows 95..1 pcs....$199
- Total................$498
DSL is currently $60/month = $720/year. Looks like big savings to me...Moderate this down (-1, DSL Is Not Available In Your Area Anyway)
--
Industrial space for lease in Flatlandia.
I've become rather caloused to the whole thing...I'm sure I'll get a few emails trying to get me to sign up, but they'll just get deleted like the rest. After being deluged by clueless morons who truly believe that unless they forward this email to a billion people, AOL will dismantle ICQ or Walt Disney will give them a free vacation, I've become a bit jaded. Preying on the something-for-nothing (or almost nothing) mindset is offensive, but not nearly as offensive as the kind of person who figures "Hey a few clicks of the forward button and I could win!" and doesn't consider the effect those superfluous emails have on others. Bleh. I usually end up flaming those people with the most acute cases of "imbecilitis" and adding their names to the shit list.
Blar.
Even more savings.
You hereby agree that if the terms of this Rules Agreement are not specifically enforced, Winfire will be irreparably damaged, and therefore You agree that Winfire shall be entitled, without bond or other security in excess of $1,000, or without proof of damages, to temporary and/or permanent injunctions and/or restraining orders with respect any breach(es) of this Rules Agreement, in addition to any other available remedies available to Winfire at law or in equity. Now I don't Normally check Terms of Service but is this normal?
If it works (I have no experience with it), FreeMWare is, well, free. The webpage says it's still unstable & for developers only.
Christopher A. Bohn
cb
Oooh! What does this button do!?
Find Windows 3.1x at a yardsale: $5
Buy Windows 9x Upgrade: $100
If you have an older computer you're not using, why not install it with windoze, then install NAT software like Wingate, Winroute, or NAT32? The advertisers can send all their crap to the windoze box that you never look at anyway, and on the other side you have a perfectly good linux box with free DSL...
let me check how much money this will save
:)
:)
me currently...hmm...$0!!
currently paying..
DSL line = $40 month
DSL isp = $0 !
--------------------
$40 month
Dont think it can get much better..
since with my old 56k i was paying
the same amount...those are the wonders
of my local bell provider and hey..
im happy
- A.P.
--
"One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad
"Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
Gotta rant a bit on this one...
;)
I've tried a couple of these "free" ad-supported ISPs (admittedly, they were dial-ups, but the principle is the same) - and while they DO give you access to the 'net, they do so rather poorly in comparison to other ISPs.
Generally, there is little or no support. This alone is a good reason for many to stay away. Especially those who are new to the internet, and need a bit of help to do things you or I would think are pretty simple. So, they generally aren't very good for newbies - that leaves experienced users...who generally go a few steps further when something seems to be wrong.
Send their "support" address a series of traceroutes, showing them that there seems to be a problem with their equipment - and get no response for a few days - then a form letter asking you to make sure your username and password are typed correctly, and that you're dialing the right number (Hello? If I wasn't logging in, how'd I do the traceroute?)
Support aside, you generally have to put up with some sort of "ad panel" on your screen. Invariably these are set to be "always on top" (which generally relates to "always in the way"). When these services first started, the ad panels were relatively small - but they're growing - soon, you'll have 60% ads, 40% other.
You can't even move the panel out of the way, as most use some sort of scripting that doesn't allow you to move ANY part of the panel off-screen. And of course, most of these services think that everyone runs at 800x600 - so you'll get constant warning messages (which you can't turn off) if you run at 1280x1024 and want to put the panel anywhere but the upper right hand corner of the screen.
I'm not even going to go into the spam...although my advice there is to make sure you never remove anything from their mail server - and when they complain, show them the spam. Of course, this may get you nowhere...
Apologies for the bit of a rant here, but these places are generally REALLY low on the quality scale. I can't imagine that going broadband is going to make them any better. In fact, I can see them getting MUCH worse (with that kind of bandwidth, they'll want to force-feed you streaming video...)
Disclaimer: I've worked for a dial-up ISP for 2 years, and have had a cable modem for one. My views are based on my own experiences, and I do try to keep my ISP bias in check most of the time
Section 9 of the terms of service allow them to use the outgoing section of your e-mail to send what is pure essence is spam and in section 14 they have an anti spam policy in contract law cases this kind of hyprocrisy doesn't hold up in court.
They also offer free dsl and dial-up service. Currently they only have software for windows, but mac and linux software will be available soon. They also do not have a banner, just software that logs your internet usage.
There's been a few free ad-based ISP's started here in Australia, one in particular called (*shock*) free.net.au which uses a program to basically control your DUN in Windows. This window when minimised automatically restores itself when a new advert appears, forcing focus onto itself (ie, it switches you out of fullscreen programs). I suppose that is the intention of it, to show you adverts the entire time while you are connected no-matter what you are doing. However, there is a simple app floating around (written in VB no less!) that allows the window to be forcefully hidden, never to appear again, a stroke of insecurity on behalf of the ISP and another point on the board for the obscurity != security beleivers.
Cow of ThirdEye
Just as Prodigy from IBM was cracked to remove all the banner ads, if this service requires special fileter to decrypt a feed that is served from their own WebTV style re-HTTP proxy with ad insertion, people will eventually get to run tools written by people like me who will LIBERATE the enslaved masses. Even if the banner ads have to be watched or viewed in any manner, so long as a web site can be put up, and so long as people want to scrub thier banner ad filled free-web-surfing windows, then the hacking tools will be provided.
I understand some advertising is needed so that some content can be provided on many of the larger sites, but captive eyeballs is a sick concept and very annoying to motivated libertarians who hate insipid forced advertisements.
I thought two free-pc firms just went belly up!
These losers are late to the game.
Plus their DSL requires using an existing subscriber line from the teco and is banking on the new FCC rulings, and is not the extra 22 dollar a month REAL DSL line... (I am betting).
Their viral marketing ploy is legally a Pyramid scheme on shakier ground than a typical Ponzi scheme or multi-tiered-marketing pyramid, but it is till one. And if they had 3 million ex webtv users they would need to spam 3*10 = 30 million spam emails minimum, and because most dupes are roped in at a max of 3 million people, that means that the late adopters will send unsuccesful spam emial to their "buddies" again and again fruitlessly, spamming until all of the DLS users on thier crappy system are added to the Realtime Black List at some point.
This is repulsive.
Please help crush this thing by writing ad maskers, even if it just means putting a pleasing gery rectangle over their screen ads on the user sustems.
I hate spam, can you tell? Well just wait until this monster is unleashed, and you will too.
Moderating up is much more preferable than moderating down.
Blar.
Fool! It filters HTTP ports and uses "webTV" style proxie to insert copius amounts of banner ads and makes sure the ads are sent down the wire. You need to crack their proprietary decoding plugin module code and mask out thier banner ads so thet the ads have no value, but except for ftp and hotline you will not be able to do much with this thing... I bet. Anyone else know for certain waht they **REALLY** will deploy? 1000 buck penalty for running wondow ad scrubbers though. Jeez. thats stiff. I wonder is a court would uphold it?
Lets write a program calle "BDGScrubber 1.0" and more imprtantly, start a website and news groupt to keep ahead of their ad embedding technology and others of its ilk. You cannot NAT the problem away
reflector@fastpointcom.com.
anyway, my recommendation to all businesses like this: do advertising, but do it through email.
that way, you don't have to support clunky platform-specific add-ons or customized browsers, and you're opening yourself up to a much wider market. i would probably take advantage of the offer myself if it were handled this way, and i'm sure many other *nix and mac users would as well.
of course, most any geek is going to either not pick up the mail from his or her foo@freewhatever.com account or procmail it out of existance, but not if the means of getting ads is also the only place where service changes and outages are announced. :) better yet, send mails along the lines of "respond to this message within 48 hours, or your account will be automatically suspended."
not that this is a big issue... most people are not geeks, and are not going to be aware that it's even possible to stop the mail. i can say this with certainty after having watched numerous newbies click on dozens of ads without any idea that the ads weren't part of the search they were doing. "how did i end up on miracle whip? i was searching for the weather report!"
--
how's this redundant? how are any of the currently-moderated (as of 8:19AM EST) posts what this fucking moron has them tagged as?
stupid piece of shit moderators...
fuck you all
seems like monkeyboy moderator strikes again.
rob: DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS BULLSHIT, PLEASE.
monkeyboy strikes again!
rob: please fix moderation. meta-moderation does not take care of crap like this.
Back in my not to distant past, I was a sys admin at a medium sized ISP. This was in a country that has callers pays telephone service (about $3 an hour).
Anyway, to make a long story short, you really had to be on the look-out for people spamming under the guise of being an "affiliate" or "refering" people with whom they have no contact. A lot of the affiliate programs prey on people who live in caller pays environments, saying that they'll pay for the cost of the telephone and ISP service by joining up. Also, there was a fair amount of name list poaching (god help you if they get into your mail spool; that huge ass regex for grifting e-mail's makes it pretty easy to spot, unless you're stacked on the service side of things). finger, ident/vrfy games, snmp walks of RASen and and down right breaking ins are quite common.
The entire situation is exaserbated by the fact that, after 6 months of bouncing around between ISPs, racking up 100s of $$s worth of phone calls and making a general neusance of themselves, these affiliate joiners have the nerve to get abusive with the ISPs when they didn't at least break even.
To make things even worse, a lot of the more recent anti-spam jihaders can't even parse a fscking mail header to save their lives; I've seen at least two cases where they've DoS attacked ISPs over forged "From:" fields. You know things have gotten completely out of hand when Aunt Salley and Uncle Bob start script-kidying a DoS attack over a mis-read e-mail header.
Jesus, will these people ever get a clue (affiliate programs and their joiners alike)?
TANSTAAFL!
The internet has become a very different place that it used to be; it's almost foreign to my experiences during the late 80's and early 90's. I no longer look it as the tight community it used to be, more like a tourist from a small town in Iowa might view NYC. Oh, well... paradise lost; it ain't no big deal. Fsck'em; I'll just be happy sit back, sell'em spuds from Iowa, while they rape and murder each other in the city.
Can someone point me the way to Internet 2, that mythical place where general stupidity has taken over yet?
I know someone who has a "Free PC" and the Free internet service that comes with it (granted only a 56K connection).
I must also say that it is working nicely. They have been surfing the net for almost three months and I haven't received a single "help" call from them. They can care less about the advertisements that ring their desktop. They need the 'net to get crucial medical information about spina bifida since their youngest daughter was born with it. The information they have discovered, and the support they found, has made an immeasurable difference in their daughter's life..literally.
If it works...this type of stuff is very good for folks who cannot afford it otherwise. Getting people on the net is a "good thing", even if you have to beg borrow and steal to do so.
I'm still working on a clever footer.
I bet you they only pick up the ISP charge. At least here in MD, Bell Atlantic charges $40 for the DSL line and then you can get different ISP's ranging from $15-20. These guys are probally just paying that $15-20, you still owe the phone co. I'll stick with my cracked accounts that I've been using for years for free :P
Cheap access is something that needs to happen, but it doesn't have to be like this, does it? Has anybody considered starting ISP cooperatives, or community supported internet access? Something that's cheap, accessable, uncensored, and with *no* strings attached?
Wasn't there something a while back about a cooperative in San Fran that had done something similar with T1 lines?
Michael Chisari
In the old days, television was a half hour long show with three-to-five minute breaks from the sponser, advertising some cigarette. Time passed and the advertising time became ten smaller commercials. Nowadays, people _pay_ for cable, and _buy_ the advertising. This is insane. It just goes to prove that 99% of north america thinks that watch advertising doesn't cost them anything (they are wrong). So now, we have ADSL being piped into our home without charge (like early TV) supported by ads. (And there are ads on many of the web pages too.) In two years they'll start charging for that too. 40 bucks a month for ADSL, one third of the screen has advertising on it all the time, and half the websites and e-mail you retrieve has spam. If spam is part of the bargain, it's not free! Don't pay for advertising!
Looks like somebody with a network sniffer, a few free hours, and perl could hack up something that looks to them like a regular user, while the owner of said perl scripts has free dsl access without the advertisement horror.
Now, personally, I avoid free providers like this, their service tends to suck bowling balls through a garden hose, and I'm a firm believer of tanstaafl, but I always wonder...
-John
look at me, me special.. me sneaky! where me learn to be so sneaky?
me so sneaky!
Did anyone notice that the modem (and therefore the service) don't arrive until April 1st? It's gotta be a joke. I provide tech support for ADSL for GTE-I and DSL is a little too complex (and limited) to be provided for free, at least at this point, IMHO. In anycase, this looks to be a spam-master's April Fool's Joke, at least to me. (and I've been on the 'net since before Microsoft had a website) :-)
The first catch - and one that I read with horror - is that in order to get a free DSL modem (they aren't cheap) a subscriber must refer at least 10 other subscribers to Broadband Digital Group.
This sounds like multi-level marketing in some way. I've tried the free ISPs for dial-up. And, think it's great that they are available, especially for those who can't afford the charges of regular ISPs. I had big problems with free ISPs: 1)I hated having my modem dial-up every time I wanted to access the net, 2) I couldn't stand the ads, 3) I had to keep switching dial-up numbers just to get a connection. I decided to go DSL because of higher bandwidth and no dial-up any more. I'd consider this new service only if they allow me to go with them without having to refer others, especially not 10! others. That's ridiculous.
I'd like to see some specifics on this free DSL. Currently, I pay $40 for the DSL line charge, $10 for the ISP, $3.77 for a mandatory Federally Ordered Subscriber Line Charge, $5.40 for a Gross Receipts Tax Surchage, and other taxes that they keep adding in. My provider is Bell Atlantic. I've had DSL since September. Every month I get the bill, I call them up to find out what these charges are, and they never answer me to any degree of satisfaction. Will I be in the same boat with this free DSL?
AD supported != Free.
:-(
Not at all! It's rather antonyms than synonyms.
PS: Sorry, I just read the header, but I'm very strongly against all this "ad supported" bullshit
I can't think of a single person that I know that wouldn't be truly disgusted (and thereby regard me with some disdain) at having been spammed, traceably, by me. No one wants spam in their mailbox, let alone spam originating from an acquaintance.
Inasmuch as it appears that there really is no other way to get the DSL router (at least for the moment), potential users really are being forced to be used as slave labor in the spamming efforts - don't want to pay for the latest email listing CD? No problem, make your "subscribers" spam people to get the service! In addition, when factoring in the percentage of people who actually respond to spam, users are going to have to send out email to many more than the ten or fifteen that are required.
This is not to mention the misnomers that are associated with this, either... DSL is more secure than cable, but only when DSL is not in bridging mode - something that in my area, is only becoming more widespread recently.
"During your times of trial and suffering, when you see only one set of footprints, it was then that I was riding the pogostick."
A good traveller has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving.
I don't see how you can accuse the "get paid to blah" people of encouraging the spamming, since they refuse to pay people who spam.
it seems like the refer thing is completely optional
(especially since it says on their page that its a limited time offer).
Don't like Windows? Have a spare PC? Put Windows on it, set it up as a router between your LAN and the DSL, hook up your Linux machines to the LAN, and away you go!
(Okay so maybe this is wishful thinking... )
Ben
I've ordered DSL from GTE. Supposedly setup was free if you had it installed in 1999. Well I placed my order back in mid November, and waited. When I asked them last Tuesday if I'd have to pay the full $400 setup fee if it had been installed after the new year, I was told "We don't know." So I cancelled my account. I wanted free setup, and I didn't want to get stuck with a bill I can't pay. What pissed me off the most was the fact that they told me they didn't know. One woudl think they'd have something ready to tell their customers in the event of the DSL not getting setup by the new year.
and let your kids, wife, parents, etc. surf on there and then you connect your computer via a LAN? Living in a family of 7 with myself being the only Linux geek, they would get a lot of links off my siblings while I play on my Linux computer :) -philsky To .sig or not to .sig. That is the question
I know the uplink on DSL is slower but this seems perfect for someone who want to put up an NT based server (or router :-) - you don't have to look at the ads if the monitor's been detached
Yes, I have done it myself, and no you can't un-moderate when things go horribly wrong. :)
/joeyo
2^5
As Neil Postman said, ``Contempt, rather than celebration, is the proper response to advertising and the system that makes it possible.''
And yes, I do practice what I preach. I have no television for this very reason. I will not pay for those programs by sacrificing my mind to trivialized sound-bytes and deceptive adverts.
I tried to check out a few net bookstores, and the only one that I could connect to was Barnes and Noble, which coincidentally was one of their advertisers. When I tried Amazon, or Bookpool, or a couple others, I remember Netscape giving a _very strange_ dialog box saying that the site didn't exist (and it was _not_ a DNS failure, it was something I'd never seen before and haven't seen since).
---
...create a file named win.com in c:\windows. Doesn't even have to be any particular length...
Used to work with the original Win95 upgrade, don't know about Win98.
InThane
I have images of a nice little Windows 95 Machine running Wingate or any other proxy type thing. Wouldn't that allow the clients, even linux, to use the bandwidth without the ads?
What's the difference... you watch TV, why do you think it's free?
Hell, in my opinion anyone with cable is just paying to watch commercials.
Now.. here's something I'd bet they never thought of, or can't do too much about.
To avoid looking at the ads, I'm sure people will be setting up some sort of proxy, ip masq/NAT, internet connection sharing, or firewall boxes to connect to the internet which displays the ads.
All the other machines on the network will have ad-free internet access!!!!
Problem with all these suggestions to use Wingate to access the DSL from a Linux or other advertisement-free box: Many of the "free ISP" software packages actually require user interaction in their GUI in order to keep the connection active. You must use their searchbar or click on their buttons every X minutes or you get disconnected. Obviously this prevents a simple Wingate setup, without hacking the freeDSL client or sniffing packets and decrypting what their server wants to see from the client, and then faking it.
Don't bother walking down the road either. There's billboards out there.
I also despise the media/consumer driven society we live in. I'm waiting for the day where ad filtering technology is a reality.
I'd rather pay $20 a month to NOT see ads if I could.
a cd from work or a friend you liberal weenie
I'd give it a month before someone reverse engineers the protocol and puts out some free software for Linux that also allows you to "view" the ads. As if /dev/null wasn't popular enough . . .
Something of a non-issue, I would imagine, for most of us who live in academia, but...
xDSL would be nice. However, as many are saying, this isn't free. Just because you don't pay out-of-pocket doesn't make it free--you must contend with ads and slow service and an unresponsive service provider. I don't know who would want that, but I imagine a lot of people would be willing to put up with it for the speed.
However, the thing to consider is that when you combine a second phone line (approx. $20/month) with a 56K ISP connection (also roughly $20/month), you're paying pretty close to what DSL costs, provided it's available in your area. Why not ditch the modem and second phone line and just upgrade to DSL, and not worry about all this so-called free stuff?
Same deal with the "free" PC's these days. They're not free. You usually either have to pay for them outright and get a rebate, or you have to look at ads or fill out surveys or some other random, pointless thing for a PC that will be obsolete in six months.
It's simple: if you're willing to jump through hoops to get an almost-free and probably sub-standard connection to the Internet, go for it, but don't complain about spam and whatnot. If you want to be real, though, why not pay a bit of money and get the real thing. Computers and Internet are not expensive, and are getting less expensive all the time.
I live in a house with 6 people and we all have our own computers. We want to share one DSL line, but the phone company says we would have to pay for 6 different lines. Can we all just get Ethernet cards and connect through one computer? Are there any instructions on how this works somewhere??
One more thing to dislike about this kind of ad-pushing is that it works on the premise that the only way to get people to do something is to trick, cajole, or manipulate them (everyone seen Office Space ?). What if we cut out the advertisers and sold our allegience to companies directly?
What if, instead of having to sit through ads for Ritz(TM) crackers, you received a plaintext e-mail at the beginning of the month from your ISP:
Send us 3 UPC symbols from Ritz(TM) cracker boxes by the end of the month, or a surcharge of $3.00 will be added to your bill.
Sure, you'd then have to actually spend money on the products. Yes, they'd get even more data on your shopping habits. But I say it would be worth it not to have to hear about rich buttery goodness. . .
- Michael Cohn
Author of the GHB FAQs
-----
Go ahead, blame me... I voted for Nader!
You can't even move the panel out of the way, as most use some sort of scripting that doesn't allow you to move ANY part of the panel off-screen.
Starting last year, I took the $20/month I was paying to my local ISP and bought a cheap second (used) monitor for $100, and a second video card for $140.
I fire up Altavista free access (now with 4 local numbers in my area) and run the main monitor at 1280x1024 and the second @ 1024x768. The blipvert stays in the far upper left corner of the second monitor, and goes mostly unnoticed, while I continue to work on the main monitor with a full view.
The way I look at it, I would have spent about $250 this year for dialup access($20x12=240). Moreover, next year, not having an ISP to pay for, I'll have the Xtra video card and monitor payed for.
The conection is faster and more reliable that the last 2 ISPs I've tried in my area, and I've never been happier. Who knows, with all I'm saving, maybe next year I might be able to spring for a bigger 2nd monitor. :)
The question to ask yourself is:
Would last years ISP bill pay for a second video card and monitor?
_________________________
Go through the paper(whois) trail, it seems to be a company part of a bunch of "Get This For Free" companys called iholdings.com(mactrading.com). Some of the websites held within seem to follow the same Multi-Tierd Marketing scemes(Pyramid). I fear the spam ...
We want to share one DSL line, but the phone company says we would have to pay for 6 different lines. Can we all just get Ethernet cards and connect through one computer?
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 10.0.0.2
:P
Certainly, you can do this. When the telco guy comes to hook up your Linux box, take the existing ethernet card out and pretend you don't have any other computers. He'll install the modem and the ethernet card into your PC and set it up for you.
You now have 1 IP address on that machine. Take your ethernet cards and get everybody back on the net. Your DSL enabled box now has two network cards in it. You'll probably have to recompile your kernel with IP Masquerading enabled. With this done, run a line like this for each machine on the network:
where 10.0.0.2 would be the address of a machine on the network who you want to share the DSL line with. Do this for all the IPs on your network.
That takes care of the server side. Now, for each of the clients add the IP of your DSL box as the "gateway". You will also need to take note of the nameserver and enter that into all the clients as well.
There you go, one DSL connection for the price of one IP address shared across your network.
I wish I had DSL available in my area
F0 07 C7 C8
This is great news to my ears, as I have been looking for a free ISP client/solution that would work under Linux.
Does anybody know of any other such ISP's out there that either work under linux or at least would work under WINE?
--Steve Castellotti
Your Brain + EEG + LEGO Robots = Brainstorms
It depends on their method of DSL. I have seen DSL that are either an external box and a 10base-T in or the newer PCI base DSL card. if they go with PCI based DSL card. then LINUX = SCREWED
Great idea, too bad ISP's will learn this trick. I can imagine streaming video on your active screen! With Windoze, it should not be hard to detect your second screen and where your mouse moves. Still, you should get some mileage out of that one. Good luck!
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
If you are creative you can get free high speed internet access in Canada with only a few strings attached (a lot fewer strings than all these Free ISP companies).
First, let me start things off by saying that High Speed access (Cable-@Home and ADSL-Sympatico) is readily available in most major Canadian cities for $40CDN a month or about $25US.
After I signed up with @Home (I used to have ADSL but it was too slow), I signed up for the most popular pay-to-surf company which pays $12.50US a month if you surf for 25 hours. Because I have a 2 computer home network to share my high speed internet connection, I run the pay-to-surf program on both computers, thus netting me a total of $25US which offsets my high speed ISP costs.
As for the pay-to-surf program, I use a fake surf program and leave it running on both computers for 3 nights a month when I go to bed. That way I never see the ads and the web surfing that they track is completely random.
To sum up:
-I Pay $25US for high speed access, get full support and excellent service.
-I Receive $25US from pay-to-surf company.
-I Rarely look at an ad since fakesurf runs 3 nights a month while I'm sleeping.
-The web surfing that is tracked is completely random.
Strings attached:
-Have to leave computers running 3 nights a month.
-Have to turn fakesurf software on 3 nights a month.
-Have to cash the cheques manually.
-Need to have more than 1 computer (Networking two computers is really cheap and easy nowadays).
Well I hope this helps out someone who wants to get free high speed internet access now in Canada. I guess it isn't too useful to you Americans since you pay ridiculous rates for high speed access (thus requiring more than 2 networked computers).
BTW I didn't mention the name of the pay-to-surf company since I'm NOT trying to get referrals, just trying to inform you of a fairly easy way to get free high speed access. (I bet you can easily guess which spam-master company I am referring to!!)
Microsoft has gotten much more anal over piracy in recent years.
We are red.
We are a blank slate.
We are like a silly clown to speak Latin mixed with English.
My favorite is sylibus, a fourth declension noun, plural sylibus. So many pompus people get that one wrong.
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
Ever wonder why Americans eat twice as much as they need? Over fed like cattle, over sexed and perverted, the evidence is all around you. Woe to the rest of the world when they catch up.
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
Pay-to-surf is a scam. I don't know any one who makes money from those pay-to-surf offers. My suggestion is to stay away from them. Don't be enticed just because something is free. Remember, there are always strings attached.
so just use a proxy server that somebody has.. it's not that hard to find them these days... (unless they decide to block ports 1080, 3128, and 8080)
There are a number of free ISPs which function *perfectly* fine under Linux, without the ad banner software they try to force on you.
It goes against their usage policies to do so, and if enough people did it maybe they'd take action, but it can be done. (No, I won't provide any details... it's simple enough if you have any computer know-how at all.)
I wouldn't be surprised if this service uses similar methods which can easily be circumvented.
It seems this is exactly the sort of information which is relevant to this discussion -- how to use this service to its greatest personal benefit while incurring none of its disadvantages.
I personally will not subscribe to any service, DSL, dialup, or otherwise, which limits the uses to which I may put my own resources.
--
Casey
More scratches on the cave wall, thanks be to anonymity.
My solution is I use 800X600 in my libretto. Since my screen ratio is 480X800, I let the netzero and alladvantage money bars occupy the upper 120 X 800 which I never "go" there. This way I get free net access and a couple of dollars per month figurtively and never get to see any ads.
/. exclusively, so what. Try to pinch an geek ad to me. BTW, they can't tell each other. I can put netzero banner on top of addadvantage banner. It's a lot of fun to see them battle the top screen every half second.
So they know I have logon
cy
Certainly, you can do this. When the telco guy comes to hook up your Linux box, take the existing ethernet card out and pretend you don't have any other computers. He'll install the modem and the ethernet card into your PC and set it up for you.
Ok... but the catch is I often use my machine for BeOS too, so I wouldn't want my machine to be the server with the DSL modem in it. So this means I would get one of my roomies to be the server. But they only run Windows. Can a Windows machine be setup to be the "gateway" server?
blah
No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
If I chased down every spammer who dumped his shit at my inbox, I'd easily waste an hour a day. Sorry, but it's not worth it to me. You'll never stop them by force of action, only by passive filtering.
Blar.
Because you need Windows to run the fucking ad software, putz.
www.freewwweb.com = free nation wide (pretty much) internet service without ads.
I don't think it works with win.com now, maybe ntkern though.
Similar to what I do. With my Matrox card, I can double the vertical space on my desktop. Then I place all annoyances at the very bottom, and use as normal. Just don't maximize anything. ;)
They'd uphold it if the company could actually prove you were doing something that broke the TOS. Good luck for them to try and get evidence of you running a proxy to filter the ads.
Although spam just got another boost, the free DSL offer is good news, for Linux and Mac users too! First of all, this offer will put a bit of pressure on broadband Internet access providers to lower their prices. Second of all: it is possible to build a Windows 9x/NT router through which Linux and Mac systems will communicate with the Internet at DSL-like speeds.
if i didn't misread anything it said you refer 10 people by april 2000 and you get to QUALITY to win a free DSL modem.. so i'm guessing you probably have to pay for setup and pay for the modem if you didn't win..
-Legion