Slashdot Mirror


Andover.Net and VA Linux Join Together

As you may have heard, VA Linux and Andover.Net are gonna be joining up. We thought it would be dishonest not to say something about it, but as you probably understand, we're sorta restricted in what we can say. Of course, you can say whatever you want, and you can read the press release if you're curious about some of the details. Creative control of Slashdot will remain where it always has been.

276 comments

  1. FIRST ANDOVER RANT` by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ANDOVER! LEAVE SLASHDOT ALONE. IT'S GONE DOWNHILL SINCE YOU TOOK OVER!

    1. Re:FIRST ANDOVER RANT` by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its like downhill skiing... its best going down and its all downhill from here!

      I'm from slashdot's first days and would have to say its only gotten much more interesting over the years.

    2. Re:FIRST ANDOVER RANT` by lizrd · · Score: 1

      The reson that /. has been going downhill as of late is because of people like you. Complaining, trolling and bitching about how you don't like the stories only makes /. a less cool place to be. I much prefered the days when I could read comments with my threshold set at 0 and not see anything offensive. This constant spamming and complaining really isn't helping make this a community worth participating in what I am seeing makes me sad.

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
  2. wow! by Cybersonic · · Score: 2

    i just want to know when RedHat and VA will merge :)

    --
    Cybie! aka Ralph Bonnell
    1. Re:wow! by cloudmaster · · Score: 2
      I'd guess they'll merge right after all the better distributions go away... :)

      --From the makers of lumpy linux

  3. Join together? by jonathansen · · Score: 3

    It sounded more like an acquistion of Andover, to me.
    --

    --
    "A dessert without cheese is like a beautiful woman who has lost an eye." -- Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin
    1. Re:Join together? by Jburkholder · · Score: 1
      yes indeed:

      The transaction is expected to be completed during VA Linux Systems' third fiscal quarter and will be accounted for as a purchase.
    2. Re:Join together? by chandoni · · Score: 1
      Free software companies are re-merging just like forked codebases of a free software project (where both fill the same niche).

      When Microsoft gets split up by the DOJ, that gives us Linux zealots more proof that "free software prevents unnecessary forking."

  4. As an Andover.Net sharholder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . Some idiot bought this stock when it IPO'd at $90. I bought @ $84 (never buy without a limit!).

    Does this mean that VALinux is trying to become the M$ of the movement??

    Only RedHat can save us...

    1. Re:As an Andover.Net sharholder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry if you and the rest of the Linux community are too uneducated to realize it, but that's how America works.

      First off, Linux didn't start with money.
      Secondly, it is actually useful for something, and hardware aside, it's still possible to make use of it for free.
      There is a difference. Money is not the end-all. Sure folks get rich from Linux, but if *everyone* working on Linux one day sells out, to the point where there's too much quantity and too little quality, do you think the same people posting here will be praising it? Hell no. They'll pick up something else.
      That's how it got in. The mainstream was crap, Linux was free and IT WORKED.

    2. Re:As an Andover.Net sharholder... by OscarLoo · · Score: 1
      First off, Linux didn't start with money.

      What does this mean? Was there some venture capital funding to start Microsoft that I've forgotten about?

      Secondly, it is actually useful for something...

      Spoken like a true Linux fanatic. A lot of people think Microsoft's software is "actually useful for something" and have proved that by paying big bucks for it.

    3. Re:As an Andover.Net sharholder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uuh...yes. M$ started with a buying out of QDOS. a lot of people dont know any better.

    4. Re:As an Andover.Net sharholder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt. I'm sorry but that is incorrect. Thank you for playing.

    5. Re:As an Andover.Net sharholder... by Joe+MacDonald · · Score: 1

      Probably best you posted anonymously. If you hadn't you would have revealed yourself as either (a) not a programmer or (b) someone your ISO staff should be coming down on like a ton of bricks. And like it or not, if you want to do business in the real world, ISO counts for a lot.

      --
      -Joe
    6. Re:As an Andover.Net sharholder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh, Ive hyped this stock like mad on Yahoo and Raging Bull its made me sick. But its the internet and some fools will invest in anything.Its too funny when a no value company takes over another. LNUX - TIME TO SHORT THIS BADBOY! . To all you Linux freaks with an itching to invest...BUY BUY BUY!. ANDN paid for my future house on Long Island. No telling what shorting LNUX will get me.. Yacht baby!! BUY LNUX YOU CLONES!#!@# -wino You make me feel like dancing, gonna dance the night away!

  5. Consolidation by michaelsimms · · Score: 1
    Hmmm, so what is the focused market going to be? Selling hardware with a linux distro with netscape on it that by default points to slashdot {:-)

    In all seriousness, good luck guys, the more big companies we have on our side, the more market clout we all have for Linux!

    --

    Tux Games. Your complete source for native Linux games.
    1. Re:Consolidation by gmhowell · · Score: 2
      Funny. For most companies, the Slashdot users (and you personally may or may not be this way) get all antsy with mergers. Witness the talks over the AOL/Time Warner merger. Now there is going to be lots of backslapping and high fives.



      -- Consolidate the complementary networks of VA (including Linux.com, Sourceforge.net, and Themes.org) and Andover.Net (including Slashdot.org and Freshmeat.net) to create the Internet's leading destination for Open Source developers, with nearly two-thirds of the total traffic of major Open Source sites and putting the combined network in the top 100 web destinations worldwide;



      Two thirds of the total open source traffic, discussion, and news will be 'owned' by one company?? This doesn't concern anyone? Sure, CT can claim that he will maintain control, but I'd love to see his contract proving that. Money changes things and people.



      This article seems to indicate that advertising is already cropping up as editorial content. How different is this 'story' from this one? Sure, it might be nice to make notice of the live broadcast, but mentioning The Sync both times seems a bit inappropriate.



      Now, before getting flamed and moderated, let me explain one thing: I'll give the Slashdot gang the benefit of the doubt. Most of them are younger than me by a couple of years, and I know I'm not fully baked. But I expect they'll have to learn fast. Just as important as actually maintaining independent editorial control (there was a story a few days back that mentioned someone trying to get andover to force a story, but CT et al. said no.) is maintaining the appearance of objectivity.



      To that end, perhaps the main page needs to be redesigned with an announcements section that concerns /. specifically. Similarly, if they are going to get help or pay for services for other companies, and they feel these companies deserve mention, put that in a 'supporter' slashbox. It should be a small thing, and would go a long way towards assuaging my concerns.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:Consolidation by um...+Lucas · · Score: 2

      So you actually enjoy the idea that the "biggest network of opensource/linux advocacy sites" is going to be owned by the largest sole distributor of Linux systems?

      Talk about slanting the tables a little!

      If Microsoft tried to buy ZDNET, everyone here would cry foul.

      If Apple tried to buy MacWeek and MacWorld from ZDnet, again, everyone would cry foul.

      If Sun went and bought performance computer, AGAIN, everyone would cry foul.

      But, if VA Linux buys Andover.net, it's a *good thing*?!?

      Wake up, guys!

    3. Re:Consolidation by storem · · Score: 2
      Does anyone actually know what the deal is between sourceforge.net and server51.com (freshmeat.net)? Will they exist next to eachother, or on top of eachother?

      Kinda scary, don't you agree? One omnipotent ruler in OSS-land...

    4. Re:Consolidation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good points. I'll try to reinforce some
      of them further:

      VA Systems is working closely with a comapny
      we all know and love..DoubleClick!

      This is too much.

    5. Re:Consolidation by mushroom · · Score: 1

      "...but as you probably understand, we're sorta restricted in what we can say." No, I don't understand. Is that a restriction on content, and what does it say about restrictions in the future?

      --
      -Every time I see you flourishing with a metaphor I experience the same anxiety I feel watching a child with a razor-
    6. Re:Consolidation by TheHeadT · · Score: 1

      These are really my concerns as well. When the major player in Linux hardware buys up the main conduits to their potential customer base, it can't really help but stifle competition (because of the aforementioned *money thing (TM)*).

      In roughly four to six weeks we will be launching TitanLogic.com. Titan Logic manufactures multi-boot Linux systems, meaning you can have most whatever you want/need on a box (RedHat, Caldera, NT Server, etc). We will be competing with not only VA Linux, but Penguin Computing and the other smaller Linux hardware manufacturers.

      The site (http://www.titanlogic.com) is locked out while development work continues. Since this is the first time I've ever publically posted its existence, I'll work on getting up a "We're almost here!" page instead of an antiseptic login dialog.

      But for folks like me /., as well as FreshMeat and others, is the best way to reach our potential customers. This purchase hasn't negated that fact.. it's actually made it more true than ever. But the big downside is that we'll be advertising through a company owned by our competition. From my perspective, and anyone else that is trying to bring better pricing to the Linux community, it is *exactly* like MS buying ZDNET.

      Now, we're not going to wet our pants and cry on ourselves (or you). We'll finish building our site, making our pitches, and doing everything we possibly can to bring the highest quality Linux boxes to the community at a fair price, but be for sure about the facts of the matter:

      1. *All* business is about money, plain and simple.
      2. VA Linux is publically held and thus is accountable to its stock holders in many areas, the most important being increasing margins.
      3. You can be guaranteed most of the people owning VA Linux (and RedHat) stock don't really care about Linux for it's own sake. They bought the stock for the same reason as any other investor: to make more money. There is nothing wrong with this in any way whatsoever.
      4. But because the stockholders are in it for the money, they apply pressure to do the things necessary to make that money. These things consists of both internal improvements and cost effeciencies, as well as external efforts to squash the competition into small little smear marks resembling chopped liver between two cinder blocks. That's just the way it goes.
      5. Why is this true? Because competition lowers industry prices. Lower industry prices reduce revenue. Lower revenue reduces company net worth. Lower net worth means lower margins.

      This little turn of events simply means that the slope of the uphill battle to bring better pricing to the community just got steeper. How much steeper may just very well depend on the community.

      Wish us luck!, /Scott

      Scott Countryman - scountry@titanlogic.com
      CEO
      Titan Logic Systems
      http://www.titanlogic.com

      --
      A good name lost is seldom regained. When character is gone, all is gone, and one of the richest jewels of life is lo
    7. Re:Consolidation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...but as you probably understand, we're sorta restricted in what we can say." No, I don't understand. Is that a restriction on content, and what does it say about restrictions in the future?

      CT is probably referring to Andover's and VA Linux's quiet period. The SEC takes a dim view of companies pumping up their hype during a merger.

  6. Deluxe apartments in the sky by Chang · · Score: 1

    You guys are like the Jeffersons, movin' on up!

  7. That's Pressure for VaLinux! by waldoj · · Score: 1

    Wow, if your servers ever poop out on you, there ain't *no* excuse good enough! :)

  8. Why is Slashdot so slow? by Romen · · Score: 3

    Linux Daily News had Slashdot scooped on this issue by more than an hour, and I submitted this half an hour ago. It was promply rejected. I sort of wonder why Slashdot is now the last news source to get anything, even when it's about them.

    --
    Sam TH
    AbiWord Developer
    1. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by mind21_98 · · Score: 2

      Maybe because they're biased to the point that they don't report negative news about themselves (only about Linux related information).

      Ars Technica seems to be much better at providing computer-related news now, and their site is cleaner too. I'm considering switching permanantly to them.

    2. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      I would imagine there was some back and forth about what can be said and when. Doesn't suprise me too much. But then, Slashdot can be just generally slow to pick up some stories, it seems.

    3. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by Jburkholder · · Score: 2
      Had it been the other way-round, (slashdot scooped others by an hour) what would we say then?

      Well, looky! Slashdot is already the PR mouthpeice of VA and Andover! What happened to journalistic integrity and independance?

    4. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by Cplus · · Score: 2

      I've been seeing little comments about this all over /. all morning and I wasn't surprised that they didn't break the story.

      Think of it this way. This is a story that's going to affect Hemos, Taco, et al in a big way and their presentation of it is probably a lot more important than their presentation of other stories in that they will see a lot more criticism for this one. I would imagine that they all sat down at a big table in the geek compound for a couple of hours this morning sipping blueberry squishies and talking this out. It's no surprise that it took a while.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    5. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by RedX · · Score: 2

      Actually I first read of this deal a few minutes before 7 AM EST (more than two and a half hours before /. posted it) on the ANDN message board over at Yahoo. I'm sure there are many, many stockholders of both ANDN and LNUX that read /. first thing in the morning that would have liked to know this news prior to the market opening. According to the VA press release, this was the "most significant transaction in Linux history" yet the leading site for Linux news and information is scooped by the entire Internet. VA's own press release was up for at least a half hour before /. posted the news, surely something could have been said earlier.

    6. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by DeadSea · · Score: 3
      The more I think about it, the more I would like a story queue and moderation of stories. I think there is a lot of news for nerds that doesn't get reported on slashdot because it is good but not great, or because there are a dozen better stories that day.

      On days that I'm really bored at work, I'd like to be able to read 50 news for nerds stories, but on days when I'm busy, I'd like to be able to see just the cream of the crop, maybe 5 or so.

      More stories! Moderate stories!Threshhold for stories!

    7. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by mihalis · · Score: 2
      Ars Technica seems to be much better at providing computer-related news now, and their site is cleaner too. I'm considering switching permanantly
      to them.

      Or you could just surf both regularly, most ISPs allow this.

    8. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by thimo · · Score: 2

      Since when is this negative news? I think this is good news, it creates a solid OS/FS front. Even stronger than they used to be, so this is good news!

      I like /. a lot and it's still easy to ignore the articles/comments I don't want to read. Guess we won't see you much around anymore and I can't really say I'm sorry because I really don't care.

      Thimo

      --

      --
      Avoid the Gates of Hell. Use Linux!
    9. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by drewpt · · Score: 1

      There's only so many hours in the day.

    10. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by storem · · Score: 1
      /. is more than *just news* ! /. provides you "News for nerds. Stuff that matters." And a unique way of trowing around your $0.02 wherever you want....
      (all in the big karma pool :) )

      Does Arse Technica provide you this? Or do you have enough with that silly UBB forum thingy?

      btw: /. is not *that* slow on our T3 :))

    11. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, we can say that even if Slashdot is several hours or days late.

    12. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by ToLu+the+Happy+Furby · · Score: 1

      Maybe because they're biased to the point that they don't report negative news about themselves (only about Linux related information).

      No, I think it's because they're just slow. But then again, their primary mission isn't to provide the fastest news updates, but rather a forum to make their news "coverage"--that is, the article plus the comments--the most in-depth and interesting out there. And I think that, for the most part, they succeed.

      Ars Technica seems to be much better at providing computer-related news now, and their site is cleaner too. I'm considering switching permanantly to them.

      Don't get me wrong--I love Ars, and I've been a regular reader there for over a year. However, if you're considering switching because you want faster or more complete news coverage, you'll be very disappointed--they only update the site an average of around once a day (sometimes less often), and usually with only 4 or 5 articles. Meanwhile, /. may be a few hours behind on many stories, but they post around 20 or so a day, which is much better variety if you ask me. And while the Ars discussion boards are a lot more intelligent than most on the web, I find I just can't go without the power of /.'s customizable comments pages--I can view threads intelligently, I can browse at any threshold, I can see and respond to responses to my posts very easily: it's nice.

      What I *do* love Ars for is their occasional original content, especially Hannibal's interesting and excellently written hardware articles. But I don't think they could cut it (for me, at least) as a primary news site.

      Just my opinion.

    13. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by Smack · · Score: 2

      OK, normally you might have a point. But remember that all the Slashdot guys are at Linuxworld. All the time before 10:30 AM was probably involved with waking up, going for breakfast, getting to the convention center, setting up, etc.

    14. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by Romen · · Score: 1

      Well, I would believe this theory if they had said somthing interesting with their story posting. Instead, they just mumbled about how they couldn't talk about anything. I'm not even sure why they can't talk now, especially after it was released to the press hours ago. AFAIK, they are no longer in the post-IPO quiet period, and VA Linux certainly isn't. So they really have no excuse for delaying the most significant story that they will probably publish this week, or even this month, so that they can present it in the context of some mumbo-jumbo about having to keep quiet.

      --
      Sam TH
      AbiWord Developer
    15. Re:Why is Slashdot so slow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel that one of the main reasons that they were so slow could have been the fact that there is ALOT of red tape to leap through when you are about to announce a merger or any other major corperate news. While they were busy doing the business end of their jobs, this end may have slacked a little, but I don't feel that they ever did anything wrong.

  9. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now maybe Slashdot can get better servers so we stop getting 502's.

    thank you.

    1. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sure can afford to I heard on the radio that the deal was for 978 million dollars!

  10. server51 and sourceforge? by ruud · · Score: 5

    How does this affect the server51 (Andover) and sourceforge (VA) projects, since they both appear to have similar goals?
    --

    --
    bgphints - internet routing news, hints and ti
    1. Re:server51 and sourceforge? by Fat+Cow · · Score: 3

      "-- Consolidate the complementary networks of VA (including Linux.com,
      Sourceforge.net, and Themes.org) and Andover.Net (including
      Slashdot.org and Freshmeat.net) to create the Internet's leading
      destination for Open Source developers"

      they will consolidate, if they do what they say in the press release

      --
      stay frosty and alert
    2. Re:server51 and sourceforge? by HeUnique · · Score: 1

      Let me see..

      Server 51 got few dozens of projects..
      Sourceforge got more than 1000

      hmmm... (calculating numbers with his old 8086 processor)... :)

      Kill server 51...

      Sorry, business is business..

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    3. Re:server51 and sourceforge? by Sanity · · Score: 3
      From my brief look at Server 51, SourceForge is lightyears ahead in terms of functionality - I don't think there is much question as to which will be folded into which!

      --

    4. Re:server51 and sourceforge? by jd · · Score: 3
      They will be combined into a new service, to be called sourceserverforge51, which will list itself as "alien technology AND not alien technology".

      The new company will be releasing their new auto-acquisition system "Andover va linux server, now!" sometime in the 2nd quarter.

      In related news, reports of flying disks around Roswell, New Mexico, and the sight of a large number of men in tuxedos and dark glasses was hotly denied by an air-force official in a penguin suit, who claimed that Freshmeat's maintainers weren't even in the area at the time.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:server51 and sourceforge? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      How will it affect Freshmeat (owned by Andover) and LinuxApps (a 'partner' of linux.com, owned by VA)?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    6. Re:server51 and sourceforge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were up to me, I'd shut down both sites without telling anyone, a la MassLinux.

    7. Re:server51 and sourceforge? by deuteron · · Score: 1

      yes, but s51 has been around for just a couple weeks (i signed up and became member #111 when the slashdot code was released on it). i think s51 has a much cleaner and cooler interface (scoop's the man!) than sourceforge. i think s51 will rock once it comes out of alpha/beta.

    8. Re:server51 and sourceforge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hi Guys....

      LinuxApps is not owned by VA. This is just a simple link exchange. Trae McCombs had asked for the 'linux.com partner' link, in exchange for the button ads placed on the linux.com site.

      Matthew

    9. Re:server51 and sourceforge? by palpatine · · Score: 1

      LinuxApps.com is not owned by VA. It is a Linux.com partner, much in the same way that LinuxNewbie.org (which is owned by internet.com) is a Linux.com partner.

    10. Re:server51 and sourceforge? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but won't they stop being a 'partner' once VA have Freshmeat instead? Oh well, not a big deal I suppose.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  11. Heh... by Teferi · · Score: 2

    Glad I held on to some of my VA stock, considering what mergers tend to do to stock prices. :)
    "If ignorance is bliss, may I never be happy.

    --
    -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
    1. Re:Heh... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Mergers don't always do good things to stock prices. have you been watching the AOL stock plunge after the Time-Warner merger?

    2. Re:Heh... by Smack · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mergers tend to make one go up and the other down. Guess you bet on the wrong one... :)

    3. Re:Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not if you bought it at 19. :)

    4. Re:Heh... by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      Mergers tend to drive up the price of the company being acquired, but hammer the price of the company doing the buying... I haven't looked in the last half hour, but ANDN was doing A LOT better than LNUX so far today...

      Why?

      VA Said that they are giving ANDN holders .4 someodd shares of LNUX for each share of ANDN they own. So long each share of ANDN is worth less than 40% of the share price of LNUX, Andover's a great buy for people trying to make a quick buck.

      BUT, if you buy Andover at 40, and people sell off LNUX until it hit's, say 80, then you've just done a magnificent job at losing money....

      ANDN shareholders are probably happy right now. LNUX ones should tread carefully, unless they're in it for the long-haul.

    5. Re:Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't assume it's a roller coaster ride.

      You might discover there aren't many investors willing to pay for your ride back up, after the dramatic plunge that's in progress.

  12. Sorta puts that postponed Larry Augustin interview into a new light, eh?

    BTW, you are opening yourselves to a lot of jokes by saying "Creative control...remains where it's always been".
    --
    Java banners:
    Bad for users because Java kills Netscape

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  13. OPEN SOURCE JOINING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STAR (as in hot young actress) WARS

    chapter vi
    a story of tender love



    natalie portman has returned to her home town of albany new york to rescue her friend, mae ling mak, from the clutches of the vile gangster, naked & petrified guy.

    little does natalie know that the evil open source empire, led by esr, has begun construction on a new sendmail daemon.

    once completed, this new daemon will spell certain doom for the natalie portman fan-club, ending their means of sending fan-mail...


    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


    open source man arrives at the development house. workers are scuttling about attempting to look busy.

    project leader: open source man, this is an unexpected pleasure. we are honored by your presence.

    open source man: you may dispense with the pleasantries, project leader. i am here to put you back on schedule.

    project leader: i assure you, open source man, my men are working as fast as they can.

    open source man: perhaps i can find new ways to motivate them!

    project leader: the new sendmail daemon will be completed on schedule!

    open source man: esr does not share your optimistic appraisal of the situation.

    project leader: but he asks the impossible! i need more volunteers!

    open source man: then perhaps you can tell him when he arrives here.

    project leader: esr is coming here?!

    open source man: that is correct, project leader, and he is most displeased with your apparant lack of progress.

    project leader: we shall double our efforts!

    open source man: i hope so, project leader, for your sake. esr is not as forgiving as i am.


    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


    thank you.

  14. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and I can't really talk about it!

    Brought to you by FirstPostBot ¦|

  15. More prizes... by jyak · · Score: 1

    Does this mean you will give away workstations now? :)

  16. A few thoughts... by dougman · · Score: 4

    First, I like the idea of Andover and VA Linux marrying. Both companies seem to be to be of the rare breed that "get it", and seem to do the right thing in almost all circumstances.

    I'm wondering how this would affect the potential for Slashdot in the future to on it's own, or in partnerships, expand into other subject areas with its brand of site design and format. Granted, with the emergence of the open source Slash engine and PHPSlash, dozens of Slashlings are sprouting up everywhere (my own site included).

    I guess I was just thinking at some point down the road that a "portal" or "index" of Slash-based sites covering a wide array of subject areas would emerge, either under the direct auspices of SlashDot, or some other party...I'm not sure how this acquisition would affect that scenario, tho.

    Either way, I'm not disaffected. I think it's a great merger and I can't wait to see the results of the open Slash engines on the 'net.

    1. Re:A few thoughts... by doodzed · · Score: 3

      >>First, I like the idea of Andover and VA Linux >>marrying. Both companies seem to be to be of the >>rare breed that "get it", and seem to do the >>right thing in almost all circumstances.

      I met most of the VA crew including Larry a few years ago and was impressed. They do get it. Both the business and the linux side.

      They are the only company who I would buy an assembled computer from. They do it right. The machines that we bought from them run 100% stable and have never given us problems. They are not alway the cheapest, but the quality AND support we got was worth it.

      On the personal side they were doing linux before it became fashionable. They also tend to know what is going on in the community. Recently they have been hiring like mad, snagging developers(ie. Raster and Mandrake) like crazy. Not all of these guys are as high profile, but a lot of them are really important. Few other companies contribute as much as them even though they are not a software house.

      --
      It's not the size of your stack that matters, it's how you push and pop
    2. Re:A few thoughts... by jaylubo · · Score: 1

      Promise me one thing....

      No cheesy e-commerce ads for the superbowl.

  17. humor by Signal+11 · · Score: 3
    Creative control of Slashdot will remain where it always has been.

    With the auto-posting perl scripts?

    1. Re:humor by tono · · Score: 1
      Creative control of Slashdot will remain where it always has been.

      With the trained chimps and grits boy?

      --
      cheese logs keep my wang warm at night.
  18. Andover sale by a9db0 · · Score: 1

    Quite frankly I was surprised that I read about this hours ago on CNNfn before any notice ever appeared here. I even submitted a story to get it reported here.

    The critical question remains - does the editorial control agreement that Rob and Jeff have with Andover transfer intact to VA?

    --
    -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
    1. Re:Andover sale by chromatic · · Score: 1


      Rob is on the Andover Board of Directors. (See the SEC filings.) I think they call him "Mr. Malda". So don't worry too much.

      --

    2. Re:Andover sale by a9db0 · · Score: 1

      >>I think they call him "Mr. Malda"....

      But will he be on the board of VA? Will his contractual agreemeents for editorial control and continued involvement remain in force? Those are the important questions for the community here.

      --
      -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
    3. Re:Andover sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Those are the important questions for the community here."
      It's a website there's millions of others. Damn there's still Usenet. Honestly Usenet can be a lot better than this website. No moderators, no one acting like they run the place, or if they do you can laugh real hard.

  19. CNN Entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN Entertainment

    Thank you.

  20. ZDNet has an article as well.. by BilldaCat · · Score: 2

    It can be found here.

    --
    BilldaCat
  21. The Future of Slashdot? by 348 · · Score: 5
    -- Consolidate the complementary networks of VA (including Linux.com, Sourceforge.net, and Themes.org) and Andover.Net (including Slashdot.org and Freshmeat.net) to create the Internet's leading destination for Open Source developers, with nearly two-thirds of the total traffic of major Open Source sites and putting the combined network in the top 100 web destinations worldwide;

    Oh boy, here it comes. All this is well and good, but how does it affect /.? This is not intended as flamebait but I think that since Andover bought /. The quality has gone downhill, mostly due to the increased traffic which also increases the trolls and the fray. When VA Linux takes over I'm curious how the flavor of /. Will change. Will added participation and content value come through more participation (on a massive scale)? Will the /. model change, part of what make slashdot so successful is the simplicity of the model. Time will tell, but I think that VA will add bureocracy and overhead to the site and change it in a way that takes it furthur from what has made it so great.

    Never knock on Death's door:

    --

    More race stuff in one place,
    than any one place on the net.

    1. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by mochaone · · Score: 4

      but I think that since Andover bought /. The quality has gone downhill, mostly due to the increased traffic which also increases the trolls and the fray

      I disagree. I think it's fashionable to wax nostalgic once something loses its "newness" or feeling of exclusivity. All I know is I keep coming back here 20 times a day to see what's going on becuase Slashdot does it better than any other site I know. Let's give them credit for working very hard to handle the explosive growth. They're working very hard and, in my estimation, getting better all the time.

      --
      Hates people who have stupid little sigs
    2. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by luge · · Score: 2

      Andover always struck me as a company that saw Linux as a money-making opportunity, and Rob's comments about their occasional early attempt to influence his content only affirmed that.
      VA, on the other hand, has always done the right thing by the community, and since it has always been a Linux company (unlike Andover, who were a failing "tech" company before /.) I think it's commitment is much more genuine. I can't imagine that they'd burden Rob with anything he doesn't want or need- Larry Augustin used to post here, ages and ages ago- he knows what this site is about.
      ~luge

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

    3. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by BenHmm · · Score: 4

      you're not making sense...how does the ownership of a site make any difference when the site itself is created by its users.

      I don't want to denigrate the good Cmdr, Hemos et al, but their role is actually quite limited to keeping the thing running...it's the users that make the content. VA linux - or anyone else -can't change any of that.

      If the quality has gone downhill because of increased traffic, that isn't because andover is driving the traffic here - just that slashdot is good, and people just want to come along and join in.

    4. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by snookums · · Score: 1

      Perhaps more participation will not be a bad thing. I forsee a future in which the existing section structure of /. is more strongly emphasised. If people only read (and commented on) those sections that interested them, the signal-to-noise ratio should go back up.
      To break things up like this requires a certail critical size of readership as a whole, to ensure that the current lively discussion continues in each of the various sections. Pulling in VA customers/associates might push things over the line.

      Rodd

      --
      Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
    5. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      I suspect the increased traffic (and the trolls, etc. it brings) are due more to the increasing prominence of Linux than they are to the purchase of /..

      --
      The cake is a pie
    6. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by loom · · Score: 1

      Actually if you look at the comments on linux.com to be any indication, you'll see that the readership is indeed different. A lot of first time linux users there... but somehow I can't be sure if this is a good thing or a bad one for slashdot.

    7. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by Stephen · · Score: 2
      I think that since Andover bought /. The quality has gone downhill, mostly due to the increased traffic which also increases the trolls
      I almost agree, except that is it anything to do with Andover? Wouldn't that increase in traffic have happened anyway?
      Stop Lights Timed For 35mph Are Also Timed for 70mph.
      17.5mph, surely, not 70mph? But that's not such a useful observation... :)
      --
      11.00100100001111110110101010001000100001011010001 1000010001101001100010011
    8. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by AeiwiMaster · · Score: 1

      Regarding the quality of news on slashdot.

      We all know on slashdot they post the news
      they find interesting.

      The problem with this is that
      people change interests.

      We have been seeing a lot more business new
      after /. was brought by Andover.net and the
      Andover, RedHat and VA linux IPO.

      I also run a weblog called FreakTech
      on http://sunsite.auc.dk/FreakTech/

      Here I have some guide lines to stay focused.
      1) Revolutionary Technology.
      2) Always include a link to more info.
      3) The link should lead to a page
      which explain the technology detailed enough
      to understand how it works.

      This means you will not find most breaking news here.
      Becours they normally don't include the detailed explanation.

      But you will find interesting and educating reading.

      I have recently move the weblog to a database
      and add subjects filters and discussion.

      And a moderating system where every registered user can
      moderate is planed.

      Knud

    9. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with your theory is that this site is NOT created by it's users. The flamebait that gets posted as the topics for each day's discussion is determined by a few people with Banner click-through revenue on their mind.

      The users just supply the flames.

    10. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by JordanH · · Score: 2
      • Andover always struck me as a company that saw Linux as a money-making opportunity, and Rob's comments about their occasional early attempt to influence his content only affirmed that.

        VA, on the other hand, has always done the right thing by the community, and since it has always been a Linux company (unlike Andover, who were a failing "tech" company before /.) ...

      VA is not just a money-making opportunity? It could be argued that now it's VA that is the failing "tech" company. They've still failed to produce a profit, right?

      Weren't you even a little concerned about Larry Augustin's answers in the recent Slashdot interview. He appeared to dodge at least one pointed question about lack of support for AMD processors and it's relationship to Intel's investment in VA. But, read the whole thing, he sure comes off as a businessman interested in making money first and foremost. In fact, the publicly traded nature of VA probably requires a fudiciary responsibility on Augustin's part to try and make money. Nothing wrong with this. I'm just pointing this out to you as you seem to believe differently.

      I think clues to the motivation for this merger can be found in this interesting article.

      Disclaimer: I work for Compaq. I have absolutely NOTHING to do with PC or PC Server sales marketing, support or service. However, I do work for Compaq. Compaq DOES view itself as a direct competitor to VA, so take this into account when reading the above.

      For the record, Compaq is a company concerned primarily with making money. I don't deny it and I'm not casting aspersions in the direction of VA Linux for also being such a company.


      -Jordan Henderson

    11. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      I TOTALLY AGREE. WE SHOULD NOT WORRY ABOUT ANDOVER CONTROLLING CONTENT. PEOPLE SHOULD STOP TALKING ABOUT THAT AND INSTEAD START READING THE MAIN ARTICLES MORE. AND ALSO CLICK THE BANNERS. THEY ARE COOL. REMEMBER, YOU CONTROL THE CONTENT, NOT US, I MEAN ANDOVER.

      Jazilla.org - the Java Mozilla

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    12. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by Uart · · Score: 1

      Slashdot HAS NEVER been a good source of news. Why? It is opinionated, it's stories are usually just a short summary and links to the real story. But that doesn't stop me from coming back, why? Because of the community, the people like you and me, (even karma whores) make this site special. I call yell scream and otherwise tell you all my opinion on whatever, and if you care, you'll read it.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    13. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by zebul0n · · Score: 1


      sorry to say this but:
      Aeiwi is a crappy search engine. I see no future there.

      Zeb

    14. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was the X10 "opportunity" before or after andover.net?

    15. Re:The Future of Slashdot? by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      I wonder if the moderator who moderated that post as "redundant" realized it was satire.

      Jazilla.org - the Java Mozilla

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  22. Good match by Hydrophobe · · Score: 1

    Makes sense to marry the linux.com domain with the top Linux content and community sites.

    Congratulations all around.

  23. andover taken into the fold. by AdamT · · Score: 1

    Well I don't mind saying I'm delighted VA Linux is
    going to be the senior partner in this arangement.
    No offence to the slashdot folk or the freshmeat
    guys (guy?) - I'm just pleased to see the 'heavy hitters' of Linux
    content under the banner of a company thats proved
    itself capable of more than just buying other people.
    Congrats to slashdot for making andover buyable :)

    --
    ... with eskimo chains i tatto my brain all the way...
  24. Creative Control? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To have Creative Control one would Imply Creativity. HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAA Oh wait ::wipes a tear from his eye:: where was i.... BHWHWHAHahhahahahHahaHahAHhaHAhHahhAhha

  25. Great day in the morning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well...it would seem you need a scorecard to keep track of all this stuff. At least VA Linux has a concrete product to generate revenue with.

    My advice to all of the shareholders is to SELL SELL SELL. I'm not a wall street genius (hell I'm not even a wall street nudnick) but I see no way that these/this company can generate revenues that will justify its' marketcap.

    -Anyone interested in filing a class action suit against the Nethack dev team for causing sleep depravation please email frank_rizzo000@hotmail.com. If those nit-wits can sue AOL for 8 billion I figure we can get a couple mill from the nethack coders

  26. Congratulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a feeling something like this was in the works. There has has been more businesses, more linux all over the place. I bought at 56. I should of bought more at 26. Linux WILL continue to expand in 2000!

  27. Congrats, guys... by SEE · · Score: 4

    But of course you're now going to have to fire Jon Katz, because now you're one of those big media conglomerates... ;-)

    Steven E. Ehrbar

    1. Re:Congrats, guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, now Jon Katz gets to up and shoot himself.

      Anybody into taking a collection for the gun?

    2. Re:Congrats, guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be bad?

  28. hopefully things will change for the better... by Mr.+T · · Score: 1

    I am concerned that creative control will remain where it has always been (since the Andover takeover)... in the not-so-capable hands of Andover.Net Editor-In-Chief, Robin "Roblimo" Miller. (Anyone for an article on "how to pick up chicks"?) VA has done a good job with Linux.Com, etc... hopefully this will "raise the bar" as far as Slashdot is concerned. I know this is almost cliche now, but I remember the *old* Slashdot... *sigh*.

  29. Humor/Hype by Duxup · · Score: 3

    So I'm at VA's site and I see the following press release titled:
    "VA Linux to Acquire Andover.Net in Most Significant Transaction in Linux History"
    I can't help but giggle a little at the hype. I appreciate that this important to me and allot of other /. users but the tittle just seems to imply allot more than there is to it. I'm trying to picture Mr. T (Linus) and such people running around calling people saying "Oh my god! This is 'Most Significant Transaction in Linux History'"
    Sometimes corporate hype is just too darned funny to take seriously.

    1. Re:Humor/Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is 'Most Significant Transaction in Linux History'" Sometimes corporate hype is just too darned funny to take seriously.

      I was not going to reply to this, bearing in mind the hostile reception my previous postings have received from the long-haired 15 year old "open source" Linux zealot brigade, but this time I cannot stay quiet while the profession and science of marketing is mocked and trivialised in this cruel, insensitive and hurtful way.

      Do you guys have any idea what is involved in obtaining a marketing qualification ? The sheer volume of hard work is incredible, and unlike "open source" zealots, there is no "respect from your peers" or "kudos from the community" to be had. Instead we are villified by the very people we are trying to assist.

      You describe our work as "hype". This is like calling Linux a program. or X11 a gui. They are both ways of life, just like being a marketeer is, and are equally valid.

      This IS the most significant transaction in Linux's long and chequered history (which I have been following since the very beginning over 2 years ago), and to laugh at it is to trivialise the extreme importance.

      By laughing at the marketers, you demean yourselves, and make yourselves look stupid to the average joe consumer, when it is your JOB to try and impress him with innovative great software

      As a highly respected prectitioner of the science of marketing, I will not be argued with when I say, Without marketing, Linux is nothing.

      Once again my "open source" opinions are free. (Although I seem to be fighting a losing battle)

      dmg

    2. Re:Humor/Hype by astrophysics · · Score: 1

      >Without marketing, Linux is nothing.

      For those of us who have been using Linux since slackware or before, Linux was something well before there was any marketing. And I beleive it will continue to be something long after the marketing goes away.

      Even if the buzz word becomes old, Linux stocks plunge, and Linux companies are bought and thrown away by MS, I can still happilly run linux. And since Linux was actively developed before any marketing, I venture to guess that it will continue to be developed after the marketing.

    3. Re:Humor/Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, you make some good points about the need for a lot more respect of marketing in the Linux community.

      But you do the message you mean to deliver a disservice you also say "the very beginning over 2 years ago," which calls into question your cluefulness. I bought one of the first commercial Linux distributions, the Yggdrasil CD-ROM distribution, back in 1993. Linux has a significantly longer commercial history than two years.

    4. Re:Humor/Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Without marketing, Linux is nothing.

      Well, that's logical coming from a practitioner
      of the science(?) of marketing.

      But honestly, you marketroids didn't latch
      on until you smelled money and by then
      Linux was ALREADY *huge*!

      Admit it Mr. Scientist. You're just a fucking
      parasite.

      You of all people are trying to claim credit
      for what came about from a couple decades
      of hard work. No. The only thing you're gonna
      do is make certain distributions suck.

      Don't break your arm patting yourself on the
      back. You've just offended several million
      people. "Marketing scientist" indeed!

    5. Re:Humor/Hype by Sludge · · Score: 2

      Yes, you WILL be argued with. Backing up a statement such as 'Without marketing, Linux is nothing', by informing readers of your accomplishments and respect-status is NOT the same as providing examples and reasons.

      By the way, the very beginning of Linux was not two years ago. My own personal first encounter with Linux was five years ago, and from what I can rememeber, it was fairly fleshed out then.

      Linux existed before it was for sale.

    6. Re:Humor/Hype by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1

      Sometimes corporate hype is just too darned funny to take seriously.

      Yeah, I know what you mean. I thought the most significant transaction in Linux history occured when Linus Torvalds was conceived.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    7. Re:Humor/Hype by Gill+Bates · · Score: 1
      This IS the most significant transaction in Linux's long and chequered history (which I have been following since the very beginning over 2 years ago), and to laugh at it is to trivialise the extreme importance.

      I hate to be the one to break it to you, but Linux's "long and chequered history" goes back a bit further than 2 years ago.

      Just because the "marketroids" didn't discover it until 2 years ago doesn't mean it didn't exist before then.

    8. Re:Humor/Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without marketing, Linux is nothing.

      Yeah, right. Just like there was no Internet before marketing people came and put little e's and i's everywhere and called it their own creation.

      So get a clue. It's silly to define the existence of something via the amount of marketing crap (or brainwashing lies if you will) it generates...

    9. Re:Humor/Hype by double_h · · Score: 1

      hostile reception my previous postings have received from the long-haired 15 year old "open source" Linux zealot brigade

      If you're going to draw such generalities, I should start out by establishing that I am 29, short haired, and have been a full-time paid programmer and/or admin for the past 5-6 years.

      This is like calling Linux a program. or X11 a gui. They are both ways of life, just like being a marketeer is, and are equally valid.

      No. Linux is not "a way of life". It is an OS kernel. Neither is X11 "a way of life". If you consider marketing a way of life, you definitely need to get out more.

      This IS the most significant transaction in Linux's long and chequered history (which I have been following since the very beginning over 2 years ago), and to laugh at it is to trivialise the extreme importance.

      First off, I will join everyone else in laughing at you over the statement "over 2 years ago". I first became exposed to Linux in 1994 and it was already a very active community at that time.

      By laughing at the marketers, you demean yourselves, and make yourselves look stupid to the average joe consumer, when it is your JOB to try and impress him with innovative great software

      As a Linux advocate, it is my "job" to want the best for the evolution of Linux, and public perception of same. In my eyes, that means supporting the efforts of people like Linus, Richard Stallman, and Bruce Perens. It also means pointing out snake oil when I see it -- and laughing at the perpetrators of same as often and as loudly as possible.

      As a highly respected prectitioner of the science of marketing, I will not be argued with when I say, Without marketing, Linux is nothing.

      I'll bet you'd be even more respected if you spelled "practitioner" correctly. Quite seriously, for someone who has worked so hard to enter the hallowed halls of a qualified marketing, your spelling, grammar, punctuation, and command of the English language all leave something to be desired.

      In conclusion, I have to wonder whether your post is in fact a troll - if so, it is a brilliantly funny, clever one. If, on the other hand, you are completely sincere in everything you've written, then I will leave you with one thought: if your job is to market Linux effectively, that means marketing it not just to "joe average consumer", but also to the kind of people who read Slashdot and use Linux already - in other words, the kind of people who think that marketers and PR people are by and large, jackasses.

    10. Re:Humor/Hype by oldmanmtn · · Score: 1
      but this time I cannot stay quiet while the profession and science of marketing is mocked and trivialised in this cruel, insensitive and hurtful way.

      Well, you could, you just chose not to.

      Calling this "The Most Significant Transaction in Linux History" may be accurate, but it's also pretty silly. I am easily the most significant engineer sitting in my office, but since there is only one chair...

      By laughing at the marketers, you demean yourselves, and make yourselves look stupid to the average joe consumer, when it is your JOB to try and impress him with innovative great software.

      None of this makes any sense. Where do you get off suggesting that we aren't "Joe Consumer"? I buy stuff all the time. I also see ads on TV, billboards, the web, etc, and I frequently laugh at them.

      Let's say for the sake of argument that none of us are "Joe Consumer". That implies that whoever "Joe Consumer" is, he ain't reading this. So, how would he be aware of our mocking, and hence able to think us stupid?

      The rest of that paragraph is pure non sequitur.

      This IS the most significant transaction in Linux's long and chequered history (which I have been following since the very beginning over 2 years ago.

      2 years ago? I've been using Linux for about 7 years now. This is not meant as your typical geekish dick waving; it is meant to illustrate that you're working from a rather different context than many of us.

      As a highly respected prectitioner of the science of marketing, I will not be argued with when I say, Without marketing, Linux is nothing.

      "Highly respected" by whom? Other marketers?

      "Will not be argued with"? Guess again, you pompous twit. Without marketing, those stock prices probably wouldn't be as high as they are (if there were any public Linux companies in the first place), but Linux would still be a stable, widely-used operating system.

      --
      - Old Man of the Mountain ---- "I want to disturb my neighbor"
    11. Re:Humor/Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marketing poeple fall for their own tricks all the time: e.g. look at the cars they buy. is a fossil fuel guzzeling truck of a 4wd really necessary for commuting or do they really intend to do a desert crossing (love the snorkel-air intake too, you never know when you might need to drive up a river).

  30. First haiku! by Frank+Sullivan · · Score: 5

    Creative control stays
    with Anonymous Cowards,
    Natalie Portman

    ---

    --
    Hand me that airplane glue and I'll tell you another story.
    1. Re:First haiku! by Double+A · · Score: 1

      A haiku should have
      five syllables first, and then
      seven, then five more.

    2. Re:First haiku! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should also make
      some kind of reference to
      one of four seasons.

  31. Why why why? by Rombuu · · Score: 2

    So what the hell does a hardware company need with a company that provides content? Why does VA think it can run Andover better than Andover? Do VA's shareholders benefit from this?

    (Note, these are all rhetorical questions... the answer is, simply, that "Internet companies" have higher stock multiples, and VA will get a nice bump in their stock price with this).

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    1. Re:Why why why? by Cool+Hand+Luke · · Score: 1
      Maybe they've seen how much space /. devotes to all things Linux? Maybe /. should replace its tagline: "News for Linux Geeks. Stuff that matters (to Linux Geeks)."?

      VA could point to /. and call it a Linux discussion site.

      BTW, shouldn't ./ be a .com now, instead of an .org?

      George Lee

    2. Re: Re:Why why why? by Cool+Hand+Luke · · Score: 1
      Not that /. doesn't discuss other topics. It just seems that there's more discussion of Linux than anything else (other than N. Portman...) ;)


      George Lee

    3. Re:Why why why? by Chang · · Score: 1

      Actually, it looks like the news got out early.

      VA was up 30 points yesterday, and now those people are profit taking this morning.

    4. Re:Why why why? by irix · · Score: 2

      Also becuase Andover's stock has benn on a one-way downhill slope since it opened. It was only a matter of time before it slipped below the opening amount.

      Now VA has all of these properties and the people at Andover (incl /.) are rich again.

      I guess we can look forward to lots of anti-VA stories being posted now. Riiiight.

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  32. Too powerful? by Smack · · Score: 2

    Is anyone else disturbed by this conglomeration of power? Andover has already bought most of the good Linux sites. VA Linux is busy sucking up the others, as well as other random companies. If Red Hat merges with VA someday, won't all our eggs be in one basket?

    1. Re:Too powerful? by Double+A · · Score: 1

      As long as there are eggs in the baskets of the Free Software Foundation etc, we'll be safe from Big Bad Corporations.

    2. Re:Too powerful? by colinscott · · Score: 2
      Not really. I try to get news from a variety of sources. I admit to having Slashdot as my homepage at home and work, but I try to keep up with Linux, Open Source/Free Software, and general computing news from other sources. The internet is large enough to find a lot of information in different forms and with different perpectives.

      I think the very nature of our community prevents a centralist monopoly of information. If we freely share one set of ideas (code), we also freely share other ideas as a consequence. Any one company trying to do this is going to alienate the one thing that makes our community different. That's us. The people who use Linux, FreeBSD etc do so because it works, and they have the freedom to use it. These people already reject the centralist view by not using the software of our favourite monopoly. They'll have no problem rejecting a monopoly of information like this, and starting new news sources.


      Colin Scott

      --
      Colin Scott If you build it, they will be dumb...
    3. Re:Too powerful? by Swinners · · Score: 1
      Is anyone else disturbed by this conglomeration of power?... won't all our eggs be in one basket?

      Yes, this thought occurred to me too. However, I'm less concerned with power than with the eggs-in-one-basket aspect. Open Source is about distributing control as well as effort, and I feel a little uneasy about so much Open Source work being held in one physical location and in one legal jurisdiction.

      Sourceforge is superb, and so is vacuuming up hundreds of OSS projects. All those projects in one server room? Scary.

    4. Re:Too powerful? by akintayo · · Score: 1

      Slashdot and Freshmeat may be popular, but are they really influential. Slashdot is basically a concentrator of relevant news, the majority of its 'articles' are links to other places and the bulk of its content is user submissions. And while respected, it is not revered by its users.

      Freshmeat provides news about new software programs, again information that is available from other sources.

      VA Linux is a small maker of computers, again there are alternatives. In fact most people use the alternatives.

      The only troubling merger I have seen is the purchase of Cygnus by Redhat, GCC is instrumental to Linux's survival. But even that is released under GPL.
      Bottom Line :- Any company that pisses on the Linux community is likely to face a backlash, so none will.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    5. Re:Too powerful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If Red Hat merges with VA someday, won't all our eggs be in one basket?"
      I don't know about our eggs but I run Slackware or Debian, and build all of my own systems. I have been looking at other URLs for technical news lately though.

  33. Congrats, guys... by luge · · Score: 3

    Frankly, I'd been occasionally worried about Andover's direction and commitment to free software, but I absolutely trust VA and their commitment, so in that sense I welcome VA's involvement. It also seems that since VA is getting so heavily into the media side of things themselves, this match makes a lot of sense and will reduce the squandering of resources by the movement as a whole. (server51 and sourceforge really just seemed like good ideas that didn't need to be competing against each other.)
    Good luck, Rob- I remember the days when I contemplated getting some CD's through your links so you'd get some spare change from CDNow. Glad to see things have changed for you all.
    ~luge

    --

    IAAL,BIANLY

  34. Becau$e,Becau$e,Becau$e, by 348 · · Score: 2
    "Andover.Net and VA are a perfect match," said Bruce Twickler, CEO of Andover.Net. "We both believe in the future of Open Source. We both believe that live software communities on the Net are more important than packages that ship once every three years and companies that simply intermediate between developers and users."

    Back the ethics truck up for a minute. I believe that Twickler and Augustin believe in the profit stemming from the future of open source. They are profit modivated period. That's their job, they have to make money for the investors and the bankers.

    Never knock on Death's door:

    --

    More race stuff in one place,
    than any one place on the net.

  35. Creative control... by donfede · · Score: 3
    Rob and others at slashdot. I (and so far the other posts) are happy for your success...

    But, regardless of the fact that you state "Creative control of Slashdot will remain where it always has been"... I find it difficult to believe that slashdot can really remain as independant as it was (especially when it was completely self run). I (and surely many others) come to slashdot because of the independant perspective presented by the editors and next by the readers. The quality/independance of the editors has already gone down since the andover purchase, I fear what will happen now that slashdot it owned by valinux...

    donfede

    1. Re:Creative control... by luge · · Score: 1

      What can they possibly make him do? Say VA machines are good? There really aren't any other conflicts of interest (that I can see), and even Linux.com (which had no independent history outside of VA) has remained completely free of bias (as far as I can tell.) Yeah, everybody likes to bitch about conglomerates, but complaints about this one seem to be completely unjustified- there is no evidence of prior control of their other sites, and they have always been OSS/free software fans, not johnny-come-latelies like so many other.
      ~luge(Disclaimer: This was written on an ass-kicking VA box!)

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

    2. Re:Creative control... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VA's in bed with DoubleClick

  36. Stock by Bad+Mojo · · Score: 1

    When does SlashDot IPO? I want to buy stock. Pretty please?


    Bad Mojo

    --
    Bad Mojo
    "If you can't win by reason, go for volume." -- Calvin
  37. server51 by dieman · · Score: 3

    Everyone knows this is all about server51. sourceforge.org is to become the nexus of opensource... With server51 in the picture, they saw an opportunity where there could be competition, not cooperation. I think that the server51 dudes and sourceforge dudes will be hooked up and all will be good.

    I dont think server51 had the hardware resources VA had. Just think.... the sourceforgenetwork. A whole ton of "mini" sourceforges that differ in setup and stuff like that. Heh.. perhaps not

    Perhaps there will be skinning of sourceforge :)

    Have a good one out to Andover and VA.

    --
    -- dieman - Scott Dier
  38. 50% of internet Linux destinations? by drnomad · · Score: 1
    They have now 50 percent of Linux destinations?

    Hope these guys aren't going for the monopoly-price?

  39. An hour is slow? by Duxup · · Score: 2

    Granted some important stuff is missed and comes much too slow and has been getting somewhat worse here. However I think an hour is pretty acceptable. If everything came up within a day of when the news broke I'd be quite content.

  40. No comment by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 3

    "...we're sorta restricted in what we can say..."

    "Creative control will remain where it's always been."
    --
    Java banners:
    Bad for users because Java kills Netscape

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    1. Re:No comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron.

      The reference to 'were sorta restricted...' is because its a stockmarket transaction and there are laws about saying certain things at certain times.

      Why is the linux community so paranoid?

      A less anonymous coward (slashdot.flames@herod.net)

  41. we need to see slashdot.COM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is about as commercial as it gets- Get rid of that .org !!!

    1. Re:we need to see slashdot.COM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it currently forwards to slashdot.org. How long till they just buy it from whoever owns it?

  42. Something I don't like about this... by Telcontar · · Score: 2
    "Consolidate the complementary networks of VA (including Linux.com, Sourceforge.net, and Themes.org) and Andover.Net (including Slashdot.org and Freshmeat.net) to create the Internet's leading destination for Open Source developers, with nearly two-thirds of the total traffic of major Open Source sites and putting the combined network in the top 100 web destinations worldwide."

    This means that one source is controlling 2/3 of all Open Source web pages! No one else hearing alarm bells ringing? It is really important to have no monopoly in the media, especially in this case where Open Source is going to have a strongly increasing influence on society.

    1. Re:Something I don't like about this... by chromatic · · Score: 2

      This means that one source is controlling 2/3 of all Open Source web pages!

      Start your own. No one here will stop you. It's what Rob and Jeff did, it's what Scoop did, it's what Joe P. did, it's what the guys behind Themes.org did. Hey, even Bruce did it, and he had some money already.

      Unless VA or Andover somehow make it so that people can't visit my site, I won't worry.

      --

  43. Reminds me of... by bobalu · · Score: 1

    Meet the new boss
    Same as the old Boss...

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  44. Should be bettter overall! by cruise · · Score: 2

    This can only be good news.

    IMHO Andover has done crap with the money earned from their IPO while companies like RedHat and VA Linux have taken their money and put it to good use.

    This makes me happy, andover hasn't made a penny while VA was in the black when they went public. Obviously Andover is getting the sweet end of the stick on this deal.

    As for creative control.. I think the Tacos of this {/. world} might be in for a shock when they suddenly are required to take some stock in the words they publish. I somehow do not feel VA-Linux-in-charge would stand so quietly over something like the /. "interview" and the severe disrespect towards the /. community's very basic and simple questions.

    Great news to hear... It can only mean more for /. with VA Linux in the picture.


    They are a threat to free speech and must be silenced! - Andrea Chen

  45. It would be nice but i don't think so by Duxup · · Score: 1

    I can't see a reason Andover (or now VA) would ever want to divest /. Holding all the chips to in that pile keeps their net worth nice and high, selling some off would do the opposite.

    1. Re:It would be nice but i don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, then why is 3com having an IPO for Palm? Its not all the chips, but its a hell-uva-lot of them...

    2. Re:It would be nice but i don't think so by Duxup · · Score: 2

      Because 3com, has had nearly 5 continious years of $ probs and needs the cash bad.

  46. Nice try, Grasshopper. by The+HaikuMaster · · Score: 1

    Creative control
    is always held by the ones
    who hold the purse strings.

  47. Impressive Combination of Services and Talent by dave_aiello · · Score: 3
    I have to admit that I didn't understand what VA Linux meant when they said that they wanted to expand into Linux-oriented services. I originally thought that they would roll out services that supported their hardware business. Now, I see that they mean to provide services to support OpenSource development. This means that VA has undergone a pretty amazing transformation. Does this mean that the hardware end of the company is less strategically important than it was yesterday?

    I think that their track record of support for major Open Source projects ensures that the Slash Engine will continue to be a strong project. I'm not sure what this will mean for the project that is called Area 51. It will be interesting to see how SourceForge and Freshmeat interact.

    In any case, I think a combined VA-Andover has a tremendous supply of proven talent. They have the people in place to create a lot of new and interesting software and Web Sites. I think it will be interesting to see whether the majority of these people will stick around, or if they will leave, as many did when RedHat bought Cygnus.

    --

    Dave Aiello

    --
    -- Dave Aiello
  48. The biggest name in Linux? by 348 · · Score: 3
    "This acquisition moves VA Linux forward on the path to being the biggest name in Linux and Open Source,"

    This is flatly not true. If they wanted the biggest name in the Linux and Open Source community, they should have gone for:

    VA LINUX
    Or,
    VIRGINIA LINUX
    Or,
    VIRGINIA LINUX
    Or,
    V-I-R-G-I-N-I-A L-I-N-U-X
    Or,
    V-I-R-G-I-N-I-A L-I-N-U-X
    Or,
    ANDOVERDOTNET A WHOLELY OWNED SUBSIDIIARY OF VIRGINIA LINUX INCORPORATED
    Or,
    ANDOVERDOTNET A WHOLELY OWNED SUBSIDIIARY OF VIRGINIA LINUX INCORPORATED
    Or,
    A-N-D-O-V-E-R-D-O-T-N-E-T A W-H-O-L-E-L-Y O-W-N-E-D S-U-B-S-I-D-I-I-A-R-Y O-F V-I-R-G-I-N-I-A L-I-N-U-X I-N-C-O-R-P-O-R-A-T-E-D
    Or,
    A-N-D-O-V-E-R-D-O-T-N-E-T A W-H-O-L-E-L-Y O-W-N-E-D S-U-B-S-I-D-I-I-A-R-Y O-F V-I-R-G-I-N-I-A L-I-N-U-X I-N-C-O-R-P-O-R-A-T-E-D
    Or, A-N-D-O-V-E-R-D-O-T-N-E-T A W-H-O-L-E-L-Y O-W-N-E-D S-U-B-S-I-D-I-I-A-R-Y O-F V-I-R-G-I-N-I-A- L-I-N-U-X I-N-C-O-R-P-O-R-A-T-E-D, O-W-N-E-R-S O-F S-L-A-S-H-D-O-T
    Or better yet,
    A-N-D-O-V-E-R-D-O-T-N-E-T A W-H-O-L-E-L-Y O-W-N-E-D S-U-B-S-I-D-I-I-A-R-Y O-F V-I-R-G-I-N-I-A- L-I-N-U-X I-N-C-O-R-P-O-R-A-T-E-D, O-W-N-E-R-S O-F S-L-A-S-H-D-O-T

    Never knock on Death's door:

    --

    More race stuff in one place,
    than any one place on the net.

    1. Re:The biggest name in Linux? by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      How about something like this?
      VVVVAAAA
      VVVVAAAA
      VVVVAAAAAA
      VVVVAAAA
      VVAAAA

  49. Wired News article....$850 million!?! by mdemeny · · Score: 1
    The Wired News article stating the true value of the deal is available here

    What does that work out to per Slashdot reader, I wonder?

  50. This would be great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... for Beowulf clusters running slash!

    thank you

  51. What does this mean to Andover shareholders? by monaco · · Score: 2

    I'm not really financially-oriented, so could someone please explain what happens to Andover shareholders?

    They get .425 VA Linux shares per Andover share, but then the press release mentioned something about cash payments?

    1. Re:What does this mean to Andover shareholders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As per SEC regulations, current Andover shareholders get hot grits poured down their pants.

      thank you

    2. Re:What does this mean to Andover shareholders? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 2

      > something about cash payments?

      $3.81/share, I believe.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  52. Is there an accountant in the house? by sethg · · Score: 2

    Can anyone suggest why VA is accounting for this as a purchase? I heard that many de facto buy-outs are accounted for as a "pooling of assets", because then it doesn't go on the books as an expense for the purchaser. Have the rules for this kind of thing been tightened recently, or does VA have some advantage in accounting for this as a purchase?
    --
    "But, Mulder, the new millennium doesn't begin until January 2001."

    --
    send all spam to theotherwhitemeat@ropine.com
    1. Re:Is there an accountant in the house? by LLatson · · Score: 2

      My _guess_ is that they don't really want to make money right now. From the little I remember of my Accounting 101 class, companies have several years to prove they can make a profit. It is therefore to their advantage to _avoid_ a profit for the first few years, avoid paying taxes on any income, and build their business up. This of course will have to change within the next two or three years, but for now, they are tax-free.

      Someone correct me if I'm wrong, please...
      LL

      --
      "If you are falling, dive." -Joseph Campbell
    2. Re:Is there an accountant in the house? by davelee · · Score: 2

      Pooling of interest is a "dirty word" in the M&A market at the moment. The SEC and other regulatory agencies have cracked down on it due to how it distorts the balance sheet and earnings per share. Of course, if both acquirer and acquired are both gushing losses and investors don't care, there's no need to piss off the regulators as well -- Pooling of interest has no advantages in that case. Regardless, pooling can only be done when you have a merger of equals. In this case, VA Linux is significantly larger, at about $5 BN in market cap. Therefore, it can only be accounted for as a purchase.

    3. Re:Is there an accountant in the house? by xyzzy · · Score: 2

      You are correct, the rules have changed for this, in the last quarter or two (maybe the end of 1999). It's much harder if not impossible for companies to account for mergers as a pooling rather than purchase.

    4. Re:Is there an accountant in the house? by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      I believe the reason that Amazon continues to lose money is that they write all their acquisitions off as purchases.

      Why not? If you're not expected to make money, as the current mindset of the stock market seems to hold, then why make money when you just have to pay more taxes on it?

      Call it whatever you want... It doesn't matter to us. Just to VA's accountants.

  53. Re:First (non-haiku) haiku! by StaticLimit · · Score: 1

    That's not a haiku!

    Creative control stays is 6 sylables...
    Cre-a-tive con-trol stays!

    If you're going to post a first haiku, at least follow the structure ;)
    Here's a good site with some haiku style information. - StaticLimit

  54. You got it by Duxup · · Score: 1

    I agree, the term "merger" seems way inaccurate. From the info on VA's site it sounds more like an acquisition. Not to say that is somehow "bad" compared to a merger being "good." The end results can be positive or negative regardless of the acquisition or merger.

  55. server51 & sourceforge? by FaKe · · Score: 1

    What's going to happen with server51 of Andover and sourceforge of VA? They seem to have the same purpose and whatnot

    IMHO, I think server51 is a lot cleaner and more organized .. sourceforge seems like a mess to me when I browse randomly looking for stuff. Maybe the best direction for them to take is specializing s51 to a certain type of project, while making sourceforge the catchall of project hosting services.

    Regardless, we'll never know the real opinions of those being affected by this acquisition. Personally, it would be nice to know what scoop (freshmeat & s51) really thinks about this hoopla.

    1. Re:server51 & sourceforge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is my understanding that both projects will be terminated so VA Linux can concentrate on revenue-producing activities.

  56. Drivel (flame) by Jon+Peterson · · Score: 1
    VA Linux to Acquire Andover.Net in Most Significant Transaction in Linux History; Combined Network Creates the Leading Internet Destination in the Linux and Open Source Community

    Well, that's a load of fucking crap for a start.

    --
    ----- .sig: file not found
    1. Re:Drivel (flame) by Wah · · Score: 2

      What, pray tell, would be a larger transaction? It's skewed in the fact that the History of Linux isn't particularly long (esp when mixed with the word "transaction"), but I can't remember a bigger one. It's just PR speak anyway, filter it before you process it.

      --
      +&x
    2. Re:Drivel (flame) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      large != significant.

  57. "we're sorta restricted in what we can say" by Johnny+Bananas · · Score: 1

    Maybe this deal will increase editorial independence/integrity. You didn't hear that kind of statement from the media outlets of Time Warner afeter the AOL deal--they are far enough removed that they are just another independent journalist. On the other hand, there is always the shameless "news" on ABC . . .

    1. Re:"we're sorta restricted in what we can say" by um...+Lucas · · Score: 3

      That's GOOD?!?

      From now on, Slashdot, which has been actively covering every twist and turn with Redhat's and VA Linux's stock (which I personally got rather sick of) may need to stop and VA story when it comes time to announce earnings?

      This is BAD BAD BAD! Why can't many people see that?

      You get angry when AOL buys time/warner because they'll monoplize consumer content on the internet, and rejoice when ANDN takes over most of the good site and then gets bought by VA Linux, who will now oww 50%+ of the real Linux related sites.

      Short sited.

  58. Discussion now limited by SEC rules by dzerkel · · Score: 1

    we're sorta restricted in what we can say

    Slashdot, where you can talk about anything, as long as the SEC and VA Linux stockholders approve.

    Doesn't seem like a good trend to me. A few more mergers and the only people left on SlashDot will be people not restricted by SEC or non-disclosures (ie, trolls). Maybe corporate control of open discussion sites isn't such a good idea.

    Just mildly concerned...

    --
    "What's the point of going abroad, if you're just another tourist..."
  59. Editorial Control? I think not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The claim that editorial control will remain where it has been is absolutely true. It will remain in the hands of the people with the money.

    Witness the headline "a merger" ??? It was a flat-out buyout. Read some of the articles and press releases. VA only wants this so they can steer people into buying their products. The Augustin interview is only the beginning. Prepare to never see a mention of AMD on slashdot ever again!

    1. Re:Editorial Control? I think not... by JamesKPolk · · Score: 2

      You forget that the good Commander was probably very cautious in his contract negotiations with Andover.. he says he has a very secure contract, allowing him to keep control.

      Now, if you believe that he's lying, just to keep the audience... then I guess you should just go read another news source.

  60. What kind of pressure does this put on RedHat? by RedX · · Score: 1

    We now have 2 800 lb Linux gorillas that offer very similar services. RedHat and VA future business looks to revolve mainly around support, and they now both offer a Linux news/portal for the community (RedHat just announced WideOpen News). The main differences are that VA sells top-notch machines while RedHat offers the most popular(?) distribution. Will the ANDN/LNUX deal put pressure on RedHat to further differentiate themselves from the other 800 lb Linux gorilla by snapping up another company (those CORL rumors are popping up again)? I don't think they'll be sitting idle while another major player takes the lead. Interesting note, no mention of the ANDN/LNUX deal on WideOpen News.

  61. Arrgh by jued0001 · · Score: 1
    My eyes!!!

    =]

    --

    _______

    I just wish I could c:\format Internet

    1. Re:Arrgh by ethereal · · Score: 1

      The goggles do nothing!

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    2. Re:Arrgh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe...great episode.

  62. Yeah right... by fuerstma · · Score: 1

    Creative control of Slashdot will remain where it always has been.

    Matt: We're here live at a press confrence to announce the merger between Andover.net and VA Linux. Maybe I can get a question in... ROB!! ROB!! What do you have to say about the merger?

    Rob: No Comment

    --
    www.jackasscritics.com
  63. Re:The Future of /.? Traffic engineering, my boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Stop lights timed for 35 mph are NOT necessarily timed for 70 mph. Think about it. Cycle time matters.

    Lets simplify and use 30mph. Assume two lights 1/10th of a mile apart. At 30mph, 1/10th of a mile is 12 secs. If you assume a 1 minute cycle time with 5-second shoulders (and no left turn stuff to gum up the works:), the light ahead of you is red for 35-12 or 23 secs prior to your light turning green. Which means that if you leave right when your light turns green, you'd have to travel 23 secs back in time over that 1/10th of a mile before you were able to catch a green light at the next intersection. Which is some seriously major relativistic velocity (somebody else can play that Lorentz-Fitzgerald game - it's way to early here:). On the other hand, if you arrive late in the cycle on your first light, you can have speedup as much as you want with respect to your next light (since by the time you arrive late in the cycle, the next light is on). The behavior changes depending on cycle length, shoulder time, and propagation delay.

    In other news, timing lights for bidirectional travel is a nightmare, requiring cycle times = travel time. For a mile long stretch at 45 mph, that's a cycle time of 1'20", which is just barely long enough. For any shorter distance, stuff breaks down. Which is why one-way streets are such a good idea.

    Cycle time should properly vary depending on traffic load. Because the shoulder times are fixed relative to the traffic speeds and stopping distances (read: I live in Anchorage, and when it's slick, it's slick, which means we need damn long yellow lights:), cycle efficiency is linked to cycle length (longer cycles are more efficient). However, at times of low load, shorter cycles are preferable. Ignorning the shoulders, the odds that you will arrive at a green light are 50%. On the other hand, if you randomly hit a light your delay (if you have to stop) is, on average, equal to 1/4 cycle time. Which means that when travel time for individual vehicles matters more than throughput in vehicles per hour, cycle time should be reduced.

    Finally, propagation direction should change depending upon system load. At light to moderate loads, it makes sense for the next light down the line to turn green after (by propagation delay) the light you are at right now. During heavy traffic, however, that produces grid lock. You can't move because traffic is backed up from the next light. It turns green after your light turns green, but by the time those people move your light turns red. During heavy traffic, you actually want the lights to turn green way ahead of you first, and for the synchronization to be linked to the wave propagation speed of starting cars from a standstill. I've always been curious at what traffic density the optimal light propagation pattern is completely synchronous (all green at the same time).

    Here in Alaska we're trying to figure out the proper propagation pattern for avalanches (the only road south out of Anchorage has been closed since Sunday night - it's been hit by a dozen or so avalanches, including two that covered more than a thousand feet of roadway each to a depth of up to 10 feet. A bulldozer operator was killed Tuesday when a second avalanche came down a chute and hit is D6 at ~125mph, knocking the dozer several hundred yards. They're finding 150-year old trees in the debris piles. Then we got 120mph winds from a chinook last night!:)

    Lights timed for 30 mph are also timed for 5 c!

    I'm not a traffic engineer, but I play one on /.

  64. Creative control remains...Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it's sad. It means more jonkatz, more doubleposting, more posts without basic fact checking, another-company-embraces-linux stories etc.
    I wish VA took control and hired some real editors and Cmdr and Co. would continue the programming side.
    Either way, noone has control over the comments which make this site what it is. Amen.

    (Oh no, I sound like a karma whore, help me !)

    Free Jon's computers !

  65. Right on! by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 2
    I finally own a piece of slashdot... :-)

    New XFMail home page

  66. .org? Hardly. by c_monster · · Score: 1

    Not to bash the VA/Andover thing, which is a fine idea, but I just realized that some of our favorite .org sites aren't even close to non-profit anymore. Slashdot, Themes.org, what's next? Gnome.org owned by Red Hat? Just me being a domain-name purist a little too late. :)

    --
    Read the full text my book Perl for the Web
    1. Re:.org? Hardly. by chandler · · Score: 1
      Gnome.org owned by Red Hat?

      bash-2.02$ /sbin/ping www.gnome.org PING gnome.labs.redhat.com (199.183.24.235): 56 data bytes

      "The romance of Silicon Valley was about money - excuse me, about changing the world, one million dollars at a time."

      --

      Visit

  67. I'm both happy and concerned by dsplat · · Score: 2

    The way I read the announcement, this is a good thing for the shareholders of both companies and is an indication that VA Linux is doing well as well as the fact that Andover.Net is an attractice company to purchase. I am also happy because I have confidence that VA Linux will let Andover.Net continue to do the things that I think everyone reading this appreciates. The combined company will have a bit more weight to throw around as well and will be better able to weather shifts in the marketplace because of a broader base of services.

    Okay, enough hype. All of what I've said may be and probably is true. But I am still concerned. Can VA Linux manage the rate of growth that has come with it's success? And as other people have pointed out here, as open source companies merge, are they bigger competitors or more centralized targets?

    As long as viable new players with new ideas keep springing up and creating niches for themselves and the big players don't forget what makes their reputation in the open source community, I don't think I'll worry. If we end up with one behemoth as the only corporate player in the open source world, then I will suspect a problem. Not because that company got big; I hope that VA Linux and Redhat continue to grow. But any market that isn't spawning new ideas is dying.

    So my message to the open source companies is simple. Stay young and alive for as long as you possibly can. It's more fun and you'll have the support of a lot more open source developers. Don't grow at the expense of who you are. This merger has every sign of being the right direction.

    --
    The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  68. Is the biggest best? by HenrikN · · Score: 1

    Is the open source business like the web business, where the wínner takes it all?

  69. Re:Not a troll here. by kwsNI · · Score: 0

    I e-mailed LinuxFool earlier today about these and they have already made the changes. I have to admit that I was impressed with the turn-around time on that.

    kwsNI

  70. bran muffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Slashdot is a "business" now, when are the the people who submit stories going to be payed for their efforts? Why should anyone contribute their effort to slashdot when somebody else is profiting? I suppose somebody might say that Slashdot repays its readers by realeasing the Slash source to the community or something along those lines, but I could not care less about maintaining a perl codebase. But I digress. Finally, slashdot is no longer deserving of the ORG designation. Any thoughts?

  71. Methinks... by duplex · · Score: 1

    C|Net announced this as a takeover by VA Linux. Methinks is Slashdot now into spindoctoring its stories? I'm slightly concerned.

  72. I know a bit about /.'s future by sumana · · Score: 2
    I wrote an essay about what makes Slashdot popular, and I'm willing to send it to you (plain text, of course). Just email me and ask me about "Slashdot's Edge."

    --
    Ceterum censeo Microsoftam esse delendam.
    1. Re:I know a bit about /.'s future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not post it on a web page for all to see?

  73. wowsers by Evro · · Score: 5

    I thought the reason you guys (Rob & Jeff) decided to be bought (or whatever the technical term is) by Andover was because it wasn't a Linux company, so it wouldn't seem like you would be losing any partiality. I realize you guys and VA have been buddies for a long time (IIRC, most of Slashdot runs on VA Hardware, bought through the barter system [they get free ads, you get free hardware]... right?), plus, Rob's (one of) the webmaster(s) (or some dang thing) for Linux.com, which they own. So VA and Andover were probably already pretty chummy... but what prompted this? I.e., why?

    I don't know what you all are allowed to say, what with SEC restrictions and all that kinda stuff, but (how) will this affect Slashdot? Will we get even more editors (like the advent of Roblimo when Andover took over)?

    I'm just guessing, but I assume Mr. Malda is pretty high on the Andover totem pole. What's going to be his new position at VA Linux, or is he going to remain at his current position inside Andover?

    I think the Andover aquisition was a Good Thing, and VA seems like a nice company, so I guess this will also be a Good Thing. Then again, you know how the Open Source Community(tm) feels about monopolies...

    Any info from higher-ups would be appreciated... and if you can't say anything, then say that you can't say anything! Otherwise I will have hurt feelings...
    ___________________

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:wowsers by shaum · · Score: 1
      I thought the reason ... was because it wasn't a Linux company, so it wouldn't seem like you would be losing any partiality.
      I thought the idea was that they didn't want to ally with a specific distro; so being bought by Red Hat or Corel would have been problematic. But VA is distro-neutral; they might even bundle LinuxOne if you asked them to.

      (Okay, probably not. But you get the idea.)

    2. Re:wowsers by Evro · · Score: 2

      Linux.com used to say "Powered by Debian" at the top, and I believe Debian is Rob's favorite distro. Of course, Linux.com had to be powered by something, and ya can't hold somebody's personal preference against them really, so I guess this isn't a conflict of interest...

      Of course, if they really wanted to be "neutral" they could have put Linux.com on NT... lol.
      ___________________

      --
      rooooar
    3. Re:wowsers by Evro · · Score: 2

      Here's a Salon.com Article that mentions the same point I raised, about Rob saying he didn't want to be bought by a Linux company. I think it says he specifically turned down an offer from VA. But I read it a few hours ago...
      ___________________

      --
      rooooar
  74. Re:The Future of /.? Traffic engineering, my boy! by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Here's a simpler way to look at it:

    When you are surfing the green on a timed street, you are really riding a pocket of green that moves at N miles per hour. These pockets of green are moving through a sea of red. If you go too fast, you will slam into the red.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  75. wt? by Duxup · · Score: 1

    All I can say is "what the heck?"
    I thought the tittle of page was funny, I didn't know that somehow was some terrible statement aimed at marketing people everywhere?

    The idea that "Without marketing, Linux is nothing" seems a bit of a broad statement, considering without something (Linux in this case) to market, marketing is also nothing.

    Long before people were marketing Linux I was using it and enjoyed it (not an expert but I still had fun).

    I'm sure marketing people work hard and all, but they're marketing other people's work, and that's something also. Your implication that I somehow didn't appreciate the hard work some marketing people did to come up with that page is accurate though. I think marketing with such far flung statements like the tittle of that article draws away from any real information that might be in there.

  76. Not a good thing for consumer choice by Howard+Roark · · Score: 3

    While I like both VA Linux and Andover.Net, this is not a good thing for Linux consumers. Did anybody besides me notice that once Andover.Net took control of Slashdot that the ads for Copyleft disappeared and were replaced by ThinkGeek (which is owned by Andover). Now that VA Linux owns Slashdot what are the chances that we will ever see another ad for SGI or Penguin Computing?
    --
    Howard Roark, Architect

    --
    Howard Roark, Architect
    I believe in a Man's right to exist for his own sake.
    1. Re:Not a good thing for consumer choice by qnonsense · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how worried I'd be about the ads. That's not the point. Will we ever see another story about Penguin Computing?

      --
      There comes a time in every man's life when he must say, "No mother! I do not want any more Jell-O!"
  77. Really Disturbing, Not Unexpected by Skyshadow · · Score: 5
    Okay, I'm all for shameless capitalism, but...

    It seems to me that having a major community hubs like Slashdot and Freshmeat owned by a parent media company was bad enough. Having them owned by a particular producer of Linux products is downright scary. I'm sure that Rob & Co. will argue that content won't be effected. While they might believe this, I sort of doubt the reality of the claim.

    Bear with me here: It figures that Slashdot and Freshmeat are the main portals for Linux information. Therefore, they are the prime ground for advertising by Linux-related companies (especially OEMs). How many Penguin Computing or Indybox ads are we going to see here when VA is fully entrenched? They might not vanish outright, but smart money says that VA will slowly muscle them out.

    Not allowing (or rather, making it difficult for) other OEMs to post up their banner ads is just as bad as if VA imposed editorial restrictions. It also makes perfect sense from a business point of view to keep your competitors from advertising on your channels -- how many ABC superbowl ads did you see on FOX?

    I hope I'm wrong. It could be that the people at VA are more idealistic than the average business types. Even so, management can change -- this cloud will forever hang over Slashdot, Freshmeat and any other major community site which ever gets aquired by a large company.

    ----

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Really Disturbing, Not Unexpected by orabidoo · · Score: 2

      your major concerns are about the *banner ads* of all things? well, I read slashdot for the stories, not for the ads.... what I sure hope is that we'll keep seeing stories about SGI's linux boxes and everything else that is interesting but competes with VA-Andover.

    2. Re:Really Disturbing, Not Unexpected by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
      Yeah, but advertising does work. Consider: Do you buy Coke, Pepsi or Jolly Good Cola?

      Even if you've never clicked on a banner ad, you have to concede that having a majority of the top-traffic Linux sites owned by one OEM is a bit scary in terms of advertising opportunity. Were I, say, Penguin Computing, I'd be sweating right now.

      ----

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:Really Disturbing, Not Unexpected by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 1

      Banner ads? Pfft. I use junkbuster. Haven't seen a banner on slashdot or freshmeat in months.

    4. Re:Really Disturbing, Not Unexpected by orabidoo · · Score: 1

      actually, I don't buy any of them. but I see your point, and I see how advertising is (relatively) important. it just doesn't strike me as the first thing to worry about, in the list of potential dangers of the formation of a single large linux conglomerate.

    5. Re:Really Disturbing, Not Unexpected by synsear · · Score: 1

      My short two cents worth:

      Personally, if which ads are on slashdot doesnt matter to me, be they VA or any other.

      If any hardware vendor comes up with a decent new product it'll be posted ON slashdot, as always.

      So who really cares which banner is at the top of the page?

      It seems to me like people are just itching to make a big deal of Slashdots 'sell-out'.

      Sincerely,

      Synsear

    6. Re:Really Disturbing, Not Unexpected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...

      My favorite carbonated caffinated beverage is the local store brand equvialent to Dr. Pepper/Mr. Pibb.

      #2? Sunkist, simply because it's the only caffinated orange soda I can find

      I also have some store-brand lemon-lime in my garage right now, and several 2-liters of carbonated water (some unflavored, some with a a dash of artificial raspberry).

      And all these stupid ads for Quebec tourism on the TV have simply convinced me that I must become a military strongman, conquer the province, and deport everyone to Haiti. If I want to be insulted for being an English speaker and an American, I'll go to France, where at least they have decent wine.

  78. This would bother me a lot more... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

    ... if the Slash source hadn't been opened. As it is, if we feel that /. is compromised by their affiliation(s), and that compromise is disturbing enough, we can go start our own "FreeDot" or something.

    I'm willing, now that /. has 'put up', to stick with these guys and their little website that could. I probably would have even if the source hadn't been released, but I would have had agita about it.

    This is also an important reminder to those of you who _weren't_ whinging about the source release: you don't get something unless you ask for it, and you need to call bullshit when you smell it, that's the true rationalist way (no hypocrisy permitted at all, strict and harsh self-editing must be imposed).. You don't have to be a flaming dick about it, but a polite reminder as needed is a _good_ thing, don't forget that.

    Your Working Boy,

  79. Single point of failure convergence? by jabber · · Score: 2

    I know that in open source this is not a big concern (as far as it's continued existence is concerned) but, does this trouble anyone else?

    The interconnection of huge companies is one thing, as long as there are alternatives. But mindshare is another concern. I suspect that VA Sys is caught up in the mega-merger surge, and is gobbling up the major players in the open-source field. Expect fusion with RedHat next...

    The problem I see here is that with one false step, the reputation of open-source may be harmed. One large company controlling (effectively) the resources that the whole community relies upon (at this point) can be bought by... guess who?

    Now, I know that the GPL protects the source against exploitation, and that we got to where we are without the reliance on a central authority, but... The instrumental people behind the movement have been gobbled up by these companies in the same way as the smaller companies have been absorbed into larger ones. They're under NDA now. Some may leave, others like the money and corporate status.

    I'm getting the feeling that the grassroots movement is getting a new corporate domed stadium built over it.

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
  80. Re:First (non-haiku) haiku! by Frank+Sullivan · · Score: 3

    Please answer haiku
    with haiku! Why, you may ask?
    It is more polite.

    Yes, i miscounted
    syllables. It's too early
    for me to count well.

    No need to flame me.
    I'm not perfect, but at least
    admit my mistakes.

    What shall i do now?
    I'll gaze Medusa-like on
    Natalie Portman!

    Haiku is so cool.
    Even Natalie Portman
    jokes can almost work.

    What else can i say?
    Hemos sux? BSD rules?
    Katz is a windbag?
    ---

    --
    Hand me that airplane glue and I'll tell you another story.
  81. Had to hear about this on Reuters by WillAffleck · · Score: 2

    Geesh. I'm checking my morning news and stuff about Burning Man, and I come across this story about VA Linux buying out Andover.net ...

    Not that I'm complaining, mind you, it's a smart move for VA Research\\\\\\\\Linux Systems.

    --
    Will in Seattle
  82. The small fish gets eaten by the bigger fish, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of cartoon where the small fish gets eaten by the bigger fish which in turn gets eaten by the bigger fish, which in turn....

    I wonder how long before AOL-Time Warner buys VA?

  83. Re:The same place System 12 went. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

    One will be pushed off the gameboard. Guess which.

    Server51 will either be gobbled up, or forced off the map entirely, IMHO. VA doesnt have a "Department of Caring".


    Bowie J. Poag
    Project Manager, PROPAGANDA For Linux (http://propaganda.themes.org)

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  84. Time for a new Slashdot.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    With VA buying up Andover, there's now no really good OSS community news -n- chat location that's
    free from corporate bias.

    I like Slashdot. I like Andover. I like VA. I'm
    a shareholder in the last two. I just don't like
    the idea of VA owning Slashdot. There needs to be
    a vendor neutral location for Slashdot or the
    future replacement for Slashdot.

    -J

  85. It's a monopoly and it sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just when I thought VA's sourceforge was going to have some competition they go ahead and buy Andover. Dang!

    Competition is good and now VA is going to have a monopoly on the Opensource CVS hosting biz. Server51 was starting to look very promising with its pledge of paying developers $0.03 per click thru. I was thinking in a couple months time Sever51 would be eating SourceForge's lunch, but not now. Expect Server51 to be canned.

    Like I said above, competition is good for consumers (i.e. opensource developers in this case). But all hope is not lost, expect Red Hat and others to hop on the CVS hosting portal biz real soon now.

    What disappoints me most is that I was expecting more from Larry Augustin, I mean I was expecting VA's IPO wealth to allow them to do something innovative and shocking. I was expecting them to actually change the world. This merger is consolidation from a man who has run out of ideas and is desperate for his company to retain its overhyped and sky high market valuation. It is sad.

    Larry, you disapoint me.

    1. Re:It's a monopoly and it sucks! by greenrd · · Score: 1
      now VA is going to have a monopoly on the Opensource CVS hosting biz

      Not necessarily. Remember SourceForge is itself open-sourced. They do put their principles into practice.

      See also dmoz listings for Open Source hosting.

  86. Here we go........... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1


    A butterfly flutters its wings in an African savannah..

    Bowie J. Poag
    Project Manager, PROPAGANDA For Linux (http://propaganda.themes.org)

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  87. This is bad bad bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You bunch of wanking sellouts. Creative control will be where it has always been? Oh really? So you've been up VA's bunghole all along? Interesting.

  88. M$ on Merger by Jim+Tyre · · Score: 1
    REDMOND -- M$ is both delighted and saddened to learn of the proposed merger of VA Linux and Andover.net.

    M$ is delighted because the merger of a leading hardware provider with a leading information content provider demostrates to DoJ and Judge Jackson that M$ is not nearly the biggest monopolist on the block.

    M$ is saddened because the merger of a leading hardware provider with a leading information content provider might actually upset the careful mono^H^H^H^H and loyal user base of satisfied customers which M$ has worked so hard to cultivate over the years.

    M$ intends to ask the DoJ to investigate whether the VA - Andover merger is anti-competitive; but not until Judge Jackson rules that M$ really, really was serious when it argued that Linux is proof positive that there are viable alternatives to the Windows Operating System.

    As always, M$ remains committed to spinning the news however it best suits M$. Please direct all inquiries to borg@microsloth.com.

  89. Slashdot not linked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I first read about the article on Yahoo News. They get their feed from C|net. And, what was odd is that they mentioned Freshmeat (and linked to it) they mentioned Sambar (and linked to it) and some other Andover.net properties. But, even though Slashdot was mentioned like 4 times, they never once provided a link to it. Maybe C|net didn't want to get Slashdotted on the link? Anyhow, here's the link to the article:

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20000203/tc/200002 03309.html

  90. Reality Check by akintayo · · Score: 1

    VA Linux is NOT the most influencial player in the linux 'market'. I am sure it is not even the most popular hardware platform for Linux users, sure most of us want a VA machine - but can we
    afford it ?.

    Also I think that the software aspect is where the influence in Linux lies, RedHat buying Andover.Net would be more troubling. Or even IBM, Dell or one of the more popular hardware platforms. VA's purchase merely shores up against the coming of the really really big companies.

    --

    --
    Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
  91. Objectivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Conglomeration of media sources and corporate media ownership is a very big concern in the US right now. Companies who own the media can report the news as they see fit.

    How can Slashdot be a truly objective news source with VA controling it's strings. It wasn't a concern with Andover because they were also an information company, but traditionally - conglomerations have prevented - not helped - the disemination of non-biased information.

    Is VA just trying to bully future competition by controling one of the best places to advertize and expect non-biased information? Can competitors be expected to be taken seriously when advertizing on a site whose content is controlled by competition?

    Think about it. If Slashdot retains complete autonomy - they what value does it add to VA?

  92. Microsoft buys VA-Redhat for $5 billion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just see this headline the day after that merger goes through though. Microsoft is rubbing their fat little hands together. It is MUCH easier to destroy a unified force than a scattered bunch of Linux companies nipping at their feet. ;-) Money talks and shareholders have ALL the say in the matter. If Microsoft offered enough money they COULD buy "Linux".. period.

    1. Re:Microsoft buys VA-Redhat for $5 billion by hoegg · · Score: 1

      Not true. The GPL pretty much guarantees that Microsoft cannot just "buy linux." Not only that, if they buy Redhat, Caldera, Debian, SuSE, AND Slackware, all they've done is buy distributions. They still wouldn't "own" linux. The kernel and the source to all the GNU software would STILL fall under the GPL.

  93. Does Rob have a Golden Parachute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to recall that Rob Malda is entitled to receive a great deal of stock/cash pursuant to his employment agreement with Andover over the next few years, in part dependent on /. performance. If his employment agreement is like many I have seen, however, it may have in it a "golden parachute" provision entitling him to receive these amounts on an accelerated basis, which would be very good for him. Does anyone know whether this is the case?

    1. Re:Does Rob have a Golden Parachute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant receive stock/cash on an accelerated basis upon a "change in control" of Andover, which its acquisition by VA Linux should constitute.

  94. Creative Control of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Creative control of Slashdot will remain where it always has been.

    With the trolls, of course.

  95. Re:The Future of /.? Traffic engineering, my boy! by mal3 · · Score: 1

    See this is why I read Slashdot. You always get to hear from someone who knows way too much about an inane subject. Granted this time the info isn't really usefull at all, but sometimes it is, no matter what the slashdot editors do we'll still get this terminally cool stuff.

    --
    Non gratis rodentus anus
  96. Makes me sad... by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by cookieman.k:

    REDUNDANT comment ahead First when Andover took over Slashdot I felt like I have been punched into my stomach. I'm not happy at all with this thing also. There are some GREEDY_PEOPLE out there who think that every thing must be in one hand. This is not the right path... What can I say more(without complaining)?...:Keep up the good work guys!

  97. Hey Rob, Hemos!!! by Wah · · Score: 2

    I just saw you guys on CNBC for their merger coverage (quick pan over a convention floor). No mention of /., tho...

    --
    +&x
  98. Get out the Cutlery by INAN · · Score: 2

    Is it time to get ready to fork? It is still a bit premature, let's wait and see how things work out, but the code for most of these sites is GPL, as long as we have that then if things start to smell fishy then we run.

    Sounds reasonable?

  99. Re:First (non-haiku) haiku! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    haiku is japanese
    japanese and english are different
    shouldn't their be differences?

  100. Pfff... by bartok · · Score: 1
    Nonsense

    Both companies are not software companies. Andover is about content and VA is about hardware and services. There is nothing in this deal that would even remotely suggest such a theory.

  101. Re:First (non-haiku) haiku! by StaticLimit · · Score: 1


    Go and use the link
    On my earlier posting
    to find such info

    One suggestion is
    That english haiku should use
    a shorter format

    Such a format makes
    English Haiku similar
    to the Japanese

    This is because words
    in Japanese often will
    have more sylables

    - StaticLimit

  102. This reflects LinuxWorld's layout, too. by mhiller · · Score: 1

    I knew it'd be nothing but trouble when I saw at LinuxWorld yesterday that the VA Linux and Andover.net pavilions were so close to each other. :)

  103. No more slashdot teal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will slashdot get a facelift with better colors?
    I sure hope so.

    1. Re:No more slashdot teal? by vandoverslash · · Score: 1

      why so bitter?

  104. The Path by SaintRobinson · · Score: 1

    "This acquisition moves VA Linux forward on the path to being the biggest name in Linux and Open Source.

    A couple of questions for the people on the "path":

    1. Can you buy yourself the biggest name in Open Source?

    2. All companies that acquire a company are looking for a return on investment. Certainly the merger didn't happen so that VA Linux boxes point to slashdot.org, more like slashdot.org points to VA Linux. What return on investment are they looking for and whose hide are they going to take it out of?

    3. As the rest of the world wakes up to Linux, will anyone care that the major Linux portals are actually owned by a select few vendors?

    4. Finally, does it make sense that Linux sites are held accountable by shareholders and not the people who participate on those sites? For instance, if VA Slashdover isn't making enough money off of advertising, programmer productivity, or driving e-commerce deals on their web properties, will they scrap it, cut performance or just let it suck?

    I obviously do not know the answers to these questions...all the more reason to ask.

    --
    all i really know is i don't wanna know
  105. Crystal Pepsi by Duxup · · Score: 2

    And without marketing Crystal Pepsi would have been nothing too :-) Oh wait?

  106. They're not even close to making money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no need to try and avoid that.

  107. slashdot servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now since /. is owned by a company that make some damn fine servers does this mean that /. will be updated accordingly?

  108. ironic contradiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love it: "...we're sorta restricted in what we can say." and "Creative control of Slashdot will remain where it always has been." appearing in the same paragraph! Oh well. I guess life goes on.

  109. Re:The Future of /.? Traffic engineering, my boy! by 348 · · Score: 2
    Yeah, I've got to agree. I've been on IP since the early 80's and off all the sites/hosts etc. Slashdot remains the far and away leader for both content and "Smilage per gallon".

    Never knock on Death's door:

    --

    More race stuff in one place,
    than any one place on the net.

  110. Perfect match, indeed! by datafred · · Score: 1

    On the one hand, there's a huge crowd of gullible fans who tend to believe every sentence that's said on Slashdot, as long as it's got the words "Open Source" in it (they call this a "Community"), on the other hand there's a vendor trying to sell standard PCs at a premium because they bundle free software with them. Wow! If this isn't a perfect match, I've never seen one.

    --

    --
    Play Match-It.

  111. VA and SGI by mbpark · · Score: 1

    I remember reading in the December 1999 Linux Magazine that VA had other plans for SGI. I think this Andover.net acquisition is only a little part of VA's overall plan.

    They are distribution-neutral, so we'll always see reviews of all distributions, and they employ developers who work on all facets of the system.

    However, this increases VA's visibility and mindshare enough to make increased work with SGI and a possible big acquisition by VA more than a remote possibility. I anticipate other sites, a few small linux services firms, and quite possibly SGI as their next targets.

    I don't consider this a bad thing, in that VA Linux is making major contributions to the community, most notably in SourceForge, Samba, and now Freshmeat and Slashdot.

    Remember, VA's CEO co-wrote Yahoo!'s business plan. Larry Augustin knows what he is doing and has to do to make Linux a major force in the marketplace that can effectively compete with Microsoft on all fronts. By owning and/or operating the major portals by which open source software is being distributed, and NOT doing what MS does by controlling the editorial output, he's providing a complete alternative to MS.

    I anticipate that you will still see banner ads for other companies, a lot more open source software, more powerful hardware for slashdot, and a refocus of VA Linux as a major player competing with Red Hat. This can be really good, since VA is contributing more and more with each step they take.

  112. Re:The Future of /.? Traffic engineering, my boy! by thedude60 · · Score: 1

    This is why I rarely read /.! Dude took a comment and created a treatise of major proportions. Whew! I was mainly looking for news about the VA Linux takeover and what do I get? Still a cool site, and I'll keep checking back.

  113. they would have sourceforge, gnome, kernel.org, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    linux.com, etc etc etc etc. bill gates will thrust his big throbbing techneutopic cock 2 feet into your pulsing freedom loving anal cavity and he will swirl it around saying 'a pc on every desk' over and over while he smacks your ass with a shitcicle he left in the freezer overnight. then he will make you lick it until it thaws so you can suck it down your throbbing freedom loving throat already tired from the gang banging it has been given by Sun, DEC, SGI, the DOD, Sony, and all the other beautiful young lovers you courted without knowing that they had the equivalent of AIDS for creative people: fame and money. your grave will read 'have you thought about home health insurance coverage' because you will be buried under a billboard hanging over a parking lot for the corporate headquarters of Dow Chemical which uses Linux to develop new anti-fat drugs that will kill certain people with genetic 'diseases'.

  114. That depends how you look at it. by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    A lot of my interaction with Slashdot has been squawking about the artist perspective on the music and film industry's abuses.

    I haven't changed: I'm still building my recording studio, still waiting for the ADAT to get back from being fixed, still building all the auxiliary equipment I need (finally finished the recording multiband compressor the other night- thing is the audio hardware equivalent of a crazed Unix console app that can do anything, but with demented syntax- it's an art form just twiddling the controls on this bugger).

    I'm also still looking for ways to tap into good publicity for 'free' ideas and inventions- will certainly begin sharing everything that goes into this hardware design as soon as it seems to be going to an unarguably public place. This is very heavily influenced by open source software. My whole approach to the world has been colored by open source software, the GPL, and my learning to identify with these values. In this way, 'our eggs' don't necessarily belong to one vendor, one company or even one platform or one field of endeavor- I think it's just as important to pursue 'free' audio electronics hacking and share information in a way similar to the GPL- specifically because going strictly philanthropic and public domain is just asking for abuse, it's just putting power in the hands of _collective_ entities such as corporations which can stomp all over individials. For software, the GPL puts some rules on behavior that legislates good behavior. I'd like to see something similar for strictly idea exchange and inventions, or we may be looking at an intellectual property Dark Ages, where you're not allowed to think or innovate because everything is already 'owned' in one way or another.

    That said, of course this conglomeration is unpleasant and nasty. VA Linux has a fiduciary duty to not help other Linux companies, and at the same time is bound by things like the GPL to limit the extent to which they can hurt other people in the community they are theoretically a part of. The people behind things like Slashdot have ended up paper millionares in many cases- and we're not talking dollars, unfortunately, we're talking stock, which means their personal wealth is equal to exactly how much _their_ little projects or big companies can hurt the other people in the community. I think that unlike the hardcore e-business such as MS, many of the Slashdot people will geniunely choose to suffer financial losses rather than hurt the community- this is not unthinkable, for instance Richard Stallman actually declined offers of stock options. However, this can only be a personal choice- for instance, Rob Malda can and probably would choose to suffer losses of half his stock money rather than hurt the community by damaging another Linux company or project. But if Rob is a corporate officer, he's not allowed to make such a decision- he's required to hurt the other Linux company, because it is his legal duty to the stockholders and he is breaking the rules if he doesn't.

    This, not the specific ownership of Slashdot, is the problem, and it's been a long time coming- there have been people pushing for the adoption of the corporate, big-business model (most notably ESR) for a long time, and people who've become upset and argued against it.

    Well, now we get to see what Linux is like when it is all owned by corporations which aren't allowed to share or be nice to each other, and controlled by stock-option millionares whose riches are directly linked to their Linux competition doing badly or failing outright. We can expect to see basically the same state of affairs as commercial software, up to and including the privacy messes we've been wailing about in Slashdot columns...

    ...with one subtle but significant point. The code is still GPL. The net is still technically accessible to individuals for publication of pages and information. As things become a mirror of proprietary software in the 'mainstream' Linux world, the underground will remain and thrive, no longer represented by just any site or company with 'Linux' in the name, but still out there and living by the principles that started all this. You may not see any reference to this stuff on corporate Linux sites or Slashdot, Red Hat and VA and Corel may censor any reference to such sites in their software installations, Freshmeat might not run updates from developers which criticise the parent company etc etc and so on in a litany of disturbing possibile outcomes, but there will be the people out there maintaining the original community, and they will continue to be able to do so regardless of what corporate Linux does to try and marginalize them.

    It's a pity things have gone this direction, but freedom doesn't grow on trees. If you don't fight for it, it erodes and fades away- but you can usually grab a bit of it for yourself anyhow, if you try.

  115. As if it wasn't already.. could /. go biased? by bugg · · Score: 1
    Now that this big _linux_ company has purchased a media site, how can we be sure our news isn't tainted?

    I'm not trying to sound cynical, but I highly doubt we'll see any more articles that speak of anything related to VA Linux in a manner that doesn't kiss its feet. Will the BSD, BeOS, Windows, and Macintosh users be screwed? What steps are being taken to preserve whatever quality slashdot had?

    Wait, I kid myself. Slashdot has _always_ been biased towards linux. (And there goes my karma)

    --
    -bugg
  116. why is the truth -1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    business people are worried about business which means profit and being sued by shareholders for lack of profit.... if the people who invented the transistor, fm radio, ac current, etc understood the motivations of these business people then theywouldnt have been stupid enough to go into deals with them and get their asses fucked.

  117. AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    A ND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> AND HOBBITS!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br> v

  118. More Aquisitions by Greener · · Score: 1

    So when can we expect to see the VASlashdover conglomerate aquire Time Warner/AOL?

  119. *I'M* a moron? by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    Your "explanation" is exactly my point. "Creative control" includes what to say and when to say it. More and more, business/legal needs are dictating what /. prints (and therefore what we read). I don't like this trend.

    If you are tempted to respond "I bet you can't do any better", chew on this: A few months ago I started programming a site that would be to Linux programming what Slashdot (used to be) to Linux in general. If it weren't for the fact that I've moved and haven't yet restored my personal Internet access the site would be up and competing with the lameness that has become Slashdot.
    --
    Java banners:
    Bad for users because Java kills Netscape

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  120. The Anti-BoB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beware! You may fear the man who can sell anything, but he's really harmless. All he can do is take your money and leave you with useless crap. Maybe he sells you a WinModem or something.... And you cry for your lost $50 and smash the worthless thing. But so what?

    What you have to worry about is the man who can buy anything. He'll take everything you have and leave you with useless paper and you'll have to work like a dog to keep it......

    Hail Bob!! 31013 31013 31013 31013 31013

  121. Interesting Article: by crayz · · Score: 1

    http://www.salon.com/tech/log/2000/02/03/slashdot/ index.html

  122. Fsck marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject says it all.

    Live free or die

  123. alternative(s)(tm) 2 many billyunheirs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gnuyaktymes.com, (never a registration required(tm)).

  124. Andover Handover? by Simplexton · · Score: 1
    Sorry I couldn't resist the title.

  125. Andover Handover? by Simplexton · · Score: 1
    Sorry, I couldn't resist the title.

    Congrats and consolations guys.

  126. domain suffixes. by jyang · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't slashdot.org be really slashdot.com long time ago?

    What's this this .org suffix for slashdot? Marketing smoke to the nerds?

    --
    --- You make things foolproof, and they'll find you a damn fool.
  127. Good Point by Kid+Zero · · Score: 2

    good bye editorial independance. Just like when Disney bought ABC, and others we could name, so too will the new heads of Slashdot control the content. it's too tempting _not_ too. I don't believe for one second that They can refrain from messing with it, Rob's comments aside.

  128. wow! My A@#..What Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what is the purpose? What is the idea in VA and Andleftover merging. This is like marrying your own brother or sister. No value added. Could have seperately done what ever they are trying to do together. Probably better!

  129. Re:First (non-haiku) haiku! by Rev.+DOG. · · Score: 1

    ---
    :Did you know the In-
    :ternet watches you while you
    :sleep?

    That's not a haiku!
    ---

    --
    "Music is music, but anarchy is stupid." -- Eli Armen-Van Horn
  130. /. got screwed by headrock · · Score: 1

    lets see... 850 million for a shell company that is literally nothing more than slashdot (and some neat clip-art cd's), and rob and jeff's stakes are worth about 20 million? bruce twickler and the other execs at andover are geniuses in the clintonian sense of the word. andover is a company with no direction, operating history or any particular expertise, but they can say "andover, the internet's leading linux destination ..." in every one of their daily press releases and somehow be valued at 800 times revenue? folks, this is only slightly less nauseating than linuxone.

    --
    i rule.
  131. And the idiot who dosn't know how to use Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...And the idiot who dosn't know how to use Slashdot

  132. Re:they would have a Linux shitcicle? by letchhausen · · Score: 1
    Hey A.C. I like the way you think.

    While offensive to some maybe, you are on to something here and I am slightly amazed that the Linux community isn't tearing up this board with vitriol. It ought to. Time and again we see something enter the world and say "This is Change!" and time and again we see the sell out. Sure it seems harmeless because it's our pals, VA Linux. But why are our pals using $$$ tactics to do this? How does this benefit the community?

    Fame and money? Power corrupts? You bet. It's just business, but I thought that there was more than businesss at stake here. The Salon article pointed out how Slashdot had rejected VA before, why does VA not respect that decision?

    I find the lack of real questioning here to be troublesome. Did you guys get the same POD that those Apple worshipers get with their macs to put under their beds to become "One of Us"?

    Where does Linux want to go today? Obviously to bed with it's incestuous self.

    "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss!"

    I guess we did get fooled again.

    --
    Hey, you think your house is cool?
  133. It's gone by mauriceh · · Score: 1

    A few months ago I noticed /. getting less "controversial" and displaying less editorial "opinion"
    Now I know it is basically gone. Ther eis no way it can act controversial without VA approval.
    Also the comments about adverts is likely true.
    Finally, the content is controlled by those who decide what stories get posted, how much headline and how they are edited.
    That is content control, and in the hands of the paid employess of VA now.
    Bye-bye.
    On to The Register for now I guess..

    --
    Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
  134. dunno by samantha · · Score: 1

    I don't claim to understand business all that well, much less the modern e-biz/.com blitz of huge piles of money to companies that can't turn a profit. But it sure as hell doesn't make any sense to me for VA Linux to spend 900 million (!) to essentially pick up more web and web-zine stuff. That is an outrageous price for what I think they might maybe get out of this. Or is it all just monopoly money and basically meaningless these days?

    Exactly what does VA Linux get that is worth such a sum that they couldn't have without the acquisition and/or at lower cost? I just don't get it. Exactly what are Andover.net folks holding that is worth that kind of money? A base (a lot of eyeballs to be disgustingly in the vernacular) for ads? I don't think so. So what is it?

  135. Salon Article On Andover/Slashdot+VA Linux by SenshiNeko · · Score: 1
    Salon has also posted an article today (Feb 4th) on the Andover/Slashdot+VA Linux merger entitled The Shape Of Open Source To Come, including comments from Rob Malda at LinuxWorld on the situation...

    It's subtitled: "VA Linux purchases Andover.net, corporate parent to Slashdot. Will the "news for nerds" site maintain its editorial independence?" and basically sees the development as being negative for the independence of Slashdot.

  136. will this go into a better site? by samantha · · Score: 1

    It took me 10 minutes of waiting to post two comments successfully on /. tonight. The site has gradually been deteriorating in performance. This needs to be fixed and right now. It doesn't make the community or linux look good when a major site like this ($900M major) has really sucky performance. If y'all don't know how to make this better then put out a call for those who do.

    It is IMPORTANT.

  137. A media blurb that gets it! by ajs · · Score: 2

    I found this Upside article on the VA/Andover purchase, and was suprised by how much of it made sense. It touches on some good points that ESR made, and doesn't fall into the trap of "introducing" Linux and Open Source.

  138. It's sad what has happened to slackware by SplasPood · · Score: 1

    I was at linux world this week... While a lot of good stuff has come into the linux world recently I think it's rather sad to see RedHat there with this giant castle of a booth, while Slackware, which has been in it since the begining in this little shack of a booth...

  139. impartial? by Kanasta · · Score: 1

    Great as VA Linux may be, /. will no longer be a tech news site, but a tech news site owned by a Linux company.

    How will this affect traditional media's perception of the stuff said here? How will this affect the level of mindless MS (or other evil of the day) bashing? Will the acquisition legitimize it in the eyes of some ppl?

    With threshold set to 3, I still get to read a good number of crappy posts where some newbie feels like they have to put in some MS or Big Corp bashing to be accepted or maybe 'cool'.

    Everyone has to spell Good Thing with initial caps and maybe add a '(TM)' after it, everyone puts in an IANAL in their post somewhere.

    Gone are the days when we'd have the threshold set to 2 and only have a couple dozen good posts with no crap or ppl speaking about things they don't know about. It's getting durned annoying, and I can see some of the others think so too.

    What would be good is if the highest threshold could be increased, then I could set my threshold up a bit too, and maybe get rid of some of the noise. And no more of this auto +2 for some ppl just because they used to post good stuff.

  140. Hooray for humor by abram_fettig · · Score: 1

    Um, I think he was kidding there folks. Do you really thing that someone would say "the total pointlessness of coding standards" in seriousness? No need to get all offended. Next time, laugh.

  141. VA Linux: Over-Expensive; Over-Valued Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only overly expensive servers... I really don't see the value of VA (Research) Linux. All what they sell are over valued hardware. And there sales reps claim that they have people that develop their own drivers. Isn't this totally, I mean totally, against the Open movement. And now these purchases??? Doesn't people out there see a patern or are you all damned blind. I would buy anything else any day.

  142. Sure. Just rationalize it that way. by kielbasa · · Score: 1

    I bet they were delibrately taking extra time at breakfast over a cup of coffee.
    Meanwhile plotting to post this story, when ever they got around to it.
    /. is slipping. :p
    Rationalisation is the strongest human drive.

  143. Re:they would have a Linux shitcicle? by vandoverslash · · Score: 1

    Do you think Hemos, Taco & Bates are going to go corporate??? You are passing judgement based on a Salon.com article (they are the next Wallstreet Journal????) go with your faith & gut-Andover.net & Va Linux are a match made in heaven.

  144. I have no web page by sumana · · Score: 1
    I have no personal home page. I know, it would be the merest of actions to get a free one, but it would be work, and I don't have the time.

    It's cool to get lots of requests from actual people into my in-box!

    That's why I can't/don't "post it on a web page for all to see."

    --
    Ceterum censeo Microsoftam esse delendam.