Slashdot Mirror


NBC Signs Up To Broadcast "Destination Mir"

Fraser Cain writes: "Mark Burnett, producer of the hit show "Survivor," has sold the rights to his new show, "Destination Mir" to NBC for $40 million. The show will follow a group of 13-15 would-be cosmonauts as they train for a trip to the Mir space station." I love this line from the article: "Each week, a contestant will be removed by Russian Space Officials until the final winner is launched into orbit on a special, live broadcast." I certainly hope the Russian Space Officials are gentle with both the runners up and the eventual winner.

238 comments

  1. More interesting... by photozz · · Score: 5

    Ship 7 people up to mir, force them to perform tasks in zero-G between puting out fires and sealing holes... whoever wins that week, gets to come home. Thats a real "Survivor"

    --


    Dirty Pirate Hooker
    1. Re:More interesting... by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      Or throw them all out an airlock and see who can hold their breathe the longest!

      --
      Sig it.
  2. Re:MIR again!?! by tesserae · · Score: 2
    Mir has been up there a VERY long time.

    Yep, it's been there a long time. Hasn't killed anyone yet (scared 'em a bit -- but it was a US astronaut who's now trying to make big $$ on book sales, that it apparently scared the most... Shannon Lucid, OTOH, appears to have had bigger ovaries than the aforementioned astronaut did.

    NASA has been insisting that the station has outlived it's operating lifetime.

    Oh, yeah! It's just like when NASA scrapped the last couple of functional Saturn V launchers (literally laid 'em out as lawn exhibits), so they couldn't compete with the Shuttle... NASA doesn't want anything to compete with the IIS (and especially they don't want Russia to spend rubles on other stuff, seeing that they don't have very many of them, and their space funds have largely come from NASA anyhow!)

    It has a decaying orbit.

    Low Earth Orbit == Decaying Orbit. Mir has been reboosted several times, just as Salyut before it, and the IIS after it. SkyLab was supposed to be reboosted, too -- but Shuttle wasn't ready in time, so it sorta rained parts on Australia...

    Reboosting is just part of what needs to be done, not a reason to avoid Mir.

    Why in the world would ANYBODY in there right mind want to risk a trip up there?

    Because it's there, just like Mt. Everest?

    I suggest you ask people like climbers, skydivers, scuba divers, pilots... you'll find lots of people who can't figure out why you don't want to do it!

    Me, I'd go in a hot second.

    ---

    --

    ---
    Politics is about making compromises. Religion isn't. --Michael Horton

  3. Just a few questions .. by kd5biv · · Score: 1

    1) Has anyone fixed the leaks in the Spektr module yet?

    2) Does the cosmonaut training include lessons in how to realign the platform to the sun before it loses power?

    3) Do we *have* to go up on a Soyuz/Proton?

    I'm not even going to discuss EVA's, or whether or not the "winner" is going to be drafted to do any in order to keep the crew alive ..

    --


    73 de N5VB (ex-KD5BIV) AR SK
  4. Better story link by Tairan · · Score: 5

    I did some searching around and found http://www.mirstation.com./news_news15. html It gives a more in-depth look at what the show hopes to do (other than draw ratings)

    --
    /. is a commercial entity. goto slashdot.com
  5. Don't you mean "Space Cadet" by Heinlein by Nanookanano · · Score: 1

    in which the kid wins a contest to go to any place on earth, and construes the rule to force the sponsors to send him to the space station?

    --
    "..don't you eat that yellow snow."
  6. Re:Jury-rigged life support by alarosa · · Score: 1

    You only drive 400 times a year?

  7. Space pens by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    Fisher's capsule history is here. He doesn't mention a $2M government contract. Are you sure that's real?

    Bruce

  8. The Bug scooped this one by smyle · · Score: 1

    And to think I hought it was a joke, but The Bug scooped this one last month. Well...almost.

    --

    Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    1. Re:The Bug scooped this one by smyle · · Score: 1

      Heh... This time with a working link

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

  9. Somewhat OTP - "Big Brother" by Masem · · Score: 3
    On a related note, if you haven't followed the entertainment news, tomorrow night should be an interesting night on the show Big Brother. I don't watch it myself, but it's like watching a train wreck - you know it's terrible but you can't help looking anyway.

    The deal is, last week the producers offered the remaining 6 contestants $500k to walk out of the house; the contestant that left would be replaced by a buxom young blonde (seriously!) for the remainder of the show. None of the contestants took it, and were themselves outraged that all 6 are threatening to walk out of the house at the same time as to end the show and to split the grand prize 6 ways. CBS is of course furious if this happens, but many predict this might be the windfall for the 'real life' gameshows if networks try to intervien too much into them.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:Somewhat OTP - "Big Brother" by xjosh · · Score: 1

      The deal actually is: The producers offered $50k if one (only one) of the contestants left. It was left up to the contestants to decide if and who. The replacement was an averagely cute girl. They all declined.

      They actually are considering walking out and had at a point all decided to do it. There has been some reconsideration by some "houseguests", though. I don't think that they are all committed to walking out at this time. They don't seem to care much about the money right now, and seem to think that if they go out with a bang they can get more recognition (and cash for appearances, etc). I think they are just as sick of the stupid game as everyone watching. They are also getting little tidbits of outside information and I think that has an influence, too. But anyway, back to the real topic.

  10. Re:What does the winner do? by sillysally · · Score: 1

    whoever the Russian mafia says. I mean, really, do they think they can keep this uncorrupted? There going to use all Russian models, and the winner is going to be a fat woman in a black dress like in those old Pepsi ads: "Shvimvear.... Shpacesuit..."

  11. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by PopeFelix · · Score: 1
    I for one admire the Russian capability to jury-rig their technology. I have often thought that a combination Russian/American space venture (where both sides were designing and maintaining the technology) would stay up for a long, long, time and be really cool. :)

    Pope Felix the Scurrilous.

    --

    Pope Felix the Scurrilous.
    Computer Geek by day, religious Icon by night.

  12. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3
    Gee. Did you get up on the wrong side of the bed this morning or something?

    I don't think Mir is much different from Skylab, which would have survived until today except that we put all of our eggs in the Shuttle basket and then had nothing to maintain its orbit after that solid-fuel firecracker did what firecrackers often do. Had Skylab survived, it might be just as nasty today :-)

    Bruce

  13. Re:Hmm... by the+phantom · · Score: 1

    Actually, in Russian, the word is borchsh. The "chsh" is my my best attempt to transliterate a soft "sh" sound -- it is about the same sound you would use when telling a child to be quite. There is not t at the end.

  14. Re:hm by Tower · · Score: 1

    John Rocker blo up even before launch...

    hey, there's an idea - I know who to send to Mir.....
    --

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  15. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Ig0r · · Score: 1

    Using a pencil on a space station would be a big no-no; considering that chunks of the pencil itself would be flying off all the time, graphite dust would be flying everywhere (mucking up machines as well as lungs), and you'd have a hell of a time using a conventional pencil-sharpener.

    --

    --
    Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
  16. Re:Meanwhile, on Russian television... by BillyZ · · Score: 1

    This was also done on either SNL or MadTV (forget which i saw it on) they mocked up the Who wants to be a millionaire set. the contestent was up to a whole bowl of rice and one question away from winning a goat...

    --
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    I take no responsibility for any spelling mistakes in the above post.
  17. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Xenu · · Score: 2

    Please do not propogate this urban legend. It is not true.

  18. Jury-rigged life support by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    I don't like the idea of jury-rigged life support, though if it keeps me breathing I will live with it for exactly as long as it's necessary. Those oxygen-emitting candles that the Russians use are especially scary.

    I think we started out with the goal of losing no lives. We lost more anyway, but I'm not sure the Soviets #1 goal was to lose no lives.

    Bruce

    1. Re:Jury-rigged life support by alarosa · · Score: 1

      What about going to movies, doctor's appointments, football games, PTA meetings, weekend lunches, church (if you happen to be religious), picnics, meeting friends, trips, etc etc etc?

    2. Re:Jury-rigged life support by slam+smith · · Score: 1

      I think we started out with the goal of losing no lives. We lost more anyway, but I'm not sure the Soviets #1 goal was to lose no lives.

      I rather doubt this. Our goal was to beat the Soviets. To have a goal like this in manned space travel is rather silly anyways. While risks are minimized, rockets have this disconcerting tendency to go boom. If our goal were to lose no lives we wouldn't have gone into space. I understand that even today the space shuttle has about a 1 in 200 chance of blowing up. If my car had this tendency, I would die on average twice a year.

    3. Re:Jury-rigged life support by CodeWright · · Score: 1

      Space explorers are not in the business of "preserving life at all cost", they are in the business of "exploring space at ANY cost".

      People unwilling to take the risks involved self-deselect themselves from space exploration.

      In other words, if you don't like the rules of the game, don't play -- but don't expect people playing the game to listen to you.

  19. Re:what I'd prefer to see by delfstrom · · Score: 1
    No, no... send 14 people up and the loosers each week have to remain on board the clunky rustbucket until the next round!

    The final looser remaining gets to be the one to steer the station on a crash-collision course with the Pacific Ocean. Re-entry must begin over North America at 8pm EST on a clear night.

  20. Re:UPN News by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    NEWS? Try their TV shows! Ugh...someone pull a Kevorkian and pull the plug already!

    --
    Sig it.
  21. Oh great. by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 1

    'The Real World' goes to SpaceCamp.

    Count me excited.

    --K
    ---

  22. Re:Maybe they could call it DeathWish... by ChuckDivine · · Score: 1
    I have doubts about this as well.

    But I might actually apply. And, if Russian space officials are doing the selecting, have a chance at making it. Why might I be selected? Reasons:

    • I'm very intelligent (IQ ~170) (yeah, I know even thinking about this is rather dumb).
    • Degree in physics
    • 9 years as a NASA contractor as a software engineer
    • Bit of a leader in space groups at U.S. national level (NSS, L5 Society)
    • High mileage runner who finished the Marine Corps Marathon in 1996. When a NASA contractor I was in top 10 NASA people (civil servant and contractor) in my age group for the Intercenter Two Mile "Fun" Runs. Yes, I'm in rather good physical condition.
    • Accomplished space artist (URL: http://home.earthlink.net/~chuckdivine/sfart/)
    • Accomplished photographer and writer
    • Even done some amateur acting

    In short, I'm alot closer to real astronauts in ability, training and desire than the average person on the street.

    Why would I do this? A few reasons:

    • Get attention (Boy, would it).
    • Get soapbox to advance both ideas about space exploration/development and what's wrong with NASA/American aerospace today (there's too much to cram into a short slashdot posting).
    • Frankly, have a real great thrill (e.g., I ski down low expert ski trails now).
    • Get some great photographs and unique story lines.

    Yes, I know it could be really dangerous. But, for me, the rewards could be considerable. No, I wouldn't recommend this for most people. Read Dragonfly by Bryan Burrough for reasons.

    Going up to Mir really scares me. See Dragonfly. Even applying does so. But it might be worth it.

    Opinions? Is this completely crazy?

    --
    "Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- B. Franklin
  23. Win a chance to die in the vucuum of space.. by Rombuu · · Score: 2

    Hmm... where are they going to get 15 people who would even want to go up into that tin can?

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    1. Re:Win a chance to die in the vucuum of space.. by CodeWright · · Score: 1

      They woudn't have a problem finding 150,000 people.

    2. Re:Win a chance to die in the vucuum of space.. by suky · · Score: 1
      Hmm... where are they going to get 15 people who would even want to go up into that tin can?

      I'd go. Sure it's a broken down deathtrap, but I'd be willing to overlook that to have a chance to go up into space.

  24. hm by abelsson · · Score: 1

    Just imagine if the "winners" rocker blows up a few seconds after launch.

    Ouch.

    -henrik

    1. Re:hm by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Maybe if the winning rocket flies off course and explodes someplace in the Australian outback we can kill two wretched TV shows in one fell swoop.

      I can hope, anyway.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:hm by irksome · · Score: 1

      I think Rocker has already blown up enough. I'm surprised that he's still on a Major League roster.

      -

  25. Re:Your final prize by Fishstick · · Score: 2
    no, you're guessing.

    Apollo 12 landed on the moon 11/19/1969 and returned safely to Earth with Conrad, Gordon and Bean

    Apollo-12 mission summary

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  26. So they by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    are going to let the Mir decay in its orbit and gradually crash into to ocean. OH WAIT...that would be NBC's ratings!

    --
    Sig it.
  27. Re:what I'd prefer to see by Trracer · · Score: 1

    Heh, that actor is Swedish. Just so you know.
    His name is Peter Stormare.
    He was in that Jurrasic Park 2 movie along with some other nice films.

    --
    English is not my first language, so cut me some slack -: Om du kan lasa det har sa kan du Svenska :-
  28. The only way this could possibly be worse... by extar-bags · · Score: 1
    ...is if they had the contestants vote each other off, so that the least-talented person would win.

    ----------

    --

    ----------
    "Rock over London... Rock on Chicago..." -Wesley Willis

  29. DestinationMirsucks.com by hedgeman · · Score: 3

    I'm glad that even in the misery that these shows seem destined to reap upon us, someone has figured out how to make a buck off those who fain dislike and secretly can't get enough of it.

  30. all jokes aside by Atticka · · Score: 1
    how does one sign up for this?

    can you say "opportunity of a lifetime"? I think that would be an amazing trip.

    or one hell of a publicity stunt for MIR/NASA or whatever agency you want....

    Atticka

    --
    No sig here...
    1. Re:all jokes aside by leibold · · Score: 2

      Exactly, the most important information is missing in the Slashdot article and the link it references. Where is the sign-up sheet ? I always wanted to travel in space and since I can't afford even a tourist class ticket from Mircorp (over $15 million) this seems like a good opportunity.

      I guess I have to go back to buying lotto tickets ;-)

  31. Now wait.. by photozz · · Score: 1

    When someone wins, and they get to be shot into space.. which contry is going to do the shoting?? USA has a far better/safer program, but Russia is cheaper, and gives you that genuine "Cosmonaut" experience.....

    --


    Dirty Pirate Hooker
    1. Re:Now wait.. by Maurice · · Score: 1

      The USA actually has a worse record in launching people in space -- Apollo 1, Challanger. The Russians IIRC have no (or may be just one) manned launch failures. So it is not fair to say the US has a "far safer" program.

    2. Re:Now wait.. by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1
      There was an article in scientific american a while back (can't find the link) talking about the Soviet space program at the time. They were fiendishly trying to get to the moon before us (if you watched From The Earth to the Moon on HBO you might remember the folks worried about the russians beating them to a lunar flyby, that was true).

      Problem is they didn't have cash for testing. Sure they'd unit test stuff, but never be able to do a system test. One time a huge booster exploded and killed 60 folks at the launch site. I think they had a couple cosmonauts killed on re-entry too but that may just be the voices in my head.

    3. Re:Now wait.. by Schaffner · · Score: 1

      The Russians (or Soviets) have lost a few astronauts. You can find out more at http://www.guardianunlimited.co.uk/spacedocumentar y/story/0,2763,200523,00.html

  32. Could be really funny... by mholve · · Score: 1
    ...actually.

    Who will survive six months on the MIR?

    If past missions are any indication, this could be a really exciting show! Gas leaks, collisions, power failures... Getting voted off the station (with no way home!) and more!

  33. Re: Ariane by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1
    Ariane ref was the Ariane 5. Wan't Russian, but pseudo pan-European, with no Russian support I believe.

    The story was passed around on the net as a "this is how one bug can cost billions" thing, where there was a float that was trying to be pushed into a place with fewer bits than necessary. Core dumps in rockets aren't good.

  34. Time for something more...interesting? by ahaning · · Score: 1

    How about a show where 10-20 groups of people (engineers, probably) build robots that race over extreme terrains (sand, wind, cold, hot, water, etc). Say you start at 20 teams. Before each race, the teams are given an explanation of what they are to design and a week(or four) to design it. Every race you could throw out the two slowest robots(or the one slowest if you want to drag it out). After 10-20 shows, you'd have the winning team who would win a chance to build a robot that goes to Mars.

    That would be an interesting show and it would get something useful accomplished at the same time.

    Perhaps, though, I'm underestimating the time it akes to build something that is ready for space travel? Nahh...hehe.

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    1. Re:Time for something more...interesting? by Vanguard(DC) · · Score: 1

      uhhg.. yeah, that sells on network TV...sure..100 geeks staying up all night drinking Dew, smoking, and "trying" to high-five when their 'Bot wins...

      sheesh... I've never quite met anyone who defines "Geek" like you just did bro...wow...

      wait a minute, yes i have,..[Vanguard slowly looks around his lab...There's one! whoa! another one! and another!...]

      -vanguard

      patches? we don't need no stinkin' patches!

      --
      "I think, therefore I get paid."
  35. Actually not offtopic by Rurik · · Score: 1

    Just had to comment, check out this. Pizza Hut comments are valid :)

  36. purges? by crgrace · · Score: 1
    So when a cosmonaut is voted out of the program is he shot and his life expunged from public record?

    Or maybe the losers have to go to the space station and try to hold it together with some rope and a couple of safety pins. That would be REAL survivor!

  37. Re:Maybe they could call it DeathWish... by slam+smith · · Score: 1

    Opinions? Is this completely crazy?

    YES. And I hope to hell I beat you for that spot :-)

  38. Re:what I'd prefer to see by FenrirWolf · · Score: 1
    Even better, take out all of the pre-space training.

    Your average joe from a nation where %80 of the population does not know what happens when you flip a light switch.

    It would be highly amusing; Unfortunately, Mir would be trashed in the process.

    --

    Where's the submit button??

  39. hmmm... where have i seen this before? by extar-bags · · Score: 1
    Did anyone watch the Sifl and Olly Show back when it was on? They had a segment called "Champs-1," in which they would communicate with the winners of a fictional contest. The winners, three college kids as I recall, were shot into space for a vacation.

    By the way, in each segment, something went horribly wrong...

    ----------

    --

    ----------
    "Rock over London... Rock on Chicago..." -Wesley Willis

  40. How to fly to Mir by Fraser+Cain · · Score: 1

    I just got off the phone with NBC, and they told me that they'll be announcing the method people will use to sign up for the competition in about a month.

    One way will be through the web.

    As soon as I hear more, I'll pass it along.

    --
    Publisher, Universe Today - http://www.universetoday.com
  41. Re:Maybe they could call it DeathWish... by panda · · Score: 2

    That said, I would still go.

    Where do I sign up?

    --
    Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
  42. Re:Your final prize by gulped · · Score: 1

    apollo 12, I think...

  43. Hint to contestants... by GungaDan · · Score: 1

    Change your name to Carbon Rod. Sure winner.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    1. Re:Hint to contestants... by cryosis · · Score: 1

      Change your name to Carbon Rod. Sure winner.
      While carbon rod does have a ring to it, inanimate carbon rod is the sure winner. Or 42.

      Life is a disease, sexually transmitted and fatal.

  44. Re:Only Americans Need Apply by Alatar · · Score: 2
    I believe you are confusing the Mir space station with the International Space Station. Mir is Russian-constructed, and IIRC currently owned by a corporation, and the ISS is, well, international.

    Yeah, doesn't make sense at all...an American producer, making a show destined for an American audience, having the cast of the show be Americans. Don't know what he was thinking.

    Of course, there could probably be a Canadian or two on the show, and I don't think anyone would even notice.

  45. Hmm... by geekchiq · · Score: 2

    And now a word from our sponsors... pizza hut!

    --
    Kat -- Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Never drink and derive.
    1. Re:Hmm... by zocky · · Score: 1

      Yep, spelled (right about): 6opw, that w and , are actually one letter (and are supposed to be connected) and are the shch sound. IANARC either z.

      --
      disclaimer: I might be right.
    2. Re:Hmm... by Alatar · · Score: 1
      Yes! Yes! Yes!

      Pizza Hut paid to have its logo on the side of a rocket that went into space. Perhaps that story was missed, in all the excitement.

      What's Borsch? I've heard of Borscht, which is a kind of beet soup, but none of the five immigrants from the former Soviet Union in my office have heard of Borsch.

    3. Re:Hmm... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      And now a word from our sponsors... pizza hut!

      No! No! No!

      "Brought to you by The Minsk Cola Company! Now producing Carbonated Borsch for long nights of codink." ;-)


      The Tick - "Spoon!"

      NEO - "There is no spoon."

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    4. Re:Hmm... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      What's Borsch? I've heard of Borscht, which is a kind of beet soup, but none of the five immigrants from the former Soviet Union in my office have heard of Borsch.

      I meant Borscht - My mistake.
      After all IANARC. (I Am Not A Russian Cosmonaut); ;-)

      Or even a Russian for that matter.

      The Tick - "Spoon!"

      NEO - "There is no spoon."

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    5. Re:Hmm... by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      what is IANARC? I Am Not A Russian ???

      and try spelling out the word 'brat' in cursive (in Russian). 6pam. it looks a lot like spam. therefore, my brother is spam. no wonder he annoys me so much :)

  46. Re:just something to ponder by zpengo · · Score: 2

    I did that on my last birthday. I almost had an unfortunate accident with the flux capacitor, however, and this time I plan to be fully clothed.

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  47. man by wishus · · Score: 1

    i wanna go to mir. i somehow doubt that training for space missions is going to make for great prime-time entertainment, though.

    wishus
    Vote for freedom!
    ---

    1. Re:man by Hellmongr · · Score: 1

      Oh, but they'll have little "challenges" like who can stay in a vaccuum without a spacesuit for the longest and who can climb the scaffolding of the launch tower to collect the most medallions with their number on it. Afterwards they'll preceed to mission control with their spacesuit helmets and vote someone off the training and they'll be forced to leave the training facilities only to stay in the five star hotel they are staying in anyways for the filming of the show.

      Okay, am I the only one that thought the show Survivor sucked?

    2. Re:man by byee · · Score: 2

      I can't wait for the centrifuge episode! Bet that one will be a winner.

    3. Re:man by biohazard99 · · Score: 1
      Speaking of extreme forces I remember going and seeing an IMAX at Huntsville/Space Camp that had a scene that demonstrated the escape sequence from the launch tower, a ziplineride from hell in IMAX, could only imagine what it would be like in reality, with Liquid O2/Hydrogen/Solid boosters blowing up behind you.

    4. Re:man by Sebastopol · · Score: 1


      not until the first live colonoscopy. what was that bladder-in-the-butt thing in the movie "The Right Stuff"? that's why i never wanted to be an astronaut: mind-over-bowels doesn't sound heroic.
      ---
      Unto the land of the dead shalt thou be sent at last.
      Surely thou shalt repent of thy cunning.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    5. Re:man by biohazard99 · · Score: 1

      I wondered about that, the tour guide didn't seem too happy with a shithead 8 year old asking that question though.

  48. Re:what I'd prefer to see by zpengo · · Score: 2

    Anyone remember that crazy russian space station guy from that one movie? You know what I'm talking about... Anyway, that's what I picture happening.

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  49. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by slam+smith · · Score: 4

    Well at least the russians haven't parked their space station in the outback. I also heard a story about the russian and pens in space. Normal ballpoint pens don't work in space. American solution: Spend lots of money and develop pens that work in space. Russian solution: use pencils. For extra credit guess what a major part of the first mission to skylab was. Well I'll spare the suspense. It was to fix it. You see would couldn't even launch the damn thing without breaking it. Skylab only had three crews before we ran out of money and ultimately treated the aussies to a multimillion dollar fireworks show. I have no clue how many crews mir has had, except it is a damn sight more than three. Considering the harsh enviroment in which mir operates, it has lasted exceptionally well. BTW do you think it is an accident that of the three modules of the ISS currently in space that 2 were built by russians.

  50. Your final prize by byee · · Score: 4

    You will be greeted at Mir with: slow degeneration of your muscles, great tasting food, and fires in the living quarters. Great Prize.

    1. Re:Your final prize by boing+boing · · Score: 2

      What are the odds that the final "survivor" will be blown up during launch? My guess is about 1 in 100. That is not a prize I would take.

    2. Re:Your final prize by Maurice · · Score: 1

      IIRC The Russian space program has no failed launches of manned flights (maybe one during the 60s), compared to two for the US (Apollo, Challanger).
      On the other hand they do have reentry fatalities.

    3. Re:Your final prize by Schaffner · · Score: 1

      Actually, the USSR space program had several fatalities, including (I believe) the first Soyuz launch. A valve opened during reentry and the guys all died. There was also one launch that had to abort before abort because of a staging problem and they took over 20g! Capsule stopped tumbling down the mountain just before a cliff! Oh yeah, there was also a big explosion on the pad on an unmanned test that wiped out a lot of people, including the "Chief Designer".

    4. Re:Your final prize by gulped · · Score: 1
      ok heres a link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/planets/timeline.s html

      anyways, there aren't any failed *apollo* missions... a lot of others failed though.

      interestingly enough, there are 6 american launch failures (recorded on the timeline), and about 20 russian launch failures. Not sure about how many are manned--it wasn't especially clear on that.

    5. Re:Your final prize by boing+boing · · Score: 1

      The 1 in 100 is about typical for a failure of a launch vehicle. They are currently beating that average. I expect a failure for them that will bring them closer to the industry norm, but maybe they produce more reliable launch vehicles, but I doubt it with their current funding situation.

    6. Re:Your final prize by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      IIRC..up until recently the program was run under a strict media controlling Communist government.

      --
      Sig it.
    7. Re:Your final prize by Fishstick · · Score: 2
      Right, but I thought the original comment was about manned launch failures.

      Anyway, this has strayed far beyond the original topic which was if one would be willing to risk their life for a TV show given the rate of failure of Russian manned launches, someone pointed out there were US failures as well. Aside from the Challenger, which was the mother of all manned launch failures, I can't find any others. I concede the point that the US space program's record on failure is not spotless, but I think the point that Russia's record would make the trip more risky is overblown - they haven't killed anybody since before challenger.

      The horse is now oficially dead :-)

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    8. Re:Your final prize by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Which Apollo mission had a failed manned launch? I know about the capsule fire during ground testing that killed 3 astronauts and Apollo 13's CM explosion, but I don't recall any any launch failures.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    9. Re:Your final prize by Alatar · · Score: 1

      The Apollo disaster was during a test, not during a launch. Russian unmanned rockets do explode on a regular basis, though.

    10. Re:Your final prize by boing+boing · · Score: 1

      I'm just talking sheer launch vehicle failures (manned missions being a small subset)...the numbers don't show high reliability.

    11. Re:Your final prize by Dharzhak · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the year 2000. Russia hasn't had a communist government since the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1992.

      Now quit talking out your ass.

    12. Re:Your final prize by haystor · · Score: 1

      92 is recent compared to the space race of the 60's.

      --
      t
  51. prime-time entertainment by Rupert · · Score: 2

    Not until a couple of the cosmonauts sneak off into the jungle outside Novosibirsk for a bit of nookie.

    --

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  52. Re:Voyeurism fad by zpengo · · Score: 2
    Verily, I think it'd be much more interesting to see what happens *after* they pick a winner and send them to Mir. Screw the elimination process, let's see the results.

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  53. what I'd prefer to see by jailbrekr2 · · Score: 5

    Is to send 14 ppl up and cram them into Mir, and have them eliminated 1 by 1.

    Now *that* would be entertainment......

    --
    Feed The Need[goatse.cx]
    1. Re:what I'd prefer to see by Duke+of+Org · · Score: 1

      You mean Armageddon? When They blow up MIR?
      That was cool Special-effects

    2. Re:what I'd prefer to see by MousePotato · · Score: 1

      You make a great point. I long for this voyertainment trend to end up as something like the gladiator games. Feed 14ppl to some hungry lions and *poof* whoever is alive is deemed the survivor.This type of 'entertainment' sucks. Though its interesting for a moment next year prime time tv will be filled with it just like we now have to endure a dozen different shows based horribly on the judicial system. (the only 'benefit' to society being that now even more people want to sue your ass because they think they know how...). I guess that what this all boils down to is the accident phenomina: Two cars collide (could be just one changing a tire mind you) on your local rush hour parking lot(ironically read:freeway) and get pulled off to the side or end up there somehow. No lanes obstructed yet traffic comes to a complete crawl. Why? Because the amount of stupid people on the road gawking at the minor distraction is in direct (albeit exponential) proportion to the amount of people who actual care about getting somewhere on time and could care less (add factor for frustration with small minded people) about seeing if (a)someones guts are spilled, (b) the quantity of tires needing to be changed, (c) number of idiots sufferg from tonic hypnosis of police lights and (d) the number of yellow tarps covering bodies multplied by how many minutes you are running late.Hrm.. come to think of there's a show in that too: Survivors of (insert city of choice) Rush Hour or just call it Road Rage. You wouldn't have to hire a cast just park on the side of the road point a cam at the traffic and see what happens...

    3. Re:what I'd prefer to see by davidmb · · Score: 1

      Oh dear

      Do you read what you've written?

  54. Removed how? by stx23 · · Score: 3
    "Each week, a contestant will be removed by Russian Space Officials until the final winner is launched into orbit on a special, live broadcast." I certainly hope the Russian Space Officials are gentle with both the runners up and the eventual winner.
    Would that be removed as in 'sneak up behind the loser and drug them' removed?
  55. Re:Official Response from by Mark+F.+Komarinski · · Score: 2

    Pfft..FOX has all sorts of stuff up their sleve:

    World's scariest near-misses by asteroids
    Single Female Lawyer In Space
    The Simpsons on Mars

    All of course followed by that great FOX News coverage you expect of the show you just watched along with other topical news ("Will Space Debris Fall on Your House? Find out at 10PM!").

    --
    -- Ever notice that fast-burning fuse looks exactly the same as slow-burning fuse? I didn't... (Edgar Montrose)
  56. Re:Meanwhile, on Russian television... by zantispam · · Score: 1

    The Onion beat you to it - Who wants to eat a meal?

    --

    censorship is a form of noise, which actively seeks to drown out content with silence - Crash Culligan
  57. Rocker? by mholve · · Score: 1

    How long IS that game? :)

    1. Re:Rocker? by abelsson · · Score: 1

      s/Rocker/Rocket

      [This text is here only to confuse the /. lameness filter]

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Only Americans Need Apply by tranZent · · Score: 3
    In typical American fashion, Burnett is (again) restricting contest entry to only U.S. citizens.

    So much for the *international* space effort.

    1. Re:Only Americans Need Apply by Aos · · Score: 1

      >If we miss a few times in testing and accidently >vaporize a third-world village or two, well >that's TOO BAD.

      I guess the only reason that this guy is not in a asylum is that healthcare in US is not free...

    2. Re:Only Americans Need Apply by .sig · · Score: 1

      Well, we wouldn't want anyone else finding out all the secrets of ...uh... well, Russion Space technology. (heh)
      If some foriegn dictator wants to learn about cosmonaut training, he's going to have to suffer through watching the show on TV.

      If it weren't for TV, I guess the world's "intelectually challenged" would have to learn to read. Scary thought.

      --
      -Space for rent
    3. Re:Only Americans Need Apply by Suhas · · Score: 1

      Were you born like this or did it come by degrees? Look at what the Indians and the chinese are doing in space research and you will realize that if you keep on dreaming like this, americans will be in space ten years hence exactly like that, in dreams.Grow up kid.

    4. Re:Only Americans Need Apply by Aos · · Score: 1

      And you have no idea what a troll is. Trolls post stupid, illogical, simple posts as they are simple and stupid creatures. I find trolls funny. I don't find hate funny.

      That post was flamebait if anything. I get caught on it, admittedly.

  60. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    OK, PARDON ME FOR SHOUTING but I'm not getting your attention. The story that you quoted says that Fisher spent $2M of his own money to develop the pen. Maybe he did - I'm doubtful about the amount. But the urban rumour is that the U.S. spent the money. That isn't so.

    Am I getting through now? Thank you.

  61. Re:My First Science Fiction Story by SIGFPE · · Score: 1

    A guy with no legs! That's the one! Damn - you don't know the title either :-( Time to consult rec.arts.sf.writen! (One of the few good newsgroups left IMHO) PS I've read 'Have Spacesuit Will Travel'. I'd forgotten about that but it's not the actual one I'm after.
    --

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  62. Re:WellDone! by lewistotle · · Score: 1

    That is one of the reasons I pulled out.

    Seriously, I arranged for rescue along with 4 other people only partially because I didn't like the way things were being done. When the 5 of us were rescued about 300 miles from the South Pole (the group was on their way there), we were told by the pilot of the rescue plane that if we'd been ANY further south that air rescue would be impossible due to the terrain. That would have meant the 20 people would have had to walk out and the were NOT equipped for that. The fact that there were 5 less people (and their gear) to deal with did help the group on the way back.

    Like I said, no one died or was even seriously injured. And yes, the Russian were masters of improvisation when it comes to fixing things, but I wasn't willing to risk my life based on their word they would get us back safely. Since they had continuously mislead the group to that point, quite frankly, I didn't trust them. That is why I pulled out when, and where, I did.

    I'm not averse to taking risks, after all, I started the trip with a skydive into Antarctica for Y2K. (I was dropping when the ball in NY was. :-) ) I just like to manage the level of that risk. I might be willing to apply for the Mir trip, but I would want to review their procedures carefully first.

  63. Re: Death ride for Regis Philbin by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Who wants to be a charcoal briquette?

  64. Re:So what if it *IS* true? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    Legitimate accounts of the space pen development seem to say that it was Fisher's own money. I find this reassuring, even though I doubt the amount stated.

    The Fisher corporate office is in Boulder city on the route between Las Vegas and the Hoover Dam. It doesn't look like the kind of establishment that runs $2M research programs. I'm not putting them down - I can't even spell the name for the semi-solid ink, no less pronounce it. But I suspect there's a little hyperbole involved in the price tag on that research.

    Bruce

  65. A question of acceptable risk by edremy · · Score: 1
    I've read a fair amount on the Russian program and you've confirmed my impressions. But does it really matter?

    People have different risk limits. Some people are afraid to leave their house. Others go BASE jumping, a sport with a very high death rate. I'm getting my pilot's license. Risky? To an extent, yes: if I screw up badly I will die, and the death rate in general aviation is not zero. (Hell, there was another fatal midair in Florida today.)

    Looking at the history of spaceflight over the last 10-20 years, an astronaut has something on the order of a 1-2% chance of death on a given mission. Assume the Russians are horrible right now and that they're 5x worse than they were in their heyday. That's still only a 10% death rate. The number of people willing to have an experience like flying in space against a 10% chance of death is not zero. I'd think about it if I wasn't in the process of adopting a kid right now. (Families distort risk balances.)

    Go into it with your eyes open, realizing the risks, but if that's ok, go.

    Eric

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  66. Re:Interceptor by cryosis · · Score: 1

    I belive you get the car. I saw some clips of one of the losers getting hauled out of the car and beaten for about 5 minutes. Fuck up show. Hadn't heard that they really go to jail though.

    Life is a disease, sexually transmitted and fatal.

  67. (OT) mad moderators by Rupert · · Score: 1

    You know, in all the time I've been moderating, I've yet to find a post that was, in my opinion, overrated. You only get five points, and it only takes a few minutes to find 3 or 4 interesting, insightful or informative posts and 1 or 2 trolls or flamebaits. Who has time to mess with overrated? Yet I find my posts marked down as overrated all the time. Are the moderators jealous of my +1 bonus?

    I've not used it this time to save you the effort, and me some of my almost-maxed-out karma.

    --

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
    1. Re:(OT) mad moderators by mobydill · · Score: 1

      This is slightly off topic from your post, but I enjoy reading Troll and Flamebait posts. They're funny.

      --


  68. Top 5 things.... by cecil36 · · Score: 1

    that the winner will remember about "Destination Mir"

    5: Space station commander saying to the lucky winner: "If one of our cosmonauts breaks something, it's your fault that he broke it."

    4: Beer to share with the cosmonauts: $200
    Repairing damage done to Mir by smashing the empty beer bottles against it: $25 million
    Deploying a Russian spy satellite to snap pictures of your ex-wife/girlfriend sleeping with another man: priceless.

    3: Water coming out of water tank is actually vodka that was smuggled on board during your drop-off

    2: Heating system on board consists of layers of blankets and Siberian Huskie pelts.

    1: Mir Commander: "Welcome aboard space station Mir."
    Winner: "Don't you mean 'Deepshit Nine'."

  69. On a special, live broadcast? by SamThePondScum · · Score: 1
    Each week, a contestant will be removed by Russian Space Officials until the final winner is launched into orbit on a special, live broadcast.

    Typical Russians...you'd think they'd want to launch them using a rocket or something...

    --
    -- PondScum, SamThe
  70. Re:What's happened to television? by Sand_Man · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they could shoot Martha Stewart up to Mir. Not that I would watch it, but at least she wouldn't be around here.

    Actually, maybe I would like watching her try and dock that thing.

  71. Re:My First Science Fiction Story by orac2 · · Score: 1

    It's not a Harrison novel. I remember reading this too. It's definately by A.C. Clarke and one of the characters was missing his legs. And nobody was thrilled to see him arrive on the station either. Can't remember the #$%$#@% name either though...

    --
    "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
  72. Re:It would be worth it! by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    Mir is cramped, loud, and somewhat dangerous
    Not too different from my surroundings right now.

  73. inmate survivor by jimmypop · · Score: 2

    Something George W could do when he loses his bid for election this fall is start up a survivor type show with inmates on death row, and each week someone new dies. Now that I'd watch.

    --
    (`._(`._( , , . JimmyPop[nL] . , , )_.)_.)
  74. Hmmm... by zpengo · · Score: 2
    I hope they build their space stations better than they build their submarines!

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  75. Once Aboard The Satellite... by Steve+B · · Score: 3

    ...the subject will be forced to watch Survivor episodes and build himself a couple of robots for company....
    /.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  76. Re:Meanwhile, on Russian television... by Tyrannosaurus · · Score: 1

    I hadn't seen that - most hilarious!!

    ---

    --

    ---
    Gort! Klatu Barata Nikto!
  77. Yeah, but with by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    NASA's budget they couldn't afford a slingshot.

    --
    Sig it.
    1. Re:Yeah, but with by photozz · · Score: 1

      ba da dump dump tsh Thanks for comin, try the fish

      --


      Dirty Pirate Hooker
  78. Maybe they could call it DeathWish... by cybrpnk · · Score: 5

    As much as I want to go into space, even I have some hesitation about applying for this. I've been to Russia and built a couple of experiments that have flown on MIR, so I have some first hand observations about this. First, the Russians are in this for the money, period. When I went there as part of a Boeing experiment team, everything was about what could they do to soak more cash from us and they could care less about the flight. Secondly, their infrastructure is shot, particularly at the launch site. Third, they are totally unable to keep to a schedule - look at the Space Station, it's 2 years late from Russians having to delay their main part. Most importantly, this thing can't be declared safe. MIR is fifteen years old, it's had a fire and a major depresurization while US astronauts were aboard, either of which could have easily killed someone. Look at their recent sub disaster and TV station fire, too - they are just stretched too thin running old equipment with people that haven't been paid in far too long. It sounds romantic, but it's being pushed by people with NO spaceflight experience and little if any experience with the realities of Russia today. The Russians aren't going to raise a single flag as long as there's enough zeros on the end of the check. If this pulls thru, it's going to be luck more than anything....

    1. Re:Maybe they could call it DeathWish... by firet · · Score: 1

      So what, NASA is working with them just out of pity?
      Those damn Russians...

    2. Re:Maybe they could call it DeathWish... by firet · · Score: 1

      Oh, and being an employee of a large corporation, it's interesting how you blame them for being in it "just for the money".
      It's all money for THEM, ain't it?

    3. Re:Maybe they could call it DeathWish... by lewistotle · · Score: 1

      I would have to seond this. Having been to Russia a couple of times myself, and dealt with Russians on expiditions to both ends of the world, you would have to do some serious convincing to prove to me that not only would the Russians come thru, but that they would do so safely.

      I don't want to post details publically about my last trip with them to Antarctica, but it was luck that kept almost 20 people from dying out on the ice. When I saw where things were headed, I pulled out and made my own arrangements for rescue. This was hard, but possible, in Antarctica; just try this on Mir. Fortunately, everyone did manage to come out OK, but it could easily have been much worse.

      I can also confirm cybrpnk's comments about their infrastructure. I was given a tour of their Space City when I was last there about 18 months ago. Everything there was in really bad shape. Even the training pool where there is a lot of US equipment is pretty run down. (It was fun to go diving in though.) Please don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that everyone from Russia is a bad and/or unreliable person. Far from it. I have some very good friends who are from Russia. But when it comes to any situation where life, money and/or scheduling is on the line, think hard about it... and then say no.

    4. Re:Maybe they could call it DeathWish... by CodeWright · · Score: 1

      Me too.

    5. Re:Maybe they could call it DeathWish... by jesser · · Score: 2
      Mir is now owned by a corporation, not by the Russian government. Here's the slashdot story from April.

      --

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
  79. My First Science Fiction Story by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

    The first science fiction story I read was about a young kid who won a competition that allowed him to ask for a spaceflight as prize. That was probably around 1975. After all these years it's finally come true! Of course the original author couldn't have guessed just how tacky a show it would be in the year 2000. Now I'd love to reread this book. Can anyone ID it for me? I think it may have been written by AC Clarke. Did he write such a book? I vaguely remember that the prize was actually a trip anywhere in the world and the prizegivers were actually surprised the kid chose a space station. Ring any bells with anyone? Anyway...it's a great thing this is happening. Anything that gets interest in spaceflight means we might actually catch up with where science fiction writers expected us to be by now.
    --

    --
    -- SIGFPE
    1. Re:My First Science Fiction Story by GossG · · Score: 1
      first science fiction story I read was about a young kid who won a competition that allowed him to ask for a spaceflight as prize.

      "Have Spacesuit - Will Travel" by Heinlein.

      In that book, the protagonist placed several thousand entries into a soap company contest to go to the moon, but someone beat him on the postmark date for the winning entry. He wins a spacesuit instead. He ends up on the moon anyhow, following a collection of fluke events.

    2. Re:My First Science Fiction Story by Myrcurial · · Score: 1

      "Have Space Suit, Will Travel" by Robert A. Heinlein.

      You can find it on Amazon, just do a search.

      The prize was a trip to space, he won one of the consolation prizes - a space suit. He won it by sending in soap wrappers. The story is about his adventures around the solar system - escaping nasty aliens, roaming around the moon, etc. It 's a great read, highly recommended.

      Actually, anything in the Heinlein "could happen" series of books about spaceflight is good, like Azimov and Clarke, he was a real scientist and actually knew about things like chemistry and ballistics.

      And oh crap what I'd do to get on that show - even to just have a chance, however, I am not an American. My wife is, but I'm Canadian. Goddamn it.

      M

    3. Re:My First Science Fiction Story by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      This, I'm sure, is not what you were thinking of, but R. A. Heinlein wrote a book called Have Space Suit, Will Travel. It is really a book for adolecence, lacking any deep characters or plot or anything, but it is about a guy who wins a space suit in a contest, then is kidnapped by aliens. It is a fun read.

  80. US and Russian approaches to technology by XNormal · · Score: 2

    When the U.S. astronauts visited Mir, they brought their Fisher Space Pens. Those were no doubt the most reliable pieces of equipment on the space station.

    When NASA realized that a regular pen doesn't work in zero G they set on a big expensive project to develop a special pen.

    The russians use pencils.

    The aging space shuttle is not more reliable than Mir, it's just that it can run back to mommmy earth at the slightest hint of trouble and get the several month long overhaul it needs before each flight.

    The russians tough it out and solve their problems. You gotta respect that. Which of these approaches results in more useful experience for future habitation in space?

    The state of Mir is more a matter of public perception than actual fact.

    ----

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  81. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Paulo · · Score: 2

    It's not really fair to keep on bashing Mir's supposed "unreliability". Remember that it was designed and built to operate only until 1992-1993 (don't remember the exact date), which means that it has been used for 7-8 years longer than its scheduled operational life. I, for one, would like to see how does the space shuttle operate in 2025... if it's still operating at all.

  82. Challenger in 1986 by alen · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this time sending a civilian into space will turn out better than in 1986.

  83. Re:So what if it *IS* true? by Zach+Baker · · Score: 2

    Actually, the Fisher company does pretty well for itself, and did so even before the Space Pen, I understand. When I lived in Boulder City, they were a cornerstone of the business community, but had just moved there in the late 70's (perhaps abandoning their multi-million-dollar research compound ;^). Although $2M might be exaggerated, I imagine the equipment to produce that special ink and nitrogen-pressurized ink cartridges could get costly. But hey, they still do quite a business (and are still on every manned NASA mission), so it was an excellent investment whatever the actual price was.

  84. Re:Rather than just random people? by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 1

    you forgot Big Brothers Nasty Nick (sadly only of relevance in the UK)

  85. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Quikah · · Score: 1

    This would honestly make a great TV show, if you got around the possible death, dismemberment, life inprisonment, etc problems. :)

    --
    Q.
  86. And here's the theme music ... by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2

    Thanks to Bob Rivers of Twisted Tunes, there's a perfect theme song for the show. Click here (ISDN line speed or better required. 28.8k version here) .

  87. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by CodeWright · · Score: 1

    Better Mir than the Shuttle.

    There's only one Mir, and it has worked provably well for just about as many years as the shuttles have been around -- but Mir has never killed anyone, and the Shuttle has.

    Given that the shuttles need a 3-6 month overhaul after every piddly flight, and they are STILL notoriously unreliable, I don't give the constant Mir-bashing much shrift.
  88. Re:How cheezy! by ckd · · Score: 1

    sounds like a ride at Disney World.

    It's going to be. The Epcot attraction Mission: Space, sponsored by Compaq, is scheduled to open in 2003. "Offering guests a one-of-a-kind ``astronaut-like'' experience, Mission: SPACE will launch guests into a simulated space adventure -- from pulse-racing lift-off to weightlessness in outer space."

    No word yet on whether it will be running Linux, Tru64 Unix, VMS, or Windows NT.

  89. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by CodeWright · · Score: 1

    Given that the discussion revolves around RELIABILITY and that Skylab WASN'T RELIABLE, that seems a rather odd statement to make.

  90. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
    The lots of money to develop a pen story is said to be an urban legend.

    As other people have mentioned, pencils make dust, which is a problem in the microgravity environment. You either clog your filters with it or you breathe it.

  91. This quote doesn't prove your point by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    I think Fisher has said elsewhere that he spent a lot of money on research to make the pen. Nobody's shown yet any evidence that the U.S. government spent a lot of money to make it.

  92. Re:Voyeurism fad by generic-man · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, in "Big Brother" the good people of America voted out all of the "extreme stereotypes" and made the house extremely dull. I stopped watching that show after they voted the exotic dancer out. I mean, who wants to watch a roofer, a law student, and some other thoroughly uninteresting people sit around all day?

    --
    For more information, click here.
  93. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, it's conductive.

  94. yeah, they'll be 'gentle' by Fishstick · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of that Discovery Channel series 'Wings'; the one episode they were talking about the Russian 'Air Force' (really, there are three I think) where they were selling SU-27 rides to anyone with $20,000 and a signed release form.

    Showed a guy all smiles and jumping up and down handing them the cash, signing any form they put in front of him and going through a 'training' which was basically how to put on the flight suit and how to pull the ejection handle.

    Once they had the cash and release in hand, they were anything but 'gentle'. This guy got his money's worth on high-g turns, negative-g dives and gut-wrenching rolls. They helped him out of the plane looking about as pale as a gallon of milk. The Russians were chuckling and winking at each other.

    'boy, I thought I knew what flying was about after playing combat flight simulators on my computer at home. this was _nothing_ like that!'

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  95. Re:How cheezy! by Tower · · Score: 1

    Brak! Sometimes I hate it when I'm right 8^)

    >Mission: SPACE will launch guests into a simulated space adventure -- from pulse-racing lift-off to weightlessnes

    Sounds just like Mr. Toad's Wild Ride with different scenery ;-0

    Or, more likely, like the Body Wars/Back to the Future/can't think of the other one right now style of ride... a bunch of people in a tin can (like the Bud driver simulators) on hydraulics, with surround video and sound, rumble seats, etc.

    Or maybe they just moved space mountain into the Golf Ball 8^)

    --

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  96. Neurotic by Amphigory · · Score: 2
    I saw an article a few weeks ago interviewing all the creator of survivor. Apparently, one of his criteria for selecting an applicant was that they be a bit neurotic. This was to produce the "soap opera" effect.

    Do we really want people who would engage in the kind of back-biting that went on in "Survivor" going to space?

    --

    --
    -- Slashdot sucks.
  97. Re:Voyeurism fad by rw2 · · Score: 2
    What is it with this new fad?

    Ya know, I still don't understand calling this a new fad. Candid Camera is one of the oldest shows on television after all!

    Survivor/Real World/et alia are just sitcoms to Candid Camera's sketch comedy.

  98. Tips?? by photozz · · Score: 1

    "Tips your waitress".
    Ditto

    --


    Dirty Pirate Hooker
    1. Re:Tips?? by photozz · · Score: 1

      ;b

      --


      Dirty Pirate Hooker
  99. Re:Voyeurism fad by Dirtside · · Score: 2
    I believe the idea was what Jared Diamond termed the "Anna Karenina principle." As Tolstoy put it in that novel, "Happy families are all alike. Every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way."

    The upshot is, people like voyeurism. Always have, always will.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  100. Where do I sign up? by Timmy · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen any info on what they're looking for in contestants, what the procedure is for auditions, etc. The show may be part of an already dying genre, but I'll be damned if I don't want to at least TRY to get up in space.

  101. ISS by mholve · · Score: 1
    ...is what you're thinking of regarding an "international space effort."

    There's not much international about MIR, especially now that it's commercially owned. I think the proper term now is "commercial space effort - who's got cash?" ;>

  102. Makes me wonder.... by Denor · · Score: 2
    Each week, a contestant will be removed by Russian Space Officials until the final winner is launched into orbit
    If they're going to be launching the winner into orbit, I wonder what the hell they're going to be doing to the people who lose!
    --
    -Denor
    1. Re:Makes me wonder.... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      The losers will be flung into the sun with a giant slingshot.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  103. Re:This should work out... by bellings · · Score: 1

    ... about as well as "Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire."

    I must have missed the alternative ending of "Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire." You know, the part where all the contestants were sucked out into the cold void of space. The happy ending.

    --
    Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  104. Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4
    When the U.S. astronauts visited Mir, they brought their Fisher Space Pens. Those were no doubt the most reliable pieces of equipment on the space station.

    Bruce

    1. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      So did the cosmonauts. Both sides have used the space pens since they were created, IIRC.

      Honestly, Mir is still up there working, for longer than any American space station has. They built well enough to last, at least compared to a space program which has crash several space probes recently.

    2. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by jesser · · Score: 1
      i find that page disturbing. a game in which death, stealing, and lying are likely to happen?

      --

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    3. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      Well, how was it not reliable, and how does that compare to Mir? Don't count the fact that its orbit decayed, that was because they underestimated the drag of vestigal atmosphere in low orbit, left it tumbling instead of in an "aerodynamic" configuration, and nobody drove up to give it a push. People thought space was a more pure vacumm until skylab and "shuttle glow".

      Thanks

      Bruce

    4. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      At least on Skylab they could do that "Dave Bowman runs around the centrifuge" thing.

      If Skylab had nothing else it was spacious.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    5. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by slam+smith · · Score: 1

      It's not an urban legend. According to this story it cost 2 million dollars to develop this pen, in mid 1960's. If you translate that to today's money that got to be at least 20 million dollars.

    6. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by MoNickels · · Score: 3
      Here's the play-at-home version:

      The Darwinism Home Game

      --

      Wordnik, a dictionary project which aims to collect

    7. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by saider · · Score: 1

      Back in the sixties, NASA spent something like 2 million dollars to develop the technology for a "space pen". The Russians used pencils.

      Not to knock the US space program, but sometimes they make things much more complicated than they need to be.



      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    8. Re:Why not send the LOSER to Mir? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

      Aw, you've caught me. Yes, I really am the 15 highest-moderated posters on Slashdot. I have a login for each of my personalities. Not :-)

  105. Are you kidding? by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2

    I just watched "Space Cowboys" recently - and it was damn funny watching them on the graviton (or whatever the centerfuge thingy is called)... can you image watching normal people on it?

    It would actually be pretty scary to see what it would do to the female form though... ;)

  106. Russian Big Brother by gcoates · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile in Russia

    After a national competition 118 russians won the chance to live inside submarine stuck at the bottom of the Barents Sea.

    Then each day they must vote on who gets to the food, water and air. The losers get ejected into the sea. The particpants are under constant scrutiny from the worlds media AND 1000 feet of arctic water.

    They're sole method of communication with the outside world is banging on the side of the metal hull. The winner is the one left surviving at the end and will receive $100,000,a Ford Probe and media licensing.

    Today's task was to connect up an electric generator in the dark.

  107. 40 million buck strategy? by jeorgen · · Score: 1
    I also want 40 million dollars. So my question is: What is the strategy to get someone to pay 40 million dollars for an idea? I suppose in this case there is more to it than walking up to the TV network, present the idea (with some drawing on a whiteboard), and then say "Now will you give 40 million?"

    Does any one know what else is needed?

    Street cred?
    ("I'm a top producer and you know it")

    Negotiation with other networks?
    ("Yeah, this is just an idea, but your lawyers can protect it if you sign a deal with me")

    Secured exclusive rights needed on the way?
    ("The Russians will only talk to me, you see")

    Please let me know and I'll be at it first thing in the morning!

    /jeorgen

  108. Re:Rather than just random people? by irksome · · Score: 1

    Not being from the UK, and not having watched Big Brother, I can say that I have no idea who "Nasty Nick" is.

    -

  109. Re:A better idea by stx23 · · Score: 1

    Next week:-
    Escape from The Highest Elevator in Moscow, while it's on fire.

  110. Sexual harassment will weed out female astronauts by Stavr0 · · Score: 2

    Last march, Canadian astronaut Judith Lapierre almost walked out of a long-term space station simulation experiment when a drunken russian astronaut started making passes at her.
    Is this the kind of crap we can expect from Destination MIR ?
    ---

  111. They really should lay of the reality-TV Shows. by Egorn · · Score: 1

    Reality TV is an oxymoron, moron!

    South Park is more real than some one getting sent to mir.

    --

    Movie News - "Entertainment news, bitch!"
  112. Re:Voyeurism fad - it's anti-strike insurance by paul7e · · Score: 1

    The reason for this "fad" is that TV producers/networks are terrified that there will be both an actors' and writers' strike next season.

    Since "reality" shows don't need either writers OR actors, they want to fill up their schedule with lots of them, just in case...

    paul

    --
    Silly Rabbit, sigs are for kids.
  113. Interceptor by British · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just dub episodes of Interceptor into the US?

    The object of the show is to drive around in a car(in Russia, this ain't no sound stage) and avoid the cops for a certain amount of time. Basically, this is a real life version of Grand Theft Auto. I think if you lose, you go to jail for real(what a rip!). This is a real-life show that EVERY American would turn to just to see if some innocent bystander gets run-over so some game show contestant can beat the clock.

  114. This should work out... by drivers · · Score: 2

    ... about as well as "Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire."

  115. It would be worth it! by wnissen · · Score: 1

    I would take that chance in a second. To turn the question around, what do you think the odds are that commercial spaceflight will ever become viable in your lifetime? I regard spaceflight as one of the shining scientific achievements of all time, and I bet that I, personally, will never get a chance to take part in it. The odds that I'll be able to afford to take a trip into space are about 0. Thus, I have to look for other alternatives. Mir isn't the safest, but the Soyuz rockets are reasonably reliable. All spacecraft are built by the lowest bidder, so why worry about this one?

    Walt

    P.S. Does anyone know where I sign up to become a "Geek in Space"?

    1. Re:It would be worth it! by boing+boing · · Score: 1

      I'm just not willing to bet my life on a trip to space...maybe I'm just too conservative. I don't think the trip would be that much fun; Mir is cramped, loud, and somewhat dangerous from all reports.

  116. What's happened to television? by tewl · · Score: 1

    What is this non-stop stream of crap that comes out these days? A contest to get shot into space to an aging space station?

    Whatever happened to shows like the "Honeymooners", with each and every show having it's own set of trials and tribulations, but Jackie Gleason still kissed his wife at the end of every show with the line "Baby, you're the greatest?"

    Who can forget the hilarity and freshness of "I love Lucy", or the ground-breaking performances on the Sullivan Show. Or even the hokiness of "The Andy Griffith Show".

    Or even when television and the evening news used to be a reliable source of information?

    These days instead of having a man telling his wife that she's "the greatest", we have them screaming obscenities at each other on the Jerry Springer show.

    Instead of entertainers, we have this non-stop flow of purile "reality" shows.

    The news we now get is so biased, with each and every of the major stations owned and operated by a large corporation out for their own best interests and will just allow you to see what THEY want you to see. It's very sickening. I'm not a "fogey" by any means, I'm only 22, but I can remember watching those shows as re-runs and the state of entertainment and television being alot more about entertaining in those days.

    1. Re:What's happened to television? by Greyfox · · Score: 2
      Ooo! "Iron Chef" and "South Park." Network prime time? What's that?

      Does anyone else think the food network needs more Iron Chef and less Martha Stewart? I mean, Martha's scarey. You gotta wonder if she doesn't have psychotic episodes immediately after the show ends. No one can be THAT domestic!

      In fact, I wouldn't mind an "All Iron Chef all the Time" network. Ok, maybe I don't get out enough...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:What's happened to television? by AbbyNormal · · Score: 4

      I don't know...It's a matter what you prefer. There are plenty of good shows on TV IMHO, just gotta flip around. Think: Law&Order, Family Guy, Simpsons, The West Wing, X-files (up to a point). There are also some decent new comedies appearing this fall. I agree, there is a lot of "crap", but eventually those types of shows will lose interest and it will fade to black (hehe...Metallica(C)(R)corp(inc)(Republic))

      Hehe...If you want reliable news, stay with Slashdot!

      --
      Sig it.
  117. Re:Voyeurism fad by squirrelboy · · Score: 2

    I've heard that a significant motivation is a threatened script writers' strike. Reality = no writers to worry about in execs' eyes.

  118. Too Intellectual or Not Intellectual Enough? by thunder-in-pants · · Score: 1
    This is a fascinating concept but I think it will fall on deaf ears in the US. Essentially, the process of training for space flight is too boring. People will tune in expecting to see The Right Stuff and instead they will be seeing Spacecamp.

    Geeks wanting to watch will be disappointed that the training is watered down and average Joe and Joan Sixpack will be confused because there will be a show of the constestants doing trigonometry problems calculating thrust coefficients and the like.

    Besides, as with Big Brother, we can see the allure of Reality TV is going away. Survivor II will be a real test of the durability of this genre.

    --

    Listen, Sigmund, we'll discuss it in the morning.

  119. Way, Way off by photozz · · Score: 2

    Recent story on Discovery chanel. The Real story of the russian space program. They blew up more spacecraft than the US ever produced. it took them 4 TRYS to get their heavy launch vehicle (I forget the name.. big thingie.. 30 or so engines) off the pad. not testing, real launches. Blew them all to hell. We never knew due to cold war blackout and iron fist on the media. Don't know what their human deth tole is, but I bet the % is far worse than us.

    --


    Dirty Pirate Hooker
    1. Re:Way, Way off by Maurice · · Score: 1

      The heavy launch vehicle was the N-1. There were 4 failed test launches after which the program was canceled since US went to the Moon. Many rockets explode during initial test launches, including the new Delta-3 from Boeing which had some big problems. Arianne also comes to mind (floating point overflow killed it). Also, the Russians have the most realiable rocket in the world, the Proton (yeah they had two explode recently because of new engines, but these count as a new model). I checked this on discovery.com.

    2. Re:Way, Way off by photozz · · Score: 1

      true,..true... they still blew up more crap, impresivly so, I might add, than we did. Post cold war, they are loosing nukes and uranium and the mafia has moved in. I'll stick with NASA

      --


      Dirty Pirate Hooker
  120. Last one to Mir is a rotten egg! by ackthpt · · Score: 4
    This should actually be exceedingly dull, unless you're Jason Fox or his buddy Marcus of the Foxtrot strip.

    For $40M NBC could have done 'Survivor' with more entertainment value, such as:

    Championship Quarterbounce

    John Madden vs. Dennis Miller, Who Can Ramble On Longest Without Accidentally Commenting on the Game

    /. Effect: Contestants must keep servers from crashing

    South-Of-The-Border Water Drinking Contest, be the last to get Moctezuma's Revenge

    Silicon Valley Survivor: Snow Wall Street and keep your dotcom alive the longest without a viable product! :o)

    Java Survivor: Write the most lines of code before finding API is documented wrong

    TV Survivor: Watch TV the longest without raiding the fridge. (Time deducted for comatose periods)

    Vote Naked 2000

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  121. just something to ponder by GW+Hayduke · · Score: 4

    Are one of them going to insist on "zero-G" training in the nude on their birthdays????

    --
    -- Life: Hate the Game... Love the cereal
    1. Re:just something to ponder by dwater · · Score: 1

      If the naken guy wins, he could moon the whole
      planet when he get up there.

      --
      Max.
  122. Re:MIR again!?! by HeghmoH · · Score: 2

    Anything in low-earth orbit is in a decaying orbit. Operating lifetime as decided by whom? The engineers who built the thing designed for five years. That is, it was guaranteed to work for five, much like your car has a three-year warranty. Would you be afraid to get in a 40-year-old car that originally came with a five-year warranty?

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  123. MST2K by Scrooge919 · · Score: 1

    This is all a secret plot of the Russians to hold the winner captive on the space station and force him/her to watch cheesey movies... Next step, they'll rename Mir to the Space Station of Love...

  124. Oh please don't burst my bubble by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    I'd like to think that no other nation on the face of the planet would WANT to be involved with something like this. Please don't ruin it for me.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  125. How cheezy! by mholve · · Score: 2
    "Destination Mir?"

    That's so hokey!

    I guess now we'll get to see all those space ads for Pizza Hut and Taco Bell... ;>

    1. Re:How cheezy! by Tower · · Score: 1

      sounds like a ride at Disney World.
      --

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  126. It's more than cultural ... by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    When trying to compare English and Russian languages, I find the origin of such a difference in approaches.

    English grammar is much stricter, and both the grammar and lexics are much less tolerant to distortions, i.e. you can distort the words and/or word order much more and still be understood correctly in Russian. With English you need to be more accurate and pay attention to all details; slight distortion, such as using one time instead of another, might change the whole meaning of the phrase.

    This is IMHO where Russian sloppiness/ingenuinity and American anal-retentivness/atention to details originate ;-)

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  127. I believe.... by The+Ferg · · Score: 1

    That the above is the dumbest thing that I've ever heard. Christ, first CBS rips the viewers away from ABC, now NBC is ripping it away from CBS. You know what I'm going to do? Rip my TV outta the wall. There's nothing good on anymore Wednesday Nights... Fergs

    --
    - The Ferg webmaster@na.mdc.net
  128. A better idea by doog · · Score: 2

    Why don't they just put all the contestants in a Russian Sub instead?

    1. Re:A better idea by Tower · · Score: 1

      You'd have just a good a chance as you would on Mir - it's a lot easier to recuperate from debilitating oxygen loss, the bends, and the like than it would be from re-entry...
      --

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    2. Re:A better idea by sillysally · · Score: 1
      Why don't they just put all the contestants in a Russian Sub instead?

      where've you been? they just ran that show a couple of weeks ago... :) OK, OK, that was callous.

  129. Rather than just random people? by irksome · · Score: 2

    Why don't they pick 15 "Well Hated" people and send them all up, see who lasts the longest.

    Hmm. Who would they send up? Here's my (mostly random) picks:

    1. Bobby Knight
    2. John Rocker
    3. Shawn Walsh
    4. Rae Carruth
    5. Carl Everett
    6. Dennis Rodman
    7. Monica Lewinski
    8. O.J.
    9. Bill Gates
    10. Any Random MPAA or RIAA executive
    11. Any member of a so-called "Boy Band"
    12. Dr Evil
    13. Madonna (deserves to die for her rendition of American Pie)
    14. That annoying little girl from the Pepsi commercials
    15. (Insert your least favorite /. editor here)

    Hmm, almost like a slashdot poll.

    -

  130. SV VC $ by jsm · · Score: 1
    Silicon Valley Survivor: Snow Wall Street and keep your dotcom alive the longest without a viable product!

    That reminds me-- I've been meaning to print up bumper stickers that read "My other startup is up my nose."

  131. You would have great ratings! by Orclover · · Score: 1

    Hell i like a previous suggestion, lets get all 14 of them crammed into mir first, then lets all vote them off the station one a day for two weeks. The last one to leave gets to actually come back to earth on a shuttle, and not just be blown out of an air lock. Make the contestants convicts (or end users, either way) and you would have my attention at 7pm (9 central) for 14 strait days.
    As for sending up somebody "unbalanced" to see what he would do? well hell that would be about the same, only the tension would be alot higher as you wait to see what the poor sap does..Does he blow himself out the airlock or mess up the control systems and bring mir crashing down onto new york?

    -Vote Ventura and Powell in 2004!

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. -Fight Club
  132. Re:Voyeurism fad by Alatar · · Score: 1
    These shows are so boring, you could hardly tear yourself away from the screen, huh? You'd figure someone that thinks these to be hardly interesting wouldn't watch them at all. Like me, for instance.

    The Mir show will be boring, like the other shows. Won't stop anyone from watching it, though. Millions and millions of people watch TV every night habitually, whether or not there's anything on.

  133. UPN News by mholve · · Score: 1

    Can't be any worse than UPN (Channel 9 in NY) news... Yikes! You mock a headline like that - on UPN/9 they actually have headlines like that!

  134. "You must be THIS tall..." by Erbo · · Score: 2
    Hey, I'd want to go, too, but I'm too tall to fit in a Soyuz. Seriously, a Soyuz can't take anyone taller than 5'10" or thereabouts; I forget the exact height, but I know that, at 6'3", I'd never fit.

    And don't even suggest that I go lop off my feet or something like that; I'd still like to have a decent life back on Earth after the trip :-).

    I wonder if the producers of this show know about the height restrictions...I'd hate to see someone become the winning contestant and then get told, "Oh, sorry, you won't fit into the capsule. Tough luck."

    Eric
    --

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  135. Re:What does the winner do? by Barbarian · · Score: 2

    they're going to launch them with two russians at the same time.

    --

  136. Hmmm... by ronfar · · Score: 2
    Ok, let's see, this will be more fun if...

    A fat, balding astronaut releases ruffled potato chips on the transport...

    The experimental ants get loose, prompting Peter Jennings to welcome our "New Ant Overlords..."

    And the day is saved by... an inanimate carbon rod.

    Should I be pleased or scared when real life imitates The Simpsons?

    A little from column A and a little from column B?

    --
    All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
  137. So it's a death ride, you say? by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    If only we could send Regis Philbin...

    --

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  138. The Next Generation in Realty TV by wuzzle_wuzzle · · Score: 1
    Man, why just copy the current Reality TV Shows?

    Cutting edge reality programming would show a dozen people locked up in a room with only Web TVs and a Mr. Coffee. Each week there could be quizes about what's on the air and the web, and contestants are eliminated one by one. Throw in an XBill contest for good measure. At the end, the winner wins a frontal lobotomy so they can enjoy life just sitting in a rocking chair watching dust collect.

    --
    "Research is like sex: sometimes something useful is produced, but that's not why we do it." -- Richard Feynman
  139. Re:Just what the world needs... by CountZer0 · · Score: 1
    Oh, and posting to /. is such productive use of your prescious time.

    It is a much better use of my time than Television.

    Television is a one-way medium.They produce, we consume./. is a two-way medium.They produce, we respond.Any conversation, no matter how inane, is a far superior way to spend ones time than as a receptor for mass-media ideals.

    Don't waste your life being a passive receiver of ideology.Think for yourself!Converse with other humans.Even if it is about something banal and "worthless" (such as this thread) at least you will be interacting with another member of your species.Television is a one-way ticket to mindless passivity.

  140. Re:What does the winner do? by PopeFelix · · Score: 1
    In fact, among the "Gangster Ho" population as a whole, the Estonian Librebashenallesfreundengeldsexxer (Gangster Ho) is widely regarded as the most attractive in the Western Hemisphere. Prominent Librebashenallesfreundengeldsexxerzen are often fervently sought out by other members of the Gangster Ho community, and asked for advice on such diverse topics as Kantian fundamentalism, the lavatory habits of the Visigoths, and the best ways of putting a cap in someone's ass.

    Pope Felix the Scurrilous.

    --

    Pope Felix the Scurrilous.
    Computer Geek by day, religious Icon by night.

  141. What does the winner do? by PopeFelix · · Score: 2
    So what will the winner do when he/she is launched into orbit? I doubt that all of the contestants will have a heavy scientific background...

    I'd like to know just what sort of criteria the producers will have for contestants. Will it be completely physical?

    Pope Felix the Scurrilous.

    --

    Pope Felix the Scurrilous.
    Computer Geek by day, religious Icon by night.

  142. I predict exageration by joepits · · Score: 1

    The training for the trip will probably not be the most exciting thing. They will most likely make it look more exciting than it is. They won't air the jogging and swimming parts of the training. The whole show will involve those things that bounce around like the amusement park rides.

    Another exciting point will focus on the use of the space toilets.

    It sounds really not fun to watch, but people will watch it.

  143. Re:MIR again!?! by rabidcow · · Score: 1

    the difference being if this car breaks down, you're dead.

  144. Official Response from by AbbyNormal · · Score: 2

    FOX: "DOH!"

    --
    Sig it.
  145. TV is more like SF everyday by Chuk · · Score: 2

    Didn't they have TV like this in science-fiction stories starting a long time ago, and even recently being filmed? (e.g. EdTV, The Truman Show) Can't TV people even make up their own crappy ideas anymore? Do they have to steal from literature (like The Running Man and Killerbowl (or whatever the heck that Gary Wolf book was called))?

    --
    chuk
  146. Re:MIR again!?! by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    Not unless the door falls off.

    Think of it more like driving the car in the desert. If it breaks, you're stuck there without any supplies. However, in the car, you have to walk to civilization. In Mir, you have a Soyuz module attached whose sole purpose it to get you back down to Earth if something goes wrong.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  147. good idea by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

    they should have shot richard into space
    the nude bum

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  148. Voyeurism fad by Rurik · · Score: 4

    What is it with this new fad? The Real World was interesting, at least the first two seasons. After that, everyone became used to it, and the novelty wore off, no matter how many extreme stereotypes they put into one room. Big Brother was the exact same. You stick extreme people from every side of the track into a house, and watch them.
    What's this supposed to prove, that your family isn't the only dysfunctional household on the street?
    Survivor was interesting. It was a novel approach, where people weren't tested on their ability to handle Suzie talking for 6 hours straight on the phone. They were tested for physical and mental endurance, and the cash prizes didn't hurt.
    And now, Destination Mir, along the same lines of Survivor. I pray that this will be the LAST of this new fad. This show will only have two good episodes, guaranteed: the first, to get to know who all is there, and the last, to know who wins. The rest is just filler. And the fact that the space staff votes contestants off takes out the human factor of friendships/enemies.

    IMO, it'll be hardly interesting. If you want to see what goes on when various people are put through training to get into physical shape, then join the Army. I really can't see a difference.

  149. MIR again!?! by A_Roche · · Score: 1

    Let's think about this.
    Mir has been up there a VERY long time. NASA has been insisting that the station has outlived it's operating lifetime. It has a decaying orbit. Why in the world would ANYBODY in there right mind want to risk a trip up there? Would you really want to compete for the chance when winning isn't about who is the most suited, but who is the best butt-kisser? No way, I want to go up, but not like that. my $.02

    --


    We now return you to your regularly scheduled moment of insanity...
  150. Re:What does NASA understand in space stations? by A_Roche · · Score: 1

    It's not NASA that cna't convert, just Lockheed-Martin.

    --


    We now return you to your regularly scheduled moment of insanity...
  151. Individual Russians are A-OK by cybrpnk · · Score: 1

    To follow up on my original post, while I have some heartburn about ***Russia***, I think ***Russians*** are a very cool and resourceful people and there are some really great individuals there. They have this love/hate relationship with strict authority, tho, and it saps them of initiative....My biggest shock about Russians was that they avoid looking you in the eye, and don't even seem to be aware they are doing it.

  152. So what if it *IS* true? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 3
    >He doesn't mention a $2M government contract.
    >Are you sure that's real?

    So what if it *IS* true?

    Fisher Space Pens sell for $7.99 per at the gift shop (last time I went to see a shuttle launch @ Kennedy Space Center... about two years ago).

    I used to live in Florida. I lived there for more a decade. I know the habits of touisitis annoyingians quite well. I have no doubt in my mind at all that they've sold enough $7.99 Fisher Space pens to recoup a $2mil investment, and more.

    It boggles the mind what a tourist will drop money on just to have an "official souvineer". SOMEBODY is *surely* making a healthy profit off those things; two-million dollar development cost or no...

    "look maw!!! it's one of them thar ass-trough-nut pens!!! less get one for juinor sweetums nana pappy and the rest of the clan!!!"

    And let's not even THINK of the mounds of Disney crap that the suckers^H^H^H^H^H^H^Htourists will blow money on.

    john
    Resistance is NOT futile!!!

    Haiku:
    I am not a drone.
    Remove the collective if

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  153. Stupid thought by ^_^x · · Score: 2

    I think it'd be so much more entertaining if they had to take all the training in Russian, and had alarms on the station go off randomly. =P

    (Actually, the idea reminds me of a lot of the Japanese game shows I've seen. "Alright, time for a game of no-hands bowling ball catch!" "WHAAAT?!")

  154. "Have spacesuit, will travel" by peter303 · · Score: 2

    This contest reminds me of the the Heinlein book
    "Have spacesuit, will travel". The book does
    have special twist however.

  155. All hail Discordia! by BrotherPope · · Score: 1

    MirCorp is a joint venture between the Gold & Appel Transfer S.A. holding company and RSC Energia...

    Why is it that I imagine the winner being given a ride to Atlantis in a golden submarine instead?

    Yeah, I know it's been said before, but the reference still amuses me greatly.

  156. special, live broadcast by Xibby · · Score: 1

    ...if we can find a transmitter that isn't charred beyond all recongition, just like our cosmonaut riding up on your missle...errr...rocket."

    --
    I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
  157. "Launch vehicles" !== "MANRATED launch vehicles" by tesserae · · Score: 2
    I'm just talking sheer launch vehicle failures (manned missions being a small subset)...the numbers don't show high reliability.

    It's not fair to lump the two categories together -- manrated boosters are a small subset of boosters, and they're much more reliable than the run-of-the-mill cargo launcher. Matter of fact, I can recall only one fatal manrated launcher failure: Challenger.

    ---

    --

    ---
    Politics is about making compromises. Religion isn't. --Michael Horton

  158. Hmm by Fervent · · Score: 1
    What guarantee is there that the winner will be competent enough to board Mir? Is this a Survivor-like thing, where the winner won't necessarily be voted as "the most competent" but "the best at playing the game"?

    Some serious legal precedents could be set up by sending some normal citizen up who passed the test -- but is actually crazy. I'm sure NBC's ratings would skyrocket if the winner accidentally opened an airlock hatch... but at what cost?

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

  159. Tell your grandkids in 20 years... by seanmeister · · Score: 2
    and they'll say..

    "You went up in THAT thing - you're braver than I thought!"


    Sean

  160. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  161. Not Heinlein by Ross+C.+Brackett · · Score: 2

    Contrary to what everyone else is saying, I think you're thinking of Clarke's Islands in the Sky

    The kid's uncle was a lawyer and the space station was technically part of Earth, and the prize was a trip to anywhere on the planet.

    Good book.

  162. Wow by KaiShin · · Score: 1

    I wonder how NBC stole this out from under CBS's nose. Maybe CBS had too much Survivor with the new Australian Outback series and the rerunning of the original Survivor series? Or maybe CBS just didn't think the series would fly, despite their success with the original series. Remember, part of Survivor's success is due to its timing. It came in the summer when there is nothing but reruns and baseball. Audiences watched it first out of curiosity, and then just kept watching to see what happened next.

    Maybe NBC made a mistake. Of course, the actual launch episode should draw big ratings.

    --
    "I live in a world of make-believe, with faeries and leprechauns and tiny little frogs with funny hats."
  163. "Apollo 1" !== "Launch vehicle" by tesserae · · Score: 2
    Apollo 1 burned on its launchpad together with 3 astronauts.

    The Apollo spacecraft is very much distinct from the booster which launched it (matter of fact, there were several different boosters which launched Apollo capsules). The Soviet manned space program had a couple of fatal spacecraft failures, too... but those weren't launcher failures either.

    ---

    --

    ---
    Politics is about making compromises. Religion isn't. --Michael Horton