Slashdot Mirror


Denmark Poised to Legalize Music Sharing

Cryogenes writes: "Denmark's minister of culture is pushing a law that will legalize private music sharing. This is a logical step for a small country that has no music exports anyway: by weakening copyright they are making their citizens richer without losing revenue. And what with Denmark being an EU member, nobody will dare call them a rogue state or something. Further information on infoanarchy and on Politiken (in danish)."

209 comments

  1. Re:Flawed analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you could cure 60% of hiv sufferers, it wouldnt encourage other countries to infect people. If you shoot down 60% of missiles, you encourage other countries to manufacture 60% more missiles. Simple enough. The big picture is pushing money to arms corporations who contributed a lot to bushs campaign funds. That, and the 'feel good' factor of believing that someone is watching over you (hello, GOD!).

  2. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Christiana is NOT in Denmark!

    And i`d be interested to see sources for your comments about drugs in Holland.

    From what i`ve seen/read, no-one has a problem with the laws on drugs there, as they are working just fine (slowly rising average age of heroin users, less violent alcohol related crime etc).
    Money isnt an issue - Holland is strong on peoples rights, and if people want to smoke something which doesnt harm anyone else, why shouldnt they be allowed to?

  3. Re:Those Europeans will change thier tune when Bus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    One small detail i`m unsure of. How will the star wars project be able to distinguish between a suitcase with a nuke in it, and any other suitcase in a New York subway, bus, airport etc?

  4. CDR piracy tax is a license to pirate, yes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    If the city sends you a parking ticket every week for $300 for parking in the handicapped zone, regardless of wheather you did or not, then why shouldn't you park there once per week?

    The corrolary to "you do the crime, you do the time" is "you did the time, so why not do the crime?"

  5. irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    isn't this a beautiful irony.... I am fairly certain that Lars Ulrich of Metallica is originally from Denmark?

  6. Domain name by CaseyB · · Score: 1

    Yup, napster.dk is already taken.

    1. Re:Domain name by CokeBear · · Score: 2
      "Redundant" moderation does not always mean that this specific comment has been posted to this story previously. It could be used (IMHO) where a comment has been posted to other stories, or where a comment is something that is obvious to a large percentage (80%+?) of Slashdotters.

      Although Frist Psot is ususally moderated as troll or offtopic, is is also technically redundant, since it has been posted hundreds of times before. A comment about Microsoft is evil, or Apple is dying, or about free beer is redundant, even if its the frist psot.

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    2. Re:Domain name by Chester+K · · Score: 2

      Although Frist Psot is ususally moderated as troll or offtopic, is is also technically redundant, since it has been posted hundreds of times before. A comment about Microsoft is evil, or Apple is dying, or about free beer is redundant, even if its the frist psot.

      Crap. I guess I better stop saying how good Linux is, else I may lose my precious karma to Redundancy.

      --

      NO CARRIER
  7. Way ahead of you. by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2

    Blank video and audio cassettes are already taxed. Paper is kind of taxed, in that large institutions pay a special "tax" covering "expected copying (xeroxing) of copyrighted material".

    Actually, everything is taxed (VAT), the above are special taxes that goes to a fund (CopyDan) which distribute the money to publishers, record companies and movie distributors. A tiny fraction goes to the artist, most of that goes to those who need it the least, i.e. the big sellers.

    Sticks are not taxed, apart from VAT. However, if you mention it to our department of taxation, I'm sure that will be fixed in no time.

  8. EU Directive on Copyright by acb · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't all of this directly contradict the European Union Directive on Copyright, which is like the DMCA only much more restrictive? Would the Danish parliament be obliged to weaken or repeal this law to bring it inline with the directive, or weaken the directive? The way I understand it, European member states are expected to pass laws implementing Directives pretty much as they are.

    Any experts on European politics care to explain?

  9. Re:ROTFL! :*) by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 1
    all your ASDM are belong to us.

    move 'Raoul' for great justice.

    Meow, indeed. -Ayatollah

    --
    "How many six year olds does it take to design software?"

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
  10. In AD 2001, Copyright War was beginning. by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 4
    *BOOM*

    DENMARK: What happen???

    MINISTER OF JUSTICE: Someone set up us the lawsuit.

    MINISTER OF STATE: Main screen turn on.

    DENMARK: It's you!!!

    RIAA: How are you, Denmark?
    All your tunes are belong to us.
    You are on the way to embargo.

    DENMARK: What you say?!!

    RIAA: You have no chance negotiate make your settlement.

    DENMARK: Move 'EU'. You know what you doing. For great MP3z!!

    --
    "How many six year olds does it take to design software?"

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:In AD 2001, Copyright War was beginning. by Phokus · · Score: 1

      In AD 2001, Copyright War was beginning. (Score:2, Troll) Proof that the slashdot moderation system has gone to hell. Me? I found the post to be rather funny :)

  11. Hong Kong by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    Part of the fun of visiting Hong Kong was returning home with CDs containing copies of the latest applications. Is it still so?
    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  12. W33D the problem.. bah. by Malachi · · Score: 1

    Regardless of what you think, no country should tell me as an individual what the hell I can and cannot do. I am responsible unto myself, if I am responsible for hurting another, then I have myself to blame and should be punished accordingly. Also, sleezy shops, there are quite a handful of ugly shops, but its not like they spring out everywhere, there is a limited number and it stays that way. Maybe something can change in a positive way.. but abandonment of an openness only paves the way for bad things.

    --
    "Life is all about strategy, mathematics and psychological perceptiveness."
    1. Re:W33D the problem.. bah. by Weh · · Score: 1

      Regardless of what you think, no country should tell me as an individual what the hell I can and cannot do. I am responsible unto myself, if I am responsible for hurting another, then I have myself to blame and should be punished accordingly.

      You are a part of society, everything you do and are affects society to some degree. That's just part of being human. Whether you like it or not humans are social beings. Hurt yourself and you hurt others, it's as simple as that. Btw, it's usually easy to translate you hurting yourself into real economic loss for society.

      Whether governments should be able to tell you what to do as an individual is a matter of opinion. For the reasons I just stated I'm not wholly against some degree of government interference.

  13. CD-R Tax by mattkime · · Score: 5

    The post says they will compensate copyright holders with a 60 cent CD-R tax.

    How well would that go over in the US?

    Imagine RIAA members getting 60 cents everytime you backed up your por^H^H^H hard drive.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    1. Re:CD-R Tax by Jethro73 · · Score: 1

      RE: 60 cent tax...

      How well would that go over in the US?

      Well, considering I can remember all-too-well paying $40 for a five-pack of CD-Rs about five years ago (ouch), it could be much worse. At least they came with jewel cases. 8^)

      Jethro

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
    2. Re:CD-R Tax by WNight · · Score: 2

      Heh, yeah. Of all the CDs I've burned over the years (150 or so), probably 95% of the pirated ones (ie, not backups) were games. I burned one disk of MP3s, the rest were applications (Photoshop, etc).

      The musicians shouldn't get any of the CD Tax I pay, but the game companies would get a pretty decent cut.

    3. Re:CD-R Tax by bolind · · Score: 1

      Yes, we do have a 25% sales tax (or VAT if you like.) Yes, that is a DAMN lot.

      I don't have anything official to back this up, but I think that most hi-tech stuff is bought in the country. Things that we go to Germany for is usually booze, wine and beer (half prize), sweets and perfume (small savings.)

      I don't know about Sweden, The price level is pretty much the same, but since you get 1 Swedish krone for 0.82 Danish, it can sometimes be a good deal. But then you have the hassle if the thing breaks etc.

    4. Re:CD-R Tax by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2


      I need to buy some more CDs today and was just thinking about this. (I'm in Canada.)

      Its kinda annoying in that I have not burned one cd for music yet I still have to pay taxes as if I did. Sort of like getting your drivers license and have to pay $20 more for "speeding tax".

      Also, if its illegal to copy copyprotected material, how can they tax it? Isn't this like "living off of the avails of an illegal activity"?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:CD-R Tax by pallex · · Score: 1

      Buying goods in DK can be expensive, as they have pretty high VAT (25% i think). Their citizens are likely to nip into Sweden or Germany for hi techery..

    6. Re:CD-R Tax by El+Prebso · · Score: 1

      No problem we'll just buy our cd's in Germany, some companies are already planning to open departments in Germany and then ship the cds from there.

      --
      I didn't say it was your fault. I said I was going to blame it on you.
    7. Re:CD-R Tax by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same thing? How can you say that?? Audio CD-Rs come with their own jewel cases, and have pretty little fabricated graphs on the packaging!

      Sheesh..

      --
      "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
    8. Re:CD-R Tax by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a difference... not in quality, but the Audio CDR's have a code on them that says it's an audio cd. What this does is it allows dedicated cd recorders (audio, consumer grade, no pc involved) to reject non-audio cdr's. I have also heard rumor that some newer cd players will reject data cdr's, but havn't seen proof yet.

    9. Re:CD-R Tax by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Canada, but the U.S. Government (more specifically several states) has no problem enacting taxes on illegal activities. For instance, technically, you owe sales tax on drug sales-- I've even seen (don't know how it ended) legislation designed to require specific tax stamps to be purchased by marijuana sellers. Once arrested for the original crime, they could always throw tax evasion onto the list of charges with laws like this.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    10. Re:CD-R Tax by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      we have the same thing in the US....they are supposed to be higher quality (for recording) but I can't tell a difference...

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    11. Re:CD-R Tax by michaelo · · Score: 1

      here in AT there are to types of CD-Rs: The normal ones, which are cheap, dont have an additional tax, AFAIK. But the "Audio CD-Rs", as they are called, have it. It is said they are exactl the same thing.. the difference is only you make a present to nice copright-orgs with the Audio-CD-Rs..
      Platy

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earthbound misfit, I.
    12. Re:CD-R Tax by freeweed · · Score: 2
      A 60 cent tax in Denmark is probably one of the smaller taxes they've got, from what I've heard about their tax structure. Here in Canada, there's a marginal tax on blank recording media, supposedly to fund poor musicians and the like.

      What I've never figured out:

      1. Musicians (at least in Canada) pretty much fall into 2 categories - the very popular (and therefore not needing this money), or the almost unheard of (and therefore distributing a lot of their music on CD-R's themselves).

      2. I use CD-R's for so many different purposes, why exactly does the music industry get money from them? Personally, I buy them by the 100-spindle, and if I've burned 4 music cds over the past year I'd say that's a high estimate.

      Whoever managed to put this tax into place, and convince people that it is a valid tax, is either a genius or a sociopath :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    13. Re:CD-R Tax by reality101 · · Score: 1

      According to a program I watched recently, the marijuana tax stamp idea was a governmental scheme to fully close the gap on the illegality of pot. The idea was, you couldn't legally posess pot unless you had the stamp, and you couldn't get the stamp until you showed them the pot. A catch-22, essentially. IIRC, no stamps were ever issued.

    14. Re:CD-R Tax by dhamsaic · · Score: 1

      no way in hell i'm paying a 60 cent cd-r tax. i burn them too damn frequently, and i remember paying $3/each for them back when i got my first burner. their damn tax is the reason why cassette tapes are so expensive. if i'm gonna be paying a 60 cent cd-r tax, i'll just stop buying them.

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
  14. Congratulations! by Paladeen · · Score: 1

    I would like to congratulate the citizens of Denmark on their luck!

    Christiania, and legal music ripping == I'm going

    1. Re:Congratulations! by CokeBear · · Score: 2

      It has nothing to do with luck. The people of Denmark are highly intelligent, due to their excellent (and free) education system. The result is the informed and intelligent electorate elects people with brains to government, who then pass laws that actually make sense. (Unlike certain other countries... *cough*USA*cough*)

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
  15. Re:no music exports? by general_re · · Score: 5

    ...Big Swedish music exports include Abba, Ace of Base, Roxette...

    ...and as a result, Sweden is now classified as an exporter of weapons of mass destruction.

    ;)

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  16. Re:Those Europeans will change thier tune when Bus by elflord · · Score: 1
    Currently with no shield 100 nukes could easily destroy the US's 70 largest cities. With a shield that's 28 cities.

    This is not really accurate. Consider Chernobyl for example. It had a serious impact on nearby countries. Well aimed missiles would be considerably more damaging. (For example, have one detonate near a river, and you'll get a spectacular cloud, and one hell of a polluted river)

    If 28 missiles really did hit the US, the lucky ones would be those standing right next to where it landed.

  17. Re:What I'd like major artists to do by elflord · · Score: 1
    f major artists get about 25 cents from the sale of a fifteen dollar CD, they should try to migrate to a tips-for-what-you-like model, as suggested by Courtney Love, among others.

    Well, they're free to try. However, judging by the way fairtunes is doing, I don't believe it's a terribly successful strategy.

    Packaging three (or fewer!) good songs among 12 shitty ones is NOT going to fly anymore. We won't pay.

    Hahahaa ... makes me wonder what kind of crap the napsterites are listening to. On one hand, they talk about how the RIAA only sell cheesy pop tunes (a lie), and on the other, comments like these indicate that they're listening to cr*p.

    OTOH, a tipjar on the website asking for very-little e-gold might well pay more than selling the same

    Yeah, it might, but there's no evidence that it does. (and some that it doesn't.) Catering to freeloaders is not a successful business strategy.

    Of course, bad people will not give anything, but ask yourself what you do in an unfamiliar city at a place you'll never eat in again when tipping-time comes.

    proof by analogy is fraud
    Bjarne Stroustrup

    The flaw with this analogy is that tipping isn't anonymous.

    Anyway, I'm still working to get folks to see that e-gold is a solution to the Napster "problem." It's been slow, as more folks want to argue

    I see what you're trying to do, and your heart is certainly in the right place. However, using a pricing model that is designed to appeal to freeloaders simply isn't a smart business strategy. I'm not saying that everyone who dislikes the present system is a freeloader, however, it seems that most of the zealous napsterites are freeloaders.

  18. Re:What I'd like major artists to do by elflord · · Score: 1
    I don't know why I bother arguing with these illiterate slashdotters, but here I go ...

    Isn't that what Craig Mundie said in his speach.

    Irrelevant. (Was that supposed to be some sort of ad-hominem?)

    The problem with everyone's math is they talk in statistic's.

    On the contrary, the problem with the napsterites math is that they don't cite any statistics to support their assertions.

    FWIW, I agree that the RIAA are not any better than the napsterites. Both are ruthless amoralists.

  19. So I'm guessing that... by rnturn · · Score: 2

    ...Hillary Rosen woke up this morning and said to herself: ``There's something rotten in the state of Denmark!''


    --

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:So I'm guessing that... by aethera · · Score: 1

      Mod this up. Then mod me down for writing this post.

  20. No music exports? by shaka · · Score: 1

    What about Aqua?

    --
    :wq!
    1. Re:no music exports? by shaka · · Score: 1

      Umm... Big Swedish music exports include Abba, Ace of Base, Roxette, Meja and the Cardigans.
      Not that I'm very proud about it...

      --
      :wq!
    2. Re:No music exports? by Tim+C · · Score: 4

      What about Aqua? It says "music" ;-)

      Cheers,

      Tim (ducking and running...)

    3. Re:no music exports? by great+om · · Score: 1

      come on, the cardigans are actually a good band. You've got to admire a band that does Black sabbath songs as bubble-gum pop. And then on their next album, disguards most (if not all) of the bubblegum .

      -

      --
      ------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
    4. Re:No music exports? by pcurran · · Score: 1

      Or Kashmir.

    5. Re:no music exports? by radja · · Score: 2

      Aqua.. heard it described in lots of ways. Black Metal wasn't one. Now excuse me while I continue listening to the Hives (swedish)

      //rdj

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    6. Re:No music exports? by Waerloga · · Score: 1

      Aqua is in fact danish altho the girl (named Lene IIRC ...don't like that kinda of music) is from Norway.

      On an interesting side note: Aqua contributes more to the Danish GNP (Gross National Product) than all the fishermen in the country combined.

      Not bad for a band that sings about dolls and candy :)

      -Waerloga

    7. Re:no music exports? by Zmej2000 · · Score: 1

      Some of the best psychedelic trance music is made in Denmark, i.e. Reefer Decree and Beat Bizarre on Iboga Records. Probably, the best music made on Earth right now.

    8. Re:No music exports? by iluvpr0n · · Score: 1

      Aqua 0wnz j00.
      Don't ask me why people have such a hard time listening to music that's just supposed to be fun. I distinctly recall purchasing the Australian import of their first album (Aquarium) at a local Circuit City a few years ago. The 16 year old punkloser laughed at me for buyin' it. Bastard. Aqua rules, I don't care what anyone says. :)

      iluvpr0n.

    9. Re:no music exports? by NachtVorst · · Score: 1

      I'd say the biggest music export from Denmark would be Lars Ulrich, of Metallica fame (?).

      Slightly ironic, isn't it?

      Ofcourse I shouldn't forget about the King (Diamond) & Mercyfull Fate.

      NachtVorst

    10. Re:No music exports? by Joohn · · Score: 1

      What about Metallica??

  21. Re:Legal in Denmark, but... by Jethro73 · · Score: 1

    Sorry. I assumed (like a stupid American) that you would guess "here" is the United States. 8^)I falsely assumed that most readers are in the States. Many apologies.

    Jethro

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
  22. Legal in Denmark, but... by Jethro73 · · Score: 2

    Isn't it legal here?! I don't recall any verdicts to come down saying otherwise...

    Jethro

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
    1. Re:Legal in Denmark, but... by MartinG · · Score: 3

      It depends where "here" is. You could have been a bit more specific. What continent/country/county/state do you live in?

      --
      -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
    2. Re:Legal in Denmark, but... by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

      I believe that a survey of Slashdot reader, if it could possibly be done, would reveal that most *are* in the U.S. Those who are not tend to (often) A) Resent the U.S. for precisely this reason, among others; and B) Act as an extremely vocal minority.

      --
      "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
  23. Swedish Metal by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    Sweden is in fact quite famous for its metal exports, and not just the subgenre of black metal. There's a whole series of death metal bands from Gothenburg that have pretty much created a new subgenre, and there's even germanic-style power/speed metal such as Hammerfall and Nocturnal Rites. These are very high-profile bands known by metalheads all over the world. I wouldn't be surprised if I even saw a Hammerfall CD in a retail music store(!) in USA. It's really that mainstream.


    ---
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Swedish Metal by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 3

      Like this guy? Pardon me while I stuff cheese in my ears.

      He is (probably unwillinigly) today's Cruel Site of the Day.
      --

      --
      Yes, the nick is flamebait
  24. Re:Those Europeans will change thier tune when Bus by Tim+C · · Score: 4

    Actually, there are those of us here in the UK who don't think that it's a very good idea at all, given the dangers of it starting another arms race.

    After all, if you had been relying on your nukes to keep you "safe" in a "they'll never attack, it would be suicide" sort of way, then someone deployed a system to neutralise that "safety", wouldn't you try to reestablish the balance?

    Still, this is a discussion for another time, methinks - we don't want to go to far Offtopic, do we?

    Cheers,

    Tim

  25. Re:Doesn't this violate international law ? by PRickard · · Score: 1
    Why don't we all join together and start our own country? Napster is rumored to be going offshore to avoid US copyright law, so lets all go offshore with it and set up The United States of Napster or The People's Republic of Free Tunes. Our nation would have no copyright law and we would have a clause in the constitution agreeing not to sign any treaties with other countries concerning intellectual property. We could get online and download all the free music we wanted and also never pay for software again.

    And since it was my idea, I get to be lord high emperor.

    --

    == Paul Rickard, Editor of The Microsoft Boycott Campaign ====

  26. Not as good as it sounds by Badgerman · · Score: 3

    Well, its nice to see the Danish government wants to allow file sharing - and they're allowing it by taxing writeable CDs.

    This isn't a victory for file sharing.

    At best, the CD tax is just a throwaway "shut up and take it" measure. At worse, however, it is the start of the idea of enforcing profits. Either way, it sets a dangerous precident.

    This is a tradeoff - taxes on specific media sent right to copyright holders so people don't get harassed or arrested for sharing files.

    If something like this was tried in the United States, companies would demand taxes on everything - disks, videotapes, audiotapes, photocopier use, etc. It'd be used as nothing more to funnel money to them - enforced profits.

    Let's hope Denmark's idea DOESN'T catch on.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    1. Re:Not as good as it sounds by KrunZ · · Score: 1

      In fact we have such taxes in Denmark. Not that I like it though. The money from the CD's goes to the record artists and sadly not the software industry.

  27. Re:coup denmark by fitsy · · Score: 1
    ...Except, ironically, Lars Ulrich, who is a native of Denmark.

    Now, that is ironic, and I like it a lot

  28. Re:Thoughts from a local... by MadMoose · · Score: 1

    Hi Bo! Last time I talked to him (the linuxpusher), he said he'd been talking to someone and wouldn't have to pay the tax. Business-exemption, I believe. Bit of a bitch for the rest of us, though... Something is rotten i Denmark, and chances are there's a tax on it. Thomas

  29. Re:Thoughts from a local... by WNight · · Score: 2

    Well, I'm completely against CD taxes, BUT... If they are going to collect them, do id Software, and Epic, and Planet Moon, etc, get their cut? The only thing I use CDs for other than backups, etc, is games. I actually own Giant, Q3, and UT, but I know many people who've pirated them - more people than have burned MP3s...

    So, to be fair, the RIAA has got to step back and let that tax be fairly divided. And now with DiVX, the MPAA is going to be involved. (And they seem to think movies are more important than music...)

    It'll be nice to see a little infighting.

  30. Re:Some information by kongstad · · Score: 1
    What Søren is saying isn't infact all true - it's IS legal in Denmark to make digital copies for personal use, and it's been like this since newyear.

    This is not true!
    The intetion was to allow digital copying, but problems with royalties on writable cd-roms stopped the law.
    There is now a draft in the works. You can see this here
    Søren

  31. Some information by kongstad · · Score: 2

    this is really not such a big deal. As it is now Danish law says that it is illegal to make digital! copies of digital content. (Me reading slashdot in Denmark is borderline criminal behaviour since my computer makes a digital copy of a digital original).
    With everyone owning cd-burners and with compression technology (mp3) this law is outdated. It came about in response to the music industries wish to protect itself with the advent of music cd's.
    Danish copyright law states that everyone is entitled to make personal copies of published material. You can copy books, videos etc. It is of course illegal to publish such material, or to sell it. You can only make personal copies.
    The new law proposes the same restrictions on digital content. Any published material may be copied for personal use. The bearing on Napster is of course that when music is available on Napster it is in fact published material. As such anyone can make a personal copy.
    It will still be illegal to publish material on the internet without consent of the copyright holders, so Danes will still be prohibited from sharing music via Napster.
    Søren

  32. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by Khalid · · Score: 1

    Yeah Denmark is certainly a pretty liberal country, alas I have learned recently that they are poised to recognize Cientology as a religion, this will be a major blow to other European countries like Germany and France who are trying their possible to stop this evil cult !

  33. Thoughts from a local... by bolind · · Score: 5

    Hi

    Being Danish, I feel I must make a few comments here.

    Currently, it's illegal to make a personal copy of a CD. Say, one for the car and one for the living room. I think this also includes MP3's, but the laws are hopelessly outdated. (Actually, it's illegal to make exact digital copies. If you run your CD through a Digital-to-Analog-to-Digital converter, you should technically be OK.)

    The new law (in the making) suggests that it should be legal to make digital copies for personal use. Second generation copies (copy-of-a-copy) should not be legal, as a mean to avoid music piracy.

    The artists should be reimbursed with funds coming from a new CDR-tax, of appr. $0.50 pr. disc[1]. (Good thing I just stockpiled 100 80 min. Kodaks, heh. ;)

    Of course, we copy stuff as crazy, so I don't see this being of much practical importance.

    On a somewhat related note, this is the country that just ruled that *linking* to MP3's is illegal. Yes, two kids, 16 at the time of the "crime", had been having a competition of who could collect the most MP3's from their homepages. They weren't storing them, just linking to them. Just got a bill for about $15.000. Freedom of speech, anyone?

    Bo

    [1] I find this somewhat fscked up, as not all CDR's are used to pirate data. Granted, in reality, that's probably the vast majority, but take my friend for instance. He runs a small side-business (linuxpusher.dk) selling homeburned Linux-distros. If the new law comes through, he's going to be sending ~$100 away in taxes each month, for something he doesn't have anything to do with.

    1. Re:Thoughts from a local... by wheel · · Score: 1
      The artists should be reimbursed with funds coming from a new CDR-tax, of appr. $0.50 pr. disc.
      ...I find this somewhat fscked up, as ...[a friend who] runs a small side-business (linuxpusher.dk) selling homeburned Linux-distros...is going to be sending ~$100 away in taxes each month...

      Not only is this bad for your non-musician friend, but it also means that musicians who self-publish CD's will end up (effectively) paying royalties to the RIAA for their own material!

      Now that is truly fscked up.

      Q: What do you call a drummer who broke up w/ their girl/boyfriend?

    2. Re:Thoughts from a local... by NachtVorst · · Score: 1
      I find this somewhat fscked up, as not all CDR's are used to pirate data. Granted, in reality, that's probably the vast majority, but take my friend for instance. He runs a small side-business (linuxpusher.dk) selling homeburned Linux-distros. If the new law comes through, he's going to be sending ~$100 away in taxes each month, for something he doesn't have anything to do with.
      Here in Holland we've been paying a small fee on top of the prices of disks, tapes and other recordable media for years. The sum of these fees is distributed among 'copyright-holders'.

      However, if you use buy a lot of recordable media, you can pay a flat fee (around 50 euro) after which you can buy the media without paying any additional fees.

      This seems like a reasonable solution to me. The customers never really complain and the 'copyright-holders' don't bitch about their copyrights being 'stolen'.

      NachtVorst
  34. Re:Let the music play by gorilla · · Score: 3

    Don't forget that it's unreliable. As SMDI found, it's very easy to distord a signal so that the recognition fails, but without noticable effects to the human listening.

  35. Re:What I'd like major artists to do by e-gold · · Score: 1

    I like Fairtunes a lot (they take e-gold!) but to be successful (IMO) any give-a-tip system would have to be right there on the Napster application, staring the person in the face. I'd agree that this is less likely since Napster has sold (out?) to Bertelsman(sp?), so when I say "Napster," please think "whatever file-sharing program ends up being dominant." From what I've seen, there's space for an e-gold account number on the Napster application, and I think that Napster would benefit as a company (and in a legal/PR sense) by encouraging this, though I doubt it's in the interest of Bertelsman(sp?).

    I didn't mean Napster users listened to crap, I just meant that folks won't tip for it, and won't any longer have to buy it or have it in their homes, and ultimately I think this will affect music in a positive way. I'd like to store ONLY songs I like, and not store any that I dislike. Before that was impossible, and now it's possible (and easy). Sorry if I was unclear.

    I don't think that asking for tips is "catering to freeloaders," and I think the other person's response covers this aspect pretty well. Ultimately, with the present versions of file sharing software, it's very hard NOT to be a "freeloader" and get any use out of the product, right?

    I'm sorry if you dislike my analogy, but when I think about it, with cash and in a diner I'll probably never eat in again I'm a LOT more anonymous than when I make an e-gold spend, and the recipient can see at least my account name & number. e-gold isn't anonymous cash (Mr. Greenspan prints that stuff, on nice greenish paper, and it USED to be backed with the filthy yellow metal). I tend to make my tips as anonymous as possible, putting them under something so that the intended recipient will be the one to find and get them.

    As for my! heart being in the right place, thanks, but actually I'm an incredibly-greedy anarcho-capitalist evil "heartless" libertarian type of guy, and I try to make it clear that many of my posts* are self-interested. I benefit if/when more people (especially artists and programmers!) use e-gold, so I hang around here for that reason; and in order not to be TOO much of a pain in the ass, I offer to click /. readers a bit of e-gold to play with, if they send me an account number.
    JMR

    * I've even said that someone should hack the Slashcode so that site-owners can sell moderator points (this may or may-not be a good idea, but I think on balance it's good, and it's definitely good for ME!:) I'd be very happy if someone here did this, I haven't the skill. Thanks.

    --
    Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
  36. What I'd like major artists to do by e-gold · · Score: 2

    If major artists get about 25 cents from the sale of a fifteen dollar CD, they should try to migrate to a tips-for-what-you-like model, as suggested by Courtney Love, among others. As seller of a payment system that allows efficient, instant, international micro (or macro) payments, I'm of course self-interested when I say this, but it goes beyond that, and I don't care if they also use competing payment systems. The important thing is to keep the RIAA from filtering out the lion's share for -- as Ms. Love so eloquently puts it -- trips to Scores (a famous NYC stripper bar, for those who don't know).

    This idea at first sounds bad for the RIAA, and it is, but it's a double-edged sword. Musicians are gonna have to get used to only being paid for good work. Packaging three (or fewer!) good songs among 12 shitty ones is NOT going to fly anymore. We won't pay. OTOH, a tipjar on the website asking for very-little e-gold might well pay more than selling the same number of CDs as free-downloads given away.

    Of course, bad people will not give anything, but ask yourself what you do in an unfamiliar city at a place you'll never eat in again when tipping-time comes. I leave a tip if the service was halfway decent -- and a really-nice tip if it was great. I don't do it for the recipient, I do it for ME (I once worked for tips, that makes a difference I've found). Anyway, I'm still working to get folks to see that e-gold is a solution to the Napster "problem." It's been slow, as more folks want to argue (at least, that was my experience at CFP99) and shout than think about a new way of paying or being paid for what we want online.
    JMR

    --
    Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
    1. Re:What I'd like major artists to do by kel-tor · · Score: 1
      Catering to freeloaders is not a successful business strategy. Isn't that what Craig Mundie said in his speach. Of course he seemed to forget that Hotmail is free.

      The problem with everyone's math is they talk in statistic's. (Made up example stats:) The average user downloads 500 songs, and bought 15 CD's. Simple math which totatly ignore's how much spending money each user has. If a rich kid has $50 to spend on music in their budget per month, they could buy 40 CD's per year (@$15) with supplimental downloads, while the next kid only has $10 per so can't buy a CD on any given month. In fact to him, the price of the CD compared to the enjoyment recieved is out of reach. $2 CD's (like you can get distro's online from some places for), would completely change this dynamic. The first kid can only listen to so much, so buys less; for the 2nd kid it's more economical. In the high priced CD version, the second kid still spends his $10 frugally on some blank CD's and burns a few of his wealthy'er friends CD's. (The bean counters have determined that a price of $18/CD makes the industry cartel the most profit). Neither kid's motivation is to give a company more money (hey next time you hear that your local grocery story is having problems competing with UberMart, are you going to donate a bit extra to keep them in business... neither will these 2 kids). Do kid's want their fav artist to get rich? Sure, but they don't really want to pay for it. Consumers do just as much cost-benefit analysis as a corp, but in simpler terms, "I got a good deal."

      The real problem defined: digital is cheaper, doesn't have cumbersome physical media, and easier and has better playback (better playback meaning: my whole music collection in one place, "Radio Ktor.")... the loss in quality, the loss of royalties, the nice looking liner notes, lack of a permanent form of physical media, nor the lack of a collectable media container, withstanding. Everyone try's to get the most for their dollar, whether it is the RIAA or the human downloading off of the net.

      If the RIAA were a guild in the middle ages, they would have had laws passed and factory owners thrown in prison if they could.

      In the end tho, it is the customer that spend's money, and it is a competetive market... please your customer and get rich, gouge your customer and get ignored. Simple economics.

      --

      ---

  37. Re:Already in the UK by Tower · · Score: 1

    $1/disc... ouch, they haven't been that expensive here for a couple years... darn VAT. Decent discs run ~$.25-30 each, with cheap ones coming in ~$.15 each. Heck, you can get CD-RWs for $.45-.50 a piece. $1 is a heck of an increase. I think I've seen the Audio CD-Rs for ~$2. So with the VAT, does that mean if you buy a Dodge Dakota (~$25,000) in the UK, the VAT increases it to $100k? (showing my total ignorance) or is media just amazingly taxed?

    --

    --
    "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  38. Covenant by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

    http://www.covenant.dk/

    Fruity pop cyberpunk music.

    1. Re:Covenant by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Who are actually a swedish band. :-)

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  39. Irak doesn't need missiles by ^BR · · Score: 2

    What are the real odds for US Customs to catch a container hosting a nuclear bomb ?

    Have you any idea how many countainers enter the US every day ? Why use missiles when you have trucks to deliver your warheads...

    (I said container because Irak miniaturisation technologies aren't on par with US ones...)

    1. Re:Irak doesn't need missiles by COAngler · · Score: 1
      What are the real odds for US Customs to catch a container hosting a nuclear bomb ?

      I assume you mean one of the standard shipping containers that does triple duty as a rail car or trailer box? I give 50-50, depending upon how Canadian Customs is doing that month.

      The US border with Mexico is relatively well-watched, compared to other national borders of the same length elsewhere in the world. The USBP there thinks mostly in terms of drugs and illegal immigrants, but they're about as thorough as they can be for their staffing and deployment.

      Our border with Canada, OTOH, is, well...two countries have a long history of relatively friendly relations. How seriously would we take the Canadian border as a threat? There aren't that many illegal drugs produced in Canada, and the only crimes Canadians routinely commit in the US are Bonnie Raitt's songs. The reason none of this actually matters: nuclear weapons/missiles are about prestige for whoever has them. Why else would India and Pakistan go public? Why else is Israel's nuclear weapons program an "everybody knows it" affair? A nation won't get that same prestige from anonymous shipping containers going boom in Milwaukee.

    2. Re:Irak doesn't need missiles by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Actually the US armed forces formed a special unit to test the security of their bases by attacking them. All the base commander was told was that it would happen in the next three months. Among this groups achievements was hijacking a nuclear submarine. Not suprizingly the team was booted out of the military because Egos in the Pentagon had benn deflated. If a US SSN can be hijacked smuggling a warhead into the US is peanuts.

      Why hasn't it happened yet?? It is also possible that an ICBM would go off on its own. Why has that not happened yet? Just because it has not happened yet does not mean it won't happen in the future. Maybe the worlds governments have just been sucsessful at stopping such attemts so far. All in all i don't see how it is practically possible to stop somebody from smuggling a warhead into the US. An even easyer coup would be to smuggle in Biological agents or highly toxic substances. If US customs can not stop cocaine from being smuggled in by the ton why should they find it easyer to locate a small box full of bioagents.

      Da Rabbit!

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    3. Re:Irak doesn't need missiles by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      So what? Pack a cargo hold half full of lead, put the bomb in there and pack another half cargohold worth of lead on top of it. Then sail the thing into position off the US coast and sink it. After a sutable amount of time detonate your 30 kiloton nuclear warhead and let the 300 meter tidal wave do the rest.

      Another variant might be what I suggested in my previous post only use a 767 cargo jet. Thousands of them come into the US every day as well.

      How about this? Send 50 holy warriors each with a small easily hidden capsule full of to 50 major US cities. Once there they dump the stuff into the water supply.

      The best defence against this is not High tech monitoring systems and "son of starwars" prestige projects that try to find the needle in the haystack. It is placing agents and infiltrators at the source of the trouble and keeping close tabs on everything the A-Bomb throwing troublemaker does. The trouble with the USA's ruling oligarchy is that it has come to believe that only satilites and hightech sensors are any use at spying. Which is also why they are so bloody suprised everytime a basic, "off the shelf" human spy equipped with only a couple of primitive MK.1 eyballs and some unsophisticated organic accoustic sensors, crawls up their arse and steals the A-Bomb serets they left lying around on the counter in the mess hall.

      Da Rabbit!

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    4. Re:Irak doesn't need missiles by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2
      They do not have to be on par in miturization. They could just buy one of the KGB mini nukes Gen. Lebed could not find a few years back when the Russians did an inventory.

      The NMS wil have 0 practical value for preventing strikes on the US for a variety of reasons. You have allready adressed the proctical impossibility of finding a nuke smuggled into the US. Add to that:

      The efficiency of this system will never reach 100%. The techincal difficaulties are too big.

      Decoys, by launching decoys a system like the NMS which is osteniably designed to deal with smaller attacks can be overloaded.

      It relies on ground stations without whom it is impotent and these stations are vulnerable.

      The simple fact is that if anyone who manages to build a hand full of nukes would also have to build the ICBM's to carry them from the middle east to the US. Which is not easy, the project is impossible to hide, as are the launch sites. Then to strike at the US he would have to launch several ICBM's carrying decoys to hide his hand full of nukes from the NMS. This in turn requires detailed technical knowledge of the sensor arrays used by the NMS. Information which a Nuclear Banana Republic might not find to be partickularly easy to obtain. The effort involved even in just creating a launch system able to reach the USA is enormous never mind the ELINT/jamming/decoys required to assure success.

      Charging a handfull of holy warriors with transporting it into the US in one of the millions of containers that enter that country every day is so much easyer. Just getting the thing into New York Harbour would be enaugh just sail it to the pier and detonate the thing.

      The only way to prevent that is to search every vessel that comes into the USA's EEZ with a geiger counter. Which would in turn require the US not only to ratifyin UNLOS but also altering it to give the US the right to conduct boardings and forced searches in its EES. Which would in turn have the side effect of giving China the right to force down or even Shoot down US Elint aircraft in its EEZ.

      MWUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

      Now what were we talking about?? Music?????

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    5. Re:Irak doesn't need missiles by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 1
      Charging a handfull of holy warriors with transporting it into the US in one of the millions of containers that enter that country every day is so much easyer. Just getting the thing into New York Harbour would be enaugh just sail it to the pier and detonate the thing.

      The only way to prevent that is to search every vessel that comes into the USA's EEZ with a geiger counter.

      No, there are plenty of other ways. All you have to do is scan the vessels with a gamma spectrometer (and you really only need to scan the ones coming into port; a bomb going off several miles offshore is going to do minimal damage compared to the political benefits to the USA's hawk faction). You don't have to board anything, and you can turn away craft which are carrying bomb materials and/or intercept and search them offshore (which we do have the right to do, because we have every right to defend ourselves against an act of war).

      The US Navy has got to have hundreds or thousands of sonar monitoring stations on the sea bed. If a substantial fraction of those aren't equipped with gamma spectrometers to detect bomb-carrying ships, I'd be very surprised.
      --
      spam spam spam spam spam spam
      No one expects the Spammish Repetition!

  40. Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by tourists by georgeha · · Score: 5

    ala Amsterdam, though instead of hanging out in coffee bars getting stoned, they'll hang out in cyber-cafe's trading MP3s.

    And when you get back to the States, Customs will go over your laptop and CDs with a fine tooth comb.

  41. Price of CDs by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2

    Sheesh. I can go through 5 cds in a couple of days.

    I hope that I can get $50/100cds later on today.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:Price of CDs by gsmraxe · · Score: 1
      Sheesh. I can go through 5 cds in a couple of days.

      I hope that I can get $50/100cds later on today.

      I'm still working on my 400 cds for 89.99 =]

      eh?

  42. Re:Hold on a second, the newspapers got it wrong by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2

    From what I can see;

    1. It allows you to copy from Napster to your CD/HD legally. A country of legal leeches. :)

    2. It allows you to rent a DVD/movie and legally rip it for your own use.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  43. Aqua er Norske by divec · · Score: 1

    Isn't Aqua Norwegian?

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

  44. Personal music copying LEGAL in Canada by xtal · · Score: 3

    From the CDR Faq: Because of the media tax imposed by the Canadian government (see section (7-13)), you are allowed to copy any music for your own personal use. This means that you can go over to a friend's house and copy any number of discs you like, so long as they are for your own use. You are not allowed to make copies of music and then give them to others.

    You can check the law yourself. The recording industry kinda skipped over this one. At least you get something for yet another miserable tax, er, levy. After all, just because a corporation doesn't LIKE something, doesn't make it ILLEGAL. What is illegal after all? The government is supposed to reflect the will of the people and the best interest of society, not the short term gain of the RIAA. (Especially if you're not IN America). That's why copyright is supposed to expire; why you have the right to parody and fair use; etc.

    Now, does this apply to file sharing software? It hasn't been argued in court that I'm aware of, but perhaps it should be. After all, it's legal for me to copy cds that a friend has - why not their mp3 equivilants? Keeping mind of course, for personal use implies that there is no financial gain, which kinda hurts napster-like models. This might give some canadian users some power if they get hassled by their ISP for whatever.

    --
    ..don't panic
  45. Re:Hmmm. reply and offtopic question by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    I'm in NJ and I use fast.net. There's no special software needed for installation and you have a straightforward, honest-to-goodness connection (via 56K, DSL & higher). I use the Freesco Linux floppy router/NAT/firewall to share my 56k dialup connection with a couple computers. No busy signals and the connection is always quick responsive.

    You get two email addresses, 5 megs of ftp/www space and access to pretty much every newsgroup (even the naughty ones).

    The cost? $19.95/mo or $15.95/mo if you prepay 6 months. It's even cheaper if you prepay for a year ($13.95 or something like that). Their number is 888-321-fast. I highly recommend them. My dad uses Netcarrier.com and their service is similar and pretty good, too.

  46. Doesn't this violate international law ? by pollo2 · · Score: 2

    As much as I find this extremely amusing, I'm pretty sure that this would violate international copyright agreements.
    I'm not _completely_ sure off course, but imho all "civilized" countries have a lot of agreements on this.

    --
    This is my sig. Hooray !
    1. Re:Doesn't this violate international law ? by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Yes, the European Copyright Directive. See this old article. I wonder what happens if a member nation refuse to adopt an EU directive.

    2. Re:Doesn't this violate international law ? by dachshund · · Score: 1
      Then they go to the big court, and in theory something happens... It could all get very complicated if an important member state really refused to comply-- the EU would probably be faced with adopting some sort of Europe-wide enforcement action (blocks on trade, etc.) But I doubt they would go too far against Denmark (as opposed to say, Latvia.)

      Here's an article on EU court efforts to enforce environmental directives, the closest thing 2 minutes of Googling would fetch me.

    3. Re:Doesn't this violate international law ? by dachshund · · Score: 2
      I'm pretty sure that this would violate international copyright agreements.

      Yes, I believe the EU has implemented something like the DMCA, which was itself based on an international treaty. Of course, the wheels of justice turn slowly in the EU, so even if it is illegal, don't expect the courts to sort it out til say, Christmas... 2007.

    4. Re:Doesn't this violate international law ? by CaptainStormfield · · Score: 1
      Yes, I imagine that allowing wholesale copying of music would violate the Bern convention. This would be Bad News for Denmark, because the Bern convention covers a whole lot more than just music. Software, books, movies . . . However, based on prior posts, it looks like the new law just implements a fare use system, which almost certainly doesn't violate Bern.

      IANAL

      --
      "The dinosaurs died because they didn't have a space program." - Niven
  47. Re:Oh boy by bnenning · · Score: 2
    Please. Last time I checked exactly one country had ratified Kyoto, Romania I believe. It had no hope of passing under Clinton, and nothing has changed under Bush.

    America is a rogue state. It is not a Democracy but a Plutocracy. It should be expelled from all international bodies

    Oh no, please don't do that. Whatever will we do if we don't get to pay for 25% of the UN budget while they pass anti-US resolutions, or pay for our military to defend the rest of the world?

    until they democratically elect a government

    We did. Perhaps you missed it, but Bush won around 5 separate recounts. Deal with it.

    --
    How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  48. Re:Music "sharing" is legal in the US by radja · · Score: 2

    here in the netherlands, ISPs are not allowed to give out your name to some random company.

    and ofcourse I can claim anyone to be my friend. Can't say meeting is a prerequisite.. a penpal who I've never met can easily be my friend. One could even make the point that everyone is your friend until proven otherwise. RIAA lawyers? they don't tell me who is or isn't my friend..and I highly doubt "friend" is a legally defined term.

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  49. Re:Music "sharing" is legal in the US by radja · · Score: 4

    depends on your definition of 'friend' I guess. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. the RIAA is my enemy. anyone who downloads music is RIAA's enemy. And damnit, the RIAA will never tell me who is, or isn't my friend :)

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  50. Music Theft in General by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

    I have used Napster and I have used Gnutella. Though I am still torn between being loyal to the artists and trying to rebel against the recording company. I agree that taking a bit of money out of the Recording Industry's pocket is acceptable, I do not agree that taking a little money out of the artists' pockets is acceptable. What can be done about this? The only thing I see is some kind of Union of Music Artists. Followed by a protest, which would include no new music, no shows, etc.

    Probability of this happening, about 1%.

    --
    microsoft, it's what's for dinner

    bq--3b7y4vyll6xi5x2rnrj7q.com

    --
    it's a sig, wtf?
    1. Re:Music Theft in General by damiam · · Score: 1

      Ever seen fairtunes.com? They let you give money to your favorite artists without going through the record companies.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  51. Let the music play by joq · · Score: 3
    Again I see no distinct difference of someone recording music onto a cassette and passing it on to a friend, this shouldn't be a big deal, and governments as well as corporations should realize that as a music lover if I wanted the song that much, no mp3 is going to suffice for me purchasing the CD. No cassette nor any other form of recording is going to give me what I want.

    Often when I look for a song nowadays its because it is no longer in stock (rare techno songs I listen to) so I search for it to hear for a few times. Other times I look for a song I may have heard and like, wanted to purchase but didn't know the title or the artist, again in future plans to buy the CD.

    All the governments and companies are doing at this point is waisting money and arguing over spilled milk which never fell from their cup.

    Why not create an AntiNapster based site where those artists concerned with theft of songs could enter their names into that database, and have those songs filtered. After all studies have shown that people who download mp3's end up buying the songs anyways. I'm sure once some of those artists start realizing how much their competition is making off the move, they'll get those dildos out of their asses and make that switch.

    it would also legalize other, more direct exchanges of copyrighted music (e.g. IRC, private FTPs, websites ..). The record industry, represented by the copyright organization Copy-Dan, is up in arms against the proposal, but the Danish minister of culture is sure that it will receive a broad majority of votes.

    Ever notice how when things are "taboo" more people will sometimes seek it out with greater passion than they normally would if it were readily obtainable? Industry sparking all these "anti-mp3" issues dig their own coffin, and I wonder if they're too stupid to realize this, or are trying to prove a point to bolster their own egos, or company reputations.


    The consequences of this law, if it passes, will be interesting. It would mean that Denmark could become a safe haven for Napster-like services, and the infrastructure there is better than in most other nations that do not enforce copyright law (and usually comply if paid enough money by copyright holders). It will be interesting to see how the RIAA reacts, either by claiming that Denmark violates international law, or by trying to get .dk banned altogether, or both. Perhaps they will lobby to change the law in such a fashion that access to file sharing and MP3 sites / networks must be forbidden for foreigners.

    Solution: Find a real life Tyler Durden and sic him on RIAA, and others like them.

    Blogger is hazardous to your E-Health


    1. Re:Let the music play by dachshund · · Score: 1
      umm, that's not insightful. watermarking [!=] fingerprinting

      It's perfectly insightful. I was going to point this out in the parent to his message, but I figured somebody'd make a point of the fact that SDMI only attacked watermarking, and this technology is fingerprinting-- just like you said. I think this guy's point is simply that if watermarking can be cracked without hurting the signal quality too much, maybe it's similarly possible to crack the fingerprinting. It might not be possible, but that really depends on the technology, none of which is proven.

      So fingerprinting is not the end-all-be-all of filtering technology, at least not yet.

    2. Re:Let the music play by dachshund · · Score: 3
      Why not create an AntiNapster based site where those artists concerned with theft of songs could enter their names into that database, and have those songs filtered

      Well, as Napster's realizing right now, filtering is a whole lot more complicated than it looks. Already Napster's filtering way more than it should, and people can still find the songs they like. The solution might be audio-fingerprinting, but a) it's unproven, b) it's expensive and difficult to implement, c) it requires proprietary software on the client and d) as an artist, it's hard to register your tracks.

  52. Re:Oh boy by DMoylan · · Score: 2

    >>>OTOH, Denmark is not some music loving college boy, who you can push around with legal threats.

    It would certainly bring a new meaning to the phrase you and who's army? :-)

  53. What does Lars think about this? by GregGardner · · Score: 1

    And by Lars I am of course talking about one of music sharing most notable opponents, Lars Ulrich of Metallica, native of Denmark.

  54. Re:Fulfill my dream by bjtuna · · Score: 1

    No, you can get really high in The Netherlands. Pot is still illegal in Denmark.

  55. Fine winds of change.. by haggar · · Score: 1

    This might not be directly related, but it kinda goes in the same direction: I expect the EU or at least some of it's countries, to declare DVD Region coding illegal. I see a lot of political forces pointing in that direction, here, and perhaps Denmark, France or one of the Scandinavian countries will soon do the big step... (I guess you know that region free DVD players are completely legal in Europe.)

    Anyhow, more power to the danes!

    --
    Sigged!
  56. Not quite free-for-all... by lindholm · · Score: 1

    Id like to quote two paragraphs from the Danish article:

    1: According to the bill, it will be legal to download music from Napster and store it on your own harddrive, but not to make it publicly available on your homepage.

    2: It is illegal to make a copy of a copy - eg you may only copy the original CD.

    As far as I understand this, it doesn't legalize unlimited filesharing - once you have a copy, you're not allowed to distribute it, neither are you allowed to make yourself another copy of the copy !

    (Just my point of view, anyway)

    //lindholm

  57. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by jacoplane · · Score: 1

    I live in Amsterdam (in the Jordaan) and I can tell you that as long as you stay out of certain areas, you won't really be bothered by Weed-smoking tourists. Sure if you go to the red light district, the leidseplein, or whatever, it is horrible. But take the Jordaan for example. I think it's possible to maintain the beauty of the city while keeping teenage-tourists. If only they would stop digging the place up ;)

  58. Re:weakening copyright? by hempguy · · Score: 1
    1) I was talking about the US Minister of Culture, not the Danish minister of culture. I'm indeed pretty confident you have one

    2) I'm not implying that Denmark is the capital of Sweden, I just forgot which country it was while I was typing my reply.

    3) I'm from Europe, I know where Denmark and Sweden are located.

    4) I couldn't agree more, there IS a world outside of the USA. And what I like the most about it, is that not everyone needs a fscking lawyer, just to walk down the streets or do some grocery shopping.

    -8<--

  59. Re:All Euro-socialists are pudd-pounders! by hempguy · · Score: 1
    Yeah, this post shouldn't even be dignified with an answer. But here it is anyway.
    You didn't save Europe, the British did.
    There are less drug addicts in Holland than anywhere in the world
    Talking about elections??? I s'pose I don't have to remind you about your latest president's election?
    Your kids aren't allowed to drink until 21, but carrying guns is no problem?
    Fighting each other of IP rights, and lawyers at hospitals?
    Please get real ... coward.

    -8<--

  60. weakening copyright? by hempguy · · Score: 3
    Finally a country's taking a step forward to push P2P and private music sharing and all of a sudden they are "weakening copyrights" and "making their citizens richer". What is this with you Americans? Is it because you're all fscked up over Intellectual Property and RIAA and all the rest, that when another country is taking sensible decisions you just start kicking 'm. I wonder if it were the US Minister of Culture (doubtful that anyone like that exists) who would announce such a law if you'd still call it "weakening copyrights" and "making US citizens richer". Damn I hate that attitude. You're just plain jealous. And no, I don't live in Sweden or whatever country it is.

    -8<--

    1. Re:weakening copyright? by COAngler · · Score: 1
      I wonder if it were the US Minister of Culture (doubtful that anyone like that exists)

      We don't have one. We don't need one. The people of the United States are perfectly capable of having culture without the government's help.

      We do have the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities, but those are mostly for the artists and such who can't get a job at the Starbucks to support their artistic endeavors.

      Love and kisses,
      COAngler,
      traffic cop by day, bad blues guitarist by night.

    2. Re:weakening copyright? by Waerloga · · Score: 1

      Being from Denmark myself I can say that we in fact do have a minister of culture, and also a departmant (minitry) of cultur.

      BTW Denmark is not the capital of Sweden or whatever most americans think it is.
      It's an independant country/state located west of Sweden, east of the United Kingdom, south of Norway, and north of Germany.

      *sigh* some ppl need to study geography a little more ...there IS (*gasp*) a world outside of the USA :)

      Here by ends the geography lesson.

      -Waerloga

    3. Re:weakening copyright? by tmark · · Score: 1

      I am not an American, but it is clear that this step would make Denmark's citizens richer - they are getting access to a resource which they might not otherwise have, and which citizens of other countries might not have. If your country made music sharing illegal, all the music-sharing advocates there would be crying foul, as they do all the time on /., precisely because they realize they have been made poorer. All this ignores, of course, what is being done to the copyright holders.

    4. Re:weakening copyright? by onepoint · · Score: 1

      >>*sigh* some ppl need to study geography a little more ...there IS (*gasp*) a world outside of the USA :)

      Being an American, I can argee with your statement that most americans do not know geography. When I ran my transport company, I would get some of the most ignorant request from customers.
      example waterborn cargo: What is the main port for Luxembourg, for those that don't know it's land locked and has 2 or 3 rivers one is the "Our" another is (I think )the "Sauer" and the river that goes to the the german Rhine river called "Mosel", there is no direct call from the USA to Luxembourg.
      Also my favorite, a customer calls me urgently saying " where the heck is the Berlin Wall, I can not find it anywhere in England". It took amazing powers to restrain myself from laughing at this guy.

      Stories like this are very common when dealing with American clients. Also you'll find it very interesting to note, that most New York city residents have not been to the Statue of Liberty. I myself have never been there, but for lunch in the past. I use to take wine and cheese, ride the ferry ( .50 round trip ) and pass by it, raise my glass and say thank you. The Staten Island Ferry is a great place to meet women also.

      ONEPOINT


      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    5. Re:weakening copyright? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1
      "weakening copyrights"

      What else would you call something that infringes upon an artist's/publisher's right to control distribution?

      "US Minister of Culture (doubtful that anyone like that exists)"

      Why you'd want to put your culture in the hands of the government is beyond me, especially since there's way too many cultures in the US to keep track of. I mean, I suppose it's useful in northern and central European countries, where 98% of the population is pure aryan already, but...

    6. Re:weakening copyright? by gsmraxe · · Score: 1

      What is this with you Americans? Is it because you're all fscked up over Intellectual Property -=snip=- Sorry bud, it's not "US Americans" that have the problem with P2P/Copyright. It's the lawmakers and corporations. It's just that all the big corporations are based over here. I'd love to have P2P completely legal here, I'd also like to see legalized drugs & prostitution, abolish seatbelt laws and helmet laws, leave the tobacco industry alone, and pretty much any stupid and unecessary law banned from the books. We have a real problem here with lawmakers and their power hungry appetites. If we go the way we're going, we'll be a totalatarian govt over here. It sucks, but most of the American people are too blind to do anything about it.

    7. Re:weakening copyright? by tolian_worf · · Score: 1

      Denmark is South of Sweden, not West of it..heh

      // Greetings from stockholm

      --
      -- No task is impossible, it is only a matter of time.
    8. Re:weakening copyright? by tolian_worf · · Score: 1

      Statements like that are exactly what makes me, and most other europeans loathe the THEM^H^H^H^H US....

      You should probably check what exactly a minister of culture does before you make your arrogant american statements.

      Way to go denmark! This should give me good reason to visit it just because I can! hehe

      --
      -- No task is impossible, it is only a matter of time.
  61. Do they still have musicians? by jidar · · Score: 1

    Ok so if this is the kind of thing that would destroy music (says the RIAA), I would assume that there are no musicians in Denmark?

    I mean, surely if they aren't using the RIAA's system then nobody over there is bothering to compose music! Right?

    --
    Sigs are awesome huh?
    1. Re:Do they still have musicians? by walkingCrash · · Score: 1

      of course they are, dumbass. R-ecording I-ndustry A-ssosiation of A-merica. the problem is amreicans think they own the world. no, they think they ARE the world. other countries are just a bunch of small patches of ground inside america. ever heard of nuclear blast records? road runner? go look who produced your roxette cd. they're from sweden.

    2. Re:Do they still have musicians? by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1
      I've never been to Denmark, but I assume they have musicians. I suspect they lack a recording industry, or perhaps their recording industry is not well-connected politically.

      From what I have read, the recording industry gets most of the money from CD distribution; only a handful of artists get meaningful cash. If that's true, and [assuming] most of Denmark's musicians have record deals with labels outside Denmark, then the actual cost [to Denmark] is very low.

      It wouldn't be all that hard for Denmark to get tax revenue from foreign services who have a nominal presence in Denmark. The service providers would have to live off of advertising and memberships, just as Napster would like to do. If the whole concept was kept relatively free of greed and stupidity, Denmark could get a tiny percentage of a huge-volume/low-margin business. Their total investment is nothing more than passing a law. Considering the utter futility of the RIAA war on MP3 sharing, maybe Denmark is simply the first to realize that there is money to be made from the mistakes of the US.

  62. Re:No Exports.. ? by geekster · · Score: 1

    Please! try to keep that aqua thing a secret... and yeah, we're the capital of Sweeden.

  63. no music exports? by walkingCrash · · Score: 3

    watch where you point that statement, boy... just because there's only a couple of hardcore black metal fans out there that buy their music from sweden, norway and denmark, doesn't mean it has NO music export.

  64. Hmmm. by Kreeblah · · Score: 1

    So does this reopen the possibility of an off-shore Napster server?

  65. Re:CD-R Tax - Welcome to Canada by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
    I can also borrow a friends CD and pay someone to copy it for me. Or ask my friend to do it. Even the owner of the CD.

    Kiwaiti

    --
    Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
  66. Already in the UK by radish · · Score: 2


    There is already something similar, but uniquely twisted, in the UK.

    Over here you can buy normal CDRs for very little (about $1 per disk) - the only tax involved is standard VAT (sales tax). However, if you go into a shop you will see other CDRs, labelled "CDR Audio", which look identical, but cost far more. Last I saw you were looking at around $5 per disk! These disks actually are identical to regular CDRs, but with a bit flipped somewhere in the media id field. The "consumer" CD recorders (the standalone hifi ones) will only work with these disks. The idea is that Joe Bloggs with an audio-only CDR unit is obviously copying audio CDs, which are probably copyrighted. Therefore he has to use the expensive disks, which pay an amount (no idea how much) to the UK equivalent of the RIAA.

    It's fine for most people though, if you use a computer based CDR unit it will take the cheap disks, and they work great in all players. I have also heard shop assistants telling (l)users that they have to use the expensive ones for all audio recording, otherwise it won't play back in a regular cd player. I guess the shop make a higher margin on the CDA disks.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  67. Re:Limiting Copyright is Good by awol · · Score: 1

    There is nothing good about copyright!

    --
    "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
  68. Re:Music "sharing" is legal in the US by Sc00ter · · Score: 1
    If you buy stolen car parts from a chop shop, but didn't know they were stolen, it's still illegal, and if they find out about it they'll take the car parts back and you get no money back.

    Getting something that's illegal is still illegal. And an unauthorized copy of a copyrighted work is illegal.
    --

  69. Music "sharing" is legal in the US by Sc00ter · · Score: 3
    It depends on how you define it.

    If I have a CD and my buddy wants a copy, I can legally give him one (there's so court case that says it's okay, but I don't know where it is).

    But that's a bit different then putting something online for anybody to grab. That's not really sharing with your friends, that's closer to distribution.
    --

    1. Re:Music "sharing" is legal in the US by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1
      sharing is a two way process, lets not forget. What you did there was 'giving'.

      "just connect this to..."
      BZZT.

      --

      Liberty.

  70. To Rip or Not to Rip, That is the Question by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

    Had to do it.

  71. Hold on a second, the newspapers got it wrong by sonny · · Score: 5

    You can read the lawproposal online at Forslag til lov om ændring af ophavsretsloven., it will help you if you understand danish, because there are no translations.

    A quote: Forslaget indebærer, at der kun gives adgang til kopiering af tekst, musik og billeder m.v. i digital form til personlig brug f.eks. med henblik på optagelse af radio- og tv-udsendelser til tidsforskudt brug, kopiering af en musik-cd til bilen, til sommerhuset eller til en walkman, kopiering til en opsamlings-cd og kopiering til en pc med henblik på elektronisk afvikling inden for husstanden. Derimod vil det ikke være tilladt at fremstille digitale eksemplarer, der bruges uden for den enkelte husstand, f.eks. kopiering til bekendte og skolekammerater. Det vil heller ikke være tilladt for køberen af et digitalt leveret musikværk at videresende musikværket via e-mail til venner og bekendte. Kopiering til personlig brug omfatter endvidere ikke kopiering som led i arbejde eller undervisning.

    A rough translation: The proposal implies that it only will be allowed to make copies of text, music and pictures and so forth, in digital form for personal use, for example the recording of radio- and tv-broadcasts for timeshifting, copying af music-cd's for the car, holidayresidence or for a walkman, copying of sample-cd's for use in the household. It will not be allowed to make digital copies, that will be used outside of the individual household, f.ex. copying for friends and schoolmates. It will further not be allowed for the buyer of a digital musicproduct to give away copies to to friends or aqaintances via email. Further copying for personal use does not imply copying related to work or studies.

    So I don't see how this can legalize Napster, it will only decriminalize the downloading, but the users are not allowed to share their collection with the work, and isn't that the purpose of Napster?

    But at least it will be legal to use a Browser in Denmark now, because the existing law prohibits all digital copying, and as you all know, a browser allways makes digital copies, one in the RAM-cache and one on the disk-cache. That was an oversight in the old law, and it was never uphold.

  72. Taxing CD-R's? While you're at it... by lumpenprole · · Score: 2

    Why don't you tax cassettes, and video cassettes, and well, hard drives because I can copy virtually anything onto those. And hey, now that I think about it, I often copy poems without the permission of the author onto a medium called 'paper', better tax that too. Oh, and sticks. Sometimes I use them to scratch symbols into the dirt without the permission of the author.

    --
    Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
    1. Re:Taxing CD-R's? While you're at it... by lahi · · Score: 1
      Why don't you tax cassettes, and video cassettes...

      We do! I'm quite sure that there is, or at least has been, a tax on plain old compact cassettes and video cassettes. If our government could find out a cheap way to meter the air we breathe, that would probably be taxed too.
  73. Mission accomplished by warez_d00d · · Score: 2

    if i'm gonna be paying a 60 cent cd-r tax, i'll just stop buying them.

    well done, that's exactly what the RIAA want.

  74. Re:Shame on you Denmark! by JamesIIGS · · Score: 1


    > And what with Denmark being an EU member,
    > nobody will dare call them a rogue state or something.

    It might be easier to get Denmark, than Russia or China, because Denmark is an EU member. Membership ties countries to all sorts of rules made by the other member countries. If a country doesn't abide by the EU laws, there are all kinds of sanctions.

    Even the US copyright laws have been extended because of agreements with other countries.

    - James - [IMAGE]

  75. Re:Just hide 'em on your camera! by friscolr · · Score: 2
    good idea. you could even use steganographic techniques to hide the mp3's in the photos (check out outguess) - all those bad photos of your significant other are really there just to contain Bjork's latest in their lower bits.

    size would become an issue. you could use compact flash - ibm has that nice gig microdrive though im not sure what cameras that can be used in.

    -f

  76. Re:Just hide 'em on your camera! by friscolr · · Score: 2
    Don't you mean stenographic?

    no. i mean steganographic.

    stenography is writing in shorthand.
    steganography is hiding information in such a way that people cannot tell you are hiding a message.

    outguess hides data in image (pnm and jpg) files in such a way that you cannot tell the image is also storing data. There is also StegFS, the steganographic file system, in which other people cannot discern information about the file system, like how much space is being used, how many files there are, filenames, etc.

    The whole point is that if no one even knows you are hiding something, then they won't know to look. With information which is just encrypted, then people can see that there is something for them to attempt to decipher. But this means that steganography is security through obscurity, so you'd want to couple it with some strong encryption too.

    -f

  77. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by pallex · · Score: 1

    Denmark`s pretty cool. You could pop into Christiana, and trade both w33d & mp3`s and its pretty much tolerated! This is the country which was the first (in the world? certainly europe) to allow same sex marriage and other funky progressive ideas. It is also free from annoying pro-US tendancies, unlike England (gawd bless `er).

  78. Ratchet--scribble--ratchet---scribble by Hellburner · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...I hear Shawn unbolting those servers and filling out his dual citizenship forms.

    I get this image in my mind. What time is it in New York, Sam? I bet they're asleep in New York. I bet they're asleep all over the world. Lars Ulrich in SS getup and a pencil mustache---his mullet done up in Princess Leia buns---"Vell, Herr Fanning, your ideas may be akzeppted in Kobenhavn, but zee Reich does not approve. I am afraid you will not receive your transit papers."

    Does the Danish national anthem sound as good as the Marsellaise? You have to give the Danes credit: per capita of effort they fought about sixteen years longer than the French. Looks like they continue the tradition.

  79. coup denmark by netcongestion · · Score: 3

    "there's nothing rotten in the state of denmark"

    1. Re:coup denmark by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 1

      Denmark looks out to sea and sees the RIAA coming with lawsuit in hand, "Something wicked this way comes."

      --
      [ ]
  80. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by LazyGun · · Score: 1
    >Christiana is NOT in Denmark!

    YES it is!!!!!!!!!!!!

    check out www.christiania.org

  81. All is not peachy in paradise by Snaller · · Score: 2

    But lets not forget Denmark has very strict copyright laws, its the only(?) country on the planet where its not legal to make a copy of a music cd. And this law is of course only for private use, not putting it up on the net - only two weeks ago two kids were found guilty in the courts for putting up links to mp3 - the danish music industry had filed the suit

    --

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  82. It's gone over pretty well, actually by Spiff28 · · Score: 2
    Here in the US we already pay a tax on CD-R's, and yes, that tax goes straight to the RIAA.

    The future may be sooner than you think, eh?

  83. Limiting Copyright is Good by wsherman · · Score: 2
    The prevailing view is that the solution to copyright problems is to extend copyright but it may be that the solution is to limit copyright. If a country were to really legalize small scale, non-comercial music copying that could be a real step forward.

    The only good thing about copyright is the incetive it provides to produce new works. Therefore, it should only apply to works that would not be produced in the absence of copyright (ie. not to email) and it should only prevent copying that prevents the copyright holder from large scale commercial distribution of the work (ie. large scale commercial distribution by someone else).

    It should be remembered that when copyright was first put in place it the US it was much more limited: protection only applied to books and a couple other specific things, protection only lasted 14 years and there was a requirement to register and publish.

  84. Re:Hmmm. reply and offtopic question by Waerloga · · Score: 1

    Reply to your off topic question:

    YES, there are no monitoring, screening or filtering on what you do with your internet connection. ISPs might not carry all newsgroups but that's about it.

    Denmark is a nice country ...we have more freedom than most people on this planet :)

    -Waerloga

  85. No Exports.. ? by neurox · · Score: 2

    Ever heard of Aqua? D:A:D? (formerly known as Disneyland after Dark) Michael Learns to Rock? (Huge success in Asia) Check this danish portal for more. /neurox

    --
    "Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger."
  86. Re:Those Europeans will change thier tune when Bus by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 2

    so, because we can "only" stop about 60% (I've heard that a laser based system would be closer to 90%) of the warheads launched at us, we shouldn't bother? If you can only cure 60% of the people infected with HIV, would you not do it because it's only "60% effective?"

    You always have to consider cost-benefit analysis. That's exactly what Bush has just done with arsenic. He figures, "If it cost $80 billion to lower the arsenic content to 10 ppb, and saves 50 lives, is it worth it? Is it not possible that 50 extra people would fall below the poverty line and die of exposure if the $80 billion weren't spent otherwise?"

    So, consider cost-benefit analysis on the nuclear shield. If we spend $80 billion on a nuclear sheild, and of the 100 nuclear warheads launched at Washington, D.C., we successfully shoot down 90 of them... what have we really gained?

    --
    "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
  87. Re:Oh boy by Golias · · Score: 1
    Your comment on the Kyoto treaty reveals a lack of awareness concerning certain political realities.

    1) Clinton didn't want it. He backed off of support for it before the ink was dry. Bush simply extended Clinton's policy of "pretend it ain't there" to "recognize that it's there, and cancel it".

    2) Congress didn't want it. The senate voted 95-0 against ratification of the Kyoto agreement.

    3) Europe doen't want it. The vast majority of European leaders saw this treaty for the dog that it was, and have been dragging their feet on it for months. Many of them are secretly relieved that Bush dumped it, because now they can simply cast the US as the bad guy. No treaty, and nobody blames you... If you are the Prime Minister of Great Britain, that's what you call "win-win".

    4) Those who understand its full impact don't want it. The cost of energy would rise dramatically under this agreement. Can you say "another Great Depression"? Some people in ivory towers like to pretend that economic arguments are all about greed... but the truth is that the super-rich can ride out tough times without inconveniece; the true impact of economic downturns is on the other end of the spectrum - the middle-class becomes the poor, while the poor become destitute.

    I did not vote for Bush, but he was 100% right for dropping Kyoto. Everybody knew it was DOA in Washington anyway... Bush was just the only one willing to stand up and take the hit for it. (This seems to be an emerging trend for Bush. Not since Truman has a president been so willing to make the tough choices, polls be damned. Like I said, I was never a Bush supporter, but I am starting to begrudgingly admit that he is not half as bad as I though he would be).

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  88. Re:CD-R Tax - Welcome to Canada by dadragon · · Score: 1

    No. It is perfectly legal for me to borrow a friend's CD, copy it, and return it. I cannont, however, copy it for another friend. I can only copy it for personal use.

    --
    God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  89. Re:pulp fiction... by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    *ouch* that smarts... c'mon that's funny... er maybe just to me...

    E.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  90. Possible RIAA Reactions by Alien54 · · Score: 3
    There is this bit from the article that no-one has commented on yet:

    It will be interesting to see how the RIAA reacts [if this laws passes], either by claiming that Denmark violates international law, or by trying to get .dk banned altogether, or both. Perhaps they will lobby to change the law in such a fashion that access to file sharing and MP3 sites / networks must be forbidden for foreigners.

    Maybe the RIAA will advocate the US declare war on Denmark for threatening the dominance of american culture. Or try to ban the internet because it is such a threat to their way of life (greed)

    In general, I like the fact that more and more major artisits are starting to side with the Napster side of the argument, seeing how the major labels are abusing the artists they say they are protecting.

    Check out the Vinny the Vampire comic strip

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  91. Oh boy by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
    The RIAA wo't be too thrilled.

    OTOH, Denmark is not some music loving college boy, who you can push around with legal threats.

    Which will be interesting! The only viable way to fight this is by threat^H^H^H^H^H^H diplomatic measures from the US gubynmynt.

    If Mr. Bush and his cronies however apply the same rethoric as the one applied when they canceled Kyoto then we are all in for a new, pretty nasty trade war.

    Most Europeans are still pretty pissed about Mr. Presidents attitude problem.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

    1. Re:Oh boy by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1

      You know, it wasn't so much the message that royally pissed people off here, it was the arrogance with which it was submitted.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    2. Re:Oh boy by SubtleNuance · · Score: 4

      US while allowing China to pollute as much as it wants

      Ohh the big evil China.. anything can be justified because of the Chinease - i seem to remember anything being justified becuase of the Russians at one point... americans are fucking sheep... get a clue - your media & government whip up a public hysteria about 'the enemy' anytime it wants to do something stupid - are you people that fucking dumb?

      this has nothing to do with China or other polluters - it has to do with bush repaying the big companies who elected him buy not upsetting the status quo (for any reason - no matter how grave) just to protect their pocket books. They are allowed to rape and pillage the commons now - they make profit now - they like it this way.

      Who are the twits who go along with the 'china is an economic adversary - we cannot let the chinese any advantage!" propaganda? Maybe you could petition the UN to ask China to *ALSO* join Kyoto. That would be a solution - not *DROPPING OUT* just to maintain your economic imperialism... fucking assholes.

      America is a rogue state. It is not a Democracy but a Plutocracy. It should be expelled from all international bodies - the world should end trade, travel and co-operation with the USA until they democratically elect a government and remove the puppets with Big Corp. up their ass.

    3. Re:Oh boy by ponxx · · Score: 1
      > Kyoto would have penalized the US while
      > allowing China to pollute as much as it wants.

      Oh dear... right, normally i try not to engage in Off Topic discussion, but this is just soooo ignorant:

      The Kyoto protocol required the US, Europe, Japan etc. to *reduce* co2 emission, and it did not ask this of developing countries. Now you might think this is unfair. BUT at the moment all Western nations produce far far far more CO2 per person than any other nations. In fact the US produce much more CO2 than China, despite having only a quarter of the population!

      The US alone are responsible for over 25% of CO2 emissions in the world, while having less than 5% of the worlds population, which is why the US are one of the countries that have to reduce emissions most (even though I believe Kyoto actually required others to do more, and was already distorted to what it is by the american side, which makes it ever the more cynical that they now renege on it!).

      If you want it *fair* and *market-economy* (which in theory are US ideals) you'd give every country the right to CO2 emissions proportional to the number of inhabitants, and then let them trade these licenses for pollution amongst each other. Even if we just set todays total emission as standard the US would be pretty screwed (as would all other industrialised nations) and there would be a much needed transfer of money/resources into the 3rd world as well as development of environmentally friendly technology, driven by market forces!!

      Now what are the chances of the US government (or any other western country) to support such a *fair* agreement? ZERO!!!

      And anything that allows the US to pollute more than other countries (like Kyoto) is inherently unfair, but biased FOR the US, not against!!! As I said, Europe et. al are no better, but unfair to the US is just not an argument in this case!!!!!!

      sorry for that... rant over....

    4. Re:Oh boy by ponxx · · Score: 1
      "You radical greenies are so quick to point out that the U.S. pollutes so much, yet the reality is this only reflects the highly industrialized nature of our economy." and "In fact, the U.S. has the best conservation techniques in the world"

      Don't be ridiculous, Kyoto was about climate change, mostly CO2 emission. Conservation techniques do not reduce CO2 emissions, unless you are talking about conservation of ENERGY. Building / buying / driving cars that take 25 to 30 liters for 100km is not advanced, nor economically necessary, nor are they better cars! Having bad insulation on a house, but the air conditioner or heater running all year is not advanced!!!

      "we actually pollute less and less per citizen every year"

      not true in terms of CO2 emissions, it has been rising year after year after year, can't remember whether it plateaued during the 70s oil crisis / economic slowdown, but it has definitely picked up again!

      The only thing that will make people AND companies create energy-efficient machines and use them responsibly is an increase in energy prices and an influence of politics to support such research, neither of which is going to happen in the US until it's too late, at least as opinions like youre are the majority (which they are) and the likes of Bush and his oil-buddys run the country...

      The US is going to wake up when Oil reserves really get low and prices *really* high, you think petrol is expensive now? You ain't seen nothing yet....

    5. Re:Oh boy by benfoldsfan · · Score: 1

      Last time I heard, the US bought it's oil from the middle east. I also thought I heard about gas being 5 dollars or so in Europe. And if Gore would have usurped the presidency, do you really think his leftist environmentalist views would have made energy cheaper?

    6. Re:Oh boy by warmiak · · Score: 1

      "Most Europeans are still pretty pissed about Mr. Presidents attitude problem. "

      So ? He is here to serve Americans and not Europeans.

      "If Mr. Bush and his cronies however apply the same rethoric as the one applied when they canceled Kyoto then we are all in for a new, pretty nasty trade war. "

      Hey, I was all for NOT ratifying Kyoto and I know quite a bit people who were just as much opposed to it.
      I don't think giving up certain US liberties just to avoid pissing off Europeans is worth it.

      --
      The only way liberals win national elections is by pretending they're not liberals.
  92. Re:Those Europeans will change thier tune when Bus by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    I feel the same way. Im Canadian. There are very powerful lobbies in Washington (Military-Industrial-Complex) who are buying this crap. Bush is a twit. A pawn. Americans should be ashamed that this POS is their president.

    Him firing up this star-wars project - is stupid beyond reason. Who the fuck wants another arms race? Im with you brother - no goddamn way should they be doing this crap.

    If they wanted to start a movement to cover the whole globe, in an international effort to end the ICBM threat from ANY nation, where the system was in control of the UN (or the military council if the permanent members were removed) - then I may consider it... otherwise this is an aggressive effort by the US and should be condemned by My Government and Yours.

  93. Just hide 'em on your camera! by Akardam · · Score: 1

    I have one of those Olympus digital cams with the smartmedia cards, and a PCMCIA adapter... the card shows up just like any other drive. So technically, you could dump some mp3s on the card, and stuff it back in the cam. The cam couldn't read them, all it could see would be the pictures. Granted, you might have to have a pretty large set of the smartmedia cards (they're only 64mb in size, I think), but still... yet another cool way to screw the Man.

    Akardam Out

  94. PARENT HAS DISGUSTING LINK by Placido · · Score: 1

    Moderators mod parent down! That link is WORSE than goatse!

    Sacrificing Karma to preserve innocence


    Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"

    --

    Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
    Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
  95. Denmark not exporting music? by chainxor · · Score: 1

    What about e.g. Aqua, Michael Learns To Rock, D:A:D etc.?
    Wouldn't they have something to say about this?

  96. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by chainxor · · Score: 1

    You're right that the Danish government has been discussing this, but it's unlikely it will happen because of the it's reputation.
    And by the way nobody really cares about religion in Denmark except a very small percentage. Actually the common protestant church in Denmark have serious problems getting people to churches on sundays - in fact all days. The only thing people uses the churches for are when somebody dies, or somebody wants to get married.

  97. BAM! by fishfucker · · Score: 1

    ha -- I love it when dumbfuck knowitall americans get their comeuppance from folks who actually live where the former is trying to spout off about.

    fisfhcuerkl

    nice one.

  98. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by Weh · · Score: 1

    The Danish although they have a reputation for being liberal appear to be a bit xenophobic too. IIRC one of the main issues at a recent referendum about joining the EU was concern over immigration.

    About Amsterdam, I really dislike what is happening to that city, the city itself is quite beautiful but I'm appaled by all the sleazy coffeshops and drug-smoking-thinking-it's-soooo-cool tourists. Interestingly enough the city recently realized that they weren't making a lot of money off the whole soft-drugs thing. They realized that it would be more profitable to have older (richer) tourists that have lots to spend coming to the city to see the museums/architecture etc then having a bunch of teenage American backpackers walking around spending all their money on weed.

  99. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by Weh · · Score: 2
    I never said that Christiana was in Denmark, my comment was about Denmark in general.

    About Amsterdam, my comment on that was not about the Dutch having problems with laws on drugs, it was about 2 things:

    I don't like seeing sleazy coffeshops and stoned tourists taking over the town (it's a matter of opinion)

    The city of Amsterdam realizing that they can make more money off rich older tourists that aren't so interested in smoking weed but have lots to spend in Hotels, museums etc. etc. than they can make money off weed smoking teenage backpackers.

    Regarding me backing up my claims, exactly which claim do you want me to back up ? How about you back up your claims about Dutch drug laws "working just fine" ? I'm Dutch and I now for a fact that the drug laws are not working "just fine" and that violent alcohol related crime *is* on the increase.

  100. Re:What?!?! ...I agree by Linux2Mars · · Score: 1

    Yeah, funny huh!?

    --

    AC is AC
  101. Bush has no bad attitude, he is just stupid. by Linux2Mars · · Score: 2

    I can't say it for sure but, it would seem that bush has no bad attitude, he is just plain dumb.
    It's funny really: situation with China and enviromentalists, oli companies, etc...
    ...what do you expect from a guy that was drunk fo r large part of his adult life...

    ...or maybe it's just me

    --

    AC is AC
  102. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

    >>Christiana is NOT in Denmark!

    >YES it is!!!!!!!!!!!!

    No it isn't, its a self-proclaimed freestate in the middle of Copenhagen. When you leave the place you are welcomed by a friendly sign stating that you're about to enter the European union.

  103. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

    >O, by the way, I speak Dutch, so where I'm from?

    Vriesland, obviously :-)

  104. CD-R Tax? But I'm deaf! by Black+Pete · · Score: 2

    So Denmark hopes to appease the copyright-holders by having a media tax since most people buying blank CDs are pirates anyway. Okaaayyy...

    What about me? I'm deaf. Yes I do wear a cochlear implant/hearing aid combo to help me hear, but it's not perfect. I can't enjoy lyrics as it's just noise and I can't understand what it is they're saying/singing. And I have to pay this tax because I might pirate music that I realistically won't ever use/listen to?

    Send the RIAA my way. Let them try to tell me (and the world) that I'm probably going to pirate music and therefore I should pay up.

    IMHO something seems just wrong about a law passed that basically assumes that everyone is a pirate until proven otherwise. And even if they ARE proven otherwise, they STILL have to pay up.

    What happened to "presumed innocent until proven guilty?" Shouldn't the burden be on the RIAA to recover their (imaginary?) losses?

    Oh, and I'm also a software developer. Where's my cut of the tax money for all the losses caused by software piracy?

  105. Oh No! by jimmu · · Score: 1

    Now, the RIAA wil retaliate by forcing our government to stop importing ikea furniture! How will i furnish my new apartment?? Oh wait, Ikea is from sweden © © © Damn, there goes my +5, Funny©

    --

    ----
    One of us needs to stick ones' head in a bucket of ice water.
    - Hobbes
  106. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by LogicalRealism · · Score: 1

    Or if you encrypt the files, could you use the DMCA to prevent them from going through your files?

  107. Dilemna by tmark · · Score: 2

    How to counter this ? At first I thought many studios and artists might refuse to tour in Denmark, and perhaps even refuse to sell their CDs and music videos in Denmark. But then the problem would be brought back to them in spades as this would force people to download music.

  108. Lars trivia by WickedClean · · Score: 2

    This is funny, because I remember reading somewhere a long time ago that Lars Ulrich (of Metallica) graduated from High School in Copenhagen, Denmark.

    --
    ...All I can say is that my life is pretty strange...
  109. Don't protect what you don't export by sstammer · · Score: 1
    "This is a logical step for a small country that has no music exports anyway: by weakening copyright they are making their citizens richer without losing revenue."

    Isn't this equivalent to tariffs and other barriers to free trade, whereby a country attempts to hinder the ability of foreign entities to sell to its market? This would discourage the incentive for efficient production, since countries that aren't efficient or don't produce would simply erect barriers such as this to prevent more efficent producers from selling to their market.

  110. But... by ishrat · · Score: 1
    Can the music companies outside denmark put pressure on the govt. asking their right to allow users to share music that does not in any case belong to that country.

    Yes I understand without the govts. support even this would be dificult because if the govt is disinclined towards a rule they have been forced to form, they would hardly take the effort to punish people violating it.

    --

    There's always sufficient, but not always at the right place nor for the right folks.

  111. Re:Those Europeans will change thier tune when Bus by Marc+Boucher · · Score: 1

    It won't be developped until at least 2012-2015. If it's ever finished.
    An the proponent even admit that it won't be more than 60% efficient.
    Talk about a shield. ;)

  112. I've got the guts by rppp01 · · Score: 1
    Denmark, you are a rogue state, and a really bad something!

    --
    They stuck me in an institution, said it was the only solution, to...protect me from the enemy, myself
  113. Shame on you Denmark! by grovertime · · Score: 1
    This is a logical step for a small country that has no music exports anyway: by weakening copyright they are making their citizens richer without losing revenue. And what with Denmark being an EU member, nobody will dare call them a rogue state or something.

    Isn't this just Denmark asking for a cultural war in the long term? Unless they place some sort of reverse firewall (and even then), how is it any different from Chinese or Russian rogue publishers printing out millions of copies of American authors' work and selling them for pennies with no royalties? It is still stealing culture, and now it's government sanctioned. They should be ashamed; I've been to Denmark and they still listen to music from outside of the country, buy cultural creative products that were made in America and now they want to sanction the stealing of products which their own retail community distributes for profit and as commodity. I don't support this at all.

    This is pretty wacky.

    1. what the?
  114. It's a "No No" as told the Dane Lars Ulrich by very · · Score: 1

    Lars Ulrich would sleep with one eye open after the Danish legalized music sharing.

  115. ...And Denmark becomes the IT capital of the world by Bonker · · Score: 2

    Hmmm... I can set set up my web server in CA or TX and be subject to all sorts of corporate and government bully boy tactics, or I can pay slightly more and set up a hosting deal in Copenhagen and be protected under their favorable sharing laws. I can put up all my favorite MP3's up on my website or share them via a shell account, and fear little or no reprecussion.

    Hmmm... I think I'll setup in Texas... NOT!

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  116. Some facts... by KrunZ · · Score: 1

    Actually Denmark has an exporting music-industry (remember that annoying "I'm a Barbie-girl" by Aqua?) these years in the ultra-pop genre. The main-export target is Asia. BTW Lars Ulrik's born and raised in Denmark...

    The actual reason for this law is to protect the citizen who is downloading something that he/she has no chance of knowing whether the stuff is copyrighted.

  117. RIAA is to big for its britches by RogueAngel7 · · Score: 1

    "It will be interesting to see how the RIAA reacts, either by claiming that Denmark violates international law, or by trying to get .dk banned altogether, or both. Perhaps they will lobby to change the law in such a fashion that access to file sharing and MP3 sites / networks must be forbidden for foreigners."

    Now I would like to see that. A private (oligopolic) organization asking for the US Govt to BAN an entire country from internet access to the US. I believe this would be the final nail in thier coffin.

    Mayday, Mayday... fire coming from engine... RIAA going down... ;P

    I need to grab some popcorn, this is going to be interesting to watch at the least.

    RA7
    -

    --
    "Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds" - RWE
  118. what if... by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 2

    Napster were to sell out to these people, then what could the RIAA do about it. They wouldn't be able to enforce any type of "filtering" on them. Ah well, just an idea...

    --

    ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
  119. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by eXtro · · Score: 1
    There shouldn't be any recognized religions in my opinion. The process of deciding who gets to be a religion and who doesn't is too open to corruption and coersion. Should the worship of Roman gods be a recognized religion, and as such be exempt from taxation? What about christianity? What's your criteria for deciding beyond "I'm a christian and so I know I'm right"?

    Put into a different light, even among christian sects there is dissention on who should and should not be recognized as a religion. Fundamentalist christians think that Roman Catholics are devil worshippers, at least if Jack Chick is to be believed. What about the Church of Latter Day Saints? Some guy has a vision that said polygamy is OK and its later retracted. Presently it still qualifies as a religion (a very rich one no less).

  120. Repercussions? by Fat+Casper · · Score: 1
    It's goung to be very interesting to see what the US does about this. We have gotten into major pissing contests with the EU on trade issues, and when our favorite religion whined about Germany, the State Department jumped. What with US law coming down on the RIAA's side, we're going to see some kind of a negative response.

    Not being a big consumer of Danish goods, I'll be able to watch interestedly, worrying only about the free speech issues. No big difference there- it's been worrying me for a while. This just adds fuel to the fire.

    --
    I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
  121. Re:Not a "Rogue State?" by Shoten · · Score: 1

    Ah, I see that my post was modded down for being "offtopic." I seem to remember the submission having the following line:

    And what with Denmark being an EU member, nobody will dare call them a rogue state or something.

    Might I helpfully suggest a website to the moderator in question...

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  122. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by TGK · · Score: 1

    the worship of Roman gods be a recognized religion, and as such be exempt from taxation?

    Worship of "pagen" gods or whathave you is protected speach/religion in the US, provided that any sacrifices etc to this god are done in a manner consistent with local/state/federal food preperation guidelines.

    As for polygamy, it was ruled to be illegal and unprotected because of the fact that marriages do not need to be preformed in a place of worship. Marriage, argued the court, is a social contract, not necessarily a religious one, and is thus regulateable by the government.

    Yea yea yea... I know offtopic. Sorry, just wanted to clear this up.

    Oh, and being Catholic myself, I can tell you that while we don't reguard Fundamentalists as "devil worshipers" I generaly support them in their efforts to seek professional counseling.

    This has been another useless post from....

    --
    Killfile(TGK)
    No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  123. Re:Hmmm. reply and offtopic question by onepoint · · Score: 1

    Denmark is one of the most progressive countries that I have ever seen. Now does this mean that there could be a Napster.dk type system. YES, but what will happen is that ISP like AOL, Earthlink and other simular ISP will prevent traffic from those locations.

    Currently I use Earthlink. They will not allow IP traffic from certain web sites, also they do not let you connect or use port 25 ( the e-mail port ) if it's not to their server . It's very easy to see that if AOL/Timewarner stop the traffic early in the game, file trading users will not notice the establishment of the denmark napster, or anything that could cost them long term revenue drain.

    My offtopic question is: are there any dialup services that give you full freedom to surf. If so could someone please advise me. My location is NJ.

    Thank You

    Onepoint

    --
    if you see me, smile and say hello.
  124. Re:Hmmm. reply and offtopic question by onepoint · · Score: 1

    I think I might have mis-stated the problem.

    1) Earthlink prevents access to certain sites and IP address. I dont know how they do it but I did confirm that with EarthLink I also confirmed that AOL does it also.

    2) EarthLink will not let you access the port related to e-mail sending ( sorry I can not recall the # ) of another server. I have tried to set up my e-mail list on my web site but I was refused connect because earthlink prevents it. Also confirmed with earthlink.

    I was hoping someone on /. could help me find another dialup isp.

    ONEPOINT


    --
    if you see me, smile and say hello.
  125. It doesn't matter anyway by Atreides4 · · Score: 1
    Even if Denmark were to legalize the unlimited copying of MP3s like a la Napster, it would crumble under US pressure. There are established ways of dealing with countries that do things that are dangerous to another's economy. Yes, Denmark does not export much music. But they would suffer greatly from a US embargo and the EU would be hurt as well, as the US could use this as justification for protectionism and refusing to yield in trade talks. More or less what goes on with generic AIDS drugs, except far more effective, for I seriously doubt that anyone ever died of having to pay for MP3s. This is why I feel that the whole idea of a data haven of any kind is ridiculous. The kind of economic or military pressure the US could exert against any data haven would far outweigh any fiduciary gain. The current data haven could simply be invaded and annexed by the USMC. If file sharing is to survive, it must become legal, either by an overhaul of copyright law or some form of compensation for artists, and yes, the RIAA. The salvation of Napster will not come from overseas data havens.

    --
    I posted and all I got was this stupid sig
  126. Serious answer to a rhetorical question by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2
    How will the star wars project be able to distinguish between a suitcase with a nuke in it, and any other suitcase in a New York subway, bus, airport etc?
    Oh boy, where to begin...
    1. That's not the job of the anti-missile defense. The anti-missile defense handles... missiles!
    2. If you want to find a suitcase with a nuke in it, you could start with the nice X-ray opacity of heavy metals like uranium and plutonium. The elements of a bomb would stand out really well at any airport baggage-checker. Then there is the background radioactivity of the bomb materials; use a gamma spectrometer and you're going to find the bomb even in a ship-load of containers. Use a gamma camera and you can pick the individual container. You can do this without having to board the ship.
    This stuff is all old hat; the kind of detectors required have been in use at nuclear plants for about 20 years (they even detect radon on people's clothes). Saddam Hussein has had nukes for about ten years now. He hasn't nuked the USA yet (I'm sure we would have all heard of that). If it's so easy to put a nuke on a ship and blow up a port city, why hasn't he? Maybe it's not quite as easy to sneak things in as some people think, and finding a nuke on a ship would be the excuse for the US military to march into Baghdad and carry his head out on a bayonet. That's why nobody has tried this: it's not likely to work, and it's suicide regardless.
    --
    spam spam spam spam spam spam
    No one expects the Spammish Repetition!
  127. Thanks for the info! by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

    What an informative post! Thanks for backing up everythign you said with a textual description of what this tax is called etc, and thanks for providing links to information about this tax. I am so glad you didn't just say "WOW WE HAVE THIS TAX TOO THOUGH NO ONE KNOWS ABOUT IT BUT ME AND I WON'T TELL YOU THE NAME OF IT!!!11"

    --

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  128. Why do I forsee... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    ... a new US/EU trade war over this issue?

  129. Will Mame DK be back and legal? by tyrannical666 · · Score: 1

    Will this I wonder apply to console and arcade roms too? Perhaps our old freind Mame DK will be hosting roms again, legally.

  130. Re:Those Europeans will change thier tune when Bus by Spagornasm · · Score: 1
    so, because we can "only" stop about 60% (I've heard that a laser based system would be closer to 90%) of the warheads launched at us, we shouldn't bother? If you can only cure 60% of the people infected with HIV, would you not do it because it's only "60% effective?"

    --

    When nuance becomes the only objective we lose the ability to function
  131. I would not mind it if..... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2
    the Danes plan to compensate copyright holders by taxing CD-Rs with a fee of ca. $0.60 per piece

    now that makes sence. if music could be copied (while remaining under the terms of fair use) I would not mind paying a tax on the media that I use to copy it.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  132. Fulfill my dream by Lothar+0 · · Score: 1

    After I got my doctorate, my dream was to set up my own (literally) desert underground cyber-community where we would route 1/4 of the Net's traffic, have the biggest Quake LAN server, and basically be a h4X0r flophouse with RJ-45 all over the place. Screw the Gobi, now I know that Denmark is the place to go to have a similar dream come true, by helping the world's peeps trade their music and *still* having the biggest Quake server.

    --
    "Anonymous Coward" is for whistleblowers, not unpopular opinions.
  133. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by Tony+de+Vries · · Score: 1

    Didn't you know Copenhagen is the capital of the Netherlands... Funny how often people are mistaken when it's about European geography. O, by the way, I speak Dutch, so where I'm from?

  134. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by Tony+de+Vries · · Score: 1

    aha... weer wat geleerd. tnx

  135. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by Tony+de+Vries · · Score: 1

    No! This is the truth! Really!

  136. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by tolian_worf · · Score: 1

    You are being sarcastic right?...

    --
    -- No task is impossible, it is only a matter of time.
  137. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by tolian_worf · · Score: 1

    Oh but dont forget to mention that Copenhagen is the capital of Denmark...so theoretically Christiania is in Denmark, its just NOT denmark hehe. I only recently learned about this place, and since I live in Sweden and its only a few hours drive from me by car... God damn I gotta go there! hehehe

    --
    -- No task is impossible, it is only a matter of time.
  138. Re:Those Europeans will change thier tune when Bus by tolian_worf · · Score: 1

    That statement makes me sick.
    Especially if you really believe that.

    --
    -- No task is impossible, it is only a matter of time.
  139. Re:Oh great, watch Copenhagen get overrun by touri by tolian_worf · · Score: 1

    Phew good, I thought you were really kidding me there!
    My life is at peace now that I know Copenhagen is the capital of Holland... ;-P *phew*
    (btw: Holland=Netherlands, good if you are a lazy typer)

    --
    -- No task is impossible, it is only a matter of time.