Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Attack -- More Updates

I'm trying to get stuff together, and post an update: The Pentagon, which evidently has partly collapsed with a chasm 200-300 feet across, and fires on six stories, has ordered the USS JFK and George Washington into NYC. PLEASE GIVE BLOOD. Over 200 firemen are reported missing, and reports of 50,000 dead in the WTC collapse are being bandied about. Dick Cheney has assumed control of the White House, and is in the situation room there. GWB is not returning to the White House until things have calmed down -- and has gone evidently to an undisclosed location. The [CDC] in Atlanta has largely evacuated but has activated their bioterrorism units. American Airlines flight 11, the first to crash into the WTC, was going from BOS -> LAX. There are rumors of Akamai's founder being onboard on Flight 11, As well, the rumor is that the pilot of United Flight 193 flew it in into the ground, outside Pittsburgh, rather then fly into the USX building, which if true, makes him a better person then I -- but there are also rumors that it was shot down by a F-16. United Flight 175 also crashed into the WTC, according to Boston.com, and originated from Boston -- so the WTC was both Boston flights. Reports of a car bomb that was supposed to have gone off int front the State Department have been denied. In a statement, the Taliban government of Afghanistan has denied any involvement, and Yassar Arafat has denounced the attack. Remember: No one knows who did this yet, so don't make any assumptions -- remember what people first thought about the OKC attack. In other news, the US - Mexico/Canada borders are being heavily screened; all air traffic has been grounded; nationwide federal buildings are being evacuated; NATO personnel in Brussells have been sent home, Israeli embassies worldwide have been evacuated, all U.S. Disney parks shut down; major parts of European cities, Britain in particular, are being shut down; stock trading is shut down in all major European and American exchanges. There are 50 flights still in the air, with 2 international flights that have yet to respond. F16s from the US Air Force has been instructed to shoot down flights in a no fly zone over NYC & DC - an AVI of the WTC plane or mpeg here. More as we know.Update: 09/11 18:10 PM GMT by H :I've heard on NPR that all flights and planes are now accounted for -- but that a fifth crash has occurred in an undisclosed location. As well, a car bomb did go off in front of the State Department, and there was a crash near Camp David. There's a well done timeline - we also had a report from someone who lives 3 miles away from the PA crash. Evidently the plane veered several times, and then smashed into an abandoned strip mine - which was luckily not near any people or anything.

127 of 2,465 comments (clear)

  1. Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by tino_sup · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are emergency contact numbers for the airlines with planes down.
    American Airlines - 800-245-0999
    United Airlines - 800-923-8555

    Hope this helps

    --
    I am me...I think
    1. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by dcgrigsby · · Score: 5, Informative

      families only please. Please don't flood the lines and make it so families can't find out.

    2. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 5, Informative

      Logan Airport has set up a Family Assistance Center in the Hyatt Hotel. If you have family members who may have been on one of the flights out of Boston, you can contact this center at 617-568-3100.

      This is for family members of those on the AA and UA flights only, not media inquiries, etc.

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    3. Re:Airline Emergency Contact Numbers by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Update to my previous post. The family assitance center will be at Logan Airport's Hilton Hotel, not the Hyatt. (The Hyatt will now be the location of a media center.)

      MassPort (Massachusett's Port Authority, which runs Logan) currently has information on contact numbers here:


      http://www.massport.com/about/advisory.html

      and also here (including the Boston Red Cross number, which is apparenlty coordinating volunteers):


      http://www.massport.com/about/91101.html

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  2. Remember the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win though to absolute victory.... ....with confidence in our armed forces - with the unbounding determination of our people - we will gain the inevitable triumph - so help us god."

    - President Franklin D Roosevelt
    December 8th, 1941
    Speaking to the American people after the attack on Pearl Harbor

    1. Re:Remember the past by scanrate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I fear all we have done is to wake a sleeping giant, and fill him with a terrible resolve."

      Japanese Admiral Yamamoto
      After attack on Pearl Harbor
      Quoted from http://www.nps.gov/fdrm/generation/ph.htm

    2. Re:Remember the past by SubtleNuance · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To promise retaliation is not hubris, it's apporpriate.

      no, its childish and immature - to retaliate, to lash out wildly is idiotic.

    3. Re:Remember the past by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just out of curiosity, since you seem to be so in favor of appeasing these criminals. If you walked into your house and watched your wife being raped, and your daughter was apparently next, would you consider it "childish and immature" to retaliate against them to keep them from further damaging your loved ones?

      Or would you walk up to them and try to "negotiate" with them? Plead with them to just leave you alone?

      Here's a gun. Would you just watch them as they began on your daughter?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  3. Plea for peace by m2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    FWIW, I'm not a citizen of the U.S. nor do I live there.

    Violence induces more violence. Retaliation will only lead to more deaths. If you are a citizen of the U.S. of America, please write your representative right now and ask him to join a plea for peace. Historically the U.S. reaction to this kind of attack is to counter strike. It's highly probably that it's already being planned or even carried on. That will solve nothing. You might get even, but that achieves nothing. The death will not come back and the attack has been already recorded on the books of history. At this point in time, counter attacking is irrational and puts not only the lives of U.S. citizens at risk, but those of lots of people all arround the world, too.

    1. Re:Plea for peace by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Flamebait

      You are SO wrong. Appeasement NEVER works. We tried to appease Hitler, and didn't work. Do you really think that we could have "pleaded" with Hitler for peace? Or "pleaded" with Japan when the bombed Pearl Harbor?

      On the other hand, when we bombed Khadafi in the 80s, terrorists didn't screw with us for YEARS.

      This requires a huge, huge response. The aggressors set the rules. At the very least, invasion of the country that either sponsored, or allowed to happen, this terrorism must be made.

      This "day of infamy" must not be allowed to stand.

      Go W!

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Plea for peace by FFFish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Correction: at least 20 000 of you *are not still here.* They died in the attack.

      Correction: you don't have peace or security. You just got attacked.

      Correction: those responsible are dead. They died attacking.

      Correction: there is NO justice possible in this situation. Nor is peace possible.

      There has to be retaliation for this, without a doubt. But it will not resolve the problem.

      You might also want to think about why this attack occurred. How did the USA get into a position where someone hates it *so* much that they'd suicide themselves in revenge?

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:Plea for peace by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "You might also want to think about why this attack occurred. How did the USA get into a position where someone hates it *so* much that they'd suicide themselves in revenge?"

      We need to be able to think of that _while_ also retaliating harshly.

      The fact that we have been brutally attacked does not make us automatically righteous. I've felt for a long time that US interests, in many ways, have been waging war on the rest of the world- but more like a siege. Mostly we have not been gunning people down- mostly our corporations have not been gunning people down- and we certainly haven't engaged in this sort of all-out assault recently.

      We're up again, and clearly we're going to be smashing the hell out of _somebody_... but we have got to take a minute afterwards, to ask: just how unprovoked was it? What have we been doing? Are we even aware of what our country may have been doing in our names? If more than half of us don't even _vote_ much less pay attention to what our country is doing with its massive weaponry and economic coercion, is that okay?

      It looks like we've got to smash somebody. In fact, it looks like the people we'll be hitting are fanatics. The fact that they are fanatics does not make us angels, and we gotta remain aware of that as we move into a 21st century and see multinational organizations taking over from nation-states.

      And boy, are we ever in the 21st century. :(

    4. Re:Plea for peace by localman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have you ever considered that today's attack was a counterstrike - against America?

      I won't offer any trite solution - I don't know whether a counterstrike of our own would be effective or not. I'm not saying that there's an obvious path, but what I do know is that today's act was not a random act.

      We don't think we're at war because our homeland is (was) so isolated from the front lines, but America is involved in many wars through funding. And wars don't happen without funding. It's almost surprising that we're not attacked more often.

      Today is an awful day. I am heartsick at all the loss that has occurred. But I am even more terrified of what is to come.

    5. Re:Plea for peace by jafac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are only two ways to break the cycle of violence.

      1. Kill them all. Every last one of them. And anyone who ever cared about them. No one will be left to carry out revenge. No future generations will rise up.

      OR

      2. Forgive.

      Apparently, neither of these are really an option, so we'll be pedalling this cycle for a good long while to come.

      - - - -
      But really, "Go W"? Do you have any idea how rediculous that sounds? We'll be lucky if that bastard doesn't round up any person who is a moslem in the US and put them in camps for orderly disposal.
      I think that the US people have learned, and will soon have the lesson reinforced, what happens when you elect a president with WEAK foreign experience.
      I'm all for rallying around the flag, but I refuse to support this charlatan of a leader.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    6. Re:Plea for peace by coolgeek · · Score: 4, Flamebait
      It is YOUR crappy airport security that allowed these people through.

      I disagree. It is our complacency that allowed them to breach security. Complacency should not be confused with Incompetence, in my book. I boarded a flight in the past three months where they did not even ask me the basics questions about how I handled my baggage. I knew that the ticket agent knew what she was supposed to do, and how to do it, and was probably capable of doing it well. She just didn't feel it was necessary any longer.

      And if you don't think the US is capable of infiltrating _every_ plane in the offending country and ramming them into _every_ major landmark on their soil, you are a fool. Our guys would probably even live to tell about it, too. Thing is, we have laws that prevent us from doing exactly that. Funny thing too, the laws seem to be enough deterrent for the average United States Citizen. The attack was well planned, well executed, some might even say impressive. The biggest mass murder in history. On the scale of expertise available in the world, it was rank amateur. The Palestinians can rally in the streets today, and celebrate the mass extermination of human beings. I doubt they will have any streets in a few years, whether the US retaliates or not. That kind of hatred is a spiritual disease that will eventually lead to their own destruction.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    7. Re:Plea for peace by norton_I · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to consider the possibility that there are some people whose way of life is fundamentally incompatable with yours. I believe that anyone capable of organizing the hijacking of several commerical airplanes and using them as weapons against both civillian and military targets in an unprovoked sneak attack is not someone that I can make amends with without making an unacceptable compromise of my integrity.

      If possible, pepetrators of this kind of terrorism should be made to see the error of their ways, in the hopes of preventing future incidents. However, if that proves to be impossible, the only recourse is total annihalation.

      I am a peaceful person. I would do just about anything to insure that we could all live harmoniously. But if other people force the issue into a "me or them" situation, I pick me, every time, and will defend that decision with ultimate force.

    8. Re:Plea for peace by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      His reasoning doesn't stink. A little overly optimistic, but you apparently haven't been reading the news for the last couple months.

      Israel has been waging an all out war on Hamas, and their killing innocents by the hundreds. As a result, Hamas is gaining popular support by leaps and bounds, and so is Saddam Hussein as he's been openly supporting Hamas. News reports have shown that the Iraqi flag is almost as prevalent as the Hamas flag in Palestinian refugee camps.

      A complete pacifistic reaction does nothing. Not even a change in U.S. intervention in the middle east would change anything. Unmitigated reactionary violence however is tantamount to disaster. The US response must be precise, measured, and carried out with absolute lethality.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    9. Re:Plea for peace by issachar · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Peace and compromise are not always the best way to go. Neville Chamberlain declared peace in our time after speaking with Hitler, and then the second world war happened. Compromise was definately not the best option in that case.

      Neither is compromise the best option now. The United States should do it's best to identify the larger supporting organisations, and strike them so that the are unable to do this again. (We can't make them not want to do it again). This will involve killing many people, and it will involve collateral damage to civilians and loss of life for US military personel. That is unfortunate, but it should still be done.

      The Canadian response, (I am a Canadian), should be to support the US in whatever action it takes. No more fence sitting. These are our friends and neighbours and they need our support.

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    10. Re:Plea for peace by Malcontent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "It looks like we've got to smash somebody. In fact, it looks like the people we'll be hitting are fanatics."

      I remember when OKC happened Rush LImbaugh started calling for bombing of "whoever is responsible". Once we found that it was an American and that bombing "whoever is responsible" meant bombing Michigan Rush shut up. I guess killing innocent people is much more palatable in Iran or Iraq then Michigan.
      In the end our tendency to look at Arab and Muslim life as basically worthless will determine the scope of the attack. Not the desire to punish the people who are actually guilty. My guess is many many innocent people will die as a result of our retaliation which will make us exactly like the monsters who committed these crimes.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    11. Re:Plea for peace by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have got to be a complete idiot.

      the target does not have to be absolutely accurate. scorching afghanistan and removing it from the map will remove nearly all of bin laden's ground troops and all of his civilian support. it may even make him a target from his own people.

      Do you honestly think the people of afghanistan have any clue? Sure, some do, especially within the ruling Taliban government. BUT, many people in afghanistan are not a party to the Taliban. A many people in that nation have taken up arms against the Taliban. Some of them have not forgotten that many Americans and Brits fought alongside them against the Soviets.

      Besides, Bin Laden isn't even an afghani, he's a Saudi and his supporters are scattered all over the world. By your grand scheme, we would have to Nuke Iran, Sudan, Yemen, and large portions of Ethiopia, Somalia, and countless other nations.

      if you commit a terrorist act, or you know someone that commits or is planning a terrorist act against this country -- you should die. the trickle down effect of this will rid the world of this plague.

      OR, you mobilize a couple billion Muslims against you. You kill one innocent, and their family is more likely to become a supporter of Bin Laden then the people who killed their loved one. The more you kill the more you drive into the arms of your enemy. If you don't believe me open any history book. One only needs to look at the numerous examples out there. The rise of Christianity in Ancient Rome, the aforementioned invasion of Afghanistan by the Soviets, the fall of the Khmer Rouge as well as any other Despotic system.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    12. Re:Plea for peace by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Live by the sword, die by the sword.

      Keep that in mind as the US retaliates.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    13. Re:Plea for peace by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Aggressors don't always set the rules.

      "Vietnam", "Afghanistan", "Retreat from Russia"

      In the latter, the Russian winter beat back Napolean, in the first two terrorism was able to hang on for years in the face of an aggressor.

      >This requires a huge, huge response. The aggressors set the rules. At the very least, invasion of the country that either
      >sponsored, or allowed to happen, this terrorism must be made.

      We don't know this was state sponsored. Clearly if it was, that country is in the deepest doo-doo imaginable. But it is most likely that this is done by a relatively small group of people; and may very well not be state related at all.

      If you really believe that invasion of the country that allowed this to happen should be done, what happens if that country unknowably turns out to be Canada?

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    14. Re:Plea for peace by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 3, Troll

      Or maybe because bombing those responsible might have started with Rush's radio station.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    15. Re:Plea for peace by anshil · · Score: 3, Troll

      I'm just thinking what must go in a mind of person that flies a 7?7 into a building with 10 thousend of persons inside.

      What personal pain such a person must have gone through? What has he seen? what was done to him? what pain must a person go through to be ready to to do such act? Had he to see to watch his family die? I just can't imagine what such person went trough.

      I believe to fight such attacks in future is best done in the long run to fight the causes which could raise such a pain in a person, btw: which must be highly educted, not everbody can fly a boing.

      It's obvios that not the airlines pilot steered the plane, why should he? he will be dead eitherway.

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    16. Re:Plea for peace by Aerog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Palestinians can rally in the streets today, and celebrate the mass extermination of human beings.

      Not that I'm condoning violence in any ay shape or form, (this act was utter atrocity), but your statement about Palestinians and immediately assuming they're responsible is bare-faced racism just like you accuse them of condoning. we have to remember at this time No group has claimed responsiblity and Arafat and even the Taliban have denounced the act. It is still unknown which group carried out the attack, and (I'm going to get modded down here), but the chance even holds that it could even be an American group (however small). We need to stop pointing fingers until there is sufficient evidence that this was an attack by group X.

      We need to focus on the aftermath and helping the survivors, and sadly I'm over half a continent and a closed border away or I'd be out there now. I hope we can put it behind us and work on the task at hand first, before condemning potentially innocent groups.

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
  4. Live Streams of DC Police by PenguinRadio · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.penguinradio.com/ has live streams of the DC Police Special Operations channel. This is a shoutcast MP3 feed.

  5. Re:Nostradamus by Diomedes01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm sorry, but that's way too vague to make any sense at all. How could anyone call DC or New York "the City of God" - I'm sick of all these new-age hippie bastards who wet their pants every time something happens that can be contorted to almost fit one of Nostradamus' ridiculous "prophecies". There are serious events in motion without letting stupid superstitions get in the way.

    --
    "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
  6. Just Give Blood!!! by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even if you're not in NYC, blood supplies can be moved around, and are desperately needed in a situation like this. Given the situation, does anybody know if they'll accept donations from folks who gave less than 8 weeks ago?

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Just Give Blood!!! by remande · · Score: 5, Informative
      I just called the Manchester, NH office (5 hr drive to NYC). They didn't make an exception in my case, but I am only 1 day underdue, and am eligible tomorrow.


      Geekoid, please note that you have done your part, two weeks ago. If that pint isn't used in the rescue effort, it may have stood in place of a pint that will be.


      Anyone who has not given blood since 7/17/01 is eligible to give blood today (9/11/01). The Red Cross says that they will need donations all through the week. I expect that NYC will go into "Spaghetti surgery" mode and stabilize everybody they can today, then spend the next few days performing more permanent medicine as supplies arrive. Thus, people eligible to donate within the next week are encouraged to do so.


      Red Cross Internet: redcross.org (leads you to your local office, has news briefs, and is nearly slashdotted).


      Red Cross Bellnet: 800-462-9400


      Will someone post NYC donation data here, and someone else mod it up? That should save valuable phone lineage in NYC. I will post donation data if I can find it.

      --

      --The basis of all love is respect

  7. Giving Blood Wherever you live! by Hollinger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People, give blood wherever you live, regardless of whether it's in California or in Rhode Island!

  8. More info by rw2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Continual updates on poliglut. And we're still operating without lag.

  9. 1-800-Give-Life by djrogers · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please, no matter where in the country you are - GIVE BLOOD! Blood banks all across the nation will be getting blood and plasma to NY and DC at this time, and we already have a serious shortage nationwide. If you're over 17 years old, 110 lbs, and have no STDs, call 1-800-give-life and find out where you can donate.

    --
    Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
  10. God Bless Google by Bonker · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are looking for news, you will find the most current information on TV or radio.
    Many online news services are not available, because of extremely high demand.
    Below are links to cached copies of news sites as they appeared earlier today.
    Breaking news: Attacks hit US [Washington Post - CNN.com (cached)]

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  11. Continuous Video Feed by marcop · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have been watching a continuous video feed for the past hour from http://www.sky.com/skynews/home/

    BTW, they www.sky.com runs Solaris. So does washingtonpost.com - which was one of the few sites that was up. I don't promote Solaris - but it is interesting.

  12. Donate Blood by MousePotato · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As I write this preparations or underway to turn our studio into an emergency blood donation center for the American Red Cross. They need help. Business want to help but most do not have the advantage we (martial art schools across the US) do; lots of floor space for them to setup.

    If you can't help this way please just go and donate blood today.

    My prayers go out to the hundreds, if not thousands of families who lost a loved one today. NYC is my home town. All I can do from 1375 miles away I will.

    Peace,

    Sandor Urban

  13. Re:Nostradamus by Smid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nostradamus's predictions have been constantly discredited, being not only applicable to all sorts of events in past 500 years, but also originally written in an obscure version of french that was regularly mistranslated.

    Please, put your doomsayer sandwichboards down and stop ringing the bells.

    (Not you Diomedes, you talk sense)

    Smid

  14. Re:this is NOT pearl Harbour by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 3, Informative

    About 3,000 have been killed since the sixties in Northern Ireland related violence. I suspect that today's deaths dwarf that figure.

  15. Better... by imipak · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Hemos: THANK YOU for your words urging restraint. There'll be plenty of time to work out who did it and bring them to justice in the following months.

    major parts of European cities, Britain in particular are being shutdown,
    I'm two miles from the House of Commons (central London) and, as far as I'm aware, Hemos is mistaken. (Source?) Specific buioldings such as Lloyds, the Nat West tower, Canary Wharf and so on are evacuated, but Londoners are used to that sort of thing: we had an IRA bombing campaign (and still do, of a sort) and there are plenty of false alarms and practice drills.

  16. September 11 = by LordKariya · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not sure if this has been posted yet...

    Today is September 11th...

    September 11th was also the date that certain conditions were reached under the Camp David accord, a treaty which terrorist groups have regularly rallied against.

    --
    I alternate between posting +5 and -1 Comments. Karma: +53 -47 = 6
  17. Re:I hope... by Pope · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Take a look at what's been going on in Britain and Northern Ireland, especially recently, and see if retaliation has ever solved anything.

    This is certainly one of the worst things I have ever witnessed, and that includes being in London during IRA bombings.

    I just have been thinking: who on Earth is going to take responsibility for this?? As soon as one has spoken up, yes, he will be a flat spot on the wall.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  18. You're right, it is MUCH WORSE by Carnage4Life · · Score: 4, Informative

    BBC reported that a US statesman as saying this is the second pearl harbour

    It is not


    Pearl Harbor was an attack during a time of global war on a military installation that cost a total of 2,403 lives.

    This attack occured during a time of peace on civilain installations and the death toll is being estimated at over ten times that of Pearl Harbor (at least).

  19. PENTAGON != COLLAPSED INTO A HOLE! Stay off phone! by GMontag · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a big hole IN the Pentagon where an airplane crashed into it. It is ONLY 5 stories tall (well, there is that *alleged* basement), 5 sides, 5 rings. A 300 foot hole can not swollow the worlds most massive office building.

    Plane crashed by the helliport, on the Southwest side. Most reports are that it hit between the E and D rings (outermost ring is E).

    Not sure if this was the wedge that is currently under renovation or not.

    There are confirmed dead adults in the building. None of the children in the daycare center were harmed. All of the children are accounted for and safe.

    Verizon is asking everybody in the DC area to stay off of ANY phone line unless it is an emergency.

  20. Statement from Prime Minister of Canada by Nos. · · Score: 5, Informative
    September 11, 2001


    Immediate


    STATEMENT BY THE PRIME MINISTER


    Prime Minister Jean Chrétien expressed his horror at the news that the United States has been the victim of multiple terrorist attacks :



    "I was stricken by news and television pictures coming from the United States this morning. It is impossible to fully comprehend the evil that would have conjured up such a cowardly and depraved assault upon thousands of innocent people. There can be no cause or grievance that could ever justify such unspeakable violence. Indeed, such an attack is an assault not only on the targets but an offense against the freedom and rights of all civilized nations.


    All Canadians are praying that the brave firefighters and rescue crews who currently on the scene will be successful in limiting the casualties. We stand ready to provide any assistance that our American friends may need at this very, very difficult hour and in the subsequent investigation.


    Aline joins me in offering, on behalf of all Canadians, our deepest sympathies to the families of the victims and to the American people.



    - 30 -


    PMO Press Office: (613) 957-5555
    This document is also available on the following Web site:
    http://pm.gc.ca

  21. AIRLINE INFORMATION by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First plane: American Airlines, Flight 11, Boston=>LA, 92 on board.
    Second: UA, 175, Boston=>LA, ?.
    Third (Pentagon): AA, 77, Dulles=>LA, 64.
    Four: UA, 93, Newark=>SF, ?.
    Five: UA, Camp David.
    Six: (PA crash),
    Seven: (CO crash?), UA?, 175, =>LA?

    Many planes still in the air, none currently threatened.

    Crash Five may be a rumour. I keep seeing it scroll by on the TV, but I've read that it's been denied.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:AIRLINE INFORMATION by FFFish · · Score: 5, Informative

      CORRECTION:

      There are five confirmed crashes. The "Camp David" one is actually the PA crash; it crashed relatively close to Camp David. The flight number is still unknown.

      I've got flight 175 listed twice. I haven't heard confirmation of the rumoured CO crash, so presumably it didn't happen.

      All the flights were East Coast take-offs heading for the West Coast. This is not because LA or SF were under threat of attack, as some stations are stupidly reporting, but because these are the flights with the most fuel onboard.

      Transalantic flights would have provided even bigger planes and more fuel, but security on them is more stringent than those for domestic flights.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  22. Facial recognition software, anyone? by osgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's pretty easy for us on /. to decry law enforcement aids like facial recognition hardware and software when times are good. However, it's at times of senseless tragedy like this when we really need to stop and think about letting law enforcement have the tools they need to prevent wanton acts of distruction like this.

    Abuses of those tools should be another discussion entirely -- an important discussion, but not a paranoid paralyzing one.

    I'm usually fairly detached during times like this, but by myself, watching the coverage, and imagining the enormity of the loss of life, mental health, peace, property, and productivity -- I couldn't help but cry in frustration at not being able to do anything.

    I'm sure I wasn't the only one. To those of you who felt likewise, don't forget that feeling. When the time comes when you're able to voice your support for tools and methods to stop these methods of terrorism, don't be silent.

    1. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by mrdisco99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And so it begins...

      Something like this happens, and suddenly we're more willing to be lax on our liberties.

      We can't let events like this damage the values and ideals that we live by. If we do, then they win.

      --

      +++
      NO CARRIER

    2. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by osgeek · · Score: 3

      Something like this happens, and suddenly we're more willing to be lax on our liberties.

      I think of it more as examining the total cost of ownership of liberties. Ironically, liberty isn't free, it must be paid for in a myriad of ways. And which liberty we're paying for, when we make choices, isn't even clear. One person's liberty to not be filmed in a public place sacrifices another person's liberty to be free from a violent terrorist attack. This isn't a black and white issue.

      We can't let events like this damage the values and ideals that we live by.

      If we do, then they win.


      Damage of these things is inevitable. Every day when you manage keys to lock your doors or passwords to access your servers, you're dealing with the damage that is done to us by the unscrupulous. This is no different.

    3. Re:Facial recognition software, anyone? by bridgette · · Score: 3, Insightful

      4. ceramic gun
      http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Alley/7931/ ce ramicguns.html

      Compromise the security people themselves, by having your own people as security moles. They see their friends coming through, they don't mention what they see on the X-ray. I don't know enough about airport security to guess the difficulties involved.

      I remember seeing Coolio on a talk show saying that he used to work airport security at LAX when he was a crackhead. Seriously. If you can get and hold down a job as airport security while addicted to crack then pretty much anything's possible. And it's probably not very hard to bribe any current crackheads on the job.

      --
      - bridgette
  23. An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "An eye for an eye, and the whole world goes blind" - Ghandi

    Are more dead people the answer here? Take a minute to think before screaming for vengence.

  24. Webcams in NYC and D.C. by bahtama · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/mmedia/webcam s/eyeondc.htm - just got the idea to search for webcams and I found this one aimed at the Pentagon. You could probably find many more out there from http://www.webcam-index.com/USA/ or something like this site.

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

  25. Re:How to Donate Blood by Rackemup · · Score: 3, Informative
    First you'll need a bucket and a butter knife...

    no no... I'm kidding... really

    The Cdn Blood Agency has lots of locations, might even set up triage sites for those situations needing "emergency" supplies. Check your local phone books for numbers to contact the Canadian Blood Services.

    I just donated a few weeks ago so I can't give again. Those people who don't donate because they "can never find the time" should get off their asses now.

  26. Re:Webcams by Pope · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Does anyone have images from the webcams before the planes hit? Those would be some Pullitzer-calibre photos if they showed anything.

    That footage of the South Tower getting hit by the 757(?) is just chilling.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  27. This is where brains come in by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Insightful
    To summarize:

    Counter attacking is not a good solution, for several reasons. 1) We do not know who to blame, and blind lynching leads to many problems, 2) even if we did know who to blame, counter attacking stands a good chance of angering others, and perpetuating the cycle, 3) even if we knew which nation to attack, and could get away with it, it is still wrong to kill people for the actions of others--we would be no better than the terrorists.

    On the other hand, doing nothing is likewise unacceptable. It will send the message that these actions can be taken with impunity, and likely lead to further assaults. Failing to stand up for yourself is the best way to become a victim.

    So, logically, we need to do something that is not a counter attack.

    This is where brains come in. What can we do that will reduce or eliminate this kind of threat but isn't a blind reprisal? That is the question we should be turning our brains to.

    -- MarkusQ

  28. Predictions by BarefootClown · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, I hope and pray for the safety of all involved, and commend the rescue workers who are putting their lives on the line to save others. These people are heroes in the truest sense, and deserve our undying admiration and respect.

    Watching the news, all of the stations, particularly the military correspondents (Gen. Schwarzkopf included) talked about the complete failure of our intelligence community to provide us with any warning about this attack. Reporters asking "how could such a thing have happened with no warning," "haven't we infiltrated these groups," "how can you maintain secrecy on something this widespread," etc.

    In a couple of weeks, I'm going to look like a prophet for this one. I predict that somebody will mention data security, including e-mail encryption. Whether correctly or not, somebody will propose it, and encryption, already a hot topic in National Security circles, will gain focus.

    I predict that within a month, Congress will have drafted, and probably passed, a National Security Act to address the threat of terrorism. In that act, I fully expect to see severe restrictions on the use of secure data systems, including encryption of any form (e-mail, PGP file encryption/encrypted file systems, even SSH and SSL), anonymity (anonymous bulletin boards, including such things as Slashdot), and relaxation of wiretapping laws. E-mail will be required to be send in plaintext, Carnivore will be restored to active duty, and put on more servers with more keywords and more aggressive monitoring. Cell phones, already ruled to be not private, will be actively monitored by the government, as will landline phones--remember, cordless phones (you know you all have them) emit RF too, and the few that have scrambling systems are easily compromised.

    Also expect to see civil liberties severely curtailed, at least for a while. Meeting with friends at odd hours (odd to the rest of the world, normal to geeks)? Suspicious. Phone calls to friends in other countries, or of other nationailities (particularly Middle Eastern)? Suspicious. Use of encryption/security? Suspicious squared--after all, what do you have to hide?

    My big prediction, though, is that the American Sheeple will hail this as a Good Thing, and support it wholeheartedly. The Sheeple will automatically say that anything that improves security must be a Good Idea, and will fall into line without even considering the ramifications.

    Mark my words, my friends: today has been one small step for terrorism, but one giant leap for the police state.

    --

    "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
    --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    1. Re:Predictions by Ratbert42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Reasonable predictions. I'll add one: we'll occupy Afganistan by the end of the year.

    2. Re:Predictions by locust · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Watching the news, all of the stations, particularly the military correspondents (Gen. Schwarzkopf included) talked about the complete failure of our intelligence community to provide us with any warning about this attack. Reporters asking "how could such a thing have happened with no warning," "haven't we infiltrated these groups," "how can you maintain secrecy on something this widespread," etc.


      A co-worker and I did the math on this. You need a minum of 4 people, 8 for better success. They have to coordinate... But: If they are people working at air ports (in bagadge handling or cleaning) they can get a weapon(s) on a plane. Security at US airports isn't exactly tight. Then you need someone who can fly an aircraft enough to steer, not take it off or land it. After take off, the armed party goes to the front bathroom, slips into the cockpit kills both pilots, and locks the door (or there is another person there for crowd control). You need one, but more likely two people per plane. In a country of 300 million, with our freedoms you have to look out for 8 guys.


      --
      locust

    3. Re:Predictions by Hilary+Rosen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right. That worked for the Russians, after all.

      --
      Yes, the nick is flamebait
  29. Well Great. by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm watching CBC television, The National. The desk reporter is superlative, and I'll be writing CBC to give accolades.

    Now that there's less action on the ground, we're getting all the "experts" in as talking heads.

    And the unfortunate thing is that some of them are instigating racial hatred. Well, cultural hatred, at any rate.

    The same thing is beginning to happen on Slashdot: wingnuts wanting to obliterate Palestian, and even some who want to nuke the entire mid-East.

    GET A CLUE!

    The US can't just walk in and kill every damn Muslim and Arab. That'd be a worse atrocity than the attack on the WTC -- and the retaliation would make today's events look like a trip to Disneyland.

    There must be retaliation...but it must be rational!

    Use your cluesticks with impunity. Contact your news stations and let them know that they're being destructive, not constructive; join the message boards and preach cautious, considered reactions; and remain calm.

    [Please also note that more people die every day or two in traffic accidents, than were killed in the attack. It's a tragedy, but not much worse than the tragedy we live with every day... it's just that we don't expect terrorist attacks.]

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  30. Re:Nostradamus by gamgee5273 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Which easily could describe the Civil War...

  31. We citizens reap what our leaders sow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The innocent lives lost are tragic and unprecendented (in the US at least--think of Vietnam, Bosnia, WW2, Siege of Leningrad and others). But we reap what our leaders past and present sow. We are a super power and an empire and so draw the wrath of thesoe we hold dominion over. And we are a free society, so hitting us from within is easier than it could be. The Roman Empire faced terroism by the Gauls and other tribes on their borders. If we as a nation, continue to support land theft, assasination and torture in throughout the world in order to maintain our empire (Chile, Vietnam, Agentina, Iran, Israel, and many more: Ask Kissinger/Bush Sr./Rumsfeld for details) then we must expect retribution will at least be attempted. It is sad to see it apparently acheived by somebody with some axe to grind: for they never kill the guilty, but instead destroy the lives of many innocent people for no purpose. They can even come from our own as in McVeigh. Terrorism is a sad, sad tactic for in leaving the guilty unpunished and killing innocents does nothing to help a cause. It jsut makes the world a meaner, less humane place. Funny huamne derives from human and it is humans who are the least humane of all animals.

  32. Just announced State of Emergency: DC and VA by GMontag · · Score: 3, Informative

    Latest from WTPOP-FM Washington, DC/Manassas, VA

    Mayor Williams of DC has just declaired state of emergency in DC. DC Government closed.

    VA Governor declairs State of Emergency.

    Camp David airplane crash report is false.

    Regan National Airport to remain closed until at least 1100 12 Sep 2001

    Massive gridlock leaving DC, similar to the first flake of snow day in this area (locals will know what I mean).

    Reminders that low flying aircraft around Dulles and National Airports are US MILITARY aircraft, NOT foreign.

    Reminders to stay off the phone.

  33. Real Flight Information by ZxCv · · Score: 3, Informative

    The flights that crashed into the WTC towers were both American flights. Straight from a story on Boston.com, there's a breakdown on the known plane crashes:

    -American Flight 11
    Boston to Los Angeles
    A Boeing 767 with 81 passengers, nine flight attendants, and two pilots aboard crashed into the World Trade Center.

    -American Flight 77
    Washington-Dulles to Los Angeles
    A Boeing 757 with 58 passengers, four flight attendants and two pilots crashed into the World Trade Center.

    -United Flight 93
    Newark, N.J. to San Francisco
    A Boeing 757 with 38 passengers, two pilots and five flight attendants crashed southeast of Pittsburgh.

    -United Flight 175
    Boston to Los Angeles
    A Boeing 767 with 56 passengers, two pilots and seven flight attendants crashed, but United won't say where

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  34. Re:Oh christ, the politics already... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Of course it's politics. The notion of the US being the 'Great Satan' is politics. The way the US has been inflicting uncontrolled freemarket capitalism on the rest of the world is politics, and the people who freak out over this are also politics.

    Attempting to destroy New York City is beyond politics- that's war. The response will be war.

    But the _causes_ of this are politics. I've seen a few brave posters from outside the US saying, "Um, you really think this is unprovoked?" and they should be listened to.

    In my opinion, we are obviously heading into a world where the nation-state is no longer the focus. I've heard the terrorist organisation responsible for this is multinational and extends all over the world. That's much like the corporations we have, which do things like try and sue Indian farmers over growing rice that was native to India in the first place, which try and tie economic relief to a political system, which try and inflict our screwed-up intellectual property notions on the rest of the world- and those guys are multinational too, and often with economic coercion to rival actual countries.

    I'm not sure there is a country that could have done us as much damage, in a conventional military attack, as this multinational 'terrorist' organization did in its attack.

    As to the democrat/republican thing: hell, I voted Green/Progressive, and lost. I believe if Gore had won, this day would still have happened. BOTH the Dems and Reps represent a particular type of American political system- one that obviously has insane, fanatical enemies.

    The fact that the enemies are fanatics making suicide attacks does not make the American political system right. The fact that we need to fight back now does not make us blameless- we just happen to be the ones expected to deliver the counterstrike. When we've done that, we damn well better take a look at whether we're really 'all that and a bag of chips' ourselves. How can we face ourselves knowing that our country wields huge force in the world, and yet half of us won't even vote for _President_ much less pay attention to what our country is doing? That's got to stop- we've got to smarten up and take responsibility.

    If we want all the world to _agree_ that we aren't 'the great satan', we have got to pay closer attention to what our country, our capitalist economic system, our political system, are doing out there. This didn't come out of nowhere. We've known about the resentment for a long time, over all sorts of things and in all sorts of ways, and mostly we've just flat out ignored anyone who dared to suggest we weren't the apex of creation.

    Once we've got through this next bit, we have _got_ to grow up...

  35. NYC Blood Donor Info--PLEASE MOD UP by remande · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I got these in a search for NYC blood banks and centers via www.bigyellow.com. I cannot confirm that these are blood donor centers, nor can I contact the Red Cross 800 number (both the phone line and the Web page are slashdotted).

    If you are in NYC and looking to donate blood, I would consider physically going to the site rather than using the phone. I am not in the city; those there should decide for themselves whether the transportation system or the phone lines are clogged up worse.

    American Red Cross - Family Respite Center
    4 East 28th Street, New York, NY 10016
    (212) 213-0755

    American Red Cross
    150 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10023
    (212) 580-2821

    International Committee of the Red Cross
    801 2nd Avenue, New York, NY 10017
    (212) 599-6021

    International Federation of Red Cross
    800 2nd Avenue, New York, NY 10017
    (212) 338-0161


    Also, if you are in the NYC area, consider seeing if these Red Cross chapters or anyone providing relief efforts to see if they need unskilled volunteers--setting up tents, manning the food lines, etc. See your local place of worship, regardless of your religious persuasions--many of them may be providing relief efforts.

    --

    --The basis of all love is respect

  36. Baha'i Perspective by under_score · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The well-being of mankind, its peace and security are unattainable unless and until its unity is firmly established." - Baha'u'llah "The winds of despair are, alas, blowing from every direction, and the strife that divides and afflicts the human race is daily increasing. The signs of impending convulsions and chaos can now be discerned, inasmuch as the prevailing order appears to be lamentably defective." - Baha'u'llah "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." - Baha'u'llah Official Baha'i Web Site

  37. BLACK BOXES by SpookComix · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If we want to gather intelligence to at least point us in the right direction of the organization responsible--we need to at *least* recover the "black box" from the aircraft that went down in PA. Perhaps we could get something from the pilot, or other background noise, to explain what happend to that particular flight, and help us understand the other hijacked flights.

    --SC

    --
    You read fiction? I write it! Lemme know what you th
  38. NYC Hospital Locations -- DONATE BLOOD!!! by autarkeia · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can find a listing here and good old MapQuest here.

    My boyfriend and I are going to Goveurnor's on the Lower East Side. You can also call 800.933.BLOOD (800.933.2566) for locations, but good luck getting through.

    Peace, everyone.

  39. Said After pearl Harbor by KingKire64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Washington Governor Arthur B. Langlie (1900-1966) made the following statement shortly the United States declared war:

    "Your state government is prepared and ready to perform every defense task which has or will be assigned to it. The State of Washington is on the frontier of a great war. We do not know what the future holds in store for us. We do not know what trials we must go through or what sacrifices we will be called upon to make. We do know what is at stake. We know that our country, our liberties and our very homes are threatened. We are individually and as a nation being called upon to make good our pledge of allegiance to flag and country" (Seattle Star).

    --
    "All I can tell the "lesser of two evils" folks is that if they keep voting for evil, they'll keep getting evil."-Lp.org
  40. Terrorists want Retaliation by Arkaein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's been a lot of posts talking about how we need to strike back, and hard. I hope everyone here realizes that's what the terrorists want.

    Terrorism is not about strategy or tacticts, these acts were not battles in a war. they served no strategic or tactical purpose, the group that perpetrated these acts is not going to move in and conquer, or anything like that. The purpose of terrorism is to generate fear and political tension.

    All this commotion the politicians are making is exactly what the terrorists wanted. They have succeeded in the first steps of disrupting American lifestyle. By making huge reactions we're fulfilling the terrorists goals.

    What we need to do is first keep calm and tend to our victims. Second we need to take a few days (at least) to cool off and evaluate ways we can improve security and information access (why was it so hard to figure out which planes crashed? can't we keep track of where a plane is in the air?). Finally, and most difficult, we need to figure how to go back about our lives. We need to show that terrorism is an impotent tool.

  41. Re:Just Give Blood Components! by bungalow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Consider giving blood components.

    I know a lot of places run people in to "donate" plasma - and then give the donors a check for a ~1 - 2 donation. The check structure is based so that those who need the income, are prompted to go in on a regular basis:

    1st week:
    Day 1 $25
    Day 2 $15
    2ND WEEK:
    DAY 3 $20
    DAY 4 $25

    These places take in just about anyone, but test blood before thaey take it. There is usually long lines and it's uncomfortable.

    If you don't like taking money for blood donations, check out Carter Blood Center. They will accept platelet donations 2x per week, and repay donors with the standard cookie / apple juice fare. It's also a longer process - about 1n hour, and you've got needles in both arms. But the nurses have to totally wait on you, and they let you bring in movies to watch, or watch the ones there. An excellent setup. As an added bonus, there's the excuse to drink two extra milkshakes a week - this is recommended to make up for the Calcium and protein loss.

  42. what does this mean for our freedoms? by fringd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    all i can think is that this will only mean tightened security. i don't doubt that this might be cited for any number of measures to quash our right to bear cryptography. people will wonder who these folks are, and how they organized. "why," they shall wonder, "didn't the cia or fbi intercept their phone calls, emails, or whatever, and stop them before they acted?"

    what do you think? are they right? do we need to give up our right to privacy to stop tragedies like this? i for one fear what may come of this, ontop of the seemingly staggering death count.

    1. Re:what does this mean for our freedoms? by imipak · · Score: 3
      I think you're spot on: whether the motivations are benevolent or not, the TLAs and their associated law-passers are unlikely to miss the opportunity to ratchet the freedom of crypto down, and surveillance up. This, of course, is not inconsistent with the theory that they might be doing this for entirely good reasons...

      One for the conspiracy theorists out there: the comparison I keep hearing is Pearl Harbour. Isn't there a sizable school of thought & some evidence that some portion of the US Govt in 1941 knew that something was going to happen, and deliberately held off doing anything (a) to avoid giving away that they had the intelligence, and (b) to allow the US to be sucked straight into the war they'd spent the previous 20 years trying NOT to get involved with?

  43. UK Foreign Office number by MikeCamel · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those in the UK (who may be unable to get through to the US), the UK Foreign office has issued a number: 020 7008 0000.

  44. Re:WAR! by Mr.Phil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Religion is NOT the cause of this crime. The criminals that did this have TWISTED thier religion to pretend that this is a Holy War.

    Islam, at it's heart, is about peace. The killing of innocents is abhorent to Allah (God).

  45. Help through RedCross by Utopia · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you plan on helping
    Visit American Red Cross at RedCross.org
    Type your zip code to find your local Redcross chapter or call
    1-800-GIVE-LIFE to make an appointment to donate blood.

  46. WILL EVERYBODY STOP WITH THE TURBAN THING? by remande · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The above and a slew of other posts assume that this is some form of Islamic attack, likely under Bin Laden. I have heard no evidence to this effect. One terrorist group was supposed to have claimed responsibility; my understanding is that this was a false report.


    It could be Muslims. It could be Christians. It could be Athiests, (White|Black|Yellow|Red|Purple) supremacists, anarchists, fascists, disgruntled pilots, almost anybody. I am not blaming any of the above groups; I am demonstrating that we just don't know.


    Here's what we do know. This was a group of people (at least four, one for each aircraft) rather than one person. Those who carried out the plan (rather than any possible planners we don't see yet) were willing to die for this. They were trained for this mission (highjacking an aircraft is not an easy job today, and the fact that we have heard of no failed hijacking attempts today implies that all attempts were successful; we didn't have four successes in sixteen attempts or whatever). This implies premeditation and weeks of planning. Note that this also implies that the act was not a Columbine-type killing. The rash of Columbine events in the past few years show a lot of premeditation, but not the level of skill needed to hijack an aircraft.


    Going from here to the conclusion that it must be some turban-wearing, gun-toting radical Islamic militants is a huge leap to a conclusion, and symptomatic of some deep seated hatred.


    Let's not try to pin this on somebody until we get some more facts.

    --

    --The basis of all love is respect

  47. Re:PENTAGON != COLLAPSED INTO A HOLE! Stay off pho by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    My NEW Sig: Nuke the fucking bastards NOW!


    The worst thing about violence is that it causes people who were previously non-violent to become violent. Don't let the terrorists make you one of them!

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  48. On another note.. by SideshowBob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I personally am mildly disgusted by some of the mainstream media coverage I've seen of the aftermath. I really hate when obnoxious camera crews stick cameras in the faces of obviously traumatized survivors and ask inane questions like 'were you scared?', 'did you see anyone die?', or 'does this make you angry?'

    Sheesh, I wish the media would a) let these people have some dignity, and b) quit asking so many stupid Sally Jessy-esque questions.

  49. "Fight Club" not so funny by Sebastopol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In "Fight Club", the plot to take out the skyscrapers seemed cool and funny. And at the end, it seemed carefree and rewarding that the monoliths of capitalism were toppling, I'm sure everyone felt good about that.

    Now seeing people jumping out of windows in terror, thousands crushed burned and killed, a city closed, an infrastructure disabled, and world on high-alert, it doesn't seem so cool anymore.

    I feel the full effect of desensitization in the movies, and I am disturbed that I can't find the right words to communicate with friends who are in the midst of this crisis. Where can compassion be found? I'm not blaming the media for anything, I'm just sharply aware of the before and after I'm feeling toward fightclub vs. the real thing.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:"Fight Club" not so funny by puck71 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only people in the exploded buildings in "Fight Club" were Tyler's people - in other words, the people in on the plot (suicide bombing if you will). Don't even try to compare the two. 0 innocent lives lost compared to tens of thousands? That's not a comparison. I suggest you watch the movie again and get your facts straight.

  50. Alternative info channel by Ktistec+Machine · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're without a radio or TV in your office, try #CNN_Newsfeed on chat.cnn.com. It shows the closed captions for what's currently on-screen on CNN.

    1. Re:Alternative info channel by ChaosDiscordSimple · · Score: 4, Informative

      As Ktistec Machine points out, CNN runs an IRC server. It's working fine right now.The channel #CNN_Newsfeed contains the closed caption information from the live broadcast. It's a resonable fall back if you don't have access to television or radio.

      If you've got an IRC client, connect to irc://chat.cnn.com:7000/. If you've got Java support in your web browser, connect to CNN's java interface. Once you've logged in and given it a nickname, type "/join #CNN_Newsfeed" in the box.

  51. They expect retaliation. What have they prepared? by captinpoo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Any group that has planned this complicated terrorist attack in such a calculated fashion must be expecting a retaliation from the US, and ALOT of the other first world countries. What I am wondering is what they have planned for the aftermath. What are they going to do to the swift responce that is sure to follow.

    The terrorist group that has organized this attack is probably the largest and most organized. But how big are they? they are by no means in size and sophistication as the US, and cannot fight face to face, but will have instead prepared an other extreme action.

    The attacks today were prime targets for 2 reasons. Casualties, and media impact. This has severely shocked America and the rest of the world. What must be done in the future to produce such horrific results?

  52. News from Internet Exchange in SoHo by wbeckler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been getting emails from a friend at Globix, the giant internet exchange in southern Manhattan. Here is the latest news:

    Globix is located on Centre Street south of Canal Street. Businesses south of Canal have been asked to evacuate. The dust from the WTC collapse has forced buildings to shut down their air conditioning. Only a few large computer operations can operate without normal air conditioning, but major exchanges, like the AT&T telephone building and Globix, have backup cooling systems that should hopefully operate in these conditions.

    Globix engineers are taking care of major service problems and trying to prevent potential major problems so they can leave as soon as possible.

    Globix is hooked into the 3 largest backbones that pass through the region, and at least one must still be operating. Email messages originating from Globix are making their way out, but messages sent to Globix are not coming in.

    A telephone call to (212-334-xxxx) from NJ (856-672-xxxx) got through, but no calls to the 718 area code are working. I just received a call from a 212 phone as well.

    My friend at Globix was walking to a class at Sun Microsystems at the World Trade Center when the first plane hit. His view of the collision was obscured, and he was not injured. He commented:

    > I ran down to the woolworth building and stood
    > looking in shock at the North tower, the smoke
    > billowing out of it and the thousands of papers
    > fluttering down against the blue sky. Suddenly
    > I saw something hurtling down the side of the
    > building. It was a man, limbs, tie and suitcoat
    > flailing. several more followed. I turned and
    > slowly walked back towars the sunny, newly
    > renovated park in front of city hall.
    >
    > I heard the second explosion hit, and people
    > began screaming and running past me.
    >
    > As I sit here at my comfortable nest of a
    > workspace, my skin crawls, and I feel sick to
    > my stomach. I have read about events this bad
    > or worse a hundred times in the novels my
    > father derisively terms storybooks, but the
    > reality is completely incomparable. Perhaps he
    > had a point.
    >

    Another friend of mine was in the 70th floor of the second building to get hit, and he made it out alive. I don't yet have the details on that.

    Transportation update (from a Brooklyn friend):
    Subway lines are running off and on, and bridges and tunnels are closed to cars. The W line was still bringing people into Manhattan at 9:30, but that has ceased. The N/R is now running above 14th Street. Pedestrian traffic is allowed on the Brooklyn Bridge and the Manhattan Bridge. People in suits have been streaming over these bridges into Brooklyn all morning.

    Historical Note:
    Today, September 11, is the 28th anniversary of the CIA-led coup that overthrew the democratically elected government headed by Allende in Chile. Why is this relevant? I feel an immense amount of anger towards the people who caused this, and I think the people who caused this are the murderers sitting in Washington D.C. who direct U.S. foreign policy. They recklessly inspire anti-U.S. sentiment in every other country in this world. We ruthlessly bombed civilian targets in Yugoslavia (including water purification sites); we starve the children of Iraq; we blockade Cuba for no good reason; we topple democratically elected socialist governments in order to install pro-U.S. dictatorships. My anger does not direct itself solely towards the government officials who have perpetrated these crimes. I am furious at the millions of Americans who voted for George W. Bush. They are responsible for putting into power a person who is walking all over international agreements about global warming and arms control. And anybody who sits by and pays taxes and watches our imperialistic military and State Department do its dirty work has to take some responsibility for these murders. WAKE UP AMERICA: THIS IS YOUR FAULT. No missile defense shield will protect us from the hate that is justifiably spawned worldwide by our pro-corporate foreign policy.

    Experience of an anarchist:
    When the mail carrier knocked on my door this morning, I was worried that I was about to be taken in by the FBI. If you know what I've been through, you would not think this was a paranoid reaction. There will be a witchhunt following these events, and the U.S. government will probably use it as an excuse to harass activists. Right now the joint anti-terrorism task forces around the country spend most of their money tracking and harassing the anti-corporate activists who have been targeting world financial summits. A good chunk is also spent on the Earth Liberation Front and the Animal Liberation Front, neither of which actually have any members; they are just slogans that autonomous cells apply to their acts of vandalism. Today's events show yet again that money spent on national security does not in fact serve national security, but rather serves the insidious ends of the people controlling this country. Expect there to be calls for more money to fund politically motivated witchhunts against the Left. Expect calls for outlawing consumer use of encryption.

    Finally:
    Eben Moglen, Columbia University Law Professor and general counsel of the FSF once said about the inevitable rise of encrypted communications:

    I don't doubt that there will be downsides. You should accept the truth that harms will be caused, as harms are caused by free speech all the time. But don't let yourself be panicked about this. The world of the twenty-first century will be more free, and will continue to be, as the spooks often say, "a tough neighborhood." Indeed, some bombs will go off; there will be, in Stewart Baker's signature phrase, "some mangled, burnt bodies." You will notice that there are already. But fewer of them will be in Iraqi prisons; none of them will ever again be in a gulag or Lager maintained by a KGB or SS state with a tap on every telephone. And of that you should be very proud, because it is we who will have made it possible.

  53. Call first, make appointment by bgdarnel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Red Cross offices (in the Raleigh NC area at least) are being overwhelmed by donors and are asking everyone to call and make an appointment rather than just dropping by.

    -Ben

  54. Radar image of New York by Braudo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The National Weather Service put up this amazing picture. Is this for real?

    (The link was spotted on BBSpot.com)

  55. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    [disclaimer: I'm Scots, posting from Scotland]

    The only difference was that Bomber Harris had access to a much greater array of weaponry than the terrorists who attacked today.

    What's scary about this is that the perpetrators did not need access to a 'greater array of weaponry'. While the US President commits huge sums of money, and breaches solemn international treaty obligations, to develop missile defence, the perpetrators were able to use fifty tons of aviation fuel that they didn't even have to pay for. Who needs a suitcase bomb, when you've got domestic aircraft?

    This was a superbly well organised and executed operation on the part of the perpetrators, whoever they were, but it was also an incredibly cheap one. I should be surprised if the whole budget for the operation exceeded $100,000.

    So what can a government do in response to this? It's easy (and depressing) to predict what Dubya will do - just what so many here are urging him to do. And it's easy to see exactly why it will be counter productive. If the US Government lauches its predictable 'massive strike' against the assumed perpetrators, there will inevitably be enough 'colateral damage' to radicalise a whole new population of people who don't yet hate the US that much. And they'll get together and launch more strikes like todays, because (if you are sufficiently organised, disciplined, ruthless and security conscious) strikes like todays are cheap to mount out of all proportion to the damage they cause.

    The US cannot run. It cannot hide. It cannot - ever - protect itself against this sort of thing. It has thousands of miles of coastline, thousands of miles of borders, which it can never effectively monitor. Today shows that wannabe terrorists don't have to smuggle in large quantities of explosives.

    For the US as for the rest of the democracies of the world, the only solution to this problem is not to be hated that much. And the only way to not be hated that much is to not act unreasonably. Which means - among other things - that the response to today's event must be strictly limited to individuals who are provably in the direct chain of command to today's event - and not thousands of civilians who just happen to live in the same town.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  56. This is not Nostradamus by NullGrey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, allow me to stamp this out before it goes much furter. This quote is from this page: http://www.ed.brocku.ca/~nmarshal/nostradamus.htm

    As I posted in a similar thread on the earlier story, this is not from Nostradamus, but rather an attempt by the author of the site (who does NOT claim to be psychic) to show how, given a vague "prediction", that something in the future will fit it. Seems to have backfired, tho.

    But, I suppose that some people would rather believe it is from Nostadamus, and feel 'eerie' about it, rather than facing the truth, and seeing that it is just a coincidence.

    --
    +-- (Score:-1, Moderator on Power Trip)
  57. Interesting Pentagon tidbits by krital · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just wanted tos ay that I was at the Pentagon this morning, and that everything there seems to be like it's very well under control. There were a bunch of different people there watching the flames be put out - TV stations and such, as well as tourists and residents who, like me, wanted to see what the hell was going on.
    Probably the most interesting thing that happened was talking to one of the officers who works at the Pentagon. She told me not to get any nearer (which I declined to listen to) and then said, I don't know if this was a joke or not, that I should try to stay alive so I could serve the country. God save us if we have to go to war!

    DC is currently in a state of emergency, and almost all the streets are closed - it's pretty eerie. I walked by the state department, and the whole thing is shut down. There are cops and agents from every sort of government department everywhere - you literally can't go a block without seeing a handful sitting around or directing traffic or doing whatever they do. Washingtonians are being pretty calm, though, so there aren't any riots or looting or anything like that.

    Just to give another view on the situation here in DC :)

    --
    -- K
  58. another NYPD live stream by Atilla · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.live365.com/stations/206780

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  59. http://www.nybloodcenter.org/ by Evro · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you are in the NYC/Long Island area, here is a URL with locations to donate blood: http://www.nybloodcenter.org/blood_window.htm. Additionally, EMS is now saying you can donate blood at any hospital in the area.

    I tried to give blood at 2500 Marcus (very near Long Island Jewish hospital) and I couldn't even get in the parking lot. I'll try again later or tomorrow. Please, if you are in the area, help out...

    I feel so useless... giving blood is all I can do to help.

    Here's the text of that URL in case it's down for whatever reason:

    NEW YORK, NY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 - Due to this morning's hijack plane attacks on two World Trade Center buildings, resulting in unknown medical emergencies, New York Blood Center has announced a blood emergency for the greater New York/New Jersey metropolitan area.

    Dr. Robert Jones, New York Blood Center President and Chief Executive Officer, is urging all eligible donors to make a blood donation at donor sites in Manhattan at 310 East 67th Street (between 1st and 2nd Avenues) and 150 Amsterdam Avenue (66-67th Streets); in Brooklyn at 120 Lawrence Street near MetroTech; on Staten Island at 1625 Forest Avenue; on Long Island at 2500 Marcus Avenue in Lake Success, 3125 Veterans Highway in Bohemia; 333 Merrick Road in Rockville Centre and Route 110N in Melville/Huntington; at 167 New Street in New Brunswick, New Jersey; and 525 Executive Blvd. in Elmsford in Westchester. For more details on available donor locations, call 1-800-933-2566. Hours at all sites have been extended until further notice.

    Who Can Help?

    Donors must be at least age 17**, weigh a minimum of 110 pounds and be in good general health. Photo or signature ID is required.

    To find the nearest donation location call 1-800-933-2566 or refer to our blood drive locator.

    *New York Blood Center regions include:
    Brooklyn/Staten Island Blood Services
    serving over 25 hospitals in Brooklyn & Staten Island
    Hudson Valley Blood Services
    serving over 50 hospitals in the Bronx and lower Hudson Valley
    Long Island Blood Services
    serving over 50 hospitals in Queens, Nassau & Suffolk
    New Jersey Blood Services
    serving over 65 hospitals in northern and central New Jersey
    New York Blood Services
    serving over 30 hospitals in Manhattan

    **17-year-olds in New Jersey require parents' written permission to donate.

    --
    rooooar
  60. I was there by Gingko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was in D.C. centre round about the time the plane hit the Pentagon. I'm a Brit, and flew out for two weeks holiday here to visit some friends yesterday. Getting out of D.C. was not easy - various subway stations were closed. For those of you who don't know D.C., the Mall area (where the Pentagon and Capitol are) is surrounded by government buildings. The streets were full of scared people, trying to play the odds on a macabre game of chance as they decided which buildings would be least likely to be hit. It was terrifying - everybody was certain another strike was coming. There were rumours flying around - a car bomb had hit the Capitol, another plane was incoming, all sorts. The roads became gridlocked very quickly. I got talking to a lady who was just standing around outside the agriculture department. Turns out her husband was in the Pentagon. We hitched a lift down to Crystal City - I owe the driver of that black van a beer. From there we picked up a couple of other ladies and got a meal in McDonalds. We went our separate ways, since some guy said he could get me to Tyson's Corner - which was near where I wanted to go. After half-an-hour stuck in traffic, not moving, I heard that some subway stations were open, and took my chances. I got lucky, and got home.

    Many didn't.

    I have never been so scared.

    --
    i don't do sigs. oops.
  61. From CNN, What's confirmed by BigGar' · · Score: 5, Informative

    NEW YORK (CNN) -- Terrorists struck the United States Tuesday morning in harrowing, widespread attacks that included at least three commercial jet crashes into significant buildings.

    In the first attack, a plane hits the north tower of the World Trade Center in Manhattan shortly before 9 a.m., followed by another plane into the second tower about 20 minutes later. Both towers later collapse.

    About an hour later, a plane crashes into the Pentagon, part of which later collapses.

    American Airlines tells CNN that it lost two planes, both en route to Los Angeles: American Flight 11 from Boston with 81 passengers and 11 crew aboard is lost. This is believed, but not confirmed, to have been one of the planes that crashed into the trade center. ... American Flight 77, a Boeing 757 from Washington Dulles airport to Los Angeles with 58 passengers and six crew is unaccounted for. Witness says plane that hit Pentagon was an American Airlines Boeing 757.

    United Airlines loses two planes: United Airlines Flight 93 airliner headed from Newark, New Jersey, to San Francisco, crashes near Somerset, Pennsylvania -- police say initial reports indicate no survivors. ... United confirms the crash of Flight 175 from Boston to Los Angeles with 56 passengers and seven crew aboard. It's possible, but not confirmed, that this is the second plane that hit the World Trade Center.

    FBI sources said all four planes that crashed had been hijacked.

    The Pentagon, the White House, the State Department, the Justice Department, the Capitol, the CIA and all other government buildings in Washington are evacuated.

    President Bush calls the crashes "a national tragedy." Later in the day, Bush issues a statement from Barksdale AFB near Shreveport, Louisiana. "Make no mistake: The United States will hunt down and punish those responsible for these cowardly acts."

    In the first-ever national ground stop of aircraft, all flights nationwide are stopped at their departure airports.

    International flights are initially diverted to Canada; FAA says later, however, that 22 U.S.-bound international flights will be allowed to land.

    Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, says in reaction to the terror attacks that "we want to tell the American children that Afghanistan feels your pain and we hope that the courts find justice."

    In New York, more than 10,000 rescue personnel rush to the scene. Evacuation of lower Manhattan begins.

    Israel evacuates all of its missions around the world.

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta is evacuated. CDC prepares bioterrorism teams in case they become necessary.

    Philadelphia landmarks are evacuated.

    In Chicago, the Sears Tower is evacuated; United Nations in New York is evacuated.

    Five battleships and two aircraft are deployed along the East Coast of the United States, and two aircraft carriers go to New York area, all from Norfolk, Virginia.

    The New York Port Authority closes all bridges and tunnels into the city.

    U.S. stock markets close after the New York attacks.

    NATO sends home all non-essential personnel from its Brussels, Belgium, headquarters.

    The Immigration and Naturalization Service puts the U.S. borders with Mexico and Canada on highest state of alert.

    Los Angeles International Airport is evacuated.

    Disney closes its parks in Orlando, Florida, and Disneyland in Anaheim, California.

    FEMA implements plan established for such events: FBI leads investigation, and Justice Deptartment heads crisis management.

    Three Palestinian groups -- Hamas, the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine and Islamic Jihad -- deny responsibility for the attacks, but blame U.S. policies in the Mideast.

    Mayor Anthony Williams of Washington, D.C., declares a state of emergency.

    A Delta flight makes emergency landing in Cleveland and all passengers are safely evacuated. Federal officials search the plane for a possible bomb.

    --


    Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
  62. Here is how far the dust cloud extends by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's a link to the NOAA website showing the radar image of the northeast US, showing the extent of the dust cloud.

  63. Akamai CTO confirmed by rschroeder · · Score: 3, Informative

    From Boston.com

    Akamai Technologies of Cambridge announced that Daniel C. Lewin, co-founder, chief technology officer, and board member of the company, died in the American Airlines Flight 11 crash in NYC today. Lewin, 31, is survived by his wife and two sons.

  64. Loss of Life and Perspective by virg_mattes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > This is an act of war against the United States.

    No, it's not. It's an act of terrorism. There's an enormous difference, a lesson that Vietnam taught us, and that you've apparently forgotten.

    > Peace did not stop Hitler; peace did not stop the Axis Powers.

    This would be a great analogy if it was accurate, but it isn't. Nations cannot operate without infrastructure, but most terrorist organizations can. You're fighting a different animal, and the weapon that's most effective against one can be entirely ineffective against the other. Think of trying to use an elephant gun (good against elephants, naturally) to kill a swarm of bees, and you'll get the idea.

    > If viable proof of guilt of Osama bin Laden is brought forth,
    > and the Taliban refuses to turn him over to the United States, then
    > they are an accomplice to an act of war and should be dealt with
    > appropriately.


    What if they aren't really harboring him? Or what if they are? What would be an appropriate response to that? Invasion? Do you really think that the rest of the world will stand idly by and watch us annex Afghanistan? Do you really think that this incident warrants a war against Iran and Iraq? How about Russia? How about China? Both world wars started over annexations of territory, and in both wars nations with no initial stake were eventually pulled in (like the U.S. in WWI, which we entered because of our alliance with Britain and France). The number of Americans that would die in World War III would eclipse the deaths today within weeks.

    > There must be a message sent to the world that terrorist actions
    > against the United States will be met with such an incredible and
    > unimaginably horrific response, than no one sane, fanatical, insane,
    > or otherwise would even conceive of the idea.


    Get your temper back in check and read that again. Sane people don't use terrorism, and fanaticals and the insane don't care about consequences. So, our "horrific response" will only serve to turn the collateral damage victims into more enemies.

    > It is time to obliterate those who would cause this to happen
    > using every means at our disposal, including the most destructive
    > and horrific weapons ever developed by man. If some civilians die
    > along the way, they are unfortunate casualties of war.


    It is almost astonishing that your comment reflects very closely the words used by Timothy McVeigh in describing his destruction of the Murrah building. But then, it's not that astonishing after all, in that you're advocating the same sort of terrorism as he was ("if the (fill-in-the-blank) government is going to protect people who commit crimes against the (fill-in-the-blank) people, then I'm justified in killing them and anyone else who happens to get in the way, and I'll call them "unfortunate casualties of war" because it soothes my sense of justice and makes my position less abhorrent").

    Until you (and many more like you) realize that fighting terrorism isn't just about brute force, we as a nation are destined to suffer from more of these attacks. Fighting terrorism is a high art form, and it can be done with a high degree of success, but it's never perfect, and it's never about simple military might. Read more about counter-terrorism, and you'll be surprised (and educated) by what you find.

    Virg

  65. Inadequate fire protection systems by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    The World Trade Center was structurally strong enough to survive being hit by a large aircraft. And it did; the towers were not knocked down. But it had an inadequate fire protection system, and the fire softened the structural steel, causing building collapse.

    The World Trade Center had inadequate protection systems in the 1993 bombing; the truck bomb in the parking garage knocked out emergency power and the fire pumps. Last time, they didn't even have battery backup on the emergency lighting. The FEMA study of the bombing and fire indicates only minor upgrades were made to fire protection systems; better emergency lighting and such. No improvements to sprinklers or new fire barriers were made, other than improving backup power to the fire pumps. Most of the improvements were to communications and control.

    This was much worse than it should have been.

    1. Re:Inadequate fire protection systems by F.Prefect · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps the fire-supression system was inadequate in many respects. That said, how can you seriously blame the scale of this catastrophe on the fire-supression system? Who in their right mind would equip an office building with a fire-suppression system that could extinguish a fire caused by enough jet fuel to take a 767 across the continent?! I think that even if it were up to a higher standard, it would have been absurd for the designing engineers to say, "hey, let's put in a sprinkler system that could extinguish a fire caused by a 767 slamming into the building with a near-full load of fuel!"

      --
      --Ford Prefect
    2. Re:Inadequate fire protection systems by bridgette · · Score: 4, Informative

      Who in their right mind would equip an office building with a fire-suppression system that could extinguish a fire caused by enough jet fuel to take a 767 across the continent?!

      Apparently, the structural engineer that worked on the WTC would, he's quoted as saying I designed it for a 707 to smash into it.

      http://chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0 10 911kamin-towers.story

      --
      - bridgette
  66. Tragical and sobering by Toshio · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My position
    I will write this in first person, as the thoughts and opinions here are expressed as mine only. When I say "you", I mean you personally, when I say USA, I mean the country as it exists in legal term. I strongly differentiate between the country that you live in and you personaly.

    What do I see
    I don't know who commited this crime, but I don't see them completely unprovoked. The choice of the day itself (international peace day) hints, that it might not be immediately connected to recent events on UN racism conference, but rather something that can be shown as direct result of USA policy of involving in every regional conflict in last decade. Playing the role of world police and trying to establish new world order isn't something that will go down lightly with vast majority of world population. Even if this resolves to be act of internal terrorism (like OC bombing was) it means that USA is growing more and more extremist by the day. Could you imagine something like this happening in the land of truly free?

    What I think about it
    For the most of the world I would say that it has it's feelings mixed. I, for one, am fed over my head with all of your freedom exports as of lately and think this might be clear signal that USA is trying to do what no country is (or ever should) be allowed to do. On the other hand I do not condone this way of acting in any way justifiable. World policing is something that UN was designed to do and internal freedoms and rights are something that USA seems to be failing in, but this kind of response is never justified.

    What do I mean with mixed feelings
    For one, I cheer, that civilians in USA are meeting the horror and uncertainty of war. UN general secretary Gali once said for Sarajevo, there's 13 places in the world were the have it worse. This time the civilians in USA for the first time in their history get the chance to experience the fact that there is no other place on Earth where it's worse. They are targeted to change the politics of their country. They are simply used as tools to achieve the goal. And at the end of the day, they are the only ones that could change the policy of the country as a whole. But before you cry that this is wrong and this will only achieve opposite effects, let me assure you, that you are right. This way of acting will never achieve the desired result unless the enemy is overhelmingly stronger. This time the enemy has showed it has weapon of FUD readily available and is capable of using it. Do you really think that you country (assuming your from the USA) really did something else when decided to bomb Yugoslavia? Can you honestly say you didn't target your war aginst civil population in order to destabilize the government? Can you really claim that power plants, car production lines, television station offices, bridges, and other things you managed to destroy or disable aren't civilian targets? In what way does USA justification of the way that it handled that war differ from justification that someone (be it international or internal) will use in its defence?

    Since I'm so smart, what do you want us to do?
    Can you honestly expect that harsh retaliation (while the bodies are still warm) will solve anything expect serve to prolong the conflict? If that someone will be taken to court, then things will have to be proven; exhibits A and B will be presented; judgement will be passed and sentence will be executed. This is the way things are done. This is the way that equality works. When taken to international stage, USA will probably act as sole judge, jury and executioner. What makes you think, that it morally can. If some country just did this and you're saying it's wrong, what makes you right? Rule of the mob?

    And what would I do?
    If I would be you (but I'm obviously not), I wouldn't be thinking about revenge (revenge for what exactly?), but I would rather be thinking abut helping those in need. I would be thinking about saying a pray for those dead. I would be thinking about correct course of action after taking care of this. If I would be president of USA, I wouldn't be talking about hunting down the enemy, I would be talking about helping those in need, I would be talking about rebuilding and healing. If I would have the power he has, I wouldn't want to help the thirst for blood, I would want to bring out the good in all the people. Only after that I would be looking to bring justice to whoever did this. Bring justice, not hunt down mind you. Headhunts and public lynch never helped anyone, but correctly executing the justice deterred other from getting help in commiting crimes.

    And your point is?
    Don't walk around, saying how good/bad this thing is, but the next time elections are around go to the voting booth and tell the country how do you want it to run the business. This will actualy mean that you will alter your behaviour based on some terrorist action, but think about the alternatives. Do you want to live in real FUD state (as in state of mind) or do you want to influence the politics to minimize the chances of this occuring again. The answer is yours. But bottom line is whether you would rather use this as an excuse to do something abou your whole society, or use this as the point of justifying more violence.

    Don't go down the spiral of violence. Don't retaliate. Don't assume.
    Act with thought. Seek international involvement. Check and present all the facts. Take the road of justice.

    If you want to know why I put this in bold, it simply because USA haven't shown much it lately. Sometimes the biggest bully on the block just needs to take the cold shower and admit that fists don't solve everything.

    --
    To boldly invent more hot water.
  67. Re:Peace ? by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You make the mistake of assuming that people such as these terrorists are willing to come to the negotiation table. They are not.

    The fact that they have reached a point that hijacking planes and crashing them into highly-populated office buildings seems like a good idea. Do you think they have any common ground with their targets? Do you think their greivances are so large that this kind of action can be justified?

    Dancin Santa

  68. Americanization by subgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have been reading through the comments on this subject. I do not claim to have read them all.

    It seems that many people, especially those outside the US, are susggesting that this attack was some sort of retaliation for crimes the US commits against the world. I am American. I am not always proud of everything the US does. It is stupidity to say that any country had this coming.

    Comments about America inflicting itself can only be taken seriously to a point. Yes, many American companies are "invading" other countries. But the people there buy it. No one is forced to buy food at McDonalds or drink Coca-Cola. The same thing happens in the US. Businesses I previously patroned are dissappearing and being replaced by things like Starbucks and Blockbuster. I say the same thing applies here as anywhere else. If you don't like a business, don't give it your money. If you don't like Hollywood being "imposed" on your country, don't see any Hollywood films. Encourage others to do the same. In the end, the people get what they want. If they want Americanization, it will certainly find them. It is easier to blame America than it is to blame the people who let our evil nation "invade" yours.

    I would also like to point out that every world power has been viewed negatively by the less powerfull. Before America it was the European Powers. It is always easy to tell America what to do when you only have to consider the consequences outside of America. If you are not American, you will not understand how the consequences will affect us.

    --
    you probably shouldn't have read this.
  69. Re:visit a mosque by beanerspace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You make a very good point. Talk to someone Islamic. I am not Islamic, but a rather identify with the type of 'Reformed' Christianity espoused as websites like Antithesis.com and the Credenda Agenda.

    That said, I know enough to know that it is ONLY the most radical and a minority of Islamics who preach violence. Most, if not all, condemn such CSCB terrorist acts. It would be victory for the chicken-shit-coward-bastard (CSCB)-terrorists if they could take these sad events and make us hate our Islamic neihbor.

    While we may disagree about God and country, I would prefer to debate our differences over some cold beer and hummus, as opposed to hot lead and fire.

  70. Insurance Concerns by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, So it's probably safe to assume that a good amount of people in the WTC towers were wealthy investment banker-ish types. Many of these guys were probably the only source of income their families had (since they would probably make enough that their wives didn't have to work). They probably had 1 million+ dollar houses mortgaged, nice cars, etc. So it would probably be safe to assume that their life insurance policies were for several million dollars. Of course, we can't discount that there were also plenty of secretaries/sys admins/janitorial staff/deli proprietors etc. in thee towers as well. Most of them also probably had life insurance policies.

    And of course we have the World Trade Center towers themselves, who are probably insured for billions.

    Well, watching CNN and various other news channels, I keep seeing that many politicians and journalists are calling this "an act of war"

    Folks, what is the one thing that almost no life or property insurance policies cover? You guessed it: WAR!

    We're going to have possibly tens of thousands of families who depended upon a primary wage-earner to survive. These families could potentially be told by insurance companies, "Sorry, but we don't have to provide coverage for your loved ones. It was war...".

    Additionally, we will have whatever group of investors counts on rental income from the WTC go completely to pot, because their property insurance on the buildings will echo the same sentiment.

    As far as I'm concerned, this isn't an act of war, it's an act of terrorism. The "war" clause in insurance policies is there as a last resort... it's meant to protect the insurance companies if half the major cities in the US get nuked to the ground. But I have no doubt that many of these companies will try to use this clause to their advantage.

    I'm going to be sending a letter to my Senators and Representatives in a few days (obviously they have more important things on their minds right now) urging them to pass a temporary law that prevents insurance companies from pulling these sorts of sh> igans. I urge everyone else to do the same.

  71. Recollections, Terrorism and Retribution by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Like many of you, I watched todays unfolding events with horror, disbelief, anger and sadness. And, there will be those who are jumping up and down in jubilation that the Great Satan has been hit.

    But, let's look at this for what it is, pure cowardise designed to strike terror in the hearts of people who have done no harm to anyone. The dead and wounded are people who were going to work, visiting relatives, or going home. They are people, much like those who have experienced terror at the hands of fanatics simply for living in a land whose government the fanatics deplore. There is no rational for the killing of innocent people. Anyone who thinks otherwise are clearly not of sound mind or thinking in a manner that western civilization can not comprehend.

    The United States takes a lot of blame for some of the stances it takes on many issues. The same United States provided food, shelter, medicine and other humanitarian assistance to many nations that are incapable of doing so themselves during a disaster or national emergency. The United States provides assistance to nations who fall prey to aggression from outside nations such as the invasion of Kuwait by Iraq or the killing of the Kurds by Iraq. They do so because of treaties, agreements, national interest or purely on moral grounds.

    Where would these people be if the United States and other nations stood idly by and did absolutely nothing? What would happen if the United States simple turned a blind eye to the plights of millions because of a few ignorant or fanatical people?

    I do not know who is responsible for this attrocity. And, I strongly feel that once the identity of the those response are discovered, that no expense be spared until they are either brought to justice of meet their maker. But, I also implore that we don't take to the streets and exact revenge on anyone simple because of their heritage. We need to rise above the feelings of anger and hate.

    Let's find out who is truly responsible for this attack and then make it clear, by our very strong actions, that terrorism will not be tolerated. Let those governments and individuals that support terrorism know that we have had enough and we will exercise our might to erratic them at all costs.

    But, for now, let's pray for those who perished and their families. Tomorrow, we fight back against those that did this to us. Then, it will be time to grieve and remember so that this does not happen again.

  72. Structural design flaws or ... by Telecommando · · Score: 5, Informative

    Structural design flaws or additional explosives involved? Of course a 757 is bigger than a 707.

    Engineers shocked by
    towers' collapse

    BY BLAIR KAMIN
    Chicago Tribune

    CHICAGO -- The World Trade Center, a
    symbol of American economic might, survived
    one terrorist attack in 1993. It was designed to
    withstand the impact of a jet, but both its
    towers collapsed this morning after planes
    rammed them.

    The structural engineer who designed the
    towers said as recently as last week that their
    steel columns could remain standing if they
    were hit by a 707.

    Les Robertson, the Trade Center's structural
    engineer, spoke last week at a conference on
    tall buildings in Frankfurt, Germany. He was
    asked during a question-and-answer session
    what he had done to protect the twin towers
    from terrorist attacks, according to Joseph
    Burns, a principal at the Chicago firm of
    Thornton-Thomasetti Engineers.

    Burns, who was present, said that Robertson
    said of the center, ``I designed it for a 707 to
    smash into it.''

    Burns, whose firm did the structural engineering
    for the Petronas Twin Towers in Malaysia --
    the world's tallest buildings -- said Robertson
    did not elaborate on the remark. Robertson
    could not be reached early Tuesday.

    Completed in 1972 and 1973, the 110-story
    twin towers were the fifth and sixth tallest
    buildings in the world. One World Trade
    Center, finished in 1972, was briefly after its
    construction the world's tallest building. The towers have been called
    ``a monumental gate to New York and the United States.''

    They withstood the 1993 attack, when a bomb-laden van exploded,
    killing six people and injuring more than 1,000.

    Closely spaced steel columns that ringed their perimeter held up the
    World Trade Center towers. Chicago's Aon Center (formerly the
    Amoco Building), completed in 1973, uses a similar support system,
    known to structural engineers as a ``tube.''

    Shocked by the building's collapse, structural engineers pointed to fire
    as the likely cause of the structural failure.

    ``Fire melts steel,'' Burns said. In addition, he said, the impact of the
    plane could have severely damaged the building's sprinklers, allowing
    the fire to rage, despite fireproofing supposed to protect steel columns
    and beams.

    ``You never know in an explosion like that whether they (the
    sprinklers) get cut off,'' Burns said.

    Architects Minoru Yamasaki and Associates, in association with
    Emery Roth & Sons, designed the World Trade Center.

    The structural engineers were the firm of Skilling, Helle, Christiansen,
    Robertson. The developer was The Port Authority of New York and
    New Jersey.

    Tuesday's attack marked the second time that a plane has crashed
    into a New York City skyscraper, although the first incident was an
    accident.

    In 1945, a B-25 flying at 200 miles per hour slammed into the 78th
    and 79th floors of the Empire State Building, gouging an
    18-by-20-foot hole 913 feet above the streets of Manhattan. The
    pilot, Lt. Col. William F. Smith Jr., had been heading from New
    York's LaGuardia Airport to Newark, N.J., when he became
    disoriented.

    Fourteen people died in the crash and the fire that followed -- three
    people in the plane and 11 in what was then the world's tallest
    building.

    Like the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, which also was struck
    by a plane, provided a sizable and symbolic target.

    The Pentagon is the world's largest office building, with a total of 6.5
    million square feet, serves as headquarters for the world's most
    powerful military. Sears Tower, by comparison, has about 3.5 million
    square feet of office space.

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
  73. tactical nukes by kaisyain · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, it's not even close to what a tactical nuke would have done. A 5-kiloton yield warhead would kill 98% of the people within one square kilometer instantly just from the pressure (~12psi). Out to about 3 square km you have 50% fatalies from pressure (~5psi). The thermal effects would be fatal (6.7 cal/cm^2) to a radius of about 1.3km and there would be significant injuries out to about 1.8km radius. Immediate radiation would be lethal to 90% of those within 1.2 km of this "low-yield" "clean" burst.

    Also thanks to the radiation, clean up and rescue proceeds at a snail's pace.

    And that's the low end of sub-strategic yields. The B-61 is lower, at about 1 kiloton, but you also have tactical nukes like those on the Trident that would cause an estimated 200,000 fatalities in an urban area with density similar to Moscow.

    Only for a loose definition of "approach" does this tragedy begin to approach the amount of destruction nuclear weapons are capable of even in their tactical form.

  74. Why Palestinians might be pissed... by FFFish · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why would Palestinian terrorists target the USA?

    Well, perhaps because the USA has exacerbated the mid-East problems, rather than help reduce them.

    From BigEye's Foreign Correspondent. No idea how truthful all this is, mind you, but I'm fairly sure it's worth consideration:

    BUSH FIDDLES WHILE PALESTINE BURNS

    NEW YORK - Pre-election concerns that George W. Bush had a weak grasp of world affairs have been confirmed by a succession of ideology-driven blunders and amateurish fumbles made by his administration that have damaged America's interests and image around the globe.

    To whit: trying to rush the anti-missile defense project when there was no need for haste; the tactless rejection of the Kyoto environment accords; Washington's crude enlistment of India in a new anti-Chinese alliance; boycotting this weekend's UN racism conference at Durban: and, most disturbingly, fiddling while Palestine burns.

    Who, one wonders, is running US foreign policy? Certainly not the nearly invisible `stealth' Secretary of State Colin Powell. America's first black Secretary of State was not allowed to go to an African-oriented conference in Durban because Israel was being accused of racism.

    Last week, Bush berated PLO chief Yasser Arafat for failing to end `Palestinian violence.' Soon after, Israel assassinated Mustafa Zibri, a senior Palestinian political leader, by firing Maverick missiles from Apache helicopter gunships into his office.

    The next day, Israeli M-60 tanks and M-113 armored personnel carriers occupied the Palestinian Christian town of Beit Jala.

    Meanwhile, it has been revealed that Israel is using the M494 105mm APERS-T tank round against Palestinians. This deadly round, designed for use against enemy anti-tank missile crews, disperses a conical spray of 5,000 tiny, razor-sharp darts known as flechettes. In the past, Israel has also used anti-personnel cluster bombs against Palestinian refugee camps.

    All of the above-noted weapons were supplied to Israel by the United States. Israel is also using an arsenal of other US-supplied weapons, from F-16 fighters to M-16 rifles, against Palestinians. Israeli-designed Merkava tanks `pacifying' rebellious Palestinians were built with US military aid.

    Israel is the largest ever recipient of US foreign aid - at least $91 billion since 1949, a sum that could have bought four complete aircraft carrier battle groups ( about 80 ships) for the US Navy. Each year, Israel gets $3-5 billion in US aid.

    The 1998 Wye River `peace' accords negotiated by President Clinton gave Israel an extra US $380 million for Apache helicopter gunships and armored vehicles - both currently being used against Palestinians. Just before leaving office, Clinton, quietly sent Congress a request for an additional US$800 million in military aid for Israel, a gift no doubt aimed at securing his future in publishing and Hollywood. Soon after, in a startling coincidence, Clinton received a book contract for $12 million.

    Many American conservatives and Jewish Americans are praising Bush for giving Israel's rightwing government carte blanche to crush the Palestinian uprising and assassinate its leadership. VP Dick Cheney has repeatedly accused Palestinian of `terrorism' while praising Israel's `restraint.' One wonders what Washington's response would be if the PLO began assassinating Israeli politicians who advocate murdering or ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

    Israel brushes aside occasional tut-tuts from the US State Department, and ignores charges its American-supplied weapons are being used in direct violation of the US Arms Export Control Act, which forbids recipients use of American arms except for national self defense in wartime.

    The White House and US Congress, fearful of antagonizing the Israel lobby, have refused to address this issue. Ironically, it was left to Gush Shalom, the courageous Israeli peace movement, to protest to Bush the clearly illegal use of American arms against Palestinians.

    It is increasingly clear that unless the mayhem in Palestine is ended, the entire Mideast could careen towards an explosion. Ariel Sharon, Israel's rightwing Prime Minister, has painted himself into a corner by vowing to crush the `intifada' and never allow a viable Palestinian state. Having provoked the current uprising, and vowed to break its back, Sharon now finds himself trapped in a cycle of violence, terror and counter-terror.

    Sharon's only answer so far is more of what he has done his entire career: blowing up houses, assassination, martial law, collective punishments. Now Sharon's aides are hinting at attacks against Syria, Lebanon, Iran, and even Egypt. Israeli critics are warning the Sharon is running amok and must be reigned in.

    Given Sharon's adamant refusal to halt Jewish colonization or allow a Palestinian state, Palestinians have no reason to halt their uprising. Only America has the power to push the two sides into an eventual peace agreement.

    Israel's brutal repression of the Palestinian `intifada' is being telecast around the globe, producing rage against Israel and its patron, the United States, and a worldwide surge of anti-semitism. America's strategic and economic interests across the Mideast and Muslim World are being threatened by the agony of Palestine, which inevitably invites terrorist attacks against US citizens and property.

    President Bush needs to act urgently. He needs to help Sharon find a way out of the corner in which he is stuck. Sharon has left himself no line of political retreat - other than being seen to bow to irresistible American pressure. Bush and VP Dick Cheney should cease helping Israel's rightwing and its American media mouthpieces demonize Yasser Arafat, who, however guilty of condoning violence, is the man with whom Israel has to make peace. Being rightwing does not automatically make one right.

    Bush's vanishing act over the Mideast has handed the initiative by default to Arab and Israeli extremists. Unless the US forcefully intervenes, Hamas suicide bombers and Sharon's death squads will determine policy. The result will be a disaster for Jews and Arabs alike.

    Bush is being irresponsible and dishonest by pretending America has nothing to do with this horrible mess. America has everything to do with it and could stop the carnage overnight if the White House showed sufficient political will and courage. Bush needs to recall the old adage, he who pays the piper, calls the tune.

    Copyright: Eric S. Margolis 2001

    Again, perhaps this fellow is lying or out-to-lunch. But if what he states is truthful, I think it's fair to say that the fanatics have just cause to be pissed off (and that's not to say that they are excused for being terrorists.)

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  75. Re:WTC holds 500,000 by AxelBoldt · · Score: 3, Informative

    50,000 people work in the towers, not half a million.

  76. Misinformation by vslashg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not right. ALL radars show bad values near the radar station. This is not a dust cloud at all. (Unless you believe that there's also a huge dust cloud around, say, Nashville or Houston as well.)

    The cloud wouldn't extend that far. However, papers from the blast were seen miles away, and a reporter ten blocks from the explosions said he could taste the dust in the air.

  77. The Twin Towers should NOT have collapsed!!!... by Douglas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When The World Trade Center was being built there
    was a heated controversy over the possibility of
    one of the Twin Towers buildings collapsing if it
    was hit by a large airliner.

    People remembered that the Empire State Building
    was twice hit by a plane. once by a small plane
    and then by a WW2 vintage bomber.

    New Yorkers were promised that the Twin Towers
    were designed to survive a crash of a Boeng 747
    Airliner into the middle of one side of the
    building or a corner.

    The virtical steel columns that make up the sides
    of the Towers were supposed to be strong enough
    to survive the impact of a 747 and also to be
    strong enough so that 1/2 of the columns on 2
    sides could be destroyed and the Tower would still
    remain standing.

    Each virtical column is supposed to be tied to the
    2 adjacent column by a heavy steel I beam at each
    floor. The interior floors could collapse onto
    lower floors but the engineerring spaces that are
    placed every 10 floors are supposed to halt such
    a collapse.

    The way that the Twin Towers both collapsed from
    the top down with the virtical columns peeling
    apart indicates that the contracters and the
    World Trade Authority lied about how the Towers
    were constructed.

    If the World Trade Center Towerrs had been built
    as they were supposed to have been they would have
    been severely damaged but they would not have
    collapsed and 10,000 people would still be alive.

    --
    Thanx Doug...
    1. Re:The Twin Towers should NOT have collapsed!!!... by FileNotFound · · Score: 4, Informative

      A 707 NOT 747.

      A 707 is a MUCH smaller plane. It's MUCH smaller than than a 747 and still smaller than the 757's that were involved.

      Get your facts straight.

      The towers survied the impact. They did not survive the fire.

      Just because a bullet proof vest can stop a bullet doesn't mean it will prevent you from burning alive.

      Same applies to this. The supports were destroyed by the extreme fire.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
  78. Re:Three Step Loop: ID, Locate, Eradicate by JWhitlock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The time for peace is over. We must identify who did this, find out where they are, go in after them, and wipe them off the face of the Earth. We will suffer more casualties doing it this way. Too bad. The death toll is going to exceed Pearl Harbor and approach if not exceed use of a tactical nuke. We are at war.

    This is not state-based terrorism. This is a small group of fanatics. Your stupid, stupid tactic would make it a war.

    Terrorism is cyclical, not a three step process. You are attacked, you get angry, you retaliate. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. Repeat.

    Look at Ireland, the Middle East, etc. Do you want our grandchildren to still be fighting the same damn "war"?

    We wait. We continue to work. We find the black boxes, the voice recorders, we investigate. Those that did it are on the run. They are in hiding, and think we don't know where they are. Let they sweat a little. When we have the evidence, when the world knows, then we act. Maybe not even violently - put them in front of the same court as Millosevich, make them stand trial.

    Above all, we show that we are rational humans, and not dogs that bite because we were bit.

  79. WTOP reports that PA plane WAS SHOT DOWN by GMontag · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just a few moments ago WTOP - FM, Washington DC, interviewed a Congressman (sorry, missed his name) and the Congressman confirmed that the PA crash was from a shoot down by US Military.

    Note: info is from a Congressman, could be total BS, ya never know. Might be why WTOP is not running it on their website, but the descriptoin from a witness on the plane in this story:
    http://www.wtop.com/news/news-story.jhtml?NewsId =1 87235 indicates that some sort of explosion happened before the plane went down.

    The same radio story reported that the Congressional Leadership has been evacuated to their safe facility.

    Flight 77 is confirmed to be the one that hit the Pentagon. A Congressional aide was on the flight and reporting to someone by cell phone about what was going on.

  80. Re:But it *doesn't* solve things by mpe · · Score: 3

    While the US President commits huge sums of money, and breaches solemn international treaty obligations, to develop missile defence,

    No one in their right mind would launch a missile attack against the US. Even if they had an accurate 20MT nuke to fire off at NORAD. For the simple reason that doing so pinpoints their exact location, which would then be passed to USAF and/or USN.

    the perpetrators were able to use fifty tons of aviation fuel that they didn't even have to pay for.

    Nor did they have to pay for the aircraft.

  81. WORLD REACTION & LINKS by FFFish · · Score: 3, Informative

    From a site that seems to be working well:

    World Leaders react -- "The following are reactions from around the world to the disasters at New York's World Trade Centre and the Pentagon."

    Related Links -- US Gov't, US Military, NYC, Airlines, and Anti-Terrorism Resources.

    Also worth noting that many mid-East leaders of all stripes and colours are denouncing this terrorist act.

    Don't paint all the mid-East with one brush. This terrorist attack was the action of a very, very small radical group that is roundly despised by many mid-East civilians.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  82. Pearl Harbor by The_Shadows · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the worst attack on America. Ever. The destruction at Pearl Harbor can only begin to compare with the carnage that has taken place in America today. September 11, 2001 is a day that will live on in infamy. It is an unprovoked attack on American soil.

    For those who don't seek vengeance, I can only say that you are likely not living in America. There will be a reckoning. Whoever did this, and it's looking like Bin Ladin, will be found an eradicated. Whoever is harboring them will be eradicated. Whoever defends them will be eradicated. War is now inevitable.

    Good may eventually come of it, as good did eventually come from Pearl Harbor and WWII. But for the time being, we will be mobilizing, preparing for war. We were shocked. Now we are angry.

    And anyone who says that we're going to war because "Bush is crzy enough to start one" as I've heard people say (though haven't looked closely on the forum here) is dead wrong. We will be going because it's the right thing to do. We need, firstly, to show the world that we will not be shaken by this, and to show the world what happens when you fsck with the USA. Any potential president, Bush, Gore, Nader, Bud Brown, Clinton, anyone would be looking for a perpetrator right now with the intent to kill. We can see this.

    From a purely political standpoint, the nation is calling for vengeance. Any preisdent who sought re-election for himself or anyone in his party would commit political suicide otherwise.

    This is edited slightly for content, mostly for length:

    "The United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked. The United States was at Peace with the world. We have been looking towards the maintenacne of world peace. This attack was deliberately planned days or even weeks ago. The attack on our cities has caused damage to civilians and economic centers. Very many America lives have been lost.

    The facts, so far, today speak for themselves. The American people have already formed their opinions, and well undertstand the implications to the very life and safety of our nation. The commander in chief has directed our forces in our defense. Always, will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us.

    No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the America people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory. We will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost, but we will make certain that this form of treachery shall never again endanger us again. We will gain the inevitable triumph, so help us God.
    This was an unprovoked and dastardly attack on the united states."

    Franklin D. Roosevelt, December 8, 1941

    December 7, 1941. A day that has lived on in infamy. September 11, 2001 will live on in infamy now as well.

    Never again. Never.

  83. Canadian Fighters Force Down Hijacked Jet by Phrogman · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a report on the CBC website that Canadian Fighters have forced down two Korean aircraft in Whitehorse in the Yukon. It is believed that at least one of the jets was hijacked. It is currently surrounded by RCMP and the local Military from what I understand.

    Here is the article since the site is hard to reach at the moment:

    Suspect 747 escorted down in Yukon

    WebPosted Tue Sep 11 15:44:33 2001

    TORONTO - Schools and government offices in Whitehorse, Yukon were evacuated Tuesday as jet fighters escorted two commercial airliners to unscheduled landings, after aviation authorities suspected one of the aircraft may have been hijacked.

    One of the airliners is a Korean Airlines 747, the other an unknown 747. Both landed at Whitehorse airport. The jet fighters continue to circle over Whitehorse.

    Peter Novak of CBC Radio in Whitehorse told CBC News Online that aviation authorities said one of the aircraft may have been hijacked. Novak said highways in and out of town may have been closed, and a bomb squad was at the airport.

    The identified Korean aircraft is believed to have been low on fuel and was redirected to Whitehorse.

    Canadian transportation officials have also shut down all airports in Canada indefinitely as U.S.-bound international flights arrive on Canadian runways.

    All domestic and international flights have been grounded as a precautionary measure after a series of attacks on high-profile targets in the United States.

    Transportation Minister David Collenette says Canada is taking security very seriously and will be carefully monitoring the situation.

    Prime Minister Jean Chretien has condemned what he called a "cowardly attack" south of the border and pledged full assistance to the U.S. He assured Canadians to remain calm, noting that the government was increasing security.

    Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs has issued a phone number for anyone worried about friends or family in the New York area. Spokesperson Marie Lilkoff says Canadians can call 1-800-387-3124 for information.

    U.S. flights diverted to Canada

    The United States Federal Aviation Authority had earlier ordered all international flights to the United States to be diverted to Canada.

    Airports throughout Atlantic Canada are beginning to receive a large influx of flights. Moncton, N.B., and St. John's, Nfld., expect up to 25 diverted planes, and CFB Goose Bay in Labrador expects close to 60 unscheduled landings.

    Halifax airport says they currently have 23 planes on the ground and expect 27 more. The RCMP will search all of the passengers' luggage and they will be transported to large sports facilities in the city for the night. All the hotels in Halifax are full.

    Passengers arriving in St. John's will be put up in hotels, conference centres and private homes. Many Toronto residents are also offering their homes to travellers stranded at Pearson Airport.

    "All Canadian airspace has been closed other than for inbound overseas flights," said Calgary Airport Authority spokesperson Mike Cunnington.

    Effects across Canada

    All Canadian border traffic to New York state is limited. Border guards are on high alert and inspecting all vehicles, said Serge Charette, national president for the customs union. He says travellers with a valid reason to be in either country will be allowed through.

    The Chief of Maritime staff in Halifax has ordered a lock-down and has posted guards at the gates the navy dockyards and the Shearwater air base.

    The rocket-proof gates of the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa were surrounded by police cruisers and plain-clothes officers. Public Affairs officer Buck Shenkman says security will increase, but the embassy will remain open.

    The Canadian Blood Services is urging people to contact their local donor branch in a cross-country effort for blood donations to ship to emergency centres in the U.S.

    In Ontario, Premier Mike Harris offered his province's full support to the U.S. government, including medical support.

    Many office complexes in Toronto allowed their employees to leave work as a precaution, jamming subways and the downtown train station. The CN Tower has also been shut down.

    The CN tower belongs to the World Federation of Tall Towers, along with the World Trade Centre and the two work together frequently.

    "Quite a few of CN Tower staff work with World Trade Center staff. There was a lot of back and forth travel in the last month. We both belong to the same industry association and this tragedy has hit us personally," commented Bud Purves, President and GM of the CN Tower.

    Written by CBC News Online staff

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  84. I just want to say... by macdaddy · · Score: 3
    I know this post is going to be lost in the unprecidented mass of posts that have occured today, but I want to say it just the same. To all those /.ers, foreign and domestic that have expressed their condolences for the tragic loss today, thank you. Your voices are heard, if only for an instant. For those of you in the US, please please please consider giving blood or a few dollars to the Red Cross Emergency Relief Fund. This was an attack on us as a nation and we need to stand together as one nation. Also, express your support to the government officials that represent you to take terminal action against those that threaten our great nation or any other nation for that matter. For you non-US /.ers, express your support to whomever represents you in your government for their support of anti-terrorist measures that need to be taken. Tomorrow it may be your country that falls under terrorist attack.

    Also, I don't recall any other /. series or stories (3 in all so far) receiving as great as attention as they have today. 3685 comments have been posted so far. I think that's a record.

  85. Phone call from hi-jacked plane by yomahz · · Score: 3, Informative

    A co-worker recieved a call from a friend at American Airlines (he works at the airline's call center) and apparently there was a call from a flight attendant reporting that the hi-jackers where of arabic origin and that 2 flight attendants and a passenger (trying to put up a struggle) was killed with a knife.

    A key was taken from one of the flight attendants and they entered the cabin and killed the pilots.

    --
    "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
  86. Canadian Foreign Office number by nano-second · · Score: 4, Informative

    For Canadians worried about relatives in NYC.

    1-800-387-3124

    --
    I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
  87. Akamai: Co-founder dies in WTC plane crash by ath0mic · · Score: 3, Informative

    This from:
    http://www.cnn.com/TECH/
    Daniel Lewin, co-founder and chief technology officer (CTO) at Akamai Technologies Inc., is said by his company to have died Tuesday as a passenger aboard American Airlines Flight 11. The Boeing 767, originally bound for Los Angeles from Boston, crashed into the World Trade Center in New York and became the first of two airliners to slam into the 110-story structure, opening an apparently coordinated terrorist attack.

  88. reflection on comments posted by SpaceGhost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A couple of days ago I heard a report about a Palistinian village. Israel had suspected that terrorists were there, so Israeli tanks surrounded the village, bombarded it, and left. It was a small report, almost an aside to the main news, which was lots of talk about the U.S. economy, and how not EVERYONE had a job.

    I kept thinking about that village. I wondered what it would feel like, to feel afraid for your life, to not know where they might strike next.

    Now I know. Today at work I kept looking out the window, reassured to see the un-marred Houston skyline. I thought of the many possible stategic sites that could be hit in Houston, of refineries that could spew poisens for days, of skyscrapers here full of people.

    And I thought of that Palistinian village. They've been living with this kind of terror for months, even years.

    This attack did not occur in a vacuum. Certainly those responsible committed a horrible act. But responding with another horrible act wouldn't help. Do we blow up Afghanni families, just in case it was Osama Bin Laden? Do we push the Israelis to attack large Palistinian areas, only to find it was another Timothy McVey?

    Regardless of whether one agrees with the current administrations foreign policies, it would be reasonable to recognize a very real arrogance in the dispensation of those policies. The United States acts like it is the invulnerable master, the king of the hill, casting justice and consensus aside. Just this week the US refused to participate in a UN conference on racism. We do anything we want, and dare anyone to try and do anything about it.

    Someone did. It would only make things worse to react in an agressive military fashion. Certainly justice must be served, but it should be measured, accurate and appropriate.

    America is a special place, luckier than most humans have ever seen. We spend most of our time planning parties and designing toys. When something like this happens we should step back, look at the BIG picture, and reflect - what have we done to help? Has any one of us written to a congressman, expressing concern over continued financial support of the heavy-handed Israelis? How many of us even NOTICE what our foreign policy is?

    Several media reports have referred to this as a second Pearl Harbour. We would be wise to recall that our enemies in that conflict are now some of our staunchest allies. Also forgotten was the American blockade of fuel oil to Japan, precipitating the attack.

    This morning the first person I talked to after I heard the news was a black man in an auto parts store. He was lamenting the fighting in the middle east, pointing out that here in Houston such strife is all but unthinkable. The Hispanic parts salesman and I agreed.

    The United States is a unique culture, made up of disparate cultures themselves sometimes at odds with each other in their respective homelands. Now one of these conflicts has struck our home. A strong response is appropriate, but we should also look at our actions and attitudes, and take what measure of responsibility is ours. Then, maybe instead of dealing with a symptom, we can address a cause - perhaps even right a wrong.

  89. False alarm by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative

    The CBC website is now reporting this was a mistake. The airliners were off course and low on fuel due to being diverted from closed airports.

  90. Re:Airlines chosen by AxelBoldt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    They will not be able to pop their little fucking heads up to talk about their "message" anymore without fear of getting immediately capped.


    You still think like somebody who fears to die. They don't. They *want* to die for what they believe in.

  91. Re:Three Step Process: ID, Locate, Eradicate by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The way you deal with terrorist soldiers is catch them, pry their kneecaps off with screwdrivers, stab them repeatedly, then leave them to die like they deserve to.

    Thereby becoming a less-free society, which is exactly their goal. When the police begin to violate the laws, and everybody has less freedom, the terrorists have won.

    And in the process, you've made some new martyrs for their cause. Do you really think death frightens people who are willing to kamikaze the WTC? Irrelevancy frightens them. Dying of old age in prison frightens them. Being killed by infidels makes them happy.