Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Releases GPS Phone

Fletch writes: "I received an email from Samsung today announcing the release of 'America's First GPS Phone.' The phone does appear to have some neat GPS-based services, such as restaurant and traffic info. Those of you with privacy concerns need not worry. According to the manual (p122, large pdf file) the user does have the ability to turn the 'Position Location' off. (it will be automatically turned back on when/if an emergency call is made)." The manual doesn't say whether the phone initially defaults to "Tracking On" or "Off".

To save everyone from downloading that PDF file, here's the relevant section (innovative capitalization and punctuation in the original):

"America's First GPS Enabled Wireless Phone Designed to Support Location Based Services of the Future Imagine having a phone that can use GPS technology to provide you with....

  • Driving directions
  • Traffic service
  • Entertainment/services location
  • 911 emergency location services
  • Location of family/friends

Location services for 911 calls are not currently available. While these services are not available today (or) (are still under development), this leading edge phone has the technology required to support such network based services upon their launch.

Settings

The settings allow you to turn the Position Location ON or OFF. If the option is turned OFF, the Sprint PCS Network cannot locate your position using the Position Location feature. This option is automatically turned ON when an emergency call is placed, then turned back OFF when the call is completed.

To turn Position Location ON or OFF:
1. Press for Main Menu.
2. Press for Locator.
3. Press for Settings.
4. Read the Position Location disclaimer by using the Up & Down arrows.
5. Press to display the Setting screen.
6. Press the Up or Down arrows to cycle between the available choices.
7. Press to Save and exit.

186 comments

  1. Opened the flood gate by iamjim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We all knew this was going to happen. It begins, wearable, trackable equipment... It can turn itself on? That can't be good.

    Jim

    1. Re:Opened the flood gate by Carbonite · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken I believe it's the position locator, not the phone itself, that turns on. Also, this is only in the rare case of an emergency call.

      From the text: "This option is automatically turned ON when an emergency call is placed."

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    2. Re:Opened the flood gate by halftrack · · Score: 1

      it's the position locator, the phone must be on to place an emergency call. It's not magic you know.

      --
      Look a monkey!
    3. Re:Opened the flood gate by Telek · · Score: 3, Funny

      It can turn itself on? That can't be good.


      Woah... You mean that something that is software configurable... So the software itself can activate the feature!

      Who'da thunkit?

      Next thing you'll be telling me that my cellphone can change it's own time too...

      (BTW, I think that's basically (if not a necessity) a great idea, so you can normally have it turned off if you want, and then it will automatically turn itself on when you make that 911 call)

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    4. Re:Opened the flood gate by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 1

      The question is, if it gets turned on for a legitamite reason, does it turn back off for normal use afterward if your preference is for it to be off?

      --
      WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    5. Re:Opened the flood gate by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      We all knew this was going to happen.

      Of course we did. Some time ago, it was mandated by law that emergency calls from cell networks include location information. The automatic switch-on of gps during emergency calls is there for a very practical reason.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    6. Re:Opened the flood gate by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      At the risk of (-1, redundant): please read above. "This option is automatically turned ON when an emergency call is placed, then turned back OFF when the call is completed."

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    7. Re:Opened the flood gate by KernelHappy · · Score: 1

      If the software was open (not even released opensource, just open) we would know for sure if dialing 911 is the only way to turn on the location automatically.

      --
      -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
    8. Re:Opened the flood gate by Telek · · Score: 2

      Man you've been reading slashdot too much lately.

      Perhaps not everything is a great conspiracy by microsoft to take over the world and know your exact and every movements, eh?

      However you do raise a point. If it could be turned on remotely, by say a court order, then you'd be in trouble.

      However I'm not important enough to worry about big brother following me around or people taking great interest in everything that I do. You want to watch me? Go ahead. =)

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    9. Re:Opened the flood gate by KernelHappy · · Score: 1

      Heh, you got me, my previous post does sound a tad paranoid but that wasn't the intent. I just thought it was a good example of where having some open policy would be a good thing. Not everything has to be completely free and open to be good.

      As far as big brotherness, I'm not paranoid about it, but it does creep me out to think people could easily track me. I worked for a major debit card processor and in the course of researching a problem with someones card I noticed that they hit the same liquor store every day or two in the previous three weeks that they were having problems. I have nothing to hide but it did creep me out a bit wondering who knows I shop at spatulas-r-us once a week.

      --
      -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
    10. Re:Opened the flood gate by Telek · · Score: 2

      but it does creep me out to think people could easily track me

      why? seriously. someone could follow you around all day, and you wouldn't know it. Someone could tag you with a tracking device, and you wouldn't know it. And just knowing where you've been doesn't tell a lot either. For all you know that guy could have been flirting with a cashier (you'd think that if he went to the same place every day they'd know him by face anyways), and if you have nothing to hide then does it really matter what other people know?

      I think that this is the situation that this phrase really pertains to:

      ignorance is bliss

      I go by the philosophy that if someone can be doing something, and it really wouldn't change anything if they were, then what should it matter if they were doing it? If someone was waiting to catch me picking my nose, I'll pick it for them. If someone is going to follow me around to catch me coming out of the shower, I'll show them. If someone could be watching my debit card usage (you must be Canadian =P) and saw that I went to the porn shop twice a week, then what should it matter if someone did know that? And people who would jump to conclusions based on simple prejudice I really don't care much for anyways.

      knows I shop at spatulas-r-us once a week

      Did you perhaps mean Spatula City?? =) I loved UHF =) "So you can take the new car, or you can choose what's in the box!" (lots of crowd murmuring) "The box! I'll take the box!" "And what's in the box? ... NOTHING... ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! YOU SO STUPID!" (lol)

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
  2. A news? by nyri · · Score: 1, Troll

    It bugs me that slashdot is so US centric. These babies have been available for ages in other parts of the world, so what is the news?

    --
    nyri

    1. Re:A news? by AtaruMoroboshi · · Score: 1


      Well, being that Slashdot is US based... makes sense, eh?

    2. Re:A news? by ergo98 · · Score: 2

      Notice that the story says America's first GPS cellphone. Having said that I'll bet that >80% of Slashdot readers are from the US, 10% are Canadian, and then 10% "Miscellaneous", so get use to a fair number of US-oriented posts.

    3. Re:A news? by Carbonite · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since many (most?) Slashdot readers are in the US, this seems to be a perfectly appropriate article. Also the first sentence even states that
      "...Samsung today announcing the release of 'America's First GPS Phone.'"

      It's not like anyone's trying to pretend this is some totally new tech that's never been seen. It's just new to us.

      ---
      Carbonite

      --
      ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
    4. Re:A news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      read the faq:
      "Slashdot is U.S.-centric. We readily admit this, and really don't see
      it as a problem. Slashdot is run by Americans, after all, and the vast
      majority of our readership is in the U.S. We're certainly not opposed
      to doing more international stories, but we don't have any formal
      plans for making that happen. All we can really tell you is that if
      you're outside the U.S. and you have news, submit it, and if it looks
      interesting, we'll post it."

    5. Re:A news? by halftrack · · Score: 1

      >80% of Slashdot readers are from the US, 10% are Canadian, and then 10% "Miscellaneous"

      Let's have a poll:

      Norway, Europe

      --
      Look a monkey!
    6. Re:A news? by Marc+Boucher · · Score: 1
      Let's have a poll:

      Belgium, Europe

    7. Re:A news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europeans are a bunch of hypocrites. They think the world revolves around THEM. They also have tons of jealousy of us Americans, hence the constant bashing.

    8. Re:A news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much would you bet? I'll take any wager that's based on American hubris.

    9. Re:A news? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, yeah, Nordic countries are ueber-wired and you all have cellphones coming out the wazoo, BFD. If all Slashdot focused on was Finland live would be pretty dull.

    10. Re:A news? by asuzuki · · Score: 1

      Switzerland, Europe.

    11. Re:A news? by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      I question the sampling methods used in this poll.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    12. Re:A news? by freakonaleash881 · · Score: 1
      Let's have a poll:

      Fayetteville, AR (yes, there are computers in Arkansas, and geeks who hate anything having to do with country music to go with them).

      --

      Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo...a star shines on the hour of our meeting
    13. Re:A news? by unitron · · Score: 2

      As long as the bet is based on American currency, right?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    14. Re:A news? by msmikkol · · Score: 0
      It's not like anyone's trying to pretend this is some totally new tech that's never been seen. It's just new to us.

      Outside USA, you should be able to get your hands on a Benefon ESC!, a gsm+gps phone that has been available for a while. For more info, take a look at Benefon's web pages.

      --
      The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error.
      -Bertolt Brecht
    15. Re:A news? by hping · · Score: 1

      A really anonymously coward. He thinks that Europe and the people of Europe really think that America (read the USA) is superior to them. IMHO I do not think so. America has its great things, but in other aspects, well I do NOT know it for a certainity. Each continent has its history, and America has a little bit less of it; but it does not mean that they are inferior, but certainly that they are not superior, just humans.

    16. Re:A news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norway, Europe

      *Raises hand*. Jojomensann.

    17. Re:A news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did I say I think Europeans think Americans are superior? If anything I was saying the exact opposite.

  3. GPS output? by partridge · · Score: 1

    Ah.. But can you use the phone as an external GPS device? i.e, can it out put NMEA data for use with a palm or other handheld as an external GPS reciever? Now that would be useful.

    1. Re:GPS output? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what I was wondering. I went to a Sprint PCS stand in the mall and asked the employees there. They didn't understand what GPS even stood for, so they called some special number they have set up if they don't know and asked someone there. They then went and asked their supervisor, and nobody knew yet (this was after asking 4 Sprint employees)!! The lady in the mall really wanted to know about this, so she proceeded to call one of the Sprint PCS stores, and asked someone there. They had no idea, and, FINALLY, I ended up asking one of the employees at the store (the lady had trouble explaining to the person on the phone what I wanted to know), who then informed me that it cannot be used as a standard GPS can. All it does is provide GPS coordinates for 911 calls, and give you spam.

      It doesn't make sense to me why they wouldn't allow people to use it as a regular GPS; all it would have to do is send the lat/long coordinates over a serial cable (the data cable) to a laptop/palm device. Oh well, maybe they'll get it right eventually.

    2. Re:GPS output? by LizardKing5150 · · Score: 1

      To be used as a stand alone GPS would eat up the batteries and lots of switch processing power. The GPS in the Sprint phones are assisted by algrithims in the switches to help with difficult GPS locations (in large urban canyons, inside buildings, etc). As far as I know, currently no wireless carrier has plans to advertise on these phones (most likely will happen in the future, but probably not for quite some time), they are just there to meet FCC guidlines for 911.

    3. Re:GPS output? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Benefon GPS-phones have support for NMEA...
      http://www.benefon.com/eng/instruments/gsm/esc_p ro data.htm

  4. Slashdot's reliability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a story that details the gross unreliability of Slashdot: Either it's not responding or when you go to submit or delve into a thread you either get an error or get dumped back to the main page. It's been like this for several days now and I'd say has a 75% reliable uptime lately. It would be nice to be told what's up rather than the Microsoft approach of "the problem must be on your end".

  5. A New Era of Phreaking by Renraku · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'll bet you could hack the phones to relay a different GPS coordinate than they're located at. Imagine prank calling someone and they do a trace, only to see that you're somewhere in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean...

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:A New Era of Phreaking by bstrahm · · Score: 2

      Actually more humourously, hack the phone to return a GPS coordinate of you standing RIGHT BEHIND THEM...
      Oh wait, we aren't watching Real Genius are we, never mind

    2. Re:A New Era of Phreaking by sporty · · Score: 1

      re: your sig

      You haven't lived until you've used ASCII for downloads. That was such a pain in the butt.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    3. Re:A New Era of Phreaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Director of FBI: Mr President, Osama Bin Laden just called saying he will nuke LA. The good news is he used a GPS phone so we now know his location.
      George W. Bush: Launch ICBMs now, authorisation code 12345!
      Military guy: Yes sir!
      Military guy: Missiles on the way
      Military guy: Umm, wait a minute..
      George W. Bush: What is it?
      Military guy: These coordinates are in LA.
      George W. Bush: Wha.. Oh..!

    4. Re:A New Era of Phreaking by Dufffader · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A simpler solution would to make the call indoors. I don't remember how many times I made a call in the open with LOS to the GPS satellites (at least 3 required for position right?). Does that also mean that GPS info will not be available for majority of the 911 calls made?

    5. Re:A New Era of Phreaking by LizardKing5150 · · Score: 1

      That's the reason that all the carriers are asking for extensions to the FCC deadlines. Anybody with a grand solution could/should be wealthy. There currently are some attempts at solutions, but they are a step away from being THE solution.

  6. One useful application by VultureMN · · Score: 4, Funny

    They could combine a GPS-enabled phone with a scent-detecting device. At some point in time, it'll detect the presence of burning bud and have a pizza delivered to wherever you happen to be.
    Ooohyeah.

    1. Re:One useful application by smunt · · Score: 1

      And automatically the nearest pizza deliverer.

    2. Re:One useful application by czardonic · · Score: 1

      Maybe the cops can just pick it up on their way over.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
  7. ahaa ... that's completely wasted by halftrack · · Score: 1

    GSM can locate you within a cell, why waste time, money, intellectual powers, technology on something it's not intended for. As for the one useful feature - the map - if you need it get a normal gps for your car (or hand.) Just as usefull.

    --
    Look a monkey!
    1. Re:ahaa ... that's completely wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you mean that gps wasn't intended for positioning?

    2. Re:ahaa ... that's completely wasted by nvrrobx · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're absolutely right, GSM location based services can track you to a cell, but it doesn't do E911 services a lot of good. AFAIK, a cell site has a range of 14 miles. So, if you're broken down or dying somewhere, they can only track you so far. Same goes for when you're lost. How useful is that?

    3. Re:ahaa ... that's completely wasted by halftrack · · Score: 1

      People lying around dying in the middle of nowhere should have brought a GPS or at least a map and if they can plae a call then they can read co-ordinates.

      --
      Look a monkey!
    4. Re:ahaa ... that's completely wasted by friedmud · · Score: 1

      I don't think the point was that these things were going to help people that are in the middle of nowhere.

      I personally have a cell phone with me when I go anywhere - if my car were to break down in the middle of the night in Washington DC and I needed to call a Cab - it would be cool if the cab company automagically new where I was - because I sure as hell wouldn't!

      You don't have to be in the middle of nowhere to be lost!

      Fried

  8. At least there's this... by maniac11 · · Score: 1

    The evil hacker from Charlie's Angels won't have to spend so much effort to track down Charlie.

    --
    Guvegrra?
  9. GPS tracking used for orienteering championships by Bio · · Score: 1

    At this year's world orienteering championships in Finland a GPS based tracking system has been used to track the competitors (and provide this information to the spectators).

    Technically it is a mobile phone from Benefon integrated into a vest and a seperate GPS antenna (also in the vest) to improve reception. Every 20 seconds a SMS is sent to a server with the position information.

  10. In this week's simpsons episode. by tcc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Moe finally tracks Bart prank calls cuz he used Homer's Samsung phone with GPS enabled on by default. :)

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    1. Re:In this week's simpsons episode. by czardonic · · Score: 1

      Moe already knows where Bart lives. Bart told Moe to lure him over to scare off Jimbo when he was macking on Bart's crush/babysitter.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    2. Re:In this week's simpsons episode. by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 1

      Didn't ever seem weird to you that Jimbo was hanging out with that chick who had to be at least 15 years old, but his best friend Nelson was dating Lisa? Never sat right with me...

    3. Re:In this week's simpsons episode. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Last night I noticed that in the one where Flanders goes crazy (when the Hurricane blows down their house) the doctor says that he dealt with Ned "30 years ago" and then it shows Ned as a small child having a tantrum, but of course Ned is supposedly a senior citizen.

      NED'S A FRAUD!

    4. Re:In this week's simpsons episode. by czardonic · · Score: 1

      I hadn't really though about it. Considering that they are all, ostensibly, in Elementary School, it's strange that any of them would be dating.

      I beleive that Nelson is in Bart's class, so he would only be a couple years older than Lisa at most, right?

      Jimbo, Carnie, etc. seem to be portrayed as older than Nelson (usually), so that might explain why the babysitter was hanging out with Jimbo. I guess they just needed an older punk-kid type, and Jimbo fit the bill. Otherwise, it would have had to be that kid with the craking voice who seems to be holding down every minimum wage job in town (the Lunch Ladies son, I believe).

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    5. Re:In this week's simpsons episode. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jimbo and the bald kid are supposed to be older than the other kids even though they're still in elementary school. They are such fuckups they got held back until they were teenagers

    6. Re:In this week's simpsons episode. by penguinboy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Ned also has young kids (around the age of Bart and Lisa). I would tend to be more suspect of the claim that Ned is a senior citizen than of the claim that he was a small child "30 years ago" (which seems to fit fairly well).

    7. Re:In this week's simpsons episode. by Nerftoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Didn't ever seem weird to you that Jimbo was hanging out with that chick who had to be at least 15 years old, but his best friend Nelson was dating Lisa? Never sat right with me...

      Boy, I hope someone got fired over that one.

  11. Super-duper tracker by standards · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course we're all waiting for the day when even more is integrated - and it'll come fairly soon. It takes very very little more to add a voice recorder, an MP3 player, and user programmability (via something like Java). You could program it to track your kids and phone in their location every 15 minutes. Haha, the heck with privacy from the phone companies, how about the parents???

    It will take a bit more for a fully functional computation device - that'll take some seious improvement in user interface technology for small devices. We're still a ways away from big displays on an ever shrinking device - I think it's time for the paradigm shift to kick in away from LCD displays - and cell phone technology is just the incentive. As long as those patenteers stay away from monopolizing good ideas!

    1. Re:Super-duper tracker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You could program it to track your kids and phone in their location every 15 minutes.


      I can see it now: "Bobby has been in the men's room at Sheman's resturant and bar for 20 minutes now. I hope he's feeling OK..."

    2. Re:Super-duper tracker by stcanard · · Score: 1
      Of course we're all waiting for the day when even more is integrated - and it'll come fairly soon. It takes very very little more to add a voice recorder, an MP3 player, and user programmability

      Well we're 2/3 of the way there -- the Samsung Uproar has a voice recorder and an MP3 player. Given that Samsung is the company producing these GPS phones, that programmable tracking is probably only a small step away!

  12. Can't Laden use one?! by garoush · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about offering one of those to Osama bin Laden and his followers? Don't they need one to keep in touch with each other?

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
    1. Re:Can't Laden use one?! by FatRatBastard · · Score: 1

      Didn't Mossad kill someone using a cell phone a few years ago? If I remember correctly they rigged a cellphone with a small explosive device and somehow smuggled it into some organization. When the head honcho made a call from it (and they could confirm it was the guy they wanted)... Boom!

    2. Re:Can't Laden use one?! by smunt · · Score: 1

      Big fun if the intended guy happens to stand behind you :)

    3. Re:Can't Laden use one?! by Kallahar · · Score: 1

      There were rumors about printers which emitted homing signals that bombs could hone in on which were sold to the iraqi's. Also, if they can get GPS circuits small enough to stick in a phone, I'm sure they can be embedded into lots of things. We just have to put a note on the product reminding the "subject" to keep the batteries charged on his turban :)

    4. Re:Can't Laden use one?! by dzawitz · · Score: 1

      Yes, they did do this, and it's pretty bad-ass. They put a small bomb in his cell phone, but they called him, and when he answered, did a voice print analysis. When it matched, they blew his head off. The bomb was small enough but placed well enough that nobody else around him was even hurt, but he was a goner.

      Note to self: Don't fuck with the Israelis!

  13. Super-tightly targetted advertising... by Consul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, you have a Samsung phone that can pinpoint your location (should you choose to let it)...

    In Portland, OR (I used to live there), they have some of these electronic billboards that can cycle through a set of animated advertisements. Imagine having a number of these everywhere, that could automatically change their ads based upon who happens to be standing around or driving by...

    Scary or kinda cool (from a tech standpoint anyway)?

    --

    -----

    "You spilled my egg... I needed that egg."

    1. Re:Super-tightly targetted advertising... by neema · · Score: 2

      Well, how would you like driving down the road with your mother in the seat while you have your phone and the ads change to "Strip Bar, Exit 79"?

    2. Re:Super-tightly targetted advertising... by Spriggig · · Score: 1

      Golly, how embarassing! I think I heard grandma fart, hee hee!

    3. Re:Super-tightly targetted advertising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scary because any power given to Madison Avenue comes at the expense of consumers.

      Eyeballs are a commodity. Outdoor advertising offers you nothing in exchange for viewing their one-sided, content-less subliminal messages (not even the "quality programming" available on the tube, hehe). So, since they are taking something from me without permission, such advertising is theft, and making it more efficient is simply making theft more efficient.

  14. Stolen phones by WyldOne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And with a bit of work could lead the cops to your stolen phone/goods. Would be nice to have a GPS modem as well for tracking stolen hardware.

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  15. Some people don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok being paranoid about GPS letting "big brother" track you is stupid. The phone company has to track you anyway because if they don't your calls will get dropped whenever you leave a cell. They have to know where you are and where you're going so they can hand you off from one tower to the next as you drive. Just having your average cell phone turned on allows the phone company to track you.

    Its easy to be paranoid when you're stupid.

    1. Re:Some people don't get it by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      The accuracy of GPS is significantly (by many, many magnitudes) better than the general tracking that cell companies do. Note that in the WTC disaster they couldn't call the cell phone company and ask where the phones were buried in the rubble: They had to bring in specialized equipment that zeroed in on one single signal (the point being that general radio triangulation is nowhere near as precise as you imply). In other words having your phone relaying where you are all the times to a great degree of precision (are they archiving this? Later can someone say "Show me the route 555-5555 did on Tuesday....oh look he stopped at 555-5729's house and then they met up and walked over to 555-5511's place where they stayed for 7 minutes"? That's an awful lot foreboding than "555-5555 was somehwere in the vincinity of the WTC, +/- several hundred meters.".

    2. Re:Some people don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are one of those people, knucklehead.

      It's easy to be stupid when you are uninformed.

    3. Re:Some people don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Under a pile of rubble, you won't be able to get GPS signals.

      2) Under rubble, the signal(s) your phone is sending isn't very powerful and probably not received by many cell towers. Stand in downtown Chicago and your phone's signal is probably being received by several towers.

  16. You cant disable all the GPS services by ilsie · · Score: 1, Informative

    According to this commweb article you can only disable the commercial services, not the E911 services. So for privacy measures, you'd still be able to be tracked.

    1. Re:You cant disable all the GPS services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! Not the evil E911 services! This is part of Big Brother's domination scheme to track down unloyal citizens who... uhm... get themselves trapped in fires... er... what the fuck was your point again?

  17. Stupid licenses. by smunt · · Score: 1

    You'll probably get problems like:

    You can only use this coolcompany-steeringwheel when you've got the gps on.....

    the world is evil...

  18. Network vs Client based data by 4n0nym0u53+C0w4rd · · Score: 1

    GPS is cool, and future emergency GPS location will be cool too.

    What concerns me is that the phone relies on the network to get restaurant and driving directions. My Visor with appropriate GPS springboard and something like Vindigo allows me to find nearby stuff using a local database (i.e., on the client). My SprintPCS phone has a feature that lets me set an alarm at a specific time. However, this feature only works when my phone is in the phone network. That is, even though my phone should be perfectly capable of keeping time, it needs a digital PCS signal to actually do so.

    If I use this phone to do anything with the GPS aside from finding my own location, I'm forced to send the PCS network my location. While I really don't care that much about the privacy of my whereabouts, I certainly don't need anyone sending me ads targeted to my present location.

  19. but _that_ is not my privacy concern... by swinge · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Those of you with
    privacy concerns need not worry. According to the manual (p122, large pdf file)
    the user does have the ability to turn the 'Position Location' off.

    I'm one of those with privacy concerns, but this phone does nothing to allay my concerns.

    I want to use the nifty features but still have my privacy. Why does the deal have to be "use the feature and be abused by having the information used without your knowledge?" Why can't seemingly smart people figure stuff like this out?

    The Nobel Prize (that's like a +1 Informative) in economics was awarded today in part for the research that showed how one side of a transaction having information that the other side doesn't have can tilt the balance so far that the market fails. I'd like to be able to walk into a shop and negotiate a price that is not based on full knowledge of my movements (perhaps at a competitor) being revealed.

    yes, I could turn off the service, but that is a Luddite response which has nothing whatever to do with protecting privacy. Please God, make people smarter: privacy entails a lot more than checking "Jedi Knight" on the census form, or being able to unplug a solid state disk drive when the black helicopter people come through the front door. It's about being able to enjoy the fruits of the modern economy without being abused.

    1. Re:but _that_ is not my privacy concern... by michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why does the deal have to be "use the feature and be abused by having the information used without your knowledge?" Why can't seemingly smart people figure stuff like this out?

      Because the people making the deal are the phone companies, and they know it's a "take it or leave it" deal. They *are* smart people - they just aren't on your side. :( Their smartness is working to figure out how to make more money off of you, not how to give you the best phone experience (those are not equivalent!). And there is no one at any level of government - because the FCC is also crewed by people who think exactly like the phone companies - who is on your side.

      You know this, of course. You seem like a bright person. But the average schmoe has no idea how or why his phone works, and most importantly, has no idea that it could work differently.

    2. Re:but _that_ is not my privacy concern... by iabervon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You want it to get for you information that depends on your location without disclosing your location? That's going to be somewhat difficult, because the service can't help but know what information they're providing to you. What logs they keep and what they do with them is a privacy policy question. There's no way they're going to send all of the data there is to your little phone, and have the phone figure out what you want from a GPS reading that it doesn't send out.

    3. Re:but _that_ is not my privacy concern... by tenordave · · Score: 1

      I believe he means that the phone can send the location, and get they can get the information he wants, but he would rather they then delete his location and not save or log where he is....or sell this info to other people.

      --
      http://students.washington.edu/djwatson
    4. Re:but _that_ is not my privacy concern... by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      Depends on the information you want... if all you want is "where the hell am I?" then no data need be sent out. :)

    5. Re:but _that_ is not my privacy concern... by zoccav · · Score: 1

      I want to use the nifty features but still have my privacy.

      Didn't it ever occur to you that using a mobile phone makes you very trackable regardless of whether you have GPS or not?

      Mobile phone services have area based access points and calls are logged with the area information. Hence, most mobile calls can be tracked and the accuracy depends on the granularity of the area partitioning. That's one way to catch (trendy, vain and silly) crooks nowadays. Analysis and correlation of the logs may (will or does already) result in usable marketing info for companies.

      I agree that GPS is more accurate but any feeling of privacy on a mobile phone nowadays is merely a deception.

    6. Re:but _that_ is not my privacy concern... by swinge · · Score: 1
      They *are* smart people - they just aren't on your side

      sorry, I wasn't being clear. I was referring to the avg slashdot privacy advocate who seems to think "privacy" is about keeping the CIA from knowing anything so they can trade mp3s secretly.

      I think it's about trust: being able to give up information--you need to tell the waitress what you want--and trust that it won't be used without your knowledge--health insurance cancelled because you ordered an ice cream sundae. Now, I don't have a problem with insurance companies protecting themselves against your fraud--you're supposed to be on a diet, chubby--but I think that transaction must be transparent to you, and that you should be entitled to equally copious information about the insurance company... or you should get paid for your info... or have it all be private.

      around here, everybody thinks that personal information is either secret, or available for download on gnutella because that's the way mp3s work. They (I assume being youngsters?) don't realize that large companies pretty much obey the law and if the law regulated privacy they'd obey it. I'm trying to get to that reasonable regulatory environment; I'm not worried about criminals or the CIA then stealing my information by spying on my transactions. I think there's a much more interesting (and productive) discussion to be had about the design of information systems that support high functionality and protect privacy.

      Here's an example: if you ask your "banker/broker" about their privacy policies, they'll tell you "very private", and the way they are thinking about it, they are. But I inquired specifically at Fidelity about whether my information was protected from access by employees of Fidelity and after some discussion the guy came out with this: "actually, a few months ago we had a customer getting divorced, and his wife worked here. We advised him to switch brokers if he wanted to be sure she could get at his account."

      ding, ding! don't bells go off within Fidelity? Privacy should mean people who work there can't browse my account. Care to guess how many Fidelity terminal operators peek at their neighbor's finances? How many hospital nurses exchange gossip about the medical records of patients they find "interesting"? it happens all the time.

      I can think of any number of clever little tricks for keeping patient records anonymous except when needed, or another approach like: no particular privacy requirement, but information systems required to kick out an email to you every time your record is accessed. Then, with knowledge of what people are doing with it we could better advocate for privacy.

      Sounds reasonable to me, but I just don't ever hear anybody else suggest stuff like this.

    7. Re:but _that_ is not my privacy concern... by swinge · · Score: 1

      of course it occured to me. my point is not that I don't want to be tracked. Tracking offers many cool advantages. My point is I don't want to be kept in the dark and abused. I want to know who is using what information about me for what purpose.

    8. Re:but _that_ is not my privacy concern... by rellort · · Score: 2

      If you're looking for the "best phone experience", I know a few numbers you can call.

      --

      -- In the future, everyone will code Perl for 15 minutes. --
    9. Re:but _that_ is not my privacy concern... by swinge · · Score: 1
      or sell this info to other people

      yes ...or just simply tell me who is buying information about me. my point is that it should not be all one-sided, it should not be opaque, and it doesn't need to be one-size-fits all. I'd like to clever solutions for information sharing that bring benefits but maintain some control on my part, or simply knowledge about who has what about me.

      if telemarketers would call me with legitimate deals on products I'm interested in, that would be great. if we turn personal information into something special instead of a commodity, it might happen.

  20. Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1, Redundant



    Sorry, gang, but this "innovation" seems utterly useless. Here's why.

    1) Why do you need a GPS phone? If you don't know where you are, you ask, or buy a map for a buck or two. The only people who would ever buy a GPS phone are the same kinds of people who get confused looking at rotary telephones.

    2) Paper maps don't run out of batteries, or break.

    3) Paper maps wont cost you $30 a month.

    4) There are plenty of Road Atlases available in bookstores, many of which provide comprehensive data on where you are and where you want to go. They cover every major metropolitan city in the world, streets and landmarks included, and cost a fraction of the amount of money you'de blow on a useless (not to mention difficult to read) GPS phone that will not only eat your batteries, but will eat your money.

    5) The GPS doesn't provide you with any unique information. Your speed, distance and travel times can all be figured out in your head or on paper, probably in less time it takes you to fire up the damn thing and take a reading from satellites.

    6) Only titanic idiots ever get themselves truly lost anyway. Trust me, I live near a forest preserve. Morons go in there all the time, totally unprepared, no maps, no money, no clue. If you suddenly find yourself so far away from civilization that you need to use a GPS to locate your position (nice fantasy world there, by the way) , you sure as hell aren't going to be able to place a cellphone call. There wont be any nearby towers to handle the call. Gee, didn't think about THAT one, didja? :)

    7) A five-minute reading of any basic book on Astronomy will teach you how to find your location anywhere on earth, day or night.

    You don't even need a magnetic compass.

    So, who wants to step up to the plate and give me ONE irrefutable reason why ANYONE would NEED a GPS-Enabled Cell Phone?

    Cheers, (and yes, PROPAGANDA is still running,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 0

      So, who wants to step up to the plate and give me ONE irrefutable reason why ANYONE would NEED a GPS-Enabled Cell Phone?

      its cool.

      --
      -
    2. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      6) Only titanic idiots ever get themselves truly lost anyway. Trust me, I live near a forest preserve. Morons go in there all the time, totally unprepared, no maps, no money, no clue. If you suddenly find yourself so far away from civilization that you need to use a GPS to locate your position (nice fantasy world there, by the way) , you sure as hell aren't going to be able to place a cellphone call. There wont be any nearby towers to handle the call. Gee, didn't think about THAT one, didja? :)

      Actually they're primarily useful in the "urban jungle". As an example recently I had to drive into downtown Toronto in an area I don't know very well, and no maps show all of the quirks of an urban area (i.e. they don't show closed roads, congested roads, sometimes not even one way streets. It's quite the difference driving in a heavily urbanized area than the fantasy land a map presents). As such I grabbed the coordinates in MapPoint and programmed it as a waypoint in my GPS (a little Garmin) and did a GOTO. I went on the journey in the general vincinity of where it was, but because of extremely congestion I decided to take alternate routes: It meant nothing to me that I was on streets that I'd never been on before because my little GPS was pointing the direction and telling me exactly how far the destination was. In the end I parked on a little sidestreet within 50m of the destination. Worked like a dream.

    3. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by stcanard · · Score: 1
      1) Why do you need a GPS phone? If you don't know where you are, you ask, or buy a map for a buck or two. The only people who would ever buy a GPS phone are the same kinds of people who get confused looking at rotary telephones.

      I think the most obvious reason is the one for which it has been mandated in the US -- so you can be located when you call 911!

      Another reason is for people like me who don't like to carry too many goodies -- a lot of the hiking and mountain biking in my area is in forests with analog coverage, but are easy to get lost in. It would be nice to have a GPS so I can locate myself on the topo maps. If that GPS is built into the same device that I'm using for my emergency contact, great, I'm saving a few ounces in my pack!

      Finally, you can't forget the gee-whiz factor. Especially not on Slashdot.

    4. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      As a sidenote to this: MapPoint 2002 absolutely rocks. I love that product. Couple the mini-MapPoint in a PocketPC with a GPS and you have a dream combination: Ever have a paper map show you the nearest bank machine or chinese restaurant?

    5. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by Telek · · Score: 2

      who wants to step up to the plate and give me ONE irrefutable reason why ANYONE would NEED a GPS-Enabled Cell Phone?

      Because you just got hit by a car/had a heart attack/(something in danger of dying or loosing consciousness)/had a stroke/are having a seizure and you use your cellphone to call 911, but pass out before you can tell them where you are, or you simply don't know where you are.

      Wow you're gonna get flamed for this one...

      In case you've been living under a rock, it's now madatory that all cellphones have GPS tracking capability because of the number of people who have phoned 911 on their cellphone and 911 hasn't been able to track their locations so the emergency people can get there to save their lives.

      And it does have usefullness... I have a GPS hooked up to my laptop in my car, and it displays on the map exactly where I am. IT's 1 step away from being able to tell me to "turn left in 500m" and give me all directions, and I never get lost anymore. Someone gives me their address and I immediately know how to get there. Having it in your cellphone can provide the same benefits.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
    6. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      A five-minute reading of any basic book on Astronomy will teach you how to find your location anywhere on earth, day or night.

      If it's that easy, I'm sure you wouldn't mind explaining it to us. Please demonstrate how to find longitude and latitude with just astronomical knowledge, both night and day.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    7. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by Minupla · · Score: 2

      Here's one. Recently while traveling, my mom fell down and broke her leg. Since I didn't know the area, I called 911 and asked for the location of the nearest hospital, figuring I could give them my exit number and have them guide me in. Interestingly enough, they had access to know the Cell node I was calling in from and after being told the highway I was traveling on, said, "OK, in about 5 seconds you should see such and such a sign, exit there..." and guided me in. I can see a situation where people in more serious situations could be benifited. Also there are times when you have an emergancy and can't talk, like a robbery. Most cell phones now have a "Push and hold" emergancy code (usually the 1 key. push and hold it for 3 seconds and it auto-dials 911). Combined with GPS, this could be very useful. Also first on the scene of an accident, instead of giving confusing, and possibly wrong location info to fire/amb/police, they can read your GPS loc. Handy.

      The privacy problems are of course, left as an exercise to the /.er :)

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    8. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by chinton · · Score: 1

      7) A five-minute reading of any basic book on Astronomy will teach you how to find your location anywhere on earth, day or night.

      Okay, smartass. Your in the middle of a field. The sun is directly overhead. The moon is nowhere to be seen. Where are you?

    9. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Ah well, I'll answer for you: you can't.

      To find longitude and latitude, you need 1) an accurate clock, 2) a sextant, 3) a book of astronomical tables, and 4) a calculator (or more tables). Given that you need to carry all that, I think carrying the GPS is a little easier.

      Apparently someone didn't watch the movie "Longitude". Pretty good movie, actually. :)

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    10. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1



      My god, I didn't think it was possible. Someone actually provided me with a good reason why GPS-equipped cell phones might be useful.

      Congratulations. You've impressed me. :) Not an easy task.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    11. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by arodland · · Score: 1

      give me ONE irrefutable reason why _YOU_ need to be on slashdot?

    12. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by donutello · · Score: 2

      How does this crap get modded up as "Insightful"? Try "Uninformed".

      As a previous poster pointed out, the GPS features is required by the FCC for the cases where several lives could have been saved if the dispatcher only knew where the caller was.

      1) Paper maps don't help you when you're dying of a heart-attack and can barely stand up.

      2) Paper maps don't help you when your house is on fire and you'd rather the dispatcher just figured where you were and sent help there.

      3) Being able to buy a paper map doesn't help you when you can barely stand up because you've been stabbed in the back.

      Gee whiz.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    13. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is hilarious when it comes to cellphone and GPS.

      90% (?) Are paranoid and think everybody will follow them. (The local resturant will send them advertisements because they walk by, etc.) Funny, but a sign on the sidewalk is more effective (and CHEAP).

      I know of a case from a couple years ago, woman was trapped in her car in a blizzard. She wasn't exactly sure where she was. She was in contact with 911 on and off for several hours. She was ok, but not able to leave her car. It took several hours to track her down with directional antennas. While she was ok, it could have been much worse. She could have been rescued hours earlier has they known where she was.

      GPS/PCS unfortunatly based on information I've asimulated on the net it looks to me like the way the GPS works in cell phones will probably not allow it to work when it is outside digital coverage areas. (I admit I could be way off). But it looks like it is given a headstart by feeding it data from the cell network which a standard GPS receives from the satalites. (One reason they can synch in a few seconds instead of 30 seconds to 15 minutes.).

      I bought a GPS unit a few months ago. Took it with me on a road trip. While the GPS I have doesn't contain a map, and I didn't bring a laptop and mapping software, I still found it handy as it contains a database of North American cities and towns. (I think it includes all towns or 5,000 or more people, but not sure, it includes some very small towns).

      People who diss GPS have never used one. Nice to have, and if you need it it could help save your life.

    14. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by linuxlover · · Score: 1

      1) why do you need mozilla when you have lynx?

      2) why do you need cell phones when you have AT&T phones every block and a bag full of quarters

      3) why do you need multiprocessing OS like Linux opposed to dos?

      4) why do you need Quake3 or UT when you can play pacman.

      boooo....please... it is all about convenient features rolled into one. Right now I am more dependant on my cell than any other gadget. Having it to do GPS would be really sweet!

    15. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I have a GPS hooked up to my laptop in my car,
      >and it displays on the map exactly where I am.
      >IT's 1 step away from being able to tell me
      >to "turn left in 500m" and give me all
      >directions, and I never get lost anymore.

      "1 step away?"
      It tells me turn left in 50/40/30m etc (countdown)
      via the screen and also SPEAKS the intructions.

      Gadgets:
      Psion 5mx
      Palmtop GPS
      Street Planner millennium
      Co-driver for speech addon

      MRed

    16. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by telstar · · Score: 1

      You carry around bags full of quarters?

    17. Re:Well, gee whiz..thank god for GPS Cell Phones! by Telek · · Score: 2

      "1 step away?"
      It tells me turn left in 50/40/30m etc (countdown)
      via the screen and also SPEAKS the intructions.


      I'm in Canada, so the mapping software that I have is patchy at best and doesn't support the text features, but I know that there are ones that do =)

      Yes, it is quite cool and fun! Great toy indeed.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
  21. Can't they allready locate you by warnerpr · · Score: 1

    Can't they get a pretty good reading on where you are using triangulation between the different cells? Or is that only in the movies?

    Putting evil tracking putposes aside for a moment, if all cars had these in them, and anonmously relayed location and speed info a system could be setup to route cars around roads just like packets around a network.... It holds some neat promise, but lots of technical and social things to work out.

    -Paul

    1. Re:Can't they allready locate you by plover · · Score: 2
      While triangulation is great on the ocean, it's not the best solution in the urban jungle.

      Since many phones are used in cities, RF propagation is not the same when you have dozens of buildings to reflect RF from. And you can't really use signal strength as a distance indicator, either, because signal strength can be dependent on which cell tower the steel in your car is blocking the signal from reaching.

      There's just too much noise (RF) to depend on this anywhere line of sight degrades. Not to mention the long stretches of freeway out in the country where one tower may be the ONLY antenna that can reach the cell phone, regardless of strength.

      John

      --
      John
    2. Re:Can't they allready locate you by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      But in cities, the cells are significantly smaller, some cells even cover only a single street.

      And the single antenna argument only applies, when they're not using smart antennas, especially one like an Adaptive Antenna Arrays (AAA) which has to determine the positon.
      An AAA determines the position of the users by detection of the direction of arrival of their signals at the antenna array.
      Then the position is used to determine a pattern with that maximises the peak at the user and simultanously minimises interference for other users. The pattern is achieved by radiating the signal with different phase shifts from the different antenna. You may guess how exact the determined location will be.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  22. whatever - not the feature I want by AssFace · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I want a phone that is advertised to get me laid more. then I'm happy. until then my 8890 is plenty cool.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  23. If it's an evil plot by sllort · · Score: 2, Informative

    If it's an evil plot, rest assured it isn't a corporate one. The FCC's requirements for E911 service are putting a whole lot of pressure on the cell providers, who face stiff fines and executive action if they can't use their phones to track you by 2005. If you think that the FCC is overstepping it's bounds with this one (I personally thing a regulated spectrum is an overstepped boundary, but that's just me) you know what to do.

  24. Privacy Concerns by Estragon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Those of you with privacy concerns need not worry. According to the manual the user does have the ability to turn the 'Position Location' off. (it will be automatically turned back on when/if an emergency call is made).

    Now this worries me.

    Exactly how is it determined that an emergency call is being made?

    --
    I rejoice that there are owls.
    1. Re:Privacy Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's called 9-1-1

    2. Re:Privacy Concerns by smunt · · Score: 1

      Not everywhere, in most of Europe it's 112.

    3. Re:Privacy Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      fine. then the european phones with similar capability would respond to that instead of 911.

    4. Re:Privacy Concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 999 in the UK.

    5. Re:Privacy Concerns by plover · · Score: 2

      My Nokia 8260 (piece of crap phone, by the way, the only thing going for it is its very tiny size) has an "Emergency" category in the dealer setup menu. When I select that, I get another menu that offers me "Emergency number 1", "2", and "3". Emergency 1 = "999" Emergency 2 = "*999" Emergency 3 = "" This is different than the "9 = Emergency" setting under the user's menu. I suspect most Nokia phones have similar settings.

      --
      John
    6. Re:Privacy Concerns by |DeN|niS · · Score: 1

      Emergency phonecalls have been designed into the GSM system. Emergency calls will immediately drop someone else's normal call if the network is busy.

      Some phones let you make emergency phonecalls without a SIM card, and all phones allow you to make one without requiring the access PIN to the SIM/phone. I.e. if you take someone else's phone and he has a PIN set, you can't get in to make calls but it will let you dial 112.

    7. Re:Privacy Concerns by radish · · Score: 2


      But what if I was in the US with a european phone? what should it respond to?

      BTW - that question is rhetorical ;-)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  25. privacy 'insured' by mysticbob · · Score: 1
    "This feature can also be turned Off (except during an emergency call) to insure your privacy."

    well, i'll rest easier knowing my privacy is insured, and in case someone does find me, what, i pay my premium, and they pay out a giant claim?

    wishing corporate america had a spell-checker, bob.

    1. Re:privacy 'insured' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since you clearly don't have a dictionary yourself, here it is:


      Insure: (2) To make sure, certain or secure.


      Yet another nitpicking dickhead too stupid to check his facts.

  26. World's First ... So We'll Give it Two Pages by telstar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it strange that this phone boasts that it's the world's first GPS-enabled phone, yet the GPS features only take up two pages of text in the manual, and one of those is the title page.

    Also, the manual mentions that if you've got GPS features turned off ... it turns them back on for the duration of any emergency calls. Aside from 911, how would the phone know what constitutes an emergency phone call?

    1. Re:World's First ... So We'll Give it Two Pages by Rovaani · · Score: 1
      Repeat after me: America is not the whole world, america is not the whole world, ...

      The first GPS-enabled mobile I know of is Benefon Esc. I can't provide a direct link, but it's the second phone on the left.

      --
      Karma: Good! Napster: Baad!
    2. Re:World's First ... So We'll Give it Two Pages by telstar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Garmin has one as well: Garmin.

    3. Re:World's First ... So We'll Give it Two Pages by vrmlguy · · Score: 1
      I have a Nokia phone and my wife has an Ericson. Both of them have a special "speed dial" for 911 calls. (On mine, press and hold "9", after a couple of seconds you're connected.) I would imagine that this would also activate the GPS feature.

      And for those who live someplace where the numer isn't 911, the manual for my phone states only that the speed dial will connect you to "emergency services" and that you can't reprogram the number dialed. I presume that the provider could set this number to whatever was appropriate for the region.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  27. Bill collecting by decipher_saint · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hi we're just calling to let you know, Vinny and 'Low Blow' McGurk are on they're way to break your legs at the corner of 99th St. and 101st Ave, please stand by"

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  28. So how many networks support this now? by NotSurprised · · Score: 0
    It seems the answer is still zero last I checked.

    Anyone got a timeframe for when one of these things can actually be USED?

    1. Re:So how many networks support this now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a sprintpcs phone. I would imagine you could use it right now.

  29. YOu just opened the CRAPFLOOD gate, you bastard!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How DARE you steal the fp without the all-knowing AC's permission? How dare you post insigtful things before we say grace? The troll queda will have revenge for this!!!

  30. Leave it on. by mlknowle · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think that tracking should always be on! It would help prevent terrorism!

    Prehaps congress should institute legislation which requires all cell phones to have GPS technology built in. And digital music protection, just to be safe.

    1. Re:Leave it on. by telstar · · Score: 1

      Prehaps congress should institute legislation which requires all cell phones to have GPS technology built in.

      They already have ... that's why you're starting to see them. Actually I think it was the FCC that is requiring it, but same result.

  31. Oil and Gas In Caspian Sea Region: The "New" War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why hasn't the media reported this?:

    Courtesy of the U.S. Department of Energy:

    Caspian Sea Region

  32. Location is good! by Kallahar · · Score: 1
    I think that tying GPS into phones is a really good idea. When visiting San Francisco a friend and I were looking for a ToGo's for lunch. We could use his phone for the web, but we didn't know the zip code, nor where we were or how to get anywhere. We ended up wandering around till we found one :)

    The most important thing is this: The ability to turn it off. There is no valid reason for anyone to have the potential to track where my phone is if I choose to not want that feature.

    Good for Samsung! Just think if the phone ran Micro$oft Windows CE?

  33. Re:Oil and Gas In Caspian Sea Region: The "New" Wa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes afghanistan is strategically important in terms of petroleum. fine so we kill two birds with one stone (hurt bin Laden etc and stabilize the region and make it easier to get the oil). i have no problem with that.

  34. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trolls, sllort, whatever. my user info is broken too, it's a known bug. he makes a good point!

  35. damn dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think you could post a few more articles about GPS man?

    Who cares, GPS is not that exciting, i don't think geeks really care, it's mildly nifty at best.

    Give the GPS crap a break...

  36. Mod parent sideways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man I dunno we should just try it out sometime. It's just a suggestion. I dunno. Let me see how are we doing on time, hal? OK we have time for one more. This one comes from the baseball herald and uhhh

  37. My guess by trilucid · · Score: 2, Interesting


    is that tracking is turned on by default. Why do I think this?

    I'm sure I'm NOT the only one (by far) who thinks this way, but here goes anyhow: They have a huge opportunity to collect detailed market data if they leave it on by default. For now, this probably isn't a huge deal, but you can bet they'll get very good very quickly at mining the data.

    Next thing you know, you wake up one morning to a mailbox full of pizza coupons (sent by various partners to your cell provider), due to the fact that you skipped into a Pizza Hut the night before to say hi to a few friends.

    Just FYI, I'm not trying to be truly extreme here. I personally love the possibilities opened up by this technology (gotta get me one of those). I'm just typically a bit wary of the marketing implications of anything like this. Thoughts? Flames? Please send on, I'm looking for other perspectives here.

    1. Re:My guess by silentmusic · · Score: 1

      I'll bet that it's off by default. If you leave it on all of the time it will consume more power. Of course this assumes that they are using some form of assisted GPS to achieve a reasonable time to fix.

      Does anybody know if this GPS works indoors? (Please don't tell me that it's impossible to get GPS to work indoors because I know for a fact that it's possible.)

      --

      Things are not as they appear, nor are they otherwise.

    2. Re:My guess by trilucid · · Score: 1


      I think you've got a very good point there. Battery life is a precious thing on cell phones; since the provider's primary source of revenue is people using airtime (and buying more), it would make sense to be sure the phones stay live as long as possible per charge.

      Alrighty, I reverse my original opinion... I guess it's logic over paranoia this go round :)

  38. e911 by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 1

    Folks might like to look at http://www.fcc.gov/e911/ to see why this is being done.

    Basically, this US mandate requires among other things, that mobile phone handsets that are capable of reporting location must be on sale by 1 October 2001, and that 100% of mobile phones sold after 31 December 2002 must include such capabilities.

    Required accuracy of location reporting will initially be to within 50 meters for 67% of calls and within 150 meters for 95% of calls.

    Of course, there are many other benefits too - but also many worries I guess.

    --
    -- Mike
    1. Re:e911 by |DeN|niS · · Score: 1

      That kind of accuracy can already be done just by the GSM network itself. However maybe in the US (also maybe using a different system?) distances between cells might be much larger so the accuracy would be worse, but the network always know where you are (it needs to to route calls to you!).

      Funny thing, in a lot of crime scenes where people were stupid enough to carry their cellphone with them the police would be able to figure out who it was (i.e. in a burglary, rape, etc) by looking at cellphone position history in the telco's logs, to see who had no reason to be there, etc. But the law doesn't allow that for some reason (Finland anyway). Anyway, moral of the story, in a city and mildly rural area using GSM the Telco can already give your position with that accuracy :-)

    2. Re:e911 by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 1

      As you point out, it is very dependant on cell size. Smaller cells==better resolution of tracking, and indeed in central London and places of high population that require smaller cells and more infastructre to support demand resolution is better (within 50 meters [Source: Wapland.com]). In Stockholm accuracy is between 100-200 meters [Source: Also Wapland.com] as the cells are larger.

      So basically, unless you are in London or perhaps New York, I don't believe the GSM network can currently deliver such accuracy, which is probably why e911 demands this.

      Of course, you might work of a telco and know more than me - but this is the thoughts I have formed from the media I read.

      --
      -- Mike
  39. "opt in" by BigBadaboom · · Score: 1

    > The manual doesn't say whether the phone
    > initially defaults to "Tracking On" or "Off".

    But the press release does. It says the service is 'opt in'. I took that to mean GPS is off by default.

  40. Re:what idiot modded this down????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, like Jesus cares.

  41. SignalSoft location services software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.signalsoftcorp.com

  42. Great by snubber1 · · Score: 1

    Now when I'm stuck in traffic I can look at my phone to find out that traffic is bad.

    --
    I don't really mind double posts on //..
  43. Icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The story is about a cell phone. Why did Slashdot use the PDA icon? Wait, let me guess, they couldn't find a picture of a cell phone. Typical /. research -- none.

  44. Caveat: is it *usable*? by fm6 · · Score: 2
    I already have a Samsung/Sprint cell with a lot of advanced features. I regret wasting my money. The features all work, but poor design and integration makes most of them basically useless. For example:

    There's an AIM chat client. But if the person you're chatting with sends to you while you're composing a message, you lose the message.

    The voice dial feature uses a completely separate phone book from the regular dialer. So you have to put in some numbers twice.

    Despite all the connectivity features, you simply have to enter phone book info by hand, period.

    There's a handy little button to turn the bell into a vibrator, so you won't get lynched if your phone rings in the movie theater. Except that button only controls voice calls...

    I could go on and on, but you get the idea. I think it's safe to assume that the GPS part will never do anything really useful. Maybe someday, Sprint will get it together enough to have the phone say, "Hey, you want Szechuan? The Blue Lotus is 2.3 kilometer's NNE!" But I'll lay money they'll never get this tied into your Mapblast account!

  45. Mapping Reception Areas. by stuffman64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is a thought. Have people voluntarily turn on the GPS tracking feature (not me). When the user makes a call, have Sprint monitor the strength of the signal and the location of the reciever. If you do this enough, with enough people, you can make an accurate map of signal strength across the country.

    Then, when RadioShack tells me that SprintPCS will work in XX area (which I know is not the case most of the time), I can show them a map and say, "In fact, no. Look at the map!"

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
  46. one thing the user's guide misses... by mrbkap · · Score: 1
    This has been touched in a couple of other posts (in a more humorous light), but the User's Guide never specifies how the phone attempts to keep you from being tracked. I think that a little more information from somewhere might be in order before I go to use this phone. Perhaps even a mention of if they encrypted it, or even just a reassurence that they have made it difficult (as just about any type of hacking is possible) for hackers to find out my whereabouts would be enough for me.

    Just my $0.02 worth

    --
    -mrbkap
  47. Maybe this is a good thing... by Ramses0 · · Score: 1

    ...like the guy from myboot says, the first line of any conversation involving a cell-phone is "Where are you?"

    This provide a handy way to stop that. :^)

    --Robert

  48. Those with privacy concerns need not worry... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Because you can choose not to buy the thing! One more difficult problem in security solved with one swell foop.

    Besides which, if you're on a digital cellphone, they can triangulate your position from various cell sites anyway.

    "The question isn't whether you're paranoid, Lenny, the question is whether you're paranoid enough."

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  49. Technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this use satellites or cell sites to figure out the position? If it uses cell sites, it wouldn't help much in places where there is no cell service.

  50. cellphone cursor.. by ldopa1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read an article in Wired a while back that the folks over at MIT's "Oxygen" project are working on a way to use these phones as a type of realtime cursor. They say that with an electronic compass and GPS (military grade), you would be able to point your phone at a building and the phone could tell you information about the building. The example they cited was a restaurant where the phone gave you the menu for the restaurant from out in the street, and offered you the chance to make a reservation. I thought it was pretty cool.

    Of course, if I think about it hard, maybe that isn't such a great idea. I can just picture what the cell phone would say about my house in five years:

    Address: 1313 Mockingbird Lane
    Phone: 699-555-1212
    Type: Residence
    Owner: LDOPA1
    Currently: Masturbating

    I don't think I want that to happen...

    --
    The Dopester
    "Yes, I'm a Karma Whore, but I'm doing it to pay my way through school."
  51. Icons? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey!

    I hate to come off sounding like too much of a purist (and will probably even get modded to OT for this), but...
    How is the PDA icon for a CellPhone accurate? Granted this thing is far more than a Cell, but I don't think it warents the PDA icon...

    Sorry... Just a random thought...

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  52. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever rated this as offtopic has obviously not seen the simpsons ever. Stupid fuck. Might as well rate the other ones in this thread as offtopic too. Cunt.

  53. Not the first GPS Phone by John_McKee · · Score: 2, Informative

    If I remember correctly, the first commercial GPS cellphone was the NaviTalk by Garmin . It was released a few years ago, and was recently updated.

    -john

    1. Re:Not the first GPS Phone by JerryKnight · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is true. For years Garmin has had the NavTalk but it is primarily geared toward pilots, as were most of the early civilian GPS receivers.

      --

      Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
  54. Sprint in Denver sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be a Sprint customer. This phone is exclusive to the Sprint network.

    Let me give to you some advice, if you are thinking about buying this phone;

    Phoenix Arizona has pretty good Sprint service. I never had a problem there.
    I hear that Salt Lake City Utah also has pretty good service.

    Service in Denver Colorado is DEATH! When I moved here, my phone was constantly beeping as it went in and out of service, in the middle of the damn city! Service was often oversubscribed and incoming calls were missed, outgoing calls were sometimes not possible.

    Trying to cancel my service was the worst though. They refused to do it! I had to call back three times before I got someone who I only had to say "Will you please cancel my service" a mere three times to before they actually did it. They were desperate to not let me cancel the service.

    Horrid.

  55. GPS not *really* needed by rmathew · · Score: 1

    If I understand it correctly, a service provider already knows where you are accurate to a cell. Therefore, they already have the information to suggest nearby restaurants, cinemas, etc. - they do not *really* need GPS to tell you that! Or am I missing something here?

    1. Re:GPS not *really* needed by |DeN|niS · · Score: 1

      Nope, you don't need GPS. Here (Finland) some Telco's offer so called locationing services, you send an SMS and it sends you back your longitude/lattitude, name of area you are in, etc. It's accurate within probably 100 metres (well, whenever I tried it :-)
      In Sydney I remember the Cell ID for every GSM cell would broadcast their location, so you'd be on the subway and every ten seconds your phone display would change "China town" "Town Hall", "The Rocks" "Kings Cross" etc. I liked that :-) Crossing the street was enough to get a new display.

      Nevertheless, Benefon (smaller Nokia, also Finnish) has had GPS phones for ages. Hence the Samsung "first GPS phone _in America_" :-)

  56. My car was stolen recently. by jcr · · Score: 2

    It would have been pretty sweet if I could have called my cell provider, asked them where my phone was, and sent the cops to pick up the perps and my vehicle.

    That LoJack thingie is a good idea, but GPS location under *my* control for *my* property is something I'd definitely buy.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:My car was stolen recently. by Osram · · Score: 1

      You can already find out the cell that your mobile phone is in via internet, see here (genion.de, German only, sorry). So, if you don't know whether its in the office, at home or with your girl friend (if you have one), then you can find that out.

  57. Please take a chill pill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because most Americans are paranoids it is so easy to attack you.
    I'm reading reply's to this news and it sure makes me laugh!
    Please take a chill pill and enjoy the 21 century and new services (in Europe its well known and used for long time) with your mobile phones.

    Cheers and BTW ..."bite my shiny metal European ass!" ;)

  58. Possibly even worse... by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    "Read the Position Location disclaimer by using the Up & Down arrows"

    Hem,

    This asks for a disclaimer ?
    like in EULA ?

    such as "this device cannot be used to track you except if somebody really wants to track you he'll just have to dial your phone number and reprogram your locator if needs be" ?

    I would like to have a look at this disclaimer beforehand, oplease...

    THEN, I was willing to buy a Palm Vx just for the cheap GPS, but if this does GPS and phone, when will they add PDA ?

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  59. this is when, by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    this is when, you americans having a broad sense of humor, that the guy @ police station reports you position to his superior, who calls the Navy to see if they have any Destroyer or sub in the location....

    and then they nuke you out of sheer boredom. 8)

    BTW a locator is good, but if you prank this way you should better also hide your caller ID, phone serial, chip code & serial, and call throught an unregistered network, for those track you too...

    (I am pleased to remind you that your phone broadcasts your location every 30 seconds to cinfirm the relays you are at this location, and this is done throught many codes and auto ID...
    So nowaday, if you want to prank, you just steal somebodys phone, use it, return it, and then smile when he/she gets busted by the feds.

    Hoping to hear from you 8)

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  60. Location release questions by Stuart+Ward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Firstly in the GSM world the [PDF] Benefon has been out for a couple of years now, not a big seller and has some limitations. GPS only works with line of sight to the satellites so the GPS will not work indoors and where you have limited view of the sky, i.e. in cities with tall buildings.

    More interesting are the issues around release of location information, how would /. Readers respond to these questions?

    Would you be prepared to release your location when making calls, in much the same way that your phone number is currently released. Your location could only be read by those with appropriate equipment. We will probably be required by law to release this information on all emergency services calls (999, 112 911)?

    1. No, I would not want my location released at all. (except emergency calls)
    2. No, Normally not released, but I would be able to release it by selecting an option when making a call.
    3. Yes, but only to services approved by (My network operator).
    4. Yes, released on all calls, except when I specifically specify not to release the location.
    5. Yes, released on all calls.
    Would you want the location of callers calling you (who have released their location) displayed on your phone display?

    1. Yes, display the grid reference of the caller.
    2. Yes, display the direction and distance of the caller from my current location.
    3. Yes, display the nearest town name to the location of the caller.
    4. Yes, but only if the information was provided free of charge to me.
    5. No, I would not be interested in this.
    . Would you allow the release of you current location to a caller who is calling you?

    1. No, I would not want my location released at all.
    2. No, Normally not released, but I would be able to release it by selecting an option.
    3. Yes, but only to services approved by (My network operator).
    4. Yes, released on all calls, except when I specifically specify not to release when answering the call.
    5. Yes, released on all calls. .
    Would you allow the tracking of your phone to enable (My network operator) and other companies to extract statistical information on your movements for providing information on traffic congestion and other services. All identification information would me masked so it would not be possible to identify you from this data?

    1. Yes. I would trust (My network operator) to manage this information securely.
    2. Yes, Only if I then had access to the traffic information.
    3. Yes, but I would want to select who received the information about me.
    4. No, I would want to opt out of this sort of service.
    5. No, I don't think (My network operator) should collect or release this information..
    Would you want (My network operator) and other companies to send you information messages about events happening near to you?

    1. Yes, only when I requested them.
    2. Yes, as soon as they happen and I am in the area.
    3. Yes, but I would want to select which companies information I receive.
    4. No, I would want to opt out of this sort of service.
    5. No, I don't think (My network operator) should collect or release this information..
    Would you be interested in a find a friend service. The network would look thorough a list of your friends numbers to see if any of them were near you. Only friends on your list would be able to find you?

    1. Yes, I would not mind my friends knowing I was nearby.
    2. Yes, but I would want to be able to disable the service, so I could not be found.
    3. Yes, but I would want to know who was looking for me before releasing anything to my friend.
    4. Yes, but I would only expect to pay if the system found a friend for me.
    5. No, I would not want this sort of service.
    6. No, I don't think (My network operator) should offer this sort of service.
  61. Is GPS really the way to go? by storix · · Score: 1
    GPS has a number of limitations which would
    curtail the usefulness of such a phone:
    • the GPS signal does not penetrate solid objects (walls, windows, car ceilings)
    • you need to have a clear line-of-sight to at least 3 satellites (which is difficult on a downtown street)
    • it takes considerable time to get a location fix from a "cold" receiver (eg. after taking your phone out of the pocket).
    • GPS receivers seem to be quite power-hungry


    I guess this makes it useful if you have the phone in the car, hooked up to the car's power supply and antenna. Not very good though for city animals like myself!

    Personally, I'd like to see base-state triangulation done by the phone combined with GPS. That would be cool.