Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft to Introduce GBA-competitor?

An anonymous reader writes "It seems that Nintendo will have a competition in the handheld market soon. ZDnet has an article that says Microsoft's plan to introduce a 'Media Pad' which includes among other things 'serve as a portable game player in conjunction with Microsoft's Xbox video game console.' So I guess the news I heard regarding their interest in the portable industry will soon come true, the question is, can they take the crown from Nintendo?"

289 comments

  1. Not unless by Pxtl · · Score: 2

    They get Mario Kart Advance. Damn, that game is just too good.

    1. Re:Not unless by Sk3lt · · Score: 1

      yeah but it will be called Microsoft Mario Kart Plus

    2. Re:Not unless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know for a site that prides itself for being supportive of the open source community and anti-microsoft you sure as hell post a lot of stories about microsoft. you're like those frat guys who "hate" faggots but constantly talk about them.

    3. Re:Not unless by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      Or Tony Hawk 2. That game really impressed me, and was just about the only reason I bought the system (I swore to myself I'd give up Nintendo systems after the N64).

      I wouldn't mind an XBox handheld, but they've got to do what they're doing with the XBox (sort of): get some high-powered developers to port some great titles, and try to keep costs relatively even (around Nintendo's $100).

  2. sounds more like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a tablet pc that plays games and interfaces w/ the XBox to me...

  3. What if.... by Uttles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is just a brainstorm-produced idea, not based in reality, but imagine if Microsoft found some way to interface their portable not only with the Xbox, but also with PS2 and GCN? I think the best thing about the GBA is that if you go to a friend's house who has a GCN, you can just plug in as another controller with your portable. Imagine if MS's new device could plug into them all... it's not like the consoles don't already have 3rd party controllers...

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:What if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Yeah, like, and imagine... if like your computer could transform into a giant, like, robot penguin... and, like, beat up those kids that stole your lunch money. That would be SOOO cool.

    2. Re:What if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mine already does.

      you really need to keep up to date with available linux pacakges... the lunchmoney you save may be your own.

    3. Re:What if.... by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

      Three Game Cubes for the kids with quick eyes,
      Seven PlayStation 2s for the teens who are stoned.
      Nine XBoxes for mortal men, doomed to play Project Gotham Racing until 4:00 AM,
      One gamepad for the pocket and home.

      One gamepad to play them all,
      One gamepad to find them,
      One gamepad to play Tony Hawk
      And in the darkness grind 'em.
      In the land of Microsoft
      Where the shadows lie.

      --
      John
    4. Re:What if.... by SuperLiquidSex · · Score: 0

      thats funny as hell. Wish I got mod points.

      --
      Oops....you'll know what I'm talkin about in a bit.
    5. Re:What if.... by hrieke · · Score: 2

      NeoGeo Pocket could hook up with Sega Dreamcast.
      4 or five games were released that could be played across the two systems.

      I don't see any problems with this idea, just as long as the protocols are standardized among the hardward developers or if the game developer has deep enough pockets to spring for the technology development.

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    6. Re:What if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Project Gotham Racing is totally crap. If you play it until 4:00am you must be more evil than the ringwraiths.

  4. No real competition by Transient0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Based on the information in the article, i doubt that this will be actual competition for the GBA. The device seems to be more of a next-generation PDA than a portable game system. It is likely that it will be far more expensive than the GBA and will cater to an entirely different market.

    Still, it is encouraging to see renewed interest in the handheld gaming industry, which has been so long dormant.

    1. Re:No real competition by Pxtl · · Score: 2

      Not only that, they're saying it'll have much less beefy power then most equipment on the market - it sounds like they're not even pushing for graphical processing gear in there. Probably the games for this device would be solitare, nibbles, and tetris, not Doom and Kart games.

    2. Re:No real competition by dperkins · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that people are underestimating Microsoft once M$ decides they are going to enter a particular market segment. M$ doesn't enter a market for the short term, or to generate a profit immediately. They are looking at the *Long Term*, and they look at how a particular venture fits into their strategy as a whole.
      It appears that they want to have their OS running everything from PDA's to Cell phones, to Game boxes. This is just an extention of controlling the platform that devices are run from. From the XBox to Stinger, to PocketPC 2002, they want to have their OS running it all. As Palm and Apple can attest, Microsoft may not get it right the first or even the second time, but they will at least be close by the third. At that point Nintendo will be shaking in their boots, and Microsoft will be passing them by in sales.
      I am not a Microsoft fan, but I am a realist. Microsoft can be criticized for a lot of things, but not doing their market research isn't one of them.

      --
      My sig hates me. That's ok, I never cared for it much anyway.
    3. Re:No real competition by GTRacer · · Score: 2
      ...not doing their market research isn't one of them.

      Are you sure? Have you seen an Xbox controller lately? Do you know anyone with hands that size (that isn't in the porn industry)?

      GTRacer
      - [dj] Please do not make me sad anymore.

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    4. Re:No real competition by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      I happen to love the controllers. They feel firm and strong in my hands.

      Funny aside: Halo describes the vibration of the controllers as something like this... "A pleasant vibrating sensation".

      Anyways, the controllers feel good in my hands. I can play for 8hrs straight and have no discomfort at all.

      (Disclaimer: I am 6'3" and can palm a basketball)

      Jeremy

    5. Re:No real competition by shokk · · Score: 1

      How is a device that costs US$2000 supposed to compete with the GameBoy Advanced? M$ had the right formula when they brought out the XBox to compete with PS2 and N64, but somehow they totally lost it when they thought this TabletPC up. Unless they can shave the cost down to 1/20th of this, no kid is going to even be able to think about getting it. At that price you're talking about something that costs as much as a used car and guess which one they'd rather have. There is a very small market that is going to pay $2000 for a handheld PC, but I don't think it will be enough to carry this to the point where it costs $100-200.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    6. Re:No real competition by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      (Disclaimer: I am 6'3" and can palm a basketball)

      I don't think anyone was disputing that people like you would like the controllers. :) I think that's what he was saying ... but for the rest of us non-giants, I choose the Nintendo GC controller anyday. Actually, the size of the XBox controller isn't /too/ bad, but the buttons on the right hand side are absolutely criminal. It's like braille, and as a (much much much too) experienced gamer, I still found myself mashing the wrong buttons after 4 hours of Halo.

      Incidentally, he said they were good for people in the Porn industry:

      Jeremy

      As in Ron? ;)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    7. Re:No real competition by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Nah,

      Last I checked I was not in the porn industry.

      The most excitement I get at work is writing Java libraries ;)

      I really never thought of the controller size being an issue, I guess because it works for my hand. One noteworthy thing, I was missing the buttons for at least 8 hours. But my XBOX is my first console since Super Nintendo.

      Jeremy

    8. Re:No real competition by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      I have a 1ghz computer with shitloads of DDR ram and huge ass HDs with a small video archive on them. (Ok ok, large video archive. :) )

      Guess what game I play when waiting for it all to boot up?

      Yup

      Tetris.

      I have gotten to level 23 so far. :) heh. Someplace around there if you let the tetri stack up higher then 4 or so lines you are basicaly screwed though, hehe. SPEEEED!!!!

      I also still have my ORIGINAL B/W GameBoy, damnit those things ROCK! Remember the pic in Nintendo Power during Desert Storm? The one where the GB had had a grenade go off on top of it and it still worked, albiet with a very dim screen? Hehe, those things were TOUGH! :)

  5. StrongARM is Intel by johnjones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Intel got exclusive rights to StrongARM

    since GBA is just a ARM7 + custom sound off the APB then it would not be hard to do the same sort of thing

    differant enough that nitendo cant sue and developers have to recompile

    but easy enought that you could have a compiler switch do all the work (except the sound and that could be redone easy enough)

    really its just a way for intel to push StrongARM and StronARM2 aka Xscale

    regards

    john jones

    1. Re:StrongARM is Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get real, the GB video system while basic is unique and covered by patents. Developers will have to develop two very different versions of their game engine.

    2. Re:StrongARM is Intel by rbeattie · · Score: 2
      You're sort of blowing off the ARM7. The GBA has a pretty kickin' processor, the ARM7TDMI which is being used in a variety of PDAs now or coming soon. (Though the GBA is running slowly - 16MHz - to save battery life.) I've been trying to figure out how much of an effort it would be to port Linux for ARM to the GBA.

      If you could get Linux running on the GBA, you could sell a 256 meg cartridge with the system and lots of empty space to play with. This would allow a whole bunch of capabilities:

      • MP3 Player
      • Internet access via modem attached to phone or mobile via the GBA Link cable.
      • Web browser
      • Multi-player games over the net
      • Downloading additional game ROMs and MP3s
      • Java for easy development
      • etc.
      This would kick ass and be A LOT cheaper than any solution the Microsoft could come up with (or maybe even Palm). If someone is really tricky, they could include a GSM SIM-card in the cartidge for wireless access right out of the box. The platform is a LOT more expandable than I think Nintendo is letting on right now.

      -Russ

      --
      Me
    3. Re:StrongARM is Intel by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      Seeing as ARM also own the rights to StrongARM, I don't think Intel have exclusive rights.

  6. Sony? Sega? by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So I guess the news I heard regarding their interest in the portable industry will soon come true, the question is can they take the crown from Nintendo.

    Nintendo fought off both Sega and Sony, two big companies. Sony forced Sega to go software only, but we still see nintendoes everywhere. The GB audience is little kids. They know "Game Boy" better than anything MS puts out.

    This article is just a slashdot crack at MS, though. "Lets point out the monopoly" article! The way the slashdot community fights with Microsoft is funny, and has quite a pattern. 'Do whatever it takes' is generally the big picture. It isn't about crappy software lately, because the government saw some monopoly qualities, that's what slashdot looks into heavily. The truth is, most people that use linux exclusively hasn't even tried Win2K, which has yet to crash or bluescreen on me. Netscape on linux, and mozilla on linux crashes more than anything on win2k for me. But I'm talking to closed minds here.

    Its going to be funny when the monopoly talks die down and people start attacking MS's quality to find its stronger than the last time they used it, so their arguements are moot. Sure, XP has bugs (all new OS's do. Try and tell me that Linux 1.0 didn't crash or have bugs.), and X-Box has its share, but it is the first console released under MS's name. But by the time the monopoly craze goes away, I think you'll be surprised at where MS will be.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  7. I guess the real question is... by cmckay · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...can it run linux?

    1. Re:I guess the real question is... by yatest5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, the real question is whether you can imagine a beowulf cluster of them - get it right.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    2. Re:I guess the real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ChYeah, that's right - anything mentioning Linux is OnTopic, since Linux has got *so* much to do with this new MS console!

  8. Unhappy developers by damieng · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While Nintendo currently have the hand-held crown it stopped accepting developers for the GBA a long time ago claiming that 400 was enough. From the handful of decent titles I'd guess it isn't.

    Microsoft will at least get those developers wanting to do handheld games but blocked-out by Nintendo.

    Like the GBA it would almost certainly use an ARM chip as that's the only supported processor for Windows 'CE' 2002.

    --
    [)amien
    1. Re:Unhappy developers by bludstone · · Score: 1

      and squaresoft is not one of the 400 developers.

      the gba has competition in japan in the form of the wonderswan. the only reason is because thats what squaresoft releases games for.

      --

      no .sig
    2. Re:Unhappy developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Thanks for the misinformation, try again!

      You can still become a GBA developer. However you must do it through a publisher. If you work out a deal with a publisher Nintendo can still approve you as a developer. All this "cap" limits is small-time hobby development, which has never amounted to anything on conoles.

      As far as a lack of games, I would point out that when someone signs up as a developer they don't produce a full game in 2 weeks...

      So Microsoft can get no-name first timers with no money, no plan, and nothing good enough to interest a publisher...yay.

    3. Re:Unhappy developers by zonker · · Score: 0

      gee, this sounds much more like a suped up "vmu" for the sega dreamcast than an actual portable gaming system...

    4. Re:Unhappy developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "PocketPC 2002" only supports ARM. Windows CE v3 and v4 (CE.Net, currently in beta) supports some 14 different processors.

    5. Re:Unhappy developers by damieng · · Score: 1

      http://www.noa-engineering.com/apply/agb.html seems to state "Nintendo will no longer be accepting applications for the Game Boy Advance developer program."

      Sounds like they DONT accept new developers. Perhaps you were reading the line

      "For publishers who wish to work with specific developers, we will accommodate their requests by authorizing those developers. This is a courtesy to our publishers, and not our normal procedure. "

      Which seems to me that you'd have to have a pretty good relationship with a Nintendo publisher or a bloody good idea for a game because you can't have access to any dev tools to show them something.

      Where did you get 2 weeks from? You in some kind of time warp? GBA was released in Japan in the middle of 2000... Developers probably had the kits 6 months before... 2 weeks? 2 YEARS.

      As for Microsoft getting no-name first timers, yeah why not? What was the last original game you saw from a established developer? We've had plenty of games from no-name companies that have blown people away.

      On a machine like the GBA it *is* possible for a small company to produce a great game. You don't need teams of 3d animators, artists, musicians etc. that the consoles and PC's need.

      You only need to look back to the age of the 8-bit and 16-bit machines with their similar screen res, RAM etc. to see how many great games were one or two man efforts.

      --
      [)amien
  9. Mobile Phones the way to go by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I recokon this will have less and less of an impact here in Europe.
    Handheld "consoles" are going out of fassion in favour of mobile phones that are incresingly having better games built in. Some already offer basic multi-player 'online' games. Unless M$ gets into the movile phone market, I won't predict too much.

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
    1. Re:Mobile Phones the way to go by $0+31337 · · Score: 0

      Ahhh yes. Very good point. I can imagine the market for this device, you know - 10 - 20 year olds, will just whip out their cell phones and play games on those instead of a dedicated hand-held game machine... Oh wait.. A lot of 10 year olds don't have cell phones? Hmmm... Guess that plan goes out the window..

    2. Re:Mobile Phones the way to go by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      Which part of Europe are you in where handhold consoles (assuming you are talking about GB/GBA) are being shunned in favour of..what? Snake? Memory game? Or the awesome Snake 2! Stuff that makes Quake 3 look revolutionary!

    3. Re:Mobile Phones the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh wait.. A lot of 10 year olds don't have cell phones? Hmmm... Guess that plan goes out the window..


      I don't know what it's like in the States, but I'll bet that the vast majority of 10 year olds here in Norway have mobile phones, and I expect the States to catch up eventually.

    4. Re:Mobile Phones the way to go by SlashRaid · · Score: 1

      The 12 to 16 age group for cell phone use is one of the fastest growing in Europe and Japan. Japan=Nintendo. Better hurry Microsoft.

      --
      God Moving Over the Face of Waters
    5. Re:Mobile Phones the way to go by blacksmith · · Score: 1

      Um.. things are moving on. Take a look at this demo - it's a DirectX phone emulator with a game. The technology is not far from market, and is catching up with handheld gaming.

    6. Re:Mobile Phones the way to go by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      I see. I`ll check it out shortly. Lets hope it works out about the same price as a gba and a mobile phone, and not £500 or whatever.

    7. Re:Mobile Phones the way to go by donutello · · Score: 2

      Unless M$ gets into the movile phone market,

      You mean like Stinger?

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  10. MS in an Even Tougher Market than Consoles!?!! by digital_freedom · · Score: 2

    Microsoft entering Gameboy's territory. This seems so crazy to me. Sure the XBox can get the older gamers, but I don't see a lot of them playing with GBAs. I saw three little kids in carts this weekend playing their GBAs and I think that shows that the GBA is really for younger kids. The XBox is really geared to an older audience, wherease the GBA and the Gamecube have offerings for a younger audience.
    I haven't seen a viable comepetitor to the Gameboy in long time. Last I saw was the Sega Game thingy and maybe that Playstation portable some guy hacked together. Now Gameboy has a huge library of established hits to really provide a barrier to new entries. Any new entrants to the portable game console market are in for a rough time.
    I guess this is what you do with a $36 Billion dollar war chest. They're gonna need it.

    1. Re:MS in an Even Tougher Market than Consoles!?!! by soupforare · · Score: 1

      I still don't get why people think the GBA is a kid's device. I've said it before, and I'll say it again:
      The GBA is the last bastion of hope for 2d gamers. Side-scrollers, shoot 'em ups, platformers, top-overs, 'classical' RPGs... There all there baby

      Goddess bless Enix

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
    2. Re:MS in an Even Tougher Market than Consoles!?!! by garcia · · Score: 4, Funny

      yep, I coach little kids during the summers and they play that fucking game Pokemon all the fucking time. Their lives consist of three things during the summers... Harry fucking Potter, Pokemon, and aggrivating adults.

      Try to get a little kid to do anything other than play Pokemon and you might as well be tearing his fingers off (disabling him from playing Pokemon or turning the pages in Potter).

      Now, as far as MS making it in this market.. I like being able to play games and shit from my favorte console but I am not in like dire need of Madden 2002 when I am at work (or whereever). Unless MS starts gearing its games to a younger audience (which it doesn't seem to be doing currently) I can't see it working all that well.

      Unless he is trying to get into wireless Internet to interface w/the XBox and him coming over the TV every morning giving his daily address to his nation (and expanding that to his required handhelds) then I don't see him taking over Nintendo.

      Harry Potter vs. Pokemon Platinum -- available only on XBox-mini.

    3. Re:MS in an Even Tougher Market than Consoles!?!! by Bobman1235 · · Score: 0, Troll
      yep, I coach little kids during the summers and they play that fucking game Pokemon all the fucking time. Their lives consist of three things during the summers... Harry fucking Potter, Pokemon, and aggrivating adults.

      Remind me to have you killed if you ever try coaching kids in my town. You should probably like them a little more if you're COACHING them, don't you think?

    4. Re:MS in an Even Tougher Market than Consoles!?!! by garcia · · Score: 2

      I like them just fine. I don't like Pokemon or Harry Potter. I also don't appreciate them not paying attention when they should be working out.

      Games are fine, not paying attention is against policy, remember I was a kid once too, I understand how it works, just do it on your own time, not mine.

      You are one of those parents that I just don't deal w/. I have two simple rules. One for kids, one for adults:

      Kids #1 -- No tattling. If I don't see it, I don't want to hear about it.

      Parents #1 -- I am generally more knowledgable and better at this than you, keep you nose in your own business. If you don't like this policy, your kid doesn't have to be on the team.

    5. Re:MS in an Even Tougher Market than Consoles!?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids #1 -- No tattling. If I don't see it, I don't want to hear about it.

      What an awful rule.

      Stevie: "Johnny's raping Molly!"
      garcia: "You broke the rule, Stevie. Go stand in the corner."

      What locality is insane enough to allow you within 50 feet of children? Let me know so I can be sure to steer clear.

    6. Re:MS in an Even Tougher Market than Consoles!?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're obviously a moron. You know that wasn't what he meant.

      The world is ending. It is full of morons. If there is a God, he certainly wouldn't put up with this.

    7. Re:MS in an Even Tougher Market than Consoles!?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You coach kids during the summer with an attitude like that? I feel sorry for those poor kids.

    8. Re:MS in an Even Tougher Market than Consoles!?!! by Decimal · · Score: 1

      Harry fucking Potter, Pokemon, and aggrivating adults.

      That Harry really gets around, doesn't he?

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    9. Re:MS in an Even Tougher Market than Consoles!?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should probably like them a little more if you're COACHING them, don't you think?

      You don't have to like the kids if you're coaching them due to court-ordered community service :-)

  11. Universal Remote... by FatRatBastard · · Score: 2

    To me it looks more like a Universal Remote / Terminal / Control Every God Damn Thing In The House than a dedicated game machine. Somehow I doubt Nintindo has much to worry about. It sounds like the form factor is going to be more tablet like, and that's not the most ergonomic thing to play portable games on (not to mention its going to be huge compared to GBA... Etch-a-sketch huge). And its not like you're going to be able to drop $100 for one for each of the kids. Plus, how happy are you going to be when you lose some functionality of your MS TV Thingy when the nipper's taken its remote control to school to play a little Halo during his lunch hour?

  12. Smacks of the Dreamcast... by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

    The DC memory cartridges that you can stick in the controller to hold save games can also hold mini-games downloaded from the DC console (which some DC games had right on the disc). Then you can play these little games on a little monochrome screen with a Gameboy like unit (direction + button A + button B). Really, it was kind of pathetic, but cool in a weird way.

    I hope this isn't what they have in mind. ;)

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
    1. Re:Smacks of the Dreamcast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the batteries wore out in about 2 weeks. Then you got this annoying long beep each time you booted up the DC. They should've made those VMU units rechargeable.

    2. Re:Smacks of the Dreamcast... by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      They were called VMUs. The best feature was in NFL 2k, where you could select your plays on the VMU's LCD screen so that the people you were playing with couldn't spy on your play selection and call their defenses accordingly.

      Nifty.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  13. Doubtful by TheTomcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the question is can they take the crown from Nintendo

    I seriously doubt it. Nintendo is particularly GOOD at what they do, especially when it comes to handhelds. Just look at the staying power of the original gameboy. Even to this day, they're still selling, pretty much the original gameboy (with much improved battery life, size, screen, etc)..

    Competition is always good, but MS' product will need to completely blow away the GBA (and then some) to compete -- let's not forget that the original 4 colour gameboy sompletely outsold Sega's technologically superior (at the time)Gamegear.

    1. Re:Doubtful by psxndc · · Score: 3, Informative
      NeoGeo Pocket Color: RIP

      Wonderswan: not coming to this side of the ocean even though it has Square and Final Fantasy behind it.

      While I don't doubt M$'s money and ability to release this thing (and it looks like gaming is a side feature), compete with Gameboy it won't. Gameboy is an unstoppable monster. Every kid has one, they're backward compatible so there is a library of a zillion games, and companies are releasing GBA versions of the SNES games a bunch of us adults loved. M$'s doohicky may exist, but will never compete.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    2. Re:Doubtful by psxndc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Crap. I wasn't supposed to be replying to this thread... doh!

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    3. Re:Doubtful by slashdot2.2sucks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The gamegear was not technically superior. It was merely the sega master system (competitor of the NES) retrofited to a handheld with a backlit color screen.

      Yes it had light, good color, and a faster CPU with more memory (the master system was a better system than the NES in almost every way), but it made a terrible portable device because it ate up about 8 AA's less than 2 hours.

      You could barely finish a game.

    4. Re:Doubtful by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

      No, it ate up about 6 AA's in four hours. That's only for people that were too stupid to realize that battery packs are the way to go. I just bought two battery packs for my Game Gear at FuncoLand for about $5 each, I think, since I lost the old one.

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    5. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a portable, the gamegear sucked. Also the screen size had something to do w/ it too (you had color, but the color graphics were crap and hard to distinquish compared to the crisp gameboy graphics).

      Still, it did have an adapter, and was a nice bed-side toy for nights you can't crash out (and don't have a tv in your room).

    6. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it also beat out the TurboExpress, which IMO was probably the best handheld to date. It played the same exact game cards as the PCEngine/TurboGrafx, had excellent colour, good sound and doubled as a portable TV if you had the tuner add-on.

      The Atari Lynx was pretty decent too, but suffered from a lack of titles.

    7. Re:Doubtful by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Atari's v2 of the Lynx included a toggle-able backlight.

      So, you had the choice of extending your battery life or actually seeing the screen. :)

      Of course, by that point they were nearly broke and had no money left to market that or the Jaguar... shame, the Lynx was a nifty little machine (I currently own 3, and about 40 games, and I'm always looking for the rest of the games -- with about 65-70 released a complete set isn't too far away.)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    8. Re:Doubtful by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      you're right about the batteries, but the Gamegear had some top-class games. I used to love Sonic and Prince of Persia on mine - better than the MegaDrive versions IMHO, though PofP wasn't as good as the Amiga variant. Sing it with me: SAAAY-GAAH!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  14. What *I* want... by Monte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...handheld emulation. I've got some of that on my Jornada 720, but not much.

    I'd love to see Nintendo/Sony/Microsquish/Whatever come out with a hand-held unit that runs a version of Mame, and the company goes out and buys licenses to all those old arcade games I love. Package'em half-a-dozen to a cartridge (yeah, you'll get one popular one [Pac-Man], a couple of so-so, then three scrubs, but it'll get the cash revenue going). Think: zero development costs, small license/media costs, and profits all around.

    That would be sweet. Now throw in GB/GBA/NES/SNES emulation as well - hoody hoo! (Ok, why should Nintendo license their old games to MS? Because they aren't selling many of the old ones nowadays, are they?)

    Anyone think this has a chance?

  15. Smart business moves lately by kitts · · Score: 1

    It was only a matter of time before they started doing this. There are no more general-user niches to fill in software anymore that Microsoft doesn't already have. Moreover, you can't really pirate hardware like you can software.

    Plus, if Linux is going to do anything it's push down the OS cost and also the cost of general server aps, potentially to the point of them being so close to free that MS can't make much money off them at the point of sale.

    The move to hardware is a bit of a no-brainer. I'm surprised it took them this long to realize it. What'll be scary is if they succeed in using this to enforce new software protocols. THAT would be scary.

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- ----
    charlton heston is more of a man than yo
  16. .NET conspiracy by Transient0 · · Score: 2

    Hmmm...

    on a second read-through i noticed a somewhat sinister mentioning of .NET in the article. It occurs to me that this device could well be made to provide Office Suite functions in a proprietary way only through the use of .NET. I just can't help but think of Microsoft's recent forays into hardware as a grand scheme to enforce use of their software...

    buyers beware.

  17. Putting the nail in the coffin by b.foster · · Score: 0, Troll
    After seeing their latest offerings (the N64 and Gamecube) lose money hand over fist, Nintendo finally learned that their core competency was in creating mediocre handheld gaming systems, and blaming a dearth of features on the "compromises" they needed to make in order to accomodate the handheld form factor. This strategy worked very well... until now. Sega couldn't beat them with a color unit, and many others tried and failed to emulate the success of the Game Boy.

    Unfortunately, Nintendo's poor business sense and lack of R&D has finally caught up to them. They are fighting an 800-lb gorilla that has billion$ of dollars to spend on dominating every area of the market that it enters. And it looks like Microsoft is about to release a very versatile, multipurpose handheld device that will blow all of Nintendo's offerings right out of the water.

    On the plus side, this means that consumers will have easier access to more advanced technology than before. On the minus side, Microsoft tends to release these products to reinforce their other monopolies. And that is exactly why Microsoft's corporate charter needs to be revoked: they do not play fair. They don't innovate just to create a better product; they innovate to improve sales of their other products. It's the same reason why Windows XP tries to con you into creating a Passport account and using Hotmail and MSN Messenger. Once they make all of the competitors disappear, they can start charging for their crappy services.

    So, it would probably be an excellent idea to avoid this new device like the plague. "Embrace, extend, and extinguish" won't work with us because we are better than them.

    Bill

    1. Re:Putting the nail in the coffin by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "After seeing their latest offerings (the N64 and Gamecube) lose money hand over fist,"

      N64, perhaps (but keep in mind even then they were able to hold their own even with no real third-party developers). But GameCube?

      "Nintendo finally learned that their core competency was in creating mediocre handheld gaming systems,"

      "Finally?" Nintendo has known since at least the early N64 era that Game Boy is its bread and butter and has gone after intrusions into the market with a vengeance. Towards the end of the N64's life-cycle in Japan, we saw all sorts of accessories to connect the Game Boy Color to the N64, from the Transfer Pak that came out with Pokemon Stadium in the US to the cable that connects the game link port on the GBC to a controller port on the N64 (attatching the GBA to the GameCube isn't a new idea).

      And also note that the GBA is their first backwards-compatible anything. Again, trying to tap into their bread-and-butter.

      "and blaming a dearth of features on the "compromises" they needed to make in order to accomodate the handheld form factor."

      It's not just the form factor they were trying to fit into, but the price factor as well. iPaqs are real nice and have all sorts of bells and whistles, but they also cost over five times as much. It's enough to make you want to play it but not so much you're afraid of breaking it.

      And these "compromises" has given us a 32-bit system that does 2-D graphics better even than a Sega Saturn (let alone a PSX). It fits in the palm of my hand and it costs less than a PS One. Not too shabby in my book.

      "Unfortunately, Nintendo's poor business sense and lack of R&D has finally caught up to them. They are fighting an 800-lb gorilla that has billion$ of dollars to spend on dominating every area of the market that it enters. And it looks like Microsoft is about to release a very versatile, multipurpose handheld device that will blow all of Nintendo's offerings right out of the water."

      If Microsoft is an 800# gorilla, then when it comes to handhelds Nintendo must me a man with a machine gun. This isn't the console market, where the dominant player rotates every generation. We're talking about Game Boy, the Ali of the gaming world. I can think of no less than seven handheld systems offered by six different companies with all sorts of advantages (both real an imagined) that got smacked down by Game Boy and smacked down HARD! The closest thing to a second place I've seen in the field is Sega's Game Gear, and half the people that have posted here don't even remember its name.

      And even before anybody thought of a hand-held video game system (where "anybody" means Gumpei Yokoi), guess who dominated the hand-held electronic games market? That's right, still Nintendo and their Game & Watch line. They've been around so long that the associated patent on a plus-shaped directional pad terminated only shortly before Sega made their Dreacast controller.

      In today's world, when was the last time you saw a dominant anything that's been on the throne for over a decade? If you ask me, Microsoft would have a better chance of breaking into the CPU business. At least we've seen that there's room for competition there.

    2. Re:Putting the nail in the coffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure GBA is great, when you can actually see whats on the screen.

      "Wait a minute, I think I just saw something move!"

      I want a fuckin' backlight. Its not difficult to implement, doesn't consume much power and would make the GBA playable rather than a torturous eyestrain device.

    3. Re:Putting the nail in the coffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And these "compromises" has given us a 32-bit system that does 2-D graphics better even than a Sega Saturn (let alone a PSX)."

      Yeah, the GBA with its whopping 256 simultaneous colors on screen is far better than the Saturn and PSX that only supported a piddly 16.8 million.

    4. Re:Putting the nail in the coffin by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter how many colors you can display if the graphics don't look hand-drawn and the animation isn't smooth and fluid.

    5. Re:Putting the nail in the coffin by yerricde · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the GBA with its whopping 256 simultaneous colors on screen is far better than the Saturn and PSX that only supported a piddly 16.8 million.

      Wrong. GBA has 32,768 colors (five bits each of red, green, and blue) in bitmap modes, and it can display more than 256 simultaneous colors even in character modes using blending modes. Besides, how many colors do you need in a cel game?

      Yes, GBA is very powerful for 2-D graphics. It has 128 simultaneous sprites with 32 rotation/scaling specifications, plus up to four character background layers (less with background rotation/scaling).

      3-D isn't everything.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    6. Re:Putting the nail in the coffin by spood · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft is an 800# gorilla, then when it comes to handhelds Nintendo must me a man with a machine gun.

      Don't you mean a plumber in overalls that can jump a rolling barrel in a single bound?

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
    7. Re:Putting the nail in the coffin by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      Oooh, ooh, who's the princess?

      -DG

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    8. Re:Putting the nail in the coffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "And these "compromises" has given us a 32-bit system that does 2-D graphics better even than a Sega Saturn (let alone a PSX). It fits in the palm of my hand and it costs less than a PS One. Not too shabby in my book. "

      The Sega Saturn is unrivalled still as far as 2D tile map/sprite-based hardware goes.

      The PSX didn't really have much "2D capability." AFAIK, you could just peek/poke the frame buffer (which was internal to the GPU), or draw sprites with polygons. But the Saturn on the other hand, had support for 4 background layers, tons of sprites, sprite effects (warping with vertices, rotation, scaling), rotating backgrounds, various interesting palette effects, several color modes (including 8-bit palettized, and a 2048-color palettized mode [or some number similar to that, maybe 1024], 16, and 24-bit), etc., etc.

      Technical shortcomings of the Saturn were its relatively poor 3D capability compared to the PSX, insane complexity, lack of hardware sound compression (the Saturn's sound unit was very nice, but the lack of hardware compression meant developers chose low sampling rates for sound effects), and perhaps too little RAM (1 or 1.5MB.)

      The dual CPU set up isn't all that great either. AFAIK, both CPUs cannot share memory well, and the only way to get both CPUs running at full speed is to have one of them executing only from 4KB of cache RAM. :(

      But despite all these faults, the system excels at 2D. The only way to outdo it nowadays is either with a frame buffer (thanks to CPU power nowadays -- the Saturn had linear frame buffer support, but a 25MHz SH-2 isn't adequate for tons of drawing) or polygons set up to function as 2D sprites.

    9. Re:Putting the nail in the coffin by toriver · · Score: 1
      It doesn't matter how many colors you can display if the graphics don't look hand-drawn and the animation isn't smooth and fluid.

      Rayman Advance and Klonoa: Empire of Dreams score on both counts.

    10. Re:Putting the nail in the coffin by DoomPlague · · Score: 1

      N64 lost money hand over fist? I'd like to see that sales data. Last year, one of the systems last, Nintendo made twice as much in software revenue as the nearest game publisher, EA, and several times as much as Sony.

      Gamecube just came out and is selling very well, as is the software. Poor business sense? Yeah ok.

      They may not have as much as MS, but Nintendo does have a few billion in cash as well. They're just being more conservative with it. Why do all that marketing when you can't put enough consoles on shelves?

  18. Wouldn't be too hard. by watchmaker1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    All Microsoft has to do is put a decent screen on theirs and it's a lock. I tried out a friend's GBA and gave up. How useful is a system that's only useable in direct sunlight?

    I remember ten years ago working at a Babbages, playing California Games on an Atari Lynx. Backlit, 4096 colors, and a hell of alot of fun.

    I'd be willing to pump more batteries in the damn thing if it meant I could see the screen.

    1. Re:Wouldn't be too hard. by Lacutis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good news then.

      Just wait a little bit longer and the guy over at:
      http://www.portablemonopoly.com/

      Will be selling kits that enable you to add back lighting to your gameboy advance for somewhere in the neighborhood of $30-$50.

      It's even toggleable to save battery life.

    2. Re:Wouldn't be too hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all Nintendo has to do is release a backlit version of the GBA and there goes a billion dollars of research and marketing.

      Remember GB, GB Pocket, GB Pocket Color. There is no guarantee that Nintendo isn't going to offer a backlit version in the future which could easily retain backward compatability.

    3. Re:Wouldn't be too hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...if that was all MS had to do, don't you think Nintendo would just release a backlit GBA to compete?

      In fact it is almost a given that a backlit GBA will come out eventually. IIRC a backlit gameboy came out after a while...it's just a matter of cost, size, battery life, etc. The batteries in the GBA last for about 10 hours+, which is pretty damn good!

      Furthermore, for that stupid poster who said Nintendo has no business sense...they are a hugely profitable company! I don't think they have ever lost money in a year, in most years they rake in money. Business sense is one thing they have in spades.

      Yeah, there was a gamegear and tg-16 express and lynx and this ms thing...what you need though are 4 things:

      1: Games
      2: Cost
      3: Battery Life
      4: Size

      For example, TG-16 express had a battery life of like 3 hours and cost 300+ when it came out...big surprise it bombed eh?

    4. Re:Wouldn't be too hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I agree with you. Why nintendoh didn't include no light is beyond me. Everybody should complain to nintendo about the backlight problem. I'd buy a GBA...heck I buy any game system with a backlit screen. Speak up and maybe they will listen.

  19. Hopefully with a better screen than the GBA by ergo98 · · Score: 2

    The GBA is completely unusable (including with the aftermarket add on front lights) in anything but very bright conditions, which is something that I think they should be a little more truthful about (i.e. in the commercial where the guy is playing in a church: Fat chance).

    1. Re:Hopefully with a better screen than the GBA by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Honestly I think people have blown this problem completely out of proportion. From my experiance, the screen is a little bit dark and somewhat difficult to use in dark (or rapidly strobing, like in a car driving through a forest) light conditions, but it's certainly not the 1000W required pitch black monstrosoty that everybody makes it out to be.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Hopefully with a better screen than the GBA by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Maybe I have a bad unit or something (though that would mean that many others with the same observation have as well), however in lighting in a house at nighttime it is unusable literally right underneath a 60W light. The only place where I've found it to be usable is in direct sunlight.

    3. Re:Hopefully with a better screen than the GBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can second that. At nighttime, the only places I enjoy playing are directly beneath a spot light (preferably halogen). Even sitting in the couch in my well lit living room doesn't do the job since the halogen spots are not directed straight at the sitting position. Same for playing while in bed. Also the add-on lights are almost worthless since you then see the reflection of the lamp in the display, rather than general illumination.
      The GBA is a nice unit, but the lack of a backlight is a huge let-down.
      BTW... I'm 30+ ;^).

    4. Re:Hopefully with a better screen than the GBA by neonstz · · Score: 1

      The real problem with the GBA screen was that the screen on the early developer version was much brighter. That's why those first games were so dark. In one issue of Game Developer Magazine one of the creators of Rayman Advance says that just a few days before the release they got a "real" GBA and was horrified because the game was too dark. Since the GBA has quite a limited video system, they had handtuned all the palettes, and now they had to change the palette to make it look OK.

      I've done a little bit of GBA coding myself, and to make images look fine I had to adjust the brightness a bit.

      (The GBA uses a 15 bit palette. Each sprite can be either 16 color or 256 color, where the data for 16-color sprites uses half the space and is therefore a good idea given the limited amount of sprite memory (32kb). For each sprite you can select between 16 different palettes. The GBA also has several layers of tiled backgrounds, where each layer can be either 256 or 16 color, and with 16-color tiles you can select the palette for each tile).

    5. Re:Hopefully with a better screen than the GBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife's grandmother (I suppose grandmother-in-law) is 70 and she loves her GameBoy.

  20. good maybe we'll get a better gba... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey if they backlight the thing maybe people will start to abandon and nintendo and they'll get their act together and release a usuable portable. currently the gba straight out of teh box is not even usable

    1. Re:good maybe we'll get a better gba... by alcmena · · Score: 2

      I wonder if these people will change their focuse when this is released. :)

    2. Re:good maybe we'll get a better gba... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you try hauling your fat ass out of bed when it's light and go outside?

  21. A Word of Caution by jxqvg · · Score: 1

    Before you Slashbots out there start droning away the thoughts of The Hive, just a word of caution: Don't scoff at the stuff Microsoft does(except maybe Bob ;) ). That'll only make them more likely to succeed. Take it ultimately as a serious threat to your freedom and respond to it as such.

  22. Apple's "big" announcement by garoush · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    In my humble opinion, I was expecting a very "big" announcement from Apple (Steve Jobs) today -- it looks like MS has, once again, taken over.

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
  23. this might be a dumb question by f00zbll · · Score: 4, Informative
    This may be risking the stamp of stupidity, but having read the article, it mentions the device would store everything on the internet on .NET servers.

    I don't know about other people's connectivity, but my cable modem connection is a bit flaky at times. Reguardless of how valuable or useful it may be, is Microsoft going to solve the problem bad ISP's? How is the average consumer going to know the cause is the ISP and not the device?

    The idea of a mobile computing device that acts as a game, computer and universal remote is pretty cool. High end audio, video, entertainment systems are similar though very expensive.

    Are people willing to reboot their DSL/Cable modem to get their universal remote to work, or will they pick up the other remote?

  24. Re:Sony? Sega? by Lacutis · · Score: 1

    "The GB audience is little kids. They know "Game Boy" better than anything MS puts out."

    I disagree about that.

    I'm getting to the point of being annoyed with people immediately saying "Nintendo == Kids".

    There are plenty of games that are just plain fun. Who cares what your friends think if you play a nintendo game if it's fun?

    I own a Gamecube, and a Gameboy Advance (That I bought because of the linking feature with the gamecube) and I don't regret it.

    I'm a 23 year old computer game enthusiast. I own Super Mario Kart advance, Super Mario advance, Doom, and even Monster Rancher advance.

    In short, if it's fun play it. If your worried about what your friends think, don't. But don't call it "kiddie" which really doesn't mean anything.

  25. Nintendo's Crown by zbuffered · · Score: 1

    I don't think that MS would have any serious trouble taking Nintendo's portable crown here. The GBA is, IMHO, several years behind the times. Remember the Sega portable? Now that was ahead of it's time. The color was great, and you could even get a TV adapter for it. If MS wanted to make a serious run at the GBA, I can all but guarantee victory. At least, it'll be a lot easier than the console market.

    --
    Synergy is your friend
    1. Re:Nintendo's Crown by Lacutis · · Score: 1

      GBA has a TV adapter with rumors of another company also making one.

      There is a review here:
      http://pocket.ign.com/news/40498.html

      And the homepage is here:
      http://www.gbatv.com/

    2. Re:Nintendo's Crown by Junta · · Score: 2

      You mention the Game Gear as an example of something that was more advanced than the Gameboy, and it very much failed, as did the Atari Lynx, Nomad, NeoGeo Pocket, and many other handheld systems, against the horrendously outdated Gameboy and Gameboy Color. Nintendo's tech may be behind the times, but in terms of games/battery life, they know what they are doing, and can easily push the units even if the units themselves are mostly pieces of crap. Judging by the X-Box standards of production, I doubt any handheld produced by MS will be efficient in terms of size nor power consumption. Though any offering they make may be mostly tecnologically superior, in all the ways that matter it will probably fall short.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Nintendo's Crown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what happened to the GameGear? Sometimes even great technology isn't enough.

      Microsoft would need a ton of great games and advertising, in addition to good technology to win. Pricing it the same as a GBA rather than a PDA would help immensely too. Everybody already knows about the GBA, has a GBA, and makes games for GBAs. Right now, if you want to get a portable, you have a choice between an established model with tons of supported games, or the technologically superior unknown with a couple of mediocre games.

  26. Wake up by Uttles · · Score: 2

    And join the rest of us here in the real world. Microsoft will never produce anything to take the "crown" away from Nintendo in the portable market. Also, GameCube, given 1 or maybe even 2 years to mature, will prove itself as the dominant game console. Anyone who's played the consoles knows this. Oh and no, playing PIKIMIN or whatever in a Wal-Mart doesn't count. I'm talking about comparing comparable games, like Madden or Crazy Taxi, both released on several systems.

    --

    ~ now you know
  27. Nintendo, never... by Tom7 · · Score: 2


    Nintendo owns the handheld market. The Game Boy has more games than any other system currently out (PS2 included), and has all of Nintendo's mascots. The GBA is cheap and has great games. (Nintendo made the most money of any video game publisher in 2000, too, even with the release of the PS2 and Dreamcast, all because of the Game Boy Color).
    I think the XBOX has a shot at taking the older gamers, but the handhend will remain Nintendo's for a long time.

  28. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is not the move of a monopolist. Microsoft is entering the handheld gaming space because:
    • It is an enormous source of potential revenue
    • The barrier to entry is very high, so new competitors will be few and far between
    • Their current competitors, in a word, suck
    They're exploring the area because they want to make money. Given that most of us are still running Windows 98, it is obvious that selling useless OS "upgrades" doesn't pay as well as it used to. So they need to redesign the company so as to recreate their former glory.
  29. Re:Sony? Sega? by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    I'm getting to the point of being annoyed with people immediately saying "Nintendo == Kids".

    I never said that Nintendo==Kids. I said that the audience that nintendo strives for for the gameboy is kids. I had an N64, and I think Nintendo has the best games ever (every game is fun, regardless of the title).

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  30. Re:I give up!!! by yatest5 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Or you could do something *really* radical, and just not buy this new MS console, rather than just posting the standard 'mummy, mummy, its not fair, MS have done something else bad' whiny-assed opinion.

    Jee-sus - if anything, this whole story is a fucking troll so the standard M$-h8ters can trot out the standard slashdot line. AGAIN!

    --
    • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
  31. Is there anything they are not making? by StarTux · · Score: 2

    Everywhere you look MSFT decide to make something for that arena, from handhelds to of course desktops.

    Only exception is Linux...

    Matt

  32. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As days goes, i read slashdot articles, their comments, about 1 hour a day.
    I am just amazed by the level of idiocy that this site and its contributors have reached.

  33. Size? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Given the size of the X-Box controller, will this be another controller that only works for people with hands the size of Andre the Giant's hands?

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:Size? by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      Given the size of the X-Box controller, will this be another controller that only works for people with hands the size of Andre the Giant's hands? I'm a pretty big guy (6'7 300+ lbs). I don't have small hands, and I can't even push the white button and the right trigger at the same time. Who DID they design these things for?

    2. Re:Size? by startled · · Score: 2

      Most of the people who bitch about the controllers:

      a) haven't used them, or

      b) have an issue with the white or black button.

      I absolutely love the controllers-- the triggers are so cool!-- and my hands are average size. What I hate about them, and everyone who's used them (or even developed for them) seems to agree, is that the white and black buttons are useless. Games aren't using them. Halo relegated the flashlight to one of them because it's not too important, and ignored the other one. Yes, those buttons suck. Other than that, though, the controllers are quite nice. I know plenty of people who prefer them over DualShock, not an easy feat.

  34. He who neglects to learn the lessons of history... by b.foster · · Score: 2, Funny
    Microsoft will never produce anything to take the "crown" away from Netscape in the browser market. Also, Navigator, given 1 or maybe even 2 years to mature, will prove itself as the dominant browser. Anyone who's surfed the web knows this. Oh and no, browsing MSN.com or whatever in a Wal-Mart doesn't count. I'm talking about comparing comparable sites, like Slashdot or Themes.org, both compatible with several browsers.

    Bill

  35. Yep, doesn't seem comparable by bbqBrain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The GBA has a beautiful (if dim) display, fantastic graphic capabilities for its size, runs on 2 AA batteries, and cost me $90. This vaporware device from MS isn't even close, and I don't think it's intended to be.

    I have to agree that it looks like an attempt to get into the PDA market. Honestly, I'm surprised it's taken MS this long to make a push for it. A device like this would be convenient, popular, and completely proprietary. One has to wonder if they're a bit late getting into the market, though. Most people who want a PDA already have one--except me. :-( And profit margins can't be too great with Visor units nearing the $100 mark. Then again, we know MS isn't always interested in short term profitability--not that they should be. If taking a loss for a couple years rewards them with 75% market share 3 or 4 years down the line, it's worth it. Witness IE--they provided it for free simply to blow the (admittedly poor) competition into oblivion. They've been >80% successful in this endeavor.

    Wait and see, wait and see, I s'pose...

    --

    One of the reasons that I became a lawyer was to avoid ever having to hire one. -SPYvSPY
    1. Re:Yep, doesn't seem comparable by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 1

      I have to agree that it looks like an attempt to get into the PDA market. Honestly, I'm surprised it's taken MS this long to make a push for it.

      Uhh, have you never heard of the Pocket PC? The Compaq IPAQ, the Cassiopia, the Jordana, or any of the other Pocket PC devices available on the market?

      --
      the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
    2. Re:Yep, doesn't seem comparable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your point is? In case you didn't realize, Microsoft does not manufacture any of the PDA's that you listed.

    3. Re:Yep, doesn't seem comparable by bbqBrain · · Score: 1

      Good point, but I don't think WinCE is exactly a counterpart to PalmOS. The devices you list generally suffer from poor power consumption (due in part to nifty color displays), too many features, and greater cost. And they've failed to grab significant market share, AFAIK. (Damn, if MS could get off the stupid, traditional Start button/desktop interface, they might have a better product on portable devices today.)

      --

      One of the reasons that I became a lawyer was to avoid ever having to hire one. -SPYvSPY
    4. Re:Yep, doesn't seem comparable by Esoteric+Moniker · · Score: 1

      Yes those currently run MS software but look at the primary manufacturers, Compaq and HP. Both these companies are investing in Linux (Compaq is admittedly doing the most on the PDA side.) What good does it do Compaq to rub shoulders with MS over a Linux distro for IPAQ if they don't see themselves getting a full blown PDA OS out of it?

      MS is going to jump on the bandwagon a few years late (ala GUIs, the Internet, Consoles, etc.) throw a truckload of money at it and hope to win, HP and Compaq have seen this before and they have to know it's coming, especially with MS's increased forays into the hardware biz. I'm sure both companies are looking for something that will let them stand on their own without MS holding them down/back/under.

      Just my $.02

      --

      man RTFM
      No manual entry for RTFM.
  36. Re:Sony? Sega? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Linux. I've also used Win2k, and the thing is plenty crashy on me. I've also used WinMe, and it's quality is, if anything, WORSE than Windows 95.

    I would find it hard to believe that no one else here has similar experiences - if anything, I would think that most of them would be similar to mine.

    I'm hardly a closed mind - in fact, as of late I've been considering my next box being a Mac. The simple fact is, however, that Microsoft is not only a monopoly, but a maker of horrid products. I would dare any person who thinks so highly of Microsoft now to consider the fact that, twenty years from now, there will be no one but Microsoft, and the same software that crashes on your desktop computer will also be in nuclear power plants, air traffic control systems, cars, and God knows what else. Would you really trust your children to be sitting in the back seat of a car with ROM chips that had Microsoft software burned into them?

  37. At least the screen will be better... by JoshMKiV · · Score: 1

    Unless they fall asleep at the wheel, the screen has to be better. My eyes almost fell out after a short time of playing with the GBA.

  38. Re:Sony? Sega? by yatest5 · · Score: 1

    I'm a 23 year old computer game enthusiast. I own Super Mario Kart advance, Super Mario advance, Doom, and even Monster Rancher advance.

    In short, if it's fun play it. If your worried about what your friends think, don't. But don't call it "kiddie" which really doesn't mean anything.


    Friends?

    --
    • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
  39. You mean the Game Gear? by Maul · · Score: 2

    By the Sega Portable, I assume you are referring to the "Game Gear."

    It wasn't ahead of its time in the least, seeing that it was almost the exact same thing as the Sega Master System, only smaller.

    The handheld system, IMO, that was ahead of its time was the Atari Lynx, as it was a 16-Bit handheld in the era of 16-Bit home consoles.
    Game Gear and Game Boy were both 8-Bit systems.

    Really, both the Game Gear and Lynx were superior
    to the original Game Boy in just about everything
    but battery life, but I'd say that only the Lynx
    was "ahead of its time."

    There was also a portable version of the Turbo
    Grafx 16, IMO... but I don't know much about it.
    I don't remember if it did have a backlit screen.

    Sega later did release the "Nomad," which was essentially the same as the Genesis and also the "Genesis CD-X" which was a console that combined
    the Genesis and Sega CD into one unit that was
    about the size of a portable music CD player for the day, only about twice as thick.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  40. sick and tired of MS by minusthink · · Score: 1

    First: I'm not antiMS. I really don't like windows, and I really don't like MS's business practices, but that doesn't mean that I think all their products are bad: I like their hardware, I like their games, I think IE is a good browser, etc. So don't take this as a blind antiMS rant.

    But I am absolutely sick of Microsoft expanding into so many territories. Why? Because they don't care about what they already produced.
    Windows, it has a huge reputation of being unstable, but MS doesn't really do anything about it being unstable. Since they have basically control over the desktop market, they really don't bother to care about the end user.
    Xbox, I have heard nothing but complaints about this thing. The 40% defunct rate, the horrible controllers. I remember hearing about how bad the controllers were from many different articles when Xbox was first debuted at E3 or wherever. And yet microsoft didn't care enough to change them.

    /shrug.

    I don't know. I'm done ranting.

    --
    "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    1. Re:sick and tired of MS by grapeape · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is this really any different than sony though? I mean sony first owned half the music industry, then the portable audio market and a good chunk of the home audio and video markets, Pc sales, and the playstation...and they have their own software developers too....sony is actually much bigger than MS but I never hear anyone screaming monopoly or unfair practice about them. Instead of whining why dont people just not buy the product and stop worrying about it, thats what I did no X-Box in my home...in fact after my dreamcast dies it will most likely be Game Over for the consoles in my life anyway.

  41. Re:Sony? Sega? by Lacutis · · Score: 1

    Yes, mine are fine how are yours?

    Link up Super Circuit brings back the days of the good old Super Mario Kart on SNES.

    On the Gamecube we have Super Smash Bros. Melee, arguably one of the best party games ever.

  42. Not too big on statistics, eh? by swisener · · Score: 1

    I saw three little kids in carts this weekend playing their GBAs and I think that shows that the GBA is really for younger kids.

    Yeah, I'm sure that's a representative sample. Man, the logic in these posts keeps getting wackier and wackier. Well, I was playing my GBA this weekend, and I think that shows that the GBA is really for 20 somethings.

    --Steven

    1. Re:Not too big on statistics, eh? by DrCode · · Score: 2

      And don't forget me, a 40-something. My comparison of GB and PC/Windows gaming:

      GB: Plop in cartridge, hit ON switch, and start playing about 3 seconds later.

      PC/Win98: Plop in CD. Wait 10 seconds. Click PLAY; wait another 30 seconds. Play 10 minutes; wait another 60 seconds while machine crashes and reboots.

  43. I was correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, I was correct the other day when I predicted Microsoft would skip software and start doing hardware.

    Ok, so I was modded down to zero :(

  44. What's in a name? by truffle · · Score: 1


    With a name liked "MediaPad" they will not be taking the handheld gaming market from GameBoy Advanced any time soon.

    What twelve year old kid is going to want to own a MediaPad?

    --

    ---
    I support spreading santorum
  45. capitulation by wonder · · Score: 1

    (sarcasm) This is what we do. We all just give up. We capitulate to microsoft universal rule. Every product everywhere shall be microsoft produced. Eliminate all competition for microsoft. Maybe then they will reach that ever-elusive goal of actually releasing a product to the market that works. (/sarcasm) ... oops.. seems the sarcasm section should have ended one sentence earlier...

  46. Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read this! by Odinson · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I believe Nintendo is about to recieve an ass wooping. Goodbye Mario, it was fun. Assuming that the there is only room for two consoles, Xbox will get the slot. Xbox has two things that Game cube dosn't. DVD playback capability, and an easy, low effort revenue stream for successful Win PC game makers. So how can Nintendo win? By making it a draw. Nintendo has a superior brand name recognition in this relm, which always wins in a draw.

    What could Microsofts weakness be? What do SONY and Microsoft have in common that Nintendo does not?

    Their first priority is to DRM and content control. Microsoft is betting on BIG deals with the RIAA and MPAA member companies. Put simply they can't piss them off.

    So what should Nintendo do? Simple. Modify the gamecube to play DVDs from any region. Make sure the DVD decoding is totally controled by one EASILY removable chip that is accessable by simply lifting a simple panel.

    Won't the MPAA sue? You bet they will and it will be great for Nintendo. When the MPAA sues Nintendo they should convert to region based chips to signify cooperation.

    This is a quadrupal win for Nintendo.

    • They get free advertising as the "hackers" console
    • They have an easily upgradable (to region free) chip
    • They have a referance chip to reverse engineer. If Nintendo does it right there will be a half dozen aftermarket upgrades in a month.
    • They have plausable deniability.
    Now the DVD argument is moot. And the vaster game base from Xbox is countered by a hassle free, region free, dvd player built into Game Cube. Kick in the name recognition and Nintendo can relax and watch Microsoft DRM itself out of existance.

    I'd buy a GameCube DVD, wouldn't you?

  47. MS Bob Advance by DeadBugs · · Score: 1

    Now if they can just make a screen that's not as reflecitve as the GBA screen so I can see what I am playing.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  48. Yet and again MS bloatware ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they post 2years before any announce to try to kill their opponents ....

    -AREAz.

  49. Breaking News by rhost89 · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft anonunced that it will 500,000 units avalible for the launch....."


    1 Mo later...


    Inital reports of the microsoft mobile gaming device is a success, they were all sold out within a 3 weeks of inital release, unfortunatly, 450,000 were returned as defective units

    --
    I will bend your mind with my spoon
  50. Nintendo IS selling them by alexhmit01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I dropped my $30 or so for Super Mario Advanced, which is a graphically improved Mario Brothers (yeah, the OLD arcade game that got rereleased on the NES later), and a slightly tweaked Super Mario Brothers 2.

    Super Mario Advanced is the same Mario Brothers game for multiplayer, with Super Mario World as the mario game.

    Mario Kart Advanced is a rerelease of the SNES Super Mario Kart.

    I bought Dragon Warrior I & II for the Game Boy Color (to play on my GBA), rereleases of the old NES games.

    The NES/SNES games are being rereleased for the GBC/GBA. Some GB (pre-color) are still on the market. I almost grabbed my first generation ones when visiting my folks, but figured I'd rather not sour their memory by replaying them. (Some NES/SNES games have had their memory ruinned for me by emulation)...

    Unlike other companys, Nintendo doesn't truly abandon software... they rerelease it for handhelds later on. I'm sure that the Game Boy Super Advanced will be 3D and have N64 ports, and the Game Boy Super Duper Advanced will have some Game Cube ports.

    Regardless, as another post set, the GBA is a great handheld for older gamers. It has 2D side-scrollers, RPGs, etc. All the games (and STYLE of games) that you loved on a NES/SNES are being released here, while the gaming market has moved on.

    My parents loved the Atari, and would play my NES while I was asleep and found it frustrating. They couldn't handle the finger twitching of the NES.

    I find that my Gamecube pushes my reflexes, and I doubt that I'll be able to keep up for much longer. When my kids are playing their systems 2 generations from now, I'm going to feel over the hill, while I did really well on my NES/SNES/SMS/S-Genny... N64 I was average, and now I'm over the hill.

    Oh well,
    Alex

    P.S. If you live in a city and commute on a subway... GBA is great.

    1. Re:Nintendo IS selling them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "P.S. If you live in a city and commute on a subway... GBA is great."

      So is my Palm IIIc. Just yesterday I was going somewhere on the local lightrail and noticed someone else with a Palm, so I beamed her a copy of an IR chess game, we played a few and exchanged phone numbers. A GBA is really a waste of money for anyone other than little kids. On my Palm I can do actual work when necessary.

  51. Ding by wbav · · Score: 2, Funny

    How will microsoft ever top the famous ding of the gameboy starting up? I mean, I've heard it so many times, it's music to my ears.

    Ding... Ahh.. I've had my fix for the day.

    --

    =================
    Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
  52. Ya, but price? by Magus311X · · Score: 1

    What about price? They said this will be larger than a Pocket PC, but smaller than a tablet PC.

    Pocket PCs are $500 still, and tablet PCs are expected to run up to $2000 a whack. What's this puppy going to cost you? $1000? Too much ... I think there's a 27" flat HDTV you can get for less than that now -- throw in a nice DVD player to make it an even G. That's also as much or less than your joe sixpack PC.

    This is also more than just a gaming device too.

    -----

  53. Nintendo & Microsoft have different interests by Vairon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I see no evidence that Nintendo is interested in anything other than TV and handheld game machines. They are not interested in DVD's, MP3's, the web or other multimedia/general computing unlike Microsoft. Granted, Microsoft has dipped it's feet in the game industry with the X-Box, but everyone who's reviewed it has something negative to say and with good reason.
    Microsoft focused on the fastest processor, most amount of memory, lots of storage (for caching and game saves) which is important in the computer market but not necessarily in the game market. Console Game players are interested in the playability/funness factor of a game over the graphics/specs of the game. Take Halo (Xbox) for example, it's nice looking and could be lots of fun, but it just screams for a mouse and keyboard. It needs lots of buttons (all the time) and it needs a FPS movement that only a mouse in "mouselook" mode can really deliver on. Where as if you look at Luigi's Mansion (GameCube) you use very few controls (all the time) and it's movement is very natural for a "gamepad" controller, it would not be natural for a keyboard and mouse. Microsoft's mistake is taking what they know about computers and trying to apply that to a console, whereas Nintendo has been in business since 1951 and started selling video games in 1971, in that tine they have learned a thing or two about making a fun, playable game. This is one market Microsoft will NOT dominate in.

  54. Nice troll. by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

    Nothing for end users? Used XP? It's great and very stable. It runs on my Thinkpad T23 I use for work that hasn't been turned off in 3 months. It finally blue screened the other day when Shockwave had a fight with the video driver (bad vid driver..way old driver). Try again. Not everyone still runs Win95.

    40% defunct rate on XBox? WTF?! There was a story the other day where less than 1% were defective. That's about right. They only shipped like 1.5 million of them. Bet you couldn't get them all perfect either.

    The idea of a company is to make money. That's it. It's not to make the world a happy place. If you don't like what they sell, don't buy. Sorry Slashdot, but people need money to pay bills and get food. I'd like to honestly know how many Slashdot posters are living on their parent's dime at college.

    1. Re:Nice troll. by minusthink · · Score: 1

      first, explain to me how I trolled. It seems to me that I expressed a viewpoint that was contrary to yours and you called troll.

      second, you make a good point, business exist to make money and not to care about the end user, and one way to make money is to have people perfer their product over competitors' (when they exist...) and how can they do that? By having a product that is easy to use by the end users.

      And yes, infact I've used XP quite a bit and it is a vast improvement over 98 or 2k, and it's what windows should have been in the first place or at least after 95.

      As I already stated, I don't hate Microsoft, but I do hate Windows. I primarily use linux because it gets the job done, however if Microsoft came out with XP instead of 95 or 98, I'd still be using that.

      --
      "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
  55. Hate to agree... by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

    I bought a Cube the day they came out and love it. I didn't buy an XBox because I didn't think they'd do well. Well, my wife got me one for Christmas and I LOVE IT. It just seems to be a better overall system than the Cube. I love Nintendo, remember many days playing my NES. I collect consoles and have almost every one ever made....

    But, the XBox is good. It does DVD. Almost every game supports widescreen. It has Dolby Digital sound. Why oh why does the Cube not do Dolby Digital? You haven't lived until you've played Halo with DD5.1. It uses it better than almost any movie....

  56. Re:Nintendo & Microsoft have different interes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You can use mouse and keyboard on PS2 games. I wonder why you can't do that on a n Xbox? Oh yeah, proprietary plugs on the front!

    Damn you Microsoft!

  57. Microsoft Media Pad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to ask if I can run my favorite Linus game, DOOM, on this.
    I have a beowulf cluster of them runnint niLux for my DOOM servers and I would like to play it now, portably, on the MS game cube compettitor.
    DOOM is a fun game in which you shoot evil monsters and humans. When you shoot the evil humans it is scary because they say, "Hey! Hey!". I can get over 30 fps when I run it on my beowulf clusters on which I run the Linus OS.

  58. This isn't flamebait by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    The article is pretty insiteful and true to boot.

    It's like the saying "That which doesn't kill us, makes us stronger". So yes, eaxh build gets better and better - Just because Nintendo has a brand name doesn't mean that a contender can't come in and make a name for themselves. Microsoft has come under fire and is watched under a magnifying glass now.

    Would this same article have appeared here id AOL/Time Warner were to come out with their own versions of a hand held?

    Sure, it's Microsoft, but I think the days of monopolistic methods by them are over - too many critics out there to pull any shenenagins again - I look forward to the competition coming up on handhelds - it's better for the consumer in the long term.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:This isn't flamebait by Gaijinator · · Score: 1

      We're talking about the portable gaming world, not the PC world. No company has ever usurped Nintendo's hold on the portable gaming world. Look at Atari and Sega, and dare I say it? Neo Geo Pocket! All of these failed because Nintendo has a huge array of games, and every new Game Boy is backwards compatible. I doubt even Billy G can stand against firepower like this.

      --
      "For success, it is essential you have Thunderball Fists." "I can have such a thing?" "That's right. Thunderball Fists."
  59. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the stuff about content control was amusing. Since when has that been an issue with consoles? Oh, he means from now on!! Speculation! We`ll see.

  60. Audience / Competition by stilwebm · · Score: 2

    Think about who plays the GBA right now. I see them mostly in the hands of kids between 7 and 12 years old. These kids are not going to care enough about the extra features Microsoft wants to have in this device. If Microsoft sells them at huge losses to compete with the $90 price of a GBA, they can do that. But even then, they will have to recover the cost somehow, which means game costs will be higher than the $20-40 for GBA games. Sure, some spoiled brats can afford that or whine enough to get their parents to buy it. But most parents are going to put their foot down. Older kids might steel some market share from Nintendo, but as it stands right now, Microsoft isn't likely to steal the portable audience from Nintendo.

  61. It's the same as Xbox vs. Gamecube: by haggar · · Score: 1

    The Xbox tends to be an enterteinment center, capable of doing games, DVD, Internet and more. The Gamecube does only games, but does them nicely.

    Same is with Mira vs. GBA. Mira tends to do many home-entertainment things. GBA is for playing.

    See? Same difference. I think Nintendo will do fine, for the time being.

    --
    Sigged!
  62. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by jmauro · · Score: 2

    Of course the collarilary to their "wins" would be that they would never be allowed to sell such a device (could never get the DVD licenses for a device with easily removable regioning), they would defeat their copy-protections measures which depends partly on only having those little disks, and people would contiunally break the panel and the easily removable chips pushing or fry the whole system with untrusted third party mod-chips which would push their support costs sky high. Yea great move. Nintendo has better things to do then completely tank the Gamecube. Besides who says the market cannot support three similar systems. None of the companies are bad finically like Sega was and all are determined to stay in the market. It may not of worked in the past but past performance of the market is no indication of future results. Or so says the SEC.

  63. For fuck's sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    According to Zdnet this thing is going to cost two grand. Yes unseat the GBA, my ass! Not until little johnny gets a 40 hour a week job.

    Editors, please read the article before making up absurd claims.

  64. sounds more than reasonable by davmct · · Score: 1

    If you've played the Quake port to the iPaq, you'd be wondering why this hasn't happened sooner. The graphics capability on the iPaq BLOWS the GBA away. Even with the GameShark, the GBA's screen is practically useless anywhere other than standing on the sun. Games, schmames. It's all in the development effort. If its easier to build games for XBox, the games will come. As that freaky voice guy said in Field of Dreams, 'If you build it, they will come'. If MS can one-up the GBA with better graphics capability, you'll be certain to see a catalogue of games grow behind it.
    I'm just waiting for MS to buy out Nintendo and port all of the games to X-Paq/XBox/XPad. Maybe Sega had the right idea all along...

  65. Market recognition. by billcopc · · Score: 2

    I think the big problem with this idea is that anyone who thinks of portable gaming will immediately think "Gameboy", even the old folks, because that's been the standard since 1985 and it's still going today. Market recognition is a huge factor in this.

    As a little anecdote, I walked into a Future Shop yesterday with a buddy to buy his PS2. This guy doesn't follow the news much, but still he loves games and rents stuff all the time. Well this 'buddy' thought the XBox was compatible with both PS2 and GCN software.. why ? because that's what he heard from his idiot coworkers and friends, and there was little or no media coverage to bring light on the new console.

    We see PS2 ads all over the place : TV, movie theatres, and they have large displays in most stores. The Gamecube might not need that much publicity, since Nintendo is an established household name wherever kids are to be found, going hand-in-hand with Pokemon. But Microsoft ? We know M$, but does my mother-in-law know M$ ? Hell no, she probably thinks Windows _IS_ the computer, and that it's made by Dell or Compaq. Why does she not understand this ? Because you don't see many Microsoft products at Mallwart, Costco or any other non-PC store. Gates' company may very well be a cornerstone of modern computing, but outside that realm they are the new kid on the block for every other market segment.

    That's why they have no chance of dethroning Nintendo, not today.. perhaps in ten or fifteen years.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Market recognition. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the Gameboy came out around '89, not '85

      /Mikael Jacobson

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  66. XBOY? by macpeep · · Score: 2

    This doesn't sound like the XBOY, of which there have been some rumors circulating for about a year now. This sounds bigger.. But the way the Slashdot article puts it "GBA competitor".. I don't know. The original ZDNet article makes it sound more like a super powered remote control or PDA - not a handheld game console..

  67. Robber Barons and Anti-trust Laws by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I am ever so reminded of the "Robber Barons" of the late 1800s. They were not brought under control until the Anti-trust legislation introduced during the 1910 - 1920 period.

    At this rate, we'll need another dozen years or so before appropriate legislation is forthcoming. Bill Gates as the Rockerfeller of the Desktop is not a pleasant a picture as some would like. And yet there are many who are sentimental and nostalgic for those times, which were not bad if you were upperclass.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  68. Hmm by Cloud+K · · Score: 2
    the question is can they take the crown from Nintendo

    If they give it a backlit screen.... yes :p
  69. Oh goodness... by Uttles · · Score: 2

    Yes, that was funny. Yes, IE is dominant, but Netscape is still around. No, that was not relevant, in any way, to the discussion about game consoles.

    --

    ~ now you know
  70. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by Ewan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nintendo has already sold several million gamecubes both in the USA and Asia, the launch sales alone have ensures that Nintendo will do well from the cube.

    Why on earth would nintendo redo the cube from the start to include DVD playback (everything from a new box up), bringing with it the rampant piracy problems the ps1 did suffer from the and ps2 is starting to have.

    Nintendo need only one thing to carry on doing well for years to come - games, and they make great ones at nice profit margins for them.

    Microsoft are spending $500Million at marketing the X-Box? Sony are still out-selling them today with the 18month old PS2 selling at the same pricepoint as X-box, and the Gamecube is outselling it worldwide too im sure since Nintendo successfully carried out a launch in both Asia and the USA when Microsoft obviously hasn't heard of other continents yet.

    People forget the largest computer games market in the world is Japan, and there the X-box hasn't made a scratch yet. It will be 2 years or more before anyone knows the real winners in this round of the console wars, but right now the winner is Sony - profitable with PS2, everything from this point onwards is just extra cash for them. Whether Microsoft managed to scrape back the initial outlay they have done is probable, but not a certainty.

  71. (s core: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "The barrier to entry is very high, so new competitors will be few and far between"

    What about Indrema?
    (see subject of this post)

  72. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading the comments, it seems only a handful of people really read beyond the headline and found that MS is making a more 'all in one unit' for TV/Internet (their whole strive lately) which seems to be more PDA then anything else. My Visor plays games, that make it a GBA competitor? Not really...

    Make sure you click on the articles and /. should stop using the 'attention grabbing' headlines and be a little more subjective and on target sometimes. It's the difference between reading the New York Times to the Post, or the Boston Globe compared to the Herald.

    Also people would take the /. MS bashing more seriously if there wasn't 100% anti MS articles day in and day out, a lot of them misleading.
    I hate MS like many people, but there's enough bad things they do/want to do, that if you embelish everything, its the same as crying wolf...

  73. Re:Sony? Sega? by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

    I have tried Win2K, it took several hours to install, due to it freezing randomly while trying to load drivers for every piece of PC hardware in existence (so it seemed anyway) and then was massively unstable whenever I tried to use it, ending up with me installing Win98 back over it. My machine is a stock PIII-500, bought at the end of 1999, without any esoteric hardware at all, and after the hassles I had and the financial loss of buying said junk and it being useless to me I refuse ever to give Microsoft my money again.

    --
    Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  74. Re:Sony? Sega? by eyeball · · Score: 1

    agreed on all points.

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  75. Re:He who neglects to learn the lessons of history by gilly_gize · · Score: 1

    And Microsoft is releasing this handheld for free? Or giving it away with every copy of Windows?

    Neglecting the lessons of history is one thing, but learning the difference between history and the present is also important.

  76. Way to get maximum mileage out of one post by jslag · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Way to get maximum mileage out of one post by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      read my journal, I even point it out myself.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:Way to get maximum mileage out of one post by nirvdrum · · Score: 1

      And all these anti-MS posts are basically the same thing, just different people posting.

      --
      If there was a "-1 Not Funny", that'd be my most used mod.
  77. Re:Sony? Sega? by sparkyz · · Score: 1

    I think there is an argument to be made that having a de facto monopoly and engaging in monopolistic (read unreasonable) business practices are not always the same thing. And I don't expect the monopolistic business practices, such as they are to go away any time soon. Although, I'll agree with you that trying to open new markets is not necessarily a monopolistic business practice; and it's also true that even if they deserved it, MS probably will not ever get a fair shake here on /.

    I do agree that the last few iterations of commercial varieties of Windows have made massive strides in reliability. Of course, the security is pretty bad as is demonstrated about every few days.

    Netscape on Linux, yeah, that's been disappointing since the days of 3.0; but Konqueror and Opera both run very nicely and Opera is downright fast.

    --
    Oops
  78. Re:FSTFUKP! by AsylumWraith · · Score: 0, Troll

    There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    My First Post is my best friend.
    It is my reason for having a login.
    I must master it, as I must master my login.
    Without me my First Post is useless.
    Without my First Post, I am useless.
    I must post my First Post quickly.
    I must post faster than Anonymous Cowards who are trying to humiliate me.
    I must post quickly before he First Posts ahead of me.
    I will.
    Before God I swear this creed.
    My First Post and myself are defenders of Slashdot.
    We are the masters of Anonymous Cowards.
    We are the saviours of my login.
    So be it... until there are no Anonymous Cowards... but peace.
    Amen.

    ----------
    Copyright © 2002 - Tasty Beef Jerky
    This post is free for use so long as it is posted anonymously.
    ----------

  79. Secure windows? user-friendly linux? by Hooya · · Score: 2, Insightful
    win XP != win 1.0 so your comparisons to linux 1.0 is quite lame. if you are telling me that winXP is infact a new windows alltogether, what does that say about forking? unlike linux 1.0, windowsXP is, say, windows 6.0 (NT4.0, win2000 (5.0), XP(6.0)). compare that to a more recent kernel and the comparison makes more sense.

    Second, win2000 does crash. My wife crashed it last night with just a single instance of realplayer running. Granted it didn't 'blue screen' but accepting no input and just plain freezing is not quite the advancement in stability you talk about. I will concede that MS has done better with 2000 and I assume with XP as well. But guess what? So has linux. Linux bashers used it 1-2 years ago and they still cry 'no-user-friendly-apps'. Guess what? Linux has evolved faster than anything out there including windows. You talked about Netscape and Mozilla... Ever tried Galeon? Konqueror (in it's new incarnation) ? Just as windows has evolved to be more 'stable' (as you say), Linux has just gotten better. Try evolution..., galeon..., staroffice...

    And yes I dual boot to win2000. Actually, I have it on my laptop. The last time I used it was quite a while ago. Why? well, I can't get a lot of features in IE that i get in galeon. Tabbed-view. Bookmark-management..

    You are right, Linux proponents can't always use "it's more stable" arguement to the same affect as before. But Linux is still a lot more stable. Windows is just catching up. And on the flip side, Windows-proponents can't use the "It's non use-friendly" arguement anymore. In fact, everytime i boot to windows, i feel boxed-in with the lack of tools and options that i boot right back to linux. you should give a recent distribution a try. you'll be surprized.

    1. Re:Secure windows? user-friendly linux? by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      So has linux. Linux bashers used it 1-2 years ago and they still cry 'no-user-friendly-apps'. Guess what? Linux has evolved faster than anything out there including windows. You talked about Netscape and Mozilla... Ever tried Galeon? Konqueror (in it's new incarnation) ? Just as windows has evolved to be more 'stable' (as you say), Linux has just gotten better. Try evolution..., galeon..., staroffice... And yes I dual boot to win2000. Actually, I have it on my laptop. The last time I used it was quite a while ago. Why? well, I can't get a lot of features in IE that i get in galeon. Tabbed-view. Bookmark-management..

      I have, in no way, said that linux was poor, or bash linux. I run SuSE 7.2 at home (along with WinME and Win2K). They each are great in different things. I just hate the attitude about MS lately, which I point out in my parent post. If windows opened up their source on everything right now, this community would still find a way to bash them...

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:Secure windows? user-friendly linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should try XP you'll be surprised. No crashing anymore. You also just cannot compare the polish of Xp to suse mandrake et al.
      Your arguement about IE just silly. Use moz or opera if you don't like IE. Of course you can still use staroffice, gimp, etc.
      At this point, MS monopoly nonwithstanding, makes a more stable easier to user desktop.

    3. Re:Secure windows? user-friendly linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean. Everytime I use windows I feel frustrated from the lack of power...
      it makes me feel like I'm locked in a padded room with a start button, and I impotently call up a msdos console before i remember that even in the supposedly more advanced win2000 the command line is still pathetic.
      I could never go back to Windows. Linux is amazing with all the tools and stuff that come on the cd or you can download really easily in .rpm.

  80. Re:Sony? Sega? by foobar104 · · Score: 2

    (This is so off-topic it's silly. But I'm posting it anyway.)

    The simple fact is, however, that Microsoft is not only a monopoly, but a maker of horrid products.

    I agree that their products are pretty unpleasant-- ugly, clumsy, tasteless-- but I think the quality argument is getting weaker and weaker across the board.

    I've been using a Windows 2000 system on my desk at work for over a year. The OS has never crashed in that time.

    I own an iBook that I've had since September. I've been running OS X on it since that time, and it hasn't crashed on me, either.

    I also have a dual-processor G4 at work. It's never crashed, either.

    It's not all that hard to find a Windows or a Mac OS computer these days that has never crashed. The classic argument for Linux-- it doesn't crash-- isn't a very strong one these days.

    In fact, in my world, Linux is less reliable than Windows 2000 or OS X. I spent several hours last week debugging a USB problem on one of my coworker's workstations. Whenever he plugged in his USB-serial adapter, the machine would kernel panic. Turns out some driver modules were loading in the wrong order. Yes, it's good that I had everything I needed to fix it myself. But it's bad that I had to.

    I'm not trashing Linux in particular; I'm just saying that PC-class software quality overall has improved dramatically in the past two years. I think Linux advocates are going to need a new killer argument.

  81. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    "Xbox has two things that Game cube dosn't. DVD playback capability,"

    Customers that want DVD playback capability as well as GameCube games can get the Panasonic Q. And like the PS2 (and UNLIKE the XBox), it will play DVDs out of the box.

    "and an easy, low effort revenue stream for successful Win PC game makers."

    As has been repeated ad nauseum, there is no such thing as an easy way to transition from PC to console game writing. No patches, no add-ons, no expansion packs, not even a real operating system. Making a dent in the console world requires a different philosophy than in the PC world. Once a game is released, it had better be self-contained and done.

    Besides, how many PC gamers do you know of that, if given the chance, would buy an Xbox and however many games instead of a shiny new PC?

  82. The MS Monopoly Dream by SlashRaid · · Score: 1

    Some day MS will have control over your PC, TV, Game Console, Remote, Handheld, Frig, Toaster, Oven, Car, toys, and much more.

    Microsoft continues it's monopolistic ways by developing new technologies that they themselves may not make, but what will run it? The OS.

    So many people still continue to over look this nightmare while Microsoft's tentacles continue to plunge into new areas feeding a machine that may never be over powered.

    I don't understand how some folks can set back and say that we are just flaming MS. This is truly something that should scare anyone. Not only as a consumer, but a human.

    Just think, this may be some what OT, but how much of our information is passed through Microsoft software. One company in the world that in some way touches your life, whether you like it our not.

    I look at it as a cause. I'll use Linux, play my PS2, and maybe this weekend buy a GBA.

    --
    God Moving Over the Face of Waters
    1. Re:The MS Monopoly Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The proper abbreviation for 'refridgerator' is 'fridge' not 'frig.'

      Thank you for playing the Slashdot game. You didn't win this time, try again!

    2. Re:The MS Monopoly Dream by SlashRaid · · Score: 1

      The proper abbreviation for Anonymous Coward is pussy.

      --
      God Moving Over the Face of Waters
  83. Any screenshots? by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    What does BSOD look like on a 2" LCD?

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    1. Re:Any screenshots? by damiam · · Score: 2
      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:Any screenshots? by rxs · · Score: 1

      Actually, considering it'll be a console machine from Microsoft, you should be asking about the Green Screen of Death. ;)

      --



      ---
      I could've sworn I disabled .sig viewing. . .
  84. Re: Your .sig by GTRacer · · Score: 2
    Do you want Linux on every desktop?
    Isn't that a monopoly?
    Think about what you wish for...

    No, that isn't what *I* wish for. Neither do I want M$ on every desktop. I simply want a software market free of underhanded manipulation. I want to buy a PC with either (or neither) OS without wondering what signed-in-blood contracts MS may have or had with the OEM's

    I want a market where the competition truly is on quality, not who can throw the largest bribes around.

    I've said before in many posts I happen to like Microsoft's products. Just not their practices.

    GTRacer
    - Think you're in shape? Try DDR on Catastrophic...

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  85. While we're on the subject... by John+Harrison · · Score: 2
    Would someone please explain to me why Palm didn't include left/right buttons along with the up/down ones? Or even just a direction pad?

    I am not saying that a Palm could be competion to a GBA, but they could have easily given a nod to the gaming market and it wouldn't have hurt it in any way that I can see.

    Yes I know that you can use the other buttons, but that is really a sloppy solution to a simple problem.

  86. More of a PDA by hether · · Score: 1

    The device seems to be more of a PDA to rival the Palm and others than a rival to the Gameboy. Its primary focus is not gameplay. Even MS themselves says in the article:

    As such, Mira would mirror many functions of personal digital assistants (PDAs), such as devices based on Microsoft's Pocket PC operating sytem.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  87. What to call it? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Hmmm.. a noisy hand held device that remotely talks to my computer. Yep, if i get one I'm calling it Ziggy.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:What to call it? by nyquil · · Score: 1

      ahh, Quantum Leap reference, nice.

    2. Re:What to call it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The computer was Ziggy, the noisy hand held device was a handlink. :)

    3. Re:What to call it? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      I think you bring up an interesting point. Is the hand-link just a terminal, or is it an integral part of Ziggy? For example, when Al smacks it, it cries. Is that Ziggy complaining about abuse of the hand-link?

      I'm not asking for the sake of settling some Quantum Leap trivia, I'm asking because I do believe this Mira device relates to what the question I just asked. If an interface device has the ability to perform other tasks, can it be considered a seperate device and get it's own name?

      I realize it's not a critical issue, but I do see a day where it's not uncommon for my watch to act as an interface to other devices. So I just thought it'd be an interesting question to ask.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  88. Re:Sony? Sega? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I'm fed up of random lusers from the interent calling Windows 2000/XP "reliable". They don't know the meaning of the word, it seems. All these people coming out of the woodwork saying "Windows == reliable" smacks of an astroturfing campaign. My personal experience suggests that Windows XP is NOT comaprably reliable to Linux or a BSD.

  89. DVD playback capability is not a major factor by hether · · Score: 1

    With the $100 price difference between the Cube and the xbox, we were able to buy a DVD player in addition to our Cube and still rack up a total price of less than the xbox alone would have cost. Not to mention that to some gamers (or their parents) $200 seems a lot more reasonable than $300 - for a system without games. In addition, many people had DVD players before the purchased a game system, meaning they don't even need to use the DVD playback option on their game systems.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  90. Why would it be a surprise? by mikethegeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Though this device appears to be more of a PDA than a game machine, it makes sense from MS's pov to come out with sich a thing.

    I'm betting a version of this, configured more as a game handheld will follow.

    Microsoft's domination of the software industry depends on their being able to cut off the "air supply" of compeditors. Leaving the handheld market to Nintendo gives them revenue that they can use to fund their competition (game cube) to the MS X Box.

    It's just an application of MS's playbook in the PC industry. This is why MS makes Mac apps, since people DO use Macs, they MUST have them using MS Office, not another app that might end up ported to `Doze and compete.

    This is why MS is fighting Linux tooth and nail. They can't afford it getting too large, so that it's a big enough market to fund non-MS app software development.

    --
    === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
    1. Re:Why would it be a surprise? by BagMan2 · · Score: 1

      yup, I agree, but then again, isn't that what capitalism is all about? You act as if there is something immoral about this strategy.

    2. Re:Why would it be a surprise? by mikethegeek · · Score: 2

      " yup, I agree, but then again, isn't that what capitalism is all about? You act as if there is something immoral about this strategy."

      I'm all for capitalism. It's the only form of economy that is democratic. However, when you have a monopoly, or a company that controls so much marketsare as to be able to stifle ALL competition which Microsoft is, that isn't capitalism.

      MS's business model basically leverages it's control of one market to take over the next. It involves entering compeditor's markets to cut off their oxygen supply to keep them out of MS's markets.

      The only reason why Linux and OSS have been able to make inroads against MS is that by and large, they don't depend on the "classic" corporate business model. OSS can't be bought and shut down. Microsoft could never own Linux even if they bought every Linux company in existance, nor would Linux die if all Linux businesses went under. It's almost as if "evolution" created by necessity the only possible "animal" that can survive Microsoft.

      Though this machine looks like more of a PDA than a portable game machine, it certainly has outstanding capabilities in that area. It's a nice little machine. I'm certain, now that they've made the plunge into the game console market, that handhelds will be next.

      However, I'm betting this particular product is meant to help reverse MS's to date failure to crush Palm based PDA's dominence.

      --
      === The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
    3. Re:Why would it be a surprise? by BagMan2 · · Score: 1

      You argument almost makes my point. Nintendo has a virtual monopoly on hand-held games, and palm-os a virtual monopoly on PDA's. In these cases, Microsoft is actually the good guy, trying to break up other people's monopolies. If they do this to try and prevent Nintendo and Palm from moving into other markets that Microsoft competes in (or dominates), then so be it...again, this seems perfectly fair to me.

  91. eBook? by skroz · · Score: 2

    I wonder if the device will sport a version of the Microsoft eBook reader. The REB-1100 is nice for portability, but the .rb format is not common. It would be nice to have a portable device that could read eBooks in a more common (though microsoft) format.

    --
    -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
  92. Don't rag on Bob! by Monte · · Score: 1

    Don't scoff at the stuff Microsoft does(except maybe Bob ;) )

    Hey, now - I liked Bob! It was the best damned screensaver ever for Windows!

  93. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by anon757 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like conspiracy to commit fraud against the MPAA, or conspiracy to circumvent the DMCA to me.
    I think a better plan would be to get more games that appeal to a wider range of people, & don't charge an arm and a leg for them.

  94. GBA competitor? How? by Torp · · Score: 1

    So they launch something that's *tied to* the xbox, that's just a terminal for the xbox, and that doesn't fit in a pocket (or so the zdnet article says), and it's a 'GBA competitor'? Perhaps people could read the articles before posting them, and before commenting on them?

    --
    I apologize for the lack of a signature.
  95. Re:Sony? Sega? by foobar104 · · Score: 2

    Personally, I'm fed up of random lusers from the interent....

    Coming from an AC, that statement seems to lack a certain credibility....

  96. Yes, but the graphics chip is Nintendo by yerricde · · Score: 2, Informative

    Intel got exclusive rights to StrongARM

    Nintendo got exclusive rights to Atlantis

    since GBA is just a ARM7 + custom sound off the APB

    Wrong. The GBA programming model includes a 16.78 MHz ARM7TDMI, plus custom chips that do DMA (that is, hardware-accelerated memcpy()), legacy tone generation, sound FIFOing, pulse-width modulation, and background and sprite scrolling, scaling, and rotation. (Read More...)

    different enough that nitendo cant sue and developers have to recompile but easy enought that you could have a compiler switch do all the work

    Sorry, it's not as easy as a recompile of a program that uses the Allegro library. The graphics subsystems may be too different. AFAIK, Windows CE devices use only a dumb frame buffer; GBA has six modes, three character graphics modes (some include affine mapping) with up to 128 sprites on top, and three framebuffer modes with up to 128 sprites on top.

    (except the sound and that could be redone easy enough)

    Heck, Nintendo even calls the GBA's FIFO-based sound system "Direct Sound," no relation to Microsoft's DirectSound.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  97. Sony? by ganiman · · Score: 0

    I don't care if the X-Box has more heavy duty hardware, the truth is, PS2 has more/better games that have the same graphic detail (not to mention that the X-Box controller is horrible). So when is Sony going to enter the handheld gaming market and take that over too? I mean, this past Christmas, Sony still beat Microsoft and Nintendo in sales, and this was the second Christmas their console was out.

    --
    geek n performer who performs morbid or disgusting acts, as biting off the head of a live chicken
  98. Am I the only one that's thrilled? by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 1

    I have been waiting for two years for a rechargable color pocket pc that does MP3 & "real" games. That's everything. Those are all the "killer apps" I need for a portable (assuming 6gb+ of storage) Hell, make it a phone as well, and I'm in heaven. One device to rule them all!

  99. nailing the coffin with a buckload of errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > After seeing their latest offerings (the N64 and
    > Gamecube) lose money hand over fist, Nintendo
    > finally learned that their core competency was in
    > creating mediocre handheld gaming systems,

    First: Gamecube came RIGHT AFTER Game Boy Advance.
    Gamecube was announced BY SURPRISE when

    > and blaming a dearth of features on the
    > "compromises" they needed to make in order to
    > accomodate the handheld form factor. This
    > strategy worked very well... until now.

    Well, the strategy worked well because the console
    market wants spectacular videogames at the smallest
    cost possible. PSX won in Italy because of piracy
    and everywhere else because it costed the 50% of Dreamcast, and original games were those 20$ less
    and 10x full of videos of N64 ones.

    Game Boy Advance won against Wonderswan and Neo Geo
    Pocket also for these reasons (not counting SNK going out of business).

    > Sega couldn't beat them with a color unit, and
    > many others tried and failed to emulate the
    > success of the Game Boy.

    > Unfortunately, Nintendo's poor business sense and
    > lack of R&D has finally caught up to them.

    Plain Wrong. Pokemon and Zelda 64, and all those
    freaking mario fans that will never go away are
    the bucking symbol that Nintendo is plentiful of
    business sense. Also that Sega choose Game Cube as another platform to release videogames (instead of going totally XBox) and another conversion of Phantasy Star Online shows that Nintendo is plenty of business sense. And for what regards R&D, Rogue Squadron is a more impressive game than anyone that could possibly run on my Athlon 1400 + Radeon 64Mb (remember: Radeon's core is Gamecube graphic's core).

    > They are fighting an 800-lb gorilla that has
    > billion$ of dollars to spend on dominating every > area of the market that it enters. And it looks
    > like Microsoft is about to release a very
    > versatile, multipurpose handheld device that will
    > blow all of Nintendo's offerings right out of the
    > water.

    Until the same old boring .vbs macro virus goes and infects all the Microsoft media pads scattered around the nations...

  100. Re:Sony? Sega? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Link up Super Circuit brings back the days of the good old Super Mario Kart on SNES.

    And some of the bugs in both implementation and specification.

    On the Gamecube we have Super Smash Bros. Melee

    I agree that SSB2 is the best thing since SSB1 (the Mario Party games suck eggs), but unlocking half the hidden stuff requires unlocking all the hidden characters, and one of the characters requires playing 1,000 Vs. matches at 5 minutes a piece. Is this just a way to get players to buy more controllers when they wear out?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  101. what a load of bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get over this dvd playback thing.. anyone that has money to waste on consoles and console games will be much happier to buy an actual dvd player. They are so cheap and they are made just for that purpose.

  102. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by kingtut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd buy a plain old GameCube too, and already have. A surprising number of people don't give a rat's ass about DVD on a game console. Nintendo is still doing what it has always done, build a solid gaming console. Nintendo knows their market and caters to them.

  103. Re:Sony? Sega? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh-huh. So you have parties where you sit around and play video games? Interesting. And to think all of this time I've been going to parties where we socialize with nice young ladies, play billiards and drink. Next time I'm gonna break out the video games and we can really get wild!

  104. Yeah, easy by eples · · Score: 1

    the question is, can they take the crown from Nintendo?

    Yeah, easy - just build a color screen you can play without a light.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  105. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by BagMan2 · · Score: 1

    region free is marginally useful for those who live in the United States. Most movies come out first in the USA anyways and are reasonably cheap.

  106. Why am I wasting Karma replying to this Flamebait? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    So what should Nintendo do? Simple. Modify the
    gamecube to play DVDs from any region. Make sure
    the DVD decoding is totally controled by one
    EASILY removable chip that is accessable by simply
    lifting a simple panel.


    How is this simple? What you're suggesting would require a COMPLETE redesign of the Cube hardware.

    That's a nice little pipe dream you have there, but it's not going to happen. If you want a DVD player, buy a DVD player. Don't expect Nintendo to spend millions on R&D for a Gamecube 2.0 and risk making an enemy of Big Media just so you don't have to spend $200 for a separate DVD unit at Best Buy.

  107. You too can be a GBA developer by yerricde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While Nintendo currently have the hand-held crown it stopped accepting developers for the GBA a long time ago claiming that 400 was enough. From the handful of decent titles I'd guess it isn't.

    Just because you can't sign up for Wario World (Nintendo's official developer support program) doesn't mean you can't develop GBA games and get published with one of the Tier-B publishers. If you want to get into GBA development, get yourself VisualBoyAdvance and GCC targeted for ARM7TDMI and start hacking. Then you can try your games on hardware with an MBV2 cable or Flash Advance Linker from Lik-Sang

    Like the GBA it would almost certainly use an ARM chip as that's the only supported processor for Windows 'CE' 2002.

    ARM or MIPS or PowerPC or x86 makes little difference compared to the graphics chip. Nintendo's GBA supports up to 128 sprites on top of four layers of scrolling, two layers of scrolling and one layer of rotation, two layers of rotation, or a bitmap. IIRC, Windows CE devices have only a bitmap and no hardware sprites, not even one for a mouse pointer because most of them are pen-based.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:You too can be a GBA developer by kesuki · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is that should you actually try to "sell" the game you'll be in for a legal battle with the Big-N. You need to be licensed to sell games for any videogame console. The reason for this is that you have to pay license fees for each game sold.
      However if you want to release agame under the GPL there isn't anything nintendo can do to you. There is of course a third option. Often times companies like konami will release a game from another smaller developer using thier brand. While this in effect means you've got two middle men, companies that can't otherwise sell legitimate gameboy advance games can use this method.
      Usually this is most benificial for popular japanese rpg developers that make a great game but have no presence in america.

    2. Re:You too can be a GBA developer by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      Can you explain the legal basis as to why you have to be licensed? As far as I understood, that was part of the contract you sign to get the developer kit. No contract, no requiremen. Am I correct?

    3. Re:You too can be a GBA developer by benjymous · · Score: 1

      The big problem is that for a game to boot up on a GBA, the ROM has to have the correct header information, which includes code copyrighted by Nintendo (part of which is the NINTENDO logo that appears when you turn on the GBA with a kart in)

      You can't produce a working game without including this game, and if you do without licence, you risk the chance of being sued for copyright infringement

      Of course other companies have got away with it in the past (Often being sued by one of the big console firms) but afaik, the law has always come out in favour of the games developer, not the hardware manufacturer

      --
      Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
  108. Bad Reporting by Docrates · · Score: 2

    How do you go from:

    serve as a portable game player in conjunction with Microsoft's Xbox video game console.

    to:

    Nintendo will have a competition in the handheld market soon.

    Even when you read the article, it is pretty clear that this device is more a tablet PC than a portable gaming system. Comparing the media pad to the GBA is like comparing my desktop PC to my PS2, it just doesn't make sense. And they don't compete with each other either.

    The media pad will have to be coupled with the Xbox in order to function as a gaming system, and even that won't be its intended target. They plan to use it to provide some PDA functions and add functionality to interactive TV apps and other weird things.

    --

    There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
  109. Re:Sony? Sega? by Jurisenpai · · Score: 1

    For the past few months, I've been alternately using Win2K and Redhat 7.2 on my Thinkpad A20m. After upgrading my Win partition from 98 to 2K, I will say that I have experienced much greater stability with 2K. However, the installation process was horrific, and Win2K did not detect my ethernet card or my modem during installation. Redhat 7.1, which I had installed a bit earlier, detected my ethernet card during the installation process, and I was easily able to install a patch for my winmodem. Today, my 2K partition still does not recognize my modem, despite many hours of struggle with drivers. I gladly use linux for my day-to-day work online and use Opera for crash-free browsing. I have given Win2K much of my time and given it a fair chance; I do not use it often because it is just not as good as linux, not because I have some unsubstantiated anti-MS bias.

    And for the record, I've spent lots of time playing SSX Tricky with my brother on his Game Cube, and I've fallen in love with Nintendo all over again. I never had a Game Boy as a kid, but am seriously contemplating getting a GBA when I can spare the cash. It's just a great system for people of any age.

    --
    "Equal bytes for women!"
  110. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by Glonk · · Score: 1

    Microsoft are spending $500Million at marketing the X-Box? Sony are still out-selling them today with the 18month old PS2 selling at the same pricepoint as X-box, and the Gamecube is outselling it worldwide too im sure since Nintendo successfully carried out a launch in both Asia and the USA when Microsoft obviously hasn't heard of other continents yet.
    The PS2 will always be #1 this round, it's got such a head start and massive game library it'd be impossible to say otherwise.

    However, you say the Gamecube is selling it worldwide: Is that really fair? Xbox isn't available outside North America. Where the Xbox and Gamecube and PS2 compete, the most up to date numbers are:
    PS2: 6.6 Million
    Xbox: 1.3 Million
    Gamecube: 1.2 Million

  111. No One Cares... by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

    Microsoft will demonstrate on Monday a tablet-shaped device that will serve as a bridge between the TV, the PC and the company's .Net services, according to sources familiar with the plans. These sources also say that no one will care, as everyone is watching theMacworld Keynote after Sunday's press leak of the new iMac.

    --Dan

  112. GBA development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just got a GBA. I'm 25. I don't care what anyone says about it being for kids(sure most games are for kids) Tony hawk 2 is damn good, so is Golden Sun,etc. $99 and I can get a flash linker to download 64 megs worth of games or CODE I'VE WRITTEN(using free tools off the net)Hmmm. Just being able to carry around a portable that I can write games/code for is worth the money alone. Now, the only thing I want is for someone to write some PDA software for it. Lets see. $400 for compaq ipaq/ hp jornada or whatever with a color screen. for less than half the cost, you can have a kickass portable game system with the potential to develop your own applications, games,etc.

  113. Master of none but with extra advertising by RobPiano · · Score: 1

    I have some problems with device.
    It simply does too much! Its a cross between one of the expensive LCD remotes, a palm pilot, xbox control, a gameboy advance, and shopping kit all in one.

    This device is going to be similar to windows media player. If you want to do anything you'll have to wade through an advertisment. Why is this a problem? Well I've already paid for my media, why do I have to pay to watch it again? Not to mention the fact that many bugs are introduced by quirky internet response and malicious users.

    As for the remote control part of it, this is a remote that literatly doesn't want you to change that channel. Imagine channel surfing, but you remote is too busy downloading content on Jennifer Somebody's sweater. I don't care about her sweater, and frankly I don't want you sending information to someone that I am looking at her sweater (added spyware, whoppie!)!

    This device is going to be bulky, expensive and with advertising, and if were lucky spyware. Microsoft I hope you fall on your ass on this one.

    Rob

  114. Its about time an american company reclaimed by t0qer · · Score: 2

    the console crown. I really really hope the MS comes out on top in this war. Since the nintendo 8 bit gamers have been forced to watch in envy as japan is ALLWAYS first to get the NEWEST GAMES and systems. How many times did you read a gamepro, EGM or other similiar magazine, seen a game that looked totally awesome but it was going to be released japan first? It really pisses me off to the point WHERE I GOT TO TYPE IN CAPS.

    I miss the good ol days when an american company was king of the console hill (i.e. atari) and i'm not very paticular who is trying to become the next american console king, even if it is LUCIFER in the eyes of the slash crew.

    1. Re:Its about time an american company reclaimed by The+Milky+Bar+Kid · · Score: 2

      I thought half the reason that these games were released in Japan first was because they were designed in Japan, by the Japanese.

      The thing I love about some of the japanese games - Mario, Pimkin, Kuru Kuru Kurunin, etc - is that they are so off the wall that I can't imagine an american game company supporting them. I can just imagine the marketing department: "Gee, a game based on a midget plumber eating mushrooms. That will sell!".

      Careful what you wish for. You might get the good games in America first, but if the good games are just Doom 5, NHL 2003 and Grand Turismo 15, then you'll be begging to have Miyamoto back.

      But I'm Australian so I'm not particularly sympathetic to this post anyway.

      --
      -- This post is about truth, beauty, freedom, and above all things, Karma
  115. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by startled · · Score: 2

    The XBox is already a region free DVD player. Good idea, though.

  116. Re:Nintendo & Microsoft have different interes by k_187 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nintendo has been in business since 1891. They originally made playing cards. ( and yes I'm picking nits).

    --
    11 was a racehorse
    12 was 12
    1111 Race
    12112
  117. Dear God, can't you mods READ?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The damn subject line told you it was a TROLL!!!!
    Not karma whoring, T.R.O.L.L.!!
    Now somebody post a 800 line diatribe on "Linux consoles -- a Ridiculous commie myth"!

  118. Terminal Services = X-Windows display by spideyct · · Score: 2, Informative

    This article was completely misrepresented by the slasdot summary. After reading the device, it sounds nothing like a GBA, or a GBA competitor. Maybe slashdot users don't know what Terminal Services is.

    The device is based on Terminal Services. For all you linux users out there, it means its just a DISPLAY for processes running on another device. Think of it as a dumb X-Windows display.

    Sure, it might show incredible graphics that are rendered on the XBOX 6 feet away from you, because its just painting the pixels, it doesn't need the fancy 3D hardware, etc. But my point is, the XBOX will have to be 6 feet away! This isn't a device you would take to school, take on a plane, take everywhere that you take a gameboy.

    From the article:
    "Microsoft's Terminal Server software shifts many computing functions off the device and onto other computers--owned either by the individual or by a service provider. Consumers can't really use a Mira device without a persistent connection to a more powerful computer."

    The only way it could come close to competing with the portability of the GBA (which is the whole reason you use a GBA), is if it uses a constant connection to a nationwide wireless network. Then you are talking monthly fees.

    Not a competitor in my book.

  119. Portable Monopoly by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sure GBA is great, when you can actually see whats on the screen.

    That's because early games' palettes didn't correct for the GBA display's gamma of 4. Newer games compensate for this with a lookup table.

    I want a fuckin' backlight.

    "Fuckin" and "back" I can't help you with, but "light" is coming very soon. Watch this site for updates.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  120. Palm vs. GBA by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    If and when I need a PDA, I'll get a Palm. Right now, my Blackberry's PDA capabilities are sufficient. The GBA is fun. I enjoy playing Golden Sun, an amazing game. I don't expect to do work on my GBA... I have a laptop, I may get the Samsung Cell Phone/Palm IIIc combo, but who knows.

    Not everything in life needs to do work. Sometimes I want to relax, and IR Chess seems less fun and relaxing than Golden Sun.

    To each their own...

    Alex

  121. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by Odinson · · Score: 2
    There is nothing like a good flame war :).


    The PS2 will always be #1 this round, it's got such a head start and massive game library it'd be impossible to say otherwise.


    Very true the US numbers don't look as good. I am more concerned with my US options as a US person.


    Thanks everyone for responding. I said what I said with some scepticism myself.


    A few things from the comments so far....


    Yes what I said was speculation, if it wasn't it would be history.


    I am assuming the 2 console rule. Which means PS2 has one of the slots down cold. The other is up for grabs. Since Xbox is going after grownups and Game Cube for kids, they are not competing heavily yet. They will start competing eventually though, it's just a matter of time before somebody starts that fight. This will go to round two.


    When they do start competing heavily, it will be to late for Nintendo to start this moving.


    If Nintendo's lawyers say they can't do an inital release region free they can still make the chip physically very modular and use a commonly understood unencrypted flash protocol to program it. Then the aftermarket will take care of the last step. Voltage/burnout problems are not unworkable. Don't underestimate the virute of customizability even for customers who don't understand what the good part of customization is. The key here is plausible denyability. The current lack of DVD ability is the perfect guise for reconstruction.


    DVDs are exploding. In the past two months Blockbuster dumped half it's VHS section and balanced out DVD's and VHS for floorspace. In another year some things will be dvd only. People without geek budgets will need players.

  122. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by Ewan · · Score: 2

    It's not unfair in that the previous post stated that Nintendo had no chance and we're about to lose everything.

    For that to happen, Microsoft will have to break Nintendos hold on the Japanese market, something they haven't even dared enter yet.

  123. Will Never Happen by __aawwih8715 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many reasons which include but are not limited to:

    1) GBA is $90
    Microsoft can't produce anything decent at the price.

    2) GBA batteries last a _long_ time.
    MS's will most likely be backlit and that will eat the batteries.

    3) What does MS know about portable gaming? Nintendo's got the track record.

    4) Who doesn't know what a game boy is?
    Its got name recognition equal to nintendo. Both are sysnonimous with gaming.

    5) Nintendo's got way to far a head start, as there will be a sequel to GBA and it will also be revolutionary.

    Care to disagree/agree?

  124. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by jmu1 · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall you posting basically this exact same thing a few months ago... I'm not real sure, but I would say almost upfront, you cut'n'pasted most of that out of your old post.

  125. Re:Sony? Sega? by linuxpng · · Score: 2

    ok wise ass... my windows xp just rebooted itself for no reason because I selected the desktop properties... and continues to do so everytime I try to select the desktop properties.

  126. Re:Sony? Sega? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if you gave us the stop error we'd feel sorry for you. Now you just sound like a lamer.

  127. Re:Nintendo has one shot at life. Nintendo read th by jmauro · · Score: 2

    No patches, no add-ons, no expansion packs, not even a real operating system. Making a dent in the console world requires a different philosophy than in the PC world. Once a game is released, it had better be self-contained and done.

    And why did MS include a harddrive with the system. Probably just for these things that the PC developers would want to do. I really think that the harddrive is the end of the nice,easy and rarely crashing consoles.

  128. Track Record by ILikeCheeseGraters · · Score: 0

    They created the Xbox, and couldn't stand to have anything less than what was put in it, greatly increasing it's size. Their hideously large Xbox logo could not be omitted from the standard controller, also making it bothersome. Can Microsoft humble themselves enough to produce a handheld appliance that isn't, say, as big as your head?

  129. Nintendos best selling quarter in HISTORY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the poster missed the fact that they're outselling their first NES system by a boatload with their Gamecube and are saying this is going to be their best selling quarter in the companies history. They actually made money off the N64 also when Zelda was finally released. Perhaps the poster didn't notice the shortage of N64 consoles from people buying it solely for the Zelda game.

    Anyways, the original post should be modded down to -5; Troll...

    Thanks.

  130. Portable Xbox! I can't wait. by ImaLamer · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I really can't wait.

    When I see someone walking down the street with one of these things, I'm gonna smash it into little pieces all over the place.

  131. mod this twit back down!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > most people that use linux exclusively hasn't even tried Win2K

    or, from my experience use linux because of the crap forcefed them for the last 15 years.

    > which has yet to crash or bluescreen on me

    that makes one.

    > Netscape on linux, and mozilla on linux crashes more than anything on win2k for me

    neither have crashed on me, which is about as good as your argument about win-oh-oh.

    > But I'm talking to closed minds here.

    sounds more like you're speaking from one......

    > MS's quality to find its stronger than the last time they used it

    well, it's been awhile since I've had any involvement with academic mathmatics, but I seem to recall anything times zero is still zero....

    bottom line is you whine about the quality of what's written here, and yet you're no different than those you're whining about.

  132. Nintendo's most profitable quarter .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They announced this as being their most profitable quarter in the companies entire history. Even blowing away the original NES and Gameboy sales quarters. They are MAKING MONEY off each HARDWARE unit of the GameCube which MS and Sony are NOT. They are LOSING money in hopes to sell more systems and the games will rake the lost revune back. This is what a lot of console makers do .. The system is not their money maker, it's the games. Well, Nintendo has BOTH money makers with the Gamecube. DVD playerback was never an option. If you look at the PS2 and XBox they have so many compatability issues it's not even funny. Who would want a DVD player that doesn't play hardly any movies? Akira doesnt work on ANY of them. Even after Sonys 4 software ROM revisions for their DVD player Akira STILL hangs. If you look at the lists for both systems there are countless awesome movies that just dont work. THATS why Nintendo didnt chose DVD playback. Trying to keep a console compatable for movies (Which isnt even the point of a console!) is a frustrating business. Nintendo has already claimed the crown, IMO. I have 1 friend with an XBox, and know 3 others with a Gamecube, and 2 with PS2s. The fact that my friends are asking me to bring my Gamecube to their apts to play Super Smash Bro's tells me something: Sony and MS have no hope when Zelda/Mario/Metroid are out within the year.

    1. Re:Nintendo's most profitable quarter .... by Odinson · · Score: 2
      They announced this as being their most profitable quarter in the companies entire history.

      Good!

      Even blowing away the original NES and Gameboy sales quarters. They are MAKING MONEY off each HARDWARE unit of the GameCube which MS and Sony are NOT.

      I did not know that Nintendo is making money on the consoles.

      They are LOSING money in hopes to sell more systems and the games will rake the lost revune back. This is what a lot of console makers do .. The system is not their money maker, it's the games. Well, Nintendo has BOTH money makers with the Gamecube. DVD playerback was never an option.

      If you look at the PS2 and XBox they have so many compatability issues it's not even funny. Who would want a DVD player that doesn't play hardly any movies? Akira doesnt work on ANY of them. Even after Sonys 4 software ROM revisions for their DVD player Akira STILL hangs.

      That sucks.

      If you look at the lists for both systems there are countless awesome movies that just dont work. THATS why Nintendo didnt chose DVD playback. Trying to keep a console compatable for movies (Which isnt even the point of a console!) is a frustrating business.

      I imagine that would be very expensive for them to maintain. That doesn't mean it would be too expensive to make it worth their while though.

      Nintendo has already claimed the crown, IMO. I have 1 friend with an XBox, and know 3 others with a Gamecube, and 2 with PS2s. The fact that my friends are asking me to bring my Gamecube to their apts to play Super Smash Bro's tells me something: Sony and MS have no hope when Zelda/Mario/Metroid are out within the year.

      As long as GTA3 is out for PS2 only there will be buyers. As for Microsoft...

      I agree almost everything you said except I don't understand one thing...

      With such insightful comments why are you an AC?

    2. Re:Nintendo's most profitable quarter .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gta3 has been anounced for the GC

  133. Re:Sony? Sega? by Yorrike · · Score: 1
    Netscape on linux, and mozilla on linux crashes more than anything on win2k for me. But I'm talking to closed minds here.

    If Mozilla and Netscape are crashing there's something wrong with your setup. Firstly, don't use Netscape, because it sucks, secondly, try running Mozilla from bash with debug flags on, it may tell you what's going wrong.

    Sure, XP has bugs (all new OS's do. Try and tell me that Linux 1.0 didn't crash or have bugs.)

    Windows XP is NOT a new operating system it is merely the latest VERSION of Windows. You'd think that after a decade or more of programming operating systems, Microsoft could get something right. A default install of XP leaves it's associated PC fully open to remote attack. From a company with as much experience and money to throw around as Microsoft, this is inexcusable.

    But I digress. Microsoft will have as hard a time grappling the Handheld market away from Nintendo as Nintendo would have grappling the Operating System market away from Microsoft. Not even the video-game-kingdom-stealing likes of Sony could out do Nintendo in the handheld market. From what the article says, though, the device mentioned doesn't even sound like a direct competitor.

    --

    Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

  134. Re:He who neglects to learn the lessons of history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Word vs WordPerfect? Excel vs Lotus vs Quattro Pro?

  135. Given their track record - NO by WillSeattle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The question is, can MSFT deliver the functionality of the Game Boy Advance?

    They can crank out a box that specs out as a GBA competitor. But it won't BE a GBA competitor, because they don't grok kids gaming.

    This is why Nintendo does well. They do grok kids gaming. You may hate Pokemon, you may not like Pimkin, but kids love them. The buttons are where they need to be - you don't get tired - the carts work easily.

    The people who brought you xBox are giving you a PC solution for Game playing. And that's why it's a distant third in the game title sales. And why it will stay that way. They don't grok gamers. They never have.

    And they lose money each box they sell. Nintendo makes money on every box they sell, which means they can sell games cheap. Cause the games are where the bucks are - so kids can buy more games. You may think it's nuts to buy the Pikachu Yellow version of Pokemon, the Red, the Blue, the Crystal, the Silver, the Gold - but it means they make money on each sale at Nintendo.

    Microsoft thinks they'll get it all in one (flawed) release. And fix the bugs later. Nintendo thinks they'll make sure it works first, and save the extra things for future releases.

    So, in short, MSFT will fail at this one too.

    Of course, what do I know, I hold stock in both MSFT and Nintendo, among other companies. MSFT makes money due to dominance, holdings, and cash flow - the game business is not profitable, except with pro forma (fake) accounting methods. Nintendo makes money with this.

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  136. M$ is going to get their asses served to them..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, damm, I don't want to have to power cycle my handheld ever 20 mins.

  137. this isn't a game console by spir0 · · Score: 1

    it's much more than that and much less than that all at once.

    this was pointless even mentioning the GBA. it's not a competitor. not even close.

    let's take a close look at "Mira."

    it's useless without network connectivity. it can't play games unless it's hooked up to an xbox. it can't be a PC unless it's hooked up to a desktop machine.

    if you've got an xbox and a 29" TV, why would you hook up a tablet to play games on a smaller screen where controls would be fiddly because you're busy trying to hold the screen and the controller?

    maybe you can hook up to your xbox via a wireless lan so you can play your game while you're taking a crap. but nobody is that hardcore addicted to any game to not pause when you need to lay a cable.

    it really comes down to being a really expensive fashion accessory. it's completely redundant because it has no capacity of it's own.

    if you want a portable games console, get a GBA.

    if you want a portable PC for doing business stuff, get a pocket pc or a laptop.

    if you want a remote control for your tv, get a remote control for your tv.

    this offers nothing new or special for anyone except those who have to have all the latest toys regardless of their usefulness.

    it should probably also be mentioned that a lot of companies are writing console style arcade games for pocket pcs. ipaq seems to be the most popular, but I don't like the layout of the directional arrows and with the bulge in the middle, it's not comfortable for game playing.. but I'm sure there will be new popcket pcs coming out which are more suited to this in the future..

    rayman is currently available on pocketpc.. more will follow.

    --
    The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
  138. Re:Sony? Sega? by Exatron · · Score: 1
    I agree that SSB2 is the best thing since SSB1 (the Mario Party games suck eggs), but unlocking half the hidden stuff requires unlocking all the hidden characters, and one of the characters requires playing 1,000 Vs. matches at 5 minutes a piece. Is this just a way to get players to buy more controllers when they wear out?
    Which character would that be? The only one that requires playing in versus mode for an extended period of time is Mewtwo. Mr. Game & Watch can be unlocked by beating classic mode, adventure more, or target test with all of the other twenty-four characters.
    --
    "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
    "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
  139. Microsoft, Microsoft everywhere... by Carnivore24 · · Score: 0

    Man this is crazy. The way things are going I wouldnt be suprised if Microsoft gets together with Whirlpool, GE, and Sony to incorporate computerchips into everything. I can see it now...You are sitting at your computer playing Quake and forget to preheat the oven, Oh! just do it from Windows GE. Forget to close the garage door? Oh, just login remotely from your Media Pad and close it down.

  140. Re:Sony? Sega? by Aexia · · Score: 1

    I cheated to get Mewtwo. I just started an indefinite length match with two human players and left the machine on all night. Bang. There's your 20 hours.

    1000 Vs. matches(any kind, any length) is probably the *alternate* way of unlocking a character or two.

  141. Crown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo's only held on to the market for portables so far because it's had no real competitors (Gamegear? No, Sega consoles don't count as competitors, but their history of yanking support and doing other stupid things is another story.)

    It's like saying CmdrTaco has the crown in terms of Militant Food for being named CmdrTaco.

    Now, with GBA, Nintendo's actually put out a decent product (Not but the GB wasn't decent, but c'mon, it was black and white, or should I say, green and yellow, for how many years?)..

    Still, all Microsoft has to do is come up with the next Pokemon, and they've got it.

    Hmm. Innotvatemon? Gotta embrace and extend 'em all? :)

  142. I hardly call it a competitor... by frostgiant · · Score: 1

    The ZDNet article says the device will cost around $2,000. A GBA costs $90. Now, do you think Microsoft will be able to sell millions of these things when the GBA is $90?

  143. Work in conjunction with the Xbox? by tachyon_01 · · Score: 1

    To make this claim is pure hype-generation. It seems this "pad thing" hasn't even been finalized for production so I'm sure it would be 2-3 years away. Now, even if the Xbox has a fairly good life span it will be old by the time this "pad thing" comes out.

  144. Re:Sony? Sega? by Dwonis · · Score: 2

    You don't GET a STOP error by default in XP... at least so I've been told by an XP user.

  145. Official URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the official Press Release:

    > Microsoft Unveils New Home PC Experiences With "Freestyle" and "Mira"
    http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/Press/2002/Jan0 2/01-07FreestyleMiraPR.asp

    - Jeremy Traub

  146. Re:Nintendo & Microsoft have different interes by gpinzone · · Score: 1

    Those "proprietary" plugs are just USB ports in disguise.

  147. target test by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Which character would [require 1000 Vs games]? ... Mr. Game & Watch can be unlocked by beating classic mode, adventure more, or target test with all of the other twenty-four characters.

    I was referring to Mr G&W. I've found some characters whose target test absolutely stumps me (e.g. Young Link). Even then, unlocking all the stages...

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:target test by Exatron · · Score: 1

      Young Link's target test is fairly easy once you figure out how to use his wall jump. Tilt the control stick away from the wall as Young Link touches it and he should do a wall jump. The timing can be a bit tricky, so it will take some practice.

      --
      "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
      "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
  148. Sega v. Accolade says you're safe by yerricde · · Score: 1

    The big problem is that for a game to boot up on a GBA, the ROM has to have the correct header information, which includes code copyrighted by Nintendo (part of which is the NINTENDO logo that appears when you turn on the GBA with a kart in)

    It's copyrighted, but copying it does not constitute infringement. From the Sega v. Accolade decision, if a game console checks for a magic cookie in the software, even the 14 KB magic cookie in the Dreamcast boot sector, copying the magic cookie for interoperability counts as Fair Use(TM). Just make sure you follow the Bleem developers' example and display "CORRECTION: This software is not licensed by Nintendo" once your code gets control.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  149. Re:Sony? Sega? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, even with the big security holes and blue sceens constantly, Windows is the better product? If a stereo manu. made products like Win, we wouldn't have a music industry, because no one would ever have a working receiver, just a bunch of intermittant static. I've used Win 3.0 through 2000, and just got XP to try, plus RH Linux. I agree that w2k is more stable than 98 (what I have at home), but stuff still crashes. Netscape on w2k crashes at least once a day, and in the middle of a really good song on a stream. The real problem is development cycles. No one is trying to put a complete, stable program anymore. it's get it out now and we'll fix it later. if more companies would take the time and make sure that their app is stable, then we would see some real competition. But that doesn't excuse MS. They have stolen, bought and crushed their way to the top, and will do anything to stay there. Apparantly Bill didn't pass Business 101. Competition is GOOD, and even having 25% of the computer OS market share would be an immense number. If they would put out a quality product that doesn't need a bazillion patches and works, I would be happier. As it is, I have to use Win to do most of my computing, but as I learn Linux more and get more involved in it, I plan to phase out Win and go straight Linux, because my experience so far has been overwhelmingly better than with win. The only thing about MS that would suprise me would be if they did put out a quality product. When that happens, I will look more closely at them, until then I will look at every other alternative.

  150. WTF is a GBA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Your blurb tells nothing of the (obviously non-universal) "term" referenced in the headline, so we therefore have no information whether to waste time on the article.


    Care to try again?

  151. Startux is Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you mean the only exception is linux?
    That's just stupid.