Slashdot Mirror


(Almost) Free Movies On-Line... Sorta

Snaller writes "See the latest movies on the net? Its possible - apparently the law in Taiwan says that for a movie to be protected by copyright law one has to apply for such protection within a month after the opening in the theaters. This rarely happens and as a consequence movie88 has opened a virtual movieplex: See any of their films for 1 dollar. The movie is streamed in a format that doesn't allow you to save it on the harddrive, but for that 1 dollar you can view it anytime and as much as you like for 3 days. The selection includes movies like "Shrek", "Legally Blonde","American Pie 2","Gone with the wind", James Bond and Batman." Yeah this'll last. Right. But it really demonstrates what TV will be like in the future when you have access to thousands of movies. And the buck a film rate strikes me as awesome. I'd watch a lot more movies if they were only a buck.

293 comments

  1. movies by karmalien · · Score: 1, Funny

    hm,, shrek but no pr0n....decision.... no good

    1. Re:movies by pacc · · Score: 1

      The porn industry did this years ago,
      the same way they invented pop-up ads
      and everything else internet is all about.

    2. Re:movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the same law makes Japanese pr0n REALLY cheap over here. VCD ~US$3

    3. Re:movies by suprslackr420 · · Score: 1

      True, Japanese pr0n is cheap, but it's also horrible.

      --
      ubi dubium ibi libertas.
    4. Re:movies by karmalien · · Score: 0

      i can see that... porn being the backbone of the internet and all..yah know

  2. Imagine the time that went into this. by Senor-D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With such a large amount of movies available for streaming, the amount of people involved in transferring and encoding must be staggering. I'd like to know what sort of source they used to get all of these movies on disk.

    I can't imagine that this will stay around for long, as the content producers will go nuts when they hear about it. It would seem that they took all this time to do this in futility.

    1. Re:Imagine the time that went into this. by medscaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about automated encoders? How hard could it be?

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    2. Re:Imagine the time that went into this. by alec314159 · · Score: 2, Funny

      the amount of people involved in transferring and encoding must be staggering.

      It's not like they are encoding the movies using a hex editor...

    3. Re:Imagine the time that went into this. by Senor-D · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about automated encoders? How hard could it be?

      Well, it depends on the media used. If they are transferring from the 35mm reels, someone needs to splice them together, run the video transfer device, etc. Real hassle. If they are encoding from DVD's, you need someone to format the output for every movie. Without this, the encoder would waste space and time on the sharp edge between the picture itself and the black borders. Also a real hassle. It would definitely take a lot of time, or a lot of people, in either case.

      I suppose they might be able to write a program to format the output of the DVD's automatically, but I've never seen this done myself.

    4. Re:Imagine the time that went into this. by gimpboy · · Score: 2

      they probably just hung out on irc for a couple years while they were in school-downloaded every movie they saw. one day they probably looked around and thought "hey lets sell this stuff on the web because in taiwan copying is a right!".

      --
      -- john
    5. Re:Imagine the time that went into this. by -Surak- · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some of them at least are sourced from VHS tapes. The Frankenstein movie they are running for free today had some noticable tracking errors and other glitches from low quality video tape.

      Also, that movie at least was 4:3, so they could avoid reformatting it.

      Granted, the quality of the source material sucks, and even the 300k stream quality isn't as good as it could be, but film purists are not going to be watching movies on a PC screen over the net.

    6. Re:Imagine the time that went into this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These people are deffintly not from America. Go read the site. Horrible translation job. This ish is straight from Taiwan.

    7. Re:Imagine the time that went into this. by gimpboy · · Score: 2

      they were probably grad students in the states. i bet it cost them a pretty penny to take all those cdr's back with them ; )

      really though. alot of the stuff on irc originates in asia. it wouldnt surprise me if they had a huge stash of movies/warez/misc media from over the years. i'm working on one myself. i've got the database and the web interface done in it's first incarnation.

      --
      -- john
    8. Re:Imagine the time that went into this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure borders on letterboxed movies can be easily determined programmatically (just sample the picture at a few points when it's bright, edge detection isn't rocket science). In any case, most movies are either full screen or anamorphic, ie, no border to worry about.

    9. Re:Imagine the time that went into this. by Ybrog · · Score: 1

      My initial thought is that if this is in Taiwan...everyone already is buying pirated copies on dvd for less than $1 American. Getting some people in other countries using this could really take up all their bandwidth, but my thought is people still don't want to pay.

      --

      bleh

  3. right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie is streamed in a format that doesn't allow you to save it on the harddrive
    ...and runs on an OS that doesn't have protected memory.
    Estimated time before <weirdformat>2mpeg.exe?
    27 minutes.

    1. Re:right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nevermind. It's been done. (And turns out <weirdformat&gt==real audio. Yawn.)

  4. O well by Compunerd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess this is fine - yes - but what about the quality? I work in a company doing video-on-demand (VoD), and VoD in less quality than 2Mbps MPEG-4 isn't a good thing.

    And ... I'll love to see this 'hacker-proof' format of theirs. I bet a hundered dollars it's already creacked :-)

    roy

    --
    Computers are like air conditioners.
    - They stop working when you open Windows.
    1. Re:O well by TheGreatAvatar · · Score: 1

      I was just there. At 300k it's not bad. Not great, but not bad. What can you expect for a buck. They use RealNetwork though....

      --
      Three things are certain: Death, taxes, and lost data. Guess which has occurred.
    2. Re:O well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And ... I'll love to see this 'hacker-proof' format of theirs. I bet a hundered dollars it's already creacked :-)

      And that would get spent 50/50 on movies and CD/R's right :)

    3. Re:O well by Compunerd · · Score: 1

      Sure...

      But how can they say it's 'hacker proof'? RealNetwork is just another client software app, and it can play from disk as it can from the network. I dunno what codec it uses, but it's probably quite easy to convert to - say - MPEG-4.

      roy

      --
      Computers are like air conditioners.
      - They stop working when you open Windows.
    4. Re:O well by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 4, Informative

      They use Real (sucky)...

      You don't really have to crack it. I've noticed they technique they use to make it difficult to change around links. they open up a no permission browser window and then from there redirect to the link of the actual .rm or .ram file that you are streaming off of. If you have any sort of network monitor you'll be able to see the exact URL where you can download the file and save it to your hard disk.

    5. Re:O well by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Umm, did anyone notice its now impossible to find the free realplayer on real's website. Does it exist anymore?

    6. Re:O well by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 2

      The links are really really small, I think it's done that way on purpose... here is where you can find what you're looking for:

      Real Player 8 which is good. It's not the newest version so they don't give you the option to download JUST the player anymore, which is hard to find. Email me (address listed above) and I can send you the RP8 install (basic, non-network install).

      RealOne Player which in my opinion sucks. This new piece of bloatware does everything the previous versions did but so much more (that you don't want it to do). I recommend against it.

    7. Re:O well by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Why hack it? My time is worth something. If the MPAA did something like this I would definately be a customer. Anything I found on a p2p network would be about the same quality, and for $1 it's not worth the effort. Sure, some poor college kids will rip it off, but for most it won't be worth it.

      Is $1 enough? It seems like it should be. If I rent a movie from the local video store I pay about $3. Surely $2 worth of that is wasted on things like rent on the space, salaries, etc.

      And don't scream about not being able to save it locally. Why would you want to? You can watch it as many times as you want for 3 days. If the movie is so good that I would want to keep it after that I'd go and buy it, much better quality and it doesn't eat any of my disk space.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    8. Re:O well by cyber-vandal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And don't scream about not being able to save it locally. Why would you want to?


      Some of us don't have super-fast internet connections like you seem to have. I've got 512Kbps cable and streaming video is pretty poor on it, however, downloading the stream while I'm at work to watch it in the evening is a viable option.

    9. Re:O well by SloWave · · Score: 1

      When I tried downloading it, Real Audio sent me a Java script that wanted the capability to do anything to any of my files. Giving Real Audio's reputation I refused to grant the permission to the Java script to do what it wanted. Is there anyway to just download a real audio player without turning my system over to Real Audio, Inc?

    10. Re:O well by dustman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Giving Real Audio's reputation I refused to grant the permission to the Java script to do what it wanted. Is there anyway to just download a real audio player without turning my system over to Real Audio, Inc?
      You are trying to download and install a binary, and you are worried about javascript on the download website? I suppose its commendable that you are "security conscious" by not allowing full-rights javascripts to run, but stop and think for a moment!
    11. Re:O well by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just found a link. I almost thought it was damn near impossible to download the basic real player anymore...

      http://www.littlechapel.com/downloads/rp8-setup.ex e

      It's a church site that lets you download real player to see one of their presentations. I guess they felt that it was sinful to let someone endure the pain of trying to navigate through www.real.com.

    12. Re:O well by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 2

      He has a right to be a little paranoid. Real player is notorious for spyware & the like. he is just looking for just the simple player (read: no bloated spywa^H^H^H^H^Hfeatures).

    13. Re:O well by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      Actually, AFAIK they use Real, and yes, it has been cracked. There's a program called StreamBox VCR, it's actually illegal as Real(C) got Real(C) PissedOff(tm) about it being able to save streaming RM content to a HD.

      However, a web search will still reveal places where you can download this excellent piece of software.

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    14. Re:O well by kryptkpr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not quite so easy.
      Once you've got the .RAM file, it contains a URL inside it (probably a pnm:// or rtsp://), and you will need a program that's

      a) capable of saving these streams, and
      b) capable of re-building the index block that required to view streaming RM video offline

      and there's only one that I know of that's capable of doing this: Streambox VCR

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    15. Re:O well by einer · · Score: 1

      Taco, I'll see you in hell... For Commandment 11 was surely, "Thou shalt not slashdot my website."

    16. Re:O well by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 2

      Ahhh, I just tried this. You have a good point. I also just checked out streambox, where has it been all my life? Easy enough to find, google search for streambox showed this first:

      www.streambox.com

    17. Re:O well by werd+life · · Score: 1

      umm, i think your missing the point. the poster was afraid of letting javascript run in his browser, but the whole point of this exercise is that once he is finished, he's planning on running an installer that is going to have free run of his computer. if real wants to mess with him, they can do it with realplayer, they don't have to mess with javascript.

    18. Re:O well by spudnic · · Score: 2

      What do you mean by poor? Is it skipping frames or having to rebuffer often, or is it just the quality of the video. If it's the latter, remember that the max stream they offer is 300k. No matter how fast your connection is you won't get any better quality than that.

      If it's the former, then yes, I could see your point. But with a 512k cable connection you shouldn't have this problem unless the bottleneck is somewhere between the other end and your ISP.

      Modem and slower broadband users? Well, everyone knows there are advantages to having a fat pipe, and they do offer a 100k stream. Not many people would bother to attempt this with a modem... they know their limitations.

      Maybe when someone legitimate does this they will make a way to download for play later. Some kind of codec with a key exchange for authorization. They could offer a higher quality feed than would be possible in live streaming with a bit of an increase in cost to cover bandwidth.

      I'd pay the same as I would for a rental in that case. No going to the video store, thousands of titles available all the time, no out of stocks, no trying to get it back on time, no late fees. Perfect.

      Someone will crack it, but like I said, why bother? If they keep the prices very low, it's not worth the wasted disk space to keep around. We've just got to get into this mindset.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    19. Re:O well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you missed it phooool.

    20. Re:O well by Cramer · · Score: 2

      Actually, accorinding to RealPlayer, it's being streamed via http.

      C:\>netstat

      Active Connections
      Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
      TCP moose:1272 210.59.224.72:http ESTABLISHED

    21. Re:O well by targo · · Score: 1

      Once you've got the .RAM file, it contains a URL inside it (probably a pnm:// or rtsp://), and you will need a program that's


      Actually, in this case it is easier, it's just a simple .rm file that you can download. Have to fake the user agent though, because you will get a 403 forbidden when trying to access it with just a browser. Just downloaded their sample free movie this way.

    22. Re:O well by targo · · Score: 1

      I'll love to see this 'hacker-proof' format of theirs. I bet a hundered dollars it's already creacked

      I just downloaded a movie from them. Do I get your hundred bucks now or what was your idea? It wasn't hard, sniff the network, figure out the real URL (surprise-surprise, it's just a regular .rm file), throw together a small program to fake the user agent and save the response to a file and voila, here we go.

    23. Re:O well by tringstad · · Score: 2, Troll
      Or just get it from Real, instead of slashdotting some small churches bandwidth, at:
      http://forms.real.com/real/player/player.html?src= 020129realhome_2,011204rpchoice_c1&dc=242322

      Scroll down and there is a Unix verion available as well. -Tommy

      --
      "I got a half gallon of Jack, and 2 dozen Ant Traps. I'm about to get wild." -me
    24. Re:O well by Kraft · · Score: 2

      A "for dummies" guide would be well appreciated.

      --

      -Kraft
      Live and let live
    25. Re:O well by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      Lots of rebuffering unfortunately. The 300K stream, when it gets going is quite nice, but the 100K is pretty dismal in both sound and audio quality.


      Having just done a traceroute, there isn't really a bottleneck, so I really need a faster connection, something that the UK providers aren't yet willing to offer at an affordable price for the home consumer.


      I would be quite happy to use the service, though, should I ever get the chance of a fatter pipe, as, all things considered, it's a damn sight better than either video stores or p2p piracy.

    26. Re:O well by isorox · · Score: 3

      I guess they felt that it was sinful to let someone endure the pain of trying to navigate through www.real.com.

      From this moment on I a'm no longer atheist!

    27. Re:O well by Kraft · · Score: 2

      URL snooper is also handy, when you want to find the link to the file.... if you dont want to browse through your temp internet files.

      download the program here

      --

      -Kraft
      Live and let live
    28. Re:O well by targo · · Score: 1

      A "for dummies" guide would be well appreciated.

      It really depends on your platform and available tools. I'm a windows guy, so I used Microsoft Network Monitor (there are probably all sorts of other sniffers available for other platforms) to sniff the network (start monitor, click on this 300kb link on the site, wait until the movie starts playing, stop monitor). You will see a bunch of HTTP GET requests in the sniff, among these is one that downloads a .rm file, this is your guy.

      Then I wrote a small C# program using the .Net framework HttpWebRequest class to send a fake user agent and other headers that I found in the sniff, sent the request and wrote the resulting data into a file. Again, you may want to do it with other tools (should be easy in perl), I just used what I had. But this is the principle, from here on it's just RTFM ;)

    29. Re:O well by Kraft · · Score: 2

      Thanx a lot for the notes, I actually got it to work - except for completing the download.

      I tried to use an altered version StreamBox VCR, and got past the http error with the realmedia user agent string, but it crashes right at the end :((

      In case anyone else out there is stuck, heres what I did in a win environment. You might not get the crash at the end...

      1) get the url to the file.
      go to the site, start viewing the movie. now you should be able to find the link in your temp internet files.
      .... or, just use URLsnooper.

      2) Get streambox
      Now you should have the link to the .rm file, you need to save the file. For this I used StreamBox VCR. Get the latest beta and patch and crack as instructed. Test the program on some file. If you have problems, there is a manual here

      3) patch streambox
      you can try on the .rm file, but you will get a http error before it manages to save the file. The problem is the user agent, as targo explained. Streambox sends a mozilla header, not a realmedia header, so you will have to hex edit streambox. So get a hex editor (eg ultraedit), open the vcr.exe file and ctrl-f to find (ascii) the string "mozilla". When found, CAREFULLY replace

      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT; CNETHomeBuild051099; DigExt)" with
      "RMA/1.0 (compatible; RealMedia)" - followed by 44 white spaces, so you dont change the size of the file!

      4) get the file
      now save and run vcr.exe file, get the file. streambox should now send the proper header, and you should be getting the file.
      I had to change "amount of attempts" to unlimited, and I lost the connection once... but it worked.

      If this worked, it would be so beautiful, because this way I can rent a movie and download the 300kb version, which I dont actually have the bandwidth to view streamed. Anyway, thanx for the help targo. If you feel like uploading your c program somewhere, that would be cool too.

      --

      -Kraft
      Live and let live
    30. Re:O well by kimihia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For those interested in the dirty details, may I recommend:

      • wget
      • asfrecorder
      • Squid
      • Ethereal (+ tcpdump)
      • A plugin-equipped browser (eg, Mozilla)

      With that combination (and sometimes "strings") I can download ANY Quicktime or Windows Media video that I want to - permissions be damned. Plus, get this: mplayer on Linux does a better job of playing Windows Media files than Windows Media Player on Windows! (And at a higher screen res too!)

      BTW, the secret letter is 'm'. (This may become apparant if you have done the above.) I don't have time for a complete downloading HOWTO, but ... mov = wget, asf = wget, asx = asfrecorder, wmv = try asfrecorder then wget.

    31. Re:O well by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      Just last week I was at a friend's trying to find the realplayer and got that JavaScript thing(once I finally found the download - they kept trying to redirect me to realone). If we're talking about the same thing it's some stupid download manager that really did a number on the system were using....it took me quite a bit of time to straighten things out.

    32. Re:O well by droopus · · Score: 1

      Oh I don't know about that. I could show you a SBC encoded divx at 750kbps that looks pretty damn close to DVD quality to me. Of course that's downloaed.

      Streamed...I agree with your spec, though a 300kbit stream is fine for a buck.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    33. Re:O well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use mozilla and the user agent overide sidebar

      http://mozilla-evangelism.bclary.com/sidebars/

    34. Re:O well by namhash · · Score: 1

      Kraft thanks for the instructions worked great However on instructions 3)

      My Header appears like this in the vcr.exe:
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.0; Windows NT)..User-Agent:.bytes=%d"

      and replaced with:
      "RMA/1.0 (compatible; RealMedia)"
      Making sure not to overwrite the "..User-Agent"

      Only replace up to the last bracket ")" with spaces any more it will not download.

    35. Re:O well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And don't scream about not being able to save it locally. Why would you want to?

      Until they go out of business. So much for your lifetime (or 3 day) rental fee.

    36. Re:O well by grimani · · Score: 1

      upon crashing, streambox vcr has a bug that overwrites the first few hundred bytes with html random data...maybe a buffer overflow or something

      anyways, save the first 5k or so of each stream and recover the corrupted data after the crash.

      works perfectly.

    37. Re:O well by tcoady · · Score: 1

      This is very clever but I can't quite see the point: unless this is yet another bug in XP I can see the file is saved under file://F:/DOCUME~1/TOM/LOCALS~1/TEMP/24iluzsf.ram
      so it ain't exactly rocket science to recover the original ram file.

    38. Re:O well by Kraft · · Score: 2

      You are right... that works :)

      Thanx.

      If anyone knows of a crashfree version of Streambox, Im interested.

      --

      -Kraft
      Live and let live
    39. Re:O well by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Not quite so easy.
      Once you've got the .RAM file, it contains a URL inside it (probably a pnm:// or rtsp://), and you will need a program that's
      1. capable of saving these streams, and
      2. capable of re-building the index block that required to view streaming RM video offline
      and there's only one that I know of that's capable of doing this: Streambox VCR

      Since Movie88 uses HTTP to stream its movies, you don't even need to go to the bother of getting Streambox VCR to work right. Once you have the URL for the stream, dump it into your favorite download manager (I use FlashGet). You won't have to filter/block the user-agent string like you might with IE or Nutscrape, and a decent download manager will use multiple streams to pull the movie in as quickly as possible. As I write this, I have tonight's freebie, Buckaroo Banzai, downloading in FlashGet at over 150 kBps. (Yes...150 kBps, not 150 kbps).

      To assist in getting the URL, get Muffin and tell RealPlayer to use localhost port 51966 as its HTTP proxy. Muffin is a Java-based proxy server with some filtering capabilities; one of the things it'll do is display URLs for whatever connections it has open. Start a movie at Movie88, grab the HTTP URL out of the Muffin connection window, and paste it into FlashGet (or whatever you're using). If Movie88 doesn't like your download manager, tell your download manager to use Muffin as its HTTP proxy and enable user-agent filtering in Muffin (a null user-agent worked for me when RealPlayer was playing the stream).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    40. Re:O well by spudnic · · Score: 2

      You're not buying the right to keep the movie. What are the chances that they will go out of business within the 3 day period you purchased your movie? And if they do, so what? How many movies would you have selected at once? Chances are that you would pick a movie right before you watched it anyway.

      Also, I'm not putting much stock in this venture. My points would hold up just fine if some major studio or other company did this, and without a lot of the uncertainty that surrounds this.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    41. Re:O well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The basic idea looks good but.

      If you take the original binary and overwrite the first part of the user agent string with the suggested one, ending it in 0x00 (that's 00 under the hex part of the editor NOT the text string "0x00") and leaving the remainder of the oldstring in tact it appears to work fine. Atleast the dozen movies I downloaded didn't crash :).

      I had previously applied the 'StreamBoxVCR1.0Beta3.1StealthMulderFix.zip' crack, don't know if you used a different one which is adding to/causing your trouble.

      The exe 'fr_svcr1b31smf_crack.exe' for my crack is 65,791 bytes and has an MD5 of 7AAE26655175D7E9BE10AAE9219E5F6D

      Good luck!

  5. US Law vs. Taiwanese Law by Bren · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder how much sway MPAA has in Taiwan. Certainly in the US this little "problem" would be fixed quickly...

    Better mark Taiwan up on the Axis of Evil list too..

    1. Re:US Law vs. Taiwanese Law by tlk+nnr · · Score: 5, Informative
      I wonder how much sway MPAA has in Taiwan. Certainly in the US this little "problem" would be fixed quickly...

      Better mark Taiwan up on the Axis of Evil list too..
      That's due to being too friendly with China:
      According to the Bern convention, you don't need to register for copyright protection.
      But Taiwan was thrown out of the UN and most international bodies, in order to please China.
      And thus Taiwan couldn't take part in the negotiations, didn't modify it's national laws.
      Nice sideeffect.
    2. Re:US Law vs. Taiwanese Law by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      How much sway the MPAA has? Well, given all the cheap ripoff DVDs and CDs that flow out of Taiwan already, I would be inclined to say, "Uhm...probably not very much at all, Bren."

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    3. Re:US Law vs. Taiwanese Law by dnoyeb · · Score: 0

      Yep, in China you can get almost any DVD for $1. Basically for the price of the plastic its made on. And why not? they made their money at the movie theater. $7 movie tickets should come with a free DVD. Its so interesting to see the world turn. American corporations have so much more concern about international politics that even the US government.

  6. cirght by karmalien · · Score: 1, Insightful

    with such a large library of movies and if this ever really gets off the ground will there ever be a future problem of full faith and credit and copyright laws between nations...such as say it is legal in tawian and aloud to be on their server but the process of me d/ling it to ohio where say perhaps it would be illegal to posses how would it all be werked out...virtual tribunal?

  7. price point by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There is the old ferengi proverb:

    Somethings that are free are not worth the price.

    On the other hand, a dollar, euro, etc, is probably the minimum that most people would pay, since much less is possible too much of a hassle. dollar stores, dollar menus are popular because people think these provide good value, even if it is not true.

    and think: when was the last time you changed a candy bar to a credit card? by itself? there is a point when paying by electronic means is perceived to be too much of a hassle.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a point when paying by electronic means is perceived to be too much of a hassle.

      dunno, but surely VISA is the best way to pay your local hooker?

      :)

    2. Re:price point by spudnic · · Score: 2

      The biggest question for me is should I trust these guys with my credit card information. I mean, you must admit that the whole concept of their business is a bit shady. I don't know if I feel comfortable with doing that.

      Now if some major company started offering a service like this, I'd jump on it. Bigger selection, quicker response times, legal, and a lot more comfortable to do business with.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    3. Re:price point by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2

      There is nothing shady about their business; it's a perfectly fine idea. The world should be one where there's nothing wrong with watching movies and listening to music. The only shadiness is that the American fat cats have brainwashed everybody into mediocrity.

    4. Re:price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you should trust everyone on the Internet who asks for your credit card number. If they were illegitmate, AOL would surely shut them down.

      Now, why hasn't my penis extender shown up yet...

    5. Re:price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please continue the story of failure.

    6. Re:price point by spudnic · · Score: 2

      What I meant was that they are doing things that would be illegal in America, and there's not a whole lot our Government can do about it. So, who is going to be able to regulate how they use my credit card? If it was a large company that I had heard of before then no problem, but giving my credit card number to someone I don't know who doesn't have to respect our laws is scarey.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    7. Re:price point by doubtme · · Score: 1
      and think: when was the last time you changed a candy bar to a credit card? by itself? there is a point when paying by electronic means is perceived to be too much of a hassle.

      Umm... if I can't charge it to credit or a debit card (via EFTPOS or the like) I get annoyed. Hell, I haven't been forced to pay cash in New Zealand for at least 2 years... Occasionally I still do get cash out and end up with small change - but only as a result of the goddamned buses here. (And yes... only the buses. Even taxis have mobile EFTPOS terminals).

      This is very much a cultural thing, and frankly, given how much more techie Taiwan, Japan, Korea etc are than even NZ, I wouldn't be surprised at all if you could be as physically cashless as you liked.

      Of course the US might be different :)

      --

      There's no $$$ in 'team'...
      www..--..net - for incisive, w
    8. Re:price point by Destoo · · Score: 1

      That would be the time to test those new "low limit" credit cards.

      They issue a credit card with a limitied amount and a one shot use, if I remember correctly.

      The Visa Cash card seems to do just that. Prevend them from charging more than what you want. Anyone know if it is supported by every site that support credit cards or just some specific ones?

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  8. Oh...I see. by pipeb0mb · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Sorry !!

    The RealPlayer video plugin was not detected !!!

    You need to Download RealPlayer Basic
    to watch our movie
    Thank you. "

    I'd rather not watch than have to watch it in Real.

    1. Re:Oh...I see. by Chacham · · Score: 1

      I'd rather not watch than have to watch it in Real.

      I agree with that. Maybe they will offer a premium service, that allows for other formats.

    2. Re:Oh...I see. by mwa · · Score: 2
      Are you (like me) just trying the "free" movie? It could be that they just use Real for that.

      On an off-topic note, I have the plugin in both Netscape and Galeon and I still get the "not detected" problem. What are these sites doing to "detect" plugins, and why? Why don't they just send the damn stream and let the client worry about how to handle it.....

    3. Re:Oh...I see. by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um whats the reason to be that much anti-realplayer? Don't tell you are following Steve Gibson's fantastic ideas that Wmedia is good, Real is evil...

      As I am on Slashdot,its even more interesting. They may have AOL in the back but Real isn't the only propetioary firm/codec giving you Linux/BSD client?

      oh, I worked on AV business, let me say... Of course, Quicktime is the best one (if they can code a client that can do true fullscreen, argh) and Real is the second. Its my personal view. For me windowsmedia is the least suscessful project of Microsoft, forever.

      If you want an open format? No, it won't happen, than people with T1/T3 whatever corparate lines will "leech" all movies from them.

    4. Re:Oh...I see. by pipeb0mb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Open or not, proprietary or not, unless the quality is as good as *at least* television, I don't want to waste my time.

      If I'm paying for it, I want to enjoy it; nothing political about it; Real SUCKS.
      :)

    5. Re:Oh...I see. by Prisoner+Of+Gravity · · Score: 1

      I don't understand this meme that says that 'Quicktime is best.' I've found Quicktime videos to be oversized, painfully slow to load the Quicktime application and even slower to buffer, impossible to determine how much of the film has loaded (the indicator is rarely accurate), and with absolutely abominable frame rates.

    6. Re:Oh...I see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's too bad that RealPlayer is such a spammed up bloated piece of shit. Their codec (the newest one) is actually very good, and they handle buffering much better than WMP or QuickTime.

      Most Real content is encoded in old, terrible low bitrate codecs, however, giving the impression that RealVideo == SUX.

  9. I'd watch a lot more movies if they were only a bu by isorox · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'd watch a lot more movies if they were only a buck.

    Watch TV then, they're all free (with adverts).

    Personally I dont have time, in between a degree, running a tv station, a social life and sex.

  10. A buck isn't worth anything? by doc_traig · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now, for a dollar, I can not only make a 20 minute phone call with 10-10-220, but now I can watch Shrek on my 'puter.

    Heh. Eat that, Terry Bradshaw.

    --
    So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
    1. Re:A buck isn't worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's only 7 cents a minute after that!

  11. Should be interesting by Yo+Grark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seeing the MPAA react to their "business". It will yield 2 results. Improve the MPAA's copyright restrictions WorldWide, allowing the recording industry to follow suite, or create very bad blood between tiwan and the US, resulting in less exporting of movies, which affect DVD sales internationally, and things like movie paraphanalia. Betcha the Tiwan government will close them down before the US does.

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re:Should be interesting by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm in Taiwan and MBILIAL. (my brother in-law is a lawyer) Outsiders are often surprised at how hog tied the government is around here now that we're oh so democratic and all that.
      The government here doesn't just arbitrarily get to do things like they used to do when I first moved here back in the good ol' days with marshal law when the cops marched down the streets goosestepping their finest nazi style in sets of four with machine guns on the shoulder. Boy, those were the days to be a foreigner, all the locals lived in fear so expats could do as they pleased like they still do in Cambodia.
      Oh how things have changed. Now, it's all about laws and following them to the letter with no special priveledges for anybody buy lawyers. Apparently this is legal according to Taiwan law. The law may get changed quick, but don't expect anything too drastic till then. This is a law abiding country --unfortunately.

    2. Re:Should be interesting by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1
      This is a law abiding country --unfortunately.

      Sir, what is your problem?

    3. Re:Should be interesting by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      The problem is the laws that many law a-biting countries make in such abundance such as prohibition, censorship, luxury taxes etc. all suck.
      I'm not advocating total lawlessness and freedom to commit violent crimes, but I think people tend to become arrogant and pig-headed about the righteousness of all the laws on the books --Sir.

  12. Cannot be saved? by Grax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK. If the data is sent to you and you can use that data to watch a movie how do you prevent that data from being stored somewhere?

    It seems to me the content producers are trying to do the impossible. In this case and in other cases where they try to do copy protection.

    Copy protection is the attempt to create something that will send a good signal to a display device but a bad signal to a recording device. Every implementation I have seen to date sends a less than perfect signal to the display device resulting in unwatchability at times.

    When it comes right down to it, all you need to do to copy the signal is create a recording device that emulates a display device well enough.

    I have 1 DVD that will not play with my current DVD player. My other DVD player had trouble with 2 different DVDs. Macrovision resulted in a distorted picture with the combination of hardware I was using to view VHS.

    Is it too much to ask that I be able to view the content I've paid for?

    1. Re:Cannot be saved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When it comes right down to it, all you need to do to copy the signal is create a recording device that emulates a display device well enough.

      Not true when the day comes where mandatory bioelectronic brain implants decode the content directly into the brain. Hardware producing unencrypted displays perceivable by raw human senses would be illegal. This is the total-distribution-control that the big content producers ultimately want. There's a good editorial on exactly this topic in the latest c't magazine.

    2. Re:Cannot be saved? by Grax · · Score: 1

      I have always said that someday RIAA will want license fees on that song that keeps running through your head.

      I am Henry the Eighth I am, Henry the Eighth I am I am. (Those fees could really add up after a couple of days of that.)

  13. Legal Release Date by satanami69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can somebody point me to the governing body that issues the legal release date? Or better yet, where do I have to apply to have my home videos protected from the Tawainese laws?

    Although it's nice that someone sticks it to the MPAA, how many channels would they need to go through to protect their wares. I don't like their bully tactics anymore than the rest of /., but they need a way to make a return on their investments just like you and me.

    --
    I really hate Dan Patrick.
  14. Not all that sure it's awesome... by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 1

    A buck a movie may sound good, but what I'd really be interested in, being a suit by profession, is how the revenue model looks. You can still pay one dollar for something and get ripped off. Look at it this way; there's a lot of costs avoided in this manner, not least of all the cost of the physical theatre, equipment, logistics of wordwide distribution, etc. I'm sure you're beginning to get the picture.

    Anyone got some background here?

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    1. Re:Not all that sure it's awesome... by bdolan · · Score: 1

      If you scale something like this out you have two big expenses other than marketing--that is paying for the streams and the bandwidth. The disk storage and serving itself is relatively small.

      You have to have enough bandwidth for your peak times--usually your peak usage hour is has ten percentage of 24 hour day usage. It is really important to understand your peak ratios -- outside that peak, it is wasted bandwidth (like empty airline seats.)

      Say your stream is 350k bps - the sample movie. If you can multicast (not likely ... ) then you only need to have a stream for every simultaneous movie and format (a low bandwidth version also.)

      If you don't can't multicast, your high bandwidth movie users are many times the cost of your low bandwidth users. Let's assume we don't have many low bandwidth users. So, at 350k that's only 3 movies per 1mbps of capacity or about 4 per T1. Using the peak to average ratio and assuming we have at least 1.5 hours per movie you only get two movies of capacity per 1 mbps of capacity. On a 24 hour basis that 20 movies and 600 movies per month per 1 mbps. In bulk, internet access can get to $200 per 1 mpbs. That's your biggest cost: $200 of serving per 600 movies. WHOOPS - you can't do DVD rates, even MPEG1 - your costs get into many dollars and your better off buying / renting from the local store--the clerk can hand you 9++GIGABYTES with your receipt and popcorn.

      Multicast and / or lower bandwidth costs are needed to make this kind of thing work. The MPAA shouldn't worry too much, yet -- Moore's laws keeps working.

      The real media cost is significant but pales versus bandwidth.

    2. Re:Not all that sure it's awesome... by rwired · · Score: 1

      Well, I've just tried it, and it is Awsesome. (I guess that it helps that I'm living in Taiwan at the moment).

      Anyway. All the vids I can watch from it are available in my local video store for about 3 bucks for 5 days. Since these guys obviously don't need to staff their store, and they could expect much higher turnover than a regular blockbuster (cause they are serving the whole country rather than just one neighborhood) - then what's wrong with it - 1 buck per flick for 3 days sounds about right.

      And, incase you've not noticed, they are offering 5$ free to your account, without asking any credit-card or email information.

      Good-on-em. I hope they survive.

  15. Everyone ought to check it out - NOW by bdolan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You get a movie for free and a five dollar (5 movie credit) just for signing up. You can watch - dont pontification and see it go down or get slashdotted -- regardless of whether you feel it should stay up.

    Even thought it is real streamed at 300k bps, you'll get an idea of what the future could look like if we really could get our film libraries live.

    Remember that many US concepts of copyright, fair use, etc don't translate into equivalent laws in other countries. This may be legal now and forever for agreements executed under the laws of Taiwan (this site). Note that some countries consider region coding to be unlawful (NZ?.

    Note that the fair use concept in the US is stronger than in many others.

    US owned a lot of IP and is considered to be unfair in its licensing practices in other countries -- they don't like embargoes on content, restrictive format licensing on contects, copy protection, delayed release dates in other countries and other US centric concepts.

    1. Re:Everyone ought to check it out - NOW by nzhavok · · Score: 2

      Note that even though NZ is often quote'd as being against region coding that I have never heard anything done about it here. We still sell coded DVD drives all over the place. Most of the movies in video stores are doubled up with region 1 and region 4 copies because not many people actually have region free DVD drives, and if you use WinDVD or PowerDVD these enforce region codes themselves. (Yes I know I can use DVD Genie but most people won't)

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    2. Re:Everyone ought to check it out - NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's anything like Australia then:

      - the government is watching pretty closely to see what happens, as the current situation is already creating some concerns regarding artificial trade restrictions, private import rights, etc.

      - region coding has been recognised as separate from copyright control. So whereas it might be illegal to circumvent copyright by chipping a Playstation (basically only useful for pirating content), it is not (and hopefully never will be) illegal to break, hack or work-around region coding or any other measures put in place to enforce it. Multiregion/region free players should always be legal, and the industry should not be able to prevent retailers from offering fully-enabled products or telling you where you can get them.

      My player is still region coded as I haven't bothered to get it chipped yet (have a PS2 with region-changing software anyway) but when I was buying, the staffer (in one of our most prominent retail stores) immediately asked if I wanted to chip it, and provided the address of a chipping store.

      I do wonder what they are planning to do about RCE. Obviously it's hard for our governments to control what gets put on DVDs released in the US, so we might be stuck just protecting the workarounds. But RCE is 'protection' of a near-illegal practice by restricting a specifically-declared legal workaround for it. Since one of the excuses for not taking further action so far has been "well, we have multiregion players so people can always still view their legally-imported DVDs", and this changes that, the industry might hopefully be in for some trouble.

  16. its Taiwan by WildBeast · · Score: 2

    They got plenty of movies, $1 is pretty cheap. I can use my Video/Audio Out from my computer to my VCR and record all those movies. So I couldn't care less about the 3 day rule.

  17. Is Final Fantasy on the list? by ReluctantBadger · · Score: 0, Insightful

    (That was of course a rhetorical question). Just a few hours ago, there was a /. article on Square Pictures closing its studios in Hawaii. The film revenue did not cover its production costs. Maybe, just maybe, if all the people that used services like this one had gone out and paid to see the movie like they should have, Square could be lining up another great movie.

    And $1 for a streaming film is theft. No argument can be made to the contrary. This website is using Taiwanese legal loopholes to make foreign produced movies available. You can be damn sure the film studios are seeing none of that $1 fee.

    You could argue the movie companies have enough money already. ooooh, bad film executives. Evil MPAA. But, at the end of the day, when cuts need to be made, it's never the senior management that go. It's the little guy cleaning the hallway or the young girl desperately making tea for everybody in a bid to break into the industry.

    MP3 trading is theft. DivX movie swapping is theft. Streaming movies against the license holders wishes is theft. Do not try and hide it under the "information wants to be free" flag - It is stealing, plain and simple. And even though you are still paying to see the film, it is no more legal than knowlingly purchasing a stolen car or computer from some dodgy looking chap in the back of a lorry.

    1. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whaa! Streaming movies is theft, mp3s are taking away my business. I feel so sorry for those suits. It costs $2 to press a CD, and bands get MAYBE $2 a sale. Where does the other $12 go? Fuck the RIAA. It cost $147 million to make a fucking cartoon. Are they stoned? Fuck square too, they should stick to games. Several record companies were under investigation for price fixing a couple years ago. Amazingly that all went away silently. If they didn't make it so blatantly obvious that they're ripping people off, there wouldn't be a mass market for this kind of "theft".

    2. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's hardly theft. And it's not a loophole. The MPAA et al are not entitled to any amount of copyright protection whatsoever merely as a consequence of having created some work. Not even in the US.

      There has to be a law affording them protection, in order for them to have any.

      Firstly, even in the US, there doesn't _have_ to be a law doing so at all. Congress could give up the whole idea tomorrow, repeal copyright laws, and it'd be one big free for all... domestically. (foreign countries would still have their copyrights, presumably; copyrights are not international, though there are mutual recognition agreements in many instances)

      It's much the same elsewhere -- England was the first country to have such laws, that was ~1700. Took until the 20th century for them to propagate in most countries. Why? Because no one cared about them, and if it isn't illegal, what's wrong with it?

      Secondly, US copyright law has, IIRC, been limited to only books and maps (films would've been fair game, music was), only for American authors (foreigners would be screwed), and only for 14 years (a fraction of the modern span).

      Isn't this just as arbitrary? Couldn't it be claimed that this is "stealing" by someone as unknowledgeable as yourself?

      Taiwan should pass laws that the Taiwanese _want_. It is that simple. Don't like it; don't go to Taiwan.

      (Besides which the word you're looking for is 'infringement,' not 'theft' or 'stealing.' There are specific meanings attached to each, and they're not interchangable. Go read some legal decisions on copyright some time and come back when you know enough to meaningfully participate in the discussion, kid.)

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    3. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      Ah, but why not vote with your vote, and pass a law mandating that the price be reduced?

      That _is_ the sort of thing you'd expect in a democratic society, is it not? Major music publishers have been frequently accused of illegal price fixing -- but if we adopted your view, they could do as they please, and antitrust laws a thing of the past.

      Glad I don't live in your fantasy world.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    4. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by droleary · · Score: 2

      It's hardly theft. And it's not a loophole. The MPAA et al are not entitled to any amount of copyright protection whatsoever merely as a consequence of having created some work. Not even in the US.

      How the hell did this get moderated up? Perhaps you need to read up on the Berne Convention to figure out what protection is afforded to parties for creation. Taiwan, it should be noted, is not a member. This little stunt, though, could easily turn them from a developing country into a country that gets hammered not just by the US and the MPAA, but by 95 other countries that actually value the efforts of individuals that create content.

    5. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      Uh huh. Perhaps you need to read the Constitution of the United States of America to see what protection is afforded to parties for creation. The answer: NONE.

      UNLESS Congress chooses to utilize its power to so create such protection, and then only within certain limits set by the Constitution, as interpreted by the Judiciary. Congress merely can pass such laws -- it doesn't _have_ to. In the absence of such laws, where would you claim copyright protections to eminate from?

      This is what I mean by artists not being entitled to copyright protection. Were they, it wouldn't take an enumerated power of Congress and actual passage of law by that body to do it. (and even then, the criteria used is based upon the progress of the arts -- not an automatic entitlement)

      Similarly, the Berne Convention does not impose copyright law on any non-signatory; how could it? It's a treaty! Furthermore, it doesn't establish any international copyright law so much as it requires signatories to grant a copyright to works copyrighted elsewhere. Even then, within certain bounds.

      And frankly, the US's lovely utilitarian copyright system could care less about the efforts of individuals that create content -- it cares about the social benefit of said content.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    6. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      Well one, you're over a hundred years too late. Antitrust laws are on the books, and generally work pretty well.

      Companies are indeed forced to lower prices, even on luxury goods. (among other regulations) This is particularly true when they have engaged in anticompetitive practices in order to control a market without concern for typical market forces.

      If you don't like complying with the laws of a democratic society, you can of course attempt to change them (just like everyone else does), suck it up like a man, leave, or be an outlaw.

      You appear to be opting to leave (the marketplace) at least. But do you really think _EVERYONE_ will do so? I'm not talking about regulating prices to the point where profit is impossible, only where it is acceptable to the public. A truly efficient capitalist will take any opportunity to profit he can get.

      You just sound greedy.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    7. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      Heh.

      As it happens, I'm an artist myself, and although at the moment I'm back at school, I've supported myself as an artist for years.

      Please, point to the bit where I said that copyright was a bad idea. You won't find it.

      I think it's a perfectly good idea -- when it's done right. Artists should be able to have the opportunity (there's no guarantee one's work won't flop) to support themselves.

      BUT, carried to extremes, copyright monopolies harm society's interests in being able to freely access and use works. They harm other author's interests in being able to modify works. (e.g. Disney's movies based on other people's fairy tales) They harm the efforts of preservationists to keep pieces of our culture from being lost permanently.

      These same ordinary people have an interest as well in seeing there be a broad diversity of works. It is in everyone's interest to afford _some_ protection to authors.

      Some.

      Where it makes sense for our society as a whole, not where it only stands to fatten the wallets of artists (or worse yet, cause harm w/o even any benefit to an artist b/c their work flopped).

      It is up to the people and governments of EVERY country to determine for themselves where that balance lies. A nation with few artists stands to gain little by affording them great protections. The US used to be one of these countries. Do you dare claim that one country should be subjugated to the law of another country unless the first has shown a willingness to do so!

      For such a triviality as copyright! That would be mad.

      If Taiwan _WANTS_ to develop copyright law, that is its business. If it insists that authors seeking copyright protections comply with their laws or forgoe those protections, that is its business. As Taiwan is not a Berne Convention signatory AFAIK, is has placed upon itself NO obligation to respect foreign copyrights as though they were its own. This works both ways -- we need not respect theirs. Nothing compels us to do so.

      I can't imagine how you think that attempting to circumvent the legitimate Taiwanese government in order to impose laws that the natives do not want is in any way just or fair. You advocate a violation of soverignty, because you don't like someone's internal practices.

      This kind of thing led to centuries of war before, when attacks on soverignty were undertaken for religious reasons. Took the Treaty of Westphalia for people to recognize that countries can do within their own borders as they like. Don't throw this away.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    8. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by timster · · Score: 2

      It's not ever really about lowering prices.

      Part of capitalism is the idea that prices will naturally flow to a fair point, since companies have to keep their prices low to be competitive. Antitrust comes in when companies try to beat the system and remove competition from the equation so that they can have high prices.

      "Price fixing" is never a company charging "too much". It's about systematically removing the competitive element from a market so that you can control it. In the case of retail industries, price competition starts at the end consumer purchase. The retailer doesn't care all that much if an item costs say $50 from the distributor if they can charge $100 for it. However if competition with other retailers lowers the price to $55, the retailer will start putting pressure on the distributor (perhaps by threatening to stop carrying their products) to lower the distributor's price to $25. This creates competition among distributors and lowers their profit margins.

      In the case of the record companies, they sought to avoid this trend not by defining the prices that retailers could charge (which is highly illegal) but by defining the price that they could *advertise* (which is less illegal). Most consumers won't do very heavy comparison shopping unless an advertisement clues them in, so this prevents the retailers from putting much pressure on each other; as a result most of them just charged MSRP. What's the point of having a lower price if you can't advertise it, anyway? This results in no pricing pressure on the record companies, since the retailers are making plenty of money per unit at MSRP.

      The government never sets any sort of price limits for an industry unless they decide to formally regulate it, which is never done with luxury items. Antitrust is about certain methods of doing business which must be illegal for capitalism to work.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    9. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by droleary · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. Perhaps you need to read the Constitution of the United States of America to see what protection is afforded to parties for creation. The answer: NONE.

      You say that as though that 200+ year old document was the last say on protection afforded by the United States government.

      Similarly, the Berne Convention does not impose copyright law on any non-signatory; how could it? It's a treaty! Furthermore, it doesn't establish any international copyright law so much as it requires signatories to grant a copyright to works copyrighted elsewhere. Even then, within certain bounds.

      Yeah, which is what I already said. Seems like you're just getting pissy because I called you on your statement that mere creation afforded no protection, whereas the Berne Convention states otherwise. No, Taiwan is not a signatory country but continued abuses of works created by signatory countries will likely lead to economic/trade sanctions against Taiwan.

    10. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      I find it difficult to believe that you think that the Constitution _isn't_ the last word on how the US government runs. Wasn't that rather the point. (it'll likely be a while before we see an amendment concerning copyrights)

      Treaties cannot override the Constitution, for it is what grants and governs the authority to enter into treaties. Laws passed by Congress in furtherence of treaties cannot override the Constitution, for it is what grants and governs their lawmaking ability.

      You called nothing. Perhaps you'd like to try again?

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    11. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by droleary · · Score: 1

      You called nothing. Perhaps you'd like to try again?

      Tell you what, cupcake. Since you're so sure of yourself, I invite you to start your own "music and movies for a buck" service right here in the USA. If there is no copyright protection as you say, you'll clean up big time. Until then, after you've gone through all the legal hassles involved, don't pretend you know jack about copyright law. Congratulations on being my first twit list entry.

    12. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      Who said there's no copyright protection in the US? I said that there's no copyright protection afforded by the Constitution, and that there is no copyright protection without the affirmative passage of law by Congress in accordance with the Constitution.

      Viz., there is no copyright law that is universal that we should expect Taiwan to be held to; that each country crafts its own laws for its own people's own best interests. The US is no different -- the substance of our laws may be the same, but the origins are no different.

      Claiming otherwise is as foolish as claiming that there is a correct side of the road to drive on, and that local custom can be wrong.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    13. Re:Is Final Fantasy on the list? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      If you're ignoring the fellow, you missed his response -- which is quite correct.

      He never claimed that there is no copyright protection in the United States; he claimed that there is no copyright protection afforded by the Constitution -- that is to say, that the Constitution alone is insufficient to provide copyright protections without Congress writing laws which make use of the (specific) powers which the Constitution grants them in this area. His argument hinges on this -- to paraphrase somewhat, since copyright protections are implemented by act of Congress, why is one mode or level of implementation more "right" than another? (Thus, why is the level of copyright protection afforded in the US more "right" than that afforded in Taiwan, since both result from considered decisions of their legislative bodies?)

      In short, you just twitted someone for a factually correct statement -- which makes you, in my book, an asshole.

  18. Re:I'd watch a lot more movies if they were only a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TV is not free in England. You pay a tax on it.

  19. And what is the point, exactly ? by Lejade · · Score: 1

    When just about anyone can already install a file sharing software, download all the latest films to their hard drive, SVHS to their TV and watch it as many times as they want, for free?

    With cable/DSL connections, 100 Gig HD becoming dirt cheap and DVD-Rs just around the corner, I know many people are using eDonkey, Morpheus and co to do just that...

    Wake up: video on demand is already here. And it's not controlled by the megacorps...

    1. Re:And what is the point, exactly ? by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Because it's too much of a pain to download movies. It's worth a buck to not have to try to find somebody with a copy of a movie I want to see, try to download it, get interrupted, dealing with different versions, downloading a Gig file and finding the quality sucks, ...

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    2. Re:And what is the point, exactly ? by kz45 · · Score: 1

      Wake up: video on demand is already here. And it's not controlled by the megacorps...

      It's only being CREATED by the megacorps. If they weren't here to provide you with those videos (and music), you would have none to share.

  20. I could have gotten a dollar? by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I first acquired broadband (a landmark event in my life). I figured it would be the nice thing to share out all the movies that I had downloaded for myself. All the movies I had downloaded were fresh releases, sometimes I had prerelease copies that weren't even in the theateres. I offered them in a format that could be saved to your hard disk... for free!

    but the MPAA managed to hunt me down and send me and my ISP really naughty obscene letters. they quoted obscene literature such as "Copyright Act, Title 17 United States Code Section 106(3" and "we hereby state, pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Title 17 United States Code Section 512" Eventually the letters started to get to offensive so I decisted all activity. But man, if I only had a team of lawyers at the time....

    1. Re:I could have gotten a dollar? by nzhavok · · Score: 2

      What do you expect? You were giving away these movies ripping the copyright owners off!

      I think this article is interesting because it's often fun to see big companies get screwed *legaly*, but you live in a country where the distribution is illegal. You can't just decide which laws you want to obey and which you don't, that's just not how society works.

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
  21. Amen to that! by Robber+Baron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Somethings that are free are not worth the price.

    Amen to that. I've downloaded several divx movies and after the nuisance of finding it in the first place, followed by a couple of weeks of broken and resumed downloads (and thats with a reasonably friendly file-sharing utility), using the better part of a Gig of bandwidth, and having other miscreants weezing stuff off my hard-drive, I'd rather go out and spend 20 bucks on a DVD. It's a better picture and sometimes they even throw in some other goodies (though I thought the tone poems on the Episode 1 DVD kinda sucked). I really wish someone would clue in the MPAA to this: That downloading movies is a pain in the ass and though I can't speak for everyone else's preferences, I really don't think that movie attendance or DVD sales is going to be threatened by it in any perceivable way. Please leave off the copy-protection shit and the regional encoding...you don't really need it.

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

    1. Re:Amen to that! by grazzy · · Score: 1



    2. Re:Amen to that! by oldays · · Score: 1

      Not that I do it myself, but if someone has a good ftp site and good capless cable or dsl, it'd take about 2-3 hours to get one movie. That's what MPAA is worried about.

    3. Re:Amen to that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem! DVD has a far better picture AND sound than any divx file I've ever seen (and I've seen almost 200, from all kinds of sources).

    4. Re:Amen to that! by alexburke · · Score: 1

      Slashdot math: 50+1-1=49 Huh! must be using one of those new AMD processors...

      What's even more amusing is that 50-1+1=50. :)

  22. Re:price point - Needs to be =$1 World Wide by bdolan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One dollar is a lot for 80% of the world, about right for a lot of the far east, and "too cheap" in the US. This would be the same even if it is DVD quality.

    The nice thing about buying items from the rest of the world is that it is often at a much lower price point overseas. Importing IP into the US is far easier than buying other IP such as drugs in Mexico.

  23. Same treatment as the Ukraine? by BusterB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if the US government is going to threaten a trade embargo with Taiwan until its government passes a DMCA-like law. But then again, could the US really afford such a trade ban with Taiwan? Almost everything is made there!

    1. Re:Same treatment as the Ukraine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look at what we give them: a huge trade inbalance (we consume much more than we send to them)

      Christ yes, they wouldn't want to lose the opportunity to send you a load of stuff and get back less in return.

    2. Re:Same treatment as the Ukraine? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The strategic importance of Taiwan right now is such that if the MPAA started complaining about Taiwanese copyright violations in Washington, they would be cheerfully told to go merrily and directly to hell.

    3. Re:Same treatment as the Ukraine? by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2

      If pretzels are made in Taiwan, then we may see this trade ban.

    4. Re:Same treatment as the Ukraine? by JordanH · · Score: 3
      • I wonder if the US government is going to threaten a trade embargo with Taiwan until its government passes a DMCA-like law.

      Maybe Taiwan already has a DMCA-like law. Who knows?

      This seems to be an entirely different issue altogether. Taiwan just insists on certain time limits wrt Copyright registration and protection.

      Seems pretty reasonable to me. This requirement just makes sorting out copyright infringement claims later much easier.

      What will almost certainly happen is that the Studios will take care to make sure the Copyright protection is in place in Taiwan before opening movies now.

      IANAL, but it would seem that telcos and ISPs might be at risk for carrying this in the US. Any knowledgeable lawyers out there who can speak to this?

    5. Re:Same treatment as the Ukraine? by theancient2 · · Score: 1

      Considering that all they have to do is register for protection within a month of the movie's release, they'll probably just do that instead. If they're not playing by the rules in that country, it's their own fault -- but it's also easy to correct the problem without a lot of trouble.

    6. Re:Same treatment as the Ukraine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case shouldn't we correct this by sending them even more stuff than they're sending us? Then I guess you'd think that would help our economy? Christ, we could give away absolutely everything, that'd give us the strongest economy on earth.

      Dollars (or any other currency) are pointless unless you buy stuff with them. If they don't actually buy our goods and just give us their goods for a stack of paper notes then no, that's not good for them, they're giving away their resources for a bunch of IOUs.

    7. Re:Same treatment as the Ukraine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they do have some trade restrictions on certain electronics, since the US makers threatened to cry when they couldn't produce the same things for less.

    8. Re:Same treatment as the Ukraine? by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      Considering that Taiwan is right next to a large nuclear power who wishes they didn't exist (and have suggested that they would help that come about before), isn't that a little unwise?

      I mean, I suspect that China's leaders are bright enough not to pick this fight, but I can't see that continuing forever and the US wouldn't easily win a war with China...

      It also surprises me a little that we're so reliant on a country that's seismically unstable for precision manufacturing. How long were the factories offline for last time they had an earthquake?

      (Yes, I know the UK's almost certainly just as dependent, before that one gets brought up.)

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    9. Re:Same treatment as the Ukraine? by Kallahar · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that most things manufactured in taiwan are owned by American companies! If we wanted to, we could convince our companies to move their plants to any of a dozen south asian countries, thus hurting the Taiwan economy.

  24. slashdotted? by mjh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe it's just my connection, but I can't seem to get to this site very well. If it can't suvive the /. effect, exactly how are they going to succesfully stream video ?

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    1. Re:slashdotted? by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 1

      They are giving away a free stream of 'hollywood confidential' that worked fine on my adsl connection. It looks like they went out and bought a bunch of bootleg VCD's and put them online :). I agree, let's give these dudes a week before the government closes up their shop.

    2. Re:slashdotted? by spudnic · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does appear to be quite slow navigating the site, but the streaming seems very solid.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    3. Re:slashdotted? by m_evanchik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have the same experience. The web site is slow but the streaming video is maxing out my broadband at 1050 Kbs.

      This is pretty interesting. I guess they did a good job scaling their video servers but not a good job on the web server. Kudos to them for devoting the most resources to the most important application.

    4. Re:slashdotted? by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Or possibly we're seeing the latency because of a satellite connection or something? Once the connection is established it's fast. I see this quite often at sites where our clients have satellite Internet access. Pages take a good while to come up, and running ssh over them is horrible, but once a download starts they are great.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    5. Re:slashdotted? by SomeoneYouDontKnow · · Score: 2

      I think you're right. Doing a Traceroute seems to indicate that the ping times go way up as the data is crossing the Pacific. It's on HiNet's network, with a router in Palo Alto, if the name is correct on the reverse DNS. When it leaves there bound for Taiwan, that's when ping times really go up. Anyone know about HiNet's network topology?

      --
      That light you see at the end of the tunnel might be from an oncoming train.
  25. Hmmm... cheap movies :) by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

    That reminded me off a special type of video cassete on which you bought a recent movie for half price. A special mechanism would trigger after the first viewing and at the second viewing the tape would be erased gradually while watching it.
    So you could only see the movie twice and then have a blank tape which acted as any other tape. Everybody tought it was great !!!

    After two days the net was full of articles about howto hack the tapes, you could just remove the 'erase head' (magnet) in under 15 minutes with some practice.

    Oddly the tapes have never been heared of since...

    1. Re:Hmmm... cheap movies :) by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      That reminded me off a special type of video cassete on which you bought a recent movie for half price.

      It was called "2View".

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  26. Balls by corby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These guys definitely have gonads. Not only are they throwing a big "up yours" to the MPAA. but they are also charging for access to hit TV shows like "Friends."

    Some of their pricing decisions seem a bit arbitrary, however. For example, you can view the 3h17m movie Magnolia for the price of a single download, but the similarly long Schindler's list is broken up into three streams that must be viewed separately.

    I give them five days before the US government threatens to give China the green light to annex unless the Taiwanese government cracks down on this site.

    1. Re:Balls by karmma · · Score: 3, Informative
      These guys definitely have gonads. Not only are they throwing a big "up yours" to the MPAA. but they are also charging for access to hit TV shows like "Friends."

      Umm... there are places in the world that have access to the internet and *don't* have access to NBC broadcasts. Think globally.
    2. Re:Balls by corby · · Score: 2

      Umm... there are places in the world that have access to the internet and *don't* have access to NBC broadcasts. Think globally.

      I'm not sure I understand your point. I said that Movie88.com has balls because they are going to attract some extremely unwelcome attention from large, moneyed interests who can exercise more than their fair share of influence on the US government (and by extension, the Taiwanese goverment).

      If you think this is changed by the fact that some people who are downloading "Friends" episodes don't get it on their local telly, you are extremely mistaken.

    3. Re:Balls by steved · · Score: 1

      Yea, Like San Francisco. Those of us without cable are now without NBC since they relocated to San Jose.

  27. It's only a buck! by ndogg · · Score: 1

    Those damn 10-10-220 commercials keep running through my head.

    Now instead of those guys talking about 10-10-220, I can hear them saying, "A dollar buys you a lot at movie88. At movie88, you can watch any movie you want for just a buck!"

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  28. Dollar movies by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1, Redundant
    I'd watch a lot more movies if they were only a buck.

    You can already watch a movie for a buck at a dollar theater, and on a big screen too. The only problem is that a bag of popcorn and a coke still cost $9.

    However, you can circumvent that problem with a low-tech method: have your girlfriend bring a big purse stuffed with goodies.

    1. Re:Dollar movies by nice · · Score: 1

      We don't have girlfriends, but we do have many, many, pockets.

    2. Re:Dollar movies by ethereal · · Score: 1

      I recommend a couple Taco Bell cheap burrito-like items stuffed in one's back pockets, then covered with a coat. Just remember: don't sit down 'til you remove them, and know that it's very messy to eat burritos in the dark :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    3. Re:Dollar movies by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I recommend a couple Taco Bell cheap burrito-like items stuffed in one's back pockets, then covered with a coat. Just remember: don't sit down 'til you remove them, and know that it's very messy to eat burritos in the dark :)

      You forgot to mention that Taco Hell is nasty. Del Taco's much better. :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    4. Re:Dollar movies by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Don't have one of those around here, although we do have a Taco John's which is about the same as Taco Hell.

      What're really good are the little local joints run by real Mexican chefs, but those burritos are usually too large to fit in ones' pants pockets :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  29. Big Server by TheGreatAvatar · · Score: 1

    They must have one hell-of-a server farm. Just went there and started streaming a movie. Figured by now they would have ben /.ed. Sunday may be a slow day for the effect ;-). Still, when I looked into doing this a couple of years ago, it was going to take some heavy iron to get the response times I was getting.

    --
    Three things are certain: Death, taxes, and lost data. Guess which has occurred.
  30. Prophecy! by Major · · Score: 1

    Yeah this'll last. Right.

    Taco once again proves his prophetic powers... the site's already MIA. Granted, that's just 'cause it's been slashdotted to the Seventh Circle of Hell, but hey...

    --=Major

    --
    One useless man is called a disgrace; two are called a law firm; and three or more become a Congress. -John Adams, 1776
  31. Sure.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just as legal as the copy of Visual Studio Enterprise I bought in Taipei for $1

    1. Re:Sure.... by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      Well you may have paid your friend a buck to make a CDR, or you might have made a deal with some kid in a back alley, but you didn't buy it in a shop. I've lived in Taipei for ten years and I haven't seen pirated stuff in shops in Taiwan in the last six of seven. Hong Kong and lots of other places sure, but not Taiwan.

  32. Taiwanese movies by Cowculator · · Score: 1

    Now that this is happening to commercial films, I bet Taiwanese politician Chu Mei-Feng wants to file for copyright herself...

  33. Save it with... streambox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yeah, like I did with that Kylie Minogue commercial ;)

    Not sure of the URL, but if you type streambox into google it should come up with the goods. I think its windows only, though.

    I'm going to go and save a load of films to my hard disk now. :)

  34. Re:I'd watch a lot more movies if they were only a by isorox · · Score: 2

    Yup, is a disgusting tax that you have to pay regardless of wheter your watch BBC or not, and regardless of whether you earn £5000 a year or £500,000.

    However life sucks. And BBC doesnt get adverts.

  35. Re:Dollar movies and expensive snacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had an old leather jacket just for this purpose. I could hide a 12 inch sub and a six pack in the liner.

  36. Well, this'll be interesting. by Merconium · · Score: 1
    If there's one thing that can be certain, the island of Taiwan is the heart of true capitalism. Ever been to Hong Kong? Navy buddies of mine have bought cameras, DVD players, nice AV Recievers, all for 75% less than what you'd pay anywhere in th US.

    These guys will find a way to make this work (I hope.)

    1. Re:Well, this'll be interesting. by netsharc · · Score: 2, Funny

      If there's one thing that can be certain, the island of Taiwan is the heart of true capitalism. Ever been to Hong Kong?

      What are you really trying to say? Hongkong is not part of Taiwan. Or do you just mean the region? Hmm join the navy and not know the difference between Taiwan and Hongkong.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  37. Account Creation Broken? by volsung · · Score: 2
    Is anyone else having trouble creating an account on the Movie88 site? I select a user name and password, and then get routed to their movie database without being logged in. When I try to log in, it tells me the password is wrong.

    Has anyone been able to actually test this service?

    1. Re:Account Creation Broken? by bdolan · · Score: 1

      worked for me - 2 minutes after being posted in slashdot. Might not scale.

    2. Re:Account Creation Broken? by volsung · · Score: 2
      Followup- The problem was either Netscape or it they fixed their end very quickly. I was able to create an account using Mozilla without too much difficulty.

      Now I can login using Netscape (where I have RealPlayer configured) and see if this thing really works. :)

    3. Re:Account Creation Broken? by mbennis · · Score: 0

      it didn't work for me either the first time.
      Second time it told me that i was using a already userd login, so i changed tit and it worked.
      SO the first request did create a login but ended in error.

  38. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  39. econ101 by dal3 · · Score: 1

    And the buck a film rate strikes me as awesome. I'd watch a lot more movies if they were only a buck.

    Yes, and I'd buy a lot more cars if they were only a buck. What's your point?

  40. Re:price point - Needs to be =$1 World Wide by sydb · · Score: 2

    Importing IP into the US is far easier than buying other IP such as drugs in Mexico.

    Interesting that you consider drugs to be intellectual property. Care to expand?

    --
    Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  41. stream capturing by buckrogers · · Score: 2

    one of the really cool features back in the day of the bbs was a program that would detect when you were downloading an image and display it as it came in. This worked totally seperate from the terminal program.

    Wouldn't it be cool if you would put a machine on the network that watched every packet going by and detected when you were receiving a stream of data and would write that stream of data to the drive and then convert it to DivX? Then it could have streaming software and a web server to show you everything that is available and to present it to anyone in the house.

    --
    -- Never make a general statement.
    1. Re:stream capturing by telstar · · Score: 1

      one of the really cool features back in the day of the bbs was a program that would detect when you were downloading an image and display it as it came in.

      Yeah ... images*cough*porn*cough*...images...

    2. Re:stream capturing by spudnic · · Score: 2

      What would be cool is to have something like TotalRecorder for video. For those that don't know, TotalRecorder acts as an audio device driver in Windows. You set it as the default device and play whatever you want on your computer. When it's told to, the device driver encodes everything that is sent through it to a file on the drive based on your compression settings and algorithm of choice, then passes the audio on to the real driver for it to be played.

      TR is great for unencrypting all those Audible files, etc. so you can save them out as a standard mp3 or whatever. I just set it up and start playing the encrypted file before I go to bed. Next morning I have an mp3. I also record several radio shows this way. A cron job launches TotalRecorder about a minute before the show comes on. When the show is about to start it launches a url to the streaming audio of the radio station. It only writes to the file when there is audio to play, so no problems.

      Why not have something that did the same thing for the video card when in full screen mode? Combine the two and you're set.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    3. Re:stream capturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Dude,

      There is no shame in watching pr0n. Maybe to a few puritan and feminist nuts, but pr0n is now the NORM in the world today.

    4. Re:stream capturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, you sound like you know the program, he he he.

  42. this is such crap... by pipeb0mb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It can't even keep track of my username. "Welcome VISITOR" after it tells me 'signin successful'.
    It's a big endless loop of 'sign in', choose a movie, 'sign in', etc.

    Already slowed to the point that it's worthless...

    Also, no 'Clerks' or 'Chasing Amy'. Or the search function just doesn't work...

    sigh.

    1. Re:this is such crap... by volsung · · Score: 2
      I had the same problem when I used Netscape. I got it to work with Mozilla. It seemed like some sort of frame stupidity that Netscape didn't do correctly. Once you create your account, you can log in using Netscape.

      So far the only problem has been the 6 zillion people hitting the site all at once.

    2. Re:this is such crap... by xigxag · · Score: 1

      Some people have had problems like this while using Norton Firewall. If you have that installed, you may want to check about how to pass referrer info to the website.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  43. I'd buy that for a dollar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Wow, "James Bond and Batman" ?

    I'd pay full price to see THAT movie! :)
    Heck, I'd pay DOUBLE if Batman was played by Adam West.

  44. Passing the Buck by telstar · · Score: 1

    The number one reason why this can't survive is bandwith. At $1 a movie, there is no way that a company can manage to pay its employees, maintain its servers, pay for the bandwith required to deliver streamed full-length movies, and pay the legal expenses that are sure to cost more than the three other previously mentioned expenses.

  45. Newbie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you new to Linux?

  46. Movie financing about to be turned on its head by Thagg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm in the movie business, specifically visual effects, and I strongly feel that we are on the precipice of a cliff in film budgets. CmdrTaco opines that he'd 'see a lot more movies if they were only a buck', and that would no doubt be true, but there is no way that anyone will ever be able to finance film extravaganzas like Pearl Harbor or, more to the point for this group, The Lord of The Rings for a dollar a ticket. Of course, in this Taiwanese case, the studios are probably getting $0.00 for each ticket, so it's even harder to break even.

    The only way to finance a movie in this new world is to sell the eyeballs that are watching the movie for other purposes. Already theaters make about half of their money on concessions, for example. The two other obvious ways of making money on the film is ancillary merchandise (toys, etc.) and product placement (advertising) within the film.

    Future films will have smaller budgets, as these ancillary sources of revenues probably cannot replace the big ticket prices being charged today. One can make exciting movies for less money, of course. We worked on The Fast and The Furious last year, which was a low-budget (by today's standards) movie that was designed to get the most bangs for the very limited visual effects bucks that were available. We've been fortunate enough to be named to the "Bake-Off" for visual effects this Wednesday night, where they will choose the Oscar nominees -- which demonstrates that you can do competitive visual effects-laden movies on very limited budgets.

    This may not sit well with the ILM's of the world -- but it is also inevitable. While with music there were huge profit margins that gave the record companies some slack with the advent of song sharing over the 'net, the movie studios don't have that kind of margin anymore. Once movie sharing becomes ubiquitous, they just will not be able to make $100M blockbusters.

    Enjoy them while you can.

    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    1. Re:Movie financing about to be turned on its head by Captn+Pepe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not convinced that you're right about the impact of cheap online movies on ticket sales. For the forseeable future, the best quality movie that can be reasonably distributed electronically is going to be highly compressed, e.g. MPEG-4 or similar, video streams. While this format looks okay on a computer monitor, slap it up on your home entertainment system with 60-inch TV and 18 speakers, and the result will look and sound like absolute crap. That is why people are going to keep going to movie theaters -- to see a movie with very high fidelity on audiovisual equipment that they could never afford. If anything, look for ticket prices to keep going up as this will become the major draw of movie theaters.

      Where this sort of streaming will have a big impact is in the video sale/rental market, which depending on the movie accounts for anywhere from 20-80% of total revenue. After all, an online stream or download is likely available before the video is released, is cheaper by far than buying the DVD, and likely looks better than the thouroughly beaten up VHS tapes at your local rental store. If anything, look for audiovisual effects to be regarded as a defense against online availability of movies in the future. Then people might actually go out and see the movie in a theater after downloading it, just to see/hear what they were missing.

      On the other hand, $100M is an awful lot of money to spend making *anything*, and is certainly out of line with what is spent on most works of art. The protesters dancing outside the WEF in New York right now might have some ideas about how that money could have been more productively used. If summer action blockbusters go the way of pyrimid building as an art form, many would argue that cinematic art would be better off.

      --

      Quantum mechanics: the dreams that stuff is made of.
    2. Re:Movie financing about to be turned on its head by Turing+Machine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but there is no way that anyone will ever be able to finance film extravaganzas like Pearl Harbor or, more to the point for this group, The Lord of The Rings for a dollar a ticket

      You may be right, but one could certainly argue otherwise. Producing movies is a lot like software in that almost all of the costs are upfront. Once the movie is made, or the distribution CDs are burned, the added cost to the production company of adding another viewing is minimal. Example:

      Suppose I go to the movies about 4 times a year at the current $7.00 price (which is about right). Now suppose the price drops to a buck and I start going every week. In the first scenario I transfer $28.00/year to the theater (and indirectly to the studio). In the second one, I transfer $52.00/year to the theater. The added costs incurred by the theater are very small (in fact, they wind up making a lot more money on concessions). The added costs to the studio are minimal (they'd need to strike more prints, and they're expensive, but they'd be amortized across a larger number of viewings).

      The point is that you can't automatically assume that "higher retail price" == "higher profit". Rolex watches cost a lot more than Timex ones. Which company makes more money? A meal at Wolfgang Puck's restaurant costs a lot more than one at McDonalds. Which company makes more money?

      Another example: In the early days of VHS tapes they were selling them for $70-$100 each (in less-inflated dollars!). Now they're more like $20. Guess which price has proven to yield more money?

      It MAY be that the current ticket prices maximize revenue. It may not. Expecting reasonable business practices from Hollywood is a little unrealistic, so I don't think we know for sure.

      Of course, your point about no one producing a big-budget movie in an atmosphere of universal piracy is spot on. Lower prices can increase profits, but the price has to be greater than 0. :-)

    3. Re:Movie financing about to be turned on its head by leviramsey · · Score: 1
      The only way to finance a movie in this new world is to sell the eyeballs that are watching the movie for other purposes. Already theaters make about half of their money on concessions, for example. The two other obvious ways of making money on the film is ancillary merchandise (toys, etc.) and product placement (advertising) within the film.

      Wrt to the theaters, that's been true for decades. Think about it. For the average new release, the percentages work out thusly:

      • 1st week of release: studio/distributor take 70% (sometimes more) of the gross.
      • 2nd week of release: studio/distributor take c.60% of gross
      • 3rd week and thereafter: s/d take c. 50% of gross
      This has a few effects:
      • It forces small theaters out of business. Since the best deal is if the theater keeps the movie in rotation for 3+ weeks, a 1-screen theater can't do that, except with exceptional films (The Lord of the Rings comes to mind).
      • Since 50% of the average film's gross is in the first two weeks, theaters make enough off the average ticket sale to pay the employees and maybe some utilities.
      • OTOH, concessions are pure profit. Last time I checked (some 5 years ago) a 50-lb bag of popcorn kernels sells for about $3. How many $5 servings of popcorn are in that bag?
    4. Re:Movie financing about to be turned on its head by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2
      Here's what turns me off about rising movie ticket prices. I live in California, and when the power crisis hit ticket prices went up $.25 supposedly to pay for the power. Now power prices are back down but that $.25 is still there. If another power crisis comes I can be sure to see the tickets go up another $.25. Ten years ago a regularly priced ticket was $5.00. Now it's $9.50. WTF?!? If hollywood would stop shoveling shit onto the market maybe they would do better. Yet Hollywood has been shoveling shit for at least two or three decades and for a while there profits were just fine.

      The hollywood greed machine feeds itself. Eventually the general populace will give a big FUCK YOU to $12.00 ticket prices when they arrive, and go buy the DVD of it for $19.99.

    5. Re:Movie financing about to be turned on its head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, sure - most americans watch their movies at home, so that's where the real money is. Furthermore, the theater owners take a big cut of the ticket price, where DVDs only have the normal retail markup. An enormous number of movies are in-n-out of the theaters in a couple weeks and make all of their profit on video.

      It might not seem like it, but going to a theater is a luxury service, so it's not very price sensitive. You are paying a premium for the big screen and big sound, and a place to go on a date.

    6. Re:Movie financing about to be turned on its head by asparagus · · Score: 1

      You're ignoring the 'nut,' or the sum the theatre ganks out of the money pot before doing the splits (sometimes after, depending). This is about 2-5k/screen/week, depending upon the theatre/film/etc.

      In the end, it works out that the movie theatre ends up with about half of the money you paid for the ticket. Not a bad profit margin.

    7. Re:Movie financing about to be turned on its head by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2
      On the other hand, movie technology is advancing rapidly. Take a look at the short film duality . (divx version available from divx.com).


      That movie was made mostly by two guys. Total crew for everything was around 8. They used good consumer level equipment. Editing and special effects were done on Macs using about $2000 worth of software. It's only their second attempt at a movie, too.


      And guess what? Duality looks as good as anything in the original Star Wars.


      I think we are entering a phase where the resources required to make a top notch movie with full special effects are going to go way down. So maybe it is true that it won't be possible to get a $200 million budget for a major movie...but I don't think anyone will need a $200 million budget anymore.

  47. Just great.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, wonderful, find a site that's (practically) giving movies away, then post it to Slashdot.

    Anyone else think the poster works for the RIAA? Jeez, I think that sound was some poor server in Taiwan melting.

    Moderators - It's Funny. Laugh.

  48. Works ok... by hklingon · · Score: 1

    I have both windows and linux boxes to play around with this on. I do not believe the site itself is 'slashdotted' but aparently someone providing bandwidth between here and taiwan has a congested link. The site was very slow earlier, so I did a traceroute from my site (eastern US) and a site we help manage in Moscow. The Moscow traceroute was through a completely different link, and the site was up even though I could not get to it from my Windows box. Testing the site in lynx, from moscow, was much more responsive, as well. From the US site, it looks like hinet.net was the bandwidth bottle neck for US users, though aparently, they got it fixed because I'm watching a movie. I'm 22 hops away in the eastern US, and 14 hops in eastern Europe.

    As far as accounts go, they seem to have some problem with Netscape for linux. Mozilla seems to work ok, though they seem to rely on some scripting features not used by Mozilla to manage user logins once you decide on what movie you want to watch. It might be a cookie thing, too. It seems to work well in IE 5.5 and IE6 for Windows.

    I have been watching Frankenstein Goes to College for the past 45 minutes or so -- no skips, data loss, fragmentation, or other oddities.

    Wendell

    1. Re:Works ok... by volsung · · Score: 1

      Have you gotten it to actually start playing the movie in Mozilla or Netscape on Linux? Even though I have Real Player installed (at least Spinner.com thinks so), I keep getting a message telling me that they can't detect Real Player.

    2. Re:Works ok... by Kool+Moe · · Score: 1

      Works great so far for me as well. 384k SDSL line and watching for 25min so far w.no skips, etc. Set to fullscreen setting and it really does NOT look bad at all.
      Netscape wouldn't work for me either (Win2k), but IE works fine (as is sadly and increasingly more common) - signed up, got a supposed $5 credit, and watching the freebie myself.
      Will try another one tonite if the Pats start losing badly - over the X10 setup from the office to the TV room. On a 29" TV from the couch, these compressed movies tend not to look bad at all! Specially for a $1.
      Will be interesting to see this sites halflife ;)
      KM

      --
      Kinda like Moe, but just a little more Kool
    3. Re:Works ok... by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 2

      I can't get it to work with either Netscape or Galleon (using the Mozilla plugin). Haven't tried Moz itself yet. Any tips for getting it to work with Linux (or alternatively stealing the URL so that the video can be saved)?

      HH

    4. Re:Works ok... by CanadaDave · · Score: 1
      I'm having the same problem. My RealPlayer usually works anywhere else, but I keep getting a little Javascript pop-up window saying that I don't have RealPlayer installed. What gives?

      Linux sex: strip, touch, finger, mount, fsck, umount

    5. Re:Works ok... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      I've got this problem as well, and after a bit of superficial checking out, the problem appears to be that the Real Player plugin helper isn't registering itself correctly with Netscape, calling itself rpnp.so, instead of Real something or other. Since the detection routine is expecting a string containing 'Real' it fails. I had a look on the Real plugin forum and some users have already noticed this, but there's no word on a solution yet.

  49. Movies 88 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everytime i try and watch a movie about 30 minutes into it. It cuts me off saying someone has logged in with my password and I must exit now.

    The picture quality is good, but its a very small window. I had to zoom down to 800x600 just to see anything. Its not Resizable either.

  50. It worked for me, but... by shooz · · Score: 1

    I created an account and begain to watch "Eyes Wide Shut" but after about 30 seconds it was inturrupted saying that someone else had logged into my account, which I doubt.

    1. Re:It worked for me, but... by shooz · · Score: 1

      Ok, now it is working. RealVideo at 80.0Kbps. English subtitles. The quality sucks but this is pretty damn cool.

  51. Totally Outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This site is such a joke. Do you think I can just send them $5 and have them stream the pirated DVD via the international postal service.
    Well, it's good for a laugh.

  52. Damn it by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 3, Redundant

    The *buffering buffering buffering buffering 3%*
    Da *buffering*
    mn *buffer--*
    movi *buffering*
    e got sla *buffering buffering buffering buffering 3 hours remaining*
    shdot *buffering*
    ted! *buffering*

    --joshua

    1. Re:Damn it by damiam · · Score: 1

      If it's too slow to stream, download it and play it off your hard disk.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  53. /.d by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Funny
    (Roll of the drums)

    A new development - the site was slashdotted - it's extremely slow and video downloads do not work!

    I can almost hear the engineer in the background... " She canna take much moore of it, keptin! "...

    I'd suspect that even if they have access to the fattest pipes in Taiwan, the international feed to Taiwan would be saturated with /.ers around the world hammering it...

    Here's to their good luck!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:/.d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just there watching at 300k.. no noticable latency. It is your connection that is the problem, I suspect.

  54. Watch out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you understand this section:

    7. INDEMNITY

    You agree to indemnify and hold us, and our subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, agents, co-branders or other partners, and employees, harmless from any claim, demand,loss and damage whatsoever including reasonable attorneys' fees, made by any third party due to or arising out of your use of the Product, your connection to the Product, your breach/violation of the TOS, or your breach/violation of any rights of another or any existing laws (local, state, national and/or international) whatsoever.

    If they get sued by the big movie companies... who's gonna pay...?

  55. US vs China + MPAA vs. Taiwan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tonight.. on FOX!

    I'm wondering how long Taiwan is going to remain free now. Certainly, the MPAA (And supporting RIAA) will send a large strike force to aid China in eradicating Taiwan! Forsooth! Those not with the Holy Union of the RIAA and MPAA, are against them!

    Eh, more seriously, this won't help Taiwan out any. The RIAA and MPAA *do* have large amounts of sway with our friendly neighborhood politicians. Stuff like this will come up when they're deciding whether or not to turn a blind eye to China wiping them off the face of the Earth someday.

  56. OMG! Copy control ACHIEVED! by Dwonis · · Score: 2
    The movie is streamed in a format that doesn't allow you to save it on the harddrive,

    Hah! They don't even control the client hardware.

  57. Mini Review by 00Monkey · · Score: 1

    Site is ok, they are using RealPlayer format (YUCK) but they managed to pull it off better than most. Problems I had were for some reason I kept getting kicked out of the movie because it said I logged in from another location, which was not true and couldn't be since I just created the account 10 minutes before I got the first error message. Also when I log in to continue the movie it can take up to 200-300 seconds to rebuffer after finding the part of the movie I left off at.

    Overall a cool idea but if I have to stop watching my movie all the time because of some flaw in their website, it will just end up making me mad.

  58. Re:price point - Needs to be =$1 World Wide by bdolan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Virtually all of the cost of new drugs is in finding or creating the one out of 1000s that has significant beneficial effects vs damage and then going through exhaustive trials to make sure you didn't miss something.

    Actually manufacturing the resulting drugs is sometimes expensive depending on the process, but it usually nearly free. In third world countries there are often identical drugs that are 1/10 or 1/100 the blockbuster price in the US. And generics are often drastically cheaper even in the US.

    The raw materials are often virtually free, aspirin, codeine etc in bulk powder form went for at most a dollar or two per KG, when I last checked about ten years ago.

    Not unlike the cost of your homemade copy of windows on a CD vs from the manufacturer or the cost of the truly high quality plug and play fully functional "Rolex" knockoff vs the one that the Rolex company makes, or YSL dress or Gucci bag ... The IP of knowing how to make it is only value due to IP protection.

  59. Non-copyright infringing uses by Chris+Hiner · · Score: 2, Informative

    They've got some pre-1923 movies, that are out of copyright now. Look in the classics section. Imagine a service like this, if copyright only lasted 20 years...

  60. Yeah, that log in deal is bogus. by ahfoo · · Score: 1

    I got the same thing other posters had about someone else is using your username. Hmm. Sounds a bit odd that so many people ran into the same problem.

    I did find a windows .ra capture tool that does seem to work. How fun, now if they'd just let us download them as divx or asf it would be like p2p, but more organized.

  61. Re:Why can't chinese people form plurals properly? by jchristopher · · Score: 1
    You can tell this site is chinese because they don't form plurals properly. E.g. they have a list of many "free movie" and a list of all of the "genre". Why do Chinese people have so much trouble making plurals? Just add an 's' and be done with it!

    For a funny take on this topic, visit http://www.engrish.com/. It's hilarious. This particular site is about funny English-Japanese translations, but the effect is the same.

  62. I've gotten it to work (sort of)... by pheonix · · Score: 2

    And it's not TOO bad. It's worth a buck to see a movie that I wasn't sure I wanted to see, if they fix the damn bugs... it's not worth a buck if I really wanna see the movie.

    I created an account and started watching "American Pie 2". The first three things I noticed out the gate... the sound SUCKS, the picture at 300K is very small, and the subtitles (which you can't turn off) are almost always completely wrong. On the up side, there was NO slowdown or stutter in the video or audio over the course of the entire hour I was able to watch the movie.

    After about an hour, the stream suddenly stopped, giving, instead, an error message that someone had just logged in as my user name, so I was being logged out. The message further indicated that it was likely my fault for handing out my login information.

    I then spent over a half hour trying to log back in to no avail. It is apparently impossible to log in... period. Ultimately, I created a new account again, ran the free movie (Frankenstein in College), and was confronted with the same problems again... to include my "stolen account". I find the odds of that happening, TWICE, staggering...

    At any rate, it could be a decent service if they offer a larger screen version, fix their sound, fix/remove the captions, and repair their screwy login system.

    Well, my $0.02, and that's probably overrated...

    1. Re:I've gotten it to work (sort of)... by emmons · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they've got login problems up the arse right now.. I can't even add a movie to my list without getting that damned "somebody's logged in with your accout" crap. I've tried 2 different accounts on 3 browsers (IE6, Opera6, Mozilla 0.9.7) and none work. Shitty site, but it would be cool if it would work!

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. What is Linux good for? by Serial+Troller · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Linux is for GAY HOMOSEXUAL NEWBIES who can't figure out how to use Windows. And Slashdot is perfect for all you GAY HOMOSEXUAL NEWBIES to discuss it and bash a real OS that you're all too incompetent to figure out.

    GAY HOMOSEXUAL NEWBIES. All of you.

    --

    STOP ME BEFORE I POST AGAIN!

  65. Damn the luck by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

    Well, damn it. Looks like the site is effectively slashdotted, and I'm not going to get to see their free preview of "Frankenstein: The College Years". Man, I was really looking forward to seeing that, too. =)

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  66. In Chinese, number marking is optional by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Why do Chinese people have so much trouble making plurals?

    Probably because marking number on nouns is optional in Chinese. Chinese has a noun for "one or more men" or "one or more" of anything else, and you can add adjectives that translate as "one" or "many" to make the noun specifically singular or plural.

    Just add an 's' and be done with it!

    That doesn't work on all nouns. Child does not become *childs, and sheep does not become *sheeps.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  67. Streambox VCR anyone? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

    This was a program that very briefly let people download streaming RealMedia files to their hard drives to watch later, or even convert them to open formats like MPEG.

    Does anyone still have a copy of this program? Can you try it on this site to see if it still works? I know after Real got the company shut down they changed their format around to break a lot of Streambox's functionality.

    Every day I still curse Streambox for bending over and let Real have their way with them. If only this site were using Windows Media! ASFRecorder is still working flawlessly even on the latest WM8 files.

    - JoeShmoe

    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    1. Re:Streambox VCR anyone? by _ganja_ · · Score: 2

      Streambox had a nasty phone home, spyware thing built in. At the link below you can download
      streambox, the cracks to remove the "phone home" problem and also an intercept tool.

      http://www.afterdawn.com/software/audio_software /a udio_tools/streambox_vcr.cfm

      I haven't tested the download, so naturally use it at your own risk.

      --

      A journey of a thousand miles starts with a brutal anal raping at airport security

    2. Re:Streambox VCR anyone? by sbetree · · Score: 1

      No - Streambox VCR's phone home thing triggered only on first-run, and was used to count the # of beta-testers. Enter a real email and it would add you to the beta test mailing list. Edit yer registry instead, and it would never phone home for that first time. Streambox Ripper did/does same thing.

      Also, (not your message) it never converted from rm to mpeg, only lets you download pnm, rtsp, and mms streams of whatever is streaming. very cool.

      finally, the great streambox vcr underground site seems to be down, but some half-ass mirrors exist here and there-- google for vcr underground and streambox vcr underground if you want the program and cracks.

  68. This is terrible for peope against the DMCA by -tji · · Score: 2

    I can't believe the reaction this is getting on Slashdot. This is basically giving the MPAA all the ammunition it needs to get their increasingly restrictive controls approved.

    I am completely against all the extreme restrictions that things like the DMCA can put upon us. But, I am completely for the protection of intellectual properties for their creators. If the movie houses don't make money off of their movies, you can expect the quantity and quality to go way down.

    1. Re:This is terrible for peope against the DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break it to you, but quality packed up and left Hollywood over a decade ago. Or do you consider such intellectually-stimulating titles as, "Dude! Where's my car!!" to be quality entertainment?

      And this is also legal. No matter how much the MPAA may get their panties in a knot over it, Taiwan apparently doesn't have the same kind of copyright laws as the U.S. does -- nevermind reading the article, did you even read the Slashdot synopsis??

  69. video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im glad i got my video out card :)

  70. Yep by Dusabre · · Score: 1

    Its ironic that these pirates are very vulnerable to being ripped off in turn. Their protection of their own income stream is pretty weak. It is possible to use some very basic software, locate the URL, and download the films (complete) or link to them directly (imagine all the warez sites that are going to abuse this) or just swap the URLs with friends without them having to pay.

  71. Bust a gut... by hyyx · · Score: 1

    I just went to movie88.com and signed up for an account, and noticed $5.00 of complimentary credit... that's pretty cool. I choose to watch Casablanca for my first movie, and clicked on a wrong link (apparently), when I get the following error:

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp"You already having this movie!"

    Hillarious!

  72. Streaming quality by WiggyWack · · Score: 1

    Had trouble getting the site to load, as some others have said.

    However, I'm streaming a movie at the 350 Kbps rate and have been for over 20 minutes and have had no trouble with it at all. No lag, no stutter, no rebuffer. Pretty impressive.

    I'm on a T1, but still...

    --
    Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
  73. bah by Trracer · · Score: 1

    2002-01-31 10:37:04 Free streaming movies? (articles,news) (rejected)

    Bah

    --
    English is not my first language, so cut me some slack -: Om du kan lasa det har sa kan du Svenska :-
  74. About New Zealand and region encoding by jesterzog · · Score: 2

    I haven't looked it up, but from what I understand it's perfectly okay to sell a region-specific DVD player. On the other hand, there's nothing the big publishers can do to prevent you from taking your DVD player to the shop downtown and having it de-regionised to play DVD's for other regions, I've definitely seen shops and electrical technicians advertising that particular service in the past. Region encoding was in some way ruled as an anticompetitive practice, I think, but I don't have it as firsthand information.

    I'm guessing but it probably came in about the same time that all the parallel importing restrictions were lifted a decade or so ago. They were temporarily put back for movie material a few weeks ago by the Labour government on the grounds of "protecting local cinema" from all of the currently released movies coming in on parallel-imported DVD's at the same time. That said, I'm not sure whether that actually involves de-regionising of DVD players or if it's actually just importing the videos and DVD's to New Zealand in the first place. I suspect it's only the latter.

    I noticed the other week that Wellington library even advises on the shelves that some marked DVD's they loan might not play in region 4 players, so if it's not legal (but I think it is) then I guess there's some significant civil disobedience coming from local government employees.

    Can anyone with a better understanding expand on this?

    1. Re:About New Zealand and region encoding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bought a new Pioneer DVD player last week from Bond & Bond. Even though the manual specified that my player would only play region 4's, I was assured by the salesman that this was not the case.
      Needless to say, I am now watching plenty of 'out of region' DVDs :)

    2. Re:About New Zealand and region encoding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that things are different in NZ than in many industrialised nations - we're one of the only western nations in the world that allows parallel importing for example.
      New Zealand, in fact, is one of the most free markets in the world.

  75. How about the library by ElOttoGrande · · Score: 1
    I'd watch a lot more movies if they were only a buck.

    This sounds handy but its still a hassle, and if you're like most people you gotta watch the movie on your clear but small monitor.

    At my local library I can rent new movies on VHS and DVD for anywhere from free to 2 bucks.. It may not be hip to get your rentals at the library but some of them (like mine) have a suprisingly good collection.

  76. I stopped going to see movies... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    Up until 5 years ago, I was a HUGE movie buff. I would go to see 1-2 movies at the theaters. When I went to school, I stopped watching movies much, because I wasn't watching television. Without TV, no commercials, no connection to pop culture... It was quite strange. I'd still see the occaisional movie, but I didn't hear about many.

    Now, I'm over a year away from school and have a home entertainment system. Until I got the system, I was watching movies and television again. Now with a ReplayTV, I don't see commercials. The cost of movie tickets is $9.50, so for the cost of the two movie tickets, I can buy a DVD and watch it at home in surround sound on a HDTV. If I want to watch the movie later, I can. I don't really rent movies because of the hassle of returning them.

    I never thought that I would stop going to see movies, but I mostly have.

    I'll still see an eye candy movie, but the rest? I'll watch at home. There is no reason to go see a movie that isn't for the eye candy. I have a better sound system than most of the theaters, so I'd have to go to the good one 30 minutes away.

    I dunno, I seem to enjoy having people to my place and watching a movie much more than going out.

    Now, if you don't really like to watch TV and Movies, the $5k startup costs for a decent system (what my "midrange" system cost) is rediculous. However, if you don't really care, you can do a passable job for $1500 and still enjoy the experience.

    Summer action blockbusters won't go, as those are more fun in the theatre. However, I no longer see them 2-3 times there. I see them once then buy the DVD when it comes out.

    I doubt that the blockbuster will go away, but the theater as a way of distributing artsy films may go away. That's okay though, digital cable and better encoding algorithms should open up plenty of channels for them, and artsy films need to make less to do well.

    The $100m film won't look good on your computer screen compared to a real theater, and when shit blows up I want to be screaming and yelling with the audience. However, $20 for two people to see a silly comedy is a bit much.

    Alex

  77. Re:Quality? by r2ravens · · Score: 2

    If the movie houses don't make money off of their movies, you can expect the quantity and quality to go way down.

    They seem to be making plenty of money, the quantity is up, and the quality is crap for 95% of the offerings. Hmmm... how can it get much worse?

    Will Rogers said, "People get the government they deserve." I guess the same goes for entertainment. If we keep paying them to go see crap, they will produce more crap. ...and don't even get me started about appointed presidents and the poor quality of government. Will Rogers must be chuckling somewhere.

    "Go on, take the money Enron."

    -- Steve Miller Band (with a little help from current events.)

    --
    War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. - George Orwell or George Bush?
  78. Re:I'd watch a lot more movies if they were only a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And BBC doesnt get adverts."

    On so many levels, this makes sense:

    1) BBC TV sucks. It just does.
    2) UK TV sucks. I don't know how you can stand it.
    3) USA TV sucks. But a lot less than UK TV. I can barely watch it.
    4) The BBC doesn't get adverts. Bully for them.
    5) Nobody would put commercials on BBC (see point #1 above) anyway.
    6) The solution to bad rating is to force your viewers (at the point of a gun) to pay for the BBC.
    7) And you're bragging about it.

    P.S. Wasn't it so cute to watch Angelie Jolie do a bad english accent?

  79. The site is slashdotted... by Adrian+Voinea · · Score: 2

    The site is awfully slow now and I think that the wise thing to do is to bookmark the page and try to visit it sometime next week.
    Also, I would like to note that this will surely not last, as the long arm of MPAA will reach them, sooner rather than later.
    Anyway, this is a great idea, but we all know what happens to great ideas if the BIG companies don't approve them...

    1. Re:The site is slashdotted... by thilmony · · Score: 1

      $5 free when you register. Watching North By Northwest right now. This is unbelievable. The 300k option is very nice for me, no burps or hickups yet.

      --
      YES, there is a McDonald's in Hanoi Square.
  80. Where's my full-screen at 28.8? by sker · · Score: 1

    Why use Real? Isn't the Full-screen Video on Demand over 28.8 ready yet? Don't tell me this wasn't true?

    Bummer.

    --
    nonsig. unsig. desig.
  81. What's the UA string for Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the User Agent string to fake a connection by realplayer?

    Thanks.

    1. Re:What's the UA string for Real? by targo · · Score: 1

      What's the User Agent string to fake a connection by realplayer?

      I use RMA/1.0 (compatible; RealMedia)

  82. Culmination of technology by bcilfone · · Score: 1

    The culmination of millions of years of evolution and thousands of years of human civilization...
    "Frankenstein: The College Years".

    Terrorists are now the least of my worries.

  83. Re:price point - Needs to be =$1 World Wide by caferace · · Score: 1
    Oh please. Like the "manufacturers" you speak of really give a shit about the end-user.

    They are so clearly insulated from the end result that anything shipped is simply gone. It's sort of like the classic used auto dealer "taillight guarantee".

    "Once the tail lights can't be seen, they guarantee is over".

  84. IANAL, but... by quintessent · · Score: 2

    Caveat emptor,

    Here is what you agree to (among other things) in the Terms of Service:

    "You agree to indemnify and hold us. . . harmless from any claim, demand,loss and damage whatsoever including reasonable attorneys' fees, made by any third party due to or arising out of your use of the Product, your connection to the Product, your breach/violation of the TOS, or your breach/violation of any rights of another or any existing laws (local, state, national and/or international) whatsoever."
    (abridged, emphasis added)

    In other words: you could get busted for this, and that's your problem. In fact, if someone (MPAA, government) sues us because you have been using this service, you get to pay our attorney's fees.

    1. Re:IANAL, but... by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      I *really* doubt those terms of service are enforceable.

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  85. Here in the US... by KewlPC · · Score: 1

    Here in the US, filing for a copyright within the first month isn't required in order for [item x] to be copyrighted. Just sticking a "Copyright (C) [year] [copyright holder]" is enough. However, if you want the right to sue, you've got to file within the first 3 months.

  86. Bzzt! by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

    404 Not Found, dammit.

    1. Re:Bzzt! by _ganja_ · · Score: 1

      Some how I managed to put a space in the URL, god knows how... DOH. Link does work though (if you take the space out).

      --

      A journey of a thousand miles starts with a brutal anal raping at airport security

  87. Streamed by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing as a streamed format that cannot be saved to disk, only clients that don't have a save option.

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  88. Blockbuster, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For just $2.99 + tax, I can go down to the local Blockbuster (And guess what, it's NOT Slashdotted!), rent a DVD and rip it to DivX ;) at great two-disc quality. To me, that's worth the extra $2.00 and change.

  89. Souxin by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Canonical site here, lots of rippers, Streambox, URLSniffer, etc.

    --

    Da Blog
  90. Automatic grabber script by aardvarko · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's a shell script for automagically retrieving movies from movie88.com:


    tcpdump -s 4096 -w /tmp/tcpdump.out &
    sleep 15s
    killall tcpdump
    grep -a http://210.5 /tmp/tcpdump.out >tcpdump.url
    wget -U "RMA/1.0 (compatible; RealMedia)" -i tcpdump.url
    rm /tmp/tcpdump.out


    I believe that the tcpdump requires root privileges.

    Here's how to use it:
    1. load up movie88 on your Linux machine (with properly configured RealPlayer) or another machine on the same hub - Windoze works fine for this.
    2. 'order' a movie. It should show you a list of all movies that you've ordered, with a button for 300Kb/s.
    3. run this script on your Linux machine.
    4. Click the 300Kb/s link in your browser.

    tcpdump will intercept the RealPlayer's request and pass it along to wget.

    Voila!
  91. downloader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.geocities.com/q3world2000/movie88/movie 88.zip

    and a test movie download url

    http://210.59.224.71/~movie1~/wWvk319p5s1Rqh5d30 0. rm

    1. Re:downloader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oops dl link get messed up http://www.geocities.com/q3world2000/movie88/movie 88.zip

  92. Its all online free anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should I pay a buck for a crappy Real stream when I can go to one of a hundred IRC channels and grab a VBR PDVD Divx that looks like a DVD...for free?

    The Lord of the Rings SVCD circulating everywhere is a perfect example. Why pay a buck when its all there for free?

    Perhaps if the MPAA and RIAA had reacted in 1997 with new business models instead of their knee-jerk, ever-thickening layers of litigation and calls for Draconian and even illegal (i.e. protected CDs) protection schemes, we wouldn't be posting to this thread.

  93. amazing streaming! by j1mmy · · Score: 1

    this is the most reliable and lag-free video stream i've ever seen! I used to think sputnik7 was smooth, but it still hiccupped at times and took 10-20 seconds to buffer.

    Of course, I'm watching Frankenstein: the College Years. A bad movie over a smooth video stream is still a bad movie =).

    1. Re:amazing streaming! by j1mmy · · Score: 1

      you also get $5.00 of free rentals when you sign up. and they don't ask for a credit card or validate your e-mail or anything.are they seriously trying to run a business like this?

  94. They're not pirates by Flower · · Score: 1

    What they are doing is legal in Taiwan. Now if you live in the States and use this service....

    --
    I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  95. That's Not Taiwan Law by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2
    I have serious doubts about this. Taiwan follows the Berne Convention on copyright. One of the the requirements of Berne is that you cannot require formalities such as registration.

    You are allowed to apply different rules to your own citizens and their works. For example, the United States does have registration requirements that must be met if you want to sue for certain kinds of damages. If a US author doesn't register, their remedies are limited. If a foreign author doesn't register, they aren't limited. Yup...US law actually treats foreign authors better than US authors (and if you are going to pirate...pirate domestically!).

    What's probably happening, assuming that there is a grain of truth to this story, is that Taiwan is doing what the US does, and subjecting their own people to extra requirements. So, it is believable that a movie made in Taiwan that is shown and not registered does not get copyright, but it is certainly not true for foreign (to Taiwan) movies.

    1. Re:That's Not Taiwan Law by sydney094 · · Score: 1
      Taiwan isn't a signatory of the Berne Convention, so I assume that means that they pretty much can do whatever they'd like.

      You can look at a list of all of the countries on the WIPO website.

      http://www.wipo.org/treaties/docs/english/e-berne. doc

      More interesting is that the US didn't become a member until 1989.

      --
      "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research." - Einstein
    2. Re:That's Not Taiwan Law by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2
      However, I found a link to some offical looking Taiwanese web site that said they had amemded their law to match Berne, so what while they aren't actually members, they do follow Berne.

      I can't find this link again, so can't double check.

  96. DMCA Annoucement: Slashdot Acquired by Walob · · Score: 1

    The DMCA have just anounced that they have adquired Slashdot.org from the OSDN network, in a press release they quote "the slashdot effect" as an effective tool to prevent pirated material from reaching the USA, in much the same way as the 1000 monkeys scripting endless pop up windows and "vote for me" sites, make it easier to legally buy stuff than download warez & co.

    --
    -I can only program my video,ahh, I am not a gook, but a joook -The World is a theatre of the absurd
  97. Movies for less than US$1 by grainofsand · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For what it's worth, one of the sole benefits of living on the Chinese mainland is DVD's for 7 Chinese yuan (US$0.84)! Sold at foreigner-friendly restaurants - you get to flick through a huge selection of DVDs (little prOn though) and settle the bill for food and movies together. New releases are available about 2-3 weeks before debut screening in the US.

    --
    A dream is good. A plan is better.
  98. Re:I'd watch a lot more movies if they were only a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jerking it doesn't count as sex.

  99. Trancers! by Internet+Stranger · · Score: 1

    Any reason why Trancers and Trancers 4 are available but not Trancers 2 & 3 & 5?

    I want my Tim Thomerson Trancers marathon for $5 damnit!

    --
    ------------- I didn't know she was your sister I swear!
  100. under mozilla? by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1

    Some are focussing on issues with the MPAA in this article but I've found little on usability.
    I managed to sign up for one of their accounts in about 10 seconds but am having trouble actually watching a movie. It has to imbed the viewer in my browser to watch and my understanding is that only the windows version of realplayer will do that. I'm currently running mozilla under mac osx and am wondering what I should do to be able to watch one of these. Does mozilla even have a realplayer plugin? Should I try a different browser? Should I try compiling the "community" version of realplayer under the my xserver instead of using the mac version?
    I'd appreaciate advice from anyone who has gotten movie88 to work under any non-windows platform *cough* linux *cough*.

    Also, I know this sounds crazy but I'm trying to do all of this under a dailup connection *sigh*, does anyone know if realplayer will automatically try to send me a more heavily compressed stream or just try to smash the 100kbs version down my pipe. If this is the case, is there any way around their system that keeps me from downloading the file? I'd be totally willing to let it download overnight.

    The only reason I'm interested in this is because of their sizable anime selection. I've found that the only way to get the anime I want is to order it online, which is kind of expensive. I doubt any of the other movies in that service will catch on, as going to a movie theater or renting isn't all that expensive. But anime *is* all that expensive and at 50 cents (for example) for battle angle its worth my looking into, even on a 56k connection with the crappy realplayer format.

  101. "We get download!" by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

    "Streambox VCR turn on!"

    (SHOWGIRLS begins streaming)

    "Someone set us up the bomb!"

    (movies88) "You are already having this movie!"

    "What you say!"

    (Movies88) "All your Hollywood IP are belong to us!"

    And so on and so forth.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  102. I can do this already [legally] by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    Through Time Warner, I've got HBO OnDemand and iControl. Both let me watch movies/shows at exceptional quality. The cost: $3-6 / movie and ten dollars a month for HBO OnDemand.

    Worth it all the way. HBO can be thin at times, but iControl even let me watch Half Baked... pause, rewind and all. Only $3.95 for all day pass.

  103. Terrorist Threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any revenue from this could be funding terrorist activity! Forget the MPAA/RIAA let's just bring in the Daisy Cutters to solve the problem.

    Hiel Bush

  104. Taiwan is in the WTO ... by ukryule · · Score: 2

    ... and as such is signed up to TRIPS which requires adherence to the Berne Convention.

    In fact, I believe the change in copyright law came a couple of years ago in preparation for their accession to the World Trade Org. - so the copyright law mentioned is seriously out of date.

    Certainly, the Taiwanese government was making an effort (without much effect) last year to stamp down on piracy etc. to convince the rest of the WTO that they'd be 'good neighbours' - but now they're in (as of January 1st) they might not care as much ...

  105. Easily cracked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Took about an hour of some basic Java programming and a little packet sniffing to be able to save an arbitrary movie to my disk. I have yet to see if I can get around the 5 movies free limit, but that's a different problem.

    It's obviously probably not legal to do this, but it's an interesting demo of how "content management" just isn't effective.

  106. Complete Stream Capture Guide +some privacy issues by emkman · · Score: 1

    First, identification info that is sent to the server:
    When you watch a movie, the server is sent a string that includes your operating system, country, language, processor class, and maybe some other things. Your ZIP code is sent. A GUID is also sent. My GUID was all 0s but this might vary, perhaps if a different operating system or proccessor is used. Or maybe this will be implemented in the future.

    How to capture the videos locally:
    1. Get The Proxomitron
    2. Get Streambox VCR (This program is no longer published, most likely for legal reasons. Search google for it, and make sure you get a version that has the Real Media capability, not all versions do.)
    3. Get Project URL Snooper, CommView, or any other packet sniffing program.
    4. Copy the following text into a text editor and save it as a .cfg file:
    ----cute here----
    ##
    ## Proxomitron Config File
    ##

    [Global]
    Enable = TRUE
    FreezeGIF = FALSE
    FilterHTML = FALSE
    FilterHeadersOut = TRUE
    FilterHeadersIn = FALSE
    EnableProxy = FALSE
    EnableAutoRun = FALSE
    ForceTextures = FALSE
    NoTextures = FALSE
    SysTray = TRUE
    Port = 8080

    [HTTP headers]
    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "Accept-Encoding:"
    Replace = "gzip"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "Accept-Language:"
    Replace = "en-US, en, *"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "Accept:"
    Replace = "*/*"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "Bandwith:"
    Replace = "1544000"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "ClientID:"
    Replace = "Win98_4.90_6.0.9.584_play32_AOL8_en-US_586_axembe d"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "Connection:"
    Replace = "Keep-Alive"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "GUID:"
    Replace = "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "Host:"
    Replace = "210.59.224.69"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "Icy-MetaData:"
    Replace = "1"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "Language:"
    Replace = "en-US, en, *"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "RegionData:"
    Replace = "06555"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "SupportsMaximumASMBandwidth:"
    Replace = "1"

    In = FALSE
    Out = TRUE
    Key = "User-Agent:"
    Replace = "RMA/1.0 (compatible; RealMedia)"

    [Patterns]
    Name = "Unnamed HTML Filter"
    Active = FALSE
    Limit = 256
    Match = "Free Movies"

    [Proxies]

    ----cut here----
    5. Start Proxomitron and load the config file you just created.
    6. Use the packet capture software to find the URL of the movie and copy it to the clipboard. (It consists of letters and numbers, followed by 100 or 300 for the quality, and ends in .rm)
    7. Start Streambox and goto Edit, then Paste Link.
    8. Make sure the URL is correct, then click the Proxy tab.
    9. Click Use HTTP Proxy. For host enter "localhost" and for port enter "8080"
    10. Click OK and let the movie download. (Each 300k movie I have downloaded so far is between 250-300 megs.)
    11. Enjoy
    Notes: I have read that it is possible to capture the movies without using Proxomitron by hexing Streambox, but this method is less permanent and I know it works. Proxomitron has many other great uses and you should explore its features. Finally, my config file is from version 3(b) but hopefully it works with newer versions, or else you can always enter the above data manually. It may not be neccesary to use all the HTTP headers above to trick the server, but theres nothing wrong with being thorough.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
  107. let me guess.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    So they are using real's streaming technology.. let me guess what the first movie you get is "Buffering" and if you like that one, the sequal also referred to as "Buffering" can be had for only $1 more.

  108. Chocolate to plastic transformation machine by dakainivanua · · Score: 1
    "when was the last time you changed a candy bar to a credit card?"

    Yesterday. I do this sort of thing regularly. I invented a machine to reorganize the molecules in a candy bar into a plastic card with a magnetic strip. I haven't been able to buy anything with the results, yet, but work is progressing..

    --
    The amount of beauty required to launch 1 ship: 1 Millihelen