Slashdot Mirror


Mandrake 8.2 Available

Jester998 writes "Linux Mandrake 8.2 is out! Check out the official annoucement or head off to your closest mirror to grab the ISO images. The release is bound to be amazing, with the return of kernel-secure, a 65MB minimum install, hotplug device support, encrypted filesystems and more!"

118 of 437 comments (clear)

  1. Awesome! It's the RH7.2 "killer" by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

    not that redhat 7.2 is bad , it's nice .. but really dated... they still only allow up2date go to 4.2.9 while 4.2.17 was out for mostly forever and super stable, and now 4.2.18 is even better (I can use my internal Jaz scsi again!!!!) but no.. redhat users are still crippled with running 4.2.9.

    I was very impressed with the 8.2 betas... time to throw this puppy into the production environment!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Awesome! It's the RH7.2 "killer" by forrest2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "they still only allow up2date go to 4.2.9 while 4.2.17 was out for mostly forever"

      Wow! 4.2.9 is much better than the 2.4.19-pre3 I found on ftp.kernel.org.

    2. Re:Awesome! It's the RH7.2 "killer" by buysse · · Score: 2, Informative

      Assuming that you actually mean 2.4.9, Redhat patches holy hell out of the kernels that are shipped.

      Besides that, linus switched to a new VM in 2.4.10, which doesn't work as well. The new VM actually doesn't pass internal testing at Redhat without failing, or so I've read. Last I knew, they used the Cerberus test suite that was originally developed by VA (*back when they actually sold hardware instead of having a questionable business model based on advertising on /.).

      --
      -30-
  2. A portrait by AirLace · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A portrait of the Mandrake user from a collection of Linux User Caricatures:
    This chap (baby) is the new distro on the market(compared to the others anyway). He is always seen as a new lunix user hence the baby look, and the distro is regarded as one best for beginners to learn who might be migrating from windows to linux.

    1. Re:A portrait by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Problem is that the Gazette article that had those was very lacking... Slackware pre-dates all of them and is considered the true hackers distro due to the fact taht it requires a much higher understanding of the underlying apps and systems (No neato-self config or gui click and drool interfaces... dont get me wrong, I like to click and drool from time to time)

      If you are serious about linux and power you use Slack.. all the other are just candy coated slackware...

      BTW, I still have a CD of the first linux distro Yggdrasil... you dont hear of that one anymore..

      well as my Leet rant finishes up I might as well do the same as the rest and put in a list of props and shouts .....

      Nahhhh... that's for lamers....

      I'll go back to my hole now..

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:A portrait by athakur999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's nothing in Mandrake stopping you from downloading tarballs, figuring out your dependencies, compiling, etc.

      If you want to be leet with Mandrake, feel free...

      Anyway, Slackware has lost it's leet status now that Gentoo is here. Slack coddles you too much by providing binaries... ;)

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    3. Re:A portrait by Aceticon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Beter yet ....

      Slackware installed from floppy disks - Now THAT's a treat form masochists^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H hard core Linux users.

    4. Re:A portrait by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      I still use Slackware.

      In the current state, if you keep using the GUI tools to play with your system, your system WILL break one day.

      I won't say it won't break if you play with it with vi, but at least it is easier to fix, because at least you could have made a log of what you've done.

      Until it is certain that the GUI config stuffies won't mess my system up no matter how I use them, I'll stick with vi.

      And no, I don't want to use a bit of both. Be consistent and you'll stay away from a lot of trouble.

  3. SHhhhhh! by chmod · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was tinkering around and thought "Oh! MDK 8.2 should be available..." So I cruised over to /. and saw nothing there "Great!" methinks, I may be ahead of the flood.

    So I started downloading. @ ~350KBPS, my usual best rate... This has been slowing and I can't figure why other than..... Did that @#$%!%! post something on /.?

    Yup, story is posted.... sites are /.'ing

    *sigh*
    b

    1. Re:SHhhhhh! by niftyeric · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've always had great luck with ftp.software.umn.edu, but I can't remember if they have Mandrake or not. I used them when RedHat 7.2 was released and had a steady flow of ~90k/s (which is really good for me). ^_^

      Er, there goes my "great luck."

      --
      proton != antielectron
    2. Re:SHhhhhh! by sporty · · Score: 2

      Heh, famous last words.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    3. Re:SHhhhhh! by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

      I have a mirror that I use that I get over 1200kb/sec with Download Accelerator. They have 8.2, and it's blazing. I'm downloading all 3 CDs at the same time right now, and each download is at about 800kb/sec. It's in the complete opposite corner of the country for me, and I'm still getting these speeds.

      Yeehaw!

      And if you think I'm gonna tell you about it till I'm done downloading, think again! :D

    4. Re:SHhhhhh! by Alsee · · Score: 2

      You /. bastards!

      You /.'ed Kenny!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:SHhhhhh! by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

      ftp://ftp.cse.buffalo.edu

      Good stuff - pulled all three CDs down in about 20 minutes. :)

  4. wait a bit before slashing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not wait a couple of hours before slashdotting it?

    1. Re:wait a bit before slashing it by ethereal · · Score: 2, Funny

      What, so you can get it first? I don't think so! Hahahaha...

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  5. I've been using the beta... by TechnoLust · · Score: 5, Informative
    and I love it! They greatest thing that I liked about it was the built-in support for those Alcatel USB DSL modems. I got stuck with one of those and had trouble getting it to work in other distros. I had to tweak a little to get it to work in the Beta, but it should be all good in the final version.

    Mandrake is a very good distro for the beginner and advanced user alike. I have tried several and this is definitely my favorite. This install is really great and warns you if you are installing anything that is a potential security risk. If you haven't tried it, what are you waiting for?

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
  6. Get it from the Mandrake Club by Eric+Damron · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can also get your copy of Mandrake from the download site that is available to people belonging to the Mandrake club.

    Its a fast download and there is additional software available there. i.e. commercial packages.

    At $60.00 per year its a great value!

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    1. Re:Get it from the Mandrake Club by jd142 · · Score: 2

      The only thinkg I can find in the download area is additional software. No iso's. Do you have a link?

  7. List of mirrors by belbo · · Score: 5, Informative
    --

    --
    "Just believe everything I tell you, and it will all be very, very simple."

    1. Re:List of mirrors by Cardhore · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you UUENCODE and then mirror (post on slashdot) the iso images, I'll mod you up even more!

    2. Re:List of mirrors by O2n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quoth yer sig:
      Mandrake Linux. Because it's got bigger tits.

      You obviously missed this :)

      Note: this is on-topic: it says "chicks dig mandrake" sideways... you just can't get better advertising.

    3. Re:List of mirrors by GSloop · · Score: 2

      Damn! Where do I sign up to be a h4x0r!?
      :) (And I'm even married - don't tell my wife about that Linux chick!)

      Cheers!

    4. Re:List of mirrors by SquierStrat · · Score: 2

      I thank God everyday I live off campus. Everyone in the dorms whines about the lag and D/L speeds! They need to add another OC/3 or 2. :-) I have a friend on west campus who consistently downloads at 3/K a second, My ADSL line pisses him off! :-)

      --
      Derek Greene
  8. No...don't download the ISO's by 9632 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy them. Mandrake needs the cash.

    --
    I've decided to mispell one or more words in all my correspondence. If you don't like it then don't read it.
    1. Re:No...don't download the ISO's by Mr+Windows · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Better to download the ISOs and send the cash direct to Mandrake (eg by joining the Mandrake Linux Users Club). That way they'll see more of the cash, as you've cut out the middleman.

    2. Re:No...don't download the ISO's by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do they have pizza huts in europe? Can I send them a pizza coupon for their programmers instead?

    3. Re:No...don't download the ISO's by ssimpson · · Score: 2

      Yes, we have Pizza Huts in Europe. Well, we do in England....

      --
      "Mary had a crypto key, she kept it in escrow, and everything that Mary said, the Feds were sure to know."
    4. Re:No...don't download the ISO's by searleb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Buy them. Mandrake needs the cash.

      | sed -e 's/needs/deserves/g'

  9. Mirror of announcement by dallen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since Mandrake is blocking the slashdot link in the story, here's a mirror.

    Mandrake Linux 8.2: Solid server, Friendly desktop.
    Altadena, CA - March 18th 2002 - MandrakeSoft is proud to introduce Mandrake Linux 8.2 as the most feature-rich, multi-purpose Linux operating system ever made available to the public. This new version of our flagship product combines the power and flexibility of a full-featured Linux server with the simplicity and elegance of well designed graphical user interfaces.

    Mandrake Linux 8.2 is the best "all-in-one" solution for saving time and money with personal computers: installation couldn't be easier with our world-famous graphical installer, and no post-configuration hassles means that your Mandrake system is immediately ready for work. Depending on your requirements, Mandrake 8.2 can be installed either as a full-featured & powerful Linux server, or as a highly productive personal workstation.

    New server features include the ability to use an encrypted filesystem for protecting sensitive data; "kernel-secure" adds important security features to the default Linux kernel; and an "Enterprise" kernel delivers SMP (Symmetric Multi Processing) and Hi-memory support (above 1024 MB) for high-end servers. Mandrake Linux 8.2 also introduces a quick and efficient way to set up printers and scanners; a new file sharing feature for easily sharing files and directories in a networked environment; and improved "hot-plug" support that lets users install new devices quickly and painlessly without having to reboot the system. A new remote desktop utility, RFBdrake, is extremely useful for controlling machines remotely within a LAN or securely through the Internet.

    New desktop features include a completely redesigned Mandrake Control Center that serves as a central location for Mandrake-specific tools and utilities, as well as many new configuration wizards. Desktop users will appreciate the task-oriented menus in GNOME and KDE which greatly simplify locating applications by categorizing them into common "tasks".
    MandrakeFirstTime is an easy-to-use wizard that helps setup a desktop environment (KDE, GNOME, etc.), choose a theme and configure email settings. DrakNet, the Internet connection and network utility, efficiently helps users configure all types of network connections, from common dial-up modems to DSL and cable connections.
    The reworked version of MSEC, a utility for configuring the security level of a machine (Standard, High, Highest, Paranoid) is more powerful than ever. Also included are the latest stable versions of KDE and GNOME which both offer some great new features and applications such as anti-aliased fonts and Evolution (an Outlook-like email client and personal information manager). StarOffice 6.0 is included with the ProSuite and PowerPack Editions.

    "With version 8.2, Mandrake Linux proves that it is the ultimate Linux experience. This new release is the result of our four year commitment to providing the best operating system ever. Mandrake Linux has long been the preferred Linux distribution for individuals, but Mandrake 8.2 marks a new step in our penetration of the corporate environment. The features and unparalleled ease of use make 8.2 an incredibly efficient and affordable alternative to UNIX and Windows 2000" said Jacques Le Marois, CEO of MandrakeSoft.

    Core System Components

    * Kernel 2.4.18
    * Improved Firewire support
    * Support for USB2, ECC memory, i830 DRM, ATA133, Geforce3
    * XFree86 4.2 provides 3D acceleration for many video cards previously only supported in 3.3.6
    * Glibc 2.2.4

    Software and Applications

    * Apache 1.3.23
    * PHP 4.1.2
    * MySQL 3.23.47
    * PostgreSQL 7.2
    * Sendmail 8.12.1
    * Postfix 20010228

    * Staroffice 6.0 is the latest version of the famous Office Suite that boasts integrated creativity and productivity tools, improved interoperability with Microsoft Office files, support for XML file formats, and improved international support.

    * Evolution 1.02 is a full-featured personal information manager and advanced E-mail client. Evolution provides the best features in its class.

    * KDE 2.2.2 (KDE 3.0 RC2 is also provided as an alternative desktop for users who enjoy the bleeding edge) and GNOME 1.4.1 -- Enjoy the latest versions of these popular desktop environments. KDE 2.2.2 includes a new print system which has been integrated with PrinterDrake; GNOME 1.4.1 includes Evolution to closely match the features and look of MS-Outlook.

    Mandrake Linux 8.2 is currently available for x86 processors, and will soon also be available for the PPC platform.

    To find out more about Mandrake Linux 8.2, please visit
    http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/82.php3

    Pre-orders are now being accepted for the Mandrake Linux 8.2 ProSuite and PowerPack Editions at
    http://www.MandrakeStore.com

    Or download your copy today at http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ftp.php3

    Mandrake Club members are entitled to download proprietary drivers and commercial software for 8.2:
    http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/club/

    About MandrakeSoft

    MandrakeSoft provides a trusted interface between users of information technology and open source developers. The company offers its enterprise, government and educational customers a set of GNU Linux and Open-Source software and related services, and user-friendly and highly competitive information technologies. In addition, MandrakeSoft offers technologists committed to open software and courseware a trusted channel to offer their services.

    The company has technologists in over 20 countries, and is traded on Paris Euronext Marché Libre (Euroclear code: 4477.PA; Reuters code: MAKE.PA) and the US OTC market (stock symbol MDKFF). "Born on the Internet" in late 1998, MandrakeSoft established headquarters in the U.S.A., Montreal, England, Germany and France. Please visit the Web site, http://www.mandrakesoft.com for more information.

    1. Re:Mirror of announcement by Random+Feature · · Score: 2

      What's cool is that MD 8.2 will support my brand new freakin' Fujitsu Lifebook and the Intel 830MG chipset it's using by including XFree86 4.2 and a newer kernel.

      Woo hoo!

      --
      I don't have a solution, but I certainly admire the problem.
  10. Truly amazing product, truly amazing company... by joestar · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I tested one of the latest Mandrake Beta (currently downloading the final), and I have to admit Mandrake Linux, and in particular the 8.2 is really an amazing product. It comes with more features than I ever seen in all other Linux distros, it's now really rock solid, in 2 weeks, I only found 4 or 5 minor bugs in the beta4. It's really a great solution that can be deployed in enterprise, as well as for individual use. That's what I love in Mandrake: I run it for personal use on my laptop, and in my company on one hundred machine, and while it's the same product, the same CDs, it's not at all the same use! On my laptop I'm like a Windows user, in my company we use it like we used our SUN network before...

    I have to say I'm really impressed by how MandrakeSoft, a small and rather fragile company, is keeping on going its own way. They prefer doing more efforts in building and improving a dream OS everyday, keeping the right open source software way, and they try to avoid laying offs by requesting financial contributions of its users (see the Mandrake Club announcement). I don't know what this company is going to become in the next ten years but really, Mandrake Linux and MandrakeSoft are more exciting product and company than Red Hat or SuSE!

    1. Re:Truly amazing product, truly amazing company... by dieMSdie · · Score: 2

      I first tried Mandrake when 6.0 was out. And I agree, imho they are the best distro out there. Powerful, yet easy to use for a novice. The installer just gets better with every release.

      As a long-time Linux user and enthusiast, I put my money where my mouth is and joined the Mandrake Club today. The only "perk" I'd like to see from that really is perhaps a private FTP server for members to get priority access to new releases. $60.00 is nothing at all standing next to all the use I've gotten from my Mandrake installs!

      --
      Don't throw your computer out the window, throw the Windows out of your computer!
  11. Star Office 6.0? by tempest303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    uhm.... the release announcement mentions the inclusion of Star Office 6.0 in the "power pack" edition, but a glance at http://www.sun.com/staroffice seems to indicate that this hasn't even been released yet? I wonder if this means Sun will be doing the final release soon?

    1. Re:Star Office 6.0? by JM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, Mandrake Linux 8.2 is out, but the Power Packs won't be in stores until a couple of weeks.
      So technically StarOffice 6 is not available yet.

      During the Linux-World expo in NY, the people at Sun said that basically the final release was ready, but they waited until end of March or beginning of April to clean up some final issues with licensing and partners.

      So expect a PR from Sun real soon.

  12. Re:mirrors? by friedmud · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nope - that directory had the rc1 files in it try this directory instead - it looks like the real deal.

    Sorry,
    Derek

  13. Sounds like a connection error... by theCURE · · Score: 3, Funny

    between the chair and keyboard

    --
    "i can never say no to anyone but you"
    1. Re:Sounds like a connection error... by mrscorpio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would tend to agree, based on my own experiences. Of course, perhaps he's running something "exotic" (or extremely old/new). I have an HP DJ932c and installing it to LM 8.1 was easier than in Win 98 SE, the OS it was created for!

      Of course, it's just as easy now that I'm running Win 2k pro, but I was mucho impressed running LM 8.1 on my PII 400/128MB PC100 RAM/16.6GB HD system, and the only reason I haven't installed it on my new box is because I knew that 8.2 was imminent and it would save me the hassle of installing 2x. My plans are to run a tri-boot Win 2k pro/XP pro/LM 8.2 on my Soyo Dragon+/Athalon 1700+/256MB DDR RAM/WD 120GB HD w/8MB cache system (only running XP because my telephone tech support job requires me to be familiar with it).

      Mandrake rocks. Wish there could be some Mandrake-centric books though. (EVERYTHING is Red Hat!!!)

      Chris

  14. Redhat by nick255 · · Score: 2

    Does anyone know how easy it is to replace a redhat install with a Mandrake one? I'm using Redhat (rawhide) at the moment, but would like to give Mandrake ago.

    1. Re:Redhat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Assuming that you would like to keep your personal files intact, do the following:
      • Sign on as root, cd /home, mv yourname rh_yourname. Repeat this last step for any other users whose files you want to keep. This will also insure that the new Mandrake install will create brand new /home/yourname directory loaded with the proper KDE 2.2.2 init files instead of the old stuff from RedHat.
      • Shutdown and reboot with the cd1-inst CD in place. When you get to the part in the install where you are given the choice to "Use existing partitions", pick this!. Next, do NOT format your home directory.
      • When you get everything installed, etc. and you sign on for the first time, copy your Mail directory from your old rh_yourname directory to its new home before launching Kmail for the first time. Sorry, that's the only MUA I have experience with.
      • Similarly, recover any worthwhile files or directories from your rh_yourname directory.
      • Enjoy

  15. 1st Karma Whore by brad3378 · · Score: 3, Informative

    New Features

    Including what will soon be my favorites:

    New installation features include the ability to download and install updates at install time

    new wizard-oriented rescue mode

    redesigned and polished Mandrake Control Center

    DiskDrake now supports an encrypted filesystem

    Improved URPMI (apt-like package manager) and Software Manager

    Rfbdrake - remotely control an X session.

    New minimal (65 meg) installation mode, which installs nothing but the base system

    Also mentions that StarOffice 6.0 is included, although It doesn't say, I'm sure it's probably the Beta.

    Worth Mentioning:

    Kernal 2.4.18

    Improved Firewire, USB2, ATA133

    Looking Good Mandrake!
    Keep up the great work!

    --

  16. EVERYONE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please wait five or six hours before downloading it. I am already downloading it now, and I don't want all you pushing in before I have fininshed. Thanks everyone!

  17. Cached articles?? by Milo77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When are we going to get a nice little "cached" (ala Google) link under a story that takes us to a version cached locally on slashdot's servers. Items in the cache could easily expire after only a day(or even a couple hours). Salshdot's readers would appreciate this as would the poor IT people in charge of the oft-slashdotted servers...

    1. Re:Cached articles?? by Aanallein · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't think I've seen more than a handful of articles on slashdot in recent months that didn't have this request. Usually the posts are modded up quite highly as well.

      Now, assuming CmdrTaco and the other powers that be are not completely oblivious to what's happening here, they've seen the request. And despite a general theme of labeling all anti-micorosoft news as interesting, I assume they're somewhat open-minded as well.
      So I figure they've either looked into things, or are still doing so. The problems I can see are (1) huge increase of bandwidth for slashdot itself because of the cache, (2) legal problems, and (3) technical problems with actually doing this.
      Since Google is caching websites as well, I assume (2) and (3) should not be too much of a problem. Oh sure, it might take some time to really talk things through with lawyers and the like, and perhaps this is still happening, but eventually it shouldn't be a barrier. Likewise, slashdot employs some people who're tech-savvy enough that (3) shouldn't be a problem for very long as well.
      Bandwidth however definitely could be a problem. I imagine caching linked to pages, even if it's only the first page directly behind the link, would increase bandwidth use by 50%-150% (remember, only 75% of al statistics are made up on the spot) ;)
      Unfortunately bandwidth costs money. So if this is not something still in development (considering how long these requests have existed, I'd say that is slightly unlikely at this point), they've looked at it, and decided that it's not worth the money.
      Maybe, perhaps, they'd be willing to reconsider if the subscriptions are succesful enough, but I personally don't count on that ever happening.

      The other possibility is linking to the google cache of the linked to pages directly from the article. It's extra effort that's not worth the time since there are plenty of karma whores who will do the same almost as soon as the article's up anyway.

      But basically, I think there's really no use in continuing with these requests. Everything that can be said about it has been said more than once. The powers that be have undoubtedly seen it all. There's little more for us to do than wait and see, or most likely don't see.

    2. Re:Cached articles?? by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

      There's no need to speculate what Taco et al. are thinking with regards to caching linked webpages, it's spelled out nicely in the FAQ.

      As it says there, the problem is a matter of courtesy to sites that generate revenue from banner ads. They say nothing about being bandwidth-limited or technically challenged.

      This gets pointed out each time somebody asks about caching...surely you saw one of them?

      The most innovative suggestion I've seen recently is that slashdot look for the <META> tags that
      a site can use to tell google not to cache their page. Or perhaps they can invent their own META tag, although I personally think it should be opt-in, not opt-out (i.e., the default should be that slashdot will not cache; only if the slashdot meta tag is found will a cache be created).

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    3. Re:Cached articles?? by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

      A plot fiendishly clever in its intricacies!

      :)

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  18. Re:Mandrake's PHP Hammered: Announcement Text Belo by RollingThunder · · Score: 2
    Postfix 20010228


    Not that I can use the default one (I need LDAP built-in, which afaik the rpm doesn't have), but it would be nice for them to be running something newer, like, say Postfix 1.1 which came out in mid January. There's been a lot of refinements since then.
  19. I still don't like their packaging by Isldeur · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The one thing I never liked (don't know if they still do it, but it was done this way in 8.1) is the way that they take large pakages (such as KDE) and put all of the files in non-standard (according to KDE, I suppose) directories. There's no /opt/kde2, everything is dispersed around the system... /usr/share/kde2/lib, etc...

    While I suppose that this is the "right" way to do it in one sense, it makes adding in other KDE software (whether compiling or what not) very difficult.

    You've got to do some nasty configure black-magic like ./configure --prefix=/usr/blah --bindir=blah blah. Does it have to be this way??

    1. Re:I still don't like their packaging by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

      I agree, altough I can't think of a sense in which throwing everything under /usr is the "right" way. Redhat does it as well...anyone know why?

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    2. Re:I still don't like their packaging by garett_spencley · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason Mandrake does it that way is to be 100% compatible with Redhat. The idea is that you can install any redhat rpm on a mandrake machine.

      I don't agree with this but that's their explanation anyway.

      I really wish they would drop this whole redhat compatibility thing and just follow the LSB.IMO the more distros that follow the LSB the better. It's the best way that I can see to be "compatible" with other distros.

      In the beginning Mandrake was RH with bug fixes, toys and compiled specifically for i586. But it has since grown in to much more than that. Ever since 7.0 they've broken away from that whole "redhat++" thing and I think it's time for them to break this compatibility issue and start following a standards base rather than acheiving compatibility by following another non-standard distro.

      It just doesn't make much sense to me especially if the idea is to make Linux more consistent which seems to be part of what Mandrake is about.

      It's really quite ironic.

      P.S: And you know what the worst part about it is? Mandrake still installs a /etc/redhat-release file.

      --
      Garett

    3. Re:I still don't like their packaging by Tsujigiri · · Score: 2

      > I think that /opt is "banned" by LSB (Linux Standard Base). /opt is ugly and non-standard. /usr/ is where all the programs that aren't in the base-packages should go.

      Nope; /opt is where packages installed by the local admin, not part of the distribution's original install , go. That enables you to track what you've done vs what the original install does, so that if upgrading == reinstalling, you don't lose the additional packages you've installed.


      I read that too (FHS - 3.12). So from that point of view, would not a distribution installing KDE in /opt/kde be violating the FHS if it is part of the basic install? And that the Redhat/Mandrake way of doing it is in fact right?

      --

      "I'll take the red pill. No! Blue! AAAaaaahhhhhhhhh"
      - Monty Python meets the Matrix

    4. Re:I still don't like their packaging by praedor · · Score: 2

      Uh, Mandrake defaults to KDE, so I would assume that makes KDE part of the original install.


      In any case, I never liked the /opt thing. I see NO reason why it is better to slap on a new directory like that instead of just installing, say, kde2 into /usr/kde2, or kde3 into /usr/kde3, etc. Then you get the same "benefit" of /opt but without that silly extra, hanging-out-there-by-itself directory.


      I have java installed in its own /usr/jre directory, and would prefer kde be in its own /usr/kde directory (instead of scattered around /usr, /usr/lib, /usr/include, etc. Just don't give me /opt.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    5. Re:I still don't like their packaging by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2
      I really wish they would drop this whole redhat compatibility thing and just follow the LSB.

      Garett Spencley is right! And while they're at it, it would be excellent if Mandrake dropped GCC 2.96 and either used 2.95 or 3.0.4 (or 3.1). Man, if they did those 2 things, I'd buy more frequently (so far, I've only bought 8.0, although I'm buying 8.2 if it's even close to stable).

  20. Whoohoo! Only a few more weeks... by cnelzie · · Score: 3, Interesting


    ...before I can download it from am FTP server!!!

    I am very impressed with the tools that they are inlcuding in this release. The best is the ability to RIGHT-CLICK on a folder and then LEFT-CLICK on SHARE!!!

    That is the greatest feature to add to Linux. The medium sized computer manufacturer that I work for is very interested in being able to use Linux in their Server products. Since most of their technical staff and clients have no interest in learning how to configure Samba, this will be a great help.

    Now, all they will have to do is have me or a few of the other techs, go by the machines, or SSH into them to update them on occasion.

    Mandrake is truly bringing Linux to the masses.

    With this one feature, the market share and thus the potential number of commercial products for Linux can and hopefully will increase dramatically.

    --
    .sig seperator
    --

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  21. Re:Share your upgrade experiences by Junta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a good reason to have /home as a separate partition :) In any case, backing up home is easy if you have a place to stick the tarball.
    tar czvf home.tar.gz /home should give you a nice backup that preserves ownership and permissions to stick somehwere...
    Don't need a GUI for something that straightforward...

    I personally keep all data that I want persistant accross installs on non-root partitions: /opt, /home, and /usr/local are the key htings I keep around when I upgrade. I also have extra software installs and multimedia files, but I keep those on the file server, and there it is also kept separate from the partitions the distro gets to screw with (and on a RAID array).

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  22. Request for Mandrake 8.3 by brad3378 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'd like to see a Wallet-sized rescue disk CD in the next boxed distro. Not sure how much cost it will add to the distro, but it seems like it would be inexpensive.

    Yes, I know of several root/boot rescue disks,
    but a disk made specifically for Mandrake might be more useful & user friendly.

    Floppies are unreliable, slow, and don't hold much.

    Include something like Symmantec Ghost for easy backups

    Include CDRW support and USB2/firewire support for those new external burners and hard-drives.

    Stupid idea? - I'd pay extra for it.
    What's everybody else think?

    --

    1. Re:Request for Mandrake 8.3 by Jester998 · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Ever try deleting about 2 gigs of stuff using pure MS-DOS mode?

      I recently had to wipe out a virus that had lodged itself in the C:\_RESTORE directory of someone's WinME install. Of course, Windows won't let you touch these "critical" files, so I booted to DOS mode... del *.*... wait 15 minutes... and it's still not getting anywhere very fast. Put coat on, tell customer I'll be back in 10 minutes.

      Come back with Linux Mandrake 8.0 CD#1, insert, reboot, type 'rescue' at LILO prompt, mount /dev/hda1 /mnt, cd /mnt/_rescue, rm -fr *. 30 seconds later everything's wiped. Reboot WinME, full virus scan, all clean. Problem solved. :)

      The Mandrake rescue feature is much more useful than just restoring a broken LILO or whatever. I now carry that CD around with my tech kit. :)

    2. Re:Request for Mandrake 8.3 by Jester998 · · Score: 2

      "cleaning up Windows systems" ... "repairing Windows installations"

      What's wrong with using a Linux bootdisk to do `rm -fr *.*` ? Or, better, `for owtype in zero random zero urandom; do dd if="/dev/$owtype" of=/dev/hda1 bs=16k; done` ??? That cleans up Windows partitions, uh, really well. :)

      Seriously, thanks for the tip though. I've bookmarked the page in case my trusty Mandrake boot CD is insufficient (?!?) for a given repair problem.

  23. P2P ISO Distribution by CaptCanuk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So what's a big problem with Slashdotted ISO releases??? To quote MC Hammer: Hammer time. Those poor distros get nailed so hard that you can't get to an ISO at a reasonable speed for a week. And companies like Mandrake really need all the support they can get. It's great product and I'm sure they have to pay for massive bandwidth with ISO releases (even with all the mirrors from edu sites and the like). Looks like we need a p2p distribution system a la fasttrack network that allows multiple downloads from multiple hosts so that we can waterfall these ISO's. I just hope someday it will be implemented (and more importantly: used by the masses).

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
    1. Re:P2P ISO Distribution by jilles · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We can do that for them. Just share it with your gnutella client and gnutella will do the rest. Just make sure that you have a client that supports some of the interesting new features (super peer, distributed downloads). Limewire does it all. If enough people share their isos, there'll be plenty of bandwidth

      --

      Jilles
    2. Re:P2P ISO Distribution by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      Any of the P2P mechanisms probably have it already. Have you looked? Nice thing about P2P is that it doesn't matter if it isn't used by the masses, as long as atleast one person with the file is.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  24. Mandrake in trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For all those saying how nice a product this is and how you are downloading the ISO's as you type, something to consider...

    Right on Mandrake's site is what I would call a plea, and what otehrs would call begging for money.

    "Mandrake Linux distribution's short-term future is in jeopardy due to a simple factor: money"

    So perhaps just this once people can go out and buy some CD's to help support this company and make sure there is another release in the future.

    I saw someone else say this earlier, but it got modded up to 2 as Funny... I don't know why buting the CD's to support a company in financial trouble is funny though.

    1. Re:Mandrake in trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why?
      I never pay Micros~1 for their stuff and they're doing OK.

    2. Re:Mandrake in trouble by BgJonson79 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or you could DL is the ISOs and donate to Mandrake directly, through a credit card, like what I did today (not to trump myself up... but it's good to give support to the industry).

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    3. Re:Mandrake in trouble by hendridm · · Score: 2

      Agreed. For a group that is driven by community development, we aren't always willing to offer community support to our favorite companies.

      > If I was not unemployed (get into computers, they said in the '70s. It's the wave of the future, you'll never be out of work! Yeah, right), I'd pay Mandrake for their distro.

      I'm in the same boat. Although I'm using Debian at the moment, I would pay for the Mandrake club just to support as what I perceive as the other great distro. Unfortunately, as a recent MIS graduate, I can't find work and I'm about to sell my winter jacket here in Wisconsin just to afford next month's rent. I now realize the folly of my ways (hindsight is 20x20), but I remember them selling me on the idea of majoring in MIS five years ago because I would be gaurenteed to find a job and could expect to earn a lot of money. Horse pucky! I consider myself "above average" and on-par with most of the CS graduates through job experience and personal persistence and I keep getting turned down due to lack of experience. I particularly loved this quote from my alma mater's web site on why to study MIS:

      > Well paid. The annual salary range for an entry-level MIS trainee with a bachelor's degree is $45,000-$52,000.

      Note "entry level". I visit that page once in awhile for a good laugh. EVERYONE, even entry level, wants experience. Everyone.

      It would be cool if someone would organize a class action lawsuit. Too bad I'm a lazy bitch and lack hard evidence.

    4. Re:Mandrake in trouble by Eric+Damron · · Score: 2

      You may as well save your breath. By the tone of this guys messages he's either a gradeschooler or immature high school student.

      A lot of people don't realize that if we don't support the company's that support us we all lose in the end.

      The great thing about Linux compays is that if you can't afford to contribute you are still allowed to download the distribution. This is empowering and if we can break out of the box and do what is necessary then it will be a good thing for us all.

      Don't expect any high standards from this individual. Lots of people complain about Microsoft but are unwilling to support anything better.

      I believe that open source company's will fail because we as a society try to apply our traditional capitalistic values on a very untraditional business model.

      Also, I sensed by the original posters comment "We don't care.. "(If Mandrake goes out of business.) That he may not have a lot of compation for the needs of other people. Imagine if the world had no one who felt differently! Not a world I would like to live in.

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  25. Re:Please by colmore · · Score: 2

    I'm new to the whole Linux thing. I've been downloading the latest iso's of the various distros. Once I find one that suits me, I plan to pay.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  26. Re:StarOffice 6.0???? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uh, I think that's supposed to be OpenOffice. Oops.

  27. Why not? Subscribe to the Club, instead of buying by JM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, Mandrake needs the cash...

    But when you buy a box, specially in stores, there's only a small portion of your cash that goes to the developers. Manufacturing, packaging, shipping, support, distributor's and retailer's margins take the major part of the revenue.

    When you subscribe to the Club, you make sure the cash will be spent directly on the Mandrake Linux open-source development, you have access to all the software, including commercial applications, and a lot of Club privileges.

    Besides, the boxes won't be available until a few weeks, so join the club and you can download everything today.

  28. Re:Good for newbs by colmore · · Score: 2

    "mainly because alternate OSs are cool."

    oh no, please God no.

    I hate the people who only like bands because they're underground. I was talking to a guy about the Strokes the other day and he said "yeah I saw 'em a few times and I really liked them, but then vanity fair started writing about them, so forget that."

    you should like something or use something because *it works for you* not because it is "alternative" or "underground" or anything else. If windows is working for you, then don't switch to Linux because it's "cool." switch to Linux because it's a better product.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  29. SuSE is better (duck!) by kikensei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    IMHO of course. Actually Mandrake is great. There's no such thing as the "best" distro, whatever works for you. I think SuSE is getting limited acknowledgment 'cause you can't download the ISO's. It is free to copy and you can install via ftp if you'd like. SuSE's YOU (Yast Online Update) and Yast package manager seem far easier to newbie's than Mandrake's equivalent. (haven't tried urpmi, which looks good). You can get SuSE Pro version for $49 bucks including the full DVD and 8 CD's if you buy the "update" version (full without manuals). Some may still prefer Mandrake, but really TRY SuSE. It'll surprise you. I know quite a few Windows "power user" discussion boards where people try Mandrake (as of 8.1) and come back swearing off linux for good. These are the same people that change winXP themes twice a day. SuSE is just easier to get going in 3D gaming (if you've got nvidia at least), make online system updates (as easy as windows updating) and 8.0 comes with KDE3. I've been running KDE3 beta 2 on my 7.3 PC since its release and I'm amazed at how quick and stable it is. If SuSE actually tries to start requiring licenses (mentioned online somewhere today) than I'll be bailing the distro pretty quickly though. Until then I've found my linux distro.

  30. YALD (Yet Another Linux Distribution) by Hercynium · · Score: 5, Informative

    OK, I'm already known for being a guy who tells it ilke it is.

    I've been a linux user since 1995, cutting my teeth on Slackware 2. Since then I have seen linux evolve, grow, change directions and broaden it's horizons.

    Here's the lowdown on Mandrake: I thoroughly believe that Mandrake Linux is the single most balanced distrubution available. I have used it for enterprise-scale web servers, for applications development, and even for an experimental wireless data-retrieval system in peru (the very complete internationalization of the Mandrake distro made it the ideal candidate, as well as it's ability to scale down MUCH smaller that I could ever get a red-hat system)

    It's also dandy as a day-to-day desktop workstation.

    However, It has it's caveats, like any distro. It's still too large. I'd like to see what you get with a 65 meg install. If it's got internationalization and a functional x-server as well as some basic ncurses-type config tools, I may end up switching from my own LFS system (weighing in at about 90 megs right now.) Also, like redhat, the configuration tools are a little too complex. If they decide to switch to ONE config manager and ONE only, that doesen't mess with your own customizations, I'll finally start using them. As it is, I don't install any of them, and I edit all files by hand, a-la slackware. However, if you're a newbie, all the drak* tools are VERY well done and perform in a fairly straightforward manner, as long as you're not getting jiggy with the .rc's.

    I must admit, I have a soft spot for Debian, especially as it's going to inherit the HURD, and apt is soooo schweet, but give rpm-drak a try. I hope you won't be disappointed.

    Other than that, well, I'd encourage anybody who believes in supporting an excellent distro to go out and buy a copy, or Subscribe. It's going to be worth the money.

    --
    I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
    1. Re:YALD (Yet Another Linux Distribution) by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      However, It has it's caveats, like any distro. It's still too large. I'd like to see what you get with a 65 meg install.

      When discussing Mandrake's "small install" options, let's remember that all the binaries which ship with Mandrake (at least in the x86 version - the most popular one by far) are 586 optimized. What's the smallest hard drive you've ever seen in a Pentium?

      Personally, I'm a bit surprised that they bothered. I don't the idea is to make a "Mandrake for older systems", which is the point of many small distros (such as Tiny). More likely, they're aiming for those expert users who just want the core programs and libraries, and will build their own system from there. For example, users who are setting up a minimal server with as little unnecessary code as possible lying around (in which case I would think that XFree and internationalization tools would not be included).

    2. Re:YALD (Yet Another Linux Distribution) by Jester998 · · Score: 2

      "they're aiming for those expert users who just want the core programs and libraries, and will build their own system from there."

      That's what I'm gonna do. :) I have an old 540MB hard drive kicking around... gonna swap that with the 2.6GB drive that's currently in my firewall/router machine, then rebuild the box from scratch on the 540MB drive using the minimal install option... then install SSH and all the other stuff I need, then put the firewall back into production. Last time I built it, I used Mandrake 8.0 and managed to trim that down to about 150MB... this time around it'll be even smaller, hopefully. :)

      I have a feeling I'm really going to like the minimal install option... Now it'll be very easy to do Linux From Scratch, because you won't need an existing Linux installation to do it!

  31. Why this obsession with ISO's? by Malc · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    What is this obsession with downloading and burning these huge ISO's? All that bandwidth that gets consumed, yet how many of the programs in the image sit idle and never used? Since I recently converted from Mandrake to Debian, I've got to say, I've turned against the idea of having ISOs. With a fast internet connection, it's so much easier and quicker to just download the boot disk and then just download during setup what you really need. The only useful purpose that I see to ISO's is for creating CDs for people without a good connection, or if you're going to have multiple installs.

    1. Re:Why this obsession with ISO's? by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      eh??

      Enter Redhat world - one FLOPPY diskette (the netboot.img one) - boot it, put an IP (assuming that your network is connected through another Linux gateway), and continue to install from there while downloading what you need only - from the net..

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    2. Re:Why this obsession with ISO's? by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      The idea that a CD is being "tangible"?

      That you know in advance that you'll always have a backup installation to fall onto, that always works, without worrying whether your network connection is down?

    3. Re:Why this obsession with ISO's? by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      Actually, no matter how fast my connection is, I always want a CD. Having a fast connection is one thing, having a stable always-online connection is another.

      There might just be one day, electricity runs out on your non-UPS equipped box, a few times when your disk is being fscked. And the ISP is down too. A CD will be your savior.

      Don't laugh, it actually happened to my box and it scared the daylight outta me. Luckily my data wasn't affected and fsck finally finished without errors.

    4. Re:Why this obsession with ISO's? by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      Ive got a nice wonderfully fast internet connection....only problem is I must connect through a Cisco VPN 5000 server....hence, I need ISOs to do installs

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    5. Re:Why this obsession with ISO's? by Arker · · Score: 2

      Umm all of them?


      I would assume. They'd have to do something pretty damn lame to break pppd.


      http://www.linuxhelp.net/guides/janou/pppoe.shtml

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  32. Re:intel 830M chipsets by smoondog · · Score: 2

    (Slightly OT) The problem with the i830M often lies in the vendor bios. A good summary of a potential solution (and further problems) is the linux w/ the dell c400:

    http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/linux/c400.html

    Hope this helps.

    -Sean

  33. Not just for babies anymore by JM · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have a look at the latest Netcraft survey, and look for Apache-AdvancedExtranetServer.

    That's Mandrake's optimized version of Apache, in use by more than 75,000 web servers, more than Domino or Stronghold (Redhat's secure server).

    So it might be the best one for beginners, but it's used on a lot of servers too.

  34. Re:There go my iso downloads by nusuth · · Score: 2

    If you have RC1 just use cooker and don't download the ISOs. For the next few weeks I guess it will be just bug fixes, not new features that might break so you are probably better off with cooker anyway.

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  35. Re:Good for newbs by geekoid · · Score: 2

    aahh the catch 22

    How many people would of look at Linux at all if it wasn't for the fact that it was "underground"?

    Don't get me wrong I agree with you. Sadly, we're in the minority. which to these people makes us cool.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  36. DAMN! by sconeu · · Score: 2

    Just last night, I updated the to the 2802 nVidia drivers... and to Mozilla 0.9.8! I could have waited a day... At least I didn't download the 8.1 ISOs last night :-P

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  37. Re:has to be better... by egreB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But, but..

    Linux was designed from the beginning, and still is, to be run on lousy hardware. I'm about to set up a Pentium 60MHz firewall/router/log-in-terminal, and I've seen people running that on 386's. By speaking like you, we only get bloatier, bigger and slower software, because "hey, I've got the hardware for it!" But have you ever tried running DOS with Windows 3.11 on a Athlon 1200? Blazingly fast! People knew how to work in Windows 3.11 as well, they just didn't have that kindergarden-look of WinXP. Keep the software small and fast, and the computers will run faster! Linux should run (and does) on Pentium 200s. It even runs fast, if you set it up correctly or use a small, fast distro (think Blackbox, few services - boots in 10 seconds). My favourite server distro in that matter is Trustix - small, fast and it works.

    MHO, anyway..

  38. Hardly by Pac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OpenOffice version numbering does not follow this pattern (current OpenOffice version is build 641C).

    And StarOffice 6.0 is about to be officially launched (this week or the next). So I think it is really SO 6.0.

  39. So does it support HomePNA yet? by Uttles · · Score: 2

    Or will that ever happen? HPNA might suck when you compare it to ethernet, but for those of us living in an apartment and having the only widspread outlets being phone outlets, HPNA is perfect. Yes we could run ethernet cable all over the place, but that would be more inconvenience than it's worth. This Mandrake stuff, supposed to be Linux for the home user, should really support Home PNA if they do in fact care about us lowly convenience people...

    --

    ~ now you know
  40. Re:65MB Minimum? by be-fan · · Score: 2

    Uh, running Sid right here with XFree 4.1. Works perfectly. In fact, Sid is a hell of a lot more 'stable' than Mandrake 8.1. I've had several broken packages in 8.1 (especially when I enabled cooker) but I've been using Sid as long as I've used Debian, and not a single problem yet.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  41. it's a symlink, guess its for compatiability by tube013 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ls -l red* && more mandrake-release
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Mar 16 15:36 redhat-release -> mandrake-release
    Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Bluebird) for i586

  42. Join Mandrake Club instead by gnugnugnu · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So perhaps just this once people can go out and buy some CD's to help support this company and make sure there is a another release in the future.

    A noble sentiment, but if you want to really help then Join the Mandrake club.
    If you buy CD a lot of that money goes towards packaging distribution and marketing.

    --
    Guilty

    1. Re:Join Mandrake Club instead by Tsujigiri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A noble sentiment, but if you want to really help then Join the Mandrake club.
      If you buy CD a lot of that money goes towards packaging distribution and marketing.


      True, but buying boxed editions has another positive effect. If lots of people buy the boxes, more stores will stock them, giving the distribution more visibility to people who have not used Linux yet, potentially getting more new users, producing more income. So there are benefits either way.

      --

      "I'll take the red pill. No! Blue! AAAaaaahhhhhhhhh"
      - Monty Python meets the Matrix

  43. Re:Why not? Subscribe to the Club, instead of buyi by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 2

    Besides, the boxes won't be available until a few weeks, so join the club and you can download everything today.

    Do both. Moving boxes adds to counts of users. Club membership supports development. Support for Mandrake is what counts. Millions support Microsoft and right now, Mandrake poses one of the few threats to the Evil Empire (TM). We need to support them or once again, we'll have no choice.

    --
    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
  44. Re:Mandrake's PHP Hammered: Announcement Text Belo by HeUnique · · Score: 2

    I think the announcment is a bit misleading...

    There is NO Star Office 6.0 officially available - there is open office - without tons of fonts (only the free fonts), no dictionary (not the gnu old dictionary!), and tons of other stuff which is not there. So I think that they bundled a snapshot of Open Office..

    Star office 6.0 WILL cost you money! How much? good question, but it won't be available freely for Linux (although you could use Open Office with the limitations I mentioned above).

    FYI.

    --
    Hetz (Heunique)
  45. DON'T USE IT if you have a Promise ATA133 card by DCowern · · Score: 2, Informative

    During testing, I discovered a bug that's related to the ATA133 patch including in Mandrake's version of the 2.4.18 kernel. If you attempt to install 8.2 with a Promise Ultra TX2 card (the ones packaged with Maxtor ATA133 drives), it will not successfully complete and will destroy your existing installation. I reported this bug on the cooker mailing list and to Mandrake's bugzilla site. It was not fixed before release. Be forewarned and wait for an updated kernel with this bug fixed. Cheers.

  46. Re:*Mirrors*? by opkool · · Score: 2

    I pre-ordered Mandrake 8.2 PowerPack, with manuals this last Sunday.

    I just can't wait!

    Those are my (more than) 2 cents (to help Mandrake)

  47. Crippled? by Akardam · · Score: 2

    Speak for yourself. I'm running RH 7.2 on my production boxes, and am very happy with the overall performance.

    Of course, you have to compare the stock 2.4.18 kernel with the highly tweaked 2.4.9 kernel from RH.

    P.S. I don't think that the kernel is at 4.x.x yet :P

  48. I'm comparing it against FreeBSD by LM741N · · Score: 2

    FreeBSD beats Mandrake for ease of software upgrades and packages due to the Ports Collection and CVSup.

    Mandrake, though, had an easier install that even Forrest Gump could do.

    However, a look at the /etc directory shows Mandrake to be very complicated compared to FreeBSD. Complicated translates to more potential problems and security risks.

  49. WRONG!! NOT TRUE, not available by spineboy · · Score: 2

    I'm a member and they definetely DON'T have it for download.

    Go ahead prove me wrong.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  50. 2.3KB/s SLASHDOT in effect by spineboy · · Score: 2

    'nuff said

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  51. Re:Why not make a deal with google? by penguinboy · · Score: 2

    /. mirroring sites and inserting its own ads would no doubt result in a world of trouble.

  52. Re:Being l33t with Mandrake by ColaMan · · Score: 2

    Hmmm... perhaps I am wrong, but,
    Isn't init in /sbin?

    Could be a bit hard to run mandrake's init scripts, if init is in a partition that isn't mounted until after init runs and kicks in all the rest.

    Probably the same sort of conclusion could be drawn with /lib and /bin as well.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  53. Is zlib (and others) fixed in Mdk 8.2 ? by brianc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been holding off grabbing any of the release
    candiates hoping the zlib, OpenSSH and other
    recent security fixes would be incorporated.

    I can't find mention of these updates for 8.2 on
    the Mandrake announcement site, or forums.

    Anyone know if zlib and the gang have been fixed?

    My query about this on the Mdk forums was
    immediately marked as "-1: Offtopic" suggesting
    to me the fixes are not there. :/

    --


    SIGLOST && SIGUNUSED && SIGQUIT
    1. Re:Is zlib (and others) fixed in Mdk 8.2 ? by fcrozat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, zlib and OpenSSh security bugs are fixed in Mdk 8.2...

  54. Re:Motd by dvdeug · · Score: 2

    If all of you send me, say, 50 bucks, I will happily give you a collection of free software other people wrote as well...

    What about the stuff that you wrote? Or that stuff that you paid to be released as free software? Or how about the hours of packaging and bug testing?

  55. Re:Motd by linux_warp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The important thing to reconize is that mandrake FUNDS the software they use in their distro. They fund many programmers to work full time on open source software. They are not a distro that just takes your money for themselves, they help the community.

    Doesnt anyone remember their donation to debian also?

  56. alcatel, by TechnoLust · · Score: 2

    Yes, but I said built-in support. When I had 8.1 I had to download things to make it work. When I installed the 8.2BETA I had to click a button and it was (almost) setup. In the 8.2 release, I assume they have the problem fixed and you can just click the button and be done. Hence "built in." If you don't have a dictionary, you can use this one. Or you could actually pay attention to what I wrote before popping off at the mouth. And who says "Fool" anymore, what you think you are Mr. T or something?

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
  57. Re:Being l33t with Mandrake by nitehorse · · Score: 2

    Uh.... did you ever bother to realize that several important system utilities are in /bin and /lib? Like... say, /bin/sh - to load your init scripts. or /bin/mount, which happens to mount your partitions?

    not to mention that these programs also happen to be dynamically linked (in some cases) to stuff like /lib/ld-linux.so.2....

    It's not "No, no, you don't want to do that!"; it's "Uh... you can't do that." Which is damned right.

    -clee

  58. WRONG! by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

    The GPL only means they have to provide source to you (at reasonable media cost) IF YOU BUY their product.

    Cheap fucks like you may WISH the GPL guaranteed you a free ride, but it doesn't. They're being nice.

    1. Re:WRONG! by kinkie · · Score: 2

      Yes and not.

      GPL also grants the right to those who buy the product from you to redistribute it in whatever way they see fit, including free of charge if they wish.

      However you're perfectly right. They ARE being nice, and we all should reward them for this.

      --
      /kinkie
  59. download edition by jonestor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What happened to the download edition that you can buy? That one only cost me about 30 bucks in the store. Now I see that their lowest cost edition cost 60. Are they that low on cash?

  60. try using your brain! by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    Mandrake is the easiest distro there is, if you think Mandrake is hard, you need to upgrade your brain!!!

    I mean Mandrake is point and click, if you want to learn a command, man command

    If you cant use KDE you most likely cant use Windows therefore you shouldnt be using Linux.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  61. PCMCIA install by Salsaman · · Score: 2
    Does anybody know if they have fixed the PCMCIA install yet ? I tried it with beta 2, and it didn't work at all...no ethernet card, no cdrom.

    And no, I am not trolling, this is a serious question.

  62. Re:ximian in 8.2? by fcrozat · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, we didn't "broke" Ximian.. Ximian is doing a repackaging of GNOME based on specific version releases.. It is up to them to upgrade to new versions of the distro, not Mandrake..

  63. Ahem... I should know it. .-) by deno · · Score: 3, Informative

    Considering the fact I'm running the MandrakeClub, how come I don't know anything about it? .-)

    No, there are no ISO downloads for users (yet?), we simply don't have enough servers to survive that. MandrakeClub members can download the applications which aren't in the "downlaod edition" from MandrakeClub site, but they have to get the ISOs from the same places as everyone else.

  64. Re:Good for newbs by saintlupus · · Score: 2

    you should like something or use something because *it works for you* not because it is "alternative" or "underground" or anything else.

    "Why is 'alternative' the largest section in every record store?"

    Wish I could remember where I heard that.

    --saint

  65. Re:Good for newbs by colmore · · Score: 2

    I'm reminded of an Onion editorial:

    "I'm not afraid to try new and popular things"

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  66. firmware by TechnoLust · · Score: 2

    Yes, I did have to download the firmware IN ADDITION TO SOME OTHER FILES. You were not there, you do not know what happened. Also, you have COMPLETELY missed the whole point of this conversation. When I (me, my experience, not yours) tried to get it to work in previous distros, it was not a single step procedure. It was a little more involved. Now, with 8.2 it IS a very simple procedure, that will have you up in seconds. I'm not implying that you never got it working in a previous version, I'm sure it could be done. Hell, if I took the time and effort, I could probably make it work on a solar calcuator. My whole point was: Before 8.2 - not so simple an infant could do it; After 8.2 - so simple an infant could do it. I know it was a licensing issue, I had to read that to download it! Now it is more simple, that's all.

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"