Slashdot Mirror


Review of Hands Free Mouse

SLDave wrote in to plug his review of NaturalPoint's hands free mouse that covered by Slashdot some time ago. It seems to work as advertised, using a camera to track your head and replace your mouse, but with a lot of caveats. Definitely worth a look for us truly lazy folks.

250 comments

  1. The review, in case it gets slashdotted... by Trracer · · Score: 0, Redundant


    NaturalPoint TrackIR
    Author: Chris Oh
    Date Posted: April 25th, 2002
    SLRating:

    Bottom Line: If you're into cool toys that have functionality, give this a try but don't rely on it outside of simple tasks, such as deathmatches.
    http://www.slcentral.com/c/h/r/naturalpoint/trac ki r

    Introduction

    Didn't you ever wish that you could just sit back and browse the web like it's made to be done? Didn't you just want to lie back and make your eyes do the talking and clicking for you? Well then, if you're like me, you will be looking for everything possible to make your time on the computer and on the internet, much more efficient and easier. As an American, I like doing things the easiest way possible. People have dreamed for a long time for something to make using the computer easier. When the mouse came along, that was a godsend and people were gracing it as the ultimate usability tool for the computer but now that we've progressed through high stages of computing, the mouse has remained relatively the same except for some laser technology. In comes the NaturalPoint TrackIR, which is a tool which supplements "not replaces" your mouse with something much better... your forehead. The concept is so simple that it's almost a crime to market and sell it off when most of us has been dreaming of things like this for years but to give credit where credit is due, NaturalPoint took it upon themselves to actually take the time to developing something like this and market it.

    Here's how it works, the TrackIR has 2 basic parts that make it work. The first is a camera that mounts on the top of your computer and second part is silver dots which you stick on your forehead, hat, etc... that catch the attention of the camera so that the cursor moves along to the movements your head makes. The dots have a cloth backing so you can stick it and remove it many times. The camera is sensitive enough to detect the silver dots and it will only detect those dots and calculate how it moves and translate it to cursor movements. So when the dots are on your head and you move your head left, the camera sees the dot moving to the left and therefore the cursor moves left. Actually, this isn't really a camera because all it can basically make out from everything else is the silver dots; it will not do anything like take pictures of your friends or of the city. The camera sends out infrared signals and the silver dots bounce the signals back to the TrackIR. The camera is connected to the desktop or laptop through USB. The cable is pretty short (good for laptops) and therefore it comes with a 4 foot long USB cable extension. Also, it has extra rubber pads for use with laptops. A good feature of this is that the device is powered by the USB port and therefore doesn't require any external power.

    The device comes in three flavors: the "standard" which has the camera, cord, software, and the dots...the "EG" (ergonomics) which has a clear case camera, two finger rings, and a breakout cable, this is meant to fully replace your mouse... and finally, the "AT" (assisted technology) model which helps out disabled people with special software. What I will be reviewing today will be the standard model.

    Installation

    When getting ready to install the device, you will see many, many notices in the packaging telling you to install the software before installing the hardware and this is a very important factor in getting this to work properly. I would've gone and tested what would happen if I installed the hardware first but I don't think that I would like to have taken that risk. After installing the software, you will need to reboot, then connect the hardware to the computer. The camera was meant to sit on a monitor or something pretty high up and level to your head or wherever you wish to place the dots. The camera has a metal base which can be bent to stabilize itself on any surface: monitor edges, desk edges, etc...The camera has a roughly 25 degree field of view which is quite adequate because it will most likely be positioned in front of you. Installation was fairly simple and straightforward, just like many USB webcams and devices. Of course here comes the tricky part or so it seemed: the software.

    System Specs

    AMD Athlon 1.2GHz
    Soyo Dragon +
    256MB Crucial PC2100DDR
    MSI GeForce2 Pro
    Turtle Beach Santa Cruz
    Maxtor D740X 60GB Hard Drive
    Plextor 12/10/32A IDE CD-RW
    Pioneer 16X DVD-ROM
    Microsoft WindowsXP
    Software

    The TrackIR doesn't work at all without the software running because it is not a native windows device like a mouse or a keyboard but making the software run on start-up isn't a big hassle. You'll know when the device is on and working when you see the green light on the top of the camera turns on. The software works with everything in the system and is basically like one of the apps everyone used to have that would move your mouse around a bit every couple of seconds to fool the AllAdvantage program. When you move the real mouse, it would disable the TrackIR program until the mouse stops moving. The software itself reminds me of the mouse control panel in Windows, it lets you control cursor speed, sensitivity, smoothness, etc...Smoothness is unique, when you set it to maximum smoothness, you get a very fluid movement from the cursor but also it seems to lag a bit...I like it because your head can be shaking quite a bit and the cursor would be steady, sort of like the Sony Handycam's Steadyshot. In constrast, minimum smoothness results in jerky and jittery movements of the cursor. Other functions include a double speed function in which the cursor moves at double the speed. Also, the gravity function lets you hit the hard to hit targets of the close, minimize, maximize, etc...buttons, they snap to a button when the cursor gets close to it so you can easily get the cursor close to the close button and the software automatically positions the cursor over the close button, where it thinks you intended to put it.

    The "Game Mode" function overrides the game's mouse controls so the TrackIR can be used for games. But in games, I found that precision and speed is lacking compared to a mouse and it would pretty difficult to be a champion while using the TrackIR as a game controller. These comments are for FPS and RTS games but for flight simulations, I've come to the conclusions from many reports that this is a good choice because of the ability for you to view out of the cockpit with the TrackIR and how it's a less point and click dependant genre than FPS or RTS.

    At this point you might be wondering how you click the mouse, both left and right click can't be done with your eyes blinking, I'm sorry but I don't think that function will ever be implemented, unless you would like to stick a few silver dots on your eyelids. Clicking is done through pressing designated keys on the keyboard, so you can have an almost hands free experience, notice the keyword being "almost".

    Common Usage

    What can I say about this device in terms of things I normally do such as browsing the web and checking email? The TrackIR can easily move the cursor as well as a mouse can and it's much easier moving your head than it is moving a mouse so I cant argue with it's ease and laziness factor. The only major problem that I think people will hit is that it takes time getting used to it. It takes time to adjust to the speed you move your head, the angles of visibility, and the range, and if you play games, those too. Also, the TrackIR catches onto many things that are bright...not just the silver dots. If you have a silver ring, there's a good chance it'll see that as a dot and track according to that. The bottom line is that you probably wont save any time by using the TrackIR but it's a good break from the standard mouse and also adds just a little bit to the human laziness factor.

    Pros & Cons

    Pros

    Works like advertised
    Makes life a bit easier
    Comes with many replacement dots
    Cons

    Lack of precision
    Wearing something that has silver dots on it
    Other shiny objects can throw off the camera
    Conclusion

    I'll give it to you, it's pretty cool to say that all you have to do to use your computer is look at the screen and move your head around a bit but considering everything up to this point, is it worth it? It would be if you could get 100% used to using the TrackIR but it's harder than it seems but the sensitivity and speed options do help. NaturalPoint has done a good job programming the software so that it makes the user have an easier time getting adjusted to the TrackIR. Once properly modified, the TrackIR can be one cool toy but it probably will not be put out for mainstream use or adopted by any OEM's because overally, it will take longer to do things with the TrackIR then it will with a simple mouse. If you're into cool toys that have functionality, give this a try but don't rely on it outside of simple tasks, such as deathmatches.

    SLRating: 7/10

    --
    English is not my first language, so cut me some slack -: Om du kan lasa det har sa kan du Svenska :-
    1. Re:The review, in case it gets slashdotted... by SLDave · · Score: 1

      I've taken off a few of the database connections throughout the site, there shouldn't be any more problems for today :)

    2. Re:The review, in case it gets slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Why did the moderator mod Trracer as redundant?

      I would have had to have tried to find the Google Cache if he did not mirror it!!!

      Moderators on Crack!!!!!!!!!1

      MoC

  2. Hands free web surfing. by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny
    At long last, hands free web surfing. Just think of what you can do now that your not stuck with one hand on the mouse.

    On second thought, better not to think about that.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Hands free web surfing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it would require you to have a strong neck as to keep your head from bobbing up and down while you're wankin' yo' chain if you want to avoid the browser going up and down at the same rate as your head.

      Did that make sense???

    2. Re:Hands free web surfing. by mpweasel · · Score: 1

      On second thought, better not to think about that.

      At least not at work....

    3. Re:Hands free web surfing. by nickyj · · Score: 1

      It should notice when you squint and widen your eyes to zoom in and out..... perhaps not.

      --
      Causing Chaos Everywhere,
      Nik J.
      The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
    4. Re:Hands free web surfing. by Vladimir+Pizdenko · · Score: 1

      Hey, when I first read about the mouse controlling with out hands I asked by what it is controlling now? And you can guess what did I think! :-) LOL! I did think it is controlling with p**is! But serius, it is good step in my opinion. It would be nice in a air port to have it in the bank machines and in extrem cases, very good idea.

      --
      - Vlad.
    5. Re:Hands free web surfing. by P!Alexander · · Score: 1

      At long last, hands free web surfing. Just think of what you can do now that your not stuck with one hand on the mouse.

      I know! I never thought I'd be able to read the Good Lord's Bible and surf at the same time!

      You can tell it's made by Christians because there is no FreeBSD or MacOSX support! Spread the word!

  3. Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I can use both hands for masturbating!

    To porn.

  4. Overally? by blindbat · · Score: 1

    Once properly modified, the TrackIR can be one cool toy but it probably will not be put out for mainstream use or adopted by any OEM's because overally, it will take longer to do things with the TrackIR then it will with a simple mouse.

    overally -- what the heck is that? Is that like coveralls or overalls for OEMs?

    1. Re:Overally? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      I think it's like "Annie Annie Over" where you throw a ball back and forth over the roof of your house. Or maybe it's an ally who is much better than the other allies.

      In a field so ripe for picking, how'd you decide on this particular gem?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  5. Hindu Plot by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tell me this thing is not made in India and part of a plot to take over the world.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Hindu Plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay.

      This thing is not made in India and part of a plot to take over the world.

  6. This being Slashdot... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


    This being Slashdot, I'm wondering whether the subject means "Review of a hands-free mouse" or "Review of Hand's free mouse".

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:This being Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, where do I get this free mouse? Is it like the "free" cue cat the good folks at RS kept giving me?

  7. Slashdotted Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does someone have a mirror?

  8. Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by MikeOttawa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't it make more sense to track your eye movements, if I could *look* at the link on a page (lets say hold it in focus for one second) and follow the link life would be great. There is some technolgy that allows tracking of eye movement - I've seen it used to research how the human brain "reads" a page of text (by scanning all over it quickly).

    1. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by donutz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But which eye? the left, the right, or both? What if you suffer from a lazy eye....if the hands-free mouse tracks the average focus point of both eyes...you'll have a hell of a time using it. Maybe it's a config setting to choose which eye to track.

    2. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by roryh · · Score: 1

      I agree. More often than not, my head doesn't actually move that much when I'm looking at my screen, whereas my eyes are always looking at the currently focussed (sorry) window.

    3. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by MisterBlister · · Score: 1

      Yeah but are your eyes looking at the window to such a fine degree that they could be used as a mouse pointer? .. Most of these inventions are stupid, for mass consumers (they do have some usage for the disabled, though). People are happy with mice, they don't want to dart their head or eyes around to move a cursor.. Just imagine the neck-based RSI lawsuits 3 years from now, when people can't move their heads around effectively..

    4. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Indras · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, it would piss me off. I wouldn't be able to read anything, because the cursor would keep getting in the way!

      And let me guess, blink the left eye for a left click, and vice versa? Imagine the look on people's faces while doing a drag and drop!!

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    5. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by MikeOttawa · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't need a cursor because the cursor would always be where you were looking - the only reason for a cursor is to figure out what the mouse is pointing at...

    6. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by roryh · · Score: 1

      More to the point, keyboard bindings let me do most of my work anyway. Mouse is fine for graphical web browsing and games, but that's what it's mostly for.

    7. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by SlamMan · · Score: 2

      That would really suck for the 30% of the population who can only blink one eye. And I'd be really consirnded to see how you emulate the middle mouse button.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    8. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by ClickNMix · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you really want to stick that silver dot into your eye?

      It might make sense, but not for a few years yet as technology catches up.

      --
      I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... But it was just someone with a flashlight bringing more work.
    9. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by rawg · · Score: 1

      Also, how would you click and drag? You would not be able to see where your dropping it.

      --
      The above is not worth reading.
    10. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by drsoran · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would really suck for the 30% of the population who can only blink one eye.

      Well I guess they'd have to use a Mac.

    11. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Havokmon · · Score: 3, Funny
      Wouldn't it make more sense to track your eye movements, if I could *look* at the link on a page (lets say hold it in focus for one second) and follow the link life would be great.

      And how do you FOLLOW that link?

      Left Click = left blink Rt Click = rt blick
      So next time you're sitting in class trying to double click that icon, be sure your teacher is a least a LITTLE hot..

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    12. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Economist · · Score: 1
      And I'd be really consirnded to see how you emulate the middle mouse button.

      Blinking both eyes would be a possibility, only 1 slight problem, one will do that a lot while working on a pc.... :-)
    13. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

      before this gets out of control, the blinking mouse clicks will never be implemented into the product so says the article.

      rather a keyboard key is designated as the left and right mouse button.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    14. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rather a keyboard key is designated as the left and right mouse button.

      You have to use your tongue to press them, though, because this device is hands-free.

    15. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1
      It could work for the lazy person's web surfing made lazier, but I don't see many practical uses for it.

      I mean, say for instance, you are playing Quake, normally you use the mouse for turning and looking up and down. Well with the eye tracking, if you see something at the edge of the screen, then look at it, it would be read as moving the curser quickly to that side, which would turn you rather fast until you stopped looking at that part of the screen. Or even if say, a dog barked to your left, you would turn to look at the dog, which would be read as moving the curser...

      Nor do I see it as being practical for people that do lots of programming, or even any typing in general. Say you want to put the curser in a specific spot. The sensors would have to be very good to get the curser into the proper location rather than five letters to the left or right.

      If all you need to do is hold your focus on the third tentacle to the left in order to see Sailor Jupitor take it all off, well, this would be ideal(I mean, how hard is it to focus in on pr0n?) and it would free up both hands...

    16. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Already done, though not commercialized as a mouse:


      http://eyetracking.stanford.edu/


      I saw a demo of this and it worked great.

    17. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by room101 · · Score: 2

      I think his idea was to hover the mouse on something for "one second" to follow the link. I think that would drive me crazy, tho.

      Also, if your hands aren't on the mouse, they are probably on the keyboard. (let's hope they are on the keyboard ;0)

      --
      room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
      (they always break you eventually)
    18. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by SablKnight · · Score: 1

      I looked into this as part of my thesis. It was really preliminary work done with a really lousy camera and Matlab (not real time), but given the right equipment and a DSP it could probably be done.

      -SablKnight

    19. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by peddrenth · · Score: 1

      Try a pen-tablet. They're only £30 and work great if you're looking for an alternative to the mouse.

      You can draw with them, they're easy to use for windows and browsers, you _can_ click, right-click, right-click-drag or whatever, and you can get drivers for linux.

    20. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by GutBomb · · Score: 1

      this is not for consumers. this is for geeks.

    21. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by VikingBerserker · · Score: 1

      rather a keyboard key is designated as the left and right mouse button.

      Well then, it isn't exactly hands-free, is it?

    22. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by room101 · · Score: 2

      Still have to take my hands off the keyboard, but hey, nothing's perfect. Someday I will take the leap and try something out. I guess my problem is that I can't test something long-term without buying it, and I'm cheap.

      I'll keep it in mind.

      --
      room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
      (they always break you eventually)
    23. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Hard_Code · · Score: 2
      That would really suck for the 30% of the population who can only blink one eye.

      Who are these strange ones you talk of. Is one eye just permanently open or shut?

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    24. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by peddrenth · · Score: 1

      my problem is that I can't test something long-term without buying it

      Sure you can. All you need is a big store with a refund policy... I test-drive bits of Maplin kit all the time, they're quite happy to let you pay for a something and then return it later if you don't like it.

      Same with catalog stores... think of them as public libraries for electronic kit!

    25. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      what about pirates with only one eye?

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    26. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing (imagine twitching your head around trying to get the cursor in exactly the right place, then think RSI), but it would be a hard one to accomplish, without some sort of head-mounted pickup.
      The only reasonably simple way i can think of would be a variation of the blinkboard, like they used for Hawking when he first lost communication, where the person talking to him would hold a transparent grid, with letters, numbers, punct. in each grid, and look at him through it. He'd look at the letter he wanted, tracking it as the other person moved the board to get Hawkings pupil pointed at him, and thus was looking through the correct character. When it was right, Hawking would blink (strobe?), and they'd go on to the next.
      Maybe a transparent plate with a bullseye, hanging on your ear and stabilized with light adhesive on your forehead would give you a stable-enough pointer.
      Why am I even thinking about this. I think it's a silly idea (except for possibly for the handicapped).

    27. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      actually this may be pretty good for quake...

      "normally you use the mouse for turning and looking up and down. Well with the eye tracking, if you see something at the edge of the screen, then look at it, it would be read as moving the curser quickly to that side, which would turn you rather fast until you stopped looking at that part of the screen."

      Exactly what you were looking at is now going to be centered on the screen and people may develop better preferable (sp?) vision and in those apache games you could actually have the targeting system work properly

      I'll give it to you for regular use for regular use it would blow...

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    28. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Moonshadow · · Score: 2
      I've got an Wacom Intuos 6x8 and it works great. I wouldn't recommend it for daily mouse usage, but it's awesome for graphics work.

      I got a refurbished tablet when they were available - I ended up paying something like 40% of the regular price, and it's worked great for over a year now.

      What about trackballs? I haven't seen those mentioned yet. True, it isn't "hands-free" but it is an alternative to a mouse. Can't use one myself, but the people that do use them swear by them.

    29. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1
      The problem is though, is that when I play Quake, my eyes are moving all over the screen, looking at everything that is moving around me. And if my character changed his orientation everytime I tried to look at what my team mate was doing while running along a platform or shooting down a hall way, I'd probably die a lot more.

      However I must agree that it would be wonderfull for locking on to targets in apache. As a secondary system for pointing it would work wonders.

    30. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      There are literally dozens, if not hundreds of
      such labs. Eye-tracking has been part of cognitive
      psychology for several decades. Further, they
      are no unique in their application of the
      technology.

    31. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by SB5 · · Score: 0

      That's what I thought, but marketing probably thought, fuckem like we did the south paws!

      -sb5-
      Let's see is there anything good on tv? didn't think so why did I even bother...

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    32. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by kurtras · · Score: 1
      I'm one - I can only independently close or blink my left eye. I can, however, blink both eyes simultaneously. I don't know what causes it. I hope this answers your questions.

      -Kurt

    33. Re:Wouldn't it be better to track eye movement? by Mawbid · · Score: 1

      They could attach a mic to this gizmo and listen for clicks.

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
  9. Warning! by MasterKayne · · Score: 1

    The ergonomic trackIR(TM) provides precise cursor control through simple head movement...

    This in combination with gestures can lead to severe neck and shoulder problems ;)

    1. Re:Warning! by Bob+McCown · · Score: 5, Funny

      And im combination with force-feedback, you can actually get injured next time you roll in NASCAR...

  10. blind mice by rot26 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Without the ability to click handsfree, this thing is utterly worthless.

    --



    To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    1. Re:blind mice by tutal · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. If the person has a disability, ie bad fine motor skill as a result of a stroke, then it would make for a decent device. For the clicks, a large - family feud style - button could be made. It sounds weird, but similar things are being used for occupational therapy technology.

    2. Re:blind mice by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

      They should put in a simple switch interface, then you could use a foot switch or whatever. This would be great for the physically handicapped, who are otherwise getting constantly reamed (or being 'harvested' for their Medicaid funding or whatever) for back-dated overpriced technology based on Apple II Plus - era hardware. Not to forget hands-free full-throttle porn surfing of course!

      --
      **>>BELCH
    3. Re:blind mice by delta407 · · Score: 1

      Think about it this way. The Unix folks decided that three mouse buttons would be the most funcitonal way to use a computer. Microsoft came along and reduced the number to two. Apple, then, decided that it could get along with one. (Okay, so it didn't happen exactly that way, but you get the idea.)

      It's only a matter of time until we can get along without clicking, or moving the mouse at all!

      Wait a minute, that's the keyboard.

    4. Re:blind mice by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
      Without the ability to click handsfree, this thing is utterly worthless.
      The article said that you can use key combinations to do it. At last - a use for the unused "windows" keys on the other keyboard (or "print screen" and "scroll lock" on this old one).
    5. Re:blind mice by ClickNMix · · Score: 1

      Not at all, you can use the keyboard to click, and really, there are few times when your not using the keyboard at all. (Browsing the web is the most obvious however)

      It would be nice to have something to auto follow hyperlinks if you hover over them for a couple of seconds to aid that, which would satisfy both the no handed browsers, and still be able to function with current technology.

      --
      I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... But it was just someone with a flashlight bringing more work.
    6. Re:blind mice by aallan · · Score: 2

      Without the ability to click handsfree, this thing is utterly worthless.

      Thats why they sell foot switches which are compatible with the trackIR EG model of the thing...

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    7. Re:blind mice by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      The contention was that this isn't really a hands-free device if you can't click "hands-free". Unless you're proposing pressing those keys without using your hands, in which case I probably don't want to know more.....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    8. Re:blind mice by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      It clicks just fine, though apparently the review does NOT make this clear.

      Dan of Dansdata.com did a review of this product quite some time ago, and HIS review kicks ass Thank You So Very Much, and mentions exactly how Dwell clicking works.

      Dwell clicking is only available on the deluxe model of the TrackIR system, this guy got the cheap ass model. Next time the reviewer should do some more RESEARCH before asking for a product to review.

      ....

      Ignoring that though, I have this strange desire to wire a few of these buggers up together and get a full 3d wireless head tracking system, only problem so far is figuring out tilt, but I figure that two dots put together at different heights should be able to accomplish that, albeit with some difficulty.

      But yah, the TRUE potential of this thing has not yet even began to be explored.

      Think wireless LCD display glasses and with some of the Track IR dots, well heck, talk about a great time!

      Hey, I do not think that anybody has mentioned that these dots can be stuck onto ANYTHING and still work just as well. For the ultimate in simulation, some sort of faux-metal gun could be included with a trigger, reload, and all. Stick a few of these dots on to it in various strategically placed locations and you would have yourself a full 3d range of movement, combine it with the head display and you could EASILY have your gun in a game point in a different direction then from your viewpoint.

      Currently that feature is a major pain in the arse to implement in most games, heh.

      Hey any developers / funders want to get together with me on this one? ]:D

    9. Re:blind mice by seven89 · · Score: 1

      In some situations it might be reasonable to let voice commands be the "clicks" for any kind of "unclickable" pointing device, such as eye movement recognition or the silver-dot head thingie mentioned in the article. (I discuss this idea in more detail here.)

    10. Re:blind mice by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Aha! Just as Outlook finally vindicated all the lusers who believed the "Good Times" hoax, this will vindicate all the newbies who thought their mouse was a foot pedal!

      Chris Mattern

    11. Re:blind mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I am moving sites from server to server at work I like to keep several xterms open (read: 6+) to let me reference one window and work in another. In X you can automagically have the window that the cursor mouses over take focus. This would allow switching window focus without the need to do any funky key combinations. Poo poo on death matchs, speedy window focusing is enjoyable; Definatly going to be an issue when you want to click open your toolbar :)

  11. Linux motion tracking? by jordan_a · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know of any linux motion tracking projects that could do the same thing? It sounds really cool, but I was to cheap to pay $200 extra for XP when I bought my computer *shrug*

    1. Re:Linux motion tracking? by Erwos · · Score: 1

      There are publicly-available algorithms which should obiviate the need for any sort of equipment other than a webcam facing your head to do this sort of tracking. I've not personally worked with them, but my father swears that they work amazingly well. He's done some work with them, so I suppose he'd know. So, yes, this sort of thing is a "potential Linux project", if no one's already working on it. I do not know if anyone is.

      I think that the bigger issue would be the _quality_ of equipment needed. If your web cam is only taking 18 shots a second (as some of the cheapo ones do), I'm not sure you'd be able to get very smooth mouse movement. There's also the question of background movement, that sort of thing, which the solution mentioned in the article shouldn't have a problem with.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  12. Rat and Mouse Giveaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign at the House of Pets pet store:

    "Rat and Mouse Giveaway. Limit 12 per Customer"

  13. sounds like a pain by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    i move my eyes when reading, not my head. my neck is startign to ache just thinking about it.

    hardware was pretty cool looking though!

    IMHO, YMMV etc etc...

    1. Re:sounds like a pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hardware was pretty cool looking though!"

      You sir, are an idiot.

    2. Re:sounds like a pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you are better? AC postin' ijit!

  14. I don't move my head by kiley · · Score: 1

    I just move my eyes. This won't help me.

    1. Re:I don't move my head by EddydaSquige · · Score: 1

      Think of it as an exercise for your neck. Hell, you could put those dots on a different part of your body every time you surf and then write a book on how to lose wight and build musle while you surf the net. :P but yah, it seem pointless, when they develop a why to do this by tracking my eyes then I'll be interested. Unless you could translate those movements for video game, a kind of poormans VR.

  15. No more mouse rashes from playing civ III by taya0001 · · Score: 0

    I play a lot of civ III. So much that i get a red marks from my mousepad. This will be good. Now if i can only find out how to get the Romans to stop attacking babylon!

  16. Slashdotted Already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There seems to have been a slight problem with the database. Please try again by pressing the refresh button in your browser."

  17. For editors with short term memory by dmccarty · · Score: 1

    This was on Slashdot just a little bit ago, here.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    1. Re:For editors with short term memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For user who can't read, it says so in the story linked here.

  18. My favorite quote from the article by Shiblon · · Score: 1

    "As an American, I like doing things the easiest way possible."

    I think it's a little off, though. What should have been said is, "As an American, I only like doing easy things."

    Seriously, I'm all for getting rid of the pesky mouse, but not because I don't want to have to move any limbs to interact with the computer. It's mostly because I get tired of moving my hands from the keyboard to the mouse and back again. As a programmer I can see this would be very useful (though I'm pretty good at getting around without a mouse these days). I can also see how this would be useful for handicapped folks. I cannot, however, see the point in getting one of these just so that you can be more sedentary. :)

    1. Re:My favorite quote from the article by Sir+Robin · · Score: 1

      Get a fullsize keyboard with a Trackpoint in it. See IBM. I've had one for years and like it a lot.

      --
      My /. ID is only 5,210 away from Bruce Perens's.
    2. Re:My favorite quote from the article by de_boer_man · · Score: 1

      I would have modded this up, but then Shiblon would be right about me being fat and lazy.

      --
      .sig wanted. Inquire within.
    3. Re:My favorite quote from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding, this is exactly the next step we need to become more sedentary. My right wrist is all leathery from rubbing on the desk, not to mention that spot where the finish is peeling off the desk.

      My life is going to be heaven now, I can use voice-recognition software instead of typing, then have this hands-free mouse as a perfect addition.

      Let's not forget rolling around on a segway, because god knows i hate walking. And I have to mention those ab zapper things you see on tv now. I can just sit back with one of those on while eating a nice big sandwich and using my hands-free computer.

      What will they come up with next?

  19. Review on DansData by iamr00t · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check it out
    As always, humor included :)

  20. The site's already starting to go... by mattbelcher · · Score: 3, Informative

    So here's the text of the article.

    Introduction

    Didn't you ever wish that you could just sit back and browse the web like it's made to be done? Didn't you just want to lie back and make your eyes do the talking and clicking for you? Well then, if you're like me, you will be looking for everything possible to make your time on the computer and on the internet, much more efficient and easier. As an American, I like doing things the easiest way possible. People have dreamed for a long time for something to make using the computer easier. When the mouse came along, that was a godsend and people were gracing it as the ultimate usability tool for the computer but now that we've progressed through high stages of computing, the mouse has remained relatively the same except for some laser technology. In comes the NaturalPoint TrackIR, which is a tool which supplements "not replaces" your mouse with something much better... your forehead. The concept is so simple that it's almost a crime to market and sell it off when most of us has been dreaming of things like this for years but to give credit where credit is due, NaturalPoint took it upon themselves to actually take the time to developing something like this and market it.

    Here's how it works, the TrackIR has 2 basic parts that make it work. The first is a camera that mounts on the top of your computer and second part is silver dots which you stick on your forehead, hat, etc... that catch the attention of the camera so that the cursor moves along to the movements your head makes. The dots have a cloth backing so you can stick it and remove it many times. The camera is sensitive enough to detect the silver dots and it will only detect those dots and calculate how it moves and translate it to cursor movements. So when the dots are on your head and you move your head left, the camera sees the dot moving to the left and therefore the cursor moves left. Actually, this isn't really a camera because all it can basically make out from everything else is the silver dots; it will not do anything like take pictures of your friends or of the city. The camera sends out infrared signals and the silver dots bounce the signals back to the TrackIR. The camera is connected to the desktop or laptop through USB. The cable is pretty short (good for laptops) and therefore it comes with a 4 foot long USB cable extension. Also, it has extra rubber pads for use with laptops. A good feature of this is that the device is powered by the USB port and therefore doesn't require any external power.

    The device comes in three flavors: the "standard" which has the camera, cord, software, and the dots...the "EG" (ergonomics) which has a clear case camera, two finger rings, and a breakout cable, this is meant to fully replace your mouse... and finally, the "AT" (assisted technology) model which helps out disabled people with special software. What I will be reviewing today will be the standard model.

    Installation

    When getting ready to install the device, you will see many, many notices in the packaging telling you to install the software before installing the hardware and this is a very important factor in getting this to work properly. I would've gone and tested what would happen if I installed the hardware first but I don't think that I would like to have taken that risk. After installing the software, you will need to reboot, then connect the hardware to the computer. The camera was meant to sit on a monitor or something pretty high up and level to your head or wherever you wish to place the dots. The camera has a metal base which can be bent to stabilize itself on any surface: monitor edges, desk edges, etc...The camera has a roughly 25 degree field of view which is quite adequate because it will most likely be positioned in front of you. Installation was fairly simple and straightforward, just like many USB webcams and devices. Of course here comes the tricky part or so it seemed: the software.

    System Specs

    AMD Athlon 1.2GHz
    Soyo Dragon +
    256MB Crucial PC2100DDR
    MSI GeForce2 Pro
    Turtle Beach Santa Cruz
    Maxtor D740X 60GB Hard Drive
    Plextor 12/10/32A IDE CD-RW
    Pioneer 16X DVD-ROM
    Microsoft WindowsXP

    Software

    The TrackIR doesn't work at all without the software running because it is not a native windows device like a mouse or a keyboard but making the software run on start-up isn't a big hassle. You'll know when the device is on and working when you see the green light on the top of the camera turns on. The software works with everything in the system and is basically like one of the apps everyone used to have that would move your mouse around a bit every couple of seconds to fool the AllAdvantage program. When you move the real mouse, it would disable the TrackIR program until the mouse stops moving. The software itself reminds me of the mouse control panel in Windows, it lets you control cursor speed, sensitivity, smoothness, etc...Smoothness is unique, when you set it to maximum smoothness, you get a very fluid movement from the cursor but also it seems to lag a bit...I like it because your head can be shaking quite a bit and the cursor would be steady, sort of like the Sony Handycam's Steadyshot. In constrast, minimum smoothness results in jerky and jittery movements of the cursor. Other functions include a double speed function in which the cursor moves at double the speed. Also, the gravity function lets you hit the hard to hit targets of the close, minimize, maximize, etc...buttons, they snap to a button when the cursor gets close to it so you can easily get the cursor close to the close button and the software automatically positions the cursor over the close button, where it thinks you intended to put it.

    The "Game Mode" function overrides the game's mouse controls so the TrackIR can be used for games. But in games, I found that precision and speed is lacking compared to a mouse and it would pretty difficult to be a champion while using the TrackIR as a game controller. These comments are for FPS and RTS games but for flight simulations, I've come to the conclusions from many reports that this is a good choice because of the ability for you to view out of the cockpit with the TrackIR and how it's a less point and click dependant genre than FPS or RTS.

    At this point you might be wondering how you click the mouse, both left and right click can't be done with your eyes blinking, I'm sorry but I don't think that function will ever be implemented, unless you would like to stick a few silver dots on your eyelids. Clicking is done through pressing designated keys on the keyboard, so you can have an almost hands free experience, notice the keyword being "almost".

    Common Usage

    What can I say about this device in terms of things I normally do such as browsing the web and checking email? The TrackIR can easily move the cursor as well as a mouse can and it's much easier moving your head than it is moving a mouse so I cant argue with it's ease and laziness factor. The only major problem that I think people will hit is that it takes time getting used to it. It takes time to adjust to the speed you move your head, the angles of visibility, and the range, and if you play games, those too. Also, the TrackIR catches onto many things that are bright...not just the silver dots. If you have a silver ring, there's a good chance it'll see that as a dot and track according to that. The bottom line is that you probably wont save any time by using the TrackIR but it's a good break from the standard mouse and also adds just a little bit to the human laziness factor.

    Pros & Cons

    Pros

    Works like advertised
    Makes life a bit easier
    Comes with many replacement dots

    Cons

    Lack of precision
    Wearing something that has silver dots on it
    Other shiny objects can throw off the camera

    Conclusion

    I'll give it to you, it's pretty cool to say that all you have to do to use your computer is look at the screen and move your head around a bit but considering everything up to this point, is it worth it? It would be if you could get 100% used to using the TrackIR but it's harder than it seems but the sensitivity and speed options do help. NaturalPoint has done a good job programming the software so that it makes the user have an easier time getting adjusted to the TrackIR. Once properly modified, the TrackIR can be one cool toy but it probably will not be put out for mainstream use or adopted by any OEM's because overally, it will take longer to do things with the TrackIR then it will with a simple mouse. If you're into cool toys that have functionality, give this a try but don't rely on it outside of simple tasks, such as deathmatches.

    SLRating: 7/10

    --

    Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

  21. It's nice... by NickRob · · Score: 1

    I definitely could've used it for my bout of tendonitis, but when will we get the hands free keyboard? NOT voice recognition, a hands-free keyboard, with cameras and all that good stuff.

    instructions: Point your nose at what key you would like to press, then lurch your head foreward

    Note: I know somepeople would complain about the lack of resistance and clicking noise :)

    1. Re:It's nice... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


      That was covered a month or three ago. Siemens is developing a keyboard-free keyboard.. :) It uses lasers to draw the keyboard on any flat surface, and detect your fingers breaking the beams. I don't know how well that would work for us touch-typests, who keep our fingers on the keys most of the time. Hmmmm.

      The Slashdot Article or
      The Yahoo Story

      (Yahoo has a pic of how bad it really looks.)

      The slashdot story is aparently a duplicate, per the comments.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:It's nice... by NickRob · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah... but you still have to use your fingers. I wanna poke my nose out when I type "Fagot = Yuo!"

  22. Clicking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll buy one only if you double-click by sticking your tongue out twice, really fast.

  23. it follows the Silver dot by kuiken · · Score: 2, Funny

    So my question is how does it work if yoiu are wearing glasses ?
    How does it handel background noise (ppl walking past ect ?
    de review doesnt seem to mention much of this

    I dout this would be usefull for anything except for handsfree porn surfing.
    Oh wait a minute euhh where can i order one :)

    --

    42
    1. Re:it follows the Silver dot by donutz · · Score: 2

      So my question is how does it work if yoiu are wearing glasses ? How does it handel background noise (ppl walking past ect ?

      And what happens if you've got a chair that spins and you do a 360....does the pointer leave one side of the monitor and reappear on the other? or do you need to give yourself whiplash to bring the mouse over to the other side?

    2. Re:it follows the Silver dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh - where exactly do you want to put that silver dot???

  24. It's progress but .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now only if they made other "activities" hands-free.

    1. Re:It's progress but .... by smallblackdog · · Score: 1

      They do, its called a woman.

      --
      Mod me down, fine with me, it's my real karma I try to keep up.
    2. Re:It's progress but .... by smallblackdog · · Score: 0

      Sadly not for OS X. But they've got some nice open source drivers with Linux and come with Windoze drivers. The latest model has a hoover, lube and is scantily clad. Very nice.

      --
      Mod me down, fine with me, it's my real karma I try to keep up.
  25. Is this safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a kid I would fool around with my kid sister as I pointed the TV remote to her forehead, pressing buttons randomly, all the while taunting that her brain was going to melt. So if I use this thing roughly 8 hours a day, in a years time will I have a red indentation in the middle of my forehead? If my indentation is bigger than yours do I get a raise for working more?

  26. Stop Clicking on the link, read this one!!!! by Soko · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yup, already gone. To wit:

    Warning: Too many connections in /home/virtual/site1/fst/var/www/html/boards/adm in/db_mysql.php on line 38

    There seems to have been a slight problem with the database.
    Please try again by pressing the refresh button in your browser.


    To add insult to injury, we have beome what we hate most:

    An E-Mail has been dispatched to our Technical Staff, who you can also contact if the problem persists.

    We apologise for any inconvenience.


    This guy's getting the "Slashdot-SPAMed-my-Mailbox-to-Death" effect, I would imagine. Stop SPAM! Read the karma whore's version here! ;^)

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    1. Re:Stop Clicking on the link, read this one!!!! by mcrbids · · Score: 2


      This guy's getting the "Slashdot-SPAMed-my-Mailbox-to-Death" effect, I would imagine. Stop SPAM! Read the karma whore's version here!


      If the site is properly designed, that wouldn't happen.

      When I build in error notification, I also build in some kind of limiter so that I don't wind up with 4,000 identical panic emails in my inbox.

      An easy method? When an email is sent, update the time on an empty file.

      Before sending out an email, check the time of that file, and see that it's at least 20 minutes old before sending out another notification email. That way, you get (at most) an error notification every 20 minutes.

      Better yet, abstract the notification method itself (instead of sending an email directly) and allow the sysadmin to have errors sent to email, SMS-capable cell phone, pager, etc.

      Come on, people. INTELLIGENT design is possible!

      -Ben

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    2. Re:Stop Clicking on the link, read this one!!!! by zCyl · · Score: 2

      allow the sysadmin to have errors sent to ... cell phone

      Because I want my cell phone slashdotted?

  27. /. strikes again! by Da+w00t · · Score: 1

    Warning: Too many connections in /home/virtual/site1/fst/var/www/html/boards/adm in/db_mysql.php on line 38 There seems to have been a slight problem with the database. Please try again by pressing the refresh button in your browser. An E-Mail has been dispatched to our Technical Staff, who you can also contact if the problem persists. We apologise for any inconvenience.
    ...side note.. /.'s lameness filter is annoying.

    --

    da w00t. mtfnpy?
  28. Looks promising....but by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Silver dots?!?

    I'm already the geek of my neighborhood, but if I forget to take those things off I'll never hear the end of it I'm sure.

    I'll pass since it isn't as precise as a mouse but I'm really taken by the concept. Especially if I can play CounterStrike or UnReal Tourney with it.

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
    1. Re:Looks promising....but by ClickNMix · · Score: 1

      It should be pretty easy to 'hide' the dot in a cap or something. And the review mention about it getting confused by rings etc. Why not use that to your advantage, and just get your nose pierced or some such, and let it track that?

      --
      I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... But it was just someone with a flashlight bringing more work.
    2. Re:Looks promising....but by TonyZahn · · Score: 1

      Even worse, I listen to heavy metal while programming, and when I'm in the elusive "programming zone", I tend to headbang.

      --
      - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
    3. Re:Looks promising....but by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Hey, now you can look like Vivian from The Young Ones!

    4. Re:Looks promising....but by Nidhogg · · Score: 2

      As far as CS and UT go, I don't play those but I do play TFC.

      I said this the last time this thing was posted on /.

      Play sniper with this dot on your forehead and imagine this situation.

      "Nid what the Hell are you aiming at? You missed that last guy by half the map."

      "STFU! I've got the damned hiccups!"


    5. Re:Looks promising....but by 56ker · · Score: 2

      I rememberseeing something like this on TV a few years ago where you had to blink instead of a mouse click. How on earth do you get away with not blinking though?

  29. Sounds great but by First_In_Hell · · Score: 0
    Are the drivers open-soure?

    How many linux kernels will it run on?

  30. dots on the forehead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They're trying to turn us all into hindus! I'll never do that, I'm happy enough with my religion!

  31. I don't need one of these by sher0209 · · Score: 1

    Fortunately I've been working on my telekenisis and can scroll and click links just by thinking about it.

    --
    -- dan.sherman
    1. Re:I don't need one of these by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      Funny you should mention it, as I'm waiting for a thought-controlled wearable pc with 802.11.. pair it up with X10 for lights/appliances and IR converters, and now just thinking about changing the channel on your tv will make it happen! You'll send email by thinking it out, and hearing it read to you by festival in an earphone. You'll get small stimuli to indicate when your Internet connection goes up and down. Of course in the early versions, I can see having to snap wires onto the back of my head like the cochlear implants (or are they magnetized?)

      Check it out.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    2. Re:I don't need one of these by coupland · · Score: 2

      A computer directly controlled by the human mind will give new meaning to the term Garbage In, Garbage Out. Computers will instantly regress to the days of the Vic20 and your PC will display nothing but porn.

  32. Errr.. no thanks. by Smallest · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have a worn out wrist than a worn out neck.

    -c

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
    1. Re:Errr.. no thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put silver dot on other body part, keeps pics a scrolling as ya go

  33. Other interesting devices by Sludge · · Score: 2
    I think it was on slashdot's last story that someone posted a URL to this site. Well, I convinced my employer to buy me a macro footpedal and one of the professional qwerty/dvorak keyboards (I already am a dvorak typist).

    It's been an interesting switch, and I most certainly find some advantage in the footpedal. My hands leave home row significantly less than the average typist. I believe this could make me a faster typist overall given some more time.

    I also jump in Quake with my big toe now.

  34. RSI by arikb · · Score: 1
    Maybe that could have helped me with my RSI - I am writing these lines with minimal right-hand movement, as my wrist is covered with a large elastic bandage.

    RSI = Repetitive Strain Injury, just in case you didn't know.

    --Arik

  35. Talk about lazy by rsinghal2000 · · Score: 1

    I try to read by just moving my eyes, since it's supposed to be faster and
    takes less effort. How about if they came out with a reflective contact lens, then
    you really wouldn't have to move.

    1. Re:Talk about lazy by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
      How about if they came out with a reflective contact lens,
      You can already get mirrored contact lenses, I've seen them in shop displays but not in anyones eyes. Maybe these guys can do a trial with those?
    2. Re:Talk about lazy by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 2

      I've got 'em. They *really, really* hurt.

  36. Kind of like the air force by tutal · · Score: 1

    I believe I saw another slashdot article about a similar technology used to aim missles on fighter jets.

  37. This is a boon for Flight Sim 2002 fans by Ikari+Gendou · · Score: 1

    This product has been reviewed on a few flight sim sites already.
    Flight Sim 2002 has what's called a "virtual cockpit", letting the user pan allaround his aircraft, and still be able to use the instruments. With this addon, instead of being stuck using the numpad or a hat switch to pan around, they can use their head to look around (within reason, of course).

    It makes visual approaches and landings alot simpler when you only have to glance left or right to line up, instead of fumbling for buttons.

    --

    Call on God, but row AWAY from the rocks!

  38. Lazy people. by fmaxwell · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Definitely worth a look for us truly lazy folks.

    Did it ever occur to you that this device could really improve the quality of life for a handicapped person? Maybe you could start yucking it up about how great wheelchairs are for people too lazy to walk. Your sensitivity is truly impressive.

    1. Re:Lazy people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it ever occur to you that this device could really improve the quality of life for a handicapped person? Maybe you could start yucking it up about how great wheelchairs are for people too lazy to walk

      Homer: And here I am using my legs like a sucker.

    2. Re:Lazy people. by pizen · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could start yucking it up about how great wheelchairs are for people too lazy to walk. Your sensitivity is truly impressive.

      I didn't know we were talking about Segways.

    3. Re:Lazy people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lighten up, idiot.

    4. Re:Lazy people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you meant that as a joke, but the majority of Dean Kamen's inventions have been medical devices, not consumer products. The "Human transporter" uses engineering derived from Segway's wheelchair.

  39. Mirror (with pictures) by kawaichan · · Score: 2


    Mirror

    --

    kawai
    1. Re:Mirror (with pictures) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That camera looks sweeet! Almost like a droid or something.

      The guy using it with the dot on his head is pretty hot too.

  40. A hands free mouse? by delphin42 · · Score: 1

    If I'm not moving it and clicking it with my hand, then what part of my body _am_ I using?

    ACK!

    --
    -- Adam
  41. oh well... by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

    SLDave wrote in to request his database be slashdotted.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
  42. Not quite ready for prime time... by Contact · · Score: 2

    Interesting stuff, but this seems pretty primitive. From a human interface point of view, I can't help feel that having to keep moving your head to move the pointer is going to cause neck strain, especially for tasks that involve a lot of "mousing".

    A few years ago, there were some consumer cameras which used a laser to detect where you were looking the viewfinder, and then focussed on that area. Something like that seems to have a lot more potential, and would make the suggested "blink to click" metaphor much easier to implement as well...

  43. Re:For posters who can't read by TheAlmightyQ · · Score: 1

    hands free mouse that covered by Slashdot some time ago.

    They say that in the intro.

    --
    I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
  44. Multiprotocol slashdot effect by sTeF · · Score: 3, Funny

    whoohoo! slashdoted, but not only the webserver, but i guess also their smtp mail server. go slashdot, go!!!

    > There seems to have been a slight problem with the database.
    > Please try again by pressing the refresh button in your browser.
    > An E-Mail has been dispatched to our Technical Staff, who you can also contact if the problem persists.

    1. Re:Multiprotocol slashdot effect by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      Someone at my office set up an infinite loop sending out e-mail earlier today... In the space of a few seconds, sent out nearly a thousand. Lucky they were to his internal mailbox :-)

      Anyway, I saw that and thought 'Oh good, those admins are going to be delighted that they set up their machines to send them an e-mail whenever this happened' - I mean, they'll be drowned. Way worse than my colleague's unfortunate accident...

      Still, it'll be pretty obvious to them that something's wrong :-)

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  45. my head weighs 10 pounds, my hand: 2 pounds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...and this supposedly /saves/ work?

  46. Uneven cursor speed at screen edges? by realgone · · Score: 4, Informative
    I can't say for sure, since I haven't tried the thing, but wouldn't having the camera track a silver dot on your forehead result in slower cursor speed the farther you move it from the center of the screen?

    What I mean to say is that your head doesn't move in a purely horizontal (or vertical) fashion; rather, it swivels atop your neck. So as one nears the extremes -- trying to move the cursor to the right screen edge, for instance -- there would be less purely horizontal motion for the camera to detect, since the silver dot is describing a curve.

    Maybethe product compensates for this at the edges? Or detects depth? I don't know, but I'd be interested in finding out.

    1. Re:Uneven cursor speed at screen edges? by nsample · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A little lesson in geometry might answer your question...


      You're right about there being less motion in the head near the edges, however, less motion is required to describe the movements near the edge. A user's head tilting 45 degrees from orthogonal to the center of the screen describes a circle of radius 5", if her face is 5" from the screen. (Too close, I know, but just for sake of easy math.) Add another 45 degrees to that, and she's 90 degrees from the screen, defining an infinite plane, parallel to the plane of the monitor. Infinity is what we like to call "far," Russ.


      Now, those are just two points, but I think you can get it from there... very small changes at the edges translate into large motions over the plane (in this case, the monitor).


      This may mean that there's a potential problem with resolution at the edges, but not with motion or speed.

    2. Re:Uneven cursor speed at screen edges? by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

      honestly, you don't think they thought of this?

      my guess is just like joystick calibration, you go through a process where you center your head, all the way to the left, all the way to the right, up and down. then the program can make a smooth curve and make the mouse speed consistent.

      however, if they didn't, then this product is just retarded.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    3. Re:Uneven cursor speed at screen edges? by room101 · · Score: 2

      Unless I am mistaken (it has happened in the past, I'm sure of it!) the cursor would move faster. When translating the circular movement to a horizontal line, the further from your head, less movement would be required to trace an equal length. Think about it exagerated to the point of a 6 foot 2x4 sitting on a desk that you are looking at from left to right horizontaly. It would require more movement to scan the section in front of you, but as you move on to the end, less rotation of your head it required to keep it moving, until (say an 6 mile long 2x4) it requires hardly any movement all to keep scanning its length. Whenever I am presented with something I have trouble visualizing, I imagine it exagerated, sometimes to infinity (the angular motion of your head would approach zero as the linear tracking approched infinity). Hope that helps.

      That said, I think that within the confines of a small space (a standard or even a large monitor) the effects would be very small, maybe even negligible, but like you said, I haven't tried it, so that part is purely conjecture.

      I have always wanted a device that would track my movements this way, not for the mouse, but for windows activation. I always use focus-follows-mouse (even in windows (look for xmouse2k)). I am a programmer, so I am usually typing, but I have to move the mouse mostly to change windows (type code, compile, run, debug, repeat). But if the active window was whatever window I was looking at (touch typing needed, I guess) then I wouldn't ever need the mouse, except for graphics (which needs more fine precision than I expect this 'dot on my forehead' can do, I seems to me).

      --
      room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
      (they always break you eventually)
    4. Re:Uneven cursor speed at screen edges? by SLDave · · Score: 1

      I got a chance to try it and I really had no problems with the speed of the cursor, although the farther you move the more jittery it gets because it doesnt necessarily pick up every movement....

    5. Re:Uneven cursor speed at screen edges? by realgone · · Score: 2
      Could you tell I was an English major? *cough* =)

      So, please, bear with me for a little while longer, because I think I'm almost getting it.

      The scenario above, if I understand it correctly, describes a person tracking something on a screen. In that case, an increasing return on angle to x-distance makes perfect sense. (Whew.) But the review gives me the impression that this mechanism works in the opposite manner. That is, one's head isn't doing the tracking along the width/height of the screen, but is the object (silver dot) being tracked from a single fixed point (camera) above the screen.

      I've already admitted I was an English major, so I don't have any formulas to fall back on here. Instead, I'm reduced to scribbling on scratch paper and trying to describe that. We have the circle of radius 5" you described. We have the head mouse-using woman facing the screen. Observing it from overhead, if she turns her head 45 degrees to the right, the dot on her forehead moves a small distance the Y-axis and a larger one along the X-axis. (I'm still scribbling as I'm typing here). Now if she turns her head another 45 degrees to the right, wouldn't the dot on her head move a smaller distance on the X-axis than and a larger distance on the Y-axis as compared to her first movement? And if the camera only tracked movements along the X-axis...

      Anyway, thanks for taking time out for this impromptu geometry lesson. The world will be a better place for it. =)

    6. Re:Uneven cursor speed at screen edges? by nsample · · Score: 1

      No problem... Yes, the disk wouldn't move as far along the x-axis during the "second 45 degrees" of her motion. However, from a single point of observatio, all sorts of other things appear change, with respect to the silver dot. It's refraction changes, for starters. Light is no longer directly reflected to the observer. Also, the disk will appear to deform, as well. Take a quarter and stand it on a table... rotate it slowly and you'll see what I mean... it goes from a disk to a line and back again.

      Any of these phenomena can be used by a trained observer. However, the simplest explanation is usually the best: a small move is more important the farther it gets from the starting position. So, as long as we know where the dot started, and where it's going, we can adjust our calculations to take care of the edges.

      As I mentioned before, that takes care of the speed + range of motion issues, but you'll still have less resolution at the edges as a consequence.

      cheers!

  47. If you're gonna plug your own review... by bravehamster · · Score: 2

    vBulletin vBulletin Message The server is too busy at the moment. Please try again later.

    ...make sure your server can handle /.

    ;)

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
  48. Whoops by Vorro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clown just slashdotted HIMSELF. How ballsy is that? =)

    --
    ____________________________
    What did the Buddhist say to the hot dog vendor?

    "Make me one with everything."

    1. Re:Whoops by redcup · · Score: 0

      "There seems to have been a slight problem with the database. Please try again by pressing the refresh button in your browser.
      An E-Mail has been dispatched to our Technical Staff, who you can also contact if the problem persists.
      We apologise [sic] for any inconvenience."

      I kept hitting refresh, but I think it only made the problem worse... when the problem concontinued, I also started e-mailing them each time ;-)

      I feel so helpful, now let's see if this karma thing really works!

      --

      RC
  49. Just use your eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Your head will get tired, your eye's won't. Check out this link and look at their tool.

    1. Re:Just use your eyes by psiflare · · Score: 1

      problem is, it says here that the erica system gets only "approximately 0.5 to 1 centimeter accuracy on a computer monitor when sitting at a normal viewing distance", versus the trackir, which gets a sensor accuracy "greater than 1 mm in translational reporting RMS, accuracy is about .5mm" at 18" from the unit, as reported by an employee on their dev boards here.

      btw, trackir also has mostly working linux drivers, and a freeware non-commercial activex component.

  50. Stride and The Nod by talmage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the day, a Nevada company called Stride made a microcomputer with a head-mounted input device called "the Nod". ISTR that the computer was a 68K system and that Jerry Pournell of _Byte_ was enamored by the thing.

  51. Biometrics and a regular WebCam by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How hard would it be to figure out (given a fair training cycle) the orientation of a users head?

    The human head isn't THAT iregular of a shape(ok some people).

    couldn't you also track the movement of key color groupings as the head moves?

    This seems cool but:
    1) how do you click the mouse? (it would be cool to do it by blinking one eye or the other)

    2) I am not sticking a dot to my head. I can barely remember to take my head phones off before I leave my desk (CHOKE!!) I dread the idea of going all afternoon not remembering to take that stupid dot off.

  52. Oh! There it goes! by vlag · · Score: 1

    There seems to have been a slight problem with the database. Please try again by pressing the refresh button in your browser.
    An E-Mail has been dispatched to our Technical Staff, who you can also contact if the problem persists.
    We apologise for any inconvenience.

    --
    Do you want to remove linux?
  53. It's dead, Jim. by jwriney · · Score: 1

    This site is toast.

    I wonder when somebody's going to decide to sue the living shit out of Slashdot for killing their site, therefore costing them downtime, robbing them of ad income, etc.

    Now *that* would be funny. And well-deserved, actually. Killing people's sites is bad, mmm-kay.

    --riney

    1. Re:It's dead, Jim. by ucbruin999 · · Score: 1

      --riney pussy!

      --
      Practical men who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences are usually the slaves of some
  54. Hands free surfing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if only someone would develop the hands-free porn appreciation machine. My forearms could finally get some relief.

  55. Little Silver Dots to use it. by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

    Instead of the silver dots to use it, I want to put 4 General's stars on my forehead like that guy on The Young Ones (Adrian Edmundson?)

  56. too lazy! by mpweasel · · Score: 1

    Definitely worth a look for us truly lazy folks.

    I'm too lazy to control the mouse pointer with head movements. Head too heavy to move so much. Hand movements easier.

    I want a direct wireless attachment to my brain so it can read my thoughts. Just as long as it doesn't send them to the government or to marketing agencies.

    1. Re:too lazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or my Ex-wives.

  57. Not exactly ergonomic by BlueF · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interesting idea for an alternate pointing device, but do you really want to point your forehead where you want to mouse? I dunno about you all but this sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen, whiplash anyone?

    Also, do use geeks really need to make this sort of fashion statement? Some kind of Silicon Valley, "I'm married to my tech-obsession" thing, ala Hindu tradition.

    All levity aside, I see how this device could help people, such as paraplegics. Although, I'm thinking that the related technology many of us are more interested in is the ability to mouse with eye movement, as I believe the US Air Force already uses with considerable sophistication, or even better, pointing/typing through brain waves.

    1. Re:Not exactly ergonomic by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      as I believe the US Air Force already uses with considerable sophistication, or even better, pointing/typing through brain waves.

      I'll bet that system requires some pretty sensitive signal discrimination. I can imagine a typical session:


      Pilot: Auummmmmmm ... I am totally relaxed for smooth brainwaves
      System: One moment please...
      Pilot: Auummmmmmm... meditate for total concentration
      System: Mind lock achieved. Proceed.
      Pilot: Auummmmmmmm... nudge cursor to left
      System: Beep
      Pilot: Auummmmmmmm... a little more to the left
      System: Beep
      Pilot: Auummmmmmmm... left click
      System: Beep
      Pilot: Auuumm--- HOLY SHIT!!! INCOMING MISSILE!!!
      System: I did not understand. Please try again.
      Pilot: FULL THROTTLE!!! DIVE!!!
      System: Please try again.
      Pilot: DAMNIT!!! JUST DO IT, YOU FUC...[eof]

    2. Re:Not exactly ergonomic by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      And not only that, you gotta think it in Russian...

      Chris Mattern

    3. Re:Not exactly ergonomic by brer_rabbit · · Score: 1

      lol...though it appear the moderators haven't seen Firefox.

  58. Re:Jeez by misfit13b · · Score: 1

    Oh c'mon, I thought it was funny:

    "Pros
    Comes with many replacement dots

    Cons
    Wearing something that has silver dots on it"

    Oh wait, it wasn't TRYING to be funny?
  59. hm, my head weighs 10 pounds, my hand: less than 2 by avi33 · · Score: 1

    ...and this is supposed to save work?

  60. AOL Time Warner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NEW YORK -- AOL Time Warner Inc. (AOL), the world's largest Internet and media company, on Wednesday posted a $54.2 billion net loss, the largest ever U.S. quarterly net loss, after taking a whopping charge for accounting changes.

    Ha Ha!

  61. I reviewed it too... by Daniel+Rutter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...a few months ago, here:

    http://www.dansdata.com/trackir.htm

  62. Brain wave mouse by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    I saw a hands free mouse a few years ago at a research fair for accessi/handicap technology. It was a sweat band like apparatus with three electrodes to collect signals from the brain and a wire going down to a largish box that did heavy signal processing. It was an impressive demo even if movement was a bit shaky. The demonstrator tended to over shoot the target quite often, especially when he tried to talk at the same time. With a little practice or concentration he could get quite smooth control.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  63. or it could be by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    "As an American, I am a fat, lazy, ignorant idiot who is willing to spend too much money on something that is totally worthless and plugs into my USB port(s)"

  64. For the lazy? by MagPulse · · Score: 1

    Seems like moving my entire head might be more work than small hand movements.

    Try this exercise: Pick five points on your monitor, and flick your mouse to them quickly. Then try aiming your head at them.

  65. Good advert for mySQL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It reminds me not to use mySQL or PHP ever again,
    and people wonder why its free !

    \_{~_^}_/

    1. Re:Good advert for mySQL by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

      a reload fixed it. It's just bad coding/configuration.

      S

  66. It really works! by Eros · · Score: 1

    I got one of these a few months ago because of the acking pains in my wrists from .... typing yeah, typing and I can personally attest to the quality of this product. All day long a move my head along and the cursor follows. I never have pains in my wists anym Aahhh!, FUCK my neck. SOBs Damnit HELP, HELP!

  67. getting seasick... by happyclam · · Score: 2

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I work an awful lot of the time with headphones on, and my head bobs to the beat pretty much nonstop... I hope the system is smart enough not to scroll up, scroll down, scroll up, scroll down, scroll up...

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  68. Interactive Porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So would this thing work with a tongue stud?

  69. Appeal to Patriotism by mattkime · · Score: 2

    As an American, I like doing things the easiest way possible.

    Finally, a mouse that appeals to my sense of patriotism!

    Perhaps we can assume from this quote, that the company also supports the US policy of mucking around in the middle east so we can keep driving our SUVs. Because, as americans, this is easier for us than mass transit or alternative power.

    Be lazy! Anything else would be unamerican!

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  70. Gorilla Neck? by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

    Gorilla Neck?

  71. Keeping your hands on the keyboard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has always been a goal of mine as well. I've turned into a real hot-key junky, and hate it when someone builds an app with a lousy tab-order, or whatever.

    But whatever they come up with, it's gotta work well enough to keep me competavie in UT and Tribes2, or there's no point. I'd be willing to forgive a learning curve, but the capability has to be there for twitch-games.

  72. Sued for Whiplash by Unreal Tournament Players by Nonsanity · · Score: 1
    You just know a year or so down the line an Unreal Tournament player is going to sue them for whiplash.

    ...Then sue the voice recognition company for the loss of their voice.

    ~ Nonsanity

  73. Great... by GriffX · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I can get carpal neck, as well...

    --
    These comments and opinions are mine and mine alone, although they shouldn't be.
    1. Re:Great... by jhanson · · Score: 1

      Not really, seeing as the carpal is a bone in the wrist.

  74. Is this next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:

    "A loud clatter of gunk music flooded through the Heart of Gold cabin as Zaphod searched the sub-etha radio bands for news of himself. The machine was rather difficult to operate. For years, radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons, and turning dials; then as technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch sensitive - you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope. It saved a lot of muscular expenditure, of course, but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same program."

  75. Jedi mouse... by JiffyPop · · Score: 1

    I can't think of a good reason why the silver dots this thing tracks have to be restricted to being placed on the head. I would put them on my palm just so I could wave my hand and say "this is not the web page I am looking for" and have it work. Could also be useful for when I am lacking a flat surface for my mouse.

  76. Un-resisted motion by lostchicken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why?!?!
    People have tried to make "button-less keyboards" and mice before, and they don't work, because pushing a button, or a mouse is actually easier than moving nothing.
    Try this. Hold your hands apart, and as fast as you can, move one to the other. Try to get very close, but don't hit them. When you stop your hands, do it abruptly, without slowing down. Repeat.
    Now try it with your hand on something smooth, sliding on a desk. (like a mouse). This simulates the action of moving a mouse cursor to a target on screen.
    While this device is used for the head, not hands, the principle is the same. Resistance may make the quantity of a motion harder, it does make control easier.

    Humans have been manipulating things with their hands for ages. That is what they are for. Why should we go against nature?

    --
    -twb
  77. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've already got a monkey doing this. Couple of implants in its brain lets it control a cursor.

    EurekaAlert

    They've also got one controlling a robotic arm.

    bbc article

    Human tests are only a few years away.

    If they could find a way to send feedback to the brain it could feel like any other part of your body.

  78. Tracking the eyes by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

    It seems like it would be possible to develop reflective contact lenses to achieve the same effect. It'd have to be more precise though. Winking would be the obvious choice for clicking. If you don't want the mouse moving while you read, simply close your eyes for a second or two and it stops sending mouse commands. Close them for another brief moment and it reactivates. IR technology isn't my field though, so I could just be talking out of my butt. Personally, I'd like to see this happen...I'm too lazy to move my head.

  79. Re:Hindwa Plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    on the subject of the south asian plot:

    tejo mahalaya?!?!?!???????????????(some hare krishna from california)

    indus saraswati river valley?(sunken city)
    c/o yeah !!!!moderation

    this propaganda is great because it comes from a lower caste perspective unfortunately it doesn't do much to forward the positive aspects of the subcontinental culture and religion. For a unifying perspective a good starting point is any non-dualist (one of the schools of vedanta) philosophy.

  80. Alot of great applications besides for lazy people by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If anyone here has worked in heavy manfg. or industry where you need to use a computer on the shop floor or at a workstation on a shop floor you'll know how quickly a mouse will die, I can see a thousand diffrent applications besides the use for "lazy people".

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  81. Here's some history by skidrash · · Score: 1

    The first implementation of this kind of thing was 1994, Stride Micro.

    This is now a pretty common tool for the disabled (someone correct me, is it now 'differently enabled?) usually combined with a rubber bulb that fits in your mouth for 'puffing' mouse clicks .

    Problem is, the volumes are so low for that market (or are the companies gouging?) that these units are like $1000 US each. How was Stride able to produce a unit with 1984 technology for less than $200 and these clowns need to charge disabled people $1000?

  82. Anyone for touch-screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe they're trying to compete with touch screens. I think the idea of touch screens would fair better than such a device

  83. coolness factor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... lasted about 2 days, it's been in the closet since then.

  84. Similar technologies outside the states by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Those of you in the states may not be aware of it, but we've had similar technology in South Africa for a while. It's a device that uses facial movements to track the mouse, but instead of using a silver dot, it works off of memorized facial features, such as eyes, nose, etc. Any distinguishing lines.


    I've used one myself actually, and it works pretty well, uses an edge detection system. The main purpose for it's creation here was for helping the disabled, due to a bill passed down from the Legislature in Gauteng Province (and later from the legislature in Cape Town), copied in part below:



    "... and that steps should be taken to ensure the use of all governmental computing facilities for the blind, deaf, physically impared, and nude natalie portmans that have been petrified by having hot grits poured on them."

  85. Eye tracking alternatives by no_opinion · · Score: 1

    I worked in a lab that provided computer access technologies (braille printers, keyboard and mouse alternatives, voice control, puff switches, etc.) for people with disabilities and there are some pretty cool technologies out there.

    When I started we had a head mouse but now there are a few eye tracking alternatives:
    Eyegaze from LC technologies, Eyecan, and Eyetech. I'm sure there are more out there.

  86. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooooooh, I could reeeally use some extra cyber-enhanced appendages. Bwaahahaahaaaaa!

  87. skeptical.. by tlh1005 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if the mouse is porn friendly?? It'll be tough for this to beat the Logitech wireless, complete with back button and scroll wheel.

  88. "...truely lazy folks." by jblake · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and those REALLY lazy ones that sit in a chair all day everywhere they go...you know the ones, I think they're called paralyzed?

    Really...it pays once in a while to think of how technology like this can be used to benefit others rather than how it could let you be lazier. A hands-free mouse interface would definately let certain handicapped people use the computer where they couldn't before. I know there are probably other 'accessibility devices' out there, but most of them are pretty expensive. A mass marketed hands-free device would let bring the cost down and let people who don't have the benefit of use of their arms anymore really use a computer a lot easier.

    --
    I just found a new sig.
  89. Re:Hind is a river by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    okay is coloquial for OK which is short for "all correct"

    about the supposed lower caste propaganda, it turns out to be christian missionary work and only portrayed as lower caste (sudra or dalit). It is difficult to distinguish sometimes becasue for example nehru-gandhi dynasty-ites, indian-marxists, etc. seem to all hold the "aryan" invasion as being the beginning of indian "high" culture. So in posturing as the voice of oppressed minorities it is acutally just an excuse to portray hinduism as a grouping of primitive cults and sects divided by physical "racial" indicators.

  90. what if I sneeze? by cheezfreek · · Score: 1

    Let me guess: if you sneeze your computer reboots. Seriously though, I'd hate to use this thing with a cold. Although, it would simulate the experience of using Windows 98 quite nicely.

  91. Multiple Monitors and April Fools by martyb · · Score: 2

    This may be a usable tool in a simple, single-monitor configuration. What happens when a user has multiple PCs?

    For example, my ideal work environment is one where I've got (at least) 3 PCs; each having its own monitor. The left-most system is where I do my coding and debugging. The middle system is where I run the application exactly as if I were a user (i.e. QA). The right-most system is where I run analysis tools on the output, log files, etc. (It may seem extravagent, but I've never seen a DESK with a 17-inch diagonal -- more/bigger monitors give me a larger "desk" on which to work.)

    How in the world could I use this head-tracking mouse on such a setup? From what I read in the article the head-tracking system can become confused when there are other shiny things in its field of view (e.g. silver rings; I'd hate to imagine what dangling earrings would do!).

    I'd need a head-tracking receiver for each PC and monitor, and I've only got one head ;^) So, as I'm working away on the middle PC, these receivers on the other PCs are going to be reading my head motions and mousing all over the place! Okay, so I'd need to use the keyboard to actually "click" on anything, so that's not a problem, right?

    Wrong! With all the tool-tips, ONMOUSEOVER, ONMOUSEOUT, etc. that we've got these days, I can easily imagine this scenario:

    • Working on one PC, I intentionally turn my head to move the "mouse" to, say, a hyperlink.
    • The other PCs are attentively watching my motions and move their mouse cursors, too.
    • As the other cursors are moving around, one moves its cursor over a tool bar and its tool-tip flashes on the screen.
    • So, I look over to see what happened.
    • The PCs see that I moved my head, so they move their cursors to follow my head movement, too, which in turn makes other tool-tips flash.
    • I turn my head to see what happened over there.
    • Lather, rinse, repeat.

    By the end of the day, I'm going to have one very sore neck, a splitting headache, and accomplished nothing more than making a lot of things flash before my eyes. Sounds like all the benefits of a hangover with out the pleasure of getting drunk. :(

    On the other hand, should these become popular, just think of all the fun you could have with your co-workers on April Fool's Day!

  92. leaving something out? by PhilJackson · · Score: 1

    > Definitely worth a look for us truly lazy folks And disabled folk?

  93. More than just Lazy folk by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    Definitely worth a look for us truly lazy folks.

    Well I have a feeling its for more than that. A guy that worked with my Mom had Lou Gehrig's Disease and, as he slowly lost control of his body, ended up using a lot of hands free technology.

    This corner of the technology market existence based upon physically disabling afflictions, not laziness. Personally I wish that there was no need for it.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  94. Oh, this is just brilliant... by coupland · · Score: 2

    To quote:

    Here's how it works, the TrackIR has 2 basic parts that make it work. The first is a camera that mounts on the top of your computer and second part is silver dots which you stick on your forehead... The camera sends out infrared signals and the silver dots bounce the signals back to the TrackIR.

    Notwithstanding the fact that you're glueing felt dots to your head, you are actually intentionally aiming an infrared transmitter at your cranium! With the talk about cel phones and tumours going about today this one's got to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard of. Whoever dreamed this up must have spent a few too many hours "beta" testing.

    Next thing you know they'll announce a power amplifier that lets you control the mouse from over a mile away and keeps your head toasty warm in a snowstorm...

    1. Re:Oh, this is just brilliant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fer christ's sake just get a black anodized aluminium hat!

    2. Re:Oh, this is just brilliant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when was infrared considered as dangerous as microwave? Your comparing drinking lemonade to drinking cyanide. More uneducated /. FUD. It's getting hard to breathe in here.

    3. Re:Oh, this is just brilliant... by coupland · · Score: 2

      Uhm, microwave??? Speaking of uneducated...

  95. slashdot.com??? by Milliardo · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice that the natural point website site says "a cool idea ~slashdot.com". Now i know that slashdot.com will redirect you to slashdot.org, but STILL. i think they could have tried a bit harder to make their reviews a bit more accurate. Maybe its just me being stupid.

  96. Not just for lazy by alernon · · Score: 1

    > Definitely worth a look for us truly lazy folks.

    or folks who get wrist fatigue/carpal from mice

  97. A Real Leap in Efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All everyone seems to talk about this product is the disabled. I haven't seen anyone mention the enormous leap in productivity for programmers that would result from having both hands on the keyboard at all time. It's like being Zimbu the monkey from Dilbert and having full control of both the mouse and keyboard at the same time.

    Unfortunately, it doesn't look like this product will make up for that efficiency since it looks like its much harder to precisely click on things. But advancements in this field would be greatly desired and I'd personally pay up to 300 bucks for something that would free my hand from my mouse (not for that reason sicko).

    -Jacques
    jc@cs.washington.edu

  98. This would be news if.. by thelizman · · Score: 1

    They were using open source beowulf clusters to run a CCD camera which tracked the reflection in your eye (after being calibrated to your eyes geometry) to determine the position you were looking at, then two blinks for left click, three blinks for right click.

    It would still be interesting without OSS and Beowulf clusters, but it probably would'nt get onto slashdot.

  99. I bought one... by figa · · Score: 1

    And returned it. I have RSI, and I was hoping to give my hands a rest. I ended up with a neck ache and frustrated by the mouse's quirky behavior.

    It bugged me that the mouse was constantly moving around the screen unless I used the mode that hides the cursor. To activate that mode, I had to press a key, so I ended up using the keyboard all the time. It was also hard to control the pointer with any accuracy.

    The Track IR is well packaged and the software works, but I wouldn't recommend using one unless you have to.

  100. old Sage computers had this by Jecel+Assumpcao+Jr · · Score: 1

    Sage, a 68000 computer from the early 1980s that was later renamed Stride, was available with this kind of input device. The exact same silver dot and IR "camera". There was a review or two in Byte Magazine around 1986...

  101. So by glwtta · · Score: 2

    For over $100 I get something that has poor tracking, only works in bloody windows and makes me look like more of a dork than a segway scooter would? Yeh, I think I'll stick with my Logitech wireless for a while.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  102. I don't think this idea would ever take off. by bandit450 · · Score: 1

    Well, I mean...If your mother walks in on you while you were looking at porn, the excuse of "I wasn't looking at that!" is impossible to make!

    --
    -- Bandit450...If-Else-Do-*TWITCH*!
  103. disabilities and alternative interfaces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    somthing that i've not seen commented on here are the applications for disabled people. Sure everyone thinks that using your hands is the easiest thing in the world, but what about if you have no hands, or no arm, or can't operate your elbow or wrist, etc. Look at someone like Stephen Hawking, I know he doesn't have enough control over his head movements to use this, but as an alternative interface it sounds very interesting.

    Also what's the range on these things? Could you use it for a physical type game where you have to run and jump around a room to interact with what's on the screen?

  104. You need to be lazy to want a hands free mouse? by TShrew · · Score: 1

    What about someone who has carpal tunnel sysndrom (even though some experts think it's not real) or some other disability that prevents use of the mouse (like maybe even, at an extreme, a missing limb or two)? Are these people "lazy" for using something that doesn't require hands?

    Sorry the comment about "definately worth a look for us lazy folks" just hit me all wrong.

    I know for myself lots of mouse (for work, not playing games) usage can cramp my wrist and hand and make my fingers a bit numb. I actually did have to stave off playing the more mouse intensive games because I was afraid I was encouraging a repeatative movement ailment. I am only thankful my current job is not mouse intensive all the time.

  105. CTS by SkinFriction · · Score: 1

    CTS of the neck, anyone?

  106. Stop being such a wanker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's perfectly possible that something like this already happens. Did it ever occur to you that the site user still wants to know that something is being done about it? Do your error notification routines say "I would have sent an email to the site admin but becuase I'm such a clever bastard I didn't".
    Thought so.
    Come on, people. We don't all have to be smug gits.

    Smug Git.

  107. hmmmm by cpuenvy · · Score: 1

    can't wait til someone hacks it...

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  108. Nouse by burbilog · · Score: 1

    You don't need that expensive software and do not need to sick silver dot to your head to control your computer. Just use this software from http://www.cv.iit.nrc.ca/research/Nouse/ with your conventional webcam. Nouse will track image of your nose (hence the name Nouse). Control computer with your NOSE %)

  109. Linux drivers coming up by jpatokal · · Score: 2
    Right now NaturalPoint works only with Windows, but according to their FAQ:

    Concern 10: If only it worked in Linux, Mac OS, windows 3.0, etc.

    Reply : Several members of our development community are working on linux drivers. And if we sense a lot of interest in a certain platform (like the macintosh OS. nudge nudge), we'll go ahead and crank out drivers for it.

    Cheers,
    -j.

  110. Works great with voice recognition by mdubinko · · Score: 1

    I have this device, as well as IBM ViaVoice. Excellent combination, especially when you get that carpal-tunnel-ish pain. As an added bonus, you can stick the silver dot on the front of the headset mic, which works quite well for tracking.

    If you insist on 100% hands-free, you can also use the "Voice Mouse" feature to kick in when you say "click", "double-click", etc.

    .micah

    --
    --- Learn XForms today: http://xformsinstitute.com
  111. so here is the first karma whore..... by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    ...So here's the text of the article. ...

    The site is just fine. But I relly prefers mirrors. As for any loading problem: fist disable loading pictures in your browser.

    -Point to the google cache (always good for a few karma points)
    -Set up a local cache at your internet provider. (Pictures... i like shiny pictures.)

    1. Re:so here is the first karma whore..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't fine yesterday when the article was first posted. You are a little late.

  112. Re:WEED IS NOT A DRUG. Plz fix, kthx. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    AMERICA IS BAD MKAY ?!