Slashdot Mirror


The Plague of Frogs

jpbostic writes "According to this article on MSNBC, ag folks in Hawaii were considering using powdered caffeine to help rid themselves of an infestation of frogs from Puerto Rico. The EPA's application regulations apparently proved too burdensome and the stuff sits in a warehouse. If the EPA is really concerned with the danger, they should investigate the coffee in some restaurants *quoth the caffeine addict*. :-)"

241 comments

  1. Holy shit.. by I.T.R.A.R.K. · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..when I first read that headline, I thought the French were invading!

    --

    "Adequacy.org: Where congenital stupidity is not an option, but a requirement."

  2. Obligatory Simpsons Episode Comment by Rampant+Atrocity · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So obligatory, in fact, that I'm not going to include it! :)

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons Episode Comment by Scrooge919 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ... Or the episode where Springfield is overrun with lizards, and Principal Skinner suggests they unleash wave after wave of creatures to prey on the previous waves...

  3. Frogs on caffeine by abh · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't be the only one, who, after reading the posting, immediately had visions in my head of hyper wacked-out frogs jumping all over the place...

    Am I?

    1. Re:Frogs on caffeine by dangermouse · · Score: 2, Funny
      Heh. Because the caffeine would make them jumpy.

      I'm sorry. I'm going to go take a nap now. Moderators, do what you must.

    2. Re:Frogs on caffeine by dagoalieman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, you're not the only one, but IIRC it won't happen.

      I **vaguely** recall hearing that the caffiene has an adverse effect on their nervous system, in essense blocking the signals from the brain and to the brain. As in once they get it in them (dunno if it's absorption or consumption) they just don't move.. and shut down.

      Someone please correct me. That's so vague on details that I'm SURE I've at least got part, if not all of it, wrong. Hopefully the real solution is better than freezing to death, though...

      .

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    3. Re:Frogs on caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question is, are the frogs really the only species in hawaii that would be adversely effected if there were a rain of powdered caffiene?

      At the least, it would be a wierd few days for any humans on the island.

      Eh. Beats raining sulphur.. or being turned into a pillar of salt. I guess.

    4. Re:Frogs on caffeine by terradyn · · Score: 1

      They're hearts basically stop. It's the quickest way they have for killing them without harming the native animals. Also from the TLC show I talked about in a previous post.

    5. Re:Frogs on caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably. On the OSISPP(Standard International Scale of Pharmaceutical Pussyness), caffeine ranks a stunning 9.3 out of 10. To give you a better idea of it's relative girlyness, Childrens Tylenol ranks a 9.5, while Dramamine pulls down a relatively respectible 8.7 rating. As this is the case, scientists are left to ponder why geeks embrace such a pussy, ineffective drug that works primarily by placebo effect.

      If you want a rush, stop being such a fucking girl and get some methamphetamine or cocaine. Pretending that caffeine is fun or energizing is just pathetic.

      Actually, meth and coke users are generally huge fucking assholes. Just stay away from stims and grow a poppy garden for your chemical needs.

    6. Re:Frogs on caffeine by ahaning · · Score: 2, Informative

      As with most topics, a cursory search of Google popped up this link. The relevant part:

      Caffeine is a central nervous system stimulant that interferes with a neurotransmitter in the brain called adenosine. Caffeine also acts at other places in the body to increase heart rate, constrict blood vessels, relax air passages, and affect muscles. An overdose of caffeine is lethal to the coqui frog.

      There is a link there to another page with examples of what they sound like. Though I'm rather against killing anything just to kill it, these ARE an alien species...so...erg. It's still a tough call. Damn conscience!

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    7. Re:Frogs on caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Actually, meth and coke users are generally huge fucking assholes."

      Or they might just be short people.

    8. Re:Frogs on caffeine by Squareball · · Score: 1

      But what happens when native animals get the caffeine? So the frogs die, but what about the birds? This can explain that bird on the beer commercials who keeps attacking people at a resturaunt and taking their beer and bringing it back to its owner. it some how all makes sense now ;)

    9. Re:Frogs on caffeine by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 2
      According to the article, the frogs do freak out

      First, the researchers decided to spray the frogs with an overdose of caffeine.
      "It's like they have a heart attack," Matayoshi explained, "from like a hundred cups of coffee."
      The scene is not pretty. "They freak out," said Matayoshi, the hunter who is not unsympathetic to his prey.

      Frogs on a hundred cups of coffee ... what an image. Lots of little cappuccino cups?

      Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

    10. Re:Frogs on caffeine by smnolde · · Score: 1, Troll

      If only we could do something like this to control the MCSE population....

      This is like roundup for the clueless.

    11. Re:Frogs on caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, caffeine generally aren't lethal to warm-blooded animals.

    12. Re:Frogs on caffeine by JanusFury · · Score: 1

      Proof that coding in Java is bad for you!

      --
      using namespace slashdot;
      troll::post();
    13. Re:Frogs on caffeine by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Heh. Because the caffeine would make them jumpy.

      "Penfold, shush."

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  4. That's okay, I will. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm not not licking toads."

    1. Re:That's okay, I will. by Cheetah86 · · Score: 1

      He's refering to the episode where they go to Australia and Bart lets his frog out at customs and by the end of the episode the whole country has a frog infestation.

  5. Won't work. by Kyeo · · Score: 4, Funny

    The frogs would just annoy you and take no breaks.

    1. Re:Won't work. by gehrehmee · · Score: 2

      Now if only we could teach them perl...

      --
      "You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help" -- Calvin
    2. Re:Won't work. by WetCat · · Score: 1

      ... they will create decent code from their bodies... Next time a new version of Apache can be simply obtained by making an aerophoto of caffeinated frog fields and getting it through an OCR...

    3. Re:Won't work. by r00tarded · · Score: 1

      yeah. id keep them away from python!

  6. I dont like the french either ... by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Funny

    but how will caffine help ?

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:I dont like the french either ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, or we'll recall all the Jerry Lewis reels.

    2. Re:I dont like the french either ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shut up, or we'll recall all the Jerry Lewis reels.

      There's about as much a chance of that happening as the french stopping the production of french fries in the U.S. (mind you, if they were sucessful maybe you USians wouldn't be so fat and smelly)

    3. Re:I dont like the french either ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you USians wouldn't be so fat and smelly"

      Smelly? I take it you have not smelled a frenchman recently. Why do they not use soap?
      Perfume just mixes with odors, it doesn't make them go away!

    4. Re:I dont like the french either ... by Loligo · · Score: 1, Troll

      >Shut up, or we'll recall all the Jerry Lewis
      >reels.

      A bigger threat would be to send them all back to the US.

      Please. Anything but that. Please, keep the Jerry Lewis movies in France where you seem to enjoy them so much.

      *shudder*

      -l

    5. Re:I dont like the french either ... by scheveningen · · Score: 1

      The coffee served in the US tastes truly awful. That brownish fluid that allows you to trace your spoon to the bottom of your cup is a crime against humanity.
      Yes, it discourages the froggies, krauts and myself from staying longer periods in the US.

    6. Re:I dont like the french either ... by edmund_troche · · Score: 1

      The caffeine is absorbed through the skin and the frogs die of a heart attack.

  7. My Response: by dupper · · Score: 0
    Theresnothingwrongwithcaffiene!!! Whosaidtheresanythingwrongwithcaffiene?! Ishouldwhupwhuptheirpunkasses, thosesonsofbitches!!!

    vvvmmmvvvrrvv... AAH!!! Toomuchpressure!!!

  8. What a waste of caffeine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean 3 tonnes of powdered powered caffeine sitting on the Big Island? Hawaii anyone? =)

  9. Slow hunters? by ElJefe · · Score: 5, Funny
    On a smaller scale, of course, there is always hand-hunting, which is how Nilton Matayoshi has spent the last year capturing 40 frogs.
    40 frogs in a year? That's less than one a week! If you're going to have a hobby, at least be good at it...
    1. Re:Slow hunters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should just pay some kids $1 for each frog they caputure. I used to catch frogs with a net back when I has younger, and I could get at least 10 a night. They make noise that you follow, then you use the net to get close to them and make them jump. Once you know where it is, you capture it. Humans were faster than frogs the last time I checked.

    2. Re:Slow hunters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, when I was a kid, me and my brother used to see how many frogs we could catch in an evening. We'd count and let them go (good for keeping the mosquitos under control)
      Easy to catch 20 frogs a night, bare handed.

    3. Re:Slow hunters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it wasn't the same frog 20 times? :)

    4. Re:Slow hunters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have to admit that towards the end of the evening, they did seem to move a lot more slowly...

    5. Re:Slow hunters? by Cenam · · Score: 0

      heh...when i was about 12 i managed to catch somewhere near a hundred in an area that was far from infested, in a day..if it takes a year to catch 40 either this guy has been stoned for a solid year and just catching the ones that stare at the colors when they breath in the smoke, or there is no infestation:)

      --

      The Truth: There is no string:)
    6. Re:Slow hunters? by kcelery · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That does not work. Some area in southern China had such policy before in catching rats. Those guys who were rewarded for the catch found the business is profitable they start buying rats from the neighboring areas, or even farming rats.

    7. Re:Slow hunters? by lucidFur · · Score: 1

      The frogs are in the Hawai'ian Islands. There are no neighboring areas.

  10. -1 troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and learn to spell.

  11. I thought amphibians were disappearing? by geoffsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Amphibians, particularly frogs, are supposed to be an indicator species for pollution. From all accounts I've read they are dying off in great numbers around the world. Maybe because the live near the surface of the water, they are more sensitive to things like acid rain?

    So why all the frogs? Hawaii... also Australia has also had a heck of a time with frogs, and in BC we've had a problem with huge frogs (the tadpoles are the size of your fist, and mature frogs so big they have been eating the ducks!) Just seems like contradictory evidence to me, maybe some species are heartier than others?

    Websurfing done right! StumbleUpon

    1. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by terradyn · · Score: 1

      These frogs were introduced by a foreign tourist. They are not native to Hawaii. The frogs have no natural enemies now in Hawaii because it is an island and no predators for the frogs evolved. These frogs populate extremely quickly leading to the death of the insect population that native birds and animals feel on there. As a result many species are dying off.

      This is all from a TLC show a week or so ago... A little late on the article guys.

    2. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by FFFish · · Score: 2

      in BC we've had a problem with huge frogs

      Er, eh? We have? Tell on, do. I'd like to see some of those monsters!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


      Geez Louise! Tadpoles the size of your fist eh? Know of any articles or pictures that shows these things in reference? I found a few things on google about BC frogs, but not much talking about these problematic huge frogs.

    4. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Sounds like bunk to me. Frogs eating ducks? Give me a break.

    5. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Cenam · · Score: 0

      the real question here is whether the parent is a troll or a chronological lier:)
      or maybee a little of both?
      lol

      --

      The Truth: There is no string:)
    6. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by geoffsmith · · Score: 2

      Try Elk lake on Vancouver Island. They have lots of them. Oh, and correction, duck=ducklings. Still, a frog that eats ducklings is a site to behold!

    7. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. I would've paid good money to see a giant frog eat a duck.

    8. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      To the naysayers, the common bullfrog is capable of eating ducklings, but its tadpoles are hardly fist sized.

      Frogs in a balanced ecosystem, as well as other amphibians, are a good indicator of pollution, but in Hawaii, as in Australia, and the Florida panhandle, non-native frogs overrun native populations by eating everything in sight including the native species.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    9. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by geoffsmith · · Score: 2

      I can't seem to find anything online either. (although sometimes I just really can't find what I'm looking for using google) It was all over the papers for a while. Here's the only online reference I could find:

      http://www.crd.bc.ca/parks/parkelk.htm

      It mentions "giant bullfrogs." I'm not sure if it's the same frog, but it sounds like it is. They are humongous. And by the way, "duck" should be "ducklings" in my original post. It still takes a big frog to eat a duckling.

    10. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a matter of locations. Here in Vermont, our frog populations are decreasing as a result of acid rain from the West. There are countless quantities of chronically mutated frogs you can find by going to any standing water source and looking hard enough.

      That isn't to say that they're dying off at a rate that'll make them endangered, but it's not a matter of how hardy they are. We're in a shitty location, compared to Hawaii. You let me know when Hawaii gets large quantities of pollution from neighboring industrial states.

    11. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "...and in BC we've had a problem with huge frogs (the tadpoles are the size of your fist, and mature frogs so big they have been eating the ducks!)"

      You have never seen "mountain chicken." These are frogs which are indigenous to certain parts of the caribbean. They get so big that a family of four can get more food out of it than two chickens.

    12. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      Damn. I would've paid good money to see a giant frog eat a duck.

      Oh, I thought you were Canadian.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    13. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they breathe through thier skin or somthing liek that, so they die much quicker in polluted enviornments

    14. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "chronological lier" ... please tell us you were trying to be funny.

    15. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by gibbdog · · Score: 1

      Amphibians ARE on the decline. Take the golden toad for example... Everyone was a *little* worried when they were limited in numbers... then 500 calling males were all that were known, the next year, it was something like 3 frogs, and now there haven't been ANY of these seen for over 7 years.

      When a frog like this is introduced somewhere where there are no predators, they will thrive.

      You are right about some species being hardier than others... Some species have a high tolerance to various things, while others can die off from an abrupt change of humidity over a couple years.

      I can personally vouch for several "mutant" frogs which are more and more common now... but the cause of these mutants cannot be pinned down... it varies from species to species, but is probably a number of things overall. That's why it is important to collect scientific vouchers of these specimens so we can see what is going on (when the population is around a few thousand, 5 or 6 animals isn't going to hurt the populations).

      As far as the guy not being able to catch them... sounds kinda odd to me. As a student of herpetology, I can easily catch over 40 frogs on a good night. Sounds like they need a new specialist.

    16. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing two different and independent problems: 1) The total frog population is decreasing in BC. 2) The native frog species in BC are being wiped out by those big, mean, American bullfrogs (that eat ducklings and so on). #1 is not contradictory to #2. #2 is the problem you've been hearing in the news in BC. #2 simply says the proportion of bullfrogs relative to native frog species is on the rise. The total population might still be decreasing though.

    17. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some amphibians may be dying out but we have (on
      Maui) cane toads as well, i believe poisonous, too
      gross to try licking anyway, large and disgusting
      targets for a boot or lead pellet or car tire.
      It's worth mentioning that the tree frog from
      Puerto Rico does *not* need water to reproduce, therefore
      can live wherever people do, elevations up to about
      6000 feet. I don't hear these frogs on Maui's
      north shore, fortunately far from the cane fires
      and from the landscaped-to-death water-sucking
      hotels on the Kihei/Wailea side, but the frogs
      are a problem, along with Formosan ground termites,
      Japanese beetles, mongooses and aggro radical weeds.
      We also have arsenic poisoned pineapple fields
      and toxic smoke from PVC irrigation pipe vaporized
      into dioxins from pre-harvest fires in the cane
      fields they water.

    18. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frogs try to eat anything that moves, literally. Rocks, pinecones, sticks, cigarette butts. If you toss them at an angle that crossses before their field of vision, they will try pretty hard to get their mouth around it. And if it's too big to fit in, they'll use both hands to try to cram it in before giving up.

      If a frog had a mouth that would fit around a duck, he'd try like hell to get one in there.

    19. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Amphibians, particularly frogs, are supposed to be an indicator species for pollution. From all accounts I've read they are dying off in great numbers around the world. Maybe because the live near the surface of the water, they are more sensitive to things like acid rain?

      Solution obvious: Set up a huge coal-fired generator immediately to the east of Hawaii, and remove the scrubbers from the smokestacks!

      It's arguably less-wasteful than having three tons of powdered caffeine sitting idle in a warehouse. If it ain't being used for the frogs, let me have some!.

      (My only complaint with three tons of powdered caffeine in Hawaii is that it probably means there was an awful lot of good Hawaiian coffee that's been ruined by decaffeination.)

    20. Re:I thought amphibians were disappearing? by whitegold · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm just being picky here, and maybe this has already been pointed out.

      But in australia the problem is toads, not frogs. In fact, the toads eat the frogs.

      There's a big difference between a big, tough, poisonous toad, and the average treefrog.

      The toads are incredibly tough (canetoads). I have personally witnessed them getting run over by cars, sucking their guts back in and hopping away.

      They are a fine example of the brilliance of biological control. They were introduced to control the cane beetle. Only problem... cane beetles fly. Cane toads don't. On the other hand they can eat more or less anything else. Endangered Native Frogs, Dog food (a favourite) and even mice.

  12. When will slashdot add... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Fortean science to its tag line?

    "News for nerds, Stuff that Matters, Fortean Science"

    Sounds good. At least it might stop tenth graders from trying to debunk -real- science...

  13. Hyperactive frogs. by bsdfish · · Score: 1

    You know, I'm sure there must be a better way to eliminate frogs than to overdose them on caffeine. The fact that they are amphibians means that they absorb a lot of things through their skin; I'm sure it would be possible to find something that these frogs can not stand but is rather innocuous to other species and just spread that around the perimeter of the hotel, or whatever else wants to be frog free. As for the caffeine . . . I'll take it. Mmmm, 3 tons of caffeine . . . I can stay up for weeks!

  14. Forget the frogs! by gila_monster · · Score: 1

    How do we get to all that powdered caffeine??!??

    OOooooooh, yeah......

    --
    Ad luna, Alicia! Ad luna!
    1. Re:Forget the frogs! by cduffy · · Score: 2

      You don't want to. In substantial concentrations, it's poisonous.

    2. Re:Forget the frogs! by Rhinobird · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have visions in my head about thousands of geeks recreating "the night of the living dead"..."caffieeeenee"groan'CAFFIEEEEEEEENNNNEEEEE "caffiene.....

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  15. Yea great by GMontag · · Score: 2

    Yes, alleged tree huggers, mod me down.

    The feds just can't quit, why the hell is it fed business if an infistation arrives to any State and that State is not allowed to eradicate the infevction?

    1. Re:Yea great by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      My thoughts exactly! Once again, the federal govt. has to nose into what should be a state's own business and "protect" everyone from themselves.

      I suppose they're going to try to justify it by claiming the frogs "crossed state lines", making it a federal case?

      In the long run, I don't think something like a frog infestation problem is going to be cured without putting some sort of toxin or poison out. The sad thing is, there's probably a substance much more harmful to the ecosystem than some powdered caffeine that will end up being legal to use, simply because the FDA has already studied it and approved it.

    2. Re:Yea great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the EPA's business because caffine is extremely dangerous and if you dump a bunch of caffine on a field, and then a bunch of tourists go wandering around it and get caffine on them, they'll die. The EPA's job is to prevent some people from killing other people by altering the environment. Sounds to me like they did a good job in this case.

  16. Easy solution by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 1

    WhydoesoneneedtoputupwiththeFDAregulations? Iwasn'ttheonewholeftthecanofJoltopen!
    (squeak!)

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Areyouhungry?Ithinkthereissomekeyboardchowunderyou rspacebar

  17. Coqui by spudwiser · · Score: 1

    It's interesting to consider that one island's cultural icon, appearing on everything from school bags to shot glasses, is another island's uber-pest. The coqui's call is measured at roughly 90 decibels. It's driven people out of hotels, including the Ritz-Carlton. At one point, a hotel was offering a $75 bounty per frog... dead or alive.

    --
    .cig - what you do after winning a good flame war
    1. Re:Coqui by gibbdog · · Score: 1

      Holy shit! $75 per frog???? Do you have any literature to back this up? I could be a rich man...... (not only cathing them, but breeding them in captivity and taking in the captive ones for $$$)

    2. Re:Coqui by gibbdog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Okay, ignore previous post.. I'm dumb..

  18. Chance to support the OSDN.com cabal by 4thAce · · Score: 1
    But alas, while the Environmental Protection Agency would grant the Hawaii Department of Agriculture emergency temporary waivers to use caffeine as a pesticide, the EPA required that the infestation sites be monitored before and after application of the super-coffee, which had to be administered by trained, certified pest applicators.

    Attention Slashdot administration, this is your cue to insert a helpful banner ad here.

    You're welcome.

    --
    Inventor of the LOLbalrog meme.
  19. Caffeine + Hunting by sellerdoor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just give the caffeine to the local kids and promise another hit for every frog they can stomp.

    I know a lot of little boys would jump at the opportunity.

  20. About coqui by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in Puerto Rico. I've always been thaught that coquis can not live outside of Puerto Rico, so their appearance in Hawaii comes as a surprise to me. The coqui is a "pet of sorts" here, if you bought a souvenir T-Shirt it would most likely have the picture of a coqui in it.

    They are rarely heard in cities but they abound in other areas. I know of foreigners how can not handle the sound at first, but after awhile they get accustomed, just like us. (Maybe in Hawaii it got REALLY out of control.) If you can spot a coqui alone (that is, not in deafeaning armies), you'll probably agree that they are quite OK.

    At one point coquis were believed to be headed for extinction.

    1. Re:About coqui by skm4jc · · Score: 1

      Personally, I love coquis. I was down in PR myself not long ago, and loved their lullabye song. :-) What I heard was some friggin' MORON brought them to Hawaii b/c they had the brilliant idea that, hey, they're cool in Puerto Rico, why not other tropical islands? Yeah, so much for that. :P Anyways, if there's no natural predators, as is the case in Hawaii, yes, they must be gotten rid of. Kinda like these damn Japanese ladybugs up here that infest our house! Anyone have any suggestions on how to get rid of them!?

    2. Re:About coqui by cat_jesus · · Score: 1

      I don't find the noise annoying at all. In fact I wish we had those frogs here. I find the sound, especially the chorus, quite soothing.

    3. Re:About coqui by Micah · · Score: 2

      I was also in Puerto Rico a few years ago and actually liked the sound of the things. And yeah, I have one of those souvenir t-shirts. :) I was told they only lived in PR, so I was also surprised to see this.

      But isn't the noise exaggerated a bit? They wren't THAT loud. I don't even remember hearing them inside the house. Granted, I was in town (Bayamon, a suburb of San Juan). It's probably worse in the jungle.

      Also, insects. Are there really so few insects in Hawaii that some frogs will endanger the birds by eating their food supply? Seems like more ways of getting rid of bugs is a GOOD thing.

      PR certainly has agriculture and tourism, so any long term threat to Hawaii seems unlikely.

    4. Re:About coqui by Kedyn's+Crow · · Score: 1

      Kinda like these damn Japanese ladybugs up here that infest our house! Anyone have any suggestions on how to get rid of them!?

      Only thing I,ve found to work is a vacuum cleaner.

      --
      "The moment "pride" is lost, "freedom" is also lost." - Ramza.
    5. Re:About coqui by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They wren't THAT loud.

      In their natural home there are predators which prevent the frogs from getting too loud--if you have too loud of a mating call then you get eaten because you can be more easily located. On the other hand, the louder the call the more females a frog can attract, so ultimately a balance is achieved. In Hawaii there is no noise level restriction and the louder frogs mate more often.

      Seems like more ways of getting rid of bugs is a GOOD thing.

      Umm, how about pollenating insects (not only bees do this): like fruit and flowers? Perhaps what you really want is a more selective removal of insects such as some mosquitoes (not all of them, just the blood-suckers). Not as easy as bombing them all with DDT, is it?

  21. No the First Frog to Invade Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although it doesn't act invasively the green and black poison dart frog has been established on Maui for well over a decade. Also, when I lived on the island of Oahu in the 80's it was quite common for us to catch toads that would breed in flooded paved areas. While freezing works to kill a frog (as mentioned in the article) I prefer to rub ambisol on their head. As for reptiles there is a caecilian of some sort that has become established and I'm sure amphisbeanians have become established I just haven't seen any reports.

  22. And in related news... by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...a plague of coders descended on Hawaii, eager to get at the caffeine and turn it into code!

    Now the Hawaii ag folks have to figure out how to get rid of all the coders. An anonymous source in the state government was quoted as saying "Actually, we're thinking of holding them, and not releasing them. We are going to corner the geek market, and then make a fortune charging other states by the hour."

    There is no word from the Whitehouse at this time regarding the swarm of geeks descending on Hawaii, but the President is expected to make a short statement later this evening.

    1. Re:And in related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in, the Federal Government has opposed the plans of California to lure geeks away from Hawaii with action games such as Quake 3 and suites of lans.

      "Those games are just too violent. Since we know that no one is responsible enough to actually raise their kids, we have to step in and put a stop to such things." One government official said. "Think of the children!" She later added.

  23. Caffeine by Medevo · · Score: 1

    Boy Not only does caffeine stimulate the central nervous system, increase blood pressure, constrict veins and arteries, and suppress you bodies natural sleep chemical, but it kills frogs!!!

    Next headline: Coffee and jolt cola found to help cure cancer

    Could you also imagine getting hold of the powder they use, better drink mix the alcohol

    Medevo

    1. Re:Caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Next headline: Coffee and jolt cola found to help cure cancer

      Well, caffeine molecules absorb free radicals... Then again, caffeine is a mutagen...

    2. Re:Caffeine by Medevo · · Score: 1

      Well, caffeine molecules absorb free radicals... Then again, caffeine is a mutagen...

      Caffeine absorbs free radicals, so there is less stuff that is likely to damage DNA (cancer is Damage to DNA, and the process that regulates cell division)

      However without adenosine regulating sleep (and body regeneration), you could only wonder what more short term problems are more likely to happen then Cancer


      As for mutations
      Caffeine is a "base analogue" of Adenine, and in fact can sometimes be incorporated into a growing DNA chain, instead of Adenine. Caffeine is a weak mutagen, for this reason. From http://fusionanomaly.net/caffeine.html

      Caffeine can be used IN DNA yet another use, but digressing, the damage that could be caused by caffeine possibility replacing C/G/T in DNA with pseudo-A could be immense, but I am yet to here of a story that mentions Caffeine as the major cause of cancer, or another genetic-based disorder

      Medevo
    3. Re:Caffeine by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

      You haven't seen "too much coffe man" then have you...he obviously is a product of coffee induced mutation.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  24. A Potentially Lucrative Proposition� :-) by NOT-2-QUICK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, approximately halfway through the article, we come to learn that "At one point, a hotel was paying bounty hunters $75 a frog, dead or alive."

    We then learn later in the article that some areas possess frog population densities of up to "20,000 individuals an acre".

    Now perhaps it is just me, but does this not sound as though it could be a quite lucrative prospect for a person with the appropriate amount of ingenuity and good old-fashioned entrepreneurial spirit... Just with some quick math, the potential industry of ridding the islands from the scourge of uninvited amphibians could be worth as much as $1.5 million per acre.

    Of course, this is purely theoretical and such activities would hardly amount to such monetary windfalls, but it does make you think!!!

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. -- Benjamin Franklin
  25. Frogs on Caffiene by Eddy+Johnson · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Ribbitribbitribbitribbitribbitribbitribbitribbitr ibbitribbitribbitribbitribbit..."

    One might think they've got a Hawaiian Frog techno mix running on repeat on the beaches.

    --


    Anonymous Coward: (n.) 1. nerd at school or library. 2. karmawhore in training. 3. embarrased prep.
  26. yea, but... by banka · · Score: 0

    if all your friends licked toad, would you lick it too??

    1. Re:yea, but... by banka · · Score: 0

      dude....you probably didn't even read the article...they're deadly FROGS, not TOADS...mods please mod this parent down down down!!!

  27. sorry by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2

    but doesn't raw caffeine kill humans on contact? Absorbed through skin & all? Are they sure this is a good thing to be spraying around?

    "The federal regulations proved too burdensome."

    Hello?! Aren't these regulations in place to prevent we-had-to-destroy-the-village-to-save-it syndrome?

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > but doesn't raw caffeine kill humans on contact?
      > Absorbed through skin & all? Are they sure this
      > is a good thing to be spraying around?

      That would be nicotine - just one of the plethora of nastinesses in cigarets. Not sure of the exact amount required other than "a drop".

  28. just read parents sig by packeteer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    read my subject... thank you that is all

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    1. Re:just read parents sig by packeteer · · Score: 1

      wtf flaimbait??? wtf is your prob... i jsut wanted to point out the parents sig... i said nothing about it... whether it was good or bad or ANYTHING... i left it up to you... i assume because you modded me as flamebait that you thought the sig was a BAD one and i was pointing that out... whatever man

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  29. Oh my god, I can't resist by abe+ferlman · · Score: 4, Funny

    We've come to one of the finest lilypads in the world and replaced this frog's caffeine powder with Folger's Crystals.

    Let's see if she notices.

    "Croak!"

    There you have it folks!

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    1. Re:Oh my god, I can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is cruel and unusual punishment

  30. Ya, but caffeine really is not that good by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2

    Don't get me wrong, I like caffeine, but it is not good for you. We have lots of studies to show this. I highly doubt that it is good for mother earth as well.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Ya, but caffeine really is not that good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but I'd rather they use caffeine than some man-made pesticide. When killing specific things is the intention, I'll take naturally-occuring (in some things, at least) over artificial chemicals any day. Our artificial chemicals have a nasty tendancy to kill/harm everything in addition to the targetted life form (DEET anyone?).

    2. Re:Ya, but caffeine really is not that good by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Oh give me a fucking break. "Mother Earth" Will eat every piece of waste our civilization ever produces, and the worst possible result is that we'll kill ourselves and a few other species off. It's not like caffeine isn't a naturally occuring substance ya fuckwit...

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    3. Re:Ya, but caffeine really is not that good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh ho? So mother nature wants a break now, does she?! Well, she should've thought about that when she was ravaging us with earthquakes, typhoons, plagues and volcanic eruptions!

  31. In other news by NickRob · · Score: 1

    The Frogs have set up a Lan to properly channel their caffeine highs.

  32. It's not giving caffeine to them.... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 3, Funny
    It's taking it away from them that'll do the trick.

    Just think about it... All those mornings that you rely on coffee to go to work. All those mornings that you need something to keep you awake, and not sleep in until noon. It's what prevents you from making your head explode.

    Get them hooked on coffee. Not just something in the water, but the frigging powdered kind. Kind of like a drug addict, where they inject it. Frogs are different though. It would diffuse right through their skin.

    Then, when you have an army of frogs addicted to the funny powder, stop giving it to them, and see what they do.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:It's not giving caffeine to them.... by Medevo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would wonder if the frogs would set up rehab centers, or would they just take it cold turkey.

      Seriously Caffeine withdrawal in frogs could be quite a interesting phenomena,
      The website Neuroscience for Kids - Frogs and Caffeine mentions that a overdose of caffeine is lethal to frogs.


      I would only wonder how?

      Medevo
    2. Re:It's not giving caffeine to them.... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Get them hooked on coffee. Not just something in the water, but the frigging powdered kind. Kind of like a drug addict, where they inject it. Frogs are different though. It would diffuse right through their skin.

      We all know that if you put a frog in a pot of water and heat it up slowly, the frog won't notice, and will boil to death.

      Now you're telling me that if you put a frog in a pot of water with some nice fresh-roasted and fresh-ground coffee, and heat it up slowly, the frog will notice, but it just won't care. Cool! :-)

      Meantime, I have visions of programmers on vacation in Hawaii sneaking out of the hotels at night to catch frogs and lick them in the same way that hippies and druggies lick toads for the bufotinin. (Except that the programmer gets paid $75 per frog for every "empty" frog he turns in ;-)

  33. Cats might eat frogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My cat would go right up to the waters edge and hook frogs with a claw, throw them into the grass and do whatever cats do with frogs. But these were bullfrogs.

    A small frog would most likely be a treat for them. But in all reality, if there are as many frogs as they indicate, other creatures who like to eat them will multiply. Vultures, mice, rats, opossums, racoons, armidillos, crows, and snakes, come to the top of the head. The problem might take care of itself.

  34. Re:GRAMMAR by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    Um... if you bothered to read the whole sentence you'd see that it's supposed to be posessive (as in "the application regulations of the EPA"). Or do we have multiple Environmental Protection Agencies in the US? Where are they getting all their funding?

    Nice try at trolling. I give it an E for effort.

  35. Re:A Potentially Lucrative Proposition� :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or perhaps a poor student like myself could fund a new car by hopping a plane to honolulu, hawaii and playing whack-a-frog = )

    naturally, i would have to obtain a stick upon my arrival, as it would be considered a potentially lethal weapon and a threat to national security, if carried on board a plane.

  36. Re:GRAMMAR by damien_kane · · Score: 1

    EPAs

    NOT EPA's


    From the /. article:
    The EPA's application regulations

    Actually the usage is correct, as the application regulations belong to the EPA, and as a result the possessive is the correct tense.

    To be completely grammatically correct, the sentence should have read:
    The application regulations of the EPA apparently proved too burdensome, and the stuff sits in a warehouse.

    The A/C who decided to enlighten us with his immaculate grasp of the English language must be American, but at least his spelling was correct...

  37. I'm the one in the frog suit... by Nobody's+Hero · · Score: 1

    sweet...free caffiene?

    No more drives to the coffee shop I'll just pull on a fake frog suit and pretend to tbe the world's biggest frog.

    And then I'll be there king...

    and once i've raised my army of super frogs "hopped" up on caffeine I will take over the world AHA HAHAHAHAHA!!!
    In all serious though has no one thought what this will actually do to the surronding enviroment?

    I live in southeren ontario Canada, recently we have had an insect infestation in the farmers' crops. So in order to control it we released thosands and thousands of geneticly enhanced lady bugs that would target the mites that were targeting the crops.

    The mite problem is gone but now we have a infestation of super bugs that won't die. I have seen entire sides of apartment buildings coated with the things...In novemeber no less(when there shouldn't be any of the critters left).

    My point here is when will we learn to stop screwing with mother nature...

    --
    The Only Person Willing to be Me is ME!
    1. Re:I'm the one in the frog suit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why we have all these freaking huge lady bugs in Michigan now? About two years ago they started showing up...the native ladybugs were just little bitty things and didn't bother anyone, these are HUGE (for a ladybug).

    2. Re:I'm the one in the frog suit... by Nobody's+Hero · · Score: 1

      That'd be why.....it's an infestation I tell you....!!!

      And now they don't kow what to do!!!

      The Lady Bugs will inherit the earth....!

      --
      The Only Person Willing to be Me is ME!
  38. Photos by loconet · · Score: 3, Informative

    This page has some photos and more information about the frogs. They're very small!!

    --
    [alk]
    1. Re:Photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hmm... those look familiar. I remember back in 6th grade or so, these things (or something that looked remarkably similar to them) descended upon the suburbs of Phoenix, AZ in droves. I remember finding them under ever rock I picked up, all over my friends' yards (they didn't like mine all that much... must've been the cat), and generally pretty much everywhere (being 6th grade, we all had loads of fun putting them in the desks in the classrooms). I guess the irrigated suburbs weren't too much of a desert for 'em. But I haven't seen any since (6th grade was '90-'91 if I remember correctly). Anybody care to speculate on how they got wiped out? I'd say it was the winter (with no cloud cover at night, it can get pretty nippy occasionally) except that they'd have to have spent an entire season breeding to overtake as much territory as they did that year... unless the winter before was milder than usual or something like that.

    2. Re:Photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it my imaginination or do they look evil? Look into their eyes. I dare you!

      ac

  39. Re:GRAMMAR by damien_kane · · Score: 1

    Can you give me an E as well? Caffeine just doesn't work well enough anymore... Computer games don't affect children... If Pac-Man affected us as kids we'd spend all of our time running around in darkened rooms eating magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music... Oh... Wait...

  40. Java anyone? *ribbit* by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

    Where's a Starbucks when you damn well need one?!
    They can have all of ours!

  41. powdered caffeine? by neo8750 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who though of this as a cool table condiment. it would take pizza to a new level.

    1. Re:powdered caffeine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a doctor or anything, but I'd guess a few grams taken all at once (not hard if it's pure powdered caffeine) could kill you, even if you've built up a tolerance. At the very least you'd have a very hard time sleeping or sitting still for a few days. :)

  42. The FFIX Solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just send in Quina. S/he loves them.

  43. Plaque of frogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would that give you dragon breath?

  44. Just curious... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I assume you meant anbesol..

    So rubbing a topical anaesthetic on a frogs head kills it?

    And uhh.. why is it you are killing frogs? Serial killer in training?

    1. Re:Just curious... by gibbdog · · Score: 1

      Actually, rubbing anbesol and similar products on frogs heads is one common trick in herp (herps = reptiles and ambhibians collectively) photography.... Wash it off when you're through and they seem to do fine... Of course, many times the frogs are sacrificed for scientific collections afterwards so I doubt it really matters... the anbesol is nothing compared to the 1:4 saturated chloretone:water solution they will soon be dumped in.

  45. Cats might eat "poisonous" frogs by BakaMark · · Score: 1
    A small frog would most likely be a treat for them.

    There are several things that Australians found out about "cane toads". For a start the stench when you happen to kill one. Then there is the fact that "cane toads" are "poisonous". Many of the Australian indenginous fauna have been dying off because of their (failed) attempts to actually consume these things. Then there have been the cats and dogs that have died as well.

    1. Re:Cats might eat "poisonous" frogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not aware of too many frogs that are poisonous, at least those found here in the US. Toads, for sure can be nasty. I think I've come across toads that give off a smell when you get too close to them.

    2. Re:Cats might eat "poisonous" frogs by kesuki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First off the frogs in Hawaii aren't poisonous, and secondly while cats could 'eat' the frogs, they're far better at being trained to 'hunt' the frogs for rewards. If the cat had to actually eat the frogs is would soon grow sick of hunting them and move on to other prey. But if the cat is rewarded for each frog it brings in, it will bring in many frogs every single day to recieve rewards. A dozen or so trained cats could easily be used to clear a resort of the frogs. Animal trainers in hawaii could make a nice business selling trained cats to homeowners who were sick of the frogs mating calls. Cats have been used for centuries to control pests, and the cost of keeping them is sure to be less (at least for resorts) than using humans. Also cats have great night vision, so they're more effective at hunting the frogs than humans.

    3. Re:Cats might eat "poisonous" frogs by Maditude · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, there's already quite a few wild cats in Maui, and I'd imagine on the other islands as well (I was just in Maui a few weeks ago). But I'm pretty sure the Hawaiians aren't real keen on introducing even MORE cats (who would probably rather catch birds than frogs anyways).

    4. Re:Cats might eat "poisonous" frogs by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Cats don't have such great vision, really. In general, they have trouble focusing on something unless it's moving. Stationary frogs would present something of a problem, though certainly not a showstopper. My girlfriend's cats will go to any length in order to get some Pounce.

    5. Re:Cats might eat "poisonous" frogs by Bitter+Old+Man · · Score: 0

      Not only do you READ Slashdot, but you actually POST to it as well, and not only do you read AND POST to Slashdot, but you do so with the name "Elbereth." Your girlfriend is either 1) imaginary, 2) as ugly as Alan Cox's, 3) retarded, or 4) has an enormous capacity for pitying others.

    6. Re:Cats might eat "poisonous" frogs by Anomaly+Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Cats have been used for centuries to control pests, and the cost of keeping them is sure to be less (at least for resorts) than using humans. Also cats have great night vision, so they're more effective at hunting the frogs than humans.

      Why did the image of a grizzly, vacant-eyed prison-worker with a bright orange jumpsuit, a large plastic bag, and one of those leaf pokers with half a dozen impaled frogs on it suddenly pop into my head?

    7. Re:Cats might eat "poisonous" frogs by ahuimanu · · Score: 0

      My dog got these things (BUFOs or Cane Frogs) in her mouth when I was growing up in Hawaii and would foam at the mouth and convulse for about 20 minutes. I was amazed that she made it to 10 before she passed on with all the BUFO venom she consumed.

      J

      --
      shock the monkey
    8. Re:Cats might eat "poisonous" frogs by CTachyon · · Score: 1
      Cats don't have such great vision, really. In general, they have trouble focusing on something unless it's moving. Stationary frogs would present something of a problem, though certainly not a showstopper. My girlfriend's cats will go to any length in order to get some Pounce.

      True, cat vision isn't as spiffy as most people believe -- it's a simple tradeoff between rods (night vision) and cones (vivid color and sharp definition) -- but I believe that cat hearing would more than make up for it in the case of these frogs.

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
    9. Re:Cats might eat "poisonous" frogs by Bitter+Old+Man · · Score: 0

      I would get a life but no one wants to date a bitter old man with a colostomy bag.

  46. Caffeine can hurt you too! by Kanan · · Score: 1
    This is from http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/cafff.html
    Caffeine is a central nervous system stimulant that interferes with a neurotransmitter in the brain called adenosine. Caffeine also acts at other places in the body to increase heart rate, constrict blood vessels, relax air passages, and affect muscles. An overdose of caffeine is lethal to the coqui frog. Other animals, including humans, are also at risk from the dangers of caffeine. Therefore, only personnel from the Hawaii Department of Agriculture are allowed to use caffeine to control the frogs and they must monitor the effects of the drug in other species. Homeowners in Hawaii are encouraged to capture frogs by hand and contact the Hawaii Department of Agriculture.
    Maybe the 110 mg of caffeine I get from pills, not including the vast amounts of tea I drink isn't as good for me as I thought..... They have a link to the frog's mating call too. After listening to it, I can't blame them for wanting to get rid of them.
  47. The real solution is easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Two words...

    Frog Baseball

    1. Re:The real solution is easy... by GungaDan · · Score: 3, Funny
      Setting yourself up for the Darwin. Frog baseball requires a "chaser" to make the frog jump to within the strike box. The position of "chaser" is incredibly dangerous given the bat swinging just inches away (hopefully). Frog golf is a much better option, IMO.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  48. All a matter of dosage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nothing new. Giving a frog a dosage that wouldn't kill a human could very well kill it because it is smaller. Editors, this isn't very cutting edge.

  49. Obligatory Simpsons Reference. by glassware · · Score: 2
    I didn't see it in the list, so I'll karma shoot myself.

    Bart gets the boot in Australia - after making a prank call, Bart arrives in Australia, unknowingly bearing a simple ordinary bullfrog, whose progeny then goes nuts and devastates the Australian continent.

    Marge: We have them in America. They're called bullfrogs.

    Clerk: What? That's an odd name. I'd have called them "chazzwazzers".

    Ribbit. Not only are the Simpsons running out of ideas, they're now predicting the Future. Any more episodes with Al Gore in them? Look for the season finale! </weak joke>

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons Reference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      > Ribbit. Not only are the Simpsons running out of ideas, they're now predicting the Future.

      Uh yeah right. Showing the past is more like it.

      Ever heard of the Queensland cane toad plague? Ever seen how bad it is?

      Dumbass history impaired and neighbour ignorant yankee fools.

      Next you'll be telling us that Mel Gibson liberated Australia from Tina Turner in 1956 and renamed the town to MELbourne.

      It's surprising how much stuff in the Simpsons is loosely based on fact and history. There's quite a bit of morality play in there, scarily....

  50. Send Jon Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And he can read them Poetry from the Hellmouth and lure them into the sea.

  51. Absorbtion. by Peale · · Score: 2

    Frogs only eat moving objects (with very few exceptions). The caffiene is absorbed along with water directly into their bloodstream through their skin. It has a 'double-whammy' effect, affecting not only their nervous system, but it also drys them out.

  52. Caffeine toxicity - material safety data by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 3, Informative
    The Material Safety Data Sheet for Caffeine has a lot of good information

    Caffeine is toxic to the blood, lungs, nervous system, and mucous membranes. It is a human poison by ingestion and is a slight irritant of the skin and eye. The oral LD50 for caffeine is 127 mg/kg (mouse); the oral TD Lo for man is reported as 13 mg/kg.

    Signs/Symptoms of Overexposure:
    Exposure to ingested caffeine can cause convulsions, muscle spasms, tremors, poor muscle coordination, vomiting, and blood pressure increase. Continued excessive use in tea or coffee may lead to digestive disturbances, constipation, palpitations, shortness of breath, cardiac disorders, and depressed mental states.

    Apparently, you'd have to drink a lot of coffee to get a lethal dose. But it does seem to possible to kill yourself (or approach it) with caffeine pills.

    Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

    1. Re:Caffeine toxicity - material safety data by crystalplague · · Score: 1

      if you ever wanted to kill anybody...this is the way to do it. very small dosage and not usually screened for in an autopsy without previous suspicion. Nicotine is also very toxic with and L.D. 50 of 230 orally in mice. However, nicotine turns brown upon exposure to light, has an acrid burning taste, and smells of pyradine. However it is very cheap. Merck was unable to provide an L.D. number orally for humans for caffeine or nicotine. Remember though, the L.D. 50 is the dosage at which half of the specimens die. To insure lethal dosage, double the amount given in the L.D. 50. Happy poisioning I guess...

    2. Re:Caffeine toxicity - material safety data by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      LD-50 for Caffeine in humans is approximately 75mg per kg of body mass.

      2x LD-50 doesn't ensure death, it just makes it more likely. I'm no toxologist or anything but at least I've got a handle on statistics. I'd bet that lethal dose requirements tend to fall into skewed normal distributions.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    3. Re:Caffeine toxicity - material safety data by lukesl · · Score: 1

      Based on the 75 mg/kg number, that means the LD50 of coffee for a 150lb. (67kg) person would be about 25 STRONG cups (200mg apiece). The LD50, BTW, is if you were to take 100 people in cages and give them all a dose of drug, the dose at which 50 people would be killed. Of course, this is more along the lines of the caffeine extracted from 25 cups of coffee injected into your veins at once. Or about 67 cans of Jolt. I could imagine that being fatal...

    4. Re:Caffeine toxicity - material safety data by IceFox · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I was working on the LSDVD project someone sent us 80lbs of Jolt. It came in two crates of 20oz bottles. I put one of the crates in my cube and over the course of the day would chain drink the soda. About 2pm I found I couldn't control the mouse anymore. As not amused as I was I repeated it for a few more days untill the Jolt was all gone. (The other three memebers of the team did get some, but I am fairly sure that I accidently got most of it.)

      -Benjamin

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    5. Re:Caffeine toxicity - material safety data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt the LD50 dose of caffeine to be 13mg/kg for humans. I weigh about 70 kg, and thus 70 kg * 13 mg/kg = 910 mg would be "lethal" dose for me (LD50 is the dose where 50 percent of the test subjects die). A cup of coffee contains about 180 mg caffeine, which would mean that you could die from about 5 cups. (This is of course if you drink them straight up, not 5 cups over a day).

      You can definitely die from too much caffeine though, take this story for instance.

    6. Re:Caffeine toxicity - material safety data by darkonc · · Score: 2

      As has been said many times, LD50 is the dose at which 1/2 the population would die. THis means that, for someone like me (who avoids coffee/caffine), sucking back 5 cups over a few minuts might very well kill me. Other people who regularly drink 8-10 cups a day have obviously developed a tolerance, and might even suffer mild withdrawal effects from reducing themselves to 5 cups/day.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  53. Coffee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ages ago, frogs used to drink beer!

  54. Coqui, the only frogs with no tadpoles by XBL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These frogs are being studied for their evolutionary traits. Right from the egss hatch the frogs, as there is no intermediate state of a tadpole.

    Maybe the lack of an intermediate stage has made this species even more hardy, and therefore more prevalent in Hawaii.

    No matter what, the Coqui are there to stay in Hawaii. They will just have to get used to it.

    1. Re:Coqui, the only frogs with no tadpoles by gibbdog · · Score: 1

      Do they have absolutely no tadpole stage, or do they have a tadpole stage that is greatly reduced and all takes place while they are still inside the eggs so they hatch out as "adults"?

  55. Not only are they noisy... by pennsol · · Score: 1

    But here in the Virgin Islands (about 70 miles east of Purto Rico) most houses and buildings get thier water from a cistern (think basement full of rain water) the coqui infest the cisterns and breed and lay ggs ...well they also poison the water(thier skin has some nasty slimey stuff on it )..granted we don't drink cistern water for other reasons but this has been known to cause very strange and painful rashes.. since we do shower with cistern water... Now that we know about the caffine...i think its time to clean that cistern.....mwhahahah!!! and they are F*@king annoying

    --

    Just Limin' Mon

  56. Australian Cane Toads by Permission+Denied · · Score: 2, Informative
    Years ago, my high school biology teacher liked to show this one film on Australian Cane Toads. Basically, these buggers were introduced intentionally in Australia to eat a particular kind of insect that was destroying crops. Problem was, these toads will eat anything, so they didn't go for the insects that would stay up high on the crops when they could eat anything else that crawled by.

    They had a HUGE explosion of these things. This movie showed them in hoards. It also had this one scene with this hippie - the guy had a VW van and his hobby was to go around smashing these things. He would swerve the van from one side of the street to the other, running over the toads which would make a very satisfying pop. This hippie is the only thing I remember from high school biology.

    So, my point is that these toads were introduced for an ecological reason (pest control), but apparently these guys didn't understand ecology all that well. Of course, this Hawaii thing is different since the frogs weren't introduced intentionally, but it seems toads/frogs have a talent for growing explosively.

    1. Re:Australian Cane Toads by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I saw that film in my humanities class on Australia. The name is Cane Toads: An Unnatural History. I absolutly loved that movie, it was bloody hilarious :)

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:Australian Cane Toads by jasontheking · · Score: 1

      In school, someone from queensland told me about all of the different ways schoolkids had figured out how to kill them. I only remembered one:

      You need a long piece of fishing line, with hooks on both ends. Both hooks need to meet about 1-1.5m off the ground when you throw the line over a power line (you know what's coming now , don't you? :-))

      stick one hook in a toad , throw the other hook over a power line (by a road) and stick that hook in the toad too. You now have a cane toad suspended above the ground.

      Now you need a car (a ute , preferably), and a bat. Simply stand on the tray of the ute holding the bat, someone drives up to the toad , and you splatter it with the bat.

      Has anyone tried a cane toad in a microwave? I want to know if they explode like gremlins...

    3. Re:Australian Cane Toads by ahuimanu · · Score: 0

      I grew up in Hawaii and what is weird about the article concerning the coquis is that it claims this is the first problem with amphibians. However, I am glad someone made mention of the BUFOs (Australian Cane Toads) as they were very abundant in the 1970s.

      I remember these very well as they would emit an awful slime from their backs and leave long strands of their eggs in puddles after a rain. I think the thing about bufos is that they did not have as annoying a vocalization that the coqui seems to.

      J

      --
      shock the monkey
    4. Re:Australian Cane Toads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah - thanks for the link. I'm gonna buy this movie (I'm amazed they're still selling it, and it's now on DVD - perhaps this is becoming some sort of a cult classic). Certainly makes for an interesting evening.

    5. Re:Australian Cane Toads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a copy of this on videotape. At first I thought Monty Python was behind it. Then I realized they were serious. A most excellent watch!

      ac

    6. Re:Australian Cane Toads by whitegold · · Score: 1

      I'm a queenslander, so I'll share some myself:

      Best I've heard (if horrible) is to get one of those firestarter bottles. You know the ones, squirt out naptha or something cool. Also get an aerosol can of butane. Catch toad. Open mouth, insert aerosol can. Spray. The toad will automatically swallow. And swallow. And swallow. Spray firelighter on toads back. Light. Watch fireball toad hop away until the flame burns through the skin and then KABOOM.

      (personally I don't mind them dying, but I'm not a fan of cruelty, even to pests.)

      The ways we killed them in Biology (all the experiments Yanks do on bullfrogs, we do on Canetoads.) were fairly kind. Either putting them in a plastic bag in the freezer (your freezer, not mine!), or holding the body in one hand and bending the nose right down. Then you get a long steel skewer and insert it into the back of the head. Does the job.

      I knew a guy who used to shoot them with an air rifle. No pellets. Just the air. Right up against them the air alone penetrates the brain.

      Most popular way of killing them, though, is to make a solution of "Dettol" (it's an antiseptic if you don't have it there) and water. Spray it on the toads and they die.

      Course, just running over them is popular too! Though I've seen them suck their guts back in and hop away. They're kind of tough!

    7. Re:Australian Cane Toads by Permission+Denied · · Score: 1
      I doubt at this point that anyone else is going to see your comment since this story is getting older (I saw it through the messaging system).

      Watch fireball toad hop away until the flame burns through the skin and then KABOOM.

      Oh. My. God. That has got to be the sickest and most creative thing I've ever heard kids do.

      Though I've seen them suck their guts back in and hop away. They're kind of tough!

      Now you Aussies are really scaring me. Gotta visit that place sometime.

      I've just ordered the movie from Amazon. Should make a great thing to watch on the weekends with friends and beers. I cannot simply allow such a cultural phenomenon go unnoticed.

  57. smiley noses by tps12 · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the article description:

    :-)

    Excess noses cost Internet providers billions annually. Consider that the noseless ":)" conveys as much information as ":-)" at two-thirds the cost in bandwidth.

    Slashdot, as a pillar of the Internet community, stands to make a real difference in the fight against smiley noses. It would be great if it could act as a role model in this important struggle.

    Everyone: please run your messages through the following perl script to remove excess noses:

    #!/usr/bin/perl -w
    $_ = @ARGV ? shift @ARGV : ;
    chomp;
    s/([:;8B?|\%])[-o^]([\)\(|PB9oO\@0{Xx\*D&])/$1$2/g ; BR> print;
    print "\n";

    Note this is a beta version. It only handles one-line messages, and only "right-handed" smileys. Improvements are forthcoming, and patches are welcome.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:smiley noses by tps12 · · Score: 2

      Sorry, that first line should say

      $_ = @ARGV ? shift @ARGV : <STDIN>;

      And the "BR>" should just be a linebreak.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    2. Re:smiley noses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With such odd content and an oh-so-whacked-out Perl script, I thought this was just a joke at first. But the thing that really disturbs me after looking over the Perl code is that I actually understand that code!.

    3. Re:smiley noses by Bitter+Old+Man · · Score: 0

      You have too much time on your hands. I pity you.

    4. Re:smiley noses by The+Musician · · Score: 1
      Hey what about us equals or cross-eyed smilers? Your first match grouping should include = and X along with :;, etc.

      =^P

    5. Re:smiley noses by tps12 · · Score: 2
      Yes, non-standard smileys are definitely an area for improvement. I know people who are very liberal in their definition of smileys, e.g., ?-> . Now, I can see a face there with a little effort, but I can also imagine a situation where that is not supposed to be a smiley at all. Like in a C++ forum.

      Current plans for development are to test the contents of some of the more popular and respected smiley dictionaries for compliance.

      Obviously, there are always going to be people who figure out a way to get around any denosing algorithms. But even a 95% success rate on real-world data will have an important and measurable impact on Internet traffic.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  58. Invasive species a problem everywhere by dalassa · · Score: 1

    Sadly Hawaii isn't the only ecosystem being disrupted by exotic species. Most island ecologies are now threatened by these invaders. Australia has its cane toads and rabbits. Zebra mussels infest the US waterways. Some idiot in the 1930s decided he would dry up the Everglades in Florida by seeding it with swamp killing trees from a plane.

    Invasive species destroy biodiversity and alter ecosytems beyind thier ability to cope easily. Add to that the effect of human alteration and climate shift we are rapidly losing vital species and habitat. Unfortunatly there are no easy answers. Remember the SNL skit about "The Bat Problem?" :)

    Now if I may be excused I have to go battle the kudzu, it grew another foot today.

    --
    Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.
  59. Send them back to Puerto Rico by incuo · · Score: 1

    Yes, in Puerto Rico they are an 'endangered species'.

  60. Thinkgeek? by Vrallis · · Score: 1

    You've gotta be kidding me...ThinkGeek hasn't bought it yet?!?

  61. Robotic antifrog sentry/hunter-killer by Blancmange · · Score: 1

    So these coquis are as loud as 90cB?

    It sounds like a great excuse to build a robot that will hunt down noisy frogs.

    A hammer would be a cheap and easy weapon, but the thought of focusing a tone burst that matches the resonant frequency of the frog (somewhere between 100Hz and 3000Hz) gets me excited.

    --
    Blancmange
  62. Easier solutions. by scott1853 · · Score: 2

    If it takes one person 1 year to catch 40 frogs, and the governments solution is a chemical spray, has nobody thought of just using a lawnmower or heavy duty roller?

    1. Re:Easier solutions. by gibbdog · · Score: 1

      Probably wouldn't work. If you've caught frogs before you might notice that calling males will usually quit calling when you get near and also burrow into the ground...

  63. Re:A Potentially Lucrative Proposition� :-) by mekkab · · Score: 2

    Given that the coqui are the size of a silver dollar and only croak at night, AND given Hawaii's position on the earth (very little "Dusk" time) I'm sure they're hard as HECK to catch!

    AS also outlined in the article, one guy caught 40 in a year... can you live off 3 grand?!

    Thankfully the island I'm going to in two weeks (Kaua'i) is not infested.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  64. Close to Water by radsoft · · Score: 1

    Coffee in US restaurants is water. If the EPA wants to investigate water, fine by me.

    --
    radsoft.net
  65. nearby guam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Hawaiians live in constant fear of brown tree snakes, which have decimated the bird populations of nearby Guam..."

    "nearby Guam." I guess geography is relative.

  66. All hail the coming of the �berkr�ten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *cue "Ironman" by Black Sabbath*

  67. Pied Piper by Rareul · · Score: 1

    is what came to my mind.
    Followed by the robot rats -- robot frogs!

    1. Re:Pied Piper by kcelery · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good idea, robo mice is also ampheban. One can condition the mice by first play the sound of frog and then reward it with a 'kick' of electric pulse. Then send out the robo mice to patrol the infested area.

  68. cane toads by estes_grover · · Score: 1

    Sounds like it just might be these guys:
    http://www.austmus.gov.au/factsheets/caneto ad.htm
    Imported into Au and Hawaii to stop insect pests in the sugar cane fields....ooooops.

  69. Bart vs. Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marge: We have them in America. They're called bullfrogs.
    Clerk: What? That's an odd name. I'd have called them "chazzwazzers".

  70. Being a /.-er from PR ... by flk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So I sit here in front of my PC, catching my daily dose of /. when I come across this interesting post.

    Considering the fact that I am not an Hawaiian ecologist, I do not understand the dangers of the coquí's presence in Hawaii. Here, on its native island, it is harmless and it had been rumored that it couldn't survive anywhere else outside of PR. To think that it has survived in Hawaii must be exciting news for Puerto Rican ecologists ... but as the saying goes: one man's trash is another man's treasure ... of course, this case, it is the other way around.

    Yes, the coquís are cute and tiny and chirp like it's nobody's business. Their half female-attracting, half male-warning calls are not annoying. Raining season coming in, the night is filled with "co-QUI co-QUI" -- it really does make for a pleasant natural soundtrack.

    --
    [...]
    1. Re:Being a /.-er from PR ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Considering the fact that I am not an Hawaiian ecologist, I do not understand the dangers of the coquí's presence in Hawaii. Here, on its native island, it is harmless and it had been rumored that it couldn't survive anywhere else outside of PR.

      Consider what happens when you take something with the reproductive rate of a small frog, that naturally eats *anything* it can get hold of, and you move it to an environment with *no* predators.

      BOOM. New frogs eat Much more than their fair share of insects etc, and the native animals suffer greatly. No predators, so frog population explodes, native animal populations (birds, especially) that feed on those same small insects decline. A Lot.

      Think how much fun it would be to get some Tazmanian devils or some such, and how well the PR local wildlife would deal.

  71. So that must be a good thing then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since feral cats are also pests...

    http://www.ea.gov.au/biodiversity/invasive/pests /

  72. These amphibians don't belong by mekkab · · Score: 2

    ACtually, its not tourists- it simply through transported vegetable matter (potted plants, etc).

    Since these frogs don't have a tadpole stage (they grow from eggs laid in/on said plants) they are much easier to carry.

    Since they don't belong there are no natural predators, so their population grows unabated, and they compete with birds for food resources.

    These croakers have gotta go!

    And have you heard the sound sample? (go to hawaii star bulletin website) EEEESH!

    Thank god they haven't taken over kaua'i! (two weeks baby...)

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  73. Re:A Potentially Lucrative Proposition� :-) by FFFish · · Score: 2

    Hard to catch? Not when they're dead... as in "dead or alive."

    Me, I'd be out there with a pressurized pesticide sprayer loaded up with Starbucks' finest!

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  74. Trained, Certified Pest Applicators... by GNUCyberKat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah right.

    "One dose for da froggies...one for me...weeeee! One dose for da froggies..."

  75. Worst threat to the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the worst threat to a state's environment is the EPA.

  76. Spiders and Caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a spider's web. This is a spider's web on caffeine.

    (pic)

    (Trust me, the link is relevant.)

    Any questions?

    Caffeine is a drug that seems to have a stronger impact on small animals.

  77. Invite frenchmen by aepervius · · Score: 1

    And let them loose on the island "everything you can catch is yours to eat".

    And before somebody mod me down for trolling the poor frenchman , I *AM* a frenchman and the idea of catching frog for a meal if they are eatable appeal to me (and my stomach).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Invite frenchmen by twentycavities · · Score: 1

      Silly frog, Slashdot is for Americans!

      --
      Monstromart: Where shopping is a baffling ordeal
  78. Re:patch by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

    Here's a patch for multi-line messages:

    @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
    #!/usr/bin/perl -w
    -$_ = @ARGV ? shift @ARGV : <STDIN>;
    +while ($_ = shift @ARGV || <>) {
    chomp;
    -s/([:;8B?|\%])[-o^]([\)\(|PB9oO\@0{Xx\*D& ])/$ 1$2/g;
    +s/([:;8B?|\%=X])[-o^]([\)\(|PB9oO\@0{Xx\* D&]) / 1$2/g;
    print;
    print "\n";
    +}

    --
    -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
  79. after reading about that cwp thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I immediately thought: "these people really need to get together, have few beers and plain drink&talk their worries over." Internet does bad things to us who believe that it could replace real face2face meetings, social contacts and general hanging-outs.

  80. Questionable Accuracy by gasp · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live on Maui, and my experience here goes back to the early 1970's.

    According to this story, "There are no naturally occurring reptiles or terrestrial amphibians, no snakes, iguanas, toads or salamanders in Hawaii. Until the coqui arrived, it was a frog-free world."

    Umm. No. It says the Coqui arrived around 1990. I wouldn't know about that. Nobody I know here has heard of these frogs. Perhaps the 40+ infestations claimed on Maui are simply places I don't go. HOWEVER...

    No other reptiles? No amphibians, toad or frogs before 1990? Totally false. For one thing, these islands are famous for having Geckos. We've got hundreds of them right in our yard. There's more than one within 20 feet of me right now. And we have other salamander-like lizards here than geckos. I'm not a biologist. And I suppose the frogs or toads I played with as a kid 30 years ago weren't here either back then.

    I don't know when or how frogs, toads, geckos, salamanders and such got here, but it was long before 1990. I'm sure there is some basis for truth in this story, but I've managed to escape hearing even one of these tens of thousands of 90-decibel frogs on Maui. That doesn't mean they aren't here, just that the story sure doesn't reflect any common knowledge here as far as I can tell after discussing this story with my friends.

    1. Re:Questionable Accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I lived on Oahu 30 years ago, and the bufo toads were rampant. Lot's of wittle toadies mashed flat on the road.

  81. Argh! Infestation of perl-coders!!!! by Laglorden · · Score: 1

    Coffeine apparently only makes it worse!

  82. The sad thing is... by MikeyNg · · Score: 2

    No one here really seems to care about the invasion of the frogs. Hawaii is a lovely environment and is home to more than 10,000 species of plant and animal life found nowhere else in the world. It is blessed with having virtually every major ecological zone (the only one missing is permafrost-tundra, like think Antarctica) and was virtually isolated from everywhere else in the world, as the islands are at least two thousand miles away from any other large land mass.


    That is, until we started to really live there, and now invasive species threaten many of the plants and wildlife that are unique to Hawaii.


    Obligatory linkage for the karma-whoring:


    Nature Conservancy

    Google directory

    Carnivorous Caterpillars!

    There's a great deal to know and understand about the endangered species in Hawaii and the invasive species that threaten them. We have no snakes, or many other reptiles, for that matter. There are no scorpions, no tarantulas, none of that really vile stuff you find in other rainforests.

    --
    Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
  83. Re:patch by tps12 · · Score: 2

    Thank you, this will go into CVS.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  84. Re:A Potentially Lucrative Proposition� :-) by TheLink · · Score: 2

    I don't understand why that guy only caught 40 in a year.

    I'll just train a few dogs, and voila one acre cleared. Believe me, if you're a frog or rat or whatever, getting away from a well trained dog is very difficult. Them dogs will just do it for fun.

    I won't even have to cheat and breed more frogs like some crooks ;).

    Cheerio,
    Link.

    --
  85. Let me get this straight... by gosand · · Score: 2
    Today, three tons of powered caffeine sits in a warehouse on the Big Island, as the Hawaiians contemplate their next move.

    The programmer's mecca.

    3 tons of powdered caffeine, sitting in a warehouse? Why do I get the distinct feeling that I am going to be seeing ThinkGeek ads for this stuff?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  86. Relocate them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These "frogs" are indigenous to Puerto Rico and their numbers are dropping fast (not to extinction but they will be, in a few more years). The Hawaiian gov. should work with Puerto Rico's "Wild Life Dept." and make a plan to relocate the Coqui (that's the frog's common name).

  87. MSNBC? by Ndog · · Score: 1

    The Washington Post's website is free. Why not link to the original article?

    --
    -N
  88. The nine iron ... by nosfucious · · Score: 1

    I've always found that the nine iron became the natural enemy of the Cane Toad back home when I was a lad.

    "Fore!!!" ... splat.

    Occasionally the bastards would move but a nicely timed show would send them in to backyards several properties away.

    --
    Q:I was listening to a CD in Grip and it sounded horrible! What's up? A:Perhaps you are listening to country music
  89. Re:Japanese Beetles (was: About coqui) by caca_phony · · Score: 1

    try putting a bunch of them in the blender and spraying the juice on the plants they would otherwise infest - it's bio-warfare breeding diseases that feed on them. This is what worked for my mom with her rose bushes

    --
    ...and this lie crawls out of its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'
  90. frogs like wine by guest12 · · Score: 1

    trap them with wine

    1. Re:frogs like wine by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      Jeremiah was a bullfrog.
      He was a good friend of mine.
      I never understood a single word he said,
      But I helped him drink his wine.

  91. You've never heard anything like it before... by MrIcee · · Score: 1
    I live on the Big Island of Hawaii and let me tell you, these frogs are something else.

    They are about the size of your pinky fingernail... very very tiny. During the day they sleep under rocks and leaves, but at night, usually between about 8:00 PM and midnight, they climb the trees and sing.

    EACH frog has a decibel level over 100. If you get 20 to 30 frogs going, it's deafening.

    At the nearby Lava Tree Park, they have a terrible case of them. I estimate easily 1000 or more frogs. Sitting in your car at night is unbelievable there - loudest thing you have EVER heard.

    I *suppose* people get used to them... but even if you get rid of them on your property, if your neighbor has them, it's just as loud.

    Luckly for me, they're still 2 streets away from my house - but advancing slowly.

    MOST of the frogs came in via plants imported to greenhouses and places like Wal-Mart, etc... they are not native to the islands and we would REALLY REALLY REALLY like them to go away now!

    The big problem is... we don't know how to get rid of them in a way that won't hurt other things in our environment. For example, dropping caffine, which causes them to internally hemorage... what will that do to our native insects? Hawaii has an incredibly fragile ecosystem - in that invasive species can do quite a bit of damage.

    Personally, I suspect we will be seeing gecko's wearing sun glasses ;)