Slashdot Mirror


Post-it Notes vs. Copy-Inhibited CDs

rjoseph writes "MacUser is running an article about how the new Celine Dion CD A New Day Has Come with copy protection mechanisms to prevent the CD from being played on a PC not only won't play on an iMac, but it will lock the CD tray (so it can't be removed) and fubar the firmware (so the machine can't be rebooted), effectivley killing the iMac. Ouch." We mentioned this interesting experiment in consumer relations last month as well, but now it's getting noticed a lot more. However, emkman writes: "What was first thought to be an April Fool's joke, now appears to be true. Some Audio CD protection schemes such as Cactus DATA Shield 100/200, KeyAudio, and perhaps others may be defeated by invalidating the outer ring of the CD with a black marker or post-it sticky note. www.chip.de has their report in German, here is a translation."

288 of 828 comments (clear)

  1. Class Action Lawsuit! by NETHED · · Score: 4, Funny

    GO buy one now!! I want a new computer at their expense!

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2

      As I recall, the Celine Dion CD at hand does not contain the official "CD" logo on the case since it is not really a CD at all. It's a copy protected CD rip-off.

      Moreover, I also recall hearing that this "album" and albums like it come printed with a disclaimer that notes that the disk will not be playable in a Mac.

      and before you start thinking of going to court... you might want to jab a paper-clip in the to manual eject whole of the CD-ROM. Just about every optical drive has one. One is probably located behind the iMac's front drive "door." You'll have to open the door by hand, which is not hard to do.

      But hey, It sure would be nice is phillips would start taking these copy protection companies to court for infringing on the compact disk patents. as I said before, these disks are not CDs (as phillips has openly stated), but they are using a lot of similar technology.

      This crap could totally be stopped with legal action if people started organizing and getting creative.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    2. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Cramer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's a huge difference between "not playable in" and "will destroy if played in". If their technology is specifically designed to do this or they release it knowing it will have this effect, then they are in a heap of trouble. Such intentional action is under the jurisdiction of the FBI computer crimes division as felony computer tresspass (the same as any "hacker" breaking into systems.) Every single person with so much as one molecule of their finger in this pie deserves prison time.

    3. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Tassach · · Score: 2

      I think not. The perpetrators of this scheme deserve a trip to the big house as much as, if not more so, the author of a destructive worm or virus. Intentionally damaging someone else's computer equipment is a federal felony. Read up on federal conspiracy laws.
      Corporate decision makers deserve to be held personally accountable for the criminal actions of their companies. Do you think the Enron fiasco would have happened if the bigwigs stood a snowball's chance in hell of actually going to the pokey? We cannot continue to allow corporations to be used as a shield which allows the senior executives to flagrantly break the law with total impunity.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    4. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      i really don't think the original post is overreacting in the slightest bit. this is intentional neglegance on the part of not the manufacturer, but of the copyright holder.

      any reasonable person would expect to be able to buy a cd, and plop it in their computer without any damages. weather or not any music comes off the disk is another story.

      is this any different than if disney's next dvd (monsters, inc?) were able to fry any dvd player that isn't using proper region encoding. it's intentional malicious behaviour twords a competing product (non-region encoded dvd's perhaps, those non-conformists bastards!)

    5. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Sancho · · Score: 2

      It depends.
      First off, there's a warning. I don't recall if they use the Compact Disc logo or not, either. If not, it's "at your own risk" if you put it in a compact disc player, computer or no. And with the warning, you should know better.
      Secondly, we're talking a copy-protection scheme here. Maybe I'm naive, but I figure the "locking up" is a side effect rather than the actual intent.

      But once again, if they don't call it a CD, and if it doesn't conform to the CD spec, it's not a CD. Buyer beware.

    6. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Cramer · · Score: 2

      Provide a picture of these warnings. I've never seen one. As for the CDDA logo... every one of my cd cases has a CDDA logo on the disk holding insert. Out of the half dozen music CD cases in front of me, none of them have a CDDA logo visable on the retail packaging. There's a logo on the actual disk in most cases -- however that cannot be seen without opening the product which requires purchasing it.

      And the warning (reportedly) does not indicate it will cause damage or void warranties. As I said, there's a huge difference between "won't work" and "will break". A DVD-ROM disk placed in a CD-ROM drive "won't work" -- it's simply will not recognize it. The drive isn't likely to throw sparks and set the neighbor's cat on fire.

      Now, the most likely scenerio is that the copy protection garbage is tripping the firmware's update proceedure. Pioneer makes a lot of stand alone hardware where this sort of firmware update proceedure is common place. Why the nuts would leave that part in the firmware of a consumer PC component is beyond me.

    7. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

      paper-clip?

      "attempting to play the latest Celine Dion CD in a new iMac will result in the machine having to be sent for repair"

      "capable of damaging the PC's firmware. It seems that this is definitely the case, as once the CD is inserted into a new iMac it cannot be removed and the machine cannot be restarted"

    8. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Gibbys+Box+of+Trix · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to this post, it appears that the new iMacs lack a manual release hole for the cd-rom drive and the disk has to be released by 'manually winding the cogs' or returning the machine for professional repair.

    9. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by einTier · · Score: 2

      Well, actually, if they know of this problem, and I'm sure by now they do, and they refuse to do anything about it, they can be held criminally negligent.

      Sure, it has a nice sticker on the front that says "does not play in Mac/PC", but it does not say "may cause damage to your Mac/PC". I also suspect these stickers and warnings on the CD are not overly large or noticeable.

      You can put whatever warnings you want on something, but when someone sees a five inch, flat round shiny disk, they are going to assume that it's a CD or DVD. It is not unreasonable they are going to try to play it. It is even more reasonable that they might try to play it in their computer after it plays fine in their car -- after all, in their experience, CDs that play in the car play in the computer. Also, even if it says "will not play", how many people will really believe that, considering they've never seen a CD that was readable by one CD-ROM and not another?

      An analogy would be if a food company put out a cereal that was poisonous to children but not adults, put it in a box with Micky Mouse on the front, and a very small warning label that said "not for consumption by children." Who do you think would be held liable in this instance?

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    10. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      IANAL

      but I expect these items to be displayed by the retail outlets in the "CD" section of their stores. Would this not push the responsibility from the packaging and on to the retail environment.

      Here's a exaggerated scenario :

      A plastic tub with a picture of an ice cream cone and some fruit on it placed in the freezer in the middle of the ice cream products. But it doesn't contain ice-cream, it contains an lovely tasting ice-cream like substance but it is mildly poisonous to people who own iMacs.

      The poison would maybe cost them $1000 in medical bills, lost work etc.

      Write in big letters on the lid "Eat at your own risk". Cripes you could even use that as your post modern advertising campaign.

      And when the come complaining say "buyer beware".

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    11. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Sheridan · · Score: 2
      I did notice a friend's (yes - really!) copy of the Shakira album had warning notices both on the outside of the case and on the disk itself, stating that the CD would not play in a computer.

      I don't know which of the particular copy protection schemes are in use on that disk, or whether they are amongst the CDDA standards violating ones, but it did (almost) not display any CDDA logos:-

      It didn't, as far as I could see, have any Compact Disc Digital Audio logos on the outside of the case or on the disk itself.

      It did however have a CD Digital Audio logo moulded into the inside of the jewel case, towards the top right of where the disk clips in.

    12. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by monkeydo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not according to Apple, "Some computers, such as the iMac (Flat Panel), Power Mac G4 Cube, and certain models of Power Mac G4 (QuickSilver or later), may not have a user-accessible eject hole."

      They may have an eject hole, but it isn't accesible. There are however other ways of removing the disk.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    13. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by Zone5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd pay EXTRA for a DVD that set the neighbor's cat on fire - the damn thing keeps me up at night while it meows pitifully looking for love.

      --
      "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
    14. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! by fobbman · · Score: 2

      It appears that you are trying to open the CD-door on your iMac...

  2. Oh no! by Villain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damnit, I was really looking forward to that new Celine CD too. Guess I'll have to spend my money on Aphex Twin instead.

    1. Re:Oh no! by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      and now own three of their albums...

      Are you sure you own them? Maybe you just have a limited license to play them.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  3. Punishment by line-bundle · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are just punishing you for listening to Celine Dion. YOu deserve it.

    1. Re:Punishment by kisrael · · Score: 5, Funny

      They are just punishing you for listening to Celine Dion. YOu deserve it.

      No, this is your karmically-correct punishment for buying the Celine Dion CD...listening is its own punishment.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  4. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 5, Informative
    Most CD drives have a mechanical (manual) eject that can be hit with a pen or paper clip. In that case you can just pull the CD out and you're fine.

    The new iMac doesn't have any manual way to do it.
    In other cases, perhaps you might need to get creative to get that CD out. Perhaps you need to pull the drive apart - who knows. The point is, the article made it clear that there is no permanent damage to the machine.

    Oh of course. All you have to do is dismantle the computer and void your warranty to get the CD out? Man, some people are just whiners!

    mark
    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  5. This explains how to get the drive to open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  6. Taking it too far by Man+of+E · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, breaking someone's machine intentionally is a bit excessive. Past copy-protection schemes were okay in my book because laymen couldn't get past them and people who bothered/could were in the minority: piracy prevention but without excess. But now the little laymen who don't bother reading the little warning labels are having their iMacs broken? This is affecting the luddites who don't know or care about p2p filesharing and buy all CDs and just assume they'll play in their CD players. Is the industry trying to alienate the people who still trusted it?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig
    1. Re:Taking it too far by raju1kabir · · Score: 2
      Only it's not. Piracy prevention, that is. All it takes is one person on a file sharing network to get past the protection, and the cat's out of the bag; the other thousands of listeners don't have to know how to get past it to just get it off of Kazaa or whatever.

      Yup.

      Moreover, it seems like this copy protection would result in lower sales than normal CDs.

      Ordinarily, after finding some music that I liked on a P2P service (which, in the absence of decent radio, is pretty much the only way to find out about interesting music these days), I'd just go buy the CD so I can listen to it in high quality and have the liner notes, etc.

      However, if I find out that the CD won't play in my preferred playback device (i.e., the computer - my stereo's CD player skips like crazy), then I'm much more likely to just download the whole thing and listen to it that way.

      I wonder if this means they'll start going after people who are posting lists of copy-protected CDs on the web.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    2. Re:Taking it too far by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2

      Um... no. Touring costs big bucks. No money = no tour. No CD sales = no money.

    3. Re:Taking it too far by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2

      Tell that to bands that have lost money on tour. It's very expensive to take any number of musicians out on the road. You have busses, roadies, equipment, lights, people to run the lights, etc. out there. (Trust me; they're not doing it just for the chicks.)

  7. Finally someone who realizes.... by Cynical_Dude · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... what the correct way to treat a Celine Dion CD is. Summary of article: a.) Buy black marker b.) paint underside of CD completely black Next up: The correct way to treat your boy group cds. a.) Buy some acetone b.) ...

    1. Re:Finally someone who realizes.... by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Then again there are the proud few of us who never bought a pop (or Celine Dion) CD in their life!

    2. Re:Finally someone who realizes.... by captaineo · · Score: 2

      My preferred method of CD enhancement is the application of a 5.56mm projectile at 3000fps.

  8. For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by Gaccm · · Score: 5, Informative

    The soundtrack of Episode 2 seems to be protected in such a way also.

    --

    Only dead fish swim with the stream...
    1. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      Wow, that's got to be one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. The overlap between Star Wars fans and people who listen to music on their computers has got to be enormous. I actually would have bought this, but now I guess I'll just wait for someone to post an analog rip to KaZaa(-lite), since I haven't owned a stereo for 3 years now.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by SealBeater · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doesn't matter, it's already been ripped and posted on
      alt.binaries.mp3.soundtracks. 8*)

      SealBeater

      --
      -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    3. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      Note that this is an article from a British website...and copy-protected CDs are a lot bigger in Europe than they are on this side of the Atlantic. Do we know for certain whether the American editions of these CDs are thusly protected?

      I do know that the Star Wars Episode 2 soundtrack is already circulating on AudioGalaxy...

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    4. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      First they came for "More Fast and Furious," and I did not speak out because that's not my kind of music.

      Then they came for Celine Dion, and I did not speak out because I'm lukewarm about Celine Dion.

      Then they came for Episode 2, and I did not speak out because I'm not really a Star Wars fan.

      But THEN they copy-protected that CD of "Richard Stallman sings Tom Lehrer..."

    5. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by letxa2000 · · Score: 2
      Episode 2 ripped fine enough for my friend to pass me a couple of tracks. Cool, it sounds better than the Episode I soundtrack...

    6. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      I believe the correct group is:

      alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.soundtracks

      at least on servers I checked.

    7. Re:For everyone saying "I don't like Celine Dion" by forged · · Score: 2
      Wonderful proof that these measures really only annoy Joe Consumer.

      Go mp3's ! (these won't kill your iMac)

  9. Celine Dion does not meet Starcraft by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 5, Funny

    I tried to test this Celine Dion CD to see if it would get stuck in my iMac, but then I discovered to my horror that I couldn't get the Starcraft CD out of the drive. Must ... Quit ... Game ... and press ... Eject ... Muscles ... not ... responding...

    graspee

    P.S. This may have legal implications if my Starcraft CD starts downloading mp3s without my permission. (ha ha. sorry).

    1. Re:Celine Dion does not meet Starcraft by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      Starcraft, like Sailor Moon, is eternal. I'd organize a gang of Starcraft fans to come round and talk some sense into you but we're really rather busy having a tournament at the moment.

      graspee

  10. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by Brigadoon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Certainly not anyone I know who owns a mac

    I hate to stereotype, but at the risk of doing so, I'd wager that Mac users are more likely to listen to Celine Dion than otherwise.

    Pooling from all of the computer users I know - if that's any decent demographic - Linux users would most certainly not fall under the Celine Dion fans. Windows users, it seems, tend to be more alternative, pop, rap, ad nauseum. And finally, Mac users are more oldies, soft rock, etc. This of course is NOT any real indication of what people listen to; not science, just my own personal observations generalized.

    I've never seen a person sing "My Heart Will Go On" while recompiling their kernel.

    -X

  11. An analogy by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If someody were to develop some amazing new casette tape that didn't work on a subset of casette players, that would be okay. If that tape, instead, destroyed the player into which it was inserted by chewing up the playback heads, that would not be okay, even if it came with a label saying, ``Not for use on foo tape decks.''

    Celine has done the latter.

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    1. Re:An analogy by penguinboy · · Score: 2

      How can it be the pen manufacturer's fault if some other company makes ink cartridges that aren't the right size?

  12. Legality? by beefstu01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ummm... isn't this illegal? If some iMac owner accidently puts one of these CD's in the drive and send the thing to kingdom come, didn't Sony just damage their computer with malicious intent? C'mon, Sony has to know that the CD's are going to do this. Can we say class action lawsuit? What's wrong with playing a cd in your computer? Sure, I've got MP3's, but I also play audio cd's on my laptop, and if my laptop gets busted becase one of these damn cds, then I'd frickin sue Sony and anybody connected to the deal for every dime they've got.

    Sony should realize that they're treading on very thin ice here. They need to realize that some people have very sensitive information on their computers, and if it gets f*$&# because of their cd protection scheme.....

    Sorry, but these dumb moves just irritate me

    1. Re:Legality? by apg · · Score: 2, Funny

      If some iMac owner accidently puts one of these CD's in the drive and send the thing to kingdom come, didn't Sony just damage their computer with malicious intent?

      Not that I agree in any way shape or form, but Sony's defense will likely be something along the lines of:

      "A sanding pad from a rotary sander will damage your CD-ROM drive, but they don't even put labels on those. At least we told you not to put our disk in your computer. It's not our fault if you didn't disassemble the jewel case to read the fine print we printed under the CD tray in reverse pig latin."
    2. Re:Legality? by dustpuppy · · Score: 2

      I get the point you are making, but think there is a fundamental difference. The sanding pad will damage your CDROM, but it never intentionally was designed to do that. And the destructive nature of the sanding pad on the CDROM is a core part of it's functionality.

      These new CDs however are intentionally being created to destroy property and this destructive feature is not part of their core functionality. I'm not a lawyer, but I would hope that this distinction is enough for lawsuits to proceed ...

    3. Re:Legality? by mpe · · Score: 2

      If some iMac owner accidently puts one of these CD's in the drive and send the thing to kingdom come, didn't Sony just damage their computer with malicious intent? C'mon, Sony has to know that the CD's are going to do this. Can we say class action lawsuit?

      I though such lawsuits were only applicable to civil matters. Whereas interfering with operation of computers is in many places a criminal matter. This isn't veru different from a virus which spreads through MS Outlook (Express). Even though the user may have done something silly that does not exclude the author of the malware.

    4. Re:Legality? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      didn't Sony just damage their computer with malicious intent?

      No, there was no malicious intent. They were designed to protect copyright.

      The fact that they *do* cause damage is gross negligence. It's easier to sue people to hell and back when you get your terms right :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:Legality? by gosand · · Score: 2
      Sure, I've got MP3's

      Then you are a pirate, a thief. You have no credibility, you are taking money out of the artist's pockets, and are silently killing their puppies. You are stealing from us. YOU are the reason our sales are down, and {ringgg} .... hold on a minute (yeah. Mmm hmm. Another boy band? Fantastic! Sign them up, give them the standard contract, tell them they have talent - you know the routine.) Now where was I? Oh yeah - you should die, you virilent scum. Our lawyers will be contacting you.

      Sincerely, the RIAA.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    6. Re:Legality? by alcmena · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't it be a riot if someone called Sony for tech support on their Vaio because this (Sony-made) CD pooched their drive?

      It'd be even more perfect if the Sony CD also caused the sound card on the Sony Vaio to output square waves that destroyed the Sony speakers on the attached Sony stereo. I'd love to hear them try to pass the buck on that one. "Uhhh, Windows did it."

    7. Re:Legality? by Cally · · Score: 2
      Oh purLEASE.... Why is it that EVERY frickin time a story like this is published, some gimp always claims "Why, if they did that to ME, I'd SUE! Can you say CLASS ACTION?"

      Stop and think. You WON'T sue them. No-one EVER sues in these situations: if they did, we'd have a Slashdot front page full of stories about hardware megacorps being banktupted by massive lawsuits. Go ahead an md me down if you want, (I'm capped anyway) but it still ain't going to happen.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    8. Re:Legality? by Gleef · · Score: 2

      Alsee writes:

      > didn't Sony just damage their computer with malicious intent?
      No, there was no malicious intent. They were designed to protect copyright.
      The fact that they *do* cause damage is gross negligence. It's easier to sue people to hell and back when you get your terms right :)


      These discs were designed to interfere with people's ability to copy the disk (if they were designed to protect copyright they would permit fair use copying). I read this incident as along the lines of "when I shot him, I only intended to wound, I didn't mean to kill him". There was definately deliberate intent to disrupt the operation of the device, but they probably did not intend to lock up the CD-ROM drive completely.

      I'm not 100% sure what the correct term is, but I am sure this goes beyond gross negligence. Disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, this should not be construed as legal advice.

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    9. Re:Legality? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      if they were designed to protect copyright they would permit fair use copying

      It's impossile for technology to distinguish fair use from illegal use. They just lump it together.

      The two problems with DRM: (1) it eliminates fair use and (2) the dumb-ass laws to protect the DRM protecting the content. Next they'll be passing even dumber-ass laws to protect the dumb-ass laws. Then maybe a constituional amendment to protect the dumber-ass laws. Ahhh, and I know - a genetic-revision to protect the constitional amendment LOL

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    10. Re:Legality? by Gleef · · Score: 2

      Alsee writes:

      It's impossile for technology to distinguish fair use from illegal use. They just lump it together.

      Exactly, my point is that it can't legitimately call it "protecting copyright" if it doesn't permit copying that is permissible under copyright law. If they can't separate legal from illegal copying (which nobody can see how to do accurately), they would need to allow all copying. This would, of course, defeat the whole purpose from their point of view.

      Therefore, rhetoric aside, their point of view has nothing to do with protecting copyrights. It is merely about preventing copying.

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
  13. circumvention devices? by schussat · · Score: 5, Funny
    Are we to understand that post-it notes and sharpie pens are now contraband circumvention devices? 3M is not going to like this, not one bit.

    -schussat

    --
    The hour of noon has passed. Let us go and get some Kentucky Fried Chicken.
    1. Re:circumvention devices? by qslack · · Score: 5, Funny
      Are we to understand that post-it notes and sharpie pens are now contraband circumvention devices? 3M is not going to like this, not one bit.


      Actually, 3M is embracing this new product direction.

      They have renamed their Post-It product line to Toast-It, making a clear reference to burning, or "toasting," a CD-R.

      They have also renamed their popular Sharpie line of permanent markers to "Share-pie," indicating that the markers will enable purchasers to share music.

      :)
    2. Re:circumvention devices? by Bouncings · · Score: 4, Funny

      in germany you have got a right to make a backup copy

      Damn you and your superior legal system snobbery.

      --
      -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
    3. Re:circumvention devices? by qslack · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear CaptainSuperBoy,

      I am sorry for the problem(s) that I have written into my messages. Down here in Afghanistan, we can't get Sharpies or Sanford markers, so I have no way of knowing the correct brand that I should have put in my messages.

      Please excuse this!

      I now must go and watch my DiVXes on my C-64 and play Final Fantasy X! Also, I have a question about Linux on quad-processor machines. I hope you can help me!

      Thank you!
      Junis from Afghanistan

    4. Re:circumvention devices? by gotan · · Score: 2

      They're working at legislation to make circumvention of copy-protection illegal here too. Last i heared it's even worse than the DMCA. The problem is, that those laws are made by the EU, not really following democratic processes (since nobody is looking, and everybody is only concerned about what's going on in their own country), and then the EU-countries have to follow that guidelines. Germany didn't even opt to go for the most consumer-friendly way possible. Hopefully we're spared this being pushed through in a few months (that was the original plan, since we are running late in following that specific EU-guideline) but it will come. Meanwhile the media is completely ignoring the story, apparently it's to complex a subject ...

      No it's not better here in germany, only later.

      --
      "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
    5. Re:circumvention devices? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the USA we have a legal right to make a backup copy. We just don't have a legal *way* to do it.

    6. Re:circumvention devices? by tweakt · · Score: 2
      Yes and by posting this information, it's in direct violation of the DMCA by spreading information on how to circumvent a copy protection mechansism.

      You may not tell someone that by putting a post-it(tm) note on their CD, they can circumvent this protection, it's illegal.

      OOps, I just did too... d'oh.

      Is slashdot liable also for spreading this information?

      When will the madness end?

    7. Re:circumvention devices? by Papineau · · Score: 2

      Don't forget it's the same country where a law firm can send a trademark infringement letter to somebody on behalf of somebody else (without their nowing), and get paid for it in the process (see Samba, etc.)

      So even if your post was meant to be funny, don't forget that there can be some things you like and some others you dislike in everything.

  14. Unbelievable by teslatug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No not the fact that the CD can break firmware, but the fact that the firmware can be broken by a CD.

    1. Re:Unbelievable by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      i agree that no cd should break the firmware, but these aren't cds. the firmware writers have to code to some sort of a specification.

      car engine manufacturers make their products to accept and function normally using a certain grade of oil. they'll run ok using other grades of engine oil sure, but they're designed to run using a specific grade. you can't go around pouring castor oil, or baby oil into a car engine and expect it to last very long.... now.. what if baby oil were packaged in a black plastic quart jar, identical to motor oil packaging, and the product were placed on the shelf right next to the motor oil. and the baby oil happened to be tinted the same color as standard motor oil. the front label reads "OIL", and on the back in small print it reads "for use on skin only.. blah, blah, blah". what is a reasonable person going to do with this jar of baby oil? damn that chevy engine manufacturer for making an engine that melts down when it's filled with baby oil.

    2. Re:Unbelievable by tunah · · Score: 2

      And not the fact that you used the passive voice, but the fact that the passive voice was used by you.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  15. Not a big deal, folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple tells how to get the job done in this tech note...not to worry.

    1. Re:Not a big deal, folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course you could find it a little troublesome to read Apple's technotes when your computer is knocked-out by Celine Dion.

  16. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Gaccm · · Score: 2

    while i don't know the details. The article said that the macs had to be sent in for repair which sounds to me to be worse than just a jammed CD.

    --

    Only dead fish swim with the stream...
  17. Re:DMCA by wilko11 · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Does this also mean that black markers and Post-It Notes are anti-cirumvention devices that must be banned?

  18. Apple Responds w/ KBA by mprindle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hello all,

    Apple has released KnowledgeBase Article #106882, Cannot Eject Copy Protected Audio Disc , to adress the problem with the cd's getting locked into the drive.

    "You may be unable to eject certain copy-protected audio discs, which resemble Compact Discs (CD) but technically are not. Some computers start up to a gray screen after a copy protected disc has been left in the computer."

    1. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by imadork · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yeah, it's the fine print on the bottom that's priceless:

      CD audio discs that incorporate copyright protection technologies do not adhere to published Compact Disc standards. Apple designs its CD drives to support media that conforms to such standards. Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple CD drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage.

      How do you like them apples?

    2. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by znu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should Apple pay if Sony breaks your computer?

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    3. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by TheTomcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree.
      If [insert big-5 label here] made a CD that fell apart or melted in the drive, it wouldn't be apple's fault. This is no different.

      S

    4. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by tbo · · Score: 2

      In other words, if you're foolish enough to buy a Celine Dion CD, Apple won't help you if you contaminate your iMac with it.

      I say, good on them.

      BTW, it won't reck your firmware, that's just typical top-notch slashdot journalism fscking up the facts. It's just slightly tricky to eject the disc, and the computer won't boot (in OS 9--X is fine) until it's ejected.

    5. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      Well, it's not Apple who's making the defective product...it's the CD pressers. There's no reason why Apple should be under any obligation to support having these plastic coasters that look like CDs in their drivess. There's no reason they should be obligated to support having mashed bananas in their drives, either. In both cases, it's a user-action that's messing up the computer.

      The people to blame for this are the RIAA and the studios who are making these defective discs. As a friend of mine with whom I was just discussing this story put it, whether intentionally or accidentally, the RIAA is distributing Denial-Of-Service attacks on its discs. He suggests that it is at least possible they could thus be brought up on terrorism charges, as per the Patriot Act.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    6. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by foobar104 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's like Apple putting a big tempting red button on the side of their iMac labeled "Self Destruct" and then trying to claim that they are somehow absolved of all liability if someone actually (or accidentally) pushes it.

      No, it's not like that at all. Don't be a shithead.

      You can't design a product with such a significant defect and then refuse to take any part of the blame.

      First of all, the drive isn't an Apple drive. It's a Pioneer drive.

      Secondly, this drive, and Apple's use of it, pre-dates these copy-protected CDs. You're trying to apply some standard of retroactive responsibility that just doesn't make any sense. Was Pioneer-- or Apple, by extension-- supposed to anticipate this particular event?

      Thirdly, you can't possibly be suggesting that a drive that fails when you put something that isn't a CD in it is a defective drive?? What's your standard these days, that the product must never, ever fail under any circumstances? I mean, Christ! Did you actually say class-action lawsuit? What planet are you on?

      Sheesh. Get some perspective, and stop digging up excuses to bitch about Apple.

    7. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

      How do you like them apples?

      What are they supposed to say? The drive is designed to play Compact Discs, and nothing else. If you put "MusicCorp(R) ShinyDiscsThatLookLikeCDs(tm)" in there, that's your problem. If they repair it when you put in that crap, they might as well repair it when your 8-year-old sticks in a 5" rotary saw blade.

    8. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by mmontour · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Thirdly, you can't possibly be suggesting that a drive that fails when you put something that isn't a CD in it is a defective drive?? What's your standard these days, that the product must never, ever fail under any circumstances? I mean, Christ! Did you actually say class-action lawsuit? What planet are you on?


      I'm damn well suggesting that a drive shouldn't fail when you put in something that is PHYSICALLY COMPATIBLE with a CD. Sure, I don't expect it to be able to handle a cheese sandwich or a sanding disc, but a correctly-sized piece of plastic should be fine.

      As another poster suggested, if it's not logically compatible with what the drive is expecting, then the drive should either eject it or ignore it. It should *not* crash, and it should (*not*)^2 corrupt any firmware or do anything that can't be cured by a cold reboot.

      I've had scratched audio CDs (being played as audio CDs, not being ripped) cause my computer to hang, because the drive did evil things to the IDE bus. That's just crappy engineering, like those "shopping cart" websites that read prices from a user-submitted form, or blindly pass user input to an SMTP client without stripping out escape sequences. In the real world, programs and devices need to perform sanity checks on their input, and fail properly when they're fed junk. The only reason we let the firmware people get away with it is that it's very hard to examine their code.

    9. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Kris_J · · Score: 2

      Actually, it just says it's not a free repair. Of course they'll help, but get your credit card out.

    10. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by leviramsey · · Score: 2

      Actually, the labels aren't putting CD Digital Audio labels on the CD's. Philips has refused to license it for that purpose, and since they have the trademark on the CDDA logo, the labels basically have to suck Philips' cock on this issue. If they put the logo on, then all sorts of fun things could occur, such as being forced to pay for each infringing CD. I haven't seen sales figures on the Celine Dion CD, but if Sony's put the logo on, Philips could probably get upwards of $5 million dollars from that CD alone, which would wipe out much of Sony's profit on that particular CD.

    11. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by jacoplane · · Score: 2

      Apple probably have a point that these are not really CDs. Philips seems to agree with them. Remember, Philips control licenses for the Compact Disc logo. I was wondering, are these new discs labeled as compact discs or not?

    12. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by BWJones · · Score: 2

      I'm damn well suggesting that a drive shouldn't fail when you put in something that is PHYSICALLY COMPATIBLE with a CD. Sure, I don't expect it to be able to handle a cheese sandwich or a sanding disc, but a correctly-sized piece of plastic should be fine.

      Well, O.K. then. By your logic, what about a CD form factor with light reactive explosive in it? In this paradigm, if your CD player does not have the right wavelength of laser in it, the explosive reacts and destroys the disc as well as your CD-ROM drive. Don't laugh, these exist.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    13. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by dbirchall · · Score: 2
      Hmmm... I guess part of the problem is that the Mac is trying to automount the volume, or some such.

      Anyway, I referred to the KBA yesterday, after the DVD-ROM drive on my wife's iBook wouldn't eject. Celine Dion wasn't to blame - our almost-3-year-old is a little too observant, and almost got the entire process correct:

      • Use the F12 key to eject... check.
      • Get DVD out of case... check.
      • Put it in, shiny side down... check.
      • Push drive closed... check.
      Unfortunately, she missed the bit about pressing down on the DVD to make it click into place, before closing the drive.

      I wound up having to use the paperclip, after trying the other approaches.

      If she's disabling Macs at this tender age, maybe she's got a lucrative career in music ahead of her.

    14. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by macwhiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right! I want to sue Apple for crappy firmware, too! I put a slice of American cheese in my DVD-RAM drive, and it didn't eject it right away! And now my system won't read CDs any more, and it's starting to smell funny! They designed that defect in! They should update their code to detect and eject any thing I want to put into that slot which isn't a valid audio CD, no matter how hard I mash it in!

      Er. *deep breath*

      I'm sure that neither Apple, nor the various third party vendors of 8cm optical disc media devices that provide Apple with drives, expected that someone would design a disc that appears to be an Audio CD but actually has trojan horse code on it intended to confuse the drive into nonoperation.

      I can't fault them for that.

      It's not that this copy protection system presents a few wrong bytes. It's intentionally designed to confuse the hell out of the drive, rendering it inoperative so it cannot "rip" the disc. In the process, it seems the copy protection vendors and the record labels forgot that a wide number of computers out there don't have an accessable hardware-based eject button.

      Oh, well. Sony definitely lost a sale to me in this case. I'm not buying the Episode II soundtrack if I can't transfer it to my iPod.

    15. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      Dee Emm Cee Ay.

      Wonder law in vogue.

      Dee Emm Cee Ay.

      If Apple and Pioneer were to produce a combination of firmware and software that avoided the system-destroying effect, Sony would be able to sue them for cirumventing the protection system.

      Great, innit? Sony can fuck up Apple's product line, and if Apple try to protect their customers, Sony can sue them for the "right" to keep destroying their computers!

    16. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Daniel · · Score: 3, Informative

      But, umm, nobody is talking about exploding CDs. Except maybe you.

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    17. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by truesaer · · Score: 3, Insightful
      well I agree with you for the most part. But one of the core markets for macs is the person who is so-so with computers. When they buy a Celene Dion CD at the store (something that should result in an execution), they should be able to assume it will work in a CD drive! They can't be expected to understand standard data formats, my mom still thinks there are actually pictures somehow in CDs that have digital photos on them.


      This just leads back to the question, is it the CD maker or the CD drive maker who is at fault? Both I think. The CD maker for not making their CD to specs, and the drive maker for not having a product robust enough to sensibly handle an invalid data format on the CD. I mean really, it should just do nothing....not wreck the whole damn machine.

    18. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by zsmooth · · Score: 3, Funny

      One big difference between this situation and Ford/Firestone:

      No one's getting killed.

      That's all.

    19. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by ragnarok · · Score: 2, Funny
      Don't laugh, these exist

      Awesome, where can I get some?

      --
      Search first, ask questions later.
    20. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by gnovos · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, that's the fattest load of bullshit I've ever heard in my life. That's like Apple putting a big tempting red button on the side of their iMac labeled "Self Destruct" and then trying to claim that they are somehow absolved of all liability if someone actually (or accidentally) pushes it.

      NO, it is nothing like that *at all*. It's like putting a 5.25" floppy drive on a computer and claiming absolution of liability when somone inserves a proccessed cheese slice in it. It's perfectly valid...

      Now claiming a CD to be an official "CD" when it's NOT, *that* is bullshit.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    21. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by God!+Awful · · Score: 2

      10 years ago, I could get Macs to hang and refuse to eject 3.25" floppies, even when you pressed the magic button. Smells like bad engineering. Looks like nothing has changed.

      -a

    22. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by leviramsey · · Score: 2

      The letters "CD" and the words "Compact Disc" are not trademarkable (as the USPTO does have a rule that no trademark can be a description of the product.... compact discs are, well, round things that are, relatively speaking, compact). So Sony can call it a CD. But they can't claim that it meets the CDDA standard (as it doesn't) and they can't use the CDDA logo, since that logo is trademarked.

    23. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by electroniceric · · Score: 2

      Have more than 3 trained squirrels actually experienced this problem?
      How many broken iMacs are we actually talking about?

    24. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by unitron · · Score: 2
      "...what about a CD form factor with light reactive explosive in it?"

      Should you or any of your I.M. Force be killed or captured, the secretary will disavow any knowledge of your actions.

      This disk will self-destruct in 5 seconds.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    25. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by foobar104 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is really Ford vs. Firestone for the computer industry.

      You have got to be kidding me. Are you a troll, or what? That kind of wildly disproportionate comparison casts your whole post in an unflattering light.

      Pioneer - for engineering a drive where it is possible with the wrong combination of bits or read errors to completely lock the drive and ruin the firmware.

      First and most important: the idea that these CDs are ruining firmware seems to have come from the mind of one sloppy reporter at MacUser UK. I quote from the (f'ing dreadful) article:

      "As we reported last month, Celine's latest offering - A New Day Has Come - features copy-protection to prevent it being played and duplicated in a PC, and that same copy-protection was believed to be capable of damaging the PC's firmware. It seems that this is definitely the case, as once the CD is inserted into a new iMac it cannot be removed and the machine cannot be restarted."

      (Emphasis mine, obviously.)

      The actual fact is that the CD, once inserted, cannot be read by the Mac. If you try to reboot the Mac, something-- the OF boot loader, or something-- gets wedged trying to read the CD. Hell, maybe the drive is wedging the bus or something. Point is, if you can get the CD out, your Mac is just fine.

      To remove the CD from the Mac, reboot, and hold down the mouse button during the boot chime. The Mac (actually Open Firmware) then spits out the CDROM and boots normally. This has been true since long, long ago. I think I remember getting a bad floppy disk out of a Mac 512K or SE that way.

      If, for an unknown reason, holding down the mouse button doesn't work, then yeah, the drive has to be removed and the CD manually extracted. A person has to twist the eject cog with a tweaker or whatever. That's what the (f'ing dreadful) article was referring to when it said that the computer may have to be sent in for repair. Just for the record, I haven't heard of any instances firsthand where holding down the mouse button during power up failed to eject the CD.

      So in summary, the idea that these CDs are ruining firmware is complete, total, utter bullshit. So let's just drop that one right now.

      Apple - for engineering a machine with a soft eject and no aesthetically-challenging hard backup. Mr. Jobs, would a pinhole really have offended your out-of-wack perfectionism that much?

      I'll say it again: it's a fucking Pioneer drive. Apple didn't design it. They didn't build it. And they didn't decide whether to put an "eject" button on it.

      So then why not a hotkey during boot to eject the media or similar?

      Apple has published not one but three non-mechanical options for getting the CD out, including the hold-down-the-button trick. The hold-down-the-button trick is very well known among Mac users, and all three of them are documented thoroughly. The fact that you are unaware of them is not evidence of negligence on Apple's part.

      God, I can't believe you got so up in arms with so little information. At least get a little information before flying off the handle next time.

    26. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by walt-sjc · · Score: 2

      ... and it's apple's fault that they use shitty hardware that self distructs when you put a CD in them. Like it or not, these plastic disks ARE CD's, just not compliant with the "Compact Disk" logo requirments. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, ...

      While I don't feel that apple did anything "wrong" by using these shitty drives, they should standby their warranty and provide a fix. Sony (or whoever created these abortions of CD's) should be sued by apple for damages too as well as by consumers.

    27. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I mean really, it should just do nothing....not wreck the whole damn machine.

      I don't disagree with you at all, but I just want to clarify. Nothing is getting wrecked. The Mac is just hanging during boot while it tries to get some kind of response from the drive. The bad disc prevents that response from coming, so it gets wedged.

      Anybody who ever stuck a bad floppy disk in an original Mac-- the kind with no hard drive that booted off the floppy-- has seen this happen before. At first it may seem that your computer is broken, but all you have to do is get the disk-- or in this case the disc-- out. You can use a paper clip, if the drive has a hole for one, or you can just hold down the mouse button at boot time.

      The real solution to this problem is simply going to be user education. It's unreasonable to think that anybody could design a computer that will function correctly under every circumstance. It's inevitable that something unforeseen will happen and the computer will crash, or hang, or something equally bad. This is already a fairly rare occasion-- in this case it took deliberate misdesign to cause the failure. Once people start reading decent articles on the subject-- unlike the MacUser UK crap that started this thread-- they'll get informed, and the problem will go away.

      Seriously, it annoys me that this topic has given certain zealots an opportunity to hop up and down on the DMCA/SSSCA/CBDTPA/THBBBPT hot button for no real reason.

      Grr. Sorry for the venting, but sometimes you just have to let it out.

    28. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by canadian_right · · Score: 2

      I agree that Apple shouldn't void the waranty for putting in a copy-protected CD, but if you want to get snarky with someone it should be the people manufacturing defective, non-stand CD's and trying to pass them off as the real thing.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    29. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

      Okay, not being a Mac user, I don't know about the hold-down-the-button trick. My first thought when you have a CD stuck is to use the old Macintosh eject key (tm) namely a paperclip.

      But people say that iMacs lack a hole. I'm sure the Pioneer drive has one. I have a hard time believing these drive were custom engineered for Apple. Aren't they just repackaged OEM units? If so, it stands to reason they have both a soft and hard eject mechanism. So if Apple covers it, whose fault is that? Apples. But if they have a substitute approach, this hold-down-button thing AND IT ACTUALLY WORKS then great, I would agree that Apple is less liable...but being that this hold-down-button technique is another soft eject mechanism, it may not work, I don't know.

      Ask yourself this...why is it iMacs that are having this problem? There are Pioneer drives for PC. There are compact little all-in-one devices made by PC makers. There are bad experiences with copy protected CDs. But are there any that require any sort of NON TECHNICAL user intervention? I sure haven't heard of any.

      Apple prides themselves on controlling the entire platform, from the grade of power cabling all the way to the type of plastic your fingers touch. They use that as a selling point, we control the hardware, we control the software, we guarantee you cover-to-cover and Apple experience.

      Well guess what, in this case it's come back to bite them in the ass. When grandma and grandpa put in a music CD ...which looks like a CD, came in a jewel case like a CD, was found in the CD section of the store...and suddenly their computer is dead and nothing they can think to do fixes it...who is going to suffer in their eyes? I'm pretty darn sure it's going to be Apple. So you can go ahead and defend/excuse them but to me, this is something that merits a helluva lot more than a couple lines in a Knowledge Base.

      - JoeShmoe

      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    30. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      You can be as sure as you like, but that doesn't mean I'll agree.

      The DMCA does not refer to removing protection - it refers to cirumventing; if the intent of the protection scheme is to have a deterrent effect (much like the rumours that some protection schemes could damage speakers), then avoiding damage becomes circumvention.

    31. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by mpe · · Score: 2

      Seriously, though, you're right... this is just crappy firmware. Either that or somebody is deliberately leaving security holes. I don't know which is worse.

      This isn't that different from Microsoft producting software which is "virus friendly". Even though they wrote Outlook Express to work that way the actions of virus writers are not dismissed out of hand.
      Another analogy would be the likes of "Code Red" crashing Cisco routers.
      But we are probably going to see another round of double standards with the record companies avoiding being treated the same was as "evil hackers".

    32. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      What do you mean with "fail"? A DVD is physically compatible with a CD, should a CD-Drive also not "fail" to play it?

      Anyway, those not-CDs are designed not to work with the drives, you can not blame the drives for that, nor those who build them into their computers (or other devices like some players). You have to put the blame on the makers of the not-CDs.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    33. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Duh. That disc is much smaller than a CD.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    34. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by markmoss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll say it again: it's a fucking Pioneer drive. Apple didn't design it. They didn't build it. And they didn't decide whether to put an "eject" button on it.

      When Apple picked this drive out of hundreds to put in their systems, they assumed responsibility for any obvious designed-in defects. And the lack of a manual eject is definitely a design defect...

    35. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      But if they have a substitute approach, this hold-down-button thing AND IT ACTUALLY WORKS then great, I would agree that Apple is less liable

      I think you need to choose your words more carefully. "Liable" implies "liability," of which Apple has none here.

      I really don't understand why you continue to try to make this sound like more than it is. Comparisons to Firestone and calls for lawsuits?? Sheesh.

    36. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      When Apple picked this drive out of hundreds to put in their systems, they assumed responsibility for any obvious designed-in defects. And the lack of a manual eject is definitely a design defect...

      First of all, the drive in question was, at the time it was first chosen by Apple, the one one of its kind: CD-ROM, CDRW, DVD-ROM, DVD-R. So Apple didn't choose from among hundreds of drives. They chose from among the... one. That's not really relevant; just an interesting tidbit for you.

    37. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by unitron · · Score: 2
      But since they used self-detruct tapes first, and discs later, a precedent has been established that they might make a change in media from time to time.

      They even had a dark haired guy (Stephen Boyd) the first year instead of Phelps.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    38. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by SEE · · Score: 2

      Er, because Apple's design for its CD-ROM is incompetent? This isn't a matter of putting something in the drive that causes physical damage. This is a failure of the Apple code.

    39. Re:Apple Responds w/ KBA by fhknack · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and it should (*not*)^2 corrupt any firmware...

      (*not*)^2 == (*not*)(*not*)

      So you're saying it should corrupt firmware, etc.?

      Alternatively:
      (*not*)^2 == (*not*)(*not*) == (*^4)(n^2)(o^2)(t^2), but that makes even less sense.

  19. How? by Gaccm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How could a CD screw up the player? All the CDROM does is read bits off of a CD. The data should not be able to alter the program (in this case firmware) at all. The only way i could see something happening is if the firmware was poorly writtian and the CD causes stack overflows.

    --

    Only dead fish swim with the stream...
    1. Re:How? by mstyne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the Apple Knowledge Base:

      You may be unable to eject certain copy-protected audio discs, which resemble Compact Discs (CD) but technically are not.

      The point here is that these *aren't* CD's. It may look like a CD, smell like a CD, and quack like a CD, but these -things- don't conform to the Compact Disc standard. If they're still putting a Compact Disc logo on these things, I think consumers have a right to be torqued.

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    2. Re:How? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2

      I'd imagine that the mac scans the bus looking for devices when it powers up. Probably it looks at the CD in the drive in this process - wether or not it actually boots from it in the end - and gets mighty confused. Shouldn't people be able to use the hidden mechanisim inside the CD drawer though (use a paper-clip to access it) to eject the CD and all would be well again ?

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    3. Re:How? by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2

      I would like to know exactly what this copy protection exploits. If it is designed to lock up a PC then I would say this copy protection is no better than a trojan horse. If I wrote code that intentionally damaged a PC of a user that was not using my software the way I had intended then I would probably be sitting behind bars.

      Exactly how big is the print that says not to be used on a PC or a Mac? Is it written in braile as well so a blind person who picks it up won't make a mistake that could damage his PC or Mac?

      Furthermore, what is the point of copy protecting CD's in one country and not another? The net is global folks.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    4. Re:How? by cosyne · · Score: 2

      How could a CD screw up the player? All the CDROM does is read bits off of a CD. The data should not be able to alter the program (in this case firmware) at all.

      Well, in general, firmware is sortof a program which is kinda permanent. It determines how some programmable electronic system will operate. Firmware is often upgradable, so logically there has to be some firware update procedure, and if the beginning of a celene dion disk has something which is sufficiently close to the 'erase the old firmware now and replace it with whatever comes after this' sequence, the disk could wreak havoc on the system. What if i wrote a disk which booted and played music in macs but which booted and flashed the bios in intel machines?
      More likely, considering this disk is engineered towards some end, is that it contains some kind of 'su' command to change the operating mode of the device. This way, the disk could do things it shouldn't be able to, like take control of the drive away from the computer to prevent the disk from being read. It may be the case that when you're messing with the part of the system that says listen to computer/dont listen to computer, you also have too much access to the firware.
      just saying...

    5. Re:How? by mpe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The point here is that these *aren't* CD's. It may look like a CD, smell like a CD, and quack like a CD, but these -things- don't conform to the Compact Disc standard. If they're still putting a Compact Disc logo on these things, I think consumers have a right to be torqued.

      Or, regardless of the logo, if retailers are selling them as regular CDs or even intermingled with CDs.

  20. Hold the mouse button down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you hold the mouse button down while turning a Mac on it will eject the CD from the drive before it boots up.

  21. Re:Be careful by logical1010 · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the German translation:

    To hardly seize: With a simple felt marker you outwit Sony Music & CO and notice your right to a backup copy.

    Take that Sony Music & CO, I hardly seize you with my simple felt marker and notice my right to a backup copy! You have been outwitted!
    --
    There is something wonderful in seeing a wrong-headed majority assailed by truth. ~John Kenneth Galbraith
  22. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're a tool; how'd you like it if the following took place whilst filling up your car:

    "Sure! C'mon, if you put our gas in your car, it's absolutely trivial to drain the fuel system and use non-protected gasoline; you'll just have to get that from...uh...er...somewhere else.

    But there's no permanent damage or anything..."

    --

    --
    I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  23. This is a nasty principle... by AcidDan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was also reading on spymac.com that you can get around this with a nikko pen, but what I really want to say is what a precedent this sets for corporations:

    We will intentionally cause damage to your property because you did not try to play this in an authorised CD player

    I think all those affected now (and more probably in the future with CDs other than Celine) should send a nice happy bill to the corporations that produce these CDs...

    Not being a legal person, how can a disclaimer cover something designed to intentionally cripple hardware? Sure you can say in a disclaimer that "it *may* do blah blah blah" but that's a whole lot different to "If you have X this CD is designed to damage this hardware"

    ... And I also doubt that the disclaimer is in a very prominent position either...

    As someone who buys CDs and owns an iBook, I'm not looking forward to the day I pop in a decent CD I've just bought (sorry, Celine fans) I don't want to discover that I can't get the damn thing out of my lappy easily...

    -- Dan >:(

    1. Re:This is a nasty principle... by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      It's a wonderful principle, isn't it? If a group of people don't like how Starbucks or McDonalds do things and smash up their property, riot squads (paid for by the citizens against who they are being used) will appear to safeguard the company; if Sony destroy your property because they don't like what you do with it, then they get away scot free.

      Oh, and don't even think about attempting to circumvent the smashing up device. Or that riot squad will be coming for you.

    2. Re:This is a nasty principle... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      I think "plainly labelled" is the key here. What the CD company are doing is more like this:

      Imagine if you went to a petrol station and found out that all the nozzles were all the same colour, and only had tiny labels on them to indicate whether they were four-star, unleaded, or diesel.

  24. New Names by Angram · · Score: 5, Funny

    We obviously can't call this Celine Dion product a "CD"...We're going to need a new term to denote CD-imposters...Lets see...

    CC - Crash Circle
    "CD" - Quote-Compact Disk-Unquote
    ICD - Imposter Compact Disk
    FD - Fool's Disk
    ID - Incompatible Disk
    SF - Sony Frisbee
    CC - Celine Coaster
    MW3 - Mommy, Why Won't it Work?
    RCD - Record Companies Downfall
    18POS - $18 Piece Of Sh*t
    SLS - Sony's Last Stand
    PD - Poo Disk

    Any suggestions?

    --

    GL
    1. Re:New Names by quinto2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those weren't funny enough.
      How about the eminently simple "Coaster," as that about describes what it's useful for.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
    2. Re:New Names by sconeu · · Score: 2

      IIRC, Philips calls it a "Silver Disk With Music On It." Should we call them SDWMOI?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:New Names by clyons · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, this may be the point at which intellictual property and trademark laws might come to be used (very creatively, of course) in our favor.

      What do you call these discs that appear to be compact discs, but to not conform to the standards? Do the retailers know these discs are not technically CD's? Can they (record companies and retailers) even legally call them compact discs if they do not conform to the standard?

      Now, I don't know who has the trademark and intellectual property rights to the cd audio standard, but I'm thinking they wouldn't even have to take legal action. There are several laws designed to protect consumers, and I believe at least some of these apply to imitations or faximilies. I would think that if a pseudo-CD causes significant problems, certain consumer protections laws could possibly be invoked, as the imitation format does not reasonably function like the origional format.

      If the "copy protected" formats mearly cause people to have to restart their computer and perform a certain procedure to get the disc out, it may or may not be enough for legal action. However, if it causes more serious problems such as firmware damage, loss of data, etc, then I would bet it would definatly be lawsuit material.

      Either way, I would hope the intellictual property holders would begin legal action against those members of the music industry that use this format. Certainly the I.T. holders could sue for dilution of trademark, making products that look enough like their format to confuse consumers, etc.

      I'm not a lawyer, I'm just hope someone takes intellictual property laws and crams it right back down the throats of the RIAA.

      --

      --
      Intelligence is definitely a recessive trait.

    4. Re:New Names by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2

      How about "Gnutella/Kazaa MP3 Fodder"?

  25. I'm reminded of a Simpsons episode by lkaos · · Score: 2

    Where the two Aliens come down and wear a Bob Dole and Bill Clinton outfit and run for presidency.

    As I'm sure everyone remembers, the aliens are found out but then say something to the effect of "What are you going to do about it with a two party system." And so they elect one of the aliens...

    Moral of the story: If you don't like copy protection, don't buy the damn cds! It's that simply.

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
  26. What to do by ocie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Go out and buy one of these CDs. Take it into a computer store. Try it out in a computer.

    When it gets stuck, try to get help from the sales people, but try to do it with a straight face, OK? Now you will probably have to leave it there, but make sure you talk to the highest up manager before you do.

    Research on the internet how to eject the disk and come back the next day to get it.

    This might work best if you bought the CD in the same store.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    1. Re:What to do by Animats · · Score: 2

      And do this at the Apple Store on University Avenue in Palo Alto, the one near Steve Jobs' house.

    2. Re:What to do by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Whaddya want them to do- make the things work in iMacs?

      Methinks you're gonna be putting the heat on the WRONG PEOPLE. These 'discs' not working in iMacs is GOOD. They are effectively viruses. The fact that they b0rk the iMac is just the finishing touch: it's an escalation of hostilities that might finally lead to the RIAA overstepping its boundaries in the eyes of the public.

  27. Re:Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is it labled as not playing in a PC? Apparently there should be a disclaimer if it is protected. If you don't see one, maybe there are multiple versions, or the original article is wrong. Maybe only the British version? The site's located in the UK.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  28. Buy CDs or download MP3... by A+Commentor · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Lets see... if I buy a CD, it might screw-up my computer... but if I download the same mp3s, I don't have to worry about it messing up my computer...

    The music publishers are giving people incentives to NOT BUY CDs...

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    1. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Lets see... if I buy a CD, it might screw-up my
      >computer... but if I download the same mp3s, I
      >don't have to worry about it messing up my
      >computer...

      Very true. So more people are going to download MP3s. Then, 6 or 9 or 12 months later the RIAA comes back and says: "Look at this! CD sales have dropped even more, and pirated MP3 downloads have increased. We told you that we needed better copy protection. Maybe _now_ you'll believe was when we say that we need hardware copy protection." Congress will say, "We're terribly sorry - we'll never doubt you again. We'll force the CBDTPA/SSSCA/whatever it will be called through right now. Take that, pirates!".

      To combat this, people should go find these CDs, and (assuming they don't have labels stating they can't be used in a computer); buy them; attempt to play them; and then return them. Then the RIAA can't say sales have decreased, and hopefully, someone, somewhere (other than geeks) will realize that copy protection on CDs simply isn't going to work.

      What about these allegations of crappy sound? Has anyone tried returning a CD because it sounded like shit (because of the audio data itself, not the content) Did they accept the return?

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    2. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by letxa2000 · · Score: 2
      But now in order to get these MP3s, you rip the CD, which you cannot because of these restrictions!

      But as someone else said, the tracks are already in MP3 format on P2P networks.

      As has also been said, it's just a matter of finding CD-ROM drives that work. And if none truly does, just put the CD in a standard Discman, lineout->soundcard, done. It takes one person an hour to rip and share the CD rather than 10 minutes.

      Net effect is that the music is shared anyway and those of us that only listen to music on our computers have one less reason to buy the CD. Besides the fact that it's Celine Dion...

    3. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      And I hope RIAA runs themselves right into the ground in a vicious cycle of inventing new copyright controls that incentivize people to use other forms of music creation and distribution. Finally nobody will be purchasing their broken ass products, and hopefully a whole new market will have formed. Keep going RIAA.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    4. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by jbarnett · · Score: 2

      1) a] Get a "male to male" 1/8 inch "audio cord". (most audio stores have them) b] Or, get 2 pairs of old headphones, cut the ends and wire them back so you have 2 "plugs". (warning b] might cause static if you don't wire them back correctly).

      2) a] Plug one end into your Casstte deck/CD Player b] plug the other end into your sound card (try audio in first, if that doesn't work try the mic jack)

      3) a] Start a peice of sound recoding software (sound recorder that is with most windows versions will work) b] Press play on the tape deck. c] click "Record" on your audio software.

      4) a] Sit back and wait. b] Drink a cup of coffee c] smoke a bit d] sit back and wait (do steps a-d as needed)

      5). a] When the tape is done, click "Stop" on your audio recording software

      6) a] SUCESS. SWEET SUCESS. b] Smoke a cig in celebration c] relax

      [ Note, if you are a non-smoker or don't drink coffee this method may NOT work for you.. Please adjust accordingly ]

      --

      "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
    5. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by Splork · · Score: 2

      agreed. i just ordered a shakira album a few days ago which i have since heard may not be a CD at all. if it doesn't rip or play in my computer and dvd player, it goes back for a full refund!

      finding workarounds is stupid until the monopolies stop releasing anything else; it only promotes buying and accepting the invalid discs "protected" as such.

    6. Re:Buy CDs or download MP3... by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      buy them; attempt to play them; and then return them. Then the RIAA can't say sales have decreased

      They will say that "pirates now buy the CD, take it home, rip it and then return it for a full refund, and oh, can we have some more copy protection to stop this, your honour, and BTW there's a pretty little thing waiting for you in your chamber afterwards". That's what they'll say.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  29. Someone please call the English Police by TheGreenLantern · · Score: 5, Funny

    "MacUser is running an article about how the new Celine Dion CD A New Day Has Come with copy protection mechanisms to prevent the CD from being played on a PC not only won't play on an iMac, but it will lock the CD tray (so it can't be removed) and fubar the firmware (so the machine can't be rebooted), effectivley killing the iMac."

    Somewhere a 4th Grade English teacher is crying, and doesn't know why.

    --

    It hurts when I pee.
    1. Re:Someone please call the English Police by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2

      :~( *SOB*

    2. Re:Someone please call the English Police by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      His revision is grammatically correct - the original is a run on. The reason the title is in commas is because "Celine Dion's new CD" or whatever already exactly specifies the object iun question, rendering the actual title unnecessary. For example, I would say "Edgar Allen Poe's story The Pit and the Pendulum" because Poe wrote many stories. However, I would also say "John Candy's last film, Wagons East."

      I dunno what this "change the meaning" stuff is, but the semicolon there seperates two independent clauses where there is no conjunction.

      The revision is awkward, but at least the punctuation is correct.

  30. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by phunhippy · · Score: 2

    Jesus people....yank the power, plug it back in, and use the dmn open-apple key sequence (can't remember it now...but if you own a Mac you should know) for ejecting the cdrom before it boots.

  31. Re:Be careful by npongratz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Take that Sony Music & CO... You have been outwitted!

    Make your time!

  32. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by znu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The CD format is a very well-defined standard, and Apple created a device that works perfectly with it. How is it Apple's fault if a malicious 3rd party intentionally creates a disc that violates the standard?

    --
    This space unintentionally left unblank.
  33. Only the UK version! by Galvatron · · Score: 4, Informative

    Alright, I feel like an idiot because I've posted three replies on this subject now, but after checking amazon.com and amazon.co.uk, it appears that this only applies to the version sold in the UK. So British buyers beware, but the rest of us are okay (though if the Amazonian reviewers are to be trusted, apparently it is a pretty weak effort compared to Williams' prior work).

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    1. Re:Only the UK version! by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.
      -Bruce Ediger "
      I can assure you that babies are taught how to use a nipple.
      One of the greatest thing that needs to be told to ecpectent, first time mother, is that they need to teach there baby how to use the nipple. I have seen many new mother break down in tears, thinking there horrible because there baby won't just latch on.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  34. Poor i-Macs... by fatalist23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    how horrible, dying with Celine Dion in your mouth! *shudder*

  35. Everybody stock up on Sharpies! by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 5, Funny

    HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA - May 13, 2002 - RIAA TEAMS UP WITH MPAA TO URGE BAN OF "SHARPIE" STYLE MARKERS.

    Local busineses were shocked today when all 2.5 million office supply stores were simultaneously served with a cease and desist order from the RIAA and MPAA banning the sale of any type of felt tip marker. Lobbyists for the media industry successfully bribed and/or threatened a number of local politician, who in turn passed legislation banning the manufacture, sale, or possession of any device on grounds that it violates the Digital Millenium Copyright Act.

    "This is a great day for freedom in this country", stated I. P. Freely, chairman of the House Committee On Media Graft and Campaign Finance. "No longer will reckless hoodlums and terrorist be able to hold our great media industries down! Already these 'media terrorists' have been implicated in causing a downturn in music sales, a deepening of the U.S. recession, balding, impotence, and dandruff. These terrorists are a threat to the very foundation of this nation. Have I said terrorist enough yet? Terrorist terrorist terrorist!"

    A small group of bewildered secretaries and office workers were rounded up by jackbooted thugs and herded into "terrorist containment vehicles" (which resemble black vans) as they went into office supply stores in downtown L.A. to buy Sharpies. "Obviously these media terrorists were bent on destroying Sony Music with these devices", said one S.W.A.T. team captain as he twirled a Sharpie in front of cameras. "Don't worry folks", he said, "you're safe now."

    When interviewed on the street, many people expressed delight at the actions of the MPAA and RIAA.

    "I'm so glad that these hideous terr'rist folks have been rounded up", says Eva Beaver. "Who knows what they might've blown up with their terror weapons. Next it could be planes slamming into buildings!"

    Opposition to this new law is expected to be light, say prominent Washington lawmakers. Naysayers will be rounded up and shot on sight, further adding to the desire to keep people from pirating music and movies with felt tip pens.

    Spokesmen for Sanford, the company that manufactures the Fully Automatic Terrorist Media Stealing Assault Weapon (formerly known as a Sharpie Marker) could not be reached following a disastrous fire and explosion at every single one of their manufacturing plants.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  36. Can't play it, but I can rip it. by jmv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My mother bought the new Celine Dion CD (I've been trying to convince her to take it back for not being a "real CD"). I put it in my PC just to test it. The funny think is that the CDROM won't play it as a audio CD. However, I tried cdparanoia and I can rip it without any problem... I guess it's just another case of a "copy-protection" technology prevent legal use (like watching DVD under Linux), while failing at preventing what it's designed to prevent (you can do a mirror copy of a DVD without decrypting it).

    1. Re:Can't play it, but I can rip it. by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ditto for me and a copy of "Stiff Upper Lip" by ACDC. Can't see the music in Explorer, but CDEX rips it just fine.

  37. Greedy businessmen... by LittleRibbon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's all about the companies getting greedy. Instead of 'losing' a few dollars on the price of each CD, they spend thousands to get the CD 'guarded'. Completely ridiculous, and a result of greed in our society.

    Then there's the junk going on about them safeguarding the CD's so they can't be played on a computer. Personally, I'm not the richest person around, and I can't afford a CD player seperate from the computer. I lodged my money into this thing about two years ago, and continue to do so, thinking "Hey, I can play my CD's on here, and write my papers, etc., rather than drive up the electric bill (damned prices last year for electricity...) with two seperate Watt-Guzzelers, as I call them. So, I saved some money there, right?

    I ended up buying a few cds the other day, after listening to them on the radio. I pop in the Lord of the Rings OST, remembering fondly the music that scared me in the movie, and waited for it to load. Instead of my lovely music, I get a webpage with a bunch of ads I don't want, and no auto-start on the music. So, naturally, I checked to see if the files were missing or something. Sure enough, they've been 'protected' against use on a computer. So, I wasted $18, and I still haven't listened to the thing once.

    Now, they're making the computers crash on us, just for fear of 'stealing' their 'hard earned songs' (even though most of them are just rewrites of old classics). Next thing you know, they'll ban CD-Roms. --;

    --
    "Those who fear the darkness have never seen what the light can do."
    1. Re:Greedy businessmen... by proxima · · Score: 2

      Hmm..I experienced the auto-load of the LOTR soundtrack, but I had no problems whatsoever ripping the CD into my beloved 256 kbit ogg files. I bought it the day it came out, (the movie), checked to make sure it wasn't from Universal (it's Warner Bros I believe), and ripped it right away. Most CDs now I don't even listen to before I rip.

      Give it a try, but don't tarnish the beautiful music by ripping it into crappy 128 kbit mp3s.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    2. Re:Greedy businessmen... by alcmena · · Score: 2

      ...rather than drive up the electric bill (damned prices last year for electricity...) with two seperate Watt-Guzzelers, as I call them. So, I saved some money there, right?

      Probably not. Stand alone CD players (especially portable ones) use very low power. In fact if you were only using your computer as a CD player, then the amount you'd save by turning off your PC and running a stand alone player would pay for the player eventually. Depends on how often you'd use only the CD player, and how much power costs where you are.

      In fact, a portable CD player may even use less power to play a CD than the additional power your computer would use to play the CD. The portable player is designed to use low power, whereas CD-ROMs are not, unless you have a laptop.

  38. Yup, permanent damage; nope, Apple won't cover it by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apple Knowledge Base article #106882 confirms the problem with "certain copy-protected audio discs, which resemble Compact Discs (CD) but technically are not," and says Apple will not pay for repairs even if you have a service contract.

    http://kbase.info.apple.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/k ba se.woa/116/wa/query?searchMode=Expert&type=id&val= KC.106882

    The note suggests a number of things you can "try" or "attempt" which "may" solve the problem.

    The telling part is the last paragraph:

    "If a disc with copyrighted protection technology remains inside the drive after following the procedures above, or if the computer does not start up normally, it is recommended that you contact an Apple Authorized Service Provider (AASP) or Apple Technical Support. CD audio discs that incorporate copyright protection technologies do not adhere to published Compact Disc standards. Apple designs its CD drives to support media that conforms to such standards. Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple CD drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage. Because the Apple product is functioning correctly according to its design specifications, any fee assessed by an Apple Authorized Service Provider or Apple for repair service will not be Apple's responsibility."

  39. Re:Getting Back at the Mac by freeweed · · Score: 2

    Only problem is, your opponent won't have to listen to Celine, thereby conclusively winning the war.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  40. Who knew.... by Y-Crate · · Score: 2

    .....the Celine Dion CDs came with an iTunes upgrade?

  41. But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by eggstasy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can these idiots somehow assume that everyone has a stereo or some form of computer-independent CD player? You wouldnt believe how small a percentage of my friends actually plays their CDs on a stereo. Why, I once foresaw the death of stereos altogether: Why spend a boatload of cash on a huge machine that can do exactly one thing (play CDs - radio sux, tapes are dead, LPs are deader), when you can do the same with your PC?
    Why have a TV/Stereo/DVD/VCR/whatever when you can have it all in your PC?
    Ah, wait, if you spend a boatload of cash on huge, clunky, technologically outdated devices such as a TV or a 1x CD player, Big Business is happy. And since the government is just for show and it's actually BB who's running the place, the "consumers" really have no choice - fork over your cash time and time again, or live like a peasant in the Dark Ages, with no comfort at all.
    I'm sick of this. Where do I point my gun at to get my God-given rights?
    Since they're all trying to label us as terrorists I say shoot the bastards and earn the title!

    1. Re:But I dont HAVE a fucking STEREO!! by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      The number one fallacy of Slashdot:

      Just because you and all your friends agree on something does not make it a fact!

  42. Way to eject CD on new iMac by pinkpineapple · · Score: 5, Informative

    You need to restart the system and just after the chime, leave the mouse button pressed until the media gets ejected. No manual way but a work around for people who like me got cought with the soundtrack of Episode 2.

    PPA, the girl next door

    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    1. Re:Way to eject CD on new iMac by telstar · · Score: 2
      a work around for people who like me got cought with the soundtrack of Episode 2
      • I think you mean ... 'got caught with a Mac'
  43. Somebody please... by famazza · · Score: 2

    ... take a look at CD not playable surface and tell us if there is, or if there isnt't, the CDDA (Compact Disc Digital Audio) logo on it.

    If it is, then this shall be an article to Philips lawyers. If it isn't the CD isn't even compatible with your stereo CDPlayer.

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
  44. watch out following translated instructions by flacco · · Score: 4, Funny
    You never know - a babelfish translation deficiency could result in instructions like:

    "Then schtick ze blow torchen up your assen-holen, and ge-crank that mutterfikken all ze way uppen-leder-hosen."

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  45. Insist on Genuine Compact Discs by B.D.Mills · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The music companies are quietly removing the CD logo from some of these controversial copy-protected CD's because they do not conform to the Red Book standard.

    So here's a way we can fight back. When you are buying your CD's, always insist on CD's bearing the "Compact Disc Digital Audio" logo.

    This does two things:
    * Any copy-protected disc that bears the CD logo may be in technical breach of some law, such as misleading and deceptive marketing, and you can possibly sue the store and record company on those grounds (IANAL) or make a formal complaint to some regulatory body such as the FTC.

    * It lets the store know that there are people who prefer genuine CD's instead of that crippled copy-protected rubbish. Once you buy the CD, it's your right to do with it as you please, provided you do not infringe on the copyright owners' rights to redistribute the music.

    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Insist on Genuine Compact Discs by thumbtack · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More Fast and Furious doesn't have the logo on the outside packaging, but does use the CD Audio Logo on the CD itself. I don't know about others, but this one does.

  46. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by foobar104 · · Score: 5, Informative
    In other cases, perhaps you might need to get creative to get that CD out. Perhaps you need to pull the drive apart - who knows.

    Apple knows. You have three non-pull-apart options.
    • Hold the mouse button down while the Mac boots. This causes the firmware to eject the CDROM before it even starts booting the OS.
    • Load Open Firmware (cmd-opt-O-F) and type "eject cd."
    • Hold down the X key while booting the Mac. This forces Open Firmware to load OS X from the system disk, if there's a kernel present. Then use iTunes to eject the CD.
  47. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by flacco · · Score: 5, Funny
    In other cases, perhaps you might need to get creative to get that CD out. Perhaps you need to pull the drive apart - who knows.

    Or perhaps you need beat the living shit out of the fuck-heads who cavalierly take it upon themselves to fuck with your hardware. Then kill their extended families, burn down their houses with their corpses inside, and piss on the ashes.

    Or that paper clip thing might work too, I don't know.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  48. Patent Infringement? by Angram · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If it isn't a "CD" does this violate the patent on Compact Disks, as it is same technology, just with a few 0s and 1s?

    --

    GL
  49. Simply refuse to buy these non-CDs by sheldon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, don't play the music industry game. Don't bother to figure out how to defeat the copy protection that just makes them try harder.

    Just don't buy the CDs.

    Or better yet, buy them, open them, then take them back to the store and complain that they don't work. If the store will only offer an exchange, take the exchange and bring that one back too. Just keep doing this until they learn that they do not work.

    The stores can't put them back on the shelves, they have to ship them back to the distributor. I guarantee you when 25% of their stock comes back defective, someone is going to start to notice what a really bad idea this is.

    Hmm, I work right next door to a Best Buy. I could buy and return a CD every day for lunch. Might be kind of fun.

    1. Re:Simply refuse to buy these non-CDs by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "Hmm, I work right next door to a Best Buy. I could buy and return a CD every day for lunch. Might be kind of fun."
      sounds fun, I think I'll give it a whirl myself.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  50. Drives shouldn't do this, anyway by iabervon · · Score: 2

    Okay, so you have some software which is vulnerable to malformed data which has been fed to it by an unsuspecting user, and it causes damage to your system. Rather than providing fixes, the vendor blames the users and the source of the malformed data. Apple's CD drives have a major security hole. It is being exploited by malicious hackers, who have produced attacks which lure people into subjecting their computers to them by promising to contain music.

    Sure, people shouldn't buy these things. Sure, the people who make them should be treated as the computer criminals they are. Sure, Celine Dion should remind people of Melissa. But Apple should really fix these things. Computers that won't work if the CD drive gets messed up? CD drives that trust discs to have valid data, and can be permanently damaged by discs with data errors? I certainly hope their network cards aren't so lousy...

    1. Re:Drives shouldn't do this, anyway by Tassach · · Score: 3, Insightful
      BZZZT. Wrong Answer. Thanks for playing. There's a huge difference between a PB&J sandwich and a shiny-disk-with-music-on-it. There's no way a reasonable person could confuse a sandwich with a CD; nor would a reasonable person expect to be able to insert a sandwich into their computer and have it play music. However, it is a reasonable expectation to put a shiny silver disk with music on it into a device that is normally used to play shiny silver disks with music on them, and not have said device melt down.

      A more fitting analogy would be if you sold rat poison pellets that looked just like jelly beans. Saying "well, if you read the fine print on the box, you would have known that they were rat poison and not candy" wouldn't cut it as a defense when you get hauled into court.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    2. Re:Drives shouldn't do this, anyway by iabervon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In general, it is wrong to assume that anything will comply to standards. "Be strict in what you produce and permissive in what you accept." Now it would be different if, for instance, these discs would cause physical harm to the mechanism directly (i.e., they would melt or reflect the laser in odd directions, or something). But it should be impossible for a disc with pits merely in an invalid configuration to damage the drive.

      Of course, it would be fine for the drive to not play these discs. Since they're invalid, there's no reason they should work. But they shouldn't be able to damage the drive or the computer. I bet the car cd players don't make the car swerve wildly. And, if they did, I'm blame the car manufacturers more than the disc manufacturers.

  51. Re:Class Action Lawsuit! (Sign-Up Here) by anonicon · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hey,
    If you are a U.S. resident (you don't have to be a citizen) and want to be part of a class-action lawsuit, go here:
    http://www.fatchucks.com/z3.cd.submit.html

    after you buy a known corrupt CD (one with a red star next to it):
    http://www.fatchucks.com/z3.cd.html


    I will personally forward your info to the group of lawfirms who are already planning a class-action against the record industry. If you have any questions about this class-action or anything else, write me at chuck@fatchucks.com.


    Peace.

  52. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by isomeme · · Score: 2
    I'm sorry, but I blame Apple for this one. No data, however warped and horrid, should be able to do this to a drive. That it can do so means that Apple misdesigned the drive (and its device drivers).

    I'm reminded of the old C-64 1541 floppy drive, which could be wrecked by malicious boot-sector code that caused it to ram the head repeatedly against the stop until it misaligned itself. But I thought we were twenty years past such silly hardware and software design.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  53. Hole punch... by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am reminded of my teenage days of punching notches into the side of 5 1/4" disks with a hole punch...

    Magic markers to avert copy protection schemes... I love low-tech solutions to high-tech problems.

    ::Colz Grigor

  54. Obligatory AYB bit... by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny


    In A.D. 2002, War was beginning.
    Mac Hacker: What happen?
    User: Somebody set us up the Celine Dion Not-CD
    Programmer: We get signal
    Mac Hacker: What!
    Programmer: Main Screen turn on
    Mac Hacker: It's You!
    R.O.S.E.N.: How are you gentlemen?
    R.O.S.E.N.: All your CD-ROM drive are belong to us.
    R.O.S.E.N.: You are on the way to destruction
    Mac Hacker: What you say?!?!
    R.O.S.E.N.: You have no chance to hack make your time
    R.O.S.E.N.: HA HA HA HA....
    Mac Hacker: Take off every Not-CD
    Mac Hacker: You know what you doing
    Mac Hacker: Remove Not-CD
    Mac Hacker: For great justice

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  55. how about this: by SaturnTim · · Score: 2

    Has anyone who purchased one the the CD's in question contact their local Better Business Bureau? When I buy something that looks like a CD, is sold in the CD isle, I don't expect it to hose my iMac.

    Let's get as many agency's in on this as possable.

    --T

    --
    http://www.theMediaBunker.com
  56. Re:Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by anonicon · · Score: 2, Informative

    So far the soundtrack to Episode II is being corrupted in Europe:
    http://www.fatchucks.com/z3.cd.starwars.soundtrack . tml

    but there have been no reports out of the Ameircas. Of course, time will tell if this holds up.

  57. So? by sconeu · · Score: 2, Insightful


    <SARCASM>
    What do you care, unless you're an Evil Hacking Terrorist Content Pirate(tm).

    Only Evil Content Pirates want the DMCA overturned. Stinking Terrorist.
    </SARCASM>

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  58. NO, USE A DR. DRE ERASE MARKER by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2, Funny

    ha ha ha I made a funny

  59. I like the bit about the Warranty there by zzyzx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Apple designs its CD drives to support media that conforms to such standards. Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple CD drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage. "

    So not only is the computer broken because you didn't see the fine print and tried to play a cd in it, but you have to pay for the repairs.

    1. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      i don't see how you blame the firmware writers. they create the firmware to conform to CD specifications. sure we all would like our software/firmware whatever to be robust and withstand any potential rot, but in all reality, it must meet the requirements and the specifications. the firmware creators for these drives certainly can't create firmware that protects the drive from every possible application of the drive. if this were true, we'de need to expect bicycle manufactueres to design and create bikes that can withstand being run over in the drive way (which by the way is actually more likely to occur than for someone to put a damaging non-CD metallic disk into their drive).

    2. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      no, but it is ok for the engine to blow a rod through the crank shaft when it's been running 11,000 rpm's (not the redhat type) for a few minutes. those engineers should have used better rods/crank shafts in their engines, eh?

      everything has it's limits and software/firmware is no exception.

      if a gun goes off unexpectedly because it was loaded with improperly manufacturered bullets, is it the fault of the manufacturer of the gun or of the bullets?

    3. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by tunah · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So not only is the computer broken because you didn't see the fine print and tried to play a cd in it,

      No, it is broken because you tried to use a product designed to look like something useful (a trojan horse) but break your computer, sort of a hardware equivalent to a trojan horse. Imagine you plug in a monitor and immediately the big internal batteries deliver a huge voltage to your motherboard through the (onboard) video.

      but you have to pay for the repairs.

      What is certain is _apple_ does not have to pay for the repairs, as their product is not at fault. In the (farfetched) example above, would the computer or 'monitor' company have to pay?

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    4. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2

      Yes, software should never crash, but sorry to say, this isn't a perfect world. Apples iMac, and most other CD readers are designed to read CDs, that's Compact Discs(tm), not compact discs.

      Difference being that the CD(tm) has a defined format, a CD reader is as designed to read other similar discs as much as it's designed to read a cheddar cheese slice inserted to it. And if I insert cheddar cheese, I don't really expect the CD player to come up with a nice little box telling me it can 't read cheddar cheese.

      Yes, it could possibly handle it better, but, it's not designed nor meant to be able to read those other compact discs.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    5. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by gvonk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Software should never crash, no matter what input you put into it. That's taught in every first year programming class I've ever seen, and it goes double for software that controls peripherals.

      Also, please note-- Automobiles should never crash, no matter what happens on the road. That's taught in every first year driver's education course I've ever seen, and it goes double if you are driving an expensive car.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    6. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah but if its a firmware crash through design, it doesn't matter how good your driver software is...remember achiles and the tortoise in G.E.B? ;-)

    7. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by mpe · · Score: 2

      Difference being that the CD(tm) has a defined format, a CD reader is as designed to read other similar discs as much as it's designed to read a cheddar cheese slice inserted to it. And if I insert cheddar cheese, I don't really expect the CD player to come up with a nice little box telling me it can 't read cheddar cheese.

      Except that a slice of cheese does not have the same physical properties as a CD. A better question would be "does it lock up if you insert a DVD?"

    8. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2
      Sorry, but that's just lame. You can explain anything with "this isn't a perfect world". Putting a 5.25 inch round plastic thing in a CD-ROM drive might make it spin for awhile and sound funny, but when I press the Eject button it had better pop that sucker back out and act as though nothing had happened.

      That's what it should do if it was perfect, just like using a soundcard input interface which gets a 200watt feed from a guitar amp shouldn't kill my computer, but it probably will. There are things that a computer is designed to do, and that's what it should do, the fact that a user is easily mislead by these protected "cds" isn't the device makers fault imo. Just like I can't blame my puter maker for allowing me to feed 200w into the soundcard, it wasn't built for it, and it's not their responsibility to make sure I don't mess up. If I use non-standard equipment with my computer, then I also take a chance and assume the responsibility should it fail miserably. Just because the consumer is easily mislead doesn't mean that the maker is responsible.

      imo the culprit here is 100% the cd maker, their cds shouldn't be able to do this to a machine. If a machine isn't capable of playing it as is intended, it should just appear corrupt or empty, not mess up the machine.

      If we go back a few years when floppies were common, what if an app requires a boot from a floppy, but on boot, instead of running the app, it flashed the bios to corruptness (in an attempt to "upgrade" it of course) and deleted all partitions on all drives, is the fault the floppydrive makers, the computer makers, or the maker of the floppy disk?

      I'd say the latter, I expect things to work a certain way, if I boot from floppy, I expect to be asked about any permanent changes, if I insert a cd-like media I expect that any cd-reading device can handle it gracefully by adhering to standard, if the reader can't actually read it, fine, but don't ruin my player because it can't handle it. Device makers trust media makers to not create media that is dangerous to a consumers equipment, and by that trust they also give responsibility to the media maker to NOT run any malicious code without the user approving it, which is the norm.

      The alternative would be devices that won't run anything which isn't approved by the maker, home-made cds? Forget it, it might do naughty things to a machine and people would blame the device maker.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    9. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Steve+X · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's what it should do if it was perfect, just like using a soundcard input interface which gets a 200watt feed from a guitar amp shouldn't kill my computer, but it probably will.


      As the previous poster noted: this is data that's causing it to die. Not something that's out of the limits of the device's normal ranges (200w for a poor leetle soundcard) but something that's well within the 1 or 0 range of binary data. I agree: software should never crash, especially when it's hardware.


      In general, hardware should be designed defensively. All-too-often, hardware will encounter problems provided by our imperfect world that might cause them to crash or fail. An example: I've been working on a robot recently with a microcontroller on it. The microcontroller has a power input with a very primitive reverse-voltage protection circuit on it (a diode and a poorly-placed capicitor). If you connected the voltage wrong, the capicitor blew and the device was rendered useless until you removed/replaced the capicitor. This is bad design. True, it's going out of the limits of the device's inputs, but not unreasonably so. (200w for an input that normally takes orders of magnitudes less vs. reverse polarity)


      A cdrom that fail to physically function on bad data is also poor design. That's like old computers that, if certain bits were twiddled incorrectly they would physically catch fire and burn. People make mistakes (in this case, intentionally), and you as a designer should trap for them as best as possible.


      one last example: this is a buffer-overrun root exploit. well, not really, but the same principle is applied: inputting data that's unexpected and causing malicious actions to occur. Buffer-overruns are one of the most prolific types of bugs that cause problems in software and people try and remove them for a reason. With that in mind, one would hope your CD-ROM would never, ever crash.

    10. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Iamthefallen · · Score: 2

      So because it looks similar it should handle it? It's still not the same media. By that logic if I wrap a circular cheese slice in tinfoil it's a cd and thus should be handled properly. I can't agree, different media need different readers, unless a combined CD/Cheese reader is released.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    11. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How the hell is Apple supposed to know before the not-CDs appear on the market that they will not be compatible with the drive they choose? Next you will tell us that Apple is responsible for Macs damaged by the earthquake, because they should have forseen it.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    12. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by ortholattice · · Score: 2
      Software should never crash, no matter what input you put into it. That's taught in every first year programming class I've ever seen, and it goes double for software that controls peripherals.

      Yes, but *where* is the software? Part of the software is the bits stored in the firmware. Another part of the software is the (corrupted) bits stored on the copy-protected CD. After all, CDs hold programs, too - and the Mac seems to get confused about "what" is on the CD since it is corrupted. It responds to this confusion in an unfortunate way, and I agree of course that it shouldn't have been designed to respond that way, but nonetheless it is still responding to a "program" of corrupted bits on the CD.

      If I gave you a bootable CD-ROM with an .exe that instructed the CPU to erase your disk drive if certain "copy protection" features weren't present on your machine, would this be the CPU's fault?

    13. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Surak · · Score: 2

      Software should never crash, no matter what input you put into it. That's taught in every first year programming class I've ever seen, and it goes double for software that controls peripherals.

      Gods! Someone please tell that to the programmers on this planet! Especially the ones working at Microsoft! :)

    14. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Apple is just covering themselves in case of wide spread problems. However, it has been my experience that for most hardware problems, Apple will quite happily repair the device at no cost to the consumer. Besides, technicaly speaking, Apple is not responsible. There is a warning on the hardware which states it should only be used with approved media, and there is a warning on the CD which says you shouldn't use it in a computer. Therefore, you have been sufficiently warned and legaly speaking are responsible for any damages to your computer.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    15. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by arkanes · · Score: 2

      You're misunderstaning his point - sure, if you hook a 200watt feed up to your soundcard, it will fry. This is because you are submitting it to an extreme physical environment outside the engineering parameters. Now, how would you feel about a digital amp that turned crashed and fried if you play a certain sequence of notes? I'd say the majority of the blame lies on the makers of the CD - they intentionally release a product that can damage your property when used in a normal fashion. Warnings that it "won't play" in a mac are insufficent. But Apple should repair these under warranty because, as the poster above says, this is a SOFTWARE glitch causing the problem. There is no excuse for a CD to be able to fry the firmware like that - if it can, it's a bug, full stop.

    16. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      As I understand it, Apple has chosen to design their computers in such a way that a music CD inserted into the CD-ROM drive is capable of hosing the machines firmware. That sure sounds like a faulty product to me.

      In a way, I could understand something like that happening to PCs, since there's a DIY tradition in the PC space. That isn't what Apple sells, particularly with regard to the iMac.

      The IMac is sold as an appliance; something you just plug in and it works, something you never have to think about. For a product like that, firmware should be inaccesible without special tools. A firmware upgrade should be something that you bring it into the shop for. A music CD should not be able to damage the firmware of an appliance. That is piss-poor design on Apples part, and the product is most certainly at fault for being vulnerable to something so inane.

      That said, though, I don't believe Apple should have to pay for the repairs. Sony is the company guilty of malicious cracking here, and needs to be brought to task for their actions, just as would any cracker that distributed a Trojan Horse. That is a federal crime, after all.

      What would be really cool of Apple to do is defer payment for the repairs and join into the burgeoning suits against the responsible record company(s). After all, it does seem like Apple's hardware has been specifically targeted, and it looks like Sony is playing a big part in this particular fiasco, and Sony does compete with Apple in the personal computer market...

      It seems to me that if Apple has the cajones, this could turn into something much more than a simple slap on the wrist of a big record company.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    17. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Danse · · Score: 2

      I think the point is that it doesn't make any difference what's on the CD. If it's a screwed up CD, then the drive should just refuse to read it. Catastrophic failure such as that described in the article should never be permitted. Someone else used the example of sticking a pizza in the drive, but I say that's just a straw man. Nobody is saying that the drive should function no matter what is inserted. They're saying that if you put a disc that is within the size and shape specs of a CD into a drive, the drive should either read it or not read it. No damage should occur.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    18. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Hallow · · Score: 2

      The disks that are hosing the firmware are NOT music CD's. They do not confrom to the CD standard, and can't really be called such. So you really can't blame Apple. In fact this may have actually been intentional, to get people pissed off about this copy protection BS.

      Quite frankly, Sony is guilty of Computer Vandalism, and should be charged with the criminal offense for every disk they release that does this, as well as civil suits from individuals with damaged hardware (or perhaps a class action).

    19. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      The disks that are hosing the firmware are NOT music CD's

      That is a technicality which in no way invalidates my critism of Apple's design. The firmware of a system sold as an appliance should not be easily modifiable by any mere disk which is inserted into any drive connected to said system. That the disk that actually did the damage was a music CD (or more accurately a disk which was intentionally packaged and marketed in such a way that it would be mistaken for one) simply serves to make the situation that more rediculous.

      I definately agree that Sony should face criminal charges, and I very much hope that Apple has a hand in bringing those forces to bear. Apple has always presented itself as a consumer oriented company, and I think this is an excellent opportunity for them to prove themselves in that arena.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    20. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      There isn't really any damage, but it isn't a user escapable senerio. There is no way to manualy eject the disc, and the disc almost works enough to retry unendingly. When you reboot, the drive is too busy trying to figure out what to do with this "almost but not quite a CD" to boot. If there were a physical manual eject button, then there would be no problem.

    21. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Software, drivers in particular, can only be so tolerant. You're relying on this device to boot correctly, so you can only be tolerant of certain types of errors. There are also only so many checks you can do to see if a disc is valid media. If a disc is specifically designed to pass all the possible tests to determine if it's, say, a bootable CD, but then turns out to *not* be a bootable CD, then there's really no automatic way to have prevented the error before knowing of the existance of this new type of disc.

    22. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by vanyel · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but a computer that won't eject a piece of plastic the size and shape of a CD is broken by design. From the very first Mac, people have been getting floppies, and later CDs stuck in them. Doesn't Apple *ever* learn? It boggles the mind that they ship products without eject buttons, much less "manual eject holes".

      Not that I let the trojan makers off the hook, but this is clearly an Apple bug.

    23. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by zzyzx · · Score: 2

      See I can't see that the warning is adequate. If you package something that looks just like a cd and it's housed in the cd section, consumers should expect it to play like a cd unless there's a HUGE warning on it.

    24. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      That's another case to take to court, whether the lable is adequate. However, I would much rather see the case of intentional damage to the computer be taken to court.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    25. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by WNight · · Score: 2

      Apple's hardware is at fault because it can't handle even simple error conditions such as something that's not a valid CD. What would happen if someone put a failed burn into the drive and it refused to boot or eject the CD properly? Would apple disclaim all responsibility?

      Now, it's also Sony's fault and Apple should probably help consumers sue Sony for intentionally trying to wreak havok on computers.

      This is crap though, with Apple refusing to take responsibility for a broken design.

    26. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Software should never crash

      But they also teach you in first year, that software is almost never 100% bug-free.

      So who takes most of the blame? Apple, for somewhere, somehow having a software bug? Or is it the CD manufacturer's fault for putting malicious code on their CD?

    27. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by WNight · · Score: 2

      No matter what garbage, or lack there of, is on a small piece of plastic in the shape of a CD, your firmware shouldn't be damaged.

    28. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by WNight · · Score: 2

      I remember the Vic-20 manual which said basically the same thing. "Unless you're an elephant."

      Yeah, hardware shouldn't be destroyable via software means.

      I've been expecting a new email virus one of these days that'll perform an intentionally bad flash-upgrade of hardware to disable a computer permanently.

      It'd be trivial. Almost all flash upgrades are simple verified with CRCs, which while being good for detecting random corruption, are incredibly easy to spoof intentionaly. (By design.)

      Motherboards, Video cards, CD drives, HDs, Ethernet cards, and more all have flashable BIOSes.

    29. Re:I like the bit about the Warranty there by Milalwi · · Score: 2


      Software should never crash, no matter what input you put into it. That's taught in every first year programming class I've ever seen, and it goes double for software that controls peripherals.

      Also, please note-- Automobiles should never crash, no matter what happens on the road. That's taught in every first year driver's education course I've ever seen, and it goes double if you are driving an expensive car.

      A better analogy would be:

      Automobiles shouldn't break (i.e., parts fail) no matter what control inputs are given.

      And automobiles pretty much meet this criterion.

      Milalwi
  60. Just protecting my rights... by sholton · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So, if I create something that resembles a CD, but really just uses the CD format to carry a harmful digital payload to damage your system, I'm just an artist protecting my rights.

    but...

    If I create something that resembles an email message, but really just uses the email message format to carry a harmful digital payload to damage your system, I'm just an evil hacker who's likely to be spending time in prison.

    Yup. Makes sense to me.

    --
    A new kind of meat designed to appeal to vegetarians.
    1. Re:Just protecting my rights... by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2
      So, if I create something that resembles a CD, but really just uses the CD format to carry a harmful digital payload to damage your system, I'm just an artist protecting my rights.
      Don't blame the artists, it's the intellectual property "owners" who are to blame...
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    2. Re:Just protecting my rights... by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe this line of thinking might actually be applicable if you were to write a peice of software that would delete or corrupt data on hardware that it was not explicitly designed for. If you said "This software will not work on any computer except INSERTBRAND computer," then if Sony is not liable for what this cd does why should you be responsible for what your software does when you expressly said it won't work on anything but what you have approved?

      You didn't say "Use of this software on unapproved hardware will eat your data," but Sony didn't put in their disclaimer that you may have to send your computer in for service after trying to use their disc. It seems like it would be like Microsoft selling copies of Windows to OEMs that looks at the BIOS to determine who the manufacturer of the computer is and if it's not the one hard coded into that particular distribution then it flashes over said BIOS. Thus the computer is basically rendered dead, and evil pirating is prevented!

      Then when you sue Microsoft for killing your new motherboard, they will say "Well why were you trying to install 'Windows XP for Dell' on your home built machine?" Hmmm, a shocking concept.

  61. Floppy Drive Firmware by borgasm · · Score: 2, Funny

    I recall something about invalidating the firmware on a floppy drive, in a slightly different manner. I think the trick was to paint the inside of a floppy with nail polish and the powder from inside caps. The drive heats up to read the disk, and in a flash of fire, the floppy drive is no longer functional. Now that's copy protection.

  62. Big security hole by Animats · · Score: 2
    The fact that this is possible indicates a big security hole. If the Cactus CD protection system can exploit this to alter the firmware, so can other attacks. Now we're going to see viruses that attack firmware.

    How did they do this, anyway? What is the disk doing. This goes beyond having a Windows autorun file and a bad CD directory.

  63. Re:Yup, permanent damage; nope, Apple won't cover by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Hey, I actually like this.

    Slashdot geeks can rant and rave all they want about these horrible booby-trapped 'discs', but the outside world must respond for anything to happen- either endorsing the legitimacy of the 'discs' or rejecting it.

    Well, this is a start.

    Playing these things on an iMac means basically voiding the warranty. If, God knows how, the corrupted and intentionally damaging 'disc' manages to actually kill the iMac, Apple says it is your fault for trying to put booby-trapped, intentionally destructive junk in the machine!

    This is a GOOD thing, and I hope other computer manufacturers do likewise. I wouldn't have believed that such a thing could kill an iMac, but note this: iMacs ARE BOOTABLE FROM CD. It seems possible that these 'discs' could contain something like a boot sector, to trick the machine into trying to boot off the 'disc' and then munging its BIOS. Viruses have been able to do stuff like that for years and years- this is simply the first time the RIAA has made a concerted effort to destroy people's computers.

    Apple cannot possibly take responsibility for this. They're doing the right thing- staring in shock, and then quickly announcing, "We will not be held responsible for interoperating with THIS BULLSHIT!"

    I say support Apple for this stance, don't criticise them. Or do you feel that computer manufacturers should now be held responsible for maintaining interoperability with VIRUSES?

  64. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

    They are compact discs, but they aren't CDDA (Compact Disc Digital Audio). If you look you will notice most regular audio CD have that logo on there, but ones that violate the Redbook standard aren't allowed to have it.

    A music CD with no CDDA logo means:

    a)It has copy protection.

    b)They put too much music on the disc.

    c)It has hidden tracks.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  65. DMCA says it's a felony to fix your Apple ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Funny
    In other cases, perhaps you might need to get creative to get that CD out. Perhaps you need to pull the drive apart - who knows.

    Apple knows [apple.com]. You have three non-pull-apart options.

    [options deleted]


    Well, let's see...

    The crud they put on the disk locks up the Apple when you try to play it. Thus...

    This is "technology" that "effectively prevents" unauthorized copying.

    Breaking your computer is part of the correct operation of this technology, so

    Fixing your computer is "circumvention" of "technology" that "effectively prevents" unauthorized copying, a felony under the DMCA, and

    Apple's post telling you how to fix your computer is "trafficing" in circumvention technology, also a felony.

    Quick! Call the FBI! (And ask Adobe for the phone number of the appropriate person to call. B-) )

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:DMCA says it's a felony to fix your Apple ... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Somebody moderate this post's parent down, please. I'm sick and tired of all this "DMCA this" and "DMCA that" shit, and I'll bet there are a few mods out there who are, too.

      If you think the DMCA is an important issue, that's fine. But by posting stuff like this-- trying to drag it into a topic to which it simply doesn't apply-- you're just hurting your own cause.

      Hell, right now I'd vote in favor of the DMCA just to annoy Ungrounded Lightning over there!

  66. We hear you brother... by AFreeman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I do have a stereo at home, but not at work...

    ...and all the music I buy is only every played at work (or occasionally in my car) - my girlfriend doesn't like my prediliction for Swedish death metal...(fancy that!), but I won't code to anything else :-)

  67. Note the culprit, folks... by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Informative
    Apple is aware of record companies, including but not limited to Sony, that use such copy protection in new audio disc releases.

    SONY.

    Sony, Sony, Sony.

    Now do you understand why I fsckn can't stand them????

    If there is an Intellectual Property fracas, 9 out of 10 times Sony's right in the middle of it. Burn in Hell, Akio Morita!

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  68. Re:Am I the only one getting scared to buy CDs? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    You will just have to buy CDs from people like me who are putting out genuine uncompressed Red Book compliant CDs in the indie world. Generally it is easy to find the 'evil disc' status of such indies. I happen to know that there is not one CD out of the over 700 that Ampcast produces, which will do you any harm or refuse to play/rip/share/etc.

    Of course, there are financial concerns inherent in choosing indie music distributors rather than the big record companies with their economies of scale.

    In order to be able to play real CDs that are not booby-trapped to destroy your computer... you will have to pay less. :D

    But I'm sure we will be understanding if you cannot afford this, and feel you have to pay twice the money to companies who take the money and spend it on ways to make the 'discs' destroy your computer when you attempt to play them. Better the devil you know than the starving, talented, honest and cooperative musician you don't, huh? >;)

    Chris Johnson

  69. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by ivan256 · · Score: 2

    Too cheap? How about not dumb enough to waste $20 on a piece of hardware that was obsolete 10 years ago. If you want to take files with you to somewhere with no net connection, burn a CD. They're more durable, and it's faster then writing to a floppy anyway. Now if only PC vendors would stop including them so we could be rid of the things.

  70. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by nathanh · · Score: 2
    I'm sorry, but I blame Apple for this one. No data, however warped and horrid, should be able to do this to a drive. That it can do so means that Apple misdesigned the drive (and its device drivers).

    Except Apple didn't design the drive. They didn't build it either. And the problem is with the drive's firmware, so it's nothing to do with Apple's device drivers.

    If you had bought the same drive for a PC then it would do exactly the same thing.

  71. A good way to kill DMCA? by Jester99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are we to understand that post-it notes and sharpie pens are now contraband circumvention devices? 3M is not going to like this, not one bit.

    You know, that just might be the ticket. Is there a way to tell a District Attourney that he should bring suit against somebody for illegal activity? Tip off the DA that 3M is marketting items which may be used as circumvention devices.

    3M will bring in their lawerly guns blazing, and will throw lots of corporate resources at smacking on DMCA; we get our precident by making big business do our fighting for us.

    Can something like this work this way?

    (As a manufacturer of floppy disks, e.g., media which would be forced to have circumvention protection systems built in if CDTBPA (Is that the right 'nym?), etc, are passed, I'm sure that 3M is interested in getting rid of these laws...)

  72. Re:Here we go!! by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

    Since when is it Apple's responsibility to sue them? Apple needs to make its iMacs bootable from CD-Rom. The CD has a functional purpose in the machine, it can't just be a music sandbox. I'd say, leave the iMacs unmolested unless you are proceeding to undertake a demonstration in court. But... proceed to undertake a demonstration in court. Class action under 'anti-hacker' statutes to prove that the (wealthy) record company is intentionally sabotaging people's property on a MASSIVE SCALE.

  73. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by grung0r · · Score: 2, Informative

    I could be wrong, but I think that the imac cd drive violates the orange book standard. I'm pretty sure that all CD-rom drives must have a manual eject button.

  74. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by BtAFMB · · Score: 2, Funny
    Oh, I was making a general comment about Apple. Too cheap to include a $20 floppy drive, too stupid to include a manual eject for CDs...

    Don't even get me started on how they don't include a punch-card reader, and it doesn't have a single vacuum tube!

    --

    "I have fallen off the wagon, for I am a slave to tea."
  75. Technical document translation by rjamestaylor · · Score: 5, Funny
    • They find the line distant up to two centimeters from the outside edge. Draw now with the pin a tangential line, which covers the dividing line accurately, into which outside range project, but does not affect the last audio TRACK. A sticking tire helps as ruler.

      Try the result out. If it did not fold, the line covers either the dividing line not completely or lies over the last audio trace - here geht's around tenths of a millimeter. Then you wipe away to the pro copying bars with a damp speed and correct after.

    I followed these directions and my Celine Dion disk is now stuck in a tire heading east on I-10 at about 75 mph. I feel better already.
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  76. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by shepd · · Score: 2

    >I'm reminded of the old C-64 1541 floppy drive, which could be wrecked by malicious boot-sector code that caused it to ram the head repeatedly against the stop until it misaligned itself...

    Most of the misalignments were done by the copy protection code loaded onto the drive itself. The constant realignments to get the drive a 1/2 sector off (or so I recall reading as such) to get at the protected data were really nasty on the drive [feel free to correct me on that]. That's when you heard that clattering noise coming from your drive when playing the "original" disks (it was more than just "fastloader" code). This was just part of the reason people (at the time) legitimately autohacked their originals with hack-'em fast parameter files (among other utilities). Without using copy protected disks your drive would last longer.

    My personal favourite were the disks that slammed the head hard enough that you could feel it through the desk.

    Of course, this was all so easily possible because the 1541 disk drive had its own CPU (ever had your PC disk drive return an easter egg string before? ;-) which was reprogrammable by the computer. Of course, in this case you had to choose to run the program -- the 1541 didn't automatically boot your disks for you.

    As usual, history repeats itself. In another 5-10 years we'll probably be past all this copy protection (again) once the copy protection industries realise the truth (again): Copy protection increases copying.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  77. Can they make the warning stickers big enough ... by gotan · · Score: 2

    ... to prevent them being sued to hell and back? If that happened to me i would sure take it out of their hide and rise a big fuss about it too. Especially in the US of A, where McDonalds has to print "Dangerous: hot beverage" or somesuch on their coffe cups, i'd expect they'll have to make the warning stickers larger than the CD-cover.

    Maybe someone can think of a way to make them pay really large for damages (put some important documents on that iMac, claim it was the only copy, and you needed it just that day ...) i'd relly like to see the creators of that copyprotection bleed over this. Also i think this should make for a really nasty press story: before it was just some abstract copyprotection that would make one or the other CD not play, but now it's about destroying ones propertywhen attempting to play the CD.

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  78. Re:More DMCA violations? by Maserati · · Score: 2

    Post-It notes use a patented adhesive. The DMCA specifies a "technological method" of circumvention, soooo... Sure ! What the heck. Makes as much sense as a lot of the recent IP rulings.

    --
    Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  79. Does that mean black markers are forbidden now? by gotan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean, they can be used as circumvention devices to copy protected digital content, so the DMCA should apply, no?

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  80. Re:Overcome the protection you must by MxTxL · · Score: 2

    Afraid, are you?

  81. Re:Am I the only one getting scared to buy CDs? by Aerog · · Score: 2

    It's days like this that I look around my room and smile, knowing that I haven't bought a CD in months, rather the room is ever so slowly filling with vinyl. yep. Good old 12" singles. Sometimes I'm glad that I'm not a slave to (North American) popularity and prefer some good old-fashioned techno which comes on non-copy-protectable slabs of black plastic.

    . . .But the day they take that away. . .

    And the internet radio thing is another story altogether. Anyone who reads this and happens to be in the US (I have no "representative" to write to) write your representative and get Certain legeslation rejected. Please?

    --

    - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
  82. Why get a CD when glue works just as well? by xactoguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why go to all the trouble of going out, buying a CD (Celine Dion *shudder*), and putting it in my iMac? I might as well walk over to my desk, get some glue, and pour it in there :D. It'll do just the same thing, be cheaper for me, PLUS I'm sure that I will get some nice sound effects/smells being produced :D. Seriously, though, why does Sony have to be doing this? How can we send them some sort of message that they are screwing themselves over by doing this?

    --


    And so we go, on with our lives
    We know the truth, but prefer lies
    Lies are simple, simple is bliss
  83. Dude, forget computer stores. by mcc · · Score: 2
    Here's a much better idea. Go out and buy one of these CDs. Take it back into the music store. Try to return it. While it's still in the macintosh.

    I mean, specifically, what i really, really want to do is this: go down to Wherehouse music tomorrow and buy the Celene Dion CD, come back home, put the CD in my quicksilver g4 and fubar it.. then go back to Wherehouse carrying the g4, and whine and panic that their cd broke my computer.. and then whomp the empty cd case and the fubared g4 on their customer service counter and demand that they accept the return. And that they get their merchandise out of my computer.

    Wouldn't it be great to see the looks on their faces??? :)

    Then I could do it at Sam Goody the next day.

    Of course, *i* know that it's easy to solve, and that all you have to do is start up the macintosh with the mouse button held down, and it will eject the cd and you can get on with their life. And i *could* just do that for them. But hey, they broke it. Let them fix it :)

    There will be thousands of clueless newbies who will buy that cd and break their computers with it, and *THEY* will be totally unable to do anything about it (since Apple won't provide phone support AT ALL unless you pay them lots of money, and so the only way to find out about the magic mouse button eject thing is to read the document on Apple's website that explains what to do.. and *how do you read Apple's website if your Macintosh is broken*?).. so.

    If Wherehouse music is going to be selling this CD to people whose computers will break as a result, and Wherehouse music isn't going to be there to help explain to them how to restore their imacs to working order.. why should i explain to Wherehouse music how to restore my mac to working order when it's sitting on their counter in front of an underpaid clerk while i hold up the line?? ^_^ I have this vision of this happening all over the country, hundreds of secretly-clued-in mac owners sabotaging their machines and then going back to make music stores actually deal with the fallout of what they've done, instead of making the consumer deal with the fallout.. but of course that won't happen. Of course i won't even get around to doing it myself, because i don't get around to finishing things often and i fucking hate Celene Dion. But it's fun to think about :)
    Anyway, for the record, it isn't that your "firmware" gets messed up like the Slashdot blurb says.. I know, because i've had this exact problem happen to me. Not with a copy-protected CD-- i apparently managed to replicate the macintosh-fubaring effects of the Cactus technology totally independently, in my dorm room, by getting my copy of "Confield" (Autechre's newest album, buy it today! ^_^) all scratched up and then spilling stuff on it. I got the same effect the apple article describes, and basically what happens is this: there's a flaw in the current macintosh CD-ROM drives where if you put in a sufficiently damaged CD, the computer gets so confused that upon trying to read the CD, it crashes. Unfortunately, with the newer macintoshes there's no way to eject the CD except by software unless you disassemble the machine.. and this is a problem because in the Macintosh boot sequence, the first thing the Macintosh does is read some data off the CD-ROM drive to see if the CD-ROM is bootable... which, with one of the copy-protected CDs, of course causes the Mac to crash again. The cycle can be broken by doing what this post says.. in my case, the mouse-button-at-startup thing worked. But only after I walked to a school computer lab and hounded people on IRC until i found someone who knew how to make a macintosh g4 eject the CD on startup.. :P
  84. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by unitron · · Score: 2

    Yeah, it's a shame about that punch card reader, but the monitor CRT is one big old vacuum tube.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  85. No problem. by ZigMonty · · Score: 2
    Dude you can always reboot a mac. In increasing order of desperation:
    1. Apple Menu->Restart
    2. Command-Ctrl-Power
    3. Reset button (if you have one)
    4. Yank the power cable/battery out.

    Done.

  86. Re:Overcome the protection you must by mikefoley · · Score: 2

    That's Herr Yoda to you and me...

    --
    What's my Karma Mr. Burns? "Excellent"
  87. The CD did it? by Andronicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The CD could not "fubar the firmware." However, it could bring out a bug in that firmware that leads to its own state of fubar.

    I hate copyprotected CDs. But the fubar'ed iMac CD drive firmware needs to be addressed by Apple.

    --
    USNG: 14TPU4605
  88. And remember, kids... by Millennium · · Score: 3, Funny

    Every time you listen to a copy-protected CD...
    Celine Dion kills an iMac.
    Please, think of the iMacs.

  89. Sony are hypocrites by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2

    Think about this for a moment -- on the one hand we have Sony (and other recording companies) telling us that we shouldn't be copying music and burning CDRs.

    On the other hand, Sony are more than happy to take our money when we buy one of their CDR/RW drives, their CDR/RW media and their various audio recording products.

    Should they sue themselves under the DMCA I wonder?

    Or are they just so stupid that they're hoping nobody will notice this crazy situation?

  90. It's not, it's Pioneer's by Chirs · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Apple really isn't to blame, except maybe for buying drives with poorly written firmware.

    The drive manufacturer is at fault here--it should not be possible to cause damage by inserting a disk in the drive. Really, the copy protection is only a disk that is corrupted in a specific way--the drive should have been designed to fail gracefully if the disk is corrupted.

  91. Many conflicts of interest... by Xepherys2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see many conflicts of interest here...

    First of all, Sony begins using this copy-protection scheme by forcing it's children-companies to begin putting it on their "CD"s. This is apparently an attempt to prevent ripping of said "CD" tracks into MP3 or other digital media files. On the other hand, Sony is one of the larger companies who are currently making hardware to play "legitimate" MP3s, such as the Sony MP505 mini-disc MP3 players, and others.

    Now, how does one go about using their Sony MP505 to play MP3s from their new Sony-parented "CD"? I mean, I understand that the MP3 players are just to jump into a market where money is to be had, but still, this seems like a case of one hand not knowing what the other is doing.

    First of all, as has been stated many-a-time, the patent holder of TRUE CDs should sue the pants off of companies that are creating discs that do not conform to standards, but still market them as CDs. Perhaps the official CD logo is not there on many of these CDs, but do the record labels make any statement that these are not truly Compact Discs?

    What other devices might these not work in? Some items made for the computer-oriented user that has a more CD-ROM style interface than a standard CD interface? What about MP3 players that use CD media to play MP3s, but also can play audio CDs? What about a device like my Apex AD-3201. that uses a very standard DVD-ROM drive attached via an ATAPI interface to a decoder? If not these discs, will others that are soon to follow cause problems here as well?

    Perhaps I am not technically inclined enough with color book standards to understand what causes the current problems in iMacs, and why there may not be other problems here and there... but I know enough to be mildly concerned about this.

    If someday I purchase Star Wars Episode II on DVD and pop it into my Apex (with region encoding and Macrovision turned off), and my DVD and mainboard firmware become damaged... I'm going to be particularly upset.

    Does anyone have a webpage up yet that lists not only known discs with this protection, but also known devices, SPECIFICALLY, which will fail and how? Just curious if maybe the full impact has not yet been felt or noticed.

    -Xepherys

  92. What would a flock of penguins do? by corebreech · · Score: 2

    Peck them to death!

    Everybody should just take Sony to small claims court!

    Bring your fucked-up iMac -- or buy an iMac and have it fucked up by Sony first -- and bring the iMac to small claims court, asking for Sony to fix your iMac.

    If everybody did this, what would Sony do? Deploy a lawyer to every one-horse town in America defending these claims?

    If they did, the cost would be exorbitant beyond belief! If they didn't, the cost would be exorbitant beyond belief!

    Think small beaks. Biting hard. Lots of them.

  93. Re:Didn't the original post say you CAN'T reboot? by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Informative

    All these three options require rebooting. However, the original post said that this CD by artist of little talent makes your computer unable to reboot!?!?!?!

    The MacUser UK article that inspired this thread is simply terrible. And yeah, it said that the CDs in question would leave the Mac unable to boot. But what was meant was that the Mac would be unable to boot all the way up to multiuser mode successfully.

    In order to force-eject the CD-- using two out of the three methods, that is-- you only have to get the Mac up to Open Firmware. That's all in hardware, so the presence of a bad disc won't affect it.

    Seems like most people don't even know that they've got a really sophisticated boot PROM underneath their Macs. Hold down cmd-opt-O-F (that's "oh" and "eff") right after powering on some time to see how it all works.

  94. Re:Be careful by Wire+Head · · Score: 2, Funny

    Congradulations! Thanks to the DMCA, we can now shut down all the felt tip marker makers, and 3M for making Post-it-Notes because they are devices capable of circumventing copy protection!

    --


    WireHead

    The previous message was created with 100% recycled words.
  95. any lawsuits? by Tom · · Score: 2

    I thought you americans would always sue everyone over pretty much everything - so where's the lawsuit? I'm fairly sure that over here in europe, where we still have some consumer protection laws, this CD would violate at least half of them (let's see - misleading advertisement, sale of known defective stuff, intent to damage private property...)

    A class-action lawsuit (not possible in europe) could make you rich. Just claim the total sales volume of iMacs as the damage and sue on behalf of all iMac owners (it may or may not help to be one).

    More seriously, why isn't there a lawsuit? Are corporations the only ones with a license to abuse the courts?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  96. Hello Good Times virus... by xixax · · Score: 2
    Oh great, $BIGCORP has just spent an obscene amount of cash implementing the GOOD TIMES virus. The stupidity of it all leaves me lost for words. I shall await the urban folklore with relish:

    Thought you might like to know...

    Apparently , a new computer virus has been engineered by RIAA that is unparalleled in its destructive capability. Other, more well-known viruses such as Stoned, Airwolf, and Michaelangelo pale in comparison to the prospects of this newest creation by a warped mentality.

    What makes this virus so terrifying is the fact that no program needs to be exchanged for a new computer to be infected. It can be spread through the existing retail systems.

    Luckily, there is one sure means of detecting what is now known as the "Celine Dion" virus. It always travels to new computers the same way - in a CD titled simply "Celine Dion". Avoiding infection is easy once the CD has been received - by not using it. The act of using the CD in your computer causes the "Celine Dion" mainline program to initialize and execute. It will then proceed to trash the computer it is running on.

    The bottom line here is - if you receive a CD title "Celine Dion", delete it immediately! Do not use it! Rest assured that whoever's istening to this CD is surely struck by the virus. Warn your friends and local system users of this newest threat to the InterNet! It could save them a lot of time and money.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  97. fun with large electronics stores by cosyne · · Score: 2

    This sounds like great fun in places that sell macs and CDs. Just sneak a celene dion disk from the music section over the the computer section and drop it in a new imac. Not that i condone evil acts like this, i'm just saying it sounds fun.

    BTW- if you are opening CDs in a store and don't intend to buy them, leave the sticker seal on the top edge and just unhinge the jewel case to get the CD out. That way you can put them back still 'sealed.'

    I just had another thought- if i did a bit-for-bit copy of the malicious part of the cd and then distributed that to mess up cd drives, would i be a malicious hacker?

  98. Um, no. by acb · · Score: 2

    Celine Dion fans would most probably be people who don't care (or know) what their computer runs; which means mostly Windows users.

    Since Windows is the default OS, Windows users' tastes would be (on average) more mainstream than fringe users. Mac users would probably have more piercings/tattoos than the average person and would be likely to listen to eclectic bands most people have never heard of.

    1. Re:Um, no. by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
      Lessee.. I own a Mac (an iMac even)...

      Tattooed? Uhm... yes...

      Pierced? Yup, that too...

      Eclectic music? Well, if Industrial and Metal counts... yes...

      BTW, I have no linux boxen, only old crummy sparcstations (of which one is a dual head) running Solaris and some Free/NetBSD boxen... And of course my iMac running OSX.

      Well you came close enough :)

  99. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    As a mac owner, my only characterizations of typical Mac owners would be that they are more likely to drive Volvos and more likely to think that their presidential candidate was robbed in the last election.

    I have a Quadra 610 that gets fired up occasionally (currently loaded with MacOS 7.5.3 and NetBSD), as well as a bunch of Apple IIs...that makes me more of an old-school Apple user than most Mac-heads. My automotive preferences lean more toward GM than Volvo (have an '02 S10 and a '77 Cutlass Supreme), and Satan will be engaged in snowball fights before I'd even consider voting for a Democrat. (I usually vote Republican, but I've occasionally thrown my vote to a third-party candidate if the putative GOP candidate was really just a RINO—a Republican In Name Only.)

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  100. Re:Be careful by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    Take that Sony Music & CO, I hardly seize you with my simple felt marker and notice my right to a backup copy! You have been outwitted!

    All your CD are belong to us...

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  101. Does any responsiblity lie with the retailers??? by msaulters · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With all this talk about how these CD's are not "CD"'s, it strikes me that a store selling them couldn't properly call itself a "CD" store. I think, perhaps retailers should separate these from the other, proper, CDDA discs.

    A warning on the packaging and on the disc itself is insufficient for two reasons that I can see: 1) It would NEVER occur to the average consumer (who's only just figured out that thing isn't a cup-holder) that not only is a CD not a CD, but that it could 'break' their computer. Yes, I've seen the explanations that the hardware isn't really broken, but we ALL know that the average user isn't technically aware, and things must be kept VERY simple.

    Reason #2) The packaging is not always available. I just hopped over to CDNOW, and there is NO MENTION WHATSOEVER on the page to indicate this is not a CDDA disc. It is listed in two formats: CD and Tape (and the CD is still more expensive than cassette, go figure)

    Knowing that retailers are extremely unlikely to provide this service any time soon, may I humbly propose we create a CDNOT.com to catalog all these unplayable discs, and make a plugin available that will warn you, should you attempt to purchase one?

    --
    These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
  102. Clearly too late on this thread, but... by seldolivaw · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine bought that CD. It plays (and rips) fine in my computer -- even on Window Media Player, for pete's sake -- except for the last track, which won't rip or play. I dunno how effective you call that...

  103. The drive isn't failing (was Re:Apple Responds w/ by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm damn well suggesting that a drive shouldn't fail when you put in something that is PHYSICALLY COMPATIBLE with a CD. Sure, I don't expect it to be able to handle a cheese sandwich or a sanding disc, but a correctly-sized piece of plastic should be fine.

    The drive isn't failing. It's doing what it's suposed to do. It's reading the equivalent of the boot sector of the CD, and attempting to boot the software on the CD. The software on the CD is then doing deliberately malicious things to the computer. Any computer that's capable of booting or automatically running software from any media is vulnerable to attack from what is in effect a boot sector virus.

    It does seem to me that Sony are sailing very close to some legal winds here. It would not seem to me to be so much a problem if the automatic-load-and-go program opened a window on the Mac screen saying 'this disc cannot be played on Macintosh computers', but this deliberate malicious damage seems to me quite serious.

    Mind you, it's arguable that anyone who buys a Celine Dion record deserves all they get...

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  104. It's completely irresponsible to blame Apple by ZxCv · · Score: 2

    In your case, I'd say the drive that burned your CD-R is at fault. Saying that Apple is at fault because these "CDs" can ruin the drives is just ludicrous. It would be like me saying that Nissan is at fault because when I put a new synthetic oil in my car, it ruined the engine. Just as my beef in that case would have to be with the oil maker and not Nissan, if I had a drive toasted by one of these discs, my problem would be with the disc's manufacturer, not with Apple. It is likewise absurd that Apple should just fix the machines and then turn around and try to bill Sony or whoever. Just the logistics in doing that correctly would be hideous, let alone trying to collect any actual money from the disc manufacturers. In the end, it sucks for the users, but the manufacturers of the discs are the ones to blame, not Apple.

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  105. Re:Episode 2 CD (Jango Fett cover+Bonus Track) by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

    I don't think they'd risk not labeling it in the UK - there was a huge stink when they last tried copy protection because the shops had to bear the wrath of angry customers who couldn't play their CDs - the entire lot was taken off the shelves a few days later, to be replaced by non-copy protected versions.

    I'd expect any cactused CD to have a huge sticker on it with 'Will not play on PC CD, Will not play on Cheap CD Player, Might not play on anything else, either... avoid.'

  106. Responsibility by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2


    Apple are *not* responsible. The CD producers are.

    I'd suggest making a claim in the small claims court against the retailer. Apple have supplied the basic evidence you need. If you keep the claim relatively low, repair costs plus *minimal* damage for your time/distress and below the cost of a lawyer for the day, they will not even defend it. You get an automatic win.

    Targeting the retailer also applies strong market pressure not to stock the CD.

  107. Who cares by t_allardyce · · Score: 2

    Lol, its a good thing that these would still be illigal without the proper labeling.

    Theres a rule, that i think you learn in business school, its pretty important and goes something like "don't piss off your customers in any way unless you have a damn good marketing spin campagne to fool the suckers into coming back"

    I don't care, i have never bought a CD in my life and im not about to start. Why bother paying for something when you can download it or rip other peoples? no its not fair to the record companys but then, life is not fair. People screw me around all the time, and you know what? i couldn't give the slightest crap weather all the major record labels' bosses dropped dead or a plane load of bad artists was smashed into their studios. lol we will probably see activists running around stores spray painting all the protected CDs.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  108. Re:Does any responsiblity lie with the retailers?? by Self+Bias+Resistor · · Score: 2

    Knowing that retailers are extremely unlikely to provide this service any time soon, may I humbly propose we create a CDNOT.com to catalog all these unplayable discs, and make a plugin available that will warn you, should you attempt to purchase one?

    I know this may be stating the obvious (since this link has been made available on Slashdot many times) but there is a site that is taking on the (unfortunately) increasing task of cataloguing all "copy-protected" CDs. It's called Fat Chuck's and it not only lists "copy-protected CDs" in various regions but also, among other things, gives help to indie artists and gives a list of banned books throughout the world. You can also submit errors and comments on "copy-protected CDs".

    If you find one in a store, excercise your customer (I hate the word consumer, it reinforces this cattle mentality corporations have about us citizens) rights and take it back, clear and simple. What they sold you is not a CD, according to the Red/Blue Book specifications and you have a right to return the product for exchange or refund unless the store specifically says otherwise. And I damn well hope somebody takes legal action because if this latest news is any indication, the record companies are not only selling you products that won't work in your equipment (ie. play and rip) but will actually intentionally damage your equipment (ie. fucking up firmware and forcing reboots, causing potential loss of data). I'm just so sick of this shit.

    --

    ----------
    When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer our friend.

  109. I think it's okay, malice on the part of the "CD" by Kjella · · Score: 2

    I think Apple should sue the "CD" makers for creating intentionally destructive devices intended to cause support costs (angry customers, phone support, returns), remarkably similar to real CDs. Overestimate some FUD noumbers, particularly for unsatisfied customers, say X% of customers scared away x X$ average sales pr. customer (which is almost impossible to determine anyway) and you'll see some nice multi-million figures. Even RIAA don't like to take on big companies.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  110. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by markmoss · · Score: 2

    Apple didn't design the drive. They didn't build it either. But they selected it.

  111. Muppet.... by MosesJones · · Score: 2

    "Physically compatible"

    So If I take a bunch of C4 explosive, press it down into a CD shape and put it in then it should still be okay, EVEN if I put a small detonator in that is kicked off by exposure to the light in the CD laser.

    Repeat for fragile glass, cookie dough etc etc...

    The "thing" that is put in is not a CD as the manufacturers of it have not obeyed the first thing in the spec.... compatibility.

    If you wire your Motherboard directly to the mains and it gets fried then you are a fool, if you get supplied with a PC without a transform its the producer of the PC not the motherboard that you should blame.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Muppet.... by AVee · · Score: 2

      So If I take a bunch of C4 explosive, press it down into a CD shape and put it in then it should still be okay, EVEN if I put a small detonator in that is kicked off by exposure to the light in the CD laser.

      Yes, that is, the firmware should still be okay and say, 'hey, this is not a CD-ROM nor a CD-DA' and then ignore it or eject it.
      And yes, your drive may fail if the stuff explodes, but you couldn't blame the firmware for that...

  112. $18 by seigel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, with all this copy protection in the CD now it is almost worth the $18 now! I guess they are just trying to make CDs more expensive to make so they can justify the price!

    Good for them.....I am glad they are finally getting the price more inline with the actual costs!

    Cheers

  113. So, could anyone take time from the flamewar .... by pyramid+termite · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... to tell me, please, whether writing on a copy protected CD with a black marker really works? My God, one of the main points of this story has hardly been addressed, except to make jokes about banning post it notes and markers. I guess people are too busy flaming record companies and Apple to address something constructive.

    I'm sorry, but people are posting a lot of drivel here and I'm getting tired of it. Mod me into oblivion for saying this, but one of the main points of this story remains unexamined.

    What's up with that?

  114. Re:But a LOT of people DO have fucking stereos by Junta · · Score: 2

    Ok, I admit I have a stereo receiver, and am looking to get either a large projection TV or a projector, and a VCR to tune TV and play tapes. Everything else I do through the computer connected through the stereo. Progressive scan DVD playback, CD playback, but more frequently rip the cds to disk so I can have instant access to all tracks on all CDs without suffering the wait of a CD changer to change discs, and without having to worry about the crap tracks. So the "typical parts" include stereo, because it sounds so damn good, TV, though not really typical, since I plan on getting something that takes XGA input from a computer, and a VCR, because TV tuner through computer through TV looks like crap and I need something to play all those damn tapes. When I can get away with it, the computer offers great quality and flexibility. I don't feel like having my rig castrated just because the RIAA/MPAA is afraid I *could* do something bad with it. Hell, I *have* to use linux in my rig because some of my non-CSS, non-Region coded discs refuse to play under any of my Windows applications, so I have to use illegal software to
    have my rig work right (technically I could avoid the CSS bits and boot between Windows and linux, but that is too much to expect).

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  115. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by hey! · · Score: 2

    Then how do you know you don't like her, other than other people are telling you it is not cool to like her?

    Charlie Parker sometimes listened to country music on the jukebox and apparently enjoyed it even though today many of his jaz snob fans wouldn't be caught dead listening to it. Being caught is the operative phrase.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  116. Well, maybe it is... by maddogsparky · · Score: 2
    From Apple's knowlege base, it looks like you have to pay out of pocket if the recomended fixes don't work:

    Apple computers are not designed to support copyright protected media that do not conform to such standards. Therefore, any attempt to use non standard discs with Apple CD drives will be considered a misapplication of the product. Under the terms of Apple's One-Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare Protection Plan, or other AppleCare agreement any misapplication of the product is excluded from Apple's repair coverage. Because the Apple product is functioning correctly according to its design specifications, any fee assessed by an Apple Authorized Service Provider or Apple for repair service will not be Apple's responsibility.

    --
    science is a religion
  117. Re:But who listens to Celine Dion anyway? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    Right cause sexual preference has such a bering on which computer you choose.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  118. Re:What garbage by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    Generaly speaking, if you toss a CD into your CD ROM drive and it isn't a mac readable CD. One of two things happens:

    a) The computer assumes there's no CD and merily goes on it's way, and will eject the tray next time you push the eject button.

    b) The computer locks up in a continuous cycle to try and read the CD. It knows something is there, and will continue to try and read it. The CD will not mount and no matter how often you push the button, the CD will not eject. The solution to this is to restart and remove the CD during the start-up process.

    If this thing is fsking with the firmware (of either the CD ROM or the Computer) we have a serious problem here. That's the equivilent of putting a tape in your VCR and having the VCR catch fire. That's not cool and if it can be proven to be intentional is also ilegal.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  119. the old TRS-80 by hawk · · Score: 2
    >Imagine you plug in a monitor and immediately the big internal batteries deliver a huge
    >voltage to your motherboard through the (onboard) video.


    Years ago, the TRS-80 (later dubbed Model 1) used three identical connectors (DIN?) on the back. I knew someone who toasted his when reaching behind to plug it together. It never *occurred* to an engineer that anyone would use the same connector like that, and he plugged the power supply to the monitor output . . .


    hawk

  120. Re:Oh for goodness sakes! by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    I am not 100% certain, but I could swear that all macs including the iMac have a hole for the paperclip on them. Perhaps you aren't looking carefuly enough.

    In either case, to reboot a mac (or any computer) , even if the whole system is locked, you simply remove the power and plug it back in. Turn it on and poof! Problem solved. Getting the CD out is as simple as holding down the mouse button, or doing any of the steps listed by the poster above.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  121. isn't that . . . by hawk · · Score: 2
    >they might as well repair it when your 8-year-old sticks in a 5" rotary saw blade.


    Isn't that in one of those American Express commercials?


    :)


    hawk

  122. This still isn't fair to most purchasers! by hawk · · Score: 2
    It is fundamentally unfair to require that someone purchasing a Celine Dion "CD" put the "music" in a computer before suffering sever punishment.


    A better solution would be to make the case into a Scroll of Punishment--hopefully the steel ball will slow the tasteless buyer enough on the way to the player that he'll have time to reconsider and never put it in .. . .


    hawk, who also understands that opening a Merle Haggard CD should be a Blessed Scroll of Remove Curse . . .

  123. Re:But hey.. by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    Back in the old days, any Apple user I knew would beat you up for calling their machine a "PC".

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  124. Re:All 3 mac users by foobar104 · · Score: 2

    I said:

    The hold-down-the-button trick is very well known among Mac users, and all three of them are documented thoroughly.

    He said:

    So, basically you're saying that all 3 mac users are well documented?

    Heh. Guess I deserved that for posting while under the influence of sleepy. I hereby deduct one grammar point from my permanent record.

  125. Re:if it's not a CD, how can I play it? by foobar104 · · Score: 2

    If it's a CD, then you're supposed to find it from a store under the label "audio CDs", if it's not, then is the store owner liable for selling dynamites that look like a cigars from the cigar stand?

    Like I said to JoeSchmoe, please don't use the word "liable" in this context. It implies a specific level of legal responsibility that just doesn't apply here.

    If you buy a CD and it doesn't play, take it back to the store. If the store won't accept the return, sell the CD at a used record store to recoup some of your expense, then find a new place to buy CDs.

    This same algorithm applies in cases where you might buy one of these pseudo-CDs.

    In fact, if you really feel like spending a little time and money to vote against these things, you should go to a record store and buy a copy of one of them. Take it home and open it. Stare at it for a while. Heck, you can even try to listen to it, just don't use a computer to do it. Then haul the disc and your receipt back to the store and-- politely, politely!-- ask for your money back.

    If the average CD run has one defect in 10,000 discs (a totally made-up number) but these CDs all have rates of return greatly in excess of that, somebody will get the message. I hope.

  126. Re:Does any responsiblity lie with the retailers?? by swordgeek · · Score: 2

    Hmmm.

    If the retailer told you it was a CD, then maybe. If they told you it would play on your stereo, then maybe. If they called themselves a CD shop, and didn't have any actual CDs, then maybe.

    But most retailers I know of are "music stores." Most staff would shrug and go "I dunno" if you asked them if it followed red-book specs. The retailer should have a MORAL responsibility, but they almost definitely don't have a LEGAL one. They'd have to work pretty hard to explicitly mislead their customers far enough to get in any trouble.

    There's an interesting articleon C|NET about whether Apple should be responsible or liable. The answer is pretty clear: Should they be liable if you put a peanut butter and jelly sandwich in your CD tray? Well then, why should they be responsible if you put one of these things in?

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  127. Re:Yup, permanent damage; nope, Apple won't cover by Knobby · · Score: 2

    I agree! Apple is doing the right thing by not covering this.

    I'd love to see Apple take it a step further and begin posting large warnings in their stores and on their website warning their potential customers. Now, that would piss off the RIAA, wouldn't it?

  128. Online retailers calling it a "CD" by vaxer · · Score: 2

    CDnow lists A New Day Has Come as a CD. Since it's not actually a CD, isn't this misleading? If Philips informed them that it's not a CD, and they kept misusing the term, wouldn't that be fraud?

  129. Alright, finally some good music! by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2
    I used to buy CD's. But, I stopped when the music industry started creating copy-protected CD's. I don't want to support the RIAA, and have only bought independantly-released disks since the Charlie Pride debacle came out. I haven't really missed them. I have enough old music to keep me happy.

    I generally feal guilty about grabbing mp3s where I haven't bought the disk. But even a goody-two shoes like me doesn't feel guilty about copying a disk with this dumb copy-protection stuff. I figure that if I wanted the music enough to buy it the CD, I still couldn't because it won't work with my OS (linux).

    And since then my music has been limited to what discs have been copy-protected. I hate country, so Charlie Pride wasn't anything I was interested. Boy bands are a similair story.

    But NOW I CAN STEAL CELINE DION! And, if other posters are correct, then I can steal the Ep2 soundtrack without feeling guilty!!!

    Things are looking better all the time!

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  130. Re:Everybody stock up on Sharpies! - NEWS AT 11! by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 2

    WASHINGTON, D.C. - May 14, 2002 - DEA BUSTS SUSPECTED SHARPIE HOARDING OPERATION

    DEA spokesman Captain L. I. Bee released information today of a successful "sting" operation where thousands of Fully Automatic Terrorist Media Stealing Assault Weapons (formerly known as Sharpie markers) were being rebranded and sold as hallucinogenic inhalants.

    "It was shocking", said Captain L. I. Bee. "Everywhere, on shelves, in boxes, were hundreds, perhaps thousands of these insidious devices. While our friends and colleagues in the media industries are joining hands to stamp out media terrorism, the DEA will not be standing by the wayside in this matter. We have classified Sharpies as a controlled substance and, with time, we expect a mandatory death sentence for anyone caught making, selling, or posessing any such device."

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  131. Re:The drive isn't failing (was Re:Apple Responds by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    >it's arguable that anyone who buys a Celine Dion record deserves all they get...

    Ok, but I can envision many scenarios where a person with otherwise good taste can find himself in the position of using a publication in the course of work or research that he might not use for entertainment. Say I'm working on my masters' and researching the irish whistle and uileann pipe in lat 20th century popular music. Guess what artist had material with such a complement? So there is a way I could be directly affected without even being a fan of the music.

    How about this: A youth puts this disc in a public (or school) library's Mac. The computer "breaks." The librarian, who is half gator, has the visitor banned, labeled as a 'hacker', expelled from school, prosecuted under some 'for the children' statute, and nobody but slashdot readers ever considers that it
    s SONY who should be punished.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  132. I disagree by Aapje · · Score: 2

    It's extremely stupid that Windows tries to read your disks when they are removed. It has irritated me often. MacOS handles that much better by actually removing open windows/drives when you eject a storage device. That isn't possible with a hardware-controlled eject. Learning to reboot with the mouse-button down isn't that hard in those rare cases that a CD won't eject.

    PS. What does the key sequence for booting have to do with this (pressing 'c' on my 1997 G3)?

    --

    The Drowned and the Saved - Primo Levi
  133. This disk is being sold as an Audio CD by Gleef · · Score: 2

    From Apple's Knowledgebase Article regarding this it implies that this product (and a couple of others) fall into that category of disks that do not qualify for the CD logo. Therefore they are not CDs.

    However, stores are marketing this as if it were a CD:
    * CDNow lists it as a "CD"
    * Amazon lists the media type as "Audio CD"
    * CD Universe lists it as a "CD"

    If you have purcased a copy protected disk without the CD logo, and it was marketed as an actual CD, you do have grounds to return the disk. Even more so if you got it online and had no opportunity to examine the logo and see warning labels on the disk. If they give you any problems, report them to the Better Business Bureau and/or your state's Attorney General.

    --

    ----
    Open mind, insert foot.
  134. CNN and Apple articles on the same topic by scubacuda · · Score: 2

    Interestingly, here is what CNN and Apple have to say about it.