Slashdot Mirror


Extreme Cooling

hakkikt writes "Icrontic brings us a review about a CPU-cooling device every self-respecting overclocker and cpu-speed freak must get. The device is called MX-EVA3. With a price of US$500, it's not for the faint of wallet, but the performance is awesome."

169 comments

  1. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For 500$, can't you just buy a faster CPU?

    1. Re:LOL by Butt+Spelunker · · Score: 0

      You don't get to laugh outloud you ass-cramming AC. Go spelunk some more butts. Anal Speleologist.

    2. Re:LOL by garglblaster · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, for $500 you can get a decent refrigerator (that has more cooling power)

      Simply put the whole of the PC inside!

      --

      perl -e 'printf("%x!\n",49153)'

    3. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You'll want to be careful. I have a pc in a mini fridge (Server and Beer all sorts of fun) Unfortonatly I lost the first motherboard I put in it. Too muich condinstation. Now I have the board sealed in in airtight plastic. Runs great have a p2 400 over clocked to about 533 :)

    4. Re:LOL by showboat · · Score: 1

      I've been considering that, but doing it here along the gulf, I'd have so much moisture in my plastic bag that the board would swim.

      Gonna seal up the mobo? Road trip!

    5. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh ! That was my line. You stole it.

  2. $500 by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 1

    for that price couldn't you just buy 2 1.8 or so processors and a dual processor MB?

    --
    sig - .
    1. Re:$500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you, sir, lack the knowledge of why true overclocking is done in the first place

    2. Re:$500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but a Celery 300A @ 2Ghz is more far impressive. To overclockers, at least.

      Of course, if you've got an XP 2200+ box and $500... *drool*

    3. Re:$500 by Erik+Fish · · Score: 2

      Because some people have more money than brains?

      Seriously, practical overclocking is currently dead. It died when my Celeron 533 running at 824 (and even the 533's that could hit 1GHz) stopped cutting it for the latest games. The price/performance ratio advantage that overclocking used to give you simply doesn't exist with current hardware.

      My brother boasted to me the other day about how his video card can be overclocked in software and it doesn't void the warranty. Hello? This isn't overclocking, it's the manufacturer underclocking to sell more units to people who are so far into the rice boy mentality that their mind shuts down and their wallet opens up when they see the word "overclock".

    4. Re:$500 by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Most overclockers just do it because it can be done. They don't really care about price/performance, although they will sometimes claim that as a benefit of all their time and money spent (wasted?) on overclocking.

      I don't really see much point in it, since I'm only interested in price/performance. I can find much better solutions than overclocking (usually, switching software or CPU architecture).

      If someone wants to create the ultimate desktop system, I'd suggest investing in server technology rather than pushing consumer technology to its limits. You can get some really cool stuff off ebay for pennies on the dollar... too bad that there's nothing really pushing consumer technology to its limits, except for benchmarks.

    5. Re:$500 by packeteer · · Score: 1

      overclocking will reach its limits when a one of a couple of thigns happen: 1. the chip core cannot disperse the heat fast enough and the chip fries... no matter how bad as your fan is the heat must still be pulled away to the heat sink and then dispersed... if its hot enough it will fry the chip first. 2. to even get a extremely high overclock one must give the chip more voltage... this usually requires a soldering iron and some new capacitors and voltage regulators... very difficult and still wont speed it up... 2. the rest of the system cannot handle it... if the core logic chipset cannot handle the speed then your cpu and ram cannot speak to each other and any work the cpu does will be for no good cause you have already crashed.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    6. Re:$500 by packeteer · · Score: 1

      damn view as html... lemme reformat that... oh god NOW i remmeber what "preview" is for.. i also know what sleep is for...

      overclocking will reach its limits when a one of a couple of thigns happen:

      1. the chip core cannot disperse the heat fast enough and the chip fries... no matter how bad as your fan is the heat must still be pulled away to the heat sink and then dispersed... if its hot enough it will fry the chip first.

      2. to even get a extremely high overclock one must give the chip more voltage... this usually requires a soldering iron and some new capacitors and voltage regulators... very difficult and still wont speed it up...

      3. the rest of the system cannot handle it... if the core logic chipset cannot handle the speed then your cpu and ram cannot speak to each other and any work the cpu does will be for no good cause you have already crashed.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    7. Re:$500 by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

      Hey, I think this will get my Celery 300a to 2.001GHz, don't knock it.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    8. Re:$500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the chip core cannot disperse the heat fast enough and the chip fries...

      More typically the chip will simply crash or fail to compute at all, resulting in a prompt cooling effect. Burning out the chip is possible, typically when bosting the voltage too high. But, as a rule, overclocking is fairly safe. If you search the web, you'll find tables of CPUs and how well/poorly they overclock. Use them, and you can't go wrong.

      There are even vendor's out there that will do all the work and testing for you. For $75, or so, you can get something like a $275 2.2Ghz P4 pushed towards 3Ghz. A 25% boost at a price linear to the 2.2Mhz part. (Spending $500 would likely be a poor value, cheaper ways will likely get the part to the limit and this gizzmo won't get it much further.)

      The usual process is to boost the clock rate a bit, test, repeat until failure, then back off a notch. That process is fairly safe. For Linux types a complete Kernel make is a great test.

      > this usually requires a soldering iron and some new capacitors and voltage regulators

      Not unless you're a hard ass, and proud of it. Most MOBO's adjust all these things through bios or jumpers. MOBOs are multi-layer and surface mount, so soldering really hasn't been an option for quite awhile.

      Some MOBOs are designed for this better than others. The good ones let you choose bus speeds from many small increments. The deal is the MOBO will handle a range of CPUs, like 300Mhz through 2.5Ghz. With that you could push a 300 as far as it will go, without hacking the MOBO.

      > the rest of the system cannot handle it... if the core logic chipset cannot handle the speed then your cpu and ram cannot speak to each other

      Again, buy a MOBO that supports the target speed of your overclock. The rest will then fall into place. The best way is to boost the Front Side Bus, and the only way on current CPUs, that way ram access is improved too.

    9. Re:$500 by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Again, buy a MOBO that supports the target speed of your overclock. The rest will then fall into place. The best way is to boost the Front Side Bus, and the only way on current CPUs, that way ram access is improved too.

      isnt the idea of overclocking to NOT have to buy the super fast hardware in the first place??? and as for hacking the mobo you do sometimes need to solder on new parts... otherwise the old parts are pushe to their limit and technically they CAN run but stability is an issue for most people...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    10. Re:$500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > isnt the idea of overclocking to NOT have to buy the super fast hardware in the first place

      Not generally. It's to not have to buy the super fast, super expensive, CPUs (central & graphics). That's were the money is (well, was, once upon a time). MOBOs cost the same no matter what their clock range is, so you simply have to make sure to buy the right ones. Price varies mostly by what support chips (Lan, Audio, SCSI, Graphics) are glued on.

      Again, soldering surface mount, multi-layer MOBOs, is impractical, nee impossible, for all but the exquisitly patient, most stable of hand, and carefully equipped hacker.

      Alas, back in the day, getting a vendor to pick and push a pair of Celerons from 300 to 500 was a $120 effort. An effort that saved about $500 over buying 2 500MHz CPUs. Now, the cost of "pushing" a CPU to its limit is generally more expensive than buying the properly rated CPU. The only frontier is pushing a 2.2GHz P4 to 3Ghz, off the scale of what can be purchased.

      Even so, a dual XEON 2.2 is cheaper than pushing a 2.2 using a $500 heat sink. If you use Linux, or Win* apps/games that are SMP aware.

    11. Re:$500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: The above post applies to Intel chips. They have internal thermal diodes that shut down/slow down the chip in an overheat situation.

      AMD's have a tendency to fry, even at rated speeds, if the heat sink fails/falls off. The newer chips have thermal diodes, but they require MOBO support and that support simply isn't workable yet. Some claim they use the thermal protection circuit, but do so too slowly (1/sec poll) to save the chip.

  3. 1 post and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the site is down. Will this get me to 20 seconds/ Yes. I believe it will.

  4. Cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Athlons.
    Who needs performance anyway? I already get 120 fps.
    Windows will always be one step ahead of performance.
    Overclocking is stealing.

    Any more?

  5. turn this phrase by bluecalix · · Score: 1

    ahh, the good old "faint of wallet".

    --
    e x p e c t d e l a y . c o m
  6. Horay for Server administration by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 2, Troll

    Go mysql, one comment and already overloaded!

    On the other hand, I do like mysql, but it seems nobody configures it to have a load on it. Oh well, a good /.ing will teach them different!

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    1. Re:Horay for Server administration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really on topic, but mod the parent up.

      I too, used to think mysql sucked arse until I saw people who had configured it correctly.

      I still prefer postgres, but hey, mysql isn't as crappy as the average slashdotter would have you believe.

    2. Re:Horay for Server administration by packeteer · · Score: 0, Redundant

      http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:kkoUVTGQZPIC: www.icrontic.com/+&hl=en&ie=UTF8

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    3. Re:Horay for Server administration by sheriff_p · · Score: 2, Informative

      I couldn't get on to the pages after the first, due to MySQL being screwed, *but*, you can view the printable version on their site to read the whole thing.

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
  7. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    A beowulf cluster of these on a beowulf cluster!

  8. doesn't beat this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.asciimation.co.nz/beer/

    --m

  9. What, 10 posts in... by testrake · · Score: 2, Funny

    and it's completely hosed already?

    Sheesh.

    Perhaps they should've used the $500 dollar heat sink on their server and kicked it up a notch.

    1. Re:What, 10 posts in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know that's what Emiril Legasse would do.
      Matter of fact that bro has a beowulf cluster of 286's overclocked to 6PHz a pop. Coupled with some Exabyte storage on his holographic frobble-snazz.

      Where was I again...oh yes...Greetings Professor Falken...

    2. Re:What, 10 posts in... by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

      and kicked it up a notch.

      Okay, you're getting sued by Emeril.

      --
      I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
  10. 500 bucks? by chuckcolby · · Score: 1

    For five hundred bucks, that thing sticking out the top BETTER be how it reproduces.

    --
    We all get along together like tornadoes and trailer parks.
  11. Overclocking cost? by neksys · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why pay $500 for a cooling device when the next-step high mHz CPU can be purchased for less than that? I mean, the appeal of overclocking is that it allows people to extend their hardware far beyond the intended lifetimes. So say you've got an Intel 900, and with this device, you can overclock it to 1.4 gHz. So what have you gained? An unstable, extremely expensive CPU. The equivalient "real" 1.4 ghz chip could have been purchased for less than the cooling device.

    And nevermind those, "I have my Celeron 300 running at 2.3 gigahertz!" folks. CPU speed is so overrated - remember, fast RAM, and lots of it, is the best thing you can do to increase system performance. Don't fall victim to the overclocking madness - spend that $500 on a gig of RAM.

    1. Re:Overclocking cost? by Kelerain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dont underestimate overclockers fanaticism for these things. And there are ALWAYS higher numbers that arent on sale. 3GHZ chips out? they want to be the first to overclock to 4GHZ. and some people have money to burn (or cool), but hey its helping the economy right? Im with you on the gig of ram thing.. *drools* but what do you use to cool your overclocked gig of ram? ;)

    2. Re:Overclocking cost? by neksys · · Score: 1
      some people have money to burn (or cool), but hey its helping the economy right?


      Maybe so, but christ, donate it to a charity or something. Do something good for those who can't afford purchase ridiculous CPU cooling devices - not to mention provide food and clean housing for their children.

      And that, in a nutshell, is the problem with the western world.

    3. Re:Overclocking cost? by exphoria · · Score: 0

      There's a societal bell curve, and there always will be. Drastic measures are needed to fix this, and chances are, this condition will not be fixed. One major problem is that the homeless chumps don't manage to do anything about their situation. Same with those on welfare. There should not be unemployment when I see "Help Wanted" anywhere. But, in a way, buying this to overclock will be donating to a charity (eh... welfare) through the tax of the purchase.

    4. Re:Overclocking cost? by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1
      Why pay $500 for a cooling device when the next-step high mHz CPU can be purchased for less than that?
      Obviously you've never met a boyracer, eh?
    5. Re:Overclocking cost? by Gaccm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1) spend $500 on a gig of RAM

      I never use more than 256megs of ram, so buying more ram wont help.

      2) Its not all about cpu speed.

      You are completely right, thats why, if you read the site and looked at the screenies, the guy overclocked his System Bus (thus affecting ram and all) to 181Mhz (from a default 133). THAT IS A LOT. That is a very noticable speed difference.

      3) use the money for something else

      call this an investment. If this thing lasts for 3 computers, then you have probably "saved" more money by not having to pay for permium speed. Your example was having a 900mhz and going to 1.4ghz. Thats pretty sweet, but what about going from 2ghz to 3.4ghz. 3.4ghz is beyond any chip in production right now, but i've seen shots from a person who has been able to get that speed. This device isn't for people with a p3 900, it is for the extreme people and for them the benefits outweigh the costs.

      --

      Only dead fish swim with the stream...
    6. Re:Overclocking cost? by binaryDigit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually something like this is for the person who just purchased the latest/greatest/fastest thing out there, and now they want more. They want the fastest Athlon out there bar none. When a faster one comes out, out goes the old "slow" chip and in goes the new one. "Look ma, a 3GHZ Athlon".

      One other thing to consider is that with something with such massive cooling capacity, and the fact that it uses templates to attach to the cpu, you have a fairly future proof cooling solution. Even the 64bit monster that AMD is coming out with should be effectively cooled by this thing, assuming you can get it to fit on the cpu.

    7. Re:Overclocking cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you doing posting here? Shouldn't you be out feeding the hungry? Housing the homeless?

    8. Re:Overclocking cost? by BeazleyR · · Score: 1

      I believe that he overclocked it from 1.7 ghz to 2.2.

    9. Re:Overclocking cost? by digitalunity · · Score: 2

      I for one understand the need and importance of this bell curve. What I don't understand is everyone thinking this is a problem. Every civilization since the dawn of time has had this socioeconomic distribution.

      It is necessary.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    10. Re:Overclocking cost? by indiigo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Besides the points already brought up, the product can be re-used over and over again, making it quite the investment that could pay for itself in 2-3 upgrades.

      --
      fslg503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-86 8650 3-985-fdsg8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-9
    11. Re:Overclocking cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I never use more than 256megs of ram, so buying more ram wont help.

      You have disabled disk caching? Not very smart.

    12. Re:Overclocking cost? by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      > I never use more than 256megs of ram, so buying
      > more ram wont help.

      Yes, it will. More ram-cache.

      Much to learn, you have ;)

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    13. Re:Overclocking cost? by mr3038 · · Score: 2
      I never use more than 256megs of ram, so buying more ram wont help.

      Really? How about getting a gig or two of memory and copying the whole system to ramdrive during startup? The copying will take something like 30s so it even boots faster than that above mentioned cooler setup. Guess if loading an application from memory is faster than loading it from disk? Of couse, if all you do is scientific calculations and you're CPU bound then it doesn't help, but in that case you probably would need more than 256MB to boot and money is better spent in SMP box anyway...

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
    14. Re:Overclocking cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Huh?

      What kind of a system fits in a measly gig and still leaves enough memory for running the applications?

      Every time I install Windows or Linux I have to reserve at least 3 gigs so that the system fits comfortably on the partition.

    15. Re:Overclocking cost? by (outer-limits) · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Bell Curve is a well known societal phenomenon in which those with power justify there need to keep those lower down on the power scale without power. Drastic measures to fix this include sending in suicide bombers to blow up those at the top of the bell curve.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    16. Re:Overclocking cost? by nil_null · · Score: 1

      Although I agree $500 is insane. I like to ignore the overclocking issue, and just look at cooling. Getting your CPU as cool as possible is a good thing (especially when your ambient temps are high like in my case 81-85F).

      Although this particular device is overkill and too costly, things like basic water cooling are good even for the non-overclocker. I want a well-cooled quiet machine, and that's what water-cooling does for you.

      Spending a little of money on cooling is generally a good investment. Because you can reuse your cooling setup with each new processor you purchase. The only probably may occur if your new processor and heatsink/waterblock aren't compatible. But Socket A has been going for a while..

    17. Re:Overclocking cost? by HamNRye · · Score: 2

      So, you're a power user (need for faster computer) and you never use more that 256 megs of ram?? Increasing the FSB might yield good performance, but at the severe costs of stability. Not to metion there are quite a few gotchas to running RAm at faster that designed speeds.

      Now, using such minute mounts of ram, and boasting the need for a 3.4 GHZ processor, perhaps you are doing some really intense compiling?? (Still couldn't hurt to have X-tra ram)

      You are obviously not running Windows, or the memory leaks alone would have you over 256 in a heart beat. 2000 and XP both can suck up 256 MB RAM on boot. They swap alot of that out, but that degrades performance. Please don't tell me you spend all of that to get the CPU overclocked and still use Virtual Memory??

      Now, most overclockers are Gamers. Gamers can benefit from better drives and a raid controller more than a fast CPU. But, they also would find 256MB RAM to be restrictive too.

      I personally think you don't know what you're talking about, and probably have no earthly idea what kind of RAM your machine uses. Now, you can come back and tell me you're running Linux, console only and need that 3.4GHz CPU for Seti-A-Home, but that just mkakes you a sap.

      Also, if you really run a *NIX and don't use more than 256 MB RAM, why not use that 500 Bucks to get yourself a real computer. Refurbed RS/6000's and Sun Ultra's, Sun Blades, O2's, etc can all be found at great prices, and should outperform any Intel shitbox on the market.

      My analysis, save the 500 Bucks and get a Raid, or some fast drives, Cable Internet, or any of 100 things that might get your tasks done faster. But the Overclockers out there have become nothing more than MHZ freaks who like to boast about "How many MHZ they can squeeze out of a P4 2.2". And if that's the case, save up for aq 29-36" monitor. that really wow's 'em when the visit the Geek Kingdom.

      But hey, give me some of the ways you actually use your computer. Maybe you do really need that 3.4GHZ with 256MB ram. I would love to hear how having more than 256MB won't help. (All of mine at home are 512 or greater.)(Yep, even the old Sparc 20)

      ~Jason

    18. Re:Overclocking cost? by bob-o-buds.com · · Score: 1

      I have 256 SD PC100 in this machine PII 400mhz. I have an athlon XP at 1.533ghz with 512MB DDR. I can't tell a DAMN difference between the two when using normal applications such as MSIE or somthing of the likes. Right now, I have 5 MSIE windows open, pop-up stopper and a few other taskbar things. 52% used. Sure, compressing a video is about 5X faster on the athlon because of the faster bus and cpu, but having 6GB of memory makes no difference on either of these computers unless I put a 2000 user edonkey server on it (then the 512M chokes from all the delicious pr0n file attributes being stored in it.) I can't believe some of you slashdotters don't know that having hordes of memory makes no difference unless you are actually using it all...

      Just as a note, do you even look at your memory usage? if it was used for a swapping, I believe you would see significant spikes in the usage monitor, even if was updated every 1 second. (like mine) I have never seen this monitor go over 70 or so during normal usage.
      And to quotith the poster, Much to learn you have.

  12. wow... by mosch · · Score: 2
    it requires a special kind of retard to buy one of these. a 2.2ghz Xeon is only $350, and there's somebody who thinks it's a good idea to spend $500 to chill it?

    whoever it is who's buying these, can i sell you my new super-conducting speaker cables, and a liquid nitrogen supply contract?

    1. Re:wow... by danamania · · Score: 2

      Yes... it takes a special kind of user, and someone who's particularly obsessed with overclocking is that type - perhaps they have multiple machines they just want to run for a while to 'see how it all goes'. There's also the use in overclocking the fastest chips at any time, as opposed to the article's testing of a more mainstream one. As a potentially revolutionary product in the field it's in, a cooler of this type is going to be expensive - and if a success will drop in price

      Personally, anything that promotes this kind of obsessive behaviour I find quite reassuring. It means it's all the more likely that my OWN little obsessions will be catered for :P

      Having said that - omg $500US is insane!!

      a grrl & her server

    2. Re:wow... by rainwalker · · Score: 1

      I hope by "insane" you mean cheap! :) My watercooling setup has cost well over $1,000 all told, and I don't get nearly that level of performance.

      Overclocking is fun! :) I hosed my main box a while back (the supercooled one), but at the time, I owned a 1.2Ghz Athlon (the fastest chip availible, anywhere, at the time) and had it running around 1580Mhz. Nothing like having one of the fastest, if not THE fastest, desktop machine in the world. THAT is the appeal of overclocking.

    3. Re:wow... by danamania · · Score: 2

      I hope by "insane" you mean cheap! :)

      I say 'insane' from a non-overclockers point of view... Probably in the same way as I'd be called insane when y'see what I paid for some absolutely archaic piece of hardware. Opposites in practice, but it's all the same fun :D

      if not THE fastest, desktop machine in the world. THAT is the appeal of overclocking.

      That was my point :). If you enjoy it - all the more excellence in your life!

      a grrl & her server

    4. Re:wow... by mosch · · Score: 3, Funny
      winning the fastest desktop in the world competition is like winning the 'most luxurious kia' award.

      the funniest part is that most O/C'd systems have drive subsystems that are far from top-of-the-line, and overall system performance would be helped more by fixing that part of the system.

    5. Re:wow... by dboyles · · Score: 2

      winning the fastest desktop in the world competition is like winning the 'most luxurious kia' award.

      You're just jealous of my underbody neon light setup.

      --
      -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
    6. Re:wow... by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

      If you hosed your system by watercooling it, I think you need to go back to the design stage...

  13. Re:Mirror by Analog+Assailant · · Score: 1

    But that heats women up, not cools them down!

  14. well by Jacer · · Score: 1

    their servers obviously don't have them installed now do they? how much does it cost for liquid nitrogen coolant?

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    1. Re:well by neksys · · Score: 2, Informative

      The server isn't actually down - it's just that they've configured mysql to only accept a certain number of connections (I think 10 is the default). Keep reloading - you'll get in.

  15. as listed on amazon.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    other customers who bought this item also bought:

    2500' suspension bridge: $19.65
    pet rock (polished granite): $14.95
    enron stock: $87.23

    --m

  16. EXTREME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yep, anything is cool if EXTREME! (you have to gutterly yell it out) is added. Of course now, the fanboy term is 'uber', go figure

  17. Sometimes by exphoria · · Score: 1

    But not when you're at the top of the line for consumer processors (XP 2100+, for example.). But then, really, why would you overclock that 2100+? For 243 fps as opposed to 230 fps in quake3 with full detail? It's not that useful, in reality. sk

    1. Re:Sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Athlon XP 2100+ is not the top of the line consumer processor.
      That title belongs to the Intel Pentium 4 at 2.53 GHz.

    2. Re:Sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sigh...

      And yet another one bites the megahertz myth... P4 is slow as molasses even if it runs at a higher frequency!

    3. Re:Sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh...

      And yet another misguided AMD fanboy... check out the facts here.

    4. Re:Sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everybody knows that Tom is Intel's poodle...

      The reason why P4 won that test narrowly over the XP was the front side bus. Just wait for the 333 MHz AMD FSB and P4 will be eating dirt again.

      And what's the price/performance ratio of the Intel trash and AMD? Yup. That's another one for AMD!

    5. Re:Sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical.
      You foaming-at-the-mouth AMD zealots can't accept facts when they're staring you in the face.
      "Oh Tom's Hardware is biased"
      "Oh just wait until...."
      "P4 won that test narrowly..."
      Cop outs.

      ...and I'll pay more money for a faster and better quality product, thanks. Ever hear of a P4 with a crushed core or that cooked itself?
      Didn't think so.
      Cheap hardware is just that - cheap.

    6. Re:Sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cop outs.

      The truth hurts, doesn't it?

      I'll pay more money for a faster and better quality product

      I bet you also buy only Nike sportswear, Hugo Boss suits and Rolex watches simply because of the brand name -- even though there are just as good alternatives available for half the price...

    7. Re:Sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth hurts, doesn't it?

      Apparently so, otherwise you wouldn't be making weak excuses for AMD.

    8. Re:Sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you also buy only Nike sportswear

      Unless I hear of another company that exploits small children!

    9. Re:Sometimes by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      I came across this one yesterday: http://www.gateway.com/home/prod/hm_700xl_ProdDeta il.shtml When I saw this post just now about a 333 MHz FSB, I thought yall would like to see one with a 533 MHz FSB. Not that I can afford any of this, I'm using a n IBM 350 P90 with a 200 mhz upgrade processor, and 128 mb ram and it works just fine for what I want. Using a 20 GB HDD, with Win 98, RHL 7.1, Win 3.11. Right now I'm playing with Netscape 7.0 for Win 98, and comparing it to Mozilla rc3 for Linux. I run one for a while, then boot back up to the other. Can't imagine what these faster machines would be like.

    10. Re:Sometimes by exphoria · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but a 150% price increase is not worth the 1.5% performance increase. That's just the pure truth. sk

    11. Re:Sometimes by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      243 fps? My monitor can only do 85Hz, so whats the point of that?

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
  18. Re:Fierst p0sTer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First Moderation!

  19. Slashdotted already? by vrmlguy · · Score: 2

    It's 1 am here (2 am east coast, 11 pm west) and this place seems to be down. At least, I keep getting an error message about a failed mysql connection. Anyone with the page in their cache want to post it here?

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:Slashdotted already? by micahjd · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's probably an advertisement... In a few hours they'll come back online, and print something along the lines of "we wouldn't have gotten slashdotted if we were overclocking our Pentium 75 to 8gHz using this new cooler!"

      --
      -- 2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2
    2. Re:Slashdotted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got the same message. I hit reload and everything was all good.

  20. overclocking is a social phenomenon by Moosifer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Overclocking has become a modern-day, geek equivalent of spending 5,000 hours working on some old [insert venerable American car type here] when you could just go out a new Acura NSX for less than your time was worth, and get way more chicks.

    1. Re:overclocking is a social phenomenon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, a shiny, loud, and fast car would attract at least some attention and some kind of "chicks". But do any go for overclocked CPUs?

    2. Re:overclocking is a social phenomenon by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Acura nsx chicks would be into cocaine and heroin, do you really want that sort of neurosis invading your space? The tralier trash chicks you would pick up in your blown 502ci chevy chevelle on the other hand would most likely be into meth and marijuana, both drugs that consume time;however, as drastically divergent effections. (A refinement in joy;an always hasty genuflection) on one's health as you see them slowly waste from the safe space of family into their own demented social caste, lead by manic depressives and delusional carnival prophets. I choose the former anyways, more appetitite.

    3. Re:overclocking is a social phenomenon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave it to you to characterize people by the drug types they may be using.

    4. Re:overclocking is a social phenomenon by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      None that I want to be attracting.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  21. Stop stop stop! by BLiP2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The thing's the size of a fucking hand vac. Good god make these people stop! Make it stop!

    --
    Vote Technocratic! Government by killer robots!
    1. Re:Stop stop stop! by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

      You have just had a look at the future, it only gets worse from here.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

  22. It looks big and ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a lot less, I can put an air conditioner right next to my box.

    Works wonders, and we're obviously not worried about aesthetics, so hey..

  23. Cached Page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone had to post it:

    Google Cached Page

  24. $500 may not be too much for a cooling system by Sancho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people would be out of their minds to pay $500 for a fan/heatsink, but $500 for a cooling system may not be out of line. I don't know just how much cooling the CPU would bring down the total system temp.. probably by quite a bit.

    The reason for this is that there are some cases/places where the ambient temperature may be too high for a computer with a normal fan.

    For example, Texas, in the summer, when the AC goes out (or if there is no AC to begin with.)

    Most people would just say, "Hey, turn off the computer then." That doesn't work if you're away :)

    1. Re:$500 may not be too much for a cooling system by ignorant_newbie · · Score: 1

      > Most people would just say, "Hey, turn off the computer then." That doesn't work if you're away :)

      or if it's a server. it's not that hard for a temperature monitor to shut the system off, but if you loose > $1000/hr the machine is down, $500 is cheap

  25. Re:Mirror by __aasfhc1949 · · Score: 1

    Just a note, the link is not a mirror of the article, but rather a link to information on vibrators.

  26. It's not about cost-effectiveness by SKYY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That device is not marketed for your average user--it's aimed at the people who make overclocking CPUs and hardware their hobby. Sure, you might mock the stamp collector or the model train builder for spending thousands of dollars a year on things you would consider 'crap', but do they care? No. So what if the stamp collector spends $300 on a mint-condition stamp from the year 1917--it's to support HIS hobby, for HIS enjoyment, not yours. All the same--so what if the overclocker who buys a $130 Pentium 4 1.6A and a $500 phase-change cooling box (still a bit overpriced for a R-134a compressor, IMHO)? For him, that $500 is well-spent if it lets him clock his 1.6 GHz chip to 2.8 GHz. He doesn't care what the person who is content running a PII 400 MHz chip thinks.

    1. Re:It's not about cost-effectiveness by davew2040 · · Score: 1


      that $500 is well-spent if it lets him clock his 1.6 GHz chip to 2.8 GHz.

      A quick trip to newegg.com shows that a retail 1.6A GHz pentium 4 processor runs $137.00, while a retail 2.4 GHz northwood pentium 4 processor runs $564. Net difference: $427.

      I understand that your post may be oriented as a general commentary on those who buy the latest and greatest, but looking at it from this basic price perspective, the ability to get a 2.8 GHz processor for another $500 almost becomes good financial sense for those who have the know-how (partly because of Intel's ridiculous pricing extremes).

    2. Re:It's not about cost-effectiveness by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      The numbers start looking really good when you realize that a decent compressor should last 10 years or more. That way you can amortize the initial $500 dollar "investment" over all the cpus it cools in its lifetime. So you can buy CPU's at the flatter part of the price/performance curve, and get the performance of CPU's at the more vertical part of the curve. Say you get and "extra $200" worth of performance from each cpu you buy by using this, and you buy 5 cpus over it's lifetime. Thats a net $500 dollars of CPU power you save. I think thats a bit conservative, actually, at least for Intel's notoriously overpriced high-end. Try $300 per CPU and 10 cpus, and I think I just talked myself into buying one of these;-)

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
  27. Overclocking as a hobby by Bamfsog · · Score: 1

    It used to be we all overclocked to get a little extra performance for little or no cost. Now its a tweaking hobby. You do it to show off to your friends. You do it to get your name in the top ten on Mad Onion. You do it because you can.

    1. Re:Overclocking as a hobby by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

      I collect stamps, myself, it costs just as much but gives me more satisfaction. I believe I will collect coins next.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

  28. hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    listen, i'm extremely drunk right now. why aren't you? it's fucking friday night, for fuck's sake. why the hell aren't you at a club?!?!

    1. Re:hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm f-ing your sister while you're out getting drunk

      she's quite a good shag too. if i give you $40 next week, does that make you your sister's pimp and/or your sister a prostitute?

    2. Re:hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad i don't have a sister, you ass-cramming AC. although, if i did, i wouldn't care.

      smoke dick, bitch!

    3. Re:hey! by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      listen, i'm extremely drunk right now. why aren't you? it's fucking friday night, for fuck's sake. why the hell aren't you at a club?!?!

      I could ask you the same; getting drunk in your room alone isn't cool!

      --
      It's been a long time.
    4. Re:hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, i'm just getting ready to hit the bars downtown. SB has a nice downtown scene, but it's nothing compared to SF...

      what's wrong with hitting the bottle alone, though?!

    5. Re:hey! by great+throwdini · · Score: 3, Funny

      what's wrong with hitting the bottle alone, though?!

      These words from your site:

      Winners Circle is a new Operating system that shall be unique in several ways. It shall be a multitasking operating system built specifically to run under dos. It shall multitask by comand, not by timeslice, as windows does. This should make the operating system run faster and with more stability than windows 95 or 3.1

      [...]

      This is also going to be written entirely (as far as I can code - I already know my mouse code shall be assembly) in QuickBasic.

      Uh-huh. Oh, yeah. Feel the burn ... of QuickBasic!

    6. Re:hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it would take a true drunkard to think up such a beast.

      you remind me of a fellow CS major i know, a *nerd* (not geek) of the highest caliber.

      get laid, bitch!

    7. Re:hey! by Thenomain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I am posting this from a club! And violating the DMCA at the same time! You can too, just ask me how!

      Offer void if taken seriously. Mind you, it could be done.)

      --
      This now concludes our broadcast day.
    8. Re:hey! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      We all start somewhere. That paticular page is several years old now.

      BTW, language is largely irrelevant. Quickbasic provides the means for low level hardware access, and for the most part, it's so goddamned slow, it forces any coders who actually want to get anything done in that language to learn heavy optimization techiques. I'd say that's not too bad for a language I just picked up one day because it actually had well documented graphics routines(something which is very important for the first few programs I wrote). It's also good because what you can and cannot do in it remains extremely constant. When I tried setting a pointer to 0xA0000000 in C, only one of 5 compilers I tried would let me without giving me an error message, and only that same one would let me write the ASM code to set the video mode.

      Hell, my current project still uses it (Quest for a King), because I don't feel like porting thousands of lines of code to C. On the other hand, look at my code. It's fast(for QB), it's all very low level, IMHO it's fairly well structured, and it all works. That's more than I can say for a large number of beginners projects coded in C.

      Two things puzzle me, however. First, why did you respond to an AC with something from MY site? Secondly, what does WC have to do with people getting drunk alone?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BASIC:
      A programming language. Related to certain social diseases in that those who have it will not admit it in polite company.
    10. Re:hey! by great+throwdini · · Score: 1

      Two things puzzle me, however. First, why did you respond to an AC with something from MY site? Secondly, what does WC have to do with people getting drunk alone?

      In answer to your first question: I mixed-up the posters in the thread. Don't ask how, but "No. It had nothing to do with alvohol in my system." :p

      In answer to your second: WC?

    11. Re:hey! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      Sorry, the acronym of the system I mentioned on that page. I ended up coding it, but all does is manages several DOS windows at a time in real-mode. Having several dos-windows open at once comes in handy when you are trying to set up a 9x system, but haven't got the GUI running yet.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    12. Re:hey! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      Maybe you don't, but I mention it whenever someone asks the question "What did you use to make your game?".

      --
      It's been a long time.
  29. Go figure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I overclocked. Got a pair of 300 Celrons at 500. Yay. Cost of the heatsink/fan was cheaper than the faster CPU, at the time. And 500 was notably more useful than 300.

    I guess an exotic cooler can push a 2.2Ghz P4 to 3G, or something. Is it worth $500? I don't think so. I met my basic need back with the Dual 500's.

    Since you're clearly be into this only for the fun factor. You could buy a $130 5000BTU AC unit and built it into a wicked antifreeze fluid cooler. Then, at least, you could locate all that noise outside and pipe the fluid.

    1. Re:Go figure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh...is this on topic? i haven't read the article or anything, but that is normal for slashdork, right? ah shit, fuck this. are you worth $500? your fun factor is 0.000000001 on the fun factor scale. do you pipe fluid into your ass? i think you do!

  30. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to admit that they look identical though.

  31. Awesome! by terradyn · · Score: 1

    This cooling system seems to be doing wonders for their mySQL server. Lovely how descriptive the errors are. I'm sure no one would have guessed PASSWORD.

  32. Disturbing fat guy cartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who found that disturbing?

    1. Re:Disturbing fat guy cartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      disturbingly erotic?

      damn, son, see a psychologist...

  33. Err.. by enneff · · Score: 1

    I think I'd probably lose a lot more self-respect if I shelled out $500 for a fucking cooling device!

  34. I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This guy's existing setup with a peltier cooler would run at 2160 Mhz. With this he was able to run it at 2200 Mhz - a 2% gain.

    $500 for a 2% gain? I can think of better things to spend my money on.

    1. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like asian hookers?

    2. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like a penis enlargement?

    3. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he needs a penis to enlarge first, fuckwit

    4. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the clit is a vestigial penis, fuckwit. how's that for a disturbing though?

    5. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thought. fuck, i'm drunk.

      fuck these inane posting rules!!!

    6. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't been able to have sex with women for some time now for exactly that reason. I don't seem to be able to get over the realisation that a woman is a man with only small, mostly mental, tweaks over here and there.

  35. Direct links and a quote by vrmlguy · · Score: 4, Informative
    The cooler...
    ...being installed...
    ...and attached to the CPU.

    Good things

    As you can see the MX-EVA3 can take care of some very high heat load. It is by far the best extreme cooling solution on the market today. I've used all sorts of cooling to get to the top and I was under the impression that my 220 pelt and chilled water cooler was bringing my chip to its limits. I was wrong.

    With the MX-EVA3 you can eliminate the use of pelts, extra power supplies and water. Now you use just one simple evaporator hook up.

    It also is pretty good for space. It fits under your case so all you're doing is adding about 9 inches to the height of your case. As far as the noise level it is very tolerable for any Xtreme Overclocker. This can only be written up as a good thing.

    Bad things

    I'll start with the instructions. They are very good for condensation proofing but that's about it. There are no instructions for adjusting the Digital Display as far as setting the boot temperature or setting what ever it is you can set with the 4 buttons on the Digital Display. This would be nice to know.

    They have no recommendation on moving your 4 AMD CPU tabs which in my opinion is a critical must.

    Mounting is a bit tough but if you take your time you can get it right. It's always a scary moment when it comes to risking frying your CPU. I'm sure the Intel 478 mounting may be a lot easier.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  36. 500$? Cheaper to overclock your brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not like you need it anyways.. spend the money on acid and n2o.

    1. Re:500$? Cheaper to overclock your brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but your brain is going to get fried faster than your computer. best try out ginseng, ginkgo biloba, and some ol' fashioned exercise.

    2. Re:500$? Cheaper to overclock your brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ginseng, ginkgo biloba, and some ol' fashioned exercise.

      Yeah, right. Exercise makes you feel good... what a load of bollocks.

      Besides N2O doesn't kill your braincells as long as you don't hold your breath too long. Acid doesn't harm your mind either if you aren't already a mental case.

  37. Story Department by khoward1 · · Score: 1

    Heh. Am I right in thinking "She's falling in a slow descending funk" is from the Dar Williams song "As Cool As I Am?" Very nice reference. I wonder how many Slashdotters will get it?

  38. Icrontic always hosed by quantumparadox · · Score: 1

    I've been an icrontic reader since its inception as apushardware.com (for the guy in the simpsons) its always going down and really didn't deserve the slashdotting it just got. Poor ol Mortin (the site op) is always getting bashed. In case you didn't know he got his door kicked in and his computer confiscated last year because he posted a link to a new version of Counter-Strike on his filespace at his ISP. They were some pissed and called it an deliberate network DOS attack (by millions of CS fans). I think that was well beyond the slashdot effect.

    1. Re:Icrontic always hosed by exphoria · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be some sort of violation of rights? I'm sure that his webspace contract allows filehosting, after all, a website is just a few files... I'm surprised Mortin still does the gig after gettin' ripped so many new ones.

  39. Other cpu cooler uses? by BingoBoingo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I hook one of these things to the bottom of my Jolt Cola can? -Bingo

  40. $500 ??! by estes_grover · · Score: 1

    Wow...for that kinda of money i could put small desk and computer in a walk-in refrigerator.

    It does look pretty cool though ;-)

  41. OLD NEWS. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    how old is the review, a MONTH or two? the product certainly has been available for that time at least. and other similar products have been around too. now, you can't go out and buy a 3ghz p4, can you? also, if you buy evap. cooling like this it will last longer than your cpu remains current.. so it's not just 500$ out of the window, and it's still cheaper than kryo's equivalent. of course, a true enthuasist could go out and buy a huge used fridge for 500$ and rip the compressor and other diddoo's out from it.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  42. Gotta disagree with ya there, Bob... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RAM is a nice thing to have too much of, but if you've got $500 to burn, GET A FAST AS HELL DISK SYSTEM. ATA is garbage, go with SCSI, you will not regret it.

    I've found that 'responsiveness' as a subjective UI metric has always been greatly enhanced by a good high-speed spindle. Just get a smallish super-high speed disk for your system disk, put all your data (mp3's pr0n) on a cheap and slow IDE drive.

    1. Re:Gotta disagree with ya there, Bob... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree.

      I couldn't believe how much more responsive my system became when I bought the Seagate's 15 krpm 18.2 Gb drive and made it into a system disk.

      Now I've got that beauty as the system disk and all my data is on an IDE array (RAID 1 on four 80 Gb quiet Maxtors).

      I'd say that combining state-of-the-art SCSI drive with an IDE array gives you the best of both worlds at a reasonable price.

    2. Re:Gotta disagree with ya there, Bob... by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      imagine the ultimate system: solid state flash SCSI drives, evaporative cooler, overclocked top of the line CPU. Overclocked system bus. the most fast ram that money can buy. Aluminium case. Top of the line graphics card. Hell, I'd ever throw in a tek-gear spectre headmounted display or a big super high res flat screen, a kick ass sound card and a 300 w five point speaker system to run the dvd drives off.

      Now what do you do with this kind of power?

      Actually not much specifically. I guess it's all about just having something with higher stats than everyone else.

  43. 500$ Good Lawd thats alotta money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (sorry for the Chris Rock reference)
    But at that price, it better generate its own liquid helium! ;)

  44. scary by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would have been better to call it the MX-EVA2 (Asuka's) , since the EVA3 is the black one that goes a bit mental and strange.

    graspee

    1. Re:scary by psamuels · · Score: 1
      It would have been better to call it the MX-EVA2 (Asuka's)

      Ah yes, the one that went down into the volcano. (Well, Unit 01 did too.) I guess Unit 02 must have had a pretty decent cooling system - actually probably more than $500 worth.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
  45. their site logo is stolen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The site's "logo" is Hanson, from Nadia: The Secret Blue Water....a kids anime series. He's a gearhead, but still, he's from a kids anime series :-)

    You be the judge . Oops, I'm -terribly- sorry. The site's dude has a little mark for his chin and the eyebrows are thicker. :-) Anyway, here's some info on the series.

  46. Central Cooling? by new500 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    . . .

    At work, people I know are more interested in the water cooling scene, hoping one day for quieter machines. . .

    But now, with an external *piped* cooling device on the market, we're just waiting for the advent of building facility CPU cooling ducts, just like the air - con.

    Yup, rent new office, bring in desk, plug CPU into cooling duct (obviously with your case and machine coming standard with a nice clean bit of plumbing), connect cat5 (or fiber, come on this is an _ideal_ office :) and go . . .

    Final thought, is there any reliability gain to be had from using such a cooler and _not_ overclocking? Okay, I could probably answer that one if I tried, but it's breakfast time and I'm hungry . . .

  47. WHAT do you expect ? by AftanGustur · · Score: 2
    Don't you recognise the big black thing inside ?

    It's a freon pressure pump (likely not pumping freon though) and if you ever 'looked-inside' your parents refridgerator with the help of a screwdriver and a few 8-12mm keys, you have already seen one exactly like this. Although this one is likely to function better that your parents frigo after your 'autopsy'

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  48. distribution of wealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, bell curve sounds okay, but
    if you plot the number of people vs. annual income, do you really think you get a gaussian distribution? Having serious doubts about this one.

  49. Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Imagine the noise overclocking makes!

    I've quit buying AMD altogether because they can't get their act together and produce a CPU in the 20-30 W range. Instead they churn out processors that need an enormous fan that makes a jet engine noise.

    On the other hand my new, dual 1.13 GHz Pentium II-S (512 Kb cache) is quiet as a whisper... that P-III sure is a sweet CPU.

  50. is there any reliability gain to be had from.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Short answer No with a but... : Long answer Yes with an if...

    Running the chip at a reduced temperature will prolong the life of the chip. The silicon will be less prone to surges in power supply rails and will degrade more slowly as the atoms will move around less. For optimum lifetime you should also store your CPU at low low temperatures. There's absolutely no doubt that reducing the chip temperature will extend it's life.

    Our real issue here is with the reliability of the cooling systems.

    A shaped lump of aliminum or copper without a fan just isn't going to go wrong. Ever. (OK.. maybe it'll fall off the chip). But those cheap fans they insist on bolting on... 12 months normally.. 4 years tops.

    Let's go for 5 years as the figure to beat.

    Keeping that compressor running will probably not be much of a reliability issue. Compressors are old-tech well-known, well constructed and easily have a lifetime of 10-20 years in most refrigerators. In spite of the fact that there's moving parts, the design of the coolant gasses and lubricants means that the compressor is not exposed to corrosion or built up of any residues inside. It remains clean and smooth running until the motor burns out, or the metal breaks. The compressor itself is very reliable.. that's not our problem.

    Our problem is almost certainly going to be with the hoses that connect the compressor to the cold plate. These hoses are under very high pressure. They have to carry compressed gas to the cold plate so it can be pushed through a pinhole (at which point it expands and cools) and then circle it back to the compressor. In a refrigerator, these hoses are all solid metal, and soldered together. 90% of the airconditioning system in my car also uses real copper tubes. Our problem if any is going to be with those tubes...

    With good maintenance and care, they could last 10 years. In reality, I'd give 'em around 3 years before a razor sharp bit of case pierces one of 'em whilst you're bolting your chiller onto you AMD Pentathlon4 @4.5Ghz

    There's lots of parts inside the compressor, flexible rubber tubing and lots of gas moving around under rather high pressures. In terms of reliability, I'd figure that the chiller unit could match a standard refrigerator (10 years? more?).

  51. Its a matter of speed and pride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of you people missed the point..... not everyone can have liquid nitrogen cooling (impractical for continual use) and a peltier setup with water cooling can be too messy too look after.

    This system is great as a "bolt on" performance upgrade that will last not just this sytem but the next as well. If any of you follow "folding" then you will know how much competition there is between people for doing the most.... lots of folders build small home server farms just to help their folding team. Although spending money on a dual system means more folding time available, it also means you have two of a slower CPU compared to one CPU with this that is at its almost absolute limit. Naturally one would buy the latest and fastest CPU and put this on it to get even more out of it. It all a matter of speed and pride.

    1. Re:Its a matter of speed and pride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been considering buying a 19" rack and stuffing it with dual CPU 1U servers dedicated to folding.

      I ran into three problems:

      1) Cost. Not a problem if you buy only a one rack server per month or so. ;-)
      2) Heat. Winter's OK, but my apartment would melt during the summer.
      3) Power. The server farm would consume quite a lot of power and that will cost me. I would probably have to get a three phase inlet too to handle the load.

  52. Re:RISC OS on the GBA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >But now, with an external *piped* cooling device on
    >the market, we're just waiting for the advent of
    >building facility CPU cooling ducts, just like the
    >air - con.

    Its getting f*cking stupid really. X86en should simply die off in a cold dark room.

    There are CPUs like XScale (ARM) which will do 1GHz with almost no heat output at all (not even needing a heatsink).

  53. Most of these people don't need fast disks by r6144 · · Score: 1

    If he wants to calculate Pi to the one-billionth digit (using Super Pi or something like that), it would be a good idea to use a 3600rpm ATA/33 drive, and then he can make the CPU a little better... (Assuming the system does not need to swap, of course)

    1. Re:Most of these people don't need fast disks by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

      3600rpm

      Do they even make slow drives like that anymore?

      --
      I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
    2. Re:Most of these people don't need fast disks by mosch · · Score: 2

      next time you come up with a reason why O/C'ing is a better desktop performance enhancer than say, a RAID card and a striped mirror, please make it at least a wee bit plausible.

  54. ahhh, cool... by kupo+zero · · Score: 1

    For the price of $500 this thing better be able to cool your room too. That would be nice.

  55. Extreme cooling by RudeBoy2932 · · Score: 1

    No thanks I'll wait for the coolchips no moving parts http://www.coolchips.com/

  56. Thermal management by panurge · · Score: 1

    This thing is hardly practical with a dual-CPU system.
    FWIW(2c)
    Split the box so the drives and PSU are in a separate compartment, then use Peltier on the CPU(s), and duct cold air from a small industrial air chiller onto all the heatsinks and areas that need local cooling.
    You might need some form of discharge brush system to stop static (there's a bit of a Van Der Graaff effect). I've never tried it on a PC but the version we built in the 80s got the main board down to -5C, allowing the memory and IO buses to run rather faster than the makers intended.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  57. finally, real liquid cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People up until now have used air-water-air coolers and called them liquid coolers. Such systems cannot significantly improve over the efficacy of air cooling since they still depend on getting rid of the head by radiating it to the air.

    But now we're talking. A true refrigeration system. Just like a R-12 or R134a A/C system.

    Note that despite this system using evaporation, it isn't actually a "evaporative cooler" (swamp cooler) in the actual sense of the word. Such units work by evaporating water into the air to dispel heat. Such units require water refills (or a constant fresh water supply) and raise the humidity of the area they evaporate into (i.e. your computer room).

    No, this unit is an air conditioner. Still, it's a great idea and a true advance.

    But since I don't O/C my machine, I won't be trying this puppy out any time soon.

  58. HA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they might have a really overclocked and fast compooter, but their web serfer totally sucks it would not even respond as if it did not exist...

  59. The Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the upcoming Pentium Pentium (Pentium V) require one of these ?

  60. VapoChill by Squalish · · Score: 1

    I think that this is a great deal as compared to the competition - this is basically a carbon-copy(A legally ambiguous one, too) of the VapoChill system(Their website uses the same flash animation of the phase-change system). The Vapochill retails at around 750-1000USD, so this is a good deal. One does not pay 250-500USD more for a midtower case.

    --
    People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
  61. Been Mentioned before but... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    This is simply a vapochill ripoff, personaly I would rather buy a vapochill case, with everything already setup, plug in the board and attach the cooler and your done.

    Vapochill

    For $695, you get the unit inside a mid/full tower case with a full warrenty on it, atleast vapochill knows what they are doing, after all they've been around for a few yeras.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  62. Kryotech by Bagsy · · Score: 1

    This set up reminds me of kryotech. They broke the 1GHz barrier if i remember right. I wonder what they are working on nowdays...

  63. Next stage in the overclocking evolution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if the overclocking business continues to grow in this direction, people will soon be giving tips in how to overclock the cooling equipment! I can imagine the discussions:

    Q: "I just got this new 'UltraCooler 5000' and was looking for tips in how to make it cool my processor more effectively. Currently it has an cooling effect of only 250 watts."

    A: "Yeah, there's a mod chip that overrides the thermostat regulator and enables the 'Ultra Cooler 6000' mode."

  64. Ummmm, why not buy a faster chip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    title says it all

  65. Buy a 'fridge & put it inside = COOL CASE MOD by spineboy · · Score: 1

    put some heavy duty fans on it too, you wont hear them since they'll be enclosed in the nicely insulated refidgerator. You can keep beer/Mountain Dew inside too

    Plus it'll be cool to show your freinds this AWESOME CASE MOD. Kinda freak them out when you open the 'fridge to pop a CD in

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  66. I know what to use this on! by Tycho · · Score: 1

    More potential uses for this cooler:
    Overclock your graphics card.
    Buy two and overclock a Dual G4 Tower.
    Use several to cool some RDRAM.
    Cool the Northbridge on your motherboard.
    Overclock your Pentium 60.
    Make your old 2GB Seagate Barracuda more reliable.
    Clamp one onto an unsuspecting sleeping victim.
    Overclock your brain.

    --
    Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  67. yeah. . . by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

    But will it keep your beer cold?

    -bpl