Slashdot Mirror


Visual Studio .Net: Now with more Viruses

News.com breaks the story (and 8000 readers submit) that Microsoft distributed Nimda-infected copies of Visual Studio .Net in Korea. I don't even know what to say here; nothing seems adequate, except to point out that "trustworthy computing" does not seem to have had any effect whatsoever. News.com just updated their story to point out that it probably won't infect the people who installed Visual Studio .Net, but it's still a rather nasty faux pas for a company that's supposed to be cleaning up its act.

118 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. So.... by Jacer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did McAfee or Norton give this press release?

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    1. Re:So.... by rector · · Score: 2, Funny

      In fact, the virus was found by a Microsoft employee manualy without any special software.

  2. What... the... hell.... by aetherspoon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean, come on, anyone ELSE see this as similar to when the Cult of the Dead Cow released Back Oriface 2000 with CIH preinstalled? :)

    Seriously, before any of the "OH ITZ M$, THY SUXX!!!1111" posts come out, lets be honest. Any company can make that mistake. It takes a special moron in Quality Assurance to release that one.

    I have to ask though... what would YOU do if you were MS in this case?

    --
    --- Ãther SPOON!
  3. they should sort of borrow oracle's motto. by overbom · · Score: 3, Funny

    "breakable"

    or maybe that doesn't quite say it. Hmmm, what am I trying to get at.

    "trivially breakable"

    It only infects one file that's never referenced by the system, and there are all sorts of unlikelihoods that prevent this from being executed. Still, bad press is bad press. :-)

    1. Re:they should sort of borrow oracle's motto. by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      It only infects one file that's never referenced by the system

      So nice of them to include a useless, unneeded file in their package.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  4. way to go by TheKubrix · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they only had been using a Walmart Lindows box......

  5. Sue 'em by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Funny

    The guy who wrote that virus should sue Microsoft for distributing it without his permission. We're talking about theft of intellectual property here!

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  6. It's a feature! by gatekeep · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hell, nimda is a better feature than that stupid paperclip thing!

  7. Microsoft should be applauded for this by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    They...um...made sure that it was a quality worm that went out the door.

    None of your shoddy open-source crap here, no sir!

    1. Re:Microsoft should be applauded for this by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope that worm wasn't GPL'ed!

      After all, that would mean that MS would have to distribute the source to VS.NET!

      Hey... now there's an idea :-)

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    2. Re:Microsoft should be applauded for this by juliao · · Score: 2
      I hope that worm wasn't GPL'ed!
      After all, that would mean that MS would have to distribute the source to VS.NET!
      Well, quoting from the GPL:
      In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under the scope of this License.
      No, they wouldn't have to release the source to vs.nyet. And if they did, what would you want it for?
  8. virus?? by hikeran · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'ts not a virus/spyware.. it's a feature that enhances your web experience.

  9. A great new marketing line for Microsoft. by Restil · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You probably won't get any viruses from installing our software!"

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  10. even better by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 4, Funny


    "breakable"

    or maybe that doesn't quite say it. Hmmm, what am I trying to get at.

    "trivially breakable"

    In this case, "broken" is what your looking for.

  11. Where's the foot? by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 2

    Why is this under the BillBorg icon, and not the Monty Python "it's funny!" foot?

    1. Re:Where's the foot? by Shagg · · Score: 2

      I think we need a new topic icon. The MP foot squashing the MS Borg.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    2. Re:Where's the foot? by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 3, Funny

      Like this? =)

  12. Not entirely Microsoft's fault by 1000101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "third party" that translated the software into Korean had something to do with the problem.

    1. Re:Not entirely Microsoft's fault by timeOday · · Score: 5, Funny

      So how do we tell "Genuine Microsoft Quality Products" from "Shoddy Software Created By Third Parties And Put Out By Microsoft"? Is the hologram a different color or something?

    2. Re:Not entirely Microsoft's fault by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's a load of hooey. Microsoft's customers didn't ask them to use a third party to translate the files, nor did they purchase the product from the third party. If Microsoft can't even handle the elementary security step of scanning the product for viruses before putting it on a CD, how do you even know that the mysterious third party isn't replacing important DLLs with DLLs that are functionally equivalent but have a hidden backdoor.

      Clearly Microsoft isn't really checking these files. Which means that when Microsoft says "Trustworthy computing" what they are really saying is that you should trust them, and all of their "third party" allies despite the fact that they have a horrific track record.

    3. Re:Not entirely Microsoft's fault by chris_mahan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      [This post contains language you might find offensive]

      Isn't Microsoft entirely in control of selecting the vendor (the translation/locatization company)?
      Would Microsoft be liable if the translator had said: Fuck you and You Eat Dog Now in the manual? Of course.

      Another silly analogy. My VW beetle was assembled in Mexico. Do you think VW says: "Oh, sorry, those damn mexicans screwed up?" when I have a problem with my car? No. They say: "We're sorry, and we'll fix it right away at no charge".

      They don't even mention the outsanding factory workers south of our border. They just take it like men and deal with it responsibly.

      That's why I prefer VW service over Microsoft's.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    4. Re:Not entirely Microsoft's fault by SAFH · · Score: 2

      ---
      Put the X-files fanzine down and step away from the paranoid dementia.
      They are checking the files they know to exist. Most likely some sort of secure hash before-n-after comparison like MD5 is a part of that process.

      Yes, scanning only for the files you know are there is pretty boneheaded. You're hyperventilating because Microsoft is the culprit.

      Do you know why Microsoft makes so many mistakes? Because they have a lot of products. More risks, more chances to make a mistake. Take a look at the number of strikeouts homerun hitters get compared to leadoff hitters.

      feh.
      ---

      As an individual who has been responsible for the distribution of many products in the past, a virus being a part of a distribution is NOT acceptable by any stretch of dementia.

      There have been comical quotes of Virual Studio .NET or jokes about "Trustworthy Computing" and a couple decent BillG skits, however the point here is that yet another company is not taking the rudimentary steps to protect it's customers.

      Microsoft's products are (for better or worse) being used the world over; in schools, doctors offices, hospitals, law firms, all through out the US Government and practically everywhere else you look and there is no one that is ensuring that they are following basic security protocols.

      Yes, "What if..." .DLL's are being replaced (or added) by anti-US operatives, or modifications are being made adding back doors... Yah, it's a bit X-Files'ish but not that far from reality. Obviously a source CD/Drive was sent over to be burned, and was connected to an insecure network, how hard would it be to figure out what network that is and insert a DLL that tracks connections on boot? AdWare companies do it through website and software installations all the time.

      Just a thought...

      feh. yourself.

      --

      I cannot confirm nor deny the allegation or allegations you may or may not have just made

    5. Re:Not entirely Microsoft's fault by Spoing · · Score: 2

      Failures found in lower levels of a company are always management's fault. You can't blame a lack of oversight on the unsupervised.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  13. Trustworthy computing? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    Well, at least we can still trust Microsoft on one count...

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  14. Only one thing I can say... by Skweetis · · Score: 4, Funny
    GET /default.ida?nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnHahahahahahah hahahahah hahhahahhaha heeheeeheeehee aaahahahhhhh

    Morons.

  15. Give it a rest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot is rapidly becoming useless with the constant derision it heaps on Microsoft. Let's have more computer news and stuff about FreeBSD and Linux and less "make fun of" news about Microsoft. As if Linux doesn't have it's problems. You might end up like Larry Ellison and his ridiculous "Unbreakable" claims.

    Of course, that's a problem with the Linux crowd. Feer of being, and being seen as, professional.

    1. Re:Give it a rest by LinuxGeek8 · · Score: 2

      Slashdot is rapidly becoming useless with the constant derision it heaps on Microsoft.

      Oh come on.
      Just like deleting the MS viruses in your inbox and ignoring them, you can just as easy ignore these Slashdot topics.

      --
      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    2. Re:Give it a rest by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      When MS says they're going to do an about face on their history and enter 'trustworthy' computing with a straight face, they are going to get laughed at when that claim looks strained.

      It's as simple as that. You'd probably be much more upset at us if we didn't all point out up front that we know we're flaming MS. :) That's the difference. When somebody makes a claim they dont keep, they wont get much support or benifit of the doubt (especially if they are the goliath.) I thank god the world works this way, or nothing would ever change.

      Sometimes I wonder what MS would have to do to actually lose some market share if the anti-MS crowd wern't so passionate - probably kill a few people in the middle of a crowd, caught on videotape, I'd wager, although I imagine they'd just point out that the guy holding the gun wasn't an employee .. just another MS perma-temp. ;)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    3. Re:Give it a rest by Violet+Null · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let's have more computer news and stuff about FreeBSD and Linux and less "make fun of" news about Microsoft.

      Go here. See the section entitled "Exclude Stories from the Homepage"? Find the box that says "Microsoft" and check it. Scroll all the way to the bottom and click the "Save" button. Walah.

    4. Re:Give it a rest by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

      you can always uncheck microsoft articles in your slashdot settings and then stop reading the comments posted under those articles. I for one want to know when Microsoft incorporates viruses into their software and any other time they screw up.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    5. Re:Give it a rest by fabiolrs · · Score: 2

      Agreed completely... I even stoped sending in stories since most of them are reject... reviews on linux products (distros, softs, hards, etc), new stuff I found, interesting server stuff, lots and lots of stories... none of them were published...

      --
      Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
      http://www.morroida.com.br
    6. Re:Give it a rest by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      You don't think they would post this is Red Hat shipped with a virus?
      No, I don't. Do you? Really?

    7. Re:Give it a rest by namespan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know where to start.

      Slashdot is rapidly becoming useless with the constant derision it heaps on Microsoft. Let's have more computer news and stuff about FreeBSD and Linux and less "make fun of" news about Microsoft.

      Slashdot is hardly rapidly becoming useless. There is no lack of abundance of news about FreeBSD, Linux, Apache, Space, OS X, Wireless, and just about any other significant I/T and geeky topic.

      And while Linux has its problems, and you may not share the editors views about Microsoft, there are two facts about Microsoft that are hard to ignore:

      1) They are huge. Absolutely huge. They have a lot of influence in the I/T and software industry.
      2) Sometimes their market presence and control gives them reputation beyond what's deserved.

      You may not agree with #2, but consider: .NET barely exists right now. Their ads make it look like people are running serious production solutions on it right now. They claimed months back that Trustworthy Computing was their #1 priority. They just made a major gafe. They've ignored simple security problems for years because it suited them.

      I wouldn't claim their technology is useless. It has its high points, a few better than open source alternatives. The problem is that it's all too easy to fall into "They're big, they're #1, so it must be the best" viewing of Microsoft. Most of us who bring up reports like this one do so because we've put up with far too much of that kind of reasoning.

      As if Linux doesn't have it's problems. You might end up like Larry Ellison and his ridiculous "Unbreakable" claims.

      Of course, that's a problem with the Linux crowd. Feer of being, and being seen as, professional.


      Well, that wasn't anything like our petty digs at MS.

      Do you mean afraid to make claims like Microsoft's "Trustworthy Computing" initiative and Oracle's "Unbreakable"? I don't see this as a problem in the open source world. OpenBSD is the only distro that comes close to making anything like an unbreakable claim, and it has history to back it up. We speak softly and upload running code. We release timely information about bugs, security holes, and patches. Cover ups are few. That's professional.

      Of course, yet again, it's so easy to confuse "big" and "professional".

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    8. Re:Give it a rest by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2

      I also quit submitting stories after two were quickly rejected a couple of weeks ago. The kicker is that the story popped up submitted by someone else 4-5 hours later. I guess the news I submitted wasn't old enough *shrug*

    9. Re:Give it a rest by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Sure. Nice try, but sure, I agree. I'll spare you the 'Linux is an OS, not a window manager and desktop' lecture, but given what KDE and Gnome have done for a *fraction* of the cost that MS and Apple did to develop their Window Managers and Desktops, I think its fairly obvious that there is significant room for improvement in driving down the costs of both those commercial OSes (of which, to note, the cost of OSX is embedded in the hardware, as the OS is 'free as in beer'). Not to pick at their usability and functionality, but once everything is installed and configured, the KDE and Gnomes stack up fairly well against Windows and OSX, for a microfraction of the cost.

      Anyhow, yes, if thats all you were looking for.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    10. Re:Give it a rest by darien · · Score: 2

      I don't think OS X is free as in beer. I think it costs $129, though it's bundled with every new Mac.

  16. The Cost of Outsourcing by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to the Article, it appears that "Microsoft's flagship developer tools picked up the digital pest when a third-party company translated the program into Korean...".

    Ultimately it was MS's responsibility to verify they did not shit in their own bed, but how many of us look at every line of code in a distibuted or outsourced project.

    Just my $.0199999

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
    1. Re:The Cost of Outsourcing by coyote-san · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They can be expected to verify the ISO image.

      Do you think they approved the disc without verifying all libraries, resources, etc., were present and properly named? (Okay, this *is* Microsoft but work with me here)

      If we can expect them to perform that level of checking, why can't we expect them to run a virus checker at the same time?

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    2. Re:The Cost of Outsourcing by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
      ...how many of us look at every line of code in a distibuted or outsourced project.

      Well, we at least install it and see if it works right. We do this on machines that have AV protection.

      Bottom line, ther is NO excuse for this type of FU. Whoever is in charge of MS's QA should be fired. Immediately.

      --
      That is all.
    3. Re:The Cost of Outsourcing by Peyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      * How many of us ship viruses with a state of the art costly development environment which will be used by thousands of developers ?

      Ford Motor Co. ships(ed) thousands of cars that when rear ended with the left turn signal on would explode killing people.

      Ford Motor Co. and Firestone shipped thousands of SUVs with faulty tires that would explode at high temperatures and rates of speed.

      Funny how these things keep happening over and over again? Nimda isn't going to cost lives is the big difference here.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:The Cost of Outsourcing by yomahz · · Score: 2

      Ultimately it was MS's responsibility to verify they did not shit in their own bed, but how many of us look at every line of code in a distibuted or outsourced project.

      Well, you'd think they'd at least compare MD5 sums of the binaries they know didn't change. Besides being easy to do, it's just common sense.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
  17. Outsourced translators by Mundocani · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Aside from the Trustworthy Computing crap, what does this really say about the industry-wide practice of outsourcing product translations? Anybody who's done software development knows that even the best products give internationalization secondary consideration, but I don't think anybody ever considered how little consideration is given by US companies to the translation and distribution of international versions of software. Perhaps this should serve as a sort of larger wake-up call for all of us.

  18. Whoo hoo hooo! by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    Mod the parent up.....score +5 Funny. I was the first to find this thing on our servers and I understand why we got.....Microsoft getting it is TOO funny!

    --

    Gorkman

  19. That's One Degree of Separation! (tm) by elsegundo · · Score: 5, Funny


    Leave out the middleman when it comes to distibuting viruses! Give it straight to your customers!

    --


    The revolution will be televised. Blackout restrictions apply.
    1. Re:That's One Degree of Separation! (tm) by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
      But is it Six Degrees to Kevin Bacon?

      (Just say the subject and message really fast and it gets funnier, I swear.)

  20. In Other News by Target+Drone · · Score: 4, Funny
    Microsoft today announced it's new "Don't ask, Don't tell" security initiative. Microsoft is now requesting that customers no longer ask if there are any security holes in its software. It is also strongly urging all media outlets to stop telling people about any possible security issues.

    A spokes person from Microsoft was quoted as saying "This is the best chance we have at cleaning up our image."

  21. Re:Perhaps not accidently by scott1853 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They already gave them .NET, how far do you expect MS to go?

  22. So.. is it any wonder by k98sven · · Score: 2

    ..that the Korean government is investing in linux systems?

    Or maybe this is just another sleazy MS retaliation tactic?
    The fact that it backfired might just be proof.

  23. Slamming MS by glh · · Score: 5, Informative

    OK, someone messed up.. but it isn't as bad as it sounds. First off, it wasn't MS that put the virus in, it was some third party thing they used to convert the language to Korean. However, MS should have at least run virus scan on it before they shipped it. Second, the person running VS.NET would actually have to install IE 5.5 over IE 6 (why would anyone do that) and browse a certain help file in order for it to get infected.

    I'm not trying to defend MS. Just pointing out the facts (or at least how they were stated in the article). On one hand it's kind of funny to read through all the quick one-liner jokes about MS (definitely worth a chuckle) but I think MS isn't quite as bad as they're being made out to be.

    By the way, anyone know the company that wrote the nimda infected software?

    1. Re:Slamming MS by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Informative
      Actually, according to the article at least, Microsoft did scan the files for viruses prior to shipping. However, they apparently have it set up to only scan files that they expect to be there, and therefore missed the added Nimba file. The way I read it, the Nimba file is not really part of the package and can never be accessed in normal usage of the product, and can only be accessed if the user goes looking through the actual help files that come with the system.

      Assuming that by "help files" they mean "VS.Net Documentation" then there are quite a few help files covering everything from JScript, VB, C#, C++, to the Windows Platform API, the C# class library, and more - which means it'd be practically impossible to manage to find the one Nimba file amoungst the croud. However, if they just mean tool help, then that content is a lot more limited, but I somehow doubt that is the case.

      I have to wonder how much about that "scan only files that should be there" is really spin doctoring, and if they didn't really scan the disk and are instead coming up with an excuse for having missed the presence of the file.

      Anyway, the Slashdot writeup is, as usual, way overblown in its anti-Microsoft slant. If they're going to write tirades about McAfee scaremongering, then they probably shouldn't do it themselves.

      (And, by the way, Michael is the author of both articles...)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    2. Re:Slamming MS by dinivin · · Score: 2


      On the contrary, I think this is worse that it's made out to be...

      Since we know for a fact that they didn't scan for a virus before burning it to CD and shipping it, why the Hell should we assume they do that for any of their products?

      Dinivin

    3. Re:Slamming MS by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's actually even more difficult than that. The infected file isn't an actual help file, it's an extra file that's not even supposed to be there, and isn't linked or referenced anywhere in VS.NET. They'd have to install IE 5.5 over IE 6 and browse to the directory the help files are kept in and actively search for and open the infected file.

      Really, it's a close to harmless as you can get, considering the astronomical improbability of someone executing the infected file by accident. Of course, one should never underestimate the ingenuity of fools, so I have no doubt that it will happen.

      On the whole, I have to give MS credit for the way they are handling this. They are offering free clean replacements to everyone who has an infected copy, they have a patch out, and they are spreading the news so that people are informed and thus able to fix the problem. I'm a little curious about the "patch", but I suppose it's a more reliable solution than just telling people to delete the file.

      Yes, I am pointing and laughing at MS right now, I am typically an MS basher after all, but at the end of the day I have to say that I wish they would deal with more of their problems as honorably as they've dealt with this one. It would have been really easy for them to sweep this under the rug and pretend it never existed.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    4. Re:Slamming MS by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dont think anyone is going to excuse this just because MS was lucky that the chamber wasn't actually loaded. The trigger went off, and thats all the ammo I need to demand someone revoke the gun license.

      As for outsourcing, this is absolutely ludicrous that companies neednt take accountability for the actions of their contractors. Thats how all the clothing manufacturers dodged the anti-sweatshop movement. Now Nike/Espirit/Adidas/Gap/Etc doesn't employ the sweatshop workers, they contract them! Brilliant, and insedious. While it may not be fair to compare that to the IT world, it shows the extreme consequences of allowing companies to divest accountability for services and products offered under their brand. If we dont hold MS accountable in the least, wheres the motivation for them to be more careful with their contractor selection skills? They will continue to select contracts based on politics and economics rather than on the quality of the service/product being outsourced.

      I realize that its not *entirely* their fault, but it doesn't help with the kind of facade MS puts on. Just like Oracle's "unbreakable" claim, if you want to make claims that simply are not true or that you cant deliver on (I dont care if its your fault or not, you made the claim), you're never *ever* going to get the benifit of the doubt in this kind of situation. If you wanna make claims you cant back up, you dont deserve the benifit of the doubt. :)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    5. Re:Slamming MS by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      'I have to wonder how much about that "scan only files that should be there" is really spin doctoring'

      That's exactly what I thought. Who the hell writes scanning software that instead of 'scan *', only scans stuff on a list? The very fact that there ARE extra file(s) should immediately set of warning lights to any validation procedure worth it's salt, unless it's coded by a band of retarded monkeys.

      Oh wait, we're talking about Microsoft, nevermind.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    6. Re:Slamming MS by wadetemp · · Score: 2

      Sorry, the trigger goes off every time you ship software. There's nothing that keeps bad pointer, in any software, from running a codepath that deletes user files or is otherwise malicious to your current task or data. I'm sure plenty of bits in most software apps could do some damage... what's the difference between these bits and those bits, besides intent? What's more important is the probability that those bits will be executed. And in this case, it's basically zip.

      I realize this is quite a bit like the arguement for revoking the right to carry certain kinds of guns, but then again, I don't think anyone needs an AK47.

    7. Re:Slamming MS by spongman · · Score: 2

      why should a computer user possibly need to know the kernel version they're running (unless they're one of the ~1% of computer users that feed off that kind of stuff)? do you know the alloy composition of your screwdrivers?

    8. Re:Slamming MS by spongman · · Score: 2

      what voodoo? all you have to do is go to windowsupdate.com and click on 'scan', 'review' & 'install'. or you can have the critical update wizard do it for you.

    9. Re:Slamming MS by spongman · · Score: 2

      and how exactly is this relevant to your argument?

  24. Easter Egg by elliotj · · Score: 2

    From the article:
    "It's extremely unlikely that a developer would ever accidentally get infected by Nimda," said Flores. "They would have to try hard just to run the worm."

    So I guess its more like an Easter Egg. I hope this isn't World Cup related.

  25. Re:Perhaps not accidently by SteelX · · Score: 2

    how far do you expect MS to go?

    Well that depends. Since MS is the one taking us for a ride, it depends on where we want to go today.

  26. Re:What... the... hell.... by Zordak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have you ever been to Korea, you moron? Those people are absolute technophiles. They love all of the newest little electronic gadgets. They're not always the highest quality little gadgets, but everybody has them. Koreans are not aborigonees living in a wasteland. They live in big, crowded cities like most of us, except they're usually bigger (the Seoul/Inchon area alone has something obscene like 14 million people) and they have lots more concrete (if you had ever been to Korea, you would know what I am talking about). You need to leave your momma's basement a little more often.

    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  27. Just another reason to complain by DrPascal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you actually read the article, there are very valid reasons (albeit mistakes) that this happened, and the likelyhood of the virus actually running on the machine is next to none. The Help system wouldn't ever open it.

    But hey, this is Slashdot. Let's all miss the relevant parts of the article and just bash "M$"! Yay, fun.

    --
    DrPascal: Not the language, the mathematician.
    1. Re:Just another reason to complain by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are missing the point. The problem isn't really that Microsoft is shipping a virus (although you have to admit that this is pretty darn funny). The problem is that Microsoft is shipping files that they don't know about. This file could have been anything.

      Microsoft has set up their business so that their customers have to trust them. There is no way for Microsoft's customers to verify that Microsoft software is safe. Yet time and time again Microsoft has shown that they simply are not particularly trustworthy. It has gotten so bad that it isn't just /. that is laughing at Microsoft. This particular story was published by CNET (which is a very Microsoft-friendly news source).

    2. Re:Just another reason to complain by stang · · Score: 2

      Microsoft has set up their business so that their customers have to trust them. There is no way for Microsoft's customers to verify that Microsoft software is safe.

      Umm, how about running a virus scanner?

      --
      "200 Quatloos on the newcomer!" "300 Quatloos against!"
    3. Re:Just another reason to complain by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      The new "Trustworthy Computing" slogan: "Caveat Emptor"

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  28. Maybe a re-brand? by rfsayre · · Score: 5, Funny

    Viral Studio .NET??

    1. Re:Maybe a re-brand? by krogoth · · Score: 2

      Like this?

      http://www.ubersoft.net/d/20020527.html

      Bet you can't guess what company is being parodied :)

      --

      They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
  29. DOJ Take Note by Paul+Lamere · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is just another example of Microsoft trying to bundle everything with windows. Now that they are bundling Nimda, Melissa is going to go right out of business.

  30. expecting a virus? by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 2

    Flores said that under Microsoft's security policy, the company normally scans every file being transferred to the master of a program. But in this case, the company only analyzed files it expected to find. Since the Nimda-infected file had been added by the worm, the company overlooked it.

    I would think one might look for something that shouldn't be there when trying to detect a virus. I guess MS has some more "advanced" method that I just can't grasp.

  31. Life Imitates Art by Kozz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Truly, life indeed imitates art(satire). Microsoft Bundles Worm with IIS .

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    1. Re:Life Imitates Art by gregbaker · · Score: 2

      This by no stretch the first time MS has caused life to imitate satire. Remember setting anyone straight on the Good Times "virus"? "No," you said, "emails aren't programs, so such a thing is impossible." Then, they wrote Outlook.

  32. In the list of new features... by iabervon · · Score: 3, Funny
    • No longer vulnerable to this virus

    How would you know they'd fixed IE if they didn't distribute a virus that no longer worked?
  33. Re:What... the... hell.... by Ooblek · · Score: 5, Informative
    You should have realized it was a joke - however lame it was.

    By the way, this is just another example of a premature attack by OS zealots. Just as the case of the cross-platform virus discussed previously, the Nimda file is installed as part of the help system, but is never loaded by the help system. As the tounge-in-cheek editorial posted by the illustrious Slashdot editors put it, "Only a complete moron would get infected by this virus." So unless someone in Korea is stupid enough to uninstall IE 6.0 (required for .Net to run), install IE 5.5, and then load the Nimda file, it is unlikely that they will get infected. For every MS goof, there is an equal goof in the OS community. (But we all know people that point that out get modded down....)

  34. Cool! Virus Free! by Cheap+Imitation · · Score: 5, Funny
    Leave it to Microsoft to change the meaning of "Virus Free".

    Now, instead of meaning it ships with no viruses, it means they include them at no extra charge!

  35. Re:technically, it's not a virus by peddrenth · · Score: 2

    "it does not spread itself around automatically"

    Yeah it does. When you buy windows, you start emailing files to world+dog (colleagues) as microsoft word files, so for them to work at the same office as you, they all need to install windows too.

    And once your whole office is publishing IE-only websites with Powerpoint presentations on them, then anyone who wants to do business with you has to install windows too. The virus is already starting to spread.

    Eventually it reaches a government department, and they make laws saying all tax-filings need to be done electronically, then write a website that only reads MS digital cerificates. Then anyone who has to pay tax (i.e. everyone except the queen) needs to install Windows.

    Course it's a virus. Just because it relies on stupidity to spread doesn't mitigate anything -- loads of 'real' virii spread that way.

    "Warn all your friends - you MUST delete command.com which is a virus"
    "Warn all your friends - you MUST send your CV in .DOC format"

  36. It may be fun to bash Microsoft . . . by Badgerman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But a third party company screwed this baby up in transition, not M$. Using this as a "M$-is-so-evil/incompetent" story is pretty inappropriate.

    There's many, many other reasons to dislike Microsoft. Taking one out of context only strengthen's Microsoft's hand and makes those who oppose Microsoft look petty.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
  37. ..And in other news by jeremy+f · · Score: 2, Funny

    And in other news, an Pakistani foreign national was detained in New York City today for what officials are calling "a suspected case of viral bioterrorism". The man, Rumollea Abdula Jabala, 30, was reported to be "coughing and sneezing", and "blowing his nose" by onlookers, who promptly called officials to report the situation.

    Jabala, who came to America on a work Visa, denies official reports that he deliberately caught the flu to infect persons in the USA whom he would come in contact with.

    Jabala is currently being held in a city hospital, under armed guard, until officials can verify any terrorist links.

  38. Re:Is M$ getting into the AV Software business? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    That's so crazy, it just might work!

    Either that or someone there has been watching too many episodes of 'The Mole".

  39. Re:slashdot morons strike again by grendel's+mom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You should include yourself in the list of "slashdot morons" because YOU missed the point.

    This significant issue is that they only check the files they *expect* to be in their distribution.

    Before you ship code, you had better know *exactly* what you were shipping. What if the 3rd party localizers added a nice trojan program? It's *trivial* to execute code on a remote Windows machine. There are several exploitable holes to accomplish this.

    The included virus is trivial. Microsoft's shoddy QA is the problem. Unfortunately, this isn't only a MS issue. It's an industry wide problem. // End rant

  40. Re:Accident? Sounds like criminal negligence! by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But MSFT did do a check of the "package" before they shipped it off. So they should have caught it.

    It's not that hard to say: scan all, including compressed files.

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  41. Perspective by alacqua · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're worried about the viral nature of the GPL?

    --

    Move on. There's nothing to see here.
  42. Trust No One by bsd-mon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wouldn't say that the Trustworthy initiatiave failed, but this will hopefully teach MS the number one lesson in security and viruslessness - trust no one. In the end, my email system is only as virus free as yours. If you are infected by Klez/nimda/... you still harass my bandwidth and my procmail filters. I'm just not dumb enough to run that .exe that h0t_ch1x@hotmail.com just sent me.

    Just because MS code and systems are "secure" and "virus-free", as soon as they hand the code off to someone else, the code is only as virus free as their system is.

    --
    To read makes our speaking English good. - X. Harris
  43. Re:Accident? Sounds like criminal negligence! by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
    Why are people giving the contractor (MS) a free swing when their sub-contractor (translation co) makes a serious blunder that can, under certain conditions, result in a major security breech? Visual Studio.NET users didn't contract with the translator, MS did and MS respresented the product as their own. So, yeah, no one who gets a paycheck signed by BillG made the error, but the blame is squarely on MS' shoulders.

    "It's not our fault," claimed Blamer, er, Balmer, "it's the fault of the {temporary worker|sub-contractor|college intern} we hired."

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  44. Nimda-infected Visual Studio .NET by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 2
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/productinfo/over view.asp

    And it will run on any platform too. :)

    --
    /*drunk.. fix later*/
  45. shipping unknown files... by dpilot · · Score: 2

    Now all we need to do is find a way to slip a GPL-ed file onto a Microsoft CD the same way this virus got there.

    They could clearly argue that the file was NOT part of their distribution, and therefore the product does not have to have source released under the GPL. But I'll bet until they finally came to that conclusion, there'd be a TON of Brownian motion in Redmond on the part of execs and lawyers.

    So before someone actually does this, the need to let the alternative energy people know, so the heat source can be tapped.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  46. And in other news . . . by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Funny

    The latest release of Nimda has been infected with the Visual Studio.NET virus.

  47. Re:Accident? Sounds like criminal negligence! by gmack · · Score: 2

    MS mastered the CD so they should have checked the contents before they did so. Odds are both parties here are at fault one for introducing it and the other for not finding it.

    It's just extremly funny and mostly harmless this time unfortunatly it's not the first time MS shipped a product with a virus.

  48. Re:What... the... hell.... by Zordak · · Score: 2
    You should have realized it was a joke

    I did realize it was a joke. I think, though, that before you make a joke at the expense of an entire culture that is proud, ancient and sensitive, you would do well to know that it has at least the smallest kernel of truth (for example, if you had made a joke about the disks getting copied all over the country, it would have been funny). Also, yes, I did the exact same thing by lumping you with the 31337 skr1p7 k1dd33z that live in their mothers' basements, when in fact I know nothing about you, and yes, I did it on purpose, and yes, I wrote my comment right off the cuff because I was irritated, and yes, the word "moron" was calculated to incite anger, so my comment should be properly be modded as flamebait. Still, though, I think the joke was about as fair and as funny as making a joke about how dispassionate Linux users are about their OS of choice.

    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  49. This was predicted weeks ago by drew_kime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    See here for details.

    --
    Nope, no sig
  50. Banner Ad by krulgar · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I read this article, the banner ad was for Microsoft Visual Studio .NET.

    It's that kind of policy that keeps me reading /.

  51. Just to be fair... by newerbob · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...about three times that I can remember software from APPLE came with viruses. And this was direct from APPLE not by way of a translation company.

    Microsoft's agent that put the virus in is the culprit here, and the risk, as news.com pointed out, is low.

    --

    --
    Ask the Ya-Hoot Oracle Anything!
  52. Re:So we shouldn't talk about it? by _xeno_ · · Score: 2
    There's a huge difference between there being a single Nimba infected file that is never used anywhere in the entire product, and the headline "Visual Studio .Net: Now with more Viruses". Not to mention that the hole the Nimba virus would be attacking becomes patched during the installation of Visual Studio .Net by the installation of Internet Explorer 6.

    Is it a problem? Yes. Is Microsoft doing something about it? Yes. In fact, Microsoft seems to be going out of their way to ensure that no one is harmed by it - giving clean copies to all the customers they are aware of.

    Michael is trying to make the situation seem much more dire than it really is. Yes, Microsoft managed to let a file infected with a virus into a version of one of their most important products. However, that product makes the system it installs on immune to the specific vector of infection that the infected file accidently included with the product.

    Just like Michael went after McAfee for claiming that the JPEG virus is a huge concern, he's claiming that the virus Microsoft included is a huge concern. It isn't.

    An appropriate headline might be "Korean Visual Studio .Net Ships With Nimba" and then mentioning in the story body that the infected file is not actually used by the system and should theoretically never be run, and even if it is run, can't infect the system with Visual Studio .Net installed anyway. The story body should most likely also mention that the virus was added by a third party contracter.

    The headline and story blurb seem to suggest that installing the Korean version of Visual Studio .Net will infect your computer with a virus, and that simply isn't the case. Yes, it still shows sloppy QA, but it can't really cause any actual damage, and that should be mentioned in the story.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  53. I really do know a Glen from Canada! by cnelzie · · Score: 2

    He used to work with me... Nice guy, except he had this funny way of saying "out and about"

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  54. Absolutely wrong by dachshund · · Score: 2
    But a third party company screwed this baby up in transition, not M$. Using this as a "M$-is-so-evil/incompetent" story is pretty inappropriate.

    If GM includes defective 3rd-party gas tanks and brake-pads in their vehicles, will you absolve them from blame? The sad thing was that this wasn't even a very subtle flaw. Microsoft could easily have found it with a slightly more robust virus checking process.

    "Trustworthy computing" means that your 3rd party suppliers are going to have to go through the wringer, too. Otherwise the phrase has no meaning, and there's nothing at all wrong with making this point.

  55. Inconsistent or sloppy? by moocat2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, Microsoft only scans the files they expect to be part of the install but they ship all the files anyway. While there is no way from the outside to prove or disprove this statement, I think it's odd they aren't consistent in which files they choose to scan and which they choose to ship. A decent process would use a consistent way to manage it.

    At a minimum, I find this an example of the sloppy techniques I see all over the industry. Of course, sloppiness is one of the reasons that all these viruses keep finding new ways to infect software so I think it's a pretty big slap in the face for MS's Trustworthy Computing program.

  56. Re:This is Obviosly sabotage - by talks_to_birds · · Score: 2
    Shoo, Micro$oft troll...

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  57. Re:People like viruses by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    No, I stole all my ideas from Taco.

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Re:What... the... hell.... by festers · · Score: 2

    There are plenty of pro-Microsoft moderators around here these days, smartass, no need to cry about that.

    --


    -------
    "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
  60. Re:Interestingly enough: by Random+Feature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It isn't a problem in the sense that it's going to cause damage, or infect anyone, but it is *damn* funny.

    And it is a PR nightmare for MS because a lot of people aren't technical enough to understand what's necessary to become infected. All they hear is "shipped with Nimda" and it's bad news.

    --
    I don't have a solution, but I certainly admire the problem.
  61. Re:What... the... hell.... by einhverfr · · Score: 2

    Couple things to note:

    MS has a very good system of preventing viruses (used to be documented in a knowledge base article until someone realized that article said they used UNIX systems because they were impervious to Windows viruses).

    What probably happened is that a system was infected before the help files were compiled, and then once they were compiled (rendering the virus intert) the AV software did not pick it up. Once the masters are checksummed, then no one will notice because the subsequent copies have not been tampered with.

    Again, the virus is inert. But this is a HUGE publicity blow to Microsoft, so it is a BIG deal.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  62. Only an utter idiot.... by talks_to_birds · · Score: 2
    ...or a complete incompetent doesn't know that Nimda is still out there and probing, daily.

    I'm seeing 40-80 probes daily (heh.. intermixed with 40-80 MS SQL port 1433 probes daily), on my firewall at home on a goddam dialup, fer krissakes...

    How the hell can *any* company, or *any* subcontractor not be aware of this ongoing problem?

    How the hell can any company with any pretensions to "Trustworthy Computing" have let this happen?

    Make no mistake (Micro$oft apologists notwithstanding): there is absolutely no excuse for this unparalleled screw-up.

    Do these people really think they are so all-powerful as to be immune to this sort of thing, or do they think they are so all-powerful that they just don't need to care?

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  63. What was it AdTI was saying? by jpvlsmv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Something about how Open Source software could have a virus on it?

    1. Re:What was it AdTI was saying? by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      Wow, I hope the media pick up on that.

      "On the heels of a white paper alledging that Open Source software might include viruses, Microsoft has shipped the latest version of its proprietary software development environment with a virus. The irony meter is, by all accounts, pegged."

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  64. They always screw up by WildBeast · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most of the time that MS uses a third-party company, that company screws up. My question is, who exactly is in charge of seeking out and contracting with those companies? Fire him big time.

  65. More Chambraigne quotes related to MS products: by brad.hill · · Score: 2

    BillG: "Microsoft Visual Studio .NET: Now with Securi-hancers!"

    Windows user: "Finally, a product for me! I believe every word that man just said, because it's exactly what I wanted to hear."

    Linux user: "Man, you've been brainwashed."

    News.com: "Microsoft developer tool distributed with viral payload."

    BillG: "He's making a mockery of the product! You're making a mockery of the product!"

    (Linux user): Noooo!! Can you not comprehend that your ignorance will cause me to explode now? Arrgghhh!!!

    BillG: "I AM THE KING!"

  66. Oh. C'MON! by rutledjw · · Score: 3
    So what? Does your point matter? MS distributed a virus with their code! Whether or not it runs, is this indicative of their source control?

    There is no way it can be stated that it's no big deal when this kind of thing happens. Period. The bottom line here is quality. If this kind of thing gets through, what else can get through? What kind of quality controls are really in place?

    Whatever controls ARE in place, apparently they aren't effective or aren't being followed...

    --

    Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
  67. At last... by hakkikt · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...M$ includes a really efficient piece of code with their compilers.

  68. Re:What... the... hell.... by Zordak · · Score: 2

    What's even better than SPAM is the high-quality "Run-cheon mit'" (Luncheon meat). The bad romanization doesn't do the name justice, but that stuff was beyond interesting. That's why I always stayed away from imitation American foods in Korea. I much preferred good Korean stuff to bad American stuff -- except Duen Jang Chi Gae (again, sorry for the bad romanization). I never could get a taste for that stuff.

    --

    Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  69. Walah by aralin · · Score: 2

    'Walah' is spelled 'Voila' :)

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  70. You miss the point by Vicegrip · · Score: 2

    It's not not the potential affect of the virus. It's the fact that it's even there.

    "Only a complete moron would get infected by this virus."

    Yes sir, we know there's a bomb in your car, but don't worry: it's not wired to the engine so it can't hurt you.

    The fact that Microsoft could allow its flagship development tool to ship with such a notorious virus is absolutely incomprehensible and humiliating. If I were Balmer I'd be skinning alive those involved with a dull spoon.

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
  71. A **high-quality** worm by melquiades · · Score: 2

    They...um...made sure that it was a quality worm that went out the door.

    Well, have there been any security holes discovered in Nimda? Sounds to me like Microsoft is living up to their promises.

  72. Re:What... the... hell.... by isorox · · Score: 2

    For every MS goof, there is an equal goof in the OS community

    I dont pay members of the open source community $500 for a copy of their work. I do pay microsoft. I expect that $500 to buy me what is advertised.

  73. Re:And yet... by Maserati · · Score: 2
    Yes.


    I really do expect them to fire up NortonAV and scan every single file on the disk, and every archive. THEN they can hand it off to manufacturing.


    I haven't seen a virus on a shrinkwrapped product since the early 90s. Back then, when I was in software retail, we saw 2-3 games a year with a virus on one of the floppies. Bad thing to do to your customers (never mind broken .bat installers and so forth). I'm pretty certain that we never heard from any of those publishers again.


    Honestly, how long does it take to virus scan a CD ? Not the disk image, but the actual burned master in a CD-ROM drive ? In a fast drive (24x or up) it's not that long. And right now every Windows developer in Korea has been sent a virus. What if they do that to a state where it is a criminal offence to distribute a virus ? I'll be quiet now, maybe somebody at RandomeSoftwareHouse will go to jail over sloppy QA. That'll be the Day !

    --
    Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  74. Nimda... by jjsjeff · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now with improved networking support! :)

  75. Intentional? by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Does anyone else think there was a conversation in Microsoft that went something like this:

    Ballmer: Damn! Some of those south asian countries have 94% piracy levels!
    Bill Borg: (Sarcastically) We may as well ship the virusses right on the installation media.

    Bill and Steve look at each other, light dawning

    Ballmer: Hey... YEAH!
    Bill Borg: Get southeast asia distribution on the phone!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  76. MS was due. by mj01nir · · Score: 2

    Not only has MS done this before, they've done it several times before.

    I'm just amazed that it doesn't happen more often.

    --
    the no .sig .sig
  77. Perhaps it's intentional... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    That'll show those lousy Koreans to pirate MSFT software!

    How much you want to bet M$ offers to release "guaranteed" virus-free software in the future provided that Korea cracks down on software piracy?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!