Slashdot Mirror


New Red Hat Beta: LIMBO

joyoflinux writes: "Red Hat has released a beta version of its distribution, called LIMBO. It includes the latest desktop technology, gcc 3.1, Mozilla 1.0+, OpenOffice 1.0, and much more. You can download it here or use a mirror. Submit bugs here." Here's the announcement.

315 comments

  1. Version 8? by reflexreaction · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Will LIMBO eventually become RH 8.0? Or are RH major releases tied to another criteria?

    --

    We had to destroy the sig to save the sig.
    1. Re:Version 8? by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

      New gcc version means this is most definitely destined to be Red Hat 8.0.

      They will probably change glibc versions in a major way also.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Version 8? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I don't know - it seems awfully desktop focused. Perhaps they performing a (slight) fork. It'd make sense.

    3. Re:Version 8? by emc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortunatly, RH needs to wait for another broken version of GCC to come out, to base 8.0 on... so don't hold your breath

    4. Re:Version 8? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, their "normal" distribution is already desktop focused for the most part, though it does well as a server. They want their larger customers to use their commercial enterprise level server products, so it makes sense that their free version is more desktop/small-medium server oriented.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Version 8? by JPriest · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you want to know what package versions various distros and betas are using go to distrowatch.com. A list of packages for the top 10 distros can be found here

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    6. Re:Version 8? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answers to 50% of the stupid questions here are answered on DW, will someone *Please* mod this up!

    7. Re:Version 8? by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >New gcc version means this is most definitely destined to be Red Hat
      >8.0.
      >They will probably change glibc versions in a major way also.
      >
      Ah yes. Nothing quite like the know-nothing opinions of wanna-be WWW software reviewers.

    8. Re:Version 8? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Thank you! Limbo is the 7.4 beta

    9. Re:Version 8? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for Red Hat to go back to the $29 boxed set. Personally, I don't need any hand-holding or support, but I'd be happy to pay forthe disk and a basic installation guide. The way it is now, I go longer between upgrades, and make more use of free downloads. Red Hat is ignoring a revenue stream.

    10. Re:Version 8? by Delphix · · Score: 1

      It should be pretty apparent that this is going to be 7.4. The beta's number 7.3.92, not 7.9.??. In all the previous beta releases the number immediately prceeds the next release.

      For intance Skipjack was 7.2.92, which lead to Valhalla 7.3. Even though everyone was saying it would be 8.0...

      If you notice, the Pinstripe beta was 6.9.5, ie: prior to 7.0 release.

      I think everyone should expect 7.4... but honestly, what difference does it make? 7.4, 8.0.. who cares. It's sthe same software.

      "That which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet." -- William Shakespeare

  2. good stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's got Gnome 2, KDE 3.01, GCC 3.1. Pretty good deal...

    But I will stay with Gentoo Linux. :)

    1. Re:good stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the above was rated as "off topic"? Please mod up.
      The person is talking about the Red Hat Limbo beta and what software is coming with it. I think it is way IN topic.

  3. Fear of Mandrake? by io333 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems like every time I blink RedHat is releasing an updated version. Maybe they're beginning to acknowledge (read: "worry about") the surprising popularity of Mandrake?

    (Although Mandrake hasn't updated in quite a while; it's still at KDE2.2 over there with a semi-difficult KDE3.0 install option available).

    1. Re:Fear of Mandrake? by T-Ranger · · Score: 4, Informative

      Redhat has consistantly produced releases about every 6 months for as long as I have been folowing them. If it takes a month for LIMBO to clear through beta then it will be just about on schedule.

    2. Re:Fear of Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are like a hundred distros that all make frequent releases. What does that have to do with Mandrake?

    3. Re:Fear of Mandrake? by guacamole · · Score: 2

      But RedHat Linux 7.3 has been released less than three months ago. What's going on?

    4. Re:Fear of Mandrake? by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

      I don't think that RedHat is afraid of Mandrake. Right now all of the distros have enough to worry about with M$ anti-competitive practices.

      I do agree with you that Mandrake has become very popular. I have alway found it to be a little too leading edge, however. A bit on the unstable side. At least until their latest release which I find to be very solid.

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    5. Re:Fear of Mandrake? by hdparm · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'd say nothing's going on.

      Limbo is just the first beta release of, dare I say, RH 8.0. New version of gcc may be pretty obvious indication of the next major release. Since it's been released 3 months after 7.3, that would give us a window of about 3 months to beta test this one, beta 2, RC1, perhaps RC2. 3 months doesn't sound as a helluva lot time - my money for this release is on December 2002.

      Since I use RH product extensivelly for quite some time now, predominantly as a server platform on a decently sized WAN, I want to take this opportunity to respond to all people in Limbo thread that have been bitching RH again, like they always do, without any apparent reason or, God forbid, technically biased justification.

      How can desktop oriented system be changed and improved in a way that IBM, HPQ, Oracle and the likes are supporting it as an Enterprise Class product? How does good chunk of Wall Street transactions get processed every minute of every day on desktop systems? What you're saying is so rediculous that it makes me wonder how would I run a WAN on say, Win98SE.

      On the other hand, I am more than pleased, hell - I'm extatic!!! - about all the desktop goodies included in the latest distro. If fine people from RH concentrate enough on this (and looks like they might, according to latest happenings around the embedded product), taking into account all negative publicity Microsoft keeps generating in last couple years, I would be expecting near future with a lot more confidence in possible desktop market earthquakes.

      Again, hats of all colours down to Red Hat!

    6. Re:Fear of Mandrake? by mab · · Score: 1

      You can tell it an upgrade becuse thay must have ported anaconda to python2

    7. Re:Fear of Mandrake? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Funny, I found lots of things were broken in 8.2 that were OK in 8.1, from a Gnome desktop perspective. I realise that the KDE implementation is supposed to be better, though... I got the impression that mdk's financial woes were the driving force behind the 8.2 release date.

    8. Re:Fear of Mandrake? by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

      I don't know much about Gnome. I use KDE myself.

      They're financial woes may have played a role in an early release. I do wish that they had waited for KDE 3.0 to come out prior to the release. I found the upgrade, although easy, was not well intergated into the distro as a whole.

      I upgraded but then later fell back. Now that they have a contract with the French government maybe their financial woes will be a thing of the past.

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    9. Re:Fear of Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redhat is probably about as concerned about Mandrake as Microsoft is about Apple...maybe if a couple of really bad years went by, there's be an actual issue.

      Plus, RH and Mandrake do technically compete, but for the moment they have a lot of common goals -- building up Linux as an attractive server and workstation OS, and marketing it to businesses currently running Solaris and Windows. Neither one is going to throw too much money at attacking the other.

  4. Code named software by reflexreaction · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Code naming software has really annoyed me. Jaguar for OsX. Longhorn for Windows. Palladium for the upcoming hardware software venture. AMD Corvette (before it was renamed). Does this kind of naming have any point or relevancy? What does naming an upcoming code base LIMBO mean?

    --

    We had to destroy the sig to save the sig.
    1. Re:Code named software by Thomas+A.+Anderson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fair question - all the redhat linux releases have names that connect to each other - it's quite a long list and I'm sure someone can recite it for you (or look at the ./ anouncement of the last redhat release).

      --
      Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand (bash.org)
    2. Re:Code named software by T-Ranger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it refreshing that products from RH - at least those in beta - are named what the developers probabaly use internally. It means that the hackers are running the place and it hasent been taken over by suits quite yet.

    3. Re:Code named software by BJH · · Score: 5, Interesting

      See here for a page that goes into more detail than any sane person could possibly want about the Red Hat release names.

    4. Re:Code named software by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      All Red Hat code names so far have been connected by a double meaning. This page documents the connections found so far. The link between 'Valhalla' and 'Limbo' should be clear. The link between Valhalla and Skipjack hasn't been posted here yet, though ISTR that they are both islands.

    5. Re:Code named software by ceejayoz · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Limbo" means it'll actually never come out. ;-)

    6. Re:Code named software by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      Because either they haven't decided what the official name will be or they don't want you (and their competitors) to know what the official name is.

    7. Re:Code named software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well...codenaming software (and heck, any sort of engineering practice) is a long, long time-honored convention. Codenames are intended for internal use -- makes things easy for people to say, and less obvious to overhearing outsiders. Unfortunately, marketers have gotten ahold of the idea of sexy codenames, and started using them to promote products to the public.

      The internal name was originally a concept not intended for outside use.

    8. Re:Code named software by VertigoAce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And for those of you who don't recognize it, Valhalla and Limbo are both locations on the Spacer planet Inferno. From Asimov's Caliban, Inferno, and Utopia (written by Roger MacBride Allen)

      Of course, there might be other connections, but that's the only one that comes to mind.

    9. Re:Code named software by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      The original Valhalla and Limbo are from Norse mythology. Warriors who died in battle where wisked away to Valhalla, roughly heaven. Limbo was liek hell, nowhere'sville man. I forgot, but I think you were stuck in Limbo, never could get out.

    10. Re:Code named software by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      The obvious: they're both afterlives. Heroes feast in Valhalla with the Gods, and Limbo is, well, Limbo.

    11. Re:Code named software by evalhalla · · Score: 1

      Valhalla is from norse mythology, I can't remember whether Limbo originated as a christian or an ebraic concept, but it is the upper part of hell in Dante's Divina Commedia. The place you call Limbo was called Hel in norse mythology.

      Either the connection lies in the fact that they're both afterlives, or it lies in some modern work of literature.

      Anyway I don't think that Limbo is a good name for a release, as I wouldn't feel like using something named after the most boring place of the whole afterlife: maybe somebody in the commercial department asked for a new release earlier than the developers felt it would be needed, so they just named that way.

    12. Re:Code named software by Aceticon · · Score: 2

      Now the big question is which do you prefer - Limbo or Valhalla?

      Or putting things in another way:
      - Live the whole eternity surrounded by guys with horns in their hats or surrounded by nothingness?

      Though one ...

    13. Re:Code named software by Sunner · · Score: 1

      Sounds easy enough.

      Stick around the most boring and probabaly depressing place in the universe.

      Or, party all night long, every night, drinking loads and loads of mead, and since it's supposed to last, I assume one wouldn't get stuff like hangovers, bad livers, etc.

      The latter sounds yummy, horns or not.

    14. Re:Code named software by oever · · Score: 1

      A Limbo is a person living or origination from Limburg, the most southern province of the Netherlands.

      The version that's good enough to release and actually works will probably be called Brabo, after people from the neighbouring province of Noord-Brabant. Just kidding all you Limbo's. ;^)

      Actually, a nice song by Rowwen Heze is very fitting for this release. The song is called 'Limburg (Een kwestie van geduld)' (Limburg, a matter of time). The main text in the song is 'Het is een kwestie van geduld, rustig wachten op de dag, dat heel Holland Limburgs lult.' For this release it could be appropriatly be translated as 'It a matter of time, wait patiently for the day when everybody talks Limbo/Linux'.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    15. Re:Code named software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Limbo \Lim"bo\ (l[i^]m"b[-o]), Limbus \Lim"bus\ (-b[u^]s), n.
      [L. limbus border, edge, in limbo on the border. Cf. Limb
      border.]

      1. (Scholastic Theol.) An extramundane region where certain
      classes of souls were supposed to await the judgment.

    16. Re:Code named software by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      You eat, drink and make merry in Valhalla. You may even get laid.

      Not a hard choice.

    17. Re:Code named software by PacoTaco · · Score: 2
      What does naming an upcoming code base LIMBO mean?

      They do it because Linux Is Mostly Boring Otherwise. :)

    18. Re:Code named software by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >What does naming an upcoming code base LIMBO mean?
      >
      It's neither here nor there.

    19. Re:Code named software by Aceticon · · Score: 2

      Ok, i see your point.

      The thing is - how do i become a hero (and i'm thinking Viking sort of hero here)?

      I do believe crushing your enemies' skulls is illegal nowadays ...

    20. Re:Code named software by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      Work for the government. If you're in the right country - say the US, Iraq, Israel, or Turkey, to pick some random examples, you'll find your skull-crushing activities welcomed and entirely legal.

      So long as they're directed against the official enemy of the week, of course.

    21. Re:Code named software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mark Twain recommended going to Heaven for the climate, and to Hell for the company. Following that advice, I'd choose Valhalla.

    22. Re:Code named software by kl76 · · Score: 1

      Yes, code names (for hardware projects at least) are useful cos they give engineers a way to identify a product before the marketroids get round to deciding what it will "officially" be called...

    23. Re:Code named software by Aceticon · · Score: 2

      Actually i was thinking maybe i can go into the crowd control line of work.

      It isn't exactly crush your enemies' skulls (or at least one expects not to be so) but at the very least one can damage a couple of skulls.

    24. Re:Code named software by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      What does naming an upcoming code base LIMBO mean?

      It means you have to bend over backwards and go really low to get a copy...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    25. Re:Code named software by kmellis · · Score: 2
      "And for those of you who don't recognize it, Valhalla and Limbo are both locations on the Spacer planet Inferno."
      [rolling eyes] It's things like this that give us technogeeks a bad name. I know you mean well, but you need to perform a sanity check before you jump in with little tidbits of enlightenment. For example, try doing a web search first. That way, you'll usually learn something you weren't aware that you didn't know, you may avoid making a fool of yourself as you did here, and you could even provide a nice link , too. Everyone wins, but especially you.
    26. Re:Code named software by indigofire.net · · Score: 1

      In just about any project, the people actually putting things together need a short form to refer to what they're working on. Saying "the new Red Hat release" gets kinda tiring, same thing with "RedHat 7.2.95" or anything similar. Every project needs a name, whether it's useful or appropriate or not, and whether or not it's actually used by anyone outside the actual project group.

      --
      -iF
    27. Re:Code named software by uberman · · Score: 1

      Possibly because this release is in limo between 7.3 and 8.0?

      I suspect the next will be an 8.0 release for no other reason than they've switched to GCC3.x, may the hack known as GCC 2.96 rest in peace...woo hoo!

      uberman

    28. Re:Code named software by norwoodites · · Score: 1

      Apple has been code naming machines and software for every, since 1984.
      Microsoft has been cod name software since they started on '95(Chicago).

    29. Re:Code named software by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      codenaming software (and heck, any sort of engineering practice) is a long, long time-honored convention

      Though the oldest of them all, Slackware has (as far as I'm aware) never bothered with this...

    30. Re:Code named software by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      oldest of the Linux distros, I mean... :-|

    31. Re:Code named software by VertigoAce · · Score: 1

      You're right, a web search is a good idea, which is why I did just that. And I did find Norse mythology references to Valhalla, but failed to find similar references to Limbo. Though they are both part of the afterlife, I decided to go with a connection that I was more sure about (and of course, the author knew the connection).

    32. Re:Code named software by kmellis · · Score: 2

      Oh, okay. Although I think your judgment that Asimov was the connecting context something of a stretch. I would expect that if you were familiar with only one of the terms, it'd be limbo, not Valhalla. Although American Gods might explain it.

    33. Re:Code named software by suss · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Limbo" means it'll actually never come out. ;-)

      No, that would be "Woody".

    34. Re:Code named software by tetro · · Score: 1

      they tried BIMBO, but that just didn't sit well with the rest of the company.

      --
      .smell my feet.
  5. Ask Slashdot: Reading at -1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the best way to read /. at -1, apart from searching for all -1 messages and ordering the messages to be highest scores first, and then reading from the bottom up?

    Are there any better ways?

    Thankyou very much.

    Anonymous Coward

    1. Re:Ask Slashdot: Reading at -1 by Spruce+Moose · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Try setting the Display Mode in the Comments tab of your user preferences to Flat for the best -1 experience.

    2. Re:Ask Slashdot: Reading at -1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankyou Mr Moose, you have been most helpful.

      AC

    3. Re:Ask Slashdot: Reading at -1 by packeteer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      a good thing to do is set it so anything modded as troll or flaimbate goes to -5... that way you can browse at -1 almost safely without blatent page wideners and goatsex linkers... also set it to anything modded funny is +2... i dont like to miss the funny stuff ;)

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  6. But will it be happier that 7.2? by caferace · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Such beta software as LIMBO is not intended for use on mission critical or production systems. Use on such systems could lead to loss of uptime, data, money, employment, or sentience.

    Not that I NEED to upgrade, but I've got a 7.2 ISO I was going to put on another non-critical box (second desktop). Should I forge ahead, and head into beta-land?

    1. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by josh+crawley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From what I understand, Limbo (or whatever the whacked-out name crap means) is the 8.0 Beta.

      What I usually do is of the following (depending on what OS):

      If it's MS Windows, I wait about 6 months till most of the bugs are worked out. XP has been a show-stopper to me. I wont install that piece of Spyware-ridden crap.

      If it's Linux distro XYZ, I usually wait for about 1.5 to 2 months till I touch the new distro. If there's bugs, it'll be usually worked out in that time. Course, if something currently works, I'm gonna leave it alone.

    2. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by ninewands · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Should I forge ahead, and head into beta-land?

      One question ... do you want something you can count on? Or ... would you rather play with the latest and greatest toys.

      It's been my experience that Linux apps (not to mention the kernel itself) tend to be stabler in bets than Windoze apps at approximately release level 4.0.

      Going to beta-land is a decision you can only make for yourself, but ... I have been running Debian woody (the current "testing" distro) for WELL over a year. I haven't had significant stability problems with it yet.

    3. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You'll be happier with 7.2. Or 7.3. Both betas for 7.3 were rock solid and more stable than many final releases of other software. But that's because it was the final refinement to the long, long, LONG-in-development 7.x series.

      8.0 beta will not be stable. It's brand new. All its parts are brand new. Everything is untested. 8.0 beta 2 won't be stable. 8.2 beta 1 might be pretty good though.

    4. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by tunah · · Score: 2

      Well if you're interested in the newer software in LIMBO (sorry) you should run AT LEAST 7.3.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    5. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by danny · · Score: 2

      With servers I advise sticking with something that's been around a while and is known to be stable. With desktop machines, having the latest apps and desktop (GNOME, KDE) is more important and stability is less important, so I might be prepared to try LIMBO on a desktop machine. Danny.

      --
      I have written over 900 book reviews
    6. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be happier burning an ISO of 7.3. If you are gonna upgrade, at least do the latest and greatest stable.

      Don't go with the betas for production. I used to think otherwise until I had 2 serious bugs on the 7.2 betas cause major havoc for my production boxes (thought I was being cool with ext3 implementation on the betas).

    7. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 2

      It depends; first, the main reason for using beta software is to participate in bug-hunting, and request features.
      Second, if you need some non-RH rpms, you may run into dependency problems, since the beta is compiled against spanking new libraries.
      This problem may be fixed by compiling from the src rpms.
      Finally, some code doesn't compile on GCC 3.x, though RH probably ships a compat-2.9x-GCC.

      My suggestion: if you have the time, then do it. If you got more than one box, then eg. try to perform a network install. So if the beta sucks, then at least you learned something new.

    8. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by guacamole · · Score: 2

      7.3 has been out for a while. There no reason not to install it instead of 7.2. It works fine for us. We run it on about twenty PCs.

    9. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!! u dissed XP. C00L MAN!

    10. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      It would probably be sort of OK, but I would wait until the Release Candidates come through.

    11. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      If they ship with that so-called 2.96 hack of GCC, chances are that a few people will find stuff that doesn't compile easily. I had to do a bit of tweaking a couple of months ago on a friend's system to get OpenOffice to compile. The configure script didn't like 2.96 as a GCC version, only 2.95 or 3.x.

    12. Re:But will it be happier that 7.2? by SecretAsianMan · · Score: 3, Informative
      Course, if something currently works, I'm gonna leave it alone.
      Interesting... Would you mind giving us a list of your IP addresses?
      --

      Washington, DC: It's like Hollywood for ugly people.

  7. Does it have any reliable update techniques? by WetCat · · Score: 1

    Such as urpmi in Mandrake or apt-get in Debian?

    1. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have you been?

      It is called "up2date"

    2. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by crush · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yup, there's a nice little app called "up2date" which you should take a look at. This allows you to get the latest rpms from the Red Hat Network. It's pretty good actually.

    3. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by mnordstr · · Score: 3

      Actually up2date can be a very nice program, and if you have several systems you'll get them all listed on the redhat network page where you can easily update them all without logging in on them. I really like the up2date program RedHat offers.

    4. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by WetCat · · Score: 0, Troll

      up2date is MUCH WORSE than urpmi from mandrake.
      You have to give your system configuration to RedHat to use it, therefore giving up your privacy.
      In urpmi you just use mirrors and update is going without sending any information from your computer.

    5. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by Why+Should+I · · Score: 1

      it doesn't seem to support upgrading versions of software.

      It still seems to be a pain in the us to upgrafe rpms of applications from one major version to another.

      anyone know how to upgrade (not just update - as in bug fixes and patches) rpms using up2date?

    6. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by hopey · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It is optional to give your system configuration.

      hopey

    7. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dim fucking shit. You don't have to give your configuration.

    8. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by Secure42 · · Score: 1

      But you have to register to use it!!
      When apt-get or urpmi for RedHat, both you don't have to register to use them?

      http://www.freeswan.org

    9. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is it? Is it for free ?

    10. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I've been working with computers for some 25 years now on mainframes, minis and PCs, and I've yet to find an OS that can be guaranteed to upgrade 100% cleanly on top of another installation. I prefer the approach of having a re-install procedure for localised settings and apps (or better, a script that handles the job automatically) and going with the fresh install on newly formatted partitions. I have found this saves a lot of headaches.

    11. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by crush · · Score: 2
      But you have to register to use it!!
      Yeah, but you get one FREE (beer) registration with each installed version. Furthermore, if you are on a really tight budget and don't feel that you can afford to pay RedHat for the service (which includes announcements of updates with the reasons, plus pretty good servers) then you can download errata rpms from RH's ftp servers, and point up2date to your local repository. Personally I think that this is more trouble then it's worth and it deprives the RedHat developers of a revenue stream that is reasonable.

      But, each to his own. The three options are open to you:

      • Buy RH boxed set and register and get updates
      • Register ONE free system
      • Do the download scheme suggested above
    12. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by crush · · Score: 2
      it doesn't seem to support upgrading versions of software (etc).
      This just isn't true. Try it.
    13. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by crush · · Score: 2
      I've been working with computers for some 25 years now on mainframes, minis and PCs, and I've yet to find an OS that can be guaranteed to upgrade 100% cleanly on top of another installation.
      Well, let's separate two different issues:
      • UPGRADE: moving from one version of a distribution to another. This is handled by the installer released with each version of the distribution. There were problems with RH7.1 -> 7.2 for a few cases. In 27 systems I had none from 7.2 -> 7.3. I did one simple home-workstation upgrade from 7.1 -> 7.3 with no problems.
      • UPDATE: applying patches, bugfixes, new application versions to a static distribution. I agree with you that for many situations I prefer to do each change manually in order to see what's going on. You can do this with up2date: it allows you to retrieve, but not install the packages. Then you can examine each one to see what the changes are going to be. Then apply it. Up2date is actually very configurable. I mostly just use it as a way of retrieving RedHat's )suggested_ fixes. Mostly I find them to be perfect.
    14. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by pyros · · Score: 1

      I'm sure what you actually mean is you can't do a distribution upgrade (7.2->7.3,7.3->8.0,...). You can upgrade packages (X 3.3 -> 4.0) no problem, and it does all your dependency checking for you.

    15. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes and No like everthing thay have trade off's. I have general just formated everything and installed fresh cleans out old lib I no longer needs and avoid Dep Hell something I get my self into from time to time. Now the bad side. You lose many of those little changes you forgot you made so you loss time having to reset most but not all of the changes you made last time. Sometime this just don't work well in new install that work great in upgrades. My Laptop upgraded to Redhat 7.3 Fine but I was running close on HD space so I decided to reinstall everything and took the laptop to work with me oneday and format and install 7.3 didn't have a Nic with Me and used it to download photo from my digital camera now I can't get the network card to work for nothing. I reinstall 7.3 Several Time and Tried everything under the sun to get it to work but no go. I can;t install 7.2 as the drive is in ext3 and 7.2 wont support. I have spent hours try to make it work and once done I will document what fixed it and reformat that drive and reinstall everything as I have messed up alot of software try to make it work.

    16. Re:Does it have any reliable update techniques? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      You lose many of those little changes you forgot you made

      I get around this by setting up a script file (which, in a feeble attempt at being funny, I call "getitup") which I update every time I make a config change. I also use it to build localised libraries and applications. It came in useful the other week when my hard drive trashed itself; I was able to re-install the OS from my Slackware ISOs, run my magic script and have the machine up and running as before within 60 minutes of installing a new hard drive.

  8. Real Mirrors List by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

    The mirrors link in the writeup is all the mirrors, I checked and most of them havn't updated yet.

    These mirrors are from the announcement link, so they all have the beta:

    - ftp://redhat.dulug.duke.edu/pub/redhat/linux/beta/ limbo/ (http and also rsync access)
    - ftp://carroll.aset.psu.edu/pub/linux/distributions /redhat/redhat/linux/beta/limbo/
    - ftp://ftp.cse.buffalo.edu/pub/Linux/redhat/redhat/ linux/beta/limbo/
    - ftp://mirror.hiwaay.net/redhat/redhat/linux/beta/l imbo/
    - ftp://limestone.uoregon.edu/redhat/beta/limbo/
    - ftp://ftp.shuttleamerica.com/pub/mirrors/redhat/li nux/beta/limbo/ (also rsync access)
    - ftp://mirror.cs.princeton.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat/l inux/beta/limbo/ Europe:
    - ftp://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/redhat-ftp/redh at/linux/beta/limbo/
    - ftp://ftp.linux.cz/pub/linux/redhat/linux/beta/lim bo/
    - ftp://alviss.et.tudelft.nl/pub/redhat/linux/beta/l imbo/
    - ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linu x/beta/limbo/
    - ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/pub/linux/redhat.com/dist/li nux/beta/limbo/ (http and also rsync access)
    - ftp://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/MIRRORS/ftp.redhat.com/r edhat/linux/beta/limbo/ (also rsync access)
    - ftp://ftp.uni-bayreuth.de/pub/redhat/linux/beta/li mbo/

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Real Mirrors List by weave · · Score: 2
      After trying several of the main mirrors listed and it not being there, I personally appreciated this list...

      Currently getting 1.1 MB/s transfer rate out of the psu.edu site. At about 10 minutes per ISO, I'll be done in less than an hour. Sweet....

      (My work has a 10 meg line to the net, it's a holiday, lines are dead, perfect timing...)

  9. Gnome 2? by jmv · · Score: 2, Redundant

    The notes just mention "the latest desktop technology". Does anyone know whether that means it includes gnome 2?

    1. Re:Gnome 2? by Thomas+A.+Anderson · · Score: 1

      not sure where I read it, but yeah, gnome 2 *and* kde 3

      --
      Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand (bash.org)
    2. Re:Gnome 2? by pr0t3uS · · Score: 3, Informative
      * The components file has been heavily reworked, mostly because of the inclusion of GNOME 2.


      That means yes but you can read all about it here.
    3. Re:Gnome 2? by prockcore · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, not only does it come with Gnome2, but the installer and all the distro apps use gtk2.

    4. Re:Gnome 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope not. Not until Gnome 2 has stabilized a bit, and possibly had a significant revamping (again) of its interface. It's far less intuitive and far more restricting than any version previous to it.

  10. Five Discs! by 0xA · · Score: 5, Insightful
    So I go and connect to a nice mirror and get ready do d/l myself some ISOs. There are five of them. FIVE!

    I imagine some of them are SRPMs or something but they aren't labeled as such. They have open office and a bunch of stuff on there though, maybe not. I am afraid that if I don't d/l and burn all five I'm going to get half way through an install and need disc 5 for some silly package. The last time I installed 7.3 on a server I needed all three, the install size was only 400 MB too.

    Why can't Red Hat build thier disc images with Disc 1 being the base, disc 2 being X and Gnome, 3 being Open Office, etc. I can't imagine any benefit to spreading things out so much.

    1. Re:Five Discs! by silvaran · · Score: 5, Informative

      This started with 7.3. Likely the first three discs contain RPMs, while the last three contain SRPMs. Why the overlap? Disc 3 is half RPM and half SRPM. Just d/l the first three. You might even be able to get away with the first two depending on the kind of install, but I don't know enough about how they position their RPMs on the discs to be able to tell. I recommend you check the listing of RPMs on the third disc (it should be available in the FTP tree) to see if you need it, or can do without it.

    2. Re:Five Discs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that even with broadband you can't be arsed to download it and burn it, silly. Look everyone - shiny red hat box in the store - mmm, tempting.

      Oh, that and its got so much stuff nicely packaged including sources that its getting huge. Now if they'd put it on a DVD in a box, I might go for that.

    3. Re:Five Discs! by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      Can someone please explain to me why they don't do this already? Video game makes do it all the time...

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    4. Re:Five Discs! by hotgazpacho · · Score: 1

      Actually, I just installed RH 7.3 on my Notebook today. Notebook class install, with KDE, Gnome, and Development. It needed all 3 CDs.

    5. Re:Five Discs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So I go and connect to a nice mirror and get ready do d/l myself some ISOs. There are five of them. FIVE!

      Sounds like this thing needs a download manager.
      Peer2peer perhaps?

      It would be sweet for those of us with slow connections to be able to peer2peer this stuff for the benefit of scheduling downloads and auto-restarting for stuff like the slashdot effect.

    6. Re:Five Discs! by SlickMickTrick · · Score: 1
      ... 3 being Open Office...

      They got OpenOffice onto one cd? No wonder this is the most popular distro.

      j/k

    7. Re:Five Discs! by egghat · · Score: 2

      Simple: They want you to buy their distro. If downloading costs 5 days and buying costs 50 dollars more people will buy and not download. If downloading costs one day, noone will buy.

      I know it's a beta and people should try it. But Redhat won't change the disc layout. It's a beta and it should be a test for the final.

      Btw.: Most distros do it the Redhat way. SuSE has always needed all CDs for installing. Mandrake is one of the few exceptions. Normally 2 CDs are enough. And a second btw: This is a great opportunity for a small debian based distro: Install net access, X, hardware, etc. and then download everything else from the net.

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    8. Re:Five Discs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the game makers that put out those fancy ISOs on your local DC hub you know...

    9. Re:Five Discs! by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      disk 3 seemed to be doc type stuff from what i recall. i did s slim install, and almost got by with only disk one. needed 2 for a few rpms, now i'm regretting selecting the "install everytyhing" button.

    10. Re:Five Discs! by HiThere · · Score: 2

      The box won't be available until they are through the beta. CheapBytes used to stock things like this pretty quickly, but they didn't for 7.3 so you might want to look elsewhere. I seem to remember that TechNation (or some name like that) had the 7.3 disks during the beta cycle.

      I intend to buy the official 8.0 release, but I don't plan to buy the first beta, not even via a CD seller. Too much delay in the line. Well, and I've only got a couple of computers that I can do what I want with, and they're both committed to jobs that require some stability. The only one I could use for this is an old one with a 2 GB HD. To fit 7.3 into it I had to decline to install KDE. Ouch! That wipes out a lot of my favorite tools. (That box is supposed to eventually emulate a web server, so it shouldn't even need X, but I plan to do the development on it, so I want my tools in place. Doesn't fit too well.) Anyway, I don't think I want to even *try* to install 8.0 on that box. Certainly not the beta version.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  11. Re:-1 REDUNDENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I wanted to karma whore, I would. I post what I feel like posting. If it happens to get modded up, then so be it. I've got 50 karma for two years now (or whenever they put the cap in), why would I want more?

  12. Have you been living under a rock or something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um newsflash
    MODERATORS ON CRACK
    film at 11

  13. gcc 3.1? by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

    I don't know much about gcc, but will it remain incompatible with lesser-used apps? Some apps have been completely ignored by their maintainers for years and it would be a pain not being able to compile them.

    1. Re:gcc 3.1? by GigsVT · · Score: 0, Troll

      Some apps have been completely ignored by their maintainers for years and it would be a pain not being able to compile them.

      It sounds like the apps are incompatible with gcc, not the other way around.

      Maybe you were just trolling, in which case, IHBT, I'll have a nice day. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:gcc 3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always install another compiler.

    3. Re:gcc 3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whole point of linux?

      do you know how many times rabid fans have yelled at me to write my own driver?

      countless.

      i guess here's where i tell ya to take the source code and fix it up for gcc 31 :-)

    4. Re:gcc 3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IHBT?

      I have bought that?

      I have been trolled?

      It hurts, but then...?

      Oh I give up.

    5. Re:gcc 3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://watson-net.com/jargon/jargon.asp?prn=1=YHBT

      [Usenet: very common] Abbreviation: You Have Been Trolled (see troll, sense 1). Especially used in "YHBT. YHL. HAND.", which is widely understood to expand to "You Have Been Trolled. You Have Lost. Have A Nice Day". You are quite likely to see this if you respond incautiously to a flame-provoking post that was obviously floated as sucker bait.

      The jargon file is your friend.

  14. Kernel? by cow_licker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can someone tell me what version it's running?

    --
    $_='while(read+STDIN,$_,2048){$a=29;$b=73;$c=142;$ t=255;@t=map{$_%16or$t^=$c^=($m=(11,10,116,100,
    1. Re:Kernel? by unformed · · Score: 1, Informative

      2.something if I remember correctly... ;)

    2. Re:Kernel? by praxim · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to insult the poster, because there's nothing wrong with the post itself, but how did it wind up being modded up to '3, Informative?'

    3. Re:Kernel? by crisco · · Score: 2

      Thats at least as funny as the actual post. Too bad we can't metamoderate +1 teh funny. Or should that be -1 funny as hell but obviously smoking crack.

      --

      Bleh!

    4. Re:Kernel? by unformed · · Score: 2

      I agree; it wasn't meant to be informative, more of just a wiseass comment.... whoever modded that +1 Informative has absolutely no clue ... +1 Funny would've been much more appropriate, or even -1 Almost Funny

    5. Re:Kernel? by ken_mcneil · · Score: 1

      I just installed it; 2.4.18.

  15. Re:-1 REDUNDENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah I think there should be a -2 Karma Whore ability on Slashdot. KW to me is worse than trolling so should have a more strict moderation.

  16. Is that why moz 1.0 isn't on rhn update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping on having official redhat rpms for 1.0

    I guess I'll have to use the ones on mozilla.org

    1. Re:Is that why moz 1.0 isn't on rhn update? by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      why an RPM? I find that source normally builds perfectly fine on a RH box as long as you've got most of the general libs installed. Also, Mozilla and Netscrape have pretty much automated installs. Just start the scripts, answer some questions and give it a few minutes. Ximian Gnome does the same basic thing too. Y'all should try that one too.

    2. Re:Is that why moz 1.0 isn't on rhn update? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2

      Building from source is fine, but getting RPMS is nice, particularly if you want other things (Galeon and Nautilus) using Mozilla. I find it quite pleasing to have someone else (ie Ximian in my case) worrying about making sure all three play happily together at any one time.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    3. Re:Is that why moz 1.0 isn't on rhn update? by rolfpal · · Score: 1

      Mozilla 1.0 doesn't play well with evolution 1.0.X. I tried it, but evolution is statically linked to mozilla libraries. Move the libraries and u are screwed.

      --
      nothing is real
  17. nope by halfelven · · Score: 1

    Where were you hidden in the last centuries?
    The whole thing about Red Hat is that they are a distribution for servers. Go again through the whole articles following the UnitedLinux thing, and you'll see.
    That being said, Limbo does indeed looks like a more desktop-focused distribution.

    1. Re:nope by volkris · · Score: 1

      I didn't read the unitedlinux thread, but in my experience I'd say Redhat has always been desktop focused. It seemed to me that they often made decisions that went in this direction.

    2. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha.

      whatever.

      might as well claim ALL the distributions are focused on the desktop..

      oh wait...they are!

      freebsd is for servers.

      linux is for desktops.

      fine by me.

    3. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no...
      FreeBSD is for servers...
      Linux is for bitches.

    4. Re:nope by volkris · · Score: 1

      Might as well, as objective as the thread is, but...

      In my personal and therefore insignificant experience, RedHat is more targeted at places with GUIs for configuration and people who want to install huge chunks of desktop software, etc.

      Other distros, such as Debian, don't make these sacrifices.

    5. Re:nope by gotak · · Score: 1

      Then you haven't ever used mandrake. It's even worse.

      That being said I think the parent should be moded funny. IT should be troll.

      Why? Because redhat explained their choice of gcc. It's not because they felt like it. But because they wanted the most up to date and standard compliant gcc possible.

      Now I don't know if that's 100% true but I don't see why they should use a broken GCC for no reason.

  18. !!!! NEWBIE ALERT !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "tunah" is BRAND NEW to the internet!!!

  19. cool! by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

    I was just thinking today, as I was compiling Apache 2.0 and Mozilla 1.0.1 from Rawhide SRPMs, how nice it would be to have a Red Hat 7.3.999 with the new KDE and Gnome (actually, I'm hoping Gnome 2.0 will be nice enough for me to switch back from KDE, or at least have a KDE with more of these little bugs fixed).

    And of course I'd want Apache 2.0, Mozilla 1.latest, and whatever else. I guess since the gcc is upgraded this will be 8.0? I hope they change some more stuff besides Gnome, Apache, and GCC to justify a point-oh.

    Anyway, I'm anxious for the offical release of whatever this is.

    1. Re:cool! by BJH · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope they change some more stuff besides Gnome, Apache, and GCC to justify a point-oh.

      It's fairly likely they will look back at their earlier x.0 releases:

      4.0: First time RH released for three different architectures (x86, SPARC, Alpha) - SPARC/Alpha didn't really work until 4.2
      5.0: First major distribution to use glibc -locales were completely broken, lots of stuff didn't compile properly
      6.0: Moved to 2.2 kernel series - heaps of security problems
      7.0: Moved to 2.4 kernel series and glibc 2.2 - yet more security problems, major bug in release version

      So hopefully they'll have something all sparkling new and totally broken in 8.0 to keep up the tradition.

    2. Re:cool! by weave · · Score: 2
      Actually, 7.0 only had lk 2.2 and 7.1 moved to lk 2.4.

      I believe the .0 are mainly a library/compiler issue which means a lot of brokeness with binary rpms between major release numbers. They also tend to shift stuff around in .0s, like location of files and how stuff is configured.

      7.x series also used the controversial gcc 2.96 to compile stuff... Looks like that issue will finally be behind us.

    3. Re:cool! by sebol · · Score: 1

      Mozilla 1.0.1

      Mozilla 1.0.1 released????

      --
      -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
    4. Re:cool! by BJH · · Score: 1

      My bad. You're correct, although I believe 7.0 was set up to allow 2.4 to be 'dropped in' when it was ready.

  20. Unfortunate name by bobtheprophet · · Score: 0

    LIMBO doesn't seem to be a terribly good name for a release, is it saying that they just barely kept the release from going straight to hell? On the other hand, it's nice to see that they're using a real version of GCC. I'm running 7.1, and I had to upgrade GCC from the broken 2.96, which wasn't easy for me, me being a linux n00b.

    --
    Don't give me none of this "nature theme" business.
    1. Re:Unfortunate name by Menthos · · Score: 2
      LIMBO doesn't seem to be a terribly good name for a release, is it saying that they just barely kept the release from going straight to hell?

      It's a BETA. Betas are releases from hell. You have to know what you are doing if you are using betas. :)
      Judging from previous history, it won't be the name of the final release.

      I'm running 7.1, and I had to upgrade GCC from the broken 2.96, which wasn't easy for me, me being a linux n00b.

      Im curious. What problems did you have with gcc-2.96-rh? Did you upgrade to the official errata updates for the compiler? Are you sure that the compiler was at fault and not the applications you were trying to compile? Some developers have been more keen on blaming the compiler than on fixing broken code.

      --

      GNU/Linux. The Freshmaker.

    2. Re:Unfortunate name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, Limbo is a stopping off point for heaven, not hell

    3. Re:Unfortunate name by disappear · · Score: 2
      Again, Limbo is a stopping off point for heaven, not hell

      Nope. You're thinking of Purgatory, where ones' sins are purged before going to heaven.

      Limbo is where virtuous non-Christians go. It's a later Christian idea --- in Dante's Inferno, virtuous Pagans go to the outermost (least harsh) circle of Hell. But people didn't like the idea that an unbaptized baby would go to Hell through no fault of their own, so 'Limbo' was postulated that gave a place for those people.

      Not too long ago, the Catholic church decided that Limbo doesn't exist, however.

      (I'm still waiting for them to say the same thing about Purgatory, Hell, and Heaven, but I might have a long wait... ;-))

  21. 5 discs?!?!?! What is this, SuSE??? by BitMan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Man oh man, bloatware. I mean, I'll install it all, but man, DVD time!

    --
    -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith
    Independent Author, Consultant and Trainer
  22. Abiword? by Compenguin · · Score: 1

    I don't see Abiword. Why was Abiword dumped?

    1. Re:Abiword? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      The following packages are currently not included but will be in a future version.
      gnomemeeting openh323 pwlib rpm2html rpmfind

      The following packages have been removed from this release of Red Hat Linux.
      alien blt dip fvwm2 ee elm extace gnomeicu gnome-pim gnorpm ical jikes kaffe metamailmi cq netscape playmidi rxvt sliplogin taper xbill xdaliclock xlockmore xmailbox xpilot

      The following packages have been deprecated and will be removed in a future release of Red Hat Linux.
      LPRng

      I'll sure miss xbill.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Abiword? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's always gnome-xbill!

  23. Removed packages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    alien, fvwm2, elm, netscape, rxvt, xbill, xlockmore, xpilot

    I really can't understand why they removed fvwm2.

    1. Re:Removed packages by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Personally, I'm wondering if rpm now handles debs. It started handling tarballs a version or so ago, so that's not beyond reason.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  24. 5 ISO images?!? by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 2

    In the ISO dir there are 5 images. Now I'm fairly sure that the final version of RH 8(?) will still keep the 3CD binary RPMS + 2CDs of SRPMS format from RH 7.3. But there is one thing that really bothers me about that setup. Even for a fairly basic install, I was still required to use all 3 CDs.

    I know I included too many packages in the instalation, and if I were to do a clean install, I could trim it down a lot. Right now I have 2Gb in /usr, and I believe I could get a lot under that. But the problem is, it's still too much, and it's too hard to keep the installation small and easily manageable. If I chose any of the preconfigured instalation methods (I think server, kde, gnome workstation, custom system), none of them worked for me. The only one that did the job was custom, but it took a very long time to select individual packages. All the other options left me without some devel tools, or without some servers (e.g apache) or without some smaller apps.

    I've been using RH since 4.2, and I used to like the fact that it was an easy to install, configure, and maintain distribution. But ever since they moved to 3CDs of binaries, it doesn't feel like that anymore. It's cumbersome to install (with the individual package selection). It's not very easy to configure, especially for more esoteric configurations like mine (I need a bit of server, workstation and devel stuff). The config files are becoming more fragmented, moved into several directories. Sometimes the only way I can make sense of them is by using linuxconf and the other setup tools, which I don't like.

    And maintainance, well, that's a story in itself. The couple of times I used the up2date were a nightmare. The first time it installed amanda, and that thing filled up my 400Mb / partition to the brim before I figured out what was going on, and I managed to clean up the mess. The second time, many apps (including X) got broken. I suppose it works just fine with standard instalations, but with modified ones, it just doesn't. So I gave up on up2date. But there are so many packages that I don't know what they do exactly, that it's impossible to update them all manually.

    I'm not pretending to be a great RedHat admin. But I have been using that distro for 5 years, and I'm becoming lost. This is not happening to me with Slackware or gentoo (my other 2 distros) or with OpenBSD. While I'm getting much, much better in these other ones, I feel I'm getting worse in RH.

    I would really appreciate any ideeas, any help I can get with this problem. Maybe I'm doing it all wrong, but it feels that RH is getting far too complex to run. Is it just me, or does anyone else share this feeling?

    1. Re:5 ISO images?!? by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got a couple of servers running 6.2 at the moment (300-day uptimes), and at one time or another I've tried out 4.2, 5.0, 5.2 and 7.1.

      I've found the way to keep a Red Hat system running happily is to _never_ install anything that isn't an official RPM - and when you're doing updates, go back and diff all the updated config files against your older versions (RH got me once with an update to sendmail.cf that blocked connections from anywhere other than localhost - and that was our main mailserver...).

      Sure, that makes for a crappy desktop system, but if you're using it as a server, you don't really need that CVS version of Xine or mplayer.

      I suppose people will flame me for saying this, but hey, it works for me.

    2. Re:5 ISO images?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I've been with RH since 1.x something. Around 6.1-6.2 I decided to give SuSE a chance in the server room.
      At this point I've come to realize that RH is superior in the server room and I'm going back.
      I love RH 7.2. I don't really care how hard installation is. I want a standard system that's easy to Maintain.
      If it took a day to install but was easy to maintain I'd still do it. I do too many src installs and while SuSE have a really great GUI configuration modules I don't like being stuck with distro versions. I want the freedom to upgrade when I want to.
      All major distro's are more complex. They start and run a lot of shit that you don't need but is eye candy or something. Somehow they have the idea that's important. (Which is probably true for all these poor windows users who think an O/S has to have a GUI to be useful. I even saw a guy complain that *nix is technical!!
      Actually I've thought about making my own personal distro for My needs. So I do think that RH is more work, but it's common across the line.

    3. Re:5 ISO images?!? by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My biggest gripe with RH is the install /configuration too. The standard options doesn't fit my need on my desktop or my servers. So I always end up using "costum" with "kernel-development" (and "XFree"), and then select the rest of the individual packages.
      The best solution is probably spending some time, learning to use "Kick-start".
      Another thing: if you dislike being a CD DJ, and have the disk space, then remember that it is possible to install RH directly from the downloaded ISO images on a harddisk partition.

      About maintance. Hm. My experience is different from yours. I think RH has become much easier to maintain, especially with RH-network. Mastering RPM to a certain degree is a must though.
      Simple stuff like "rpm -Fvh *.rpm --test" or "rpm -qa | grep foo" or "rpm -qf /etc/foo.conf" saves the day.
      And underappreciated tool is "mc" or Midnight Commander", a dual panel "Norton Commander" ncurses based clone. Among other things, it is able to browse inside rpm packages. Nifty.

      You mention that up2date filled "/". It is configurable where up2date dumps the downloaded rpms. On my servers "/var" and "/home" are on seperate partitions, so that eg. huge, growing log-files etc. doesn't spill over the "/" partition.

      Gentoo Linux looks very interesting, and the guy that makes it, D. Robbins has written some extremely well written tutorials for IBM on: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/

    4. Re:5 ISO images?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried gentoo recently and was very impressed. It was the only distribution when I ever successfully upgraded to a newer version of KDE or GNOME. The biggest downside is that the first few installs take ungodly amounts of time on an underpowered CPU, but I just started them before going to sleep / work and that worked out pretty well. I'm hoping this will be the last time I ever install an OS on that partition, its ability to upgrade very complex packages is very cool.

      I was also a little disappointed that chkconfig wasn't available or built into the system, I thought that most linux distros used that system now?? I haven't really found any good documentation about controlling services under gentoo, but it appears to require manual symlinking. Based on that, I think I'll still use Redhat on servers, but gentoo makes for a pretty good desktop system.

  25. Complaints about 5 CDs by smallstepforman · · Score: 5, Funny

    For those people who are moaning about 5 disks, all you really need is the net install disk image, which conveniently fits on a 1.44 floppy. Then you can spend 4 hours downloading the beast, 3 hours configuring, 2 hours cursing, then reboot and continue playing MoH:AA on the other system which we wont mention ;-)

    --
    Revolution = Evolution
  26. Re:5 discs?!?!?! What is this, SuSE??? by Jagasian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Debian has already started using a DVD installer in addition to the more traditional CD installers.

    Most Debian users hardly ever use DVD or CD installations... as they somehow get Debian installed once, and after that, Debian's robust package management system makes updating the OS fully automatic.

  27. You think RH will include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The latest pcmcia with wireless networking support included finally? You know considering 802.11b is only being unsed in about 90% of new laptops... You also think they will have it recognise Lucent Orinoco Gold cards? I'm still hacking at 7.3 to get it to work. Maybe I am just doing something wrong, but you would think that it would immediatly recognise this card considering it was the market setting card when 802.11b came out (and still is one of the top 3 in my opinion).

    1. Re:You think RH will include... by hotgazpacho · · Score: 1

      Have you tried the orinoco_cs module? Its included with the Redhat binary kernels.

      Not to familiar with Orinoco cards, but I have a Linksys WPC11 v.3. I used the linux-wlan-ng modules, available as RPMs here.I don't have a WLAN to test it out on yet, but I will when I get back to school in about six weeks, so I'm not sure if it works. It does, however, flash the Link light, just as it does under W2K when it is seraching for a WAP.

    2. Re:You think RH will include... by kubusja · · Score: 1

      ORINOCO support was included already in 7.1 or 7.2. If you have Prism2 card - linux-wlan-ng rocks, even USB cards work fine.

  28. Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anonymous because karma is meaningless, but changelogs are not. This took a lot of hand editing to get past the lameness filter, thanks Malda and thanks crapflooders.

    The Netscape Web browser has been removed.

    The RPM Package Manager (RPM) verifies digital signatures when reading packages during installation. In order to verify signatures for packages after installation, the package's public key must be imported into the rpm database. For example, to import the Red Hat public key, type the following as root at a shell prompt:

    rpm --import /usr/lib/rpm/RPM-GPG-KEY
    After importing the public key, you can verify package digest and signature information using the following command:

    rpm --checksig package_name

    RPM will also suggest package(s) that will satisfy unresolved dependencies if the rpmdb-redhat package is installed. For example, if you are attempting to upgrade the gnumeric without a necessary library, you will see the following message:

    rpm -Uvh gnumeric-1.0.5-5.i386.rpm
    error: Failed dependencies:
    libbonobo-print.so.2 is needed by
    gnumeric-1.0.5-5

    libbonobo.so.2 is needed by
    gnumeric-1.0.5-5
    libbonobox.so.2 is needed by gnumeric-1.0.5-5

    Suggested resolutions:
    bonobo-1.0.20-3.i386.rpm
    The above mechanism is equivalent to (and will replace) the existing --redhatprovides mechanism.

    GNU Ghostscript has been upgraded to version 7.05.

    By default, top and ps only display the main (initial) thread of thread-aware processes. To show all threads, use the command ps -m or type [H] in top.

    The junkbuster proxy filter package has been replaced by the privoxy package which can now filter animations, pop-ups, refresh tags, and webbugs. Privoxy is configurable at run-time by pointing your browser to http://p.p and choosing options from the menu.

    Red Hat Linux 7.3.92 contains the following new configuration and system tools:

    Red Hat Log Viewer (redhat-logviewer)

    Red Hat NFS Configuration Tool (redhat-config-nfs)

    Red Hat Samba Configuration Tool (redhat-config-samba)

    Red Hat X Configuration Tool (redhat-config-xfree86)

    Red Hat Sound Card Configuration Tool (redhat-config-soundcard)

    Red Hat Language Selection Tool (redhat-config-language)

    Red Hat Keyboard Configuration Tool (redhat-config-keyboard)

    Red Hat Mouse Configuration Tool (redhat-config-mouse)

    Red Hat Root Password Tool (redhat-config-rootpassword)

    Red Hat Security Level Configuration Tool (redhat-config-securitylevel)

    Package Reorganization
    The following packages have been replaced.

    ucd-snmp - replaced by net-snmp
    gtop - replaced by gnome-system-monitor
    gphoto - replaced by gphoto2
    console-tools - replaced by kbd
    junkbuster - replaced by privoxy

    The following packages are currently not included but will be in a future version.

    gnomemeeting openh323 pwlib rpm2html rpmfind

    The following packages have been removed from this release of Red Hat Linux.

    alien blt dip fvwm2 ee elm extace gnomeicu gnome-pim gnorpm ical jikes kaffe metamailmi cq netscape playmidi rxvt sliplogin taper xbill xdaliclock xlockmore xmailbox xpilot

    The following packages have been deprecated and will be removed in a future release of Red Hat Linux.
    LPRng

    Kernel Notes
    The kernel used in this release supports the following list of improvements and new features. The kernel is based on the 2.4.19- pre10-ac2 release for this beta.

    HZ=1000 on i686 and Athlon means that the system clock ticks 10 times as fast as on other x86 platforms (i386 and i586); HZ=100 has been the Linux default on x86 platforms for the entire history of the Linux kernel. This change provides better interactive response, lower latency response from some programs, and better response from the scheduler. We have adjusted the /proc filesystem to report numbers as if using the default HZ=100, but it is possible that issues could arise -- please test and report bugs, as always. Adaptec's latest hardware that supports the new Ultra 320 SCSI standard is now supported. It is a new driver, so if you have the hardware, test and report any issues that you encounter.

    The latest aacraid driver now has 64-bit support, and so should have much higher performance on systems with more than 4GB of memory when you use the "bigmem" kernel.

    The network console and crash dump functionality from Red Hat Linux Advanced Server 2.1 has been ported to this release. Documentation for setting this up is included in the netdump and netdump-server packages and is also available as a whitepaper at the following URL:
    http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/netdu mp/index.html

    This beta contains a kernel providing EA and ACL support for the ext3 for setting this up is included in the netdump and netdump-server packages and is also available as aw whitepaper at the following URL:
    http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/netdu mp/index.html

    This beta contains a kernel providing EA and ACL support for the ext3 filesystem based on the patches and user-level tools from
    http://acl.bestbits.at/

    The support for EA and ACL is included in several packages:
    kernel provides the support for storing EAs and ACLs on disk for ext3 filesystems provides the system calls to manipulate EAs and ACLs; and provides the mechanisms to enforce ACLs on file access.

    e2fsprogs includes knowledge of the new on-disk extended attribute formats so that fsck can check filesystems using the new feature.

    attr provide access to extended attributes attached to libattr files

    acl provide tools to set, modify and query the ACLs set libacl on files

    libattr-devel libraries and include files to build programs using libacl-devel, acl, and attr

    1. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red Hat Linux 7.3.92 contains the following new configuration and system tools: [SNIP]

      Do they have graphical frontends? I keep my fingers crossed that they do, because Red Hat Linux could really use a simple way to change desktop resolution for example. Mandrake has tools like that, but even after several generations they're pretty flaky, so my hope stands to Red Hat. If they deliver graphical tools for all the tasks mentioned above they've got me as a customer.

    2. Re:Changelog by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >Red Hat. If they deliver graphical tools for all the tasks mentioned
      >above they've got me as a customer.
      >
      What makes you think they want you as a customer?

    3. Re:Changelog by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      You can switch resolutions in X using Ctrl+Alt+Plus or Ctrl+Alt+Minus.

    4. Re:Changelog by Tet · · Score: 2
      The following packages have been removed from this release of Red Hat Linux.

      alien blt dip fvwm2 ee elm extace gnomeicu gnome-pim gnorpm ical jikes kaffe metamailmi cq netscape playmidi rxvt sliplogin taper xbill xdaliclock xlockmore xmailbox xpilot

      Hmmm. Taking a quick look around my desktop, it looks like they've removed half of what I use on a daily basis... fvwm2, rxvt, ical, xdaliclock. I know RH are heading towards a brave new GNOME world, but removing fvwm2 and rxvt are criminal. Stranger is the removal of ee -- I haven't seen them adding anything to replace it. Not that it's a problem for me, as I still use xv, but it seems an odd move. I can compile up local versions of the missing bits, but it's looking like RH are heading in a direction that I'm not too happy with... maybe it's time to take a look at Gentoo.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    5. Re:Changelog by psychosis · · Score: 1

      I've not used either extensively, but my guess is that Eye Of Gnome (eog) will be replacing ElectricEyes (ee)...

    6. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > rpm --import /usr/lib/rpm/RPM-GPG-KEY

      s/rpm/gpg/

    7. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone know how to adjust the /proc filesystem to report 100 for the HZ value?

    8. Re:Changelog by pyrotic · · Score: 1

      Also, you can now setup LVM (logical volume manager) during install, which is a handy alternative/complement to software raid.

      Apache 2.0 + PHP seems to be there, presumably working, so I will have to see how threaded webservers do on pooling persistent database connections. This could be a big memory saver for our servers.

      But why is there no remote sys-admin tool? Bindconf, apacheconf etc are very nice under gnome. But I don't run xwindows on my servers, so what the hell am I meant to use to admin bind and sendmail, 2 progs I'd rather not have to deal with the syntax for. I could use linuxconf, but that's been dropped as of 7.1. Please get it together with a curses based front end to all the *conf programs, or put linuxconf back.

    9. Re:Changelog by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 2

      ditto, I've been using rxvt for like 10 years (no kidding) and ee from the command line is really useful (also as an image displayer for gnus since sometimes inline image display doesn't work as well as I'd like).

      And what about elm? It's a really nice commandline mailer, I haven't used it for a looooong time, but sometimes it's useful to fire it up to look at your inbox without having to launch emacs.

      Not including netscape 4.7x is a really boneheaded move: while I do use galeon for my daily browsing, there are sites that don't work in anything but netscape 4.x or IE (notably, my public library site, their horrible java appplet doesn't work in anything but ns 4.7 on linux)

      Fvwm2, while something I haven't used on my *user* desktop for at least 5 years, is useful for when you want a *quick* login (i.e. you're logging in as root to fix something like the X configuration and you don't want to wait forever for gnome/kde to load up)

      I could go on and on (doh, I already have!) but these choices don't look that great, at least from the perspective of an 'old' unix person, what next, removing TeX for OpenOffice?

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    10. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netscape has been removed...
      btw, Opera is now supposed to be included in the Suse and Mandrake distros. Mozilla can do everything Netscape 4x did, and better. I use the 1.1a version, and it is nice.

    11. Re:Changelog by dusanv · · Score: 1

      Mozilla can't do roaming profiles (which I need)! That's just one. I do not know of any other examples...

      D.

    12. Re:Changelog by binner1 · · Score: 1

      Admin your boxen from your desktop, and use the powers of X to solve your problem.

      Try adding:
      export DISPLAY=`who am i | awk '{print $6}' | sed 's/(//; s/)//' `:0

      to your .bashrc, and then xhost +.

      You're all set...use those nice tools, and don't bother with the hideous syntax!

      -Ben

    13. Re:Changelog by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Is eog useable without X Windows running? It sounded like that was how he was using ee.
      (I don't find any man entries for either of them in my RH7.3 system.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    14. Re:Changelog by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I don't know why (I haven't checked), but that has stopped working for me. Probably about the time I switched to XFree86 --- is it version 4? Anyway the major version switch about a year or so ago. And I seem to remember that before that time the setup allowed me to define multiple resolutions, where now it only allows me to select one. Usually sufficient, but occasionally **VERY** annoying. And esp. if it turns out that you set your screen too small during setup. (I still haven't found out how to change the resolution. When I've needed to, I couldn't stand squinting at the screen, and when I haven't needed to I haven't bothered.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    15. Re:Changelog by brank · · Score: 1

      One problem: eog doesn't have the image editing features of ee. It doesn't even have an image list, so if you want 32 images you need 32 windows.

      --
      it's green.
    16. Re:Changelog by salmo · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why people needed a roaming browser profile. I would think either you didn't need it, or you needed to have more data "roaming" than just your browser config/bookmarks, etc.

      Have you thought about NFS (or I guess SAMBA or something else) for your home directory? That way you can share all your config files. I find keeping my .bashrc, .emacs, etc. in synch more annoying than setting up a browser. Then again, I don't really use bookmarks, I used to just set up a page with all the links I usually use and set it as my home page. Now, I set up a PHP script that XSLTs XBEL to HTML so I use the bookmarks in Galeon and upload the XBEL file every now and then.

    17. Re:Changelog by metalogic · · Score: 1
      And what about elm? It's a really nice commandline mailer, I haven't used it for a looooong time, but sometimes it's useful to fire it up to look at your inbox without having to launch emacs.
      Try mutt: it can behave a lot like elm, read elm mailbox format, plus it has better support for attachments, pgp, etc. (Speaking as somebody who's just migrated from elm to mutt recently.)
      Fvwm2, while something I haven't used on my *user* desktop for at least 5 years, is useful for when you want a *quick* login (i.e. you're logging in as root to fix something like the X configuration and you don't want to wait forever for gnome/kde to load up)
      Running the sawfish window manager alone without all those Gnome/KDE cra^h^h^h niceties (panel, filemanager, desktop icons, whatever) is as fast as fvwm2.
    18. Re:Changelog by AT · · Score: 2

      They removed jikes?? That sucks. Kaffe, I can understand, since it often confused users who installed Sun's JDK by having it's java/javac appear ahead of Sun's in the PATH. But jikes is a small package that conflicts with nothing, and provides a lot of value.

      Incidentally, Kaffe 1.0.7 is out (first release in over a year) and jikes 1.16 should be out shortly.

    19. Re:Changelog by Tet · · Score: 2
      Running the sawfish window manager alone without all those Gnome/KDE cra^h^h^h niceties (panel, filemanager, desktop icons, whatever) is as fast as fvwm2.

      Yes, but it's lacking in other ways, notably menu configuration and a desktop pager.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    20. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course if your in a enviroment where coworkers like to X back netscape with goatse on the webpage xhost + is not a good idea. I would just do xhost +machine to save yourself the embarassment.

    21. Re:Changelog by pr0t3uS · · Score: 1

      Well you can run Xconfigurator which will create a basic XF86Config file that you can fine tune later. It will allow you to choose multiple resolutions and depth (just select all resolutions you want to use). But if you are using nvidia drivers after that you should change your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file in the way you did it when installing drivers. Control+alt++ and control+alt+- should work just fine now.

    22. Re:Changelog by guacamole · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Does anyone know why package LPRng has been removed?

    23. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the printing setups I've had to do recently with Red Hat 7.3, I've had to switch from LPRng to CUPS for various reasons anyway. IMO CUPS is just plain better at this point. Maybe that's why...

    24. Re:Changelog by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You could do what I recently did, remove nautilus. Gnome runs a lot faster and you still get the panel and pager and such. Of course your solution is more light weight, but nautilus-less gnome is pretty nice.

      On the down side, I couldn't figure out the "right" way to get rid of nautilus, so I just renamed the executable. Works fine now.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    25. Re:Changelog by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that you can...
      - install GNOME+KDE
      - run FVWM2 alone as your "desktop"
      - run any KDE/GNOME apps such as AbiWord, Gnumeric, Kmail, etc

      And if you don't like FVWM2's menu system, you can always execute "panel", which brings up the GNOME panel.

      I get the best of both worlds...
      - all the apps/applets/games in GNOME+KDE
      - no resource-hogging pointy-clicky, draggy-droppy, touchy-feely, ooey-gui desktop to slow a 3-year-old machine to a crawl.

      My attitude is that I don't run desktops, I run applications. That's my priority, and that's where my machine's limited resources should have their priority.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    26. Re:Changelog by Tet · · Score: 1
      Are you aware that you can...
      - run FVWM2 alone as your "desktop"

      Yes, I am. In fact, that's what I do now. The complaint, though, was that Red Hat are removing fvwm2 from future distributions...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    27. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So run xfce

  29. In the Linux world, not stable != not stable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Others might disagree, but I've found that, in general, in the (GNU)Linux world, the maintainers of large projects are very causious of calling them "stable releases".

    While I generally wouldn't advise their use in a live server, some Linux newbies might think that development versions are only for developors. They are not. If you have a secondary machine that you use for non-critical desktop type work, (E.G. word processing, games, etc), you could help a lot by using development versions, and reporting bugs.

    Back in the Linux 1.3.X days, a lot of people used the development kernel tree, because it had features that they needed that were not in the 1.2.X tree, (I think that that is less so in 2.5.X vs 2.4.X), and personally, I always found that it was very stable.

    So, basically, Linux newbies - if you want a feature of a development version, and can cope with the *possibility* of a crash, (in the same way that many people cope with the possibility of a crash in other OSs :-) ), I would encourage you to use development versions.

    1. Re:In the Linux world, not stable != not stable by robbo · · Score: 1

      I agree, with one burning exception-- development kernels are definitely not for the faint of heart. I'm happy to test drive all kinds of alpha software on my machine, but I won't go near an odd-series kernel.

      --
      So long, and thanks for all the Phish
    2. Re:In the Linux world, not stable != not stable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you had problems with development kernels?

      Anything like a filesystem corruption bug is usually reported VERY quickly. If a kernel has been out for 3 or 4 days, I would consider it usable for development purposes.

      I'm not suggesting that every new Linux user immediately downloads and installs the latest pre-patch alpha kernel, but on the other hand, if you want to, why not?

    3. Re:In the Linux world, not stable != not stable by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

      Well, more to the point, stable means different things to developers and users. When developers talk about a "stable release" or a "stable branch" of the code, what they really mean is that development has reached a point where all new development is for bug fixes, and new features and major development has moved on to an "unstable" branch. In a perfect world software that is stable in the development sense would also be stable in the reliability sense, but nothing can really guarantee that.

  30. WARNING! GOATSE LINKS! by Stuff+That+Splatters · · Score: 0

    I just wanted to warn you that over half of those links point to the evil goatse anus pic :/

    Taco, can we do something about this?!

  31. Python by ultrabot · · Score: 1

    So, what's the story with this thing and Python? Did they finally manage to get rid of 1.5.2 ( == port their own scripts to 2.2.1)?

    --
    Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    1. Re:Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It looks like that, only python-2.2.1. Also, perl is 5.8 (haven't checked which RC, final 5.8.0 isn't out yet afaik, although I prefer even 5.8.0RC1 over 5.6.1).

  32. Re:no xbill? by notanatheist · · Score: 2, Funny

    How could they!?! Where can I find the source for it. Really now, it's quite fun squashing Bill before his OS gets on my network. Level 21 has been my best for the few times I've played.

  33. Limbo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in their stock price?

  34. Re:-1 REDUNDENT by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's complete BS. KW'ing actually does serve a useful purpose -- it brings facts into the discussion that would not otherwise be brought up. The people who get the +5 get it because they contribute to the discussion.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  35. The first release for Joe the User? by pere · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if I have used RedHat for several years, I have never recommended it to new PC users. The reason is that (even if they probably be satisfied if I set up a Linux ystem for them) they be more happy if I set up something running MS Windows.

    To be an alternative for the ordinary user on the desktop, Linux must have:
    * A decent office suite
    * A decent browser
    * A decent e-mail program
    * A streamlined desktop
    * A sentralized way to change the system settings

    A year ago, Linux didnt have any of this. Open Office 1.0, Mozilla 1.0 and Evolution (or KMail) are brilliant programs. I have no problems recommending them instead of MSOffice, IE, Outlook. (To be honest MS Office is a better program then OpenOffice, but MS Office is way to expencive for an ordinary user, and Open Office is GoodEnough(TM)).

    With Gnome 2 and KDE 3 the desktop starts to look fairly streamlined. It still some work to be done on Gnome 2, but hopefully Redhat will fix the most annoying bugs before releasing 8.0.

    With "a sentralized way to change system settings" I do mean that the most important settings should be reached from a "control panel"-like program. To the ordinary user it is very hard to explain that the desktop resolution have to be changed by editing a text-file, while the desktop backgroud can be changed by right-clicking the desktop. I hope Redhat have a better control-panel in 8.0.

    If they fix the last two items, this could be the first Linux distribution I recommend to a novice computer user. Im looking forward to it..:-)

    1. Re:The first release for Joe the User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You call IE and Outlook a decent browser and email program? They spell trouble to me..

    2. Re:The first release for Joe the User? by dreamfactory · · Score: 1

      well said that man!!

      what we need is an efficient distribution with the following packages that PERE has put. A centralised control panel is just what is needed. Also, the configs to be put in one damn place and not fragmented.

      I find on many linux distros there is a lot of overlap with programs, not that this is a bad things but a distro with one office program i.e. openoffice (leave koffice and gnumeric etc out) and make it simple and easy for people.

      Not that this will suit everyone but altho linux is gaining popularity, trust me I only been using linux for a few months and I find it very hard, and I am no way like your average joe!

      There must be some distro which is heading for this simple one-program per application type, stick it on a cd with lots of nifty backgrounds, supress error messages into more friendly ones.

      THEN you have your linux 'introduction' distributio n

    3. Re:The first release for Joe the User? by bastard01 · · Score: 1

      You should try SuSE 8.0, I would think that Yast would be at least fix the problem of not having a good centralized control panel, although I prefer KDE 3 to Gnome at any version, although it is not without its little quirks, it is headed in the right direction for being a mainstream desktop.

    4. Re:The first release for Joe the User? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      This is a tricky problem. Consider Lindows. They went out of their way to make things as easy as possible. They make have implementation problems, but what they caught flack for, even before the release, was design issues.

      Well, I have problems with their design too. Users shouldn't log in as root by default. Still, one can't deny that it makes it easier to use. But easy or not, it's a bad idea.

      Corel had a better approach, but they started too soon, and they were hemorraging cash. And some of the applications weren't ready. Perhaps Xanthos will manage a satisfactory resurrection.

      OTOH, I see nothing wrong with Mandrake. Installing the software will always be tricky for an end-user, but if the deal with WalMart works out, WalMart will be selling systems pre-configured with Mandrake. That should solve most of the problems. (Then the question of easier printer installation needs to be addressed -- but perhaps WalMart will also sell complete configured systems. [I wish!])

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  36. I doubt it - different goals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RedHat's more about the corporate environment than desktop users, which seems to be Mandrake's forte.

    Maybe they're acknowledging the (*chortle*) threat of (*snicker*) UnitedLinux.

    1. Re:I doubt it - different goals. by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      No, they have clearly declined any cooperation in UL. One of the best points was
      Which is a good thing. All four UL distros are way off from gaining users, they're constantly loosing them. That's just their try make log rol in the way they'd wish

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
    2. Re:I doubt it - different goals. by justsomebody · · Score: 1

      No, they have clearly declined any cooperation in UL. One of the best points was
      "Why would distros that hold most of users change their way for four distros that try to get more trough lack of knowledge. All four distros in UL don't have user base large as Mandrake i you put them together" Which is a good thing. All four UL distros are way off from gaining users, they're constantly loosing them. That's just their try make log rol in the way they'd wish

      damn me, I should press preview. :)

      --
      Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
  37. Is this supposed to be R.H Linux v8.0 later on? by antdude · · Score: 2

    Or will it be v7.4? If I read correctly, GCC version major change result major change in Linux version for Red Hat. Is this still true?

    Thank you in advance. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Is this supposed to be R.H Linux v8.0 later on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what the version number is? I don't think it's important. Slackware skipped some version numbers just to be in line with the rest of the distros.

      Do you think Mandrake is better because their version number is bigger? You should instead look at the quality and purpose of the distro.

    2. Re:Is this supposed to be R.H Linux v8.0 later on? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Red Hat usually changes major version numbers when it breaks binary compatibility. gcc3.x breaks binary compatibility with gcc2.x, and this new release uses gcc3.x. So, yes, I expect it to be the 8.0 release.

      On a separate line of reasoning, the version appears to be called 7.9xxx, and another tradition calls for the betas to have a lower (but not much lower) version number than the release version. So on this grounds, also, I expect this to be the pre-8.0 release.

      Still, I don't believe that Red Hat has officially announced anything. (Also their tradition.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Is this supposed to be R.H Linux v8.0 later on? by antdude · · Score: 2

      Ah, I was planning to upgrade my old 7.1 and 7.2 versions to v8.0. I saw nothing important in 7.3 for me to upgrade. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:Is this supposed to be R.H Linux v8.0 later on? by codeguy007 · · Score: 1

      Evolution, Kde 3 and several other nice programs. Originally it was going to have GCC 3.1 but they backed off and released GCC 2.96 version instead. Explaining why they called it 7.3 instead 8.0.
      BTW there are also lots of added drivers in 7.3 and a much new and better kernel.

    5. Re:Is this supposed to be R.H Linux v8.0 later on? by antdude · · Score: 2

      I'm happy with my 7.1 and 7.2. I dislike upgrading OSes often.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:Is this supposed to be R.H Linux v8.0 later on? by codeguy007 · · Score: 1

      That's fine as long as you install the required updates when the are released. One nice thing about RedHat is that they support older versions really well. Others like our French friends would prefer that you upgrade with every new release.

    7. Re:Is this supposed to be R.H Linux v8.0 later on? by antdude · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that is what I am doing. I update often. Eventually, I will reach a point that upgrading things will require more than just libraries. Heh.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:Is this supposed to be R.H Linux v8.0 later on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      sync to compiler (gcc) major version is a character of young systems.

      sync to desktop (gnome) major version is a character of end-user systems.

      sync to server (database?) major version is a character of server systems.

      Wait for PostgreSQL 8.0 :)

  38. kde 3.0.2 cvs by alonso · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that rpms is kde 3.0.2 cvs.

  39. LVM in there by E/\/\P · · Score: 1

    nice that LVM is now supported by default, so you dont have to mess with kernel modules and initrds ..

    the question is: does it support online growning of ext3 ?

    1. Re:LVM in there by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 2

      nice that LVM is now supported by default, so you dont have to mess with kernel modules and initrds ..

      Check out IBM's EVMS (Enterprise Volume Management System). It is a plug-in based "front end /API" for storage management tools like LVM.
      Basicly that means, that you can create, destroy, resize LVM 'volumes', software RAID volumes, partitions, and use chkdisk etc, with the same tool. There are are one CLI, and two GUI's, one ncurses based(console), and one Gnome based. The latter simply makes me drool.

      see http://evms.sourceforge.net/gui_screen/

      No, it isn't ready for production systems. But that won't stop me from drooling. (and trying it soon)

      Further, it looks like it (EVMS) also has plug-ins for various filesystems and their tools, like; Ext2/Ext3, ReiserFS, JFS, Linux swap.
      And how about making snap-shots of a volume, and later a roll-back?

  40. Inflammatory by wkurdzio · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Slashdot'll post on the front page news about a new beta version of Red Hat but doesn't post on the front page a new *RELEASE* version of FreeBSD. Seems like Henry Ford's comments about what color the Model T was availabe in: "any color as long as it's black." Slashdot: News for Nerds. Stuff that matters. As long as it's Linux news, E/N crap (Katz, movie/book reviews), or an OSDN promotion.

    1. Re:Inflammatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that all the BSDs put together have five times less user base than RedHat alone BSD news are about as relevant as news about the nomination of a new head for Vatican's Swiss guard. ("Vatican how many divisions".

  41. is mplayer there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that mplayer has been GLPed (I think), would it get included in the distro?

  42. What I would like to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is that RedHat 'd include apt for RPM, but I guess that's not "compatible" with their RHN strategy...

    Any RedHat people (bero-rh?) willing to comment on this?
    (by the way, I submitted this article hours before this one, but what the heck...)

  43. Wheres bero_rh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bero_rh usually gives us plenty of useful information aroung here when theres any kind of RH news.

    bero! where are you today?

  44. SAMBA by mab · · Score: 1

    The version of samba is way out dated hope they get up to speed soon

  45. Electric Eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stranger is the removal of ee -- I haven't seen them adding anything to replace it. Not that it's a problem for me, as I still use xv, but it seems an odd move.
    Well, they addes EOG los of time before, so the transition in the last 5 years is: Xv --> ee --> EOG

  46. What happened to Linuxconf? by jregel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a time when Red Hat were seemingly pushing Linuxconf as the system admin tool. Now they have developed their own. Anyone know why?

    1. Re:What happened to Linuxconf? by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 2

      There was a time when Red Hat were seemingly pushing Linuxconf as the system admin tool. Now they have developed their own. Anyone know why?

      I don't know the details. But there were some serious problems with Linuxconf, since it had a tendency to mess up the config files.

      Besides, such monolitic configuration tools, are difficult to make and maintain for a Linux distro, since all the programs (and their config files), and the configuration program, all are made by different people, without any common standard for config files etc.

    2. Re:What happened to Linuxconf? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      If they've replaced Linuxconf with something else, that's
      almost certainly a good thing. All my experiences with
      Linuxconf, across three distributions, using the text-mode
      version, the Gnome version, and the web interface, have
      been bad.

      Not only does it leave out some of the things users often
      want to configure, and obfuscate others, but it also (as
      of last time I used it, which admittedly is not recently)
      hangs and dumps core way too often for comfort, to say
      nothing about creating inconsistent state so that the
      easiest way to recover is to reinstall.

      What is needed is a tool that integrates the Gnome or
      KDE (whichever session the user is in) control panel
      together with graphical interfaces for enabling and
      disabling services (in a way that not only starts/stops
      them but also changes the relevant startup scripts so
      that their started/stopped-ness persists after reboot),
      GUI tools for setting up multibutton mice and scroll
      mice, changing resolution, colour depth, and refresh
      rate of the X server, and so on. Anything you can
      do from the Windoze control panel should be included.

      I like the tree-on-the-left panel-on-the-right
      approach of the Gnome control panel, but besides
      Gnome, the rest of the system config needs to be
      gathered there too -- at least, anything a newbie
      might want to configure.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:What happened to Linuxconf? by axxackall · · Score: 1
      Linuxconf's major design problem is its own config database, which is used to generate real config files. On practice it drives to inconsistency to your own manual changes or they will be eliminated. Besides, you don't have good control over the generation process and linuxconf sometimes can regenerate some of config files even you didn't mean it.

      Webmin is much better tool at least in its design. It reads real config files, so your manual changes will never be lost. It's still premature, though - some of modules, like usermin, are broken.

      The major design problem of all such systems is a lack of versioning, (ACID) transactions and unified (XSLT?) reporting mechanism.

      There is no pressure on that side from alternative vendors (Apple, microsoft), so I don't expext any big improvement here soon.

      The best commercial admin env in Unix I saw was Smith in IBM AIX. It's object-orinted (sort of), good designed, and most important - it helps to learn CLI administration by giving the two-way access to CLI commands it runs. I wish IBM would contribute it to Linux at some day.

      --

      Less is more !
  47. Not yet another release... by Lo-techie · · Score: 1

    Starting to sound a lot like M$ pouring out WinXX's. When will people tire of installing new distributions every month or so and settle on a distro that does automatic package updating, like gentoo?

    1. Re:Not yet another release... by Jerf · · Score: 2

      Much as I love Gentoo, this criticism is a bit unfounded. I never know with the next "emerge rsync" whether I'll get an obscure couple of new revisions to obscure packages I never use, or a sudden change to a new compiler version that will recompile everything I have just to update my window manager. Installing a RedHat distro is far, far more stable.

      This is why I go Gentoo; I'm willing to risk the instability to get the latest features, and for the most part, it pays off. I'd hesistate before putting it on a server, though, and when I finally decided to go for it (the performance boost is quite tasty), I'd be very careful about actually updating it.

      Debian's a good example, with 'stable', 'unstable', and 'testing', a.k.a. 'probably actually unstable'. (Unstable is usually an OK choice for most uses.) You can't have it all.

  48. No Registration Required. Run Your Own RHN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RedHat offers a free 'public' Red Hat Network. It is almost always busy.

    There is an open source free (as in speech) alternative to RHN called 'current' on SourceForge. It works very well.

  49. Installation by MrHanky · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else tried the network install? I found it quite confusing. It seems the colours were switched for the buttons after downloading the install image, and I would answer the opposite of what I thought I was. This caused me to reboot instead of installing twice. I won't bother trying one more time.

  50. I'm Joe new user, I hope someone listens to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    --I like redhat up to the point of security, then the default install, even checked on high security and NOT selecting the 'server" install, just doing a minimum "workstation" install, leaves ya wide open. Yep, I got owned fairly soon after that install. I've had to reinstall 3 times to finally have something that might be close to bare minimum secure. I had to find a third party GUI front end for IPtables to have some sort of maybe it's working firewall. NO WAY most n00bs can command line IP tables or even know what all that stuff is.

    My other serious major beef is I can go to gnorpm, I see a zillion packages, yet my gnome desktop only has very few clickable menu items. Wazzup with that? What IS all that other stuff, where is it, how do you get it to work, or is it working, or what? And just TRY to find out on the web, it's not happening. And WHY are so many services running by default, when you aren't running a server? Again, what is this stuff? Granted, I'm still on 7.2, I have been using up2date to up2date stuff I don't even use but it says I have! ARRRGHHH! I haven't even been able to find out how to use 9/10ths of the stuff on here. Ya, I know, somehow find the package correctly and do ./package, but how do you turn it off then? and sometimes that ./ doesn't work, but yet, I have all these packages.

    Is there some way to differentiate between the traditional "program start" from something that isn't a program but some library or widget or name I don't even know what it is? I have a smallish harddrive, do I REALLY need all this stuff on here just for casual home use? I had so little diskspace left over after installit ain't funny. I'll get another large hardrive when i can afford it, I'm on a low fixed income, I can't take what for me is a week's pay to buy a "new" hardrive. I got almost a 2 gig hardrive, why isn't this enough, why can't it fit on a much smaller area? Why does "boot" partition waste many many megs that are apparenbtly never used? Why is there this need for some huge "swap" partition if you have 200-odd megs of RAM? Ain't that enough? I've surfed for years with a maximum of 64 megs on both mac and windows, now I got over 200 megs of ram and a "swap partion" that is large than that. WHY? Why is a swap partition even needed? Isn't RAM enough as it is? the 7.2 install I have comes from a full release set of disks and what passes for a couple of manuals that are really just pamphlets, I was expecting actual books for 50 some bucks.

    I want to support linux, and I chose redhat after mandrake refused absolutely to dial out on a normal modem, I mean it just WOULD NOT DIAL, at least redhat dialed out. I'll support the company directly by getting their offical releases, but I'm not popping 60$ every 6 months or now less, and even though I have used cheapbytes to try the mandrake release, I would rather support the distro maker itself. I fully appreciate that they need the loot, they offer a product, they lose money on the bulk of the people who use their products. Bandwith isn't "free" although a lot of folks here seem to think it is. "Download the ISO image". That costs money for that company.

    And I honestly hope that someone will realise this isn't a troll, maybe a professional redhat sys admin will actually take the time to type a paragraph to answer a few of the questions I have. I've tried those newbie forums and stuff, I am not a newsgroup person though, not comfortable with huge volumes of email that are mostly flamewars and half of them have apparently malicious scripts in them.

    Thanks in advance to anyone.

  51. Network based installs! by miffo.swe · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I always do my installs over the network. That way i just d/l the files i need. Its no problem at all if you dont own an unusual obscure NIC. RH7.3 even installed over my toshiba 1100 cable modem connected over USB. Do THAT on a windows box anyone, i dare you!

    Try networked install, its real easy but remember to write down the full path to the directory of /i386 on you ftp of choice.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Network based installs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      network installs can and are done for windows all the time, within the walls of redmond. I worked there last summer, that's how they setup my machine for me. unfortunately they don't let the rest of the world do this.

  52. Re:I'm Joe new user, I hope someone listens to thi by miffo.swe · · Score: 1
    Troll

    Go back to yer cave.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  53. The name game, what is the connection this time? by gnugnugnu · · Score: 1

    Skipjack->Valhalla, islands maybe (skipjack is also a fish)
    Valhalla->LIMBO
    At least this time i can see the connection, both are to do with the afterlife.

    Valahalla, where Norse warriors go when they die.

    Limbo, a kind of non-place where (some) Christians (used to) believe some go when they die. Neither Heaven nor Hell, Limbo was supposedly the place where good people who are not Christian (or babies who die before becoming Christian) go when they die, but that is the old ways and we are more progressive now and God loves you all (even aethists :) or something like that.

    (Dont mod me down just because you dont appreciate my religion or are against organised religion on principle. I choose not reject my religion despite some of the misguided leadership and crazy zealots. Dont mod reply.)

  54. G++ iostreams fixed in 3.x? by /dev/zero · · Score: 1

    In 2.96 they're not standard, and some things, like width(), don't appear to work on strings...

    G.

    --

    He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.
    -- J.R.R. Tolkien
  55. Re:RH == amateurs by bearl · · Score: 1

    >>The way RH handled this release...

    Release? Hmmm, I definitely AM a newbie then! The article title says "BETA."

    I have labored long under the misunderstanding that BETA sort of meant "TEST." ;-)

  56. GCC 3.1 by MarkoNo5 · · Score: 1

    Is it also compiled with GCC 3.1, or does it only include the compiler ?

    1. Re:GCC 3.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's compiled with GCC 3.1.

  57. LIMBO by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the Java-like programming language for Inferno, the Plan9-like operating system? Isn't it also the slang term for pergitory (which, iirc, is also the name of some other component of the Infernon system).

    It almost sounds like they're about to jump mascotts to Beastie as well :)

    1. Re:LIMBO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Limbo is where you go just before entering heaven

  58. I'm not a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a troll, I am a relatively new (this year only) user who has tried three different distros so far. I am NOT a programmer or software coder. I'm NOT a professional IT person at all, I just happen to like computers in general, I enjoy reading about them and other sorts of new devices, and am attempting to learn more. I'm coming from a mostly mac classic background, but I have used windows as well, but I switched years ago. I first started using DOS in the 80's and can honestly say I never liked copmmand line, my brain doesn't work that way, I can think in pictures/concepts easier, ie "GUI" interface, that's why I switched to mac classic first time I used one. I'm trying linux now based on what I had heard about it, to whit, it could run on older slower but still functional machines. latest releases of both apple and intel world machines I just cannot afford, that's my personal bottom line, I just don't make that much money, that's reality. I'ver gotten ahold of some older i86 machines and are using them, some I fix and give away, some I fix and sell for the cost of the parts I have in them, so that people with limited budgets can have 'a computer". that is what I offer to 'the community". but to repeat, I am not a coder, and saw linux as away to put an operating system inexpensively on these machines. My personal machine I'm keeping only has a small hard drive, but it works OK. the machine itself although several years old was "new in the box" literally and I got it really cheap.

    I was posting an honest sort of "review" of my experience with both mandrake, and rh 7.1 and 7.2, which is all I have used so far. From someone coming from a non professional background, my personal observations and experience learning/trying to learn/ trying to use linux in other words, so I was a good example for the parent post I replied to. I'm on a linux machine right now. I qualify as a joe average home user newbie, and that doesn't automagically make me a "troll". I'm semi retired, don't make a lot but can pay my bills and have a very small amount left over, which I usually put into computer stuff as I like this as a hobby. I had some legit questions and observations, that's about IT. I have a background in other technical matters that aren't "computer", that's where my primary interests over the years have been, and they are varied. I'd say not counting power tools I have around half a ton of just hand tools for example, and I can use them. If you count power tools I have many tons of them, tons as in thousands of lbs. None of these things-my other interests and what I have done professionally and still do very part time even ever come up on this forum, so there's no posts from me about them. I've done a lot of mechanical repairs on engines large and small, from single cyclinder two strokes to custom 4 stroke small racing engines, built elaborate and expensive custom furniture and cabinets, constructed and built a lot of homes and additions, operated large farms as a general manager, owned and run a bicycle shop a long time ago, worked as a gunsmith, and etc. I currently am learning a lot more about alternate energy, and maintain a huge personal solar installation, probably the largest for this state I am in in this general region. It is quite sophisticated. In fact, when it comes to alternate energy, something a LOT more useful than your fucking video games, "Mine is a lot bigger than yours" when it comes to this technical amount of hardware and knowledge, GUAR-AN-FUCKING TEED it is.

    Assholes like you here brag about your latest video card and how elite you are playing childish childrens games. childish, immature, resource wasting bread and circuses jack off games. Or how cool it is to have the latest lcd screen PDA which basically is mostly a waste of electrons. YOU and people like you are the idiots and trolls and a drag on the planet earth, despite touting "open source" or whatever your favorite 'distro" is, which anotyher thing, that word "distro" is about as faggy as you can get. Must be too hard to just say "distribution"..

    SO FUCKING SORRY none of that applies to slashdot or linux. I enjoy learning new things, this is fun for me, I have problems still but I expected that, what isn't fun is dealing with teenage or older punk masturbators who feel so superior on slashdot because they can hack into some poor person's windows machine or know some obscure coding language. And I get labeled as a troll? I also don't like the linux community in general "fuck you" attitude to newbies, as your post was and as I have seen on other linux forums when attempting to find out the answers to something. My post had a lot of "why's?" in it because they are legitimate querstions I have. I have yet to find out why I need a swap partiton when the same thing can be done on other computers just with ram. I hardly ever have used "virtual memory" on computers, I have found for my purposes that ram was sufficient. It's faster and cheaper in the long run to add more ram. I've taken ancient mac computers and figured out how to run a complete surfing/browser experience entirely inside a ramdisk. This is "cool" I guess, getting almost new machine surfing performance out of 25 mghz machines. That was one of my questions I had, the swap partition, and the wasted megs of space in this "boot" partition that are just sitting there unused and probably never used from a default redhat install. I have a lot more, but just simple things like "why are there 500 apps in an install but only a few dozen show up in the desktop menu, where the fuck are they" are LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS.

    1. Re:I'm not a troll by redtuxxx · · Score: 1

      I am not a RH sysadmin but I know a fair bit.

      Have to say I think you've been a bit unlucky, both with the rooting and response on forums.

      Personally I ave always found the majority of linux people to be helpful and friendly even when I was a newbie

      Programs

      The vast majority of programs tend to be command line or system programs, which is why they dont appear in your menus. Examples are ls(list files), locate(fast find), find, grep (search for text.

      Swap

      Linux uses swap differently to w9x and probably mac but similar to NT derived kernels.

      It swaps programs in and out of memory and the swap partition so that programs execute more efficiently.

      all programs are in one of /bin,/bin,/usr/bin,/usr/sbin

      libraries live in /lib and /usr/lib

      a few good lists to subscribe to

      https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redh at -list

      http://www.ssc.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-questi on s-only

      these are basically support forums

      If you have the full set of discs you should have a docs cd which has several guides and books on the cd, several are very useful

    2. Re:I'm not a troll by Andrewkov · · Score: 1
      Well said. You are the exact kind of person that Linux developers and the community as a whole should be embracing, the type of user who is more willing to learn than the average Joe user. Obviously you've spent a lot of time and effort in learning Linux, and I think that's great. Keep it up!

      Anyway, I'll tackle one of your questions: The swap partition is set up as a seperate partition for certian efficiencies in the kernel. Other OS's such as Windows and Macs use a file for swap space which resides on the primary partition. This has the advantage of not requiring another partition, but the disadvantage that you can fill up your hard drive with swap (I've seen this happen many times on Win 95 machines). Most computers, even modern ones with 256 MB of RAM will use the swap file in Windows if you have several applications open at once. On my Win2000 machine, if I type dir /ah at the C:\> prompt, I see a file called pagefile.sys, which is over 400MB. This is my swap file, equivelent to Linux's swap parition. (This Win2K machines also has 256 MB of RAM)

  59. Re:Fear of Mandrake? ??? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Red Hat usually releases upgrades about four times per year. It varies, depending on how the development goes. Frequently the release cycle is roughly March, June, September, December. There is a lot of variability in the cycle though. Possibly they have been slowing down toward 3 releases per year.

    I'm not really sure what the Mandrake cycle is, or whether they are even that regular. They could time their releases to match significant changes in KDE.

    Both of them have already upgraded this year. So have many other distributions. Even Debian is coming close to an upgrade, and they tend to have the slowest cycle (though you can get on the unstable tree and run at the bleeding edge if you want to).

    I'm sorry if you are feeling impatient to move faster, but things are really moving at about as fast a clip as is safe already. Perhaps a little faster (even the major distributions don't always do enough testing before a release).

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  60. Decent browser URLs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://dillo.cipsga.org.br/
    http://atrey.karlin.m ff.cuni.cz/~clock/twibright/l inks

    What's wrong with those!?

  61. Answers to Joe User by jaaron · · Score: 2

    These are good questions. These are the type of questions that a lot of experiences Linux advocates forget about or ignore.

    Well, I'm not going to be able to give a lot of very specific answers to everything here, but this should help. I would first point you to your local Linux Users Group (LUG), if there is one. I've found that there's almost always someone in the group who can help me. It's one of the closest things to true tech support the Linux community has. Chech out http://linux.com/usergroups.pl to find one nearby. You should also do a google search since not every LUG is listed.

    Many of the packages you see in gnorpm are libraries or applications that run only via the command line. Only a few of these are GUI applications you'll actually see under one of your menus. Now you may think that's a LOT of libraries and system utilities, but (from a Windows point of view) if you ever check out all that's in your C:\WINDOWS folder or C:\WINNT folder, you'll find all sorts of stuff you never seem to use (that doesn't make them unnecessary though!). I've been using Linux coming on two years now and it's only been in the last couple of months that I feel I really start to know what the different core packages are and what they do. And this is after doing many many installs of Linux. A good way to 'explore' what you've got is to check out the 'man' pages for the applications you find under /bin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, and all those other 'bin' [binary] directories you have. I wouldn't suggest just sitting down and going through them all unless you have a LOT of time, but searching through the 'man' and 'info' pages are how you can learn a lot about your system.

    You're 'boot' partition is where the libaries and programs that start up your computer reside. This partition in general does NOT have to be very large. Space is usually given on the boot partition if you what to do some configuration and cusomization. Try reading http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Partition/partition -4.html#NUMBER .

    As for the swap space, check out http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Swap-Space.html and also: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/mini/Partition/partition -4.html#AEN347 . In general the Linux Documentation Project is a wonderful place to find answers.

    Linux still has a horrid learning curve to it. While some love that (I for one), it's a rough climb for many. Learning about your system and about linux is a process of doing exactly what you did here--ask questions, participate in the community. And eventually, you'll get the hang of it.

    As of Linux for Joe User, I would say we're getting close, very close, but there will always be more to do.

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
  62. hehehehehehe-hahhahahahahahah�linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jaguar has these features (my favorites are bold):

    Quartz Extreme - Hardware-accelerated Quartz engine, faster interface, Quartz Compositor (and apparently in newer builds, even more things) powered through OpenGL on GPU on powerful enough cards.
    Rendezvous - Brings simplicity of AppleTalk to TCP/IP networking. Automatic detection of computers over TCP/IP.
    Rendezvous-aware iTunes - share music libraries over network (Airport streaming, etc.)
    FreeBSD 4.4 equivalency
    GCC 3.x compiler - system speedup as result
    Ink - Handwriting recognition built in to the system.
    iChat - Fully compatible AOL Instant Messaging client.
    Quicktime 6
    Spring-loaded folders
    Minimize windows to the Dock or to floating mini-windows
    Change Desktop picture after specified time period
    Desktop Picture changer fades between images like screensaver does
    CUPS Printing system
    Printer sharing
    Internet Connection sharing (Airport Software Base Station on steroids)
    Firewall control in System Preferences
    New Menu Extras (Bluetooth File Sharing, Eject, etc.)
    Bluetooth File Exchange app
    Audio/MIDI Setup app
    New System Preferences for "Digital Hub" (control of DV Camcorders, digital still cameras, audio CDs, blank CDs, iPods, etc. etc.)
    Many improved System Preferences
    System Preferences can be viewed by category (as in OS X 10.1) or by alphabetical order (as in OS X 10.0)
    Developers can now use Brushed Metal interface appearance
    Control of font sizes in the Finder
    Display icon labels below or to the side of icons
    Forward button in additon to back in Finder
    New "Small Icons" option for app toolbars
    Vastly upgraded Preview - new thumbnail drawer, new toolbar, etc.
    Support for scanners in Image Capture
    Beefed-up contextual menus
    Vastly improved Calculator - brushed metal appearance, "paper tape" drawer, full Scientific mode, convert units
    New Sherlock 3 - no longer does file searching. Internet only. Features new
    "channels" like Watson - Internet search, Movies, Pictures, Yellow Pages, News, Stocks, Flights, Package tracking, Dictionary, Translation, and AppleCare Knowledge Base search. Brushed metal appearance.
    New Find dialog in finder - search with multiple rules, etc.
    New Search box in Finder toolbar - enter search terms and results are displayed in the current Finder window with a split view
    Vastly improved Address Book
    Improved Mail - much more robust Rules support, intelligent Spam filter, better performance, interface tweaks, consolidate multiple accounts into one Inbox, etc. etc.
    System Sounds are back - sounds for removing from Dock, Trash operations, loggin in/out, iChat, system, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.
    New Zoom Windows - opening folders, etc. gives Quartz-smoothed "zooming window" effect like Scale Dock option
    Vastly improved Show Info - Command+I opens individual Show Info windows (as in OS 9), with many more options, improved Permissions control, etc. Command+Option+I opens dynamic single Show Info window as in OS X 10.1.
    Vastly improved Networking in Finder, vastly improved Windows sharing.
    VPN support in Mail, etc.
    Exchange support in Mail
    Improved Finder (better multithreading)
    Support for more systems in DVD Player
    Can take screenshots of DVD Player
    When using "snap to grid" in the Finder, files and folders will smoothly slide into place.
    Ability to turn off Preview in column mode.
    Application icon added to lower right corner of minimized windows to aide in differentiating them.
    Spoken Interface option in Speech Preferences
    Improved Disk Copy
    Improved Apple System Profiler
    New Aqua interface ("flatter" buttons etc)
    The amount of antialiasing can be controlled (4 levels)
    Subpixel rendering on LCDs
    A removed user's home directory is saved as a disk image.
    Netbooting
    More info under the filename, like ID3-tags, size of images and number of files in folders - Examples: Display Hard Drive total/remaining space under name on desktop HD icon, display Track Length of MP3 files under file name in Finder windows.
    Minimize in place of windows.
    "Poof" sound effect when removing from Dock
    Screensaver "Slideshow" is improved, can download images from the 'net.
    Anti-aliased mouse pointer with shadow.
    Connect to FTP in the Finder
    More man-pages.
    Spellcheck in 10+ languages.
    Python, TCL och Ruby included
    Account features, quotas
    No lines in the Dock
    Better Terminal: new Inspector, scrollback in split windows full UNICODE support
    Mail integrated with iChat. Can run AppleScript based on the new files
    Address book can send SMS, control global variables in system?
    Translation in Sherlock
    Net installation
    Can run AppleScript when new Digital Hub devices appear (drives, CDs, cameras...)
    Disable trackpad when inserting mouse (optional)
    Black-and-White screen (Universal Access)
    All network activity (FTP, SSH, SMB etc) controlled from sharing, integrated with firewall
    Classic programs will store settings in the users' folder, not OS 9 Preferences
    Can see memory reqs of all Classic programs, even background.
    Services in context-menu
    New menu for PC-Card support (like the Eject menu).
    Clean install option in Installer.

    1. Re:hehehehehehe-hahhahahahahahah�linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dosen't feel good when people troll your shit does it. With all of these features in OS X how can anyone dare say their system is better.

  63. Too bad, Limbo has already been used by slickwillie · · Score: 2

    It's the programming language for Bell Lab's (you know, the original Unix people) Inferno embedded O/S.

  64. thank you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --thanks for the decent reply! I appreciate it and will save it to disk!

  65. Changing X Resolutions by keysor · · Score: 1
    I'm running a pretty standard RH 7.3, and the CTRL+ALT+Plus and CTRL+ALT+Minus seem to work fine for me. Try adding a line like the following to the "Screen" section of your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file:

    Modes "1600x1200" "1280x1024" "1024x768"

    (This is on XFree86-4.2.0-8.)

  66. No Apache?? by pH7.0 · · Score: 0

    No Apache at all! No 2.0. Not even 1.3.x !?

    1. Re:No Apache?? by pH7.0 · · Score: 0

      OK. It's rename to httpd...

  67. Re:I'm Joe new user, I hope someone listens to thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't use RedHat(tm), so I can't answer some of you r questions specifically, but these should be useful pointers:

    Security:
    I highly recommend that you read some on-line documentation about network security. There is absolutely no reason at all for your machine to offer any services to the outside world. I suggest that you set up a firewall to deny all access to ports up to 1023, if you are not running a server. Then you can install various server applications and use them locally for educational purposes. If you log packets that are being denied, don't be suprised when you get lots of attempts to access various ports and servers.

    Swap partition
    IGNORE THIS ADVICE:
    "You should set your swap partition to X, where X is double the amount of physical RAM".
    That advice is COMPLETELY INACCURATE.
    The VM system in Linux has changed a lot, so there is no one 'rule' anyway.
    Linus DID say at one point that for the VM system to work efficiently, that you should either have no swap space, or at least double the amount of RAM. Personally, I have 128 megs of RAM, and no swap partition. My system works fine. My 4 Mb RAM laptop has a 20 Mb swap partition, and my 8 Mb RAM laptop has a 16 Mb swap partition. If you have over 200 megs of RAM, I suggest you do not have a swap partition at all.

    General suggestions

    To get a bit of extra performance out of your system, why not try mounting your partitions with no access time updating - this means that every time you read a file on disk, a write doesn't occur to record the date and time you read the file. This can increase performance significantly. Just modify your /etc/fstab to include noatime in the fourth column. For example, here is my /etc/fstab: /dev/hda1 / ext2 defaults,noatime 1 1
    none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
    none /proc proc defaults 0 0

    Anyway, let us know how you get on, and if you need more help just ask, as I browse /. all day every day, (I am a freelance programmer, without enough contracts!).

  68. Gnome2 in Limbo by StarHeart · · Score: 1

    I am currently running Limbo after my second fresh install. The first one I did to give Gnome2 a spin, and boy did it Suck. I had tried Gnome2 betas and they weren't that great, but I had to give Gnome2 final a spin to see if anything changed.

    First problem was I installed sawfish and metacity. If you install both, metacity takes preference. So I uninstall metacity and try to find a way to use sawfish. Well I found a setting for window manager in gconf_editor, but it had no effect. Finally after doing a few searchs on Google I found you just manually run the window manager and make sure the session gets saved on exit(Lame). So I tried Sawfish for a little bit and it isn't too bad, but is missing viewports and many other features I require. So I install Enlightenment and find I need to recompile it. So I recompile it, install, and run it. It runs, but Gnome2 and Enlightenment 0.16.5 don't get along. First the panel isn't sticky across viewports. Second the panel becomes very resistant to unhiding. Three Enlightenment's viewport hotkeys go wacko. After reinstalling Limbo and replacing Gnome2 with Gnome1(remarkably not that hard of a thing to do, tho will require some recompiling to get near perfect) unsurpisingly enough Enlightenment 0.16.5 and Gnome1 work great together under Limbo.

    Another problem with Gnome2 is the lack of settings. You may have heard of they just hide all the settings in Gconf, NOT! After looking through gconf_editor I can tell you, yes, there are a few settings in gconf_editor that aren't normally visible, but not nearly as many as were in preference panels in Gnome1.

    Then there is the stupid stuff like when you go to change a panel's type. You can't change a panel's type. You must make a new panel, configure it how you want, and then move everything over. In Gnome1 you would just turn a edge panel into an aligned panel, and then move it where you wanted it.

    Yet another problem was the lack of a gtk1 theme selector. In Limbo the Majority of the the applications are still gtk1(Xchat, xmms, galeon, gaim, etc).

    There is the inconsistant Cancel/OK mess. Gnome1 uses OK/Cancel and Yes/No, Gnome2 uses the silly reversed Cancel/OK and No/Yes. Sawfish2 uses OK/Cancel.

    --
    Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
  69. glibc 2.2.90 by pH7.0 · · Score: 0

    What is glibc 2.2.90? Something like gcc 2.96??

  70. where is XFS? by littleKoala · · Score: 1

    when can I expect that XFS journaling filesystem is included in this distribution? or do I have to move to gentoo?

    1. Re:where is XFS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      move to Gentoo. i did it last week am i'm really in love with it. i was a rh addicted before, but gentoo opened my mind ;)

  71. Re:Changelog (jikes) by jgilbert · · Score: 1

    likewise, I'm amazed that they removed jikes. The speed difference between it and the regular jdk javac is required.

    xdaliclock would be another disappointing removal. what does it hurt? such a cool and useful screensaver.

    jason

  72. Limbo -- Mambo? by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since the Limbo is also a dance, I bet that the next Red Hat release will be codenamed something like Mambo or (dare I say it) Macarena? ;-)

  73. glibc should remove known security risks by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If glibc is going to break compatibility for its next version, I think the glibc maintainers should consider removing functions which KNOWN SECURITY RISKS, such as gets(), strcpy(), strcat(), sprintf(), and friends. There are safer alternatives, such as strncpy(), strncat(), and snprintf(). If glibc removes risky functions, then application writers will be forced to improve their applications by use safer functions and coding practices. Shouldn't known "best practises" be encouraged by the libraries we use as the foundation of our software?

    Unfortunately, even some of those "safe" functions can be difficult to use safely. OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and Solaris libc libraries include strlcpy() and strlcat(). Theo de Raadt co-wrote an insightful paper about these new functions: strlcpy and strlcat - consistent, safe, string copy and concatenation . Why does glibc insist on not supporting these safer alternatives?

    If removing these risky functions is too controversial, then glibc could use a transitional approach. Move the risky functions' prototypes into a separate header file. Name it something scary like "unsafe.h", "securityrisk.h" or "bufferoverflow.h". Application writers who are too lazy to fix their use of risky functions, can simply #include "bufferoverflow.h".

  74. DVDs by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

    I hope that DVD sized images become more widespread. (Kudos to the distributions that use them now.)

    I also hope that soon DVD(+/-)RW drives are available at a price comparable that of CD-RW drives.

  75. More Quality less Quantity by Martin+Marvinski · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be better if they waited until they had major improvements before they released a distribution? I buy my CDs from the store, and this is ridiculus! Every 6 months I upgrade and there isn't that much difference.

    Make it much better and release it as version 8. Get the new GCC in there, and make it support more processors and throw in StarOffice for the price you charge for the Distro.

  76. gtk+ font by Compenguin · · Score: 1

    the default gtk1 font sucks and there is no easy way to change it in gnome2

  77. Rutgers by charlie763 · · Score: 1

    I hope that the next Redhat distro is out before I start me next semiester at Rutgers University.

    --
    Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
  78. Here's happened to Linuxconf... by Nailer · · Score: 2

    Generally because Linuxconf wasn't stable. It would often eat hand edited configuration files (though that improved with time), and had a nasty tendency of asking you to perform actions that weren't necessary to make your changes take effect (eg, wanting to postfix when you made a change to samba) with no logical explanation. The system also seemed to want to perform actions necessary for changes to take effect two or more times before it would let you quit.

  79. how about making CD 1 a base CD? by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 2

    Anyone out there from Red Hat listening? If so, why not put the important stuff on CD1, & have something next to the packages saying which CD they are on? Or even making it possible to install from CD 1 & if there's anything you selected that wasn't on the CD, you can download it after the initial install?

  80. Limbo! Hah-hah! by jdeking1 · · Score: 1

    The name just kills me. Kills me!

    It reminds me of an electronic design package from Innoveda - the software is named BetaSoft. BetaSoft! Hah! It's a released product! I'm dying here!

    Limbo! Ho-hooo! "How's the project going?" "It's in Limbo."

    --
    "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." -- Robert Heinlein
  81. Versions reported? by goldfndr · · Score: 1
    Sorry to reply to such an old message.

    The changelog doesn't mention it but maybe you'd know: Does 7.3's or newer up2date show currently installed version in addition to newly available version?

    Reason I ask is that I prefer Red Carpet in 7.2 for updates (I did the go-gnome thing). But Red Carpet is updated less often and without kernel updates (and doesn't have upgrade advisories easily available), and up2date doesn't warn that it's going to overwrite a ximian rpm with a non-ximian rpm.

    --
    Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
  82. Linux system crashes make me faint by r6144 · · Score: 1

    I have tried some of the patch collections for 2.4. They are made by fairly random people, so I think it should be about as stable as alpha releases. After it locked up hard three times when I did some serious stress tests (yeah, the mouse suddenly stops moving, and absolutely nothing appears in the logs), I returned to a safe kernel version and have never been in a good enough mood to meddle with kernels since then. After all, my machine has crashed about 6 times altogether in linux during the past three years, so every crash makes my heart faint.