Slashdot Mirror


Milestones in the Annals of Junkmail

fdc writes: "Web pages are a great source of postal addresses for direct mailers. Judging by some of the addresses we've seen recently, it's evident that the data is harvested not by humans, but by computer programs that scan web pages for names and addresses. Several weeks ago we (the Kermit Project at Columbia University) announced a new release of our Kermit 95 communication software for Windows -- SSH, secure FTP, etc; cousin of C-Kermit for Unix (search Freshmeat). Since this was a major release, we chose a new icon for it: the Columbia crown. A web page explained that this is the emblem of Columbia University: the crown of King George the II of England (1727-1760), who founded Columbia in 1754. JUST ONE WEEK LATER guess who received a postcard from Dell."

145 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. whew by r00tarded · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    so my cat fluffy *didnt* order those dells. whew!

    1. Re:whew by dknj · · Score: 1

      Lets see, a poster copies a website word for word and they get a front page post. I copy a review word for word and get modded down.

      -dk

  2. Your Highness, you're gettin' a Dell! by acceleriter · · Score: 1

    just doesn't have the same ring to it.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  3. Dude... by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thou art getting a Dell!

    ---
    I'm tired of waltzing for pancakes. -- Gwen Mezzrow

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:Dude... by FueledByRamen · · Score: 2, Funny

      A DELL?!?! Thou shalt be drawn and quartered for thine suggestion of a DELL!

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    2. Re:Dude... by ranulf · · Score: 1
      Thou art getting a Dell!

      Oooh! Really?

      I always wanted little shaded area of grass all to myself.

  4. So, ... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    Was this about Kermit or Junkmail?

    1. Re:So, ... by funky+womble · · Score: 1

      yes, this is a very original way to have details of your new release posted on /. (:

    2. Re:So, ... by packeteer · · Score: 1

      obviosuly you dont get it... if you go to the kermit creator there is another project on there about saying "i eat glass and it doesn't hurt me" in many languadges

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  5. new techinques by SonicTooth · · Score: 1

    maybe now people will instead of type their address write it in ascii code or something like somebody(at)something.com instead of somebody@something.com to fool the bots.

    1. Re:new techinques by scott1853 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would be very easy to interpret such simple encoding with a bot. I would think that such bots already exist that filter not only that but removing NOSPAM from e-mail addresses which seems to be another popular attempt at keeping a public e-mail address semi-private.

    2. Re:new techinques by Kickstart70 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh geez...the owner of somebody@something.com is gonna be pissed!

      Kickstart

    3. Re:new techinques by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's the owner of someone (at) somewhere.com posts to bugtraq.

      example.com
      example.net
      example.org

      Are the RFC 2606 eserved domains you should use in examples, such as the parent post.

      Also reserved are the TLDs: .test .example .invalid .localhost

      I don't know if it's been updated since, but they don't mention the common "localhost.localdomain" that I see a lot. I guess it really doesn't matter too much, except for trash traffic to the root name servers if someone messes it up.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:new techinques by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Note to self: Always remember to close HREF tags.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:new techinques by fdc · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the point was that postal addresses (not email) addresses were being picked up, and in a fairly sophisticated manner. I believe the Web page in question is http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/k95.html which contains our postal address (near the bottom) and also mentions King George II (near the top). The address harvester recognized the postal address (no big accomplishment) but also picked out "King George II" as a name. Which I suppose it could be!

    6. Re:new techinques by binner1 · · Score: 1

      My personal favourite: drunk@home.always

      -Ben

    7. Re:new techinques by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

      my real email address is

      myname@jacobs.coxatwork.com

      Where myname is my last name followed by my initials.

      Thus myname@jacobs.cox@work.com is bogus.

    8. Re:new techinques by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      Indeed, there is somebody on Usenet whose real email is something like nospam@foobar.net, and he/she claims to almost never get spam there...

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
    9. Re:new techinques by RobinH · · Score: 2

      I would think that such bots already exist that filter not only that but removing NOSPAM from e-mail addresses

      That's why my next email address will actually be something like "myname.NOSPAM@whatever.com". Somehow we must continue to prove that we're smarter than the machines! ha ha

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    10. Re:new techinques by colmore · · Score: 2

      I usually tell all those sites to send to joe@aol.com

      I wonder who that poor sucker is.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    11. Re:new techinques by Jay+L · · Score: 2

      I usually tell all those sites to send to joe@aol.com. I wonder who that poor sucker is

      It's self-centered assholes like you that forced me to stop using jay@aol.com after nine years. My misdirected mailing list subscriptions were far more problematic than my spam load. You don't want to get e-mail, so you send it to someone else instead? Do you also dump your trash on your neighbor's lawn?

      If you don't want to get spammed by e-commerce sites and the like, use "me@privacy.net". That sends an auto-response for every e-mail, telling the merchant that they should ask permission before assuming you want to be added to a mailing list. If the site tells you that is already used, try adding a single digit, e.g. me3@privacy.net.

    12. Re:new techinques by colmore · · Score: 2

      I was kidding, I usually give something@localhost.localdomain

      I also wonder what the data suggesting I am a 95 year old female government employee making less than $25,000 a year goes to.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    13. Re:new techinques by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      You do realize it's a billion times more likely you're simply the victim of a dictionary attack, right? I get mail to david@domain.dom, and I'm certain that no one is handing out my domain as their email address. And running the mail server, I see tons of [first name]@domain.dom. Either my little domain is orders of magnitudes more popular than I think, or they're just finding *@domain.dom and dictionary attacking it.

      Trying [firstnamee]@aol.com is a sure way to actually reach somebody.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    14. Re:new techinques by Jay+L · · Score: 2

      Yes, I was also occasionally the victim of a dictionary attack, as well as plain old address harvesting, but much more common was someone else named Jay (or someone whose initials were J) entering "jay@aol.com" as his e-mail address when signing up for a web site. It was very clear when the latter occurred - it was usually a legitimate mailing list that simply didn't use verified opt-in, or an e-commerce site that automatically added customers to their "hot products" newsletter.

      Oddly, another common source of mail was an AOL member named Jay typing "Jay" into the CC field. This was less of a problem after the field label was changed from "CC to "Copy To" a few versions ago. It seems that, in the post-carbon-paper era, people don't always know what "CC" stands for. The first box is "To", so the second one must mean "From"!

    15. Re:new techinques by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      I post to Usenet with [firstname]_nospam_[lastname]@myisp.com. I created that address as an email alias, and also created the following aliases as well:
      [firstname]__[lastname]@myisp.com (two underscores)
      [firstname]_[lastname]@myisp.com (one underscore)
      The two-underscore address was NEVER posted or used anywhere, yet I've received spam to ALL THREE of the above addresses, though few compared to my main account. So yes, it appears many harvesting bots either demung or don't use addresses with "nospam" in them, but some spammers just spew to whatever addresses they harvest.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  6. Hey it's Obligatory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Forsooth Royal Dude, you're getting a ye olde Dell!

  7. I hear that 31337 isn't a real zipcode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But that's what I always write when asked. Poor dudes at the postal services.

    1. Re:I hear that 31337 isn't a real zipcode by uberred · · Score: 1

      ha. Good idea. I usually use 99999 myself. :)

      --
      Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so. --Ford Prefect
    2. Re:I hear that 31337 isn't a real zipcode by morgajel · · Score: 1

      I've always preferred 90210.
      then they think I'm some rich snobby kid with social problems and no personality.

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    3. Re:I hear that 31337 isn't a real zipcode by lukegalea1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I live in canada so 90210 was the only real postal code I know.. I use it whenever I go to a non canada friendly site.

    4. Re:I hear that 31337 isn't a real zipcode by wesmills · · Score: 2
      I've always used 23280, the zip code Time-Life gives out on their vast multitude of CD, casette and video commercials.

      23280 is associated with the following:

      TIME-LIFE CUSTOMER SERVICE VA
      NOT ACCEPTABLE-USE RICHMOND

  8. Advances in Artificial Intelligence by SpatchMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You should be glad that AI has come this far. For an intelligent agent to be able to harvest addresses by clicking through web pages, and then mailing out postcards is truly an advancement of the technology.

    Remember, there are good points to everything, even things like this which under normal circumstances could be described as "alienating our rights."

  9. Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by Gorobei · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are no clear King George + address on the web-page. This just looks like a prank database addition by someone at Dell on a slow day (probably a Kermit user, tho.)

    1. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by howardjp · · Score: 1

      I noticed this too, I highly doubt a bot did this. In fact, on that page, King George is not refered to as King George, but rather as "George, King of England." The card was addressed to "King George II." This is a bit much for even the most intelligent bot.

    2. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by banky · · Score: 5, Informative

      actually the address is on
      http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/k95.html
      most of the way down, under the "buy now" stuff

      --
      ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    3. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by superkri · · Score: 1

      Take a look at http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/vendor.html where you can find the phrase: "Founded: 1754 by King George II of England" At the top of the same page the rest of the address is written.

    4. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by fdc · · Score: 1

      Actually that's what is so devious about it. I thought there was but on second glance, the "King George II" reference comes from separate pages on the same site, most likely this one.

    5. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 5, Informative

      In fact, on that page, King George is not refered to as King George, but rather as "George, King of England."

      Actually, it said, "George II, King of England". The harvester program ignored the "of England" part, and decided that "George II, King" looked a lot like "Smith, John". Just like it turns that into "John Smith", it got "King George II"

    6. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by mbyte · · Score: 2

      hmm, have to disagree. I think the spambot looks for common firstnames, and only found:

      img alt="The Crown of King George II" align="left" src="crownico.gif"

      a bit of parse logic would get rid of that Crown of stuff, so the name is there, it matches a dictonary word, as the adress has no dicionary name in it !

      so i think its possible that it was a real spambot :)

    7. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by howardjp · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. I stand corrected.

    8. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      actually the address is on
      http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/k95.html
      most of the way down, under the "buy now" stuff


      I still don't believe it. The name "King George" isn't anywhere on that page. It would take some human intelligence to associate the name from a different page with the address.

      It's a gag by a bored keyboardist. Move along, folks, there's nothing to see here....

    9. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by BLiP2 · · Score: 1

      Problem is, the 4 digit zip extension on the page mentioned above and on the scanned postcard are different.
      It is still possible that the computer generated it's own zipcode from the address, as everything else is the same. The four digit extension doesn't appear to be that critical to mail delivery for Columbia zipcodes anyway. It's all done internally, and mail (for students anyway) just disappears into a mysterious glass box for several weeks before being packaged in garbage bags and expelled.

      --
      Vote Technocratic! Government by killer robots!
    10. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by sconeu · · Score: 2

      The name "King George" isn't anywhere on that page.

      It's in the ALT text for the crown logo.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    11. Re:Looks like a prank by someone at Dell by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      We use a program at work where you pass it street address, city, and state, and it will return 5+4 ZIP and timezone. People write in Zip codes wrong all the time, but rarely make a mistake on city or state. I would bet that this kind of software is very common.

  10. Ask Dell about it... by FurryFeet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Really, contact Dell and ask for an explanation. I think we'd all love to hear what kind of lame excuse they try to come up with in order to avoid admitting that they harvest spammable addreses from the net :)

    1. Re:Ask Dell about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It may require a bit of looking around. I used to work for the company that actually ran Dellhost...not just the servers, but also the technical support side. At that time (2001) The only relationship between Dell and Dellhost is the name and the fact that they actually used Dell servers (or so they claimed.) Otherwise, Dellhost is run by a completely different operation (and not a very good one either, but i may have a bit of angst against a former employer. :-)

    2. Re:Ask Dell about it... by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      It may require a bit of looking around. I used to work for the company that actually ran Dellhost...not just the servers, but also the technical support side. At that time (2001) The only relationship between Dell and Dellhost is the name and the fact that they actually used Dell servers (or so they claimed.) Otherwise, Dellhost is run by a completely different operation (and not a very good one either, but i may have a bit of angst against a former employer. :-)

      Yes, they did actually use Dell servers. I also worked for Interliant briefly, but not in the DellHost division (though I did support the DellHost teams). And you're right, it wasn't all that great of a company to work for. The pay was above average at first, but then the organization took a serious downhill slide and starting laying off most of the employees that they had acquired in mergers. Fortunately I got out before they popped. It wouldn't suprise me that they tried to solicit business from King George II.

    3. Re:Ask Dell about it... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Huh, if they want to sell some Dells, they should be trying to contact King George III.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Ask Dell about it... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1


      thanks for the info...drop me a line if on it if you don't mind. my stay there wasn't long enough to see the collapse. :-)

  11. Nope... that would be "Your Majesty". by TDScott · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Your Highness" denotes royalty other than a King or Queen. "Your Majesty" denotes a King or a Queen. (Source)

    Just nitpicking...

    1. Re:Nope... that would be "Your Majesty". by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      Fair enough-I learned something today! I assume the sovreign wouldn't be addressed as "thou," either, since that's the familiar?

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    2. Re:Nope... that would be "Your Majesty". by cyberformer · · Score: 2

      For non-monarchs, it's usually "Your Royal Highness", just to nitpick further. Hence the title HRH (His/Her Royal Highness).

    3. Re:Nope... that would be "Your Majesty". by FriendOfMarky · · Score: 1

      That's okay... I referred to our bishop in the third person as "His Grace" and nobody knew who I was talking about :/

      This whole thing is pretty damn funny tho. His Late Highness will probably get mail there for the next five years.

    4. Re:Nope... that would be "Your Majesty". by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Actually to be a bit more nit picky, it depends on when you are talking about. Henry VIII for example, was neither Your Highness nor Your Majesty but Your Grace. Sycophants invented Your Highness and Your Majesty later.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    5. Re:Nope... that would be "Your Majesty". by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Just curious, but how would you prefer a foreigner address the U.S. president? "Sir"?

      Which is an aside to my actual point. Which, roughly stated, is this. Get over it.

      Personally, as someone who doesn't give a stuff where you live, I show the accepted level of respect to anyone, regardless of their nationality. Perhaps if more people did the same, the world would be a happier place. Too bad common courtesy isn't.

  12. Mod Parent Up by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I think he makes an excellent point. I'd *love* to hear them try to explain this one away with their cooperate-speak. They'll prolly try to sell it off an as honest mistake, that the guy responsible has been summarily punished, etc etc.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Mod Parent Up by binner1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The person responsible for this spam has just been sacked...

      The person repsonsible for the person responsible for this spam has just be sacked...

      Or something thereabouts! Sorry MP.

      -Ben

    2. Re:Mod Parent Up by damiam · · Score: 1
      This spam will now be completed in an entirly different style.

      Would you like to buy a DeRALPH THE WONDER LLAMAll? It'll only cost you REG LLAMA OF BRIXTON $499, and you get a high MERLE Z. LLAMA IX quality computer, complete with monitor!

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  13. Bad for Direct Mail Companies by TheRedHorse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would direct mail companies choose to use automated programs like this?

    Let's look at what these programs give you:

    1. A ton of results.

    2. 80%(and probably a whole lot more, I'm just being conservative) of those results are probably false due to all those AOL member pages that haven't been updated in years, people who put up fake info, info that is out of date, etc.

    Wouldn't this be bad for the direct mail companies? Clients that hire them want to reach as many real people as possible. The direct mail companies that use the methods mentioned in this story can never provide their clients with what they want, the ability to reach real consumers.

    The Direct mail companies probably know this and either, are planning on changing it or don't care and are just interested in spamming as many people, real or not, as possible.

    Direct mail companies interested in doing what they promise should think about the way they collect information in order to provide better service if they are a real company not just looking to spam everyone alive, or dead in this case.

  14. Dell doesn't harvest addresses by peterjm · · Score: 3, Informative

    Companies like Dell don't harvest addressess. They deal with direct marketing companies who either do the harvesting, or who buy large lists from email addressess from companies who swear up and down that they lists contain only people who asked to recieve information about this sort of thing (whatever this sort of thing may be).

    1. Re:Dell doesn't harvest addresses by jelle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Companies like Dell don't harvest addressess. They deal with direct marketing companies"

      Hiring a marketing company to do some work in your name makes you liable for whatever they do in your name.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    2. Re:Dell doesn't harvest addresses by keithlim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Companies like Dell don't harvest addressess. They deal with direct marketing companies who either do the harvesting, ...

      Actually, nobody involved here did any "harvesting" of any addresses. "Harvesting" implies that they did something to earn their list of addresses, something akin to sowing and nurturing a field of crops. They did nothing of the sort.

      A better term for such behavior would be something like "scraped" or "dredged", something more appropriately descriptive of the indiscriminate collecting of addresses on a large scale. It's a change in usage that I would like to see happen. "Harvested" seems to have become something of a de facto standard term for the practice, unfortunately.

      There is a place for "harvested" in describing a list of addresses. This would be an appropriate term for a list of addresses built up by (confirmed) opt-in, i.e. everyone on the list knowingly consented to be on that list, for whatever the purpose of that list is.

      However, unlike agricultural harvests, a harvested list cannot be sold or given away. The moment it is transferred to someone other than the harvester, it's junk, it's garbage; it's beyond useless, in fact, as it would be counter-productive if ever used.

      --
      -- keith lim keithlim@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~keithlim/
    3. Re:Dell doesn't harvest addresses by acecccp · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't actually be hiring them, but purchasing a product (list of emails) from them.
      If I buy brand name sneakers for instance, I am not legally responsible for the labor practices of the manufacturer.

    4. Re:Dell doesn't harvest addresses by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

      Mafia bosses don't kill people, they just hire assassins who do the killing for them.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    5. Re:Dell doesn't harvest addresses by jelle · · Score: 2

      But if you use the sneakers to kick somebody in the b*tt, then you can't say 'hey I bought the sneakers from somebody else'.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    6. Re:Dell doesn't harvest addresses by acecccp · · Score: 1

      you "*"d out "butt"?

  15. Yep - it'd be "you"... by TDScott · · Score: 2

    That was (and still technically is) the respectful version. The monarch would reply using "thou".

    Wow. I actually learned something useful out of my English course...

  16. Why Dell and fundamentalist religion... by uberred · · Score: 2, Funny

    are incompatible...

    Dude, you're going to hell!

    --
    Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so. --Ford Prefect
  17. Except at slashdot... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    where they can't even interpret the coding to do page widening...hence the second part of my sig...

  18. Re:Artificial Intelligence?? by SpatchMonkey · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see you try it. AI researchers have been working on this sort of Natural Language parsing for years to little avail.

    This is why steps such as these are so important.

  19. Time to seed some pages by SeanTobin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would just love to throw out a page with addresses like:

    Zephram Cochrane
    c/o Phoenix Research Institute
    186000 Miles Avenue
    Central, Montana 01701

    Seven Nine
    2349 Tendara Street
    Unimatrix, CA 79301

    John Kelly
    2032 Gravaton Ave.
    Mars, NC 02376

    Tobin Dax
    2135 Bajor Parkway
    Symbiant, UT 02230

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    1. Re:Time to seed some pages by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about:

      Get A. Life
      123 Too Much Time On My Hands Street
      Trekkieopolis, Nerdinistan

      Dude, you're NOT gettin' a life!

    2. Re:Time to seed some pages by balloonpup · · Score: 2, Funny

      The time has come for all good nerds to come to the aid of their country. I ask of you now, Nerdinistan, yea or nay?!

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    3. Re:Time to seed some pages by LazloTheDog · · Score: 1
      But the zipcode validation would fail.

      --
      Oink, Oink!!
    4. Re:Time to seed some pages by jalagl · · Score: 1

      You're right. I normally use:

      Juan Perez
      21 Jumpstreet
      Somecity, FL 33102

      --
      -.
    5. Re:Time to seed some pages by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Probably the Direct Marketer's software would bounce those addresses, because the Zip codes don't match.

      CA is 90000-95999

      0xxxx is somewhere on the east coast of the US. I believe it's the north-east coast.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Time to seed some pages by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, my habit of giving my snail address as "Beverly Hills, CA, 90210", would work perfectly. Knew that show was good for *something.*

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
    7. Re:Time to seed some pages by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      To hell with the junk mail: T. H. E. Devil 666 Evil Way Hell, SC 13666

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  20. Spam ... by halftrack · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    What an intuitive way to get spam published on slashdot.

    --
    Look a monkey!
    1. Re:Spam ... by damiam · · Score: 1

      Not intuitive. Imaginative, maybe.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  21. Federal Felony by Snowgen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't it a Federal felony to read the post card if you're not King Geoge? Never mind scanning and posting someone else's mail on the web without their permission! :)

    1. Re:Federal Felony by shepd · · Score: 1

      I think the mail fraud laws say that you aren't allowed to open the mail of others.

      I don't think they say anything about reading it, which would explain why credit statements are often sent in security envelopes.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:Federal Felony by tomstdenis · · Score: 2

      Actually no. Receiving mail under a pseudonym is not illegal. The assumption is that unless you are a tennant of the address you cannot open the mail [unless the company has some policy, e.g. registered mail].

      I mean I can subscribe to Maxim as "Joe Dirt" .... :-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Re:Artificial Intelligence?? by SpatchMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That is a little different. The data you received clearly had a common structure as it was just retrieved from a database and placed into a template.

    Actually analysing language is a much more difficult task. Just look at the very imperfect quality of language translation tools on Google and Altavista to see just how hard it is.

  24. Well then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let's definitely contact Dell in that case, then. Don't you think they'd be very interested to learn that the marketing firm they were buying their address lists from populates their database with information that is largely completely inaccurate?

  25. Letter sent to the kermit project... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sent this letter to the kermit project address. Maybe someone here can answer it for me:

    --Begin--

    Computers are stupid and would not be able to aggregate a name on one page to a snailmail address on another without human help, yet I can't find where King George and this address were listed near each other. Any ideas from which page this name and address were gleaned?

    thx :)
    very funny otherwise

    1. Re:Letter sent to the kermit project... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That is reaching... Also, it takes off "of england". It's programmed to do that? uh-uh...

      This is looking like a farce...

    2. Re:Letter sent to the kermit project... by core_blimey · · Score: 1
      If you look at this page http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/k95.html and view source it might help a little, although if it was an automatic tool that did this it's pretty good. Perhaps it looked for the "This page last updated:" bit and found the "The Crown of King George II" near it and that was good enough. Or maybe it was the first "name" mentioned on the page (a dictionary of common names would certainly include George) or perhaps it finds all names in this manner.

      The more I think about it, the more likely it just grabbed the html, parsed it for matches with a dictionary, that gave it the King George II part. It also parsed it for addresses, probably finding "New York NY 10025-7799" and stripping the address sections before it as well. Not rocket science, but then again pretty good really. This works in a manner similar to all those screen scraping firms around I guess. I wouldn't be surprised if "Manning Publications Co" got a similar postcard, or if one to "Georg Fischer" was created to (although how common is Georg without the e?) I doubt "Oren Yehezkely" got one though.

      --
      In democracy your vote counts. In feudalism your count votes.
  26. Uh... that's what I said. by TDScott · · Score: 2

    I said: "That [you] was (and still technically is) the respectful version."

    You said: "The familiar version of "you" in Middle/Early Modern language is "thou." "

    Aren't we saying the same thing?

    1. Re:Uh... that's what I said. by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Nope. The easy way to remember is that the familiar is for folks you might call by their name, while respectful would be for people addressed by titles (Mr., your Kingliness, what have you.)

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Hello, may I speak with Charlie Root? by voisine · · Score: 1

    I was once asked if I could put Charlie Root
    on the line. The person had aparently recieved
    some email from him. This is the default real
    name for the root user on FreeBSD.

    l8r
    Aaron

    1. Re:Hello, may I speak with Charlie Root? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      $cientology was looking for Major Domo. I think it had something to do with an FTP server on [127.0.0.1] with copyrighted material.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Hello, may I speak with Charlie Root? by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      You should have put them on hold listening to Mr. Roboto. That woulda backed their noodles.

      Domo aurigato, Mr. Roboto, domo (domo) domo (domo)

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    3. Re:Hello, may I speak with Charlie Root? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      I can do better than that: I have a telephony app that will read the story of Xenu. However, it's currently broken because Microsoft, in its infinite wizbang, decided that only Win2000 should run telephony apps.

      I never did finish the telephone solicitor app that would keep inserting "Yeah", "Uh huh", "Hmmm", etc into the conversation. Could have been fun.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  29. I hope it was in German by 00_NOP · · Score: 2

    Because that is all that fool Geordie could read.

    Stands Scotland where it did?

    If you don't get it read up some history.

    1. Re:I hope it was in German by vinyl1 · · Score: 1
      Not exactly. George II was born in 1687 in Hanover, and his native language was German, but he could speak and read English reasonably well by the time he assumed the throne. He came to England when his father became king in 1715, and had adequate time to prepare for his future duties.

      (Looks like today's reading of Reed Browning's biography of the Duke of Newcastle, who held various offices under George II from 1727 until 1762, wasn't entirely wasted.)

  30. That's funny as hell by YahoKa · · Score: 1

    ahahahahahahahaha ... that's the funniest thing i've seen in a long time.

  31. Oh yea, and solution: by YahoKa · · Score: 1

    Use raster data for your contact information, and where it can't be done (like for DNS entries) use sites like myprivacy.ca .

  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. Occams Razor by KFury · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems much more likely that someone on the team was registering for something somewhere and, wanding to avoid stupid spam, put in the clever King persona instead.

    Promptly forgotten, it was a surprise when Dell, seemingly unrelated to the registration account, sends email to that profile.

    More than likely someone on your team remembers it now, but finds the alternative 'harvesting' explanation so funny he's keeping quiet.

    1. Re:Occams Razor by KFury · · Score: 3, Interesting

      'sends email to that profile'

      Err, snail mail, rather.

      And it might not have been someone on your team at all. People use false data for setting up accounts all the time. Maybe they just thought this would be funny.

      Heck, they were apparently right.

    2. Re:Occams Razor by r7 · · Score: 1

      >It seems much more likely that someone on the team was registering for something somewhere

      As my 7 year old niece would say "yea, right".

      I've received these Dell ads at my P.O.Box too,
      and have never advertised it except on the web.

      What's worse than their "harvesting" methods is the fact that they don't provide an opt-out phone number. If you call the number listed on the card the person will tell you that A) they can't take you off the mailing list, B) they can't connect you with someone who will, C) they can't give you their name, and B) they can't connect you with a supervisor. If you want to opt-out you can call a Texas phone number...

      I believe this is all illegal by FCC regulation. That never stopped Dell though. Not surprisingly Mr. Dell is one of the most outspoken supporters of Microsoft's monopoly business practices. What an ass-kisser.

    3. Re:Occams Razor by kyras · · Score: 1

      slashdot.c: In post `Re: Occams Razor':
      slashdot.c:9: redeclaration of `B)'
      slashdot.c:9: `B)' previously declared here

      Yes, I'm drunk.

      --
      Tastes like burning! - Ralph Wiggum
  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. We are Not Amused by gelfling · · Score: 2

    You dirty colonist rabble with your General Washingham. The Quartering Act stands.

  36. Yes, this and more by drwho · · Score: 1

    Now, if you could insert some control characters and cause a format string overflow on the postal machines, muha ha ha ha.

    This explains all the mail I get to the church of the subgenius, ishmaelian sect.

  37. Re:Isn't Dell the company... by istartedi · · Score: 3, Funny

    uses prison labor to make their computers?

    Dude, you're gettin' a cell.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  38. now I get it... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    I read the article on /. 3 times before following the link. it made NO sense to me each time... until i read the EXACT same verbage found in the link.

  39. HEY DELL by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1, Troll

    LOSE THE FUCKING DORK!

    that guy must be some dell execs kid - he is an IDIOT.

    It is precisely because of him that i will not buy a dell. he insults the intelligence of the human race... I cannot STAND that guy. Dell is a stupid stupid company for thinking that that lame ass kid is good for their image. It makes them look as bad as acer and packard bell - pandering to the lowest common denomenator.

    dell, dont you think that people are smarter than that - especially people who ARE INTO COMPUTERS.

  40. I don't really care about Postal junk mail by Ryu2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For me, postal spam it's not as bad as email, because it doesn't cost you in disk space or bandwidth.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:I don't really care about Postal junk mail by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 1

      Mail isn't delivered to my door so when I go to my mail box (once evry week or so),there's an awful lot of junk I have to weed through to get my mail.

      What with fliers and catalogs it's really not that hard to loose that check you've been waiting for. How's that for bandwidth problems?

    2. Re:I don't really care about Postal junk mail by mrmag00 · · Score: 1

      this isnt 1985 - the 1 megabyte a year at MOST of spam an average email account recieves isn't much. and if you save spam, may god save your soul. so there goes disk space...

      yeah, someone will bitch because they get more, but really. I don't get more then 50 spam emails a year, which is less then 100kb i'd bet. which is not much, espically if you have broadband.

    3. Re:I don't really care about Postal junk mail by ColaMan · · Score: 2

      Personally I don't care about the lose-weight-fast / get-rich-quick schemes.

      I get three or four a day, and I wouldn't mind so much about it, if it wasn't for all the penis enlargement, !!!!RAPE SEX!!!!!, hot ANAL teens and other sexually explicit material arriving in my inbox daily.

      I have kids aged 1 and 2 - I don't want them exposed to this type of crud when they go to use my computer.

      (And smart replies about where I've been surfing will be ignored - I surf at work.)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    4. Re:I don't really care about Postal junk mail by Phil+Hands · · Score: 2

      50 a year, I agree, is nothing to get upset about.

      If on the other hand you had received 35 spams in the last 24 hours, you might like me be forced to spend time fighting it, which is time that you cannot spend doing something useful.

      Spamassassin has caught 3917 spams for me since mid April.

      Obviously, the advent of spamassassin helps, but it is also teaching the spammers to be more devious, so will eventually result in the equivalent of multi-resistant bacteria.

      Actually, looking at this, rather too many of those 35 spams got through the net. Must be time to apt-get install spamassassin/unstable

      Anyway, if someone was stealing your time, in significant quantities, you would get rapidly upset about it. If you told me that you'd been mugged, I'd be sympathetic despite the fact that I've never been mugged.

      The fact that I probably spend a few hours a month dealing with this, as do many others means that the spammers are depriving people of many lifetimes a year. This is mass murder, just spread out over a wider population, so the average loss is lower.

      Postal junk mail goes on my fire, and warms my house, so doesn't really worry me (apart from the damage to the environment)

      --

      Debian: GNU/Linux done the Linux way
    5. Re:I don't really care about Postal junk mail by Phibian · · Score: 1

      I've found it easier to get off postal junk mail lists than email lists (I get roughly 100 messages a day). Snail mail costs the sender money, rather than the recipient. Thus, the senders care a little more about the recipients. If you have a "real" mailbox, you can put a no flyers sign out, which reduces the junk too. Return to sender anything that's junk and has an actual address - it's an easy way to get off lists. And then don't sign up for catalogues if you don't want them....

    6. Re:I don't really care about Postal junk mail by headchimp · · Score: 1
      If I get a spam snail mail that has a pre-paid envelope in it. I will shred the mail they sent me, stuff it in the envelope (sans personal info) and mail it back to them. That way they pay to receive their crap back.

      I used to take old coke cans, flatten em a bit, fill with concrete till it hardens just to add weight to the letter.

  41. The true test by Fat+Casper · · Score: 3, Funny
    Is whether or not ye King gets a pre-approved credit card application. Make sure the bills are sent c/o the office of Exchequer.

    --
    I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
  42. Occams Razor SUCKS by Ixohoxi · · Score: 1

    Let's all say it together!

    Don't you just love it when pseudo-intellectuals spout Occam's Razor whenever they want to play "Devil's Advocate"??

    Besides the fact that the supposed "Razor" is LESS likely and MORE complex than the explanation which was already given.

    Yes I have a pet peeve with people who call upon Occam's Razor. A majority of them are clueless about the topic at hand and are just trying to sound intelligent, and according to Occam's Razor, the simplest explanation for why such people use Occam's Razor is because they ARE clueless!

    Polish a turd, it's still stinky and brown.

    --
    What's a second? An hour? A day?
    It has much more to do with
    the Earth's rotation than with cesium.
    1. Re:Occams Razor SUCKS by KFury · · Score: 2

      I actually find it more irritating when people blatantly label others as 'pseudo-intellectuals' for using terms they personally don't like.

      Since your post is ambiguous, are you against the term 'Occam's Razor' or the underlying principle of complexity theory? Can you elaborate why?

      Thanks much,

    2. Re:Occams Razor SUCKS by (void*) · · Score: 2

      Actually you are wrong. There is nothing wrong with the principle, but what you are irritated by, is that you CAN'T SEE what seems to be a simpler explanation. Either ask, or flame the supposition that it is simpler. Don't blame anything on Good Ol' Occam, or the invocation of it. It's good that people are invoking it, and good that they can disagree with you.

    3. Re:Occams Razor SUCKS by Ixohoxi · · Score: 1
      Thanks for inviting clarification. I have nothing against the term, only its misuse. Thus the unkind label 'pseudo-intellectual'.

      One translation of Occam's Razor: "One should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything." More about O.R. here.

      Why this happens, IMHO: Most people whom I see invoke O.R. are NOT knowledgeable on the topic at hand. Case in point - original article poster is the most knowledgeable on the topic at hand AND gave the actual explanation of how things happened. O.R. invoker was trying to explain what happened in a DIFFERENT way. I felt that the O.R. invoker CREATED unnecessary entities in his explanation of how the Dell postcard was 'really' sent to King George II.

      Occam's Razor is not to be abused as a framework for the creation of a 'simpler' explanation that somehow must be correct because of its supposed simplicity.

      That said, of course I myself created an unnecessary entity by explaining how most people who abuse O.R. are clueless about the topic at hand. With confidence I assume this, however, it is not necessarily so. However, after analyzing the 'simpler' explanation, I can with exacting hindsight conclude that they abused O.R.

      In summary, I feel like Occam's Razor is often misused as a pseudo-scientific "God made it so". It's one of those theories that can be difficult to ignore when used properly, but rarely is it used properly.

      --
      What's a second? An hour? A day?
      It has much more to do with
      the Earth's rotation than with cesium.
  43. Natural resources by Bouncings · · Score: 1

    It is indeed a bit ironic that commercial harassment companies (they call themselves 'direct marketers') use the name harvest, when infact what they are directly doing is destroying thousands of miles of rain forests each year. A harvest implies they actually grow plant matter, not waste it.

    --
    -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
  44. Let's use the system by Bouncings · · Score: 4, Funny
    Here we go:

    The Devil
    1 Microsoft Way
    Redmond, WA 98052


    Jack Fuck-me-in-the-ass Valenti
    MPAA
    15503 Ventura Boulevard
    Encino, CA 91436

    Just to start off with a few.

    --
    -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
    1. Re:Let's use the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    2. Re:Let's use the system by gosand · · Score: 2
      I just put this one up on my website, in an unlinked page:

      Frigginspammer, Ima
      One Dell Way
      MSC8424
      Round Rock, TX 78682

      If Dell picks it up, or anyone else, then they are using a harvester because this page isn't linked from anything.

      There are many possibilities for this type of thing. I keep record of those companies who send me unsolicited ads, like Dell. Just because I give them my email address (because they required it when I ordered something), it doesn't mean they can send me spam. Instead of talking to the brick wall, I just make sure to go sign up for all kinds of newsletters on the web, and use sales@dell.com, or support@dell.com as my email address.

      Kind of a take-off of the old order-20-magazine-subscriptions-and-"bill-me-later " for one of your "friends".

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  45. Re:Artificial Intelligence?? by Bouncings · · Score: 2

    This isn't language translation. All they have to do is look for a known city, followed by a known state abbreviation. The last two lines will be the address. And to make sure there's no junk data, they can simply verify that the address exists.

    --
    -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
  46. Get the joke right.... by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

    He was Hanoverian....

    Geck, erhalten Sie ein Dell!

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Remotely similar incident by Hygelac · · Score: 1

    I've had a remotely similar incident with Dell. For some dumb reason, they send marketing spam to MAILER-DAEMON@myisp.com where I am a postmaster (where 'myisp.com' would be the actual name of my ISP). The spam had instructions for removing your address via a website -- I tried it...didn't work. Then replied to the sender address asking that I be removed...didn't work. Then sent a message to abuse@dell.com and postmaster@dell.com asking to be removed...didn't work. Added the spamming class-C network to the deny file for my entire ISP -- no more spam. ;-)

    --
    -- Grow up and use mutt.
  49. did you send one to Bernie? by skidrash · · Score: 1

    Schiffman, that is.

  50. Re:Artificial Intelligence?? by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

    It found the name "King George II" somewhere else in the page, that's why. I assume "George" is what triggered it (searching for common names in a database, probably).

  51. You're evil! :) [nt] by emmons · · Score: 1

    nt

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  52. Let's play spot the difference by Tottori · · Score: 1
    From http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/k95.html:

    The Kermit Project
    Columbia University
    612 West 115th Street
    New York NY 10025-7799
    USA

    From the postcard:

    KING GEORGE II
    KERMIT PROJECT
    612W 115TH ST
    NEW YORK, NY 10025-7721

    Now, I'm willing to believe that software might exist that can canonicalise a street address and correct the zip code. It's even not utterly outside the realms of possibility that it could pull a person's name off a completely different page on the same site and include it in the address. But why oh why would it remove the word "The" from "The Kermit Project"?

    --
    use constant PERL_IS_BROKEN => $] >= 5.006;
  53. very clever marketing guy at dell by guest12 · · Score: 1

    neat, huh? gets dell many eyeballs and chuckles.

  54. Re:So, ... (off topic) by colmore · · Score: 2

    I don't know how widely kermit is used, but I go to Columbia, and if any of the project members are reading this:

    Quit trying to redo the interface! The old one worked fine and looked good in black and white. The new one is too small to read and has no reason for existing.

    But other than that, it's the best print management software I've come across, so good job on the free advertising and all that.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  55. Interestingly enough... by Enigma23 · · Score: 1

    Junk Mail may end up being much less of a problem in the United Kingdom as it was recently determined that selling information contained within the Electoral Register for an area without the consent of the persons whose information would be transferred would be in violation of the Data Protection Act.

    Sometimes the Law works in our favour... :-)

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une .sig
  56. junk mail is why I don't mail by twitter · · Score: 2
    Once, not long ago, the post was delivered three times a day with no crap. That's how things HAD to be before telephone and faxes. You can't run a business without effective communications.

    How sad the US post has become. My wife has to dig through piles of junk to get the few bills we must mail. Fliers of all descriptions, Magverts, garbage small and large, even a page from the post office listing all the junk mail. Is it any wonder that real mail is trown away at home, get's delivered to the wrong house by the postman, or just plain lost in all the crap? It's inconvienent and disgusting. We all pay for those piles of junk, even if the company buying the useless adverts goes out of business - your insurance premiums will cover parts of it, higher retail prices cover other parts and your postal stamps will subsidise the rest. It's not a fear of anthrax that makes me wash my hands after getting the mail, it's all that nasty ink that comes off onto my hands. Contamination by touch is the lowest of the post office's indignities.

    So I use the mail less, so prices of stamps go up, so the post office sells more junk mail, so I use the mail less .... See a patern?

    When did the post office get into junk mail anyway?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  57. Won't Someone Think of the Trees!?! by Snover · · Score: 1

    C'mon. Postal SPAM kills trees. We like trees. They allow us to live. That's very important, because if we don't have trees, we don't live, and we're dead, and that's bad. Don't kill trees. Trees are our friends. *takes another draw from a marijuana joint* Really.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
    1. Re:Won't Someone Think of the Trees!?! by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      > if we don't have trees, we don't live, and we're dead, and that's bad
      <joke>But at least there'd be no more spam...</joke>

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  58. "Mr. President" or Sir by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    is the appropriate wording i think. I would probaly call him the shrubbery.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:"Mr. President" or Sir by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      > . I would probaly call him the shrubbery.
      Sir is more appropriate for a knight. Especially a Knight that says "Ni".

      > Give me back my karma numbers, damnit.
      Amen to that. (Yes, I know it's "Excellent" - but how Excellent?)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  59. Re:Artificial Intelligence?? by I91MM · · Score: 1

    Probably it found the "II" at the end of King George II, backtracked a word and found "George" (a name), then backtracked and found "King" (another name, though usually a surname).

    So, it was pattern-matching for names followed by Roman numerals (as Americans such as William H Gates III are wont to do :). Not very hard. It probably then found a postal address on the page and cross-linked the two.

    --

    Sen vord is thrall and thocht is fre,
    Keip veill thy tonge I conseill the.

  60. But not of the contemporary axis (I think). [nt] by emmons · · Score: 1

    nt.

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.