Slashdot Mirror


Real Will Include Ogg Vorbis Support

Skuto writes "Following the example of AOL with Winamp, RealNetworks has decided to give Ogg Vorbis their sign of approval and will be including support into their player software. The press release has more information. Meanwhile, independent listening tests are being set up to determine how well Vorbis fares against its competitors WMA, AAC and MP3Pro. You can help by signing up for the tests here." A couple of comments (1, 2) in our previous story provide the best description of what Real is doing, if you missed them.

294 comments

  1. I wonder.. by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 0, Troll

    If they will make it always become the default player for everything despite your multiple attempts to make it otherwise!

    --
    Erutangis ym si siht.
  2. Anybody by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does anybody still have Real Player installed? And actually use it for a general player and not just for when certain cites require it for video clips?

    1. Re:Anybody by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 1

      I don't even have it installed anymore after it went and kept assigning itself default player for everything despite my multiple attempts to tell it to only play RealMedia. Shouldn't that be illegal that it does that?

      --
      Erutangis ym si siht.
    2. Re:Anybody by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 1

      Actually, Real caused a little stir in the OS X world when they released their player recently. It turns out that people missed it pretty bad.

      I don't think anyone actually enjoys using real player, but it's pretty firmly entrenched for now.

      --

      --
      pants ahoy
    3. Re:Anybody by gerf · · Score: 0

      not i. all i use it for is to watch southpark episodes. sans commercials ^^watches his back^^

      but what really would be a big help is if ogg was used nearly as often as mp3s. then, people may start an exodus toward it. but till then... it's more of a sideshow, a little used download.

    4. Re:Anybody by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 1

      Ever since RealOne... no. I used to use it quite often, but RealOne seem to have a bad habit of taking over my system.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    5. Re:Anybody by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah I do... lots of porn uses it.

    6. Re:Anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a piece of shit and I'm not installing that spyware. Any content in .ra or .ram I miss. I don't miss it much.

      What we need is an Open Source application to capture a .ra or .ram stream, convert it to .ogg or .mp3 and optionally save it to a file or just play it. If this happened then Real would be DEAD unless they changed their format or authentication methods radically, and that would break compatability with all the content already out there. No sympathy from me, I remember what a misery it was last time I tried to uninstall their product.

    7. Re:Anybody by DennisZeMenace · · Score: 2

      Does anybody still have Real Player installed? And actually use it for a general player and not just for when certain cites require it for video clips?

      Of course. RealPlayer is actually pretty good as an mp3 stream player. What else is there on Linux for streaming video anyway ? (besides the almighty mplayer).

      -DZM

    8. Re:Anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Err, yeah, I do.

      There's no native player for Windows Media for Linux, and there's so many radio stations out there using Real. I'd prefer they streamed MP3 or Ogg Vorbis, so what choice do I have?

      None of the win32 emulating players like aviplay or mplayer are particularly stable yet.

      When is someone going to reverse engineer Windows Media? I've tried, but I just don't understand audio encoding enough.

    9. Re:Anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I have done my best to get the damned thing uninstalled from one of my systems (the others have been cleaned or are clean), but it continues to elude me, causes a protection fault when I first log in and my (bootloaded) debugger kicks in. Very annoying.

      In my observation, Real is just another MS Borg type operation - they don't want to give you generalized utilities and leave you alone to make the decisions - they want to own internet audio, eliminate all other choices, lock everyone in and collect data on them.

      For me and audio, it's been WINAMP all the way for years. Elegance, flexibility, extesibility and ease of use. It whips the Real Llama's posterior. But I am worried that AOL will spoil Winamp (CRINGE "You've Got Audio!" /CRINGE) as they get more involved. I haven't tried Winamp 3 and their video support yet. And I'm not mentioning Media Player because I was taught not to swear.

    10. Re:Anybody by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's possible to castrate the nasty parts of Real Player so that it stops taking over all your file associations and popping up "messages". I remember doing it manually, the main thing is deleting this .exe which RealPlayer runs on startup both of your computer and whenever you use RealPlayer, along with removing anything else it runs on your computer's startup and changing some of the RealPlayer settings. Now I can play Real content but otherwise I never notice I have Real on my computer.

      Ad-Aware would probably do it for you with more ease.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    11. Re:Anybody by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Another way to get around realplayers problems in windows is Tara's real audio winamp plugin. You still need realplayer around of course, but at least you never have to start it up again.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    12. Re:Anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Really, has anyone installed RealOne lately?! It's cool.. "FOR ME TO POOP ON!". Each release of Real's 'player', IMHO, has just gone further down the tube.

    13. Re:Anybody by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      Yes it does if you blindly click on the "Install everything how ever you want" button.

      However with a tiny bit of patience during and after the install it can be completely neutered into playing ONLY real media files. You can even get rid of that annoying auto-popup web browser, tray icon, and stealthy "upgrade" demon with only a couple minutes of work.

      I have no love of real, but it's no "Gator" yet. It's behavior can be controlled rather easily even if, by default, it does try to take over everything.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    14. Re:Anybody by good-n-nappy · · Score: 1

      I will grant you that it has some horrible spyware that is very persistant and difficult to uninstall. It also seems to frequently ignore or forget user preferences and settings. But (if you can get over that:) in comparing Windows Media Player, QuickTime, and Real Player on Windows, I have found Real to be the most reliable as far as working across formats and with arbitrary codecs. It also has much better keyboard controls than either of the others.

      I know, its sad trying to compute:

      lesser as mediaplayer
      for each evil in mediaplayers {
      lesser = min(lesser,evil)
      }

      --
      Never underestimate the power of fiber.
    15. Re:Anybody by SirRichardPumpaloaf · · Score: 1

      The beta version for OSX that was just released actually seems to be fairly well-behaved. It comes as a single "bundle" that you just drop into the Applications folder, without having to run an installer that craps all over everything. I don't know if it has any spyware or not, but I haven't noticed any so far. They're probably saving that for the "gold" version. :-)

    16. Re:Anybody by Malc · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I've had it installed for sometime on my Win2K machine, and I've never had this problem. Perhaps you need to take some time to configure it properly.

    17. Re:Anybody by sfjoe · · Score: 1



      Nope - I got rid of it the first time I saw it trying to connect back to Real for no good reason. I still want to know what information they gather - hopefully we'll find out when they open-source it. Plus, somebody signed me up for one their spam email lists and they won't take me off of it so Real can go straight to hell for all I care.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    18. Re:Anybody by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      MPlayer cvs is capable of playing RM files by using the original codec nowadays (check www.mplayerhq.hu), which is good news because you don't have to launch that uglyness anymore to watch Real files.

    19. Re:Anybody by bmetzler · · Score: 2

      I don't think anyone actually enjoys using real player, but it's pretty firmly entrenched for now.

      I have one Windows box and all audio and video streaming as well as MP3's are played with it. I enjoy RealOne and actually make an effort to return associations to RealOne every time Windows Media Player tries to steal them.

      -Brent

    20. Re:Anybody by Tarpan · · Score: 1

      That's the beauty of the almighty mplayer, when you got it you don't need anything else for streaming videos.

    21. Re:Anybody by jandrese · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I just hate how RealOne tries to keep sending data back to Real. I have zone alarm preventing it's connections but it tries to connect every 30 minutes or so. Personally I don't trust Real to not sell my data, so I'm rather hesitant to allow any data back to their servers.

      It's not like there's an option to turn off the reporting either. It also doesn't help that the player has falled for the "skin" diesease. As soon as any program picks up the ability to skin itself it ships with the most god-awful interface possible (witness WMP7), often with a loss of functionality (witness WMP7).

      Finally, here's a hint for you media player writers: do not open webpages automatically (especially "UPGRADE NOW OR THE BUNNY GETS IT" pages) at startup. If I wanted to go to a webpage I would have started my web browser.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    22. Re:Anybody by 3.1415926535 · · Score: 1

      There was a thing in Xiph cvs for a while called libsnatch that did just that (actually it grabs the audio/video on its way to the kernel).

    23. Re:Anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it should be ilegal. So should spam, hatespeech, porn, mp3s, and unfiltered internet access. Lets regulate EVERYTHING! Yeah!

    24. Re:Anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I enjoy RealOne

      omg rofl lmao lol omg hahaha!!!!

      5, Funny, anyone?

    25. Re:Anybody by Artifex · · Score: 2

      Does anybody still have Real Player installed? And actually use it for a general player and not just for when certain cites require it for video clips?

      I've got it installed, but just because a friend of mine gave me some files in that format. It's incredibly bloated software, and I have ZoneAlarm totally blocking it from the internet, because I caught it trying to get on several times a day, even when it was supposedly not running. Unfortunately, Quicktime looks to be getting almost as bad with the bloat, though it does behave when I tell it not to check for updates.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    26. Re:Anybody by DaCrusierI · · Score: 1

      Wow, you gotta be one of the few that actually uses real player ... all I ask is why? (personally, I avoid RealOne and Windows Media Player both)

    27. Re:Anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I'm using RealPlayer 8. Listening to a stream right now. I use it only for the Real formats, though. Its actually not bad (though RealOne sucks).

    28. Re:Anybody by bmetzler · · Score: 2

      Wow, you gotta be one of the few that actually uses real player ... all I ask is why?

      It's clean, easy to use, intuitive, and I like listening to streaming radio.

      -Brent

    29. Re:Anybody by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wish I could find the winamp plug in that my friend used to have. It was really simple - install real player so you have the codec, then bust up into the permissions and tell real it was NEVER EVER ALLOWED TO RUN UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE, EVER. Then you added this plugin to winamp, and it played real files (videos, if you can dig it) in the little side window of winamp that no one uses (the minibrowser?). I've seen it work, but I think real got onto winamp and got them to remove the plugin. I don't know why, both are owned by AOL nowadays. Regardless, I haven't seen it.

      Anyway, if you follow the "underground", and by underground, I mean the message boards on sites similar to doom9.org - divx.com, etc, ogg is about to explode. Support is included in winamp 2.80. I would say once the college year starts up, they're going to get extremely popular. Once the CD Burning programs support oggs the same way they do mp3s, it's going to take off. For now, I guess we use waveout in winamp to slam them into wave files. Soon (i.e. once a large number of the "underground" people have ogg codecs installed), Gordion Knot will support DVD rips with ogg files. It's right up their alley - variable bitrate and all that.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    30. Re:Anybody by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah, and I meant to add that the best thing i've seen to rip via oggs is Exact Audio Copy. It absolutely rules. Check out their website - it's free for non commercial use. Just download and unpack the ogg codec, tell EAC you want to rip with an external program, it already has the commands built in. I suggest telling it to rip constant bitrate Quality 7. Remember ogg is variable regardless. I've found that telling EAC to rip variable bitrate with oggs sounds a little funny.
      Anyway EAC is slow as christmas, but that's because it reads every bit like 8 times to verify it. I think it's finally gotten into most people's heads that when they rip, quality is paramount over speed. It's ripped greenday CD's that spent a year on the floor of my car, face down. Highly reccomended.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    31. Re:Anybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    32. Re:Anybody by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Had it. Got sick of it really fast. Really obnoxious software. Software must stay out of my way until I need it to run.

    33. Re:Anybody by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I have it and installed it by my own will, like 80% of net streaming still uses it.

      My reason was sound quality, its highly subjective matter I know but I found Real sounds better than Windows Media.

      Oh and its ages ahead of Windows Media by embedded flash content,Dynamic updating XML stuff (like now Playing:) also one of the reasons I prefer it is, being multiplatform.

      One other reason, on every story about Real, someone like you pops up (I bet there are spyware etc stuff below) and makes me want to use it more.

      About the "evil spyware stuff" (!), er... from its options, turn "allow automatic services when player is running only" ON. Damned... :) Oh, on next step (spyware war), launch windows media player, and check "send player GUID" OFF... Better check it weekly, because innocent, cool windows media somehow likes to turn it ON on every update.

    34. Re:Anybody by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Isn't it interesting especially when Linux users bitch about Realplayer which is only a standalone application?

      Heh if I was the guy coded native realplayer for Linux and saw Slashdot clueless posts, I would be seriously in doubt.

      -"Real sux"
      -"Er, I plan to install linux sometime,what will I do when Real sinks?"
      -"Install wine, install xyz cvs, pay to some site... and listen to windows media.. Since Microsoft didn't give a fuck about your platform"

      Bitching about Real has been a good karma whoring sports lately on slashdot, anyone figures?

    35. Re:Anybody by jskline · · Score: 1

      I just reloaded my laptop freshly with Windoz and Linux and "EXCLUDED" real player from both. It has also been removed completely from 2 other machines in my home when they were "cleaned up".

      I have had nothing but trouble with Realplayer taking over and screwing up my machines. Its performance was always substandard compared to Quicktime and I even lost quicktime once it started "Gathering demographical data on the sly".

      I will not have SPYWARE on my machines. Period.

      Cheers

      --
      All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
    36. Re:Anybody by rutherford · · Score: 1

      What, Mplayer is not stable? You must have something wrong. My Mplayer plays even totally corrupted AVIs and Video CDs with which Windows Media or the DivX Playa crash instantly! And I use gcc 2.96 which should not work with Mplayer! Just read the documentation before installing it.

    37. Re:Anybody by arsaspe · · Score: 2

      "What we need is an Open Source application to capture a .ra or .ram stream, convert it to .ogg or .mp3 and optionally save it to a file or just play it"


      MPlayer, now fully GPL'd, has (beta) support for realmedia, and comes with an encoder for many formats.

    38. Re:Anybody by cameleon · · Score: 1

      You mean this plugin?

  3. Hardware Acceptance by Bonker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Software decoders in Winamp, Real, and hopefully Quicktime is only the first step. Ogg will be in the pink when hardware decoders start showing up in the form of CD MP3 players with Vorbis Support and DVD players that will decode Ogg's as well as MP3's and other formats.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Hardware Acceptance by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ogg Vorbis on DVD players will be a bit more work for the manufacturers. Don't forget that MP3 is really MPEG Audio Layer 3. By supporting MPEG systems they get automatic MP3 decoder support. If they want to add Ogg Vorbis support that means they'll have to include a totally seperate set of routines in their decoding software.

      Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see the support. But we'll probally see it adopted much quicker in dedicated MP3 players first, cause they don't have full MPEG support so they aren't getting something for nothing, they just have custom audio decoding software.

    2. Re:Hardware Acceptance by InfiniteVoid · · Score: 1

      Well, considering OGG's cheapness to license, you'd think that it would be quite an attractive deal to hardware manufacturers.

      Once we get past the "wait and see" period, while they make sure that the format will be around & in use long enough, I expect we'll see a few players with OGG support come out.

      I'll have my check card ready. :)

    3. Re:Hardware Acceptance by pmcneill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, this is not the case. DVD players decode MPEG2. MP3 is part of MPEG1 (MPEG1 Audio Layer 3), and thus not needed by a DVD player. The only reason it's being added so cheaply is there are cheap complete solutions to add MP3 cd playback.

    4. Re:Hardware Acceptance by pricedl · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, this is not the case. DVD players decode MPEG2. MP3 is part of MPEG1 (MPEG1 Audio Layer 3), and thus not needed by a DVD player.
      Most DVD players, including my cheap-o one, also decode MPEG1. Ever heard of VCD?
    5. Re:Hardware Acceptance by benwaggoner · · Score: 2

      Actually, that's not the case either. MPEG audio support is optional for DVD supports. Only AC-3 and PCM are mandated.

      MPEG audio was in the draft spec for PAL DVD, but was dropped for the final version. It was never in NTSC.

    6. Re:Hardware Acceptance by Misagon · · Score: 1

      Minor correction: MP3 can be either MPEG-1 Audio Layer 3 or MPEG-2 Audio Layer 3.
      The only difference is a couple of new bitrates and sampling rates.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  4. the more the better by longduckdong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is great. The more exposure OV gets, the closer we get to getting world wide acceptance of technology without legal overhead and high priced licensing.

    --

    -- Knuckle Blood : Official Lube of Team Rusty Nuts.
    1. Re:the more the better by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Gee, ya think so?

      That's the most goddamned insightful thing I've read all day. The more exposure something gets, the more people will use it! You've just revolutionized the way people will do business with that one elegant statement!

      Go ahead and mod me down for not wanting to read this mindless drivel.

      --

      --
      pants ahoy
    2. Re:the more the better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this post

  5. now all that's left is for iTunes to support it by krog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    once iTunes supports Vorbis, then all the major players will support it. that means it will be ubiquitous, and anyone will be able to use .ogg without worrying about if someone has an ogg player.

    talk to Apple if you want to see it happen: feedback page

    1. Re:now all that's left is for iTunes to support it by Matty_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't use that link, please. Here is one that is specific to iTunes.

      http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunes.html

    2. Re:now all that's left is for iTunes to support it by norwoodites · · Score: 2

      All someone needs to do is wrap libogg into a quicktime codec api. And you can even add RTP support for ogg vorbis (like mp3) to quicktime streaming server and quicktime, for more information look at http://www.apple.com/developer.

    3. Re:now all that's left is for iTunes to support it by scrod · · Score: 1

      I believe that's what these guys are trying to do.

    4. Re:now all that's left is for iTunes to support it by scrod · · Score: 1

      That's why I should've used the preview button. Here's the link:
      http://qtcomponents.sourceforge.net/

    5. Re:now all that's left is for iTunes to support it by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Here is the proper link for iTunes feedback.

      --

      mbbac

  6. Day late. Dollar short. by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    mp3 is alredy the defacto standard for cd-ripping. Support for Ogg is just too late to matter to anyone except for geeks on this site.

    The only company whose support would make any difference is... MicroSoft. If they blessed Ogg, you might see players ship that can handle it. Otherwise, it's just a nerd's pipe dream. If fraunhoffer ever gets serious, maybe you'll see some games and similar things ship with Ogg's instead of mp3's. But this race is already run.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by leshert · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A few years ago, you could have said the same thing about PNG. Now, every major image editor supports it, as do all the major image viewers and web browsers.

      The existence of a defacto standard doesn't mean that you shouldn't try to improve on that standard.

    2. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by defender57 · · Score: 1

      Why would Microsoft bless anything other than their own wma's? They are greedy to get a part of the market and wouldn't touch anything other than their stuff with a ten foot pole. People will choose what will give them the most freedom and that which is also the cheapest. That means ogg.

    3. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      mp3 is alredy the defacto standard for cd-ripping. Support for Ogg is just too late to matter to anyone except for geeks on this site.

      The only company whose support would make any difference is... MicroSoft. If they blessed Ogg, you might see players ship that can handle it. Otherwise, it's just a nerd's pipe dream. If fraunhoffer ever gets serious, maybe you'll see some games and similar things ship with Ogg's instead of mp3's. But this race is already run.


      I beg to differ. Although MP3 is firmly entrenched, the vast amount of encoders available ensures that an MP3 cannot be judged by bitrate. I know of several people who would be overjoyed to see a "real" standard for audio, with an official encoder. Just one encoder. Not an official one and lots of spinoffs. If the encoder is done right, and is free, open-source, and open to outside contribution, then there are no reason for spinoffs. This ensures identical quality across the board.

      Why is this important? File-sharing networks. I HATE downloading a 192 kbps MP3, and finding it to sound like a 96 kbps one made by LAME.

      --

      The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
      --Aristotle
    4. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by garett_spencley · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I personally don't really give a shit if little Johnny down the street is using ogg or not.

      What matter to me is wether I'm using ogg or not and at the moment the answer is yes. All of the cds that I rip are ripped into ogg.

      And when I download music I don't care the slightest bit wether it's in mp3 or ogg because if I really like it I'll go buy the album and then I'll rip it into ogg. If I don't like it enough to buy the album then I don't like it enough to want it in a better format either so it doesn't matter.

      The only thing I would like to see regarding ogg is portable ogg players (that also support mp3 of course) and other devices like dvd players etc. But with Real and AOL blessing ogg maybe that's not a pipe dream afterall?

      Just because I prefer a certain format doesn't mean other people need to prefer the same.

      --
      Garett

    5. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      mp3 is alredy the defacto standard for cd-ripping.

      Heh. Maybe it was a few years ago, but it's been several years since I encoded a MP3.

      You've failed to understand that the most common use for CD ripping is so that the person who is doing the ripping, can listen to the music. Most of the time, when you encode, you don't care whether or not someone else can listen to the result. You just care if you can.

      So just about everyone is free to use the best tool for the job, that they know of. That's why MP3 pretty much died and Ogg took over about two years ago.

    6. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by kwashiorkor · · Score: 1

      The difference between GIF or JPG and PNG is noticeable.

      The difference between OGG and MP3 is... pretty much in the licensing.

      That's the difference.

      --
      -- kwashiorkor --
      Leaps in Logic
      should not be confused with
      Jumping to Conclusions.
    7. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Wish I had mod points. After a discussion a few days ago, on the occasion of the 1.0 release, I came to the same conclusion. Ogg offers a couple of features that MP3 lacks, but they are useful only in very specific situations. I'm a heavy user of MP3s-- as I mentioned elsewhere, I have ripped my collection of about 400 CDs to MP3, and I play selections from that library practically every day-- and I can't come up with a good reason why I would be interested in Ogg. The software is there, the hardware is there. Unless something changes drastically, I predict that Ogg will pretty much continue to be irrelevant to all but a select few.

    8. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I agree. Improvement is a good thing. But Ogg isn't an improvement on MP3, except in some very marginal ways. Best I can discern, Ogg is about equivalent to MP3, except for the lack of software and hardware that supports it.

    9. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support for Ogg is just too late to matter to anyone except for geeks on this site, i.e. you. What's up, gspencely@yahoo.com - comprehension skills deserting you?

      The fact that you'd like to see portable players suggests that you need to hear this again: support for Ogg is just too late to matter to anyone except for geeks on this site. Manufacturers won't bother because it isn't and won't ever be a selling point.

    10. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by FatRatBastard · · Score: 4, Informative

      mp3 is alredy the defacto standard for cd-ripping. Support for Ogg is just too late to matter to anyone except for geeks on this site.

      Nope, software developers as well, esp. game developers. You have to pay scratch if your compressed audio is MP3 (good old Thompson Multimedia want their cut), so OGG actually does pretty well in that niche.

    11. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      What'll happen is people will get bored with Mp3 and want to move to something 'better'. As long as Ogg keeps improving, it'll eventually take over. That is, of course, assuming that it stays on top and something new doesn't come along and knock it out of it's roost.

      I do wonder, though: Is there a point where they'll stop trying to make music smaller? Internet is only getting faster and storage is only getting bigger. What happens when fingernail sized memory cards can cheaply handle gigs of RAM?

    12. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, geeks will choose that. PEOPLE will choose what works and what is available. The public doesn't CARE if it is Free as long as it is free.

    13. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by DennisZeMenace · · Score: 2

      I disagree simply because with time MP3 will become less and less competitive versus more state-of-the-art formats. MP3 is not going to get much better in terms of encoding quality (it's all in the encoding, but we have a bunch of very good encoders already). So when a number of newer formats arrive that can encode at the same quality in half or third the size of MP3 (we're not far from that already), there'll be more and more pressure to switch to it.

      Now whether Ogg will be the winner, that's hard to tell. I'd bet more money on some Micro$oft closed format...

      DZM

    14. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Mr_Perl · · Score: 2

      The difference is quite noticeable.

      Have a listen. Unless you're mostly deaf you might be in for a nice surprise.

      --

      My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
    15. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Explo · · Score: 2

      The difference between OGG and MP3 is... pretty much in the licensing.

      And the sound quality at low bitrates. Honestly, vorbis audio with around 64 kbit/s average bitrate sounds quite lot of better than something encoded with lame to mp3 with ABR set to similar value. That 's good for things like audio streaming; either the user gets considerably better sound quality at old rate, or same quality at smaller bitrate.

      --
      Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.
    16. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by southpolesammy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as there are companies like Forgent who try to claim frivolous patent royalties on formats that are for all intensive purposes the de facto standards, there will be a market for OSS products. In the compressed audio arena, this is Ogg Vorbis' greatest benefit, and one that may ultimately be its raison d'etre.

      Additionally, I've heard the comparisons of .ogg files vs. .wma and .mp3 files, and with little tweaking, .ogg is as good if not better than the heavily tweaked competitors. It seems to be the better choice overall. Acceptance will only be limited by usage.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    17. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      One problem: the biggest browser of all, Internet Explorer, has broken alpha support! That's one of the biggest reasons why GIF isn't dead yet.
      So yes, Microsoft does matter. If they don't support it, or support it well, it will be a problem.

    18. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Mhrmnhrm · · Score: 1
      The existence of a defacto standard doesn't mean that you shouldn't try to improve on that standard.
      Of significant irony is that JPG itself may soon be revoked as a standard (lame software patents tick me off), and PNG *appears* to be the only legitimate replacement candidate. GIF's are CompuServe (AOL/TW now) proprietary, and too big to use for much more than banners). JPG is (likely) dying (Sheesh... makes me sound like the *BSD trolls), while TFF and TGA are relatively unknown outside engineering and photoediting. Don't even think about suggesting BMP, either. MegaShaft worries aside, the files are friggin' massive.
      --
      I suspect that one of these choices is incorrect. Correct.
    19. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides sound quality (have you done some listening tests?), Ogg supports multiple channels. This is extremely useful for making your (backup/archive) DVD rips with 5.1 sound and such. MP3 is however limited to 2 channels. If DVD Audio ever takes off to replace CDs, I think Ogg will be more widely used.

    20. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      The quality of LAME's --r3mix setting just makes me smile. Is there an equalivant setting with the Ogg Vorbis encoder? Something that uses VRB, allows it to go as high as needed to encode the audio well, but saves every chance it can?

    21. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Matty_ · · Score: 1

      You're not talking about improving the standard, but instead changing the standard. That's much tougher.

      MP3 is the standard because of its wide acceptance among users. It will be difficult to get people to use something other than MP3. It has become synonymous with digital music to many people.

      PNG has the same problem. PhotoShop and other software out there still support GIF. There is no reason for developers to switch. The only motivation, at this point, is political and most companies or developers don't care.

    22. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by rgmoore · · Score: 3, Informative
      mp3 is alredy the defacto standard for cd-ripping. Support for Ogg is just too late to matter to anyone except for geeks on this site.

      And if CD ripping were the only function of compressed audio, you might have a point. But Vorbis has some genuine, big advantages for streaming audio. A single file, for instance, can be streamed at different bitrates without modification, so you can easily adjust the rate to each user according to his connection speed. There's also no licensing fee, which might be enough to make the difference between being profitable or not to the streaming company. And, of course, Vorbis is supposed to give better sound quality at a given bitrate, so more connections can be supported for a given bandwidth.

      As long as a format gives advantages for the producer or distributor of files, there will be a reason for files to be generated in that format. Now that the biggest obstacle to using Vorbis- the lack of ubiquitous players- has been eliminated, those producers and distributors can start taking advantage. It doesn't matter whether Joe User understands why he should want to switch to Vorbis if the people who are generating the files he listens to have already made the decision for him.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    23. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by kwashiorkor · · Score: 2

      If you're concerned about sound quality, you are not listening to compressed audio of any sort.

      On the other hand, PNGs are lossless compression which provide roughly the same file size as lossy GIFs and JPGs. You can keep your gradients looking sharp, and still expect a quick download of the image.

      I won't disagree that OGG sounds better or worse. I'm saying that NOBODY who uses compressed audio seriously gives a rat's ass.

      --
      -- kwashiorkor --
      Leaps in Logic
      should not be confused with
      Jumping to Conclusions.
    24. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Cardhore · · Score: 1

      Mod this up. This is the embodiment of an intelligent thought.

    25. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by David+Gerard · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "mp3 is alredy the defacto standard for cd-ripping."

      Actually, it's the defacto standard for file sharing. For ripping your own CDs, you'd be a fool to stick to mp3 - you can get much better sound in less disk space with Ogg. One place Ogg really needs support is in CD ripping applications, like AudioCatalyst.

      See what you can do with your filesharing app to get it to share and search .ogg files - and if it doesn't, lobby the programmers.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    26. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by phriedom · · Score: 1

      "I personally don't really give a shit if little Johnny down the street is using ogg or not...The only thing I would like to see regarding ogg is portable ogg players..."

      But don't you think those two things are related? I think we are going to need an ogg vorbis user base before we can get a manufacturer to add support in a portable player. Ogg Vorbis support from WinAmp and Real is a step towards getting more user support. It becomes a bit of a chicken/egg problem until you get critical mass. I for one, am not going to rip my whole CD collection to Ogg until I can play it in the car and the living room without buying a laptop. A handheld portable covers both those.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    27. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What are you talking about? GIFs are not lossy, and JPG files are always much smaller than PNGs for photographic-type stuff. Get your facts straight.

    28. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

      "On the other hand, PNGs are lossless compression which provide roughly the same file size as lossy GIFs and JPGs."

      roughly the same size? >10 times larger filesize for photographs is not what i would call roughly the same size.

    29. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I actually don't disagree with you about game developers, and said as much in my original comment. That is as far as I see the limited market for ogg going.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    30. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Technical superiority matters not a whit to the individuals, nor to the 'marketplace' that they comprise.

      Beta over VHS, LD over VHS, Mac (and others) over MS OS, MD over CD, etc, etc, etc.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    31. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by SirRichardPumpaloaf · · Score: 1

      JPEG is an open standard and turned out to be (perhaps) patent poisoned. What makes you so sure that Ogg Vorbis won't have the same problem down the line? Just because there's some OSS code floating around for it now doesn't mean that nobody's sitting on a patent they won't someday try to enforce. The existence of an OSS implementation means nothing in that arena.

    32. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Don't need the upmods. All it does is encourage M2 avoiding lamers to mod post '-1 overrated'.

      The other trick with mp3's is that I can play them damned near anywhere. I don't need my uber-7ee+ player. I can play them on sister's DVD player, brother's computer, mother's iPod (well, she doesn't have one, but you get the idea).

      "What about disc space?" What about it? In a very short time frame, I'll be able to buy a hard drive with enough space for .wav files. Even the portable devices have tons of space (I couldn't listen to 5 gigs of mp3's in a single sitting any time soon).

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    33. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hell it is.

      MP3, for all purposes, is an evolutionary dead end. Why do you think MP3Pro exists? And why do you think it ain't free?

      MP3 will not grow. Ogg is free to grow wherever it wants. Plus, it sounds better than MP3. I don't have a single MP3 in my collection--I use Ogg exclusively. Day late? Dollar short? I don't think so.

    34. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by tastegood · · Score: 1

      I think I'd be a bigger fool to attempt to convert all 40 gigs of my mp3s into ogg vorbis, which I would then subsequently NOT be able to load onto my Nomad Jukebox and take with me, everywhere I go.

      Thanks anyway, I'll stick with what works.

      On the other hand, as a game developer, I'm also happy to have the option to use ogg instead of mp3 for compressed audio, and not having to pay the licensing fees.

      But professional applications are clearly a whole different ballgame from personal ones. A format would have to come out with a _significantly_ improved compression to quality ratio, not to mention hardware support, for me to even blink on this one.

    35. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by David+Gerard · · Score: 2
      "I think I'd be a bigger fool to attempt to convert all 40 gigs of my mp3s into ogg vorbis, which I would then subsequently NOT be able to load onto my Nomad Jukebox and take with me, everywhere I go."

      Yeah. xiph.org really has to get that integer-maths Vorbis decoder done for the hardware players. That's a BIG problem with the Vorbis 1.0 package as released.

      (And you realise of course that you never rip mp3s to Ogg, because the result sounds really crap. You rerip only from source CDs.)

      "A format would have to come out with a _significantly_ improved compression to quality ratio, not to mention hardware support, for me to even blink on this one."

      My data bucket is 40 gig, and saving 30% of that by reripping my CDs to .ogg is sufficiently significant to me. YMMV, of course.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    36. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I HATE downloading a 192 kbps MP3, and finding it to sound like a 96 kbps one made by LAME.
      Here's a hint: Go to mp3hq and find official MP3 scene group releases, all of which must meet the 44.1kHz 192kbps LAME quality standards. Often high-bitrate files that sound terrible are results of inferior products such as Xing and Blade. If only file-sharing networks would let you know what the mp3 was encoded without downloading it.
    37. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      37 replies. good one.

    38. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the question is, are those select few irrelevant to others?

    39. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Technical superiority matters not a whit to the individuals, nor to the 'marketplace' that they comprise.

      Technical superiority? No. Practical superiority? Yes. Observe:

      Beta over VHS

      "New format" against "format with a lot of tapes allready." Content providers failed to support Beta, so the market went to VHS, where people could actually watch movies.

      LD over VHS

      Oh, let me think--"flip the huge, easily breakable and expensive disk four times in a movie" against "stick in and hit play--or even record." Not even a contest for anyone except fanatics with money to burn.

      Mac (and others) over MS OS

      MS ships on a larger variety of configurations, and can be had for a lower cost point--and this has been the case ever since Windows came out.

      Mac is *just now* getting to a price point where it can compete--and it's doing quite well for itself.

      MD over CD

      See Beta v. VHS.

      In the case of MP3 v. Ogg, they're both conusmer-level formats. MP3s aren't sold in any meaningful fashion, and that means that Ogg just needs some hardware support to take over.

      If Ogg files really are smaller for the same quality, expect a switch--when someone big (Sony / MS / Apple) holds it up and says "look, we can fit more on a drive the same cost!" and offers it, just as an option, it'll take off.

      Until then, I'm off to find a good Ogg ripper so I can re-do my collection.

    40. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by bilbobuggins · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You remember back in like 97 when low quality Real-Audio streams were the rage and mp3 was like this new weird thing that nobody really knew about? (at least amongst me + geeks i knew)
      there is NO reason Ogg can't take over as the de-facto standard. especially if it really is a better format.
      sure, it might not be tomorrow but with the increasing ease of switching (i.e. with all this new software support), mp3 is _anything_ but entrenched and could be uprooted with half of users not even knowing what file type they are playing.

    41. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      You've misstated the historical cases and made a flawed analysis of comparison to Ogg vs. MP3.

      Beta was out and available for quite some time prior to VHS. Late 70's, early 80's, most shops were brimming with Beta tapes. For the early adopters, that was where it was at. When Joe Schmo went into Circuit City and was confronted with a $50 difference in price between machines, he purchased in spite of lack of media available.

      Your analysis of the Mac is also incorrect. Early 90's, many models of Mac's (particularly the LC's) were price competitive on a feature standpoint with comparable PCs.

      You've dismissed Ogg vs mp3 because those formats aren't sold. You are, again, wrong. They are 'sold' for free. Sold via napster, gnutella, audiogalaxy, etc. etc. etc. They are sold via people who have spent time ripping their cd's. No, they are not sold for money. They are sold for time. While people are stupid, they aren't that stupid. Why should they buy/learn/use a new encoder to save disc space that they aren't worried about or sure about how to calculate? They won't.

      Elsewhere, someone mentioned a chicken-egg problem. Why should Sony or Apple (because MS ain't gonna support Ogg) include Ogg support? Even if it costs two cents (Canadian or US) for each unit, how much more revenue will they get? Zero. When your balance sheet numbers are that large, the improved sales due to that 2 cent increase are zero.

      I rather hope you're reading this far, as I'm done flaming and, in general, being an ass. What I think would be far more enlightening to me is an answer to these questions:

      How many files (either in CD's, or megabytes) is your current mp3 collection?
      What do you use it for?
      What is your reason for switching to Ogg?

      Let me give you some answers on the opposite side of the question:

      I don't know how many songs, but I have around 50-100 cd's (sorry, that's incredibly vague, I know) on my hard drive.
      I'm too lazy to dig for CD's when I want music.
      I encode with lame at 192. If I ever finish ripping my collection, I'll use VBR. I have a ton of space left on my hard drive.
      Why keep mp3? I can play them damned near anywhere. There's more software available (although this is changing and I bet the freeness of the codecs have something to do with it) to manipulate them. There's more software available to play them.

      Okay, so I went from talking about the market to two individuals. Still, I'm interested in your answers. Perhaps they could give me some insight as to why I should care or expect this will be anything more than a Cauzin strip reader. (Points to anyone who remembers them:)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    42. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by gnoshi · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression they already had the integer decoder done, and were charging some kind of licensing or purchasing cost (not sure how it is licensed) to try to scrape up money to fund continued development (which I feel is quite reasonable btw; anyone else can build an integer decoder if they want to).

      Still, I could be wrong, and have been before.

    43. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • Beta was a consumer-targeted video format that couldn't even fit a movie on one tape.
      • Laserdiscs were inherently fragile and hard to handle.
      • MacOS didn't have memory protection until last year.
      • Minidisc was too small, too lossy, and crippled by DRM.
    44. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by David+Gerard · · Score: 2
      "I was under the impression they already had the integer decoder done, and were charging some kind of licensing or purchasing cost (not sure how it is licensed) to try to scrape up money to fund continued development (which I feel is quite reasonable btw; anyone else can build an integer decoder if they want to)."

      Something like that - see the kuro5hin story The Trouble with Vorbis.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    45. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by gnoshi · · Score: 1

      With the 1.0 release of ogg vorbis, I believe the docs are now quite complete (that was one of the main tasks for the 1.0 release) so while I think at the time many of the points made in the kuro5hin.org article were valid and relevent then, I feel they are significantly less so now.

      gnoshi

    46. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1

      Well I see it a different way...

      There WILL be a company (be it a very small one) that will produce the first Ogg Vorbis player. Since this will be the only one in the market, people will buy it, my guess is it will be more than the other mp3 players out there. Other mp3 players out there will take notice, and think that supporting Ogg Vorbis might not be a bad idea after all.

      Well IDNCAM :)
      (I don't know crap about marketing)

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    47. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by David+Gerard · · Score: 2
      "With the 1.0 release of ogg vorbis, I believe the docs are now quite complete (that was one of the main tasks for the 1.0 release) so while I think at the time many of the points made in the kuro5hin.org article were valid and relevent then, I feel they are significantly less so now."

      Here's to that hypothetical team of six crazy Russians then :-)

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    48. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by falzer · · Score: 1

      UT2003 uses ogg files for music.

    49. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      In my analysis, ogg had plenty of artifacts and problems when trying to be as compressed as mp3, but started to really _stomp_ mp3 when the bit rate went up. By the time you had 256K or 320K, forget it- it was doing an amazing job, particularly with regard to simultaneously having tonal purity and transient sock. mp3 can do pretty good at one or the other given the right encoder for the job, but not both, whatever the bit rate.

      If space expands to where 320K 'something' is nice and compact, ogg will truly come into its own. Particularly since you can peel back the 320K to lower bit rate files in case you're still just a BIT short on space on your portable player and need to fit on a song that's not quite fitting.

    50. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Shanep · · Score: 2

      I won't disagree that OGG sounds better or worse. I'm saying that NOBODY who uses compressed audio seriously gives a rat's ass.

      I'm the kinda guy who cannot tolerate imperfections in my music listening. A Beyerdynamic DT-911 and Yamaha CDX-1060 kinda guy. I can walk into a room and hear if there is any CRT switched on in it. I am always annoyed at the cinema when I hear the awfull noises of AC3 and DTS. I have avoided MP3 for a long time.

      Until I read about LAME 256kbit CBR. I decided to encode some of my favorite Dire Straits CD's to have a listening test. Doing A/B tests between MP3 and WAV, I could not detect any difference.

      A year later, all my CD's are encoded (16GB), I only listen to CD's in the car and whenever I hear a strange tone, ringing, warble, pop or click, I quickly check the original CD, thinking I've finally found a reason not to use MP3... only to find that what I thought was an MP3 artefact, is actually on the original raw CD.

      The World is not as black and white as you think. Practicality is important too. And speaking of which, if I can fit the same quality or better, in a smaller space with Ogg, then I will happily re-encode my whole collection.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    51. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to say I appreciate your post. I understood that Ogg was for lower bitrate files, not better audio quality.

      *Interested in checking it out*

      Thank you!

    52. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Shanep · · Score: 2

      Beta over VHS, LD over VHS, Mac (and others) over MS OS, MD over CD, etc, etc, etc.

      You seem to have compared these as Best:Worst.

      So why MD:CD?

      You think MD is better than CD?

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    53. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by nathana · · Score: 1

      foobar104, I missed the discussion that took place under that story until a few days after it occurred. I posted a reply to one of your own many replies, but seeing how that story had long since moved off the front page, my post elicited no responses. So, at the risk of being modded down for "redundancy", I will repost it (slightly modified) now under this thread. The original post is here.

      I first begin by quoting a portion of your reply.

      -----

      My point is just that it's kind of disappointing that people would spend their time and energy working on an audio codec that's not necessary and that doesn't offer significant advantages over existing codecs. They could have been working to improve MP3 instead, or on something new that we don't have yet. Instead, they just decided to reproduce work that's already been done. That's disappointing, because it smacks of wasted opportunity.

      You may be happy with the corporately paid-for and supplied iTunes, and all the more power to ya. Apple of course must have some sort of license agreement with Fraunhofer in order to supply its users with a program that can encode and decode MP3s. Apple is not stupid, and is not going to trample over other companies' IP rights, at least not so overtly. As you pointed out, it is not likely that they would supply their users with software that the mere fact of owning and using would make them criminals.

      At the same time, however, you must need to recognize that Ogg Vorbis scratches an itch, and a fairly large one at that. An itch for a higher-quality codec with features not availible in the MP3 world (such as have been pointed out to you by others in this thread at different times). Now, you may not care about these features, but surely others do.

      It's obvious from the above quote of yours that you recognize the need to continually advance media compression technology, and lament the fact that the resources that were dumped into the Ogg Vorbis project weren't put to better use, such as "working to improve MP3 instead". What you fail to realize is that, as I said earlier, Ogg Vorbis is an attempt to scratch an itch, and it is an attempt to scratch an itch in a legal manner. My dear boy, if they could avoid re-inventing the wheel and instead build their improvements to audio compression technology on top of other people's work, don't you think they would do it? Because of the patents on MP3 technology, though, "underground" projects such as the LAME encoder (which is, seemingly, now the most widely used MP3 encoder engine, bar-none, and which is a project that does exactly as you suggested -- throw resources at improving MP3) are essentially illegal (not that they seem to care, and all the more power to 'em). LAME did not pay Fraunhofer a license, and they don't pay Fraunhofer licenses for every copy they distribute. People who are using LAME are technically lawbreakers.

      So, you see, they had no choice but to "reproduce work". And, once that was done, they were left with an open standard that they could then begin to work on improving, without legal blockades and restrictions. In addition, because of its openness (used in both the un-patent-encumbered-ness and the open-sourceness senses), anyone can build improvements on top of it without fear. Thus, it lays the foundation for a truly promising future codec.

      In the future, I would not be surprised to see a version of iTunes released by Apple which supported Ogg. At that point, it will no doubt have accumulated a great many desireable features which it does not even contain now, all as a result of its openness, and then it probably won't seem like such a "wasted opportunity" to you, will it?

    54. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could you get "raison d'être" right (except for the accent) and get "for all intents and purposes" wrong?

    55. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by somethinghollow · · Score: 0

      The new Unreal Tourny uses/will use Ogg...

    56. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Skuto · · Score: 2

      >Yeah. xiph.org really has to get that integer-maths Vorbis decoder done for the hardware players. That's a BIG problem with the Vorbis 1.0 package as released

      It's been done for months! Available directly from xiph.org on request. Alternatively, the spec is out so anyone can write his own. The spec even contains explicit pointers to what integer decoders need to look out for.

      --
      GCP

    57. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Oggs are VBR. Try the -q4 or -q5 options.

    58. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As portable players move towards being a comodity item, the manufacturers will have to start squeezing their profit margins as prices are forced down by the market. If they can convert even a single cent on each unit shiped by using Ogg Vorbis royalty free, rather than paying licencsing to Fruenhoffer, you can bet they'll switch in a heartbeat.

    59. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by rutherford · · Score: 1

      Did you ever tried Ogg and compared them? Ogg encoded Music sounds so much better you will not believe it. It's much biggger than between PNG and Gif/Jpeg. You can compare a q 0 Ogg (~ 60 kbps) with a 128 kpbs MP3. If you think that is not a difference why don't you use Mp2 files. Mp3 files are also not 10 times smaller if you think that is needed to be noticeable.

    60. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget that license fees are paid (per unit) if a unit supports a format, not if anyone actually uses it. Who in their right mid would remove MP3 support just because they had Ogg? It will be years of not decades (if ever) before MP3 isn't needed.

    61. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they could avoid re-inventing the wheel and instead build their improvements to audio compression technology on top of other people's work, don't you think they would do it?

      NO! And this is exactly why OSS people will always be just a bunch of bickering dilettantes. They prefer to own it all, just so they can have the hubris of giving it away. The thought that some company involved in making money (gasp) might benefit is just too much.

      There's really something wrong with people who happily use hardware that was created to satisfy market forces while claiming to be working to "free" software. How is it they ignore the work that goes into software while still paying for hardware? At the end of the day hardware should be free too, because the silicon and stuff was just lying around in the ground...

    62. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      And this is exactly why OSS people will always be just a bunch of bickering dilettantes. They prefer to own it all, just so they can have the hubris of giving it away.

      LOL. I love it. That explains so many things. OSSers love to re-invent the wheel because pointing at an inferior copy of somebody else's application and muttering the magic incantation, ``But this one is FREE,'' gives them a heady rush of moral superiority that far outweighs the feelings of technical inferiority they get from having written it in the first place.

      This is my favorite new theory on why OSSers are they way they are.

      It reminds me of a great quote from Douglas Adams; it's not exactly the same idea, but I think it expresses the same sentiment, more or less. I'm too lazy to look it up right now. I'll paraphrase: The sense of satisfaction a user gets from getting the machines to work at all blinds the user to the machines' essential uselessness. In other words, their superficial design flaws completely hide their fundamental design flaws.

    63. Re:Day late. Dollar short. by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      What is your reason for switching to Ogg?

      twofold.

      1: I'm a cheap SOB who doesn't want to shell out $ every time I want to make a PC play music. Being able to legally configure my PCs is an incentive to switch formats.

      2: If they are smaller file sizes, that means I'll have easier backups--which is a good thing for me.

  7. I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... but, I made a pact with myself some years ago to never use any file format that was named in the Klingon language.

    Seriously, the name is so stupid and embarrassing to say or read that I wonder if people won't resist it for that reason alone. I'm not being facetious here, either. I'm hesitent to listen to Ogg Vorbis format files because I would be too embarrassed to have to say "It's Ogg Vorbis" should someone ask me what I'm listening to ...

    1. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by jglow · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you have other issues. I have no problem saying ogg vorbis simply because people look at me strange when I say it.

      Ogg what?
      Ogg Vorbis

      It'd be different if it was called Barbie's Dream Audio Compression.

      --


      There's no "I" in Linux.. err..
    2. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 2

      I find "Ogg Vorbis" equally as embarrassing as "Barbie's Dream Audio Compression". Honestly. I'm probably alone in this, but it's true.

    3. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 2

      OK, fair enough, but the point I was trying to make is this ...

      The name of the format will have some effect on its adoption. Maybe it's not a large effect, but I believe that there is definitely an effect there. Consider the MP3 format. Do you think that maybe the fact that "em-pee-three" rolls so easily off of the tongue might have had some small effect on the rate with which the format was adopted?

      I realize that the effect is not large, but I'm sure it's there. Had the MP3 format been named "Poop Chute 3" I honestly think the name would have had a negative impact on the format's adoption.

      I feel the same way about "Ogg Vorbis". I think that a format which is trying to become adopted as a de-facto standard needs all the help it can get in stealing mind share. And the name is just so stupid, I think it is detrimental to this.

    4. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by MeNeXT · · Score: 1
      I used to think the same about Yahoo. How can tehy be serious. Look at them today...Do you Yahoo!...

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    5. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm hesitent to listen to Ogg Vorbis format files because I would be too embarrassed to have to say "It's Ogg Vorbis" should someone ask me what I'm listening to ...

      I imagine the conversation going like this:

      Joe: Hey Bryan, what are you listening to?

      Bryan: Ogg Vorbis

      Joe: No you fucking idiot, what is the name of the song you're listening to? Who the fuck cares what format you encoded it in?!

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    6. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 1

      I semi-agree. I don't like the name, but I do like the format.

      I think they should drop the "Ogg" part of the name (which I personally can't read without mentally mapping it onto "egg", and I don't like eggs, either) and just call the format "Vorbis". On its own, "Vorbis" sounds cool.

      -Stephen

    7. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I think mmm-p'thri sounds far more like "k'plah" than Ogg Vorbis, which sounds like it could mean something in a European language that's over my head. "Oh, Od Forbis. Of course I've heard of it. It's like Ad Nauseam."

    8. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, people will probably just think you're talking some Lord of the Rings character or something.

    9. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by tmarzolf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Anybody else get the eerily and relevant fortune at the bottom of the page?

      "The medium is the message." -- Marshall McLuhan

      --

      This Sig has been depreciated.

    10. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by wdr1 · · Score: 2

      ... but, I made a pact with myself some years ago to never use any file format that was named in the Klingon language.

      Ahh, is that where it came from? I was wondering. It is unfortunate, Klingon inheritance aside.

      Guess Marketing does have some value after all! ;-)

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    11. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I'm not embarrassed at all by saying it. I think it is a stupid name.

      "what format is that?"
      "Ogg Vorbis."
      "What?"
      "It's Ogg Vorbis."
      "What the hell is an ogg vorbis?"
      "So, these guys don't like mp3 because of the patent issues so they came up with their own format and they named it ogg vorbis."
      "Why ogg vorbis?"
      "It's some fantasy thing, a tribute or something."
      "Like Lord of the Rings"
      "Uh, yeah, something like that."
      [continues]

      Sorry -- I'd rather avoid that conversation.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    12. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      Ogg is a collective name for "systems" (to use an MPEG term) of audio and/or video. One of the possible audio formats is Vorbis. I think one could call a Ogg file with just a lone Vorbis audio stream a Vorbis file. But the file extension will still be .ogg.

    13. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vorbis is the name of the lossy audio compression codec. Ogg is just a name for a generic media encapsulation format, that will eventally handle multiple audio/video streams multiplexed or standalone.

      Calling an Ogg file that you are listening to Vorbis is exactly as legit as calling an MP3 file an MP3.

    14. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reasoning behind all the names etc is explained
      here

    15. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by SurfsUp · · Score: 2



      You are being silly. "Vorbis" is neither more nor less silly than "Linux".

      --
      Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
    16. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

      Are you being sarcastic? I used to think Yahoo was serious, but look at them today.

      Bonus points for both of us for saying Yahoo Serious.

    17. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pity thee. You could have had so much and you settled for so little. Well small minds fill up fast.

    18. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by astrashe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is ogg any more strange as a word than egg?

      Once people get used to it, it will be ok.

      At least it's a word, and not an acronym.

    19. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

      I'm not embarrassed at all by saying it. I think it is a stupid name.

      Of course, they could have called it "Wossname? Makes a small sound?"

      What's in a name anyway? I have no problem with "Ogg Vorbis". Actually, I think it's kind of catchy. But hey, I happen to like the "fantasy thing" as well.

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    20. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by dlb · · Score: 1

      Sounds like people look at you strange regardless of what you say.

    21. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by charlie763 · · Score: 1

      Check out this page for information on how ogg vorbis and other computer realted things were named.

      Here is a quote from that page related to ogg vorbis

      Vorbis, on the other hand is named after the Terry Pratchett character from the book _Small Gods_. The name holds some significance, but it's an indirect, uninteresting story. Ogg Vorbis is the current CODEC in development as part of the Ogg multimedia project, begun immediately after Fraunhofer issued its 'Letter of Infringement' to freeware MP3 encoder efforts. Vorbis is intended to go head-to-head with the two current MPEG-4 compressions, AAC and TwinVQ.

      --
      Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
    22. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Fantasy is a niche market. Granted, so is Ogg Vorbis for now. I like names that not only give you some idea as to what it does, but sound somewhat like english and not something from a rejected Tolkien novel.

      Here's just one suggestion of what I have in mind, just off the top of my head, "PFM" - catchy, has the FM to think of music (Patent Free Media).

      That and the full name fits in the extention. Is it an Ogg? No It's an Ogg Vorbis! Then why is it .ogg? Oh, that's right 8+3 mentality. So have a 3 letter acronym or something. Just my $0.02.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    23. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Augusto · · Score: 2

      You are not alone, the name is utterly stupid and sadly I think it does impact the amount of people who know about this format.

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
    24. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

      "PFM" - catchy, has the FM to think of music (Patent Free Media).

      How boring. That's just another acronym, one among thousands. After a while they get to be just background noise. Besides, what does frequency modulation (FM) have to do with music anyway? ;-)

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    25. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bah, you could have said the same thing about mp3 4 years ago.
      "Is that a CD?" (you probably could have said the same thing about CDs too, but I won't)
      "No, it's mp3"
      "What is an mp3?"
      "Mpeg layer 3, it's compressed audio"
      "Oh, aren't those illegal?"
      "Some of them, not all of them"
      "Oh, then can I have some?"
      "Sure" ....
      "I put it in my CD player and it didn't work."
      "No, you need an mp3 player"
      [continues]

      Those were back in the days when you got all your mp3s searhing on altavista and doing http transfers. Even before the ratio FTP servers. It was hardcore.

    26. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by FattMattP · · Score: 2
      Seriously, the name is so stupid and embarrassing to say or read that I wonder if people won't resist it for that reason alone.
      You have a point although Ogg Vorbis doesn't sound as bad as GIMP. I have a hard time convincing people that they should use a program called GIMP. It has negative connotations to most people. I think the strange names that some projects have or will be a barrier to Linux being accepted on the desktop.
      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    27. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Besides, what does frequency modulation (FM) have to do with music anyway? ;-)
      What is commonly transmitted over FM radio signals?

      Music. Yes, Music. The #1 thing transmitted over FM radio signals.

      That's just another acronym, one among thousands. After a while they get to be just background noise.
      MP3, MPG, FM, AM, TV, GNU, GPL -- all background noise, and cornerstone words in certain peoples daily life. If you want recognition you make it easy to remember and easy to say. Acronyms do that, that is why they are so widely used. They go into the background and get remembered.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    28. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by jafac · · Score: 2

      *sigh* PFM is owned by Adobe anyway. Some silly Font thing.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    29. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone is technologically savvy enough to be interested in the file format you use to store your music, then chances are they won't care what the file format is called.

      If someone ask's "what are you listening to?" you reply, "I'm listening to my favorite recording artist!"

    30. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Xerithane · · Score: 2


      "Mpeg layer 3, it's compressed audio"
      "Oh, aren't those illegal?"
      "Some of them, not all of them"
      "Oh, then can I have some?"
      "Sure" ....
      "I put it in my CD player and it didn't work."
      "No, you need an mp3 player"


      4 years ago .. I think you are confused when Napster went commercial

      At least in the conversation you stated it has to do with music and not some stupid sounding fantasy-based name. MP3 has something to do with the file format. It's a good name. CD has something to do with the format. It's a good name.

      Ogg Vorbis has something to do with.. a Fantasy character(s). Not a good name. Just my $0.02.

      I'm entitled to my opinion on this, and you wont change it :)

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    31. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Khalid · · Score: 2

      Note that it only sounds strange in English, in French it doesn't sound that strange (of course this my personal opinion). Oddity is probably something which depends of the language use use

    32. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That begs the question: what is the plural form of "Ogg Vorbis"? Is it "Ogg Vorbis" without an "s", like "Lego"? "Ogg Vorbises"? "Ogg Vorbii"?

    33. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Bj�rn · · Score: 1
      "PFM" - catchy, has the FM to think of music (Patent Free Media).

      It could however be a little confusing listening to the group PFM (Premiata Forneria Merconi) encoded in PFM (Patent Free Media) format. :)

      --
      Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think. --Niels Bohr
    34. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by gnoshi · · Score: 1

      On the whole .ogg thing, maybe it is 8+3 mentality.
      Alternately, it could be because Ogg is the container format and Vorbis is the audio compression format.
      Like .mov, .avi etc not being .mp4.vid.aac.aud or .divx3.vid.mp3.aud.in.convenient.bite.sized.contai ner but rather named based on the container format.
      I would say the latter is more likely given that I believe most of the xiph ppl are mac and linux users, so are not exposed to 8+3 silliness.

      Oh, and I like the name Ogg Vorbis. Someone says to me "what's ogg vorbis" and I say "an audio compression format" and they say "why called ogg vorbis" and I say "cos that's what it is called".
      Why is a tree called a tree? cos that's what it is called (unless someone has a better reason for me).

      gnoshi

    35. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Just tell them your listening to music :)

      Christ, when was the last time someone asked you what media of music you are listening to?

      If they ask, and you feel (oddly) embarrassed about saying OGG Vorbis, just say "O2G". That works for the w3 consortium, why not you?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    36. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Too many people have seen "Pulp Fiction"

      "Bring out the GIMP"

    37. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by FattMattP · · Score: 2
      Not just that, but they know what the word means:

      gimp
      n : disability of walking due to crippling of the legs or feet

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    38. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by stux · · Score: 2

      What is commonly transmitted over FM radio signals?

      Music. Yes, Music. The #1 thing transmitted over FM radio signals.


      Ummm, lets see... ads, schlock-talk, drive-time crud, ads, more ads, still more ads, and every now and again, some piece of top-40 junk.

      Music is most likely NOT the #1 thing transmitted over FM radio signals.

      --

      ---
      Live Long & Prosper \\//_
      CYA STUX =`B^) 'da Captain,
      Jedi & Last *-fytr
    39. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be OG2? Seeing how W3C is WWW C not WCCC.

      --
      Why not fork?
    40. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by m0nkyman · · Score: 1

      and em-pee-three is better? at least ogg can't have urine jokes based on it... ogg vorbis always sounded like an old german stereo maker to me...

      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    41. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by rabidcow · · Score: 2

      That's the main reason I never installed Napster. (or at least the main excuse) I mean "Napster" is MUCH dumber than "Ogg" and look how popular it was.

    42. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think that maybe the fact that "em-pee-three" rolls so easily off of the tongue might have had some small effect on the rate with which the format was adopted?

      Except it doesn't. You think it does, because you're used to hearing, reading, writing and saying it. However, "MP3" is three syllables, and "OGG" is one. So if you're seriously saying the success of a compression format is dictated by how easy the acronym "rolls off the toungue", then Ogg will be three times as succesful as MP3.

    43. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by bgarcia · · Score: 2
      ROTFLMAO!

      I'd vote you up, but:

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    44. Re:I'd try Ogg Vorbis ... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I thought about OG2, but O2G just sounds cooler :)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  8. I don't use Real by Marvel+Man · · Score: 0

    Real is too slow for me to use. I would rather not even use Real Player. But maybe this will allow for better support(somehow) and maybe some improvement in the player and the format itself.

  9. Open Source wins again by tps12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Victory! First Real puts out a Linux version, then we learn that Real is going Open Source (and not just with their own stuff, but with Microsoft's as well), and now they embrace Ogg, the best codec ever!

    It's good to see companies finally "get" Free Software. I am now going to Real's website to download the latest RealPlayer public alpha for $25, just to show my support for their recent behavior. I encourage every person in the world to do the same.

    Linux rules!

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:Open Source wins again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real are NOT going Open Source. They're adding support for one OS format. You won't be getting code with your RealOne player, unless it's to satisfy the minimum distribution conditions for Ogg.

      $25? Enjoy your spyware! Too bad you don't know that it can be downloaded for free, they just make that link hard to find on their site.

      It's predictable to see another little karma whore shout "hooray for Open Source!" without knowing the facts.

    2. Re:Open Source wins again by mmurphy_helix · · Score: 4, Informative

      RealNetworks will be releasing the Helix DNA client software as open source in 88 days. This represents a media engine that can be used to build streaming media players. Today's announcement means that Ogg Vorbis support should be ready in time for RealNetworks' own open source release. For more details, visit the Helix Web site! We're interested in collecting input on Helix and what we can do to work better with the open source community.

      --
      ----------
      Mark Murphy, Helix Community Manager
      CollabNet, Inc.
      http://www.helixcommunity.org
    3. Re:Open Source wins again by B.+Vhalros · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I'm pretty sure the author is trying to be sarcastic here. Am I wrong? Other repliers don't seem to be getting that.

    4. Re:Open Source wins again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Mark, until it's ALL open, don't waste your breath. Until I am free to decode and listen to a .ra stream without using that Real crap it's not open at all.

      Seems that "Open" is just another label dot-commers want you to believe but not think about. We're supposed to believe in a couple of new licenses cooked up by Real? Thanks but no thanks. There are plenty of licenses they could have used.

    5. Re:Open Source wins again by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Mark, until it's ALL open, don't waste your breath. Until I am free to decode and listen to a .ra stream without using that Real crap it's not open at all.

      Seems that "Open" is just another label dot-commers want you to believe but not think about. We're supposed to believe in a couple of new licenses cooked up by Real? Thanks but no thanks. There are plenty of licenses they could have used.


      Welcome to Slashdot, Mark.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:Open Source wins again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the OSS "community" could never build anything like the Real system by itself, I'd suggest you shut up, take what you're given, and be happy with it. Who the hell are you to be making demands?

    7. Re:Open Source wins again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll just say no to Real.

      Who am I? I'm the consumer, and I'm exactly the person that makes demands. Think about it retard!

    8. Re:Open Source wins again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RealNetworks will be releasing the Helix DNA client software as open source in 88 days

      Is Ogg haxor-talk for 088?

    9. Re:Open Source wins again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this truelly becomes open sourced, then surely it becomes possible to write a plunin for say Winamp or XMMS to cope with RA files (I mean without having RealPlayer installed first)?

      That would be my ideal anyway!

      Regards, Toonie.

  10. What?!? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've got a name like Ischo and you complain that Ogg Vorbis sounds stupid and embarrassing?!?

    1. Re:What?!? by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1, Redundant

      If I had mod points, I'd mod you +1 funny ... that was good.

    2. Re:What?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gesundheit! Oh, sorry.

  11. A geek format... damn cool, but a geek format... by RinkSpringer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When Ogg Vorbis 1.0 was released, I converted all my audio CD's to Ogg files. It looks as if the Ogg encoder is much faster than LAME with variable bitrate, but I haven't really compared them accurately.

    I fear the issue with Ogg Vorbis is that it is not as known as MP3. OK, so Unreal2 uses Ogg Vorbis... but do you honestly believe most gamers really read the manual, and especially the credits? I wouldn't think so.

    At my work, I told a few employees about Ogg Vorbis, and absolutely no one ever heard about it. Some even said: "Why would I want to use that? I have MP3 and it works fine!". They simply don't care about patents and such, they just want it to work...

    Based upon this, I fear Ogg Vorbis will only be used by geeks. Maybe when major software like Nero can instantly create Ogg files and not just MP3 files when saving tracks, it will be more known by the masses.

  12. no more Real Media by frovingslosh · · Score: 2
    Ever since RealOne... no. I used to use it quite often, but RealOne seem to have a bad habit of taking over my system.

    Amen! RealOne was enough to make me know that I'll never install another new RealMedia product. I uninstalled it and found and old RealMedial player I had downloaded a year or so ago and reinstalled that. If I come across something it will not play and other players also can't handle it I'll pass that content by.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:no more Real Media by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      sounds like you use windows.. the realone player for linux is really quite nice.. better than the thing they had out before. if you want to download it and give it a spin.. you can start off here Community forum /a

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
  13. Working on it... by Subliminal+Fusion · · Score: 1

    I'm involved in a beta test of a new product from Sonic|Blue, and one of the features I've requested is Ogg support (it probably won't make it into this product, but it is a possibility). I'm not alone in wanting it either, my motion was seconded by another beta tester.

    1. Re:Working on it... by Subliminal+Fusion · · Score: 1

      Considering it's more than 10% of the beta testers, it is somewhat significant. I personally am not interested in Ogg because it's open (although that's a benifit), I'm interested in it because it sounds better than an MP3 file of the same size.

    2. Re:Working on it... by farfolen · · Score: 1

      not to me...it sounds rather poor in quality to me. 192k/bit mp3 compared to a level 6 ogg.

      --
      werd to yo motha, muh nizzle.
  14. Good News for Ogg by GarfBond · · Score: 1
    This is the kind of market acceptance that can only prove to be good news for Ogg Vorbis. Now, if I wanted to, I could rerip my entire MP3 collection into Ogg, using CDex to rip and now either Winamp or Real to play. I hope this also indicates RealNetworks is truly interested in open source and not just trying to hype things up.

    Now if only my MP3/CD Player, one from iRiver, would support Ogg anytime soon I could have a complete solution.

    1. Re:Good News for Ogg by Azat · · Score: 1

      I've been hassling iriver for months about that with emails.... =(

      so far I have not heard much positive news. I always post their responses in http://www.hydrogenaudio.org . If you want to check them out.

      -Jeffrey

  15. Support for Vorbis on the RioVolt by paul248 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I sent an email to SonicBlue asking if they were planning on adding support for ogg vorbis on the RioVolt SP250 via a firmware update. I received the following response:

    Dear Valued Customer,
    Nothing in the works yet. Maybe in the future.

    Looks like I won't have portable oggs for a while.

    1. Re:Support for Vorbis on the RioVolt by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      I don't know the exact specification of the RioVolt but I would doubt it. A lot of portable players have a little chip that *ONLY* decodes MP3 and can't do anything else, and the other chip they use to drive the LCD, buttons, etc doesn't have the power to decode anything.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:Support for Vorbis on the RioVolt by Quikah · · Score: 2

      FYI Rio Volt decodes mp3 and wma so I don't hitnk it would be too hard to add ogg.

      --
      Q.
    3. Re:Support for Vorbis on the RioVolt by GarfBond · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sonicblue licensed the RioVolt design from iRiver for models SP-90, 100, and 250 (Don't believe me? Go to the link and look for the iMP-100 and 250 and look at the pictures. SP-90 is just a stripped down 100)

      In theory, all the iRiver and Riovolt players can be upgraded for Ogg support because of the flash firmware available on the players. One thing to note is that iRiver usually releases firmware much more frequently and much earlier than Rio does, so official Rio fw updates containing ogg might take even longer to release. However, rumor has it that iRiver is having trouble implementing Ogg support. Two reasons I've heard on the mp3.com message boards is that there's some floating point calculations involved or that they've run into legal troubles releasing the firmware (look for the reply by CrashWire). The first reason is plausible, although I don't know if that's the real reason. Can someone tell me if Ogg actually does go through some floating point calcs? The second reason sounds really really really doubtful since legal troubles is precisely what Ogg is trying to avoid.

    4. Re:Support for Vorbis on the RioVolt by Matty_ · · Score: 1

      I think it is entirely possible to get Apple interested in Ogg Vorbis and possibly have them included support for it in the iPod.

    5. Re:Support for Vorbis on the RioVolt by David+Gerard · · Score: 2
      "Can someone tell me if Ogg actually does go through some floating point calcs?"

      It sure does. This is a BIG problem with putting Ogg Vorbis in devices - while all personal computers these days have floating point, quite a lot of embedded processors don't.

      So if you're feeling all inspired, get to work on making the Vorbis decoder integer-clean!

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    6. Re:Support for Vorbis on the RioVolt by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      FYI Rio Volt decodes mp3 and wma so I don't hitnk it would be too hard to add ogg.

      I recall reading some place that .wma is just a one off from mp3s and that it is nothing much special, likely all integer decoding as well. Was that integer decoding library thing for ogg ever worked out?

    7. Re:Support for Vorbis on the RioVolt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So SonicBlue is out of the nasty "customer business." It looks like they've finally got a good .com business plan.

    8. Re:Support for Vorbis on the RioVolt by Skuto · · Score: 2

      >It sure does. This is a BIG problem with putting
      >Ogg Vorbis in devices - while all personal
      >computers these days have floating point, quite a
      >lot of embedded processors don't.

      The example reference implementation does for ease of understanding, but you can do without just as well.

      --
      GCP

  16. Pocket PC support? by astrashe · · Score: 2

    I just looked around for something that would let me play ogg files on my Jornada, but I couldn't find anything. Does an application to do this exist?

    I use my jornada as my portable audio player, even though it's not really very good as an MP3 player. If there was an app out there, I could switch to ogg without any trouble.

    1. Re:Pocket PC support? by ironhide · · Score: 2, Informative

      I play oggs on my jornada with the latest pocketdivx. You should try the movie clips at pocketmatrix also, ofcourse you can also capture your own tv-programs to watch them on the road.

  17. Re:A geek format... damn cool, but a geek format.. by paul248 · · Score: 1

    I thought geeks used Nero, and everyone else used Easy CD Creator.

  18. Re:Ahh, but you forgot one thing.... by RadioheadKid · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Based upon this, I fear Ogg Vorbis will only be used by geeks.
    Many people are listeners not rippers. Geeks are the most efficient rippers and propagators of music. Many people don't care what format to which they are listening, as long as it plays in their favorite player. I send files to my friends in Ogg Vorbis format. The first time I sent them, I attached the Winamp plugin. Now, you don't even have to do that, it's included. One of my friends said that he hates when he finishes listening to one of the songs I sent to him and then the next song is an mp3, he realizes how bad a lot of his mp3's sound.

    Now not having a portable Ogg Vorbis player is a whole different story...

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  19. Re:A geek format... damn cool. by Telastyn · · Score: 2

    Oddly enough I heard nearly the same exact thing about mp3's 6-7 years ago...

  20. Thanks for not taking it personally! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    If you knew my name, you'd bounce it right back at me :-)

  21. Re:A geek format... damn cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was before anything like it existed. *now* we have MP3 already. Ogg is nothing special over that. If it was 10x better like mp3 was 10x better than wav or au as a storage format well then something might happen. But the two cases just are not the same.

  22. better analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    avi/divx

  23. ROFL!!!...mod up +5 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    classic...

  24. Very easy by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    What format do you think people will choose after hearing a few Ogg songs and seeing that they get much better quality than MP3 in less space? Hard disks might be cheap, but even with my quite decent 40GB disk I have to delete stuff every few months. Same for players, on a larger scale because there's less space available. Basically the choice with them will be filling it with lots of tiny songs that sound like crap, or have that same amount as Ogg with a very decent quality.

  25. Re:A geek format... damn cool, but a geek format.. by David+Gerard · · Score: 2
    Some even said: "Why would I want to use that? I have MP3 and it works fine!". They simply don't care about patents and such, they just want it to work...

    The evangelism tack to take here is that Ogg makes much smaller files for better quality. Like, 70% of the space. So they can fit a lot more on their hard disk, if their interest is their CD collection.

    If their interest is filesharing, then obviously that's not going to work as well. But with WinAmp and Real supporting Oggs out the box, people will be able to use .ogg files they find. And if your favoured filesharing network doesn't have .ogg as an audio format, be sure to let the developers know!

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  26. Another delay for Theora?... by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2

    Dagnabbit, I've somehow managed to develop a completely irrational impatience to see an "official" implementation, or at LEAST an official spec, for a reasonably free-as-in-speech video-in-ogg format, and now that Ogg/Vorbis 1.0 is out, I was hoping they'd get a chance to get at least a creaky alpha version of the VP3 code and ogg mux'er out Real Soon Now...but instead [from the press release]:

    the Xiph.org Foundation will begin immediate work on the Ogg Vorbis plug-ins.

    Another distraction....

    Hopefully, the potential for Theora to be used in RealPlayer/Server will spur some development on it soon, too. People are starting to get impatient, and unnofficial video-in-ogg is already appearing which may or may not be "compatible" with the official one, if it ever comes out....

    1. Re:Another delay for Theora?... by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is already some maintainance work going on with the VP3 code, but you are right - converting the code over to use the Ogg framework will take a little time.

      The projected timeframe at the moment is to have everything ready by next summer.

      Writing a Vorbis plugin for Real will not serious impact this work ... it's not particularly hard to write a plugin :)

  27. LAME advocate new to Ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After seeing this thread I just made my first ventures into the Ogg world. After long advocating lame --r3mix and the lame --alt-preset insane, I have to say that Ogg sounds good at about half the file size at 128kbps. I'm so new I'm not quite sure what settings are used. I believe it is just a '-q 4' flag. Try it, you'll be impressed. If '-q 4' isn't sufficient for your needs, try '-q 6'.

    1. Re:LAME advocate new to Ogg by farfolen · · Score: 1

      at level 6 quality i still thought a 192 mp3 was better. anymore than q6 and the point of ogg is moot. btw the q6 ogg was bigger than the 192 mp3

      --
      werd to yo motha, muh nizzle.
  28. Congrats OGG! by turnstyle · · Score: 1

    Score one for the good guys. I'm pleased to say that MP3 jukebox thingie was listed at the Vorbis site long before the good news hit. It couldn't happpen to a nicer fish. -Scott

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
  29. Holy Sh*$ by systemaster · · Score: 1

    I really never bothered learning much about ogg vs. mp3...I got a few mp3 around of songs I have to have, singles basically. I'm not like some with 1000+mps ......BUT the page you linked to with the comparison between ogg and mp3 WOW!!! Am I impressed, I have both ogg .wav's and the MP3 .wav looping in winamp.....(the .wav's are decompressed from each file format) If these examples are real....I'm going to start burning and moving everything over to ogg.

    --
    LinuxWorx
    Spelling errors are intentional as are gramatical error
  30. Don't like ogg vorbis? by Cyno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's fine. You've all read about the recent Forgent JPG thing. So you know that patented formats such as MP3 could easily be licensed for a reasonable fee. If you want to pay that fee then feel free to continue using MP3s. But don't complain when, in a few years, you find yourself converting hundreds of gigs of MP3s to some other format to avoid licensing costs and to maintain compatibility. You've been warned!

    1. Re:Don't like ogg vorbis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patents can come from seemingly nowhere. Ogg could be "infringing" on some unknown stupid patent at this moment. There isn't any guarantees against that. Until we throw out software patents (unlikely), all software developers have to live with that unhappy situation.

    2. Re:Don't like ogg vorbis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US$15,000 minimum per year for each and every software developer is hardly reasonable.

  31. Re:A geek format... damn cool, but a geek format.. by sacrilicious · · Score: 2

    All we need is fraunhofer to assert patent rights over mp3 the way Forgent is asserting patent rights over jpeg. This stuff DOES happen, and perhaps the mere possibility of it happening will lead to the eventual wide adoption of Vorbis.

    .

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  32. Hardware Support? by philovivero · · Score: 2

    Does anyone have a list of Ogg hardware players?

    I have a "Riovolt" MP3 player that plays fullsize CDR-W's and has a good interface. I'm happy except for whatever ungodly WRONG reason it plays WMAs and not Oggs (okay, because the Ogg was not 1.0 at the time).

    Now I'm very interested in hardware that has upgradeable firmware and has at least some plan to support Ogg in the future.

  33. funny little man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey funny little man, you funny little man, just call it ogg. That's what I do.

  34. Oggs by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    The format is Ogg. Vorbis is just the codec. So if you have multiple Ogg files, you have Oggs. Just like if you have multiple LAME-encoded MP3s, you have MP3s.

  35. Winamp support is crucial by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    The fact that it's included in Winamp now is I think one of the most important factors for Ogg's adoption. I used to encode only in mp3, because when I sent files to a non-computer-literate friend, it'd be a pain in the ass to also send the Ogg plugin, explain how to install it, all the while being asked why my files can't be played by default Winamp like normal MP3s can be, etc. Now if I send an Ogg and they can't play it, I just say "your version of Winamp is too old; upgrade to the newest one," which is a concept even the most tech-illiterate person understands.

  36. Re:A geek format... damn cool, but a geek format.. by OneFix · · Score: 1

    You know what's gonna convert everyone...

    Multiple channels (254 is the limit I think) eventually with an almost limitless bit rate (currently 640kbps I think)...what this means is cheap and easy encoding of say 5.1 sound or a "poor man's" DTS. When cheap (sub $200) DVD-Rs become widely available, I expect to see this as the CODEC of choice for all non MPEG-2 video for that very reason.

    It increases the size of the file, but as time goes on, size becomes less relevant.

  37. Problems with OGG by evilviper · · Score: 1

    While I've heard that OGG 1.0 sounds much better than the RCs, I haven't had a chance to hear it myself... In their infinite wisdom, they've decided that only Linux users get the privlidge of using Ogg. For any other platform, it has to be ported, for no good reason.

    Secondly, Ogg is under the GPL (and the libs under the LGPL). That's reason enough to prevent a great number of people from using it in their applications. Read this post that explains quite well why standards and the GPL are mutually exclusive. The fact that the libs are LGPL'ed is an improvement, but still not good enough for many applications where Ogg could get wider support.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Problems with OGG by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 2
      Secondly, Ogg is under the GPL (and the libs under the LGPL).

      The Ogg and Vorbis libraries are under a modified BSD licence, *not* GPL or LGPL. Very early versions were GPL, but this was changed at least 18 months ago.

      Please pick some other FUD to spread - this one isn't valid any more.

    2. Re:Problems with OGG by evilviper · · Score: 2
      Fine, my mistake. So the libs are under a BSD style license. That doesn't change the fact the the rest is under the GPL, or that their software won't compile on any platform other than Linux, without porting it...
      Please pick some other FUD to spread
      No FUD here. I'm a user of Ogg myself. I just happen to be concerned, and disappointed by their actions.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Problems with OGG by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      > That doesn't change the fact the the rest is under
      > the GPL

      What's your point? Portable players won't use ogg123 anyway.

  38. Press Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Real Networks, near Chapter 11, noting the failure of last week's attempt to woo the linux community with the promise of "open source", tried again with the promise of "ogg vorbis".

    Real Networks, a software company that manufactures spyware, sees great promise from it's forthcoming zero-income products.

  39. From The RealONE License. Glad I didn't accept it by Cardhore · · Score: 2

    REALNETWORKS, INC. END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT REALNETWORKS PRODUCTS REDISTRIBUTION NOT PERMITTED Software License for RealOne Player

    AUTOMATIC COMMUNICATIONS FEATURES.

    a) The Software consists of interactive Internet applications that perform a variety of communications over the Internet as part of their normal operation. A number of communications features are automatic and are enabled by default!!! By installing and/or using the Software, you consent to the Software's communications features. Once you log into the Software, user information including your user id will be sent in communications with RN's servers. This information is used to access your regular account, premium content, non-premium content, services, features, and other personalized services. RN may match the user id to personally identifiable information in order to provide you with products, services, and software that you're entitled to and to provide you with relevant information. You are responsible for any telecommunications or other connectivity charges incurred through use of the Software!!!

    b) Cookies: The Software also allows the use of cookies....

    c) AutoUpdate: The RealOne Player, using AutoUpdate, automatically communicates with RN's servers on the Internet to check for updates to RN's and RN partner's software, such as bug fixes, patches, enhanced functions, missing plug-ins and new versions. AutoUpdate also has the capability to run independently of RealOne Player to perform background update checks. RN may download updates during the background checks, when RealOne Player automatically communicates with RN's servers, when you manually check for updates, or when RealOne Player detects a file it does not support. AutoUpdate sends information about installed RealNetworks' products and components to the servers to determine upgrade availability. If you prefer to be notified when an auto-update is performed, follow these steps: On the Tools menu, select Preferences, AutoUpdate, and then de-select "Automatically download and install software updates." However, as we describe above, certain updates to RealOne Player functionality will happen automatically and without advance notification!

    d) Message Center: The RealOne Player software, using Message Center, automatically communicates with RN's servers to check for new important messages, including software updates and service bulletins. Message Center can also run independently of RealOne Player to perform background new message checks. Message Center sends information about installed RealNetworks' products and components to the servers to allow receipt of suitable product update and other messages. Message Center is set by default to show message headlines and to check for messages once or twice a week. You can change the way messages are displayed and the frequency messages are checked by following these steps... If you sign up for services that send messages more often than the frequency you have selected, your frequency selection may be adjusted!

    7. SCHEDULER. An application Scheduler, known as "evntsvc.exe," is installed along with RealOne Player. Once installed, it runs independently of RealOne Player....

    8. DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ("DRMs"). a) The Software includes a DRM called the RealSystem Media Commerce Update Software ("Media Commerce Software") and may include third party DRMs as Plug-in components, which are subject to their own license agreements. DRMs are designed to manage and enforce intellectual property rights in digital content purchased over the Internet. You may not take any action to circumvent or defeat the security or content usage rules provided or enforced by either the DRM or the Software. DRMs may be able to revoke your ability to use applicable content. RN is not responsible for the operation of the third party DRM in any way, including revocation of your content. RN is not responsible for any communications to or from any third party DRM provider, or for the collection or use of information by third party DRMs. You consent to the communications enabled and/or performed by the DRM, including automatic updating of the DRM without further notice, despite the provisions of AutoUpdate defined in Section 6(c). You agree to indemnify and hold harmless RN for any claim relating to your use of a third party DRM. b) Content providers are using the digital rights management technology contained in this Software to protect the integrity of their content("Secure Content") so that their intellectual property, including copyright, in such content is not misappropriated. Owners of such Secure Content ("Secure Content Owners") may, from time to time, request RN or its suppliers to provide security related updates to the DRM components of the Software ("Security Updates") that may affect your ability to copy, display and/or utilize the Software. You therefore agree that, if you elect to download a license from the Internet which enables your use of Secure Content, RN or its suppliers may, in conjunction with such license, also download onto your computer such Security Updates that a Secure Content Owner has requested that RN or its suppliers distribute. Unless notification is provided to you, RN and its suppliers will not retrieve any personally identifiable information, or other information, from your computer by downloading such Security Updates. c) The Media Commerce Software allows you to receive and playback content that has been digitally secured by a content provider. The Media Commerce Software interacts with your computer in the following ways: 1. Hardware information: In order to download the appropriate software, RealOne Player must send certain anonymous information about the hardware on your computer to the RealNetworks download server. Once the software is installed, information about your hardware will not be stored on any server. Hardware information will also be sent for content passes, as described below. 2. Content passes: When obtaining passes for playback of content (such as a music or video file) in RealOne Player, information about your specific Media Commerce Software installation and hardware will be sent to the content provider for inclusion in the pass. This installation and hardware information will be scrambled a different way each time it is sent, usable only for inclusion in your pass. 3. Personal information: Media Commerce Software will not associate itself with any personal information in RealOne Player or anywhere else on your computer. RealNetworks' use of any personal information is governed by the RealNetworks privacy policy (http://www.realnetworks.com/company/privacy/index .html). RealNetworks does not share with third parties any personal information you provide in connection with our products without first obtaining your informed consent. 4. Financial information: Media Commerce Software does not interact with the process of secure financial transactions, e.g. credit card transactions. These transactions are handled by the website providing the content and are governed by that party's privacy policy. 5. Usage information: RealNetworks may keep statistics on the aggregated anonymous use of the Media Commerce Software. However, content partners using the Media Commerce Software will not provide RealNetworks with information on specific content for which an individual user obtains passes.....

  40. GIF dithering makes it lossy by yerricde · · Score: 2

    What are you talking about? GIFs are not lossy

    The standard mode of Compuserve GIF(tm) with Unisys LZW(tm) Technology supports only 256 colors. To squeeze a 16-bit or 24-bit image into 256 colors requires a lossy operation called "color quantization." This can produce either banding (if no dithering is used) or noise that cannot be compressed (if error diffusion dithering is used).

    You can actually get more than 256 colors in a GIF image, but you have to use multiple-image GIF to first draw a 16-color preview image, then add 255 new colors in each subsequent frame. That's OK for low-end high color (1K to 4K colors), but don't count on doing 24-bit true color that way.

    PNG supports up to 48-bit color, compressed with zlib. The MNG extension supports everything in PNG plus animation and JPEG sprites (the latter to be removed if Forgent has its way).

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:GIF dithering makes it lossy by modecx · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe it's splitting hairs, but I gotta say it anyway, even at the risk of being pendantic... GIF *compression* is actually lossless. Ok, so the format may not be able to support more than 256 colors normally; this much is true. However, LWZ compression (which is used in GIF) is quite similar to that used in the zip archive format. Heck, PNG even uses GZip. Pretty darn similar. Is using a text compressor the most efficient way to compress an image? I'll leave that one for someone else to decide..

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    2. Re:GIF dithering makes it lossy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gzip works pretty well, doesn't it? Not just for text, either.

      Of course there are probably better ways to do lossless compression for images...

    3. Re:GIF dithering makes it lossy by modecx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, gzip can do great things to compress something, especially if there's some sort of pattern in it. Text, being the human readable thing that it is, normally has a ton of patterns. Naturally, something designed to compress word patterns would be especially good at that task, and that task only. Not that gzip is only good at doing text, because there's many applications for gzip. Computer binaries, for example, have many many data patterns. In fact, most everything a computer does has patterns. They're good at doing just that: very repatitive stuff, that humans could or would not want to do.
      Images often have patterns as well, just not in the same way that text does. JPEG and MPEG use certian techniques to exploit those patterns, and can also just plain throw some of that information away. Perhaps they will do some anti-aliasing to make the changes the algorithms have made look less mangled.
      If, perhaps, one could devise an algorithm that efficiently represented graphical data (patterns) as some sort of text with lots of patterns, then theoretically a compressor good at text compression could do lossless compression of images efficiently.
      The problem is, there's already a bunch of ways to compress image data pretty well, beit lossless or not. I don't personally think such a method would be in demand, or processor efficient enough to expore, though.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  41. IE supports PNG as well as it supports GIF by yerricde · · Score: 1

    the biggest browser of all, Internet Explorer, has broken alpha support! That's one of the biggest reasons why GIF isn't dead yet.

    IE 5.x and later correctly support binary alpha channels in indexed PNG images. It just has problems with the deeper alpha channels used in grayscale and true-color images. Given that transparent GIF images are also indexed and also use binary alpha, I don't see any difference between IE's transparent PNG support and IE's transparent still GIF support that would preclude use of PNG images in web site graphics.

    On the other hand, unlike Mozilla, even IE 6 does not support animated PNG images, which are called MNG. This is the real reason why PNG hasn't taken off on the web, because it can't be used to deliver animated advertisements.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:IE supports PNG as well as it supports GIF by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      But that was what I was talking about. IE has broken support for full alpha!

    2. Re:IE supports PNG as well as it supports GIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IE has broken support for full alpha!

      I think what yerricde was getting at was that you don't really need full alpha to Burn All GIFs on your web site.

  42. Re:A geek format... damn cool, but a geek format.. by uhoreg · · Score: 1
    If their interest is filesharing, then obviously that's not going to work as well.

    Sure it will. Smaller files -> faster download times.

    --

    To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

  43. Real Audio Player sux so much that by Don'tBAWank! · · Score: 0

    most experienced users refuse to have it on their machines at all. Just b/c they are including OV doesn't mean their Player won't suck anymore and stop freezing up machines.

  44. r3mix by yerricde · · Score: 1

    If you're concerned about sound quality, you are not listening to compressed audio of any sort.

    Tell that to the r3mix team, who achieved transparent reproduction of audio using the LAME MP3 encoder at under 192 kbps.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  45. No, JPEG2000. by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Of significant irony is that JPG itself may soon be revoked as a standard (lame software patents tick me off), and PNG *appears* to be the only legitimate replacement candidate.

    PNG is not a legitimate replacement because it doesn't have any frequency-domain quantization support; it supports color quantization only in the spatial domain, which isn't as efficient. Spatial color quantization (i.e. dithering to 8-bit) can't go much lower than 4 bits per pixel after the lossless phase.

    Try JPEG2000 (.jp2). Those who have claimed IP on JPEG2000 have agreed to license their patents royalty-free. And this time, ISO has probably learned its lesson and isn't going to let anybody sell a patent to a third party such as Forgent who plans to terminate the royalty-free license.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:No, JPEG2000. by Mhrmnhrm · · Score: 1
      And this time, ISO has probably learned its lesson and isn't going to let anybody sell a patent to a third party such as Forgent who plans to terminate the royalty-free license.
      Just because they don't intend to doesn't mean it isn't going to happen. How long did it take Forgent to realize it even had a possible patent claim... 10 years? More? As to the rest of your comment, that's getting nitpicky. It's good enough for the general net-surfing populace. Who cares if the picture grows an extra 5% because it lacks a certain dithering algorithm? Compared to the massive growth (and IP problems) that would come from using GIF or BMP, the lack of your pet quantizer is largely irrelvant. Perv Sixpack on his wimpy dialup won't notice the extra 2 seconds it takes to download porn with PNG, but will scream bloody murder for the minute involved with GIF (Though admittedly, this could be useful in accelerating the growth of broadband, a whole new can of worms). JP2 would be nice, but I've yet to see it in the wild.
      --
      I suspect that one of these choices is incorrect. Correct.
  46. Re:FUD by szap · · Score: 1
    In their infinite wisdom, they've decided that only Linux users get the privlidge of using Ogg. For any other platform, it has to be ported, for no good reason.
    If you've been bothered to look, you'd easily find this page, where there's plenty of binaries for Linux/Unix, Windows, Macintosh and BeOS.

    As for the GPL/LGPL argument: we've already a hardware player, lots of software players/editors with plugin support for the ogg/vorbis... It's the "marketshare" that's holding it back more than anything.

    Bah, I should stop feeding the troll.
  47. Fixed-point Ogg Vorbis decoder by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Was that integer decoding library thing for ogg ever worked out?

    Xiph.org finances development of Ogg media technology by selling shared-source licenses for a proprietary fixed-point Vorbis decoder. (Fixed-point math is an approximation to floating-point math using the integer arithmetic instructions of a DSP.) But now that Ogg Vorbis 1.0 is out and that the help file contains the complete Vorbis audio layer I specification, you'll probably see a couple fixed-point ports of Xiph.org's reference decoder pop up on the usual sites.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  48. Ogg Vorbis embarrassing? Try living with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a name like Darth Vadar. Or Fu Manchu? Ogg is an interesting name and that makes it appealing and actually, pretty damn easy to market. Why's that, you say? Well, because Ogg Vorbis can just about mean any damn thing you want it to.

  49. Some IDEAS for Ogg developers by adixon01 · · Score: 1

    Can we actually turn ogg past mp3 by including a checksum verifier that tags each file and can tell if you have the full version of a file. EX if i rip "Blah's greatest hits" and put it on a file sharing server, could it have a way of saying that everything is there when a person get the files. Also start a database of known ripped items. This would eliminate bad song files. Can we make the format more complete than a better than mp3 mp3? Also start a native file sharing system that would be otimized for the OGG format and support TRUE "Streaming" while saving, etc and would mask user information so file sharing would turn back to it's Total Anonyomus state. EX open the software, type in the artist, it goes to the artist database, sends a request to other unknown users with a IP and it would send the file to the ip in a special protocal. See, it's somewhat of a central server, except for the only information it has is IP's and it dosent handle downloads, it simply takes a code for a file and sends it out to other clients and tells their software to send the file to the User. simple filesharing, but if implemented could be better than gnutella (similar) but less bloated and more precise.

    1. Re:Some IDEAS for Ogg developers by Ziviyr · · Score: 2

      Can we actually turn ogg past mp3 by including a checksum verifier that tags each file and can tell if you have the full version of a file.

      If Ogg doesn't already have something of the likes built in it should be pretty trivial to add an MD5 metadata tag for the Vorbis part of the stream.

      I think.

      So it'd just be a matter of support for it.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:Some IDEAS for Ogg developers by NiGHTSFTP · · Score: 1

      There is no way to tag a file with "this file is complete" flag. Even if there was, the RIAA would definately abuse that with their 30-second-silence-looping fucked up songs.

      As for generating a "unique code" for each song, to identify it, try making SHA-1 hashes of files. Make a website that hosts a list of "trusted users" and they can personally identify a list of "good"(complete, good sounding) songs.

      As for gnutella, this could be implemented fairly, well... effectively.

      My thread here: http://www.gnutellaforums.com/showthread.php?s=a49 327a287617c86cb56c1fc7065a4f2&threadid=10745

      I've gone as in-depth with it as I'd ever cared to. If you can get a hold of Sajma, and/or you are also a major gnutella player who wants to implement it... consider getting a hold of him.

      ---
      "Also start a native file sharing system that would be otimized for the OGG format"
      ---

      You completely lost me there.

      ---
      "See, it's somewhat of a central server, except for the only information it has is IP's and it dosent handle downloads, it simply takes a code for a file and sends it out to other clients and tells their software to send the file to the User"
      ---

      Gee whiz! This is a great Idea! I want to give it a name though.. *hmm* how bout "Supernodes". Does that sound good? :)

      ---
      "...mask user information so file sharing would turn back to it's Total Anonyomus state. EX open the software, type in the artist, it goes to the artist database, sends a request to other unknown users with a IP and it would send the file to the ip in a special protocal"
      ---

      Its 3 am. I dont feel like commenting anymore.

      A good up-and-coming filesystem, that will probably scale better than gnutella, and is much more secure: http://www.filetopia.org

      Think of filetopia as a mixture of gnutella, direct connect, and a whole lot of clients into one :) Its prietty neat, just needs more than its current 1000 active member userbase.

      --
      http://www.angryburrito.com/ The best, completely unfinished software review site ever.
  50. Real spyware by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Informative

    If your using windows, and you want to disable real spyware, this is how you do it. Ever wonder why real player gives you updates when you tell it not to run on startup?

    Registry Key Location:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\W indows\Curr entVersion\Run
    Key Name: TkBellExe
    Value: C:\Program Files\Common Files\Real\Update_OB\evntsvc.exe -osboot

    delete evntsvc.exe, everything will still function fine.

    1. Re:Real spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, Real puts that line back in the registery every time its started. At least it does on my system.

    2. Re:Real spyware by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      nothin a little shell script couldn't fix! oh, windows....

  51. Huh ? by Smthng · · Score: 1

    I'll bite.

    In theory, how would one go about using this information ?

    All I see is a three letter code associated with each album.

  52. AAAAAHHHHHH!!!!! by Augusto · · Score: 2


    Ummm, lets see... ads, schlock-talk, drive-time crud, ads, more ads, still more ads, and every now and again, some piece of top-40 junk.

    Music is most likely NOT the #1 thing transmitted over FM radio signals.


    Oh boy, what now, you're going to post statistics telling us what's the most transmitted information over FM? His point was simple and he made it, this level of nitpicking usually means you've got nothing to contribute and it's time to shut up.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  53. Games using mp3 do NOT require $ for license by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Games using mp3 do NOT require $ for license. You read right. MP3 for games does not require a payment for the license, just use it. Check Thompsons if you doubt.

  54. Re:FUD by evilviper · · Score: 2
    there's plenty of binaries for Linux/Unix, Windows, Macintosh and BeOS.
    Yes, Binaries... Most likely much patching has taken place to get those binaries built. I'm talking about platforms that the source compiles on, without the need to independently port it.

    Their "Linux/Unix" section only means "Linux", and it might as well be labeled that way. It will not compile on anything else without porting and patching.
    we've already a hardware player, lots of software players/editors with plugin support for the ogg/vorbis...
    Most software players that include Ogg support are GPLed anyhow (and often Linux only).
    It's the "marketshare" that's holding it back more than anything.
    My contention is that the license is helping to hold back marketshare. Besides, the lack of portability of their software sure doesn't help.
    Bah, I should stop feeding the troll.
    I wouldn't be posting at +2 if I was a Troll. My Karma wouldn't be at the max, if I was a troll.

    Is it just that you (and the user that moderated down my original post) just dislike any messages that don't reflect your own view?

    If you don't like it, call it a Troll.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  55. What makes you REALLY think ogg is patent-free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes you REALLY think ogg is patent-free? It can very easily be tied up in the courts for a very, very long time, at any time, and then where will you be? Pick your medicine: mp3, a known and clean format, or ogg, a complete unknown, and not for hi-fi use anyway.

    1. Re:What makes you REALLY think ogg is patent-free? by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 2, Informative
      What makes you REALLY think ogg is patent-free?

      Two seperate patent searches: one paid for by Xiph itself, and another paid for by AOL which had to pass before they would allow the Vorbis encoder/decoder into Winamp.

  56. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Yes, Binaries... Most likely much patching has
    > taken place to get those binaries built. I'm
    > talking about platforms that the source compiles
    > on, without the need to independently port it.

    Nope. It's easily compiled with MSVC, ICL, and GCC under Cygwin.

    > Their "Linux/Unix" section only means "Linux",
    > and it might as well be labeled that way. It
    > will not compile on anything else without porting
    > and patching.

    Nope. Vorbis-tools compiles cleanly out of the box in Linux, FreeBSD, and OpenBSD. I'm sure others as well, but these are the platforms I've personally tried.

    > Most software players that include Ogg support
    > are GPLed anyhow (and often Linux only)

    How about the DirectShow filters that add OGG support to WiMP? :)

  57. Re:A geek format... damn cool, but a geek format.. by Wavemaker · · Score: 0

    "Everyone else" has switched to Nero by now... Easy CD Creator is actually harder to use than Nero, with those wizards that instead of helping make things more confusing.

    I think everyone knows the difference between an Audio and Data Cd by now...

  58. what about OGG support in QuickTime? by Miska · · Score: 1

    with Apple high on 'open standards'
    one could always hope.

    --
    -
  59. Re:Ahh, but you forgot one thing.... by zapfie · · Score: 2

    Most MP3 decoders suck. Try listening to MP3s through MAD and see what you are missing.

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  60. Re:Ahh, but you forgot one thing.... by RadioheadKid · · Score: 2

    The encoders are the biggest factors. There are still people encoding with Blade or old Xing encoders. Yuck, really bad. Lame is the only way to go. Yes, I'm very familiar with MAD and it's a great project, hopefully Rob will make a great fixed point Ogg Vorbis decoder too, now that the spec. is published.

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  61. Uh, this is a good thing? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not going to rehash the several posts from before that explain in detail why Real sucks. It does. That's a fact.

    To think that it's a victory for OGG that another 'mainstreme' app supports it is assinine.

    All this means is, if you have to install Real for certian media, it will take over the file extension and it will take that much longer to load and that much more tracking of your online habits.

    We need to stop cheering whenever some big, sloppy crappy application takes a shine to an otherwise good format, and start enjoying the format as it stands.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  62. Re:A geek format... damn cool, but a geek format.. by David+Gerard · · Score: 2
    >If their interest is filesharing, then obviously that's not going to work as well.

    Sure it will. Smaller files -> faster download times.

    I mean in terms of critical mass of users, and of program defaults. A lot of filesharing apps and networks either don't share .ogg at all as yet, or don't recognise it as an audio format by default.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  63. Probably Not. You're the Subject Line *Troll*. by SubjectLineTroller · · Score: 0
  64. What about the BBC ... by dunstan · · Score: 2

    ... who were trialing Ogg earlier this year (and still have ogg feeds up from time to time). They have taken stick in the GB press for adopting Real as their primary format for streaming (because Real player decides to take over granny's computer, etc.).

    If all the people who've sacrificed their computers to Real Player could listen to ogg feeds with just an automatic codec update, then it would strengthen the case of those inside the Beeb promoting "free" formats.

    Dunstan

    --
    The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
  65. PNG is 5x bigger than JPG for photos by yerricde · · Score: 1

    How long did it take Forgent to realize it even had a possible patent claim... 10 years?

    Forgent bought a set of patents. Eighteen months later, Forgent legal realized 1. that one of its patents covered JPEG, and 2. that the company was not party to any contract mandating royalty-free licensing. ISO members must license patents that cover ISO standards under RF or RAND terms. The previous owner of the patents was an ISO member; Forgent isn't.

    Who cares if the picture grows an extra 5% because it lacks a certain dithering algorithm?

    Not 5%. 500%.

    the lack of your pet quantizer is largely irrelvant.

    You don't understand. The human visual system converts received images partially to the frequency domain. Without a quantizer that works on data in the frequency domain (such as JPEG's DCT followed by integer division), you're not going to be able to store images efficiently.

    won't notice the extra 2 seconds it takes to download porn with PNG, but will scream bloody murder for the minute involved with GIF

    GIF and 256-color PNG use similar technology (uncompressed palette data, then lossless Lempel-Ziv* compression of color indices) and produce similar file sizes to within 10%. A 24-color PNG is in essence a gzipped 24-bit BMP file.

    * PNG uses Deflate, a variation of LZSS, an LZ77 (window based) algorithm. GIF uses LZW, an LZ78 (dictionary based) algorithm.

    /me goes to work on his own pet wavelet project, based on prior art

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. Ogg Vorbis by Sir_Stinksalot · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tried this listening test. Man I am doing it right now and I am awed by the quality of the ogg vorbis compression. On one of the tests 3 were obvious compression artifacts and 2 I couldn't determine which was the compressed one and which was the real one. Both of those ended up being ogg formats. If the highs in the song are fairly constant with some busy lows like in blackwater and flooressence it seems that the other compressions fail miserably but ogg shines through. Great work vorbis dudes. When my band releases some of its new songs on the net they will be in ogg format.

    --
    "We can no longer live as rats... we know too much." -Secret of NIMH
  68. Re:FUD by evilviper · · Score: 2
    Nope. It's easily compiled with MSVC, ICL, and GCC under Cygwin.
    Cygwin might as well be regarded as Linux. Windows native is really a complete port (not just a result of writing portable code) so it very well may have taken a great deal of tweaking, just by the developers, not the end users.
    Vorbis-tools compiles cleanly out of the box in Linux, FreeBSD, and OpenBSD.
    You sure as hell could have fooled me. I could have sworn it was a FreeBSD box right in front of me here that won't compile the ogg-vorbis-1.0 libs to save it's life. Not only does 1.0 not compile on FreeBSD, but previous versions NEVER worked (without porting) on OpenBSD either.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant