Slashdot Mirror


Trident Back From the Dead

FunkyMonkey writes "It seems that Trident is trying to pull a Matrox and resurrect themselves from the 3D video card grave yard. AnandTech posted a Trident XP4 Preview today that has some interesting information on Trident's latest stab at the graphics market. The company is claiming 80% the performance of the GeForce 4 TI 4600 at a price tag of less than $100 USD including DX 9 support. How? A 0.13 micron process and only 30 million transistors thanks to pipeline resource sharing. "

225 comments

  1. Who's next? by saintlupus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh, goody. I can't wait to see some next generation products from Hercules, Cirrus Logic, and S3.

    "Now Non-Shitty!"

    --saint

    1. Re:Who's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S3 announced its new mobile and standalone parts in May. AlphaCrome for mobile, SavageXP for desktop -- same Zoetrope core jointly developed with Via.

      Cirrus Logic really IS dead, though. They sold off their graphics assets to a small company that specializes in winding down products.

    2. Re:Who's next? by 13Echo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually,

      Hercules is one of the biggest manufacturers of current video cards. They are using the latest nVidia (maybe not for long), ATi, and PowerVR chips in their boards. They were purchased by Guillimot a few year back and have been making some excellent products. In my opinion, they were the pioneers of high quality video boards when the nVidia GeForce series started to take off. Recent connections with ATi and PowerVR though have soured the nVidia relationship.

      Cirrus Logic is currently making some of the best audio DSPs in the business. You can see (hear) their chips in the Turtle Beach Santa Cruz, Hercules Game Theatre XP, and a few others. Most operate on a dual chip DSP setup that allows a lot of control for audio spatialization, and their reference design for boards based on the CS4630 was designed with quality in mind. Currently, they also create DSPs for a lot of integrated devices, including portable MP3 and WMA players.

      S3 on the other hand, still blows, and always will. "SIGHT! SOUND! AND SPEED!" They still have a lot of the cheap OEM integrated market, especially after being purchased by VIA Tech. But that still doesn't make the Savage series any more than pumped up S3 ViRGE chips. It remains to be seen how their Alpha Chrome and Savage XP chips hold up.

    3. Re:Who's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But that still doesn't make the Savage series any more than pumped up S3 ViRGE chips.

      Savage4 is _still_ the only graphics chip on the consumer market that gives true trilinear filtering with no performance impact (in essence, for free).

    4. Re:Who's next? by ottawanker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh, goody. I can't wait to see some next generation products from Hercules, Cirrus Logic, and S3.

      I have an ISA VGA Trident Video Card in my Linux router. It has 256k of video memory, and let me tell you, when I used to use it on a Windows 2000 server, it used to take 5 seconds to redraw the page.

      BUT, on a related note, it is still working, and has been working for almost 10 years straight. Much better than the Radeon that I bought 2 years ago, which has now been moved to by web server, because it only works half the time. Trident makes cards that may not be quick, but they are pretty cheap, and seem to last forever. Never had a problem with one. If I'm looking for a video card for a server, I don't want to have to spend $60-80 on an ATI card. I want a $30 Trident card.

    5. Re:Who's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG does S3 really have a chip called "Savage XP" ?

      WTF? I hope they didn't pay the marketing jerkoff that came up with that.

      Do all your eXtreme Programming on windows XP using a fast Athlon XP and a new Savage XP. And much better driver support than Nvidia's Detonator XP drivers.

      Would someone please copyright "XP" so we can stop this marketing madness!

    6. Re:Who's next? by jred · · Score: 2

      I never had a problem w/ the Virge line (well, other than their multihead non-friendlyiness). It got the job done for ~$25.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    7. Re:Who's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a GeForce 2 MX for that these days. The S3 is shit for anything more than 800x600 16bit, too.

    8. Re:Who's next? by jred · · Score: 2

      I'm actually using a Geforce2MX DH Pro, that has dual-head built in. That's on my main system. I couldn't tell you what video cards are on my servers. SSH...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    9. Re:Who's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's no lie. Ever since the ViRGE chips, everything from S3 has had this nasty issue with hogging the PCI bus, and interfering with sound devces and other things. Anything over 800x600x16 acts weird.

  2. Trolling back from the dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    fp, ham-hog

  3. Dear Sir, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Please fuck me in the ass, for I have FP'd.

    Thank you.

  4. Trident 8900 by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My firewall is blustering along using a ISA Trident 8900 : You can't fault them for making low quality products.

    Having said that, this preview has no hardware, and hence no benchmarks or qualitative/quantitative reviews. This is nothing more than market fluff at this point.

    1. Re:Trident 8900 by ADRenalyn · · Score: 1

      well ergo98 is probably right, this is just marketing fluff at this point. However, I doubt that Andandtech would post a review on something that was complete speculation. In any case, it is always good to have more competition... Even if Trident can't compete with Nvidia and ATI for the high-end consumer cards, they can still have a place for those that don't play video games or need a lot of texture memory. As long as their hardware quality holds out and the drivers are somewhat decent, this can't really be a bad thing. Just my opinion though.

    2. Re:Trident 8900 by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 3, Funny

      In breaking news, market fluff has been found to have super-conductive capabilites.

      This substance, also known as corporate BS (cBS2) is available almost anywhere where products are sold. Due to its ready availability and near-infinite supply, specialists are looking into its computing usages.

      Marketing fluff has long been known to transfer information at a very great rate, often causing the specs of a product to arrive before the product itself is created. This, using the theory of relativity, means that the cBS2 is transfering information at a rate greater than the speed of light, making it the fastest transfer medium that has been found up to this point.

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    3. Re:Trident 8900 by topham · · Score: 4, Funny

      yes i can. Their old 256K cards, upgradable to 512K had such a slow memory/DAC combination that the frequency required to support the card was below that of almost any monitor available on the market at the time.

      I choked when I had to replace the card. Replaced it with an ET4000 card. (Only problem with Et4000 was its allergy to PCI-ISA bridge chipsets.).

      For an ISA card it was damn fast.
      (Tridents response to me when I asked about the frequency problem was 'Go buy a new, 1Meg video card'. I did... it just wasn't a trident.)

    4. Re:Trident 8900 by Quixadhal · · Score: 2

      Heh.

      My file server (no X11, no monitor) has an Nvidia Geforce 2MX... hey, it was already in the barebones system I used as a base to start from!

    5. Re:Trident 8900 by smash · · Score: 1
      Hehe...

      My freebsd firewall box (has a monitor tho that runs the "fire" screensaver) has a 64meg Geforce 2 MX.

      My question is this:

      Wouldn't it be cool to be able to use the video ram as some sort of harddisk cache, or swap? Plenty of bandwidth... and its about 64mb - 64kb more video memory than I need in that box ;)

      Comments?

      smash

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    6. Re:Trident 8900 by Gruturo · · Score: 2

      My home server/gateway (Firewall, DHCP, etc etc) has no video card at all. Once I installed it, I removed the AGP SiS 6326, and, apart from a couple beeps then it starts up, it works just fine. Lilo and Linux talk to COM1, the only thing I can't do is enter the BIOS, but WGAF.
      Went thru many kernel upgrades and reboots and never missed the monitor, also because it sits in a tiny closet where I can't hear its noise and a screen+keyboard wouldn't even fit in that place.

      On the other hand, I *do* appreciate that it eats a couple Watts less, gives off less heat, and I really hope someone builds an AGP Gigabit Ethernet card someday, since that's the only free slot left :-)

      --

      Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
    7. Re:Trident 8900 by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't it be cool to be able to use the video ram as some sort of harddisk cache, or swap? Plenty of bandwidth... and its about 64mb - 64kb more video memory than I need in that box ;)

      now *this* is an idea worth looking into. tired of sharing your system RAM with your video card? turn the tables.

      before you know it we'll have bootable floppies which require only 1 MB RAM and a fat video card, creating a VRAMFS slice and going to work.

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    8. Re:Trident 8900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The idea is brought up occasionally on Slashdot. I don't know whether it's true or not, but apparently it's difficult and slow to get the graphics card RAM back to the motherboard. It's all tuned for output to the screen.

      Not that it can't happen.

    9. Re:Trident 8900 by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      The idea is brought up occasionally on Slashdot. I don't know whether it's true or not, but apparently it's difficult and slow to get the graphics card RAM back to the motherboard. It's all tuned for output to the screen.

      Not that it can't happen.


      It's mapped in memory just like regular memory. At least it was last time I checked...With todays tech, who the hell knows. Maybe only the card gets to see the memory...

      --
      It's been a long time.
    10. Re:Trident 8900 by joerg · · Score: 1
      Anything is possible:

      The german computer magazine ct distributes a program to test your computer's RAM. It is loaded into video memory and executed from there, so it can write into the entire RAM without crashing.

      Download from here.

  5. oh boy.... by jormurgandr · · Score: 1

    another cheap videocard that promises a level of performance it cannot acheive.

    The last time I saw trident was on a Packed Bell computer, if thats any indication of quality.

    1. Re:oh boy.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "The last time I saw trident was on a Packed Bell computer, if thats any indication of quality. "

      Remember dudes, everything is constant. Nothing ever changes, even if many years have gone by.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:oh boy.... by jormurgandr · · Score: 1

      how is that an "unrealistic extreme"? I was stating a fact, how does that make me a shithead?

    3. Re:oh boy.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      That was my sig, not directly aimed at you. Nor do I think that applies in this case. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:oh boy.... by mxmissile · · Score: 1

      must have a short fuse

    5. Re:oh boy.... by jormurgandr · · Score: 1

      I see, says the blind man peeing into the wind. Sorry for the misunderstanding, I think I've had too much coffee this morning. Time for a cup of Bawls!

    6. Re:oh boy.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      No worries man. I changed my sig anyway, I've had other people make a similar mistake. Slashdot's not very good about beating people over the head with sigs. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  6. Bend over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    here it comes again...
    Loser.

    1. Re:Bend over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Hmm.. you have no penis. Why is this?

  7. Trident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would *not* recommend Trident to anybody who is in the market. It is sugary and rots your effing teeth right out of your god damn mouth. I would instead go with Wrigley's Extra instead. Also Wrigley is a very moral company and they named the baseball field in Chicago. Please to be thanking you.

    1. Re:Trident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my my my, is that so

    2. Re:Trident by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      I thought Trident was sugar-free?

    3. Re:Trident by NeuroChrist · · Score: 0

      don't 4 out of 5 dentists recomend Trident to their patients who chew gum?

    4. Re:Trident by mekkab · · Score: 2

      yep, it's sugar free, and saccharin rich!
      4 out of 5 dentists would recommend it to their gum-chewing patients, and it may reduce the risk of tooth decay.

      I know, I have a cinnamon value pack right in front of me.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    5. Re:Trident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See I'd have to disagree with that. For me, Tridents meet and usually meet or exceed my impaling needs. True, swords usually inflict a deeper wound, but the 3-for-1 value of a trident can be a really useful feature.

    6. Re:Trident by theFool · · Score: 1

      Actually, in this news.com Article, the fifth dentist finally caved!! Guess the stalkers finally got to him.

      --
      LINK : LNK6004: Sig not found or not built by the last incremental link; performing full link
    7. Re:Trident by Oztun · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Yeah the cancer will kill you before your teeth have a chance to decay!

    8. Re:Trident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I prefer a net with my trident. It may lack the sophistication of modern-day weapons, but no opponent of mine has yet found an answer to a quick sweep of the net and a quick thrust of the trident. 4 out of 5 Gladiators surveyed recommended the trident and net over other Bronze age weaponry. Plus, it's a babe magnet.

  8. Chew on this... by phraktyl · · Score: 2, Funny

    We had a Trident card in the first 486 (SX33!) we had, and I remember thinking that I could probably get a faster display using Trident Gum...

    Hope they've changed things a bit.

    --
    Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
    1. Re:Chew on this... by kontos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the way I remember it, the gum might have been more expensive.

      --
      SM MBL-VIR looking 4 SIG 4 LTR. must be DDF, no 420, SD ok.
  9. Oh nooo!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Stay dead, you evil bastard! Stay dead!!!

    *ahem*

    Yes, sir. I ownded a Trident, too.

    1. Re:Oh nooo!! by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

      Clato Berate Nic *Choo*

      There, I said it, I said the words.
      *Grabs the Necronomicon and books*

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    2. Re:Oh nooo!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha! +5 for the critter/Jason-won't-die reference.

      Great!

      Too bad I can't vote.

  10. POS by baldass_newbie · · Score: 0, Troll

    FWIW, the Trident I have/had (975 3D Image AGP) sucked big-time.
    4MB RAM and lines at 1024?!?!? WTF?
    But it came with my no-name machine and I'm about to pawn it off on my brother (poor bastard.)
    Needless to say, this release is underwhelming.

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
  11. LL Cool J is Hard as Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Node:Top, Next:Introduction, Previous:(dir), Up:(dir) #======= THIS IS THE JARGON FILE, VERSION 4.3.1, 29 JUN 2001 =======# This is the Jargon File, a comprehensive compendium of hacker slang illuminating many aspects of hackish tradition, folklore, and humor. This document (the Jargon File) is in the public domain, to be freely used, shared, and modified. There are (by intention) no legal restraints on what you can do with it, but there are traditions about its proper use to which many hackers are quite strongly attached. Please extend the courtesy of proper citation when you quote the File, ideally with a version number, as it will change and grow over time. (Examples of appropriate citation form: "Jargon File 4.3.1" or "The on-line hacker Jargon File, version 4.3.1, 29 JUN 2001".) The Jargon File is a common heritage of the hacker culture. Over the years a number of individuals have volunteered considerable time to maintaining the File and been recognized by the net at large as editors of it. Editorial responsibilities include: to collate contributions and suggestions from others; to seek out corroborating information; to cross-reference related entries; to keep the file in a consistent format; and to announce and distribute updated versions periodically. Current volunteer editors include: Eric Raymond esr@snark.thyrsus.com Although there is no requirement that you do so, it is considered good form to check with an editor before quoting the File in a published work or commercial product. We may have additional information that would be helpful to you and can assist you in framing your quote to reflect not only the letter of the File but its spirit as well. All contributions and suggestions about this file sent to a volunteer editor are gratefully received and will be regarded, unless otherwise labelled, as freely given donations for possible use as part of this public-domain file. From time to time a snapshot of this file has been polished, edited, and formatted for commercial publication with the cooperation of the volunteer editors and the hacker community at large. If you wish to have a bound paper copy of this file, you may find it convenient to purchase one of these. They often contain additional material not found in on-line versions. The two `authorized' editions so far are described in the Revision History section; there may be more in the future. * Introduction: The purpose and scope of this File * A Few Terms: Of Slang, Jargon and Techspeak * Revision History: How the File came to be * Jargon Construction: How hackers invent jargon * Hacker Writing Style: How they write * Email Quotes: And the Inclusion Problem * Hacker Speech Style: How hackers talk * International Style: Some notes on usage outside the U.S. * Lamer-speak: Crackers, Phreaks, and Lamers * Pronunciation Guide: How to read the pronunciation keys * Other Lexicon Conventions: How to read lexicon entries * Format for New Entries: How to submit new entries for the File * The Jargon Lexicon: The lexicon itself * Appendix A: Hacker Folklore * Appendix B: A Portrait of J. Random Hacker * Appendix C: Helping Hacker Culture Grow * Bibliography: For your further enjoyment Node:Introduction, Next:A Few Terms, Previous:Top, Up:Top Introduction This document is a collection of slang terms used by various subcultures of computer hackers. Though some technical material is included for background and flavor, it is not a technical dictionary; what we describe here is the language hackers use among themselves for fun, social communication, and technical debate. The `hacker culture' is actually a loosely networked collection of subcultures that is nevertheless conscious of some important shared experiences, shared roots, and shared values. It has its own myths, heroes, villains, folk epics, in-jokes, taboos, and dreams. Because hackers as a group are particularly creative people who define themselves partly by rejection of `normal' values and working habits, it has unusually rich and conscious traditions for an intentional culture less than 40 years old. As usual with slang, the special vocabulary of hackers helps hold their culture together -- it helps hackers recognize each other's places in the community and expresses shared values and experiences. Also as usual, not knowing the slang (or using it inappropriately) defines one as an outsider, a mundane, or (worst of all in hackish vocabulary) possibly even a suit. All human cultures use slang in this threefold way -- as a tool of communication, and of inclusion, and of exclusion. Among hackers, though, slang has a subtler aspect, paralleled perhaps in the slang of jazz musicians and some kinds of fine artists but hard to detect in most technical or scientific cultures; parts of it are code for shared states of consciousness. There is a whole range of altered states and problem-solving mental stances basic to high-level hacking which don't fit into conventional linguistic reality any better than a Coltrane solo or one of Maurits Escher's `trompe l'oeil' compositions (Escher is a favorite of hackers), and hacker slang encodes these subtleties in many unobvious ways. As a simple example, take the distinction between a kluge and an elegant solution, and the differing connotations attached to each. The distinction is not only of engineering significance; it reaches right back into the nature of the generative processes in program design and asserts something important about two different kinds of relationship between the hacker and the hack. Hacker slang is unusually rich in implications of this kind, of overtones and undertones that illuminate the hackish psyche. But there is more. Hackers, as a rule, love wordplay and are very conscious and inventive in their use of language. These traits seem to be common in young children, but the conformity-enforcing machine we are pleased to call an educational system bludgeons them out of most of us before adolescence. Thus, linguistic invention in most subcultures of the modern West is a halting and largely unconscious process. Hackers, by contrast, regard slang formation and use as a game to be played for conscious pleasure. Their inventions thus display an almost unique combination of the neotenous enjoyment of language-play with the discrimination of educated and powerful intelligence. Further, the electronic media which knit them together are fluid, `hot' connections, well adapted to both the dissemination of new slang and the ruthless culling of weak and superannuated specimens. The results of this process give us perhaps a uniquely intense and accelerated view of linguistic evolution in action. Hacker slang also challenges some common linguistic and anthropological assumptions. For example, it has recently become fashionable to speak of `low-context' versus `high-context' communication, and to classify cultures by the preferred context level of their languages and art forms. It is usually claimed that low-context communication (characterized by precision, clarity, and completeness of self-contained utterances) is typical in cultures which value logic, objectivity, individualism, and competition; by contrast, high-context communication (elliptical, emotive, nuance-filled, multi-modal, heavily coded) is associated with cultures which value subjectivity, consensus, cooperation, and tradition. What then are we to make of hackerdom, which is themed around extremely low-context interaction with computers and exhibits primarily "low-context" values, but cultivates an almost absurdly high-context slang style? The intensity and consciousness of hackish invention make a compilation of hacker slang a particularly effective window into the surrounding culture -- and, in fact, this one is the latest version of an evolving compilation called the `Jargon File', maintained by hackers themselves since the early 1970s. This one (like its ancestors) is primarily a lexicon, but also includes topic entries which collect background or sidelight information on hacker culture that would be awkward to try to subsume under individual slang definitions. Though the format is that of a reference volume, it is intended that the material be enjoyable to browse. Even a complete outsider should find at least a chuckle on nearly every page, and much that is amusingly thought-provoking. But it is also true that hackers use humorous wordplay to make strong, sometimes combative statements about what they feel. Some of these entries reflect the views of opposing sides in disputes that have been genuinely passionate; this is deliberate. We have not tried to moderate or pretty up these disputes; rather we have attempted to ensure that everyone's sacred cows get gored, impartially. Compromise is not particularly a hackish virtue, but the honest presentation of divergent viewpoints is. The reader with minimal computer background who finds some references incomprehensibly technical can safely ignore them. We have not felt it either necessary or desirable to eliminate all such; they, too, contribute flavor, and one of this document's major intended audiences -- fledgling hackers already partway inside the culture -- will benefit from them. A selection of longer items of hacker folklore and humor is included in Appendix A. The `outside' reader's attention is particularly directed to the Portrait of J. Random Hacker in Appendix B. Appendix C, the Bibliography, lists some non-technical works which have either influenced or described the hacker culture. Because hackerdom is an intentional culture (one each individual must choose by action to join), one should not be surprised that the line between description and influence can become more than a little blurred. Earlier versions of the Jargon File have played a central role in spreading hacker language and the culture that goes with it to successively larger populations, and we hope and expect that this one will do likewise.

  12. Ha, ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Penis is in your mouth.
    Now you see it.
    Now you don't.
    Taste my salty man juice.
    Bitch.

    1. Re:Ha, ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      So you mean to say that he literally ate it? Boy, when you homos do something, you go all out...

  13. for the damn brits by c0nfucio-licious · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    I was a victim of my own naivete, when, while extremely intoxicated, I walked into a tattoo/piercing parlor, horribly ignorant of the "we do surgery too!" sign above and to the left of me. An Overlooked detail and a bottle of Makers Mark; a cocktail of disaster when combined. Without hesitation, I, in a drunken stupor, mistakenly asked to have my LABIA pierced...now, given the fact that I am a male, the guy doing the piercing was understandibly concerned with my request. "You know, I am assuming that you're sure you REALLY want to go through with this procedure". "Just Do it, man!" I demanded. Now, first of all, It's one thing to go into his parlor drunk and mispronounce a simple word, but not knowing he was also a licensed plastic surgeon ....how could I possibly miss that little factoid? Well after I awakened from the anasthetics, the mirror I was facing reflected a dissappointing portrait of my lower half, exposing the unexpected, yet, terribly noticeable mutilation I had undergone. However, I was thrilled to know that I was still in posession of my previous anatomy, placed just so in a smuckers jar filled with ice and water. I apologized to the piercing guy and explained to him that it was a silly misunderstanding, and that I was in desperate need of my previous extremities. We laughed, and laughed. Afterward the doctor surgically replaced my reproductive organs. In a display of common hospitality, he let me keep the labia I briefly sported for good luck....I even got it to hang on my neclace for a while, just like a keepsake! I never did get around to piercing my labret, though.

    --


    "someone should make a hot air balloon that is shaped like a giant vagina" -- Bill Clinton
  14. Not a DirectX 9 part by wpmegee · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Trident XP4 isn't a DirectX 9 part, as the headline says Trident claims that they have a DirectX 8.1 GPU. Anyway, even if it was DX9 compliant, it would only meet the Vertex Shader specs and not the pixel shader specs (2.0 is DX9, 1.4 for DX8.1).

    For that matter, no current processor has the fill rate necessary to comply with the Pixel Shader 2.0 specs, except possibly the Radeon 9700, which isn't yet available for benchmarking.

    And while the specs are good for an entry level part, count the number of launch partners-zero.

    1. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by motardo · · Score: 1

      I wish DirectX wasn't the way people compared their cards to, I'd much rather see OpenGL specs, since I never play with DirectX (since I run with dual celeron 533's, DX runs like total crap)

    2. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by T3kno · · Score: 2

      Amen to that. Why is a proprietary system the de facto standard for rating a video cards worth. Some work should be done to create a truly open video standard and pull the rug out from under MicroSoft.

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    3. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by be-fan · · Score: 3, Informative

      But the Radeon 9700 is available for benchmarking. Benchmarks are on the anandtech site.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by motardo · · Score: 1

      just an FYI, they dropped the uppercase S a while ago from their name.

      I really do wish that there were open standards across the boards, but I don't see it ever happening when Microsoft has such a big share of windows gamers.

    5. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just an FYI, they dropped the uppercase S a while ago from their name.

      Microoft?

    6. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by mczak · · Score: 2, Interesting
      For that matter, no current processor has the fill rate necessary to comply with the Pixel Shader 2.0 specs
      Are you sure of that? AFAIK there are no requirements at all about fill rate which must be satisfied to comply with ps 2.0 specs. You are probably refering to the 16 textures per pass which a chip must be able to do to be dx9 compliant, but this has nothing to do with fill rate. You can easily build a 100Mhz, single pipe, single TMU (must be able to do 16 loopbacks) GPU which is DX9 compliant with a paltry fillrate of 100MPixels/s (and also 100MTexels/s).
      mczak
    7. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason for the comparison to DirectX 9 is because there are solid standards to compare. You can talk about DirectX 9, and talk about how you need to have support for 16 texture layers, or floating point color, or displacement mapping. OpenGL's version system is much more nebulous, and talks more about extensions than hardware. If the OpenGL ARB came up with solid rules for OpenGL, such as being 2.0 compliant requiered that your card had hardware support for xxxx and xxxx, then I'm willing to bet that you would see OpenGL mentioned at least a bit more. In the mean time, Microsoft is in a better position to have standards compared to.

    8. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's Microsoft you twit

    9. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by Ted_Green · · Score: 0

      I like Microoft.
      Good onomonopia

    10. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by motardo · · Score: 1

      how about MicroFUD?

    11. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      1. Because most people use Windows and DirectX.

      2. Each version of DirectX has a clearly defined set of functions whereas OpenGL has the core spec, generic extensions, and vendor specific extensions. Which makes a better bullet point on a package? Full DX9 support, or OpenGL 1.4 compliant with support for ARB_***, NV_***, etc. (listing all extensions).

      This is mainly just for cards aimed at the gamer market. Check out the info on some higher end cards like FireGL or Quadro. They really tout the OpenGL capabilities on those cards because they are aimed at the 3D Developer/Designer segment.

    12. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by CaseyB · · Score: 3, Funny
      Big sticker on front of box:

      "HEY KIDS!! Now with GL_NV_OCCLUSION_QUERY and GL_NV_VERTEXT_ARRAY_RANGE2 support!"

    13. Re:Not a DirectX 9 part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I don't see anyone bitching when people use Quake to benchmark it. It must hurt Epic's Unreal in the same way DirectX hurts Linux.

  15. Nothing wrong with a little competition... by altgrr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With ATI and Nvidia taking the lion's share of the market, but putting their main publicity on their top-end products, it wouldn't be unusual for a not-quite-so-high-end graphics chip to find its way into a lot of cheaper systems. If the performance is reasonable, I should think it'd be a welcome addition to the tiny Shuttle computers, for example.

    --


    Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
    1. Re:Nothing wrong with a little competition... by gmack · · Score: 2, Troll

      I take it you have never had to deal with trident.

      Trident has been known for sucky performance and bad quality hardware.

      I really don't miss them.. I hope they spend a fortune on this and go bankrupt or something.

    2. Re:Nothing wrong with a little competition... by 13Echo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Trident has their ties with all sorts of markets... Most of which are video. This is not strictly PC based. Their chips are in HDTVs and small devices, among other things. They make decoders, display adapters, and other ICs for DVD players and every thing else.

      You won't see them going anywhere any time soon. If they were exclusivly doing chips for PCs, then maybe, but that isn't the case.

    3. Re:Nothing wrong with a little competition... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      You're right. And their cards used to cost $30. If the card fails, for $30, you'd get another one. It would still be Cheap.

      If you didn't want to deal with that, you could spend $100 on your graphics card. You are apparently not in Trident's target market. If you had a head on your shoulders, you would never have dealt with them at all. Otherwise, you would have been happy to save the $70.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  16. God Gave Rock and Roll To You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Lameness filter encounteLameness filter encountered. Post aborted!Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! Reason: Please usLameness filter encountered. Post aborted!adsf jfkalsdfjasiodfj asdlkfasifdoapsf d Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.e fewer 'junk' characters.asdf sdffgth njh k yuk ujkhj Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.red. Post aborted!Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!c 2343 5345 45656768790 567 45 Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters. Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.

  17. talk is cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    And Trident is making cheap chips. They surely can talk.

  18. Their Name by scott1853 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think they'll be able to live down the stigma associated with their company name. They probably should have come back under a different name to at least show that they've changed a little. It was such a disgrace having a trident card or built-in chipset in your computer back in the day.

    1. Re:Their Name by aengblom · · Score: 2

      I don't think they'll be able to live down the stigma associated with their company name.

      I don't know. I like there gum. I havn't tried any of their other products, but it couldn't have been that bad

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    2. Re:Their Name by Fuyu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Trident has always been known for their video cards that have been well liked by OEMs and your average consumer because of their budget prices.

      From the article, "If you sliced the desktop graphics market into 4 different sectors ( $300) you'd realize that the largest volumes would be in the sub-$100 range, and that's exactly what Trident is targeting with their XP4."

      Trident is going after the market where they can sell the most volume of video cards and if they can really deliver on 80% of the performance of a GeForce4 Ti 4600, it will be well worth it.

    3. Re:Their Name by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      That stat is coming from the company and not independant benchmarking. I'm a little skeptical. I think it would be more reasonable to assume that it might reach 80% of a GeForce4 MX, unless they're counting on the driver doing all the real work and it's running on a dual 2.5GHz CPU.

    4. Re:Their Name by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 0, Troll
      probably should have come back under a different name

      probably wont help, because people would recognize them by their lousy drivers. ill be damned, sliced and burned if i ever again spend a single cent on a piece of *hit designed by someone who claims to have three teeth, prongs or similar protrusions. the drivers they wrote looked a lot more like three brain cells.

      i owned 2 different trident cards in my life - i gave both to people i really hate.

      learn from the past - dont take history!

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    5. Re:Their Name by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Funny, but I don't remember Trident having a bad reputation. Where does this come from?

      All cards manufactured during that time frame were slow. You can't pull a card from 10 years ago and expect it to compete with today's accelerated 3D cards. They just didn't exist back then. Sure, Trident's cards made back then are slow today. But they are reliable and do the basic job of delivering a signal to the monitor well.

      Given the technology they have to work with today, their past vision would be welcome.

    6. Re:Their Name by crimoid · · Score: 2

      Trident wasn't sexy, but they made decent low-end video cards. No hype, no fuss, you got what you expected... a basic, no frills video card.

    7. Re:Their Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I remember actually being *proud* when I replaced my 512K Oak Technologies card with a 1MB Trident 8900. Afterwards, games and demos ran a little bit faster on my beloved 386.

    8. Re:Their Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back then, "graphics card speed" meant simply just how fast you could access the video memory over ISA bus.

      And trust me, Tridents were slow (I upgraded from whatever slow horrible Trident to Tseng ET4000 on my 386/25 at one point). IIRC, the raw video memory speed more than tripled. And for a program (mostly games/demos) that has to draw the entire screen all the time (like Doom or Wing Commander), that could mean the difference between playable/unplayable.

      And of course Windows was be really slow with slow video memory access and no acceleration features on the graphics card, so that processor had to do all the drawing byte by byte...

    9. Re:Their Name by Oztun · · Score: 2

      Yeah if it ran Doom and Wolfenstien that meant it was a good card. There really wasn't much else to it back then.

    10. Re:Their Name by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2, Funny

      The parent is *not* a troll. I've wasted too many hours trying to get dipshit trident drivers to work. Why anyone would buy their stuff when you can get a perfectly good ATI 64meg AGP board for about $70 I don't know.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    11. Re:Their Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I upgraded from whatever slow horrible Trident to Tseng ET4000 on my 386/25 at one point

      Moron.

      When people upgrade their hardware to the next level, I'd hope there would be a speed increase. Its silly to bash an earlier generation of technology.

      This is like saying Hayes was crap, because my cablemodem beats the hell out of their 300 baud modems. Duh...

  19. Good luck, they'll need it... by sterno · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The graphics market boils down to two major markets:

    1) OEM's
    2) Gamers

    Gamers will likely pay the premimum to get that extra 20% of performance. Also, the NVIDIA name carries a certain assurance that it's all going to work well.

    As for OEM's, harder to say. One the one hand you've got some systems where the goal is being cheap and you go for an integrated chipset. Then on others the goal is best performance and thus the premium for 20% becomes worthwhile. There's a middle there, but I don't know how wide that middle is.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Good luck, they'll need it... by Builder · · Score: 2

      Also, the NVIDIA name carries a certain assurance that it's all going to work well.

      Yeah. It'll work great. Until you want to play games in something kinder on the eyes at 60Hz refresh rate on 2K or XP. Then you'll find that they're a pile of shite!

    2. Re:Good luck, they'll need it... by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      The OEM market is where it will hit, if anywhere. Usually, gamers build PC's. They might not put the parts in themselves, but they spec it out (to some extent).
      OEM on the other hand, is a completely different animal. Most OEM builders want good parts, but not great parts. I could easily spend $4000 on a pc, but a $1200 pc sounds much nicer to the masses, as long as the processor has a high number, the graphics card has the going ram on it, and it's Internet Ready, guess which one you're going to sell.
      Take a look at any mass-marketed PC ad in the paper, and you'll see only 32 or 64 mb graphics card listed, and not the make and model.
      The last PC's I bought had Asus V7100 cards in them. In an office where most desktops sit at 8X6, it's overkill. But that was the bottom rung. If they had 4meg PCI's for sale, I would have bought those.

      Solitare doesn't need hardware acceleration!

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    3. Re:Good luck, they'll need it... by Joe5678 · · Score: 0

      The thing that companies are just starting to notice is that the Gamer market controls the OEM market. ATI has found that out the hard way. A couple of years ago they had something like 70% market share in OEM machines. Their cards were decent for the OEM user, but crap for gamers. So if OEM users don't care what name is on their video card, why should ATI loose any market share right?

      Well it turns out that when gamers scream nothing but NVIDIA for two years, even though the OEM ATI cards are fine for what they do, they OEM's start throwing in NVIDIA MX cards left an right.

      By the look of ATI's new line of cards, they have finally turned their downward spiral around and seen that before OEM's will use your low end cards, you have to prove you are the FPS king.

    4. Re:Good luck, they'll need it... by eggz128 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, ATI cards suffered the same problem (at least they have similar tools to fix the problem).

      Anyway, heres a link that offers some solutions (for ATI ,nVidia and others).

    5. Re:Good luck, they'll need it... by Drogo+Knotwise · · Score: 1

      You forget what most OEM's do on "best performance" PCs: make it appear high-end by sticking big numbers and famous brand-names on it, disregarding the small matters of performance and stability.

      Dell offers "PENTIUM 4 2.53 GGHz!!!!! w/ 533 MHz FSB!!!!" computers, with "(256 MB PC2100 DDRAM)". What use is the added bandwidth and MHz when you have so little and so slow (comparitively) RAM.

    6. Re:Good luck, they'll need it... by Surak · · Score: 2

      That's right ... and besides, there's already a card with 80% of the performance of a GeForce 4 TI 4600 for $100, its called the GeForce 4 440MX. :-P

  20. The Problem with Crap Floods...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    ....is that they are so much fun

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.

  21. PLEASE STOP OFFENDING PEOPLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Take your homosexuality elsewhere. God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. People like you should be castrated.

    1. Re:PLEASE STOP OFFENDING PEOPLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If i had mod points this would be at like score +1000. people hate scripture but that does NOT mean that it is not true.

    2. Re:PLEASE STOP OFFENDING PEOPLE by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're assuming the existance of a god or gods here. Not just any god or gods, but YOUR god. You are taking it for granted that everyone else here is christian. I am offended.

      Besides, this is the internet, an place for idea sharing and tolerance. Perhaps people like YOU should be castrated, simply so they don't reproduce and create MORE little biggots.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    3. Re:PLEASE STOP OFFENDING PEOPLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Besides, this is the internet, an place for idea sharing and tolerance. Perhaps people like YOU should be castrated, simply so they don't reproduce and create MORE little biggots."

      Yeah ...

    4. Re:PLEASE STOP OFFENDING PEOPLE by maj12_lovebuzz · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Bwahaha...love it when heathen, atheist cornholes lecture the masses on the evils of their ways. Get stuffed.

    5. Re:PLEASE STOP OFFENDING PEOPLE by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Thank you for making my point.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  22. Marketing stratagey 101 by carlcmc · · Score: 2

    1. Make card slower than competition 2. Charge less little for it 3. .... 4. Profit! Our card is slower than theirs but you should use it anyway!

    1. Re:Marketing stratagey 101 by telstar · · Score: 4, Funny
      2. Charge less little for it
      • Less little? Is that anything like more gooder?
    2. Re:Marketing stratagey 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Southpark reference. (I think I'm the only one who noticed.)

    3. Re:Marketing stratagey 101 by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "1. Make card slower than competition 2. Charge less little for it 3. .... 4. Profit! Our card is slower than theirs but you should use it anyway!"

      The cheapest pricewatch price for a GF4 Ti4600 is $280.

      The entry price of the Trident card is $99 (or so the article says.)

      So would you by a card that has 20% less performance than a GF4 Ti4600 and 65% (or better) less cost? Maybe not. But would you put one in your kids' machine or kid brother's machine who has been whining about wanting a 3D upgrade so they can play Max Payne?

      Cha-ching! Cash for Trident from your wallet.

    4. Re:Marketing stratagey 101 by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      1. Make card 80% as powerful as competition.
      2. Make card cost 1/3 of the competition's.
      3.Sell cards like crazy because few people want to spend >$200 on the video card alone.
      4. Profit!

      Most people are satisfied with the performance of a mid-range video card, and 80% of a high-end card for 30% of the price would be great for many of the "demanding" average users.

      Some people are happy with their graphics, even if they can't get 150 fps out of Quake III.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  23. Class 90/10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The taiwanese are very smart. Why spend billions on R&D when they can get 90% of the performance at 10% the cost? I believe the resurgence will be very noticeable this time, especially since companies like SiS (Xabre 400 chip - 90% performance of Ti 4200, 10% production cost) also make motherboard chipsets. Trident, being a long standing Taiwan chipmaker, probably has a natural advantage in striking deals to integrate their chip into m/b chipsets. This also explains why NVidia feels so compelled to make nForce. I think NVidia is smart enough to realize that these Taiwanese companies are a hell of a lot more stable and successful than they are, and that if they want to mirror tha success, they will have to also focus on integration to build product synergy and adoption.

    1. Re:Class 90/10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't both nVidia and ATI founded/run by Taiwanese immigrants?

    2. Re:Class 90/10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a huge difference between a Taiwanese company and one founded by someone with Taiwanese lineage.

      Is Microsoft a British company just because Bill Gates has British ancestry?

    3. Re:Class 90/10 by smyle · · Score: 1
      ... they will have to also focus on integration to build product synergy and adoption.

      Did you just pull that out of a Dilbert comic, or are you really a member of management?

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

  24. Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This article has been up on /. for about two minutes, and almost every comment so far has been, "Well I had a card from them that sucked, so everything else they do will suck too."

    Guess what? THOSE CARDS ARE YESTERDAY'S NEWS! Trident is making a different card with different chips and different circuits. They'll have different performance than the old cards!!!!

    Now the new card is going to be cheap, which makes me suspicious of its performance/quality. However, discounting is out of hand because their last card (or even every card before this one) is completely pointless and wrong-headed. Look at the card, and then decide if it sucks. Amazing that so many of you have to be told that.

    Lets also not forget that Trident did extremely well selling 'shite' cards. At one point there were more 8900 chips than any other single video chip in PCs at the time! Cheap, slow, but great where you just need a screen. (like my console server and my firewall, for instance)

    So get over the past.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off.. if they've always made shit products what makes you think they'll change. jerk.

    2. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by Enonu · · Score: 2

      Given no other data, past performance, no matter what the situation, is ALWAYS the best indicator for the future.

      I'm sure a lot of death row killers are also trying to CHANGE.

    3. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? because they sucked in the past, and suddenly said "oh yeah, we're going to change, we want to be a good company"

      i would rather go for a company that has been consistently good, they will most likely continue that trend, every company can release a bad product here and there. but at trident, thats what they do. so basically it doesnt matter if they are trying to change, their track record is much more of a factor.

    4. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by dattaway · · Score: 2

      I still have many old Trident cards. They all were reliable and did their job without fail. And I'm keeping mine, because they still have good utility.

    5. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Guess what? THOSE CARDS ARE YESTERDAY'S NEWS! Trident is making a different card with different chips and different circuits. They'll have different performance than the old cards!!!!

      Who else says this all the time...

      Oh wait a minute, a thought is entering my mind...

      "Windows XP -- The best windows ever!"

      The only way Trident can shake their past is to either change their name (sneaky) or release this product, ensure it lives up to their marketed performance, and release another. By the second or third release cycle I might buy it, because by then they'll have rebuilt their lost trust.

      Maybe. But I really doubt it. I expect to see their stuff in many more crappy PCChips and ECS boards to come, and I don't expect things to change all that much.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    6. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off.. if they've always made shit products what makes you think they'll change. jerk.

      Would you care to quantitize your scatological remarks into information that can be related to in the real world? I have done CAD work with Trident cards back in the old days. They never failed. Granted, cards back in those days did not have acceleration, but they were snappy compared to the competition.

    7. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Now the new card is going to be cheap, which makes me suspicious of its performance/quality."

      People say the same thing about AMD chips, but they're not exactly going out of business.

      But overall I agree with you ... we must look at a real non-vapourware card and benchmark it before slandering Trident.

    8. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Hmm. ATI's drivers sucked with the Radeon series, and guess what? They sucked with the Radeon 8500 as well! And they sucked back in the Rage 128 days also! S3 sucked back in the ViRGE days, and sucked more recently in the Savage days. Past history is a very good indicator of future performance. Its up to Trident to overcome their past history. Until then, they deserve the negative response they get.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    9. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have a rage128 and a savage, does that implement that i do suck?

    10. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by crazy-bones · · Score: 1

      Wow. What can you say to that? I didn't realize the passion involved with this. Sombody must have lost their first born. If thats the case I'm sure everyone supports you in your quest for vengence on Trident.

    11. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by smash · · Score: 1
      Heh amen.

      On the software side of things, anyone remember the shocking reputation that Codemasters used to have (C64 era - granted, they had a number of classics, but most of their games were shit)?

      Look at them now - arguably one of the best quality software houses around :)

      Times change people... ;)

      smash

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    12. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey moron, I bought a trident card last year. Part of the integrated video in my laptop. It still doesn't support full acceleration in any linux distribution. How can I support a company pretending to be a 3D player who won't even release specs to have their old 2D technology accelerated? You must like throwing your money away. This was a new laptop, off the shelf, designed for XP. Don't buy Trident or Toshiba! Until they do change and play a fair game as a hardware manufacturer.

    13. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      "This was a new laptop, off the shelf, designed for XP."

      And you're bitching because it doesn't work well...under Linux?

      Ah.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    14. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      "Past history is a very good indicator of future performance."

      True, with some caveats.

      "Its up to Trident to overcome their past history."

      Also true. (although their history is for making really really cheap cards which they in fact did fairly well)

      "Until then, they deserve the negative response they get."

      Not really. They deserve some suspicion certainly, but they don't deserve to be written off wholesale, sight-unseen. They deserve the chance to overcome their past, whether or not they can.

      For the record, ATI drivers for Solaris are flawless.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    15. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at your user number, it appears you created your account just to troll this article. Why?

      Trident was the graphics standard many years ago back when the ISA and VLB buses were the norm. If you wanted something that worked, Trident was the best choice. Other venders were pretty much proprietary and didn't conform to the SVGA standard.

      Take your crap somewhere else.

    16. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by Yakko · · Score: 1
      For the record, ATI drivers for Solaris are flawless.

      I'm betting the farm that that's because Sun writes the drivers.

      The OBP programmers need to optimize their little FORTH-based framebuffer code for the console... the scroll speed is VERY slow.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    17. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by be-fan · · Score: 2

      I don't see any Solaris drivers on ATI's website. Thus, Sun must be writing drivers. There is also nothing more recent than the Rage Pro Turbo. Even if ATI wrote those drivers (and they didn't) 3D back then was completely different. Hell, the Rage Pro didn't even do multitexturing!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    18. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      Many (Most? All?) of Sun's high end video cards are made by ATI currently. Sun and ATI co-write the drivers. These are not commodity cards, but they are commodity chips.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    19. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      Ummm...the display speed of the console is (more or less) fixed at 9600-baud. That's why it's slow.
      Once Solaris takes over, it can do whatever it wants, of course.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    20. Re:Hey Idiots! They're trying to CHANGE!!! by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Huh? Which ones? The only ones I could find are based on the old Rage chips. The new Sun cards (the Elite3d-lite and the XVR-1000) are based on 3D labs chipsets.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  25. Is it too late? by brejc8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Begs the question if it really is too late to get into the 3D graphics biz.
    I was at a presentations about asynchronous logic by a company who did some research into the area.
    They took the advantage of fast and fine grain asynchronous pipelines but by then nvidia was in the market and they claim they had no chance copeating with them.
    If trident can come out of the blue and make a card %80 of the speed of a gforce4 then maybe they and others gave up too early.

    1. Re:Is it too late? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      no, like all mature markets, you need something the others don't have. In the case of graphics cards, getting .13 or smaller is a huge benefit.

      when a market is mostly driven by one company, its vision can get narrow, nVidia say this, and is releasing video cards of different qualitys. this is a good idea, but there marketing has blown it with there naming, Now its confusing to know which one is the best without research.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Is it too late? by dan501 · · Score: 1

      when nvidia entered the market, 3dfx appeared to have it pretty sewn up.

      when mci entered the market, at&t REALLY had it all sewn up.

      when pepsi entered the market, coke appeared to have it pretty sewn up...

      if everyone assumes that the leader has it pretty sewn up, we'll end up with monopolies in all markets.

      --
      my livejournal is interesting and worth reading - I swear. I know everyone thinks their blog is interesting. mine is.
    3. Re:Is it too late? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      It's never too late for anything. Nvidia is just a company amongst others and even if they have fast chips, so what? People working there are just people, not gods, and it's not like they have all the designers in the world that are capable of doing 3D hardware. ATI already beats GF4 with R300.

      Not to mention, said NVIDIA wouldn't even be there if they would've shared the same mentality when 3dfx ruled the market almost alone.

    4. Re:Is it too late? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      If it was such advanced hardware, then they most probably would have had to sell it for a price that matches that advancedness (i.e. in the upper price segment, where NVidia & Co. are already), to get back their development cost.

      Now Trident does not go into that market segment, but into another one: Cheap cards which are fast enough for most.

      Of course, for hardcore gamers, nothing but the fastest is fast enough. But what the hell do I need a fast 3D card if almost all I do is moving 2D windows around, typing into 2D windows, clicking into 2D GUIs, and the only 3D program fired up on a regular basis is the screen saver? Even if you play a 3D game once every month, it will usually not justify the price difference to a upper price segment card.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  26. how? by CodeMunch · · Score: 1
    The company is claiming 80% the performance of the GeForce 4 TI 4600 at a price tag of less than $100 USD including DX 9 support. How?

    Usually in these situations, the marketing dept. designed the spec's for a less than wonderful implementation by the tech dept resulting in the usual h/w crud where we cringe at the mention of their name - cyrix, celeron, early AMD, Acer CDROM's, hellokitty, etc...

  27. Damn... by Brian+Goldman · · Score: 0

    I just can't think of any good chewing gum jokes.

  28. Penis Envy ; It's what's for dinner by BlackTriangle · · Score: -1

    What's the matter, pal? Your pencil dick not pleasing the ladies? You need to become a real Aryan man, Mr. "Made in Taiwan."

    1. Re:Penis Envy ; It's what's for dinner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be racist and perhaps grow up ;)

  29. Trident's aren't deald by lburdet · · Score: 0
    I have Tridents in my LRP routers (486) back home...
    The Hercules Monochromes are far from complaining of a whopping 2MB (?) video card they've got...

    it may have arguably been a bad card, but it's lasted forever, and that's a good thing(tm)

  30. 101 EASY WAYS TO SAY NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I'd love to, but...
    1 I have to floss my cat.
    2 I've dedicated my life to linguini.
    3 I want to spend more time with my blender.
    4 the President said he might drop in.
    5 the man on television told me to say tuned.
    6 I've been scheduled for a karma transplant.
    7 I'm staying home to work on my cottage cheese sculpture.
    8 it's my parakeet's bowling night.
    9 it wouldn't be fair to the other Beautiful People.
    10 I'm building a pig from a kit.
    11 I did my own thing and now I've got to undo it.
    12 I'm enrolled in aerobic scream therapy.
    13 there's a disturbance in the Force.
    14 I'm doing door-to-door collecting for static cling.
    15 I have to go to the post office to see if I'm still wanted.
    16 I'm teaching my ferret to yodel.
    17 I have to check the freshness dates on my dairy products.
    18 I'm going through cherry cheesecake withdrawl.
    19 I'm planning to go downtown to try on gloves.
    20 my crayons all melted together.
    21 I'm trying to see how long I can go without saying yes.
    22 I'm in training to be a household pest.
    23 I'm getting my overalls overhauled.
    24 my patent is pending.
    25 I'm attending the opening of my garage door.
    26 I'm sandblasting my oven.
    27 I'm worried about my vertical hold.
    28 I'm going down to the bakery to watch the buns rise.
    29 I'm being deported.
    30 the grunion are running.
    31 I'll be looking for a parking space.
    32 my Millard Filmore Fan Club meets then.
    33 the monsters haven't turned blue yet, and I have to eat more dots.
    34 I'm taking punk totem pole carving.
    35 I have to fluff my shower cap.
    36 I'm converting my calendar watch from Julian to Gregorian.
    37 I've come down with a really horrible case of something or other.
    38 I made an appointment with a cuticle specialist.
    39 my plot to take over the world is thickening.
    40 I have to fulfill my potential.
    41 I don't want to leave my comfort zone.
    42 it's too close to the turn of the century.
    43 I have some real hard words to look up in the dictionary.
    44 my subconscious says no.
    45 I'm giving nuisance lessons at a convenience store.
    46 I left my body in my other clothes.
    47 the last time I went, I never came back.
    48 I've got a Friends of Rutabaga meeting.
    49 I have to answer all of my "occupant" letters.
    50 none of my socks match.
    51 I have to be on the next train to Bermuda.
    52 I'm having all my plants neutered.
    53 people are blaming me for the Spanish-American War.
    54 I changed the lock on my door and now I can't get out.
    55 I'm making a home movie called "The Thing That Grew in My
    Refrigerator."
    56 I'm attending a perfume convention as guest sniffer.
    57 my yucca plant is feeling yucky.
    58 I'm touring China with a wok band.
    59 my chocolate-appreciation class meets that night.
    60 I never go out on days that end in "Y."
    61 my mother would never let me hear the end of it.
    62 I'm running off to Yugoslavia with a foreign-exchange student named
    Basil Metabolism.
    63 I just picked up a book called "Glue in Many Lands" and I can't put
    it down.
    64 I'm too old/young for that stuff.
    65 I have to wash/condition/perm/curl/tease/torment my hair.
    66 I have too much guilt.
    67 there are important world issues that need worrying about.
    68 I have to draw "Cubby" for an art scholarship.
    69 I'm uncomfortable when I'm alone or with others.
    70 I promised to help a friend fold road maps.
    71 I feel a song coming on.
    72 I'm trying to be less popular.
    73 my bathroom tiles need grouting.
    74 I have to bleach my hare.
    75 I'm waiting to see if I'm already a winner.
    76 I'm writing a love letter to Richard Simmons.
    77 you know how we psychos are.
    78 my favorite commercial is on TV.
    79 I have to study for a blood test.
    80 I'm going to be old someday.
    81 I've been traded to Cincinnati.
    82 I'm observing National Apathy Week.
    83 I have to rotate my crops.
    84 my uncle escaped again.
    85 I'm up to my elbows in waxy buildup.
    86 I have to knit some dust bunnies for a charity bazaar.
    87 I'm having my baby shoes bronzed.
    88 I have to go to court for kitty littering.
    89 I'm going to count the bristles in my toothbrush.
    90 I have to thaw some karate chops for dinner.
    91 having fun gives me prickly heat.
    92 I'm going to the Missing Persons Bureau to see if anyone is looking
    for me.
    93 I have to jog my memory.
    94 my palm reader advised against it.
    95 my Dress For Obscurity class meets then.
    96 I have to stay home and see if I snore.
    97 I prefer to remain an enigma.
    98 I think you want the OTHER [your name] .
    99 I have to sit up with a sick ant.
    100 I'm trying to cut down.
    101 ... well, maybe.

  31. Please note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    YHBT. HTH. HAND.

    p.s. - you are a fag.

  32. Odd Ad... by TibbonZero · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Offtopic yes, but isn't it odd, what with the 'normal' banners that appeal to most of us that are on ./ that I just saw one for Microsoft Visual Studio .NET? Kinda odd with all the MSFT and .NET bashing here...

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Odd Ad... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      "Offtopic yes, but isn't it odd, what with the 'normal' banners that appeal to most of us that are on ./ that I just saw one for Microsoft Visual Studio .NET [microsoft.com]? Kinda odd with all the MSFT and .NET bashing here... "

      Yeah but whoever is serving the banners can get good data on what IPs have the most reloads on anti-microsoft stories.

      And I'm sure MSFT could do something with that information. Maybe they could find out which company has the most anti-MSFT slashdot readers and send the executives of that company on a nice MSFT-sponsored vacation and then start hawking Visual Studio .NET to them.

    2. Re:Odd Ad... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      I think this is a troll, I've seen similar posts before, but never seen an MSDN add.

      Of course, having now said that, I'll either see one as soon as I submit this post, or 20 people will reply claiming they've seen one.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    3. Re:Odd Ad... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

      I didn't post it as a deliberate troll but I see what you mean.

    4. Re:Odd Ad... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      actually, I meant to reply to the parent of your post, so I didn't mean to imply that you were the troll.

      Sorry for the misunderstanding :)

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  33. Trident sucks, Trident triumphs by Zarathustra.fi · · Score: 1

    I wish this ghost of the past would've stayed where it belongs.. Like, in the past, and inside one of my firewall machines.

    I, for one also, had a Trident 8900 board in my oldie 486 computer, and boy did it suck. It was so slow and disgusting and, and..

    ..And miraculously, it still works! I mean, my first 3D-accelerated card, with a RIVA128 chip, went FUBAR in a couple of years. I've seen lots of other cards too, that haven't stayed for as long as this Trident not-quite-a-nuclear-missile did.

    Perhaps it's the fact that it's a big and ugly ISA card, designed with no hurry in mind, unlike those overclocked and packed 3D-miracles we have today.. But I am still a bit astonished it's actually working without any errors, and the picture is still a solid square.

    But please, for the love of 3D gamers, stay dead, will ya?

    --
    __
    Zarathustra.fi
    Modern man has no goal, no aim, no ideals.
    1. Re:Trident sucks, Trident triumphs by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I, for one also, had a Trident 8900 board in my oldie 486 computer, and boy did it suck. It was so slow and disgusting and, and..

      Of course, it's all relative. The trident 8900, like all of it Cirrus Logic competitors, were nothing more than a frame buffer that it was up to your CPU to fill : There was virtually no difference between the speed of these unaccelerated cards, and the limit was often the ISA bus (hence why Carmageddon ran that much better on a VL-Bus system).

    2. Re:Trident sucks, Trident triumphs by smash · · Score: 1
      Actually, bit of trivia..

      The old trident video chipsets (such as the 8900 - yes i had one in my 486 too ;) were handicapped compared to most of the SVGA cards of the day, as trident didn't implement a way to access more than 1 64k bank of video memory at a time.

      This means that copying data around a trident card's video memory had to be done from video -> system -> video as a two step copy, rather than from one memory window to another.

      I forget the specifics (was a long time ago) - but I read about this in an old demo coders documentation/tutorial pack. Most excellent, had docs on x86 assembly, 3d engine programming and all the low level info on VGA, and the soundcards of the day :)

      Anyone know the pack I'm talking about? I'd love to get my hands on it again :)

      smash

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    3. Re:Trident sucks, Trident triumphs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I am still a bit astonished it's actually working without any errors, and the picture is still a solid square.

      That wouldn't be a solid, blue square by any chance, would it?

      The reset button will cure that, you Microsoftie! ;)

    4. Re:Trident sucks, Trident triumphs by Zarathustra.fi · · Score: 1

      Anyone know the pack I'm talking about? I'd love to get my hands on it again :)

      Yes, I know what you're talking about.. I've read many different tutorials and FAQs regarding demo coding and tricks.. But I don't recall which one you're talking about. Here's the Hornet Archive's FTP site and it's tutorial directory you might want to look at:

      ftp://ftp.hornet.org/hornet-archive/code/tutors/

      --
      __
      Zarathustra.fi
      Modern man has no goal, no aim, no ideals.
  34. Trident! Woohoo! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    Actually, I wish they would stay dead.

    There was nothing less fun than having to find OEM Trident drivers for a crappy Windows 95A desktop.

    Good lord how we hated on the board Trident video.

  35. 101 Ways to Annoy a Fascist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    1) Tell him his armband is inside-out.
    2) Re-arrange his golf club covers without telling him.
    3) Tell him he has ring-around-the-collar on his brownshirt.
    4) Insult his pit bull.
    5) Shoot his pit bull.
    6) Shoot him.
    7) Slash the tires on his Porsche [note: proper Fascist auto maybe substituted
    here.]
    8) Riot.
    9) Spraypaint FUCK CAPITALISM on his Porsche.
    10) Spraypaint FUCK CAPITALISM AND FUCK COMMUNISM on his Porsche.
    11) Spraypaint FUCK THE WORLD on his Pitt-bull.
    12) Overthrow the government.
    13) Wear a Chineese peasant's blue denim uniform with a button reading I
    SUPPORT THE NATIONAL LIBERATION FRONT.
    14) Learn Russian and speak only Rusian.
    15) Learn Albanian and do like-wise.
    16) Sing the following version of the Marines' Hymn:
    From the balls of Montezuma
    To the whores of Tripoli
    We fight for cunt in battles
    In the air, on land, and sea

    First to fight for boobs and pussy
    And we keep our penes clean
    We are proud to claim the title
    of Whore-Fucking States Marines.

    17) Burn George Bush in effigy.
    18) Burn George Bush in person.
    19) Tattoo FUCK CAPITALISM (in Russian) on his wifes left breast when she isnt
    looking.
    20) Hand out pamphlets saying that says that Ronald Reagan is a Polish Jew and
    the leader of the Communist conspiracy.
    21) Cut his head off.
    22) Assassinate The President.
    23) Assassinate the Governor of New Jersey.
    24) Assassinate Sununu.
    24) Register as a Communist.
    25) Organize an army and march on Washington.
    26) Castrate him.
    27) Castrate his pit-bull.
    28) Castrate George Bush.
    29) Attempt to overthrow the Government of the United States of America by
    force and violence.
    30) Organize you own country and declare war on South Africa.
    31) Call him an anus.
    32) Call him a gonad.
    33) Call George Bush a gonad.
    34) Blow up his Porsche.
    35) Blow up his Pit-bull.
    36) Blow up George Bush.
    37) Give away copies of the Communist Manifesto.
    38) Eat five pounds of beans and lock yourself in a small enclosed area with
    him.
    39) Defy Authority.
    40) Destroy Authority.
    41) Desecrate Hitlers Bunker.
    42) Drop LSD in the Potomac.
    43) Bomb Washington with Chia Pets.
    44) Bomb Washington with SPAM.
    45) Bomb Washington with registered Nurses.
    46) Bomb Washington with a drug dealer named "vinnie".
    47) Citizens arrest the president.
    48) Board the Staten Island ferry, point a toy gun at the pilot and force him
    to sail to Havana. If you are caught, explain that you wanted to just show
    the passengers how bad Castro's Cuba really is.
    49) Fart the pledge of allegiance.
    50) Burn the flag.
    51) Send George Bush a bar of soap and order him to wash his mouth out every
    time he tells a lie.
    52) Skip school.
    53) Picket his house, holding a crucifix and mumbling "pax..pax...pax..."
    54) Issue a public statement saying you hate mom, baseball, apple pie, and
    the flag; but you love to fart.
    55) Wear a t-shirt reading HITLER WAS A WEENIE.
    56) Spray paint MAKE LOVE NOT WAR on his pit-bull.
    57) Tell him to go fuck himself.
    58) Tell him to go fuck himself with a limber dick.
    59) Tell him you are a member of the John Birch Society and that you are i
    investigating reports of him being a pinko.
    60) Wear a t-shirt reading JOE MCARTHY WAS A WEENIE.
    61) Stare him down.
    62) Steal his SS epaulets.
    63) Wear a sweatshirt with a big 69 on it reading THE BEST MIDNIGHT SNACK.
    64) Ask him if he has any papers, because you want to roll a joint.
    65) Set up a private Espionage organization and offer to sell your services to
    the highest bidder. Solicit Bids from all the Communist countries. If the
    FBI objects, respond with a long speech on the superiority of the
    Capitalist system, where all goods and services are sold for the highest
    price. Accuse the FBI agent of being a fuzzy-minded pinko.
    66) Bury him in Lenins tomb.
    67) Bury him in Stalins tomb.
    68) Bury him in Grants tomb.
    69) Simulataneously enroll in orginizations The Ukranian Workers Society, North
    Yugoslav Peoples Assosciation, Hungarian Peasants Club, The John Birch
    Society, and Jews for Jesus.
    70) Ask him "who the hell cares if the trains run on time?".
    71) Get yourself invited to his house for dinner. Bring a gun and a target. At
    an appopriate moment lean the target against a wall and
    start shooting at it, screaming: KILL THE COMMIES! KILL THE FUCKIN COMMIES!
    72) Take a tour of the White House. Bring a defused hand grenade with you and
    toss it on the floor in front of the highest ranking Bureaucrat you can
    find. Run like hell the other way, shouting "Die, imperialist dog!".
    73) Distribute copies of CHALLENGE
    on Wall Street to anyone wearing a suit.
    74) Alternately, try to sell it to them for 10 cents and when refused, reply
    "Oh, your too cheap to spend a dime to find out the truth!"
    75) Enter your local recruiting office. fart. leave.
    76) Enter your local Recruiting office. Pull out a water pistol and spray all
    Military personnel you meet as soon as they turn their backs. When they
    take the pistol away from you (after a lecture) listen intently and
    abashedly and say youre sorry. As soon as the lecturer turns his back on
    you, pull out another water pistol from you pocket and shoot him in the
    back, laughing hysterically.
    77) Pass your own Selective Service Act and draft everyone you meet.
    78) Sing at the top of your lungs:
    Onward Christian soldiers,
    Onward as to war.
    Kill your Christian brothers
    As you've done before.
    79) Enter your local Marine Recruiting office. when asked why you want to join
    the marines, reply "Ive been waiting for a long time for a chance to shoot
    a motherfucken general!"
    80) Take a tour of the White House and offer $1000 to any of the Marine honor
    guards who will spit on the flag and say: "Fuck the imperialist United
    States" three times. If any of them take you up on it, wait until they are
    finished and then tell them that you cant pay him cause that would be
    corrupting him.
    81) Offer to sell the first official you meet your share of the country.
    82) Whenever asked a question answer "FUCK THE WORLD", try to convince
    the rest of the known universe to do the same.
    83) Hang out in front of your local Navy recruiting center wearing a white
    sailor cap and singing "Anchors Aweigh".
    84) Join the Amerikan Nazi Party. Arive in a tutu and slippers carrying a sub-
    machine gun. open fire screaming "DIE DIE DIE!!!!"
    85) Enroll at the School for Marxist Studies.
    86) Enroll at Moscow University.
    87) Just keep on doing what youre doing.
    88) Tell the truth about the wars of the U.S. (i.e. make a speech explaining
    the true character of America's involvement in Vietnam.
    89) Convince him that Hitler is alive and living in the basement of the
    Pentagon, then let his hopes down.
    90) Tattoo FUCK FASCISTS on your chest in letters 6 inchs high.
    91) Tell him your the Popes illegitimate son.
    92) Surround the White House with paid mercenaries and take it over.
    93) Own a Monarchy.
    94) Claim to be a Bloshevik-Socialist-leftwing-jew.
    95) Burn down the Reichstag.
    96) Lead a profligate life: live with a negro; drink; gamble and also swear.
    97) Commit an original sin.
    98) Vote in a foreign election.
    99) Bite him.
    100) Send him a copy of this file.
    101) All of the above.

  36. IN THE NAME OF THE GREAT PENIS BIRD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I adjure you to stop, o Slashbot.

    Smile. You're on candid camera.

    1. Re:IN THE NAME OF THE GREAT PENIS BIRD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sir you may want to consider giving up your Stalinist ways and instead come over to the side of goodness and wholesomeness. this i pray in the name of lord cthulhu.

  37. trident cheap...but good in a "niche" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got a low-cost laptop from HP (one of the 'build your own' from Circuit City); and it's got a Trident cyberBladeXP in it. I was going to wait a bit to hold out for a ATI chipset, but after doing some reading I figured I could make it work. It does. Sure, I had to throw X into vesa mode to use my whole screen, sure the default trident driver stinks up the room (badly), but Trident just opened the specs for the cyberbladeXP and there is now a "drop in" driver for X that is 2d accelerated (3d is being worked on); and it works great. It's "no frills," but then I wasn't getting this laptop to do serious gaming. Would I use a Trident Card in a gaming machine, only if I was taking some serious drugs that warped my mind, but for a simple workstation, sure; no prob. I too had a terrible card in the past from Trident, but they're trying to get better. Can we just give 'em a chance?

  38. 101 Ways to Skin A Cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    1. Lawnmower
    2. Hold it by its tail, shake vigorously
    3. Give it a bath in hydrochloric acid
    4. Let it play with a ball of barbed wire
    5. Teach it to jump through a flaming loop, then get it drunk and have it do it
    6. Eat it, cough up a furball, then puke
    7. Put it in a paper shredder, slowly (collect bits afterwars, glue and some assembly may be required)
    8. Tie tongue to one car, tail to another, and have them dive in opposite directions
    9. Flamethrower
    10. Attach tail to fan, put it on high (the fan)
    11. Get a pair of tweasers, pluck one hair at a time
    12. Bury it, dig it up a few weeks later
    13. Throw it at a fan (make sure it's on (the fan))
    14. Stuff it in a mailbox with a quarterstick of dynamite
    15. Throw catnip on the launching pad of the space shuttle just before takeoff
    16. Have it roll in hot tar
    17. Drop it off a building onto a sharpened sewer grate
    18. Toss it in Boston Harbor
    19. Use a tire pump to fill it with air, pop it
    20. Shave "Saddam rules" on it and throw it to a pack of Kurds
    21. Volunteer it for a documentary on pirranahs
    22. Cover firecrackers with catnip (light them)
    23. Use it as the bat in "mailbox baseball"
    24. Throw it at the windshield of someone who annoys you (or just for fun)
    25. Tie (or shave) a message on it and throw it through the window of an enemy
    26. Use it as shark bait
    27. Train an attack dog with it
    28. Volunteer it for radiation testing
    29. Volunteer it for Olympic training for the hammer throw
    30. Use it as a train brake
    31. Put a condom on its head and give it to a Bishop
    32. Use it as printer paper
    33. Use it as the "kindling" to burn down a billboard (for best results, douse in gasoline first)
    34. Rub alcohol on it and chase it over hot coals
    35. Cats love chasing moving things, cut some live electrical wires and watch them dance (bring your cat, twit)
    36. Light its tail on fire and watch it chase it
    37. Give the cat and some acid to Skeeve
    38. Let it run The Works for a day
    39. "Bowl" it over millions of shards of broken glass
    40. Experiment with the explosive properties of cat hair
    41. Turn on the car while the cat is getting warm in the engine
    42. Check the read/write properties of cats in disk drives
    43. Test out the hair club for men on it
    44. Put plastic explosives in fake mice
    45. Drop it off a cliff, repeat until it doesn't land on its feet
    46. Feed it to a pack of raving Puce Armadillos
    47. Have it figure out the previous entry
    48. Wrap duct tape around it, peal off rapidly
    49. Have it try to write a 101 (tm) text file
    50. Feed it live grenades (and run)
    51. Slide it quickly down a slide lined with brillo pads
    52. Use it to smoothen the rusty parts on your car
    53. Squeeze it through a pipe half its size
    54. Chainsaw
    55. Throw it at a velcro wall and rip it off
    56. Use a cheese grater
    57. Feed it cherry bombs
    58. See how good it is at "eating fire"
    59. Eat fire yourself, and use the cat as a target (great at parties)
    60. Use sandpaper
    61. Ask it the meaning of life
    62. Have Skeeve explain the meaning of life to it
    63. Use it in a game of "tethercat" (this entry courtosy of The Far Side comics inc.)
    64. Have it piss off (or on) Cab the Nastie
    65. Try to get it inside the computer to accomplish the preceding entry
    66. Use hedge clippers
    67. Test how good the properties of cats are for making spam
    68. Scotch (tm) tape it to the exhaust pipe of a bus
    69. Use its face as a guitar pick, gradually move to other parts of its body (Note to all you sex perverts: No, I didn't have a special entry just for this number, nyah nyah nyah!)
    70. Get a giant, economy size electric pencil sharpener and...well, you know...um...ok...fine, so it was a bad idea
    71. Use it as the lance (or shield) for a good clean game of joust
    72. Test its electricity conductivity properties (in any manner you choose)
    73. Put alcohol in its water bowl and release it into a mine field
    74. Nail the pet door on your door closed, encourage it to run full speed into the house
    75. Introduce it to Butch the pitbull next door
    76. Pull its flea collar off, going from head to tail
    77. Hang some catnip from the rear bumper of your car (near the tire) and have the cat chase it, then slam it (the car) into reverse (this can also be found in the soon to be released "101 (tm) ways to ruin your transmission")
    78. Have it attempt to figure out "f00g and the art of Zen"
    79. Severely hinder the existence of one of America's greatest evils, the trailer park (of course) by using the cat to link two of the park's power lines, thus shorting out the whole place
    80. Use it as a place to stick Post-it (tm) notes
    81. Put it on ther head of Raytheon's famous Patriot Missle
    82. Put it 5 miles from the intended target of a Scud
    83. Shave the American flag on it and sell it to a drunken football fan as a patriotic souvenir (ok, enough with the belated-gulf-war-patriotic-stereotypes)
    84. Paint it white and bring it to a sheep shearing contest
    85. Toss it into the street after it (the street) has been newly tarred, get some popcorn and wait for the steam roller
    86. Treat it like you would a balloon animal
    87. Shave signs of the devil on it and give it to Mother Theresa as a gift
    88. Teach it to surf
    89. Have it fight a big armadillo
    90. Ask it why armadillos are such a favorite topic of mine (cats HATE even the mention of the word)
    91. Let it play with your favorite samarai sword (did I spell it right?)
    92. Have it use a razor sharp spork (they're so common...) to eat from its food bowl
    93. Stuff its nose and mouth full of sawdust and watch it flip out (place any desirable sharp objects near it)
    94. Feed it green eggs and spam
    95. Introduce it to the wonderful world of narcotics (Note: This was put here in a mood of jest and merriment only, Psychotic Alliance would like to stress that drugs are of no use, except when writing text files)
    96. Use a utility knife (anyone who accomplishes this, please contact me)
    97. Poke it with a pen all over its body, let the scabs heal and then pick all of them off
    98. Put it in a time capsule
    99. Push it through a screen
    100. Just use a razor blade...
    101. Give it some swiss cheese (YOU figure it out, hehehe)

  39. Interesting by Shillo · · Score: 1

    I'd actually *like* to be able to buy a whipping cool card for $100. And it's quite plausible that Trident will be able to deliver (after all, they've stopped doing ISA cards ages ago).

    The real potential problems with this: driver compatilibity and Linux support. If their drivers turn out sucky, well, *DUH*. And if they remain tight-lipped about their 'intellectual property', they'd better release decently performing DRI drivers.

    --

    --
    I refuse to use .sig
  40. A differing opinion. by paganizer · · Score: 4, Informative

    The newer "blade" series of trident cards support OpenGL, have Linux drivers, are relatively responsive, and CHEAP.
    I've always liked Tridents, especially in comparison to S3; they work.
    Not the power gaming card, but good for general performance on a budget.

    --
    Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    1. Re:A differing opinion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they easier to get GLX out of than the NVidia cards? I have an nvidia part, and god damn if it isn't the biggest pain in the ass to get decent X11 OpenGL out of the thing... I guess that's part of a larger question: what card gives the best OpenGL/X11 performance with the least hassle (a secondary consideration to me is cost, although I don't really want to shell out, say, $1000 for a 3dlabs oxygen card).

  41. Where do you people come up with this shite? by windside · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Jeez... Not only is this stupid, but it's largely incorrect: not too many of these are actually ways to *skin* a cat! Dousing Mr Meow in gasoline and using him to ignite a billboard would get rid of a lot more than just his skin.

    --
    ...Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
    Churchill
  42. Why the resurrections? by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    Are there fatal flaws with NVidia and ATI's offerings? Why else the resurrection of these other companies? Is it because NVidia and ATI are getting monopoly rents?

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  43. The stigma by Hooya · · Score: 2
    I don't think they'll be able to live down the stigma associated with their company name

    For me, the stigma is not with the name but their support. I got a company laptop with a trident card. need i say more? i will anyway, no driver support under linux. so no X. no more trident for me. what's even worse is that there is a third part driver but has a small quirk (intermittantly types in multiple chars when i hit a key) trident could have just helped this guy fix the driver. but guess not. they want to keep their IP to themselves. they can keep their video cards to themselves too.

  44. Gamers by siskbc · · Score: 1

    I don't know - hard core gamers, granted, spend all the money they make working at Taco Bell on a new $450 vid card every 4 months.
    However, there are a lot of the rest of us who don't want to drop that kind of cash, who cant tell the difference between 100 fps and 140 fps, and who would have to look a while to tell the difference between 24 bit and 32 bit graphics. We are NOT the people who buy games at midnight the day they come out, dressed up as a damned orc (yeah, you WC III freaks, that's you) or some Jedi retard for Outcast. We even wait until the games come down from $50 to buy them.
    There are a lot of people like that. Check it out - NVIDIA is still selling the shit out of the Ti 4200, and even GF III's. There is a market there, and while I don't trust Trident, I will be buying a $150-$200 GeForce in a few months - to replace my, ahem, TNT2. *duck*

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Gamers by phong3d · · Score: 1

      ...I will be buying a $150-$200 GeForce in a few months - to replace my, ahem, TNT2. *duck* I replaced my TNT2 with a GeForce4 a couple of months ago. Of course, the boost in performance was astounding, but the old TNT2 did a great job with newer games - I played through Max Payne and Black & White with no problems and perfectly decent graphics. I only got a GeForce4 after NWN's Aurora Toolset Beta convinced me I needed something a little more modern. The TNT's residing in a built-from-parts Linux server and works like a charm.

    2. Re:Gamers by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      would have to look a while to tell the difference between 24 bit and 32 bit graphics.

      Assuming 32 bit graphics are a variant of RRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGBBBBBBBBAAAAAAAA, there should be no difference compared to 24 bit unless your monitor can show what is behind it.

      Or you were talking about layering/3-D surfaces with transparent attributes rendered by the card (which is a pretty far out concept for the AOL grandmother).

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    3. Re:Gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many new games let you have either 16 bit or 32 bit color, for example. As you say, it's pretty much how many R,G,B and A bits you have. For 16 bit, it's 4 bits per component - with 32 bit, it's 8 bits per component. With 16 bit colors, you could have 2^4=16 different saturation levels for a pure red (for example), at 2^4=16 different brightnesses. With 32 bit colors, you get 2^8=256 different saturations of red, with the same number of brightnesses. If you are acclimated, you can tell the difference.

      As I said in my original post, though, it can be questionable how much this will affect the playability of the game.

    4. Re:Gamers by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Many new games let you have either 16 bit or 32 bit color

      Many old games do too. ;-)

      For 16 bit, it's 4 bits per component.

      Thats new to me. It used to be that 16 bit was usually RRRRRGGGGGGBBBBB, or five bits per channel plus an extra optional green channel for the masochists. The alpha channel was just a feature of 32 bit modes to fill up that extra byte without having to offer extra bits on the DAC.

      Its been argued that RRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGBBBBBBBBLLLLLLLL (using that byte for luminance) would offer a much greater range of color and more importantly grayscale bitdepth.

      Since unlike my previous suggestion monitors cannot accurately display clear. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    5. Re:Gamers by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that 32 bit was 24 bit with the alpha [-adding. The sole purpose of this was performance, since computers and find offsets and do calculations on powers of two a lot faster then on 24. This is because to multiply by a power of two it is a bit shift. not a multipication.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  45. 80% Performace for $100? by sevensharpnine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On a GeForce 4 4600 Quake 3 in 1024x768 32bit High Quality runs at 220 fps. (Source: Tom's Hardware VGA Charts.) Now, 80% of 220 = 176. A Geforce 3 (standard) runs the same benchmark at 173.8 - roughly 80%. A GeForce 3 can be had for $91 according to pricewatch. Granted, it may not have the same "DX9" support, but I'm sure it will run without any problems with DX9. In fact, I'm sure it will run any game on your local computer retailer's shelf. It will also run under Linux. It will also have new drivers released next year. It also works with your choice of virtually any AGP slotted motherboard being sold today. It will not cause random lockups because you bought a cheap NIC. It has flawless OpenGL AND Direct3D support. And any game manufacturer that produces a game that doesn't run under it will go out of business.

    Don't get me wrong, I love market competition as much as anyone. I hope Trident can compete with Nvidia and ATI, but even if this PR bullshit proves true, they're still behind the curve as far as I can tell.

    --
    "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -Voltaire
  46. No go by af_robot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The company is claiming 80% the performance of the GeForce 4 TI 4600 at a price tag of less than $100 USD including DX 9 support.

    Let me guess, the other 20% will be critical bugs in their drivers. Nice try Trident :)

  47. And change they may. by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

    Seriously, you just proved his point.

    Companies aren't genetically pre-disposed toward a course of action. They weren't abused when they were young and are therefore more likely to settle into that same pattern.

    Companies have not been subjected to rigorous Pavlovian testing (hear the bell ring and produce a low-end graphics chipset!). While they may occasionally be stricken with poor management, they can, and do, change.

    --
    Meanwhile, back at the site, ACs were posting for no reason.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:And change they may. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, occationally... I can't remember the last time I saw a company with decent management.

    2. Re:And change they may. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, but the driving force of any company is management and although you say that they may be stricken with poor management they can be stricken with poor management for decades.

      Corporate culture is a that stupid buzzword (from '95) to describe it. Some companies can put out a shitty product and survive through marketting, or in this case by being propped up by other products. Companies get into patterns, into habits. Some aren't interested in forging new ground.

      It'd be nice to say that shitty companies will die but we know that's not always true.

      -AC, back at the site

  48. SLASHDOT GAY CONSPIRACY!!! IMPORTANT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    This is a preliminary announcement of my forthcoming series called: Slashdot Gay Conspiracy - How Slashdot made me dream of other men's pee-pees.

    It is an autobiographical account of how a straight man like me, to whom the very idea of homosexuality was utterily repulsive, was slowly brainwashed by countless Taco-snotting, goatse.cx and Linux Gay Conspiracy posts into thinking that I could, in fact, engage in homosexual activity and perhaps even like it one day. The last straw was the dream I had last knight in which I willingly did a handjob on a total stranger.

    The truth must be told so that the others can avoid my fate!! Stop reading Slashdot now unless you want to turn into a fagort!

  49. I think not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hercules makes crap cards. Their GeForce2 Ultra (they called it the Prophet Ultra or something like that) had uninsulated pins on the SVideo out. Thus making the card exteremly succeptable to interference and useless for PC->TV applicatoins. Their tech support is good though, it didn't take much for customer support to start forwarding me to R&D.

  50. X Windows by Kakarat · · Score: 1
    Back in the day, I remember Trident was one of the few chipsets that was supported in Xfree86. I always had a problem getting to my S3 card to work.

    --
    "I bet I'll get blamed for this." --Mayor Quimby
  51. This is the same Trident by r_j_prahad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, everybody seems to be bashing the snot out of Trident the company, so I'll probably just get buried in the noise. But... a few years back, when sound cards were a genuine pain in the ass to support under Linux, Trident Microsystems was one of the few to release complete details of their chipset (4DWave DX/NX), and even wrote and donated an open source driver to the ALSA project. So, maybe their video cards weren't as perfect as you all seem to want, but you need to quit slamming the company. Because in fact, they were one of the early "good guys" with Linux.

    Based on that experience, I'll probably buy the video card. So long as it includes a Linux driver.

    1. Re:This is the same Trident by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Spot on. All the NVidia performance in the world doesn't do me a darn bit of good without a Free Software driver. Sure, I can buy an NVidia card and hope they keep supporting their closed source driver, but I would much rather purchase hardware that came with a Free Software driver (even if the hardware isn't quite as spiffy). The fact that the card will be cheaper is also a huge bonus.

    2. Re:This is the same Trident by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what's the situation with Trident and their video drivers for Linux?

      A quick Google search came up with complaints that they aren't providing the Xfree86 developers specs of their hardware and apparently number of their common chipsets remain unaccelerated under Linux. Since Trident has pretty much fallen off radar however I don't know if that is still true. Graphics chips being their bread and butter, and common in cheap generic hardware, I'm not sure I'd raise them on an open source pedestal for providing drivers for some of their sound chips only.

      They are parading the banners of some of the largest PC OEMs on their website, a number of which (try to) appear friendly towards the Linux community, so it'd be truly positive if their upcoming commodity chips would be properly supported by open source drivers. Closed binary drivers may be fine for a while, until the company cuts the oxygen supply.

      On the dark shadowy corner we have Micro$oft, the eternal holders of the DirectX belt, who would much rather not see a flood of $300 PCs coming out with complete and perfect driver support under Linux...

      I'd kind of be up for a new video card and the specs per price ratio of these new Tridents seem okay to me, but I'm hoping to give my cash to really nice guys who really support my favourite platform.

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    3. Re:This is the same Trident by SurfsUp · · Score: 2

      I'll add my 'me too'. Look forward to the closed binary NVidia drivers breaking several times this year, due to internal kernel changes in locking etc which will be transparent for any driver provided in source. Hopefully NVidia will get a clue at some point. In the meantime I will support Trident if they get anywhere near the 80% performance they aim at, so long as they publish their register-level specs.

      It would be nice if the Trident part doesn't need its own fan.

      --
      Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
  52. When will they get it? by captaineo · · Score: 2

    Now that several companies are producing OpenGL hardware that is somewhat comparable to NVIDIA's, all it's going to take for me to switch is for one of them to have a completely open-source driver. I am tired of recompiling NVIDIA's driver manually for every kernel update, waiting for updates from them, and forget any platforms other than x86 and ia64...

    Cards are so fast these days, I'd gladly sacrifice a 25-50% performance edge for the portability and reliability advantages of an open-source driver. ATI, Matrox, Trident - I'm waiting...

    1. Re:When will they get it? by dusanv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ATI, Matrox, Trident - I'm waiting...

      I was waiting too until I got sick of it and got a GF4 4200 128MB. Yes, the drivers are closed source but they are fully featured and work *fine*. Sure beats my friend's Radeon 8500 open source driver which still doesn't support half of the things the card is capable of. How long does he have to wait to get the full support for the hardware he bought 6 months ago? ATI is cheap and lame - they think they only have to open the specs for the card while the Weather Channel pays for the driver development. I mean the Radeaon 9700 will cost $400. For that kind of money I bloody well expect a shiny new Linux driver.

  53. Pull a Matrox? by nekdut · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It seems that Trident is trying to pull a Matrox and resurrect themselves from the 3D video card grave yard

    I hardly think Matrox comparing Matrox to Trident is very fair. Matrox did not "come back from the dead" with the Parhelia, they just attempted to compete in the gaming market. While they did not release a Ti4600 killer, the Parhelia did introduce a number of innovative features. But G-series cards have been quite successful for the past few years in the workstation and financial markets with Matrox's excellent dual-head capabilities. Trident on the otherhand hasn't released a competitive card on any level in many years, so this announcement is in fact a resurrection of sorts.

  54. its Biblical by geekoid · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    When you want to convert, go to where the sinners are.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  55. Please do not buy Trident products by daserver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In my laptop, a toshiba tecra 8200 is a trident cyberblade xp gfx chipset. Trident has not beeing willing to provide specs. or anything else so that the Xfree people can provide us with drivers. I feel very bad about Trident and will never buy another product from them again. Please do not support such companies and buy products like Ati, which have a good relationship with the Xfree people.

    1. Re:Please do not buy Trident products by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      That's of course bad behaviour. But then, if XFree doesn't run on it, why should I buy it anyway?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Please do not buy Trident products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you wanted to run XFree86 on a laptop, why didn't you check the specs BEFORE BUYING IT?

      On a positive note, the XFree86 Driver Status page shows that your card (cyberblade XP) is supported with the 4.2.0 release.

  56. better yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when'ln fucking vida sell their shit at 30 bucks out of spite?
    I'd fork over 30 for a ISA and 40 for AGP not 140 just 40

  57. How can you bash a card that doesn't exist yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't help but laugh as I read all of the "Stay dead Trident! Stay dead!!!" messages on the board here. Um, if you hate Trident cards so much don't buy one. :)

    Yes, the ones they've made in the past have always been a bit lower grade, but they HAVE worked haven't they? My daughter helped me put together a server just a few months ago and the Trident video card that she put into it was older than SHE was. And still working like a charm. I don't want to play Doom 3 on the thing, I want to check on my server. The one meg card works great for this, and it is the oldest piece of hardware that I own. This translates to RELIABILITY. Now, if they are able to produce new cards that are inexpensive AND capable of putting out decent performance without losing Trident's reputation for reliability, what's the problem? I can't wait to see the final product myself! :D

  58. Trident Back From the Dead by Dirtside · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A Trident spokesperson had this to say:

    "BRRAAAIIINNNNSSSSSSS....."

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Trident Back From the Dead by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      May the humorless pieces of shit who modded that down burn in hell. And this is my troll ID, so bring it on.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    2. Re:Trident Back From the Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could it be? A goats.com reference? On slashdot?

  59. Why would OEMs choose Trident? by roushi · · Score: 1

    Especially over ATi and nVidia offerings. Maybe the Same OEMs that offer computers built with Cyrix CPUs, yea. :)

  60. The bad news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even with 100% the performance of the GeForce 4 TI 4600, Morrowind still runs at 12fps...

    It makes me sick that instead of being made to take advantage of existing hardware, many new games only run well on hardware that wont be available until 1-2 years in the future. Anarchy Online anyone?

  61. Hopefully low heat... by Thag · · Score: 2

    I've been looking for a video card that doesn't put out more heat than the rest of the computer.

    At 0.13 micron and with the low transistor count they advertise, maybe this will be it.

    If it's 90% as fast as a GeForce4, and puts out a lot less heat, I'm there.

    I'll wait for reviews and drivers to see.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  62. Let me see if I can recap my video card history. by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Linux - ISA Trident card
    Amiga - (Paula, Fat Agnus and Denise - OCS)
    Win311 - PCI Trident Card (1 meg memory, yes!)
    Win95 - S3 Virge (de-cellerator, Came with OEMed Decent)
    Win98 - Nvidia TNT 8 megs (Diamond MM)
    Win98SE - Dual Voodoo2's and Nvidia TNT (DMM)
    Win98SE - Dual Voodoo2's and Nvidia TNT2 (DMM)
    Win98SE - Geforce 1 (DMM)
    Win2K - Geforce 256 (Asus)
    Win2K - Geforce 2MX (Asus)
    WinXP - Geforce 3 Ti500 (Asus)

    Linux Box - PCI Trident (8 meg)
    Linux Box2 - S3 Savage AGP (16 meg)

    I remember looking at video cards for some unix boxes, the 2 choices for a cheap card for a long time was Jaton branded pci cards(Trident chips) or Cirus video cards. I tried to go with jaton, the trident chips always had good opensource drivers. I still try to get trident videos card for linux boxes I build, but they are harder to find at local wholesale stores.

    The only card I never used, which I heard had great linux support was any Matrox cards, the prices were just to high, and always slower than the others for games.
    -
    Do you DirectVNC?

  63. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The anand benchmarks were generated by taking the claimed performance percentage comparisons to a known part ("47% more foo than bar") and using the known part's performance to make the numbers. In other words, it's a pudding of guesswork with a few raisens of numbers.

    1. Re:no by IHateUniqueNicks · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you read the article, what it is is numbers disguised as percents. They did the benchmarks, they compared the numbers to the numbers the other cards got on the benchmarks, then they posted the percentage. They even state that if you want a VERY close approximation of the real numbers they got, to apply the percents to the GF4 review numbers they have listed in other reviews.

    2. Re:no by cqnn · · Score: 2

      Those numbers were also based on a pre-production card, so should not be taken as reflective of
      benchmarks from a full retail release product.

      ATI has also released a newer (supposedly faster)
      version of thier catalyst drivers in the interim.
      Which may have additional impact on the performance of the cards once the popular review
      sites get actual, testable, cards to make use of.

    3. Re:no by IHateUniqueNicks · · Score: 1

      I should also point out that the card they were able to benchmark was running at production speed (don't know about the RAM though), so they really should be representative of the retail versions.

  64. My thoughts on Trident by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    First of all back in the 486 days all of the BTO mom and pop shops bought Trident cards like they were going out of style. Then along came PCI and they continued that but the cards were relatively the same performamce. Then along came AGP and the Trident 3DImage. We used to sell those because they had TV out. Well I'll tell you one thing.. Such atrocities done to 3D should not be expanded to 52" for all to see! That was the last I had heard of Trident until the IOpener came along and people were hacking them to load Linux. Cyberblade... Sounded cool until I found out it was basically a reworked 3DImage chipset. Yet for whatever reason HP and Compaq were all over it like flies on..... It seemed to be a popular choice in their laptops. Especially their K6 and mobile Athlon/Duron models.

    Now lets look at the compeditors at the time. 1998 had seen the introdcution of the Intel i740 low cost graphics chip. We could get these things in bulk for about $35-40 with 8MB ram. And compared to the 3DImage and the other option, the VirgeGX they kicked ass. (My boss was a cheapo and always wanted the cheapest card possible in his systems). At the time the video card options were basically Nvidia RivaZX, Rage Pro Turbo, and Permedia2. The high end market was served by the just introduced TNT and the Voodoo2. The i740 offered better graphics quality as the Rage Pro cards but cheaper. Trident didn't have a chance, so they slowly pulled back into their turtle shell.

    Personally I'm hoping that this card will be everything it was hyped to be. It will force everyone to be bigger/better and cheaper. So I say "Good luck, and God speed!"

  65. Yeah, but who really makes the *cards*?? by Reziac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I liked the Trident 8900 ISA and 9200/9400 VLB cards -- they weren't the fastest but they were rock-stable and the drivers were well-behaved, AND they have a really nice legible screen font, ideal for console use. They're still my card of choice for ISA/VLB systems (yes, I still support some and even own some).

    But I've been gravely disappointed by every PCI/AGP Trident-based card I've seen. Slow as molasses, and the AGP cards have a shit screen font (apparently pilfered from an old Diamond chip). OTOH they do still get along with everything, and they're VERY cheap ($8.00!!), so I use 'em for testing hardware and for "anything that outputs a video signal will do" situations.

    In short -- good points: cheap, stable, well-behaved, drivers always available, PCIs and earlier have a really good screen font; bad points: PCI and AGP are both slow as mud (MUCH slower than the claims typically printed on the box), *no* VESA 2.0 support in hardware (so can't do hires outside of Win32), AGP models have a horrible screen font.

    But when I went to Trident's site to get information on one of the newer cards, I was presented with a long disclaimer which boiled down to: "Trident only makes CHIPS. Trident has NEVER made *video cards*, ever, period. We only supply drivers as a convenience to you. Don't ask us about any video cards, they're not our fault, we didn't make them, and we don't support them!!"

    After reading that, I wrote Trident sales and tech support to this effect: "In that case, you'd better keep an eye on who you supply chips to, because these uniformly-awful recent Trident-based cards are giving Trident a bad name." (No response.)

    Anyway.. since Trident disclaims making anything but chips -- my question is WHO IS MAKING THE "TRIDENT" CARDS??

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:Yeah, but who really makes the *cards*?? by nathanh · · Score: 2
      I liked the Trident 8900 ISA and 9200/9400 VLB cards -- they weren't the fastest but they were rock-stable and the drivers were well-behaved, AND they have a really nice legible screen font, ideal for console use.

      Yes! The ISA Trident cards are still my video card of choice for consoles. Their character set has a nice curl on the lower-case 'l', making it really easy to distinguish from '1'. I've yet to find another card, any vendor, any bus, that has a font that nice.

    2. Re:Yeah, but who really makes the *cards*?? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Exactly!! The old Trident screen font's wonderful legibility was a MAJOR reason why I stuck with Trident-based cards as long as I did, and why I still use them in old systems.

      I have an ISA 8900 in an XT, believe it or not. The older Trident-based cards have another advantage I'd forgotten in my previous post: All the control lines are in the part of the card that plugs into the 8bit bus. The rest of the bus is only used to increase thruput. So you can hang a Trident ISA card in an 8bit slot, or a VLB card in an ISA slot, and they will still work. A few other ISA cards would also agree to do this, but most won't.

      Back to screen fonts.. My peeve with most cards, Diamond in particular, is the EGA-style screen font: specficially the narrow lowercase m, which is hard to tell from a lowercase n. ATI cards have a tolerable screen font (m/n not quite right but at least legible), tho it sorta looks like it really wanted to be italics, which gets annoying after a while.

      Some S3Trio and S3Virge cards have the same nice screen font as the old Tridents. And I was thrilled when I got a Matrox Millennium G200 and found it too had the same screen font! Guess what's now my card of choice for midrange Pentiums :)

      There are old DOS utils to extract a screen font from the video BIOS and apply it to another system TSR-style, tho I've never used this trick.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  66. Already been done. by SonicBurst · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember a few hacks to programs running on C64s that would do exactly that...they would borrow the video memory and use it as system memory if you didn't have enough to run whatever it was you wanted to run.

    If you could deal with the bottom or top third of video fscked up, you just scored a few K of free memory.

    --

    Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
    1. Re:Already been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehm. On the C64 there weren't any separation between system memory and graphics memory, and you could map "graphics memory" to several different places in system memory via a register.

    2. Re:Already been done. by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember a few hacks to programs running on C64s that would do exactly that...they would borrow the video memory and use it as system memory if you didn't have enough to run whatever it was you wanted to run.

      Dude, all the C64 had was system memory. The VIC was just given a pointer to a paved over area of system memory to display off of. You could display whatever you wanted though. ROM, I/O registers, BASIC token space, etc.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    3. Re:Already been done. by SonicBurst · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

      --

      Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
  67. Re:Let me see if I can recap my video card history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Amiga - (Paula, Fat Agnus and Denise - OCS)
    Paula was the sound chip, not video.
  68. nvidia IS taiwanese you dolt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but ati is canadian originally, though they do a lot of manufacturing in taiwan.

    get your facts straight next time seriously.

    1. Re:nvidia IS taiwanese you dolt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot, NVidia is not a Taiwanese corp. It was founded HERE in SILICON VALLEY in 1993 by Jen-Hsun Huang, Chris Malachowsky, and Curtis Priem.

      You are probably one of those guys who sees an Asian CEO and automatically thinks the corporation must be Asian. It probably never occurred to you that Huang is one of the best CEO's in the industry.

  69. Fluff, dead simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No silicon, no stats, no numbers, no real world testing... bah. Claims are claims, but if they are like the Parhelia debacle, it's not even a blip on the radar for Nvidia and ATI.

    Also, by the time it comes out (if), the Ti4600 will have dropped to the sub 200 dollar level new or less thanks to the 9700. Tried and true hardware and drivers versus untried hardware and a recent history of crappy drivers with the last blade release. No contest.

  70. What About OpenGL? by death00 · · Score: 1

    I notice a lot of discussion about DirectX 8.1 and DX9 support (or lack thereof), but what about OpenGL? What version of OpenGL is Trident buying into with this new chip (1.2/3/4 2.0)? Which shader programmer will they support? Will they have their own extensions? If they are trying to get into the sub-$100 market, OpenGL becomes important since many low-end systems are used for non-Windows OSes.

  71. You are not the target... by IdleTime · · Score: 1

    More than once reading through the comments here I was on verge of puking.
    You guys are so 133t.. At least you think you are.

    Just face it. You are not the target of Trident, continue to spend $450 on card just so you can get a zillion fps in the newest, hottest game. The rest of us don't care.

    If you read the article on Anandtech, you will see that it is not geared towards the high end gaming market. It is aimed towards Joe User who buys a couple of games a year, who like to see a couple of pr0n movies in high quality (or pictures). The only platform they really need to have a driver for is Windows. Linux (or rather XFree86) is unimportant. The market volumes are not in Linux, it is in OEM manufactured PC's running Windows Xp Home edition. Like it or not, but that is the cold, hard facts.

    I have actually emailed Trident today to ask about drivers for XFree86 because it is a card I would consider putting into my Linux box to replace my old Voodoo 3dfx. I also need a new card for my Windows box, but I haven't decided what or when to buy yet, as I have a feeling we will see even more new high-end cards later this year. Given the right price/performance, I might buy a high-end card even though I do not need it. All the games I play work very well with my current hardware, but I see it is starting to show it's age, hence plans to buy a new card. (But then again, I also want to buy a new PC, bigger hard drive (200GB), DVD burner...)

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  72. Drivers anyone? by askii64 · · Score: 0

    It's good that Trident is still trying to compete in the 3D graphics market, but all of their past 3D accelerated cards (at least all the ones I've read about) have had horrible support. It seems standard for Trident to release 1 driver set for each OS the card works with and then never touch it again. Disappointing really, as that means we'll probably never see the full potential of this card... I know it was that way for my Blade3D that I had at least.

    --

    -This quite possibly mangled, stupid, demented comment was brought to you by Askii64.
  73. No DRI/GLX by drig · · Score: 2

    I have a Trident Cyberblade/XP in my laptop. The 2D acceleration is decent, but I haven't been able to find any 3D acceleration. It's also a little disappointing that the 2D acceleration is closed-source/NDA. If I could swap out a laptop video card, I would have long ago.

    --
    Citizens Against Plate Tectonics
  74. trident is awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my first graphics card was a trident! cheap computer parts rule

  75. W007!!! by eel183 · · Score: 1

    Thats all I can say.....

  76. Troll Education 101 by SlashdotTroll · · Score: 0

    <p><b><font type=arial size=4 fgcolor=black bgcolor=white>
    1. HTML<br>
    2. ???<br>
    3. first post<br>
    </font></b></p>

    {this code is licensed under the Gnu General Public License}

    --

    I am the nightmare of nightmares.

  77. DING! DING! DING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found it!!!

    Textfiles.com

    Yay! What do I win?

  78. Trident users rejoice! by intermodal · · Score: 1

    hopefully, they'll focus on Linux compatibility. I don't need a bunch of flashy crap, i need an affordable card that can handle WindowMaker or KDE at 1024 or higher without being unstable if I swap back and forth to my virtual consoles. Riva TNT2 Ultra, as nice as it is for Half-Life on Win98, just doesn't offer me the same stability that my tried-and-true ISA Trident cards do (and that I still use in most of my boxes). And when it comes to servers, give me an antique Trident any day. Fortunately, affordability seems to be something they do have in mind...I just wish they'd come out with something that isn't trying to compete and put it out at sub-$50 levels so I can use a more stable card in my non-ISA boxen. Especially with how NVidia cards are with AMD's processors...

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  79. Calm Down. by AndrewGoat · · Score: 1

    Look, for someone like me, this would be a nice thing. I right now have a 32 meg Diamond Viper II card...it barely runs Unreal Tournament. hell, it wont even run most other things, This card is cheap as hell and promises basically a Ti card. I'd buy it. I sure as hell would.

  80. Gamers are cheap, oems are just stupid. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    If trident didn't have such a bad reputation for reliability (they stink fyo), gamers would probably get it, we're talking $200-300 for 20% performance. We all know Athlons are basically a better processor than P4, and they're less expencive, but P4's are slightly better in games. OEMs will probably just stick with their Nvidia TNT2, or maybe even a VANTA. So pathetic...

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  81. I wish Trident lotsa luck! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    While Trident may have come up with a low-cost 3-D graphics card breakthrough of sorts, that's what SiS claimed with the 305 and 315 chipset cards, which proved to be a bit disappointing in 3-D performance.

    I'm not sure if OEM's here in the USA want to install cards using the new Trident XP4 chipset, especially when you consider that for slightly more money OEM's can install cards with the ATI RV250 chipset, which will likely offer much better overall 3-D performance, especially for DirectX 9.0. Indeed, the ATI RV250 chipset cards are definitely aimed for the various small computer assemblers, and because of the cachet of the ATI brand name will likely be quite popular, too.

  82. true, a related case: SiS by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

    This is all purely anecdotal, but in 2000 I worked at a startup for about six months that was ultra-shoestring (even by the standards of most startups). Our developer workstations used these super7 motherboards with everything integrated on them (sound, modem, etc. pretty much everything but an ethernet card, for those we had $7 realtek cards). The graphics subsystem was by SiS (I want to say 635?), using 8mb of shared memory. *That was the crappiest system and video performance I have ever seen.* Hands down. How bad? Baaaaad. Like, move a window and it'd pick up blitting errors as it moved across the screen bad. Scroll text in a browser and the sound stream off the cd drive skips caliber-of-suck. To this day I'll travel miles out of my way to avoid shared memory video. Ever since then I've mentally expanded SiS to "Shitty, intensely Shitty".

    Then, in the past three months or so, I've actually run across some pretty nice bits of hardware than were SiS-branded (one was a SiS 6236 (or was it 6326?) 8m pci card in a server, I was impressed that it's x11 performance didn't compeletely suck; the other is the SiS 735 chipset that gave a computer I built for somebody decent/good athlon performance and an integrated nic for the price of an expensive dinner). I was very suprised. Not that the products in question were earth shattering on an absolute scale, but when you compare them to what they'd been producing a few years back, the difference was just night and day. Sort of like running into the wastoid stoner dude you knew in high school, only now he's a high school physics teacher...

    So I guess the moral of this is that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future behavior. (c.f. any mutual fund prospectus to see a graphic illustration of that ;-p)

  83. another "me too!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully I can pawn off this very capable but proprietary GeForce2 GTS onto my brother who uses Windows and get myself a well supported Radeon (of similar speed and without chip-fan possibly).