Slashdot Mirror


On EBay: Shuttle Flight Deck Simulator

An anonymous reader writes: "Just to pass time before taking the real trip. shuttle flight deck simulator" Not a real nasa simulator, but a very impressive operating replica. The construction details are quite interesting too.

199 comments

  1. darn cool... by danimrich · · Score: 1

    ...but I'd prefer the real thing! ;-)

    --
    where's all that Karma?
  2. Price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    $14,999 and no bids! I can't ever think why!

    1. Re:Price.. by Syre · · Score: 2

      He'll never sell it with that high a minimum bid.

      He should have started the bidding at $1 and had a reserve of $14,500. Then he could at least see what the market will bear for his thingy without risk.

  3. Oh, great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now terrorists can buy it so that they can train to hijack the shuttle.

    1. Re:Oh, great. by garcia · · Score: 2

      with all the problems its been having recently we are probably all better off with that choice.

  4. what a way to boost your Auction by lostindenver · · Score: 1

    But beside that fact this is a real nice thing, it is a shame that a school dropped a program like this though.

  5. What's with the pictures? by nanaki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most of the pictures on the page have a little note under them saying what's being sold doesn't include everything shown. What is included?

    1. Re:What's with the pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The headphones. But they're really good headphones.

    2. Re:What's with the pictures? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 3, Funny

      The simulator is not included.

      You will, however, get an almost new copy of Microsoft Space Shuttle Simulator. If you agree to pay the $350 shipping, he'll include the nifty joystick.

    3. Re:What's with the pictures? by MrScience · · Score: 2, Informative

      Reading the front page of the site, would see the link titled, "List of components included in this auction"

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

    4. Re:What's with the pictures? by k2enemy · · Score: 3, Informative

      it was explained quite clearly on the web page. there was even a link for "what is included in the auction". you get all of the panels, the mission timer, joysticks, some flight manuals + flipbooks, power supplies and software. you don't get the chair or any of the misc things in the picture.

    5. Re:What's with the pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would be easier to have a link stating what isn't included!

    6. Re:What's with the pictures? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Does the $14999 include the self-inflating auto-pilot like I saw in the documentary entitled 'Airplane!'

      Will he also check my credit history if I didn't have enough money down?

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  6. Amazing by Hayzeus · · Score: 1

    ... that the construction site is actually still up.

  7. Public Property? by The+Dobber · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If he recieved a grant (I'm assuming some type of educational type), wouldn't this be property of the goverment/school system/public entity?

    1. Re:Public Property? by dytin · · Score: 2

      As the website says, the school dropped the flight shuttle program and allowed him to take the simulator with him when he left. Now, he doesn't want to pay $60/month any longer to store it, so he decided to sell it on ebay.

    2. Re:Public Property? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think the question was more of, 'does the school have the power to give it to him?'

    3. Re:Public Property? by captain_craptacular · · Score: 3, Informative

      Many grants come from private sources. My mother was a teacher and got a load of cool tech gadgets from a weather study grant once (digital cams, laptops, etc..) in the early 90's. The grant specifically stated that any materials/items bought with the grant were NOT to be given to the school system when the project completed. So she could keep them, sell them, eat them, whatever.

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    4. Re:Public Property? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if she wanted to donate them to the school? ;^>

    5. Re:Public Property? by aslagle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not the way most high school-level grants work. Most grants (even Federal ones) at this level are to the teacher, not the school. Included in the terms of the grant are that the property bought with the money goes with the teacher - not the school they were at the time. So, the school probably couldn't really have stopped him from taking it anyway.

    6. Re:Public Property? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I think a digital camera would probably taste like crap.

    7. Re:Public Property? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      More importantly, the level of detail and realism on this thing - which is impressive - is really the kind I expect private hobbyists to pay for. Using a grant to pay for these niceties (as opposed to a functional and educationally adequate simulator) seems excessive.

      From the construction page:

      In my simulator, they weren't really necessary, [...] this was no easy (or inexpensive) metal work.

      To increase the realism even further, everywhere on the panels where there was a line drawing of a screw or bolt, I put an actual screw or bolt.

      set of three custom-designed and -built clocks [...] is an incredible system - the parts alone cost over $1000.00

      Makes you wonder what the funds could've been used for...

    8. Re:Public Property? by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      Almost certainly not. Having dealt with stuff like this working for government, the proper way of disposing of stuff is to declare it salvage, (meaning that it has 0 value, or < 0 value (it costs more to store than it's worth), and then it would be sold for scrap. Nearly nothing is thrown away.

      In reality, since 9/11, the NYC city agency that used to accept salvage stopped. So it's actually more normal now - is it crap? Okay, toss it.

    9. Re:Public Property? by BLAG-blast · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't know about you, but I think a digital camera would probably taste like crap.

      Well, dude, in the Western world if something tastes like crap we put tomato ketchup on it and eat it anyway. Just look in any large restaurant chain and you'll see what I mean.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
  8. Landing The Shuttle by toki · · Score: 2

    If you want a cheaper way to play shuttle-pilot, X-Plane offers a space shuttle landing scenario. The demo version limits you to about 6 minutes of flight time, but that's enough to land the shuttle from final approach. Of course the payed version doesn't have a time limit, and you can start from space and land from there.

    1. Re:Landing The Shuttle by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Funny

      ya but I dont care about landing or taking off.... just flying it. although the time limit might help some.

    2. Re:Landing The Shuttle by PD · · Score: 1

      Didn't one of the terrorists say that too? Hmmmm.

    3. Re:Landing The Shuttle by Will_Malverson · · Score: 2

      Better: Try Orbiter, an awesome space sim that lets you both launch and land the space shuttle, fly super-advanced spacecraft, dock at the ISS, or at a big wheel orbiting the moon, or fly to all the other planets in the solar system. Learn orbital mechanics before you try it though, or you won't be able to go anywhere.

    4. Re:Landing The Shuttle by merlyn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh, www.orbitersim.com is no longer. Perhaps you wanna go back to the original site which a quick google search found.

    5. Re:Landing The Shuttle by Maxwell_E · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to that ca. 1992 era shuttle simulator with the 400 page manual? I remember playing it on a Mac SE30. Anyone?

    6. Re:Landing The Shuttle by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the publisher of X-Plane, which is coming out with a combat version of X-Plane asks the question: "Want to put a 200,000 lb GPS-guided bomb in the cargo bay of the Space-Shuttle and deploy it during re-entry? Be our guest."

      Mmm, dropping a 200,000 lb bomb from the Space Shuttle

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    7. Re:Landing The Shuttle by Chairboy · · Score: 2

      Orbiter is pretty, but the aerodynamics on it are very super rudimentary compared to X-Plane. The X-plane shuttle landing is extremely accurate, with working glass cockpit displays and reallistic handling.

    8. Re:Landing The Shuttle by Will_Malverson · · Score: 2
      Uh, www.orbitersim.com is no longer.
      Sure enough, it now leads to some web hosting company's home page -- but I tested it just before I posted, and it worked fine. {shrug}
    9. Re:Landing The Shuttle by unicron · · Score: 2

      It's not a flight simulator unless you have to remember what 30 keys do and it comes with a keyboard overlay.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    10. Re:Landing The Shuttle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn local cache! Damn it to hell! =)

    11. Re:Landing The Shuttle by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2

      You're not the only person this happened to... When I was posting about this software earlier in the same article (6:19 PM EST), the orbitersim.com link worked fine. How odd.

    12. Re:Landing The Shuttle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud you on your keen sense of the obvious.

  9. Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "This one-of-a-kind simulator is almost exactly like the simulators the NASA astronauts train on"

    So it's a simulated simulator?

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by nybble_me · · Score: 0

      Nope, it's a simulator simulator.

      --

      reenigne
  10. Operating? by rlangis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not a real nasa simulator, but a very impressive operating replica. The construction details are quite interesting too.

    I'd hardly call that 'operating'. Did you actually LOOK at the construction details? Most of the knobs/switches and doo-dads aren't even connected to *anything*. I would at LEAST like some of the switches to turn on a light or make something buzz or whirr or SOMETHING. Especially for the list price of $15k.

    --
    GIR: I'm going to sing the Doom song now. Doom doom doom doom doom doom de-doom doom doom doom doom doom doom...
    1. Re:Operating? by mlh1996 · · Score: 2, Funny
      It's actually more functional than a lot of the ship simulators I learned on in the Navy.

      Want really lame? Try operating the "simulator" you just drew on the chalkboard.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    2. Re:Operating? by whg409 · · Score: 1

      If you bothered to read (or even look at the pictures), you'd see that MOST of the switches turn on lights. Also, the green computer pushbuttons actually operate the computers - I think that's pretty impressive engineering.

    3. Re:Operating? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you think that's impressive, you must shoot a load in your pants every time you turn your computer on and surf le internet.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Operating? by whg409 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see you do something like that

    5. Re:Operating? by Jubedgy · · Score: 1

      haha reminds me of the marlinspike out in Great Lakes...at least the sound-powered phones worked (and the floor was painted blue just like water!!)

      --Jubedgy

      --
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis hebes
    6. Re:Operating? by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      That was outrageously funny. Thanks.

    7. Re:Operating? by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you bothered to read (or even look at the pictures), you'd see that MOST of the switches turn on lights.

      Kewl! And with my trekkie uniform (The Old Star Trek) I could pretend to be one of the switch-turning and knob-shifting extras aboard the Enterprise who gets killed in the first few minutes...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    8. Re:Operating? by Kredal · · Score: 1

      like what? Shooting a load while surfing the internet?

      No, you really don't want to see him (or me) do something like that.

      Oh, you were talking about the simulator. Nevermind.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    9. Re:Operating? by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      Actually, a lot of them do make a corresponding indicator light up. Most of the guages aren't wired and a surprising number of the lights aren't wired, though. The computer keypad and joystick DO work, and I believe the creator has a computer with simulator software on it, though it doesn't appear to be included in the auction...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  11. Let's play watch the hit counter go! by aengblom · · Score: 2

    13933 hits at 5:48 PM EDT ;-)

    Already had read through the stuff, so far from the first hit

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    1. Re:Let's play watch the hit counter go! by Dthoma · · Score: 2
      As of 11:05 PM BST, the hit counter appears to have turned into a small grey square.

      Can't think why ;-)

      --

      Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

    2. Re:Let's play watch the hit counter go! by ewithrow · · Score: 1

      I'm showing 17249 at 6:14 PM EDT

    3. Re:Let's play watch the hit counter go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      21665 @ 6:58 EST.

    4. Re:Let's play watch the hit counter go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now at 34522

  12. Not the only one by Burdell · · Score: 4, Informative
    Two of the Space Camp simulators in Huntsville, AL are fairly accurate recreations of the whole flight deck and mid deck of an orbiter (the panels are really only a small part of it). One of them (Atlantis) is from the movie "Space Camp" (don't ever watch it if you can help it). The other simulators in Huntsville are not as accurate (they are motion-based, and it is hard to build a two story motion-based simulator), but the panels are just about as accurate (although the relative placement isn't 100%).

    Basically, when he says "To my knowledge, there is not another like it in the world.", he may be right (to his knowledge, but then that just means that he is not very knowledgeable). There are other Space Camps around the US and the world (they are franchisees from the original in Huntsville) and at least some of them also have simulators.

    1. Re:Not the only one by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      not another like it in the world

      One at Space Center Houston (for tourists), at least 2 fully functional trainers in Bldg 9 at Johnson Space Center (for astronaut training) and 1 in motion-based simulator (training).

      Another thing he failed to mention - the shuttles are migrating to glass cockpits, not the 70's-era CRT's, knobs, buttons, and dials.

    2. Re:Not the only one by whg409 · · Score: 1

      I believe he meant at a public school, not including professionally built simulators. Also, since he built it in the early 90's, the glass cockpits were still in the planning stages.

    3. Re:Not the only one by JetScootr · · Score: 2

      At Nasa, in the Integrated Training Facility, bldgs 5 and 35, there are 3 fully functional simulators, two are fixed base and the other is 6-degree of freedom motion base. There are at least a dozen other "single system" or engineering simulators all over Johnson Space Center, for doing all kinds of development, testing and mission support. I forget what's in bldg 9. There's also several trainers for using (for example) the remote manipulator system (the robot arm) to move around big balloon "satellites" and such.

      --
      Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  13. Is this a new business-model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1: Write free software.
    2: ?
    3: Buy a shuttle simulator.
    4: Profit!

  14. Hey Baby by FakePlasticDubya · · Score: 5, Funny

    Want to train for the 150-mile high club?

    --

    "We shall show mercy, but we shall not ask for it" -- Winston Churchill
  15. I've been hanging with too many photographers... by Bogatyr · · Score: 2

    but my first thought was "great set for a photo shoot or a film".

  16. Auction Sniping this one? by ChicoLance · · Score: 1
    I've been playing with auction sniping clients recently. They work really well when you don't want to be "one-upped" when bidding on auctions. Pretty cool.

    Maybe they'd only work with an object of this magnatude if you throw a pack of "wonder diet pills" in with it.

    1. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by Mononoke · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've been playing with auction sniping [auctionsniper.com] clients recently. They work really well when you don't want to be "one-upped" when bidding on auctions
      Why not just bid what you are willing to pay? You know how proxy bidding works, don't you?

      I'm guessing that would just make too much sense.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    2. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by John+Miles · · Score: 2

      Why not just bid what you are willing to pay? You know how proxy bidding works, don't you?

      Because other people tend to base what they are willing to pay on what you are willing to pay.

      Placing a competitive bid early in an auction is just plain stupid.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    3. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by ChicoLance · · Score: 1
      Because other people tend to base what they are willing to pay on what you are willing to pay.

      This is exactly it. I never really thought about it before, but have only recently realized the advantage of auction sniping. Lots of people just put a bid in just higher than the existing people, and sniping at the last minute solves the problem of them comming back later. I've won a lot more auctions recently this way.

      Anyway, I know that this client works really well, and I'm not going back. :-)

    4. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Because other people tend to base what they are willing to pay on what you are willing to pay.
      But, with proxy bidding, other people cannot know what I'm willing to pay until they bid above my maximum. Once they've done that it doesn't matter anyway.
      Placing a competitive bid early in an auction is just plain stupid.
      Seeing the auction process as a competition is stupid. The seller is the only "winner."

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    5. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      I've won a lot more auctions recently this way.
      You haven't "won" anything. You just paid more than anyone else felt the item was worth.

      Good for you.

      The only advantage of sniping is the opportunity to overpay for things. As a seller, I thank you very much.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    6. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      The thing is, often an auction will go like this:

      Bidder 1 places a bid.
      Bidder 2 outbids bidder 1.
      Bidder 1 sees that he's been outbid and decides he can go just a little higher.
      Bidder 2 sees he's been outbid...

      I once had an item I was selling on Ebay jump from around $70 to around $170 in the last couple hours this way. Because the bidders kept revising how much they wanted the item over the course of the auction, I ended up with an extra $100. Had bidder #2 used a sniper service, the auction would have closed at only $70.

      Now, if both bidders had decided on a maximum beforehand and refused to change it, then the bidding process wouldn't have made any difference. OTOH, if bidder #2 decided on a maximum beforehand and not been willing to change it, while his competition displayed normal auction behavior, he would have won by sniping but not otherwise.

    7. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by ChicoLance · · Score: 1
      Alright, maybe I've mistated what I meant. Sniping doesn't "win" you any more auctions than if you just put in your full proxie bid. Both ways, you're putting in the max amount you're willing to pay for an item.

      However, look at any auction. See a couple of joes who place multiple bids because they didn't put in their max bid. They put just what they thought would win at the moment. The current proxie bid went up accordingly. They didn't win, so they bid again. Look through enough auctions, and you see many people who bid just enough to raise the final price of the auction, but because you were a good buyer, you had your proxie in place and you still won.

      This happens all the time. The advantage of sniping is that you're putting in your proxie bid at the last minute. There is no time left for people testing the waters to raise the final price. The auction is over. But because you waited, the final price was lower.

      It's the buyer that wins at this, not the seller. That's what you don't see things like the auctionsniper logo at the bottom of auctions -- the seller can't even watch the bids go up until the last 30 seconds.

      If you get beat these days, often it's because somebody put in that $20 bid, it didn't win, then placed a $22 bid that beat you. Sniping avoids this.

      OK. I'm done now. :-)

    8. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by John+Miles · · Score: 2

      But, with proxy bidding, other people cannot know what I'm willing to pay until they bid above my maximum. Once they've done that it doesn't matter anyway.

      You're missing the point. By bidding early, you give the other bidders something to aim for.

      Few people have a perfectly fixed idea of what a given item is worth. If I bid $10 for a CD and one or more people come along later and outbid me, it may have the effect of persuading me that the CD is "worth" more than $10, and that I should raise my maximum bid. Conversely, if I'm the high bidder, I really don't want to give the other bidders time to stew about being outbid. There's no upside at all to that.

      This kind of thinking is what turns auctions into "competitions," often in defiance of common sense. It's just human nature, nothing more and nothing less.

      Seeing the auction process as a competition is stupid. The seller is the only "winner."

      Very true. That's why eBay has several million auctions running at any given time. Sellers (like myself) LOVE people who follow your advice and bid early.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    9. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      You're missing the point. By bidding early, you give the other bidders something to aim for.
      I think you missed the point. Other bidders have no idea what to aim for, because do not know what my maximum is. Because I don't see it as a competition, I don't lose. If I'm outbid, then obviously someone else wanted the item more than I did.
      Few people have a perfectly fixed idea of what a given item is worth.
      You're right. That's why auctions always work to the advantage of the seller. People who know what they are doing know exactly how much they are willing to pay, and bid accordingly. People who don't know make sellers like us very happy.
      Sellers (like myself) LOVE people who follow your advice and bid early.
      Sellers like myself just appreciate it when more than one person bids on an item. If they want to try to out-snipe each other, fine. I'll win every time.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    10. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by emarkp · · Score: 1

      Here's a link that explains sniping very clearly.

    11. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by John+Miles · · Score: 2

      Other bidders have no idea what to aim for, because do not know what my maximum is.

      (sigh) They don't have to know what to aim for. They will still cost you, the early and eventually-successful bidder, more money just by trying.

      What you're forgetting is that on eBay, it's the second-highest bidder that determines how much the winner pays. The less time the second-highest bidder has to reconsider his maximum bid, the better off the highest bidder is.

      Placing your maximum bid early in an auction practically guarantees that you will pay more than you would have if you had placed the same maximum proxy bid in the last few seconds of the auction. Whether you like it or not, that's how the game is played.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    12. Re:Auction Sniping this one? by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      What you're forgetting is that on eBay, it's the second-highest bidder that determines how much the winner pays.
      I realized today where my perception problem lies: I don't participate in auctions because I'm looking for an obscenely great deal. I bid because I've found something I've wanted, usually something that can't be found elsewhere. Usually the 'deal' comes because the seller has an item they have no use for and just want to get rid of. Many deals I go after are on repossessed and/or 'evidence' items. Just like in real auctions. Sometimes I bid on rare collectable items that I would never find locally.

      In other words, auction bidding is not bargain-hunting for me, in the strictest sense. I don't 'win' every auction, either. I haven't been upset by any 'lost' auction, however.

      So someone outbids me. So what.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  17. Did you see this guy's seller history by thelinuxking · · Score: 5, Informative

    He tried selling this thing a total of 4 times, each of which he recieved NO BIDS AT ALL! It took him 3 times to sell his Actual NASA Mission Control Console Computer. Here are his attempts to sell that: First: Wanted $199, no bids Second: Wanted $175, no bids Third: Sold that thing for $50 Chances are by the time he sells this, it will be around $1000...

    1. Re:Did you see this guy's seller history by nanaki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did those others get Slashdot coverage? EBay is massive and his site isn't exactly easy to find, I don't think it's that there was nobody interested... more likely that nobody knew about it. Then again, $15,000 is a lot of money...

    2. Re:Did you see this guy's seller history by mrgeekguy · · Score: 1

      What is much more disturbing is he actually bought a copy of "The Quick and the Dead" on DVD.

    3. Re:Did you see this guy's seller history by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      Why aren't museums jumping at this? Perhaps he lacks the marketing fu it takes to unload something like this.

  18. slashdot effect by jemele · · Score: 1

    see the counter at the bottom of the e-bay auction site?

    watch it spin!

    1. Re:slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      junkbuster!

  19. Re:I've been hanging with too many photographers.. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    Great for the upcoming Playboy spread: Babes of Nasa!

    oh, wait.....

  20. This kind of thing is just sad... by fmaxwell · · Score: 1, Troll

    I always find it kind of pitiful when someone invests this much time and money building something which is really just a toy cockpit. I'd love to fly on the space shuttle, but its not going to happen and I'm not going to waste my time building expensive sets so that I can play "make-believe." Flying a single-engine Cessna, ultralight, or even a paramotor is a lot better than sitting in a pretend space shuttle cockpit.

    1. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by blincoln · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm guessing you (like several people I know) don't understand why people play videogames either.
      A lot of people (like myself) would like to do things that we can't - whether it's flying a space shuttle, piloting mecha, or leading a party of adventurers into a dungeon.
      Flying an airplane is cool, but it's just not the same thing, any more than getting a job in the timber industry driving a six-legged forest walker would convince me to sell my copy of MechWarrior 2 =).

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    2. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think building a simulator is easy forget it. Building a real aircraft is easy in comparison. There are many folks out there building home-built simulators of all sorts of aircraft,automobiles, trains, and mechs. Everyone of them would agree that building a simulator is not for the faint hearted nor weak minded.

    3. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet if you were given the opportunity to lead a party of adventurers into a dungeon you'd fill your pants at the sight of the first thing that tried to kill you and never do it again, if you lived.

    4. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      True, but I believe this is closer to a replica than a simulator.

      --
      I do security
    5. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by g051051 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's sad? This was constructed for a legitimate educational use. The sad thing is that a work of art like this is stuck in a storeroom somewhere, instead of being used and appreciated by another school, or a Science Museum somewhere.

    6. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      This guy should give it to the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum. Their simulator they have there....well....sucks.

      --

      Gorkman

    7. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Eil · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Way to follow a link or two there, tough guy.

      The auction page quite clearly states that he recieved a grant to build it for a public school that he teaches at. He did not just throw it together in his garage so he could play "make-believe." This simulator was used for 6 years in the school where the students ran 3-hour long missions and learned a thing or two about the space shuttle and space in general.

      If I were a student at this school when I was a kid I would have been grateful in the extreme to be able to play around with a simulator of this quality. Who knows how many kids got to experience this sim along with a knowledgeable teacher and decided that they might be interested in persuing a space-related career?

      Seems to me that the creator of this thing, a public school teacher, set out to influence the lives of his students in a positive way. Odds are very good that he succeeded. With the kind of attitude that you display, you will never be that lucky.

    8. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      I'd love to fly on the space shuttle, but its not going to happen and I'm not going to waste my time building expensive sets so that I can play "make-believe.
      Or spend lots of money on a computer and internet connection and waste time posting on a website to play "I have a make-believe life". Having a beer with buddies or even sitting with your girlfriend is better than typing some stuff into a pretend community to a bunch of nerds.

    9. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Or spend lots of money on a computer and internet connection and waste time posting on a website to play "I have a make-believe life". Having a beer with buddies or even sitting with your girlfriend is better than typing some stuff into a pretend community to a bunch of nerds.

      You sound depressed about your life.

    10. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so buy it, big-shot!!

    11. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Not if you have the Space Suit waiting in the closet....

      Then one could say, Open the pod bay doors, HAL.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    12. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you get paid to be an asshole? You're obviously not a troll, based on that stupid posting history of irrelevent BS posted at +1 with no one paying attention, but you aren't a karma whore either, because you never post anything of any relevence.

    13. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2
      Do you get paid to be an asshole?

      If you could be paid for that, you would be a rich man now.

      You're obviously not a troll, based on that stupid posting history of irrelevent BS posted at +1 with no one paying attention, but you aren't a karma whore either, because you never post anything of any relevence.

      You don't have great reading comprehension, do you?

      Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderation done to your comments)

      8 Re:This may not be the best idea... posted on Tue Aug 20, '02 11:45 AM (Score:5 Replies: 2)

      18 Re:The stock price was up higher shortly thereafte posted on Fri Aug 16, '02 11:33 AM (Score:4 Replies: 1)

      23 Re:Easy posted on Fri Aug 16, '02 12:18 AM (Score:4 Replies: 4)

      attached to Slashback: Activism, VOIP, Ivies
      24 Re:Easy posted on Thu Aug 15, '02 10:38 PM (Score:4 Replies: 1)


      You are just another cowardly little person hiding behind your anonymity so that no one can see a history of your "contributions." I have no doubt that it would be amusing.
    14. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you're arguing that you are a karma whore? Every single one of your "insightful" comments was just pandering to the slashbots.

      If you really are a karma whore, you suck.

    15. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      No, I am arguing that, overall, Karma often relates to the value of the posting. But, as you can see from my history, I speak my mind even when it occasionally results in negative Karma points.

      You, on the other hand, appear to be hiding behind anonymity rather than taking the blame/credit for what you write. Why is that?

    16. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous speech is protected speech. I write anonymously such that I can say things people who karma whore like you don't like and keep you from modbombing things that I think everyone should be able to see.

      I also don't waste my +1 on petty arguments like this. Do you really think your above comment should be rated 2 or 0?

      ADD METAMOD TO SCORE +1 DEFAULTS TODAY!

    17. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Anonymous speech is protected speech.

      I never claimed that you did not have a right. I just questioned your motivation.

      I write anonymously such that I can say things people who karma whore like you don't like and keep you from modbombing things that I think everyone should be able to see.

      So you post anonymously to protect your valuable Karma points you've been whoring under your real login name. I understand.

    18. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the first and scond anonymous poster, (not the METAMOD) guy, I'd like to note that I post anonymously because I feel that my personal privacy is more important that your ability to identify me.

    19. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Your use of a pseudonym on Slashdot would not allow me to identify you. It would allow me to identify the collection of messages you have posted and the opinions you have expressed. Does knowing that someone logs into Slashdot as "shadow303" really tell you anything private about them?

      I have to wonder how many people post anonymously out of a desire to keep from being accountable for things that they said in the past. They can argue in favor of spamming one day and the next they can call for spammers to be hung and no one will be the wiser or call them on their contradictions.

    20. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting logged in gives slashdot the ability to track my posting and viewing habits by depositing a cookie on my machine and looking at it every time I open a page.

      By using multipe proxies and not logging in, I prevent that.

      You know that notorious black-hat hacker fyodor regularly hacks people whose opinions he disagrees with on slashdot?

    21. Re:This kind of thing is just sad... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      You know that notorious black-hat hacker fyodor regularly hacks people whose opinions he disagrees with on slashdot?

      So you believe that Slashdot is tracking IP addresses associated with user postings (but only for those users posting under a login) and providing those IP addresses to "notorious black-hat hacker fyodor"?

      Have you ever seen the movie "A Beautiful Mind"?

  21. Re:I've been hanging with too many photographers.. by jx100 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ride, Sally, Ride.

  22. eBay Feedback whores by nucal · · Score: 1

    People like to treat their eBay Feedback like some sort of video game, with a numeric integer representing their score in the game. People who do this simply are missing the point.

    1. Re:eBay Feedback whores by BigASS · · Score: 1

      And what is 'the point'?

      --
      - Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
  23. Not a real simulator by jsimon12 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looking at these images it doesn't look like the switchs, buttons and toggles actually control anything. So it is more like a mockup with TV's and lots of switchs that don't do anything (other then maybe lightup). Hardly worth 15,000 dollars for something that just looks intersting but serves no actual function.

    1. Re:Not a real simulator by Omerna · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If all the switches do is light-up that's probably a fairly accurate representation of the space shuttle's cockpit. Afterall, unless you build the ENTIRE SHUTTLE there's not much they can do now is there?

      --


      No sig for you.
    2. Re:Not a real simulator by jsimon12 · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't entierly agree with that, there have been previous posts of users who have made fighter cockpits with functional switchs and instrumentation, linked to a computer simulator. Guess I would just expect something a little more then a lightup cockpit mockup for 15,000.

  24. I like this. by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    I also love Slashdot linked sites that have hit counters. Let's you see how bad a Slashdotting the site can take. Obviously, eBay is unaffected by a paltry Slashdotting.

    Unfortunately for this guy, his Special Shuttle Web Page couldn't handle 17,000 hits and it's completely slashdotted.

  25. Shipping extra??? by unicorn · · Score: 2

    The parts are already packed. But he'll charge you $350 for packing anyhow.

    And he wants to charge shipping on it as well.

    I suppose with an opening bid of 15k, a couple hundred extra gets to be chump change for the buyer. Assuming anyone ever bids on it.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
    1. Re:Shipping extra??? by whg409 · · Score: 1

      That's how e-bay works, doesn't it? The buyer always pays for shipping.

      Just because it's already packed doesn't mean it didn't cost anything - in fact it says it was professionally crated. That ain't free

  26. Potential software for it? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2

    There was a Space Shuttle simulator for DOS that came out back in 1992... As I remember, it replicated the functionality of most switches in the cockpit well. Perhaps it might be possible to combine the two?

    As an aside, I remember switching the "jettison external fuel tank" switch on only a few seconds after takeoff... Not recommended if you want to survive!

    1. Re:Potential software for it? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2

      Here is some more potential software for it. Here is even more.

  27. What's included and what's not? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Troll

    Gotta love the caption on the photos, too:

    (Note: not all items in this photo are included in this auction)

    So I don't even know how much of that thing $15K buys! Maybe it just buys the frame and all the knobs are to be sold on another auction?

    Sheesh...

    GMD

    1. Re:What's included and what's not? by aslagle · · Score: 1

      If you'd actually read the site you'd know why this thing is worth $15K. This guy spent 3 years building it - it's not just some shell that looks pretty and that's about it.

    2. Re:What's included and what's not? by mad+flyer · · Score: 1

      Yes it doesn't even look pretty... It's really amateurish work compared to other cockpit made for flight simulators. This guy is not ashamed of selling something who look like 17 years old work. ok IT'S BIG... but it's not worth it. I made my first cockpit when I was 17, It was a good way for me to fucked up school and to try to forget Suzanne. And I destroyed it 3 years later just because it looked like this one. not enought straight lines... And also because flight simulators on the macintosh were going nowhere...

    3. Re:What's included and what's not? by MavEtJu · · Score: 2
      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    4. Re:What's included and what's not? by whg409 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It was a good way for me to fucked up school..."?

      With grammar and spelling like that, you probably should have gone to class more.

    5. Re:What's included and what's not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me fail English? That's unpossible!

    6. Re:What's included and what's not? by mad+flyer · · Score: 1

      Yep, but 2 things, 1 it was 4 am in an unsleepy night (I am from the sign of the cat, which means that if my night are shorter than 9 hours i'm quite unable to do anything good) 2 The way I spelled Suzanne, may have warned you that it wasn't in english... cause i'm french. And I took German and Serbian as my foreign languages. BTW: approx: When the wyse show the moon the dumb watch the finger... we were talking cockpit and flight sims little boy.

    7. Re:What's included and what's not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, but for the record? Your whole post isn't english.

      approx: watch the finger, wyse cockpit boy!

  28. What software by unicorn · · Score: 2

    He's selling a bunch of sheets of wood, with some switches bolted on. And some pretty artistic stuff. I can't imagine why anyone would want this. But then ppl will buy anything, apparently.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  29. I've got it!!! by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    The guy who made that mech in his back yard - find the link yourself... should buy this and build it into a mech as the cockpit.

    then all he would have to do is work on getting the controls to actually move the thing around.

  30. Overkill by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I also had switch guards fabricated by a local metalworking shop. On the shuttle, their purpose is to keep the weightless, floating astronauts from accidentally bumping an important switch. In my simulator, they weren't really necessary, but I was going for total realism...

    This is overkill, especially if it was taxpayer's money. Perhaps it was a fixed-priced contract and the extra's were on him, I don't know. Otherwise, just use erector-set L-joints or something.

    Also, I have seen turn-knobs roughly similar to the grey ones he talks about at Radio Shack. He went and made *custom* turn-knobs.

    If such "extra's" were out of his pocket, fine. However, as a tax-payer I would have a fit if I found out all the custom stuff that was made when close-enough ones were available off-the-shelf.

    He must be an ex-military contractor.

    1. Re:Overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said it was a government grant?

    2. Re:Overkill by danielrose · · Score: 1

      Your mother

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    3. Re:Overkill by JetScootr · · Score: 2

      However, as a tax-payer I would have a fit if I found out all the custom stuff that was made when close-enough ones were available off-the-shelf.
      You can relax. Most of the knobs and switches, etc, in the crewstation are standard aviation parts.
      even the GPC (General Purpose Computer) that does the navigation and reads the kabillion sensors all over the inside of the shuttle was an IBM-off-the-shelf model with software customized for space flight.

      --
      Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
    4. Re:Overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (* You can relax. Most of the knobs and switches, etc, in the crewstation are standard aviation parts. *)

      Didn't he state that he made his own plastic mold for the turn-knobs?

      Are you saying the real ones are off the shelf, bit *his* are custom?

      Boy, the school board is gonna launch him into space if they ever find that out.

  31. What's his game? by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Informative

    What is this guy up to? When you look at the pictures and the price, it seems like a really cool simulator/mockup. But, digging a little deeper and looking at the list of items that are *actually* being auctioned off, there are a lot of things missing.

    Not included are a few panels, headphones, TV sets, *the actual framework* that all this mounts on. One wonders why. Basically all your getting for $15,000 is some very nice looking skins. They're non functional and a lot of assembly/construction will be required.

    But, what is he going to do with things like the framework? It sounds to me like he is dissatisfied with version 1.0 and is dumping the skins so that he can start version 2.0. Sorry pal, for $15,000 I expect the entire rig, as well as some support for putting it back together after shipping.

    1. Re:What's his game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, looking at his history, he sold a batch of 9 CRT monitors a while ago. I guess he's slowly selling off everything and stuff...

      yeah.

      ok, my head hurts. 5 minutes till I get to go home.

    2. Re:What's his game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have more than 1.5 hours. I envy you. Going to be late for the Vex Thal raid....

  32. Not at 20k yet?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am fairly dissapointed, the "slashdot effect" has not produced 20K hits in 52 minutes.

  33. I can think of a buyer... by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    This is just the thing for a fledgling Chinese space program, doncha think? Actually, I'm surprised the man can't find a museum or some sort of park where he could rent this thing out. Not for actual missions, but still...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  34. So.... by spacefrog · · Score: 2

    And we will get to watch the video of the moon collapsing for the next year

    If we allow the resulting change in the tides to affect us, the terrorists will have won

  35. Fledgling Chinese space program? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    fledgling Chinese space program

    Haven't the Chinese had rockets for several centuries? What's the friggin' holdup over there?

    1. Re:Fledgling Chinese space program? by mrgeekguy · · Score: 1

      I dunno, those bottle rockets could barely lift my G.I. Joe three feet, tho they if find a really tiny Chineese dude.....

  36. Better Use for it: by mortonda · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A place like the Kansas Cosmosphere might be a btter place for this thing. A truly wonderful place, despite /.'s fear of Kansas.

  37. It's eBay. Not EBay or Ebay. by frostgiant · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You always seem to get it wrong.

    1. Re:It's eBay. Not EBay or Ebay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats ok, [Ee][Bb][Aa][Yy] themselves dont seem to know what it is either, look at their logo. ebaY is different again.

  38. Hrrmmm... by mrbill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe Lance Bass from N'Sync can afford this, since he doesnt seem to be able to pay his bill to the Russians on time... He can sit in the chair and make rocket noises...

    1. Re:Hrrmmm... by unicron · · Score: 4, Funny

      He does already. Calls it a "concert".

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Hrrmmm... by NoFX · · Score: 1

      oh shit.. is THAT what he's doin?

  39. Time == Money? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    If you'd actually read the site you'd know why this thing is worth $15K. This guy spent 3 years building it - it's not just some shell that looks pretty and that's about it.

    So I should pay $15K because he spent 3 years building it, huh? And if he managed to build it in 1 year of super-intense work, would it only be worth $5K?

    And, oh yeah, if I'm quoting from the site, then it stands to reason that I read it, don't cha think?

    GMD

    1. Re:Time == Money? by jachim69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the guy got a grant from the government to build it! He got paid for it! So just where is the 15 grand going? Will it go back to the taxpayers? I doubt it. Sounds to me like he's trying to line his pockets!

    2. Re:Time == Money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're quoting the ebay site, he's refering to the construction site. They're not the same thing, don't cha think?

    3. Re:Time == Money? by danielrose · · Score: 1

      Mmmm yes.
      I think you are on to something.
      If he was paid originally to build it for the school or whatever the fuck he did, then all proceeds should go to said school, or the government, correct?
      I say we call some nasty federal type men!

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    4. Re:Time == Money? by cduffy · · Score: 2

      There's been no evidence as of yet that his grant was from the government. Believe it or not, commercial grants to educational facilities are quite common.

    5. Re:Time == Money? by jachim69 · · Score: 1
      Yes, I thought of that about 20 minutes later. However, he still go tpaid for it, so why does he need $15k for it now? Because he stored it for a year? I don't think so, that's only $720.


      He needs to be up-front and say why he wants that much, and what's going to happen with the money.

    6. Re:Time == Money? by big_oaf · · Score: 1

      Oh, gosh! Heaven forbid someone would try to make some money! What? Does he think he lives in some sort of capitalist society or something?

      Oh, wait...

      --
      -- My hovercraft is full of eels.
    7. Re:Time == Money? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Because the people who paid for it didn't want to keep it, so it got given to him.

      So he's got the thing, and what do you want him to do, give it away free? It has a market value, and he's trying to find it and extract that value. I don't see what's so unreasonable.

  40. Wait a minute.... by nortcele · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think there was some water damage on a few of those panels... are we sure that these weren't retrieved from a Florida beach and cleaned up a little?

    1. Re:Wait a minute.... by whg409 · · Score: 1

      That's just sick.

    2. Re:Wait a minute.... by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Oh come on... it was 16 years ago. Don't you know you can make jokes about tragedies after 11 years?

      Personally, I'm waiting for Sept 12, 2012

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  41. I'm not buying this unless... by pigeonhk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... it runs Linux! :P

    --
    If you have the source, you have the whole world...
  42. 24,719 hits and NO bids! by dpbsmith · · Score: 2

    As I write this, the counter is showing 24,719 hits--and no bids.

    That has got to be one of the highest hit counts I've EVER seen on eBay. How frustrating to it must be to have that many hits and no bids.

    I have to think the guy was unwise to set the starting bid so high, though. I wonder why he didn't set a lower bid and put in a $15,000 reserve? Then he would at least have been able to get a reading on its market value. (Although eBay does charge a reserve fee if the item doesn't sell...)

  43. How do you see someone's seller history ? by Utopia · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find any links on the page.

    1. Re:How do you see someone's seller history ? by jred · · Score: 2

      You click on the number representing feedback, behind his user name.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  44. It's so easy to criticize... by whg409 · · Score: 2, Informative

    What a bunch of losers some of you are!

    I went to this school in the mid-90's, and participated in this program. Let me tell you, this was the coolest thing I'd ever done - and nothing I've done since comes close.

    We trained for five or six weeks, learning all the shuttle's systems and how they worked. We also trained in the simulator for several days, practicing the procedures over and over. We even landed the shuttle with some kind of computer sim.

    It makes me mad to see some of your criticism. It's easy to criticize someone else's efforts, but I don't imagine any of you ever began to accomplish something as impressive as this.

    If there were more dedicated teachers like this one, there would be a lot less of you jerks sitting in front of your computers all day in your momma's basement.

    1. Re:It's so easy to criticize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why don't you buy it for 15K?

    2. Re:It's so easy to criticize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why don't you kiss my bloomin........

  45. MET clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I ignorant, or is that MET clock the worlds most complicated microwave timer in existance. The software was written in C++ too, I wonder if its object oriented ;-).
    Anyway, if you look carefully, you will notice a piss poor job of wirewrapping. The 3% of switches and light that are actually hooked to anything look like one of my freshman year college projects.

    I would say the real world value of this monstrosity is about $100, but who the hell knows. If this thing sells for this price then we know that the seller is not the idiot.

    1. Re:MET clock by whg409 · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes, you are ignorant. Can you design, build and program something like that?

    2. Re:MET clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you design, build and program something like that?

      Yep. I imagine you could, too, after spending a few hours coming up to speed with a Radio Shack 300-In-1(tm) Project Kit.

  46. if you want a shuttle simulator... by QuasiRob · · Score: 1

    ...try the simulator here:

    http://www.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/~martins/orbit/orbi t. html

    I even see the latest release has "Instrument panel support. Spacecraft can now be designed with custom panels."

    I've got an older version and its fantastic. And its free.

    --
    If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done?
  47. Go mules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re:Go mules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea go mules!
      i used this simulator in the 8th grade and it may not be a full working model but it was pretty cool learning about all the stuff that went into our fake mission. i was the capcom in the mission control room

  48. From a guy that works on the Real(!) simulator by JetScootr · · Score: 4, Informative

    The simulator shown is incredibly authentic, but I think there are actually TWO such non-Nasa sims. I saw one about 15 years ago at a mall that was having a "air and space hobby" show.
    The sim shown is what we call "Pre-MEDS". MEDS was an update to the cockpit (Multifunction Electronic Display System) to update the shuttle to semi-modern "glass cockpit", that is, use computer monitors instead of actual gauges.
    Also, there were two original simulators used to develop procedures and do leading-edge-of-wing math modeling in the early 80's and I understood that those two simulators (real NASA sims!) were sold to private individuals or companies (as scrap, as far as Nasa was concerned). I may be wrong about that.
    PS: I've worked at Nasa's shuttle astronaut training center since 1979.

    --
    Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
    1. Re:From a guy that works on the Real(!) simulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the pleasure of working for Intermetrics doing the BFS (Backup Flight System) software support and spent many happy hours in the simulation building at Rockwell/Downey watching the sims run..as well as getting to fly in it late one Friday night on an Autolanding test run...

      The Simulator the guy is selling isn't much different than the one in building 4 at Rockwell ... and crews used it for basic learning.

      Incidently,speaking of simulation folks, I had Al Ragsdale autograph my copy of Analog .. is he still hanging around down there?

      If I had the 15K I'd buy it ..play with it for a bit ... then donate it to a museum and take a tax writeoff

  49. This sucks by dacarr · · Score: 1

    There is no zero-G system on this. For $15k, I want one.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:This sucks by JetScootr · · Score: 2

      So take it up in an airplane. Drop it. Depending on how high u start, you'll get several seconds of "zero G". Watch out for the dismount, though.

      --
      Pavlov wouldn't be so famous if he'd used a can opener instead of a bell.
  50. I've actually seen this thing... by BlueLlama · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I helped to install network cabling in the very school this simulator used to reside in a few years back... Although I never saw it running, it appeared to be a well crafted simulator. I've seen the one at space camp as well, and it was surprisingly close. I'm fairly certain most of the buttons and switches were wired to something, with several computers running the simulator. The room it was in had just about enough room to get in and out of the cockpit, the rest covered in equipment. My first reaction was disbelief that a school actually had something this cool. I can't believe the school ditched this... perhaps the local Children's Museum would be interested in it as a sort of local, mini-space camp. Either way, I think it was awesome that someone went to all this trouble to build something like this for his school. Regardless of how he's selling it off on e-bay, this guy is authentic about his description of the way he built it and the way it was used in the past.

  51. Save your sanctimonious speech for someone else. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2
    Way to follow a link or two there, tough guy.

    Well continue on and we'll see just how good your reading comprehension is.

    The auction page quite clearly states that he recieved a grant to build it for a public school that he teaches at. He did not just throw it together in his garage so he could play "make- believe."

    Oh yeah? Then read the opening on ebay:

    Have you ever dreamed of being an astronaut? If you found this auction, then probably so. But, if you're like me and the other 99.999% of the population, your chances of flying in the space shuttle are probably zero.

    How would you like to do the next best thing?


    I am offering a full-size space shuttle flight deck simulator.


    Seems to me that the creator of this thing, a public school teacher, set out to influence the lives of his students in a positive way.

    Seems like he got a government grant to build a fantasy toy for himself (see quote from ebay) that the students also used and he's now trying to sell it for $15K. I'd be a lot more impressed if he was donating it to another school, but he seems more interested in 'influencing his bank balance in a positive way.'
  52. Al-Qaeda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep Arabs away from this!

  53. Re:Everybody to the limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Uh-oh, somebody is unfamiliar with the Strong Bad Canon Of Great Emails. Just make sure you've read them all before the test next Friday, mmkay?

    ObFhqwhgads: I made up my own stanza for the song today. (Apologies to Sugarhill Gang.)
    Said ho-tel, mo-tel,
    Fhqwhgads,
    If your girl starts acting up,
    Then you fhqwhgads...
    What do y'all think?
  54. This would be cool if it had software support by Animats · · Score: 2
    Apparently there's some minimal computer interface, but most of the controls don't do anything. No indication of whether you can actually use it as a flight sim, but since the entire software provided fits on two floppies, probably not.

    The ideal would be for somebody to get this thing who wants to put enough computer support behind it that you can fly simulated missions. There are some open source flight sims you could use as a base for future work.

    1. Re:This would be cool if it had software support by Manitcor · · Score: 2

      Yeah but for 15k I should be able to put it all together as is and make it work. Not spend another 5-10k on equipment and another 10+k (time cost) on coding or setting up the framework.

      if im gonna spend all that time I might as well use the 150 pics he has on his site and build my own.

      However im not interested in it enough to do either.

      --
      "Don't mess with him, he taunts the happy fun ball."
  55. Re:Save your sanctimonious speech for someone else by Eil · · Score: 2


    I don't understand what quoting the ebay page proves. I'm fully aware that most people will never get a chance to fly a space shuttle. But I'm also aware of the fact that just one experience like this for the right kind of kid could start him onto the path to becoming the next Neil Armstrong. Your original post had the pessimistic tone of, "boy, what a loser this guy is building a shuttle sim for no good reason then selling it off on ebay." My point was merely that there certainly was a good reason, one that you seemingly didn't even bother looking into before jumping into bitch mode.

    Seems like he got a government grant to build a fantasy toy for himself (see quote from ebay) that the students also used and he's now trying to sell it for $15K.

    How do you reason that he built it all for himself and got the government to pay for it? A project like this is a labour of love no matter how much money is involved. If I ever had the opportunity to do something this cool (and then share it with others) I'd jump at it in a second.

    Granted, I'd never pay $15k for the thing (would much rather enjoy building one myself, actually) and it would be awful nice of him to donate it to another school, but it is well within his right to sell it to someone else who could do something useful with it. It would be a waste of my time to complain about his ethical standards.

    FWIW, working in the underpaid, underappreciated public school system and undertaking the huge task of constructing something of this magnitude, $15k is barely a door prize. I'd wager that over the last 9 years, he's spent a fair chunk of his own money and time maintaining and upgrading the sim but there's no proof of that either way.

  56. It was a gov. grant (Re:Overkill) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (* Who said it was a government grant? *)

    From the ebay page:

    "In 1991, I received a grant to build a space shuttle simulator at a public school where I was a science teacher."

  57. Re:Save your sanctimonious speech for someone else by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    I don't understand what quoting the ebay page proves.

    The intent for the project: A cool toy for people who want to pretend that they are astronauts.

    How do you reason that he built it all for himself and got the government to pay for it?

    Read his ad: "if you're like me..." As to funding: "In 1991, I received a grant to build a space shuttle simulator at a public school where I was a science teacher. After three years of construction (mostly by me), our simulator became operational." If his primary interest was in seeing it put to good use to inspire students, it would be in another school right now instead of being sold on ebay, wouldn't it?

    A project like this is a labour of love no matter how much money is involved. If I ever had the opportunity to do something this cool (and then share it with others) I'd jump at it in a second.

    That's very commendable and I'm sure that, if you try, you can find something that you can do in a similar vein.

    Granted, I'd never pay $15k for the thing (would much rather enjoy building one myself, actually) and it would be awful nice of him to donate it to another school, but it is well within his right to sell it to someone else who could do something useful with it. It would be a waste of my time to complain about his ethical standards.

    The entire process of getting a government grant to build the flight deck for a school and then privately auctioning it off on ebay is questionable, legally and ethically, at best. But perhaps the real lapse was the school's in giving him school property worth $15K (his estimate of its worth).

    Don't get me wrong. If this guy had built the thing for his students and then donated it to another school when his school could no longer house it, I'd be recommending him for Teacher of the Year. But that's not what happened. He built it with public funds and the help of his students and is now trying to get $15K (or more) from whatever self-indulgent, rich person is willing to buy it.

  58. Re:the point by nucal · · Score: 1

    yet another bad joke, I guess. If only I could erase these. Or for that matter, not post them ....

  59. Sellers discretion by unicorn · · Score: 2

    Both charges are entirely at the discretion of the seller. Ebay is merely a marketplace, it doesn't set the terms of sale, at all.

    And my point was, that when you're selling something for 15k, it just seems cheesy, to squeeze an extra couple hundred out of someone for shipping and packing.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke