Slashdot Mirror


Reconfigurable, Modular Dream Home

ssyladin writes: "CNN is reporting a new dream cyber home being designed by the Brits for use in Hong Kong. It combines smart home technologies of touch panels for lights, heating, water taps, with the ability to move the interior wall partitions around with a basic toolbox and about a half day of labor. No more LAN parties in the garage! The homes can also be built faster and with less waste too. Bit skimpy on the details, but its an exciting prospect if its ever finished." Concepts like this probably fill a lot of napkin doodles around the world -- what do you think this particular one should do differently?

182 comments

  1. Reminds me by Syre · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of my father's friend back in grade school (oh, like 1960's) who had invented furniture that hid behind walls and then could be inflated and unfolded as needed.

    Last I ever heard of it...

    1. Re:Reminds me by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of my father's friend back in grade school (oh, like 1960's) who had invented furniture that hid behind walls and then could be inflated and unfolded as needed.

      And the Ted Bundy model comes with company.

    2. Re:Reminds me by Salad+Shooter · · Score: 0

      That was his girlfriend, not furniture that was inflatable. Why did he hide her behind the wall, though?

    3. Re:Reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny... I used to have a girlfriend like that.

  2. Fav Quote by Winnipenguin · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You can control your temperature of the flat, you can control lighting," said Donald Hughes with the Hong Kong Housing Society.

    Just imagine ...

    1. Re:Fav Quote by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2

      Holy #*(@# batman! Temperature AND lighting!

      If only the neighborhood kids would quit stealing the bathroom wall I'd be a happy man.

  3. walls movable with tools... by shren · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait a minute. That sounds like a cubicle. 'Cubicle' and 'dream cyber home' do not belong in the same article, ok, guys?

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
    1. Re:walls movable with tools... by slutdot · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was thinking the exact same thing when I read this. Just add X-10 technology to your cube and you have a "dream cyber home".

    2. Re:walls movable with tools... by dattaway · · Score: 3, Interesting

      or try "manufactured" housing. Here today, gone tomorrow. This may be the seeds of the trailer parks of the future.

    3. Re:walls movable with tools... by XorNand · · Score: 2


      This seems to be an ugly trend in "Modular America"... We change our employers much more often than our parents did; drive plastic vehicles that aren't quite a truck, yet not quite a car; and dare label stuff that comes out of a spray can "cheese".

      When I come home, I want my home to have a solid, permanent feeling. If I wanted cheap and easy, I'd live in a double-wide tornado magnet.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    4. Re:walls movable with tools... by EvilAlien · · Score: 3, Funny
      Don't forgot our pop idols like Britney Spears, not quite a girl, yet not quite a woman.

      OH THE HUMANITY!

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  4. CNN Video Clips by n-baxley · · Score: 1

    Has anyone been able to get CNN video clips, like the one in the story, to work in Mozilla? I'm using 1.0 and all I get is a new little window and then nothing. I've got Real installed, and I think the plugin is installed. What gives?

    1. Re:CNN Video Clips by WayneGayle · · Score: 2, Funny

      The best thing to do is to uninstall RealVideo and to never ever use it again... even if it means you can't get CNN video.

      --

      "America, I smoke marijuana every chance I get."
    2. Re:CNN Video Clips by PD · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wrote the webmaster a little note and he responded that the videos cost money and can only be seen by subscribers. I wrote a note back saying that under Mozilla/Linux I don't even see the popup that gives me an option to subscribe, and he never wrote back.

      Talk about clueless. It's the webmaster's job to make sure his site works. It plainly doesn't. The name is cnn.com, not cnnforwindows.com!

      I wrote another note to BMW because their site doesn't work either. I wrote that people who demand the most out of their cars buy BMW, and people who demand the most out of their computers use Linux, and asked him nicely to support Linux. He wrote back and said he'd think about it.

    3. Re:CNN Video Clips by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      We ecountered difficulty in downloads from government agencies at work where the download strings and file names had spaces in them. I would work with IE but not in Netscape. They told us to get an updated version of IE - It wasn't their job to make sure it worked in every "fly by night web browser." It was fixed within a week of our complaint to the purchasing agent.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    4. Re:CNN Video Clips by donutello · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The name is cnn.com, not cnnforwindows.com!

      Ironic, that this is the same company that owns Netscape.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. x10 cameras by mr4k · · Score: 1

    Does it use x-10 wireless cameras? :)))

    1. Re:x10 cameras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but they pop-under the walls.

  7. A little overboard maybe... by jsonmez · · Score: 1
    "Housing in Hong Kong is notorious for being badly planned and oblivious to environmental concerns"

    Do you think maybe, just maybe this might be a little overkill for the problem they are trying to solve?

    1. Re:A little overboard maybe... by ozzimark · · Score: 0

      Nothing is ever, ever overkill. Ever.

      --
      C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg
  8. Yes but... by Sembiance · · Score: 1

    does the dining room table have a built in ethernet hub?

    1. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but an MIT student is working on putting a 4-port hub into a cookie jar.

  9. The hell w/ Hong Kong by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 3, Funny

    When do we get this here? (NJ/US)

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:The hell w/ Hong Kong by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      I'm a little confused where the humor is in this- why the hell would you want to have anything in NJ, let alone your home?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  10. Pfeh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Big Whoop.

    This Old House did a show on modular housing in Japan, exact same thing. Only TOH did it years ago, and its been going on in Japan for years upon years. Each room is a module, you can move interior walls around easily, etc, etc.

    PS: I live by X10 remotes.....

    1. Re:Pfeh.... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that you're not referring to the "extreme homes" special discussing a crazy man who lived in a wharehouse and had a few big boxes on wheels that they called "rooms"? That sounds like what you're referring to.

    2. Re:Pfeh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the house was composed of structurally independant, metal-framed rooms that were constructed in a factory and bolted together at the site, wiring was pulled through, etc. The most impressive thing about it was how FAST they were.

  11. been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this story on 3-2-1 Contact in the 70's, and on Beyond 2000 in the 90's. Yawn.

  12. What's in a name... by McCart42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dunno...I wouldn't want to buy a house designed by a company with a name like "The Integer Group"...sounds limiting.

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    1. Re:What's in a name... by PD · · Score: 2

      Naaah, you just need to stay from "The Odd Number Group." They're only half as big. And you can't run up their stairs two at a time.

    2. Re:What's in a name... by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      (* I dunno...I wouldn't want to buy a house designed by a company with a name like "The Integer Group"...sounds limiting. *)

      According to CNN, in/near Dresden Germany they have some "floating point units" right now. Get your rowboat out and you can maybe catch one or two.

    3. Re:What's in a name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm kinda pudgy, maybe I should buy from "The Double Wide Integer Company"

    4. Re:What's in a name... by uawcpm · · Score: 1
      Naaah, you just need to stay from "The Odd Number Group." They're only half as big.

      Actually, there's a bijection between the set of integers and the set of odd integers, so they're the same size.
    5. Re:What's in a name... by Myco · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but you really should have come up with a way to make that funny. Otherwise you just sound like a pedantic jackass.

  13. Modular Dream Home? by paladin_tom · · Score: 4, Funny

    How is that possible?

    I thought the web browser was an inseparable part of the home.

    --
    #define sig "Every social system runs on the people's belief in it."
  14. The Cube II: Ubiquitous Cube by jukal · · Score: 3, Informative

    To me, that does not sound like a dream home, it sounds more like Ubiquitous version of the dream house featured in the movie Cube.

  15. All that is great... by jsonmez · · Score: 2, Funny

    But what I really want to know is does it have a dispenser to dispense a cup with spongy jelly

  16. Locked in by a blackout? by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Being that everything in the house is electronic, what happens in the event of a blackout? Usually the first action is to turn off everything that was on -- but an electronic switch prevents that. How would you get water from the taps (or worse, shut it off)?

    I hope the door and window locks aren't electronic, too.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:Locked in by a blackout? by _Swank · · Score: 1

      a proper environmentally friendly house would have some sort of alternate energy power source (solar, wind, etc.) so as to minimize it's electricity usage from power companies. i'd assume it used some of that power (possibly from some storage device/generator)

    2. Re:Locked in by a blackout? by EDA+Wizard · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone who currently lives in a house with electric locks on all doors it still works fine in a california blackout. Here are our basic design criteria:

      * All doors that don't need to open in an emergency are fail secure. This means that with extended power loss or critical failure the doors stay locked.

      * All doors that must allow egress during an emergency or critical failure should release bolts under failure (fail safe) and allow the door strike to function like a normal door (latch the unlatched strike). This unbolts the door, but also causes the standard positive latch to fall into the strike. This provides a secure door with manual egress

      * garage door won't function anyway.

      We have batteries that keep each door alive for about 2 hours. The front door has enough battery for about 6hrs. After that entry becomes a bit more complicated. After critical failure or extended blackout, entry requires a physical key in the one door that has a keyed knob. That door's bolts are fail safe so it should be unbolted, but key-latched if the system fails.

      Normal entry is via proximity access control with a standard HID card.

      Securitron Unlatch for electric strike control
      http://www.securitron.com/SubCat.asp?Cata goryID=4

      SDC Electric Bolts
      http://www.sdcsecurity.com/newsite/html/pro ducts/e lectricbl.html

      HID Access control
      http://www.hidcorp.com/

    3. Re:Locked in by a blackout? by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      From The FAQ
      "What happens if this intelligent technologies, the various control systems, break down?"

      "Again, this is being considered. For example, in the design of the Millenium house specifically avoided any centralised computer control system to minimise such problems - if there were faults the technology was engineered for graceful degradation. As regards more general Integer housing, in terms of design there should always be a manual override so heating, lighting, security and anything else can be operated separately and manually rather than being pre-programmed. The more detailed arrangements that still have to be put in place concern questions of exactly who to contact, just as currently people have to contact tradespeople like plumbers, electricians or gas engineers if there is a fault."


      -GiH
      What is cheeseier anyway?

  17. Just imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a Beowulf cluster of these! Hah!

    1. Re:Just imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be an apartment building?

    2. Re:Just imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, that would be a trailer park.

      hey jimbob - you doing that sooper 'computin tonight?

    3. Re:Just imagine... by Integer-UK · · Score: 1

      The Hong Kong design is exactly that - a 40-storey 6 or 8 flats per storey tower designed to be built at one storey every two days. It's what they need in that environment where the availablity of land is so tight. I'm one ff the design enginers.

  18. This would be great! by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 1
    What if all of the devices ran MS software? Your light switches, toaster, faucet, and could automatically call home and download the latest secutiy patches (complete with their newly-revised EULAs). Now MS would not only know what movies and music you enjoy, but also how often you use your microwave and toilet!

    (That was a joke.)

    1. Re:This would be great! by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      Joke, maybe, but funny? Not one little bit. I think it is actually their plan.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    2. Re:This would be great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but you can kiss the lock on the back door goodbye.

  19. Saw a TV show about this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was recently down in the Caribbean and saw a show with about a 15 minutes story on these. Someone earlier mentioned a cubicle. Bingo. The things were a glorified cubicle (frosted glass/plastic panels for many of the walls) with lot's of gadgets on the "demo model" (computerized fridge, etc.) My favorite was the remote control for the lights and temp. It was the size of a tablet PC and the guy is standing like 2 feet from a lamp, point this thing at it and about 4 seconds later the lamp turns on. What a bunch of crap.

    1. Re:Saw a TV show about this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I was recently down in the Caribbean and saw a
      >show

      Down in the Caribbean... watching TV?

      Did it occur to you to go outside?

  20. Cameras and lights are controllable online by lute3 · · Score: 3, Informative
    If these systems are so integrated, could there be structural or functional implications for being Slashdotted?

    "You can control the Integer house.." - link
    Cameras (evidently dark right now in Hong Kong) - link

    I wish I could read more about the thing, but the pages aren't loading and it looks like we're going to burn it down!

    1. Re:Cameras and lights are controllable online by Integer-UK · · Score: 1

      The cameras are at the four year old prototype in the UK and, yes it is dark here at present. And there's been so much traffic that we've knocked over the cotnrol server until I reboot it tomorrow - UK time.

  21. I would just like to add here... by CoderByBirth · · Score: 1

    ...that no home is complete without the talking Beauty Toilet (pronounced "BJUUUTI TOILEEET"),
    which provides you with a completely automated, FuzzyLogic(tm) bathroom experience.

  22. wondering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading this article, I wondered if this is written in 1995 ish. Talk about smart internet appliances is already outdated fashion. And moving the walls around in half day with handyman ? Looks like existing rearrangeable partitions outsmart these guys. Internet enabled refregirator, Internet enabled microwave (why?) and Smart cash in the ring on the finger. When we gonna walk the talk ?. And the monochrome panel in the wall with stylus isnt vision of future at all. And for ordering food from refregirator, stick a touch pad interface on old refrigerator, interface it to your box and have it faxed to near by 'free home delivery ' shops on weekly (or as needed basis). And since when we started to go green with all those electronic waste and nuclear generated electricity? SO much to talk about technology.Shit.

    1. Re:wondering! by Renraku · · Score: 2

      Well..Slashdot *IS* notorious for posting old news..

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  23. my dream home by avandesande · · Score: 1

    My dream home would be 200 years old with slate roof and 5 fireplaces.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:my dream home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine too... none of this throw-away, designed-to-fall-apart-after-twenty-years shit you find all over "modern" asia.

  24. Re:Wasteful? by MaxVlast · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this remind anyone of the old houses of the future? I have a robot book from the early '80s with this strange modular, domed modules that were supposed to be the computer-controlled home of the future. Now that it is the future (as far as I can tell,) I'd like to know what's substantially different about this idea compared to homes of the future twenty years ago.

    Though I do like the name (the Integer Group.)

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  25. living conditions by sstory · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Wouldn't it be interesting to see NYC, Hong Kong, etc, mandate 100% polymer construction for non-load-bearing elements, and concrete/steel for the rest? think about it--NO BUGS. I COULD FINALLY MOVE TO NYC!!!!!!!!! :-)

    seriously, there's no way you can live in a place where you get home and encounter a swarm of flying bugs in your kitchen. jesus christ.

    1. Re:living conditions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > seriously, there's no way you can live in a place
      > where you get home and encounter a swarm of flying
      > bugs in your kitchen. jesus christ.

      Man, you need to take out the trash more often. And do the dishes more often too. I had that bug problem too. I took out all the trash, walked down to the corner market and bought a can of Raid, came home, sprayed, and took out the trash every day on my way to work. I walk past the Dumpsters anyway.

  26. Read "Your Engineered House". . . by kfg · · Score: 3, Informative

    by Rex Roberts. Published by M.Evans, 1964.

    You'll never look at houses the same and his interior walls don't even necessarily need tools to move. Heck some of them aren't even technically walls although a stranger couldn't even tell.

    This book should be required reading for anyone intending to build a house, especially architects.

    KFG

  27. reality springs from Sci-fi by Conare · · Score: 1

    this reminds me of the Towers of Utopia by Mack Reynolds. A massive apartment building where layouts were completely configurable. It also had automatic room service that included alcohol!

    --
    Stop Continental Drift! Reunite Gondwanaland!
  28. YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have long dreamed of this becomming widely available and accepted.

    However, in talking about it among friends and collegues, I realized that most women will *not like it*.

    It is too clinical and "same-same". Girls want something that makes them feel "special". If everyone has the same panels and boxes, then it will become a status symbol to have something *different*.

    And we all know that:

    Status_Symbol != Convenience

    1. Re:YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by jafuser · · Score: 2
      You mean the same girls who all try to look like one particular pop music star, or one of the two main female characters from "Friends"?

      Bah, to hell with them... gimmie my LEGO house now dammit!

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    2. Re:YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      Have you been to and growing city like Boulder, Phoenix or Los Angelis receantly? There are thousands upon thousands of "cookie cutter" homes that have sprung up. Whole neighbourhoods where all the houses are designed fomr the exact same blueprint. Not only are they all "same-same", but you can't reconfigure them without some major tools. Based on the rate they are being built, I'm guessing they sell pretty well, and it's families I see living there, not single geeks.

    3. Re:YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by geekoid · · Score: 2

      are you kidding? now the can re-arange the walls.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by Shant3030 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is too clinical and "same-same". Girls want something that makes them feel "special". If everyone has the same panels and boxes, then it will become a status symbol to have something *different*.

      False. Most woman are conformists. They dont like to step out of the box because they hate being the criticized for being different. Why do you think eating disorders are so common among woman? Because they hate looking differently from the the models they see on TV or magazines. They are bombarded with the message that thats how woman should look like and anything other than that is appalling.

      I dont know of many women that dislike technology because everyone has it...
      Most woman will not like it because its not feminine. Why do you think tech and science majors (comp sci, bio, physics, engineering....) are filled with mostly men? Do you ever see women sitting around the TV playing XBox? No. Women just arent into that stuff... Thats the main reason, not from a fear of being different...

      --
      100% Insightful
    5. Re:YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by AugstWest · · Score: 2


      thank you, Captain Generalize.

    6. Re:YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* thank you, Captain Generalize. *)

      Fine! Get married in a Lego house and see what happens when it falls out of style in ten years. We need good guinee pigs to test the sociality of this concept anyhow. If you want to volunteer, be my guest.

      Just make sure you get a signed pre-nup.

    7. Re:YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by krogoth · · Score: 2

      Might as well complain that everyone uses light switches to control their lights...

      --

      They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
    8. Re:YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by broody · · Score: 1

      You don't really know very many women, do you?

      --
      ~~ What's stopping you?
    9. Re:YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

      You don't really know very many women, do you?

      Nope, none... my girlfriend just suggested that I write that crazy post.

      --
      100% Insightful
    10. Re:YAN logical nerd idea that repells chicks by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Bah. Once it stops being stylish it's just a simple matter of rebuilding the Lego house into some sort of attack robot, and taking over a different house. And if you use the flat lego pieces that are difficult to pry off of each other, it's just that much harder for the poor sap you're attacking to defend himself.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  29. What's the point? by elbowdonkey · · Score: 1

    Leave it to the Brits to get absorbed in fancy pants cubicle construction for a country on the other side of the world.

    Tally Ho! Let's see some effort put forth towards improving British food. How about inventing a device that can eliminate unwanted blood pudding or dry bagettes?

    That CNN article is as devoid of details as British food is of flavor.

    1. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave it to the Yanks to go and bomb some other country on the others side of the world.

      You, Sir, are a racist troll and I despise you.

    2. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dental technology is another area the brits seem to have neglected!!!

  30. Buckminster Fuller Spinning in his grave! by TheLocustNMI · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Well, maybe he's not, but reconfigurable housing (as an idea) has been around a while, and no doubt the Dymaxion house was a great example! Forget that half-day crap, you could unlock the wall and turn it around the center-post!

    http://www.hfmgv.org/dymaxion

    http://www.thirteen.org/bucky/house.html

    1. Re:Buckminster Fuller Spinning in his grave! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Buckminster Fuller Spinning in his grave!

      He can't. They ignored his plans and made the dammed coffin rectangular.

    2. Re:Buckminster Fuller Spinning in his grave! by gentlewizard · · Score: 2

      Rats! Beat me to it. :-)

      Actually, Bucky had more than one reconfigurable housing idea. In addition to the Dymaxion house, which used suspension instead of compression for structure, he also invented a variety of
      domes including one, the Fly Eye dome, designed to be assembled in sections that could be lifted with one hand (so the other could fasten the bolts.)

      Check out the
      Buckminster Fuller Institute for all things Bucky.

  31. Unfortunately by Winnipenguin · · Score: 1

    Right after the demo for the press, hax0rs using the SmartHouseDIE exploit caused the walls to turn blue and fall down. Several reporters were killed. BSOD.

  32. Watch out!! by mustangdavis · · Score: 1

    I'll huff, I'll puff, and I'll blow your house down!

  33. Dont tell the wife by MrWinkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ack! Dont tell my wife! She will want that! I can see it now....

    Honey can you move this wall over here? Then that wall over there and then this over there?

    Later that week...

    Honey can you move that wall back over there? Maybe this wall over here?

    I can already hear my own screams.....

    --
    Vote early. Vote often. Vote CowboyNeal.
    1. Re:Dont tell the wife by SPYvSPY · · Score: 2

      Putting aside the fact that you're making a joke, why can't your wife to do her own heavy lifting? Unless she's injured, that's extremely pathetic.

    2. Re:Dont tell the wife by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      If it was truly modular, then you can simply purchase sub-walls that make up the walls, IOW bricks, and then tell her to "move the damned wall yourself, you fat lazy cow".

      Of course, then you will be wearing the wall for a while.

    3. Re:Dont tell the wife by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

      why can't your wife to do her own heavy lifting? Unless she's injured, that's extremely pathetic.

      That's covered by paragaph 6 section C of the unwritten contract. Amongst other things, she never has to screw in a lightbulb or do any heavy lifting. Paragraph 6 section D says she doesn't ask me to vacuum or do the laundry.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    4. Re:Dont tell the wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amongst other things, she never has to screw in a lightbulb ...

      Yes, my wife is that way too, though I never thought of doing it in a lightbulb.

      How do you ... ? Never mind

    5. Re:Dont tell the wife by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you've never been married. Women get the men to do their heavy lifting so they can stay pretty for us, or at least for the guy that comes along after us while we're busy doing the actual heavy lifting.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    6. Re:Dont tell the wife by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2


      The past two posts are proof that most Slashdotters have never talked to a real woman, instead gaining all their knowledge of the mysterious opposite sex from 1940's radio sitcoms.

      Come on, fellas. Question those outdated ideas about gender roles.

    7. Re:Dont tell the wife by Trinn · · Score: 1

      I agree. This "traditional" separation of "masculine" and "feminine" roles has -got- to go. It exists to allow, in general, men to dominate women. It is really a sick perversion, and a departure from what most free countries profess to believe, that is that all humans are created equal, regardless of shape, size, gender, skin color, etc. This buisiness of forcing women to be weaklings and men to be heavy-lifters is just....sick.

    8. Re:Dont tell the wife by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      Paragraph 6 section D says she doesn't ask me to vacuum or do the laundry.

      But if the floor isn't spotless and the clothes clean and dry when she gets home from work, there's hell to pay. Obviously, I need to work more on my telepathic skillz. I've got the telepathetic bit down pat, though. ;-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    9. Re:Dont tell the wife by Zordak · · Score: 2

      Or maybe it's because, despite what feminists want to believe, men are just generally built bigger than women. There's nothing wrong with men and women being different. I agree with you that there is a problem with many men being domineering and abusive, which is something that needs to be addressed both harshly and separately (I personally think that men who abuse their wives and children should just be shot), but that does not mean it's wrong for men and women to be different. My wife is a petite little thing at five feet tall and just over 100 pounds. I find that quite attractive, and she finds it attractive that I am bigger than her and that I do "manly" heavy lifting and such. And you know what? Neither of us is oppressed or unhappy. I don't push her around. I respect her as a person and as my equal. We have a very good, healthy relationship, and we are still very, very different. Different is a good thing. I personally would hate for her to take off her clothes, and here I see this big, beefy, hairy, manly thing in front of me. And she would hate to be it. She likes being petite and pretty, and I like seeing her that way. So what, exactly, is wrong with this relationship?

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    10. Re:Dont tell the wife by jafac · · Score: 2

      Don't forget paragraph 112, section A, covering the killing of spiders, and disposal of dead rodents caught in traps.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    11. Re:Dont tell the wife by jafac · · Score: 2

      Domineering is okay - you'd be suprised at how many women out there actually WANT that. In fact, there's an awful lot of women out there who WANT it, but are extremely frustrated because they can't admit it to themselves that they want that - because society has told them that it's wrong, and their husbands cannot BE that way, because society tells them that it's wrong.

      And for those couples where the female is the Dominant one - that's fine too - but again, these people are often marginalized because society tells them that that's wrong.

      It's all a matter of biology, and social dominance. (no, I'm not saying that men are born dominant, and women are born submissive - I'm saying that many people are born one or the other, irregardless of sex. Male dominance and female submissiveness may be most common, but not necessarily as ubiquitous as the traditional Male-dominated society wants us to think).
      Where it breaks down is in two places. Where society comes in and tells people not to be what they are (you're a woman, so you cannot be Dominant, no matter how you feel about it, you were probably raised wrong and need drugs and counselling, and especially Jesus - lol). And where the Dominant player in the relationship abuses his or her power. (these people simply need to be beaten with a clue-by-four).

      A LOT of so-called "normal" people can learn a great deal from the BDSM community.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    12. Re:Dont tell the wife by jafac · · Score: 2

      poot_rootbeer wrote:
      "The past two posts are proof that most Slashdotters have never talked to a real woman, instead gaining all their knowledge of the mysterious opposite sex from 1940's radio sitcoms."

      I replied:
      And your post is proof that you've never talked to a real woman either. Just read lots of militant feminist propaganda from the 1970's. Get a clue - not all women want to be a CEO and spank and whip their boytoys.
      I agree with the feminists that women should not be forced into the traditional submissive mold. But on the other hand, a lot more women than you'd think don't want it the other way either. And the feminist viewpoint that these women are all sick or the subject of abuse, or incorrect child-rearing is just as much bullshit as the propaganda the rightwingers spout that all women are inferior and need to be housewifes.
      My point is, some do - some do not. Don't force either to be something they're not.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  34. Re:Wasteful? by LordNimon · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    old houses of the future

    Your name wouldn't happen to be Dan Quayle, would it?

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  35. cheap housing by bytesmythe · · Score: 1, Troll
    The only thing with more bizarre fads than cheap, efficient housing is perpetual motion machines.

    Take a look at Xanadu and Monolithic Domes. You can build houses from bales of hay, chunks of sod, or into hillsides.

    Most new housing concepts don't take off. One that unfortunately has is the trend of making houses out of cheap, pressed lumber and using shoddy fixtures. I don't like feeling like I can't lean on a wall or slam a door in many modern homes. Even homes costing USD$300K+ are built with flimsy parts now. I can't imagine how much worse it would feel living in an overgrown cubicle.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  36. Red Flags by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
    Ugh. Cyber dream home, indeed. More like (in my best world-expo style announcer voice) "House...of the future!"

    First off: they're using a stylus for the main control panels? Does the designer of this brilliantly planned system use salad tongs to throw light switches in his current house or something?

    "You can control your temperature of the flat, you can control lighting..."

    Hey, they're onto something here! A method for controlling lighting--patent it while it's hot, lads! And controlling the temperature of one's flat? Sheer brilliance! Can I do all of this with the same stylus, as well??

    "If you have a party, and want to control your music sound, you would basically be able to press [a few central] switches instead of walking around the whole flat."

    Well hell, looks like I should have held off on buying that "Walk around my whole flat" stereo control system. Of course, I still get a good workout when setting the equalizer...

    "The Internet fridge"

    I stopped reading the article right here. Anything that talks about the Internet Fridge is doomed to failure. It's like the Goodwin's Law for overuse of technology.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Red Flags by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      This was very misleading. Remember, the internet fridge is not for food. "The Internet fridge stores recipes and makes up a shopping list as you run out of food" Other interchangeable terms might include: "house-wife" or "house-husband" or "servant" or "mother-in-law" or "pda" or "computer."

      You will still need to provide a "regular" fridge.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    2. Re:Red Flags by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Please repeat after me. "It is not a requirement that EVERYTHING on the planet be replaced with a computer"

      Sometimes a piece of paper is a better choice

  37. Modular != Expandable by WinPimp2K · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure you can move the interior walls around, but you can't add any additional living area. Need a new room for those adorable additions to your family? Sure, but that means you will have a smaller living room/master bedroom/etc.

    Sure the circular layout means less building materials needed to enclose a given living area, but it plays pure heck with the idea of putting em close together (think townhomes) - they still need a large footprint to sit on.

    Also, given that they are trying to sell this as an answer in an area that needs high population density, how does that silly spire (antenna?)on top work when you want to stack them vertically?

    I imagine the Integer Group ran across one of those websites extolling the advantages of geodesic domes and decided it was time to update the design because they have computers and lost of wizzy gadgets.

    --

    You either believe in rational thought or you don't
  38. Auto Flush! by swimfastom · · Score: 1

    Sounds very slick - Automated bathroom tools would be great!

    --
    http://tomgould.com/
    1. Re:Auto Flush! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to be able to tell my toilet to "flush and put the damned seat down!"... but something tells me that my girlfriend would end up saying it a lot more often.

  39. uh, not in hong kong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, if you could afford the _land_ for this house, you'ld be able to afford the company
    designing it.

  40. Look Daddy, Big Legos! by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny


    You come back from the store to discover that your kids remade the house into a giant giraffe.

    1. Re:Look Daddy, Big Legos! by Zarquil · · Score: 1

      Saaaaay, that's great kids!

      I really like where you placed the bathroom this time. Very apropos.

      I promise, next time we're going spend a little more and get the Mindstorm Dream Home so everyone else on the block knows we're going places!

  41. Wait until Steve Jobs gets a hold of this... by arloguthrie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Apple today introduced its latest product in the Digital Hub strategy that drives the company:

    ** iHouse **

    Using such open source ideas as "kitchen" and "living room", Apple has created the world's fastest, most advanced habitat, built on a rock-solid foundation of UNIX and white plastic.

    No more Edison plugs -- all appliances now plug into Firewire ports built into every movable wall!

    The iThermostat automatically detects your body temperature and can spot sweat or goosebumps from 50 feet away, adjusting the temperature accordingly!

    New iSafe security cameras record surveillance activity on DVD with SuperDrive!

    The house automatically finds the keys to your iCar using Rendezvous technology!

    Inkwell technology turns your child's wall scribblings into text instantly!

    Control everything via your Bluetooth remote control from any room in the house!

    More advanced users will be interested in the PowerHouse, built entirely of Titanium!

    "I live in one now," said Mr. Jobs. "It's like living on the set of THX-1138!"

    --
    ----------
    Cheese it! It's the FEDS!
    1. Re:Wait until Steve Jobs gets a hold of this... by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait until Steve Jobs gets a hold of this...

      Dear God I hope not. I don't want to take a shower in a translucent bathroom.

  42. A half day??? by Garridan · · Score: 1

    With all the "intelligence" in this house, how could the designers even think to make changing out walls so difficult as to require a "handyman"? Its as simple as this: install small servo motors into the wall sections that move locking mechanical parts into and out of place (instead of the screws or whatever they use now). Put the wall into place, and it should have electrical pads to power it automatically. Press a button or two, and the wall locks into place and disengages the servo motors. Press some more buttons, and the wall reverses the process and unhooks from the floor/ceiling/surrounding walls.

  43. insmod plumbing.o by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 3, Funny

    You probably have to patch your home and rebuild it before you can install that bidet module. I don't think many consumers would go for that.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  44. Moveable molding.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Funny

    .. like crown molding? I guess if you're into that, but I can't imagine the walls looking anything but like an office building.

    Not to mention I wouldn't want to give my wife the option of changing the size of the rooms; rearranging the furniture is enough of a hassle

  45. Track housing by lhbtubajon · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Women already put up with living in cookie-cutter houses. They just add their own personal touches to make it their own.

    With a modular system, they have even more control over their space, such as reconfiguring the floorplan. No two houses would be alike!

    1. Re:Track housing by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* Women already put up with living in cookie-cutter houses. *)

      True, but still each neighborhood has a different floorplan set. IOW, "local" modularity, not global.

      Interchangable parts would mean that *anything* built with them will have the same look and feel.

      You do have a point about making it easier to change the floor plan. However, I am not sure the tradeoff is worth it for most females.

      Any non-geek females want to comment? Any non-geek females on slashdot, period?

    2. Re:Track housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Any non-geek females want to comment? Any non-geek females on slashdot, period?

      <crickets> chirp... chirp...

    3. Re:Track housing by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      Any non-geek females want to comment? Any non-geek females on slashdot, period?
      ...
      1 reply beneath your current threshold.


      There's something wrong, here...

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    4. Re:Track housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I also wonder how many non-geek males are on slashdot.

    5. Re:Track housing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a number I just pulled out my arse that has no relevance to anything, but 10% seems about right.

  46. Re:Wasteful? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    I mean precisely that. No matter how silly it sounds =)

    The future in 1950 was quite different from the future in 1975 and the future in 1985. In my mind, the future isn't just one concept; it is a series of different periods that existed in the past and can safely be referred to in the past tense.

    Furthermore, I think we are currently in the future, so it can also be referred to in the present tense. Things like "now that it's the future..." and such.

    But that's just me.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  47. patent by geekoid · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I would like to notify everyone that I have patented the 'napkin doodle'.

    Since there are millions of people stealing my intellectual property, it is only fair that I get .50 cents from every pen, pencil, and napkin sold.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  48. Re:Wasteful? by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 3, Insightful
    They say it generates "30 percent less waste", which I assume means operational power, though it could mean construction waste. Electricity used for automation is trivial compared to things like lights, dishwashers, air conditioners, or hair dryers. We're not talking about a fast CPU in every wall, or a CRTs all over the place. In the image they show a simple B&W LCD input, which would use very little power.

    I do wonder about the material cost to produce some of these electronics -- but, honestly, I don't really know what that cost is. My impression is that CRTs are the worst offenders among typical computer parts, but even circuitry is fairly environmentally costly (mostly using large amounts of water to manufacture, and perhaps requiring raw minerals who's mining is environmentally damaging).

  49. On the side of waste by lingqi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am not completely sure about HK, but in Japan, it seems that houses are rarely renovated, as in the US, but much more frequently torn down and rebuilt altogether. Some people blame it on the "bad taste" of the previous owners and their funky designs of the house, and then build some funky design themselves.

    Is situations like that -- when the interior can be EASILY re-configured, you bet it would be much more efficient. It would also have the added advantage of being able to just create a room for, say a baby.

    I mean, the alternatives are shoddy at best: most interior partitions people built themselves are not exactly fire-code compliant; and have people come in and actually do professional work costs a CHUNK of cash. have ceiling-high configuable walls would be a dream! i am just worried about the wall strength (kids running into them), acoustic damping (sex in the next room), and plumbing (probabbly harder to wire than electrical, no?)...

    otherwise I am all for it.

    p.s. there has always been talks of "modular apartments" and the such. I am really kind of disappointed that they havn't show up more often. but this is a good direction

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:On the side of waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there aren't many houses in HK. The ones you see are either owned by the ultra rich (and they definitely wouldn't be buying these monstrosities), or they are way the hell out in the New Territories. I could see the squatters, Vietnamese boat people, or the hippie expat Brits liking these though.

  50. We already have this in the US... by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    it's called Manufactured Housing, although most people know them by their slang name, Trailer Homes.

    Seriously.

    You can get Single, Double, and Triple-wide manufactured homes, and I've even seen two story setups (I used to pass a ton of these "dealerships" on my way to college each day). The basic concept is not unique, but it also isn't stupid: I seem to recall a number being quoted as about 1/3 the cost to assemble as a "custom" home (which makes sense, as these are essentially produced on an assembly line). Take modular pieces, assemble together, call it a day. No different than cubicles or the Habitrails you built for your hamster as a kid.

    Is it a bad idea? I would say not at all. No one smirks at the build quality or luxury of a Mercedes Benz or BMW, but they're just as assembly line built as, say, a Kia (or Yugo or whatever). Assuming modular housing could succesfully target itself at the lower-end of the new home market, people would get a lot more house (and in a lot of cases, a better built house) than they do from the "custom" market (custom in quotations because that market is essentially nothing but cookie-cutter tract homes where housewives get to feel important because they paid $500 extra to change the color of the walls in the living room).

    Stop and think about it: In Houston, which has probably the cheapest real-estate market of any major city, $100,000 gets you a stripped-down ~2,200 sq. ft. house about 30 miles from downtown. No fancy garden bathtub/jacuuzi, no structured wiring system for a house-wide network, no faux marble countertops, and shitty carpet with shitty padding. That same $100,000 could go a hell of a long way on modular housing. It needn't be a trailer home dumped on a slab; a simple arrangement of modular wall pieces available in multiple sizes and completely assembled using steel, insulation, and wallboard would be, as far as I'm concerned, just as good as one pieced together from raw materials by 6 guys who know what the hell they're doing and 40 guys who were picked up from the immigrant labor force at the 7-11 that morning.

    I once worked for a subcontractor, and I needed to run some wiring through a colum that was in the kitchen area. Knowing that the wiring I was running was quite large, and would require a 3/4" hole in a 1 1/2" piece of wood, I asked the construction foreman whether or not the pillar was load-bearing. He replied, "how the hell should I know, ask the guys who made the blueprints" and returned to whatever it was he was doing. I vowed right then never to buy a home made by that particular company.

    I would say that the company that can figure out the proper configuration system and negotiate contracts with the entry-level tract-home builders would be a profitable company indeed.

    1. Re:We already have this in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop and think about it: In Houston, which has probably the cheapest real-estate market of any major city, $100,000 gets you a stripped-down ~2,200 sq. ft. house about 30 miles from downtown.

      must be nice. In my neck of the woods ~$100,000 will get you a 660 sq. ft. shoebox to live in

    2. Re:We already have this in the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      $100,000 gets you a stripped-down ~2,200 sq. ft. house about 30 miles from downtown.

      Ummmmm, how much of this is the house and how much is the _land_?

      That same $100,000 could go a hell of a long way on modular housing.

      Ummm, yeah, and where exactly would you put it?

    3. Re:We already have this in the US... by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Read my statement. I'm referring to modular housing, not pre-manufactured housing.

      How much of that is the land? A miniscule amount. Assuming one is purchasing a tract home, the land is generally part of the home deal; the lots are generally standardized sizes. This is out in the 'burbs, where land is cheap. People want a home for their money, not land. Approximately $5,000 worth of that price is land.

      I'll use a computer analogy to demonstrate:
      A manufactured home (trailer) is a retail PC, say, a Compaq Presario. We know they suck, but for some people it works well enough.

      I'm proposing something akin to the ATX standard. You buy the case size you want, and your Mobo manufacturer (or, in this case, the company that mass-produces pre-built wall units) makes them in a standardized size. PCI and AGP cards fit as they should, the power supply area is standardized. Parts are trucked in, not a pre-built house.

      The current "custom" home market is akin to Micron, Intel, Nvidia, and Abit setting up temporary fab equipment in your house and making a single chip for you on the spot. Then IBM shows up with a mobile clean room and builds your Hard disk, 3Com rolls up with a partially assembled NIC, likewise for, say, Creative with a soundcard, and so forth. You get the idea.

      In some instances, a completely custom jobby is the best way. A 10,000 square foot home would call for things like domed entryways, custom blacony setups and so forth that would make integrating modular pieces ineffective. But that aforementioned 2,200 sq. ft. home? I doubt it.

    4. Re:We already have this in the US... by blowhole · · Score: 2

      But how will they ship all those parts in from Taiwan? :) ... I mean ^_^

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
  51. All walls are moveable... by El_Smack · · Score: 2


    with tools. You just need big tools. :)

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  52. furniture that hid behind walls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like the vaunted "closet" technology.

  53. A BIT skimpy on details??? by tomzyk · · Score: 2, Funny

    And in other news...

    This one guy and his soon-to-be-famous company from somewhere on Earth developed and created this thing that can do some really cool technical stuff.

    --
    Karma: NaN
  54. My state of the art house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has gas AND electricity! The windows open and close easily, thanks to its hidden weighted chains.

    It has running water, indoors, with a beautiful claw-footed bathtub.

    It even has a toilet inside the house! And for all you old fuddy duddies that claim it is disgusting to defacate inside the house, they've put the toilet in the basement, right next to the coal room.

    The box gutters are built into the roof, and the carraige house is big enough for two carraiges, or a carraige and its horse.

    Yes, my house was built in 1915. Beautiful carpentry. Craftsmanship obviously died before I was born.

  55. Relevant Reading: "How Buildings Learn" by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Thirty or so years after he was a Bucky Fuller memoid hyping geodesic domes, Stewart Brand wrote an amazing book looking at how people actually use buildings:


    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/01 40 139966/


    (Uh, remove the space in the above link. The comment editor won't let me put in a continuous URL. Sorry . . .)


    How Buildings Learn is amazing. Fun to read, persuasive, and rousing. It looks at building designs that work (e.g., MIT's ugly, rambling wooden lab and office structure, Building 20) and those that don't (e.g., MIT's Media Lab building, very modern and all but not given to easy adaption.


    Stefan

    1. Re:Relevant Reading: "How Buildings Learn" by Drownedrat · · Score: 1
      Was a good TV series too. He's one smart cookie!


      D.

  56. Wow fucking amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "You can control your temperature of the flat, you can control lighting," said Donald Hughes with the Hong Kong Housing Society.


    Wow !!! Controling the lighting!!! Wooo0000t!!!! Wow.... What a fucking technological masterpiece!!!! I can't fucking wait!!!! W000000t

  57. Pipe Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ever live in a mobile home, or a pre-constructed modular home? These are the same things, only made with movable walls (which inevitably will not be fastened down correctly).

    You'll deal with wonders of sound transmission through 3/4 inch walls. "Listen to me piss into the toilet from across the house."

    Multiple levels? "Listen to the cat piss on rug upstairs"

    Got a leak? Don't bother repairing it, you'll have to replace the whole pre-fab panel.

    These type of homes are an environmental nightmare. There is a reason they depreciate like a car. They are made to be disposed of after x years.

    This is an overhyped, bad idea.

  58. Effeciency and creativity at a loss... by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

    How electrically efficient will these homes be? Already, power companies are struggling to keep up with the current usage, won't this just add to the huge drain?

    Regardless, I think that this is more "Jetsons"-like than reality. This article also did not do much to stir my imagination because most of technologies were previously mentioned in the past.

    Perhaps the coolest thing would be a decentralized stereo system with speakers in every room.

    --
    100% Insightful
  59. Probably the more likely appilcation by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    Will be in newly constructed apartment houses.

    New buildings constructed with each level left open in a large, empty space (as many office structures are).

    As market forces change with demand and pricing changes, the landlord simply changes the number and size of the units.

    A housing shortage happens? I'm sorry Mr. Tennent, but we're going to be knocking 100 sq.ft. off your apartment to make room for an additional unit on your floor.

    There is a surplus? Mr. Tennent, We don't wish to lower your rent, but to keep you here, we will offer you an additional 100 sq.ft. of living space for the same space.

    (Though somehow I suspect the former will happen more often the the latter).

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:Probably the more likely appilcation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry Mr. Tennent, but we're going to be knocking 100 sq.ft. off your apartment to make room for an additional unit on your floor.

      But we're still going to charge you the same rent

  60. Re:Wasteful? by ductormalef · · Score: 1

    Automating your home can actually SAVE a significant amount of power. For example, a microcontroller that requires 10mW of power can keep a 60 watt light bulb dimmed to 90%(hardly a perceptible difference from 100% on). This uses 5.99 Watts less than a 60 Watt light bulb on a normal toggle switch.
    Using automation to turn off the lights when nobody is in the room (you could do this yourself, but most people don't do it EVERY time they leave the room) is another example.

    --
    The Fat Man Walks Alone
  61. tenament of the future by shren · · Score: 2

    I can see it now. Automatic moving walls. If you're living on the dole, then the longer you live on the dole, the smaller your flat will get.

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  62. what do you think... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    ...what do you think this particular one should do differently?

    perhaps, actually exist in the real world. there seem to have been enough napkin doodles. why has the home depot house prevailed?

  63. What About Families With 2.5 Children? by Myriad · · Score: 2
    I dunno...I wouldn't want to buy a house designed by a company with a name like "The Integer Group"...sounds limiting.

    And what about families with 2.5 children?

    WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  64. re: Is it a bad idea? I would say not at all. by shren · · Score: 2

    One thing that would have to be overcome before you could hit mainstream: Trailers tend to decrease in value over time, unlike tradtional homes. The only reason people accept 100,000+ debt slavery is because some slick real estate agent sells them on the fact that it's an investment.

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  65. The People Who Live Inside Of Your Walls by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of my father's friend back in grade school (oh, like 1960's) who had invented furniture that hid behind walls

    For The People Who Live Inside Of Your Walls?

    We're the people inside of your walls,
    We live here inside of your walls
    We're watching you daily with great fascination,
    At night we curl up inside pink insulation,
    We're the people inside of your walls.

    Of course, we're not like average people you know,
    We eat tiny bugs for our dinner
    We're all just as tall as your average joe,
    But why, we'll admit we're much thinner,
    We're the people inside of your walls.

    - The Frantics, "Four On The Floor" TV series, 1986, this song was the source of many childhood nightmares.

    Almost as many nightmares as this.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  66. Why is this flamebait? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    All of these things will come to pass, most likely.

    Audio/Visual networks are already here, the thermostat has been toyed with. (I think Bill has this already)

    DVD wouldn't be the most efficient at security videos; I'm guessing a big Raid server in a closet would serve better, and also be useful for mp3/divx distribution.

    'Writing on the wall' would be great! Use that with the 'paper' thin displays and you've got a giant touch screen! Remote control *should* be house-wide. Toasters with an IP address are over the top, but the rest of this is certainly achievable, and probably useful.

    If you modded this down because he took Steve's name in vain, you need to read the moderator faq here. If you modded it down because you don't get the joke, well, watch more cartoons or something, but don't waste your points modding this down. Go find a good comment that has been overlooked and mod it up.

    BTW, I am immune to moderation. So don't bother.

    1. Re:Why is this flamebait? by arloguthrie · · Score: 1

      Thank you for defending my post. Next time I post something even remotely satirical, I'll be sure to surround it with .

      --
      ----------
      Cheese it! It's the FEDS!
  67. You first by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2

    People have been pushing modular homes for decades. Not as whiz-bang with the touch pads as these, but these models will end up like all those before it - unsellable junk or mobile-home park fodder.

    1. Re:You first by NETHED · · Score: 1

      My parents just bought a 'smart-house' for pennies on the dollar because no-body would touch a house where the phones and lights are controlled by a thingy in a closet. My dad is as big of a nerd as I am (runs in the family), so he bought it and later learned what it cost to build, he paid less then cost for a brand new house.

      Technology like 'smart-homes' is around, but people are still afraid of it. There arn't standards and it does 'crash' on occation. (we had a false CO alarm once)

      --
      --sig fault--
  68. Re: Is it a bad idea? I would say not at all. by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 2

    Well, not technically.

    Houses tend to retain their value, and essentially increase an incremental amount with the cost of living. It is a reasonable investment, and most people can expect a return somewhat similar to what they might get with a good CD or Savings Bond. This, of course, assumes that property values in their area don't swing wildly in any direction. Again with Houston (can you guess where I used to live), there was a booming market in the Richmond area of buying up the tract homes that had been there since the early 50's, knocking them down, and buidling two 3 or 4 story homes in their place. Many people saw the value of their homes shoot from $70,000 to $150,000 in less than a year. On a completely different line, between Hurricane Allison last year and this year's mid-spring floods, the 100-year-flood plain was completely withdrawn. Guess what happens to your property's value when you got drawn into it?

    I'm not suggesting a fab system along the lines of trailer homes, where the whole place is already built. If a manufacturing company were to produce a variety of pre-built walls in varying heights (vaulted for the living room, standard-sized for hallways, ancillary bedrooms, etc. 1/3-sized for a bar) and builders were to design their cookie-cutter designs based on those available sizes, it would streamline the hell out of the whole process. Truck out x number of part A01, and Y number of part B02, provide a system so that certain walls can provide easy access for the electrician/plumber/HVAC/etc. (maybe part A01r has a removable face), and then just put the house together. It would still be built on a foundation and would be indistinguishable from the normal tract-home setup where the only major variance is the type of decorative lights, the color of the carpets, and the paint on the walls.

  69. Re:Wasteful? by Belgand · · Score: 2

    Not really, in fact I'm part of a growing movement focused on the idea of retro-future. There's a zine in the works and various other projects all focused around a 1950s-1960s "atomic age" view of the future, what we're doing to bring it about and why we should or should not.

  70. Made in Britain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it is being designed over here then I doubt it will get too far. This place aint what it used to be.

    Old: GWR etc - Efficient reliable rail service
    New: Railtrack - worst accident record in Europe. My train is delayed EVERY day.

    Old: Tower Bridge - Big, impressive, well engineered
    New: Millenium Bridge, closed due to wobbling.

    Old: Crystal Palace - World renowned exhibition.
    New: Millenium Dome. Expensive failure that someone tried to burgle using a mechanical digger.

    Old: Anything by Brunell
    New: Millenium Wheel. Made by ferrari and still didn't go round.

    Old: Jaguar E -Type
    New: Car industry? What car industry?

    Old: Acorn Computer - scared IBM originally, first real GUI OS.
    New: Acorn Computers - now design set top boxes.

    Old: Won two major world wars, navy twice as large as nearest rival.
    New: Army does what ever Bush tells Blair to do

  71. How this really happened by Animats · · Score: 4, Funny
    "I know how we can make some extra money".

    "How"?

    "You know all those unsold floor-to-ceiling movable office partititions we have in the warehouse?"

    "Yeah, and we've got another ten acres worth coming back from the WorldCom bankruptcy. Nobody's fitting out office space right now. What do you want to do with them?"

    "Let's team with a builder to build house shells and use the partitions as interior walls in homes. It'll be cheaper than regular construction. And homeowners will be able to reconfigure; add a bedroom for a new kid, open it up when the kids leave.

    "That will never fly; house buyers are too traditional".

    "Maybe if we had a sales gimmick... Let's call it a "modular cyber house".

    "What's "cyber" about office partitions?"

    "We'll throw in a home control system. We've got lots of commercial building automation parts in the warehouse too."

    "Well, maybe. But we need a design for a house. Just a big shell, but modern-looking".

    "Just build a big round roof, and frame it with stock glass and metal exterior panels. That'll be cheap to build. It'll look like those old '50s designs from that Fuller guy. And prices are really low on exterior panels right now."

    "This could work out. Let's draw up some renderings of what it would look like and get some press. Even if it doesn't work out, maybe we can do a bulk sell on the partitions to some homebuilder."

  72. Crash by anakuran · · Score: 1

    Ah mom, the shower crashed again :)

    hehe, they could have commercials for upgrades by Raid, "Keeping the bugs out of your system since 2015" :D

    This could also bring a whole new meaning to cyber terrorism...

  73. Re:Wasteful? by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    that is an interesting view of things :)
    I think that many people see the present that way as well, that part scares me...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  74. This idea hasn't worked for universities by dmwst30 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Posvar Hall [ http://www.umc.pitt.edu/tour/tour-040.html ] (formerly Forbes Quad) at the University of Pittsburgh has just such "reconfigurable" floor plans, with moveable walls. It was originally designed in the 1970s so that rooms could be made and adjusted to fit the current needs of the university. Never were these walls moved once during my four years there (1997-2001).
    Also, this building is legendary for having under 30% usable floor space due in part to the idea that the movable walls would increase the utility of the remaining space!)

  75. wow, just what I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a modular home assembled to be even more like everyone else's than the already soulless cookie-cutter houses most of us live in. I guess it's OK if you're living in a place the size of an overgrown Star Wars lunchbox in Hong Kong or Tokyo, but for people who want a real home give us the technology as furniture and appliances, not as a complete dwelling. Oh, and let me guesss, there's a big swoosh logo on the outside...

  76. Doesn't help sell by asv108 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The problem with any of this futuristic crap is its obsolete in a few years or even months so it doesn't do anyything to increase the value you your home. The only house tech that makes sense is to wire each room with cat-5, have nice appliances, and a good heating and cooling system.

    Its funny to look at houses that were built in the 80's and see integrated gadgets like intercom system, central-vac, and B&W security cameras that probably cost a fortune back then yet do nothing for their sale price today.

    1. Re:Doesn't help sell by Integer-UK · · Score: 1

      It does have CAT5 (well CAT6 actually) everywhere, does have highly efficient appliances and heating and coling systems - so what's your problem. BTW - they are highly sort after here in areas of the UK.

  77. Well, for one thing... by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    ...the camera doesn't work.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  78. Re:Wasteful? by Integer-UK · · Score: 1

    Yes - 30% less construction waste is correct and with significantly lower power and water consumption in use. BTW, it is also designed for dismantling and recycling at end of life.

  79. Re:We already have this in the US...but it SUCKS by rlangis · · Score: 1

    'Manufactured Homes' suck rocks, my friend. I know, I owned one. Sure - the cost to buy the home itself isn't bad. But when you buy a $150k house that was built on-site, you're also buying the land under it. Buy your manufactured home, and THEN you have to find somewhere to put it. And THEN you have to get wiring and plumbing piped in. And THEN you have to get it hauled to the site, installed, and pray to GOD that the subcontractor that was hired to do the interior touch-ups and whatnot isn't just jerking off in the spackle and hoping it holds together 2 years down the road.

    We had to claim bankruptcy because of ours - mainly because we were in a manufactured home 'park' where you buy the house but rent the land, and they kept raising the friggin' rent every 6 months.

    But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

    --
    GIR: I'm going to sing the Doom song now. Doom doom doom doom doom doom de-doom doom doom doom doom doom doom...
  80. Re:Wasteful? by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    How do you mean?

    My friend said the funniest thing about the future a year or so ago, "Damn, I'd wear shiny clothes if I could have a flying car."

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  81. Re:The Cube II: Ubiquitous Cube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me, the idea sounds perfect for Hong Kong. No one needs their shoes indoors anyway.

    Hell, the traps would probably help with their oversized population and allow for more space in Hong Kong for people to immigrate in (which has been a real problem lately).

  82. It's fine if it's BOCA. by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    I've got one of these homes, and it's a BOCA. That means the value increases with time.

    The reason most trailer homes lose value is the same reason they burn down quickly. (Your average singlewide will burn down in 11 minutes from initial flame.) They're not BOCA-compliant.

    Apparantly, the value of a house has something to do with its safety and how well it's lasted the years.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  83. Not necessarily by mlinksva · · Score: 2
    The new gray ranch-style home in one of Lafayette's most expensive areas has many selling points, not the least of which are 10-foot ceilings and granite kitchen countertops.

    It also has a potentially huge detraction: It's a manufactured home.

    Before you cringe, hear the rest of the description: With 2,600 square feet of living space, the house has a killer view of Mount Diablo, yet it's just across from BART and only minutes from downtown. It also has some other amenities such as bay windows, oak cabinets, a whirlpool tub, a large cobblestone patio and even planter shelves.

    An added attraction: It was built in three days and cost about $200,000 less than if it had been built like most other houses.

    ...

  84. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Britneys in your bed by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1
    Don't forgot our pop idols like Britney Spears, not quite a girl, yet not quite a woman.

    Last time I looked, Britney was all woman and a damn good looking woman at that. She is young, beautiful and rich.

    So do you hate her because she is young, because she is beautiful or because she is rich?

    --
    ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
  85. Nobody else would have to know by roystgnr · · Score: 2

    The Integer Group is discrete.

  86. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Britneys in your b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So do you hate her because she is young, because she is beautiful or because she is rich?

    I hate her because her music is repetitive mindless crap

  87. Not so funny by mamahuhu · · Score: 1

    It's not a laughing matter - it's easy to make jokes when you live in North America where the population density is 32 people per square mile - in Asia it's 203 - but for Hong Kong we're talking 6,571.14 per square kilometer.... a smaller area than square miles. Also a large proportion of Hong Kong is uninhabitable mountains or isolated islands - the real habitable area's density exceeds the 20,824.38 quoted for Macau.... I mean Hong Kong people go there to escape the crowds!

    Hong Kong's population grows by 1 million every ten years and everyone has to be accomodated. The large proportion of people live in high rise residential on reclaimed land, and construction is the number one source of garbage in Hong Kong. When you add up all these issues then any way to improve construction efficiency and sustainability and reduce waste is important.

    Now all this might be moot - I mean Hong Kong is literally on the other side of the world.... but hang on... check out this article in the Economist. Predictions are for half a billion Americans by 2050. Where are they going to live?

    The Integer project has relevance here.

    Living in Hong Kong is like living in an Arcology and many of the trends visible here will need to be transferred to North America if the population does increase to 500,000,000 people.

    So next time you crack a joke about living in a cubicle 24/7 at work and play - you might just be fortelling the future....

  88. Reminds me of some ideas I had once. by jlseagull · · Score: 1

    Self-configurable housing. Something like a series of open platforms mounted on either arms or tracks, able to reconfigure themselves using hydraulics. Who needs to go to the kitchen to get a beer, bring the kitchen to you.

    The second is kind of an "apartment stalk" with an elevator core and a double helix track up it. With this arrangement, one can construct a house shaped like 7/8 of a helix on the ground and "screw" it up the stalk past all of the other houses to its desired position. If the stalk were made out of something strong and flexible like carbon fiber, one can imagine fields of these structures swaying in the wind...

    --
    'Be always mindful, even when ditch-digging.' --D. T. Suzuki
  89. Visitor says: thumbs down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I visited the place a while back and was stunned by how many bad design decisions had been made to accomodate already-irrelevant, needlessly complex sponsored junk technology made by Samsung.

    Better still, the place was swarming with attendants who had no idea how to make any of it work. If an 18 year old boy whose best friend is a WAP cellphone can't figure out the House of the Future, who can?!

  90. The *first* modular home by ssyladin · · Score: 1

    Okay, maybe not the "first", but certainly the concept is old (read pre-50s home of the future). The Geodesic Dome Home. While not quite modular, you can set up a frame with you, two friends, a standard toolbox, and a weekend. Timeberline Geodesics has many floorplans to work with. Geodome homes use less materials, are cheaper to heat and cool (higher interior volume:exterior surface area ratio). Only hiccup is the weird shape - make sure to find a contractor who is flexible and knows city/county ordinances. Great thing about these homes is if you do need a new wing, you can knock out a wall of your living room or kitchen and just build another frame. Voila.

  91. GTA 3 by bigsmelly · · Score: 1

    Sounds a lot like the GTA III "house of tommorrow"............

  92. Imagine.. by peen · · Score: 1

    ..a beowulf cluster of these :/

  93. Home Dreams are Junk News by Peahippo · · Score: 1

    Anyone who started out their intellectual life reading Omni ought to be feeling a very pronounced deja vu when encountering this kind of stuff.

    This dream of home redesign has had more than enough merit since the 1930s. Yet, in America and Europe, homes look pretty much as they have always looked for the last several hundred years. There are important differences (internal power, plumbing, water-protection) from the original design. Plastics have taken over some of the functions of wood and stone. Glass and filters have replaced openings, weaves, nets and animal skins. But overall the aim is the same: a wood- or steel-framed cave, lined with a combination of wood and stone.

    The redesigns of homes almost always involve labor-saving devices that look hip, mod, and snazzy, but avoid the real economics of the issue. Original designs are expensive and mostly illegal. Wiring or re-wiring for modern "needs" is expensive. New materials may not be reliable or durable. And -- as always -- the needs of the contractor conflict with the needs of the homeowner; a door that is put in fast simply doesn't last for decades.

    What I am trying (poorly) to say that these things are pipe dreams and cannot come true even in limited ways. You may as well postulate personal aircraft, which neglects the impossible relaxation of regulation and miraculous availability of fuel. The hip, mod and snazzy things (like pervasive and central controls of house functions) are for the rare and wealthy to exploit. The rest of us must make do with the wooden caves that have been around for decades to centuries. Even when a cause for innovation strikes -- say, a factory in converted into housing -- the entire affair is firmly put under traditional rules.

    The home of the future has always been here, but apart from the whole us, in small sections of the population. You can wire up your own home now for centralized controls; but even with such accessability, very, very few have done so. In short, trying to construct or modify such a home in places like Toledo, Ohio is either impossible or the very definition of the word "rarity".

    --
    [also misbehaves on Kuro5hin as Peahippo]
  94. FYI it's been done before. by Criton · · Score: 1

    The basic concept had been done before by Buckmister Fuller . In 1950 he demonstraited a modular home that could be reconfigured even the bathroom was a single module with plumbing for the tub ,toilet and ,sink all ready connected. This ideal even looks like some of his early work before he made the domehome. As you know the ideal did not catch on back then and probley would not today . The track home aka suburb won out. Some ideals that seem great on paper end up inconvenant in practice. Also most upper class people in HongKong either has or are leaving the city since China has taken over who can blame them I'd leave too if an oppressive gov took over. As for the gadgets my updated 100 year old victorian has the same stuff ethernet/802.11b updated climate control I can control via phone if needed and it looks a whole lot better to boot . Also unlike the modular flat it's walls accually deaden sound and the inside doesn't look like a cubical.

  95. Re:Wasteful? by Criton · · Score: 1

    Don't forget longevity I doubt it would last more than 30years if built. Pervious houses lasted for generations but prefabs are not long lived stuctures. If House A takes more material than house B but house B only last 30 years while house A lasts 90 to 150 years then I have to say you'd endup using 3x "including maintance/upgrades to the the traditional home" the materials with design B in the long run.