Slashdot Mirror


Nokia 3650 Symbian Imaging-phone

Ch_Omega writes "Nokia have announced a new cameraphone in the, traditionally low-cost, 3xxx-series. Surprisingly enough, it seems to have the same functionality as the Nokia 7650, as well as tri-band, MMC-expansion slot, and abillity to capture video as well as still images. The new smartphone has been given the name Nokia 3650, which, according to this article indicates that it will be much cheaper than the 7650, while actually being superior feature-wise!"

162 comments

  1. Dialing... by krugdm · · Score: 1

    ...what's with the funky number pad? Are they going for the retro-dial look?

    1. Re:Dialing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me about it. That thing is so ugly, I'll just stick with my Moto TimePort until Nokia can make a *good* looking phone.

  2. bandwagon by sideone · · Score: 1

    looks like everyone is jumping on the bandwagon, and why not nokia? they are king of the cheap product? Why is it that the low-quality devices become so popular?

    --


    sideone
    ITBitch.com Your reason for leaving work!
    1. Re:bandwagon by captain_craptacular · · Score: 2

      Because not everyone can afford to pay $400 for a cell phone?

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    2. Re:bandwagon by Ojamin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Low-quality products become so popular (at least in tech stuff) because consumers still haven't realized that you actually get what you pay for. If you buy I cheap phone, PDA, or digital camera it's just not going to last like something of better quality that is a little more expensive, and the consumer will have to replace it 1 month after the warranty expires. Yet still things like this sell like hot cakes.

    3. Re:bandwagon by bluGill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I've droped my cell phone into lakes too often to want an expensive one. (it was in my pocket when I fell overboard last time) Sure I recover it, but I haven't had success getting them to work after than.

      Combine that with new features coming out all the time, and I'm not sure I want an expensive one. As others have noted, this cheap phone looks better feature wise than a more expensive older model.

      Or to put it a different way: why spend money on an expensive phone when I can get a cheap one, and the next model will be better?

    4. Re:bandwagon by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      in short, the features you want are:
      Floats
      WaterProof. ;)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:bandwagon by sideone · · Score: 2, Informative

      i agree. i have made the mistake of buying many products because they were inexpensive, even though reviews told me that the product was shit. You know what i found out, exactly what the word cheap really means.

      --


      sideone
      ITBitch.com Your reason for leaving work!
    6. Re:bandwagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's almost like there's some sort of mysterious law of supply and demand at work, and a high degree of substitutability among cell phones.

    7. Re:bandwagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put the phone in a glass of water right away,
      and take it like that to the phone service shop.
      They will ultra sound wash it and it will most
      likely work.

    8. Re:bandwagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, it costs me like 2 bucks a month for full coverage insurance on my phone. Should anything happen to it - say it gets lost or broken - it gets replaced free of charge. As a matter of fact, the antenna finally broke on my old phone, so I pitched the whole thing, called up my provider and had them send me a new phone because my old one was "lost".

  3. Yeah, but... QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the kind of Sybian Phone that I want.

    1. Re:Yeah, but... QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You beat me to it.. Drat!
      However, I think a Sybian Phone would be the only product where an extreme buzzing noise drowning out your conversation would be acceptible...

  4. More info on Symbian products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Symbian doesn't just make a rock-solid OS for phones, they also have a slew of other high-tech products.

    1. Re:More info on Symbian products by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      the symbian orgasm machine?

      --
      C|N>K
  5. I dont get it..... by Kenja · · Score: 0
    even on vibrate mose these things just dont seem big enough. And why would you want to use a phone like that?

    Oh, wait a sec'. Sy-M-bian. Never mind.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  6. what? by tps12 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Consumer electronics becoming cheaper and more featureful as time advances? Unheard of!

    Seriously, this product is doomed to fail. Nobody needs or wants a camera, PDA, mp3 player, or web browser on their phone. 10-number speed-dial was the last useful feature to be added to cellular phones. In 10 years all of these Uberphonen will seem silly and ridiculous. "What were we thinking?" we'll all ask, in much the same tone as someone remembering the days of disco, when big pants and cocaine ruled the night.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I do. Just not that one. I'd like a touchscreen too.

    2. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would buy this in a heart beat

    3. Re:what? by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      I hope you were trolling....because if you think a PDA is a useless addon for a cell phone...you are dead wrong.

      Why carry 2 devices of aproximately the same form factor....with overlapping functions?

      Whats the easiest way to update the contacts in your phone? Buy a $40+ cable, wait 5-10 years for a 'standard' wireless transfer protocol and content format, or combine them?

      Why carry two seperate devices that both have support for: email, contact managament, web browsing, game playing, data/fax. Combine them!

      (BTW, I think my Samsung I-300 is the single most useful electronic device I have every purchased)

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    4. Re:what? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the extra features on new phones don't really add up on size or anything, since it isn't practical to have the phone smaller than what they are now.

      and this product is DESTINED to be a huge hit among teens, which has been the major target group of the 3*** series phones(of course, it will probably be cripled in more ways than one, but the teens won't care). the nokia's mp3 capable phone with the all-characters keypad sucks technically but still was quite 'hip'.

      it's like most of the people don't need all the features their newly bought vhs player has, but those extra features just come as, doh, extra when you upgrade.

      what i personally would like is that they would design more robust phones that wouldn't crack up and start acting bad after 2 years of abuse.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:what? by be_all · · Score: 1

      Maybe the spirit is right, but the application is wrong. Converging technology is great: wireless networking is a good step, digital cameras are super for a lot of people, and, heck, I bet a whole bunch of people would love to listen to mp3s on their cellphone.

      The cappy stuff is spawned when you choose to mix a myriad of technologies just becuase you can. I think the key to having successful personal digital devices is two-fold:

      1. Integrate only mature technologies. (eg. a cellphone and a decent mp3 player--lot's of songs, battery power, play list capabilities). All the integrated technologies have to be useful unto themselves--right now, no one would buy a digital camera of the quality they have in these phones.

      2. Modularity. I think that as we develop the technology to integrate all the digital elements of our lives, we should develop them in a way that we can choose how to piece them together (like our PC's are now and like we design our (good) software).

      That's my two cents. Now, I'm just going to wait for my cellphone-laptop-digitalTVreceiver-taser-GPS-light sabre.

    6. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for your self, all these features combined make my life easier

  7. ick by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

    it says that it runs realONE for video playback

    never seen that application of real's coftware yet

    1. Re:ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you should go to their site more often since it's been around for quite a while now.

  8. huh??? by pinkUZI · · Score: 2, Funny

    I still don't get this. It's like combining a nose hair trimmer with a toothbrush - sure you could combine those, but why would anyone want to?

    --
    You are receiving this message because your browser supports Slashdot Sigs and you have Slashdot Sigs enabled.
    1. Re:huh??? by mo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not long ago I would have totally agreed with you, but then I got a Canon s110 and I totally changed the way I viewed cameras. Due to the fact that it was so small and that there is zero cost to take pictures, I started taking it everywhere with me. It is as common as keys, wallet, and cellphone. So why not consolidate the cellphone and camera? Actually, I'm seriously interested in buying a product that merges my wallet and my cellphone.

    2. Re:huh??? by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 1

      It's like combining a nose hair trimmer with a toothbrush

      I call the patent!

      or do you have super patent-savers?

      --
      "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
    3. Re:huh??? by chrysrobyn · · Score: 2

      Actually, I'm seriously interested in buying a product that merges my wallet and my cellphone.

      Maybe I'm the only slashdotter here who has to say this, but my wallet doesn't exactly smell like roses. I'm not saying it's because I sit on it 10 hours a day, or that it's because of the god-only-knows-where-it's-been money, but it's not something I want to keep by my face for the length of a phone call. Unless it means winning a prize.

    4. Re:huh??? by zapfie · · Score: 1

      Dude, what are you doing to your poor wallet? Mine smells fine.. and it's pretty old. Then again, it's not leather, so maybe that influences it?

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
  9. design? by sideone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    why are we going back to rotary?

    --


    sideone
    ITBitch.com Your reason for leaving work!
    1. Re:design? by superpeach · · Score: 1

      why are we going back to rotary?

      To make it harder for current mobile phone users to send text messages maybe? Or maybe it just looked prettier that way or maybe futuristic (yes I know, rotary is old not futuristic :) ) Its a 3xxx phone, they have usually been aimed at people that like pretty things, you can change the covers on all the recent 3xxx phones but not the more buisinessy models.

  10. I hope they have it on VoiceStream - err, T-Mobile by AssFace · · Score: 2

    I have the 8890 right now and while I like it, I would like something new.

    I like the look of this phone if it is going to look like what the link showed.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  11. Two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Don't get the 7650: it's huge and ugly.

    2. The Register had this story on the 6th September.

  12. Vanity by Subcarrier · · Score: 2

    It's like combining a nose hair trimmer with a toothbrush

    Do you meant to say that you carry a nose hair trimmer and a toothbrush with you at all times?

    Kinky.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  13. This is something the Linux crowd should learn.. by otuz · · Score: 1

    First release a tech-version with all-new features, then trim it down and re-relase it as a new product.
    The even/odd scheme with linux kernels work in a similar way, but that's only about bugfixes..
    How about a first mainstream linux version without added-on bloat?

  14. Re:I hope they have it on VoiceStream - err, T-Mob by Alfthemack · · Score: 1
    I, too, have an 8890, but with PacBell Wire -err, Cingular.

    It should work because its tri-band (1900 Mhz was listed)...

    Anyone else notice that this Nokia 3650 looks a like like a Palm M130.

    Get the color schemes right and the two could match...

    Kinda like my '00 era Nokia 8890 and my Palm V.

    --
    --Al
  15. The man in the gabardine suit is a spy by hlynna · · Score: 1

    So, if this camera phone is so great, it should fit right into my bow tie...

    So be careful!

    For folks who really want to mod me up (*grin*) that was a Simon and Garfunkel joke...

    "I garfunkeled your mother!"

    --
    The one in the corner looking clueless at most everything, but enjoying it, nonetheless.
  16. yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the camera, I want the polyphonic ringtones!

  17. Yawn.. by unicron · · Score: 2

    What's the deal on the phone from the Matrix? I know they built one where a piece of plastic covers the mouth part and you slide it down by hand, but did they ever make a spring-loaded one?

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    1. Re:Yawn.. by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

      You have to slide the cover on a Nokia 8110 open by hand. The ones in the film had the 'spring loaded' mechanism added to look cooler.
      Given the tendency of the sliding covers on that style of phone to break, I would imagine that spring loaded ones would end up being fired across the room within a day :)

    2. Re:Yawn.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only internally, as prototypes of the 7110. I am not sure, but my bet is that there were too many moving parts, and the simplification of no spring-load was more economical and reliable.

      They were kind of scary to handle, though. The way those covers just sprung outwith the slightest touch of the button -- tsjakka! -- it was reminiscent of a guillotine in a way.

    3. Re:Yawn.. by unicron · · Score: 2

      I can find no mention of a model 7110 on their website, do you have a link per chance?

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    4. Re:Yawn.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Yawn.. by mejh · · Score: 1

      The one they used for the film was the 8110 (my first mobile phone :) with a special push-button slider mechanism created for the film.

      M.

    6. Re:Yawn.. by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Yup: it is like the nokia 7110. And I've got one: it's quite popular in the Netherlands (came out as a cheap bundle) and the big screen and 'chik' sound it makes make it quite popular in movies too. Thew IrDA makes it a tweaker phone, too. The one used in the matrix is the 8110, which doesn't have the spring loaded cover IRL.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  18. Nokia's new product line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: Will there be a PC and Mac version?
    A: No. StarCraft: Ghost is only being developed for console systems.

    Kiss my FUCKING ASS blizzard, you cum burping knob slobbers!

  19. Great, but why would I use it when I have a digcam by Serveert · · Score: 1

    My digital cam works fine. It has superiour picture quality. Why would I want a phone that takes crappy pictures and can only be sent to other people who have an MMS-capable phone?

    (btw it should read MMS not MMC).

    Is this truly useful? Methinks not.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
  20. How about devices that do ONE THING *well*? by Primordiax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I realize I am bucking the trend here, but what I really want to see is less of this combo crap and more SINGLE FUNCTION devices (and software apps, for that matter) that do one major thing and do it extremely well.

    For example:

    Internet suites suck. I want a stand alone email program that just does email and does an amazing job of it. I want a stand alone newsreader for usenet. I want a stand alone browser. I want a stand alone IM program (which, incidentally, talks to anyone on any IM network of course).

    I want a PDA that does an amazing job at being a PDA. It doesn't need to do MP3s. It doesn't need to take (or show) pictures. It doesn't need to operate as my TV remote or my garage door opener.

    I want a printer that just PRINTS. Has anyone noticed the complete LACK of innovation in the printer space? Why haven't color LASER printers at 10+ page per minute speed come to the consumer level ($200 and under). All we get are a variety of inkjet printers with various extra features tacked on (fax, scan, etc). They do a crappy job of scanning and a crappy job of faxing (of course, fax machines are all crap and it is a technology that needs to die, but that is a whole different matter).

    I want my scanner to scan. I want my fax to fax (I actually want it to die, but I really shouldn't keep getting distracted by my fax hatred). I want my printer to PRINT.

    Is this too much to ask? Combo devices generally do everything poorly. I would rather have devices that do ONE thing and do it GREAT.

    --

    -Michael (Aristotle@Threshold RPG)
    http://www.threshold-rpg.com
    1. Re:How about devices that do ONE THING *well*? by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Eh, my preferences flip around once you move to the portable arena. When I'm deciding to take a device or not, the total weight and number of devices I've got is a big factor. If reducing that weight and number means I'm twice as likely to be carrying my PDA or cell phone at any given point, that just makes the PDA or cell phone twice as valuable.

    2. Re:How about devices that do ONE THING *well*? by sulli · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Buy an iPod.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    3. Re:How about devices that do ONE THING *well*? by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      I want a flying car.

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    4. Re:How about devices that do ONE THING *well*? by Jay+Bratcher · · Score: 1

      Actually, they have been making cell phones for some time which do nothing but place and receive calls - maybe you should get one of those instead...

    5. Re:How about devices that do ONE THING *well*? by phil+reed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here you go then. Moller SkyCar.

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    6. Re:How about devices that do ONE THING *well*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy Nokia 2110 then. It was the phone that was the final push back in mid-1990s to create the phenomenom called mobile phone industry and made Nokia, a small Finnish multi-industry company back then (yep, Finland used to have Nokia as the biggest toilet paper brand, biggest rubber boots manufacturer, biggest computer maker and biggest car tyre maker in the country), into one of the biggest companies in the world.

      Worked fine, could take any hit imaginable and still functioned, had every basic function that cell phones have (SMS + voice) done _very well_ into it.

  21. GSM, HSCSD and GPRS by mah! · · Score: 2, Informative
    Another preview dated Sept 16. of the 3650 is to be found at GSMBOX and of course at all their other sites, including the original one.

    They english translation says that it's targeted at European, Asian and North American markets however, being a 3-band GSM it means that it'll work quite everywhere in the world except in Japan: all across Africa for example, and in South America too.

    As in the original article it'll be initially marketed in those 3 continents, but nothing prevents it from being sold and used anywhere else.

    Curiously enough, non-GSM users are left out for now. Hopefully, at least in the North-American continent, the (late) conversion to GSM by AT&T will speed up the conversion of the last 30% of the world maket to the dominant global standard.

  22. rotary dial by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    is the dial nonintuitive for those who have actually used a rotary phone? i would be looking for the "1" on the other side.

  23. Great! Not only will people by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    talk while they drive, but these mental marvels who have a hard time chewing gum and thinking at the same time will be taking pictures of the Big Mac they're eating at 73 mph.

    "Dude! Check it out! This pickle slice looks like Elvis! Hey! Nooo! ..Ahhhhhhhhhhhh.....!"*CRASH*

    Sounds like I'll be telecommuting.

    1. Re:Great! Not only will people by sulli · · Score: 1

      And they'll all dial the wrong numbers because of that moronic keypad. "Sorry, officer, I didn't mean to dial 911!"

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  24. How about a product we actually NEED? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I think I need a product that will wash the taste of Cmd Tuna Taco's pee sprout out of my mouth. What knob slobbers we are!

  25. I've seen one of these things . . . by hamsterdude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And they are pretty nice in real life. One of my friend's dad works at Nokia and now has one of these phones and boy is it nice. The keypad is weird at first, but apparently a represtative sample of text-messagers in the UK said that the keypad was better than the regular style once you get the hang of it. The one strange thing, though, is that there's no cover over the lense (well there is but it's transparant and perminantly there and permenantly open to scratches). At first I was a little paranoid about this but apparently they tested it by literally scrubbing it with sandpaper for half an hour and not a scratch! It's also impervious to keys and change in your pocket - the only way to seriously damage it is to take a scalpal to it! The software on the phone was all development/old versions but it's going to have RealOne and, apparently, real internet browsing (Has God answered the prayer's of millions? Is W@P dead?) and other goodies. The phone has the usual Nokia tactile feel, though perhaps a little more plasticy than previous phones (think transition from Palm III to M100 without the shambolic hardware issues). And generally is pretty sweet. I can't wait to see the polished production version!!!

    1. Re:I've seen one of these things . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The prototype versions have always had plasticy prototype covers and keys.

    2. Re:I've seen one of these things . . . by scottme · · Score: 2, Funny

      RealOne? I can hardly wait for my cellphone to urge me to upgrade every time I place a call.
      Sheesh.

  26. Re:Great, but why would I use it when I have a dig by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

    "Why would I want a phone that takes crappy pictures and can only be sent to other people who have an MMS-capable phone?"

    Actually, you are wrong. The pictures(640x480x24bit) can be mailed to any e-mail adress, transfered to your box via bluetooth and more, in .jpg format.

    "(btw it should read MMS not MMC)."

    It should read MMS if it was MMS i was talking about. However, it was not. I was actually talking about a Multi Media Card, a removable memory-chip.

  27. Nokia is HIGHEST quality by Daath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nokia makes the best phones on the market. Period. I've owned Siemens, Motorola and four Nokias - I've tried the Sony Ericsson T68i, Ericsson (old ones) and a few others (like Bosch etc) - NONE of them are as good as the Nokia - they simply have the best user interface - menu system - of them all. On advanced phones the menu system is very important - And none beats the nokias.
    The only thing that I regret about the new phones, is that they no longer have the "IntelliKey" - that was a good!

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:Nokia is HIGHEST quality by sideone · · Score: 1

      i agree nokia, has some 'cool' features, but what i really care about is the sound quality, batt life, and basic phone operations. By sound quality i am not talking about tdma vs cdma vs foo, i mean the stuff inside that hike the price up to another $100.oo.

      --


      sideone
      ITBitch.com Your reason for leaving work!
    2. Re:Nokia is HIGHEST quality by Eunuchswear · · Score: 0
      Nokia makes the best phones on the market. Period. I've owned Siemens, Motorola and four Nokias - I've tried the Sony Ericsson T68i, Ericsson (old ones) and a few others (like Bosch etc) - NONE of them are as good as the Nokia - they simply have the best user interface - menu system - of them all. On advanced phones the menu system is very important - And none beats the nokias.
      My experience with Nokia:

      Great menu. Pity the phone doesn't work.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    3. Re:Nokia is HIGHEST quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. I've yet to see any other phone with the features, sound quality and durability of my TimePort. This includes all Nokia phones.

    4. Re:Nokia is HIGHEST quality by florin · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I've used several Nokias over the years and I sure wish every device was as reliable, well engineered and intuitive as these phones.

      That said, I'm still gonna try the Ericsson t68i next, as Nokia doesn't currently offer exactly the phone with the features I want.

  28. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 54 by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1
    ...Stephen King was found dead in...

    OK, I've seen this posted on Slashdot a lot. I don't get it. Is there a joke somewhere in these postings that I am missing?

  29. how will i play snake... by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

    if the number pad is semi-circular, how the heck will i play snake ????

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    1. Re:how will i play snake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there is the d-pad in the middle. I guess you didn't even look at the article photo.

    2. Re:how will i play snake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, with that 4 directional pad above it?

  30. waaaa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't the ultimate convergence appliance be a combination toilet/refrigerator? Imagine the multitasking capabilities!

  31. The Merge by lpret · · Score: 1
    I see this as a last ditch effort by cellphone manufacturers to stay relevant. I, as many nerds and even normal people, carry a cellphone in one pocket a PDA in the other, my keys in one back pocket and my wallet in the other backpocket. Now the goal is to put all of this into one device that will fit in one pocket. THAT is why you see so much of this put together. I, for one, welcome any such merging of devices, as this cuts down on the pants saggage. We have already seen the first generations of PDA/cellphone combos that don't really appeal to anyone, but sooner or later, there will be that one defining product that finally merges the two. Nokia is trying from the cellphone side, Handspring tried from the PDA side.

    Also, about your comment, Nobody needs or wants a camera, PDA, mp3 player, or web browser on their phone -- I find it absolutely untrue. Perhaps you cannot "think outside the box" but I would welcome anything that can do all these things. I own a digital camera, a PDA, two mp3 players, a laptop and a desktop. Now, if you can create one product that can do all of these things even remotely competent, but most importantly, fit in ONE pocket... you have your first customer right here.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:The Merge by tps12 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You carry your keys in your ass pocket? Doesn't it hurt when you sit down?

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    2. Re:The Merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't have time to sit down. He's too busy making deals on his cell phone and checkin' his stocks on his PDA.

    3. Re:The Merge by swb · · Score: 2

      Of course it doesn't hurt. There's only one key, to his mom's garage. With all the money spent on hot gadgets, he can't afford anything else like a house or car that requires a key.

  32. I must be watching too much porn... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    ...cause I went in here to make the same post.

    --
    Blar.
  33. Thoe keypad would drive me nuts! by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

    The phone looks really cool, but PLEASE give it a regular phone keypad!!! If I want a rotary dial, I'll go get some old pulse dialing phone.

  34. I don't like the keypad. by pomakis · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I don't like the keypad. It'd be awkward to everybody who's used to the standard 3x4 array of buttons, which is, well, everybody!

    The least they could have done is arranged the circular buttons in clockwise order so that they'd be layed out in a way similar to the old rotary-dial phones.

    1. Re:I don't like the keypad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The keypad is HORRIBLE. I bet they can it within three months for the US market. Wrong way rotary dialing - yeah, that's a good idea!

    2. Re:I don't like the keypad. by malarkey · · Score: 1

      Rotary phones numbers are listed counter-clockwise. When you dialed, you turned the wheel clockwise, with "1" being the shortest.

      The number here just aren't in quite the same position.

  35. Re:GET SOME PRIORITIES! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    A ductator across the ocean is building weapons of mass destruction.

    Yessss, ve vill rule with an iron quack! They vill tremble before the flapping of our bill! Ve are ... THE DUCTATORS!

    Fear the stomping of our jack-booted web feet.

  36. Idiot marketroids naming things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the hell named that thing? Someone that doesn't have the internet, obviously!

    Yow! I just set my phone to vibrate! Call me!

  37. Re:New way to troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who modded this down? It's actually pretty funny.

    Let me explain for the idiots who don't get his joke... He's saying you can take a picture just like Goatse.cx with your cellphone.. Get it?

    Isn't this advance in technology wonderful???

  38. Multi-funciton devices by msheppard · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    From here:

    % At the gun club meeting, Moe holds up a rifle, attached via strings
    % and rods to four smaller weapons.

    Moe: And that's how, with a few minor adjustments, you can turn a regular
    gun into five guns. [receives applause]

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
    1. Re:Multi-funciton devices by yelligsc · · Score: 1

      snpp.com kicks all kinds of ass.

      Do you know how long has this site been around? I just found it the other day.

      Scott.

  39. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just one of the ongoing jokes that is posted here, like all the beowulf cluster and goatse jokes. Unless I'm missing something too. :)

  40. You mean this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the phone you mean? Cover slides down to reveal the keypad.

    http://www.nokiausa.com/shop/nokia_accessories/p ro mo/1,5291,phonecode:8890,00.html

  41. Soylent purple is Muppets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soon, we here at Monsanto will close the loop. And you will pay for the privelege!

  42. all the cool kids have ericsson t68i's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They bust ass in america. we get all the cool shit last. :(

  43. Will we be seeing Video Cell phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be kinda neat... Low cost Video cell phones... what's the cost on this?

  44. It covers everything in my list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - phone
    - mp3 player
    - stereo headphone jack
    - bluetooth
    - GPRS
    - tri-band (for usage in USA)
    - expansion (MMC)
    - simple camera

    I don't want an all-in-one device. I can not see this replacing my PDA. The screen is too small for email, ebooks, web surfing. This is why I need the bluetooth to connect to my PDA or laptop so I can use the GPRS data connection. The built-in camera will not replace my digital camera, but it would be fun at parties or other events when I just want to send a MMS or email to someone to show them what they are missing.

  45. New model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Sybian phone fot the ladies :D

  46. Riding the Symbian? by snowlick · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the original "Symbian" company will sue Nokia for stealing the name. I mean, I'll be really confused now when I see popups for "Hot XXX girls RIDE THE SYMBIAN"... Hmmm, have they created a new fetish niche?

    --
    Crystal Meth: Would you ingest somthing made from a poisonous gas and an explosive metal? You do it every day -- Salt!
  47. How much is 200 pounds in real (IOW: American) $ by Future+Linux-Guru · · Score: 1


    I still don't see a market for these phones. Most people that want to carry a camera around with them want *usuable* pictures from it.

    Just buy an elph.

  48. Oh please by seizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You don't sound like a habitual cellphone user. I am one, and I can tell you that I have developed a scary reliance on a number of features (SMS messaging, the built in alarm clock, caller-ID-associative ringtones, tetris, etc) - all developed after your 10 number speed dial. There is nothing I wish for more than a completely integrated PDA/phone/camera/mp3 player/web browser, etc.

    And guess what - it's coming soon (RSN ;-). Ericsson's P800 is due out early next year (revised date), with all those features - and MPEG4, Java, everything crammable into a 150mhz ARM processor with 16mb memory.

    Check it out

    I know it's what I've dreamed of, and I bet you that many other (geek and non-geek) people have dreamt of it too.

    1. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I like the freedom from being annoyed by people trying to sell me things when I leave the home or office!

    2. Re:Oh please by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2
      And guess what - it's coming soon (RSN ;-). Ericsson's P800 is due out early next year (revised date), with all those features - and MPEG4, Java, everything crammable into a 150mhz ARM processor with 16mb memory.

      See it. *Actually* used it.

      Upsides: Symbian, rock solid, lovely UI, loads of apps, decent web-browser, expandable, cool apps already available for it.

      Downsides: The stylus is flimsy plastic that clips to the side, the keyboard presses onto the screen (its a flip) which harks back to the problems of the R380-or-something (in which the buttons wore down and weren't as responsive). There is a camera (which is good) but makes the damn thing rather heavy.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  49. Re:Great, but why would I use it when I have a dig by Serveert · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually, you are wrong. The pictures(640x480x24bit) can be mailed to any e-mail adress, transfered to your box via bluetooth and more, in .jpg format.

    Let's say you want 5" x 7" prints of your photos. At 640 x 480, the pixels per inch will be 640/7 or 91 ppi horizontal, 480/5 or 96 ppi vertical.

    With my Nikkon 775 which was around $300, I get 1600 x 1200 resolution. This gives me 228 ppi horizontal, 240 ppi vertical.

    You approach photorealistic quality at 300 ppi. If I were to get 5 by 7 prints, the photos your camera would produce wouldn't be tolerable. Not even talking about the fact that my camera uses 32 bit color.

    Add in the fact that it probably doesn't have flash and other nice camera features like red eye, etc... you'll have to conclude that it's no replacement for a digital camera.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
  50. he's fallen in the water... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 0
    I don't know about you, but I've droped my cell phone into lakes too often to want an expensive one. (it was in my pocket when I fell overboard last time) Sure I recover it, but I haven't had success getting them to work after tha[t].

    You need a good old motorola 3688, had mine in my pocket when I fell into the Canal du Midi, 5 days later it was working as good as new.

    Only 83g as well, carry a 130g telephone? Those Nokia guys think I'm an elephant?

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  51. Re:How about devices that do ONE THING QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but that would require giving money to Apple for their overpriced hardware, and I have sworn a solemn oath to NEVER support Apple and their proprietary "lock you in and never let go" hardware.

  52. Re:GET SOME PRIORITIES! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 0

    There are people dying in New York. A ductator across the ocean is building weapons of mass destruction. Go donate some blood or something, don't bother us with your pandering consumerism.


    Yup; Dubya has the bomb. Deal with it.
    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  53. Interesting to mention... by WetCat · · Score: 1

    That most sci-fi writers in the seventies, sixties
    and earlier forecasted creation of videotelephones
    but usually they mean desk-mounted ones,
    not mobile ones...

  54. Prices by Dexter77 · · Score: 1

    Here are the preliminary prices of the new Nokia models including 3650 (625).

    http://www.idesan.pp.fi/nokia.html

    1. Re:Prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're blind or dumb or what?!? :-) The new phone from Nokia would be 3650, not 7650 (which's already out now)... The price you've reported is referred to the 7650... ...Or was that just a way to get more hits to your little page?!?

  55. LOCK THAT KEYPAD! by tweakt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've heard a lot of stories of cellphones accidently dialing
    numbers when in someone's pocket or bag. Sometimes this occurs
    during incriminating or embarrassing situations, and typically
    the number on the other end will be a friend or relative since
    they are going to be the last dialed number, or someone on a
    speed dial entry.

    Now pause for a moment, and imagine the implications of a
    video-cellphone accidently dialing your parents at a bad
    time...

    On a more serious note, I've also read about cell phones being
    used intentionally for this sort of spying. Ones that can
    auto-answer calls silently are inconspicuously left in a board
    room or someone's office, and then later, can be called in order
    to eavesdrop.

    They typcially dont raise any concerns because, hey "Its just a
    cell phone, someone probably forgot it, and will come back to get
    it".

    Now... adding video to the technique may prove to be interesting
    or problematic (depending on which side you are on).

    1. Re:LOCK THAT KEYPAD! by jedrek · · Score: 2

      Buy a phone (Ericsson, Siemens and Sony all have this function) that will... automatically block your keypad after a few minutes of non-use.

      Technology actually making life easier... whudathunkit.

    2. Re:LOCK THAT KEYPAD! by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      My Nokia 3310 unlocks itself, just by the act of sitting in my pocket whilst I travel to work or college.

      This is standard, but i've also accumulated about 20 new 'names' and 'numbers' in my address book from it being jiggled about.

      I'm just waiting forthe day for it to SMS me and tell me i've forgotten to buy milk.

  56. Re:Great, but why would I use it when I have a dig by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

    Yes, but what I commented was your claim that it could only send pictures to other MMS compatible phones, which was wrong. I also commented on your belief that I didn't know the difference between MMS and MMC, and merly misspelled MMS, something I certainly did not.

    When talking about image-quality, I agree with you that 640x480 is not good enough, but the old VGA-resolution seems to be current top resolution among (the few available) imaging phones at the market. Anyway, this phone is probaly not meant as a competitor to dedicated digital cameras, but more as something to have handy, should a interesting/fun situation arise. :)

  57. Sprint. by unicron · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Sprint makes a camerphone that just utterly blows this one out of the water, if for nothing more than it doesn't look like a fisher price toy.

    I've begun to notice that gadgets are either going the "look ultra futuristic" or "look like something only a 2 year old or a raver would want" paths. I for one want all my gadgets chrome or black.

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  58. Just what the world needs... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2, Funny



    A cell phone named "Symbian".. Small enough to fit you-know-where, and vibrate.

    My culture has destroyed itself.

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  59. Re:I hope they have it on VoiceStream - err, T-Mob by biglig2 · · Score: 2

    And there, in a nutshell, you have the reason why this phone exists.

    Basically, my Ericsson T39m (to take a random example) is everything I could possibly need in a phone. It works as a phone, all over the world. It talks to my Palm or my PC, and I can use it for data. GPRS if I want hi speed data. Simple games too for boring moments. Very sophisticated memory; I could use it as my contact manager if I didn't prefer my Palm. SMS make it a sper alpha pager too. It's tiny. It looks nice.

    So, what can the company offer me to make me buy a different new phone? Well, technically, all they can add is battery life, but we're at the technological limit for that. So, all they can do to persuade me to get a new phone is to put fancy crap into it, such as a camera + MMS so i can send crappy photos about. Or a mp3 player, or a radio, or a thumbboard so I can type messages faster, anything to persuade me that I need a new phone.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  60. I like it. Here's why: by mo · · Score: 2

    When you first use this phone you are able to dial numbers. Why? because the digits are on each buttons, and you just hunt-and-peck your way along. But the real beauty of this UI is for expert users, and everyone is an expert user of their cellphone. By arranging the buttons radially, you have a much easier time dialing blindly. Check out the keypad, there's a nice buttonless space for your thumb to go when you grab the phone in your pocket. From there, each button is easily naviagble. In fact, it's somewhat similar to mozilla's pie menus. They're going for ease of use while dialing blindly, and they know that whoever get's this as their phone will have more than enough time to become an expert at using it. That's because people use it every day. Handspring made the mistake of not enabling blind dialing in their Treo phone. Because the touch screen has no texture, it's impossible to find the buttons without looking.

    So don't look at the nokia layout as an attmpt to be retro or to emulate a rotary phone, they're trying to make it easy for people to effortlessly use thier phone without looking. And there's no reason to stick to the 3x4 layout. Most cellphones' buttons are so different in size anyways that it's impossible to blind dial one after constantly using another. Therefore, they might as well rearrange them completely.

  61. What's exactly wrong with convergence? by Marton · · Score: 1

    I mean, you guys are bitching about phones that take pictures. You want a camera that takes a good picture. You want an MP3 player that holds tens of gigs. You want a phone that goes for a week with a single charge and is very light.

    Umm. You can buy these things right now. I have.

    But do I carry my Nomad jukebox in my pocket all the time? Hell no. Do I have my Olympus Camedia hanging in my neck all the time? Nope.

    I picked up a Nokia 7650 recently. I've been a Nokia person for ages (save for an odd Motorola or Ericcsson here and there, only to be disgusted by their lack of user-friendliness).

    It's a bit bulky. It does not play MP3s. It can only take pretty lousy pictures with its fixed focus VGA-res camera. It's short on memory and is a bit slow. The built-in PIM is OK, but it does not have a spreadsheet. I would be happier with a small keyboard or a touchscreen for text entry.

    But... doesn't it just cry out the possibility of an ultra pocket device? Isn't it where we're headed? There are very small cameras out there that take very nice pictures. There are very small MP3 players. There are very small phones. Combine them without trade-offs, and you got my $2000.

    I don't know what's this "I like my scanner to scan" attitude. (And I have no idea what's +4, Interesting about it at all.) I like my scanner to scan too - I just don't mind if it's the same machine as my fax and printer, conveniently hooked up to my PC with a USB cable.

    I actually don't like the fact that they did not integrate an ISDN phone into it.

  62. cellphones for the adult market? by Patersmith · · Score: 1

    Nokia is making a Sybiancellphone?? WTF??

    1. Re:cellphones for the adult market? by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and the company is called no-kia. These guys must hate cars an awful lot to make a cellphone named after a sex toy...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  63. Re:GET SOME PRIORITIES! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he means a person that installs ducts. Personally, I wouldn't do business with a duct installer that had access to anthrax.

  64. I'd like... by aero6dof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about a cellphone on a pcmcia card. Maybe with an optional bluetooth interface for the head set. Then I could plug it into a PDA, a laptop, or mabe a plain phone chassis.

    1. Re:I'd like... by tom.allender · · Score: 1
      How about a cellphone on a pcmcia card.

      this?

    2. Re:I'd like... by aero6dof · · Score: 1

      Yes! I'll have to look and see if there's a version availiable in the US. I'm already using a GSM carrier.

    3. Re:I'd like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out handspring's pda to cellphone card

    4. Re:I'd like... by lanalyst · · Score: 1

      Verizon and others are offering the Sierra pcmcia card... I have one. It has a jack for a standard handsfree or headset. In my opinion, the phone is a novelty - it can't answer unless the PDA or laptop is powered up and ready (read:burning battery). Here, 1X service pretty much sucks speed-wise - web browsing is painful.. email is bad too... VPN during rush hour is next to useless.

      I have used it for telnet and it seems okay. In a pinch, it's handy, but I can't justify the expense.

      I'd rather have a 1X data capable phone and a blackberry.

      YMMV

  65. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, like the fact that someone with a low,low UID of 1610 would just now be slumming around reading below (score : 1) at this late a date.

  66. Re:This is something the Linux crowd should learn. by DGolden · · Score: 1

    Er. The "linux release" version is the "trimmed down" version. Check out redhat or mandrake distro kernels sometime - the amount of add-on doohickeys they include is astounding.

    --
    Choice of masters is not freedom.
  67. Re:I like it. Here's why: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmmmmmm pie.... menu ....
    bring back pie!

  68. I imagine you are protected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by your books and poetry.

  69. repetitious artiles on the phone by neitzert · · Score: 1

    is it me or are the /. editors repeating themselves?

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=39800&cid=4249 720 thread and article talk about this phone from like 2 weeks ago

    --
    This communication is secured using Rot-26 Encryption Algorithm, Unauthorized decryption will be subject to laughter.
  70. whew! by salmo · · Score: 2

    When I first read the subject of this, I thought it said Simian Imaging phone. I thought this was one of those fancy phones for picture taking monkeys and I knew that this had to be part of the evil Ximian conspiracy for the advancement of all apes and ape-like creatures.

    You know, the one where they help shape Gnome into a desktop so easy to use that a spidermonkey could take over my job. I thought with a phone for that same monkey, he could soon take over a CxO (where x = E,T,F,O,etc.) position. But then I guess things like Enron would be a little bit easier to catch early on.

    Hear that screaming from upstairs?
    Yeah, sounds like Pooky the CFO is shredding documents again.

  71. Re:Great, but why would I use it when I have a dig by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

    Bah. It's something extra they can throw on top of the existing product. It's not like they are looking to replace digital cameras, but it can put them into the hands of folks who might not otherwise buy one, and it will be useful for lesser tasks. You might imagine your cell phone will go places with you, but you'd have to go to extra effort to carry your (dedicated) camera everywhere...

  72. Re:I like it. Here's why: by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

    Umm...it's pretty easy to "blind dial" on my existing Nokia 3somethingorother that has the traditional (ok, non-rotary!) layout. Top left key is 1, the rest follows from there. It works the same as your average TV remote -- they may be in different places but you are going to find a similar number layout. Easy to work in the dark.

  73. Missing things... by z-man · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just got a 3410, and to my grief, I shortly figured the only way to transfer apps to the 3xxx series is through WAP. Unlike the 7xxx series or even the 6xxx series. That is a real drawback for us midlet java programmers :(.

    1. Re:Missing things... by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

      "I just got a 3410, and to my grief, I shortly figured the only way to transfer apps to the 3xxx series is through WAP. Unlike the 7xxx series or even the 6xxx series. That is a real drawback for us midlet java programmers :(."

      Nokia 3650 is supposed to have both infrared and Bluetooth, as well as gprs, so the options are a bit more open than with the 3x10-series, which dosn't have IR/BLUETOOTH.. :)

  74. Another mobile phone story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and more Americans complaining about convergence/too many mobile phone features. "I want a phone to TALK on, dammit!" Open your eyes, embrace the march of mobile technology (we are nerds, right?)

    You have your phone on you all the time - taking snapshots of nights out clubbing and sending them to people who didn't make it out will be COOL!

    Complain at your operators preventing the SMS phenomenon kicking in, not at the handset capabilities.

  75. Re:I hope they have it on VoiceStream - err, T-Mob by jquirke · · Score: 2

    8890 is only dual band - GSM900 and GSM1900 - no GSM1800 support.

  76. Motorla v70 is the coolest by xWeston · · Score: 1
    I've never actually used one of these phones, but i saw somebody with one and i got to hold it and i was trying to figure out how to dial but i couldnt, then she showed me. It was SOOO small and the design seemed really cool. Checkout the manual or the demo at this site. I'm not sure how much it costs though

    Motorla v70

  77. um.... by stinkythumbs · · Score: 1

    anyone else see this as nokia/sybian phone?

    i mean, there's always been jokes about getting calls on a phone set to vibrate in your pants pocket, but that would be taking it one step further...

    --
    I wish I had more hands so I could give this post 4 thumbs down!
    1. Re:um.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      anyone else see this as nokia/sybian phone?

      No.

      Not everybody shares the same, er, ahem, hmm, cultural background.

  78. Symbian Vibrate mode by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

    Oh wait...um, that was another device I was thinking of... ;)

    (let's just see who gets this)

    -JT

  79. Re:Great, but why would I use it when I have a dig by psavo · · Score: 2

    Add in the fact that it probably doesn't have flash and other nice camera features like red eye, etc... you'll have to conclude that it's no replacement for a digital camera.

    Do even understand that red eye comes from flash? Of course it's not replacement to digi, but it's better than nuffin, and it's always there.

    --
    fucktard is a tenderhearted description
  80. Previews of 3650 by scrm · · Score: 1

    There are some good previews of the Nokia 3650 over on GSMBOX and Howard Chui's site. I'd still vote for the 7210 though, integrated cam or not.

    --
    ---- scrm
  81. Smaller units - connect with bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By cramming everything into one phone, the 3650 becomes too big and heavy at least for me. I still want to be able to send digital pictures on the fly, though. So why don't the digicamera manufacturers start putting bluetooth chips in their cameras??

    That way I can have my tiny T68 in the pocket and use my top quality digital camera to take pictures which I can send wirelessly using the phone.

    The 3650 is more like a poor PDA, a poor camera and a poor (and big) mobile phone.

    1. Re:Smaller units - connect with bluetooth by erixtark · · Score: 1

      It's interesting how for example Palm will start shipping Palm Pilots with built in GPRS-chips and bluetooth soon. The PDA-market is merging with the phone market.
      I think buying a PDA without some sort of comunication chip pretty soon will be like buying a PC without an ethernet-card (or modem).

  82. Re:I hope they have it on VoiceStream - err, T-Mob by rafelbev · · Score: 1

    Get your facts right....
    its 900 and 1800. 1900 is in the states

    --
    Dodge this !! --Trinity, The Matrix
  83. Last chance for mobile phone companies by ites · · Score: 1

    The fotofone (or whatever) is more than just a gadget.
    Adding MP3 players to GSMs does not create revenue.
    But digital cameras might.
    The hope of Nokia and SonyEricsson is that fotofones
    will drive new network usage, like SMS did.
    If this fails, like WAP did, Nokia and SonyEricsson are in deeeep trouble.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  84. Re:This is something the Linux crowd should learn. by otuz · · Score: 1

    Er.. my personal favourite is debian. It's gnu and all, but my point is that none of the current linux distros are something the Joe Average could grasp. And the add-on doohickeys are baad.. The vga text mode shell is also very lame, it should seriously be replaced with something graphical that fits on a floppy and includes all the basic /bin functions.

  85. North-American cellphon market prevents that by mah! · · Score: 1
    this is likely; anywhere except in the North-American market: unlike anywhere else in the world, the US &c. cellphone companies (even those owned or controlled by European companies, like VoiceStream and Verizon), offer either:
    • 1-year contracts (high penalties if you quit earlier), or
    • too high per-minute charges and expiration periods too shorton pre-paid cards

    there is, therefore, very little incentive to just have a couple of SIM chips around, as it can be conveniently done in other countries.

    I was hoping for the non-US companies to change things once they start buying the scattered North-American ones, but apparently it has not happened yet. Oh well, a few years to catch up with more mature markets...

  86. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 54 by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1
    would just now be slumming around reading below (score : 1) at this late a date.

    If you read my post, you'll see that I said I have seen this posted a lot, so yeah, I read down in the depths below "score:1" sometimes (lately I have been reading at a higher level because I get sick of the "page widening" posts though). I have always just read it, wondered what the joke was and went on with life. I just figured after all this time, it keeps getting posted, maybe there was some "inside joke" I was missing. No biggie!

  87. Re:I hope they have it on VoiceStream - err, T-Mob by jquirke · · Score: 2

    Huh? What are you talking about? Get YOUR facts straight

  88. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Joshu: What is the true Way?
    Nansen: Every way is the true Way.
    J: Can I study it?
    N: The more you study, the further from the Way.
    J: If I don't study it, how can I know it?
    N: The Way does not belong to things seen: nor to things unseen.
    It does not belong to things known: nor to things unknown. Do
    not seek it, study it, or name it. To find yourself on it, open
    yourself as wide as the sky.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...