Slashdot Mirror


(CD) Pirates Take to the Ocean

rammstein_rulz writes "www.cdfreaks.com reports that asian CD pirates now produce thousands of pirated VCD's on anchored ships in international waters to avoid getting caught. Malaysian marine police have been asked to be on the lookout for pirate ships"

123 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. I wanna say it first... by GeekyMike · · Score: 3, Funny

    ARRR... hoist the jolly roger and walk the plank

    --
    Beware the fury of a patient man
    - John Dryden
    1. Re:I wanna say it first... by The+Importance+of · · Score: 4, Funny

      LawMeme has an entire post on this in pirate lingo - Shiver Me Timbers! Pirates Take to the High Seas

    2. Re:I wanna say it first... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2

      You're too late! Worldwide Talk Like a Pirate Day was back on Sept 20th!

    3. Re:I wanna say it first... by uberdave · · Score: 2

      When I was growing up, the phrase was "I was BORN on a pirate ship". By pulling your mouth open to a wide grin with your fingers, you distort the pronunciation of the phrase. "Pirate" sounds like "pile of" and the P in "ship" sounds like a T.

  2. International Waters by kila_m · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If they are in international waters.. what are the legal implications ? Whos Jurisdiction etc .. would they come under ?

    1. Re:International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The RIAA's. Just wait for them to start issuing letters of marquee.

    2. Re:International Waters by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Informative
      Actually, very few laws exist in international waters. That's why whaling and such is legal when boats get far enough out. Some countries have laws covering what you can and can't do as a citizen even outside of the country, but to my knowledge it's perfectly legal to sink a ship if it's attempting to commit piracy or other theft of goods.

      Wrong, the law of the sea is probably the most extensively litigated aspect of international law. International law was originally invented to cover the sea. The London Times reports on maritime law cases all the time.

      The basic principle is that every ship is registered in a national shipping registry and is subject to the laws of that country. So if a ship is registered in Panama the laws of Panama apply.

      A ship that does not have a registration is subject to the laws of any nation that cares to enforce them. An unregistered ship is likely to be seized each time it calls at a port.

      It would not be legal for a merchant ship to attack another for any reason other than self defense. However a coastguard or navy vessel can do so.

      One wonders if the story is a spoof since being at sea does nothing to improve the legal situation and the mechanics of producing CDs on board a ship do not sound promissing, I doubt that CD pressing plants are designed to be used on ship.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:International Waters by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well the legal status is probably similar to the radio stations that used to broadcast from offshore to holland. I don't know if this happenend anywhere else but the the netherlands is a small country with the heavy population centers near the coast. So a ship in international waters could reach a sizeable part of the population. This was done to avoid the laws on radio regulation and to avoid having their equipment seized constantly. The police could only interfere when a storm would knock the vessel into national waters.

      The same probably applies here. The pressed CD's don't suddenly become legal but the police won't be able to seize the equipment involved as long as it stays out at sea. Of course the old radio pirates went on to become legal radio/tv stations when it was shown that a large portion of the citizens supported them. I doubt the same will occur with cd-pirates.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    4. Re:International Waters by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One wonders if the story is a spoof since being at sea does nothing to improve the legal situation and the mechanics of producing CDs on board a ship do not sound promissing, I doubt that CD pressing plants are designed to be used on ship.

      Agreed, personally I saw this as an April-fools type story when I saw it: It sounds more like the fabrication of someone who was trying to think of a real pseudo-ironic (not literally ironic, but in the manner that most people use the term ironic): "Isn't that ironic? They're producing CDs, making themselves pirates, on ships! HAHA!". Legally, as you said, this has zero merit. The excuse that they're doing it to avoid detection has no validity either: One can hide a dupe machine anywhere with zero chance of getting caught-> Getting caught comes when you start to sell the product and the authorities work themselves up the chain until they're busting in your door.

      I'd love to here from someone in Malaysian confirming this story, because personally it sounds like BS.

    5. Re:International Waters by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 5, Interesting

      An AC wrote:

      > I believe that a vessel in internation waters is
      > subject to the laws of its flag country -- the
      > country in which the vessel is registered.

      Then these ships must fly a gold sun cross on a field of blue, the flag of that island whose language is song. Its divine Queen has never recognized the property rights, real or "intellectual", of the media sharks before ("Mosura" 1961, "Mosura tai Gojira" 1964, or "Gojira, Ebira, Mosura: Nankai no Dai Ketto" 1966), and I don't see her starting anytime soon.

      Seriously, I think it bears pointing out that these ships are pressing VCDs of movies so we are talking MPAA here -- let us get our sharks straight. The market for these unauthorized copies is to people in the region who would never, ever, be able to afford a full price DVD. As with software, cheap versions of the hardware is a seriously major purchase for them (assuming they don't just use a computer at an internet cafe). Just forget about their having anything but pocket change to pay for the software/movies/etc. The street vendors hawking these unauthorized copies sell at what the market would bear. The media sharks do not sell to these people, so there is demand, but not much money, and no legitimate products to fill the demand.

      The people out in boats making these VCDs are *not* real pirates. They do not hijack ships, murder, or rape (at least, that we know of). Yes, they are breaking a law, but so is the average American who speeds on the way to work, parks without paying the meter, or lies on income tax forms.

      If the media sharks were remotely interested in actually putting an end to this terrible crime, they'd sign these "pirates" on as local distributors for a cut of their profits! The people get their movies at a price they can afford, the newly ordained distributors can conduct their business under more pleasant conditions, and the police can save their efforts for those who continue to prefer breaking the law and, gasp, actual murderers! The sharks save money on enforcement, and make a little money from their new distributors.

      But no, that would be common sense. We can't have that!

      Bells are ringing: Mothra, Mothra! Every heart is calling: Mothra, Mothra!
      Come on, Tok Wira, these sharks have gotta pay! New Kirk calling Mothra, we need you today!

      G Countdown: 23 days (www.godzillaoncube.com)

    6. Re:International Waters by chamenos · · Score: 2, Informative

      i'm not from malaysia, but i'm from singapore, which is just south of malaysia.

      i personally don't think this story is false, as the state of lawlessness in malaysia can be quite bad at times.

      just a year or two ago, bandits masqueraded as military officials and stole over a hundred M16s from a malaysian armoury in broad daylight. another bunch of them stole some steyr AUGs, and both gangs went on a spate of robberies before the authorities managed to catch up with them.

      in view of the above, i don't think malaysian software pirates shifting their base of operations to a ship is that unlikely =) besides, the malaysian authorities recent clamp-down on software pirates has been quite well publicized so such a reaction from the pirates may not be that far-fetched.

    7. Re:International Waters by sadtrev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is plenty of trade in Pirate software, VCDs and, over the past 6 months DVDs made in Malaysia and sold in Johore Bharu - just over the causeway from Singapore at abut Rm8 (US$1.50) each. Most of these are for the local (ASEAN) market but I have seen plenty of examples of DVDs that are targeted at expatriates and business travellers.
      As for police reinforcement - I've seen it for myself - In a shopping mall called Holiday Plaza where a lot of the pirate electronics is openly traded - all the stalls will close down for half a day every month or so. The police will perform a token raid, fine any traders that didn't pay the bribe beforehand and leave.
      Business can then proceed.
      I suspect that the authorities are slightly more serious about staming down on the manufacture rather than the sale of contraband CDs but even so, a Royal Malaysian Navy patrol vessel raiding a token pirate ship will serve nothing more than government propaganda. One or two stories on the evening news.
      The Singaporeans will say they were Malaysian, the malaysians will say they were Indonesian and the Indonesians will say they were Chinese.

    8. Re:International Waters by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      It may not improve the legal situation - but frankly its harder to find and sieze ships that are 18-20 miles off the shore.

    9. Re:International Waters by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      I doubt that CD pressing plants are designed to be used on ship.

      Hm. I think newer ship designs, using deep pontoons for flotation rather than hull-on-the-water, can achieve vibration and roll free sailing.

      Or, you could build some bizarre suspension system for the burning factory.

      So, it's possible that it could be done. Interesting story.

    10. Re:International Waters by mbogosian · · Score: 2

      One wonders if the story is a spoof since being at sea does nothing to improve the legal situation and the mechanics of producing CDs on board a ship do not sound promissing, I doubt that CD pressing plants are designed to be used on ship.

      Maybe they learned everything they know about law in international waters from the the Simpsons....

    11. Re:International Waters by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I thought they already had.. isn't that what this latest "license to hack" bill is all about??

      Of course, back in the day, there was often no practical difference between privateers and pirates...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:International Waters by mpe · · Score: 2

      Yup, it's possible, but it seems a bit like what people say about James Bond villians. It's all overly elaborate and unnecessarily expensive. This is a criminal enterprise about producing CDs as cheaply as possible to sell as many as possible. Such a ship would be expensive and a flashy high tech ship would probably draw unnecessary attention without camoflage (which would be easier for a land operation).

      Unless it gets to difficult to do things like paying the manager of a pressing plant to run off a few (thousand) extra...

    13. Re:International Waters by Reziac · · Score: 2

      The one that lets the RIAA have their way with P2P networks; much-discussed hereabouts over the past month.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  3. Piracy on the high seas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    England certainly still has the death penalty for this (along with treason and one other I cannot remember).. does this mean we are going to start seeing people hang again? ;)

    1. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by ColdGrits · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Off topic I know, but the third crime for which the UK (not just England, please note) has the death penalty is "arson in a naval dockyard".

      Mind you, the thought of software pirates swinging from the gallows is an interesting image! Althogh I think hanging Spammers would be more likely to meet with universal support :-)

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    2. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by benwb · · Score: 5, Funny

      The us has about as much chance of agreeing to join the european union as france has of seceding from europe and becoming the 51st state.

    3. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      Sadly, in 1998, the UK abolished the death penalty for all offences. I suppose this is a good thing (I'm anti-death-penalty), but I don't mind treasoners hanging from the rafters. Oh well.

      --Dan

    4. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Albanach · · Score: 4, Informative

      The death penalty for all remaining offences was abolished in the 1998 Crime adn Disorder Act

    5. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by syrinx · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's a reason why the US can't join the European Union.

      And here I thought it was because the US is *not in Europe*.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    6. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by ErikZ · · Score: 2

      I thought the reason the US couldn't join the European Union was, like, it's in Europe.

      Oh yeah, and if the US switched it's currency to the Euro, what would they use to prop up the Euro?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    7. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      If you add up the pluses and minuses of our society, 60 fried scumbags/year hardly makes us uncivilized.

      The death penalty was reenacted in this country by democratic process. Apparently, there are many people who do not share your opinion that capital punishment is immoral.

    8. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by SkulkCU · · Score: 2


      At this point, that's more likely to happen than the UK joining the EU...

      --
      .sig last updated Jan. 14, 2000
    9. Re:Piracy on the high seas? by mpe · · Score: 2

      There is no death penalty in any state of the European Union. We are civilized people here. That's a reason why the US can't join the European Union.

      Not that the US would probably want to.
      Of more direct relevence is that this no death penalty clause trumps any extradition treaties EU members might have with any other nations. If someone may face execution they cannot be extradited. The US is in the same catagory as any other nation which allows execution here.

  4. Cheaper by the million by mangu · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Why bother with small scale copying at all? Instead of trying to impose non-working copy-protection on consumer hardware, the media industry should focus on large scale copying.


    If I was trying to make money in IP violations, this is how I would do it:

    1) Forge documents from media companies, ordering large batches of CDs and DVDs from established manufacturers.

    2) Sell those records to wholesalers, which might or might not be aware of the scam.

    3) Profit

    1. Re:Cheaper by the million by suss · · Score: 2

      3) Profit
      4) Prison

  5. Why use a boat.. by Perdo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When you can do the same thing at your desk?

    Someone tell those guys not to take the term "Pirate" litterally.

    "Suck Emma, suck. 'Blow' is just a figure of speech!"

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  6. Re:ARRRRRRRR, matie!! by handsomepete · · Score: 2, Funny

    ArrrrMS says information *wants* to be free!

  7. But... by tsa · · Score: 2

    I always learnt that on a ship the laws of the country the ship sails under apply. If that's true what's the problem?

    --

    -- Cheers!

  8. What I found to be funny... by Travoltus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...was that the page with the news article featured links right to where you could purchase the CD ROMs and RW's, plus the software to burn the CDs.
    Which basically means anyone can just follow the provided links to buy all the sh-t (except the boat) that will enable them to jump right into the offshore piracy business!

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:What I found to be funny... by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if you want to spend lots of time moored out in the sea, running your computer off a battery or generator, at threat from real pirates and so forth, be my guest.

      Count me out tho. :)

    2. Re:What I found to be funny... by MaxVlast · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's the real humor: What are the chances these guys will be gotten by real pirates? It's still a big problem in the southern Asian seas. "Arrrr, gimme all yer CD-Rs." "Aye matie, but we'rrrrre pirates too." "No ye arrrrrn't, yerrrrr just geeks. Well tanned geeks. Arrrrr."

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    3. Re:What I found to be funny... by Flounder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked for a Pirate radio station in Tijuana a few years ago. Technically, they weren't illegal, they just had their station and transmitter about 150yds from the border in San Diego and blasted about 75,000 watts.

      They had a "subsidiary" that was stationed on a old oil drilling ship, that sat moored off outside in international waters off the coast of NYC, and broadcast at 60,000 watts. People there would work and live on the ship, only going ashore about once a month for supplies.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    4. Re:What I found to be funny... by MaxVlast · · Score: 2, Funny

      Further evidence that pirate jokes are among the funniest things in the world.

      Though they're CD-arrrrrrs. :-)

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    5. Re:What I found to be funny... by Zara2 · · Score: 2
      What station was that? I just might have listened to it.

      Yea I know its off-topic but interesting too.

      --

      Pithy, yet ultimately meaningless, phrase expressed with gusto!

  9. Legality ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting



    Even when they're NOT in international waters, the so-called "legality" is just as blurred.

    What's "piracy" anyway ?

    If RIAA wants to charge people an arm and a leg for trying out songs, and themselves (the RIAA) are known to NOT PAYING THE ROYALTIES to the artists, who's the REAL "pirate" ?

    What the so-called "CD-pirates" are doing is just this - they are doing one thing that got the MPAA, RIAA, BSA and whatever hopping mad, as mad as what the DCMA is doing to many of us.

    I am NOT saying what the "CD-pirates" are doing is right, but just that, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

    Period.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  10. Hilarious by ffatTony · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Police in Penang last week launched "Operation Green Ribbon" to nab peddlers of illegal CDs and VCDs and Mazlan said they had already arrested four retailers and seized over 1,000 pirated copies.

    I went to Penang just recently and there were literally multi-floor malls selling professional copies of Oracle for $20, dvds for $2-5 (based upon quality), Adobe products, MS products, etc. It was so vast it was staggering. One guy took a duffel bag overflowing with dvds/software back with us.

    Basically what I'm getting at is if they've only found 1000 pirated copies, then they are either totally inept or not trying very hard.

    1. Re:Hilarious by merky1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They only nabbed those four because they were late on there "insurance" payments...

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
    2. Re:Hilarious by gotr00t · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yes, I agree that the law enforcement around the far east are doing a horrid job. Apparently, last time I went to China, there were literally entire floors of a mall covered with retailers of pirated CD's. Most of them were selling the exact same thing, hinting at a similar souce. Some of the packages were printed well, and had a good design to them, and most of the CDs were of poor quality, but were pressed, and not burned. There were also CD's that came in packages that looked like it came out of an inkjet printer, and the CD itself was a CD-R.

      Apparently, these operations can never really be stopped because while I was there, I literally saw police go and buy some copies of some VCD's (not seized, bought). These people just don't realize that their personal gain in purchasing and selling cheap software may be good for them in the short run, but disasterous to their nation in the long run.

    3. Re:Hilarious by ponxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > but disasterous to their nation in the long run

      I'm not saying i agree with their methods, but how exactly is it going to be disastrous for China in the long run? No-one would buy this software there at full price as it's simply not affordable. With the pirated versions people gain knowledge and skills that can get them jobs everywhere in the world! And it advances Chinas computer industry, so until the US lays a boycot on them for lack of copy-right prevention it'll do nothing but good for the country, seeing it doesn't loose any profit itself

    4. Re:Hilarious by Xpilot · · Score: 5, Informative

      I live in Penang, and sometimes raids are advertised in the papers. You'll see headlines such as "Raid Next Week", and all the shops close on that day. Neat huh?

      There are surprise raids sometimes, but pirates somehow find out about it before hand, and all the shops close on that day. Some surprise.

      There really isn't any way to elimainate piracy in Asian countries when the price of licensed software is so high. In the States, $100 for a word processor may be affordable, but when it gets converted to Malaysian currency, it becomes 380 Malaysian ringgit. Considering the per capita income of most Malaysians to be around 1000 to 1500 Malaysian ringgit, it's considered pricy (and the fact that people can easily buy the pirated version for 7 ringgit doesn't help the situation either).

      To reduce piracy in these parts, software companies should price their software at prices that are affordable from a local point of view.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    5. Re:Hilarious by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Informative

      If all they got were four folks and 1,000 CD, then they weren't trying *at all*.

      I think it must have been a "show".

      I understand China performs a show whenever Western companies complain of copyright violations during critical negotiations of some sort, just round up and destroy a bunch of fake goods hoping that the West accept their claim that they are trying.

      It sounds to me like someone is making payoffs to prevent a *real* bust.

    6. Re:Hilarious by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      No-one would buy this software there at full price as it's simply not affordable. With the pirated versions people gain knowledge and skills that can get them jobs everywhere in the world!

      Exactly how did these people that can't afford software manage to find hardware to run it on? Did they steal it?

    7. Re:Hilarious by Xpilot · · Score: 2

      The hardware isn't cheap. In fact, it's more expensive here in Malaysia where I live than in the US. 1 USD is approximately 3.8 ringgit (Malaysian money). Now if a person has blown 3000 Malaysian ringgit in hardware (about 2 months salary for an average person here), he finds out he needs to spend about 1000 ringgit more for an operating system and an office suite. Then the ultra-cheap pirated versions are really tempting indeed, since one can get any kind of software for only about 7 ringgit apiece.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    8. Re:Hilarious by amorangi · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've lived in Hong Kong and Philippines and am staggered by the scale of the malls in each place. In Hong Kong they'd raid a mall every 3 months and nab a couple of 12 or 13 year olds (un-prosecutable), and report it on the main TV news that they'd done a crack-down. It always made me laugh. In fact it's HARD to get unpirated software. The inflight magazine on Bangkok Airlines actually gives advice in buying pirated software and DVDs (DVDs are often of inferior quality).

    9. Re:Hilarious by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      Doesn't that mean Malaysian piracy efforts (selling Word for 7 ringgit) undermine Malaysian software development growth?

      Who in Malay would want to write and develop any software when you could steal it down the street for 7 ringgit?

      Isn't that reason enough for Malay to try to curb software piracy, in order to strengthen it's own IT industry? It's akin to the US trying to put tariffs on Japanese cars in order to make US cars more competitive. In this case, it would be Malay govt placing a 200% tax on non-native software, so that instead of 7 ringgit, it now costs 21 ringgit, with the extra income being funneled into software infrastructure and schools, or something.

    10. Re:Hilarious by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And of course as soon as they do that some bright person will buy a million or so copies for 7 riggit each, ship them to the US, sell them for $10 a pop and make a nearly $10 million.

      And that's one of the many reasons why things like Palladium are being developed - imagine region encoding on software. Except instead of a 2 or 3:1 price differential, we're talking 100 or 1000:1.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    11. Re:Hilarious by Xpilot · · Score: 2


      Who in Malay would want to write and develop any software when you could steal it down the street for 7 ringgit?


      The name of the country is Malaysia. Malay is the language and also the major ethnic race here.

      The answer to your question is : almost nobody. Retail software is practically non-existant. The only job programmers get here is developing custom or in-house software. It's a sad state of affairs, but that's the reality of the situation here.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    12. Re:Hilarious by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2

      If the software isn't in english it wouldn't sell very well :)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    13. Re:Hilarious by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of Vancouver BC... Seriously.

      I don't live there (I have some relatives that do), but last time I went up to Vancouver and down to Richmond - I saw several shops who were selling VCD's, and Audio cd's for about 8$ a pop. Most of these disks were professionally printed, but one has to seriously wonder about why they were so cheap.

    14. Re:Hilarious by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      To reduce piracy in these parts, software companies should price their software at prices that are affordable from a local point of view.
      Uh.. yeah, that's what software needs: region codes!
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    15. Re:Hilarious by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2

      Legit VCDs can go for $8 CDN. Compare the low quality video (spanned across multiple discs) to a $20 DVD, it stacks up. I'm not going to claim that the copies those shops are selling are legit, though... :)

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    16. Re:Hilarious by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      Hmm.. Nation that doesn't produce software, nation that can buy CDs for $5 instead of importing the same thing from the US for $1000. How is this disastrous to their nation in the long run?

      Don't you know it's not even illegal in some countries? Is a kid in China earning $100/mth going to learn Oracle by using 3yrs of savings? I don't think so.

      US law != world law

    17. Re:Hilarious by mpe · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying i agree with their methods, but how exactly is it going to be disastrous for China in the long run? No-one would buy this software there at full price as it's simply not affordable. With the pirated versions people gain knowledge and skills that can get them jobs everywhere in the world!

      If anything it is more of a threat to open source in these Asian countries than a direct threat to the countries themselves.

      And it advances Chinas computer industry, so until the US lays a boycot on them for lack of copy-right prevention it'll do nothing but good for the country, seeing it doesn't loose any profit itself.

      Easy access to American software could advance China's computer industry rather less than not having such easy access. You could argue that simply cloning US products dosn't do much to advance any Chinese industry. Especially something so trivial to clone as software.

    18. Re:Hilarious by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

      LOL, well, 'compete' doesn't mean 'beat'!

      We've got Apple (OS, software), we've got Corel (Office productivity), we've got Blizzard (video games), we've got Palm (PDAs), we've got ID software (3d graphics APIs), etc.

  11. Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is an example of an unreasoned, apocalyptic extremism that plays into the hands of the forces the poster so adamantly attacks.

    Playing word games with "piracy" is pointless. Producing unauthorized duplicates of commercial products is known as counterfeiting. Most countries have laws prohibiting the creation and distribution of counterfeit goods. It's as illegal to market a counterfeit CD of the current flavor-of-the-week pop band as it is to sell fake Rolex watches.

    By glibly saying "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", all you've done is made more enemies: You have aligned yourself with counterfeiters, a tactic unlikely to draw support from the mainstream public.

    The enemies of your new friend are now your enemies.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> ...forcing prices to be artificially high is known as "Price Fixing.

      So what? Pointing to high CD prices won't legalize counterfeiting.

      This debate is not about the ability of college students to buy and copy music and movies as they see fit. The debate is about changing U.S. copyright law to ensure the interests of the public are addressed, rather than skewed in the interests of corporations with a lock on music distribution.

      If you seriously want to change the status quo, get to work. Otherwise, understand that unthinking assertions do more harm than good.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    2. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rather a broad judgement don't you think?

      Of course SOME people will always pirate stuff to get it for free, but there IS a magic number when it comes to buying things where people will just buy an original rather than deal with the hassle of getting it "for free".

      Take a real-life example that actually happened a week ago to a friend of mine:

      She found some local electronics store that was selling a new CD she wanted for $5 on a short promotional special. Rather than deal with the hassle of trying to get all the tracks on kazaa, etc. She just dropped $5 and has a nice original CD.

      If the CD was $15, she probably would've downloaded it.

      Myself, I have all of the tools I need at home to duplicate DVDs (region-free DVD-ROM, software utilities, and a DVD-R drive).

      I don't - the reason being the price of DVDs, which is usually reasonable value for the money. Why should I spend hours of time and effort ripping/re-encoding a DVD to make a copy when I can just throw down a $20 and have an original?

      My time and effort is worth more than the cost of the DVD, so I just buy it.

      So there we have it - at some magical price-point, people WILL buy stuff, if for no other reason than the amount of work it entails to get it elsewhere (and having an original "anything" is nice too).

      I trust I need not even comment on software companies like Adobe or Microsoft that sell their products in the hundreds or thousands of dollars, then whine about piracy...

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    3. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You don't "need" to steal anything, especially something as unimportant as popular music.

      The price of a product has nothing to do with your own sense of ethics. If you aren't personally ashamed to be a thief, well, I guess you'll steal something.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    4. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by kableh · · Score: 2

      You have aligned yourself with counterfeiters, a tactic unlikely to draw support from the mainstream public.

      Perhaps this is just my raging cynicism kicking in, but the past couple of years have given me the impression that the RIAA et. al. ALREADY view us all as a bunch of theives. Yes, the parent your comment replies to is a bit extreme, but with the hyperbole Hilary Valenti spouts on a daily basis it is justified in my mind.

    5. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by kableh · · Score: 2

      Thanks for making a gross generalization, and answering a valid question on behalf of all of us consumers.

      Asshole.

    6. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Well, yes, that's right. The RIAA does think you're all a bunch of thieves.

      Hyperbole is not justified. Hyperbole just strengthens the impression that people are simply trying to justify theft, rather than addressing the legitimate copyright and property issues that have surfaced via all this P2P noise.

      This is a political and legal debate. It will be decided by votes in Congress and rulings from the Supreme Court.

      Most of the U.S. public doesn't buy music often enough to care. Why should they care if it is legal for you to copy a track of music by some bar band that got a record deal? Talk to them about the price of food, electricty and health care and they might start paying attention.

      Pick your fight. If you think copyright law needs to change, go for it. If you think CD prices are too high, stop buying CD's.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    7. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You too are ignoring my point in favour of a particularly useless ramble over a point of grammar. Yes, I probably should have said "want" instead of "need".

      Big deal.

      Here's a big difference between going out and stealing that $10,000 TV and downloading a song. With the TV there is a tangible item. It is property. If you steal it, that store has a loss to their inventory. If someone downloads a song or an entire CD from a P2P service, no store has lost that CD or that song. They still have the same inventory as before, but perhaps (and this is the important part) only have lost one customer. Businesses exist to make money. I'm not going to argue that. Most businesses that don't make money don't stick around for long, government subsidized ones notwithstanding. But the business (in this case a music store) did not lose any merchandise. Someone can still come in and buy that CD.

      And how much does one song on a CD weigh? I can weigh the TV. How much is it worth? I can price TV's individually. It is worth more if it's a Top 40 hit? Some TVs are more expensive then others. How about if it's been the #1 song for 12 weeks running? What if it's a "B side" song? And some TV's are less expensive. It depends on the brand.

      Your arguement holds little merit.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    8. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ummm...choosing the wrong word isn't a mistake of grammar.

      Sure, the price of CD's is too high. And, sure, that's an incentive to get it elsewhere. People are still buying them, though. Someone paid cash for that CD they're "sharing".

      The best way to force CD prices to drop is to stop buying CD's at those prices. Start putting some stores out of business.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    9. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 2

      >> it's no surprise that someone, like you...is upset...

      I'm not upset, just amused that so many people think that pop music and the RIAA is so bloody important that they elevate the issue to this level.

      Besides, you don't have a bloody clue about what I may or may not believe, or whether I support or don't support the "system".

      >> Government is set up such that votes and candidates may be bought. Legal recourse in courts and through legislative action do nothing because of the economic differences in the lobbying effort.

      If you believe that's true, then why aren't you buying votes and lobbying? Why hasn't the P2P community managed to organize?

      >>..You can have a very valued and preferred choice lose out because of the political process. This puts question in the validity of that process and those that represent it

      No, it doesn't put the validity of the process into question. It simply means you lost. You may value and prefer your choice, but others may not. At times, my success is dependent on your failure. Alleging that the process has failed because you didn't get what you want means only that you failed you to get what you wanted from the process. From others' perspective, the process may have succeeded quiet nicely.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    10. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by bilbobuggins · · Score: 2
      Why should I spend hours of time and effort ripping/re-encoding a DVD to make a copy when I can just throw down a $20 and have an original?

      Yes, this is true for now and believe it or not the **AA actually knows this.
      The real reason they are running so scared is they realize that as technology advances and copying/downloading becomes easier and easier that magic price point gets lower and lower.
      Ten years from now, imagine yourself saying 'why should i spend 15 minutes copying a dvd when i can just buy one for [magic-number]?' and what number will that be? 50 cents? 25? 10?

      At some point in the future, covering production costs will always be higher than acquisition costs for the consumer.
      I'm looking forward to having this revolutionize the entertainment industry (read: distribution is no longer the major cash cow), but to play devil's advocate: for the congolomerates to start searching for a price point that can't exist, well it's guaranteed to be a losing battle - the most they could do is just prolong it for a couple of years.

    11. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Probably not, but so what? Is that going to change anything, or make the RIAA less powerful?

      All that's happening with most /. posts about this issue is a bunch of pontificating about morality, as if that will have any affect on anyone who can actually improve the state of affairs.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    12. Re:Enemies of Your Friend Are Now Your Enemies by aminorex · · Score: 2

      Said counterfeiters are in fact commiting massive
      acts of civil disobedience. Whether they are doing
      so from personal pecuniary interests or in an act
      of noble self-sacrifice is immaterial. The fact
      remains that they are *doing* something about the
      rape and subdivision of the Intellectual Commons.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  12. Re:Yeah, because singing is just like money by MaxVlast · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know about you, but I get my towels from a towel licensing firm. I'm only allowed to use them for a restricted set of purposes, but I get the benefit of regular maintenance updates and, um, patches.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  13. Why not USA : EU :: Russia : NATO? by yerricde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a slight geographical inconvenience [prohibits the USA from joining the EU]

    Even if all EU members must claim territory that geographically belongs to Europe, then why not "admit" the USA to the EU in much the same manner as Russia has been "admitted" to NATO?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Why not USA : EU :: Russia : NATO? by mpe · · Score: 2


      Isn't NATO the "North Atlantic Treaty Organization?" From what I can tell on the map, Russia has every bit as much of a claim to be on the North Atlantic as does, say, Turkey.

      Depending exactly where you draw the boundries on bodies of water Russia probably has a stronger claim than Turkey.

  14. International Waters == Anarchy? by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
    It gets pretty weird, doesn't it. What's to stop the RIAA from influencing the USG to send ships to sink or confescate the vessels? You'd probably be safer in the territorial waters of a state that won't enforce. They would certainly raise a diplomatic stink if another country came to enforce without permission.

    Just another stake in the heart of "the architecture of control". I'm not about to support this sort of thing either in principle or through buying pirated CDs, but it does demonstrate the weakness of the RIAA position. If you treat your customers with respect, they won't disapoint you. Let those who won't pay even what it is worth to them worry about their own karma.

    1. Re:International Waters == Anarchy? by mpe · · Score: 2

      What's to stop the RIAA from influencing the USG to send ships to sink or confescate the vessels?

      That is known as "piracy" the real kind, not the more modern definition of copyright infringement. The RIAA does not want to get into "piracy upon the high seas".

    2. Re:International Waters == Anarchy? by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
      I don't think so. The US Navy or Coast Guard is able to operate on the high seas, although it may need some congressional support to do it legally. Applying international law implies that the damaged party is claiming protection of another state, which probably isn't the case here.

      I think there is an international law of the sea, but it probably doesn't keep nations from enforcing their own laws. Maybe someone who knows can comment.

  15. Freedonia by yerricde · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe that a vessel in internation waters is subject to the laws of its flag country -- the country in which the vessel is registered.

    Then register pirate ships in Freedonia, whose flag (called "Jolly Roger") is a white skull and crossbones on a black field.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  16. In other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hilary Rosen declared today that the RIAA would be offering letters of marque to aid in the hunting down and destruction of the Content Pirates of the South Pacific.

    When interviewed, Rosen stated, "We will not stand for this! The Crown will pay a thousand marks to any who bring in the heads of these scourges of the entertainment industry!"

    Several daring captains of the IT industry have joined forces with the RIAA, becoming privateers. However, not all recording artists agree with the actions of the RIAA.

    "I was there for the announcement. This one guy, he came up to me and said, "Arr, don't be worrying matey, I'll be sinkin' those music pirates! And then he pulled a flintlock on me and stole my watch!", said Lars Ulrich.

    The pirates in question could not be reached for comment.

  17. Be on the lookout by giminy · · Score: 2

    Be on the lookout for the ArrrrrIAA.

    Budum *crash*

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  18. This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by shimmin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If the ships used are registered in some nation's maritime registry, then that nation's laws still apply onboard, so why not just do it ashore in that nation? If the ships used AREN'T registered, then they have no legal protection against the coast guards or navies of _any_ nation that cares to harass them.

    It made a lot more sense back in the 1950's and 60's when Norweigian oil platforms in the North Sea installed some truly overpowered AM rigs and broadcasted music the BBC wouldn't play into the UK. (Paid for by the record companies who wanted the advertising.) Then, they were doing something that was legal in Norway, but not in the UK, and benefitted from being close to the UK, so a Norweigian maritime installation made perfect sense.

    Here, the pirates are doing something that doesn't benefit from being done at sea, so why bother?

    1. Re:This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by passion · · Score: 4, Funny

      OK, then I'll register my ship with the principality of sealand, or maybe I'll launch a satellite, and form a moon base to make my copies.

      --
      - passion
    2. Re:This sounds like more hassle than it's worth. by mpe · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the ships used are registered in some nation's maritime registry, then that nation's laws still apply onboard, so why not just do it ashore in that nation?

      Maybe because they are a long way from their country of registration, have chosen to register with a country without a substantial navy and conduct their operations somewhere near a place which does not have good diplomatic relations with their country of registration.

  19. Pirates, eh? by elemental23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: What do pirates use to copy movies?

    A: CD-Arrrr

    *ahem*

    --
    I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  20. Pot, kettle, black. by TheLink · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What do you mean by "These people just don't realize that their personal gain in purchasing and selling cheap software may be good for them in the short run, but disasterous to their nation in the long run"

    It's not that stupid.

    Maybe you don't realize it but this sort of thing worked for the USA, it worked for Switzerland and I'm sure it worked for many other countries.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2002379.stm

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,6 65 861,00.html

    Open your eyes dude. The only reason it'll be bad in the long run is if the USA takes hypocritical, harsh and unfair action to stop others from doing precisely what it did for its own benefit in the past. Trade barriers etc etc.

    Try to see it from this point of view just for a moment.

    --
  21. Their preferred medium? by graybeard · · Score: 2

    CD-RRRRRRR

  22. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not a real Country?

    Say, perhaps, the "Country" of Sealand?

    Now, here you might have something! You get the 3 guys (or whatever) to agree to register with the International Registry, and ... voila!

    Heck, they practically are a ship to begin with!

    But this raises more questions... What if you have a permanently anchored "dock" at sea? Something that floats, with pools, solar water purifiers, etc, and market it as a "vacation resort"?

    Make it big, and kinda sprawling, and make it float. What then? Cruise ships today routinely take passengers numbering thousands, already many more people than something like Sealand.

    At what point can a manmade structure become a nation?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  23. Re:Doesn't make sense to me by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    ehm, well at least you are honest. If only the selling part was legal then me burning a copy of a cd for a friend who of course I do not charge would be legal. It isn't. You are not allowed to make copies of cd's. It is written on most of them. Only in some countries are you allowed to make backup's for strict personal use only, and even that is combatted left and right. (ever tried copying some games for backup?) I don't think that knocking of 10.000 copies could be considered for personal use even by the most rabid /.er

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  24. Re:What caused this? by MoneyT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Fun? Entertainment? Getting your message out? Self expression? Some how I doubt musicians started out with the idea that they were going to turn into multi million dollar stars. There are plenty of local and independent groups all across the country that perform in night clubs and bars. They do street performances, give lessons etc etc etc. They do not make millions from selling CDs, yet for some reason, they keep making music.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  25. International Law is a Farce by Maul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There should NOT be very much international law. We already have too much. The fact that Bush wants everyone else to follow it, but doesn't want the US to be accountable to it is only an illustration of the very problem with international law. Every country has different values and societies.

    It is too hard to enforce, first of all. Second of all, it imposes the values of (mainly) the West on every country in the world.

    If Afganistan wants to make heroin and opium until the cows come home, let them.

    If Malasyans want to copy CDs and burn them, let them.

    Creating international "bully forces" to impose Western values on other countries isn't going to do anything but cause more people worldwide to become "terrorists" who are out to "kill the West."

    International law should be stripped down to cover war crimes like genocide. It shouldn't have any place outside the of things like that.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    1. Re:International Law is a Farce by Xeger · · Score: 2

      I disagree that Afghanistan (or any other country) should be allowed to pump out any drug it pleases..

      Heroin is one of the most addictive substances on the books. If Afghanistan wants to sell it on the international market, then it is our right to conduct a trade embargo against them as a form of protest.

      The problem with international law, is that it favors the rich countries over the poor countries. But this isn't some evil of Western civilization--this is how the human mind works. The rich ones get all the power.

      Until there is more economic parity, there cannot be more equality.

    2. Re:International Law is a Farce by mpe · · Score: 2

      Heroin is one of the most addictive substances on the books. If Afghanistan wants to sell it on the international market, then it is our right to conduct a trade embargo against them as a form of protest.

      Plenty of things, including various alkaloids are addictive. Nicotine is also highly addictive (and toxic) but since it's produced by Americans that can't be embargoed...

    3. Re:International Law is a Farce by Xeger · · Score: 2

      Nicotine is also highly addictive (and toxic) but since it's produced by Americans that can't be embargoed...

      This is a great example of the richest country getting all the power, and it's a shame. Nicotine being even more addictive than heroin, it seems all the more criminal. But in the US' defense, there are few nations in the world whose populations would stand for a cigarette embargo. Europe dearly loves its cancer sticks, as does Asia.

  26. Re:Yo ho ho.. by Knobby · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pirate Linux sounds something like PorthOS.. PorthOS is something a few friends of mine and I kicked around whenever the alternative OS announcements on /. became boring or we felt like tormenting the IT guys on campus (/. DDOS).. Anyway, PorthOS was going to be the Anti-Linux. The heaviest, most feature laden, OS ever. Error messages would be passed through text-to-speech and yelled at you in Esperanto with a drunken-french accent..

    Someday it'll happen!

  27. Free CD's == No CD's by reallocate · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    If the price of CD's -- or any other product -- drops to zero, people will stop making CD's.

    The music business is just that, a business whose purpose is to sell music. If the price of music drops below the cost of music production and distribution, the business will vanish.

    Poof, no more CD's to buy or "share".

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Free CD's == No CD's by billbaggins · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or maybe the crap artists who are in it just for the money will stop making CDs, and the "art for art's sake" folks will carry on with what they do, living by contributions or concert tix or something, distributing their music on the Internet, and generally making music for the reasons that people started making music. To express themselves. To have fun. To entertain. To praise $DEITY. Because they wanted to, not just because they could make money off of it (though I will admit that making money is almost always a nice secondary effect).

      --
      "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
      --Winston Churchill
  28. Price point and region encoding by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One thing I've always wondered about is the use of region encoding, but on a much smaller scale. You mention how you're willing to pay $20 for a DVD, because you can't be bothered to spend the time ripping it - but what about someone who only makes $5 an hour? Is it worth THEIR time?

    I have rather well-off friends financially who don't even blink an eye at plopping down $500-$1000 a month for PC software, whereas with my student status, that's more than I make most months. So, I resort to what most students do, and still use the software.

    Now, we all know one of the big uses for region encoding is so that content producers can effectively price-fix their products: they know they'll still make a profit selling a CD for $5 in say, Malaysia, but not any more than $5 because the average Malaysian makes 1/4 of what the average American does (all hypothetically speaking).

    With a very large wage gap between the rich and poor in the US, it almost makes me wonder: CDs for $5 (still making a profit, remember)would sell boatloads to poorer families who normally would just download them. HOWEVER, the richer folk among us would buy the CD, even if it was priced at $50.

    Now the only thing left to do is have the **AA buy some legislation that allows it to check your financial status, and price your goods accordingly. "Look, we've nearly eliminated those evil pirates, AND we're being nice to the little guy!"

    Wow, I think I just scared myself.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  29. Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When you go to college (if you do), an ethics professor will teach you that not everything that is moral is legal, and not everything that is legal is moral. Maybe it will take a real ethics class for you to realize that the mere observation that an activity is illegal according to some standard is no argument at all that there is anything wrong with it.

    I suppose if you lived in the 60's you'd say "I don't care about your principles and arguments--the law is clear: Niggers go in the back of the bus!"

    1. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by reallocate · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thanks for resorting to the typical Know-Nothing Slashdot tactic of resorting to gratuitous insult and ad hominem attacks.

      None of this has anything to do with legality or morality. It's only about tactics. It's just about cheap, throw-away music.

      If you think "sharing" music will get you what you want, fine, go ahead. I think it will cause you to lose and simply get more draconian copyright restrictions placed on all of us, including people like me who don't really care a twit about whether some college student can afford to buy CD. That's the point I'm making. Morality and legality have nothing to do with it.

      BTW, your equation of the civil rights struggle in the 60's to the music business is a gross and demeaning insult to the people who lived in that struggle.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    2. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by reallocate · · Score: 2

      How about the struggle of Anonymous Cowards to develop coherent thought?

      Your personal insights ought to be very revealing.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    3. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Why should anyone stoop so low as to insult you, when you're doing such a fine job of it yourself?

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    4. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
      No, I insulted you only alongside my making a cognet (if obvious) argument. Your "insightful" comment consisted of nothing but the observation that the piracy described in the article was illegal, and leaped from there to the conclusion that it's bad.

      I hope even you have enough sense to recognize that as a foolish argument, and so do most readers here, but it's worth repeating anyway. The comment moderation is making me think you are not alone in being fooled by that line, and that what's obvious to most people is not too obvious to be repeated on Slashdot.

      I'm afraid everyone needs a new reason for thinking that what the VCD counterfitters do is wrong. It's illegality is totally beside the point; unjust laws are not that unusual.

    5. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Spork, if your goal is to convince people that counterfeiting digital media is ethically correct, I'm not interested. Frankly, I don't care what people think about it.

      What I do care about is preventing the passage of a new legislation that restricts traditional fair use even more than the DMCA. I fear the passage of legislation that mandates strict control of Internet use via required hardware controls and enforced ISP regulation. (Imagine a day when only "approved" hardware can legally access the net and when access providers are required to block unapproved hardware. Imagine a day when certain packets cannot be addressed to your IP address.)

      Preventing all that comes down to old fashioned political effort in Washington, plus help from folks like Lessig, the EFF, and several new organizations that have sprung up. It is a matter of getting legislation drafted, getting it to a vote, and lobbying, campaigning and hard work. Nothing the P2P networks or the so-called community can do will change that.

      All this will be especially difficult because copyright and intellectual property issues are below the radar of almost everyone in the U.S. Unless you belong to the small minority who have a personal or financial investment in filesharing, copyright and IP are just boring lawyer mumbo-jumbo.

      Pseudo-metaphysical postings on /. that attempt to make the case for the morality/ethicality/legality of counterfeiting and unauthorized reproduction damage do not help. Coupled with the frequent vitrolic and unreasoned responses from the True Believers, they only serve to provide more evidence to the RIAA and others that the real goal of this "community" is the elimination of Constitutionally mandated copyright protection (note that eliminating copyright in the U.S. requires a Constitutional amendment), the end of IP, and the destruction of digital media commerce.

      If I was an RIAA lobbyist testifying on the Hill, I'd show up with a stack of /. postings like yours.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    6. Re:Legalism is the dumbest ethical theory ever! by aminorex · · Score: 2

      Power flows from the end of a gun. -Mao Ze Dong

      You are a slave, and your children are slaves, owned
      and serving at the whim, *surviving* at the whim of
      the reigning plutocracy. I think you're fussing
      about the pinstriping on your guillotine. The only
      way to really address the corruption of the
      political process in the era of centralized control
      of the mass media is terrorism.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  30. From Waterworld to Super Mario Bros. by yerricde · · Score: 2

    You have to be careful, though, or Dennis Hopper and his Smokers will start raiding.

    In that case, just send Bob Hoskins and John Leguizamo after them. Or send in Diddy Kong; he's dealt with pirates before.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  31. And once the piracy is done? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what do these guys do with those huge chests of burned cds? Bury them and make a map?

  32. What is next for the RIAA? by DiveX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How long is it going to be now for RIAA to ask for legislative permission to use torpedoes and their own naval forces to take care of the 'pirate problem'? After all, if they can hack into your systems with full legal protection to go after the small fry traders, then shouldn't they have just as much power to go after the bigger violators? How long until we have a real RIAA Capt Nemo in a sub with anti-society crew members on a quest against the pirates of the world?

    --
    Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
  33. Bring back Privateering. by blair1q · · Score: 2


    If they have pirate ships, we can have privateers, and sink them.

    1. Re:Bring back Privateering. by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      umm, privateers where pirates who held letters of marque. A letter of marque ment, when country A was at war with country B you can committ acts of piracy agaisnt country B and have a safe harbor to return (country A).

      Hehe, maybe Sony would be interested in allowing me to pirate cd's produced by Virgin records for example, as long as I don't touch anything produced by Sony. In exchange they will provide me with lawyers to legaly protect my ass. Well fat chance of that happening

      --
      >
    2. Re:Bring back Privateering. by Xeger · · Score: 2

      Seriously, this isn't far off. Industrial espionage is only one step away from the scenario you describe.

    3. Re:Bring back Privateering. by blair1q · · Score: 2

      You've been watching too much Technicolor.

      The definition of Privateer has no requirement that the privateer be a pirate.

      --Blair

  34. Quit talking that crazy talk! by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    Well, obviously if they were selling MS Office in Malaysia for 7 ringgit, it would soon be selling for that here in the states.

    So in effect you're saying that a software company that has completely covered it's development costs with original retail sales of some software, and now makes the current versions for $0.47 should be selling that software for only a 1000% profit instead of 1 million%?

    What are smoking? That's crazy talk! How are they supposed to feed their children??!?!?

    --
    -Styopa
  35. This brings a whole new meaning... by Q3vi1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ah, back to the good ol' days of pirating. Well, good new days? Who knows, all I know is that it'll be interesting to see walk the plank for poor quality, or stealing the captian's mead.

  36. Holy L. Ron Hubbbard! by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Holy L. Ron! The pirates have taken a page from the Pope of Fugitives. Elron, founder of Scien*gy, spent, what, ten years at sea in a converted freighter (correct me here), for the sole purpose of not getting arrested on numerous warrants.

    I think I can see, like legal sheet lightning on the horizon, the copyright industry gearing up to remove the protection of international waters.

    Which is doubly amusing, since the Church of Scien*ology was one of the first instigators of digital copyright law change. Back in '91, I recall, they first tore after anon.penet.fi for relaying their "copyrighted" Xenu tracts. And in '95, when they were confiscating PC's for having "illegal" copies. And certainly when they helped out with the DMCA legislation.

    I just think it's funny, in a sad way. Round the circle we go. Now the copyright kings in RIAA et al. will set out after international water neutrality, seeking to to remove the protections that once saved the founder of one of the most litigious copyright abusing organizations.

    If the protection of the high seas is removed, as I posit, then there will be no place left to get away from the U.S.'s interpretation of intellectual property. No Switzerlands of the mind.

  37. No one said it yet? by VivianC · · Score: 2

    Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of those!

    Sorry. I couldn't control myself.

    --
    Viv

    Gmail invites for ip
  38. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At what point is a nation not a manmade structure?

    A nation, in the final analysis, remains a nation when it fends off attack by challengers to its status. Sadly.

    It is similar to my personal definition of intelligent life: a lifeform that shoots back at humans -- and wins. Whales would be considered ILF's if they fired frickin' lasers at the whalers.

    Nations that want to remain nations, even if they are floating platforms in the ocean or spinning city-states in solar orbit, must have legal, economic, or martial ability to defend and counterattack.

    Sealand exists because it isn't worth anyone's time to remove them. And a nation that simply removes Sealand will face really bad PR if they don't fabricate some excuse first: select 1) for pedophiles 2) for terrorists 3) for Drugs.

    If Sealand gets private support, as offshore tax havens do, it will continue to exist, bar provocation. The pirates, however, will be sunk. No one is looking, and no one cares.

  39. Re:Funny, but by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Of course it really should have been "letters of marque and reprisal" :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  40. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
    Why don't you just give peace a chance?

    The best way to avoid war is to disarm.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  41. Arrrrrr by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

    Looks like I'm going to find a new line of work.
    i wish they would advertise Corporate Spy in the classifieds, it would make my search for the job closest to something from a William Gibson novel so much easier.

    --
    >
  42. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by lamz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why don't you just give peace a chance?
    The best way to avoid war is to disarm.

    Oh yeah? Tell that to the frickin' laser-totin' trigger-happy whales!

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  43. Re:Freedonia, and "Micro Nations" by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

    Nations that want to remain nations ... must have legal, economic, or martial ability to defend and counterattack.

    Dude, you're scaring me. I'm CANADIAN!

    S

  44. Meet The New Boss... by reallocate · · Score: 2

    Nuts to you. Here are 3 cliches, in sequence, that apply here:

    1. Come the revolution, all will be better.

    2. Been there, done that.

    3. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.


    You're mechaniclally spouting nonsense you've heard from some other embittered soul . It is as if you really expect everyone else to automatically agree with your personal moral pronouncements. When you realize that isn't going to happen, you decide you're still right and the only way to fix things is violence. You're no different than that mythical plutocracy that animates your anger.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"