Slashdot Mirror


Floor Vacuum Robot for $200

abhikhurana writes "MSNBC is running a review of Roomba, supposedly the first intelligent 'floor vac', as in a cross between vacuum cleaner and a robot. I think its especially suited for lazy bums like me. Just let it loose, sitback and enjoy. There is also a video of how it cleans the floors, which requires windows media player (what else?) to watch it. It seems that the robo cleaner can indeed do that job for which it has been designed. A related article on Techreview has slightly more details about how it works. There is also a website exclusively for Roomba."

56 of 353 comments (clear)

  1. Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by qurob · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Remember? Robots were going to do EVERYTHING in the 70's and 80's.

    They were going to help us! Everything was robot this, robot that.

    Bring us drinks, cut the lawn (solar power!), vaccuum....

    I'm going to go read all my back issues of Popular Science, I'll find a robot lawn mower or two.

  2. Vacuum? by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they crazy?!? Everyone knows that nature abhors a vacuum. When a vacuum and normal matter meet there's an enormous explosion. Or implosion. Or something.

  3. meoooooow! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


    Fluffy? Where are you Fluffy?

  4. Why is it... by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That my Aibo can plug itself back in, but this thing can't? Seriously, how hard would it be to remember a room, vacuum it, and return to a docking station while I'm at work? What good is this thing *unless* it does that? I want my vacuuming to be sort of like setting up a maintainance cron job to run at 3 AM.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Why is it... by atathert · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, let me see. It could be because your Aibo is approximately an order of magnitude more expensive than this. To tell the truth, I am amazed at the functionality you can get for $200 dollars. I saw one of these things at Brookstone, and it just looks like it starts with a basic spiral pattern. It was demoed in the middle of the store, so I am not sure what happens when it gets to things like chair legs and such. Probably just senses them with the bump sensors, and shoots off on another direction.

    2. Re:Why is it... by pivo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I seem to remember a european (Brittish?) version of this type of vac that was announced a long time ago here on /., if I remember correctly, it did what you're talking about. I agree, if I have to watch it, what's the point? (Of course, I'd watch it anyway, but I want it to be able to work by itself.)

    3. Re:Why is it... by worthb · · Score: 5, Funny
      I want my vacuuming to be sort of like setting up a maintainance cron job to run at 3 AM.


      I don't know about you but if that thing started running in my house at 3 AM it would end up out the window.
      --
      "the universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle" - Stapp's Law
    4. Re:Why is it... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For $200, I'd say that the trouble to plug it in each night, pull it out in the morning and press a button is fine. Assuming I don't buy one beforehand this is definetly on my christmas list.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    5. Re:Why is it... by mbourgon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It doesn't actually remember the room. It uses a variation on the wandering drunk pattern, but the practical upshot is it should finish in a couple of hours. Part of why it's so cheap - it doesn't have to "learn the room", you just put it down and walk away. From what I've read on it, the price point is paramount... for $200, I'm damn tempted.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    6. Re:Why is it... by DrBlake · · Score: 5, Informative

      Electrolux of Sweden has a machine called Trilobyte that can recharge it self. See http://www.trilobite.electrolux.se/ . It is much more expensive though.

    7. Re:Why is it... by kris0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Assuming docking itself can be easily done, it's really 'remembering' a room, or even just a path to get back to the docking station, that is the hard part.

      Consider the small number of sensors on this thing. If I remember correctly it has just a few IR sensors (used for following walls, etc). Mapbuilding in general requires a little more than that, and is also VERY computationally and memory intensive (for more information you might want to read about the most common method for mapbuilding, evidence grids).

      Even if you were just to attempt to remember a) the location of your docking station and b) your own location, after half an hour of vacuuming (especially on carpet) and bumping into things, the odometry error that will have accumulated is tremendous -- you'd have no hope of knowing your actual location relative to the docking station. Normally a number of localization methods are used to combat odometry error (most commonly, Kalman filtering). However, they all require lots of sensory input and processing.

      So, if you want a robot that can plug itself back in (at least, one that can do so by remembering where it's docking station is), be prepared to spend a lot more than $200.

    8. Re:Why is it... by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So, if you want a robot that can plug itself back in (at least, one that can do so by remembering where it's docking station is), be prepared to spend a lot more than $200.

      Well, let's think different.

      We don't need a combat system here -- we're talking about one room. How about putting a blinking IR light on the docking station and a IR detector on the vacuum unit? Then program the vacuum to roll around until it "sees" the dock...

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  5. Runaway by egg+troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the first link in a chain of events that will eventually have Gene Simmons chasing me across a skyscraper with a swarm of robotic spiders!

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  6. Maybe I'll get one of these things so I can... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 5, Funny

    sit back and chat on my video phone.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  7. Heh.. by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey! It's R2-D2's cousin: SUX-2BU.

    Okay, dumb joke, but it beats the inevitable "That robot sucks!" jokes.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  8. Goal by limekiller4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know the dot-bomb is rebounding when an MIT startups goal is to suck.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  9. hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by edrugtrader · · Score: 5, Funny

    .... why 65% of americas youth are overweight.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by egg+troll · · Score: 4, Funny
      .... why 65% of americas youth are overweight.


      Because the research was based on a Slashdot poll! I mean have you seen Cowboy Neal?

      --

      C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  10. What about the corners? by beerman2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This thing looks pretty sweet. If it actually picks up dirt and can do an entire room without recharging/emptying then i want one of these babies. The only crappy thing is that it can't get the corners, which seems to be where all the dust accumulates, at least in my appartment.

    1. Re:What about the corners? by f97tosc · · Score: 3, Informative

      The only crappy thing is that it can't get the corners, which seems to be where all the dust accumulates, at least in my appartment

      I had the opportunity to listen to an explanation of a similar product made by a competitor.

      As you suggest, the robot does have a hard time reaching corners. However, when compared to a human operator, it was found that most people miss large patches when they do their vacuuming. It is just hard to remember exactly what areas have been covered (that and the constant urge of doing something more interesting). All in all, it was found that the robot covered a larger fraction of the floor, even if it did not reach all the corners.

      Tor

  11. Wonder how the cats are going to react to this? by Chastitina · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it's dog-friendly, but at 7.5 pounds how is it going to hold up to the teething Labrador next door?

    Sounds like a lot of fun for when the cats misbehave, though.

    "Here kitty kitty kitty..."

  12. Have one! Works great! by rindeee · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually my wife has one. It is worth every penny. I also have a robo-mow robotic lawnmower (made by Friendly Robotics) to take care-o-th-lawn. I think I paid about $300 for it. The vaccuuming is no biggie to me (since I usually never did it anyway), but the robomower has paid for itself many times over in the time I have saved. $500 total spent. Hundreds of hours saved already. That's pretty darn good ROI if you ask me. Of course for those who don't make a point of exercising, the robomow may be a death ticket.

    1. Re:Have one! Works great! by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Less than half an acre, since that's all the robomower is designed for.

      If, however, he bought it a couple years ago I might buy a hundred hours saved.

      Looked at one of the robotic mowers a few months ago, but they only work well if you have a single contiguous area of lawn, with no narrow sections. I have three separate lawn areas, which would require buying two additional power stations and manually moving the robomower between each section. No thanks.

  13. The Fools! by foistboinder · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't they realize the danger?


    According to Professor Frink:

    Elementary chaos theory tells us that all robots will eventually turn against their masters and run amok, in an orgy of blood and the kicking and the biting with the metal teeth and the hurting and shoving.
    1. Re:The Fools! by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Theme park owner: "Well how long do we have?"

      Professor Frink: "According to my calculations, the robots will not turn on us for at least 72 hours."

      [Robot sits up on the table and starts to choke a scientist.]

      Professor Frink: "Oh, forgot to carry the Y."

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  14. Family Test - LEGOS! by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love how they never test these in a real American Familys house. This thing wouldnt last a day around my kids.

    Legos, flash cards, marbles, mcdonalds toys, stuffed animals with fluffy parts, video games and controllers, dirty clothes.

    Now give me a robot that washs and folds clothes, and picks up kids toys, and I can use a Roomba. (And no Honey, you are not a Robot.)

  15. That's bullshit.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    $200 ?!
    I paid $6,000 (US) for my RealDoll and it can't move at all, let alone vacuum the floor.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:That's bullshit.. by egg+troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      $200 ?!

      I paid $6,000 (US) for my RealDoll and it can't move at all, let alone vacuum the floor.


      But have you tried fucking the vacuum?

      --

      C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  16. Pre-Vacuum Pick-up by CutterDeke · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've got kids. Will Roomba do the pre-vacuum pick-up of all the Legos, money, etc.?

    My wife does a lot of sewing. How well can Roomba handle lots of thread on the floor? How about pins?

    The problem isn't the vacuuming. It's the picking up that you have to do before you can vacuum.

  17. Step one by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    But first something has to clean up all the socks, underwear, pizza boxes, AOL disks, rejection notices, bannana peels, etc. that are all over the floor. This is the hard part.

  18. I read a review of the roomba by CableModemSniper · · Score: 5, Informative

    in a local paper. It said that the Roomba couldn't completely replace your standard vacumm. It doesn't do stairs, and it has no attachments for things like furniture upholstery, etc. The article basically said it was good if you lived in a small place such as an apartment or didn't have kids, but if you need to do heavy duty cleaning, the 'bot wasn't gonna repalce your standard vac.

    --
    Why not fork?
  19. Nit-pick by Overt+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    from the to-lazy-to-stand dept.

    And, apparently, from the too-lazy-to-spell department, too...

  20. Pervert! by slagdogg · · Score: 3, Funny

    I also took Roomba home with me to see how it would do in a somewhat more sedate setting. Once again, Roomba did its thing with a minimum of noise or fuss.

    Hmmm ... I don't see any mention of what exactly "its thing" was ... ewww.

    --
    (Score:-1, Wrong)
  21. Floor VAX? by ari_j · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it running on DEC hardware?

  22. It's too slow by Proc6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The CEO interviewed says a 10x12 room takes 1/2 an hour to vaccuum. I can vaccuum my entire 1000 square foot apartment in about 3 minutes. It's just not that difficult. Id rather do it myself and be done in less than 5 minutes, than hear that thing's motor whirring and whining for 3 hours while it cleans every room in my house.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    1. Re:It's too slow by dubiousmike · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the manufacturer figures you are going to leave your house at some point or another.

      silly manufacturer

      :P

  23. Real man's challenge by shrikel · · Score: 5, Funny
    I can see it now:

    Geeks now have a vacuum cleaner web server!

    First one to run apache/linux on it wins.

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
  24. That's better than a kid by Ghoser777 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's very difficult to get an algorithm to cover oddly defined spaces, especially when there's objects (aka furniture) in the way. Should the robot move the furniture? What if a piece of furniture has a clearance that is below the robot's ability to vacuum under?

    Now that I think abou it, the robot probably only vacuums area that it can physically move over, so after a couple months, Fibonaccinumbers come into play and you'll have a dust bunny population explosion. But that's about the same amount of area any kid will vacuum, except that kids will probably skip any areas that don't look dirty (even if they really are).

    F-bacher

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
  25. Another Vacuum story? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Slashdot: News for Nerds. Things that Suck.

    (doan hit me ;)

  26. This is Rodney Brooks' company. by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those robot geeks among us who did NOT know, this is Rodney Brooks' company.

    Rodney A. Brooks is Director of the 230 person MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and is the Fujitsu Professor of Computer Science. He is also Chairman and Chief Technical Officer of iRobot Corp (Roomba)

    He received degrees in pure mathematics from the Flinders University of South Australia and the Ph.D. in Computer Science from Stanford University in 1981.

    This guy is to robot-geeks what RMS is to Open-Source.

  27. Re:Good idea, but... by huh_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    So you only get the floor mostly clean. Seems like it could use some more work...

    Well, to me, mostly clean is much better than the horrible mess I have now.
    You can eat off my floors, but not because they are that sanitary, but because they have all that food on them.

  28. Except the batteries don't last long enough by SonicBurst · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a blurb on the Roomba in this month's What's New section of PopSci. They quoted a battery time of 90 minutes, which to me seems like WAY more than enough time to vacuum. However, the blurb said that it can only do 2 10x20 rooms in that amount of time. Well, I don't know what everyone lives in, but it would take this thing all day to vacuum my house which measures in at about 2000 sq. ft, and I for one wouldn't want to hear a vacuum running all day. And I can't just let the thing run all day at work, since the batteries only last 90 min! Guess I'll be vacuuming the old way for some time to come still....

    --

    Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
    1. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by rworne · · Score: 3, Informative
      You would hear it running all the time.

      They had one of these on demo at Brookstone in the local mall, and it made a hell of a racket.

      It sounded like a combo between a cheap motorized plastic toy and a hair dryer. I really hope for their sake the one I saw was busted somehow.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    2. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gee whiz then I would need two of these gadgets. Our house measures without the garage and closets about 3500 square feet. Actually that kind of sucks since the vacuum cleaner would be running constantly.

      My question though is what about the dog factor. I have English Bulldogs that consider vaccuum cleaners the enemy...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  29. Flat Earth Myth by Red+Weasel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole idea that the entire world thought that the earth was flat until Columbus came around is a total and complete fabrication.

    This story was invented by Washington Irving (yes the writer of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Other Stories) to show his contempt for the priesthood and for the conservative nature of the church and European nations. And guess what? It caught on and expanded to include everyone that lived before them.

    Lets all ignore the fact that every time there was an eclipse that the shadow was round or that sailors from around the world would loose site of land as they sailed or that a Greek mathematician calculated the circumference of the earth and was only 52 miles off.

    Jeffrey
    Burton Russell
    Has a very short piece but he says it best with

    "A round earth appears at least as early as the sixth century BC with Pythagoras, who was followed by Aristotle, Euclid, and Aristarchus, among others in observing that the earth was a sphere. Although there were a few dissenters--Leukippos and Demokritos for example--by the time of Eratosthenes (3 c. BC), followed by Crates(2 c. BC), Strabo (3 c. BC), and Ptolemy (first c. AD), the sphericity of the earth was accepted by all educated Greeks and Romans."

    --
    ..which just shows that the human brain is ill-adapted for thinking and was probably designed for cooling the blood-T P
    1. Re:Flat Earth Myth by User+956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole idea that the entire world thought that the earth was flat until Columbus came around is a total and complete fabrication... by the time of Eratosthenes (3 c. BC), followed by Crates(2 c. BC), Strabo (3 c. BC), and Ptolemy (first c. AD), the sphericity of the earth was accepted by all educated Greeks and Romans."

      First off, Claudius Ptolemy lived in the second century, not the frst century.

      Second, Christianity is well known for destroying and suppressing knowledge. That's why they burned the library at Alexandria. Galileo was arraigned before the Catholic Inquisition and forced to recant his heretical view that the earth rotated, and also revolved around the sun. However, you are correct that the Greeks and Romans knew the Earth was round.

      My question is, when Columbus was ready to sail, did he sail from Greece, or did he sail from Spain, a country dominated by Catholicism?

      Read the Bible. The conception of the earth in Genesis 1 is that of a single continent in the shape of a flat circular disc. In addition, the Hebrews were influenced via the patriarchs by Mesopotamian concepts (due to their time in Egypt), and via Moses. Moses was, after all, "educated in all the wisdom of the Egyptians" (Acts 7:22; Exod 2:10). It is highly probable, therefore, that the writer and first readers of Genesis 1 defined the sea in the same way that all people in the ancient Near East did, namely, as a single circular body of water in the middle of which the flat earth-disc floated and from which all wells, springs and rivers derived their water.'

      It therefore all the more historically probable that the writer and readers of Genesis 1 thought of the earth as a single continent in the shape of a flat circular disc. The belief was that the earth is covered by a vault and that celestial bodies move inside this firmament. This makes sense only under the assumption that the earth is flat. This is reinforced in Genesis 1:6 and 1:7, and was commonly depicted in religious art, through the 1400s.

      If second grade serves me, I believe Columbus sailed in 1492.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  30. Scrubbing bubbles by ACNeal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get those scribbing bubbles by Dow.

    all the adds show them as autonomous. You just apply them to the bathroom surface, and they zoom around like they were at a 1970's skate park. According to the ads, they do a pretty good job to.

    I always wondered why they didn't use these as the basis for nano-technology.

  31. Improvements. by SecGreen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These guys should hire some programmers (and engineers) from The Robomower Company... The mower can handle a quarter acre with all kinds of obstructions...

    Also on my wishlist:
    1. Return-to-base self-charging.
    2. Return-to-base dust bin emtpying.
    3. Environment learning. It could develop a map of the floor, and keep track of the dirt collected in different areas. Then it could do a daily cleaning of the high-traffic areas, and do occasional full passes.
    4. Take some lessons from Robot Soccer and learn some teamwork. (Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!)
    5. Remote Interface with an X10 burglar alarm. (Although "Release the vacuums!" just doesn't have the same ring as "release the hounds!)

    --sg

    --
    Dupe posts are /.'s tacit protest on the rights of users to time-shift content...
  32. Similar robot from ElectroLux by Erwin-42 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here in Scandinavia, ElectroLux has commercially launched Trilobite which is similar -- it runs around finding the walls, uses ultrasound to detect obstacles and can find its way back to the base station when necessary. This happened about a year ago (November 2001) according to the press release dates.

    Trilobite is about 12000 DKK however, which is 1500 EUR.

    Here's the Danish website with Flash demonstration and some information in English too.

  33. ...And space comedy movies! by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 4, Funny
    I want MegaMaid.

    "She's gone from suck...to blow!"

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
  34. I have something like this. by spudwiser · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's called a cat. It roams around the house eating anything on the floor and depositing it in a box that needs to be emptied every few days. It was even free!

    --
    .cig - what you do after winning a good flame war
  35. more than one of them in a house??? by Sabalon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cause a beowulf cluster of these would really suck!

  36. We have one of these at work by iamchaos · · Score: 3, Informative

    And they almost work. It takes the little guy forever and sometimes he just gives up. Put him between two chairs and watch the confusion begin. It is a little loud and will get hung up quite a bit. Other than that it works great. Just keep an ear out for it to shut off and go see if it is done or gave up.

  37. Seems to be ill-suited by Anenga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think any clean-freak mom in America would want this thing to do it's floors. I watched the video clip in the article, then you'll know what I mean.

    First of all, it seems to only floors. And it only cleans "slightly" it doesn't seem like it will go deep into the rug and get that dirt out, it does not seem powerful at all with no adaquate suction.

    In addition, it doesn't seem very intelligent. It works by sweeping around an area, then when it detects something, it will go in a circular motion to make sure it gets all of it up in that area. But it can easily roam off and miss a lot. Well, unless you give it a lot of time. In the video, they said it would take 45 minutes to clean the studio. Or a half hour to clean a small room. Do note, half of that time is probably finding the mess. That's probably it's biggest problem. Perhaps it should send out detection lasers (or whatever, the stuff that stores use for automatic doors etc.) to detect if anything is above floor level?

    The problem with actually finding the mess in a short amount of time was so paramount that they developed little pods that you put around it, to cage it in so it won't pass them and find the mess faster. While that helps, it really isn't solving the problem. Ideally, you'd start it up and it goes straight to the mess and clean it up.

    Right now, I'd consider the thing blind. Aimlessly circling around looking for crumbs.

    I wouldn't recommend it. Though, there is very good potential for "iRobot" (the company). Check back in a few years.

    1. Re:Seems to be ill-suited by Fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The article makes reference to the fact that this is like the swimming pool vaccuums. I have a polaris for my pool and the path it takes is completely random, it isn't even smart enough to do things like and expanding circle, etc. However, after about 15-20 minutes it always has the pool completely cleaned. You'd be surprised at how well a random walk can cover an area. Plus, you really don't need to get every part of your floor 100% clean every time. If you do this every other day, you'll probably keep the floor clean enough that it won't show.

      --
      -no broken link
  38. Just bought one... by jfinke · · Score: 5, Informative
    I just bought one last weekend. It is pretty slick. It does what it claims to do. You can just let it go and return later and your room is clean. I have 3 cats and the amount of cat hair it picks up is pretty amazing.

    It manuevers around and under everything that is over 6" high. So, it can deal with coffee tables, chairs, beds, etc. It detects stairs and avoids them. It comes with a virtual wall unit (you can buy more), that sends out a signal the roomba won't cross. When I first got it, I put it is my main room. It has a TV, a large L shaped couch, and 2 litter boxes. The room is 20x10. I eat in front of the tv, so you can imagine all that crap. I ran it in there, and I was amazed at all the stuff if picked up.

    There are a few caveats, however. Battery life. You can only do "3 medium size rooms". My carpet is pretty thick, however. It is closer to 2 rooms. Plus, the time to charge the battery is 12 hours. You can buy spare batteries and a "quick charger", however, they are $60 bucks apiece. It is designed to do one room at a time, so you just can't put it up on the second floor and let it do everything. You have to put it into a room, close the door, and let it rip. It is not designed as a spot cleaner. If you have one really messy part of the room, you are better off getting your regular vacuum and vacumming that part of the room and then putting the roomba to work. The dirt collector is pretty small, so you have to empty it out after every room. Also, because of all the cat hair, I spend a lot of time cleaning the brushes and making sure the machine is clean. Unfortunately, it does not map out the room, so it may go over some areas that are not as high traffic as others, due to the algorithm that is uses.

    My girlfriend thought I was nuts for buying it. However, for $200 bucks, (the price a of a decent vacuum) it is pretty cool. Now, only if it would travel stairs, do multiple rooms, have a larger dirt container, and plug itself back in, it would be near perfect