Slashdot Mirror


Floor Vacuum Robot for $200

abhikhurana writes "MSNBC is running a review of Roomba, supposedly the first intelligent 'floor vac', as in a cross between vacuum cleaner and a robot. I think its especially suited for lazy bums like me. Just let it loose, sitback and enjoy. There is also a video of how it cleans the floors, which requires windows media player (what else?) to watch it. It seems that the robo cleaner can indeed do that job for which it has been designed. A related article on Techreview has slightly more details about how it works. There is also a website exclusively for Roomba."

147 of 353 comments (clear)

  1. Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by qurob · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Remember? Robots were going to do EVERYTHING in the 70's and 80's.

    They were going to help us! Everything was robot this, robot that.

    Bring us drinks, cut the lawn (solar power!), vaccuum....

    I'm going to go read all my back issues of Popular Science, I'll find a robot lawn mower or two.

    1. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by silvaran · · Score: 2

      You have to wonder if, without these predictions, we would have these robots now. False hopes of the future spurred research, and may deliver, albeit a little late, the very predictions we made long ago.

      Remember? The world used to be flat:

      A: "I'll travel around the world!"
      B: "But... you'll fall off the edge.."
      A: "No, the world is round, watch, I'll prove it..."
      B: "But...!" (feels tap on shoulder)
      A: "See?"

    2. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by t0qer · · Score: 2

      Yeah funny you should mention the robots of the 80's

      Tomy had a line of robots called the omnibot line. Included in the lineup was a little guy called "vacbot" if I remember correctly. It's not nearly the vaccum the one in the article is (had less power than a dustbuster, would only work on flat surfaces,cliff avoidance was a simple switch that made the thing turn right)

      Just wanted to have a short flashback.

    3. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by Spunk · · Score: 2

      Wait no longer, your solar robot lawnmower is here! And it seems to function very much like the Roomba.

      I want one of each!

    4. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by captainstupid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Instead of robots, we got helper monkies.

      They can do way more useful stuff than robots...
      Steal doughnuts from the donut shop by stringing multiple doughnuts on their tail and arms.

      They aren't forced to abide by those crazy moral laws that are supposed to be built into robots.

      --
      "Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling...." - Abraham Simpson
    5. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by orthogonal · · Score: 2

      A robot to cut the lawn?

      It's called a "goat" (or in some places, a "sheep").

  2. Vacuum? by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they crazy?!? Everyone knows that nature abhors a vacuum. When a vacuum and normal matter meet there's an enormous explosion. Or implosion. Or something.

  3. meoooooow! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


    Fluffy? Where are you Fluffy?

  4. too easy by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2

    $200...
    sucks...

    ahh, nevermind

    1. Re:too easy by da3dAlus · · Score: 2

      I think you're referring to the 2000 SUX...

      --

      Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
  5. Why is it... by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That my Aibo can plug itself back in, but this thing can't? Seriously, how hard would it be to remember a room, vacuum it, and return to a docking station while I'm at work? What good is this thing *unless* it does that? I want my vacuuming to be sort of like setting up a maintainance cron job to run at 3 AM.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Why is it... by atathert · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, let me see. It could be because your Aibo is approximately an order of magnitude more expensive than this. To tell the truth, I am amazed at the functionality you can get for $200 dollars. I saw one of these things at Brookstone, and it just looks like it starts with a basic spiral pattern. It was demoed in the middle of the store, so I am not sure what happens when it gets to things like chair legs and such. Probably just senses them with the bump sensors, and shoots off on another direction.

    2. Re:Why is it... by pivo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I seem to remember a european (Brittish?) version of this type of vac that was announced a long time ago here on /., if I remember correctly, it did what you're talking about. I agree, if I have to watch it, what's the point? (Of course, I'd watch it anyway, but I want it to be able to work by itself.)

    3. Re:Why is it... by worthb · · Score: 5, Funny
      I want my vacuuming to be sort of like setting up a maintainance cron job to run at 3 AM.


      I don't know about you but if that thing started running in my house at 3 AM it would end up out the window.
      --
      "the universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle" - Stapp's Law
    4. Re:Why is it... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For $200, I'd say that the trouble to plug it in each night, pull it out in the morning and press a button is fine. Assuming I don't buy one beforehand this is definetly on my christmas list.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    5. Re:Why is it... by mbourgon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It doesn't actually remember the room. It uses a variation on the wandering drunk pattern, but the practical upshot is it should finish in a couple of hours. Part of why it's so cheap - it doesn't have to "learn the room", you just put it down and walk away. From what I've read on it, the price point is paramount... for $200, I'm damn tempted.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    6. Re:Why is it... by DrBlake · · Score: 5, Informative

      Electrolux of Sweden has a machine called Trilobyte that can recharge it self. See http://www.trilobite.electrolux.se/ . It is much more expensive though.

    7. Re:Why is it... by Jon+Chatow · · Score: 2

      ISTR it was made by Electrolux, who are, I think, an Anglo-Sweedish consumer electronics conglomerate. This was ~ '97, so the term "first intelligent 'floor vac'" seems to jar a little, but hey...

      --
      James F.
    8. Re:Why is it... by kris0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Assuming docking itself can be easily done, it's really 'remembering' a room, or even just a path to get back to the docking station, that is the hard part.

      Consider the small number of sensors on this thing. If I remember correctly it has just a few IR sensors (used for following walls, etc). Mapbuilding in general requires a little more than that, and is also VERY computationally and memory intensive (for more information you might want to read about the most common method for mapbuilding, evidence grids).

      Even if you were just to attempt to remember a) the location of your docking station and b) your own location, after half an hour of vacuuming (especially on carpet) and bumping into things, the odometry error that will have accumulated is tremendous -- you'd have no hope of knowing your actual location relative to the docking station. Normally a number of localization methods are used to combat odometry error (most commonly, Kalman filtering). However, they all require lots of sensory input and processing.

      So, if you want a robot that can plug itself back in (at least, one that can do so by remembering where it's docking station is), be prepared to spend a lot more than $200.

    9. Re:Why is it... by CvD · · Score: 2, Informative
      I remember Dyson had a prototype a couple years back, but I can't find it anywhere on their website. Google still remembers, though:



      Cheers,

      Costyn.
    10. Re:Why is it... by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So, if you want a robot that can plug itself back in (at least, one that can do so by remembering where it's docking station is), be prepared to spend a lot more than $200.

      Well, let's think different.

      We don't need a combat system here -- we're talking about one room. How about putting a blinking IR light on the docking station and a IR detector on the vacuum unit? Then program the vacuum to roll around until it "sees" the dock...

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    11. Re:Why is it... by ehiris · · Score: 2

      Somebody please port Linux to it or mount an XBOX on top of it and hook to its movement controls.

    12. Re:Why is it... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      That my Aibo can plug itself back in, but this thing can't?

      If you fall asleep on the couch, and it's plug-finding mechanism screws up, I don't even want to think about all the orifices it might try.

  6. Runaway by egg+troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the first link in a chain of events that will eventually have Gene Simmons chasing me across a skyscraper with a swarm of robotic spiders!

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  7. Maybe I'll get one of these things so I can... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 5, Funny

    sit back and chat on my video phone.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  8. Heh.. by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey! It's R2-D2's cousin: SUX-2BU.

    Okay, dumb joke, but it beats the inevitable "That robot sucks!" jokes.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Heh.. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      The old joke about having sex with a vacuum cleaner.

      Nothing sucks like Electrolux.



      Associated Press report of May 13, 1998:

      Man's penis severed by vacuum cleaner

      LONG BRANCH, N.J.: A 51-year-old man seeking sexual gratification with a vacuum cleaner nearly bled to death when the machine cut off a half-inch of his penis, authorities said.

      The intoxicated man first told police that someone had stabbed him in the crotch as he slept, Long Branch public safety director Louis Napoletano said.

      However, officers who responded to Monday's call for help instead realized the man had hoped to obtain sexual pleasure from the appliance's suction, Napoletano said.

      "But what he didn't realize is that there's a blade in the vacuum cleaner right under where the hose attaches that pushes the dust into the collection bag," he said.

      When the man, who was not identified by police, turned on the vacuum cleaner, the blade cut off part of his penis. The victim told detectives he did not remember the incident.

      Doctors at Monmouth Medical Center were able to stop the bleeding but were unable to reattach the severed part, Napoletano said. He was listed in stable condition Tuesday.

  9. Goal by limekiller4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know the dot-bomb is rebounding when an MIT startups goal is to suck.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  10. hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by edrugtrader · · Score: 5, Funny

    .... why 65% of americas youth are overweight.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by egg+troll · · Score: 4, Funny
      .... why 65% of americas youth are overweight.


      Because the research was based on a Slashdot poll! I mean have you seen Cowboy Neal?

      --

      C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    2. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by Jacer · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Cowboy Neal Counts as 65% of America

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    3. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      Because of the food pyramid. (NYT, free registration et fucking cetera)

      Now you know.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Beasties by anicklin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't imagine how clean it will get a room when the dogs and cats are chasing after it and knocking them around. Maybe you have to up the room size in order to compensate.

    Then again, a $200 interactive cat toy might be a good thing, if they never get tired of it like every other one they get. :-)

  12. What about the corners? by beerman2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This thing looks pretty sweet. If it actually picks up dirt and can do an entire room without recharging/emptying then i want one of these babies. The only crappy thing is that it can't get the corners, which seems to be where all the dust accumulates, at least in my appartment.

    1. Re:What about the corners? by f97tosc · · Score: 3, Informative

      The only crappy thing is that it can't get the corners, which seems to be where all the dust accumulates, at least in my appartment

      I had the opportunity to listen to an explanation of a similar product made by a competitor.

      As you suggest, the robot does have a hard time reaching corners. However, when compared to a human operator, it was found that most people miss large patches when they do their vacuuming. It is just hard to remember exactly what areas have been covered (that and the constant urge of doing something more interesting). All in all, it was found that the robot covered a larger fraction of the floor, even if it did not reach all the corners.

      Tor

  13. Wonder how the cats are going to react to this? by Chastitina · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it's dog-friendly, but at 7.5 pounds how is it going to hold up to the teething Labrador next door?

    Sounds like a lot of fun for when the cats misbehave, though.

    "Here kitty kitty kitty..."

  14. Good idea, but... by mrgrey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Roomba's walk isn't guaranteed to cover an entire floor, but in practice it does a very good job.

    So you only get the floor mostly clean. Seems like it could use some more work...

    --
    -Tolerate my intolerance
    1. Re:Good idea, but... by huh_ · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you only get the floor mostly clean. Seems like it could use some more work...

      Well, to me, mostly clean is much better than the horrible mess I have now.
      You can eat off my floors, but not because they are that sanitary, but because they have all that food on them.

  15. Have one! Works great! by rindeee · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually my wife has one. It is worth every penny. I also have a robo-mow robotic lawnmower (made by Friendly Robotics) to take care-o-th-lawn. I think I paid about $300 for it. The vaccuuming is no biggie to me (since I usually never did it anyway), but the robomower has paid for itself many times over in the time I have saved. $500 total spent. Hundreds of hours saved already. That's pretty darn good ROI if you ask me. Of course for those who don't make a point of exercising, the robomow may be a death ticket.

    1. Re:Have one! Works great! by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Less than half an acre, since that's all the robomower is designed for.

      If, however, he bought it a couple years ago I might buy a hundred hours saved.

      Looked at one of the robotic mowers a few months ago, but they only work well if you have a single contiguous area of lawn, with no narrow sections. I have three separate lawn areas, which would require buying two additional power stations and manually moving the robomower between each section. No thanks.

    2. Re:Have one! Works great! by rindeee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Untrue. I have my yard divided into 3 sections. All it requires is putting a wire around each section and moveing the transmitter to the section you want to mow (sufficient wire and extra connectors are included with the mower kit). I mow 1 section per day once a week. Takes about two minutes to hook up the transmitter and start the mower. I come home and it's done.

    3. Re:Have one! Works great! by GMontag · · Score: 2

      If you put them in the garage together do they fight like hell until one is dismembered?

      I think I saw a documentry on these things on an educational cable channel, like Comedy Central or TNN.

    4. Re:Have one! Works great! by GooberToo · · Score: 2

      Ever concerned that it will be stolen while you are away?

    5. Re:Have one! Works great! by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      Actually, I thought I read that one of these robot mowers had a built in alarm system. If it strays too far outside the perimeter you set up by planting stakes in the ground - it sounds a loud alarm - deterring theft.

  16. combine this with photovores and ... by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a similar idea to this (and probably millions of other people did too) but I thought it would be cool to have the thing solar powered. It would seek out a spot of sunshine and recharge for a while, then clean until it got almost dead, then seek out light again. it would not be able to sweep for long on any given charge, but you could put it in a room and let it just go on and on. maybe it could alert you if it got stuck or if it was in need of a new bag.

    --
    There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
  17. The Fools! by foistboinder · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't they realize the danger?


    According to Professor Frink:

    Elementary chaos theory tells us that all robots will eventually turn against their masters and run amok, in an orgy of blood and the kicking and the biting with the metal teeth and the hurting and shoving.
    1. Re:The Fools! by Zelet · · Score: 2

      You forgot to add "froinlaven!"

      Where is a slashdot editor when you need one. Taco, can you spell check "froinlaven" for me please?

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    2. Re:The Fools! by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Theme park owner: "Well how long do we have?"

      Professor Frink: "According to my calculations, the robots will not turn on us for at least 72 hours."

      [Robot sits up on the table and starts to choke a scientist.]

      Professor Frink: "Oh, forgot to carry the Y."

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    3. Re:The Fools! by foistboinder · · Score: 2

      Right, and in steps Roomba to clean up the mess! You have just created the perfect marketing strategy for these guys!

      Maybe I can get a job in Microsoft's marketing department (Shudderrrr!).

    4. Re:The Fools! by miTTio · · Score: 2, Funny
      Elementary chaos theory tells us that all robots will eventually turn against their masters and run amok, in an orgy of blood and the kicking and the biting with the metal teeth and the hurting and shoving.


      Do you have Old Glory Robot Insurance?
    5. Re:The Fools! by Chairboy · · Score: 2

      and the Glaven!

  18. Family Test - LEGOS! by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love how they never test these in a real American Familys house. This thing wouldnt last a day around my kids.

    Legos, flash cards, marbles, mcdonalds toys, stuffed animals with fluffy parts, video games and controllers, dirty clothes.

    Now give me a robot that washs and folds clothes, and picks up kids toys, and I can use a Roomba. (And no Honey, you are not a Robot.)

  19. That's bullshit.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    $200 ?!
    I paid $6,000 (US) for my RealDoll and it can't move at all, let alone vacuum the floor.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:That's bullshit.. by egg+troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      $200 ?!

      I paid $6,000 (US) for my RealDoll and it can't move at all, let alone vacuum the floor.


      But have you tried fucking the vacuum?

      --

      C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    2. Re:That's bullshit.. by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 2

      I paid $6,000 (US) for my RealDoll and it can't move at all, let alone vacuum the floor.

      If you bought your RealDoll expecting it to vacuum the floor the sales rep must have been absolutely amazing!

      --

      As with the sun's light
      My mom was magnificent
      Unquestionable
    3. Re:That's bullshit.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      But have you tried fucking the vacuum?

      Yeah, then he ended up buying it a wig and a name placard which reads "daddy's little shop-vac".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Pre-Vacuum Pick-up by CutterDeke · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've got kids. Will Roomba do the pre-vacuum pick-up of all the Legos, money, etc.?

    My wife does a lot of sewing. How well can Roomba handle lots of thread on the floor? How about pins?

    The problem isn't the vacuuming. It's the picking up that you have to do before you can vacuum.

  21. Step one by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    But first something has to clean up all the socks, underwear, pizza boxes, AOL disks, rejection notices, bannana peels, etc. that are all over the floor. This is the hard part.

    1. Re:Step one by GypC · · Score: 2

      Yes, we need a robot to handle that part of the job as well. I propose; the Slob-O-Matic 3000!

    2. Re:Step one by dzym · · Score: 2
      The missing step #2 has been found!

      1) clean up all socks, underwear, pizza boxes, AOL disks, rejection notices, banana peels, etc.
      2) vacuum
      3) Profit!

    3. Re:Step one by koreth · · Score: 2

      No problem, just sit one of these down at the controls of one of these and you're all set. It'll even clear away the floor if you want the room really clean.

  22. I wonder .... by Tensor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How noisy it is ... all the article says is at a pretty low noise level.

    Pretty low noise for what ? a vaccum cleaner ? cos even a low noise one is noisy as hell.

    This looks like a ripoff of Husqvarna's automatic lawnmower. Only they have a 100% unattended one, as one model is solar powered !! http://www.automower.com/

  23. Lazy by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 2

    OK, so we were already moving to a point where we wouldn't have to leave the house to do most daily tasks. That was bad enough. But with inventions like this we won't have to walk around the house either.

    --

    As with the sun's light
    My mom was magnificent
    Unquestionable
  24. As soon as version .1 comes out by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2

    that recharges itself, and dumps its own lint pan, ill probably get one. 150 bucks to never vaccum again?!? Ill go for it.
    Now, when it can sort my laundry on my floor by sniff check, ill buy 2 of em.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  25. I read a review of the roomba by CableModemSniper · · Score: 5, Informative

    in a local paper. It said that the Roomba couldn't completely replace your standard vacumm. It doesn't do stairs, and it has no attachments for things like furniture upholstery, etc. The article basically said it was good if you lived in a small place such as an apartment or didn't have kids, but if you need to do heavy duty cleaning, the 'bot wasn't gonna repalce your standard vac.

    --
    Why not fork?
  26. Nit-pick by Overt+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    from the to-lazy-to-stand dept.

    And, apparently, from the too-lazy-to-spell department, too...

  27. Pervert! by slagdogg · · Score: 3, Funny

    I also took Roomba home with me to see how it would do in a somewhat more sedate setting. Once again, Roomba did its thing with a minimum of noise or fuss.

    Hmmm ... I don't see any mention of what exactly "its thing" was ... ewww.

    --
    (Score:-1, Wrong)
  28. https? by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

    Is it really necessary for us to slashdot their SSL server? I mean, if we're going to trash it, can't we at least do the lesser of the two and go with good ol' HTTP? (-:

    (not to mention the mismatched host and cert)

    S

  29. Floor VAX? by ari_j · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it running on DEC hardware?

  30. It's too slow by Proc6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The CEO interviewed says a 10x12 room takes 1/2 an hour to vaccuum. I can vaccuum my entire 1000 square foot apartment in about 3 minutes. It's just not that difficult. Id rather do it myself and be done in less than 5 minutes, than hear that thing's motor whirring and whining for 3 hours while it cleans every room in my house.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    1. Re:It's too slow by SheldonYoung · · Score: 2

      Who cares how long it takes if you're not home?

    2. Re:It's too slow by dubiousmike · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the manufacturer figures you are going to leave your house at some point or another.

      silly manufacturer

      :P

    3. Re:It's too slow by tid242 · · Score: 2
      I think the manufacturer figures you are going to leave your house at some point or another.

      Hmmm... they must not have computers where they're from...

      -tid242

      --

      With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

    4. Re:It's too slow by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      One of the biggest reasons people seem to like Roomba is its ability to easily go all the way under beds, tables, and the like and vacuum underneath them.

      Sure, you can vacuum an apartment in only minutes, but do you really bother to switch to the crevice tool and make sure you get everything under your bed, etc.? (Probably not, if you're like most people.)

      I do agree though... it's one of those "gee whiz" things that initially sounds teriffic, but I bet most owners quit using it after the first year or so. The small lint tray instead of a decent-capacity bag, the rechargeable battery which will no-doubt quit holding a charge after a year or so of use, and the fact it can't do any stairs (the part people hate vacuuming the most!) means it's not quite as useful as it first appears.

  31. Real man's challenge by shrikel · · Score: 5, Funny
    I can see it now:

    Geeks now have a vacuum cleaner web server!

    First one to run apache/linux on it wins.

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    1. Re:Real man's challenge by The+J+Kid · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's nothing...
      Imagine a whole beow...

      */me tears like heck to save skin*

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    2. Re:Real man's challenge by einTier · · Score: 2
      You know, if you mounted a web camera to it, and allowed remote driving of the robot, that might actually be interesting.


      "You looked a little distracted in that meeting today, Bob... what were you doing?"

      "oh, just vacuuming my floors... chasing the cats... that sort of thing."

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    3. Re:Real man's challenge by Restil · · Score: 2

      I'll get on that right away. :)

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
  32. come on now by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    My rugs are vacuumed everyday before I get home...That is why one gets married isn't it?

    1. Re:come on now by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

      Oh god no! I hate that pyramid shit.

      I take it you haven't read this book yet!

  33. That's better than a kid by Ghoser777 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's very difficult to get an algorithm to cover oddly defined spaces, especially when there's objects (aka furniture) in the way. Should the robot move the furniture? What if a piece of furniture has a clearance that is below the robot's ability to vacuum under?

    Now that I think abou it, the robot probably only vacuums area that it can physically move over, so after a couple months, Fibonaccinumbers come into play and you'll have a dust bunny population explosion. But that's about the same amount of area any kid will vacuum, except that kids will probably skip any areas that don't look dirty (even if they really are).

    F-bacher

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
  34. The First? by frause · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about Electrolux Trilobite?
    Electrolux claims they were first! Trilobite Pressrelease

  35. Asimov would have loved the company name... by douglips · · Score: 2, Funny
  36. Re:Wife by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

    Apparently you are a lonely sole.

    Here is proof that we get married.

  37. My dogs will destroy it... by Gruneun · · Score: 2

    Though, I'm not sure if it will be with their teeth or the sheer amount of dog hair. I vaccuum once a week and empty my upright three times, once for each floor. I don't see how that tiny thing could possibly hold up against any single room in my house.

  38. I'm just waiting.... by SensitiveMale · · Score: 2, Funny
    for someone to say that this is too expensive and that he built the EXACT same thing with a 486/25, and ATi AIW video card, wireless networking, and an old 15" monitor he had in the garage.


    And just a little script in Perl.

  39. Another Vacuum story? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Slashdot: News for Nerds. Things that Suck.

    (doan hit me ;)

  40. This is Rodney Brooks' company. by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those robot geeks among us who did NOT know, this is Rodney Brooks' company.

    Rodney A. Brooks is Director of the 230 person MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and is the Fujitsu Professor of Computer Science. He is also Chairman and Chief Technical Officer of iRobot Corp (Roomba)

    He received degrees in pure mathematics from the Flinders University of South Australia and the Ph.D. in Computer Science from Stanford University in 1981.

    This guy is to robot-geeks what RMS is to Open-Source.

  41. not terribly useful by WhiteChocolate42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, one of these would only come in handy if I actually vacuumed in the first place. Now, make me a robot that posts to slashdot, drinks mountain dew and takes naps, and you've got yourself a customer! Laser eye-beams probably wouldn't hurt either. http://www.geocities.com/robot_president/quotes.ht ml

  42. Except the batteries don't last long enough by SonicBurst · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a blurb on the Roomba in this month's What's New section of PopSci. They quoted a battery time of 90 minutes, which to me seems like WAY more than enough time to vacuum. However, the blurb said that it can only do 2 10x20 rooms in that amount of time. Well, I don't know what everyone lives in, but it would take this thing all day to vacuum my house which measures in at about 2000 sq. ft, and I for one wouldn't want to hear a vacuum running all day. And I can't just let the thing run all day at work, since the batteries only last 90 min! Guess I'll be vacuuming the old way for some time to come still....

    --

    Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
    1. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And I can't just let the thing run all day at work, since the batteries only last 90 min! Guess I'll be vacuuming the old way for some time to come still....

      Let it loose in one room each day, then finish up the remaining rooms (if you have more than 5 rooms) on the weekend.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    2. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by jon+doh! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      my house which measures in at about 2000 sq. ft,

      is that without kitchen sq footage? what about bathrooms? i know some homebuilders add in the garage to their sqft measurements, do you vacuum closets? pantry? the tiled entryway? i know some people vacuum anything, even if it isn't carpeted, but we only sweep the tiled parts of our apartment.

      probably not a whole lot knocked off there, and if you have enough furniture, i'm sure most people won't move the big heavy stuff to vacuum more than once or twice a year.

    3. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by rworne · · Score: 3, Informative
      You would hear it running all the time.

      They had one of these on demo at Brookstone in the local mall, and it made a hell of a racket.

      It sounded like a combo between a cheap motorized plastic toy and a hair dryer. I really hope for their sake the one I saw was busted somehow.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    4. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 2

      And what happens if this thing grabs a hold of an extension cord or antenna rotator wire or speaker wire that's too close to the floor or far from the wall? Does it just keep right on chugging until it has ripped your TV off the table or your monitor off your desk or your 100 lb speaker onto your cat and killed it (or a small child!) and done enough damage to cost you more than a maid would for 6 months? Not as dangerous as a robot lawnmower, I would expect, but dangerous enough. The prep for operating this thing must rival pre-washing dishes in sheer lunacy.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    5. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gee whiz then I would need two of these gadgets. Our house measures without the garage and closets about 3500 square feet. Actually that kind of sucks since the vacuum cleaner would be running constantly.

      My question though is what about the dog factor. I have English Bulldogs that consider vaccuum cleaners the enemy...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  43. Somebody else remembers Orbots?!? by Bonker · · Score: 2

    Orbots was one of my very first exposures to anime-- even before I ever saw Macross (Robotech), Voltron. My next exposure was a rather good Voltron-like anime OAV that had been edited and dubbed into english by Funimation called 'Voltus 5'. I always considered both Voltron series to be pale imitatons of that movie.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  44. Flat Earth Myth by Red+Weasel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole idea that the entire world thought that the earth was flat until Columbus came around is a total and complete fabrication.

    This story was invented by Washington Irving (yes the writer of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Other Stories) to show his contempt for the priesthood and for the conservative nature of the church and European nations. And guess what? It caught on and expanded to include everyone that lived before them.

    Lets all ignore the fact that every time there was an eclipse that the shadow was round or that sailors from around the world would loose site of land as they sailed or that a Greek mathematician calculated the circumference of the earth and was only 52 miles off.

    Jeffrey
    Burton Russell
    Has a very short piece but he says it best with

    "A round earth appears at least as early as the sixth century BC with Pythagoras, who was followed by Aristotle, Euclid, and Aristarchus, among others in observing that the earth was a sphere. Although there were a few dissenters--Leukippos and Demokritos for example--by the time of Eratosthenes (3 c. BC), followed by Crates(2 c. BC), Strabo (3 c. BC), and Ptolemy (first c. AD), the sphericity of the earth was accepted by all educated Greeks and Romans."

    --
    ..which just shows that the human brain is ill-adapted for thinking and was probably designed for cooling the blood-T P
    1. Re:Flat Earth Myth by User+956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole idea that the entire world thought that the earth was flat until Columbus came around is a total and complete fabrication... by the time of Eratosthenes (3 c. BC), followed by Crates(2 c. BC), Strabo (3 c. BC), and Ptolemy (first c. AD), the sphericity of the earth was accepted by all educated Greeks and Romans."

      First off, Claudius Ptolemy lived in the second century, not the frst century.

      Second, Christianity is well known for destroying and suppressing knowledge. That's why they burned the library at Alexandria. Galileo was arraigned before the Catholic Inquisition and forced to recant his heretical view that the earth rotated, and also revolved around the sun. However, you are correct that the Greeks and Romans knew the Earth was round.

      My question is, when Columbus was ready to sail, did he sail from Greece, or did he sail from Spain, a country dominated by Catholicism?

      Read the Bible. The conception of the earth in Genesis 1 is that of a single continent in the shape of a flat circular disc. In addition, the Hebrews were influenced via the patriarchs by Mesopotamian concepts (due to their time in Egypt), and via Moses. Moses was, after all, "educated in all the wisdom of the Egyptians" (Acts 7:22; Exod 2:10). It is highly probable, therefore, that the writer and first readers of Genesis 1 defined the sea in the same way that all people in the ancient Near East did, namely, as a single circular body of water in the middle of which the flat earth-disc floated and from which all wells, springs and rivers derived their water.'

      It therefore all the more historically probable that the writer and readers of Genesis 1 thought of the earth as a single continent in the shape of a flat circular disc. The belief was that the earth is covered by a vault and that celestial bodies move inside this firmament. This makes sense only under the assumption that the earth is flat. This is reinforced in Genesis 1:6 and 1:7, and was commonly depicted in religious art, through the 1400s.

      If second grade serves me, I believe Columbus sailed in 1492.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:Flat Earth Myth by User+956 · · Score: 2

      One more thing: Jeffery Burton Russel's paper, which you cite, was presented at a conference at Westmont College, which is a Christian College. If you read the entire thing, he also goes on to bash Darwin and the theory of evolution.

      Hardly a credible source.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    3. Re:Flat Earth Myth by LMariachi · · Score: 2
      Second, Christianity is well known for destroying and suppressing knowledge.

      No argument there, but evidence suggests that neither a Christian nor a Muslim (as is elsewhere alleged) was responsible for the burning of the library at Alexandria:

      http://www.bede.org.uk/library.htm
      http://www.ehistory.com/world/articles/ArticleView .cfm?AID=9
      http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandri a

    4. Re:Flat Earth Myth by werfele · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you're suggesting that Columbus was radical in his belief that the world was round, that would be incorrect. His proposal to reach the East Indies by heading west was examined by the commission headed by Isabela's confessor, Hernando de Talavera, consisting of religious and scholarly leaders.

      Over the span of a couple of years, they decided to reject the plan because they concluded that Columbus had underestimated the distance, and that the actual distance was too far to be practical. They were correct on the first point, and wrong on the second only because of the unexpected presence of the Americas. Not even the religious leaders raised the idea the the plan would fail because the earth is flat. http://www2.worldbook.com/features/features.asp?fe ature=explorers&page=html/newworld_plan.html&direc t=yes

    5. Re:Flat Earth Myth by User+956 · · Score: 2

      If you're suggesting that Columbus was radical in his belief that the world was round, that would be incorrect.

      All I'm suggesting is that anyone who says "The whole idea that the entire world thought that the earth was flat until Columbus came around is a total and complete fabrication.", and then goes on to talk about how open minded the Church was, is making shit up.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  45. Re:I wonder what would happen if... by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 2

    actually, it has a built in cliff sensor to prevent it from commiting suicide like that :)

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  46. Re:What about the corners? - 1890s fix by victim · · Score: 2

    What you need are dust corners. These are little brass trianglish affairs to go in square corners and turn them into radiused corners. They made sweeping and scrubbing easier back when it was all hand powered.

  47. Scrubbing bubbles by ACNeal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get those scribbing bubbles by Dow.

    all the adds show them as autonomous. You just apply them to the bathroom surface, and they zoom around like they were at a 1970's skate park. According to the ads, they do a pretty good job to.

    I always wondered why they didn't use these as the basis for nano-technology.

  48. yeah, WSJ had this weeks ago by mekkab · · Score: 2

    and my wife and I have been salivating over it since.

    no, it won't replace my regular vacuum, nor my vacuum with attachments, nor my steam vac, but periodically running it every couple of days to pick up all the kitty litter? PRICELESS.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:yeah, WSJ had this weeks ago by einTier · · Score: 2
      This is exactly why I want one. That and my 2000 sq ft of hardwood floors.


      I'm tired of sweeping the hardwoods every few days, and doing a doubly good job before I mop them, and I'm tired of all the kitty litter the cats track around, even if most of it is confined to laundry room.


      I don't expect to be freed from vacuuming forever, but if this means that instead of vacuuming the whole house every week and sweeping the hardwoods every few days, I can just hit the hardwoods just before mopping and the carpets once in a blue moon, it's worth every penny.


      I haven't purchased one yet, because I'm still a bit skeptical that it can actually get 90% of the floor under full automation -- but judging from the reviews, I'll have to get one soon.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    2. Re:yeah, WSJ had this weeks ago by mekkab · · Score: 2

      okay, so cat #3 is being hospitalized- projected damage is $700 (however likely to rise)(hyper calcimia... can lead to renal failure (if not caused by renal failure))
      BUT!@

      I'll let you know how to roomba is if I have any cash left over.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  49. Small height, goes under stuff by mekkab · · Score: 2

    it's REEEAAL short, so it can fit under most couches and things.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  50. Re:Wife by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

    Well as Triumph the insult comic dog would say:

    "You'll die alone!!!"

  51. Obligatory reference elucidator by laetus · · Score: 2


    The movie Runaway

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
  52. Improvements. by SecGreen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These guys should hire some programmers (and engineers) from The Robomower Company... The mower can handle a quarter acre with all kinds of obstructions...

    Also on my wishlist:
    1. Return-to-base self-charging.
    2. Return-to-base dust bin emtpying.
    3. Environment learning. It could develop a map of the floor, and keep track of the dirt collected in different areas. Then it could do a daily cleaning of the high-traffic areas, and do occasional full passes.
    4. Take some lessons from Robot Soccer and learn some teamwork. (Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!)
    5. Remote Interface with an X10 burglar alarm. (Although "Release the vacuums!" just doesn't have the same ring as "release the hounds!)

    --sg

    --
    Dupe posts are /.'s tacit protest on the rights of users to time-shift content...
  53. Similar robot from ElectroLux by Erwin-42 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here in Scandinavia, ElectroLux has commercially launched Trilobite which is similar -- it runs around finding the walls, uses ultrasound to detect obstacles and can find its way back to the base station when necessary. This happened about a year ago (November 2001) according to the press release dates.

    Trilobite is about 12000 DKK however, which is 1500 EUR.

    Here's the Danish website with Flash demonstration and some information in English too.

  54. Isn't it typical... by nmnilsson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did they even stop to think before giving it a female name? *sigh*
    If vaccuming had been fun, it would have been l33t suXor or something...

    --
    No sig to see here. Move along.
  55. Re:Forgot about robot cartoons by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Informative
    Then later you had UltraMan...
    Whadda mean, "later"? I was watching Ultraman fight giant rubbery monsters long before Voltron, etc. came along.
    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  56. What's Excellent Carma anyway? by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    A BeoWulf cluster of these.... will take over the world in under 72 hours.

  57. Re:What if by Comedian · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yes, the Electrolux Trilobite actually recharges itself automatically. Check out the English press-kit.

    The technology they are using in the Trilobite to let it map out rooms is really cool: echo-location with ultrasound, just as bats do.

    As far as I know, it's so far only being sold in Sweden (since spring 2002) and Norway (since autumn 2002). I've read that Electrolux plans to start marketing it for other European countries in early 2003.

    The only down-side about this robo-cleaner is the price.. about 12000 kroner here in Norway, which is about USD $1500. (Ouch.)

    I've been drooling over this thing since it was released on the Swedish market, but it's way too expensive for me yet. Hopefully competing products will force Electrolux to lower the price.

  58. Re:Their new robots by NutMan · · Score: 2, Funny
    In the Friendly Robotics FAQ, they have some interesting robots in the works:

    Q: Are any new robotic products coming to the market soon?
    A:Yes, our R&D is currently developing other household products that will eliminate spending time on mundane choirs.

    Are they targeting the Vienna Choir Boys or the Mormon Tabernacle Choir? Either way it seems like this is kind of a small market.

  59. ...And space comedy movies! by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 4, Funny
    I want MegaMaid.

    "She's gone from suck...to blow!"

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
    1. Re:...And space comedy movies! by Myco · · Score: 2

      ...Suck! ...Suck! ...Suck!

  60. Cool stuff. by dr00g911 · · Score: 2

    After looking at the assorted websites and reviews (plus the "we're being /.ed so be kind to us" opener), I have to say that this is a cool piece of tech.

    For $200, I may just buy one to piss off/delight (depending on the moon cycle) my girlfriend, who takes pride in keeping her slovenly geek-boy's living conditions pristine. (she deserves a medal for that, BTW).

    I'm just waiting for version 2.0 (which you know is coming).

    Combine the preset programs of it's current mode of operation with a second set of pathfinding and room mapping (tape lines for the inital ala some consumer 'bots?) instructions.

    Then the thing would be able to use one mode to find its way to the middle of each room to be cleaned, and be able to drive itself back to the charger, switching between mapping/pathfinding modes as necessary.

    Add some floor wax and oscillating brushes, and this thing will rank pretty close to some of those old Popular Science predictions.

    Regardless, one hell of a great pilot release, and kudos on the price point!

  61. what the hell is wrong with people? by tid242 · · Score: 2
    However, when compared to a human operator, it was found that most people miss large patches when they do their vacuuming. It is just hard to remember exactly what areas have been covered (that and the constant urge of doing something more interesting). All in all, it was found that the robot covered a larger fraction of the floor, even if it did not reach all the corners.

    So they're basing this model on being better than people too ADHD'd to *remember* which parts of the floor they already vacuumed?-for some reason i'm thinking these aren't the kind of people that're going to have an extra $200 sitting around to spend on a vacuuming robot. i don't know what kind of dope they're smoking but i want some, it deeply bothers me that i can keep track of which parts of the room i vacuumed a few minutes before...

    -tid242

    --

    With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

  62. One step towards the XQJ-37 Roto-Plooker by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2
  63. Screw the back issues by BigJimSlade · · Score: 2

    I'm going to go read all my back issues of Popular Science, I'll find a robot lawn mower or two.


    Since I don't have back issues of Popular Science (and I'm pretty lazy), I'll just search for one on Slashdot. How about this Internet-enabled lawnmowing robot?

  64. I have something like this. by spudwiser · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's called a cat. It roams around the house eating anything on the floor and depositing it in a box that needs to be emptied every few days. It was even free!

    --
    .cig - what you do after winning a good flame war
  65. Screw the vacuuming... by docbrown42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bring on the sexbots.

    Which would you rather spend $200 bucks on?

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  66. more than one of them in a house??? by Sabalon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cause a beowulf cluster of these would really suck!

  67. Gee, I wonder where I read about Roomba before... by rhwalker22 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...maybe it was a month ago on washingtonpost.com. Cool picture too.

  68. We have one of these at work by iamchaos · · Score: 3, Informative

    And they almost work. It takes the little guy forever and sometimes he just gives up. Put him between two chairs and watch the confusion begin. It is a little loud and will get hung up quite a bit. Other than that it works great. Just keep an ear out for it to shut off and go see if it is done or gave up.

  69. Seems to be ill-suited by Anenga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think any clean-freak mom in America would want this thing to do it's floors. I watched the video clip in the article, then you'll know what I mean.

    First of all, it seems to only floors. And it only cleans "slightly" it doesn't seem like it will go deep into the rug and get that dirt out, it does not seem powerful at all with no adaquate suction.

    In addition, it doesn't seem very intelligent. It works by sweeping around an area, then when it detects something, it will go in a circular motion to make sure it gets all of it up in that area. But it can easily roam off and miss a lot. Well, unless you give it a lot of time. In the video, they said it would take 45 minutes to clean the studio. Or a half hour to clean a small room. Do note, half of that time is probably finding the mess. That's probably it's biggest problem. Perhaps it should send out detection lasers (or whatever, the stuff that stores use for automatic doors etc.) to detect if anything is above floor level?

    The problem with actually finding the mess in a short amount of time was so paramount that they developed little pods that you put around it, to cage it in so it won't pass them and find the mess faster. While that helps, it really isn't solving the problem. Ideally, you'd start it up and it goes straight to the mess and clean it up.

    Right now, I'd consider the thing blind. Aimlessly circling around looking for crumbs.

    I wouldn't recommend it. Though, there is very good potential for "iRobot" (the company). Check back in a few years.

    1. Re:Seems to be ill-suited by gravelpup · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I watched the video clip in the article [msnbc.com], then you'll know what I mean.

      Yeah, the host was obviously Unclear On The Concept of what the Roomba was designed to do. He just put it down and expected it to seek out the mess and clean it up in a 30 second spot, and appeared frustrated when it didn't.

      Rather, this is one of those things you start up when you go off to work and you come home to a clean room. Much like the dishwasher. You shouldn't expect a lot of intelligence at a price point lower than most PDAs.

      --

      Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.

    2. Re:Seems to be ill-suited by Fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The article makes reference to the fact that this is like the swimming pool vaccuums. I have a polaris for my pool and the path it takes is completely random, it isn't even smart enough to do things like and expanding circle, etc. However, after about 15-20 minutes it always has the pool completely cleaned. You'd be surprised at how well a random walk can cover an area. Plus, you really don't need to get every part of your floor 100% clean every time. If you do this every other day, you'll probably keep the floor clean enough that it won't show.

      --
      -no broken link
  70. The Dyson DC06 has been doing this for years. by androse · · Score: 2, Informative
    I remember seeing a demo of the Dyson DC06 at least 2 years ago, maybe more. The things were commercially available at the time.

    Check it out If you are looking for the grooviest vacuum cleaners out there, get a Dyson. Expensive, but worth it.

  71. Re:Forgot about robot cartoons by GMontag · · Score: 2

    What about Tobor the 8 Man that I used to watch on the Ray Rayner Show when I was a kid? He was cutting edge "Japan invading the cartoon industry" stuffn and he could do anything!

  72. I, Robot by bill.sheehan · · Score: 2

    I think someone needs to sit down and define the term "Robot." If this thing is a robot, than so is my washing machine, my dishwasher, and my refrigerator. It doesn't even have enough smarts to plug itself in!
    Sorry, I'm waiting for the general purpose robot that is not dissuaded by staircases (no Daleks!) and can do floors, windows, and light carpentry.
    Let me know when my vacation flight to Venus is ready...

  73. The movie wasn't that impressive by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

    Hell my first lego robot performed the same way minus the vacuum cleaner (roamed around randomly changing course when it hit something.)

    The vacuum cleaner wasn't that great, refering to the movie it just sort of threw the crap around instead of cleaning the mess.

    However this is only version 1.0. I'm suprised more /.ers don't have a more open mind about this kind of tech. for the price of a playstation it can keep light dirt of your carpet, is a great conversation piece, it's a fucking robot, it's geeky, it's kindof cool.

    Hell I think I'll get one, I'll start a nice project to hack roomba to interface with a pc so instead of randomly roaming all time it would target high traffic areas like doors and in front of the couch about 20% of the time. Hell maybe a remote control so you target those hard to reach spots or torment the cat.

    --
    >
  74. Just bought one... by jfinke · · Score: 5, Informative
    I just bought one last weekend. It is pretty slick. It does what it claims to do. You can just let it go and return later and your room is clean. I have 3 cats and the amount of cat hair it picks up is pretty amazing.

    It manuevers around and under everything that is over 6" high. So, it can deal with coffee tables, chairs, beds, etc. It detects stairs and avoids them. It comes with a virtual wall unit (you can buy more), that sends out a signal the roomba won't cross. When I first got it, I put it is my main room. It has a TV, a large L shaped couch, and 2 litter boxes. The room is 20x10. I eat in front of the tv, so you can imagine all that crap. I ran it in there, and I was amazed at all the stuff if picked up.

    There are a few caveats, however. Battery life. You can only do "3 medium size rooms". My carpet is pretty thick, however. It is closer to 2 rooms. Plus, the time to charge the battery is 12 hours. You can buy spare batteries and a "quick charger", however, they are $60 bucks apiece. It is designed to do one room at a time, so you just can't put it up on the second floor and let it do everything. You have to put it into a room, close the door, and let it rip. It is not designed as a spot cleaner. If you have one really messy part of the room, you are better off getting your regular vacuum and vacumming that part of the room and then putting the roomba to work. The dirt collector is pretty small, so you have to empty it out after every room. Also, because of all the cat hair, I spend a lot of time cleaning the brushes and making sure the machine is clean. Unfortunately, it does not map out the room, so it may go over some areas that are not as high traffic as others, due to the algorithm that is uses.

    My girlfriend thought I was nuts for buying it. However, for $200 bucks, (the price a of a decent vacuum) it is pretty cool. Now, only if it would travel stairs, do multiple rooms, have a larger dirt container, and plug itself back in, it would be near perfect

  75. sounds good to me by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2

    The article basically said it was good if you lived in a small place such as an apartment or didn't have kids, but if you need to do heavy duty cleaning, the 'bot wasn't gonna repalce your standard vac.

    And that would be perfect for me (lazy bachelor that I am) since I could set this thing to vacuum a different large room every day when I leave for work, on a rotation. In theory, the dirt would never build up to the point where I need to do the heavy-duty vacuum--or at least not a FULL run with the big vac. All I'd have to worry about is the stairs occasionally, using my other vac.

    Plus, I just want to tell people that my robot does the cleaning-- I mean it's 2002 already. We're officially in The Future now. If only it talked... but I guess the mod scene hasn't begun on this thing yet.

    If somebody makes a speech add-on, I'd just make it say "dammit!" every time it bumped into a wall or piece of furniture. And perhaps make R2D2 noises in the mean time.

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  76. Re:Wife by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

    Did I refer you to this book yet DJFirBee?

  77. Speaking of lego's (see story icon) by Arcturax · · Score: 2

    Will this thing be smart enough to avoid all the legos I have on the floor? :)

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  78. To all /. folks who say "What can't it do ...." by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 2

    To all /. folks who say "What can't it do ...."

    Unknown investor to a Mr. H. Ford I'm sorry that we can't invest in your factory for this "Model A" of yours, but it just doesn't do enough. It takes too much of this "Gasoline" to go very far, the travel distance is too short to be of practical value, it can only go on roads, and it doesn't even seat a whole family.

    Maybe you should come up with some way of improving regular carriages instead of wasting any more time on this "Horseless" carriage of yours.

    Come on now, this is the first edition/first draft. It's only aimed at "Early Adapters", not at your mother. It will improve in time, just as the Model A, improved to the Model T, and so on.

    What this does do however is give them a "First to Market" advantage in this country.

  79. obligatory star wars reference by cosyne · · Score: 2

    Huh. And the news media refered to our avatar system as an R2D2-like "dustbin on wheels."

  80. Other vaccum robots by prototype · · Score: 2

    There's been a lot of vaccum based robots already out on the market, and reasonably priced. If you're interested, the Cye robot came out a year or two ago (http://www.personalrobots.com/home.html) and offered a vaccum attachement as well as open source software (under agreement) that mapped out rooms. It also returns to the charger for you. Maybe if these two companies put their heads together they might have something.

  81. And in the silver and yellow corner... by matthew.thompson · · Score: 2

    Dyson also have one featuring their cool see through canister and dual cyclone technology - shame it's not thair Root Cyclone though.

    See http://www.dyson.co.uk/range/feature_frame.asp?mod el=DC06 for pics and details.

    --
    Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
  82. RIPOFF!! It seems to be one anyway.. by mattr · · Score: 2

    This looks like a total ripoff of the TRILOBITE by Electrolux. I coordinated an event called Swedish Style in Tokyo 2002 (Oct 1 to 15, just ended) where it was announced with Toshiba, who helped them get it ready for Japan and distribute it.

    We had the robot running for real for two weeks so even if there is no relation (extremely hard to believe) Electrolux is definitely first and we announced it first.
    Check out the homepage which is also better done, at http://www.electrolux.se/ (it was released in Sweden earlier).

    The Trilobite automatically maps out the room, has tons of sensors and automatically docks, can be hemmed in by magnetic tape so it doesn't go down the stairs, and when you watch it it seems pretty smart.

    For anyone who does not know it, Electrolux probably makes the best vaccuum cleaners in the world, in addition to fridges, and also has th majority of riding lawnmower sales as well apparently. I am biased because 1) my family has used their vacuums for 30 years and never breaks and 2) I just made a commercial for two other products of Electrolux, a steam gun (very cool, clean, stylish, well done..) and oxygen, another vacuum cleaner. As it happens Oxygen gives off exhaust air out the back which is as clean as what you get from dedicated air cleaners; a baby can crawl behind it. Just shows to go ya, these guys must have hurried to make a press release and flashy homepage to not miss out on timing and presumably their investors.

    Of course there is a very small chance that this is Electrolux. And iRobot may have great people and this is convergent evolution etc. BUT it is hard to believe that they are unaware of what Electrolux has been doing for so long and this is very misleading. If Electrolux is inside they should get the CREDIT.

    Matt Rosin
    Telebody Inc.
    Tokyo Japan

    1. Re:RIPOFF!! It seems to be one anyway.. by mattr · · Score: 2

      P.S. I am also biased because in addition to shooting that commercial for Electrolux, they also paid for time on four giant outdoor television screens in Tokyo these past two weeks. I provided free time (3 minutes per hour) for the Swedish government and Electrolux and Volvo decided to add some paid ads of their own.

      On the other hand, I also have worked with MIT and robot designers, and have nothing against them, and the gecko stuff and iRobot is also quite neat. More power to them. But they are not the first, and it is not evident that they know anything about vacuum cleaners or robots in the home, or what the quality is since the price is about ten times less than the trilobite.

      My own hope is for a telescoping legged robot that can do things for me remotely, preferably bigger than an aibo and closer in price to an irobot. If it can clean the toilet or do the dishes that is also a plus.

      In the end who cares who is first, these things take a long time to develop and I hope those iRobot guys do well.

      But no more misleading stories please, slashdot. You can do you research too.

  83. Re: Really a Electrolux ripoff by orthogonal · · Score: 2

    Is it just me or does it look like she is getting ready to be "taken" from behind?

    That's how she earned the 12000 kroner it costs to buy the Trilobite.