Slashdot Mirror


Panasonic Combined DVD-R & PVR Device

Raetsel writes "Caught a commercial the other day hawking the device I've been waiting for. TIVO is a great idea, but what if you want to keep something more permanently? Enter the Panasonic DMR-series. The top-of-the-line DMR-HS2 ($1000 US) has a 40 GB hard drive, offers "Time Slip Playback" (TIVO's "pause live TV" function), and allows you to move shows off the hard drive onto DVD. Heck, you can even record straight to DVD-R or DVD-RAM discs (which is what the $700 DMR-E30(K/S) does). There's also a IEEE-1394 input, so you can record from sources that have a FireWire output. Oh, yeah... it's a progressive-scan DVD player, too."

194 comments

  1. Formats by tmark · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So what formats will it recognize over Firewire ? I wonder whether a S-Video In would be more useful than firewire....does it have that ?

    1. Re:Formats by Erv+Walter · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Firewire is likely intended to allow you to easily transfer video from a digital video camera to DVD using DV.

      --
      -- Erv Walter
    2. Re:Formats by savagexp · · Score: 1

      The purpose of the device is to be forward-thinking. That means digital technology, not archaic analog BS.

      If you want to record from S-Video, just buy this JVC VCR.

      --
      =======================================
      Doer of bad deeds, screenwriter-wannabe
      savagexp
    3. Re:Formats by Shabbs · · Score: 5, Informative

      As per their page:

      Inputs:
      DV In (x1)
      Video In (x3) (Phono)
      S-Video In (x3) (S4P)
      Audio In (x3) (Phono)

      --
      Mark
    4. Re:Formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this JVC VCR

      What an ugly ass peice of electronics! Shit, I've seen better looking 80's boom boxes and top loading Beta VCR's!

  2. Ok Im stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whats a "progressive scan" dvd player?

    1. Re:Ok Im stupid by Kj0n · · Score: 1

      Use Google or look here

  3. Yeah, that's great and all... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but, this is Slashdot, where $1000 is the average yearly salary for most people. Is there a way to build something that does what this thing does, albeit poorly, using Linux and our old spare 486s?

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Yeah, that's great and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

      Anyone making less than $1000USD a year should have other priorities than getting a TV and TiVO.

    2. Re:Yeah, that's great and all... by Jobe_br · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is the type of idea I had a while back, but the short answer, unfortunately, is no. At least, there's no way of building a hardware-based DVD player on the up-n-up (e.g. no DeCSS) w/o getting your own decryption key approved (that ought to set ya back a few).

      It'd be nice, though .. its gettin' to be more and more that the DIY type thing is out of the picture. And just think, we don't even have broadcast flags yet! Even so, I can't think of any way that I can build my own box that can play DVDs, have TiVO like functionality, tune both my regular cable channels as well as my digital cable channels - never mind if I had satellite, which I don't, and never mind premium cable channels or InDemand or PPV, which might require totally different chips on your tuner.

      Ah well, that's what we've got capitalism for, right? To see to our every need ... supply & demand, God bless.

      Cheers.

    3. Re:Yeah, that's great and all... by squaretorus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just remember that that average comes from 99% earning zero, with the 1% in paid employment earning shite loads so this IS interesting if your in the moneyed 1%.

      How to tell them apart? Find the guys with just one laptop - they're rich - they know they can buy a new one anytime so they give their old ones away to impoverished geeks - the rest of us keep em (and even lug em about) just in case

    4. Re:Yeah, that's great and all... by NumberSyx · · Score: 2

      Not on a 486 you can't, I doubt you could even do the mpeg encoding and even if you could, it would take days, maybe weeks. By the time you assembled the parts for this thing you'd be in it more than a $1000, a DVD Burner alone is more than $300 and besides DVD authoring on Linux is pretty much in it infancy, it has only been possible for a few months. Although you could do it with a regular CDRW making VCD instead of DVD. Honestly, if your yearly income is $1000, then you have bigger problems than this.

      --

      "Our products just aren't engineered for security,"
      -Brian Valentine,VP in charge of MS Windows Development

    5. Re:Yeah, that's great and all... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

      while we're at it, how can I build a tv to use my homebrew DVD-R TiVO on?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    6. Re:Yeah, that's great and all... by RC+Pavlicek · · Score: 4, Informative
      FWIW:

      Here's a page explaining how I constructed a Linux-based TV recorder for about US$300:

      http://linuxprofessionalsolutions.com/pavlicek/tv. html

      It creates files that can be burned to VCDs. I have no DVD burner, so I can't say what would be needed to create DVDs from the output. But it's using all Open Source software, so you can tweak it until it does what you want.

    7. Re:Yeah, that's great and all... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      i wonder whether your mother would suck me off while i suck your cock? do you think she would?

      No, she probably wouldn't.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  4. Best Buy by savagexp · · Score: 0, Redundant

    BB has two panasonic DVD-R models in their ad this week.

    --
    =======================================
    Doer of bad deeds, screenwriter-wannabe
    savagexp
  5. excellent by tps12 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's great to hear that it's a progressive-scan player. My current DVD player is a Christian conservative-scan model, and it refuses to play a sizeable proportion of my video collection.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:excellent by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 2

      No problem, anything the Christian conservatives have a problem with sounds like just my taste in video. You can send them to me and I will keep them safe for you. :-)

    2. Re:excellent by Enocasiones · · Score: 1
      I wonder what those thought who mod'ed this "Overrated" before it started going up as "Funny"...

      --
      Enoc
  6. How did this make it past hollywood by ipmcc · · Score: 1

    What's the catch? How did the industry let this happen? I wont say that people arent already doign this with DirecTiVos and outboard PCs but this seems like it would be really scary for networks and other "anti-copying" people. And how long until someone hacks this thing to allow DVD copying? Then it will really be some technology to watch... At any rate this may just be my next toy :)

    --
    This too shall pass.
    1. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by SkulkCU · · Score: 4, Interesting


      How did the industry let this happen?

      I've heard it said that companies make way more on hardware than they ever could on entertainment. I don't really have any numbers on that, but it doesn't sound unreasonable.

      --
      .sig last updated Jan. 14, 2000
    2. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      The catch is:

      The tech industry completely DWARFS the entertainment industry.

      Got it? Keep that in mind when you read the next 'Disney is going to control the world' rant.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by Raetsel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Perhaps it's this little "feature" -- (from the Panasonic site):
      • "Recording from the hard disk to a DVD-RAM or DVD-R disc cannot be done with images for which only single-generation recording is allowed. When recording these images to a DVD-RAM disc, the original image on the hard disk is erased. "
      There you go -- only one copy of a 'restricted work' can exist thanks to this device. But you can have it on reasonably durable media.

      So it's got some sort of restriction ability built-in. Bad that you can only make one copy (but then burn more from your computer?), but good that you could save, say, the Angels winning the World Series for posterity.

      --

      "...America's great minds of today, teaching America's great minds of tomorrow. Poor bastards." -- A Beautiful Min
    4. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by doormat · · Score: 1

      Yea, whats the restriction on taking that DVD-R to my computer and ripping the data off that onto my computer? Or copying the DVD-R. It seems to meet half way, and its a good compromise, but its not totally secured. Someone could still burn it to DVD, then divx it, then put it up on the net.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    5. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      typically the price of blank recordable media has a tax that pays some MPAA-like organization.

    6. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So it's got some sort of restriction ability built-in. Bad that you can only make one copy (but then burn more from your computer?), but good that you could save, say, the Angels winning the World Series for posterity.

      Yeah, but will the media last for the forty years it will take for the Angels to win another one?

    7. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      First a DiVX ;) compatible DVD player... Now a PVR that burns DVDs.

      This is gonna be a bad season for "media companies" which can't learn how to take advantage of new media formats...

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    8. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, and at $1,000 the output DVDs wouldn't be macrovisioned, but they are probably CSSed, since that's part of the standard. I would find it annoying that the player would automagically decide to encrypt all the stuff I watched on Sci-fi channel, for instance. And DVD-VCR combos won't record DVDs to vhs unless they're explicitly tagged as being copyable, so it WOULD require a computer, and your choice of DeCSS tool. And if it's doing as much as the retail Discs from hollywood are, then that's good enough for them, I suppose. Plus at $1,000 it's not exactly going to be in every home.

    9. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      I think that the time has come that consumers take a 'Soviet' view of new entertainment products: what is unsaid about them is more important that what is said. We need to stop trying to balance the potential of the feature set with the asking price and start requesting that the manufacturers disclose all of the DRM ('Digital Rights Management' i.e. copy and viewing restrictions on the entertainment media) pollution imposed on the new device.
      Without complete information on DRM restrictions in any new entertainment-media player, the public should consider the fair price of the new device to be no more than the 'Weird Stuff Warehouse' value on the components inside the box.

    10. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In an ideal world, the industry wouldn't have any say over whether it happened.

      Remember the ruling in the Betamax case? The Supreme Court said that contributory copyright infringement theories could not be used as an excuse to ban a technology that had even just one significant legitimate use.

      Computing, recording, etc. technology almost always has multiple significant legitimate uses.

    11. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by graikor · · Score: 1

      I'm almost convinced that the DRM on this unit would only be an issue when using the DV (Firewire) input.

      Since there's no program guide, and it's not an HD based unit, the only way it could know if a program was restricted to a single recording is if such data were stored in the analog TV signal (perhaps the VBI?).

      I don't think that such a signal is currently in use with analog TV, so it shouldn't be an issue unless the machine defaults to only permitting a single recording unless that bit is overridden in the digital source. THAT would be a dealbreaker for a lot of folks.

    12. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Angels. After the Giants beat them 16 to 4, it became crystal clear who the better team was. Then to have that stupid fucker hit a pop fly... ARGH! I had pegged the Giants to win. Now I'm just pissed.

    13. Re:How did this make it past hollywood by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Funny

      So it's got some sort of restriction ability built-in. Bad that you can only make one copy (but then burn more from your computer?), but good that you could save, say, the Angels winning the World Series for posterity.

      Yeah, cause, God knows, that kind of thing won't happen twice. I just feel bad for all the Red Sox fans thinking of buying a PVR for "next season, which will be OUR YEAR!"

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  7. What is TIVO? by wolfc · · Score: 0

    If anyone (including me) has that question on mind, look here.

  8. TiVo + network + PC by MarsBar · · Score: 1

    If you're that bothered, why not hook up a network card to your TiVo, extract the data from the hard disk over the network and burn a movieCD?

    1. Re:TiVo + network + PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      because TiVo and DirecTiVos do not record mpeg2 video suitable for directly burning to CDs or DVDs. Its the wrong resolution and audio bitrate. some players can handle it, many can't. DirecTiVos are even worse as the directivo VBR video is not in a normal mpeg2 format and takes VBR way further than any normal SVCD / DVD standard allows.

      whats the point of buring onto a DVD or CD if you can't play it in any arbitrary player in the future?

    2. Re:TiVo + network + PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A SA Tivo's bitrate and resolution can be modified with a bit of hacking. TivoWeb allows you to modify these on a per quality level basis, and it can be changed such that you can direct burn to a SVCD or VCD if you like. Most people doing this change the Basic quality level to do it. Rip, burn. Problem solved.

      The Best quality level isn't anywhere near the best the Tivo can really do. Not even the highest resolution it can do.

  9. Sounds nice by looseBits · · Score: 1

    I've got a series 2 TiVo (with the USB port and network functionality). I've been wondering how hard it would be to expose the video on my network and pull it down to one of my systems to burn onto VCD (I don't want a DVD burner yet, waiting for the formats to settle down).

    --
    Lord, bless my users that they may stop being such fucking idiots!!
  10. Or by yatest5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The top-of-the-line DMR-HS2 ($1000 US) has a 40 GB hard drive

    Er, or they could do a 60Gb one for $1040?

    --
    • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    1. Re:Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aye, it's that cheap for buying components, but there is a HUGE availability and reliability thing with HDs. Having been involved with digital video recording to HDs, I've seen too many disks spew out bad sectors after a couple of months good use.

      You could probably find some very cheap IBM 60GB ...

  11. This is dumb. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you have a spare $1000, just make your own unix box, setup your own implementation and you dont have to worry about "service" fees later. You don't have time?? then why are you watching TV!?!?!?

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:This is dumb. by irma+trattino · · Score: 2, Funny

      : You don't have time?? then why are you watching TV!?!?!?
      The problem is NOT not having time... The problem is NOT HAVING BRAIN. =)

      --
      irma trattino
      eat.me at http://irmetta.free.fr
    2. Re:This is dumb. by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's fine for geeks, but a lot of people who have the time don't have the know-how. For them, spending $1000 on a fairly dumb appliance is a lot happier a prospect than spending 1000 hours swearing at Unix manuals.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:This is dumb. by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      That's fine for geeks, but a lot of people who have the time don't have the know-how. For them, spending $1000 on a fairly dumb appliance is a lot happier a prospect than spending 1000 hours swearing at Unix manuals.


      Especially since

      a) my free time is worth more that $1 an hour and

      b) I spend all day programming to earn money and consequently $1000 is a piss in the ocean.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    4. Re:This is dumb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why people hate computer geeks. You don't see surgeons walking around claiming "can't do heart surgery = no brain" or architects claiming "can't design office block = no brain".

      It also illustrates that geeks consider their time to be without value.

    5. Re:This is dumb. by Skirwan · · Score: 5, Funny
      You don't have time?? then why are you watching TV!?!?!?
      Dude: Decaf. Seriously.

      --
      Damn the Emperor!
    6. Re:This is dumb. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      You have Unix manuals? Where can I get some?

    7. Re:This is dumb. by irma+trattino · · Score: 1

      The problem is that I am not a computer geek at all... just a simple secretary with no diploma or anything. I think everyone is able to do such things as long as they try hard. Lately, I have been learning to install Linux and ssh tunneling, and such things... I had hard times, as you can imagine, because I had no Linux knowledges. But if I can do it, everybody can. Don't think I considered this time being without value. You never loose time when you LEARN something. And anyway, if you still consider this is loosing time, then what do you think about people watching survivor or such stupid programs on TV? I go on thinking my time was used in a better way than my couch potatoe neighbourg's. And also, nowadays, you can't go on living without getting SOME computer knowledge. That is, if you're not amish. Nobody asks you to be a geek. Heck, I am NOT a geek. I don't think I'll become one. I just learn what is useful for me. That is no geekiness... =P With computers, you can get a lot of things done, with not much investment at start. Computers are the future. Get to know them.

      --
      irma trattino
      eat.me at http://irmetta.free.fr
  12. No Program Guide, though by jcrash · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The complete lack of a mention of a program guide and this statement:
    A list of recording dates, times, channels and (user-entered) titles are shown on screen.
    ...make me think that it has no program guide. The lack of a guide is a "deal-breaker" feature to me. Plus, once you've had a PVR with two tuners - you can't go back.
    --
    I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
    1. Re:No Program Guide, though by swb · · Score: 2

      Lack of a program guide means it's not Tivo, but don't just judge it by Tivo's standards. Tivo doesn't have a DVD-R drive in it, either.

      I have digital cable, and the set-top box is required for HBO and other pay services. The program guide included with the digital box is quite good. When I think about getting a Tivo and the service associated with it, I think I'm kind of paying twice. All I really want is a HD-based VCR -- I already have all the program guide I need.

      This kind of a box fills the gap between what Tivo is hardware is, and what it does service-wise, with at least one great extra, DVD recording.

      I'd buy a Tivo this afternoon if it could tune digital cable with an internal tuner, and if I could buy the service-for-life with the opportunity to transfer it ONCE to a new Tivo. otherwise it seems like just another $xx.xx per month I don't really feel the need for.

    2. Re:No Program Guide, though by McSpew · · Score: 2

      It takes a *lot* more than a built-in program guide to make a TiVo. TiVo's ability to record every new episode of a show--regardless of what the network (or local affiliate) decides to do to its time slot--is a huge feature. If it weren't for TiVo, I wouldn't have seen a single episode of the current season of The Drew Carey Show. My local ABC affiliate shows it at 10:30 on Sunday nights for some reason.

      In addition, your reasons for not buying a TiVo are really weak. What benefit do you get from having a built-in digital cable tuner? TiVo will work with your existing cable box to change stations. Why is the inability to transfer a lifetime subscription a deal breaker? If you tried TiVo, you'd probably be fine with the lifetime sub cost or paying the monthly fee. As it is, it seems you're just making excuses.

    3. Re:No Program Guide, though by swb · · Score: 2

      In addition, your reasons for not buying a TiVo are really weak.

      TiVo's ability to record every new episode of a show--regardless of what the network (or local affiliate) decides to do to its time slot--is a huge feature.

      I don't need or want that feature. If I don't watch most things about the time that they're on (within a few days), I won't ever watch them. TV watching fills "down" time, it's not that much of a purposeful activity for me.

      What benefit do you get from having a built-in digital cable tuner?

      The ability to tune the channels directly without the cable box overlays? The elimination of an overly complicated wiring setup? $8 per month discount, since I wouldn't have to rent the cable box?

      Why is the inability to transfer a lifetime subscription a deal breaker?

      I don't trust that the box will last for 3 years. All of my AV components have served me for at least that long before being replaced. I don't think a HDD will last that long, at least not suffering the abuse it would get in a DVR. Broken Tivo == lost service. I note that Tivo does not mention on their site what the product warrantee is. If Tivo would make product lifetime subscription transferable within 3 years I might bite, since my investment would have some protection.

      The Tivo costs $349+$250. I get a bunch of VCR scheduling stuff I'm unlikely to use, and I run the risk of having it be pretty much useless if I have it break after 12 months or so. New Tivo, new service contract. I'm happy with my digital cable guide now. I do occasionally record programs on TV, and some of them I actually want to keep. For $1k I get the Panasonic DVR that does VCR duty as well as making DVDs. It just sounds like a better fit, although $1k is still too expensive. When they hit $600 I'm buying one.

    4. Re:No Program Guide, though by McSpew · · Score: 2

      You haven't the foggiest notion how different watching TV with a TiVo really is. I won't beat you over the head with it, because it's been beaten to death in other threads here, but trust me, you're judging TiVo from an incomplete understanding of its capabilities and advantages. If you truly don't need the stuff it offers, then you don't need one. Period. At any price. Or with any features.

  13. Supports DRM Too.... by TXG1112 · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article:

    *Recording from the hard disk to a DVD-RAM or DVD-R disc cannot be done with images for which only single-generation recording is allowed. When recording these images to a DVD-RAM disc, the original image on the hard disk is erased.

    I suppose we should be grateful that it supports any type of fair use.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered. My life is my own.
    1. Re:Supports DRM Too.... by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      I other words, it will be sued by MPAA by tomorrow.

    2. Re:Supports DRM Too.... by mblase · · Score: 2

      Heck, who really cares? If it's on your DVD disc (unless your burned a coaster), you don't need it on the hard drive anymore. Stick it in your computer and file-share it from there if it's important to you. :)

      As you said, this is annoying, but it's probably the least annoying annoyance they could make.

  14. what i've wanted by ceswiedler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The biggest reason I would want this is very specific: tell it to record every Simpsons episode which airs (including syndication repeats) and burn them onto a DVD when there are enough of them. Ideally it wouldn't re-record episodes it had already recorded (though I don't know how it would be able to compare them) and put tables-of-content as DVD menus and printed labels (or DVD liner notes) telling me what episodes are on the discs.

    I suppose you could use this for shows other than the Simpsons...but why?

    1. Re:what i've wanted by zsmooth · · Score: 5, Informative

      Tivo doesn't re-record episodes it already has recorded. It looks at the schedule to see which episode is being aired and compares that to ones already saved.

    2. Re:what i've wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It compares the first few minutes of closed captioning, and can tell if it has already recorded that episode...

    3. Re:what i've wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well this isn't Tivo, from the looks of it, its PVR fuctionality is very minor. Personally I'd love it if Panasonic would have licensed the tivo software and used that as the interface for this device. I'd buy it in a heartbeat. But we really don't know much about the interface with this device and the discription leaves more questions than answers.
      Anyways its clear that this device doesn't use a service to get its listings, and apparently it has to be programmed like an old style VCR.

    4. Re:what i've wanted by holmesIV · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a limit to the time it won't repeat. It will rerecord something it recorded over I think it is 90 days ago. I'm not sure it it would rerecord it if it still had it on the drive, but it doesn't avoid reruns.

    5. Re:what i've wanted by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      The limit is 30 days. And it still won't record a dupe of something that you have on the hard drive, no matter how long ago you recorded it (this is assuming that it can tell that it's the same show of course).

      You can also tell it not to record re-runs for a Season Pass, period. Assuming that they're appropriately marked in the guide data.

    6. Re:what i've wanted by zsmooth · · Score: 0

      The point was, he said he didn't know how it would do it, while the Tivo does it, so it's possible.

    7. Re:what i've wanted by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Anyways its clear that this device doesn't use a service to get its listings, and apparently it has to be programmed like an old style VCR.

      Which means it will not be tied to a subscription (like TIVO), which further means that it will likely be available in Canada (unlike TIVO).
      Besides, it's not that hard to program an old school VCR.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    8. Re:what i've wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you sick of the antics of O.J. yet?

    9. Re:what i've wanted by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


      The real pisser is that TiVo can only avoid re-runs of pre-recorded material when the guide description for the episode is available. Believe you me, I wish the Anna Nichole show had its program guide description complete. My Tivo records every airing and it plays like twice a day!
      Seth
    10. Re:what i've wanted by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      Just to be pedantic, I'm pretty sure it's actually 28 days. The only website reference I can find is here. And it is for the uk, but I'm pretty sure my TIVO says the same thing, and I live in the U.S.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  15. DMCA by e8johan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this a violation to the DMCA... By playing back a DVD in a player encoded for one region and burning it down in another I break the copyright! Go out and arrest some engineers, see if you can get a CEO too...

    This makes me wounder when TV broadcasts will come with a signal saying that the show can only be seen once, then the recording will be deleted.

    Except from my fears of stupid politicians, I think that this is great progress. If I wait for half an hour before watching the movies on TV, I can fast forward past all the ads... hmm, I like that!

    1. Re:DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      This isnt the first time I have noticed the Consumer Electronics industry ignoring (or side stepping) the MPAA and RIAA.

      Its a great thing really and its logical. Consumer Electronics manufactuers want to sell hardware (to make money). They see that selling electronics that enable digital recording has a broad appeal (better quality recording, very long life time, current technology, etc...). So they have a choice - Help a couple of orginizations make money (and they make nothing) or produce the good that will bring in the Green. The decision is obvious.

    2. Re:DMCA by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This makes me wounder when TV broadcasts will come with a signal saying that the show can only be seen once, then the recording will be deleted

      The studios are trying to get exactly this. Actually, they don't feel that this is adequate either - they want to have time-limited recordings and remotely deletable recordings.

      In the ongoing HDTV wars between the equipment manufacturers and the studios (with the broadcasters caught in the middle), about a year and a half or so ago the studios once again whined about there being insufficient copy protection on DTV broadcasts. They wanted all set top boxes and recording devices to comply to an as-of-yet-unspecified standard that would allow for them to set flags allowing maximum number of viewings, time durations, and remote delete capability.

      The electronics manufacterers told them to go fuck themselves.

      HDTV does have a "do not record" bit in the broadcast. But that's it. The attempts to get more invasive control have failed, and while the cable companies and studios are still pouting, the reality is that it's a dead issue now. There are too many HD receivers out there already and the US government has mandated that all TVs will be manufactured with decoders in the next few years - at that point the installed base is too big to change it. And the various companies will have the choice of selling their wares with "insufficient" copy control or not selling them at all.

      Darn.

    3. Re:DMCA by sporty · · Score: 2

      Or, if the device companies are forced to use DRM of some sorts, mod chips will skyrocket.. or easy hacks that allow easy viewing. Look at region control and how many dvd players have simple ways of switching it that are straight forward and "hidden".

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    4. Re:DMCA by Steve+B · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Consumer Electronics manufactuers want to sell hardware (to make money).

      And they do not want a million calls from Joe Sixpack demanding to know why the box didn't record and play back whenever he wants, just like his old VCR.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    5. Re:DMCA by "Zow" · · Score: 2
      By playing back a DVD in a player encoded for one region and burning it down in another I break the copyright!

      No can do dude. I've got the previous generation of Panasonic DVD recorder (the E20), and if I try to play a DVD on my Sampo (with Macrovison disabled) and record it on the Panasonic, the Panasonic pops up an error message and refuses to start recording. (Not that I actually want to copy and DVDs, I just wanted to see if I could.)

      -"Zow"

  16. DVR's and Digital Cable by Dyvim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only I don't like about TiVO and the rest of the DVR's is that they don't work well with Digital Cable settop boxes. I have AT&T Broadband, and you can only record the channel that the cable box is set to. This kinda removes all functionality of the TiVO, since it can't change channels when a show is on, and it can't record one and watch another.
    I heard that the TiVO for DirectTV can do this stuff? Anyone have one and is it true?
    Anyone know of a future release where the TiVO and the set-top boxes work together?
    The DVR's are cool, but until they get this functionality, they are limited in use.

    --
    -A
    1. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by mgs1000 · · Score: 1
      Yep, the Directv Tivo has 2 "tuners", so it can record two shows at once. Or you can watch a show and record another. Or you can record two shows at once and watch a third previously-recorded show.

      The solution to your problem is to get Directv. Unfortunately, it may not be possible where you live.

      Did I mention that you can extract video from Directivo and burn it on dvd. (If you happen to have a DVD burner in your computer)

    2. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Panasonic Showstopper (ReplayTV) has an "IR Blaster" that sticks to the front of my digital cable box. When I hit channel up or down on the Showstopper, it relays my channel change via the IR Blaster to the cable box.

    3. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by gss · · Score: 3, Informative

      TiVo actually does work well with digital cable boxes. It uses an IR blaster to change channels, or if you're lucky you can hook up certain cable boxes with a serial cable, which is more reliable than the IR blaster. I'm not sure if the Panasonic devices have this capability but most others do.

    4. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      Tivo For DirectTV? Yes all the things you've heard are true, because its the same box. Basically you can get from DirectTV a tuner that has TiVo features. I believe you don't even have to pay for the Tivo Schedule Serivce either as it uses the DirectTV schedule feed. Anyways the downside though, I believe it does have some restrictions on recording payperview and some other stuff, but thats pretty understandable as its sold by the same guys.

    5. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by radish · · Score: 2

      Tivo works fine with digital cable. When you use Tivo you don't watch "live" tv, hence the problem never arises. You watch everything off disk, and let it change channel to as much as it likes.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hold on, did you just say you have AT&T Broadband?
      http://www.tivo.com/2.0.asp
      They are apparently now selling a version just for AT&T for only $199 dollar

    7. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

      Time Warner is now offering the Exlorer 8000 digital cable box with DVR functionality. Tivo has much better software, but there are advantages to using TW's box.

      Here are some of the features/points:
      1. No capital outlay of ~$300.
      2. Service fee is $10 above normal cost of digital cable.
      3. 40 hour recording
      4. Dual tuner (it sounds like DirectTivo in that you can watch two things while recording a third).
      5. It works with the built in program guide. No searching for actor or title like Tivo.
      6. The software is pretty buggy but functional.

      I am very happy with the unit. My wife loves it even though she did not really want to get it.

    8. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Informative

      I heard that the TiVO for DirectTV can do this stuff? Anyone have one and is it true?

      Yes it can do this because the TiVo is built into the DirecTV unit. In fact, it has two tuners, so you can record two shows at once, also. (That is how it allows you to watch TV while it's recording another show... dual tuners.)

      Anyone know of a future release where the TiVO and the set-top boxes work together?

      This would involve your cable company releasing a PVR, because the PVR and digital cable box have to be integrated in order to do what you're talking about. It would also need dual tuners.

      I know TimeWarner announced plans to release their own PVR for their digital cable service, but no news lately. As a die-hard TiVo user, and a TW digital cable subscriber, I am torn. I love the TiVo, but if TW's PVR is integrated nicely with their digital cable, I would definitely consider switching over.

      (When they made the announcement, they didn't specify who was providing the PVR technology ... it could be "in-house" or perhaps they're leasing from TiVo or someone else.)

      NEWS FLASH... I just did a news.google.com search, and found this article, which states they are already testing it in 2 markets, and hope to have it in 18 markets by year's end. It is $5-$10 per month for the PVR service, and you get the box at no extra charge!

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    9. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by flagstone · · Score: 1

      (When they made the announcement, they didn't specify who was providing the PVR technology ... it could be "in-house" or perhaps they're leasing from TiVo or someone else.)

      NEWS FLASH... I just did a news.google.com search, and found this article, which states they are already testing it in 2 markets, and hope to have it in 18 markets by year's end. It is $5-$10 per month for the PVR service, and you get the box at no extra charge!


      Just to clarify...in Austin, it is $6/month for the box plus $10/month for the service (the box for DVR is the same price as the box for standard digital cable). Also, it is not licensed from Tivo; it is an in-house service running on a SA-8000 box. As such, it currently does not provide all of the services Tivo provides (since it is still release 1.0, basically).
      --
      These people have looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    10. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by Buran · · Score: 2

      Charter doesn't enable the direct link function, and with many cable boxes (including Charter's) the IR blaster doesn't always work. I don't have a TIVO yet but I'm addicted due to a friend who does have one (so I'll buy one after I move). His solution? A "black box" that covers the IR blaster and the sensor on the cable box so there's virtually no way the "change channel" command can be missed.

      My solution, after I move and buy a TIVO? Not use digital cable. Forget about cable boxes -- they're more headache than they're worth. I temporarily don't have a TV, so I unplugged the cable box... and Charter sent a service guy to my apartment to find out why. Uhm? Why do I need my cable box plugged in if I have no TV temporarily, and what business is it of theirs anyway?

    11. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by Wanker · · Score: 2

      And even better, apparently that serial port connection into the digial cable box is now functional.

      http://attbroadband.tivo.com/0.5.asp (announcement)

      http://attbroadband.tivo.com/0.5.1.asp (setting up the Tivo serial connection)

      Wonder if it works on the series one recorders?

    12. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by attobyte · · Score: 1

      Can you give us some more information on extracting them and burning them with your computer. That just might make me get a tivo system.

      Atto

      --
      I didn't use the preview button, so get over it!!!!

      Mike

    13. Re:DVR's and Digital Cable by mgs1000 · · Score: 1
      Check the directv hacking forums on dealdatabase.com, there is more than enough information in there.

      http://www.dealdatabase.com/forum/

      Have fun

  17. Money, money, money by McCart42 · · Score: 2

    This sounds great, but I really don't think combination devices like these are going to take off until the price comes down a lot (say, about half of what it is now). DVD recordable drives themselves are just beginning to get down to affordable levels.

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    1. Re:Money, money, money by mblase · · Score: 2

      Well, duh. ANY new technology costs too much when it's first introduced. Early adopters pick it up, help work out the bugs, and gradually the tech becomes more available and prices come down.

      It's not supposed to "take off" at this price. This is the normal life cycle for any new consumer electronic device, and gradually (if the demand is there) they will take off or fail quietly.

  18. In other news... by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jack Valenti sees press release, has massive breakdown and is committed to a mental institution, rocking back and forth, muttering softly to himself.

    Seriously though, how long will it be before this thing ends up on the wrong end of a protracted legal battle? If the networks, MPAA and whoever else controls the content don't like the mere PVR, imagine the controversy that this little box should cause.

    The lawyers rejoice yet again.

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:In other news... by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      This would have Jack Valenti spinning in his grave.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if they get into a legal battle, like the Rio won for mp3 players, and like JVC won for VHS, they'll win. They're selling hardware, which has legitimate substantial non-infringing uses. They even go so far as checking the signal to determine how many copies a user is allowed to have. They might get sued, but they're not going to loose, and yes, the lawyers will rejoice, because they'll be the only people who are happy.

    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Jack Valenti sees press release, has massive breakdown and is
      committed to a mental institution, rocking back and forth, muttering
      softly to himself." ...and i had a window and i could see the squirrels, and they were married... ...i believe you have my stapler.

  19. Riding the wave of technology into the future by RichMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The consumer technology industry is moving so much faster than the media giants brains it is amazing. I bet the RIAA would nuke the factories making these devices if they had the ability.

    Archeaologists have been able to recover sounds from pottery spun thousands of years ago. The recording industry (AKA the people that charge $ for recordings) is going to have to adapt to the fact that once something is transmitted broadcast, acted or spoken out, it is released into the collective state of existance and is available to all.

    1. Re:Riding the wave of technology into the future by ceswiedler · · Score: 2

      The recording industry (AKA the people that charge $ for recordings) is going to have to adapt to the fact that once something is transmitted broadcast, acted or spoken out, it is released into the collective state of existance and is available to all.

      Unfortunately, this means that professionally produced media would disappear. Writers, actors, musicians, and directors would make very little money, and therefore find other jobs. This includes non-entertainment media, e.g. computer reference books. Why should I spend my time writing a reference book, if as soon as I publish it, the entire world can read it for free?

      Do you really think that you can get all the media (which you currently pay for) for free? TANSAAFL. It's in your best interest to find some (reasonable) way to pay for it.

    2. Re:Riding the wave of technology into the future by RichMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Values will shift. That is the dynamic of society.

      I see plays and live action still performed. I see bands still playing live performaces. Live entertainment will still exist.

      I see actor salaries at $10e6 for a movie or $1e6 per episode disappearing. I see that as good.
      I see professional sports salaries of $5e6 a year disappearing. I see that as good. Live events will continue at much more reasonable levels.

      Books and other media will continue in some form. Possibly paid from some large pool based on recognition and contribution to society. A whole lot of distribution and sales people will be removed from the process.

      Societies change. The free information age is bringing change.

  20. Great idea, but.... by matlokheed · · Score: 3, Informative
    ... I didn't see anything in the specs that would help you get information off of the machine. I love the idea that it pauses live TV. I think it's terrific that it can store shows you want to record. Burning is a great thing to do with TV shows. But with no way to get the show off of the box (outside of using a DVD), there's no way I'd be able to cut out the commercials for my archiving of old shows I want to watch.

    Why no ethernet port? Or even just a usb port that'd let it work like an excess hard disk for an external PC. It seems like it runs most of the race well, but gives up on the last lap.

    --

    "If the good lord had intended us to walk, he wouldn't have invented roller skates." -Willy Wonka

  21. This is NOTHING like a TIVO. Missing features! by Viewsonic · · Score: 4, Informative

    It doesn't have daily updates of program guide data to select shows to record, subscriptions, actor/director lists, no on guide info while watching. No thumbs up or down.. Basically everything that makes TIVO awesome is NOT on this. They're getting there, but I suspect the only people releasing something of what we want is TIVO themselves.

    1. Re:This is NOTHING like a TIVO. Missing features! by mblase · · Score: 2

      Would it be theoretically possible (not for this machine, maybe, but in the future) for TiVo to offer a CD/DVD with their software on it, enabling full TiVo support with a paid subscription? If so, I can see these machines someday becoming widespread and TiVo becoming the next AOL... a TVSP, perhaps?

    2. Re:This is NOTHING like a TIVO. Missing features! by mobets · · Score: 1

      so, what yo are saying is that we can use it like a VCR and not worry about monthly service fees? Cool, there is no reason for my VCR to be plugged into a phone line.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    3. Re:This is NOTHING like a TIVO. Missing features! by jayntguru · · Score: 1

      I get so tired of hearing this. Everybody wants to claim XX PVR device is "just like Tivo." That is silly. That is like saying Windows XP is just like Linux because it has the same feature set. There's more to a device/OS/PVR than just the features listed on the box. -Jay long time Tivo owner

      --
      -Jay
    4. Re:This is NOTHING like a TIVO. Missing features! by Rushwind · · Score: 1

      Exactly so. However, it seems that it might make a pretty good stand-in for that "Save to VCR" function... Keep your Tivo, add a DVD burner (let it be a backup TV recorder if you must, but I'd just ignore the PVR part), and voila! All the Buffy you could ever want, on nice, unmarked DVD-Rs that you don't have to explain to Mom.

    5. Re:This is NOTHING like a TIVO. Missing features! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what I've done with Enterprise -- it rocks!

    6. Re:This is NOTHING like a TIVO. Missing features! by "Zow" · · Score: 2

      What's more, I've got the Panasonic E20 DVD Recorder (almost identical to the E30 mentioned in the story), and let me tell you: its user interface sucks. It's weird, jumping between the DVD-R and the TiVo is like jumping between a 1986 Yugo missing second gear, and a mint Jag, in terms of useability (although the Panasonic does much better on the quarter mile than the Yugo :-)

      -"Zow"

  22. Works fine w/ Digital Cable by alexhmit01 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had a Replay hooked up to AT&T Broadband for a year. You use the included IR Blaster, which sticks to the IR Receiver and changes the box's signal. Now that I have DirecTV, my Replay connects via Serial cable, I just bought an older receiver that works with it.

    I'm waitting on an HD Tivo Series 2 DirecTivo, which I expect to come out within the year. Then I can timeshift my HDTV programming. In the mean time, the 100GB drive I installed in the Replay should suffice.

    I was tempted to grab this, as I could drop-in replace my Progressive Scan DVD player and get archiving capability. However, I really don't want to buy any more gear until the HD Tivo comes out.

    Dish has an HD PVR in the works, I can't imagine DirecTV won't get one out soon, given that Tivo has gone on record stating that the Series 2 COULD handle it.

    Alex

    1. Re:Works fine w/ Digital Cable by LionMage · · Score: 1

      That's nice that you were able to get the IR blaster working. I never could, but then, I have digital cable from Qwest (the local phone monopoly in Phoenix, AZ) rather than Cox or AT&T. I contacted ReplayTV about supporting my cable box, and although they supposedly implemented support, it never worked.

      What we really need is a standard bus for consumer electronics devices to communicate with one another, so that hard-disk TV recorder devices can talk to cable boxes without kludges like "IR blasters."

      Personally, I can say that it really sucks having to program two different devices in my house to record shows.

    2. Re:Works fine w/ Digital Cable by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

      Firewire perhaps? :)

      I'm really psyched that Firewire will make everything nice... Replace the 50 wires behind my TV with 6 or 7? Wow! Who knows though, this DVI push is gumming up the works... its a shame, because Firewire would be SO nice. Send the sound and signal around that way, and have the devices figure it out among themselves? Receivers could take the legacy devices and encode the video (HA, wishful thinking).

      I had AT&T Broadband, as did the post I was responded to.

      I agree, a control standard would be nice, but we'll never directly see it. Firewire could do it all though, that that would.

      Wow, I never actually spoke to anyone that got the promised phone/cable competition from the telecom act (back in 1996, right?), glad you found something.

      I feel that after decades of wandering, we're really hitting a point where television and HT technology is getting there.

      HDTV is awesome... if only someone could get the delivery mechanism right. HD-DVD, HD-PVRs, that will revolutionize things. When the random cable channels start broadcasting in 480p 16x9 (EDTV, not HDTV, but still progressive-scan DVD quality), we'll be there...

      PVRs are the most amazing thing to hit the market, IMO, blowing away Laserdisc and DVDs contribution, as they really change things. DVD is nice, but HD-DVD will get us where we should be.

      Alex

  23. Philips has had this for a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    um. philips has had both, and in fact with the philips stand-alone DVD+RW recorder it will even allow basic video editting to produce your own DVD for others to view, complete with menu and such.

    and of course philips was the first to manufacture the Tivo hardware units.

  24. I had to check by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2, Troll

    To see if amazon sells this product. They do. Check out the used products you can get it for around $800.

    1. Re:I had to check by devnullkac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Interesting how Amazon jacks up the "List Price" by $300 (vs. Panasonic's MSRP) so they can claim that "You Save" that much.

      --
      What do you mean they cut the power? How can they cut the power, man? They're animals!
    2. Re:I had to check by funwithstuff · · Score: 1

      Hey! Ralph Whitbeck! Stop sticking your Amazon referral URL in otherwise content-free Amazon-promoting comments! You've done this (and been flamed for it) in plenty of other similarly uninteresting posts.

      And in your sig too. You'll go blind, you know.

      --
      it's not about the karma, it's about the whuffie
  25. Tivo has been this way even without digital cable. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1
    You run your coax straight through the Tivo. Sure, you can run RCA jacks and split the coax to the TV and TIVO, but you can do the same thing with Digital Cable - Get a second digital tuner box. It's not the TIVO that is the issue, it's the Digital Cable that is the problem. What you're waiting for is a Tivo with two tuners, the dish version of the Tivo has this, and allows you to record two/watch programs at the same time. Why they havent released a consumer upgrade for the standard TIVO is unknown.

    One problem will exist still though, to record and watch the same things, only ONE can be set to DIGITAL while the other CANNOT record through digital because the DIGITAL BOX can only DECODE one stream per box.

  26. Why are people still buying TiVos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OK seriously, ReplayTV is:
    Cheaper to purchase than TiVo
    MUCH easier to upgrade the HD
    Comes with a 10/100 NIC built in
    Has a better menu system
    AUTOMATICALLY SKIPS COMMERICALS
    Is 3$ cheaper a month for service.
    Lets you tell your DVR to record something from anywhere that has a net connection.
    Ect, ect.
    Ohh, and there is already easy to use java software to pull or push video from/to the ReplayTV with your Win/MAC/Linux/Whatever box.

    1. Re:Why are people still buying TiVos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheaper to purchase than TiVo

      A 40 hour Replay unit is $50 more, a 80 hour unit is the exact same price. And yes, I'm considering the "new" Replay units, which now have a subscription fee as well.

      MUCH easier to upgrade the HD

      What crack are you on? It doesn't get any simpler to upgrade the Tivo's HD. You burn a boot CD, boot from the CD (after removing the drives) and type a few commands that are listed exactly for you. It's that simple. Search for Hinsdale's upgrade guide, detailing every possible HD upgrade you could want to do.

      Comes with a 10/100 NIC built in

      Series 2 boxes need a $20 USB Ethernet dongle, granted.

      Has a better menu system

      Subjective. I find the Replay menus confusing and irritating, personally.

      AUTOMATICALLY SKIPS COMMERICALS

      Doesn't work. I've tried it, I've read the Replay forums, I never got it to work. Turning it on made it, invariably, skip portions of the show. No thanks.

      Is 3$ cheaper a month for service.

      Same price for lifetime. And Replay is raising it's monthly soon enough.

      Lets you tell your DVR to record something from anywhere that has a net connection.

      Yes, assuming you don't want to record anything within 24 hrs of when you tell it to record. Because it won't let you, will it?

      Tivoweb, which is a hacked program admittedly, lets you setup recordings instantly, because it's running on your Tivo, not on some Replay server somewhere.

    2. Re:Why are people still buying TiVos? by grahamX0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dunno where you're shopping, but I got my ReplayTV for 250$ retail. The HD upgrade IS easier. My commerical skip works like a champ on anything not Big 5 network. On those its 50/50, on cable shows its so close to 100% right that we don't reach for the remote anymore. The program that streams/records video from/to the ReplayTV can also automate tasks. You set up an hourly task for the Replay to chek the website while you're out of town and it gets the shows you want it to. TiVo is so very much the MAC of this competition. People seem to think its far superior without any grounding in fact.

    3. Re:Why are people still buying TiVos? by tgibbs · · Score: 2

      I believe the AT&T TiVo is now going for $200. There are vendors that sell plug & play replacement TiVo hard drives, which is about as easy as you can get.

    4. Re:Why are people still buying TiVos? by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People seem to think its far superior without any grounding in fact.

      I think my TiVo is superior because I paid $150 for it over 3 years ago. It took ReplayTV too long to get it right. Their early versions were crap. In the time it took them to make it worthwhile, lots of people already bought TiVo. What you have already is better than what you can buy for more money.

    5. Re:Why are people still buying TiVos? by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

      But can you get ReplayTV in the UK?

    6. Re:Why are people still buying TiVos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno where you're shopping, but I got my ReplayTV for 250$ retail.

      Anywhere. A 40 hr Tivo is $199. A 40 hr Replay is, like you said, $250.

      The HD upgrade IS easier.

      No, it's not. Really. It's the same pretty much either way. Replay hacker have made a Win32 GUI Tool to do drive expansions as well as a Linux boot floppy, Tivo hackers have mfstools 2.0, which will not only upgrade your Tivo (using a linux boot disk or boot CD), but also improve the spacing of the partitions and increase swap space to make it run faster.

      But either way, the difficulty level is about the same. Having done both, I can honestly say this without flinching. Unless you happen to think that a GUI is really easier than typing a command line when the entire command line is given to you, verbatim.

      People seem to think its far superior without any grounding in fact.

      People don't think Tivo is far superior, they know for a fact that it is. The fact that Replay still can't deal with a changing episode size gracefully, has no ToDo list, a confusing priority and space management scheme, and all the things that you actually *use* on a daily basis is evidence enough for me.

      Replay has Tivo beat on whiz-bang stuff, but the neat whiz-bang features like the web interface that doesn't work within 24 hrs, or the show transfer that takes it 3 days to send a 1 hr episode to someone, or the show transfer to the PC using the unsupported software.. These are bits that the average Joe User won't use and doesn't give a shit about. These things don't matter as much as the day to day features that Replay simply cannot compete with.

    7. Re:Why are people still buying TiVos? by grahamX0r · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute, you can't claim the TiVo upgrade to be easier "unless cli is too hard for someone" AND then claim that this mythical someone won't use the features in a Replay. I don't have any idea what you're refering to about episode size. I haven't had any problems with it. The lack of a To Do list is, admittidely, an issue for the normal user and occasionally annoying for the power user. Back to the Mac/PC argument. TiVo is a great product for joe average, but this is slashdot, and no one here is joe average (or, at least, no one here would admit to it). Replay has much better features and "tricky bits" for a power user. The fact that last night's two "Buffy" episodes from FX automatically get backed up to my video/audio server PC overnight with about five whole minutes of setup is something that TiVo isn't and apprently won't compete against. Yes, TiVo is a great product for those people who can't manage to get the VCR to stop flashing "12:00", but for the people I was speaking to, ReplayTV is WAY better.

    8. Re:Why are people still buying TiVos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute, you can't claim the TiVo upgrade to be easier "unless cli is too hard for someone" AND then claim that this mythical someone won't use the features in a Replay.

      I never said they were the same person.

      Adding a hard drive does not make you some kind of power user. Quite simply, on Tivo, to add a drive you need to know how to follow instructions. There's no reasoning or thinking really required. The instruction reads "type this: mfsbackup -xvi bob" and you type it. It's that simple. On Replay, it's much the same, with a GUI instead. But the level of computing IQ required is minimal for both cases. All the hard work has been done and it's spelled out in the documentation that you can find online.

      But the whizbang features in the Replay are not specifically power or normal user features, nor did I say they were. I said that they are inherently useless due to their limitations.

      The send show function takes 8-10 hours to send 30 minutes worth of lowest quality recording. Not it's fault, of course, but it still sucks. The Web function won't let you schedule that show that comes on this afternoon that you forgot to schedule this morning when your wife mentioned it. The skip commercials doesn't work well half the time and it gets so annoying that you end up disabling it. These limitations on the admittedly cool features turn them into little used items.

      The lack of a To Do list is, admittidely, an issue for the normal user and occasionally annoying for the power user.

      That's the problem, the normal, much more frequently used, features like the ToDo List are far more important to the average user.

      Why does the Replay give me grief about Shows moving? If a double showing of Friends comes on one week, why does it only grab the first one (they may have fixed this since I last used it)? If a special one hour Friends comes on, why does it not get it? Why can't I adjust priorities? Why is "guaranteed" limiting my ability to record non-guaranteed shows? Why does it reserve that space even when it's not in use at the moment? If I reserve space for 5 weeks of a sitcom, that's 2.5 hours that cannot be used for anything else, ever. A few sitcoms like this and I can't record anything else. And non-guarenteed just seems not to record for no obvious reason sometimes. It's hard to outguess the damn thing and get it setup properly.

      With Tivo, it's easy. Make a change, see it in ToDo. The options make more sense. *Everything* is guaranteed, in that if I tell it to record, then it will record or tell me why not, right then and there. No guessing.

      Back to the Mac/PC argument. TiVo is a great product for joe average, but this is slashdot, and no one here is joe average (or, at least, no one here would admit to it). Replay has much better features and "tricky bits" for a power user.

      Yes, but having cool tricky bits doesn't save them from having the bits that *everyone* uses, power user or not.

      So you setup a way to backup your Buffy episodes nightly. Good for you. Now, when Replay wins their case for the show sharing features (oh, you did know they were being sued over that, right?) then I know Tivo will have the exact same feature announced and out within a week or two. But meanwhile, you're giving up needed functionality for uncertain techy functionality that may not stick around forever and is of dubious value to most people in any case. Okay, so we're not most people, but that doesn't make your solution the right one even for the techhead.

      And let's not forget, the average techhead on this forum is a Linux techhead. Tivo runs Linux. You can get a shell on the thing. You can get access to the drive. If you want, you can extract the video with numerous tools. You can automate it. You can add network cards. You can even add wireless networking to the damn thing. Don't want to spend the money on a network adapter, no problem, do PPP over the serial port to achieve the same thing (albeit slower).

      Hell, you can add On Screen Caller ID, with the existing hardware no less. Tell me you can do all this kind of cool whizbang addon shit to the Replay like you can to the Tivo... There's people making hardware addon boards for the device. Guy over on the tivocommunity forums is talking about adding inline caching cards for the harddrives to improve access speeds... even integrating it with a form of hardware RAID 0 to get more space capabilities!

      For the techhead who likes to get into the machine and mess around, Tivo is the most obvious choice because it's so open by comparison. Replay simply gets left in the dust in terms of techhead geekiness.

    9. Re:Why are people still buying TiVos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but when the dust settles, TiVo will be the PVR that lasts. TiVo is not being sued by the MPAA, the RIAA, and the broadcast networks over a stupidly blatent "commercial skip" button. TiVo is not being sued over the worthless "share a program over the net" Replay feature that is too slow to actually use in reality. TiVo is the defacto PVR standard. It slayed UltimateTV. It will outlast this cripped DVD burner poser-TiVo. I consider myself a power user, but I want a machine that will last. I don't want a 21st Century Betamax or Atari ST. TiVo focuses on its software, and less on gimmick hardware. Would I like ethernet to be built into TiVo? Yes. But I just purchased a $20 USB to Ethernet Adapter and changed the dialing functions so it makes its daily call over my broadband connection instead of the phone line. Big deal. The only real features TiVo needs for Series 3 are Component Video Inputs and Outputs, and a second tuner. These cheeseheads on Slashdot seem to think the DirecTivo has dual tuners...it has none. The only reason why it can record two shows at once is because the signal is MPEG2 and it can decode two signals. Its cheap, versus having to install two analog tuners into a stand alone PVR. That is also why the DirecTivo will only work with DirecTV and not as a stand-alone Tivo.
      The best thing SonicBlue can do is to settle the lawsuits with MPAA, RIAA, and the broadcasters by discontinuing Replay...drop the intellectual property (IP) lawsuit(s) with Tivo, merge their IP with Tivos, and become a Tivo licensee and put in the extra bells and whistles and emphasize integration with the Rio product line in their own branded Tivo. I myself would buy that because SonicBlue would load it up on the extras like Firewire, Ethernet, and USB 2.0 ports. Hell, maybe even Bluetooth support might be doable. But as it stands, no way is my hard earned money going for a Replay today, gone tomorrow machine...
      And on a sidenote, TiVo Series2 will be programmable from the internet via AOL shortly...and you'll be able to run Instant Messenger on it as well...details to be announced in a few short months...

  27. How about FireWire...? by Raetsel · · Score: 2

    It's got that IEEE-1394 port (they call it "DV in"). I wonder exactly how much function that port allows... I mean, you can get info to the internal hard drive via it, so what will happen if you attach a Mac or one of those nice little Shuttle SS-51s instead of a camcorder?
    • (Here's hoping it - like the iPod - shows up as a hard drive!)
    Guess I'll have to buy an SS-51 when I buy one of these.
    --

    "...America's great minds of today, teaching America's great minds of tomorrow. Poor bastards." -- A Beautiful Min
    1. Re:How about FireWire...? by karnal · · Score: 2

      Maybe you could pull the OS off of it, or maybe even copies of Office!!! :)

      --
      Karnal
  28. Re:Tivo has been this way even without digital cab by Quixotic137 · · Score: 1

    Why they havent released a consumer upgrade for the standard TIVO is unknown.

    DirecTiVo records the MPEG stream directly from the satellite, rather than re-encoding it. The standard TiVo has to do too much processing to record two shows at once.

  29. Here's a review by rfischer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's a review

    1. Re:Here's a review by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 1, Troll

      It reads more like a sales-pitch than a review!

      "the unique Time Slip feature allows viewers to replay a scene recorded 30 seconds earlier without disrupting the recording process, simply by touching a button on the remote"

      Err, not only is that sales-speak, but the last time I checked the meaning of the word unique it was: Without an equal or equivalent. Now someone correct me if I'm wrong -- but doesn't the Tivo and ReplayTV have this feature too??

      There's nothing worse or more valueless than an advertorial "review".

  30. Re:Riding the wave of technology into the (O/T) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Archeaologists have been able to recover sounds from pottery spun thousands of years ago


    Huh? Care to provide a link?

  31. Linux solutions? by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2

    When I though about trying to do this a while back, it didn't look like it was a no-brainer. There were some groups trying to put the pieces together, but it would be nice to have some definitive information about just what is required to make this work. It's got to be better and more flexible than a dedicated box like this, or it has to run on older hardware so I can use an old PII or something. If its not cheaper, it has to be better.

    1. Re:Linux solutions? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      And it IS cheaper... even if you don't have a pII sitting around, you can throw together a cheap athlon for $280, plus a dvd writer for $200, and you're around $500, add your programs... and you save $500, or more if they start charging monthly fees.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    2. Re:Linux solutions? by masoncooper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, a linux solution is closer than you'd think. Check out MythTV. This guy has been working on a PVR in Linux running fairly cheap hardware. Definately worth a look-see.

    3. Re:Linux solutions? by RC+Pavlicek · · Score: 2, Informative
      FWIW:

      Here's a page describing a US$300 Linux solution I put together:

      http://linuxprofessionalsolutions.com/pavlicek/tv. html

    4. Re:Linux solutions? by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
      Exactly what I was asking about. Looks like this project was just getting started when I looked around before. Almost ready for prime time, and plenty of functionality to make it worthwhile now. Now if I only had some spare cash to dump into this. Oh well, it will be cheaper and better when I do.

      Thanks for the link.

    5. Re:Linux solutions? by specialized_sworks · · Score: 1

      15 FPS. No thanks.

      Not much of a 'solution'.

      -Dubya

    6. Re:Linux solutions? by RC+Pavlicek · · Score: 1

      > 15 FPS. No thanks.

      Spend a few bucks more than I did on the TV capture card and you can get the full framerate. I've had at least one other person write me to say that he gets the full PAL framerate (25 fps, I think; I do NTSC) just by going with a slightly more expensive card. All the rest of the project stays the same, with a tweak to the "rec" script and "modules.conf" for the higher capacity card.

  32. What is a MORON? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone (including me) has that question on mind, look here

    1. Re:What is a MORON? by wolfc · · Score: 0

      If you wish to start a flamewar, at least have the guts to do under your own nick.

    2. Re:What is a MORON? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can't do that, it's more fun this way because we can all GANG-BANG YOU.

      Moron...

  33. Give 'em time-- or get a Series 1. by raygundan · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't think the series 2 units are hackable like the series 1 tivos were. There is some sort of cryptographic signature check on the config files, so it's not just a quick edit to the files to give yourself telnet and ftp.

    Somebdy will figure something out though-- in the meantime, check out the tivo forums here:

    http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/forumdispla y. php?forumid=8

    When I peeked just now, the very first thread was titled "No, you cannot hack a series 2 box (yet)" and had quite a bit of good info. Be patient, though-- somebody will figure it out. :)

  34. Missing Tivo features? Good. by iainl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've seen a few complaints in these posts about the fact that it acts like an old-fashioned VCR, and needs to be told when to record by time, rather than the Tivo-like functionality of downloading programme schedules. Thats a cool thing to have, but currently these devices charge a monthly contract fee for that, while this device is just a pay once and you're done box. Personally, I don't actually want a box that I have to pay a monthly subscription on, and doesn't dial home to let them know that I recorded last night's Scrapheap onto DVD to watch again later.

    I know better than to think that there is a single /. hive-mind, but these people complaining they want programme guides are different ones to those that bang on about privacy rights, aren't they?

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  35. I have one of these by ender_wiggins · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It has changed my tv life! I record simpsons and cut out the commericals twice a day, and slap 4 hours onto one dvd. Its great, pricy but great. There is a upgrade to 80gb drive available in the far east, but is not available here. I wish someone would fix that problem.

  36. Where are my moderation points when I need them? by rfischer · · Score: 1

    You make a good point:
    If downloading programming info means uploading my viewing habits, I prefer to cut the cord.

  37. HDTV capability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be interested when it has HDTV capability. Low resolution TV doesn't interest me. Actually, nothing much on TV interests me, but seeing basketball over an HDTV signal does make it worth watching if you are interested in the game.

  38. Devices like this are needed... by debest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..so that Joe Average user might start actually to see these in Best Buy ASAP. If combination PVR and DVD recorders begin to combine the benefits of VCRs (removable, permanent recordable storage), DVD players (high-quality video), and PVRs (instant random access, freeze, content searches, etc.), then I think that these could be huge. As demand kicks up, watch the price plummet.

    If these things get market penetration quickly, then we will be able to more effectively deflect the **AA's various fair-use restriction attempts. It's one thing for /. geeks to be up in arms over this, its quite another when a bunch of people start getting used to their "new VCR thingy", and some new laws come down which says that they'll never be able to buy another ever again!

    Market penetration is what is needed, though. The industry can afford to piss off the early adopters of analog HDTV sets (that may be obsoleted by embedded permission tags in transmissions) because there just aren't very many HDTV sets out there. And of those, a bunch don't use it to its fullest advantage (ie. won't miss 1080i broadcast quality 'cause they never saw it to start with). For these PVR/DVD-R's, we need people literally replacing their VCRs and DVD players and using the features as they were designed to be used!

    --
    Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
    1. Re:Devices like this are needed... by jimsum · · Score: 1

      Actually, it will probably be even worse for Joe Average user. All of these new devices have programmable firmware which the manufacturer can change at will any time the device "phones home" to get a program listing. Not only won't Joe be able to buy another "new VCR thingy", the VCR thingy he owns will no longer be able to do what it could at the time that he bought it!

      We need a law to ensure that owners can choose when to update, or more important, when not to update their devices.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    2. Re:Devices like this are needed... by debest · · Score: 2

      All of these new devices have programmable firmware which the manufacturer can change at will any time the device "phones home" to get a program listing. Not only won't Joe be able to buy another "new VCR thingy", the VCR thingy he owns will no longer be able to do what it could at the time that he bought it!

      All the more reason to get these things in homes ASAP, with full features enabled. Joe Average will scream murder even bloodier if his current machine becomes crippled, as opposed to simply holding on to his current machine when new ones have features removed.

      The hardware manufacturers will never voluntarily do as you suggest: why would they want to insense their customers that way? (Think of it this way: why would Panasonic release the machine at all if they intended to retract features?) They would do this only after being forced to do so by lawsuit or legislation, either one of which would be (finally) highly publicized and be unlikely to succeed due to the outcry.

      Again, this is another opportunity to get the Joe Averages of the world to give a crap about things like this. There has never been a story since Betamax which has gained anywhere near mainstream media coverage on copyright and fair use rights issues. Most people don't rip CDs, so they won't care if they're copy protected. Most people don't watch DVDs on Linux, so they don't care if its illegal to do so. Most people don't need to turn e-books into PDFs, so they don't care if a Russian "hacker" is jailed for providing the means. But if most people are threatened with having their favorite new (and somewhat pricey) toy obsoleted or even crippled arbitrarily, you're damned right they'll care!

      --
      Look at the tomato! Isn't it sad? He can't dance! Poor tomato!
  39. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    these people complaining they want programme guides are different ones to those that bang on about privacy rights, aren't they?

    Nope. I want a program guide and I care about my privacy. That's why I have a Tivo. They have a comprehensive privacy policy that the software actually adheres to (as verified by independant parties.. aka hackers). The data it sends back by default really and truly is anonymous. You can opt-out thru their phone number, and they send a command to the box itself to stop sending data back (also verified independantly). Or, if you like, you can opt-in to identify your data and let it be used for more useful things, although there's not much point in that as of yet.

    1. Re:Nope by iainl · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info - I've heard so many scare stories about the devices 'phoning home' that I just assumed this was the case. Mind you, I'm really more concerned with the paying £10 a month than the initial outlay, so either way this box is for me. My digital satellite service already does a very good programme guide, so I don't want to pay extra to save myself the job of reading.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  40. Bang on. by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    And that is one of the aspects, of this device, that I like, indeed prefer over Tivo. No subscriptions, no unknown software updates that could possible reduce functionality and no Tivo phone home.

    The Panasonic machine is like a VCR, you push the button and it does what you want. But, it does so in a modern format and has a few more features than today's VCR. Unlike Tivo, which I feel is severely threatened by the RIAA, this device could indeed be the next VCR.

    I don't want a device that can do anything/everything for my television, I already have a few computers. I like this specific function device and when the price hits $500, probably after Christmas, I'll get one. By then, hopefully the price of the media will also have dropped.

    1. Re:Bang on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the media is as cheap as VHS tapes

  41. Not all encoders are equal by cvd6262 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I like this thing, but, as a professional DVD author, I have to warn you that not all encoders produce equal quality video streams.

    You only have to look as far as QuickTime's encoder. Yeah, it's a software encoder that works at 2X, but it does not produce anywhere near the quality most people want, especially at low bit rate.

    Of course, this could have hardware encoding, but the real quality, either software or hardware, comes from multiple passes. If this is recording to DVD in real time, it has no chance of doing VBR.

    On pass VBR is worse that CBR.

    So, I guess you could record, but only at VHS quality.

    --

    I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    1. Re:Not all encoders are equal by ggram · · Score: 1

      That's not true, good quality at a low bit rate (relativly) comes from multiple passes. You can get a fine looking picture with a single pass, you just use a constant bit rate and throw lots of bits at it, you can't expect an optimal encoding in real time.

    2. Re:Not all encoders are equal by jimsum · · Score: 1

      I don't think the encoder part of this device is anything new. TIVOs (and the equivalent) already need to encode a show in order to record it onto a hard drive, and the many happy TIVO users must think the quality is adequate. Also, since it appears that more and more TV will be broadcast digitally (via satelite or cable) the encoding problem will ultimately be solved by the broadcaster.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    3. Re:Not all encoders are equal by cvd6262 · · Score: 2

      I should have been more specific. I was speaked of MPEG2 encoding.

      --

      I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    4. Re:Not all encoders are equal by Elvii · · Score: 2

      I know someone who has one of those - I saw it record dvd in realtime yesterday - seems cbr thou, as no matter what quality we set it to it only seemed to record 2 hrs of video to the dvd. Granted, we only read enough to set titles and make the thing record, but that's a 3 minute impression of the unit.

      --
      This sig left intentionally blank.
  42. Re:Riding the wave of technology into the (O/T) by bdr1 · · Score: 1

    Archeaologists have been able to recover sounds from pottery spun thousands of years ago
    > Huh? Care to provide a link?
    Hear! Hear!

  43. More on TimeWarner DVR by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Informative

    I did some more digging to followup on my previos post about TimeWarner's integrated DVR/Digital Cable box. They are testing it in Rochester, NY, and they have a page up here. There is a movie (infomercial) about the service where you can see what the UI looks like... does not resemble TiVo at all, so I doubt they are using TiVo. Probably custom software from Scientific-Atlanta, the people that make their digital cable box. It's called the Explorer 8000.

    It will have an 80GB drive. It will allow for PIP, watching live TV while recording another show, or recording two shows at once.

    There is no cost for the device from TW, you pay around $10 a month for the service. No installation charge if you already have TW service.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:More on TimeWarner DVR by rufo · · Score: 1

      I've heard absolutely horrible things to date about the TW DVR. As it is in testing, I don't know how much will be fixed by the time it's widely availiable, but the main thing that worries me is that it's supposed to have a tendancy to not stop recording until it runs out of disk space, corrupts itself and requires a reset of some sort. Not to mention its' tendency to just not record stuff for no reason. You can read the article on Google Groups if you like.

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
  44. Looks like a good '1.0' version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ... but after reading in a review (epinions) that it doesn't play well with a satellite receiver, I'll be waiting for the next revision. Besides, I saw one in BestBuy over the weekend, and the front panel is straight out of 1978.

    Seriously, this looks like it would be a 'killer-app' product with just a little more attention paid to the user interface. If it would talk to my DirecTV box, I'd have bought one of these already.

  45. Firewire with DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting



    Sony et all have made the requirement of drm in firewire applications. Therefore, if the format supports connectivity through firewire, in all likelyhood, the firmware contains drm that is either on by default, or can be turned on using various methods (os, discs, patches, etc).

    So has anyone done the proper due diligence on whether this product contains any unknown drm? Sony has already been caught in a news article about a month ago quietly installing drm into all of its CD/DVD drives through firmware.

  46. One time viewing? Sounds like ... by Greedo · · Score: 1

    With all the push towards deciding how many times people can view a particular event, I'm surprised the TV Studios and MPAA don't give up on TV and film entirely, and devote all their efforts into producing live theatre.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  47. step in the right direction by tgibbs · · Score: 2

    Well, it's no match for TiVo yet. I'd like to have some kind of TiVo-like service, at least as an option. I find the most useful aspect of TiVo is that it will autosearch for programs and construct a recording schedule based on a defined set of priorities. And having to entire the titles myself would be a real pain. Still, if the TiVo folks are smart, they are thinking about a DVD-recorder equipped version or DVD-recorder peripheral, because I expect that these things will ultimately take over as an archival medium.

    On the other hand it's a big step up from a VCR. The media is a bit pricey--the hours per disk they quote are of course for the lowest recording quality, which if my experience with TiVo is any guide, means horribly artifacted for anything other than talking heads. But I'm sure the blank disks will get cheaper in time.

    1. Re:step in the right direction by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      Blank DVD-R disks are down to $1 ea for 2 hours of fairly high quality recording. I'd say the media costs are already as good as or better than tape.

      You can of course do all this with a PC today. But for a lot of people it really is worth a grand just to have a single "Rec" button rather than the 25 steps to do the same thing on a PC.

      Less flexible. But infinitely easier to use.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    2. Re:step in the right direction by tgibbs · · Score: 2
      Blank DVD-R disks are down to $1 ea for 2 hours of fairly high quality recording. I'd say the media costs are already as good as or better than tape.

      The proper comparison for tape is of course to other erasable media. But you are right that they are comparable for archival purposes.

      I don't necessarily want my PC to have to be in the same room with my TV. I appreciate a cheap, self-contained dedicated box.

  48. Re:One time viewing? Sounds like ... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

    I'm surprised the TV Studios and MPAA don't give up on TV and film entirely, and devote all their efforts into producing live theatre.

    Actually, if they stopped releasing things on home video or TV and essentially forced people to go to movie theaters to watch movies, they could possibly make more money (i.e., $50 for taking your family to a movie versus $5 for renting the video at blockbuster). The theater companies would be happy; consumers most likely would not.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  49. Apple by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2


    Although I haven't heard more than rumors, this sounds a lot like a PVR device that I would expect Apple to produce--down to the pricetag being 2.5x the competition ($400 for a TiVo vs. $1K for this.) Hm, lets' see: SuperDrive, FireWire. Figure that Apple throws in a better show finder than TiVo, and connects it to .Mac for either the same price as this, or maybe a little more. Watch for it 11/5.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  50. Toshiba Panasonic by unFKNreal · · Score: 1

    Personally I'm waiting for the Toshiba RD-X1. Its supposed to be available now, and has an 80 Gig drive as opposed to a 40. The price in the press release says $1500, but it can be seen on C|Net for as little as $789.

  51. oops by unFKNreal · · Score: 1

    Meant to say RD-X2. The RD-X1 was only available in Japan I think

  52. Re:Toshiba Panasonic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would go for this... If it could make disk images of my DVDs to put on the HD. I doubt though, that will ever happen (unless I build my own).

  53. For me, no program guide is a deal MAKER ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "The lack of a guide is a "deal-breaker" feature to me."

    I have ReplayTV and I do not allow telephone connections to update the program guide because of the possibility of them retrieving information about viewing habits. Until someone provides a program guide over a broadcast medium (i.e., not telephone, Internet or cable box), I will be entering data manually.

  54. No, they wouldn't be CSSed by Kjella · · Score: 2

    ...because if you did, you could legally claim to be allowed to break CSS as the copyright holder, provided you could get your own recordings CSSed.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  55. What size is your tinfoil hat? by jcrash · · Score: 1


    Really, I don't care if someone knows what I watch. I think there are a lot more interesting things in the world than looking at my viewing habits.

    Even if I watched porn 24x7, I wouldn't care. I've got better things to do with my time than entering 150 channels of program guide 365 days a year.

    --
    I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
  56. Re:Toshiba Panasonic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just purchased the HS2 last night. Funny it showed up on Slashdot. The toshiba might have a leg up in quality since it can do a bit for bit video/audio transfer from HDD to DVD.

    "One major benefit of this process is that during High-Speed Dubbing, from the HDD to the DVD-RAM, digital audio and video signals retain their original integrity. The video signal is not decoded to baseband then re-encoded to MPEG-2. This helps to insure consistent digital picture quality and reduces artifacts when dubbing to DVD-RAM."

    I like the unit so far but I haven't figured out how to make my panasonic record on a schedule since I use a digital tv box. At least this stuff is out on the market but I'm not sure if I'm going to keep the damn thing.

    My wish? Ability to have a set top box like this (just works better than all the ATI, snap stream, etc. crap) and get video/audio in mpeg-2 from the unit to my computer for editing. Damn. Maybe I should buy a tivo and hack it. Oh wait, that is a lot of work. What do I do?

    I wonder what the hard drive on my panasonic looks like. Wouldn't it be cool if it stored files in mpeg-2?

  57. troll: you have this the other way around by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


    Perhaps you made a simple typo here. Not sure. Maybe you just don't know.

    Let's do the math-- 1 DVD player yeilds a profit no greater than maybe $20-$50 for a hardware manufacturer. Subsequent purchases of DVD movies yeilds a profit of perhaps $5.00 per copy sold. If the owner of the DVD player purhcases 20 DVD titles, that's a profit of $100. The asian hardware manufacturers are making pennies compared to the hundreds of millions made by entertainment producers.
  58. A better answer for digital cable, too by swb · · Score: 2

    I have digital cable and it has a great guide with it. Program details, run times, etc etc. It's included with my cable service.

    Tivo would give me a better recording-oriented guide, but I can't see it being all that much better for watching.

    Plus, Tivo can't decode digital cable internally anyway, so I end up with multiple guides. The extra money for the Tivo service doesn't seem worth it.

  59. Broadcast program guides by tgibbs · · Score: 2

    I can't say that I particularly care if they retrieve my info, but if I hear that they are making money from selling it, I'm going to be asking for a cut.

    By the way, there exists a broadcast medium for program info. I have a device called Starsight, which controls my VCR. It doesn't have a phone connection, but picks up program info that is apparently co-broadcast on PBS channels. The device itself is decidedly inferior to Tivo, however, because it won't do searches.

    I used to have an even better program guide/VCR control device--nearly as good as Tivo, in fact--that used the pager network to deliver the info. Unfortunately, they got bought up by the company that owns Starsight, who discontinued the service.

  60. Re:Where are my moderation points when I need them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NEWS FLASH: no one gives a crap
    what rfischer watches. the data is for cumulative analysis - like ratings.

    Freakin' LaRouchies!

  61. Re:Where are my moderation points when I need them by rfischer · · Score: 1

    I am an agent of Soviet influence.

  62. Firewire as an interconnect standard by LionMage · · Score: 1

    Well, Firewire could be made to carry control signal information in addition to multimedia content. But it's really meant for applications where high bandwidth is a requirement. It's kind of a waste to use Firewire for sending a signal from your PVR (Replay TV, TiVO, etc.) to your cable box saying "change to channel 11."

    You could make Firewire carry everything multiplexed over one cable -- it supports enough bandwidth to make this practical, at least for standard resolution video streams (but probably not for high definition video). But you'd run into a hell of a lot of opposition in the consumer electronics industry.

    The DVD Forum (aka DVD Consortium) has a standing policy banning the use of Firewire ports on DVD players. Their fear was that Firewire used as a carrier for digital video would facilitate piracy of DVD movies. Hollywood would never have jumped on the DVD bandwagon without this concession. (Interestingly, now that movie directors have gotten into DVD for their home theaters, many are doing after-market modifications of DVD players and big-screen plasma TVs to use a much higher bandwidth interconnect than Firewire for transmitting video. This takes advantage of the obvious loophole in the ban on Firewire ports for DVD players -- other digital interconnects aren't disallowed.)

    The original ReplayTV units had Firewire ports on them, with the intent that they would eventually be activated by a software revision allowing consumers to dump recorded video to an external hard drive or other storage device. Later models removed this port (and the Panasonic Replay TV unit that I own also lacks the port); the software was never updated to use the Firewire port. Again, this was a concession to big media companies concerned about piracy. Similarly, Castlewood bet the farm on the notion that PVR devices on the market would eventually incorporate Orb drives for removable storage. None of these devices ever made it to market, at least not in North America.

    Bottom line: Don't count on Firewire being a universal standard for two-way communication between home theater components any time soon. The few devices that have come out lately which burn DVDs and have Firewire capability are set up to use that port strictly to take video from a digital camcorder and transfer it to the unit's hard disk or straight to DVD.