Slashdot Mirror


1+ GHz Commodore SX-64 Mod

Spider[DAC] writes "I just found this site, about a person who modified a Commodore SX-64 to contain a 1.2 GHz PIII system. It appears to be a really cool system, and apparantly requires some specially made hardware to make it all interoperate properly. A well-documented read, and definitely something to dream about doing yourself."

316 comments

  1. imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ... a beowulf cluster of these

    1. Re:imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's this "beowulf" all about? What does it mean? Where did you copy that from?
      Hey! I'm Talking to you!

  2. Not my dream by dmanny · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    But hey, if it works for you.

    --
    All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
    1. Re:Not my dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet. Now you can PEEK and POKE even faster than you did in 1983!

  3. Now this makes me wonder... by Lukano · · Score: 1

    If I should un-mothball my old Commodore!

    COOL STUFF!

    1. Re:Now this makes me wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave it alone, in a few years an SX64 might be worth something. Especially if other SX64 owners do the mod :)

  4. You'll need that 1Ghz+ by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh, let's put it to the test with the /. effect.

    1. Re:You'll need that 1Ghz+ by buck_wild · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hope his web site isn't hosted on that thing...

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    2. Re:You'll need that 1Ghz+ by Dakisha · · Score: 3, Funny

      It gets a slow stream of hits over the course of a day or two. Slashdot throws thousands apon thousands of hits at it in a matter of mins, as we geeks have little better to do with our times than refresh ./ every 5 mins to check for a new story..

    3. Re:You'll need that 1Ghz+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know this was going to get to slashdot, so the server is basically dying... It's running off of a cable modem, so ugh... freakin' slashdot effect....

  5. What would Weird Al say? by Lothar+0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Think your Commodore 64's pretty neat?
    Put in a P3 and it'll be l33t!

    --
    "Anonymous Coward" is for whistleblowers, not unpopular opinions.
    1. Re:What would Weird Al say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pentium 3, Dorito, what's the difference?

    2. Re:What would Weird Al say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One more pun and I pull my gun.
      -Fox Mulder

  6. Yes!!! by gik · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...and definitely something to dream about doing yourself."

    Finally!! I get to dream about doing myself!!

    I love you Slashdot!

    --
    ZERO
    1. Re:Yes!!! by erroneus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Strangely, I've had that dream. It was weird.

    2. Re:Yes!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some may consider that "informative" but it's a LOT more than I needed to know...

    3. Re:Yes!!! by RebelTycoon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Itchy bum... Smelly finger.

    4. Re:Yes!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could mod this up to +10 Flipping funny!

    5. Re:Yes!!! by 1DarkZen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was it a dream where you see yourself standing in sort of sun god robes, on a pyramid with a thousand naked women screaming and throwing little pickles at you?

      --

      "If Diet Coke did not exist it would have been neccessary to invent it." -- Karl Lehenbauer
    6. Re:Yes!!! by hitzroth · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know, I'm glad I'm not the only one who has that dream.

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
  7. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > A well-documented read, and definitely something to dream about doing yourself.

    Keep dreaming.

  8. Been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    True hardware enthusiasts value the electronics, not the plastic that encloses them. That VIC-20 processor is a lot more interesting than a small form factor PC.

    1. Re:Been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Pretend I'm a bastard troll who is heckling you.
      What makes a VIC-20 any more special than a small form factor PC? Were they special "back in the day"? Oh really? Didn't think so.

    2. Re:Been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. He should have instead installed a liquid nitrogen cooling system and overclocked the bitch to 1+ Ghz!!!!!!

    3. Re:Been said before by Cryptnotic · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That VIC-20 processor is a lot more interesting than a small form factor PC.


      No it's not. The VIC-20 used an 8-bit Motorola 6502 microcontroller. It's dead simple. If you took a university course in computer systems architecture, they might have you design a similar CPU for your semester project. They might even have you build it in VHDL, which you could synthesize onto an FPGA.


      Some old systems are intersting for the nostalgia. Others are interesting for novel design. The CPU in the VIC-20 is far less interesting than the nostalgia gleamed from playing old games and reliving your childhood for an hour or so.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    4. Re:Been said before by ctar · · Score: 1

      The CPU in the VIC-20 is far less interesting than the nostalgia gleamed from playing old games and reliving your childhood for an hour or so.

      An hour !? Come on...Be honest now...

    5. Re:Been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      If you took a university course in computer systems architecture, they might have you design a similar CPU for your semester project

      Ha, try to built a 6502 in VHDL. It is much more complicated than you might imagine. You can not compare it to the simple RISC CPUs used in education.

      The fact, that there is no cycle accurate 6502-Core on the web should tell a lot...

    6. Re:Been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      both of you obviously dont know what youre talking about. the VIC referred to on the page is the VIDEO chip, not the VIC20 computer.

      amigas chips all had individual and even catchier names too.

    7. Re:Been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • The CPU in the VIC-20 is far less interesting than the nostalgia gleamed from playing old games and reliving your childhood for an hour or so.
      Obviously you've never coded a demo, for any machine. Otherwise you wouldn't be saying that. :/
    8. Re:Been said before by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      quite simply it's rarity. If all of the SX-64s in existence get dremeled to death by snot-nosed kids trying to install a window kit (whatever the fuck the point of a window in a computer is) than another - albeit small - piece of computer history will disappear. Shame on this fucker - he could have just got himself an old PII 266 x86 laptop for the same kind of money and had a perfectly fine C=64 emu running on that.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:Been said before by fitten · · Score: 1

      Except the 6502 was developed by MOS Technologies and originally made by Rockwell, not Motorola. http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?6502

    10. Re:Been said before by operagost · · Score: 1

      He's not talking about the CPU, I think. He probably meant the Video Interface Chip, which for the time was quite advanced and blew the doors off of anything else in a home computer. The VIC-II in the C64 did 300x200 in 16 colors in 1982. At the time, its closest competitor, the Apple IIe, did only 140x192 at 16 colors, and had no real sound capabilities to boot. The VIC chip was also much faster at writing to the screen. You didn't have to use page-flipping tricks to avoid flicker like with the Apple II.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    11. Re:Been said before by evil_qwerty · · Score: 1

      The 6502 was designed by M.O.S. not motorola.

    12. Re:Been said before by iocat · · Score: 1

      The Apple II did 280 x 192. However, if you wanted color, and wanted to be able to address all 6 colors (in high-res) in any "pixel," you were limited to a virtual 140 x 192. But if you're working on a green screen or amber monitor (for less eyestrain), you could easily address 280 pixels across horizontally. You were basically address color sub-pixels. Sub pixel rendering, of course, is a technology Microsoft used on the Apple II, but then "rediscovered" and patented on LCD screens. A good discussion of the subject can be found here .

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    13. Re:Been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you quote yourself in your sig so everyone will know for sure you're a flaming asshole, (in case it didnt come through in your posts) or is it just a cherry-on-top sort of thing?

    14. Re:Been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? The C64 still kicked APpLe II's ass.

    15. Re:Been said before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If all of the SX-64s in existence get dremeled to death by snot-nosed kids trying to install a window kit (whatever the fuck the point of a window in a computer is) than another - albeit small - piece of computer history will disappear.

      Oh, the fucking horror.

    16. Re:Been said before by corey_lawson · · Score: 1

      The "VIC" of VIC-20 was the VIC chip. These custom chips were the cool parts of the VIC-20 and C-64, much like the DSP56000 in the NeXT boxes was, and the current video hardware arms race.

  9. My project is the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm attempting to move the innards of a C64 into a Dell case. Wish me luck!

    1. Re:My project is the opposite by m.lemur · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good luck. It'll be an improvement on the Dell anyway.

    2. Re:My project is the opposite by secondsun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude! You killing a Dell!

      --
      There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
    3. Re:My project is the opposite by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I did just this with a 486 Packard Bell. (details)

      First, I converted the c64 motherboard to run from the PC power supply. Then I installed a 1571 floppy drive in the 5.25" drive bay. The 3.5" drive was hooked up to a 1581 controller board, and a Super Snapshot V4 rounded out the system.

      For the keyboard, I used the original C64 case (now empty) with a DB25 cable, and replaced the red power LED with a nice bright blue one. :)

    4. Re:My project is the opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ties into a pet peeve of mine: even if he 'fixed' it to "off of" it would still be wrong-o. "Off of" should always be replaced with "off".

      Aside: My name is little bongo, I sing my little song-o. I have one ear upon my head, some people say it's long-o.

    5. Re:My project is the opposite by RotHorseKid · · Score: 0

      Really cool project of yours. I'm glad to be able to glance at it before geocities cut you off...

      --
      Nobody writes jokes in base 13. - DNA
    6. Re:My project is the opposite by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      I'd rahter move my trusty 486 router into an Commodore 128D chassis. Can't find a power supply with less than 45mm (that's less than two inch) height though.

      --
      +++ath0
    7. Re:My project is the opposite by Zonekeeper · · Score: 0

      If you kill it, Dude! You're going to hell!

    8. Re:My project is the opposite by SecretAsianMan · · Score: 2

      A Commode Door and a Packard Smell... They seem quite suited to each other.

      --

      Washington, DC: It's like Hollywood for ugly people.

  10. Wow by Apreche · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's very impressive. I mean the most I did was get a 14.4 modem into a normal Commodore 64. And I've seen guys who took Apple][gs machines and installed hard drives, cd burners, nics, and got everything from wolf3d and down to run on them. Even web browsing and AIM.

    Even though it's not practical or useful for the average person I think it's good that there is proof that unless you are playing games or doing other high powered tasks like encoding video, that you don't need a new powerful machine.

    Radio Shack Coco 2 in the house

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Wow by karnal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Radio Shack Coco 2 in the house"

      I remember dreaming of having enough money one day to get the 512KB memory upgrade for my coco3....

      Or, drooling over the 1MB or 2MB upgrades, or the 0 wait state disk controller (OS9 goodness....)

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Wow by fatboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      or the 0 wait state disk controller (OS9 goodness....)

      A friend of mine had the Frank Hog Labs 0 wait state disk controller. I only had a DISTO Super Controller II 4-n-1 and it sucked!

      Multi User, Multi Tasking with less than 512k of ram. OS9 rocked. I still have the c compiler around here somewhere for it.

      --
      --fatboy
    3. Re:Wow by jkfresh · · Score: 1

      Applied Engineering is what made all that possible. If i remember correctly, apple's memory expansion cards topped out at 2.5 megs. If you had an applied engineering card, you could go all the way to 8 megs.

      In order to play wolf 3d or lemmings, you pretty much needed to have either a transwarp gs (applied engineering) or a Zip GS (forgot who made it). I think that the transwarp was 7 mhz. I know the zipgs is 9. This is from a stock clock of i think 3 mhz.

      There were a lot of companies that made hard drives. I had an AE vulcan 40 meg. You rip out your power supply and drop that in. The drive is contained in it.

      That machine was a lot of fun. I think i will power it up and play crystal quest.

      jkfresh

  11. Mirrors? by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    This is pathetic. 16 comments and slashdotted? Mirrors anyone?

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Mirrors? by Matchstick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      16 comments and slashdotted
      That means people are reading the damn link before posting. Hooray.

  12. For crying out loud by shepd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Destroying the rarest C64 ever made to change it in to a PC?

    People that do this don't deserve to have old computers. (IMHO).

    This is like taking a Model-T Ford and "converting" it into a Toyota Corolla.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:For crying out loud by carb · · Score: 1

      Well, technically, isn't it still the rarest C64 ever made? Last I checked (just now), it is the fastest one in the world. If I converted a Model-T ford into a Toyota Corolla, wouldn't that make it one hell of a unique Model-T ford? Just a thought.

    2. Re:For crying out loud by carpe_noctem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From the website:
      the sx-64 dissapeared as quickly as it arrived. today they remain a collector's item.

      20 years later

      given, the sx-64 kicked ass in the 1980's, but my current computer is literally 1600 times faster than this thing! i wouldn't use a 5-year old computer without complaining, let alone a 20 year old computer. computers need to be able to stream DVDs, movies, surf the internet, play 3d games, and store gigabytes worth of mp3's before they can be considered useful nowadays.


      I couldn't agree with you more. This guy basically bastardized a collectible antique computer and stripped it of all its value to make it a marginal desktop computer. If he was so concerned about having a "usable computer" for everyday computing tasks, he'd be better off buying a 60$ case and power supply. He'll be sorry in another 25 years when he sees one of these selling for big bucks on "Antiques Roadshow".

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    3. Re:For crying out loud by Jouster · · Score: 2

      This reminds me of a comment I spotted once about collecting old computers (one of my hobbies... wanna see my AS/400?):

      Paraphrased, "Yeah, I really need to find a hobby that's less expensive and doesn't take up as much room. Y'know, like collecting large diamonds."

      At any rate, the guy who modded this Commodore is an idiot. I would have paid some good money for that machine, and many of my friends would have, as well. And, coincidentally, my Osborne 1 arrives tomorrow. I'll have to make sure this site isn't on my other computers' screens, or the Osborne might get a little anxious....

      Jouster

    4. Re:For crying out loud by carb · · Score: 1
      today is the (car (cdr)) of the rest of your life.

      ;The procedure cdr has been called with 0 arguments; it requires exactly 1 argument
      ;To continue, call RESTART with an option number:
      ; (RESTART 1) => Return to read-eval-print level 1.

      2 error>

    5. Re:For crying out loud by LoadStar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Destroying the rarest C64 ever made to change it in to a PC?

      People that do this don't deserve to have old computers. (IMHO).

      This is like taking a Model-T Ford and "converting" it into a Toyota Corolla.

      I'd have to agree 100%, though it's a flawed analogy.

      A better analogy would be if you were a kid and you had a prized model car - one that your dad put together and handed down to you... you took really good care of it... then one day your kid brother decided to rip the top off it and use it for a body of a cheap Radio Shack remote control car - just because it was old and he didn't see any point to just leaving it on a shelf. "But it's still a car, and it looks kinda the same!" your kid brother whines - as you pound him into a fine paste...

      Longer analogy, but more apropriate. And yes, I do feel like pounding this guy into a fine paste. His logic is that you wouldn't want to use a 5 year old computer, so therefore no one would want to keep around a 20 year old computer. Yeesh. There's a big, BIG difference between a 5 year old crappy Intel machine and a 20 year old Commodore - especially one of the rarer ones to find.

      I'm going to have to go and track down and buy a SX-64 - just to keep it from people like this guy.

    6. Re:For crying out loud by Teferi · · Score: 1

      OT, but regarding your sig:
      (define today (car (cdr (your-life))) would be more semantically correct. :)

      --
      -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
    7. Re:For crying out loud by haggar · · Score: 2

      Agreed. I really don't understand this guy, but then, I never had such a rare computer by my hands. I guess the more you have the less you appreciate it.

      --
      Sigged!
    8. Re:For crying out loud by Chromium_One · · Score: 1

      The SX-64 may be the rarest 64 made, but hardly the rarest Commodore. I think that (dubious) honor belongs to the 128B. Pure CP/M machine, Z80 CPU only rather than the dual Z80/65xx setup like the other 128 models.

      --
      When you live in a sick society, just about everything you do is wrong.
    9. Re:For crying out loud by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a comment I spotted once about collecting old computers (one of my hobbies... wanna see my AS/400?)

      An AS/400 is old? Crap.

      --
      Why not fork?
    10. Re:For crying out loud by RollingThunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep. I have a working Kaypro... I -could- gut it and install my Athlon in it... but then all I'd have would be an athlon, in a wierd case. The working Kaypro is way cooler. :)

      Now, making a REPLICA case, that's another story. Hmm....

    11. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This reminds me of a comment I spotted once about collecting old computers (one of my hobbies... wanna see my AS/400?):

      How old? We still have one at work to support clients who want to run our software on it. I got a couple of phone calls the other day when it quit accepting logons for awhile.

    12. Re:For crying out loud by starman97 · · Score: 2

      Hey what a great idea..

      I think I'll gut out my Altair 8800 and convert it into a run-of-the-mill PC. Hell, I could drop a PowerComputing motherboard into it and turn it into a Mac!!

      or maybe not.

      (right now a NEC P90 laptop serves as a 'glass tty' for the Altair, I might have to get one of those 1100 disk format gadgets to read the old Altair 71K 5-1/4" hard sector floppy format)

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    13. Re:For crying out loud by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and I hope he has fun getting eyestrain trying to watch DVDs on the 5" CRT..

    14. Re:For crying out loud by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2

      Yeah baby so passe, ISeries is where it's at now :-)

    15. Re:For crying out loud by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      You should shop around for an era-correct glass teletype for it. Find a Lear-Siegler ADM3A or a VT100. Or some of the more obscure stuff. They're usually cheap when you can find them.

    16. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah really. He can't brag. As you can see, I'm Anonymous Coward. I've posted over a million comments. His mere 1600 is not worth crap to me.

    17. Re:For crying out loud by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm sorry (not), but this guy should do anything he wants with his hardware. It's now usable on daily basis, and most likely will be better taken care of than a 'closet classic'. Christ - you people talk like there were only 3 ever made and one went down with the Titanic.

      Sure, its a casemod. It's no longer the computer it was. But guess what? He likes it.

      I can understand the guys who spend 300 some hours making a clear acrylic case for their Duron machines, and people who turn Mac SE's into fishtanks, and guys who make their classic 67 Beetle into some bastardized trike, ect ect. It's what they like to do.

      I wouldn't do it myself, but what's important here?

      The fact that this will be used with the form intact and the function 'improved'? Or that it stays in it's original form and decaying function?

      Is the next post I read on /. going to be how everyone should go back to the 1.0 Linux kernal, "Cause that's da way it should be." ?? Ugh.

      Personally, I'd love to have a Next Cube with an shit-hot PC in it. Why? So I could use it for what I do *now*, and look at it's beatiful shape and color while I record music and edit video on it. Would I miss the Next OS? Sure, maybe. Would it get used on a daily basis? (We're talking 040 processor, people)

      No.

      But hey what the hell do I know?

    18. Re:For crying out loud by Jouster · · Score: 2

      A 9402-236. From what I can tell, not much more than a decade old.

      I also have:
      Osborne 1 (should be arriving tomorrow)
      DECserver 200/MC
      and two Tektronix XP421C's.

      The XP421C's are interesting... Shinomura had one, which is how Mitnick exploited the trust relationship. The buggers are vulnerable to SYN flooding, and possess a trivial ISN generator. I gave one to a friend, and we use them at work, but first we hop through our Linux boxen that are set up to SSH port-forward. If you've never seen a machine run an X server with no fans or HD, and 8 MB of RAM, you haven't really lived. ;)

      Jouster

      P.S. And here are some pics (on top of the AS/400, those are ISA 5250 emulator cards).

    19. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. We should all go back to th 0.01 kernel. The original, and still the best!

    20. Re:For crying out loud by shepd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're willing to spend all those hours making casemods, why not simply design the case from the ground up?

      ie: make a regular PC case in to a SX64-looking case.

      You end up with a classic and the "cool PC". What could be better?

      >Christ - you people talk like there were only 3 ever made and one went down with the Titanic.

      That's almost how it was. And there'll never be anymore made -- the SX64 schematics were mostly lost during the Escom buyout, and the last scraps were lost when Gateway bought out the Commodore IP of Escom.

      >The fact that this will be used with the form intact and the function 'improved'? Or that it stays in it's original form and decaying function?

      Oh, I'm not saying he should let it rot. He should _repair_ it and bring it up to original new spec, if anything. If not, sell it to one of us for $100. That'd pay for one shit-hot PC case; racing stripes, V-TEC sticker, 8 blue headlights, 6" dual-mufflers, fuzzy dice, mag wheels, and the rest.

      Hey, what he likes and what is the "right" thing (to people who actually appreciate C64 machines) are, quite possibly, very different things.

      >Personally, I'd love to have a Next Cube with an shit-hot PC in it. Why? So I could use it for what I do *now*, and look at it's beatiful shape and color while I record music and edit video on it. Would I miss the Next OS? Sure, maybe. Would it get used on a daily basis? (We're talking 040 processor, people)

      Why not just buy a modern cube shaped case and fix it up to be similar looking to a NeXT cube?

      Again, you get the classic and a cool PC.

      What this guy did to his SX64 is worse than anything you'd see here, IMHO.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    21. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $100 won't buy shit for a case, son

    22. Re:For crying out loud by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1
      This is like taking a Model-T Ford and "converting" it into a Toyota Corolla.

      Meh, I'd rather have the Corolla -- they, like, run and stuff.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    23. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean it's gone past 0.01? I guess that means USB should run properly by, what, version twelve?

    24. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, other SX-64 owners should THANK the guy for driving up the value of their machines a tiny bit, by taking his out of circulation. There really were very few of these sold.

      Also the NeXT OS isn't dead, it's still alive (somewhat) in Mac OS X. Though I really miss the original NeXT machines. They were sweeeet.

    25. Re:For crying out loud by shepd · · Score: 1

      >$100 won't buy shit for a case, son

      Then you don't know the first thing about cases, do you, grandaddy-o.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    26. Re:For crying out loud by shepd · · Score: 1

      Dude, thank you so much for that link in your .sig. I'm now going to integrate it into my personality file. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    27. Re:For crying out loud by shayne321 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Yeah, next thing you know people will be turning IBM PC's into catboxes. Sheesh.

      Shayne

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    28. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If his mod lasts for 25 years, it's going to be worth more than the original sx-64. I mean, his mod is fairly unique isn't it?

    29. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rare? As a technician for an authorized Commodore dealer, I saw a *LOT* of them in the late 80s/early 90s. I can honestly say I saw more of these than C128Ds and I saw a lot of those, too.

    30. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words.

      Gold C64.

    31. Re:For crying out loud by p00ya · · Score: 1

      I have a good condition sx-64... I'd happily sell it for anything over $100AU. Without going on ebay, any ideas on how i could possibly do this?

    32. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell you what. Your whole attitude is reminiscent of just about every other elitist prick's attitude on Slashdot. If I wanted to buy an SX64 and beat the crap out of it with a bat, I would. There's nothing morally apprehensible about it, unless you're some whining turd who waxes eternal over crappy old computers (which I suppose means half the population here is horrified). Take your high-and-mighty bullshit elsewhere.

    33. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yuor sig is teh ghey
      plz fix
      thx

    34. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NeXT Cubes are actually gaining in price because they are collectable!

      Fine destroy a computer worth over $500 just to insert a $50 motherboard! and your motherboard will be worthless in 2 years while your cube (if you didn't mangle it that is) will be worth over $700.

    35. Re:For crying out loud by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Take your high-and-mighty bullshit elsewhere.

      PKB.

      Nothing more to see here... Move along children.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    36. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If U want too bees liek teh JeffK yuo have much more too work on.

      Get some lunix skillz!

    37. Re:For crying out loud by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      What a waste of a great old computer, I agree. This current trend towards making useful machines useless by inserting an x86 is starting to sicken me. Should we really have people who think a 5-year-old computer is too old with these great old treasures?

    38. Re:For crying out loud by iocat · · Score: 1

      Don't worry -- I just bought an SX-64 at the Vintage Computer Festival (www.vintage.org), and I plan to keep it stock. Although, as an Apple II fan, the thought of turning it into a portable Apple //c was pretty tempting. -Chris

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    39. Re:For crying out loud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a C-64. It's a pentium 3 running windows XP. He ripped out all the internals and replaced them.

    40. Re:For crying out loud by adubyah7 · · Score: 1

      That is why collectables are worth money. Not everyone keeps them in mint condition. The rare ones are those that haven't been thrown away or gutted.

    41. Re:For crying out loud by geigertube · · Score: 1

      These are only relatively rare. They go for $20-100 on ebay. A coworker of mine has seven of the dx/sx-64's.

    42. Re:For crying out loud by shepd · · Score: 1

      Then perhaps I over-reacted. I was under the impression that only a few were made, and that many people owned were actually prototypes.

      Good to know this guy didn't destroy a 1 in a 100 type of item.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    43. Re:For crying out loud by BeazleyR · · Score: 1

      ahhh, Kaypro memories....

      when I was a kid I used to play blood bath on my dad's.

  13. Stop Dreaming and start coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    What makes this stuff interesting is that you can do any of this stuff (if you limit your slachdot reading and tv watching)

  14. Charming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And I must admit I was quite impressed too. Despite being cumbersome and heavy, it certainly has charm, and it looks a lot less dated and ugly than some of it's temporaries."

    Statment not true. Spectrum was more charming, and lot less cumbersome. SOME of it's contemporaries is the key work here.

  15. About Time by carb · · Score: 4, Funny

    It took 15 years, but I can finally play my C64 copy of "Bad Dudes" at more than 5 frames per second - hoorah!

    1. Re:About Time by BillBat · · Score: 1

      Rags to Riches here I come!

  16. I admit it is pretty cool but... by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 0

    I really wonder how the hell the guy got the idea for this. I would have spent my time and knowledge trying to build something usefull like a portable ogg/mp3 player. I give him credit though, it's a really cool mod to a retro computer.

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
  17. Re:a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a duratec is actually a ford produced engine. Due to the fact the Taurus weighs near 2 tons, the engine had to be designed to be powerful. The generation 3 taurus was the first to equip the Duratec, and the generation 3 SHO's had a Yamaha Duratec hybrid v8 producing 235HP. The car was Zippy. I love my Taurus. I have two. Why dont you?

  18. A C64? by bytesmythe · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's nothin'... I have the original UNIVAC in my spare house that I modified to use AMD 2.2 GHz Athlon XPs. Of course, the blinkenlights flash on and off so fast they burn out in just a few seconds. Then again, the original wiring was only run at 2.2 MEGAhz, so trying to get all the timing right was a nightmare.

    And have you ever tried searching PriceWatch for a PGA to vacuum tube converter? Sheeeeesh... You'd think people had never heard of retrocomputing.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
    1. Re:A C64? by gurnb · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have an old UNIVAC that IS my spare house!

      --
      "This must be a Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays."
    2. Re:A C64? by Jasa · · Score: 1

      How about the guy who turned a VAX in to a mini bar?

      --
      -Jasa -- Linux - The SOURCE will be with you, ALWAYS
  19. A little audio theme to go along with that... by apk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're at all into the C64, you've got to check out the song "C64 Convention" by mindfusion, available for free on mp3.com.

    Cool old school electronica that rocks.


    Andy

    1. Re:A little audio theme to go along with that... by jred · · Score: 2

      Or the band Commodore 64. I love Straight Outta CompUSA :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  20. Whoa this is really cool by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Take a regular PC and load up an emulator on it while still using the old case. This isn't a hardware hack, it's a case mod if anything. Anyone else interested in a really fast C64??

    Frodo is a crossplatform C64 emulator for windows, macos, beos, riscos, and many more. Take the system you have now and use it as a C64, or emulate a million other systems as well.

    I'm really sorry, but this is yet another case of shoddy journalism and actual fact checking before publishing. I know slashdot is far from a "professional" grade news source, but I would like to think that there is at least a small bit of integrity in there somewhere. Speaking of integrity, whatch this get modded down, -1 Troll, -1 Offtopic, -1 Redundant, -1 Overrated, -1 too many mod points for editors.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Whoa this is really cool by Uller-RM · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      -1 too many mod points for editors.

      Hmm... nice overflow. For a 32-bit signed int, that'd be (2^32)-2 mod points, right? ;)

      Just think... 4 billion mod points... one could mod down as "Underrated" every comment ever made on every story Slashdot has ever run, and still have plently left over to mod up goatse links, since he'd never get hit for it in M2 either...

    2. Re:Whoa this is really cool by megabeck42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Woah, cut the guy some credit! This isn't just a case hack; he didn't just spend 4 hours with a dremel.

      He went to the trouble of using the orignal keyboard. That means he designed and programmed a microprocessor to convert the matrix from the keyboard into the serial stream for the ps/2 port.

      According to his tech page, he's going to build a switching power supply, which isn't easy to do right, to replace the 1U power supply he's currently using.

      Oh, and there's the sound interface, too, more custom hardware.

      Sure, he's using an emulator, but, he's also using a lot of the original hardware.

      I'd like to see you do that.

      --
      fnord.
    3. Re:Whoa this is really cool by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

      I agree. What's also cool is the attempt to make good use of a 5" color CRT....? Go figger.

      --
      db
      Cig:
      ôô
      /`
    4. Re:Whoa this is really cool by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

      Well actually I think VICE is much better, you get more than an accurate c=64 emulation; you get a C128, Vic20, C=16, Pet, and a few more. Plus it can emulate the c=64 keyboard nicely.

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  21. /.'ed by Sivar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hopefully the website's server isn't this guy's shiny ...er, new SX-64. It just melted.

    The page:



    this page is dedicated to my efforts to skillfully implant a 1+GHZ system inside of my Commodore SX-64 portable computer. this modification will be completely stealth. in fact, when my C64 emulator is running, it should be completely indistinguishable from the original system. however, when the emulator is not running, i will be able to watch DVDs, play MP3s, surf the internet, and play games from anywhere through windows XP. a truly portable system, complete with integrated monitor, keyboard, and handle! lan parties here i come!

    SX-64 History

    this was my commodore sx-64 before it was modified. i got it for free from a friend at work back some time in january. this little machine was the world's first COLOR portable computer system. the keyboard doubles as a protective face for the case. the handle doubles as a tilting arm to make the monitor more viewable.

    the original unmodified SX-64

    the system has a built-in 5-inch color CRT monitor, a commodore 1541 disk drive, a 1mhz cpu, 64k of RAM, MOS6581 sound chip, and a VIC20 video chip (320x200 pixels, 4-bit color, 40x25 text mode). it also comes with a built-in speaker, a game cartridge slot on the top, an expansion port on the back, an RS232-C serial port, two gameports, and composite NTSC/PAL out (depending on where your SX-64 came from). the operating system is SX-64 BASIC (developed by microsoft!!). the system was released in 1983 and retailed for around $1000 USD.

    some of the world's best games (IMO) were for this system. classics like the original PAC-MAN, donkey kong, maniac mansion, etc were well worth the price of the system back in the day. not to mention, the BASIC operating system was so easy to use, you could program your own game in no time. no microsoft APIs, DLLs, or bluescreens to deal with! just PEEK and POKE your graphics and sounds to memory, and you were on your way to being a professional programmer (aside from learning assembly, of course :]).

    from what i've read, the SX-64 was a flop because it was targeted towards the business market (it was called the "executive computer"). it competed with laptops like the Toshiba T-1000, but was heavier, had no batteries, and didn't fit in your lap. the sx-64 dissapeared as quickly as it arrived. today they remain a collector's item.

    20 years later

    given, the sx-64 kicked ass in the 1980's, but my current computer is literally 1600 times faster than this thing! i wouldn't use a 5-year old computer without complaining, let alone a 20 year old computer. computers need to be able to stream DVDs, movies, surf the internet, play 3d games, and store gigabytes worth of mp3's before they can be considered useful nowadays.

    the only way to wedge a new motherboard in my C64 will be to go SMALL.

    the latest computer craze (at least the latest craze i've been following) is the 'small form factor' (SFF) PC. these little systems work great for home theater PCs (HTPCs), internet terminals, and lan parties. i, for one, would hate to lug a full-size tower and monitor to a lan party and back. but my SX-64 above would be perfect for lan parties. it has a handle, it's rugged, and everything's built-in (even the monitor!).

    SFF motherboards (the two big form factors now are Flex ATX and Mini ITX) are the perfect choice for my project because they have integrated sound, network, video, and tv out. the tv out is probably the most important since the c64's internal CRT takes an NTSC s-video input. without it, the screen would be useless. the only bad part is that the 3d graphics will suck pretty hard (s3 savage core) so lan parties will suck for me because i will probably get killed a lot since i'll probably be playing at a low resolution. (update: I'm running about 40fps in cstrike in 800x600. It's not as good as a Geforce4, but at least it's faster than the original c64's VIC chip!

    Research

    planning plays a big part in any big project. if i was just adding a window kit or something stupid like that, yea i could just go to town with a dremel and not expect any real problems. but if i cut too much away from the case, or just guessed on which wires to solder, this whole project would be over.

    after searching around the internet, i found the original schematics for the seperate boards inside the sx-64. several circuit boards will have to be designed and etched to interface the sx-64 case to the newer hardware. (update: most of these boards can be found in the tech info section). many hours of dremeling the steel inside the case were required, because the original cards were mounted vertically, and my motherboard has to go in horizontally.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    1. Re:/.'ed by Jouster · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm adding more content to it as I get it, but here's what I have so far:

      My Mirror.

      Jouster

    2. Re:/.'ed by Jouster · · Score: 2

      The worst part is that I have several additional pictures pulled up in my Mozilla 1.2 Beta (build 2002101612, WinXP), but can't save them because my Mozilla decided to stop saving things recently. Anyone have a solution?

      Jouster

    3. Re:/.'ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use IE6?

    4. Re:/.'ed by Jouster · · Score: 2

      Okay, the main page and tech info pages are now complete, others are coming along nicely.

      If you haven't looked in a while, look again, since I'm putting in the latest content wget is feeding me every ten minutes or so.

      Jouster

    5. Re:/.'ed by Yakman · · Score: 1

      Quit Mozilla, Delete compreg.dat from your "Mozilla\Components" folder, restart Mozilla. It's a known (and fixed in Nightlies) bug where the Installer doesn't overwrite your compreg.dat file because of something to do with modification dates.

    6. Re:/.'ed by Jouster · · Score: 2

      You, my good man, ROCK!

      I owe you a beer next time you're in Virginia.

      Jouster

  22. Re:Is it really destroyed? by m.lemur · · Score: 1

    From his site:

    in fact, when my C64 emulator is running, it should be completely indistinguishable from the original system

    Your analogy was off the mark, its more like taking the body of a Model-T and replacing the engine with a nice V12.

  23. Re:a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    also, to spread more duratec love, the next base model mustangs will come equiped with Duratec's pushing 250 horsepower, and several other vehicles, like the Ford Escape and maybe even a Mazda Miata, will come equiped with the awesome Duratec engine.

    Vtec is a "performance" increaser, or so everyone says. Vtec is really just a method Honda uses to gain "power" in their "peice of shit" "rice rockets". Their 4-thumpers produce MAYBE 4hp below 3000rpm, but get a nice large MPG rating, but hit a larger rpm, your gas gets sucked, your car sounds like a bumble bee, and you get 11mpg.

    Ford. For everyday driving.

  24. seriously... by EZmagz · · Score: 1
    (insert "boy, looks like the webpage was HOSTED on that damn thing! comment here...)

    Seriously, it's been a while since I've seen a site get taken out THIS fast! Does kinda make you wonder.

    --

    "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned for SEGA. ..."

  25. What about... by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Overclocking? Has anybody ever tried to OC a C64?

    1. Re:What about... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes.

      i knew at least one guy who did just that, he also stacked ram chips and managed to get 640k of usable ram on his modified 64.

      64s were modded every way from sunday, everyone worth knowing in the day had at least a SuperSnapshot v4.0 in the cartridge slot.

      Painting, lighting.. I saw a lot of impressive things done to commodore hardware in the day. This isn't one of 'em.

      If the thing wasn't functional, and beyond repair, then he could be forgiven for gutting it and sticking in a flexatx based crap-rig.

      If it was functional, then may god have mercy on his soul for defiling it like that.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:What about... by Compton+Q.+Groundhog · · Score: 1

      The c64 can't really be overclocked much because everything is so tightly integrated. The VIC-II video chip doesn't run on an asynchronous bus like the graphics cards on a PC. Its clock is high when the CPU's clock is low, and vice-versa. Speeding up the CPU directly would screw up the video timing and make it impossible (or at least difficult) to get a useable video signal out of it. But, there are a few different accelerators out there using the DMA line on the CPU bus to take control of the system. They interact with the 64's custom chips at 1MHz, but offer CPU speeds of up to 20MHz (overclocked 16MHz WDC65C816).

    3. Re:What about... by deppe · · Score: 1

      One popular hack here in europe was to put a switch on the motherboard jumper that controlled the PAL/NTSC frequency. That way, you could switch from the normal 50Hz generator for the video to the NTSC 60Hz generator, and the synced nature of the chips would make the CPU run faster as well.

      It was really handy when making large compressed files on copy parties back in the day, or when pre-calculating large sets of 3d motion data for demos.

      The TV set didn't show anything useful though, and it crashed about once an hour. :-)

    4. Re:What about... by 3am · · Score: 1


      If the thing wasn't functional, and beyond repair, then he could be forgiven for gutting it and sticking in a flexatx based crap-rig.

      If it was functional, then may god have mercy on his soul for defiling it like that.


      amen, brother.

      --

      A: None. The Universe spins the bulb, and the Zen master merely stays out of the way.
  26. No /. elitist anti-Windows comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's with you people? Didn't you read that this thing runs Windows XP?

    Where's all that /. outrage?

    1. Re:No /. elitist anti-Windows comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't worry, I'm secretely hating him.

      it's probably pirated anyway. I doubt he went out and bought a copy.

    2. Re:No /. elitist anti-Windows comments? by zulux · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's with you people? Didn't you read that this thing runs Windows XP?

      Runs Windows XP? More precisly: Limps-along with Windows XP like a mangy three-legged dog that stopes every ten feet to eat it's own poop that dribbels out it's ass.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    3. Re:No /. elitist anti-Windows comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever tried to run KDE on less than 192MB of RAM? Oh, let me guess, "sure, it's fast." Stop lying.

    4. Re:No /. elitist anti-Windows comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever tried to run KDE on less than 192MB of RAM? Oh, let me guess, "sure, it's fast." Stop lying.

      I only need -ONE- machine on the network that runs KDE quickly and I can serve the whole fucking network with snappy KDE desktops with X windows.

      Fucking MCSE.

  27. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This guy says it's just a Windows XP machine with an emulator running...so basically it's just a modern computer in an old case. This has been done before.

  28. Re:Can you say word-wrap? by catwh0re · · Score: 1

    word wrapping wouldn't be the issue. the high speeds will probably make all your games unplayable anyway. Like the theme park or leisure suit larry (1 original)games on a pentium. Even the slowest modes will be just waaay too fast to be useable.

  29. I have a dream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    definitely something to dream about doing yourself.

    No. I'll continue my long-standing tradition of dreaming about a trio of beautiful, naked, goth-looking chicks who service my every need. I rather like that dream.

    But if you want to dream about the Commodore 64, go right ahead.

    1. Re:I have a dream... by nebenfun · · Score: 1

      honest to God....
      there are people, on slashdot no less, that when faced with a choice:
      a) a night of insanely hot sex with
      or
      b) an original with boxes, etc...

      they will choose b....
      many more will have to think about it....
      some might think of ways to combine a and b
      we are truly an odd lot
      nbfn

    2. Re:I have a dream... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      How can you tell they're goth if they're naked?

    3. Re:I have a dream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The bad poetry.

    4. Re:I have a dream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you hadn't posted AC my cousins & I might have been able to help you out... ; ) xxx

    5. Re:I have a dream... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      COuld that be a trio of beautiful, asian, goth-looking semi-naked(like some gothy stuff) chicks?

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  30. Re:Is it really destroyed? by jandrese · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since it's bad analogy day on Slashdot how about this:

    It's like taking a Model-T, ripping it apart, and using the body panels to make a Toyota look like a Model-T.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  31. Hope that SX-64 wasn't working. by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Hope that SX-64 wasn't functioning when he gutted it, as there are some Commodore fans who are weeping that another SX-64 bit the dust. It'd be like gutting an Osborne so you can put a PC in there to have the ultimate lan party machine. Sure, it'd be cool and all, but the original is far cooler.

    Chalk one vote for nostalgia and leaving rare and cool things alone.

    1. Re:Hope that SX-64 wasn't working. by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
      I've got an Osborne II (I think). Complete with the magnifying lens that hangs on a stick like a carrot for a donkey. What will you give me for it? (I've given up on the idea for a museum.)

      I've also got 2 Vic 20s, 2 C64s, several Atari 8 and 16 bit boxen, as well as a genuine IBM System 4 (8 inch floppies, 16K RAM. I'm half serious, but also curious as to who else can't throw away shit that is too old to be truly useful - and hangin' on to it for nostalgic reasons. Hell, I'm even doing it with 286-486 stuff. It was really good at what it did!

      --
      db
      Cig:
      ôô
      /`
    2. Re:Hope that SX-64 wasn't working. by Jouster · · Score: 2

      I'm always collecting, but in fairness to you and others, you should really look into eBaying.

      Jouster

    3. Re:Hope that SX-64 wasn't working. by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Heh, know the feeling

      1 Mac II, 1 Mac IIsi, 1 Centris 660AV, 1 Newton MessagePad 130, 1 Powerbook 170, 1 NeXT MonoStation, and 1 PS2 Model 55/386, that's merely what's currently functional and sufficiently odl to be classic hardware.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
  32. What the ...? by arb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...modified a Commodore SX-64 to contain a 1.2 GHz PIII system.

    Hardly a 1+ GHz Commodore SX-64 Mod. More like a simple case-mod effort. Slapping a small form-factor MB into an SX-64 case is kinda cool, but it ain't that cool. Now, building a real C64 notebook or building a souped up C64 (not emulated) would be damn cool.

  33. Cool, eh? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1
    It appears to be a really cool system

    Not any more guys :-(. RIP. Apparently the guy was running his website on it and it turned from a cool to warm to hot. Currently the are cooking omelletes on the router. Dirt chip.. 20 cents only.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  34. Commodore One by antibryce · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.go64.de/english/frames/frame.htm

    Looks like an interesting project. They're building a fully backwards compatible mobo which should support all existing C64/128 software. The best part is the CPU is 20MHZ and the Sid emulation will have 16 voices!

    It's all only $200, and will fit into any ATX style case.

    1. Re:Commodore One by runderwo · · Score: 1

      Here is a more direct link.

  35. So according to the two latest slashdot stories by thelinuxking · · Score: 2

    The last story tells me to mod my pc with a chip so I can emulate a C64 on my pc...

    Now this story tells me to mod my C64 so I can emulate a C64 with it, as well as use it as a pc...

    Hmm...i'd like to do both, but I'm afraid that the two mods might cancel themselves out somehow...

  36. Beowulf by Superfreaker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish some Scandanavian warrior would rip this guys arms off :-)

    Made you look!

  37. Re:Is it really destroyed? by shepd · · Score: 1

    >Your analogy was off the mark, its more like taking the body of a Model-T and replacing the engine with a nice V12.

    A P3 1Ghz is about as much V12 today as a Honda Civic has a V-TEC engine...

    If you're going to hack the hell out of a good machine, at least do it in style. A nice P4 2.4 Ghz, or whatever the fastest AMD chip is now would be a start. But a P3 1Ghz? That's so old it's hard to buy!

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  38. Now that I think about it... by thelinuxking · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows XP would REALLY suck with only 64k of memory...

    And to start the thing up without a hard drive? I figure it would go something like this:

    LOAD "WINXP",8,1
    LOADING...
    FLIP DISK TO SIDE 2
    PLEASE WAIT...
    INSERT DISK 2 OF 5.34E20
    PLEASE WAIT...

    1. Re:Now that I think about it... by compwiz3688 · · Score: 2, Funny

      While loading the 5.34E20 floppies:

      INSERT SWAP DISK 1 OF [insert another large number]
      SWAPING 64k TO DISK...


      At least the hiberfil.sys will only be 64k :)

      Next up, loading Offic...

      *ducks*

    2. Re:Now that I think about it... by Wolfier · · Score: 3, Funny

      While loading the 5.34E20-th floppy:

      GENERAL PROTECTION FAULT.
      SYSTEM STOP ERROR AT $24FF
      TO RESTART, INSERT DISK 1

  39. I'm still trying to make time... by GreatDave · · Score: 1

    ... to gut my Dell Inspiron 7500 laptop with the stupid monitor latches that won't stop breaking, get some chassis fans and a flip-top thing for an old-school NES (mine is missing that flipping cartridge thing) and make myself a Lintendo. w00t.

    --
    "I am root. Bow before me." To this I say, "You are root, and you bear the sins of the world upon your shoulders."
    1. Re:I'm still trying to make time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no chance to survive!

  40. How about a C64 Palm Top (Re:What the ...?) by Jasa · · Score: 1

    I thought, why doesn't some one come up with a C64 palm top. With a flash card to contain all of the .D64, .T64 files. I think it easy to make a C64 fit into a very small palm device with todays technology... It's sure to sell like caffinated penguin mints on thinkgeek!!!

    --
    -Jasa -- Linux - The SOURCE will be with you, ALWAYS
    1. Re:How about a C64 Palm Top (Re:What the ...?) by arb · · Score: 2

      I thought, why doesn't some one come up with a C64 palm top.

      Bingo! That's the kind of thing I'd be interested in seeing.

      That and the Commodore One project.

  41. Re:Is it really destroyed? by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

    'cuz a P3/1.2 (.13u) runs cooler than a P4 or Athlon, and in the P3-S version (512K cache) does more per clock? I could see a high end model of either of the latter melting the plastic. ;)

  42. What's Next? by limekiller4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of these days, I'm going to wake up, select Slashdot from my bookmarks, and find that the top story is about some 7 year-old who managed to get his bicycle -- complete with training wheels and little brother onboard -- into lower earth orbit using some recently GPL'd Mathematica clone, an overclocked Furby, 50ft of CAT5 scavenged from the local LUGs trash bin and Jack Valenti's ego tinsnipped into tiles for the re-entry shielding.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
    1. Re:What's Next? by Jouster · · Score: 2

      And someone will complain that it would have happened years ago if it weren't for the fact that "Micro$haft R&D is actually a secret organization charged with preventing the colonization of space by kids on bicycles."

      And someone else will demand that the CAD/CAM files for the bicycle be released, since GPL'd software helped get it into outer space.

      Jouster

    2. Re:What's Next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just submit that as a story. It'll be rerun without any checks until whenever you decide to look for it :)

  43. Re:I love you too, sweetie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Jennifer, you might find my wang more to your liking!. It is quite large.

  44. ... and he hardly knew what he was talking about by Montreal+Geek · · Score: 3, Informative
    Sheesh.

    Destroying a neat piece of collectible cruft like that is bad enough, but it appears he actually knew very little about what he was destroying.

    - The video chip was named 'VIC' not 'VIC20' (which was another, bittier, box).
    - Neither Pac-Man nor Donkey Kong were originals on that platform, or indeed even faithful reproductions.
    - I'm not even going to go into that 'BASIC operating system' bit [but hey, now that I think of it, it does establish a pattern for Microsoft 'OS'es]
    - The T-1000 was a nice piece of PCish hardware; but had no battery either. Mains or no dice.

    ... But most of all, I am amazed at even his missing the irony of stating he wouldn't be able to use a five year old computer "without complaining" yet one of his admitted design goals was that he could run an emulator so that he could.

    -- MG

  45. That damn ENTER key by rsteele19 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see it uses the original Commodore keyboard... I wonder, do you still need to use a hammer to press the "Enter" key?

    --

    This sig is umop apisdn.

    1. Re:That damn ENTER key by dgmartin98 · · Score: 1

      Remember that RUN/STOP Key? Why the hell did it require a harder whack than the other keys to function properly? e.g. you could hit the 'H' key with 1 N of force to type an 'H', but you had to hit the RUN/STOP key with like 5 N of force to get it to stop a program. Mechanically, they seemed like the same key.

      Dave

      --
      FPGA, Wireless, ASIC, Verilog, VHDL, HW, 10yr exp, Team Lead, Ottawa (More? Email above. slashdotusername=dgmartin98 )
    2. Re:That damn ENTER key by thales · · Score: 2
      "Why the hell did it require a harder whack than the other keys to function properly?"


      To make it harder to accedentaly stop a program that took 5 minutes to load. There were even third party kits to add this useful "feature" to an Apple II.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    3. Re:That damn ENTER key by PurpleKarma · · Score: 2, Informative

      *sigh*

      That was the RESTORE key that required a significant amount of effort. Remember, you held down RUN/STOP and pounded the RESTORE key.

      BTW: The C64C models had a much-improved version of the RESTORE key; you simply tapped it with the same amount of effort as you would any other key.

      --

      --
      eek. eek. eeeeeek. eek-eek.
  46. Great Hardware design... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 5, Funny

    The SX-64 page mentions--
    "Ah, the DX. That was the american version which had 2 disk drives. (The UK gets short changed
    again! - Akuma). Our european version had one plus a hole marked 'Storage'. Very useful, as long
    as you don't store disks in there; the magnetic fields generated by the SX64's drive tends to wipe
    them clean or corrupt them at the very least. Nice piece of design.
    "

    Probably Commodore's way of paying tribute to the Coleco Adam..

    1. Re:Great Hardware design... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      well, it could have been a privacy feature, u know, '0h sh1t, Th3 f3D5!, quickly, all disks to storage!!'.

      i found it quite funny too, like, did a piece of sheetmetal or something cost too much?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Great Hardware design... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the DX-64 was never sold officially. The two drives put too much load on the SX's power supply, so the upgrade kit and the DX-64 product were quickly canned.

      If you were to find a real, authentic DX-64, DON'T GUT IT TO MAKE A COOL PC.. They're extremely rare.

      Many people have modded their SX-64s to have two drives, but these aren't authentic DX machines, of course.
      --
      Jope

    3. Re:Great Hardware design... by radish · · Score: 2

      Nah it wasn't cost it was the weight - they'd managed to keep it down to a tiny 25.5lbs - think of the effect of that extra piece of metal!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  47. Next up : 2.0 GHz C-128D by baine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dig-dug oughtta get something like 3,500 fps.

    --
    Need a simple, easy to use data tier generator? http://www.gryphinsoftware.com/
    1. Re:Next up : 2.0 GHz C-128D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So *that's* what people used to measure performance before the Q3 FPS tests... Interesting :)

  48. That's really great... by cerebralsugar · · Score: 1

    but can you play SOLITARE on it?????

    --
    Easy guys, I put my pants on one leg at a time. The difference is after I put on my pants I make gold records!
  49. Re:For crying out loud OT by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Ok, for fucks sake, people. Every time I post a comment on /., someone tries to correct my damn sig. Well I'm gonna let you in on a little hint...it's supposed to be a FUCKING JOKE! ;)

    I know scheme rather well, but see, if I did:

    (define today
    (lambda ()
    (car (cdr '(your life))))) ...that would just be stupid and nerdy. the (car (cdr)) gets the point across to people that know lisp/scheme and is easier to read. Ok, I'm done ranting (for now).

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  50. imagine that! by nuckin+futs · · Score: 0

    making a 15 year old computer up to par with a 5 year old computer and not having it go beepbeeepbeep and losing your stuff.

  51. do you mean ENIAC?... never mind by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    I have the original UNIVAC in my spare house

    You probably mean ENIAC, the huge digital beast built for the Army at the University of Pennsylvania. It was something like 30 tons and had roughly 20K vacuum tubes. Slower than your TI calculator, but being able to do 5000 ops per second wasn't too shabby for 1945.

    UNIVAC, on the other hand, was a successful commercial computer (though only after Mauchly and Eckert sold out to Remington-Rand... the company that later became the LZW/GIF bastards, Unisys). The various UNIVACs fit into a single (large) enclosure and had a snazzy operators console. Very SciFi looking. Again, slow by todays standards, but quite a speed demon back in the day.... 40kbps tape storage, 2.25 MHz logic units (still vacuum tube based), sustained performance of over 100,000 ops per second.

    Hmm, now as I proof-read, I realize you *are* talking about the UNIVAC-1. I'll post this anyway, heh.

  52. Two in a row? by Ratbert42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Two stories mentioning the C64 in a row? Someone please turn down the Improbability Drive a bit.

  53. Oh how I miss the old days by Haxx · · Score: 2

    Cranking up my C64. Running a BBS. Being part of a "crack group". Local "crack group" wars. 300, 1200 baud. 1541's. 1581's. Phreaking. Peeks and Pokes. Doing Binary math in my room to make pretty sprites.

    560 DATA 255,128,255,192,16,0,8,64,96,0,0,255
    570 GOSUB
    580 END

    Sniff...

    I miss those days... 15 years old and no worries

    1. Re:Oh how I miss the old days by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      If I read that right...

      mmmmmmmmm |
      mmmmmmmmmm |
      m |
      m m |
      mm |
      mmmmmmmm|

      Silly lameness filter...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  54. CDC 160-A by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Seeing this mod brings back twenty-year old memories of our geek squad exerting our muscles to load a Control Data 160-A into the back of a truck for shipping to our high school. Given that the console weighed a ton, that our sole physical exercise in those days was loading paper into the TTY, and that our only helper was the septuagenarian priest who'd arranged with his executive buddy for the donation, it still amazes me we weren't all squashed.

    What a beauty it was with its sleek Austin Powers space-age styling: banks of switches (RUN / STEP), flipping numbers, and polished steel head. Moddable? Wouldn't make a bad coffee table, come to think of it...

  55. Profane Motherfucker's First Computer by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 0, Troll

    Was indeed the aforementioned SX-64. To call these fuckers portable is like calling a grand piano pocked sized. They were most certianly not too fucking portable. However, it was a nice unit for blasting some shit up on Fort Apocalypse or zipping around in the original Test Drive.

    They were actually a nice fucking unit. All contained, keyboard and all. Unlike laptops the keyboard seperated from the face meaning that an ergonomic desk, like anyone gave a shit about that shit back then, was a lot easier.

    I never did anything but play games on the thing, and now I'm kind of curious what the fuck happened to them.

    Putting a PIII in one isn't exactly a kosher mod, in the PMF book of mods. There is an inherent goodness in this absofuckinglutely slow C64 processors of the day.

    It's a pity that the fuckers are outrageously overpriced on Ebay. Adjusted for inflation, I'm thinking that the current assraping prices are more than the few hundred that was charged back in the first Regan administration.

    1. Re:Profane Motherfucker's First Computer by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      You are indeed one profane mofo. If you're wondering what happened to Commodore the company, they declared bankruptcy and were liquidated in 1994. Their 8 bit assets are currently in possesion by Gateway Computer (USA), with the trademarks being held by Tulip Computer (Netherlands). I'm not sure who owns the Amiga tech. these days..

      FuzzyBad-Mofo, proud owner of two (unmodified!) SX-64 computers.

  56. Do the old games play unreasonably fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My favorite game on the commodore was the baseball game hardball. (ahh, the good ol days). Anyways, I assume that games back then were designed for that specific processor speed, thus any animations are relational to the speed of the processor.

    Does anyone know if this is correct? I would imagine with this kind of processor the pitchers are throwing about 300mph. Probably tough to hit.

  57. Re:Funny ?!? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Metamoderate if you don't like it.

  58. Re:Funny ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The attempt to be funny is as important as being funny... Not everyone thinks a joke is funny. That doesn't mean noone thinks its funny. Geesh, give the mods some slack. If they wouldn't have modded it funny then someone would have been bitching that it wasn't modded up.

  59. webserver by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2

    I still think the C64 webserver was way cooler. I won't link to it so it doesn't get slashdotted (can barely handle one person hitting it), but you'll find the site through Google.
    Anybody can destroy a computer.

  60. Re:... and he hardly knew what he was talking abou by KewlPC · · Score: 2

    He is probably also missing the point that you CAN use a 5 year old computer if you don't put WinXP on it.

    I also find it ironic that he complains about not being able to use a 5 year old computer, yet all he puts in the case is a PIII/1ghz (and yes, it's probably for power and heat reasons, but ironic nonetheless).

    I don't see why he had to ruin this computer. Is he too lazy to burn his favorite MP3s onto a CD-R (or two or five) and use a CD player? Or just use a computer he already has? No way in hell you'd see me rip the guts out of my SGI Indy or Sun SparcStation IPX just so that I could have a PC in a "retro" case.

    When I was a teenager, the only computer that I could afford was a 386 @ 8MHz with something like 2 megabytes of RAM. I put up with the damn thing into the 90s ('96 or '97 IIRC), until I finally was able to afford a modern machine. I'd like to see if he could get by with something like that (probably not).

  61. Re:Can you say word-wrap? by matguy · · Score: 1

    It's a regular PIII system inside the case. Any issues with C64 games would be problems with the emulator(s)

    --

    matguy(.com)
  62. His Windows XP boots up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in what, a week and a half? :P

  63. Shoulda kept the one I got.... by Tmack · · Score: 1
    I thought the built-in CRT was kinda neat, and the way the keyboard snaped into the front of it was sorta nifty, but the only thing I kept was the carrying case. Its the perfect fit for my old desktop case, was padded, and had a cumfy shoulder strap. Worked great when I had to move dorm rooms each year. Now it just sits on the shelf with the old case in it.
    Think I got it from work, iirc it was still in use and had some important stuff on it (go figure) but was dead. They wanted me to try and resurect it... I laughed

    TM

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  64. Regarding your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    today is the (car (cdr)) of the rest of your life.

    I don't think that's semantically correct...

    I can suggest improvements that would make more sense if you'd like.
  65. Re:For crying out loud OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I got news for you bozo - you're shouting in the dark. The collective borg that is /. CAN'T HEAR YOU !!!!

    The message is - if you get pissed off cos your sig attracts complaints then CHANGE IT !!! Otherwise you'll keep wasting everyone's time with your offtopic BS

  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. sx-64 thoughts by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

    I don't know what you mean by "originals", but Pac Man, Ms. Pac Man, Donkey Kong, DK Jr., Mario Bros., and other games of the era were quite excellently translated to the C64. Hell, I was playing a great version of Smash TV on my SX-64 in the early 90s.

    And of course, the SX-64 did boot into BASIC.

    I do think it's a shame, though, that he gutted a working SX, since there are hundreds out there that are no longer working, but what the hell -- it's his box to do with as he pleases. I'd prefer he used a dead one in the first place, but nostalgia does not prevent me from acknowledging that this is a pretty sweet hack.

    I like when he goes to the LAN party:

    "i couldn't play pac-man for more than five minutes before someone was asking me why i'd bother bringing a commodore to a LAN party. every time i simply minimized my emulator and watched their jaws drop :) 'you put Windows XP on a C64? WTF?'"

    That reaction shot has gotta be priceless.

    --
    He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  68. DOOOOOOOODE! by Chuqmystr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yer gettin' a Commodore! Brah!

  69. Blah ... by DigitalDreg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really hate it when people hack up perfectly good old computers and think it's cool. This guy trashed a pretty rare piece of equipment that can't be replaced. Ugh. But this observation is redundant, and not going to earn me karma. That's ok ..

    It's just like seeing your favorite vintage machine being parted out on eBay. To me, the whole is worth more than the sum of the parts. Somebody who hacks apart a machine for fun (this article) or profit (eBay) just doesn't understand.

    I take my sadistic pleasure in trying to do things on older machines that the Bit Gods just did not intend. Like, try to run DOS 6.2 on a PCjr. (No DOS after 3.3 supported the PCjr.) Or try to run a modern SCSI drive and SCSI CD-ROM on the poor beast. Now, that's retro computing ...

    Or the guys who build their Apple ][s into monster machines - that's classy.

    Or just simply enjoy the machines, as they were originally designed. My Timex Sinclair 1000 was one step above garbage in 1983, but today it's a hoot. Same with C64s, Vics, the dreaded PCjr, etc. Even an old IBM PC 5150 with the 64KB motherboard and the 5 ISA slots can be a hoot. (Yes Virginia, people did use monochrome monitors without graphics, and they like it!)

    1. Re:Blah ... by furchin · · Score: 1

      If this hurts you so much, then it stands to reason that you could have saved the machine he hacked up. Surely you can advertise that you'll buy old machines for a lot of money. I doubt this guy, who seems to like it, would have let his commodore 64 go for $100, but if you offered him $100,000, you'd probably have saved it. I'm sorry, I don't mean to be personal, its just that a lot of people seem to be complaining how this vintage piece of hardware was destroyed, yet I bet almost none of them try to save any vintage hardware themselves.

  70. Old Tandy 1000RL by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

    I've got an old Tandy 1000RL I've been thinking about putting X86 hardware into. Right now I'm using it as a monitor stand.

    I've also got an old Apple Performa 620/CD or something at work that I'm doing the same thing with. It would make a good funky style rack case if I ever had the motivation to do the modifications.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  71. Amiga rights by AlienRelics · · Score: 1

    Amiga rights are owned by... Amiga!

    Some ex-Gateway employees bought rights to use the Amiga name and patents and such.

    http://www.amiga.com

  72. Forgot something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ?syntax error in 570
    ready.

  73. Ten Years Behind the Curve by ewhac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is Old News.

    In the late 1980's, one of the Amiga luminaries, Dale Luck, got his hands on a Commodore SX-64 (when they were slightly less rare), hollowed it out, and stuck an Amiga 500 in it.

    Apparently one of the toughest parts of the hack was getting the keyboard to work as the C-64 keyboard layout and electronics are completely different from everything else. Fitting the motherboard was also a bit of a squeeze. All in all, it was an amusing hack, but because the SX-64's color monitor was of such low resolution, it was a struggle to read, even at 640 * 200 pixels. So it was cute but, alas, not useful.

    As others have already observered, gutting one of these rarities to stick a PC in it is just sacrelige.

    Schwab

  74. Re:Funny ?!? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    twas a joke, man. He's making a humorous statement by paraphrasing the annoying guy in the Dell TV commercials who says "Dude, you're getting a Dell."

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  75. Yawnnn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wake us up when there is a real 65x2 running at 1Ghz or faster.

  76. Blasphemy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are not that many SX-64s around.

    If this had been a broken unit he modified, I'd have said go for it, but he gutted a PERFECTLY WORKING SX just to fit in some PC.

    Blasphemy.

    --
    Jope

  77. not what i consider correct treatment of historics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, no one said id have to like that,
    but some people would kill for a rather intact SX64, given that they where RARE even back when they where state of the art.
    i had one, and i`ld give the proverbial arm and leg for one intact.

    gotta say whoever commited this atrocity isnt sane.
    would not slice a sx for a mere trashy x86.

    rc

  78. LOL by NaCh0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its a sad day for apple when even the commodore 64s are made faster than the crap they sell.

  79. Load *.* ,8,1 by hangingonwords · · Score: 1

    ehhh i miss my old C64. the times we had. if it weren't for my crack headed mom selling the damn thing for crack i would still be playing choplifter as we speak. i may want the fastest processor and the most ram to today's standards but i for one could never destroy such a work of art. this guy is a douche bag and i'm gonna "DREAM" about pissing on his little computer... /paul

    --
    fact: microsoft > linux
  80. Evil headline there by forgoil · · Score: 2

    First I thought that it was a really original hack, with making the poor C64 actually run at 1+GHz. That would have been awsome (no idea how you would do that though, but then again, I guess shrinking that old system into one single 0.15 micron chip would be easy today. And not only that, incredibly awsome ;)

  81. Thought by Ando[evilmedic] · · Score: 2

    Something new within something old.

    Beautiful.

  82. Re:Funny ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone should browse at -1.
    italic bold underlined

  83. obEbay link by Guiness17 · · Score: 2, Informative

    All this talk about them being so rare...are they really?

    Here's one and another SX-64.
    Not trying to troll here. I happen to collect (original, full size) arcade machines from the eighties, so I understand the pain when I see one gutted.

    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
    1. Re:obEbay link by Jouster · · Score: 2

      No idea if they're particularly rare, but it's old, and it's a computer. I'd take it, and pay eBay or better prices for it. Probably $50 or so, which I realize is less than the $100 he paid for it.

      And in response to your comment: it's also relatively easy to find NEXTCubes on eBay; they're nonetheless rare. They just happen to be at that magical point right now where many "normal" users are getting rid of them, creating opportunities for the collectors. In two years, it will be impossible to find a NEXTCube on eBay for less than $500.

      Jouster

    2. Re:obEbay link by corey_lawson · · Score: 1

      come on, think of the bright side. This guy just made everyone else's SX64's marginally more valuable in the long run.

  84. dont't you mean.. by The+Creator · · Score: 1

    PRESS PLAY ON TAPE

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
    1. Re:dont't you mean.. by operagost · · Score: 1

      Tape WOULD be better. There was a software hack that would actually make the tape load faster than a stock 1541. It would take all day and night, but at least you wouldn't have to swap floppies! Of course, you'd probably also need 5000 feet of tape, hard to fit in a compact cassette!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:dont't you mean.. by compwiz3688 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah... I remember those. I had an old, old Apple computer (I forgot which model, it's old enough to have a keyboard and CPU as one unit) and I used to load BASIC games from tapes.

      Then came the floppy drives with DOS (!) but it is actually a BASIC interpreter.

  85. Actually by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

    it's load"*",8,1

    --
    >
    1. Re:Actually by hangingonwords · · Score: 1

      yeah, didn't realize till it was too late... it's been too long my friend, too long...

      --
      fact: microsoft > linux
  86. Re:TAURUS!! by Blackneto · · Score: 1

    I had a 99 SE up till a few months ago. Never had a problem with it. Jet Black with a Silver stripe. My favorite team colors.
    Had to trade it in though with the immenant arrival of the 4th kid. Got an '02 Windstar Sport. The sucker has a 22~25gal tank on it.
    It too is jet black but no stripe yet.

    --
    Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
  87. Does this mean.. by thumbtack · · Score: 2

    that we can expect Club Caribe back anytime soon?

  88. Apple slow?? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0

    Umm... as far as I know a 800 mhz PowerPC
    has 3 times the power of a Pentium III with the same speed.

    So a 1000mhz ppc-chip is enough to kick the ass of a 2.8 GHz P4 (who is slower than P3 in many things!).

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  89. Speaking of commodores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just found this site.

    At least it's smth different than the standard frameset :)

  90. 6502 is easy... in software by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It's not so hard in software. VHDL may be another matter of course. Ugh, hardware :-(

    I wrote the guts of a 65816 core in C in a few days, which is a superset of the 6502. The bugs in it were due to inadequate documentation rather than inherent difficulty. e.g. if you perform TXS in native mode with 8 bit indexes, does the high byte of the stack get set to 1 or 0?

    6502 is very simple compared to Z80 or other 8 bit chips. I still think the SPC700 is the prettiest though :-) and current RISC chips with their weird special-purpose instructions barely deserve the name. Bring back the One Instruction Computer :-0

  91. I have an SX-64 by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2
    How rare can they be? ;-)

    I love the dinky screen, and how it uses the sensible VIC-20 colours - blue on white with cyan border, instead of blue on blue with blue border.

    But the disk drive is out of alignment and AFAIK you can't plug a tape deck into it. My cartridge selection is rather limited! I can connect it to my PC I guess using the PC-parallel - 1541 DIN plug, but I don't know if the software will still work on Windows XP... You may guess I haven't used it so much recently...

    1. Re:I have an SX-64 by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

      I wish I had those colors on mine. I got my SX-64 by chance. Someone had it out with the spring cleanup garbage. I got to it before the metal scrappers did. Of course, it didn't work, but after about 2 weeks of tedious troubleshooting, I discovered that someone had put a SID chip in the Kernel ROM socket (should have looked at the chip numbers first). I popped one out of a spare C64 and transplanted it to the SX-64 and it worked. However, I get the light blue/blue screen and C= + Run/Stop asks me to "Press Play On Tape". I still get it out from time to time. It's the only item in my collection that I keep in a closet instead of with the other collectables in the basement.

      As for drive alignment. It's rather easy, but you do need a formatted disk from a properly aligned drive, or a disk from a purchased game (which should be properly formatted).

      The technique is simple. You may need to search the net for some BASIC code for the C64 that will allow you to move the drive head to different tracks and continuously report the read error number as the drive is spinning. Should be a simple program to type in. Just move out to track 1, loosen the stepper motor screw and adjust the stepper motor until you get a good read code (I forget the actual code). Tighten down the screw and go to the other edge of the disk (Track 35). Verify and or adjust as needed. Then try the middle track (Track 18). After testing and adjusting where necessary, you should have a well aligned drive.

      This technique worked well at the user's groups for "field repair".

  92. They were auctioned by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    at the Discworld Convention 2002 slave auction ("3 beautiful goth chicks") and hardly anyone bid for them! It can't be that common a fantasy...

  93. Supporting evidence? by vrai · · Score: 1
    Without wishing to cast too much doubt on your assertion I was wondering if you had any independent figures to back it up (i.e. non-Apple/Intel).

    I only ask because if PPCs are three times as powerful as a P3 my next Linux box is going to be PPC based.

  94. I would be mighty impressed if... by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 1

    ... someone managed to port Windows XP to Commodore 64-SX (in its original configuration) and
    being able to run it... Just wonder how many tapes it would take to hold the bloated XP.

  95. Re:... and he hardly knew what he was talking abou by HeavensTrash · · Score: 1

    Well, you do realize you can rip apart that old Indy or IPX and buy a new one for much less than the cost of a PC case, right?

    As we're speaking now, I see a *working* IPX on Ebay for exactly $9.00, and an Indy R4600sc for $20.00...

    I mean really? Who doesn't have an old classic or sparc 2 they're using as a foot rest or door stop?

  96. Recycling Computer Cases by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

    I've been considering modding my old Macs into PCs, with two IIlc's holding FlexATX mobos if I can swing the port drilling properly (with a PCI riser for networking), and a PowerPC 6116 with a MicroATX board, gonna need to stock up on parts though, so in a sense I paid $15 a pop for used Mac cases... The systems are still functional, but frankly not much can be done with them...

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  97. I would have kept it compatible. by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    Commodore BASIC at 1.3ghz must be faster than vb on a processor of similar speed.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  98. there is NO vic20 chip in the sx64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tha main cpu is a 6510, 'cause it's a c64, the vic20 had a 6502. I think they are some diffs on the way they adress things... i'm not sure of the diffs...

    the graphics chip in the vic20 was the vic, the 64 got the vicII.

    no vic20 chip in the c64...

    i would have been more impressed if he had modded his sx64 with all the c64 add-ons like the super cpu, memory and hd expansions...

  99. A trend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a whole host of recycled cases at mini-itx.com - quite a few consoles and some silly ones too. They use mini-itx motherboards which are quite dinky, ideal for the smaller consoles. They haven't squeezed one into a Gamecube yet - has anyone done this? There's other sites, but this one gathers several together.

  100. Just *another* case mod.. big deal by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    Now if you created an actual C64sx that ran at 1ghz.. THAT would be an accomplishment.

    And no, emulation doesnt count.. :)

    Plus he destroyed a bit of history in the process ;(

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  101. This just in.... by thelmatr · · Score: 0

    Man in North Carolina upgrades his left nut to a 1.8 Gigahertz Athlon system, complete with DVD/R, Wireless networking, and 18" flat screen. Film at 11.

    --
    "Early rising is a vice, Ira; it'll stunt your growth and shorten your days." - L. Long
  102. In Other News: by Tsali · · Score: 1

    Formerly defunct Commodore Corporation has announced they will litigate against "mad modding bandits" who are taking their property and altering it claiming it was never meant to be run alternate hardware. The corporation hopes to come back via patent lawsuits to build the new Commodore Business Machine ][, or the CBM2-Box for short.

    --
    This space for rent.
  103. Re:Funny ?!? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    nobody should browse at -1 unless they're moderating. Very little happens below "1" worth reading.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  104. Major disappointment by billcopc · · Score: 1

    I was thinking the guy had used the laser clock generator to run his SX64 cpu at 1.2ghz. That would have been a hell of a lot more worthy than just sticking a goddamned Wintel chip in a weird box.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  105. Re:Yes!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why am i the only one who has that dream?

    *Real Genius

  106. classic quote. by mekkab · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Self-realization. I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, when he said, "I drank what?"

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  107. Re:For crying out loud - IMPORTANT by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Let me put this in terms I deal with all the time. Say I buy a guitar. I know that this guitar is not being made anymore and that I paid 100 dollars for it at a garage sale.

    I know that I can sell it right now for $400. I also know I can wait 5 years and it will be worth a grand - if I put it in it's case and leave it in the closet.

    If I play this guitar, invaribly I will put a ding in it here, a scratch in it there. I will need to change its strings, adjust the bridge, most likely adjust the neck. All these things are pretty much normal maintainance for an instrument that has not been played, or is heading into a new season.

    Say this guitar has a bad pickup in it (and I have decided to play it). I have these options:

    Leave it alone.

    A new Pickup

    Rewind the Original pickup.

    A new pickup destroys (the collector's) resale and also maximizes choice.

    A rewound pickup is less damaging to resale, but does not present as much choice.

    Blahblahblah.

    My point is this: People are watching too much Antiques Roadshow, and Lost Treasures, and endlessly refreshing pages on eBay. They lose sight of an important thing.

    In 90 percent of collectables, the 'collectable' item was *meant to be used*. Crackerjack toys were meant to be played with, China teapots were meant to serve hot tea, guitars were meant to be played, cars were meant to be driven.

    That is the purpose of their existence. These items had something special about them: they worked well for their purpose, they were fun, they never broke, or you had your first date in one.

    In many of these items, form follows function - an apple peeler used by Gramma looks pretty much the same as one you can buy now. In some guitars (especially) function follows form - they look great, but were cheaply made, or are banged up and *used*.

    If I love the form of a NeXT cube enough, I'll want to use it all the time. I'll want to see it, and touch it, and *use* it but I don't do things that that hardware can do.

    Sure, I have stuff that is put away and not modded, or used. I have Hot Wheels still in the package, I have a guitar that sits in a case, I have a Beatles keychain in a drawer. I can look at these things and be happy I have something that not many others have - but I'd rather be using them in the context of their creation.

    Some things I have learned in my short lifetime - Keep and use the things you love, get rid of the things you don't. Life is too short to be worried about resale.

    You get one ticket for the ride, make sure its the ride you want to be on.

  108. They might... by mekkab · · Score: 1

    And they might give you a "gentleman's C" when you can't get your goddamn FPU to work! (I hate verilog)

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  109. Just to clarify... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, this site is not run on the c64. I am hosting this site for neil from a cable modem with a 384k upstream cap. That is why it's as slow as something running off a c64. It's actually a debian box with a duron 600 (cpu is 98% idle). this guy seems to have done a good job mirroring it: http://www.thereifs.com/~dan/SDM/3. Sorry the server sucks, but I didn't know it was on slashdot until this morning when I couldn't even telnet to my box...

    1. Re:Just to clarify... by Jouster · · Score: 2

      Drop me a line, dude. dan@BLOCKtheSPAMreifs.com, remove "BLOCK" and "SPAM".

      Jouster

  110. Beetle Trike by Nintendork · · Score: 2

    After reqading that, I just had to do a google search on beetle trike. LOL

  111. My little geek!! by NANANAHEY · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm so happy for you Neil!! I love you!!

    1. Re:My little geek!! by Neil+the+SX-64+Guy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I love you too April!

  112. Why does everyone keep saying how rare these are? by gatekeep · · Score: 2

    There's a couple on eBay And at $41.00, not too expensive.

  113. Re:TAURUS!! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking Windstar if I wind up getting stuck in minivan mode. With any luck, there will be some decent large wagons available by then. How is the performance? Mileage?

    What's your favorite team? Raiders?

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  114. Thanks for taking interest in my project all by Neil+the+SX-64+Guy · · Score: 1
    sorry about the site going down and stuff, my friend hosts it through a cable modem we were NOT expecting to get slashdotted for a while to come...

    also f** anyone here who thinks that this is 'murder' to an old collectible... 99% of my emails come from people who are 'die hard' c64 collectors, and they love the mod. i say it brings the c64 into a new era. like sticking a new V8 into an old MG midget or something. if these things are so rare, why can i pick up a used one on ebay for under $100???

    i did NOT put any window kits in it. i did NOT put any neons or LEDs on it.. i kept it as stealth as i could, and it still runs the emulator.. no C64 functionality has been lost, except for the cartridge. oh well. i think it's worth it, seriously

    but thanks to all who have enjoyed this site, i will keep it updated so please visit back. i've still got a lot of work to go...

    -neil jansen
    http://sx64.opsys.net

    1. Re:Thanks for taking interest in my project all by Jouster · · Score: 2

      Drop me a line, dan@BLOCKtheSPAMreifs.com, remove "BLOCK" and "SPAM".

      Jouster

    2. Re:Thanks for taking interest in my project all by kobotronic · · Score: 2

      Very cool project - and thanks for documenting it as you went. I gave away my SX64 in spring when moving overseas, otherwise I should be tempted to try something similar. Would an internal wi-fi card work behind one of the plastic panels? That way you could save one of the 9-pin control ports for a joystick.

  115. Re:Can you say word-wrap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, really. What's the big deal here?

    He basically built a PIII system into his SX64 casing. The original post makes it sound like the PIII is actually used (in some way) by the C64 system. Like, using the PIII as a calculations co-processor.

    Now, that would have been news for nerds.

  116. Alien Syndrome by Milican · · Score: 1

    I remember when I was a little kid and bought Alien Syndrome at Babbages. Brought it home looked on the back cover and got all amped about the graphics. Long story short is it didn't work. I called tech support and they didn't support the SX-64, only the C-64. Man was I disappointed. But Mail Order Monsters sure did rule!

    JOhn

  117. 1GHz SX-64s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of THESE!!!

  118. test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    larry22@clarice.2y.net

    sorry this is a test

  119. university test by EEgopher · · Score: 1

    An agreeable project, to VHDL the M6502. First test case: floating-point mult/div, of course. But you are more correct to assume the importance of game-plaing ability.

    the warm, pulling sensation of falling, smiling and watching the screen through shimmering tears.

    "I really did it! I could destroy 99 ships in Taipan for the Apple IIe when I was eight years old! Now I can barely operate the wall plug without getting confused."

    Good. Old. Days.

    --
    hi, I like pancakes -.-- -.-- --..
  120. Hmm, he sure sounds happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The page now says:

    fuck you, slashdot.

    I had to take the page down because the site is hosted on a cable modem with a 384k upstream cap! Try a mirror instead.

  121. Re:TAURUS!! by Blackneto · · Score: 1

    well Performance is well, it's a minivan :P steering and get up and go are tight though.
    Mileage is very close to the Taurus though, only 2 gal less/mi.
    and yes, the Raiders.

    --
    Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
  122. Re:Funny ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Dung,

    A LOT happens down here in the -1 realm. This is
    where REAL men hang out because we're not afraid of
    "mod-duh-rators".

    Dogbert

  123. all I have to say is.. WHY? by madshot · · Score: 1

    why? Then again thats like asking a ham radio operator why he makes a light blink everytime foot steps are heard in the dark. exactly, why..

    --
    Obama = Socialism.
  124. Re:For crying out loud - IMPORTANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I really liked what you said- I've always wondered why people dont use some things- guys who buy bikes/cars that are dream machines and do maybe 400 miles/year, or just garage them. That's a crime really and totally pointless. Unless something gets trashed it can usually be restored. Sometimes its nice to keep old things, and yeah sometimes its nice to see things in good condition, but ultimately its pointless...like everything else it just turns into memories which is all we have left at the end of this ride. I remember my first car, bike, computer etc, and they were great, but things move on and we get to experience something new all the time.

    Whoops, I'm rambling. But I like what you said.

  125. Re:... and he hardly knew what he was talking abou by KewlPC · · Score: 1

    My Indy runs just fine. My IPX just came today, so I haven't gotten a chance to test it out.

    And I paid $10 for it.

    But that doesn't change the fact that I would never take the guts out just so I could have a PC in an IPX case.

  126. How to make a custom ATX supply for the SX64 by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

    I dashed off an e-mail to the guy after I saw on his website that he seemed to be interested in building a linear power supply with designs from a Radio Shack book.

    Given the apparent quality of his project so far, that didn't seem right... here's the e-mail for others to consider if they're trying similar projects.

    Please remember that opening a computer power supply does expose you to potentially lethal amounts of power. Also, they run off the line power (120V/240V), and component failures or other problems can cause fires. Don't play with them unless you know what you're doing.

    ######

    Hey,

    Cool project. Kinda disappointed to see ?irreversible? modifications to something as rare as an SX64, but your artistry is evident.

    I was planning on doing something similar with an old PET I have with a fried motherboard. The PET was retired from a school - while the front decal is in pretty good shape, the cabinet needs to be repainted and a few other things. Of course, the difficulty in building the SuperPET Ultra will be less than yours. :) And I'm certainly not worried about putting a CD/DVD-ROM behind a floppy drive door; almost everything I do comes across the ethernet.

    Color CRT into the PET? Nah, I'll probably hack an old monochrome NEC MultiSync to drive the PET's green phosphor monochrome CRT and call it good. (I want 800x600 or better; of course, on a 5" SX64 CRT, that's less of an issue...)

    i bought a book down at radio-shack, "Building Power Supplies" (RS#276-5025), which gave me all the calculations i needed to come up with a decent design.

    Uhh... having never seen that book, I'm not sure if it book covers switching supplies in sufficient depth to design one for a computer. And you don't want a linear ~250W computer power supply, they're very heavy. (See http://www.glowingplate.com/ticard/ for a similar situation which TI built.)

    the only problem now is that all the parts will run me around $60, which i don't have (it's so high because i need seperate supplies for the +3.3v, +5v, +12v, and -12v. a normal ATX PSU actually uses a single multi-tapped transformer-style coil to step the voltage down, whereas i'll need seperate coils and controllers for each voltage). since i do have a power supply that works for now, this will probably be my last part of this project.

    At this point, you have a PC board template planned out. My suggestion is labor-intensive but less so than attempting to design a switching supply from scratch (trust me on that). Don't underestimate how much time it will take you to get through stuff like the Power_Good comparator circuit or the ATX controls.

    Switching supplies are a nightmare to build on your own. The tiny little transformer on your board steps down ~250W of power. To do this with a linear supply requires a huge and heavy transformer because it's running off the line frequency of 60Hz. All other things being equal, transformers get smaller as the frequency increases.

    Since you're a Commodore man, you might know the transformer in a PET. I figure it's rated for about 100W of power at 60Hz. Open up any modern supply and you'll find a tiny one on the board which handles about 250W. This is not Moore's Law of Power Supply Design. :)

    Most modern computer power supplies are probably running around 50kHz. Of course, the chopper which cuts up the incoming power must be very accurately tuned to the resonance of the transformer; generally, you're dealing with (impractical in single unit quantities) a custom transformer.

    But someone else has already done all this stuff for you...

    Get yourself a good ATX supply; two identical ones are preferable so that you can compare notes along the way. Open it up; discharge all the capacitors. Place the PC board on the stage of an overhead projector, then map out the schematic using that backlighting. Even if you don't know what all the windings in the transformers and chokes do, just represent those components as little boxes with pin numbers on your schematic. Label *every* component by type number.

    Once you've got the schematic completed, get a friend (or several) to go over a copy, crossing off each and every connection to every component as soon as they're confirmed to be correct.

    Transcribe the schematic into Eagle CAD or another PC board autorouter. (OrCAD is good if you're running Windows, but I hate Windows, so I don't use it.) Import the PC board template, place large/special components where you need them to be, then tell it to route the board.

    Check it over again. Etch the board. (Apparently, this isn't a problem to you, judging from your work.) Transfer the corresponding components one at a time from the original PC board to your new PC board.

    All consumer electronics are cheap crap, using the lowest-rated (ie cheapest) components possible. While you're transferring components, replace electrolytic capacitors with ones having the same values (in uF) but higher voltage, temperature and ripple current ratings. Replace 1/4 watt resistors with same-value 1/2 watt resistors. If you can find a given transistor or MOSFET type, look it up and choose the one with the same parameters but the next-highest voltage, current and dissipation ratings. Get an electrical engineer or technician friend to help you. This supply should now last an order of magnitude longer than it would with its original components.

    Your 10lb aluminum heatsink will, without any question, cool the power supply's power transistors enough to eliminate the fan. Make sure you put mica insulating hardware between the transistors and the heatsink; you want to be able to ground the aluminum. The heatsink might get warm but should not get too hot to touch; the attached transistors will almost definitely be running cooler (and will last longer) than they would in the original supply.

    The airflow through the original power supply case also cools the transformers. I'd place the main transformer right next to the aluminum heatsink and devise a thermally-conductive clamp to hold the transformer against it. Heatsink grease will be your friend. I don't think the magnetic field leaking from the transformer will be sufficient to cause worrysome eddy currents in an aluminum clamp pulling heat away from the transformer.

    Just a couple of thoughts for you. Should cut your costs and yield a more practical/reliable project.

    Thanks for the great read,

    Lawrence

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  127. Re:Funny ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oooooh now I get it (not from the US).

    but mods are still on crack : 5 - funny
    (5 ?!? It deserves a 2 max)

  128. Not Moterola by Felinoid · · Score: 2

    Short story:
    MOS designed and produced the 6500 Moterola sued them to the brink of death. 6502 was the compramise.
    The chip so named for using Moterola's pateted buss hence the lawsute.
    Before MOS went to silicon hell (Red Dwarf refence) Commodore bought them up.
    From then on Commodore would make it's own chips.. Except for rom and ram as anyone looking inside an old Commodore 8 bit can tell.

    Moterola never made a 65xx chip.

    Side note 6502 clones are still made today and still a populare chip in low end applications (not computers)

    http://www.6502.org/

    When I saw this story I thought someone cloned the whole 65xx chip line and broke the speed barrer on em.
    But part of me knew it was just someone gutting a sx64 for a pentium 4 system.

    This'll be ideal when I get my time travle card working.
    Then my computer will look 'normal' when I go back in time and tell my yonger self I'm an idiot.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  129. Re:Funny ?!? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

    A LOT happens down here in the -1 realm.

    Yeah, I've browsed at -1 before. That's where all the potty jokes, goatse.cx references, and f1r5t p05t! crap happens.If being a "real man" requires talking about poop, showing stretched asshole pics, and being the first dog to piss on the tree, count me out.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  130. NOT A MOTHERFUCKING TROLL!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Slashdot moderation has gone to shit, and is gettin stinkier every day. what fuckwit retard modded this as a troll? how is it a troll? you didnt even fucking read it did you? you lowlife gutter licking pig raping cock touting cesspool swimming sister fucking ring whore. your arse makes Goatse guy's look like a goldfish's shithole. READ AND UNDERSTAND BEFORE MODERATING [OR NOT]!!! cuntwit. I'm modding the man back up if/when i can, to teach you pathetic little pre-pubescent shit-mincers how to fucking moderate!

  131. Re:I'm modding the man back up if/when i can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Motherfucking done!

  132. Re:I'm modding the man back up if/when i can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh arse-rapers, it didn't do that [undo mod from an AC post] before. At least it makes sense. *makes mental note to use other IP/box next time*

  133. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    FORTRAN, "the infantile disorder", by now nearly 20 years old, is hopelessly
    inadequate for whatever computer application you have in mind today: it is
    too clumsy, too risky, and too expensive to use.
    -- Edsger W. Dijkstra, SIGPLAN Notices, Volume 17, Number 5

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...