Slashdot Mirror


Grab A Bunk In The Dot-Com Dorm

airrage writes "According to this Washington Post article, the University of Maryland has created "dot com" like dorms complete will all the necessary executive perks: wood desks, leather chairs, wireless, whiteboards; all to encourage entrepreneurship. Apparently, it's working too. Twenty of the students have created their own start-up firms, and six are already generating revenue."

298 comments

  1. 3 of the 6... by SimplexO · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... have already started layoffs and are now filing for chapter 11.

    1. Re:3 of the 6... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yep. In a couple of years, the university can start providing "dot-bomb cardboard box under the bridge" dorms to complete the students' learning experience.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:3 of the 6... by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      And they can have teachers promise "A's" all semester and then flunk them at the last second, just to teach them all about venture capatalists.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    3. Re:3 of the 6... by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 5, Funny

      How may of the 6 that have posted profits have lied about their bookkeeping? :)

      -- That's a hoax/scam/virus and your friend is a moron.

      --
      When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
    4. Re:3 of the 6... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I had thought it was only about the technology. You're not going to catch us doing the same thing that's already been done," said Lei Gong. "Part of this program is that we get to take risks and fail here first, before we're 28 or 29 and have kids to think about."


      ugh... feel... so... very... old...

  2. Now if only my landlord... by TibbonZero · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... had the same type of ideas.
    Hey, if I make money, I keep paying the rent- No money, no rent.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  3. Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am waiting for Co-Ed Porn Dorms. There would be lighting rigs, a queen sized bed, and hot bi-sexual co-eds who will do anything for tuition money.

    1. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bisexual men? Why is it that every computer nerd and or Slashdot reader is a gay man?

    2. Re:Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it like that now already? Well, the bisexual students part anyway.

    3. Re:Eh... by new500 · · Score: 3, Informative
  4. Encouraging pr0n? by FaasNat · · Score: 5, Funny

    So how many of them are running porn sites?

    --
    There's never enough when you have too little
    1. Re:Encouraging pr0n? by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      6, man, didn't you read it?

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Encouraging pr0n? by pjgeer · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, 5 of the 6 are webcams: deviantdorm.com, randy-RA.net, studyhard.com, cramsession.org, and all.holes.filled.with.hard.cock.com. The 6th sells accounts to view stills pirated from the others.

    3. Re:Encouraging pr0n? by unicron · · Score: 2, Funny

      all.holes.filled.with.hard.cock.com

      "What was it again?"

      "Happy Scrappy Hero Pup"

      "HAPPY SCRAPPY!"

      "She loves it."

      "Yeah, obviously. Oh hi, lemme get one copy of the following..."

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  5. Good success rate they have there by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only 6 out of 20 are generating revenue? Sounds like a pretty realistic dot-com environment to me.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:Good success rate they have there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 out of those 6 are selling open source software freely available on the Net. The 4 individuals dropped out of marketing class.

    2. Re:Good success rate they have there by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Only 6 out of 20 are generating revenue? Sounds like a pretty realistic dot-com environment to me.

      Also note they said "revenue", not "profit". Even petfood.com had revenue. Just not enough to cover expenses. The VC's in this case are the parents.

      Welcome to Prick-U

    3. Re:Good success rate they have there by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Funny

      " Only 6 out of 20 are generating revenue?"

      Those 6 probably sold the furniture on eBay.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    4. Re:Good success rate they have there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 out of those 6 are selling open source software freely available on the Net.

      Do they offer phone support? I'll take one.

  6. Six are generating revenue... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How many are profitable? I could generate revenue selling old paper cups to morons over the internet, but I bet I wouldn't make any money at it.

    But this gives the \. readership something to strive for once they get out of high school, so I suppose it's topical.

    -MondoMor

    1. Re:Six are generating revenue... but by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      But this gives the \. readership something...

      Which reminds me, isn't it about time for a Backslashdot?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:Six are generating revenue... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, \. is Slashdot on DOS.

    3. Re:Six are generating revenue... but by Lev13than · · Score: 2
      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    4. Re:Six are generating revenue... but by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Yes! Exactly!

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    5. Re:Six are generating revenue... but by jfortier · · Score: 1

      Ummm... I think Backslashdot was slashdotted.

    6. Re:Six are generating revenue... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think it was DOSed.

  7. Uh, better read the fine print... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...if I recall correctly there was language in all the paperwork I signed when I went to school that said something to the effect of 'everything you do while you're attending college belongs to the college'.

    Does anyone know of any possible consequenses to this type of arrangement, or if that sort of agreement is even enforcable?

    1. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by User+956 · · Score: 5, Informative

      if I recall correctly there was language in all the paperwork I signed when I went to school that said something to the effect of 'everything you do while you're attending college belongs to the college'.

      Yeah, that sounds about right.

      Don't like it? Don't go to a major university.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, these guys are completely screwed if they do anything interesting at all while in college.

      This is the main reason that when you do something valueable you dropout of college BEFORE you announce it to the world.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    3. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by pbranes · · Score: 3, Insightful
      As far as I know, this is enforcable. I know several people who have had to sign agreements similar to this when starting jobs. Any patents, books, or marketable products even remotely related to what the company makes became the property of the computer, or in one case, the company got 40% of any profit from such products. I'm assuming that since these types of agreements are legal in the business world, they apply to the college world as well.

      In some ways, I guess it is good because people won't start selling a ripoff of the company's product, or use company tools to make an invention and then sell it for personal profit. However, I can see it being bad because it also restricts what you can do with the knowledge you gain from a job. If you are able to invent something great, using only the knowledge you have gotten from a job, it seems unfair that you don't actually have any rights to that idea.

    4. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by User+956 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, or you can steal ideas from other people at the University, and then leave to start your own company. That's how Cisco did it, and it seems to be working out for them.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    5. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by orangesquid · · Score: 2

      What I want to know is...

      Do they have to pay for their internet access? My University (www.udel.edu) does not allow students to use the free ineternet for non-academic uses---running a business or having any sort of network server is specifically mentioned as a violation of the terms of the contract. (Is it just me, or is the server part kind of... strange?)

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    6. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by suman28 · · Score: 1

      That's just like anyone who is a step ahead of the rest. They have the money and the power. But they want more. So they encourage you to do more business because you will generate revenue for them. Then one day they can claim it as their "intellectual" property.

    7. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by Ponty · · Score: 1

      The server part is probably to cover their ass against you running a big warez site or some such thing. CMU, where I go, fortunately has more liberal policies: you can do anything legal from your dorm server but use the University resources for business purposes, IIRC.

      (But if you are running a warez server, or are hoovering up bandwidth, watch out. John Lerchey's patience is short and being disconnected from the network is fairly common.)

    8. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by briancnorton · · Score: 1

      What it says is that anything you do while under university supervision or on the university's dime is their property. If they are funding your research, they get a cut. If an undergrad develops a better mousetrap on their own time, the university has no claim to it.

      --

      People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    9. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      everything you do while you're attending college belongs to the college

      BREAKING NEWS! Young entrepreneur gives University of Maryland V.D.! More at 11:00!

    10. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if I knock-up some co-ed, while living in one of these plush executive dorms, does that mean the kid belongs to the school? Thank God!

    11. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by truesaer · · Score: 2

      I've heard people say this before, but I never signed anything that I know of when I came to my university. Maybe its different as a grad student, but all I had to sign was an application and that only said that I was swearing to the truthfulness of my answers.

    12. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if I knock-up some co-ed, while living in one of these plush executive dorms, does that mean the kid belongs to the school? Thank God!

      He he.

      Where do you think they get all the bastards to dream up dumb ideas like this dot-com shite?

    13. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

      Nah, Univ. of Maryland's Office of Information Technology is pretty liberal with internet usage. I just read an article on it actually... they'll only flag your usage if you avearge more than 2 Mbps/s over a 24 hr period. So that's 21.6 GB of data. And I never signed anything about non-academic use when I went there. If it is policy, it's certainly not being enforced.

    14. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by Palshife · · Score: 1

      Don't like it? Don't go to a major university.

      Either that or GPL your work. That's exactly what I did for my computer science classes.

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    15. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by sahala · · Score: 2

      hahaha....i remember lerchey. he busted me for mp3 distribution and pulled my network connection. he definitely didn't take any bullshit from me when I tried to justify my actions. no network for 2 months (rest of sem.) sucked, but it wasn't too hard to find a workaround. hah...lerchey.

    16. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Well with the sorry state the network took post-Napster you wouldn't even be able to run a server if you wanted to, unless you were serving TXT and 2-color GIFs.

      My friend who went to Lehigh for a year in 1997, said that someone was using Lehigh's bandwidth to run a porn site, and the site was taken down after a few weeks because the university couldn't handle the traffic. IIRC he made a few thousand in that time span.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    17. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      Gah that was a document of nothing but links- let's pretend I'm so lazy that I cannot bring myself to read the answer which is so clearly in front of my face- even if I'm in my dorm room working on a project completely unrelated to a class I am taking, or heck even general subject, can they impose this on me? (The answer will be trickled down through hundreds if not thousands of similarly lazy people- someone can be a hero, and all you need to do is read for about 6 to 7 weeks)

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    18. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by Necromancyr · · Score: 1

      This isn't abnormal in science. I would say 99% of all discoveries made by researchers at either research institutions or universities themselves are owned - in whole or major part - by the university itself. It provides them with rights to sell the product/technology/etc. developed and gain increased income from it. Look into some of the most famous discoveries of all time (pennicillin, streptomycin, etc.) and you'll find their discoverers did not make much off them - if anything. The other thing, is that this shows the move by the academic sector towards a more commercial outlook. These agreements are commonplace (I had to sign one as a college intern) in industry, and are never questioned there.

    19. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by skyhawker · · Score: 1
      OK -- I did. In the next to last cited reference, University of California Policy on Copyright Ownership, we have the following quote:

      C. Student Work

      A student work is a work produced by a registered student without the use of University funds (other than Student Financial Aid), that is produced outside any University employment, and is not a sponsored, contracted facilities, or commissioned work.

      Ownership of copyrights to student works shall reside with the originator. (Emphasis added.)


      So in the University of California system, at least, students own their own work -- unless they get paid for it via a research grant or something, maybe. What am I missing here?
      --

      The best diplomat I know is a fully activated phaser bank.
      -- Scotty.
    20. Re:Uh, better read the fine print... by novakreo · · Score: 1

      Any patents, books, or marketable products even remotely related to what the company makes became the property of the computer,

      You know there's trouble when computers start owning your property :-)

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
  8. I think that sums it up... by still_sick · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    "Twenty of the students have created their own start-up firms, and six are already generating revenue."

    If six are generating revenue, then fourteen are a money-pit, no?

    --
    ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    1. Re:I think that sums it up... by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Well, they're still paying tuition, aren't they?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:I think that sums it up... by User+956 · · Score: 2

      Well, they're still paying tuition, aren't they?

      Hey, bleeding the employees was Loki's strategy, and their CEO made out ok. Maybe that's the plan here.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    3. Re:I think that sums it up... by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "If six are generating revenue, then fourteen are a money-pit, no?"

      Not necessarily. All you can say is that they aren't generating revenue. We know nothing of their expenses and we know nothing about what phase the businesses are in.

      Scenario 1: Bob and Ted come up with a killer business idea. They incorporate as a business, come up with a business plan, and begin looking for investors to provide venture capital. So far, all expenses have been trivial out of pocket stuff (incorporation fees plus some phone calls and maybe minor travel). Is the business generating revenue? No. Is it fair to call it a money pit just because it's taken in some money? No.

      Scenario 2: Bob and Ted have found the venture capital. They're currently in the process of spending it in order to develop the product that their business will sell. Since the product isn't ready yet, they obviously can't sell it. Is the business generating revenue? No. Is it fair to call it a money pit? Not if the product can be finished with the money they've got and will sell well.

      So just because a business doesn't instantly jump from existing to generating revenue is no reason to label it a money pit. Sure there were dot coms that spent lots of cash and wound up with nothing to show for it. There were also companies that spent lots of cash and then wound up with even more cash to show for it.

    4. Re:I think that sums it up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's already better than the music industry...

    5. Re:I think that sums it up... by still_sick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, Firstly I think you meant to say "Bill and Ted", but anyways...

      "Scenario 2: Bob and Ted have found the venture capital. They're currently in the process of spending it in order to develop the product that their business will sell. Since the product isn't ready yet, they obviously can't sell it. Is the business generating revenue? No. Is it fair to call it a money pit? Not if the product can be finished with the money they've got and will sell well."

      Sorry, but I disagree here. Your first point, alright. But this to me is the very definition of money-pit - Throwing tons of money at an idea that "will" pay off in the future. By your own scenario, the definition of money-pit can only be applied retroactively. If you throw a ton of money at something for two years, it's in limbo - if it comes up bad then it must have been a money-pit.

      I'd say that a business is a money-pit untill it starts generating revenue. At that point it loses its pit status, but untill it demonstrates that you're better of investing your money than burning it...

      ... I suddenly have a strange compulsion to rent a Tom Hanks movie...

      --
      ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    6. Re:I think that sums it up... by warpSpeed · · Score: 2, Redundant
      Scenario 1: Bob and Ted

      Thats Bill and Ted, and thier Excelent Venture, Dude!

      Scenario 2: Bob and Ted

      This venture is run by Bob and Alice, because it involved crypto.

    7. Re:I think that sums it up... by transient · · Score: 1
      It might be the other way around, too. They could all be in the money pit. Profit equals revenue minus expenses. Positive revenue does not necessarily mean positive profit.

      --

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    8. Re:I think that sums it up... by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Ok, Firstly I think you meant to say "Bill and Ted", but anyways..."

      If it were Bill and Ted, then the business would almost certainly become a money pit.

      "But this to me is the very definition of money-pit - Throwing tons of money at an idea that "will" pay off in the future."

      Except that I never said tons of money. Also, there's a difference between spending money on an idea and just throwing it at it. If I purchase a store front, renovate it to add tables and a kitchen, prepare a menu, and hire a chef and wait-staff that will begin working next week, have I created a money pit? Probably not. Yet, I've still got a week before more restaurant will take off.

      There's an inherent timelag between the initial outlay of money in a business and when money starts coming back in. It varies based on the business -- in a software context, it often takes a significant amount of time before you've got something you can sell.

      "By your own scenario, the definition of money-pit can only be applied retroactively."

      Not quite. It can only be confirmed absolutely retroactively, but that's just because hindsight is 20/20. Before that point, it's something of a judgement call. If a business is spending what it expected to spend, and it's on-track for the goals that it has set, then it seems odd to label it a money pit.

      For example, let's say Bob and Ted discover that there's a good market for a certain software product, via carefully conducted market studies. Now let's say they find that, as far as they can tell, no one is developing such a product. They plan out the software development and decide that it'll take 6 months of work from a 3 man programming team to get this done. Since Bob and Ted are both business students who don't know how to program, they use their venture capital to hire 3 programmers. At the 3 month mark, the project is on schedule and shaping up great. At the 5 month mark, it's slightly ahead of schedule. Bob and Ted have spent 15 months worth of programmer pay, and they've gotten exactly what they were expecting from the spent money. Is this a money pit? I honestly believe it isn't, as there's nothing to imply that they're wasting the money.

      Now consider a similar case. Only at the 4 month mark, they discover that they're behind schedule and hire a 4th programmer. At the 5 month mark, they're further behind schedule, and they have reason to believe that they greatly overestimated the demand for their software. In this case, they are most likely wasting money, and it's already turning into a money pit.

      The key thing is that a money pit is a pit. The business has started tossing cash into it, and isn't getting results. In the non-pit case, even though there's no revenue, there are measurable results to indicate that the money has been properly spent and that the business is on the right track for profitability.

      "I'd say that a business is a money-pit untill it starts generating revenue. At that point it loses its pit status, but untill it demonstrates that you're better of investing your money than burning it..."

      That method prevents you from seeing the big picture. If an investment is at the point where it has an 80% chance of paying off tenfold what you put into it over the next 3 years, but it's not paying off yet, then you're certainly better off than if you had burned the money. All investment is a gamble, but some of it is a gamble where the odds are stacked in your favor. If that's the case, then it's considered a good investment up until/unless it actually fails. In the long run (or over a variety of investments), the investor wins.

    9. Re:I think that sums it up... by Samrobb · · Score: 2
      Since Bob and Ted are both business students who don't know how to program, they use their venture capital to hire 3 programmers. At the 3 month mark, the project is on schedule and shaping up great. At the 5 month mark, it's slightly ahead of schedule. Bob and Ted have spent 15 months worth of programmer pay, and they've gotten exactly what they were expecting from the spent money. Is this a money pit?

      No - it sounds a whole lot more like bloody drug-induced daydream :-)

      A version closer to reality:

      Since Bob and Ted are both business students who don't know how to program, they waste 2 months trying to put together a prototype using Adobe Acrobat. After that crashes and destroys a hard drive (and their mp3 collection), they use their venture capital to grudgingly hire 2 programmers. At the 3 month mark, the project is already behing schedule and continuing to slip, as they forgot to buy hardware for their developers to use. At the 5 month mark, it's obvious that the schedule was a complete fantasy, and the developers tell Bob and Ted that it will take at least anotehr 6 months to finish the work. They are promptly fired for their insolence, and with the VC's putting pressure on them to deliver, Bob and Ted hire a VP of Sales, reasoning that they can always "clean up" their prototype and sell that until they can get their feet under them. After 3 months, the VP of sales is fired for non-performance, the company goes under, and Bob and Ted go on to be VPs at some poor company that's gullible enough to think that because they've failed, they've somehow gained "value" experience.
      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
  9. It sounds rather forced... by Jedi+Paramedic · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "The thing about the Hinman program is that it's faculty-sponsored, it's not student-driven. It's really quite remarkable to say, 'We're not only going to teach classes, but we're going to get these kids to live together,' and it's often over those late-night pizzas where the best ideas are born."
    I dunno... It's a great idea to foster entrepreneurship and group work, but can it really work when the school seems to be throwing a bunch of self-selected eligible potential e-tycoons in a really nice dorm?

    On the other hand, maybe they're just playing the odds that if they throw 100 people together and provide the infrastructure and cell phones, one of them is bound to come up with enough of a marketable idea to make a bajillion dollars.
    --

    That's my purse! I don't know you! -- Bobby Hill
    1. Re:It sounds rather forced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it's often over those late-night pizzas where the best ideas are born."


      Most great ideas are born in the middle of the night when it finally click's in... the sudden snap at 4 am.... with an "AHHA!" and then coding or drawing/writing until morning...

    2. Re:It sounds rather forced... by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, maybe they're just playing the odds that if they throw 100 people together and provide the infrastructure and cell phones, one of them is bound to come up with enough of a marketable idea to make a bajillion dollars.

      And then make huge donations to get buildings named after them later :P

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    3. Re:It sounds rather forced... by kayell · · Score: 1

      As a Hinman CEO, I'd like to say that we're not self selected - it's a strenuous application process and a fabulous opportunity if you make it in. It's not as luxe as they make it out to be; I guess they want all that leather chair crap to be part of the image. But what it is is a wonderful networking and brainstorming environment for would-be entrepreneurs. Before we graduate and join the workforce to be mindless drones, this is what we see as our chance to be creative and be different...and hopefully break through to run our own successful business.

    4. Re:It sounds rather forced... by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      If one out of every 100 people made a bajillion dollars, there would be far too much money out there... :)

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  10. And the good news is by sulli · · Score: 2

    they got all the furniture off ebay for pennies on the dollar.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:And the good news is by glitch! · · Score: 2

      they got all the furniture off ebay for pennies on the dollar.

      Not necessarily. Some (many?) eBay sellers are truly weasels.

      "Congratulations on winning that chair for $50. The shipping and handling will be $200, plus $100 for insurance. Please send your money order for $350 to ..."

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    2. Re:And the good news is by invenustus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Good thing I always get confirmation of the shipping/handling/insurance charges before bidding.

      --
      grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
  11. 6 Generating Revenue.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow.. That's almost as many that were generating revenue before the burst..

  12. In other news today... by Noryungi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two of these students have been seen driving BMWs with stickers saying: "I burned 20 M$ in VC financing and all I got was this lousy gas-guzzler"...

    Ten other students declared personal bankruptcy after failing the IPOs of their start-up, citing the lousy performance of the financial market...

    And two former CS professors have seen panhandling outside the University with carboard signs saying: "will teach Java programming for food".

    So what else is new? =)

    (as if giving someone a leather chair was going to transform him/her overnight into a PHB with a clue... Sheesh...)

    This story should be in the it's funny: laugh section.

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:In other news today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't change your sig to not make it look like a reply, I'm going to mod you down

  13. FUNNIEST. ARTICLE. EVER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I wouldn't trust "wannabe guru" CS majors with anything. All university proves is that you were too pussy to join the real world when you should have.

    1. Hire newly graduated CS students.
    2. Discover Solaris has been replaced with Linux development kernel and GNOME.
    3. Customers go elsewhere for professional services and products after meeting obnoxious, smelly and arrogant "techies".
    4. ???
    5. Profit.

    1. Re:FUNNIEST. ARTICLE. EVER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and where does that put those of us who spent 6 years working our way through university?

      I value my CS degree, I think actually learning the math is invaluable.

    2. Re:FUNNIEST. ARTICLE. EVER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I value my CS degree,

      You may be the only one. The world is changing, and the most important things can't be learned in schools right now.

    3. Re:FUNNIEST. ARTICLE. EVER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, I mean, who the hell needs perseverence, rigor and accountability when you can have, uh... real-world experience. Which usually means "lived in my parents' basement for four years and ate pizza to try and be more like CowboyNeal".

  14. Ownership Dispute by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What about the ownership of the individual business models or products?

    At my university, all products and ideas developed on university owned equipment is property of the university. Is that to say that since the whiteboards and other "idea-inducing" workspaces and utilities are functionally provided by the university, and on university property, should they belong to the university?

    Should they and will they are obviously two different questions...

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
    1. Re:Ownership Dispute by mizhi · · Score: 1

      I do believe that you go to my Alma Mater. As far as I know, they own everything that I wrote there... least the stuff I told them about. :-)

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    2. Re:Ownership Dispute by marauder404 · · Score: 2

      Don't think about your company while taking a shit on their toilets. They might take it from you. Your idea, that is.

  15. VCs by rtphokie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Venture capitalists, lawyers and serial entrepreneurs drop by weekly to impart wisdom and to mentor" If any of these "businesses" were worth a damn, the VCs would be imparting more than wisdom. But I do like the term "serial entrepreneurs", it describes these people very well.

    1. Re:VCs by lordgert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some say "terminal entrpreneurs" describes them better. Gotta admit though, most of these people aren't in it for the big bucks; they really just want to make enough to fund their next venture. It's these companies that get a lot more interest (note: i didn't say money) while the economy is in the dumps as it is now and it is small businesses that really create jobs. I say more power to them.

    2. Re:VCs by the+gnat · · Score: 2

      I get a big laugh out of that phrase every time I see it; I've seen a few of that type in action. It's a great backhanded compliment; makes you think "Stop this man before he innovates again!"

  16. Already teaching them wrong by NineNine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wood desks? Leather chairs? What the fuck for? I went to an Ivy League business school, and I currently run my own business, and I've *never* heard that in order to run a company, you have to have the best equipment. If anything, it's teaching these kids to fail. Anyone who spends this much just to *start* a business on unnecessary shit doesn't know how to cut corners on luxuries to make a new business succeed. It's impossible.

    If they really want to teach these kids to run companies, they should set up an office that looks like their parent's basement, complete with folding chairs, ramen noodles for food, and a barely functioning PC. That's how real businesspeople do it. These are just some spoiled little shits who would never have the balls to start a business that isn't financed by venture capitalists (of yeah, and mommy and daddy).

    This post was written in a relatively successful 4 week old store while sitting on a chair from the 1970's found in a broom closet, using an old P233, which also functions as the POS system, music player for the store, bookkeeping system, and graphic design station, in a store that was painted, lighted, and outfitted solely by the owner.

    1. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ninenine.com? You opened a porn shop?

    2. Re:Already teaching them wrong by mosch · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hate to be the one to tell you this but Penn State isn't Ivy League.

    3. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Mike1024 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey,

      Wood desks? Leather chairs? What the fuck for?

      What would you make tables out of?

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    4. Re:Already teaching them wrong by User+956 · · Score: 2

      they should set up an office that looks like their parent's basement, complete with folding chairs, ramen noodles for food, and a barely functioning PC.

      You forgot about the photoshopped porn of Sarah Michelle Gellar doing 69 with Seven of Nine and T'pal.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    5. Re:Already teaching them wrong by NineNine · · Score: 2

      What would you make tables out of?

      I meant fancy wood desks like they'er describing in the article. But really, particle board and metal tables from Wal-Mart hold shit just as well as "a grand cherry-wood conference table".

    6. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dropping 35,000 on an ivy league business school is really cutting corners isnt it

    7. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you make tables out of?

      Yes! Inquiring minds would like to know.

    8. Re:Already teaching them wrong by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Projects take money and have risk.
      Why should I risk my own money for an idea with say an 80% chance of working? Not counting the lost time etc.
      My university at least has a 'university venture' or whatever they call it. They boast an 80% success rate, and were willing to take on one of my ideas. They offered to put down £40,000 to get it working - at no risk to me.
      If I had tried to pay for that myself, and lost, well..

    9. Re:Already teaching them wrong by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      > their parent's basement, complete with folding chairs, ramen noodles for food, and a barely functioning PC

      and

      > This post was written in a relatively successful 4 week old store while sitting on a chair from the 1970's found in a broom closet, using an old P233, which also functions as the POS system, music player for the store, bookkeeping system, and graphic design station, in a store that was painted, lighted, and outfitted solely by the owner.

      Let me guess. You're a sadomasochist running a BSDM store.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    10. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you can't swing Wal-Mart's prices, steal some fucking plywood and cinderblocks!

    11. Re:Already teaching them wrong by NineNine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why should you use your own money? I dunno. Self respect. Pride. Small things like that.

      Even more than that. Pick up an INC Magazine. Something like 95% of all successes started on their own savings, credit cards, and money borrowed from friends and family. The fact is that people who aren't willing to put their own money on the line also probably aren't willing to put in the effort to make something succeed.

    12. Re:Already teaching them wrong by NineNine · · Score: 2

      And if you can't swing Wal-Mart's prices, steal some fucking plywood and cinderblocks!

      Exactly! That's how entrepreneurs think.

    13. Re:Already teaching them wrong by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Let me guess. You're a sadomasochist running a BSDM store.

      I'm not a sadomasochist, but the zoning around here wouldn't allow a sex store. Already looked into it :)

    14. Re:Already teaching them wrong by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      Rats. Any chance you're in the south? Some of the laws down there I've heard regarding the sale of sex toys explains quite succinctly why the south is having touble rising again.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    15. Re:Already teaching them wrong by cmckay · · Score: 2

      Just to clarify, POS refers to "Point-of-Sale" (as in cash register). Though I think NineNine also has a double-entendre thing going on too, hehe.

    16. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And quite a professional you are. I noticed that your Whois is entirely false. Such a nice reputable business that you are afraid of people knowing who you are?

    17. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      FYI (and yes, I caught the double entendre), while there may be laws against sex stores in many southern states, they're not enforced.

      I've lived in both Texas and Georgia, and both have anti-sex laws of various flavors. In Texas it was illegal to own more than 6 dildos. Didn't stop adult video stores from having a few hundred and selling them. In Georgia it is (or was) illegal to rent adult videos. And yet there are at least a half dozen chains that exist primarily through the sale and rental of them.

      There are occasional busts in both states, which end up with tons of mostly bad publicity for the police chief that authorized it, but by and large the blue laws are ignored. And in recent years (in Georgia at least), every blue law that went to court has been struck down.

    18. Re:Already teaching them wrong by jokercito · · Score: 1

      And we liked it! :o)

    19. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      If you are in/near athens drop by the eastside and checkout Exxperience. It's a great place to buy pr0n, sextoys, whatever stuff....

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    20. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Wood desks? Leather chairs? What the fuck for? I went to an Ivy League business school, and I currently run my own business, and I've *never* heard that in order to run a company, you have to have the best equipment. If anything, it's teaching these kids to fail. Anyone who spends this much just to *start* a business on unnecessary shit doesn't know how to cut corners on luxuries to make a new business succeed. It's impossible.

      I hear this shit all the time in my start (I'm starting right now) and I have to agree, it's annoying. Our most expensive piece of furniture is a $50 chair I bought with my own cash at a clearance sale. Our newest computer is a cel 1ghz laptop, followed by an 800Mhz PIII. It gets the job done.

      This fluff and luxory setups are just going enforce bad habits through the years. Furniture is expensive. We have a partnership thing (strange arrangement) with a furniture company and it still is an expensive resource that you don't need.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    21. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Wal-Mart hold shit just as well as "a grand cherry-wood conference table".


      Every few months Office Depot sells the cherry-wood conference tables at a really good price. You can get 6' tables for around $30. I've yet to see anywhere that beats that price.

      Those are work tables. When you are starting up, you move and rearrange a lot. Getting heavy furniture that isn't portable fucks you. End of story.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    22. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why should you use your own money? I dunno. Self respect. Pride. Small things like that.

      Incentive not to fail seems like a big one to me.


    23. Re:Already teaching them wrong by lostboy2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the most part, I'd have to agree with you. At $STARTUP[1] where I worked, initially we sat on the floors to have meetings because there wasn't any furniture other than our computer desks and the server racks.

      Granted, $STARTUP[1] isn't around anymore, but I doubt that having a perfectly coordinated set of teak furniture would have made them more successful.

    24. Re:Already teaching them wrong by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Borrowed money from friends and family? Thats not such a good example for "self respect".

      Where am I, as a poor student, going to find even £10,000 to start up? And what if it fails?
      I was quoted a figure of around 1 in 10 businesses fail - and you want my friends and family to bear that?

    25. Re:Already teaching them wrong by CDS · · Score: 2

      The other reason to use your own money is DRIVE. If you NEED a sucessful business in order to put beans&rice on the table, you have a MUCH stronger motivation for success. Problems arise? You roll up your sleeves, dig in, and FIX IT (or die trying) because you need to feed your family. If someone else is funding you, and you run into problems, "well, gee, oh well. That's too bad. Glad it wasn't my money."

    26. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Hanno · · Score: 1

      In Texas it was illegal to own more than 6 dildos.

      1.) I'd love to see a citable official source for this law.

      2.) How do they enforce this? Will police search your home for dildos when they receive a tip from an anonymous informer? Some policement must really hate their job there...

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    27. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted, $STARTUP[1] isn't around anymore, but I doubt that having a perfectly coordinated set of teak furniture would have made them more successful.

      No, but they would still have some nice furniture!

    28. Re:Already teaching them wrong by jon+doh! · · Score: 1

      Office Depot/Max sells folding tables for about $30 each (depending on the size). wanna make it look nice? buy a $5 table cloth to hide the wires goin' down the back of the table.

    29. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Animats · · Score: 2
      Autodesk, in its early days, had that attitude. The whole place was metal folding chairs and tables, including the CEO's office, which had a picture of his VW Microbus on the wall. They started with $60,000 from the founders and built up a billion-dollar business.

      Then they hired a mid-level manager from Sun as CEO, all the founders left, and the stock underperformed the Dow for a decade.

      I'm glad I sold my stock in 1990.

    30. Re:Already teaching them wrong by buzzcutbuddha · · Score: 1

      Despite his trollish tone, NineNine has a point that if you dance around waiting from some VC angel to give you the cash because you don't want to pony up your own time and dough, then you need to rethink your desire to go into business.

      And as far as finding the cash, if you have a business plan that tells you you need close to $10,000 to start, fantastic, go hit the banks. Some investor will probably give you a shot. If you don't even know how much you'd need to start, then stop whining, create your business plan and get to work!

      By way of example, Kevin Smith really wanted to make a movie, Clerks, and he didn't want to lose control of the work, so he applied for a bunch of credit cards, borrowed money from friends and family and made his movie. Now he's swimming in dough. It takes one person, one idea, and whole hell of a lot of determination to get somewhere in the business world.

    31. Re:Already teaching them wrong by jvj24601 · · Score: 1

      The other reason to use your own money is DRIVE. If you NEED a sucessful business in order to put beans&rice on the table, you have a MUCH stronger motivation for success.

      "When Cortez reached the new world, he burned his ships. As a result his men were well motivated."

      Captain Marko Ramius (Hunt for Red October, movie)

    32. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you make tables out of?

      I would make them out of my foes list, which you just joined.

    33. Re:Already teaching them wrong by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Oh I agree totally. I was just saying that you shouldn't not go to VC's because of pride or anything.
      I've known too many good ppl get burnt because of a failed non-limited company (or even limited ones )

    34. Re:Already teaching them wrong by asv108 · · Score: 2

      Give PSU a break, at least Smeal is in the top 50. Ninenine probablly went to Pitt.

    35. Re:Already teaching them wrong by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2

      You forgot about the photoshopped porn of Sarah Michelle Gellar doing 69 with Seven of Nine and T'pal

      Actually, that would be more like a 127, but I'm not complaining, put me down for two copies...

    36. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Warui+Kami · · Score: 1

      In Texas it was illegal to own more than 6 dildos.

      1.) I'd love to see a citable official source for this law.

      OK, Texas Penal code section 43.23 (c)(1), (e) and (f)

      (c) A person commits an offense if, knowing its content and character, he:
      (1) promotes or possesses with intent to promote any obscene material or obscene device; or

      (e) A person who promotes or wholesale promotes obscene material or an obscene device or possesses the same with intent to promote or wholesale promote it in the course of his business is presumed to do so with knowledge of its content and character.

      (f) A person who possesses six or more obscene devices or identical or similar obscene articles is presumed to possess them with intent to promote the same.

      And, according to Section 43.21 (7) a dildo is an 'Obscene device'.

      (7) "Obscene device" means a device including a dildo or artificial vagina, designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs.

      Back to Section 43.23, though...

      (d) An offense under Subsection (c) is a Class A misdemeanor.

      To finish up....

      12.21. Class A Misdemeanor

      An individual adjudged guilty of a Class A misdemeanor shall be punished by:
      (1) a fine not to exceed $4,000;
      (2) confinement in jail for a term not to exceed one year; or
      (3) both such fine and confinement.

      Oh, and just so you know I'm not making it up, here's a link to the Texas State Penal Code

      Crazy, huh? I think one of the dodges is to call them 'educational devices' around here, but I haven't checked.

    37. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the idea is that image can convey success: Why do you think most managers are males of above average height? It has absolutely nothing to do with their management ability, but the perception by many people that there is something of "leadership" quality about them. I worked at one firm where they brought in a stunning chronic liar with virtually no experience, and made him the head of a largish software development team. Of course a year later everything he touched turned to shit (he had the Colidas touch), but the president, who was responsible for hiring him, was still justifying why it isn't his fault.

      What does this have to do with desks, etc? People can take people in stereotypical "successful business" environments as being, well, successful. Actually results aren't needed. This perception can help them get work by clients who would otherwise go with someone more established, employees who would otherwise consider it a scary startup, etc.

    38. Re:Already teaching them wrong by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      But really, particle board and metal tables from Wal-Mart hold shit just as well as "a grand cherry-wood conference table".

      Um, no they don't. I certainly wouldn't want to put production servers on a cheap metal and particle board table from Wal-Mart for very long. Imagine thousands of dollars in downtime due to catastrophic table failure!

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    39. Re:Already teaching them wrong by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I'll tell ya' what... Watch a movie called "American Movie". THAT guy has the biggest set of brass balls that I've ever seen. He had less than most people do, yet he still managed to create something pretty damn cool. He didn't whine once. Fucking amazing. THAT guy is a real entrepreneur.

      But as another poster said, if you need 10,000 to start something then you better find a way to start it for less, or you better start getting some credit cards. Either you're an entrepreneur or not. Having someone set you up so there's no risk to yourself isn't entrepreneurial at all. Anybody can do that. You use your own money (and a bit of your family and friends' money), and you're gonna work many, many times harder to make sure it doesn't fail, because if it does, you're homeless.

    40. Re:Already teaching them wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that figure isn't made up (I'm 99% sure it is), the other 5% are destitute if they fail. NEVER go into business with your own money. If you can't get anyone else to buy into your idea, you might realize that it's not quite as good a business venture as you think, no?

      If you have the drive to succeed, it doesn't matter whether or not you're doing it with your own money. With your own money, you're more likely to be forced to make desperate moves, anyhow, which can be very bad...

  17. Re:Ugh... by pVoid · · Score: 1
    Jason Volk of Potomac lives and works in a specially outfitted and wired University of Maryland dorm for future and current CEOs.

    FAAAAACK. I CAN'T BELIEVE IT!!!! <bangs head on desk>

  18. Some item missing by mseeger · · Score: 5, Funny
    complete will all the necessary executive perks: wood desks, leather chairs, wireless, whiteboards

    I miss:

    • A lawyer: if the SEC finds out that the revenue comes from a swapping deal with the guy next desk.
    • An creative accountant: to show you how to make swap deals.
    • A VC to fall for your schemes.
    • A Prosche dealer who gives you a car for company shares.

    Don't you miss that ones too?

    Yours, Martin

  19. Re:Ugh... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I have no more sympathy left for any of the dot-com ass holes. They are the reason the economy is on it's knees right now... and some people still manage to find pride in it."

    Actually, I think it was all the people who believed in the '3.) ???? 4.) Profit!!' business model and invested in it that caused the economic slowdown.

  20. Great Idea, But is this a Lawsuit Magnet? by Schlemphfer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a neat idea. Traditionally, college students who create viable businesses in their dorms have done so in spite of their surroundings. This project sounds like a way to give students an environment and a set of expectations that's conducive to starting up a business.

    For that matter, most people outside of college can and should upgrade their surroundings in ways that would boost productivity. One post-college insight I've gotten is the huge difference in the working environments that successful people choose to set up for themselves. Good chairs and whiteboards should be seen as a necessity, not a luxury.

    One potential pitfall of this venture, not mentioned in the article, is how U of M is going to avoid potential liabilities and lawsuits arising from student startups that go sour. The average failed startup has nothing left to sue, whereas a state university has deep pockets for disgruntled investors.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:Great Idea, But is this a Lawsuit Magnet? by NineNine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For that matter, most people outside of college can and should upgrade their surroundings in ways that would boost productivity. One post-college insight I've gotten is the huge difference in the working environments that successful people choose to set up for themselves. Good chairs and whiteboards should be seen as a necessity, not a luxury.

      From the real entrepreneurs that I know (meaning people who beg, borrow and steal what they can to get started, and make something, as opposed to getting a nice fat grant, and having 10 mentors tell them what to do), I've *never* heard of anyone starting out like this. Real entrepreneurs (meaning those with the guts to put something on the line and make it succeed) scrape by on the fancy shit, often forever, in order to plow more into the business. I can tell ya' that if I spend $200 on a chair, that's a shitload of inventory that I can't buy. "Productivity" is something measured in terms of ergonomics, keystrokes per second, number of reports written, lighting quality, etc. is something to be left for middle managers in large companies. Real entrepreneurs make it work with or without a fancy chair and whiteboard.

  21. If I had this kind of space in college... by NineNine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...not to mention that kind of money, I would've startrf a real business. Not another bullshit dot-com that's built around *synergy*. I probably would've gotten a few used ovens to put in there, run down to the grocery store to get the basics started, and print out a shitload of flyers to put around campus announcing my new pizza business. THAT'S a *real* business. These kids are just playing make believe. I doubt that any of 'em have ever worked a day in their priviledged little lives.

    1. Re:If I had this kind of space in college... by PhxBlue · · Score: 2

      I wonder if folks had the same opinion of Amazon when it first started. I'll admit, I never thought it would pull itself out of the red; but it has, and it's pretty much shown that internet businesses can be "*real*" businesses, too.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    2. Re:If I had this kind of space in college... by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but Jeff started out in his garage. So although he's huge now, he had to rough it at the beginning, too.

    3. Re:If I had this kind of space in college... by VitrosChemistryAnaly · · Score: 1

      Do you know what the best thing about yours post are?

      You're not coming off as a bitter old man at all!

      Seriously dude, if they're teaching the kids the wrong way to start a business...guess what, the kids are gonna figure that out really fast.

      And if it turns out to that it's a good way to start and run a business...more power to them.

      Just stop sounding like such a washed up old has-been.

      "In my day we didn't have fancy wood tables and leather chairs. I had to make my wife get down on all fours and put a piece of plywood on her back. Then I'd draw the blood out of my own finger and use it for ink. On top of that my "leather" chair was made up of pressed skin flakes that I stole from bums!"

      Blah...

      --
      "It's a tarp!" -- Dyslexic Admiral Ackbar
    4. Re:If I had this kind of space in college... by DutchSter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is exactly what my older brother did when he was here. In fact, he's still here because of his oak-wood desk business with deep synergy underpinnings: Pizza and beer, to your door, in 30 minutes or less, oh and they take plastic. In fact, by the numbers, even considering that they basically shut down three months out of the year, they still gross more per capita than most other chains in this end of the state.

      Or then there was the other kid in his class who had a great racket going for a while - he printed up a bunch of parking tickets that looked identical to those of the university. The only difference is that the funds were to be remitted to a different address. He'd have people run around early in the morning before the real parking people went to work and cite all the illegally parked cars (primarily students in faculty lots). The real lady would come around and assume that the other lady already tagged that lot. You can imagine the rest. He got about $10,000 in his first month, oddly enough he was only expelled :)

  22. Moderators? HELLO? TROLL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I went to an Ivy League business school, and I currently run my own business

    OK, so you went to an ivy league business school, own a free porn site, AND a pet store?

    And now your pet store knowledge taught you all of this?

    -1 Troll.

  23. Bookkeeping LIES! by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 1, Redundant

    How may of the 6 that have posted profits have lied about their bookkeeping? :)

    --
    That's a hoax/scam/virus and your friend is a moron.

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
    1. Re:Bookkeeping LIES! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      How may of the 6 that have posted profits have lied about their bookkeeping? :)

      I wonder if the accounting department sponsers Run Your Own Enron to parellel the dot-com excesses.

  24. Selling DivX Movies and Mp3s? by bwindle2 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    What are they doing, selling camcorder movies and Mp3s CDs?

  25. when do they study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    sounds counterproductive to me. They are supposed to start a business and go to school. I had a business when I was in school. Guess which activity took up most of my time? It wasn't school.

    1. Re:when do they study? by linuxelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aww, man, I was gonna guess!

      --
      - "That's just the kind of fuzzy-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten."
    2. Re:when do they study? by medscaper · · Score: 5, Funny
      I had a business when I was in school. Guess which activity took up most of my time? It wasn't school.

      Was it your business?

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    3. Re:when do they study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually it was frequent and lengthy sessions of rough, vigorous and sometimes dangerous masturbation. You see, I ran a sperm bank.

    4. Re:when do they study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, dummy, it was his business!

    5. Re:when do they study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drinking?

    6. Re:when do they study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess which activity took up most of my time?

      Masturbation?

  26. Any type of business they will permit? by McFly69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if the students can start any kind of business. What if their company policies clash with the school's policies? This would include nuddie sites, adult toy sales and companies the dedicated themselves to spaming college students. Can the school draw the line somewhere?

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
    1. Re:Any type of business they will permit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, a liquor store that sells to minors? That'd make more money than anything in your post.

  27. Of course it would be an even number by scalveg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course it would be an even number 'generating revenue'.

    Probably they teach students about inflating revenue by 'round tripping' in their freshman year these days!

  28. old idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    old idea, been working here in finland for atleast n+1 years... the worlds first mobile operator was born there...

    http://www.innopoli.fi/english/background.htm

    1. Re:old idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jesus, shut up already! if i read one more "finland did it first" post i am going to püükk.

  29. Ah my tax dollers at work... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I a shareholder if they get financial aid from the US gov or MD?

    How about they just fork over a nice chair? I could use something like that.

    1. Re:Ah my tax dollers at work... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Am I a shareholder if they get financial aid from the US gov or MD?

      What do you mean if? Do you think that the University is supported solely by tuition? No, every public University is supported in very large part by TAX DOLLARS.

      I bet the taxpayers in Maryland are very happy to hear how the University is spending their tax dollars to provide college students the infrastructure to run businesses out of the dorms. I bet the small business owners who are being competed with by taxpayer funded dot-coms are just pleased as punch to be forced to pay for this.

    2. Re:Ah my tax dollers at work... by schmink182 · · Score: 1
      I bet the taxpayers in Maryland are very happy to hear how the University is spending their tax dollars to provide college students the infrastructure to run businesses out of the dorms.

      I agree completely. I'll be a taxpayer in MD soon (in a year or so) and a prospective UMD student, and I'd be glad to pay for this, so long as I'm one of the ones in those dorms...:)

  30. Requisite GPA? by schlach · · Score: 4, Funny

    To be considered for the Hinman program, students must have a 3.0 grade-point average ...

    Umm, it's been my experience that the folks with the real drive have shitty GPA's, because they want to spend all their time and energy on their other projects. Perhaps they should say, "To be considered for the Hinman program, students may not have more than a 3.0 grade-point average." =)

    1. Re:Requisite GPA? by aengblom · · Score: 3, Funny

      Score!

      I have exactly a 3.0! I can do everything!

      Take that "4.0" mom & "honor student" dad ;-)

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    2. Re:Requisite GPA? by Silverhammer · · Score: 2

      Blockquoth the poster:

      Umm, it's been my experience that the folks with the real drive have shitty GPA's, because they want to spend all their time and energy on their other projects.

      Why was this moderated "Funny"? It's absolutely true. I graduated with only a 2.85, because I was busy around the clock building two different home businesses and running three different student clubs. After I graduated, every company with which I interviewed was blown away by those accomplishments and couldn't care less about my transcript.

    3. Re:Requisite GPA? by 3am · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whatever, it shows you can't prioritize well. Your job as a college student is to learn everything in the classes you enroll in. If you are going to run 2 businesses and 3 clubs, you should consider not being in college, perhaps, and save a lot of money.

      (and I had a poor GPA too, but don't make excuses about it)

      --

      A: None. The Universe spins the bulb, and the Zen master merely stays out of the way.
    4. Re:Requisite GPA? by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      See, that just sounds weird. I respect your experience, and I'm well aware of the problems of arguing against anecdotal evidence, but there seems to be something funny about what you're implying:

      A typical "driven" student is uninterested in the curriculum offered by the college of his or her choice.

      A typical "driven" student is incapable of performing well in the classes he or she enrolls in, or else is so unwilling to perform well that it amounts to the same thing.

      A typical "driven" student is only actually "driven" to perform well outside of the classroom.

      Clearly these three things can't actually be true, can they? What seems much more likely is that the truly "driven" students are the ones who get the 3.0 GPAs Note that these are not necessarily the smartest or best-educated students--they're simply the ones who care enough about either the material or their grade to perform well through consistent effort.

      The "driven" students you seem to be talking about sound much more like me: above-average intelligence, but no real interest in conventional education(I never attended college), and no habit of self-discipline. My high school GPA was certainly abysmal, and I'd probably not benefit too much from the university program mentioned here. I've got few of the habits conducive to productivity in such a setting, and I think the University would be quite sensible to make me ineligible based on my GPA. Certainly I was sensible enough to take my skills, interests, and curiosity directly into the workforce, rather than paying thousands of dollars to some University, simply for the privilege of discovering (yet again) that I don't have the temperament for it.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    5. Re:Requisite GPA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's been my experience that the folks with the real drive have shitty GPA's,

      so is that what you told your parents/profs when you were in university and got crap grades?

    6. Re:Requisite GPA? by schlach · · Score: 1

      hehehe... my favorite "proud parent" bumper sticker is still "My kid reads your email" from Thinkgeek =)

    7. Re:Requisite GPA? by schlach · · Score: 1


      Yep, and it works, too. Feel free to use it when you
      get old enough to start thinking about college ; )

    8. Re:Requisite GPA? by Silverhammer · · Score: 2

      Blockquoth the poster:

      Whatever, it shows you can't prioritize well. Your job as a college student is to learn everything in the classes you enroll in. If you are going to run 2 businesses and 3 clubs, you should consider not being in college, perhaps, and save a lot of money.

      Ah, but the true value of a college degree is not in the content of the classes you take. Particularly when you're being graded by bored and bitter TAs who flunk anyone that doesn't regurgitate their own prejudices.

      Nope, the true value of a college degree is in the development of critical thinking, writing, problem solving, socialization, and team management skills. That piece of sheepskin says "I've survived the silliest, most useless crap that college life could throw at me and I can still tie my own shoes."

      In fact, I've had recruiters tell me that they actually prefer B-average students because they're the ones who tend to think outside the box and risk contradicting their professors. A-average students are suck-ups and C-average students and slackers.

    9. Re:Requisite GPA? by luciuskwok · · Score: 1
      What schools and universities generally do well is to turn out students who make good employees (a.k.a. wage slaves) but not good entrepeneurs or business owners. Even through college the focus was on getting a degree for job security and learning the skills to be a good obedient employee.

      To be driven to get a high GPA means being driven to suck up to the teachers and school administrators.

      To be driven to succeed in business means being driven towards making money.

    10. Re:Requisite GPA? by getch(); · · Score: 1

      Oh give me a break.

      I'm a computer engineer (at VT) graduating next May and I have a really high GPA. I do not "suck up to the teachers" or hang out in their offices. I don't spend every waking hour studying. And I definitely don't ask stupid, irrelevant questions in class to prove how smart I [think I] am.

      Did it ever occur to you that there might be people who can comprehend the subject matter, get their work done, and get good grades for it?

      It's been my experience that the suck-ups aren't necessarily the ones getting the good grades anyway.

    11. Re:Requisite GPA? by luciuskwok · · Score: 1
      Did it ever occur to you that there might be people who can comprehend the subject matter, get their work done, and get good grades for it?

      Yes, if all your classes were in subjet matter that was actually important to you, and the amount of course-work was reasonable. Maybe I've had some bad teachers, but there were some courses which I felt were a waste of my time and the teacher really didn't care about the subject matter.

      Ultimately, nobody's going to ask you what your GPA was once you're in the working world. If you went to school because you enjoyed learning the subject matter, and the high GPA was a side-effect of that, then more power to you. It's just when parents push their kids to get an Ivy League degree costing hundreds of thousands of dollars, that's when I get suspicious

  31. Those 6 students..... by cyberise · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ....better be making a nice amount of cash just to break even with the building they are housed in costing over 14 million.

    1. Re:Those 6 students..... by gothamNY · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They better be making a nice amount of _profit_. All the article mentions is revenue. Most of the dot-coms made some revenue, just not enough to cover costs and actually post a profit.

      After all, anyone can sell dollar bills for $0.75 and his revenues would be through the roof. He'd never make money however. :)

  32. Richie Rich by nogoodmonkey · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the school that Richie Rich attended in the film of same-name. Wow, I can't believe I just admitted watching that.

  33. All class work belongs to them by ACNeal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Generally it is all classwork that belongs to the University, not _all_ IP. Anything that you did with their labs, their equipment, etc.

    Not to mention most dorms aren't really associated with the school for other legal reasons. When I went to school, the dorms weren't even technically on state property, and run by some management company. This allowed for strict rules in the dorms that the university could pretend to not be able to do anything about, among other things. I wonder where this leaves these entrepreneuers.

    You'd have to read the fine print on several different contracts, and not only the ones you signed, but the dorm with the university, etc.

  34. Slacker by Sanga · · Score: 2, Funny

    This guy looks like he is the slacker of this group:

    story here :-)

  35. Is that all it takes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if you spend $500 (to be even) at Staples, you can become a successful entrepenuer? Silly me -- I thought business skills were involved.

  36. A sad trend. by Find+love+Online · · Score: 0, Troll

    Has anyone else noticed this sort of 'stratification' of the student housing on various campuses? Here at ISU they're building a lot of these 'student sweets' that cost more then regular dorms. I think its kind of sad, as one of the most interesting things about collage life is that for the most part its a true meritocracy, and you get to meet people from all different walks of life and social backgrounds (and, once you get out you're all mostly on the same playing field, depending on how well you did :P)

    Now we add these stratifications, and... I donno it just seems wrong and in the least unnecessary.

    ---

    Anyway, a more specific comment about this dorm. All I can say is 'belch' The business world will be soul sucking enough when I get out of collage. To me collage is supposed to be about learning and academia. Not about becoming the next money grubbing enronite. The whole 'money money money gimmy gimmy gimmy' culture is just so repulsive. I mean, I understand the desire for money, I do. I really do like money... (hell, just look at my sig : P). But this thing sounds like it's a breading ground for the kinds of people who put money above everything else, including the value to society. Lots of people would love to stifle innovation and humanity for profits (just look at the RIAA, Enron's roll in the California energy crisis, Microsoft, etc)

    I guess I wish more people would try to think more of their impact on society rather then how much money they make. You can make a lot of money while making the world a better place (i.e. google, as a simple example) but the two things are not intrinsically bound.

    I think this school should be more worried about teaching it's business students humanity rather then trying to shove them off into the dog-eat-dog world as soon as possible.

    1. Re:A sad trend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I like most about this post is that a guy who can't spell the word 'college' is attending university. I taught myself to code (well). I aced calculus without ever opening the textbook. I can spell, punctuate, and use correct grammar. I could not, however, afford the education this moron is getting. I love this world.

    2. Re:A sad trend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I aced calculus without ever opening the textbook

      No, you didn't. I refuse to believe that you, above all others, were endowed with intrinisic knowledge of limits, sums, series, derivatives and integrals that the rest of us actually had to gain from a reference of some sort, whether it be a book, a teacher or even Google.

    3. Re:A sad trend. by Binome · · Score: 1

      Now now... don't be too quick to judge. Maybe he's Leibniz reincarnated.

      After all, Newton went public with his Calculus because Leibniz was parading around with his error-laden version of Calculus. Leibniz is just the type of guy who would love Slashdot.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Beowulf cluster imagines you!
  37. Nature of the Business / UMCP / Outdated Ed. Ideas by sampson7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The one thing the article failed to address was the nature of the businesses. The Maryland side of DC tends to specialize in Genomics and biotechnology, while the Virginia suburbs do the more traditional e-commerce things (odd how geographic differences spring up in virtual/tech businesses, but that's a different post). Given the massive start up costs of most biotech ventures, the fact that 6 are generating revenue may not be at all bad. But to me, the most interesting thing about this (as a Maryland grad), is the idea that taking smart students, putting them in swank digs, is somehow going to generate a better mouse trap. Whether the end product is a genome sequencer, a great work of literature, or the next great super-virus, colleges and universities seem to love chucking money at rather small groups of students in the hope of producing something special. Does it work? I don't know that it doesn't, but I can think of other projects that I think might have a better chance of success. Lastly, I think the article's description of the dorm rooms was a bit misleading. It made them sound like the students are given all the creature comforts as well as the necessary technical and business tools. But it actually doesn't sound all that different from any of the newer dorm rooms at U of M College Park -- they are all actually pretty nice -- with a few extra mechanical and technical gadgets. Just a few thoughts.

  38. Gross misunderstanding... by UTPinky · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I rad "Dot-Com Dorm" first thing that popped into my mind was a dorm where they placed all the students destined to flunk out... my bad

    --
    I'm only paranoid because everyone is against me...
  39. Burn through cash 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because its never too early to learn the best ways of running a company into the ground with useless spending.

  40. yeah, right by fizban · · Score: 3, Funny

    Monkeys have been known to put together a nice piece of work when given a typewriter. Doesn't change the fact that they're still monkeys.

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  41. Re:Moderators? HELLO? TROLL! by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    you own a free porn site, AND a pet store?

    Actually, it's conceivable that both of those are part of the same business venture.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  42. At last!!! by dipfan · · Score: 1

    Venture capitalists, lawyers and serial entrepreneurs drop by weekly to impart wisdom and to mentor.

    Woo hoo! The dotcom glory days are back!

    Listen, I've got this great idea about selling pet food over the internet! It's gonna be the next big thing. All I need is $200m in start-up capital and ... hey! Come back!

    1. Re:At last!!! by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Listen, I've got this great idea about selling pet food over the internet! It's gonna be the next big thing. All I need is $200m in start-up capital and ... hey! Come back!

      You forgot... what about FREE SHIPPING!? :)

    2. Re:At last!!! by dipfan · · Score: 1

      You forgot... what about FREE SHIPPING!? :)

      Hey, great idea! You wanna be on the board?

      I've also got big plans for a sock-puppet advertising campaign and .....

    3. Re:At last!!! by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Hey, great idea! You wanna be on the board?

      Sure! I'll be the CFO.

      All right, let's see... a bag of dog food costs us $10, we sell it for $15, we pay $10 in shipping, so that's...
      15 - 10 - 10 = profit!!!!

      I think this is gonna do really, really well.

    4. Re:At last!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! That's the same business plan I used for my startup!

      Of course, eConcrete.com didn't last long, and the VC's are still mad at me, but I think I provided good value to our customers, which is what's important.

  43. Stuff done for class, research. Not on their own by Find+love+Online · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Universities don't own the ideas that students come up with on their own, outside of class, only things that you need to turn into the school. For example, a project you wrote for class could be sold by the school, but something you wrote in your dorm room in your spare time would be yours.

  44. Re:Moderators? HELLO? TROLL! by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 2, Funny
    OK, so you went to an ivy league business school, own a free porn site, AND a pet store?

    ...you assume that the pet store and the porn site are seperate entities.

    Once you change this aspect of the equation, the Ivy League business education suddenly makes all the sense in the world...

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  45. Netscape as well. by Find+love+Online · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only worked for a while. But who would have anticipated Microsoft writing less buggy software then their competitors?

  46. Party... by r41nm4n · · Score: 1

    "I'm gonna party like it is 1999" takes on a whole new meaning.

  47. Idea Lab by interociter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sounds good on paper. Anyone remember Idea Lab? Where's their bajillion-dollar idea that pays for everything else?

    --
    Interociter
    -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
  48. s/BSDM/BDSM by SirSlud · · Score: 1


    oops, got a little too vanilla there for a second

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  49. Whatever happened to a good educational foundation by inteller · · Score: 1

    Instead of pushing this money grabbing mentality, why don't they make the students master the fundamental educational tenants first before putting them in the "Grow-a-Dell" incubator.

  50. Yea I wish by rosewood · · Score: 2

    Hey, Im lucky I even get a door to my damn room. Ugh. Such perks are a CrAzY idea for Wichita State!

  51. Re:Ugh... by Edgewize · · Score: 1
    Actually, I think it was all the people who believed in the '3.) ???? 4.) Profit!!' business model and invested in it that caused the economic slowdown.

    Obviously. Everyone knows that the three-stage version of that plan is more efficient.

  52. Revenue is not Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Twenty of the students have created their own start-up firms, and six are already generating revenue.

    There's a BIG difference between REVENUE and PROFIT. Toys.com had revenue. Pets.com had revenue. Amazon.com has had LOTS of revenue, but it took Amazon years to make a profit.

  53. Business Incubator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Northwestern University has a similar program in my town that has been running for years.
    http://www.researchpark.com/
    The 'business incubator' provides low rent and cheap internet access, as well as a community of other start ups.

  54. As realistic as the Onion... by Sigma+Kiwi · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As a University of Maryland Student who lives in these dorms, allow me to point out reality (caveat: I live in building 1. Hinman CEOs is housed in building 2). Yes, the apartments are fully furnished -- but you pay through the nose. The average apartment pays over $2200/month in rent for relatively small living space. Technically, you could call the desks "wood" -- but they are cheap and uncomfortable. If a student has a leather chair, it is because the student provided his own. The provided chairs are little more than burlap over hard metal. I've heard rumors that they will install wireless, but I can't confirm that it is active yet (the coverage map for campus' wireless doesn't have South Campus Commons listed. I know others who have run their own APs in commons, though.

    Other privileges of living in South Campus Commons include monthy inspections by the RAs (yes, you do pay money to a private company to live under Resident Life rules -- even though we are technically "off campus" housing). It's not uncommon for the hot water to go out for days at a time, frequently with no notice.

    And the kicker? The lease that I signed forbade running a business from my room. In other words, unless they modified the lease for these Hinman CEOs, they're all in violation.

    We *definitely* do not live in spaces that would ever be confused with executive furnishings.

    1. Re:As realistic as the Onion... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2

      You think that's bad?

      I was in Old Leonardtown in the summer of '00. Jackhammer right outside my window at 8am, AC off for two weeks, smelly workers (probably illegal immigrants) coming and going while they redid our kitchen (and helping themselves to anything we didn't have bolted down or locked away). The frequent power outages were a joy as well. I suppose the only nice thing was having a fat pipe to the net with virtually nobody else using it. Was a lovely time for friends on IRC.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    2. Re:As realistic as the Onion... by Sigma+Kiwi · · Score: 1

      I live right by the loading dock for the South Campus Dining hall ;-). Every morning by 6 am "beep beep beep...THUNK...beep...beep...beep"

      I lived in New Leonardtown during Summer '00 for two weeks with roomates who didn't understand basic hygeine. I very quickly found another place to live ;-).

      Commons are VERY nice, if you compare them to the dorms. For their price, though, you can do much better.

    3. Re:As realistic as the Onion... by Hanno · · Score: 1

      You think that's bad?

      Back in my days, we used to run our e-commerce server from an Atari 600 XL and 5.25" floppy drive, while these kangaroo-sized hamsters kept stealing chocolate from our storage room. Which wasn't exactly a storage room, but an old greasy rocket silo in Mexico, built illegally by the Russians during the Cuban crisis.

      Oh, you kids don't know how easy life has been for you.

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    4. Re:As realistic as the Onion... by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      You had a floppy drive for your Atari 600XL? All I had was a cassette drive with a bad interface cable!

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    5. Re:As realistic as the Onion... by LeiGong · · Score: 2, Interesting
      His almost 100% right except that Hinman students are allowed to operate businesses from the dorms. I guess we are the exception. ALSO, even if everyone in the apartment is 21 and you throw a party, you will still get written up and the cops will be called.

      The first and 2nd floors of the building have wireless points spread across the halls, so we do have access.

    6. Re:As realistic as the Onion... by MLoff · · Score: 1

      I lived in commons building 2 over the summer (sublet)... Pretty nice place...

      http://www.capstonecompanies.com/locations/marylan d/

      Building 1 might be ass-kicking high tech... but I think building 2 recieved significantly less funding. When i was moving from building 2 to Calvert Hall (where I'm at now), my golf clubs were stolen from the building's lobby. Response from management? Don't worry... We have a security camera in there! ... (1 week later) ... Sorry, the security camera wasn't on.

      Wherever you are-- thanks, asshole. I hope you suck at golf.

    7. Re:As realistic as the Onion... by rufo · · Score: 1

      According to this guy, his setup is quite a bit different from yours. Might be time to become a "driven student" so you can get in on the cushy seats. ;)

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    8. Re:As realistic as the Onion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luxury. ;-)

  55. Expensive Dorms? by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1
    • Wood desks (to hold the extra-large pizzas)
    • Leather chairs (for when the bed is taken)
    • Wireless (for when your head is in the toilet)
    • Whiteboards (for hanging women's underwear)
    Yup, that would encourage me.
    --
    TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
  56. Re:Stuff done for class, research. Not on their ow by MightyTribble · · Score: 1

    Thank god. I thought that meant if I had children while at University, the college would own my offspring and could sell them into White Slavery. ...but at least it would save me on alimony. So it wouldn't be all bad.

  57. Leather Chairs? by supun · · Score: 1

    I think the symbol of the dot-com is the Aeron chair. When these companies started to go belly up, and auction off all their assets, Aeron chair were the common factor.

    --
    :w!
  58. (-1, Offtopic): Story and comment bodies by germinatoras · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice the body text is missing from people's comments, and several headlines?

    Before modding this as "Redundant", consider my plight: I can't see the bodies of the other messages!

  59. While... by garbs · · Score: 1

    out of the 6 that are profitable, 5 of them are cooking up the books to make it look like they are making a profit, and 1 runs an adult website.

    1. Re:While... by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      See, this is why I skipped college: When the 20 leetest students at your school are so stupid that only one of them thinks to start a porn site, 5 others get as far as some half-assed book-cooking scheme, and the other 14 come up with nothing at all, then it's time to give higher ed. the finger and take your skills on the road.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  60. more outstanding copy from timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    timothy: learn to write properly would ya.

  61. what about profit? by miltimj · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "six are already generating revenue"

    Yeah, but what about profit??...

    They could run the business into the ground with expenses, sell a cup of lemonade on the corner, and consider themselves "generating revenue"...

    --
    "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
  62. Where's my startup? by dkarney · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have a wooden desk AND a leather chair. Where's my startup? I want to get rich quick too!

    Maybe I need a Dell with a LCD monitor...hmmm..

  63. Chapter One Billion by EEgopher · · Score: 1

    How is the bankruptcy agent going to save these champion scholars?

    LIST OF ASSETS:
    1) coffee mug
    2) cold coffee in mug
    3) pretty-boy haircut
    4) roomate's dentist
    5) earthquakes

    --
    hi, I like pancakes -.-- -.-- --..
    1. Re:Chapter One Billion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6) ???
      7) Profit!

  64. Whatever happened to... by Interrobang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree 100%. Whatever happened to pure research? It seems as though tertiary education these days is all about applying learning to make the quickest and biggest buck possible. Unless your scholarship/discovery has some sort of immediately-apparent commercial potential, most universities don't seem to be too interested in it (unless, of course, they have one of those "work for hire" type IP clauses where all your IP you develop there belongs to them).

    Which is probably why most "innovations" these days don't seem to be anything radically new. They seem to be "better, faster, smaller, cheaper, smarter" versions of the same old stuff. Without research for the sake of research, we wouldn't have 99% of the "older" technology we take for granted.

    Hmm, I seem to be repeating myself, to the tune of "Professionalism to excess is a bad thing." Whatever happened to having fun, anyway? Since when did our culture start glorifying the workaholic as the ultimate hero-figure anyway? I thought university was supposed to be for learning, playing, getting radicalized, pushing the boundaries, and other such similar things. University is short. Working life is long...oh, boy, is it long. I think people should enjoy it while they can. Anyway, starting my own business in a "business incubator dorm" doesn't sound like my idea of a good time -- or a good education.

    1. Re:Whatever happened to... by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought university was supposed to be for learning, playing, getting radicalized, pushing the boundaries, and other such similar things.

      What?! You mean all this time I thought college was supposed to be about getting plastered, scoring with tons of chicks, and skipping class to catch up on sleep from that wild party the night before, and it wasn't?! Man, I have wasted these past 3 years!

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    2. Re:Whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 years?!? I thought it was "Seven years of college, down the drain!"

  65. government subsidies == entrepenurship ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds more like the government
    picking and choosing "winners".

    BTW, where are the Americans in this?

  66. "Bunk"? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if that title was intentional humor or a fruedian slip, as in:

    "Sleeping room? No problem. There is plenty of bunk, I mean bunks in the dot-com department."

  67. Revenue != Profit by jaredcoleman · · Score: 1
    six are already generating revenue
    $300,000 in revenue only means $300,000 profit if expenses are NILL. I didn't read anything that said this was the case.

  68. what the hell? by shren · · Score: 2

    How in the world are old-money interests going to retain control over all of the new-economy ventures if new ventures have the ability to start up without old-money funds? This is a blow to our old-money controlled capitalist-worshipping way of life and must be stopped as soon as possible! Someone call Dubya and have him send in the BATF after these commie hippies!

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  69. Actually it's simple as to the economic decline. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2

    Irrational exuberance related to earnings projections based on nonuniform purchasing patterns leading up to the Y2K hype machine caused the economic downturn.

    To simplify:
    Every idiot believed what they read instead of researching and determining for themselves the reason(s) the economy was on such an insane upward turn (history is a great indicator).

    This is why in addition to my MIS degree I doubled in Finance. No point in having money if you don't know what the hell to do with it. I was expecting this since 1998 (and as a result was questioning the hell out of my forcasting until the summer of 2001!). You can still make money in the stock market, you just need to buy companies instead of stocks (see Warren Buffet methodology).

  70. This would be useful! by Diver777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am a Computer Science student at the University of Waterloo. I am just getting involved in the beginnings of a company (technology related if you must know, but not a dot com). People involved are from London, Waterloo, Toronto, and elsewhere. As far as places to meet, my residence is out of the question because it is too small, and does not offer the conveniences that these students are offered. If I had access to a board-room style table with whiteboards and conferencing equipment, and all for free, then I would have a much better setup to host meetings.

    I see everyone here bashing this article, but it is actually quite an interesting program. Don't forget that aside from the material perks, you are also required to live in this dorm for 1/2 of your school career, so you will be around the same group of LIKE-MINDED ENTREPRENEURIAL people. This is a huge benefit, as half of the job of 'networking' is already done for you.

    --
    The reason Santa is so jolly is that he knows where all the bad girls live.
    1. Re:This would be useful! by Diver777 · · Score: 1

      ah crap, put the post in the wrong place, ah well. It's still valid, and hopefully it gets modded up so someone can see it. It should have been its own thread though.

      --
      The reason Santa is so jolly is that he knows where all the bad girls live.
  71. It does work by XCondE · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, the universisty I went to set up a similar program, named Instituto Genesis (Genesis Institute). You can check their web site in portuguese for more info.

    The success rate is high, with graduate companies making good profit. A coincidence (or not) I work at one of those companies, and we are doing very well. The initial support given by the program was a very nice push.

  72. ya think? by Schlemphfer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not a "real entrepreneur" at least by your definition, but it's worth mentioning that the cost of having comfortable and reliable office equipment is downright cheap. I'm not arguing for $900 leather chairs (especially since I'm vegan; ) but these days, the cost of equiping an office appropriately amounts to maybe a thousand bucks. I've got a great computer worth no more than $750, a super comfortable chair from Staples for $90, plus some other odds and ends. The bottom line is it helps my productivity and I don't feel like hell at the end of the day. Yeah, I suppose I could do my work on a folding chair and a 486 I scrounged from the Salvation Army, but why? My time and comfort is worth something, particularly when it can now be bought so cheaply.

    If U of Md wants to spend a bit of money so these students have a great working environment, that's terrific. It's a super-cheap investment, which amounts to a tiny gamble. Now, let's see if it pays off.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:ya think? by medscaper · · Score: 1
      I'm not arguing for $900 leather chairs (especially since I'm vegan; )

      I think to myself, "What? He's tempted to eat the chairs?" before I realize that vegan != vegetarian, except in the most heirarchical sense.

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    2. Re:ya think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If U of Md wants to spend a bit of money so these students have a great working environment, that's terrific.

      Especially since they can amortize this expensive furniture over 4 or 5 serial failures.

  73. Breaking News by FallLine · · Score: 2
    Why should I risk my own money for an idea with say an 80% chance of working?
    This is why we have this thing called CAPITALISM where the risk takers can actually profit off of their risk taking (whether that means spending time, risking capital, taking a job at a reduced salary, or even simply working harder than the next fellow.)
    1. Re:Breaking News by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Within acceptable levels - which is why we have venture capitilists, limited companys, and so on.

    2. Re:Breaking News by FallLine · · Score: 2
      Within acceptable levels - which is why we have venture capitilists, limited companys, and so on.
      Which is still why we have this thing called capitalism. They're not funding you to be charitable. They're absorbing some of the risk, because they're going to take at least a proportionate share of the eventual profits when and if they ever occur. Venture capitalists exist primarily because they HAVE the funds that you do not. Contrary to popular opinion, they do NOT exist to take levels of risk that you (well your average entreprenuer) are not willing to take. VCs are, in fact, rather risk averse and rarely invest substantial sums in early stage companies that do not have something in pipeline already (except for where they're deluded enough to think that they can essentially play an arbitrage game as in the case of the DotComs).
  74. So *thats* where they went by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It appears that the idiots who dreamed up dumb dot-com ideas have retreated to the education field. I was wondering what happened to them all.

  75. Another perq by Storm · · Score: 1

    Do they get an expensive trenchcoat to throw over their heads when the Feds come to take them away because the SEC found they were involved in insider trading?

    --
    --Storm
  76. So thats were all the bandwidth went... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And the rest of UMD gets: Slow Internet Access in Residence Halls:

    We are aware that Internet access in the Residence Halls has been extremely slow for many of you this semester and apologize for the inconvenience. We are investigating various methods of improving the performance of your data connections.

    And by "slow", they mean 2k/s downloads, and 1k/s uploads. Oh, if only I had my 28.8 back...

  77. Re:Moderators? HELLO? TROLL! by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2

    ""you own a free porn site, AND a pet store?""

    "Actually, it's conceivable that both of those are part of the same business venture."


    There's that Vulcan sense of humor we're all so fond of here on slashdot.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  78. Unless, of course, you want to talk to people by avoisin · · Score: 3, Informative

    If they really want to teach these kids to run companies, they should set up an office that looks like their parent's basement, complete with folding chairs, ramen noodles for food, and a barely functioning PC. That's how real businesspeople do it.

    Actually, that's not how many businesspeople do it. If you want to hold interviews, interface with a customer, and do anything besides be a little code monkey, the nice surroundings and furniture will help. Would you trust the guy in raggedy clothes with a three-legged desk or the one in a sharp suit and an oak table? The former might be a better coder, but only the latter could sell code to an end customer.

    Sure, many businesses do get started with little to work from, starting with only the capital in the founder's pockets. But a business is a hell of a lot more likely to be successful when the owner has a proper place to file things, have meetings, and talk to customers.

    1. Re:Unless, of course, you want to talk to people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HELLO:
      Why would you {meet/interview/interface/etc}
      with customers/new hires/etc unless you have a product?????? You create your business, make a product(get loans from a bank to finance your early venture), produce a product. Then you go and meet customers at their offices and make deals. Then when you've grown enough to get an offce do so.

      DUH!!!!!!

  79. Re: There is a valid point here by CrypticOutsider · · Score: 1
    Wood desks? Leather chairs? What the fuck for? I went to an Ivy League business school, and I currently run my own business, and I've *never* heard that in order to run a company, you have to have the best equipment. If anything, it's teaching these kids to fail. Anyone who spends this much just to *start* a business on unnecessary shit doesn't know how to cut corners on luxuries to make a new business succeed. It's impossible.

    The point being that a successful entrepreneurial startup is greatly facilitated by using OPM - other peoples' money (the best kind). If you can get your potential customers to help fund you, then you stand a much better chance of having them actually buy your product/service when you're ready.

    But, since not everyone pays tuition, you could argue that some of them might already be using OPM :)

    FWIW (and there's a lot of education bashing on ./), the above information was relayed in a Wharton MBA class. So let the negative karma commence.

  80. My school gave me a wooden desk. by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

    My school gave me a wooden desk. Plywood, sure, but still :P

    Well, it was in my dorm room anyway, I guess they didn't really give it to me.

    And yeah, these kids are pussies. I say let the company make enough money to afford the leather chairs and nice desks before it gets 'em : P

    Also your porn site sucks.

  81. Leather Chairs? by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Sure, but what if you try to use a hotplate?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  82. P&C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > six are already generating revenue.

    They're called "Porn n' Chicken."

  83. Tools Tools Everywhere by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not a product in sight. If any of these people where to actually be bright enough to deal in actual "see, order, touch, own" products -- then would not the money better be spent on shipping, distribution, collections, customer service. I think that was the whole problem with the .com bust -- all sorts of tools (leather chairs, compuers, ping pong tables) and no tangible product. In the end the consumer spends money on the same things they have always spent money on. Technology can only offer different avenues for shopping for and ordering product. All the technology and VC in the world is not going to replace air with product.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  84. All they need now is a secretarial(slut) dorm. by beatnitup · · Score: 1

    For the lovely co-eds of UMD, All rooms will be furnished with lovely reclining chairs, and padded carpeting

  85. Thats not true by Find+love+Online · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are really two classes of achievers. One is the one whose driven to bear the fruits of their mind. The other is driven to do the best he can at whatever task they are put to. That second class will have high GPAs, the first will have GPAs that are lower then what they could have if they worked harder.

    I would say that most innovation comes from the first class, but that a lot of success and wealth is generated by the second class (often times by exploiting the first class, but hey)

  86. Facts from a Hinman student by LeiGong · · Score: 5, Informative
    First off...WOAH...I can't believe that just got /.'ed. And shocked that I got quoted 3x in there too.

    I think I can answer some of the questions you guys have about the program, I was interviewed by the reporter and a current participant of the program.

    Question: Who owns the IP of the products and company?
    Answer: The students and their supporting professor (if any) own the IP. The program has special arrangements with the university to leave the companies formed in Hinman as independent entities. If such an arrangement didn't exist, the program would not be here today. In fact, we even have servers that use the university's bandwidth. The School of Engineering and School of Business have been incredibly supportive of the program and we have the Deans' full backing. So if any companies become successful the only thing they expect is for us to donate back to the school. However, this is not true for non-Hinman students or if the technology used by the company was researched by a professor on the university's dime.

    Q: Why the 3.0 GPA requirement?
    A: While the application does say 3.0, the director has made many special exceptions for driven students. I myself had a 2.9 GPA when I enter the program (I'm a CompSci, so sue me). It's mearly there to scare off people that only want to join the program to take advantage of the extra nice housing.

    Q: Where's all the money getting spent? Why buy all the nice furniture?
    A: Because we often have very prominent CEOs and corporate execs giving speaches, it's important that we appear professional. For example, we've had the CEO of Webmethods, Polycomm, Microstrategy, and a host of many other local and national CEOs swing by for talks. We also use the conference rooms as shared conference space for client meetings. If you think about it, one very nice conference room split among 6 companies is pretty cost effective.

    Q: Porn companies?
    A: No. Not yet ;)

    Q: What kind of technologies do you guys have?
    A: The first and 2nd floors of the apartments have full wireless access and all rooms have access to IP-phones donated by Avaya. We also have tele-conferencing units donated by Brian Hinman. On top of that, we have a 5 computer tech lab that's accessible to all Hinman students. The computers are brand spankin' new Dells all with flat planel monitors. The sys admins had to put screen guards on the damn things to keep the business majors from poking at the screen. :) Any more questions?

    1. Re:Facts from a Hinman student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Because we often have very prominent CEOs and corporate execs giving speaches, it's important that we appear professional.

      Indeed.

    2. Re:Facts from a Hinman student by jokerghost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Spoken like a true .com-er-- all about the toys and not one mention of a product. Here's a few questions I have and also what the interviewer should've asked:

      What exactly are these businesses? What are the services or products they provide? Of those, which ones are turning a profit?

      Sounds to me like a bunch of .com shit... Smoke, mirrors, and speaches.

      mod me down and never know the truth.
      -jokerghost

    3. Re:Facts from a Hinman student by LeiGong · · Score: 2, Informative
      Q: What exactly are these businesses? What are the services or products they provide? A: Please read the article. One of the companies is Alertus, which caters to a niche market that requires emergency news. Their product is a wireless alert device that can be used practically anywhere. Another business is ran by "Manny Herrmann, a sophomore political science major, who said his textbook-sales business has already generated more than $300,000 in revenue this year." - WashPost

      Q: Of those, which ones are turning a profit?
      A: See above. Also keep in mind most product based technology companies do not turn profits until their 2nd or 3rd year, if they're lucky (unless you're talking about consulting). Since these businesses just got started, you can't expect profits to be rolling on day one. There's a product development cycle, marketing, and R&D that needs to be paid for before a single a cent is made.

    4. Re:Facts from a Hinman student by molywi · · Score: 1

      come on, give people a break.. just because they make a spelling error, does not mean they are not professional. if i had mod points - your comment would be flamebait.

    5. Re:Facts from a Hinman student by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 1
      Smoke, mirrors, and speaches

      Surely you meant "mearly smoke, mirrors, and speaches"?

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
  87. Can't really be dot.coms... by fanatic · · Score: 2

    and six are already generating revenue.

    --
    "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
  88. It might just work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just graduated with a Comp. Sci. Engineering degree, and I know for sure the best ideas and best knowledge that I obtained in the 4yrs was through talkin with 'the guys' in my dorm. In class, you learn specifics....In the dorm, you learn life application. (dealing with other people on a project, coordinating programming tasks, documentation planning).

    I think it was a great idea for them to do that, as long as they make sure their not just sponsoring someones lush living for a year, and make sure that these 'e-businesses' are genuine, and full of ingenuity.

    I know that if I had that type of environment, and had the time to do so, It would have been a GREAT experience...especially for new graduates to put on their resume.

    Usually with new college graduates, all they have on their resume are classes, and any internships theyve done. If they have experience with a 'start-up' type business with responsibility....it would be a great asset to their education.

  89. Are you on crack? by FallLine · · Score: 2

    Firstly, Amazon is not presently in the black. They are in the red and by a large margin. They managed to pull themselves into the black for a tune for 5m or so one quarter. However, that sounds to me to be more like an accounting slight of hand than anything else (mind you, that is chump change when you look at the size of their reported revenues...it doesn't take much). Secondly, there is very little net equity left in the company because they've loaded themselves with debt in the process. Thirdly, just because a company is nominally profitable (and they're not) does not mean that they are a "real" business. It simply means that they _might_ have the ability to continue operating in the future. When many millions of dollars are invested into a company you expect a hell of a lot more than a trickle of profits. In short, I still would not invest in Amazon.com, especially not at its current 7b dollar market cap.

    That said, I do believe there are "real" internet businesses, but Amazon is just not one of them.

  90. I wish they had started this before I graduated... by borgheron · · Score: 1

    I would have happily signed up for such a unique opportunity. :)

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  91. Six Generating Revenue....Mmmhmm. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 0, Troll



    "Twenty of the students have created their own start-up firms, and six are already generating revenue."

    And two of them even carry fat chick porn!

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  92. same here with running business and school by simontek2 · · Score: 1

    i ran a computer repair shop in highschool, round certain times of the year, i got so busy, i didn't even bother with school. still doing computer work, just in the savannah area. Simontek

    --
    SimonTek
  93. Think big! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    King-size bed, not queen, you dope! :)

    1. Re:Think big! by operagost · · Score: 2

      The queen-size one is for the gay porn.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  94. But what is FAR more important is... by Elgon · · Score: 1

    ...the fact that you'll force the business guys, engineers and tech dudes to hang out and live together, which may just breed a bit more understanding between the different groups: I mean imagine a business grad who appreciates the subtleties of letting the techs make the technical decisions and techs who understand that the business guys aren't completely clueless and do (usually) have reasons for the decisions they make.

    Elgon

  95. whatche in for? by valmont · · Score: 2
    two dyke inmates chat:

    " dyke1: so whatche in for?
    dyke2: i had steamy sex with one of my horny high-school bi-curious student bimbos, who subsequently ratted me out after i gave her a C on a shitty paper.
    dyke1: ow. that's harsh.
    dyke2: you?
    dyke1: dildo fetish.
    dyke2: *blink*. i guess i'm headed for deathrow.
    dyke1: *nod*. you shoulda stayed in california
    "

  96. Vegan by azizlumiere · · Score: 0

    He comes from Vega the brightest star in the constellation Lyra.

    --
    -Linux is SO fast it does an infinite loop in 5 seconds.
  97. Porno marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I had no idea there was a whole mini-industry frantically submitting thumbnail galleries of content purchased elsewhere. That seems so lame.

    On the other hand, creating good stuff is a low-margin business. In San Francisco, this is more like a fun hobby. I know a number of women who operate their own porno/erotica sites, but none of them are making big money. One, who knows all the major pro dommes in San Francisco, and does domination herself, tried a "fetish portal", but it's not making any money. (But she throws great parties.) Another is into "extreme bondage", and does make some money with her site. I know two photographers into glamour porno, one male and one female. The woman moved to L.A., the market wasn't there in SF. The guy had a good gallery opening last Friday, but nobody seemed to be buying.

    And then there's the blonde with the all-girl biker gang. She makes some extra cash selling calendars, but despite national TV and press coverage of her gang, it hasn't been a huge moneymaker.

    None of these people have been able to quit their day jobs.

  98. PHB Boot Camp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the article, students can now learn the first-hand techniques on how to run a successful business, such as: creating snow-job Powerpoint presentations; stealing public grant money for private profit; and commercializing technology developed at public expense. Yes, they'll learn how to create artificial wants, get people dependent upon them, then yank the supply, jack up the prices, and call the police to enforce their newly created markets. They'll learn these strategies in specially created CEO dorms, fitted with leather seats and oak desks to reinforce the culture of an exclusionary class of manipulators and scammers. After being submersed in this PHB boot camp, they'll have developed all the essential traits necessary to succeed in the cut-throat world of business that they will help perpetuate: a narcissistic over-confidence in their own abilities to funnel money and power to the top of the grand pyramid scam--all the while knowing that they are intrinsically better than everyone else and basically the world owes them. Thus is created the modern day PHB. Capitalism Uber Alles.

  99. Education? by KingPrad · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there a time in the dim past when colleges taught theory, fundamentals, and basic skills that could be applied in almost any field. College was about learning how to learn and use information, not about teaching specific careers and such. I hate to see all these resources being spent to accomodate a few students who want to start companies. I think economics and communication skills classes would be better investments in their futures.

    --
    Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
  100. Just watch out for PanIP by egad_man · · Score: 2, Funny

    They might try to sue the students for $5,000 because they are making a profit and want some of that too.

    --
    Hmmm, I have 5 mod pts, its time to metamod, and on top of that I have to meta-metamod? When do I get to read slashdot?
  101. Burlap over hard metal = Herman Miller Aeron? by mypalmike · · Score: 1
    Seriously, what dot com ever had a single leather chair? Sounds more like they have the standard staple of dot bomb ass-placement, the Aeron.

    -_-_-

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  102. What?! by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    What?! You mean all this time I thought college was supposed to be about popping antacids like candy, futilely attempting to score with tons of chicks, and skipping sleep to catch up on schoolwork from that wild 3 hour lecture the night before, and it wasn't?! Man, I sure wasted the past 8 years!

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  103. Be careful what you wish for... by e_n_d_o · · Score: 2

    At my university, they once had a guest speaker talk to the engineering students about the advantages of starting your own business. Two friends and I did just that, and it did quite well.

    So well, in fact, that shortly thereafter we all dropped out.

  104. Guarantee they didnt make money like these kids by The-Bus · · Score: 2

    Hacking Las Vegas A group of mathematicians from MIT jacked millions out of Vegas... Good article.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  105. my lemonade stand generated revenue... by *weasel · · Score: 1

    and i didn't need a whiteboard, a leather chair or a nice desk.

    perhaps they should -qualify- the scale of startup we're talking about here. they could be cutting lawns - and would that have anything to do with their digs?

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
  106. Well, nither can I by Find+love+Online · · Score: 1

    To bad you're not smart enough to know how to use a bank, dumbass.

    But I guess we'll see if you're ability to spell, punctuate, and use correct grammar beats out my ability to use tools like "student loans" and "sepulchering software" (btw, there is nothing wrong with my grammar, and little with my punctuation. AFAIK)

    I've also held down a part time job making $21/hr, as a which easily would have covered my education expenses. (as a VB programmer for the Student Loan company, ironically)

    If you're an American (I'm assuming you are) the only reason not to get a university is general stupidity.

    But congratulations on your grammar.

  107. Awesome... by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 2

    A new dot com era starting in school. Guys, let me suggest AT LEAST business 101. This will put you miles ahead of your forerunners.

  108. Re:Whatever happened to a good educational foundat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fundamentals... like the difference between "tenets" and "tenants?"

  109. 6 of 20 are generating revenue by cylcyl · · Score: 2, Funny

    But 20 of 20 are generating a loss...

  110. Nice moderation there... by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Hrm, one post gets -1, and a reply that says "I agree 100%" gets a 3.

    Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. It dosn't really seem like much of a troll to me, either.

    Certanly not worth a -1.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  111. I'm not sure about that by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    For upperclassmen, and especially grad students, running a business could be a valuable experience.

    An interesting project for a school would be to have a sort of business that gets passed along to students taken a particular course. Like Biz 146 is lower management Biz 246 is middle management and 346 is upper management.

    It would probably lose a lot of money, but if the leaders or whatever we elected you might get some interesting and smart characters.

    Well, I think it would be interesting, anyway.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  112. Well... by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    You can't GPL code you down own, wether you wrote it or not.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  113. Wow by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    if he made a few k, he should have got his own hosting.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  114. Re:Moderators? HELLO? TROLL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    own a free porn site, AND a pet store

    I think you mean free porn site AND a pet store.

  115. The question is by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    After throwing the money down the pit for two years, do you have an empty hole, or a pit full of money?

    I certainly wouldn't mind a pit full of money :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  116. One short of a full "Ten", huh.... by kayell · · Score: 1

    It's a damn good thing that an "Ivy League" business school taught you how to put a site together to teach people how to masturbate online. Commendable. And oh so different from the rest of the Linux losers that spend their days trashing others to put themselves above their otherwise dull and pointless existence.

    I'm in the Hinman program, currently seated in my dorm - issue pressed wood desk and barely padded chair, in front of my ancient computer, working 2 jobs with 19 credits, and running a business. And it's not some sheisty online porn site.

    Good to know that us "spoiled little shits" will grow up to be self-inflated huge shits like you when we enter the "relatively successful" business world. Thanks for the pearls of wisdom, swine.

    Stop being so bitter about the lack of opportunity you had when you were young, and rejoice in the opportunities handed out to your younger counterparts. Perhaps your startup will be a little more than just "relatively" successful if you would be more openminded.

  117. If I were 20, and had 3 20 year-old friends... by newestbob · · Score: 0
    ..I could generate revenue, too, if we walked around in our underwear and had a cam in our room.


    2x if we were girls.

  118. great, another get rich quick scheme by mcguyver · · Score: 0

    For some reason this reminds me of the startup.com movie. The best part of that movie was when the guys were trying to secure an angel investor and before they had signed a deal, they were in a taxi cab talking about taking the company public. The economny has no room for people looking for get rich quick schemes - which seems to be what this program is encouraging.

  119. You'd have filled it with porn... by kayell · · Score: 1

    I'm in the Hinman CEO's program myself. I'm not a dot-com business; not like your nasty porno site you have going. You think we're playing make-believe? I'm not the one trying to make a living with porn...and I'm not the one thinking that I have the right to bash a program I don't know about and kids that I can't hold a candle to in my past-my-prime age. Our students are engineers who are inventing medical instruments; trying to make the world a better place...News flash - creating a porno site makes you the scum of society; and the fact that you're so proud of that and present that as your life's work makes me understand why your bitterness drives you to attack faceless state college kids from your supposedly "ivy league" throne. We are working our fingers to the bone to EARN the priviledges. We're not handed any money; the "space" you so freely speak of without prior knowledge is an 8 by 8 room that we pay $600 for per month. And you have one point - I would actually probably be using Mom and Dad's money if I hadn't won a free ride here with a scholarship that I worked for with sweat and blood. We're not handed a silver spoon, we WORK. I'm in awe of my peers here in this program who work so hard and accomplish so much. You know nothing. Go ahead and stew in your ignorance and bitterness; when you wonder why you're not successful in the business world, realize that it takes a positive vision to really make it. Not the negativity that you so freely spew about a topic that you know nothing about.

  120. Not only that. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    but he seems to have understood both Newtonian and libniz's (sp?) notation perfectly as well.

    (Or more then likely he meant he learned it all from lectures or something. Personally I think he just had an easy-ass class)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  121. Re: Ugh... Actually it's all Worldcom's Fault... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    I have no more sympathy left for any of the dot-com a** holes. They are the reason the economy is on it's knees right now...

    Actually, it's Worldcom's fault. B-)

    The Internet was supposed to have a doubling time that amounted to growing at a factor of 10 per year. Turns out this was a myth. But it was a very believable myth. Even up to a week before the myth was exposed as false, well respected people (such as a certain Stanford professor) were promulgating it, in both media stories and learned papers.

    Well, it turns out that, for about two years, the internet's traffic WAS growing at a factor of ten per year. This was just after it was opened to general exploitation, and was probably the result of pent-up demand.

    But that was about 7 years to 5 years in the past. After that it slowed down to about a factor of two per year. (At least for the next three years, until the dot-com collapse. Last I looked the nubmers weren't all in for the following period, and maybe it was a bit lower.)

    Now doubling every year is still phenomonal growth. (Beats Moore's Law by a bunch.) But it's still a shortfall from what was expected by a factor of five per year.

    Well the network equipment manufacturers designed and built for the factor-of-ten. And the dot-com companies built business models based on the factor-of-ten. And then the demand failed to materialize. By the time of the dot-com collapse the shortfall was a factor of 625.

    Now some of those dot-coms were crooks milking venture capitalists and 401(k) plans. And some of them had business models that amounted to "lose a little on each sale and make it back on the volume", or "if you build it they will buy". But don't you think that SOME of them might have been viable businesses IF their market was as big as they thought - 625 times what it really was - and doubling every hundred-ish days?

    And by now the shortfall is about a factor of five THOUSAND from what people were building for. Any bets on why there's a telecom/internet equipment manufacturer collapse?

    Now all this apparently happened because Worldcom's UUNET subsidiary was cooking their books. They kept saying that the net was growing at this mythological factor of ten - but what was ACTUALLY behind the stat (if anything at all) was an expansion of capacity, not traffic.

    Much like saying "We built enough storm drains this year to handle ten times the water as we could handle last year. We'd better build ten times as many this year, or we'll be flooded when the rains come".

    Unfortunately, nobody checked their numbers. (They were the biggest backbone - by their own numbers B-) - so they REALLY ought to know...) Other companies that weren't keeping up with the mythological growth rate blamed their sales operations rather than questioning the numbers.

    Eventually the real numbers finally came to light as a result of the investigation of Worldcom's other accounting "innovations". B-)

    So that's why I say that it's all Worldcom's fault.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  122. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Puns are little "plays on words" that a certain breed of person loves to
    spring on you and then look at you in a certain self-satisfied way to
    indicate that he thinks that you must think that he is by far the cleverest
    person on Earth now that Benjamin Franklin is dead, when in fact what you
    are thinking is that if this person ever ends up in a lifeboat, the other
    passengers will hurl him overboard by the end of the first day even if they
    have plenty of food and water.
    -- Dave Barry, "Why Humor is Funny"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...